02-5826 Adopt CIPuws.w
RESOLUTION NUMBER 02-5826
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2002-2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS.
WHEREAS, the City of Salina has established a Capital Improvement Program Policy
as a component of its Financial Policies Document; and
WHEREAS, the Policy, shown in Exhibit "B" includes establishment of a five-year
Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) to guide decision making on public improvements and
expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has completed its annual review of capital
improvement planning. SO NOW THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina, Kansas:
Section 1. That the 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program, as outlined in Exhibit
"A", incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That no project shall be initiated unless said project is contained in the
adopted Capital Improvement Program or otherwise authorized by the Governing Body.
Section 3. That the Capital Improvement Program and this resolution may be amended
from time -to -time as deemed appropriate by the Governing Body.
adoption.
Section 4. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners and signed by the Mayor this 25h day of
March, 2002.
istin M. Seato , Mayor
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
kdAo&��
Lieu Ann Nicola, City Clerk
CITY OF SALINA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2002-2006
EXHIBIT A-1
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Street Repair Program
SMewalcsswill R
5 ' • -0
S' ■= -)0
Street Repair Program
Sldewalrs and R
S A .0
S' -= -0
Street Repair ram:
Sirlewalks and Ramps
S' -----1t
Street Repair ram:
SkW*,Wks and Ramps
S' Gej Ow
5.001100
Street Repair Program:
Sidewalks ard RarvVs
S • O
S' r -0
Neighborhood Parks
S '--)0
Park Improvements
• .0
Park Improvements
S. • •n
Park improvements
Sias,
Park Improvements
•10
Park
$ _X: -x0
& Facilities
Ss-. :0
- Park
S-• =-•t
Buildings 3 Facilities
5480 000
Neighborhood Park
S=- .0
BuiWi 3 Fadlties
atticlOs b E ' .
S,-, •0
S' . _ : -)D /
Vehicles 3 Equip.
E / Median.
S =0 (1) Buildings 3 Facilities
S'•= u0 Vehicles & Equip.
S-•-- -•r
•n
Vehicles 6 Equip.
S1 334 :-)0
55.000
Buildings 3 Facilities
..
Vehicles 3 Equip.
Y -_ --0
S • - •. •p
En /Median Improvements
. •- -0
C
S-- -0
E / Median Improvements
S --r
C I P. PI
---0(1
$ +i 7A
Com echnol
_.- •0
5.=•4;10
C.I.P. Plarnw
S'_i -0
Corriltutereffechriology
S'=r -1•1
Stormwote(Pmjects R Planning53000(10
C.I.P.
�-- •0
C.I.P. Pwinvy
S : -0
Stormwater Projects 3 Planning
S. - -0
C.I.P. PI
$-• -
Signal U
$200000
Planning.0a
ma
d Pte
Traffic
5 - r -s0
S. - •0
Traft S'
Water System Enhancements
r-_ -0
a -- .0
Sbnrrvvae&
TraOtc Signal Upgrades
na
Wastewtr. System Enhancements
'0
S`=x:'Ir0
Water System Enhancements
f. r-0Stonnwater
• 0
WeW System Enhancements
S• ti --•0
WasW*. System Enhancements
S.■_ -0
Water System Enhancements
: _• -_
N Ohio
5'6100:-,p i
Wastewtr. System Enhancements
S -•- •4
Waste%W S Entlancements
S. 9th Corridor Const - Phase 111
5 - �0
5. :' v0 2
Schilling/ Centennial Construction
Landfill Cal Closures
S -0 (2) Wastewtr. System Enhancements
Si -• -0 3
y --
S. Ninth
..
- •0 (p
Waterwell Irderchange Utilities
5 A.A. •0
Landfill Call Construction
S' .•- -0 (3)
Moundview Road Connection
S' '- -• 0
S. Fourth Street Improvements
f.-, _ -0
N. Ohio Corridor Pre -project
S -- .0
Bridge Const - N. Ninth
- --0 2
Park Spnitygrounds 2
Sr - -0
Bridge Const - Lakewood
S - ' --D 2
Mu ' ' Court
S - •0 3
Waterwel Rd. Interchange Const
' -' -0 4
Fox Theater Grant - Part 11
S-- --O
Confi2am
$100,000
Contingency
$100,000
Con'
$100,000
Cont
$100,000
lConfingen
$100,000
Tota/ 2002 C.1. P.
$10,8218 260
Topa/ 2003 C. L P.
$16 691900
Total 2004 C. L P.
$6, 000
Tool 2005 C. L P.
$ $91,000
Tool 2006 C. P.
$8,169,000
(1) EMS -County: $100,0OD
(2) In addition to 5300,000 pre -project cost in 2001 CIP
(3) $90,000 obligated in 2001
Proposed. March 26, 2002
(1) Golf Course - Comb. lease -purchase and cash expenditures
(2) KDOT
(3) Repaid by Landfill Fees
(4)County-$360,000 KDOT-53,171,600
(1) $4 million G.O. Bonds/ $14 million a combination of (1) $1 million G.O. Bonds/ $2 million KDOT
KDOT and UPRR funding -
EXHIBI T A-2
CITY OF SALINA
2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PROJECT
GENERAL
FUND
SPECIAL
PARKS
GAS TAX
FUND
FLOOD &
DRAINAGE
BI -CENTER
INFO.
SERVICES
SANITATION
SOLID
WASTE
GOLF
COURSE
WATER &
WASTEWTR.
G. O.
OTHER BONDS
REVENUE
BONDS TOTAL
Street Repair Program,
S1 100.000
S1.100.000
curb & gutter, crack sealing. brick
asphalt b concrete repair.
seals and RR crossings
Sidewalks and Rams
S700.000
5100.000
Neighborhood Parks
551,000
551.000
Park Improvements
5100.000
S1100000
13uikink s 8 Fac libes
$275000
$67.000
S50.000
5270.000
$662.000
Vehicles 3Equip
S419000
5200.000
S107.000
5255,000
$18000
$139000
$101000 (r)
51239.000
Entryway/ Median Improvements
575.000
S75000
Computersrrechnology
5200.000
5250.000
$2000
S2 250
$30000
$484250
C I P Planning
5150.000
S43000
$1%000
$349.000
Stormwater Projects 8 Planning
550,000
$300000
5350.000
Traffic Signal Upgrades
S175000
$175000
Water System Enhancements
$550.000
$550.000
Wastewater System Enhancements
S300 O00
$300,000
S 9th Corridor Const - Phase III
S2 550 000 2)
$2550000
Watenwes interchanp Utilities
S54400()
$5440001
Moundview Road Connection
S125000
S125.000
N Ohio Corrdor Pre -project
$300000
300.000Park
_S300.0-00-
ParkSpraygrounds (two)
5100.000
S100.000
$200000
_
Municipal Court
S1.210.000 (3)
S1.210.000
Fox Theater Grant - Part II
5375.000
5375.000
Contingency
ToWC Plan
S100.000
S2,O83,000
$200000
51100000
$300000
1110000
$250,000
5$07,000
5/63,000
520250
11833000
Sf0f000 $4060000
$100000'.
SO Sf0839250'
(1) EMS -County: 5100,000
(2) In addition to $300,000 pre -project cost in 2001 CIP
(3) 90,000 obligated in 2001
Approved; August 27, 2001
Proposed Revisiow March 25, 2002
EXHIBIT A-3
CITY OF SALINA
2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(1) Combination lease -purchase and rash expenditures.
(2) KDOT
(4) County - $360,000 KDOT - $3,171,600
Approved: March 26, 2001
Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002
EXHIBIT A-4
CITY OF SALINA
2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PROJECT
GENERAL -'
FUND ;:
IAL _ l
-BARKS ;--'
GAS TAX
FUND
FLOOD &
DRAINAGE
BI -CENTER
INFO.
SERVICES
SANITATION
SOLID GOLF
WASTE COURSE
WATER &
WASTEWIX OTHER
G.O. REVENUE
BONDS BONDS TOTAL
Street Repair Program
S1 100 000
S1 100.000
curb & gutter, crack sealing, brick
_ _
asphalt 8 concrete repair
seals and RR crossings
7
777777777--7
Sidewalks and Rams
5100.000
5100.000
Park Improvements
$100,000
5100.000
Neighborhood Park
$75000
575.000
Buildings & Facilities
S250000
$110000
$100.000
$460.000
Vehicles 8 Equip
5650.000
S 100 000
$30.000
5120.000
S34.000
$100000
St, 334 000
En a I Median improvements
$75000
$75.000
Com ters/Techn
5150.000
5250.000
$100,000
5500000
y.
C I P Planning
$100000
$100000
Stonowater Projects 8 Planning
$300.000
S300000
Traft Signal Upgrades
S200000
$200000
Water System Enhancements
S650.000
S650000
Wastewater System Enhancements
5500 000
5500.000
Conlin en
7oMC trenlerrfPlen
5100000
Si,t100000
$t0D000
51,300,000
$300,000
$
5250,000
$120,000
$0 $34,000
$1,450,000 $0
$100000,
$0 $0 $5,294,000
Approved. March 26, 2001
Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002
EXHIBIT A-5
CITY OF SALINA
2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD 8 INFO. SOLID GOLF WATER 3 G. O. REVENUE
PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI SERVICES SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEWTR OTHER BONDS BONDS TOTAL '
Street Repair Program: $1 100 000 Sl 100 000
curb a gutter, crack sealing, !rick _
asphalt a Concrete repair,
seals and RR crossings
a
CIP. Pk
S650000
(1) Combination of KDOT and UPRR funding
Approved: March 26, 2001
Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002
$500000
EXHIBIT A-6
CITY OF SALINA
2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
(t) KDOT
Proposed: March 25, 2002
Co'wd t4&1'8
A
C.
EXHIBI T A-7
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FOR FURTHER REVIEW
BRIDGES
Lakewood Park Historic Bridge Relocation — (cost underway)
Possible relocation and reuse of historic bridge for pedestrian/bicycle
bridge to new Lakewood Middle School at river near Elm Street, east of
Ohio. Replacement of historic bridge with new structure is scheduled for
2003.
MAJOR ROADWAYS
1. East Pacific Corridor — (cost unknown)
Project to include the improvement to urban standards of East Pacific (old
Highway 40) from Front Street to its connection with the new/realigned
Pacific/Ohio intersection. Likely to be constructed as part of the North
Ohio Corridor/Overpass Project.
2. East Magnolia Corridor, Phase 2 — ($600,000)
Widen and improve to urban standards Magnolia Road from River Trail
Road to Flood Levee. Three land roadway. Project should be
accomplished along with major drainage improvements, including
replacement drainage structure related to the Knox Sandpit outlet channel
crossing. That drainage project and this roadway improvement not fully
evaluated or scheduled. $600,000 estimate is for roadway only, no
drainage.
3. Centennial Road, Phase 2 — (cost unknown)
Improve to urban standards Centennial Road from Bailey Road south to
Waterwell Road. Timing depends on industrial development in area.
MAJOR STORMWATER
Ohio/Magnolia Drainage — ($2,000,000)
Off -roadway drainage improvements east of Ohio, including areas near
Huntington Road, the Holmquist Oxbow and Knox Sandpit outlet crossing
on Magnolia. Long-term project may be segmented into various smaller,
more manageable projects. Crossing at Magnolia must be accomplished
prior to East Magnolia, Phase 2.
E.
2. West Dry Creek Channel — (cost unknown)
Improvements to various segments of the major drainage channel
between Waterwell Road and Cloud Street, west of 1-135. Needs further
analysis and planning studies. Smaller segments may be future Flood
and Drainage Fund sub-C.I.P. projects.
3. Marymount/Glen Drainage — (cost unknown)
Arterial street drainage causing occasional street flooding and
impassability. Will require careful study to prevent shifting problems
downstream. Possible Flood and Drainage Fund sub-C.I.P. project.
UTILITIES
Utilities, West of 1-135/Magnolia Interchange — ($1,800,000)
Extension of water and wastewater system to serve new development.
Preliminary engineering plans have been completed. Timing of
construction is dependent on private development plans. Costs will be
predominately special assessed or cost recovered at development.
2. Schilling/Ohio Utilities —
Extension of water and wastewater system to serve future development
along Schilling Road and South Ohio. Needs concept design and
feasibility report. Special assessment/cost recovery project. Timing is
dependent on private development plans.
3. Water Utilities West Grand/North Street Area — (cost unknown)
Extension of water system to serve current and future development in
northwest area. Special assessment/cost recovery project. Some
annexation may be involved. Needs concept design and feasibility report.
4. West Diamond Drive Utilities — (cost unknown)
Utility extensions (and possible street paving) to enable further
development in area west of 91h Street, north of 1-70.
BUILDINGS
1. Fire Station Facilities — (cost unknown)
Renovations to existing fire stations and expansion of Fire Station #2
(South Santa Fe). Needs concept design and cost estimates as C.I.P.
Planning project.
2. Bicentennial Center Expansion/Renovation — (cost unknown)
Possible addition to south side of building for food service, kitchen and
storage areas. Necessary updates to arena, including sound system,
2
C.-WSO.
F.
restrooms, concession areas, etc. Needs comprehensive plan, concept
design and cost estimates. Possible bond financing project, to be repaid
out of annual Bi -Center facilities budget.
3. Museum Gallery Renovation — ($900,000)
Possible permanent gallery structures and comprehensive exhibit. Project
requires City Commission review at study session and approval as a city
building project. Arts and Humanities Commission has approved and is
apparently in process of seeking pledges and private financing. City
Commission to review this Spring (2002).
PARKS AND RECREATION
1. School Property Re -Use — (cost unknown)
Possible redevelopment of one or more former school buildings or sites
for parks/recreation purposes. USD 305 plans community membership
committee to assist in analyzing surplus property disposition re -use
issues. City staff has expressed interest in Roosevelt -Lincoln gymnasium
and related facilities.
2. River Revitalization Extension — (cost unknown)
Possible extension in Kenwood Park/YMCA area. May continue and
extend projects similar to those accomplished in early 1990s. Possible
clearance of trees/brush, and/or major dredging. YMCA has expressed
interest in a pedestrian bridge.
3. Lakewood Nature Center Expansion — ($500,000)
Potential future major project to add more public use/nature class areas at
Nature Center in Lakewood Park.
4. Oakdale Park Greenhouse — ($150,000)
Construction of new greenhouse in Oakdale Park to better serve projects
and programs of Parks and Recreation system and gardens.
5. Trail Projects — (cost unknown)
Expand existing pedestrian/biking trail to other sections of flood control
levee, and/or along rail corridors which may be abandoned in future.
KDOT enhancement grants may be available for partial funding.
6. Soccer Complex — (cost unknown)
Possible addition of new soccer fields to serve current and future growing
community programs. Needs further analysis and cost estimating.
3
c��i�ms+rre
G,
7. Park Spraygrounds — ($100,000 each)
Possible additional neighborhood spraygrounds; evaluate after completion
and two season operation of pilot projects.
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
1. Public Shooting Range — ($200,000)
Possible cost -shared project for construction in a rural area. Private
sector, state and city funding needed. Preliminary $100,000 state;
$50,000 city; $50,000 private. Project is awaiting private sector and state
action. DESIGNATED C.I.P PARTNERSHIP PROJECT.
2. Eastern Development Area — (cost unknown)
Infrastructure needs, including flood and drainage, streets, utilities, park
land for property in our eastern growth area between city limits and
Holmes Road. Full area master planning may be accomplished under
C.I.P. Planning in 2002.
3. Wayfinding Signage Plan — (cost unknown)
Design and installation of a modern directional signage plan for major
community areas and facilities, including but not limited to downtown
facilities.
4. Schilling Pedestrian Bridge — (cost unknown)
Major upgrade or replacement of existing temporary pedestrian/bicycle
bridge, between residential area and Schilling School. Needs further
internal planning and cost estimates.
4
consoeeaiw Ulm
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
IDENTIFIED BUT UNFUNDED
1.11 Family Aquatic Facility — ($5,000,000 - $6,000,000)
Construction of a major outdoor pool/acquatic facility in Kenwood Park. Concept
design complete. Voters declined to approve special sales tax for funding in
2000. DESIGNATED C.I.P. PUBLIC REFERENDUM PROJECT.
2. South Ohio Corridor, Phase 2 — ($2,300,000)
Widen and improve south Ohio to urban standards from Magnolia Road south to
Schilling road. Four land roadway. Timing dependent on major roadway funding
availability, as well as development patterns and traffic flow issues.
3. East Magnolia Corridor, Phase 1 — ($1,300,000)
Widen and improve East Magnolia from Shalimar Road to River Trail Road.
Three -lane roadway. Timing dependent on major roadway funding availability,
as well as development patterns and traffic flow issues.
5
EXH/B
Chapter I1; Page 1
Rev. January 2000
Resolution #00.5555
H. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY
The City shall establish a five-year Capital Improvement Program (C_.I.P.) to
guide decision-making on public improvements and expenditures.
provides a mechanism for scheduling public physical improvements over a
number of years. It establishes the City's priorities for public projects based on
available financial resources and project criteria.
The C.I.P. shall be updated annually following analysis of year-end financial
reports, and prior to the adoption of the City's annual operating budget.
Generally, the updated C.I.P. shall be approved by the City Commission by
April 10 of each year.
The City shall use a portion of its annual budgeted revenues for cash capital
investments. Mill levy proceeds, sales taxes, user fees or other local revenues
may be dedicated for capital improvements.
The City will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its
capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs.
The C.I.P. and budget will provide for the major- renovation and orderly
replacement of buildings, facilities and equipment from current revenues
where possible.
The Capital Improvement Plan shall include an appropriate reserve for
contingencies for approved projects.
City staff, in making C.I.P. recommendations to the City Commission, shall use
the following criteria in evaluating projects.
1. Priority consideration will be given to:
➢ Capital investment projects which preserve existing infrastructure and
maintain basic public services.
11 ➢ Capital projects which implement a component of an approved City plan.
Chapter II; Page 2
Rev. January 2000
Resoludon #00.5555
➢ Projects which specifically replace or renovate an essential, but obsolete,
facility.
➢ Projects which reduce the cost of operations, maintenance or energy
consumption.
➢ Projects identified as addressing important public health and safety issues.
➢ Projects mandated by the federal or state government.
➢ Projects which are funded, in whole or in part, by leveraged or partnership
funding, including grants, private funds, etc.
G. Certain capital improvement projects lend themselves specifically to public-
private partnership, wherein project funding would be derived partially from the
City and partially from private donations, dedicated user fees and other non -
city sources. Community proponents wishing to initiate such projects should
first present a concept plan to the City Commission, including a financial cost-
sharing plan for both the initial capital costs, as well as the ongoing cost for
operations and maintenance. Generally, the.City Commission will consider
proposed partnership projects at its regular C.I.P. planning period during the
first quarter or each year. If approved by the City Commission, proponents
would be encouraged to complete project plans and initiate fund-raising
efforts.
H. Certain non -infrastructure capital projects may be of such type and scope as to
be beyond the financial capacity of the City without additional revenues, and
thus may be appropriate for public referendum. Public Referendum projects
should fall within the following criteria:
➢ Projects not involving public health and safety or basic infrastructure; and.
➢ With a capital cost estimate of $750,000 or greater; or,
➢ Potentially requiring a significant ongoing City appropriation for operations
and maintenance.
Chapter U; Page 3
Rev. January 2000
Resolution #00.5555
Proponents of such projects may circulate a petition in accordance with
state law, calling for a public referendum on the project and *specified
funding source. The City Commission shall determine whether the City
takes an official position on the issue. If approved by the voters, the project
would be completed.
I. The C.I.P. as approved annually, shall contain the following sections:
1. A listing of preliminarily approved capital projects, including estimated
cost and funding source by years, which have undergone review for
costs and benefits and have identified funding expected to be available
for the project.
2. A separate listing of potential capital projects which require significant
additional information, e.g. concept design, feasibility report, cost
estimates, funding source analysis, etc. before they can be formally
considered for approval and placement in a specific year in the C.I.P.
This section shall be titled "Projects For Further Review."
3. A separate listing of projects for which adequate information exists as
to planning, estimated costs, benefits, etc. and which the City
Commission agrees would be desirable- projects for the community in
the future, but for which an adequate and appropriate funding
mechanism has not yet been determined as available. This section
shall be titled "Projects Identified But Unfunded."
4. An identification within any of the "Five -Year," "Further Review," or
"Identified But Unfunded" categories of any projects specified as
"Partnership Projects" or "Public Referendum Projects."