Loading...
02-5826 Adopt CIPuws.w RESOLUTION NUMBER 02-5826 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2002-2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS. WHEREAS, the City of Salina has established a Capital Improvement Program Policy as a component of its Financial Policies Document; and WHEREAS, the Policy, shown in Exhibit "B" includes establishment of a five-year Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) to guide decision making on public improvements and expenditures; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has completed its annual review of capital improvement planning. SO NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina, Kansas: Section 1. That the 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program, as outlined in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That no project shall be initiated unless said project is contained in the adopted Capital Improvement Program or otherwise authorized by the Governing Body. Section 3. That the Capital Improvement Program and this resolution may be amended from time -to -time as deemed appropriate by the Governing Body. adoption. Section 4. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its Adopted by the Board of Commissioners and signed by the Mayor this 25h day of March, 2002. istin M. Seato , Mayor (SEAL) ATTEST: kdAo&�� Lieu Ann Nicola, City Clerk CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2002-2006 EXHIBIT A-1 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Street Repair Program SMewalcsswill R 5 ' • -0 S' ■= -)0 Street Repair Program Sldewalrs and R S A .0 S' -= -0 Street Repair ram: Sirlewalks and Ramps S' -----1t Street Repair ram: SkW*,Wks and Ramps S' Gej Ow 5.001100 Street Repair Program: Sidewalks ard RarvVs S • O S' r -0 Neighborhood Parks S '--)0 Park Improvements • .0 Park Improvements S. • •n Park improvements Sias, Park Improvements •10 Park $ _X: -x0 & Facilities Ss-. :0 - Park S-• =-•t Buildings 3 Facilities 5480 000 Neighborhood Park S=- .0 BuiWi 3 Fadlties atticlOs b E ' . S,-, •0 S' . _ : -)D / Vehicles 3 Equip. E / Median. S =0 (1) Buildings 3 Facilities S'•= u0 Vehicles & Equip. S-•-- -•r •n Vehicles 6 Equip. S1 334 :-)0 55.000 Buildings 3 Facilities .. Vehicles 3 Equip. Y -_ --0 S • - •. •p En /Median Improvements . •- -0 C S-- -0 E / Median Improvements S --r C I P. PI ---0(1 $ +i 7A Com echnol _.- •0 5.=•4;10 C.I.P. Plarnw S'_i -0 Corriltutereffechriology S'=r -1•1 Stormwote(Pmjects R Planning53000(10 C.I.P. �-- •0 C.I.P. Pwinvy S : -0 Stormwater Projects 3 Planning S. - -0 C.I.P. PI $-• - Signal U $200000 Planning.0a ma d Pte Traffic 5 - r -s0 S. - •0 Traft S' Water System Enhancements r-_ -0 a -- .0 Sbnrrvvae& TraOtc Signal Upgrades na Wastewtr. System Enhancements '0 S`=x:'Ir0 Water System Enhancements f. r-0Stonnwater • 0 WeW System Enhancements S• ti --•0 WasW*. System Enhancements S.■_ -0 Water System Enhancements : _• -_ N Ohio 5'6100:-,p i Wastewtr. System Enhancements S -•- •4 Waste%W S Entlancements S. 9th Corridor Const - Phase 111 5 - �0 5. :' v0 2 Schilling/ Centennial Construction Landfill Cal Closures S -0 (2) Wastewtr. System Enhancements Si -• -0 3 y -- S. Ninth .. - •0 (p Waterwell Irderchange Utilities 5 A.A. •0 Landfill Call Construction S' .•- -0 (3) Moundview Road Connection S' '- -• 0 S. Fourth Street Improvements f.-, _ -0 N. Ohio Corridor Pre -project S -- .0 Bridge Const - N. Ninth - --0 2 Park Spnitygrounds 2 Sr - -0 Bridge Const - Lakewood S - ' --D 2 Mu ' ' Court S - •0 3 Waterwel Rd. Interchange Const ' -' -0 4 Fox Theater Grant - Part 11 S-- --O Confi2am $100,000 Contingency $100,000 Con' $100,000 Cont $100,000 lConfingen $100,000 Tota/ 2002 C.1. P. $10,8218 260 Topa/ 2003 C. L P. $16 691900 Total 2004 C. L P. $6, 000 Tool 2005 C. L P. $ $91,000 Tool 2006 C. P. $8,169,000 (1) EMS -County: $100,0OD (2) In addition to 5300,000 pre -project cost in 2001 CIP (3) $90,000 obligated in 2001 Proposed. March 26, 2002 (1) Golf Course - Comb. lease -purchase and cash expenditures (2) KDOT (3) Repaid by Landfill Fees (4)County-$360,000 KDOT-53,171,600 (1) $4 million G.O. Bonds/ $14 million a combination of (1) $1 million G.O. Bonds/ $2 million KDOT KDOT and UPRR funding - EXHIBI T A-2 CITY OF SALINA 2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT GENERAL FUND SPECIAL PARKS GAS TAX FUND FLOOD & DRAINAGE BI -CENTER INFO. SERVICES SANITATION SOLID WASTE GOLF COURSE WATER & WASTEWTR. G. O. OTHER BONDS REVENUE BONDS TOTAL Street Repair Program, S1 100.000 S1.100.000 curb & gutter, crack sealing. brick asphalt b concrete repair. seals and RR crossings Sidewalks and Rams S700.000 5100.000 Neighborhood Parks 551,000 551.000 Park Improvements 5100.000 S1100000 13uikink s 8 Fac libes $275000 $67.000 S50.000 5270.000 $662.000 Vehicles 3Equip S419000 5200.000 S107.000 5255,000 $18000 $139000 $101000 (r) 51239.000 Entryway/ Median Improvements 575.000 S75000 Computersrrechnology 5200.000 5250.000 $2000 S2 250 $30000 $484250 C I P Planning 5150.000 S43000 $1%000 $349.000 Stormwater Projects 8 Planning 550,000 $300000 5350.000 Traffic Signal Upgrades S175000 $175000 Water System Enhancements $550.000 $550.000 Wastewater System Enhancements S300 O00 $300,000 S 9th Corridor Const - Phase III S2 550 000 2) $2550000 Watenwes interchanp Utilities S54400() $5440001 Moundview Road Connection S125000 S125.000 N Ohio Corrdor Pre -project $300000 300.000Park _S300.0-00- ParkSpraygrounds (two) 5100.000 S100.000 $200000 _ Municipal Court S1.210.000 (3) S1.210.000 Fox Theater Grant - Part II 5375.000 5375.000 Contingency ToWC Plan S100.000 S2,O83,000 $200000 51100000 $300000 1110000 $250,000 5$07,000 5/63,000 520250 11833000 Sf0f000 $4060000 $100000'. SO Sf0839250' (1) EMS -County: 5100,000 (2) In addition to $300,000 pre -project cost in 2001 CIP (3) 90,000 obligated in 2001 Approved; August 27, 2001 Proposed Revisiow March 25, 2002 EXHIBIT A-3 CITY OF SALINA 2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (1) Combination lease -purchase and rash expenditures. (2) KDOT (4) County - $360,000 KDOT - $3,171,600 Approved: March 26, 2001 Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002 EXHIBIT A-4 CITY OF SALINA 2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT GENERAL -' FUND ;: IAL _ l -BARKS ;--' GAS TAX FUND FLOOD & DRAINAGE BI -CENTER INFO. SERVICES SANITATION SOLID GOLF WASTE COURSE WATER & WASTEWIX OTHER G.O. REVENUE BONDS BONDS TOTAL Street Repair Program S1 100 000 S1 100.000 curb & gutter, crack sealing, brick _ _ asphalt 8 concrete repair seals and RR crossings 7 777777777--7 Sidewalks and Rams 5100.000 5100.000 Park Improvements $100,000 5100.000 Neighborhood Park $75000 575.000 Buildings & Facilities S250000 $110000 $100.000 $460.000 Vehicles 8 Equip 5650.000 S 100 000 $30.000 5120.000 S34.000 $100000 St, 334 000 En a I Median improvements $75000 $75.000 Com ters/Techn 5150.000 5250.000 $100,000 5500000 y. C I P Planning $100000 $100000 Stonowater Projects 8 Planning $300.000 S300000 Traft Signal Upgrades S200000 $200000 Water System Enhancements S650.000 S650000 Wastewater System Enhancements 5500 000 5500.000 Conlin en 7oMC trenlerrfPlen 5100000 Si,t100000 $t0D000 51,300,000 $300,000 $ 5250,000 $120,000 $0 $34,000 $1,450,000 $0 $100000, $0 $0 $5,294,000 Approved. March 26, 2001 Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002 EXHIBIT A-5 CITY OF SALINA 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD 8 INFO. SOLID GOLF WATER 3 G. O. REVENUE PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI SERVICES SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEWTR OTHER BONDS BONDS TOTAL ' Street Repair Program: $1 100 000 Sl 100 000 curb a gutter, crack sealing, !rick _ asphalt a Concrete repair, seals and RR crossings a CIP. Pk S650000 (1) Combination of KDOT and UPRR funding Approved: March 26, 2001 Proposed Revision: March 25, 2002 $500000 EXHIBIT A-6 CITY OF SALINA 2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (t) KDOT Proposed: March 25, 2002 Co'wd t4&1'8 A C. EXHIBI T A-7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FOR FURTHER REVIEW BRIDGES Lakewood Park Historic Bridge Relocation — (cost underway) Possible relocation and reuse of historic bridge for pedestrian/bicycle bridge to new Lakewood Middle School at river near Elm Street, east of Ohio. Replacement of historic bridge with new structure is scheduled for 2003. MAJOR ROADWAYS 1. East Pacific Corridor — (cost unknown) Project to include the improvement to urban standards of East Pacific (old Highway 40) from Front Street to its connection with the new/realigned Pacific/Ohio intersection. Likely to be constructed as part of the North Ohio Corridor/Overpass Project. 2. East Magnolia Corridor, Phase 2 — ($600,000) Widen and improve to urban standards Magnolia Road from River Trail Road to Flood Levee. Three land roadway. Project should be accomplished along with major drainage improvements, including replacement drainage structure related to the Knox Sandpit outlet channel crossing. That drainage project and this roadway improvement not fully evaluated or scheduled. $600,000 estimate is for roadway only, no drainage. 3. Centennial Road, Phase 2 — (cost unknown) Improve to urban standards Centennial Road from Bailey Road south to Waterwell Road. Timing depends on industrial development in area. MAJOR STORMWATER Ohio/Magnolia Drainage — ($2,000,000) Off -roadway drainage improvements east of Ohio, including areas near Huntington Road, the Holmquist Oxbow and Knox Sandpit outlet crossing on Magnolia. Long-term project may be segmented into various smaller, more manageable projects. Crossing at Magnolia must be accomplished prior to East Magnolia, Phase 2. E. 2. West Dry Creek Channel — (cost unknown) Improvements to various segments of the major drainage channel between Waterwell Road and Cloud Street, west of 1-135. Needs further analysis and planning studies. Smaller segments may be future Flood and Drainage Fund sub-C.I.P. projects. 3. Marymount/Glen Drainage — (cost unknown) Arterial street drainage causing occasional street flooding and impassability. Will require careful study to prevent shifting problems downstream. Possible Flood and Drainage Fund sub-C.I.P. project. UTILITIES Utilities, West of 1-135/Magnolia Interchange — ($1,800,000) Extension of water and wastewater system to serve new development. Preliminary engineering plans have been completed. Timing of construction is dependent on private development plans. Costs will be predominately special assessed or cost recovered at development. 2. Schilling/Ohio Utilities — Extension of water and wastewater system to serve future development along Schilling Road and South Ohio. Needs concept design and feasibility report. Special assessment/cost recovery project. Timing is dependent on private development plans. 3. Water Utilities West Grand/North Street Area — (cost unknown) Extension of water system to serve current and future development in northwest area. Special assessment/cost recovery project. Some annexation may be involved. Needs concept design and feasibility report. 4. West Diamond Drive Utilities — (cost unknown) Utility extensions (and possible street paving) to enable further development in area west of 91h Street, north of 1-70. BUILDINGS 1. Fire Station Facilities — (cost unknown) Renovations to existing fire stations and expansion of Fire Station #2 (South Santa Fe). Needs concept design and cost estimates as C.I.P. Planning project. 2. Bicentennial Center Expansion/Renovation — (cost unknown) Possible addition to south side of building for food service, kitchen and storage areas. Necessary updates to arena, including sound system, 2 C.-WSO. F. restrooms, concession areas, etc. Needs comprehensive plan, concept design and cost estimates. Possible bond financing project, to be repaid out of annual Bi -Center facilities budget. 3. Museum Gallery Renovation — ($900,000) Possible permanent gallery structures and comprehensive exhibit. Project requires City Commission review at study session and approval as a city building project. Arts and Humanities Commission has approved and is apparently in process of seeking pledges and private financing. City Commission to review this Spring (2002). PARKS AND RECREATION 1. School Property Re -Use — (cost unknown) Possible redevelopment of one or more former school buildings or sites for parks/recreation purposes. USD 305 plans community membership committee to assist in analyzing surplus property disposition re -use issues. City staff has expressed interest in Roosevelt -Lincoln gymnasium and related facilities. 2. River Revitalization Extension — (cost unknown) Possible extension in Kenwood Park/YMCA area. May continue and extend projects similar to those accomplished in early 1990s. Possible clearance of trees/brush, and/or major dredging. YMCA has expressed interest in a pedestrian bridge. 3. Lakewood Nature Center Expansion — ($500,000) Potential future major project to add more public use/nature class areas at Nature Center in Lakewood Park. 4. Oakdale Park Greenhouse — ($150,000) Construction of new greenhouse in Oakdale Park to better serve projects and programs of Parks and Recreation system and gardens. 5. Trail Projects — (cost unknown) Expand existing pedestrian/biking trail to other sections of flood control levee, and/or along rail corridors which may be abandoned in future. KDOT enhancement grants may be available for partial funding. 6. Soccer Complex — (cost unknown) Possible addition of new soccer fields to serve current and future growing community programs. Needs further analysis and cost estimating. 3 c��i�ms+rre G, 7. Park Spraygrounds — ($100,000 each) Possible additional neighborhood spraygrounds; evaluate after completion and two season operation of pilot projects. MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 1. Public Shooting Range — ($200,000) Possible cost -shared project for construction in a rural area. Private sector, state and city funding needed. Preliminary $100,000 state; $50,000 city; $50,000 private. Project is awaiting private sector and state action. DESIGNATED C.I.P PARTNERSHIP PROJECT. 2. Eastern Development Area — (cost unknown) Infrastructure needs, including flood and drainage, streets, utilities, park land for property in our eastern growth area between city limits and Holmes Road. Full area master planning may be accomplished under C.I.P. Planning in 2002. 3. Wayfinding Signage Plan — (cost unknown) Design and installation of a modern directional signage plan for major community areas and facilities, including but not limited to downtown facilities. 4. Schilling Pedestrian Bridge — (cost unknown) Major upgrade or replacement of existing temporary pedestrian/bicycle bridge, between residential area and Schilling School. Needs further internal planning and cost estimates. 4 consoeeaiw Ulm CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IDENTIFIED BUT UNFUNDED 1.11 Family Aquatic Facility — ($5,000,000 - $6,000,000) Construction of a major outdoor pool/acquatic facility in Kenwood Park. Concept design complete. Voters declined to approve special sales tax for funding in 2000. DESIGNATED C.I.P. PUBLIC REFERENDUM PROJECT. 2. South Ohio Corridor, Phase 2 — ($2,300,000) Widen and improve south Ohio to urban standards from Magnolia Road south to Schilling road. Four land roadway. Timing dependent on major roadway funding availability, as well as development patterns and traffic flow issues. 3. East Magnolia Corridor, Phase 1 — ($1,300,000) Widen and improve East Magnolia from Shalimar Road to River Trail Road. Three -lane roadway. Timing dependent on major roadway funding availability, as well as development patterns and traffic flow issues. 5 EXH/B Chapter I1; Page 1 Rev. January 2000 Resolution #00.5555 H. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY The City shall establish a five-year Capital Improvement Program (C_.I.P.) to guide decision-making on public improvements and expenditures. provides a mechanism for scheduling public physical improvements over a number of years. It establishes the City's priorities for public projects based on available financial resources and project criteria. The C.I.P. shall be updated annually following analysis of year-end financial reports, and prior to the adoption of the City's annual operating budget. Generally, the updated C.I.P. shall be approved by the City Commission by April 10 of each year. The City shall use a portion of its annual budgeted revenues for cash capital investments. Mill levy proceeds, sales taxes, user fees or other local revenues may be dedicated for capital improvements. The City will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. The C.I.P. and budget will provide for the major- renovation and orderly replacement of buildings, facilities and equipment from current revenues where possible. The Capital Improvement Plan shall include an appropriate reserve for contingencies for approved projects. City staff, in making C.I.P. recommendations to the City Commission, shall use the following criteria in evaluating projects. 1. Priority consideration will be given to: ➢ Capital investment projects which preserve existing infrastructure and maintain basic public services. 11 ➢ Capital projects which implement a component of an approved City plan. Chapter II; Page 2 Rev. January 2000 Resoludon #00.5555 ➢ Projects which specifically replace or renovate an essential, but obsolete, facility. ➢ Projects which reduce the cost of operations, maintenance or energy consumption. ➢ Projects identified as addressing important public health and safety issues. ➢ Projects mandated by the federal or state government. ➢ Projects which are funded, in whole or in part, by leveraged or partnership funding, including grants, private funds, etc. G. Certain capital improvement projects lend themselves specifically to public- private partnership, wherein project funding would be derived partially from the City and partially from private donations, dedicated user fees and other non - city sources. Community proponents wishing to initiate such projects should first present a concept plan to the City Commission, including a financial cost- sharing plan for both the initial capital costs, as well as the ongoing cost for operations and maintenance. Generally, the.City Commission will consider proposed partnership projects at its regular C.I.P. planning period during the first quarter or each year. If approved by the City Commission, proponents would be encouraged to complete project plans and initiate fund-raising efforts. H. Certain non -infrastructure capital projects may be of such type and scope as to be beyond the financial capacity of the City without additional revenues, and thus may be appropriate for public referendum. Public Referendum projects should fall within the following criteria: ➢ Projects not involving public health and safety or basic infrastructure; and. ➢ With a capital cost estimate of $750,000 or greater; or, ➢ Potentially requiring a significant ongoing City appropriation for operations and maintenance. Chapter U; Page 3 Rev. January 2000 Resolution #00.5555 Proponents of such projects may circulate a petition in accordance with state law, calling for a public referendum on the project and *specified funding source. The City Commission shall determine whether the City takes an official position on the issue. If approved by the voters, the project would be completed. I. The C.I.P. as approved annually, shall contain the following sections: 1. A listing of preliminarily approved capital projects, including estimated cost and funding source by years, which have undergone review for costs and benefits and have identified funding expected to be available for the project. 2. A separate listing of potential capital projects which require significant additional information, e.g. concept design, feasibility report, cost estimates, funding source analysis, etc. before they can be formally considered for approval and placement in a specific year in the C.I.P. This section shall be titled "Projects For Further Review." 3. A separate listing of projects for which adequate information exists as to planning, estimated costs, benefits, etc. and which the City Commission agrees would be desirable- projects for the community in the future, but for which an adequate and appropriate funding mechanism has not yet been determined as available. This section shall be titled "Projects Identified But Unfunded." 4. An identification within any of the "Five -Year," "Further Review," or "Identified But Unfunded" categories of any projects specified as "Partnership Projects" or "Public Referendum Projects."