Government Center Feasability, Ph III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~)e-r/(
'..:,~'.. "~... .........:..::......:....::.
......." . . 'N'.ry,.:.
... .... .. . ....
... . . .... ...
................................
.....................
"::::'c" ",,":r:" ':y:'" '::.
..... . . . -..
...... ... . I' ....
..... '1 I' ....
...... ., I' .....
................
Feasi bi I ity Report
PHASE III
A Governmental Center
for
Saline County & Salina Kansas
by
~
ANDERSON - JOHNSON ARCHITECTS.
~U(~[R ~ Willi)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CON S U l TIN GEt,: GIN t E '" S ~ P l ANN E I( <;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHASE III
SPACE NEEDS AND COST STUDIES
for
A FEASIBILITY STUDY of a
PROPOSED GOVERNMENTAL CENTER
for
SALINE COUNTY and
CITY of SALINA, KANSAS
May 1964
Prepared by
ANDERSON - JOHNSON, Architects
and
BUCHER AND WILLIS
Consulting Engineers and Planners
Salina, Kansas
I
I
CONTENTS
I
I
I
Item
Scope and Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Space Requirement Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
I
Departmental Space Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
I
Departmental Relationships and Information . . . . . . . . . . .. 17
General Use Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 48
I
Miscellaneous Possible Cost Savings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
I
Summary of Building Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
I
Civil Defense Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 60
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
Outline Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Project Cost Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 66
Continuing Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
Outline for Administrative Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Future Expansion Needs . . . . . . . . . .
.......
. . . . . 109
Recapitulation at Phases I, II and III .
........
. . . . 111
RecoDlJlenda ti on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
I
I
I
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
I
Phases I and II of this Feasibility Study have explored the questions
regarding the possibility of a Joint Governmental Center. The con-
clusion of these two phases is that a combined building for Saline
County and the City of Salina, Kansas is feasible from the standpoint
of -
I
I
need,
legal requirements,
I
ownership and operation,
I
location.
I
Phase III is an exploration of the desirability of a joint facility
for the two governments.
I
In Phase I it was determined that there is a need for larger and more
efficient facilities for both governments.
I
Assuming, therefore, that each Government will embark on a program of
facility improvements, there are three possible courses:
1. Two separate and distinct buildings, unrelated to each other;
I
2. Two separate buildings conveniently related to each other on
the same site;
I
3. A single building housing both governments.
I
In order to determine whether a Joint Governmental Center would be
desirable, Phase III studies each of the three possible building com-
binations described above regarding:
I
space requirements
construction costs
I
operating costs
I
I
I
Finally, as a conclusion of this Phase III, a recommended course of
action is outlined.
I
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S?ACE REQUIREdENT STANDA.RDS
I
The following three sheets
are a collection Qf typical
snace requirement drawings
of typical situations in
the two Governwents.
I
I
The spaces shovm a~e mini-
mum standards, and ar~not
iritended to be final state-
ments of the exact facili.
ties needed for a given
activity or piece of equip-
ment.
I
I
The spaces would be varied
as required for incorpor-
a tion vii thin a specific
planning situation.
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T\(PICi.L
ti."-r _ ':
---...... I
I
: _ __ _ _ __ _ J
<;[CPETAl?Y
" X 8' MIN..
40 SQ, FT.
c; PAC [;
D r /""', I II f7 i ~. ..... ~ :' "',-::
K t '--:. \..~ I F. t. II ',7,:. - \~ i J
.-.---l- --~
I ____J r-- J
IT _ h __ __[-=-'I
.::; h 'y. + -' FILES
5' )< II' A': I; .
55 SQ. FT.
2'
Of _.~
,.----.-- . ---_..~._.
J :
nl~; r r-, '\ !
I~~-- -~- _.:cL=.:] _ i
L__.__..____ (:)1
\ ,'\ '\ :: /; I -1
---' \-~I ,--' L! U
----- -_.- - .---_. -.
M1NIN';.:,V,- ri/;, E\~'I";~l< OF
CCr-.\FERO.!CE AY,Et.~
'.., /
I,"
.,J
~-- ~.
~_.. --- 'i
~--I'-~"I
p~E;jL~!=l
ID~l>w-F~ OPE"! i I
T -- ,_no -- -. -- --
L_ .._. - ~ - -U"l
I
_: I I
~t __ [fT~lT~1_~E:_RT 1_
Q):
! _~ 1 I. 3 I' I
c-.... 5' I
,o- . - ...
, 10'
,.j
~-
f=ILE Cl.d5!~~n'5
/5'
rLA'l~_~_~_,__F '-~r-' ---W'-'-'~I
,--" F J l :I2..J
I C.) r------ i ,'-1
I I " "j ,
t L?_~. ~~''!. - . r~~l i
-l!)j L..
-I
I
i [J 11 ,'j /
I Ii' _ /
I L. ,--, ;.__. :
~----_.'.- . --.------.
2 Z 5 S. 1=.
IZ'
i-~---:-- ---.- -r--=-.,
I ': r'f~;'i
1 [;G~~~~ I
e.)
-looo_/u
144 <;. F.
,YP\Cl..L
--~-
~ i
'<t:
=:i
i
,
,
_ '1-
~'
{~'=r .fJ -0 -0 ):~:llj ~
If ' I
Ii I I
,L_ I I
--C] : I
- I I
:0 0, Di~
Ie 0: D:-
EH---~JoD:
[ --________1
/3'
'1'" II' .. 99 s. F.
I~I)I, 15' :: 195' '5. F.
~)}.I EL Vlt~4 - ~ ~~El..v'E5
t-Ml-J EQUAL" ~ L1h!EAL
FEET OF 'Srf~vpL~ rER
FOOT OF FLOO~ SPACE
TYPICAL 8 BOCI(5/FT.
U W BC;(;l(-j - {, lWC /(s/ FT.
/2/
r---.-, -----J.---- H_~
I LIiYGFP [:'
, --;" F-0-:TI
~_J
in
3""" 72'1:
io
lOO[=L
180 S.F.
10'
I rl ruJj
1 r:- 'J
"'N: ~00.
-I
I
i /1
LQD ( u
120 S. F.
OFF
T,(P1L,~L - S lIE,J ECT T"o
Cj.LI.~k;[ Te MEFT SFEC!i/( ~UDS
~ooob~r~:
1_ _ _ .J. __J I
I I' I I
I I I
I 1 I '
I I ,I
I ~\ I;~r--r--i-
1_ =' _ ~ b-il~ .t-d W J
W/',:T'Nt.; (N!r' /J.YL. WAL'i.)
2 C H.to' 12.-; - 5 'x 7 I -== 3')". F,
3 /I 7"x7/::49S,:::.
~ " ~//( 101 :: 5_r, <;,P.
~ 7'~!o' c 70 ;;::.F.
8 II '1'x 10' - '10 $.F
10 I, 11'~ID' -= l/O s,~.
,2. II l3t){ '0' ~ )30 $,f:
I
1M lfW 3 FaK' iCjMP' S rMJ.(
L I ~[---'-I -r
........JL7-1___ __,,, _<-+
f I
I
I I --:
. , .- --_ _ _ _ __ _. _ ~ __:rt
l v t.. R I E-~ !
I "'i
won:: <;;P-ACE @,. C()L"~!Tn
!~u.uw 3' OF com~H:~
<PACE FDR MfME00rzAP~
r--f~"
-:.. ;'---. ) i
l..--__l
2~Z" 3'
-\9~' I HO I
I : 00' ~J
i. _ J I :
13 s.F./ LA v. ..L 1_ __-'
2'
hlHH
_ L I
ll'>' ,
I 1
1._ .J
10 S.F.jUR.
I
10
i 0 IF!~
-9! bo",,~~J
U2_~/1
100 s. F.
8'
U--'--~-J
F l~l!
[) j'
-ir--. J
Cl' ,
-I '--_
iD /jj
~J u
SO S.F.
C &,,______5,_ LZ__~ s
If.(~7 S.F.
pg/Vt..-;E TOILET
PL!BUC TulLETS
24 ';.F. / w.e.
__ _J
8'
r-::__ _ "_ ~_ ---g-
i ' )
-;~
001 L__~ 1-
I ri / ,
, I !
L-..; I ,
L_____i '
~4 S.F.
5
I
I
I
I
I ~~t-
I
I
I r
.1 ~._____._.____
I
II
I
I
I
I '" -; ',~':f l.:u;io. /.Jet/
,---- - -=:J
I
I
I
c::-----.-. --1
I ~y E~~-=-' =:~3
I
-7: r- - -- - --
-."
,:"'1....
''D
'T ",-~ .-
'l"
I'"
- c, 'r------ - 1 -.
cr- '&+- ~, r., i
j~.3
1~.
iJ" ... PEr PE;?(;/-J (<~ CU!/FU
I
,
I
_ _1
1--
I
", I
,j
I
.t-
P"\<~ I ~ c;Ef<'y'!(f eel'I'TER
'5' )( '1',4" (19 'SF./ C:HVI:E <;Tl1T10~J)
12'
ins E /; T5-8 -.-,.
~- - -- , - - -
~--
L___., .'_____
I
L_____ _~____
I
L_~___
,
L ,
I
L_
4'
-,,+.,-+ .
I I
I
- - j
- j
_, _ J
/2'
2'
. 4f -.....
I ,
. -- -- ..,
rs ~.!I S8 __.n -- '_]
I
I I
I-I" L
G
j - : -:\-
I
~-
I
I .
L._
[--~, -
------.-- - .1
, ---__.J
j
I
_i
I
j
I-
I
1
I
! ~
,1L!D170;';:.'A.\
'::EA--,rJ.:.; IIJ PEW':;
- -_._~--
-~ -- -- --.- -- .-.- -
('~rn' CF P;''-:-TP:{r'~ Oi/in- - V/.IJL;
E-.-: . i ; L.".::-t''i 14'
- .-- --
D (.; (JJ:i:'.;
Ie Li~.F'. ft)
--. l
7,A ...,1,,,",,
t-l.f ,........
r;.c YEt. I? - II D D 3(), UN
FT. (TCT4L 40 FT.9ELF)
~ e L110. FT, 5~Ei.. VIN4
(, '5 H. H I.(,/--l
eLf) (!::..C;E FILES
, I
J_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ...J
I.>PD 2 p,::" ,", /Y!:A,'
:. 6~![ flJt ,/-.I 7 v<(~
0f/ 7-S k~LT
If.!
SO ,/EAr .
( 5 I " .'.~ I _ <:: t. ',I 5', /2 '4
TD ALLCW Vf' I~\,
aU.SED 4k:wnl KA'7E)
NEW (AC,E.fhfS -58"'I"~"!D~,)i'!<
rLC.(;~ Af:fL/ FILE -?' $, -,F
L(" NOW
2/\'<' x;C ,'12."" 10,', (LE;.
<; F.~':: F k [(, ,
i7) )( 8,t,1 ~ 10~"
I
2,l
i ! I
,; i. l _
j c I_!.'~__~~~~ \;i=__~~1< 1
.,
~I
I',
~_I!
C 1':;
---=-i'i:" J l
j L__.J ____j c_~-~: ~
.~, F F ;,.. E r ~
L_
C 1 !'-,
(' (11y;\1\: .~ ',: " '
21 '
'" I
E-i-=-- --=-.::.-~.~]
L
CCl't\!TY
(::/' A~.-'vt /"-':"IC ~
[L {L~ _(f_~ :..n<=-\,,~~~LT
E-.:
J?"
:---.,
~-- ~~
, ,
[~J
C,( l' -: - 2 2;1 . It
rlJ
! -1
.,
\"\ ;.
V',_ I
wi
C'4;
CJ.
-
.
IS'
t4 CGill!
,. ~,1 ,4,::, == '6. 2& .:::.~_ FLee I<
SPl>C[ r (,12 2 EAr!::'; Y/IT/4
CCgI:l.D':'l-.
BETW!;O)
NOw... ONE l:'~.(Y PE'2
NUD
35 R!',':T"
1'E/..\'
Fe R ~JEf" 3~ "f I~Z 'j -- L".loL 70 RAO: 5
3r; h~~b wi CD~ ~ .
35ll,~.2"1
IE>
290. -SF.
1- -.- - - - _. - ,- .,
I
I
I I
G:!!C(U~TErJ
)(,;,' K 12'
clre IC%
I t
L-_________,_J
1('
OlP ncof.p:; eN UIC,T
L ,~~ ,,",'F ;?
2 TABd':'2
,-:----n
I I : .
tlql ! \ I
I I '
it'
~____l :
I ,~
= 1'1 2
z~o
------ -
482
48
530
r L '; ":f. Ie:. ( '& = '2" /(,
-= 12 E.
~
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
PI";' ;~ i ( f' .._C.~J,~E_~.E -;.~~\i\ l.
cC'u g'! LfU.
pr ESUJ T
~.~ Exi"Ti"!C ['11/, I C'l'rr A~:U. -(U." vf f!Li!,
Z I' ,( 3G' = 7 5,:; S F >(. 7 5 = E5 (. 7 5 . F .
S"PEC7,1TC:R LREA - ~ELT 7::
REF. 4 l' D I T C r I :..; ^'~ -S E :. T J
'SFA...'L ~[(;.,U';':'J)
'I ~ - j, ._ (.. U ~'i' r ::. //
2 I )( ?;;
I~ FEW' -P4/.f_
If. 72 <:' F
30 >< 40 = ! ,2 .
(DEPTS, Wi PRiVATE ;, "lOT CCLJt~T ED)
(if/ 4QAPHIC <STA~lIA~P~)
I I . I
I W /'. Z LID, 3 ,. 'I
\ "......) "-') ,-/<(,/
(4 W.,:.; 4 LAY.)
TOILET r.OCMt:; FOR
-~-,-----..._~--- ------
<;TAFF
COUNTY
~TAFF COllN'T:
37 ME~
1;7 WCME~
104
.Q.IY
52 ME iJ
50 WON,Hl
102
CON~J ~E"V
89 MEN
117 WOMEN
20(;,
<:;TAFF LC"LHJ4E
+ 107,
r5P il.\!u
I
83 <;.~. Mlt-.;;;';\LM (,9ISr
148 S.F. M !~IMUM (Jt.2 ~,F
( '2 W. C. ~ 3 Ug.; 3 l ~ V)
( 3 W. C .; 3 LA V. )
117 S.I=-. MI1J1N.'JM (:28~F
III S.F M1N IMUM 021 ~F)
(3 W. C. '> 3 U R ') 4 L II V.)
(c,W,c,; 5 LA'/-)
154 S.F. MI""lMUM (!~Cj'5F)
20') S,F. iY\l~ IMUM (2ZC;~~)
A~ S UIv\ E !-4 OF TOTAL STA FF US I~C:
COU~TY - 1/4 OF 104 = 2(, )(
CITY ~---_.- 1/4 OF IC2 "" 25
cell'" Bl},lt:D -- '/4- OF 20(., == 51
LOU~{,"f AT O/..t1: TIME (IOS.F,/poc;c~J,\
10' - 200 <;'/=,
.
'>( 10
2 5 C -So F,
l(
10
510 ),r-,
PUBU c: TOILE T ,eOvMS (A<;'-;lIME NAxfNUM I~ A':-.: EMFL '( /.H: tj.l. ';)
cell k'TJL~u Sf :
C0U~TS 20,~:
C OMMI<;5"1 cl~n": - 5>
G E 1\2 H Li... S /)
3C'~~-'(150 M I i?~ w)
~~L'(...l:1-b L L
CiTY CCiJKI
CCJMMi 55 lONb!.
GE~EKAL
100
- JOO
50
2.50 (125 M) 150 w)
COMBiNED - 550
COLlRTI1CJ';E -{N)- 2 PM), -I Vie; I U~; I LAY, EU4 -- IDC ~F
(w)- 2 K/I:~. - 2 W~; I UN. fACri - - 13 c5!....
TOTAL 230 SF
\
e/T""- WALL -(M)- Z .PM:'. - IWC; IUf'; IlAV. EA<i1 - lQ( SF
(w)- 2 ~M':' -lWC;' '-lV, Ei:'CW -_130 ~E...
10TtL 230:F
COMP,INE:D-(M)-3RM:,-IWC; I~R> ILAY,EACu - 150 SF
(w /- '3 ~M';,-. 2 we; , l-AV. fAC/4 - I q:; ~;(-
TOTAL 34) '>/-
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DEPART1IENTAL SPACB REQUIREii1EN~
On the following tables, the
required area for individual
snaces has been determined by
reference to the drawings or
diagrams preceding this SG~-
tion, but have been "tempered"
by the Architect's judgrrent to
serve specific situations.
-------------------
----------- .o,......~_.~~n".....~._~_, '.._<-.. . "..._'"',_...._ ".'. -"'_.._-"'~'-',",.,,-' =~""'-.,,",' "-....,..=-~
0 EPAI2TM~N TAL 'S PAC ~ 2 ~ QUI 2~Mr;NT~
--."--- -------"-----""----~
DEPA12TMENT 12.00M O~ ACTIVITY DIMEN AR.~A NUMsn -SUB TOT~LS 10% FO~ TOTAL SPACE 12 UU..e ~<
S!ON':; -T~U<S WtlLL l( [()UI~EP ~OE
\APPRu)(-) HI(]:NE.,5 DE PARTMEN r
CITY MANACia J(E C EPT ION 1ST 10 x I~ I GO 1 I~O
_u_ ---.-- -.---. --~-- -- - n_ "- f--- --------
worn:: J200M_~__u_ _______ 10 >( 12 I 20 I I 20
---- ~- - -- .---- --- --" ---- -- - - --------
_L t IbRA~'y IS ~ 18 27Q_ I 27 0
- ~---. - "- - ---..--"-....-.-.- f- -- --- 1-__ _n -
COlJFE2ENCE ~OOM 14 )(. 24 33~ 1 .33G>
----..- - " -- - .-,---.-..-.- --" u_ .... u,'_'.____. --+-. - -- "" ------. -- ------
P21VATE' TOiLET'5" 4 ,. 5 20 2 40
----------- -- -"" "un" .-- --'- --- ---.------ ---. - -~-----,-- -- ---- -- ~--_._- -- ------ "+'- ------------
CITY MANA~E~ 15 "- 15 -225 ! 215
_"_Un" ____ ----" __On" ____"_____________.____"_ ____on _M -- -- . - ---"- >-----
A<;SISTAhlT c. MAN,L.GcR 12 x 12 144 1 I 44
-"------- -----~._.._-.._.- ..- -- _ __ __h____ f------" ----- U __.._ -- - --------
'J 'Zc:c: /30. i,4 .., S.
/ - - 4-
CI Ty' COMMISSIONERS P'.JB~ Ie MEET lfJG ROOlY\ 32 x3' I. I 52 I I, I 5 2
--- - _.- _.- -------------""------ --- -- .._._~-_..._.._--- ~-_..-._- d___ r" ---- -- --,-- ---------
__" d _ _______ "___ ______ --- ----.--- -.--. -- _n_ .._____ _.~ - .- '.-..---
I , 5 .., I , S. I, 2 ~ 7.
I, '- ,
':""'y ,_ L .:: 12}:: R I; CEPT ION I<;T '7 x 24- 408 I 408 LOCA IE OfJ Flf~-:
----- "- ------_.~._-_.--_._- -----.--.,-- ---. -.~....._._---- -----_.~- ---- --- -- " "---- --- ---- ~------
( ITY TJ(EA<:;:..lgER p;:: ,VATE OFFICES 12 )( 14 1~8 3 504 ~LOO2
--"" - ._-~ ---'.-"'- .._---"---- ----.---- .----- --. -- --"--- --- - ._- _0-- --- -.. _. ._-~ ------
WOflt: ROOM . W x 23 4~O I 4~D
""" - --"-- ---"-"------"--"---- ',-- -.- -- _._- -- ------ -- ------
Boo~nEP//J4 d. MAc+llfJE: c:; 23 x40 920 I 92 0 "* (::1' ..... _.. - ~. .......
--.- --.- ---~-" ------ ------- -- ------ --- -" "-- ._------
AU DiTI)..)4 ~ Ml<;CHLA~EOLiS 12 x I~ )92 I I 9 2 USE l}:.ELS
"____h______ ._____ .'-.-- --- --~ -- "---- ----- -"-- n_ f-"---"-
CUU~~NT VAULT 15 )( 24 3,"0 r 3~O
------ ---- ---~-~~._--_.._-_.- ----- -------- ---- ---"" --~-- -- ---
.- DEAD S TO R.1.11::~ S VAULT 1& )( 25 4;0
--------"-- --- --+-- -- -- --
~---- ----- --
---- --- ----
544 3, , 2 8
'-- ,
CITY W,~TER DEP.1rTMO-lT . R': -r'" : Cii-.: c..,. 20 ><20 400 I 400 _J:A T E :)N I~ F'
-- , . .
~--- --.----.---.---- '--'- -----------,-- -- ---- ----- --_.. - -----.--
CASI-jIERS 20 >( I~ 320 , 320
r-- ----,--- ---~----_._._.._- -"- .--.-.--......- -- -- -- --_. -.- --~-
CU<STOMI: R SHV~C~ 32 >C 20 ~40 I ~40 * CO:.!i_P '::';f.,>=[ wmI
r---"-- - -- - -- -.-.--- -- ---- ---- - --------- -- C' ErV/'T"~EA<
ACCOUI..1TINu 32 '" 32 1/024 I \,024 ~ . -/, .. -- .
r-- - -- -.-- - -"----- ~--- - ---- --------
. M!:""UJ.~ [; ~ ,3 -.( 15 ) '15 I I a 5
f
t- - .--.------------- -"--'- ----- - --- .- ----"-- --.- ---'~'-
'C;E ~VICE 7>EPT, 20 >( 20 400 I 4;)0 * r ::.,'_ :::: c, ::-2':'.
t-----h----------- ------~. -- --
SUPPLY ~O 0.'1\ 10 i< 15 I 50 i , S0 USE AgEAS
i
t-------------- - , ------..
COAT ROON, 7 )( 15 :05 I , OS
r-------- - ----- -
. RE CO~p STOE:ACi~ 12 '1'-20 '24()
T
--
~----~---- -- -----
3j 2 34 -:( (3 3, 5 ...,.
~
--.-,.
____"_____U__________"_U"_ ______ ______ __u.~_____ -------.---- ----- ---------- ----
---
-o4t
-------------------
DEPA2TM~NTAL c; PAC I; 1lI;:QUI2~Mr;NT<;
DEPARTMENT QOOM O~ ACTIVITY DIMEN - A~EA NU,Mgn SUS-TOTALS 10 % FOg TOTAL SPACE 12 EMA~ Ir::~
,)IOt-l~ T~US WALL HOU1RED FO~
IlAPPROx.) TIIICk'NESS DEPAIZTMENT
CiTY E~Cj!~n~I"\4 PEPr, : RECE:P710~ 4 IIIAf' ROOM 20 l( 30 <DOO I cDOO
..
E ~ c; i kl E t. ~ i 1.,;6 P'RI VtlTE OF!=ICES 12 x I~ 1'12 4 7t:,g
n!'::PECTlol-.! UTILITIES OFFICE iC:,><18 33~ I 33~
-- -~-_._--
UTilitiES PRI'ltlTS CYF F J C E S 10 x. I~ I~O 2 320
PU..~!~I~JC:; J:)..!SPt;:CTIQt.J. FI LES 8'" 12 9C:> I 9C:>
-------
DRld: rl~c ROO..v, 20 x 30 ~OO I ~OO
_.
VA lJ L T 15"'2.5 375 I 375
f----..
P~:).jT:1-!4 12><1C, 1~2 I I q Z
. 3,287. 328 3, ~ ! 5
CITY COU2T '* COURT ROOM 32. x 44 ',408 I 1,408 S~otiU/ BE.: 01-1
ClE.rK OF CITY C Ot.!RT l~ )( 22 352 \ 352 <;tCO~P FLOOR
VtlUL T (CURI2Etn) 12)( 12 144 I 144
t DEb!) STORACjE VAU L T 15 I( 15 225 , 225 * COUl D <;+!t.~E
Jl'~Y 'KOOM 12 )( 18 2 I ~ \ 21~ W1T~ OT+JE~
PRIVATE TOIL.ETS 4 x S 20 2 40 CR.O!..1P$
LAWYE!"--S ' gOOMS 81( 10 86 3 240
Mh."St1!l.LLS OFFIC E 20:>< 15 300 , 300 t CA ~ B E I/o! BSMT.
JU DC:; E- 's OFFICE 12 J( 12 144 \ 144
CELL 10)( /2 120 I 12.0
3. ! c. c; 3~B 3,507
CIIY !::. 70H.!EY l2.f Ci: PTIOt-!IST / C; EC12E TAgy 12 x 14 l~g I 1(#8 S ~C0t.!D FlOD~
CITY ATTOlUJI;:Y 15)( 15 225 I 225
ASSIC;TA~T ATTORN~Y \ 2 l( 12 144- I 144 CA~ SHAR.E A
I
L lB~A2Y 10)( 12 120 I 12D COr-!F. 'f,DOM wrn4
"57 (#5 722 Cn/fe DEPTS.
CITY gECR~ATIO/l! RECEPTIO~!ST 15x 20 300 I 300 Ft~q F l 0012
.SUPfRVJ<;O~ I Z >( 15 180 1 180 VE'5I~bBLE ~UT
S UPE ~1f..!.T~~DH!T 15 It 15 225 I 225 ~oT MA~PATv~Y
STORA4k 10)( 15 150 J /50 ~
855 =5 940
.~ - _.
.
0
------~------------
DEPAJ2TM~NTAL SPAC~ Tl~QUI2~M(;NT<;
DEPARTMENT 12.0 OM O~ ACTIVITY DIMEN - AREA NUMSE2 SUS- TOTALS 10 % FOE TOTAL SPACE l(EMARl(~
SION~ T ~U., WALL ~ ~OU1~ED FO~
(APPROX:) TWIC.t:NE~S DEPAHMENT
BOM~P OF EDUCf.:.TIO~ <;L'PERI~TE~DEtJT 20)( 20 400 I 400 * PIVJDE WITH
-- --
PR:V/:'.TE OFFICES 15>( J 5 ~2 2 5 5 " I 2 5 FOL Dr N4 voce
SECR.e TA~Y 10.. 20 200 ~ 1,200
r----- I, 152
PRJVATE OFFICES 12'" 12 144- 8
f----
C:;ECJ:i:ETA~Y 12", 12 144 8 I. 152
STORA(j& 1 2 )( 2D 240 3 720
~ cot-J FE~Et--!CE ROOM 20>( 40 800 , 800
L15RA~Y 20 >( 30 ~oo I ~oo
<;TORA4E 30 x: 30 900 I '100
Dl'PLIC..1TIO~ 3D'l(30 qoO I '100
8," 4 q g-q4 ct,843.
CITY/COU"-!TY -l-lbALTI-I PJ;?/VATE OFFICE- 12 l( 12 144 I 144 Z~D FLOOR CJ. ):: .
i::;CE-?TjCI.JI<; I /";EC~I:TAeY 10>< IS , 50 , /50 IF ELEY.1TOt? AVAIL
W O~I( ~COM 20 x. I 5 300 1 300 ABLE.
P~I'/ATE TOlltTS 4.. 5 20 2 40
STORAG' E 10.,. 12 120 3 1~O
G~OUP OFFICES 20')( 20 400 2- 800
"P)( lVATE CO~FEI<OlCE RC0M 10.. 10 100 I 100
.
E)(AMlt-JaT1Ot-.!. ROCM 12'" 12 144 I 144
ur IL 'TY L(ITC+lE~ '2 )( 15 180 I 180
COIJ;:HENC( rOOM fEYE TESTIt.!c:i 20 '#. 25" 500 I 500
2,718 271 2,QB'l.
CIVIL DEFENSE- l<ECEPT10~I'5T 14 l< 20 280 I 280 cD. VEPT. co~-
DI~ECTOg'S OFFICE- ll')( 20 240 I 240 TAI/.!EP WIT-..) !~
A<;;';ISTA~T'S OFFICI;; 12>c 14 I ~8 I 1fs,8 CO'-.!T~CL C ::.l!TEf 01
STOF1'A~E ZO x 30 600 I (;,00 F'r!.CM 0, ccc. TO
.11288 128 1,41~. 12, COCo SQ. FT.
ALL LOCAT ED II-!
BAS eMEt-.! T.
--------~-~------------ ---
=
-----~-------------
DEPAflTM~NTAL 'SPAC[; 2I;QUIIl~MENT~
DEPARTMENT QOOM 012. ACTIVITY DIMHJ - AR~A NU.M8Ei C;U B - TOTALS 10 % FO~ TOTAL SPACE I2EMA~k:':;
<; lONe; T~U<; WALL HOU1RED FO~
lAPPROX:) T~l(nIHS DEPA12TMENT
COL't-!.TY COMMj<;SICl-ltl?'5 * COMMI'SC; IOl.t g.;' eCCM 20)( 2~ 520 I 520 * PO~~II!>LY COULD
----- ------- -- -
P \< IYATE OFFICE 12'" 10 120 I J 2 0 ';H'\~;; wITJ.1 CITY
-- --
TOILI:T gOOM / COAT <SPACE ~ ><. 12 72 I 72 CCMA~ ,';S' ION
712. 71 783
.._-~ ~--~ ----------. . .
LOCATE CLOSE TO
CLE.U/TIZEAS.,1 Hl4.
IF SPACE <;~IH'ED
WITt! CITY-HjE~
UQ, 3 CFF,- IZl()2::4s2
WEI;D CONTROL PR IVATE OFFICE 12 >< IS 180 I 180
we R K: ~OOM IS'" 20 3~O I 3~O
STOI2.A<::;E ~)( t,;; 3'- I 3~
S7iP 57 ~ '3 3
POS TAL CENTER WOQ.~ ~OCM 1'5 x. ZS- 375" I 37S 37 4 I 2
CCLlt...!TY E~Cl/>..!EEf? SECI2ETAI2Y 15)( 15 225 I 225
E~GI/-.!EEg 12 >< 15 /80 I 180
DI2.AFTI~C eCOM 20 >( 30 ~oo I ~oo
Vf..ULT 12)( 12 /4-4 I 144
I} 14~ 114 I, 2. ~ 3.
CO()~TY SC-HOOl 'SuPT. PT2tVA TE OFFICE 12 x 15 180 I \80
~~CE'PTIO~15T / SECJ<fT.6I?Y 12 )( 15 180 I 180
WOEK 'ROOM 18X 20 3~O I 3~O
VAULT 8)( 10 80 I 80
STCfA4e:- 8)( 10 80 I 8e
880 88 9~8
I
I
-p~toTOc;TAT W02.K ROOM - - - 300
~
---- f-- _.~~ 1---
--
N
.
.
- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - '-
DEPA2TM~NTAL ~PAC(; Tl.b:QUII2.~M~NT~
DEP~RTMENT QOOM O~ ACTIVITY DIMEN - ~~EA NUMBEr SUS- TOTALS 10 % FO~ TOTAL SPACE Q~MARj(~
. C; 10N~ T~U<) WALL HOUIRED FOr.
(Appwi) T~IC~~ESS DfPAl2TMENT
COul'-!TY TRtASl!RI::1( ~_LIC SHV/Cf 4 WOgt ~OOM 20)( 25 500 J 500 FI ~ST FLOCg
~...--- ~-- -----
PI21Vt..T-E- 6FFIC€- 10'< 12 120 I 120
--- f--
*' MAC~lfJE ~OOM 20)( 2D 400 1 400 * S}jUE wIT~
--- CLHK d AS:)E<;"O~
VAUL..T 30>< 40 1,200 , I,ZOO
-- --- - ---
2,220 222 2,440.
YtI-lICL~ DEPT. 'PUBLIC St:I2VIC-& I 2 >( 30 3~O I 3~O FlgST FLeeR
--- f----
Pl2:/VAT& OFFIC~ 8)( 10 80 1 80
-
TALi STORt..<:;E 10>< 20 200 I 200
-- -
~40 c04 704.
~f.~lSTt:R OF PUDS PL'BLIC SfEVICf ~ wo~~ ROOM 2/4, x 28 72S I 728 lOCATE C LO<;"E fa
PRIVATE OFFIC E 10>< I Z 120 I /2.0 COU~TY CLEI2l::
t:.l?>ST1::ACTCRS' rOCM 10 )( 18 /80 \ 180
VlIULT IS ><'44 (g(#O I 0~O.
1,~88. 1~8 1,8 5~.
CoVt-.lTY CLEer 4 t:.SSE'550e PUBLIC SU'YICf 4 wo~~ FOOM 2.0 )C 2 5 500 I 500 LOCATE; ON
p~IVArE OFFICE 12 )<( r~ /'12 I r <::J 2 FIIC:'ST FLcce
'* MACf..lI~E tOOM --- - -
DE PUTY CL.~ J2t: /2 >< , 2 14 ~ I /44 * REI TI2 EAS.
AS<;E-S<;O~ 12")( 15 180 \ 180
WOI(IC l<COM \8 x 30 540 , 5" 40 t 13 COULD B~ ON
.t VAU L T 20 )< 45 900 \ 900 A~CT~ER LEVEL
rEF. ~EI.!.. USE AHA$
2,45~ 245 2,70 1
PlCOBt:.T& JUDc;E- ~ECEPT)CfJ I won' I?OQM 20>< 20 400 I 400 tlKST FLue ~ ~/..J-
COU~T ~OOM 20 >( 2~ 520 I 520 L.~SS ELEV. t.\,jl~-6U
JUDG E'S OFFIC E 12 >< I ~ '''2 I ''12
pgOB~TIONAl OFF/CER(oS) 12 )( I~ I 'f '2 Z 384
VAULT I~ l( 48 7~13 I 7~8
. 2,2 ~4 22~ 2,49 O.
-
\0.1
-------------------
DEPAI2TM~NTAL ~PAC(; Tl~QUIlZJ~M(;NT<;
DEPARTMENT QOOM O~ ACTIVITY DIMEN - AREA NUMSn C::;UB- TOT~LS 10 % FOg TOTAL SPACE rt:MA~I(':;
SIONt:; T~U., W~ll HOUI~ED FO~
UPPROX~) TWIO:NE~S DE PAInMENT
COl'NTY ATTO~~EY ~ECEPTlO~'ST r 2 )C 15 180 I \ 80 C O~y'E ~IEtJT TO
----- ---- --.- -- --
WOK'/( ROOM 18 )( 20 3~O I 3~O COURTS'
COUN TY' 4TTO~NEy' 12)( '2 144 , /44
--~- -- '---- ----- >---- --
DEPUTY ~TTOFt-IEVS <) K 12 108 3 324
----- I. 108.
'/008 100
CLfRI( OF VIST12\CT CCVHS l'l!BLlC <;;'EI?VICf.f W02K 200M 25)( 30 750 I 750
(IIolCL, CCMMOIJ. FACILI TicS C~ILD .,LlPPO~T 4 ~OOIn::EEPIN(J" -
IZ )( 25 300 / 300
FOR ALL C.OU~TS.) f'Q IV"Tf OFF ICE 12 )t 15 186 r 180
TOfU: I 5 ><. 4 20 J 20
. VAULT 30 )( 45 1.350 I 1,350
<5To2A4f FOE COun ~x+lIBITS I S x 15 225 I 225
.
P~OSPEcrlvr JU2CR WAITI/I!4 l8 x ZO 3~0 I 3~O
COU~T LI5RARY 18 )( 24 432 I 432
LAWYER-S' LOLIIJ~ E 10 l( 10 100 I 100
TOILET ~ x 8 48 I 48
c.eLL 8)(.10 80 I 80
3,~45 384- 4~ 2 2 ~.
1/1t;TJ(/CT CuL'I2TS (VIV. I ~ DIv,rr) COURT J:?OOM 30 }( 40 1,200 2 2,400
JUD(JS'S OFF IC_ 15 >< 15 225 2 450
cotJFn'E~CE ~OOM 12 lC 2/ 2.52 2 5"04
COU~T ?EPO~Te~ 12 )( 12 144- Z 288
~EC E?TIOIo.! ISI 12 I< IZ 144 2. 288
101 LET 5 )( 4 20 2 40
WITNESSEti' ROO/Y\ 10 l( 2.0 zoo Z 400
JU k'Y ROOM 12 >( 18 21~ Z 432
TOILET> 4 x. 5 20 4 80
AT ,0f(~EY~' ROOM'5 lOX 10 100 4 400
5,282 528 5,810.
(FUTURl; DIVI<;JOI-l. :m) ALL ROO M, S SAME AS 'DIVS.I4.rr 2/, 2. I 252- (2/773.)
~
-------------------
DEPAI2TM~NTAL ~PACI; 1lI;QUI2~MI;NT<;
DEPARTMENT Q.OOM OQ. ACTiVITY DIMEN - AIlEA NUMSn SUB-TOT.US 10 % FO~ TOTAL SPACE l( EMh.H:<;
S IONt; T ~ 0<; W6.LL HOUI~ED FO~
I\APPROX:) Tl4l(nlt~S DE PAI2TMENT
(FUTURE "FAMILY COl!RT") cou In ROOM 30 x 40 1,200 I 1,200 *SPAL:/!S CUT -
---- .----.---------------- -----.. ----~---- e---____ fOR THI~
* JU'D4E4:> OFFICE I; )( 15 2Z5 1 225 LINEP
---------..----- ----- >---
c:;oc IAL WO~KEI2S' DFFICE 5 10 )( '2 120 4 480 CCW~T AJi~E OI.lLY
---..-----.-----.--------- f--- --,-- f---- --
~Ef'OJ(TEg I Z J( 12 14-4 I 144 SPECULllTrvE, AS
-----------.------- .-.-.- f-------- ---.--- --- ~---- ----- LEC;ISlATIO~ JI~s
12ECEPTIO"!./ST /2 x j 2 144 I 144
- ------ r--- _. ~OT YET BEEII!
TOILET 4-" 5 20 I 20
-. '----- --- -- ESTA!LI~I-lep.
WIT~S'5SES JO '" 20 200 I 200
---.. ------------------_.------- --- --~~
JURY 12 " 18 2.1~ I 21~
-_. ---------------- -- -- 40
TOILETS 4'" 5" 20 2
ATTOJ?NEY~' -- -- ----- ---
ROOMS 10 x /0 100 J 100
- -- 3,04 5.
2., 7 ~ , 27(,
t-------
GOllNTY WI:LfAI2E OfFICE ~ E C f PT I 0 tJ 1ST 20 >< 2 2 44-D I 440 .
S TE )...!O~l?APH Ie "POOL I B l( 24 432 I 432
-- --
FISCAL "DEPT. 18 ~ /8 324 I 324
---~----_. ------ ------ --
FilE ~OOM 9 >< 34 30G I 30(,
~-
SU'PPLIES J 2 )( 14 I~B I 1(,8
DI2ECTC2'S OF Fie E I Z lC 12 /44 I 144
SOCIAL WORKERS' OFFICES 10 x 1'2 /20 10 I,ZOO
3,0 ,~ 301 3,3 1 ~.
----_._-- -~-- --
A.:;~ICULTU~Al. EqnlSlotl CDuAlCIL ~ECEPTIO~ ~OOM 20 )( 2 5 500 , ~oo
---
STO~AGE 4 WO~I( lWOM 20 )( 20 400 I 400
4L; ~IC Ul T URAL AGE t-!T 15")( 18 Z7C I Z70
sTORA<::iE 8)( /0 80 I 80
CLUB AC:::;E~T I 2 )( 2.0 240 I 240
"5T012A~' to x 12 120 I /20
HOME fC Ol.!6MICS AGE~TS IS- )( 20 300 I 300 ~
STORAcCE 12 )It 1'2 144- I 144
SOIL TE~TI~~ LABORAT02"( 8 x 10 80 1 80 -
MEfTl"-IC (DEMo~SnATIO~) J(~OM 30 x 32 ~~O I 'i~C
3, 0 'f 4 30'1 3A03.
-
.
---
m
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.,
DE:PArzTM~NTAL SPACI; ll~QUII2.~M~NT<;
D!iPARTMENT 'K.OOM Ok? ACTIVITY DIAAEN - AR~A NUMBH SUB-TOTALS 10% FJt: TOTAL SPACE Q t. N\J~ H. C;
') ION~ T ~O<) Nj,LL HOUI~ED FOt::
I\bPPROX-) TkICl(NEs-S Df PAQTfr\EN T
cOUIJTY CO\?OI-.!ER P~IVATE OFFICE 12 l( 12 144 I 144
~-- .. _.'____________ ___ __.__....____. 0- _.__ ----- - - u_.._ - -- - --ee - ------ -----".--
STORAG€ 'S )( 10 80 I
r--- -- _H__ -_. ---- ---- .~_._._---- ~- ----..--- -- ---- -- -.-----_...._-- --- ----
224 22 24~
t"----- - ----- ----- --- - ---- ------- ------- ---.-- -------- _-__.-0 __ --- --.-.- ..- _____u_ .__ _.______ --- -- -------
4UIV.A~E CE~TE2 WAIT/~4 12 oeM I" x 20 320 , 320
~------- - --- --_.-_.--._------ -_._- ._------_.. --..- ~._---"_..- ---_.----- ------- ~---_.-
Sl::C~ETA~If"S 15 >( 20 300 I .300
~--------------o--- ______ ------~-- --._-_.~. -- -- ---- ------ --- ---- --- - ---------- ~-----.- ------ -
PRIVI.Tt; OFFICES 10>< 14- /40 8 L , 20
f----------------- -------- ------ ------------------ ----.---- ------ ~--- --- -- -, ---- .---.-- --- 0_-
COI'-JFeRE/oJCE ROOM 12 }( 24 I~S I 1~8
------------- -- --------- ---- -- ---- ----.- --- ---------- --~- ---- ~----
OBSEI2VAT/Ol-! PLAY ROOM 12><:24 1~8 I 1~8
__n_______________o______ ----- ----- --------
2,07~ 207 2, 283
.--_____________________ _n_______ _______ _Om ----------- _______ 00- ___0_____- -- ------
f-------- -- - -- ---- --- - -------- ~----o--- _ -------- --.-------- ----- ---- ----
POLICE DEPAPTMH1T L 0BBY 12.>< 15 I 80 \
C~-iEF'~ OFFIC-E--------- ---- ----- - ----._- .----
12", '5 I 130 I
-,-------- ---------------- ------- ~- --.--- ------ -----.----- -----
REC CRDS DIVI'; JON 3 I )( 3 I I
--:---- ---- --- ----- ----~-- ---- --- ----
j U V EN! L E OFFICEeS 28 )( 28 784 ,
- ----- ---------- --~--~- ----c------:--- --- ----. ____0__-
POL; CE COL!j(T SUliE 32 >< 32 1,024 I
-- ---
DETECTIVE$' 32)( 43 1,3 7~ I
--------------------
PHOTO, FI~tERP12INT It LAB 31 " 3 I 9~ I I
~-~ ---- ----- --
CAf?A6E 2.5 )< 25 ,
------ -- f- --
BAS EMH1T 53 "- 53 2,80 I) I
------ -,- ----- * ESTiMATE
*" JAIL ,4,. 5+ 2,4] I ~
-- -- 1----- -
'D1~PATCI_.jER~ OFfiCE 20 >( 2 0 400 ,
1-- ------ ---
BOO ~ I~C DESk: 12 )( 12 144
--
u I-JI F' orvt. PATROL 6 HAFFIC PIV. '-5")< ~o 3,~OO I
--t- 1t"lW 1,(,2 (, I 7, 88&.
-- t---- _0
----- ~---- ----
- .
-
-
.
--
-- -
-- ----- _-0------ ----- ----- 1------- ~-------
i' --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DEPARTMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS & INFORMATION
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C<XJNTY CQ.tMISSIONERS
.As Symbolical and to a large extent Actual Head of County Government,
this space should be located in a position of prominence.
Should be convenient to the Public.
It is important that the County Clerk be on a ~irst floor location, and
the Clerk should be adjacent to the Commissioners Room, therefore, the
Commissioners Room should be located on the first floor.
Departmental Personnel: 3 men
Visitors: Some days there are no visitors at all, and on other
days there may be as high as 50 persons.
Occasionally there are as many as 50 visitors at one time.
The County Attorney should have an office convenient to the Commissioners.
If the County population reaches 100,000. there would need to be a
"Counselor" to the Commissioners in addition to the County Attorney.
Some time in the remote future it could be possible that the County would
change to the County Manager system of government.
It is possible that the City and County Commissioners could share the same
meeting room. If this were done, the County Commissioners would require 3
private offices, (one each).
County Commissioners meet on Monday-Wednesday and Friday now. It is
possible that in the future they might meet daily.
Should be conveniently related to: County Clerk
County Audi tor
County Engineer
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations.)
!
,
,
i
( COMMIC::;C;\O~EJ~C;' 'KOOM
\
\
\
~~ ~/
------ --."~--~
~..
8
COR lZ ID012
0, LO'e,y~
18
I
I
CCUNTY ENGINEER'
I
I
I
Can be located on either first or second floor.
Departmental Personnel: 5 to 7 men
1 woman
Visitors: Ranges from a low of 2 persons per day
to a high of 8 persons per day.
If population increases it is possible that an elected Surveyor might be
required.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Should be conveniently related to: County Commissioners
Cdunty Clerk
Register of Deeds
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
'"
"
"
--------'--'-....
"',
~.
~
f
~--
",/
"
/
~/
VRAFTI~4
~OOM
- ~.-
---+-
"
\
\
\\
C02RID012 QR L08&Y
,
,
I
/
/
/
I
/
,/
/'
19
I
I
COUNTY TREASURER and VEHICLE REGISTRATION
I
Heavy volume of visitors makes a first floor location important.
I
Departmental Personnel: Treasurer - 2 men
8 to 12 women
Vehicle
- 10 women
I
Visitors: Treasurer - ranges from a low of 15 persons per day
to a high of SOO persons daily.
I
Vehicle - ranges from a low of 50 persons per day
· to a high of 700 persons daily.
I
Vehicle department must be convenient to the Public, but does not re-
quire direct connection to County Treasurer.
I
Possible future changes in taxing methods could result in changes in
space requirements.
I
Could share common machine room with County Clerk and Assessor..
This department frequently directs visitors to the CITY CLERK during
tax season.
I
(SEE DIAGRAM ON FOLLOWING SHEET.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
20
-------------------
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates a desirable
convenient relationship, either by corridor, or
side-by-side locations.)
..----._'--...
/' ---.""
.( M.~~~~~E t--.--
\ I
/'''_' )1.'-."-''--..
'''',''' ~r '
'x' ~
\
)
I
/
Im.~",\
V~UlT
.
t.-
/.
I
I I
! /
I /
~'-i
;//-
/~~ (CLE~K~
DEl'~~~ r-t WO'K'l QOOM
C.LE~K J \
X
..-- '.....
'------- -'
r:c~/
\ CLH~ J
"-- X ~~.
-)( '-",;
/ \ ~
1"/ \
CO.MM'~S'CNHB' I "--..... ,
\ ROOM / "-.
\.
\
'~ ./ ~2JVATf)'
.......... - __ OFFIC/
G~~~
"
"
"
!
,
!\)
t-'
I
r A<;~E,,;c;OgS
\ WORt:: ~()OM.
\
'"
'",.
"-
C Cg~IPO~
LCBBY
Oil
VAL!Lf
\
~
"
'>/ \------."
, '"
'f. \
f ,
i I \
I T~EASLlRE12~ \
I I
\ WO~i( 'l.OCM I
\ !
\, /
'- /
"^- ~/
/ "'------
------
~, 8
'C:LE REj
\ '
\ /
\
/
/
../'
'-----.-.---
I
I
COUNTY CLERK and COUNTY ASSESSOR
I
I
A first floor location is important.
Departmental Personnel: 3 men
6 to 9 women
I
Visitors: Ranges from a low of no visitors on some days to
a high of 100 persons per day.
Could share common machine room with County Treasurer.
I
I
If County Population reaches 65,000. the County Assessor would be a
separate department.
Require occasional use of a committee room seating 50 persons. This
room could be shared with other departments.
I
Should be conveniently related to: County Treasurer
City Clerk
City Treasurer
County Commissioners
I
(SEE DIAGRAM - PRECEDING SHEET.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
22
I
I
REGISTER OF DEEDS
I
Should be convenient to the County Clerk, otherwise a .econd floor
location is satisfactory.
I
. Departmental Personnel: 4 to 5 women
I
I
Visitors: Ranges from a low of 5 persons per day
to a high of 25 persons per day.
Register of Deeds' Private Office should be positioned to permit
observation of Vault.
I
I
Because of permanent nature of records that must be kept, expansion
possibility is mandatory, in work area and especially in vault.
Growth of this department will be dependent on population growth.
I
Should be conveniently related to: County Clerk
County Engineer
City Clerk
Bill Paying Agencies
Departmental space relationships:
(A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations.)
I
I
I
(\
( VAULT )
, I
\ I
\ />,~
. /
/./\------X
\
I
I
\
\
"-
"--.
,
i
i
'.
I
\
\
I
I
I
i WOg ~ ReOM
,
\
,
/
/'
.,,---'
CCR.l(IVO~ O~ LDEBY
.
I
23
I
I
PROBATE JUDGE
I
I
.
If an elevator is provided a second floor location will be satisfactory.
Departmental Personnel: 2 to 4 men
2 to 4 women
I
Visitors: Ranges from a low of 25 persons per day up to
a high of 50 to 100 persons per day.
Court room must be separate and private.
I
Should have expansion space within Vault because of permanent nature of
records which are kept.
Should be conveniently related to: Register of Deeds
County Clerk
County Treasurer
I
I
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
loca tions.)
I
I
I'
I
I
--------- ---......"- '....~ ~-...
,/."
'-
..........,
"
\,
\
\
"
,.-/"
I
VAULT
..
\
\
J
1
1
.I
/
J
I
I
I
I
I
"
"
--
,
--,-,_/~//"
LOJ?>Sy
I'
~--_._--
/- -'~'-
/ ""
,,' "'",
/ '.
,/~ .
..
/
i
/ '
\ COURT ~OOM I
\ t
\ k~
~ ( PROBATE
, JUDGE
24
I
I
COUNTY ATTORNEY
I
I
I
Departmental Personnel: 4 men
1 to 2 women
Design should de~initely permit ~uture e~nsion if required.
Increase in County population would increase work and space requirement
of department.
Even if population does not increase, work load, and consequently space
requirements will increase.
I
Should be conveniently related to: County Law Library
District Courts
City Court Room
A conference rOOM.
I
I
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
I
I
~_._-_.
.//
,/
Jl OOM
.-----------
~
CGiRR IDOf< Otl. LOBBY
I
25
I
I
I
DISTRICT COURTS
The courts serve all people, including handicapped, and have a large
volume of public use. Therefore a first floor location is important.
I
Each Court Room should provide for from 50 to 75 spectators.
I
It is imperative that the Courts Suite be planned for expansion:
It is very likely that a third division of the District Courts
will be required by 1980.
Some time in the foreseeable future it is anticipated that a
"Family Court" will be authorized.
I
Clerk of the District Court is considered to be a part of the Court
Suite.
I
I
The space relationship diagram below is for a typical Division of the
Court. Facilities that serve all divisions of the Court are shown as
a part of this diagram, but would not be repeated for each division.
I
Departmental space relationships:
q
-"---/
(A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
I
I
I
I
-~------._-~
-------
COURT
J200M
...........,"-.....,
\"'>
I
I
I ,/"~\
(p<omen" \ \
I ~~:~~,<?-
I ! CORRIDOR
1
/~
(' ~,
G:
~--- )
/ - '" /
// "/'
/ ,/ // "
,.' I .
/,,/ (CL EI2k:. OF \
-----t DISTRICT courT)
\,~
26
OR L05BY
I
I
I
a..ERK of the DISTRICT COORT
I
Is an integral part of the District Court Suite.
Locate on first floor.
I
Departmental Personnel: 4 to 7 women
)
I
Visitors: R&~es from a low of 25 or SO visitors per day up to
a high of ISO persons per day.
I
Should have easy access to all District Court Rooms.
Should have approximately one employee per 15,000. population.
I
I
Due to the permanent nature of records kept in this department, there
should be expansion space within the yault to accommodate anticipated
needs for life of building.
Should be conveniently related to: County Clerk
County Treasurer
I
Departmental space relationships:
(A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
I
I
- ..~.
I
I
\
\
\ .-'--- ..~,
/'"'~ ........."'......
"
"
I
I
I
I
I
;
r
I
~
\
I.
WOI2k:
ROOM
,
\
\
+----
}
I
J
l
/
,//
V AU. L T
'-"
----
COI( ~IDO~ 01. L.OP> BY
I
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
WELFARE DEPARTMENT
High percentage of aged visit this department. There~ore, it should be
located on the first ~loor unless an elevator is available.
Departmental Personnel: I man
15 to 20 women
Visitors: Ranges ~rom a low o~ 5 persons per day up to
a high of 50 persons daily.
Should have access ~rom the exterior o~ the building.
Should be located in a somewhat "out-of-the-way" part o~ the project to
a~~ord privacy to visitors.
Requires a Conference Room ~or about 25 persons. Can share a room with
other departments.
Should be conveniently related to: Guidance Center
Probate Court
Probational O~~icer o~ Juvenile Court
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
~H>!U~2A'~1C
/~ POOL
/ \
~.
...------ '.-.
..4' ....~
~/
./ "
/
'\
\
f' R I VA T E 0 F F iC E S
FOR
soe IAL WO~KE2S
~/
FI<;Cll.L
OFFICE:
C 0R ~lV0R 01< l08 p.y
28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCXJNTY SUPERINTBNDRNT OF SOIOOLS
Second floor location is satisfactory
Departmental Personnel: I man
I woman
Visitors: Ranges from a low of 3 persons per day to
a high of 10 persons per day.
Occasional visits by groups of 20 or more persons at one time.
Could share a conference room with other departments.
The position of County Superintendent is not clear at the present due to
the pending developments in the School District Unification program.
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a d.sirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
I
locations. )
02 LOB8Y
29
I
I
PHOTOSTAT
I
Could be on either first or second floor.
Departmental Personnel: 1 man
I
Serves the Register of Deeds office.
I
Equipment is privately owned, but is located in Court House because it
is directly related to Court House activities.
I
If a building project develops, the possibility of a different system
should be studied; one possibility would be the addition of micro-film
equipment.
I
Another possibility for study would be the establishment of a central
room or department of duplication center for the entire governmental
complex. This "Center" would, or could, include equipment for:
Photostat
Blueline printer
"Xerox", (or equal)
Multilith (and/or mimeograph)
Etc.
This type of department was not studied in depth at this time due to
the limitations of this report, and because it would require policy
decisions on the part of both governments. Also, there were mixed
reactions from department heads when the idea was proposed.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNTY WEED CONTROL
This departaent serves farmers with supplies of certain chemicals which
are sometia.s packaged in 100 lb. bags. A first floor location would
facilitate the handling of these bags. If an elevator were provided,
perhaps a second floor location would be satisfactory.
If the Weed Control warehouse were located wi thin a block of the Weed
Control O~fice, there would be no need for Checking out chemicals at
this ~'fice.
Departmental Personnel: 4 men ( su...er)
1 wOlII&n (suamer)
3" men (winter)
1 woman (winter)
Visitors: Ranges from a low of 5 persons per day
to a high of 12 persons per day.
Should be located with other County Of~ices for convenience to public.
Should be conveniently related to: County Agriculatural Agent
,
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
~-...........,
(PRIVATE
\ OFFICE
\
\
"
......--...
C~ LOBJil.Y
31
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
AGRICULnTRAL EXTENSION COUNCIL
Departmental Personnel: 2 to 3 men
4 to 5 women
Requires a Meetino Room/Demonstration Room seating 75.
This room would be needed about 85% o~ the time, but could be
shared with other departments when not in use.
Plat~or. should have a demonstration kitchen.
.
Should be conveniently related to: Weed Control Office
Departmental Space Relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
(LUB
\,;\(i&NT
\
,
r;::.)
\ AGEI.l~~' )
\ . /
"~
;
/
------
./..--_.,---...,.~
,i"r-
/
.1// '\
." "
.' \
. \
I \
i
\
\
;J
i
i
j
,
i
\
I
\
~\
'"
"'-~, .,,'"
-'--, .--/
1'------.....
PEMOt-!STRATION
All! J)
MEET 11\14
1200M
/
./
,
,.-
//
OR LOBBY
32
I
I
COUNTY GUIDANCE CENTER
I
Should be located for visitors "privacy".
I
I
Departmental Personnel: 6 men
5 women
Will probably be expanded to serve 3 or 4 counties.
I
Waiting room should provide for 15 persons.
About a fourth of the Waiting Room should be designed as a children's
play area.
Waiting room should be closed from Secretaries and Receptionist, with
access for conversation through a window.
I
Soundproofing, (control of sound from one room to another), is vital in
this department.
I
Conference Room should seat 16 persons, and should have facilities for
movies, and chalkboard demonstration.
I
Provide "two-way" mirror for observation of play room.
I
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
I
(:---9 : ~~} ~A
'~ (
-....,---.
\ . \ ,/ ---"\ (//---'\ (~---"'\ //----..,\
_T)E )1 ;F)S-jc):i ;jl
\ ~<~-=-=-:c::::--=--"~:::::::::::- ... -
'- --' _."- -
I
I
....."'.
'---...:
.....
I
I
I
I
I
- --------- //
;' 'y/ !
( H c. EPTIONIS~--i w 1. I T \ ~ cJ
\ <;E;C~nARY 'j "
, /
"-"'---.,/
~'_.-.-
------- / ".
--. / "
( O.<E~VATIO~\1
.~ / ---"',", \ PLh Y ~OCM /
\ \ /
, ". /
/""'-----.l COl--lFEREhlC"\ "~
, --/ ' )
__----==r---- " . //
~R j;? IDD g OR LOB ~------..\-----/
I
33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNTY COO ON ER
...
Departmental Personnel: 4 to 5 persons
New law requires a Pathologist for Coroner.
Will serve four counties.
Need storage for records and personal effects.
34
I
I
POSTAL CENTER
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Should be centrally located to be convenient to all departments.
Located convenient to an entrance ror delivery and dispatch of mail.
Present Court House has room approximately 10 x 14 ror this purpose.
A room somewhat larger could probably serve both governments.
If a building program is decided upon, it would be well to investigate
the possibility of establishing a branch post office. '
The Register of Deeds Ofrice states that deeds require a Federal Revenue
Stamp to be affixed on the deed. If a Postal Sub-Station were in the
project, it would be a convenience service to the public.
Departmental space requirements: Assume 2 women.
Mailing Center should include: Service for incoming mail
"Pigeon holes" for departmental mail
Outgoing lI&il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
35
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CI'IY / CaJNTY HBALm
Seeond .floor location is satisfactory if an elevator is provided.
Departmental Personnel: S to 10 lien
S to 10 wollen
Visitors: Range. fro. a low o.f 2 persons daily to
a high of 2S to 50 persons.
Serve .from 300 to 400 persons per day .for special clinics or
inoculation services.
Growth o.f department dependent on 'population growth.
Probably add three persons .for each 10,000 o.f pop~lation growth.
Should be conveniently related to: Most departments, b~t none especially.
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
~-
,
\
-,"-----
./
f~eCEPT'Q..t)
-----__ f <SEe R.ETARY
---1 i wo~~ ~OOM
\
/--\
-"",
. \
COi-!FE~&IIlCE
'i.OOM. .. VISIOIJ TE'T
CO~RIDOQ OR. L081!>Y
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY / COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE
A Civil De~.nse or Emergency Control Center should be located in the
basement o~ ~e proposed project, and the Civil Defense Of~ice should
be contained wi~in the Control Center.
Provide a ~allout protecti~n factor o~ 8.
Control center would include survival ~&cilities including sleeping,
eating, o1'fices; toilets, etc.
Departmenltal Personnel: 2 men
3 women
DePartmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
loca tions. )
~~-----~........----,,,,",,,,
~ .~
/~~ ,~...
/' -"-.
/.,
/
"
.-'
/
-'
,
,.
.i
)
I
.
f
J
.
;
~
\
\
~ EME~GENCY
'-._,
',,--
"'"--,....
-",
~--
/i
;
J
-_. .~-->
CO"-lTROL
CEt-lTE~
"'"'
..../
--~
----
...---.---.....-.".. ...~
---
"-
,.
'.
"
~\.
\
,
\
,
\
.
i
j
(
I
/
;
J
I
;'
/
/
///
-'
/
.;,r
37
I
I
I
C I T Y
COM MIS S ION E R S
I
I
I
Symbolical and Actual head of City Government, should therefore be in a
position o~ proainence. City Manager is a servant or the Board o~ City
Commissioners, and as such should be in a somewhat less prominent posi-
tion than the City Commissioners' Meeting Room.
Departmental Personnel: 5 City Commissioners serving for short periods
each week.
Other participants in City Commission meetings
are members o~ other City Departments, and do
not as such add to the total building personnel.
I
I
I
Visitors: Requires spectator seating for up to 100 persons.
Average number of visitors or spectators is rrom 12 to 14.
Perhaps a room could be developed that would provide normal
seating ror 20 spectators, but expandible to accommodate 100,
the expansion space normally being used ror a conrerence room
or other purposes.
At some indeterminate time in the future, it is possible that the number
of commissioners could be increased to perhaps 9 or 11 persons.
Should be conveniently related to:
City Manager
City Attorney
City Engineer
I
I
I
I
Departmental space relationships:
(A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
~.-~ "
~-.
"
'"
"
I
I
I
1//
I
l
I
----..,
,,~ ..-.....
,
,
J
i
I
CITY
CO MM I';S I OI\!E RC;
MEETI~4 ROOM
.
\
\
\
\
---
'.
\1
\
'.
',-,
"
.'''----
/
CITY
MM!ACE2'~
0:; UIT E
CITY
EJ...!41J..lEE:RI~~
"E 'PlI12T ME f,! T
/,...-
--
C.ORl<.:lDOR OR LOBBY
.~./
.' .
\
.\ -
,/
---~-_._--~-~
38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C I T Y
MANAGBR
As administrative head of the City Govern..nt, this department
should be located in a position of proainence in the building.
Departmental Personnel: 1 to 2 men
1 to 2 wo~n
Visitors:
Ranges from an average low
average high of 12 or 15.
numbering up to 30 persons
at one time.)
of 8 persons daily to an
(Occasionally a large group
will visit the City Manager
Growth of this depar~ment would be dependent on population increase,
and/or increase in the activities of the department. Anticipated
sometime in the future is an Assistant City Manager and a second
Secretary.
Should be conveniently related to: City Clerk
Ci ty Attorney
City Co.mi.sioners Meeting Room
City Engineering and Planning
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles in-
dicates a desirable convenient
relationship, either by corrido~
or side-by-side locations.)
'\
---i- C I T Y
I
;
\ COMM l.;srO~E~S
\
\
.-",'
----------~
COR~IDOe O~
j
+ --
'7
. "- .,/
------- .-"
/
/
LO BB "T'
'i<...
'\
/
39
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY CLERK and CITY TRBASURER
Voters must register in this office, which implies a large volume of
visitors, (including the elderly and handicapped). Therefore, a location
on the first tloor is important.
Departaental Personnel: 2 to 3 men
6 to 9 women
Visi tors: Ranges from a low of 50 persons daily up to as many as 1000
during election registration periods.
Tbe addition of a Purchasing Agent is anticipated in the future.
,
People frequently visit this office to get inforaation that is only avail-
able at the County Court House. If the two governments were closer to-
gether or in the s... building it would be more convenient and less irri-
tating to the public.
Should be conveniently related to: City Water
County Clerk
These two departments could share a common Reception Room with the City
Water and Sewage Department.
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
VAULT
/t-
i ,
i THASLlREI2'5
\ we'i.K. ROOM
,
",,----
-----
//~_/ CORJ;?JDOE::
J
I
!
Olt LOBBY
40
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cl:TY WATBR DBPARTMBNT
A very heavy voluae o~ visitors, (including the handicapped), .akes a
first floor location iaportant.
A "drive-in" service window should be provided - another reason for a
location on the first floor.
Departaental personnel: 2 ..n
12 woaen
3 servicelllen who coae and go tbroughout the day
4. meter readers who COIle in one time daily
Visitors: Ranges fro. a low of 127 persons daily to a high of 561.
Should be conveniently related to: City Clerk and City Treasurer
City Bngineer
City Director of Utilities
Could share a reception room with City Clerk aDd Treasurer.
Departmental space relationships: (A line be~n two circles indicates
-& desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locatioDs. )
~~..
!
t.1Cc,OLJNTJJ.Jc::4
\
..............
"""
.~.
\
\
---....., .
( SUPPLIES
\
\\
\ '--..-'
\
-~.,/
"-.........._----~...-,...
C02RI'DOR o~ LOBES\(\
41
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY BNGINRRRING DBPARTMENT (Engineer, PlAnner, Inspection, Dir. Utilities)
Departaent&l Personnel: 14 men
2 wollen
Visi tors: Ranges 1'rom a low 01' IS persons da.ily to a
high 01' 45.
Should definitely be planned for expansion.
Should be conveniently related to: City Manager
City Clerk
Ci ty Water and Sewage
Could share a conference room with other departments.
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenie~t relationship,
either by corridor, or side~by-side
, locations.)
,
___ ~ ../i
~ 'r "
........ _,_/r'
~._._..~.
~lO~
J'-'~ -_.._~-----....
""'-
-""
.........
V~AFTI~4 ' P.OOM
i
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I /
( l'~I"'TI"'~
I '""
--<
/~ .r- ____.,',\
(CITY ) ~S!STA~T \
n!CIa.!EE2 \ ~~4'NEE12 )
\ I
x /
/' '~'f-~_/
\\. -. '-.. L
.... .....
..,...... ..,..............
..;...--
'.
.~
'"
-,,:
~ eCEPTIOt..! ROOM J
c:;eCIZ.ETAR,JE-SJ A~D
I, MA P<s
,
\
/
,/
( DIRECTOe
\ OF UTILITIES:
.~ .
-~~_.-/
'Y'"
I n.!SPECTIJ..!.C )
\ OFJ:1CE~
\ /
'" .,/
~._~.
42
I
I
C I T Y
ATTORNEY
I
Second floor location satisfactory.
I
I
I
Departmental Personnel: 2 men
1 woman
Should have convenient access to County Law Library.
Could share a Conference Room with other departments.
Should be conveniently related to: City Manager
City Clerk
I
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates a
desirable convenient relationship, ei-
ther by corridor, or side-by-side 10-
ca tions. )
I
I
I
I
I
I
',,-
I
I
/
.1
I
I
_.~.._-
~Q. o. lC~';,\
I
43
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C I T Y
COURT
A second ~loor location is satisfactory.
Departmental Personnel: 3 men
6 WODlen
Visitors: Irregular.
Storage and Work areas for the Clerk of the City Court should be expandible,
because o~ the necessity o~ keeping Court Records, and due to increased
number of court case. as the population expands.
It is not likely t~t the actual Court Room space requirements will vary
during the l~e of the building.
Court Room should have space ~or 12 man jQry.
Seat 100 spectators.
Should be conveniently related to: County Attorney
County Sheriff
De~rtmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship, f
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations.)
..
"~
r
/
J'''';
CITY
COU~T
~OOM
\
\"
'.._~",. ~
CO~'KIDOJ:; Of LOlH3Y
44
-
I
I
I
I
I
".t,.
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY RECREATION DEPARTMENT
This departaent serves many elderly persons in "Gol<len Years" prograas
etc., and therefore a first floor location would be: desirable, but not
manda tory.
Departmental Personnel: 2 men
2 women
Department needs use of a meeting room to accommodate 50 persons, ap-
proximately 8 times per month. This room could be shared with other
departments.
There is an occasional need for a meeting room to accommodate 100 persons.
This department works closely with the Park Department.
A possible future deVelopment might be the establishment of a "Director of
Parks and Recreationlf.
Should be conveniently related to Park Department.
(This would ra.ise the question as to whether this department should
be included in this project, or located elsewhere.)
Departmenta.l space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations.)
. -- -'-----
~"
8
~EC E prIG N,1~T ~
woru. ROOM
O'l~
45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BOI\RD OF BDUCAnCJll
Departmental Personnel: 15 men
IS women
The Board o~ Education indicates a
with a secretary's space ~or each.
tary space co.ald be developed that
"sub-departaents".
nee4 ~or several "sub-departments"
It is possible that a co..on secre-
would e~~ectively serve all at these
If population increases, there will certainly be an increase in space
needs for this departaent.
"
Should be conveniently related to: City Clerk
Ci ty Manager
County Clerk
Juvenile Court
Depart..nt o~ Social Welfare
Police Depart.ent
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicate.
a desirable convenient rel.tionship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
~
\~
~
\~
8
y"
9898
. .~
SEe Rt;:T~Q'ES
A"-J D S TOR A C ~
/'
I
( ~ EC E PTIONfST
.----
.-----
,/'"
rC.ty
\
"'"
.j..
: SUPT.
\.
\
"-
"
I
! CO~FERH.ICE'
2. 0 OM{S)
46
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
CITY POLICR DEPARTMENT
Some functions of the Police Department could be on the second floor.
This department should actually be adjacent-to or attached-to the County
Jail rather than a similar relationship to the proposed City/County
Building.
Departmental Personne 1: 8 men
13 women
40 commissioned officers who come and go during the
day. (Commissioned Officers should increase as
population increases to maintain a standard of 1.6
officers per 1,000. population.)
(Office staff will probably increase to 30 - 35
during life of building.)
Visitors: Average of 250 persons daily.
High of 350 persons daily.
Facilities as described in this report should be adequate to serve the city
until the population reaches 100,000.
Should be conveniently related to: County Jail
Departmental space relationships: (A line between two circles indicates
a desirable convenient relationship,
either by corridor, or side-by-side
locations. )
/~
--\ (BO()'iIN~)
\ \ fOaM
Y::/ ~ ----------~-- \~I
)c( ME- ~ - \ \
. Pf'S<:IoI~ -"-.. - . ' /\-'-___
JAIL /' \ '''Y~OMMIJIJ. Crt.
\ 'SQL16D \ '
FACILITIES \, ROOM +--1: DESt:: stir.
iVo..tH ' /
'--...____._ '. I .ONfIS '. ,______./
./ "- /"
. ~ / -'/-'
'(PHOTO ~.-
(LAB. 4, )
'~~
PO LICE
C0L12T
_._-~
.- '\
\
\
)
~
OUT
OF
Dooe'S'
"
.,//
--
~ OUT
---
~~~c~
;- D IV. ~ I
~ \.H.A!.~~=, )
~_.__ \T~
o F DOC ~~---._--~._--- ___
---.."
47
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I GENERAL USE AREAS
I i.lethods of determi-
nation of spaces
other than the act-
I ual Governmental De-
partments.
I
I
I
I
48
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL USE AREAS
Dead Storage Vaults
Both Governments accumulate records which must be kept in perpetuity, but
which, due to age are seldom, if ever, referred to. At the present these
records are using valuable space in current record vaults, or are stored
in spaces where they are vulnerable ~o fire or theft or both.
A definite size for such storage space was not determined in interviews with
Department Heads.
The size of 1,000 square feet was arbitrarily established for each of the
two separate Governments. This space, it is assumed, would not be materially
reduced by a combined building.
When a building project is authorized, the Architect should develop more
specific size(s) for such storage space(s) in conference with department
heads who would use it. This space may be located in the basement.
Wall Thicknesses
In this Architect's experience the structural system, walls, and other void
spaces in a building account for from 4 to 6% of the total building area.
Also experience has shown that the precise area of individual rooms is often
not possible to achieve due to other plan requirements, the result being a
slight increase in the actual total area over the stated program requirements.
For these reasons, in determining the Departmental Space Requirements, a
factor of 10% was added to the Departmental Space requirement to account for
wall thicknesses, etc.
Computer Room
The letter from the National Cash Register Company, reproduced on page 54
states that a room of 15' x 20' would be required to accommodate this
facility. This area, 300 square feet is included as a general space re-
quirement on the building area statement~. A slight increase in area is
shown for the combined project.
Building Information, Telephone Switchboard and Postal Center
Essentially the same floor area would be required for this (these) area(s)
whether it was serving a single government or the combination. The area(s)
included are arbitrary.
49
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mechanical Equipment Room, Custodial and General Storage
Experience has shown that these spaces vary slightly as the area of a
building increases. The larger the building, the smaller the percent-
age of the total building area required to accommodate these services.
It has been found that areas of these spaces in buildings designed by
this Architect range from about 1.5% in a building of 175,797 square
feet, to 7% in a building of 19,458 square feet.
There are other factors, (amount and type of equipment, location of the
room in the building, type of construction, and others), that affect
the size requirement for these buildings, and it is difficult to est-
ablish a clear-cut "trend".
In a publication of the USPHS, the Mechanical and Custodial areas varied
from 65 for a building of 11,800 square feet, to 3.5% for a building of
74,630 square feet.
With the above information as a background, we have used a factor of 5%
of the building area in the smaller buildings, and 4% of the building
area for the combined building.
Lobby Space
A public buLlding requires a certain amount of Lobby Space to provide
for such things as a Building Directory, Information Desk, Phone Booths,
Elevator Lobby, and to present a symbolical expression of the importance
of this building to the community.
There are no "rules" to define the amount of space required for a Lobby,
but the equivalent of a space 20 feet by 50 feet was used for each of the
separate buildings, and only slightly larger, 30 feet by 50 feet, for
the combi~ed building.
.
50
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i.IISCELlANEOUS POSSIBLE COST SAVINGS
51
I
I
I
I'
I
POOSIBLE OIANGES IN POLICY OR ORGANIZATION
The most effective way to lower initial construction on a building
project is to reduce the area of building.
As is clear from the accompanying information in this report, the only
area reductions that are readily achieved are in the general use spaces.
By effecting such apace reductions, it is estimated that substantial
savings can be realized in construction costs.
I
There are other ways that could possibly result in less building area re-
quirements, but in order to include them in the project they would necess-
itate a comaon agreement be~een both governing bodies as well as the De-
partment Heads that would be involved. And in sOIae cases, perhaps even
special legiSlation would be required before such combinations would be
possible.
I
The fOllowing possible changes in organization and/or operation might ef-
fect a reduction of required space:
I
Use a common Drafting Room to serve both County Engineer and City
Engineer
Use a c~n aeeting room to serve both County Commissioners and
City Commissioners, (if this were done, the County CommissiGn-
ers would each need a private office.)
(A possible objection to this proposal would be a tendency to
"blur" the distinction between the two Boards.)
Use a Computer Room with electronic equipment for possible reduced
area in pertinent departments o.f the County and City, (see page 54~
Establish a Duplication Department to serve all departments of both
governments for work such as mimeograph, multilith, photostat,
"Ozalid", "Xerox", etc. (See page 30).
Combine certain Departments with similar functions in both Govern~
ments.
Use common Court Room for City Court and Police Court.
I
I
I
I
I
I
The above are not recommendations, but are suggest~ points for fur~her
study only.
I
I
I
I
I
Even though it may not be desirable at this time to combine any of the
activities described above, it is possible that 20 or 30 years from now
circumstances might make such an action very important. If a combined
building is constructed there is more latitude permitted for variations
in organization and/or cooperation than with two separate facilities.
S2
I.
I
EFFECTS OF AUTOMATIOO'
I
The following pages of the report are a copy of the letter received by
the Architect from the National Cash Register Company in response to an
inquiry concerning possible savings through the use of computers and/or
Electronic Data processing.
I
I
From the information presented in the letter it appears that at this time,
the cost of the computer system would probably be approximately that of
the salaries of the persons replaced by the computer. It does not appear,
from the limited study of this report, that a sizeable savings could be
effected at the present time by using a computer for both city and county
needs.
I
I
However, the availability of a computer to the city and county governments
would undoubtedly result in the departments being able to perform addition-
al services or operations from what is now possible. The desirability of
a computer might be due to its ability to perform more services and at
faster speeds than is now possible, rather than due to any distinct cost
savings.
I
I
It can be safely said that the desirability of a computer system from a
cost standpoint will increase in future years, due to population increase
and to the probability of increase in governmental functions. Therefore,
while its present desirability might be questionable, its use in the
future should be planned for in a building program.
I
I
Potential future use of a computer could best be utilized in a combined
city - county building where the cost of a computer could be offset thru
use by bQth city and county, and where convenience to both governments
would be possible. Combined use of a computer with separate buildings
on one site would not be as convenient, but would probably be workable
if the two buildings were very near, or were connected by an enclosed
walkway. Combined use of a computer if two buildings on two separate
sites were constructed would be extremely difficult, and could con-
ceivably never get past the decision as to which building would house
the computer.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
53
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,....-- -- : ---. --r--- -1
1,.N.,:.Y........,i" 'I.
'* f't -rr~f !",J,'\i-JO:'< '~l
_____."----._.~..L___. .
,..:.. :~- \ I l.~) i
- .r:' r\ :\'.'
..' ;.. "" A
i i
"I:
~1ay 15, 1964
Anderson-Johnson Architects
137~ South Santa Fe Avenue
Salina, Kansas
Deflr Sirs:
By your request, this lettoer outlines some aspects of
potential computer applications relative to joint Salina City ~
Saline County utilization.
Speaking in terms of equipment ~ith which we are famil-
iar, we would propose a s~all, low cost computer syste~ such as
the ~CR "390".
SYSTEM DESCRIPTIO~:
This completely flexible system allows four means of
data input including keyboard entries, ~agnetic striped ledgers,
plKhed paper tape and punched cards. It has four means of data
output including all types of print out formats, enco~ed magnetic
ledgers, punched paper tape and punched cards.
Tne set U~ time for individual applic~tions including
changing programs and inserting forms in the carriage takes only
a few minutes.
The type of print out allo\.!ed on the 26" carriage in-
cludes simultane~'~s preparation of all kincs of statements, checks,
invoices, journals and ledgers.
The internal electronic programs automatically do arith-
metic functions including percentages and ratios, ~ake co~~arisons
and decisions, do all kinds of sorting and distributions, control
all units including the movable carriage and printer, ~a6netic
ledger reader, punched tape reader and recorder, and punched card
reader.
APPLICATIONS:
Some of the applications th~ are now being used by
various local governments inclued:
1 - Utility Billing: Including post card bills and consumer ledgers
and allowing any variation of step billing~th complete accumu-
lation of classification totals.
-:;10=; -tS I,:"~) ".: ". c,;~ff' '~-'r; :"'""STdt., \'!'tH'(1
.\~, ,: t.;'., ~~:...._8"" Kl,"'./~:.,',
'>1..:.; !... _'.,' HOb.. I,,'
54
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Anderson-Johnson Architects
F31<e 2
'2 - Tax Billing: Including all tax spreading, tax nottce pre-
paration and upcating iJroperty owners ledgers.
3 - :;.evenue Posting: Including all collections from the above
billings.
4 - Fayroll: All payroll computations and check w~iting and rc-
cordin~, as well dS Inc~me Tax and FICA Tax reporting.
5 - .,ppropriations Postinp, and General Ledger Posting
6 - ~aintenance and Service Department: Inventories, cost account-
ing and controlling records.
c.ther broad recommendations include tre following:
Space ;~e~uirements: A room wi th minimum d imens ions of 15' x 20 I
or one 2~1 square for additional desk and storage space.
~e~u~~~cl Ke~Lire~ents: From 3 to 5 people depending on data
lnput preparation by individual department people. ~ith a re-
duction of 1 to 3'people for each depart~ent utilizing. the com-
puter.
Utilization Time: From 4 to 6 hours per day is a practical
utilization goal with peak periods increasing to 8 hours or more.
The above applic<3tions should C3bsorb this time with
potential service bureau processing time available for nearby
city or county units until such ti"e as population increases
would cause furt~er local usage.
LocatDn: :~o particular limitations or demands depl'nding on ;nean~
of input. >luch computer service bureau work is being carried
by regular mail service.
Costs: This would vary depending on the number of components
but would fall within these ranges:
::onthly [~ental: $1,500. to $2,000. (includes vearly
h ~75 0 to SlOO,OOO. maintenance)
Purc ase: ? ,00 v T
Yearly :'!ain tenance: $ 4, ':)00. to $6) 000.
Some overall advantages to be gained from computer
utilization include the fact that costs could be distributed on
the basis of de?artment use and yet each departmen t ~-roulc have
all the benefits to come from automation. Some of these include
timeliness of statement preparation, electronic accuracy, increased
analysis or expenditures and auto~ation of routine jobs.
Yours truly,
~A\~: er
't;'. ,,\ , . .; eye r, :",. an age r
~ccounting ~achine Sales
55
I.
I
I
I
'I
I
ELEVATORS
The County and the City Governmental Functions exist to serve the public.
As such, there are a number of aged and/or handicapped persons who visit
the various departments 'from time to time.
Most of the Department Heads interviewed expressed concern that the hand-
icapped were not being fully served when their departments were located on
other than the first floor. For this reason, most of them requested
that their department be located on the first floor.
Several of those who consented to a location on the second floor suggested
that it would be satisfactory if there were an elevator.
I
I
The average able-bodied person will usually walk one flight of stairs ra-
ther than wait for an elevator.
However, if a governmental building is to serve all patrons, it is advisable
that a building of more than one level should have at least one elevator.
This one elevator could serve the handicapped and would be a great asset
for deliveries of supplies and equipment to the second floor.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If the building were designed for future vertical expansion it would be
mandatory that space be provided for elevator service in the expanded
building.
An elevator of 3,000# capacity, 200 feet per minute, with three stops,
(Basement, First & Second), would cost an estimated $30,5.50. This eleva-
tor should adequately serve either the City Hall, the Courthouse, or the
Combined Building.
Therefore, with the two separate buildings, there would be a combined to-
tal elevator expenditure of $61,100. For the Combined Building the cOst
would be $30,550. or a saving of $30,550. This is included in the build-
ing cost figures.
56
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S~~~RY OF BUILDING AREAS
County Courthouse
Ci ty Hall
Combined Facility
57
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMBNTAL SPACE R~IREMENTS (Areas to nearest 10 sq.:tt.)
County
C01Ulisaioners. .
Weed Con trol . .
Engineer . . . .
School Superintendent.
Photostat. . . . . . .
Treasurer. . . . . .
Vehicle Registration
Register of Deeds. . . . .
Clerk and Assessor
Probate Judge. . .
Attorney . . . . . .
Clerk o:t the District Courts . . . .
District Court - Division I and II .. . .
District Court - Division III (2770 sq.:tt. future)
District Court - "Family Court" (3050 sq.ft. :tuture)
Welfare. . . . .
Agriculture. . . . . . . .
CorOl2er. . . . . ... ..
Guidance Center. . . . . .
Heal th (one-hal:t o:t Ci ty-County Health Department) .
Vaul t. . . . .
780
630
.1,260
970
.........300
. . . 2 , 440
. . . . . . . . 700
. . 1 , 860
.2,701
. . . 2,490
.1,110
. . . . .4,230
.5,810
TOTAl.. . .
City
Ci ty Police
Police Department. .
Ci ty Court . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . .
. . . . .
.
. . .
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
:tt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
:tt.
:tt.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
. . - - - - - -
. . - - - - - -
. . .3,320
.3,400
250
. . . . . 2 , 280
. . . . .1,500
.1,000
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
. . 35,930 sq. ft.
. 17,890 sq. :ft.
3,510 sq. :ft.
21,400 sq. :ft.
58
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AREA, CITY BUILDING
*Departmenta1 Areas. . . . . . .
Postal Center and Switchboard.
Employee Lounge and Toilets . . . . .
Public Toilets. .
Lobby . . . . .
Sub-Total . . .
Mechanical Equipment (5%)
Circulation (20%) . . . . .
. . . 28, 430
200
500
230
1,000
. . 30, 360
1,520
6,070
37 ,950
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
:ft.
ft.
ft.
:ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
AREA, COUNTY BUILDING
Departmental Areas. . . . . . . . 35,930 sq. ft.
Postal Center and Switchboard . . 200 sq. :ft.
Employee Lounge and Toilets . 500 sq. ft.
Public Toilets. 230 sq. ft.
Lobby . . . . . . . . . 1,000 sq. ft.
Sub-Total . . . 37,860 sq. ft.
Mechanical Equipmen t ( 5%) 1,890 sq. ft.
Circulation ( 20%) . . . . . 7,570 sq. ft.
47,320 sq. ft.
AREA, CITY POLICE
Departmental Areas. . . . . . 21,400 sq. :ft.
Toilets . . . . . . . 100 sq. ft.
Sub-Total . . . . . . 21,500 sq. ft.
Mechanical Equipment ( 6%) . . . . 1,290 sq. ft.
Circulation , 10!1) . . . . . . . . 2,150 sq. ft.
24,940 sq. ft.
AREA, COMBINED BUILDING
*Departmenta1 Areas. . . . . . .
Postal Center and Switchboard.
Employee Lounge and Toilets .
Public Toilets. .
Lobby . . . . .
Sub-Total . . . ....
Mechanical Equipment (4%)
Circulation (20%) . . . . .
. . 64,260 sq. ft.
250 sq. ft.
800 sq. ft.
350 sq. ft.
1,500 sq. ft.
. . . 67,260 sq. ft.
2,690 sq. ft.
13,450 sq. ft.
. 83,400 sq. ft.
COMPARISON OF AREAS
Ci ty Building Area . .. . . .
County Bui 1ding Area. . . . .
Total Of Separate Buildings.
Area of Combined Buildings .
Area saved by a Combined Building. .
37,950 sq. ft.
47,320 sq. ft.
85,270 sq. ft.
83,400 sq. ft.
1,870 sq. ft.
* Includes a civil defense office, but does not include a control center.
59
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CIVIL DEFENSB CQIlSIOBRATIONS
Area and cost
have not been
an Emergency
ter due to the
nature o~ such
requirements
prepared ~or
Control Cen-
controversial
a project.
However, if it were included
as a part of this project,
the following information is
pertinent to the funds a-
vailable for construction.
60
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEDERAL Ml\TOIING FUNDS AVAILABLE
FOR PLANNING AND cniSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER
The fOllowing paragraphs are quoted from pages 3 and 4 of the publication
entitled:
Guide For The
EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER
Program
~ Prepared by:
Department of Defense
Office of Civil Defense
Region Six, Denver
July, 1963
4. E1..IGIBLE COSTS
A. Federal contributions ....y be made toward the following costs in
connection with the construction o.t an emergency operating center:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(1) Hiring a qualified private architect-engineering firm (or
individual architect or engineer) for conducting a prelimi-
nary survey, preparing advanced planning report, inclUding
rough cost estimates, the preparation of final drawings and
specifications, etc., and inspection during construction.
In lieu of a private firm or private individuals, a State or
local government archi teet or engineer may be employed. When
design of fallout protection is necessary, and where no member
of the firm or individual has qualLfied at one of the OCO
two-week courses in Fallout Shelter Analysis, the firm should
e~loy, on a consulting basis, such an individual who has
qualUied.
(2) PreParing advanced planning report, conducting a preliminary
survey, including rough cost estimates, to determine the
feasibility of undertaking such civil defense con$truction.
Upon a determination that it i. the desire and the intent of
the State or local government to construct an emergency operat-
ing center, whether construction is undertaken immediately or
within a reasonable time, Federal contributions may be made
toward the cost of preparation of the final plans and speci-
fications required for such construction. Where a multiuse
structure which includes provision for an emergency operating
center i. planned, contributions may be made toward the cost
of onlrathose plans and specifications which are necessary and
essent 1 to the emergency operating center portion of such
multiuse structure.
(3) Construction, where the structure includes only the emergency
operating cent,er; modifications and improvement of existing
buildings, or underground space where structurally feasible
and economically practicable. (oeD shall determine feasibility
and practicability.) Utilities, site preparation, grading,
parking facilities, and access roads are eligible costs when
determined by OCD to be reasonable and not disproportionate
to the remaining cost of the center.
61
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(4) Costs relative to the construction o~ an emergency operating
center in the basement o~ a multiuse 8tructure, such as a new
city hall or county courthou8e. The Federal government will
contribute one-hal~ toward the construction cost of the center,
only. In determining the cost o~ the emergency operating
center portion of the multiuse structure, computation will be
on the basis of ,additional (incremental) costs of constructing
the emergency operating center as a part o~ the multiuse
structure. Such costs may include the necessary site prep-
aration, excavation, ~ooting8 and foundations, utilities and
alternate utilities, grading, soil stabilization, and other
costs to the extent that they are over and above the normal
cost8 ~or the multiuse structure concerned. To determine the
portion o~ the building that may be considered a part at the
emergency operating center for purpo8es of contribution~, the
following two-part test shall be used:
a. Tbe space involved must be within the protected portion
of the building (the protection required is set forth in
paragraph 10.B. below); ~
b. The space must be assigned as working space for an element
o~ the State or local government having emergency operat-
ing responsibilities, living space (dormitories, kitchens,
washrooms, etc.) for the staff of such elements, or space
necessary for supporting functions of the center in an
emergency, such as communications, air-conditioning and
heating equipment, in~irmary, storage of emergency-operat-
ing records, corridors, storerooms, and other essential
uses.
B.
Only one-half of the extra cost of constructing an emergency operat-
ing center in a multiuse structure is eligible for matching funds.
The State or local government, in addition to paying the remaining
one-hal~ o~ such costs, must bear all of the costs resulting from
the addition of space and facilities for nonemergency operating center
use. Architect-engineer's cost estimates shall be prepared so as
to separate completely the additional costs of constructing the
emergency operating center as a part of the multiuse building from
the normal construction costs of such a building.
C.
Contributions are available for obtaining and installing such equip-
ment and supplies as are necessary and essential to the development
and maintenance of the emergency operational capability of the
emergency operating center. Included are: ventilating and air-
conditioning systems; kitchen equipment; toilets and emergency sew-
age disposal systems; reliable emergency water supply systems;
infirmary equipment: bunks, lockers, desks, tables, chairs, ~iling
cabinets, map and status boards, telephones; up to 30-day supply of
fuel; and similar essential items.
62
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D. Contributions are available ~or obtAining ration-type rood
sur~icient for 14 days' operation of the center when fully
staffed.
E. The ~ollowing related costs are also eligible for Federal con-
tributions under other programs as indicated:
(1) The cost or communications equipment, including installation,
which is required for the emergency operating center.
(2) Warning equipment is eligible for contributions.
5.
INELIGIBLE COSTS
A. No Federal contribution can be made for the procurement of land,
and the value of any contributed by the StAte, or any political
subdivision thereof, must be excluded from the computation of the
State's share of the cost of the project.
B.
No Federal contribution can be made for the development of un-
protected operating racilities, or for space, facilities, or equip-
ment that does not increase the civil defense emergency operating
capability o~ the government concerned.
C.
No Federal contributions are available for the replacement of
rations after the initial 14 days' supply for the center.
63
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS
64
I
I
OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS
I
The following specifications are given only for the purpose of indication
of the quality of construction assumed in arriving at a unit cost. The
specifications are not intended as recommendations for construction. How-
ever, these specifications are felt to be reasonable for this type of
building.
I
I
Structure -
Reinforced concrete of fireproofed steel frame
Floor Construction -
Concrete slab over cellular sub-floor for flexible
electrical system
I
Exterior Walls -
Stone facing, LWC masonry back-up, plastered on
interior face
I
p. 00 f -
Built up roofing
I
Windows -
Aluminum
Door s -
Aluminum
I
Foundation -
Reinforced Concrete
Floors -
Vinyl Asbestos tile for office areas
Terrazzo for corridors, foyers, toilets
I
Walls -
Corridors and toilets - washable surface
Offices - moveable metal partitions
I
Cei lings -
Mineral acoustical tiles, layed in an exposed grid
I
Interior Door -
Steel Doors and frames
Lighting -
Fluorescent, recessed fixtures
I
Heating and
Air Conditioning
Hot/chilled water system with zoned air handling
units, central boilers and air conditioners
I
I
I
I
I
I
65
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT COST ESTIr:1ATES
Includes estimated pro-
ject costs for three
combinations:
1. Two separate build-
ings.
2. Two buildings, same
site.
3. Combined building
66
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
On the following pages are estimates of comparative construction costs
for separate City and County Building!i and for a combined facility.
Construction costs are computed using square foot costs derived from the
Marshall Valuation Service Manual. Under this system, a basic s~uare
foot cost is given for the specific type of building occupancy, type of
construction, and quality of materials and equipment. This base square
foot cost is then refined by applying a factor related to the building size
and perimeter area.
To apply this system a size and amount of perimeter must be assumed. For
the purposes of this report is was assumed for all cases, that the buildings
would be two story and that the amount of exterior wall area would be equiva-
lent to a rectangular shape where the length is twice that of the width.
l.
67
I
I
I
COST ESTIMATE
Police Station
Area Required:
Assumed Size:
24,940 square feet
2 floors, 79 x 158, Perimeter 474'
I
Base square foot cost. .
Add for Air Conditioning
. $18.91
. . +$ 2.38
$21.29
.x .944
$ 20 .10
Area - Perimeter Factor.
I
Total Building Cost, 24,940 sq. ft. at 20.10 = $501,290.
I
I
COST ESTIMATE
County Building
Area Required:
Assumed size:
47,320 sq~are feet
2 floors, 109 x 218, 654 foot perimeter
I
I
I
Base Square Foot Cost. .
Add for Air Conditioning.
. $13.91
.+ 2.38
$21.29
..x .918
$19.54
Area - Perimeter Factor.
Cost of 47,320 square feet Q 19.54 =
Cost of Elevator
Total Building Cost. . . . . . . .
$924,630.
$ 30,550.
. $955,180.
I
COST ESTHiATE
City Puilding
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Area Required:
Assumed size:
37,950 square feet
2 floors, 97' x 184', 582' perimeter
Base square foot cost. .
Add for Air Conditioning
. $18.91
. . . + 2.38
$21. 29
. x . 920
$19.59
Area - Perimeter Factor.
Cost of 37,950 square feet @ 19.59 =
Cost of Elevator
Total Building Cost. . . . . . .
$743.440.
$ 30,550.
$773,990.
68
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COST ESTIMATE
Combined Building
Area Required: 83,400.
Assumed Size: 2 floors, 144' x 288',864' perimeter
Base square foot cost. . .
Add for Air Conditioning .
A~ea - Periaeter Factor.
Cost at 83,400 square feet at $19.08
Cost at Elevator
Total Building Cost.
. . . . . . . . .
Summary of Building Costs
City Building. . . . . .
County Building. . . . . . .
I
Total for separate buildings .
Combined building. . . . .
Saving8 for a combined building.
.
. .$18.91
..+ 2.38
21.29
. . . x .897
$19.08
· $1,591.270.
$ 30,550.
.$1,621.820.
. . . $
. . $
773,990.
995,180.
.$1,729,170.
. .$1,621.820.
. . $ 101 , 350.
69
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Part of the savings indicated in the preceeding cost analysis is due to
the anticipated savings thru a reduction in exterior wall. As an explana-
tion of this, we offier the following illustration:
Assumed size of building - two floors of 40,000 square feet each
Assumed shape - rectangular with one side twice as long as ~he other
TWO BUILDINGS
COMBINED BUILDING
. I
100
I
:00
-?f!:1.? I
....C,;;;1_
ttJ,OOO
- ?2. FT-
~
wax
/
-\) ~, Fr:
\}
101
"t
40~~;::,-r::
I
Perimeter
1200 feet
Perimeter
846-feet
There is 354 feet less perimeter for the combined building. Asswaing 10'
high, floor to floor this means a saving of 7,080 square feet of exterior
wall.
I
I
I
70
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Costs here have been considered for completely separate buildings and for
a totally combined building. However in actuality there are many different
arrangements which fall somewhere between these two concepts. Variations
between these two concepts might range as follows, depending on the degree
of combining:
f , , , 1 ~< >J
F /
,
" t~///~/j
-
, "- I ' , 4
/~ /' /'
Completely separate buildings.
-----'~
Ir<<: 11 I~/;/;(/jl Separate buildings cnnnected
'~"fr' .. :' .. 21. . J~;///. '~~~_i1er room or tunnel.
~ ,: : :]'".-;.:>"iE:: _~ Z~
I.
b ' " '>1 ~;;/1
~. ~", ': ',''tz:>~{kj~/'/l
IF', < >~fi~' >/'.>4V'// /~ ]
by an underground
Separate buildings but with a connecting
orridor or lobby above ground, and possibly
other underground connections.
Separate buildings but constructed side by
side with few if any connections.
~I
Separate wings with a common lobby and circu-
~ lation areas on all floors.
~-<~::~'J;X~:/,j;;j
--\i- ~~~':~'~f//~:i,-
k' >~~>~//>~
r>~;@~'<:~@
-W~ I~;~/;~ ~_
IL '- "0:~/>~<c:::sJ
Combined building with separate
each government.
areas for
,
Combined building with departments arranged for
convenience to each other and to the public,
with little regard whether they are city or
county functions.
71
I
I
I
Two recent Courthouse Projects in Kansas are described here to suggest
possible variations in construction costs for a civic buil~ing.
I
COURnIOUSE
Winfield, Kansas
Bids received: December, 1961
I
SIZE: Total 'floor area - 45,304 sq. ft.
"U" shaped - 228' x 240'
1 and 2 stories - no basement
29' average wall height
Volume - 693,740 cubic feet
I
FACILITIES: County Clerk
County Treasurer
Register of Deeds
County Engineer
County Superintendent of Schools
District Court
Probate Court
County Attorney
Welfare Offices
4-H and County Agent
Sheriff's Office and Living Quarters
Jail facilities for 100 prisoners
I
I
I
I
CONSTRUCTION: Reinforced concrete structural system
Silverdale stone-Granux exterior walls
brick back-up
Reinforced concrete floor construction
Reinforced concrete roof construction
Built-up roofing
Sheet vinyl and terrazzo floors
Plaster painted
Vinyl on corridor walls
Wood paneling in Courtroom
I
I
I
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: Gas boi ler
Hot water combined radiator and fan coil heating
system.
Gas engine driven chillers
Chilled water fan coil multi-zone units-air condition-
ing system.
I
I
cas TS :
Structure. . .
Plumbing, Heating,
Electrical . .
Jail Equipment . .
Ventilating and Air Conditioning.
I
TOTAL
$ 660,976.
$ 152,743.
$ 83,532.
$ 61,200.
$ 958,451.
I
I
I
$21.16 per square foot
$1.38 per cubic foot
Boeckh index - December 1961 - 309.4
March 1964 - 328.8
Cost per square foot adjusted to March 1964 -$22.49
72
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COURTHOUSE - Oskaloosa, Kansas
Bids received: April, 1961
SIZE: Total ~loor area - 22;383 sq. ft.
Rectangular - 129' x 60' and 18' x 20'
2 stories and basement
38' average wall height
Volume - 283,518 cubic feet
FACILITIES:
68 rooms; 2 stairways; future
Director
Fiscal O~~ icer
Commissioners
Register of Deeds
Abstractors
Treasurer
Clerk
Soil and weed control
Farmer. Home Administration
Extension service and Home Ec.
elevator
Probate Judge
Sherif~
Attorney
Engineer
Superintendent of Schools
Clerk of Court
District Court
Agriculture stabilization
conservation
Soil Conservation
and
CONSTRUCTION: Reinforced concrete structural system
Face brick and mo-sai exterior walls
Haydite block back-up
Concrete pan and joists floor construction and roof construction
Vinyl asbestos floor tile
Haydite block painted for interiors
Terrazzo faced block in some areas
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: High velocity hot water heating system
High velocity air conditioning system, 62.6 tons
COSTS: Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 258 ,399.'
Plumbing, Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning. . $ 73 , 950 .
Electrical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,590.
Built-in Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,500.
TOTAL . . $ 365,439.
$16.32 per square foot
$1.29 per cubic foot
Boeckh index - April 1961 - 307.1
March 1964 - 328.8
Cost per square foot adjusted to March 1964 - $17.47
This is for a two story building with full basement. If the basement is
assumed to be one half as expensive to construct as an upper floor, the
adjusted figures would be $21.00 per square foot for upper floors and
$10.50 ~or the basement floor.
73
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
On the following sheets are project cost estimates related to the various
sites. The sites to which the costs are related correspond to the sites
studied in Phase II with the following exceptions,
SITE B - Site B studied in Phase II presumed the coapletion of a
complete civic center along with City~ounty office facilities.
Therefore, Site B for Phase III has been altered to allow for
construction of City-County facilities independent of the Civic
Center. However, Memorial Hall still must be removed to allow
for construction at new City and County facilities.
SITE E - The shape has been slightly changed to remove the 'jog
at the north side of the site.
The following assumptions were made in arriving at the project costs:
1. Value at property to be acquired is estimated at four times the
assessed value of land and improvements (same method as used for
Phase II).
2.
Value of property presently owned by either City or
on land value only, and was computed from values of
It is assumed that these properties could be sold,
obtained for these amounts.
County is based
adjacent properties.
or value otherwise
3. Architects fee were assumed to be 6% of the building cost.
4. Parking requirements:
City Building - 90 spaces, (55 atfstreet)
County Building - 110 spaces, (65 offstreet)
City and County on same site - 180 spaces (100 affstreet)
City Police - 15 offstreet
Paving per space:
Area per car:
$300.
400 square feet
5. Where two buildin9s occured on one site, site costs were allocated on
the basis of total building area:
City Building. . . . . 37,950 sq. ft.
County Building. . . . 49,320 sq. ft. .
. . 43.5%
56.5%
Total.
. 87,270 sq. ft.
. .100.0%
6. Where two separate buildings are considered, one half the area ~ the
City~ounty Health department was included in the area of each build-
ing. This was done for the purpose of cost comparison purposes only.
In actual practice, the Health Department would probably be placed in
one of the buildings and the other government charged for one half of
the cost.
74
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
7.
Building costs for a combined building were allocated on the basis of
departmental areas.
Ci ty Departmental Area. .. 28,430 sq. 'ft. .
County Departmental Area. . . . 35,930 sq. ft.
. . 44 . 2%
. . 55, 8%
.100 .0%
Total . . .
. 64,360 sq. ft. .
8.
Costs of site development was assumed to be .lO~ per sq. ft. of site
area. This is to cover walks and landscaping.
9.
It is assumed that the salvage value of buildings on property obtain~d
would be equal to the cost of clearing the site.
10.
In order to meet the parking requirements for several of the sites,
parking was Shown on the Memorial Hall property. It was considered
possible for this to be accomplished in this this parking would also
be of benefit to Memorial Hall. In these cases, no additional land
cost was considered for these parking areas.
11.
The City Police Building has been considered for four different sites.
The actual site selected would depend upon the site(s) selected for the
City and County office facilities. All sites are located near the exist-
ing County Jail.
75
SEPARATE SITES
- --. '--'--- .-
~l
~
:r~.....
~. ,~...
\ "
Z
~_e\./=~7;-1
I
\[1
--<'{
\j
rt
f:
E] I.
~=--......JT~
Me::M~;A_ .
t-i.u :.. _
."-l '-J -; rl
. ., J I
. . .
;. -,
.. .. .
'. : I
..
..'. " I
... .' '.: :..f. i
;:-. Gri i-:-r
S~,i E"-JTM
5,c.. '-J -:- ,Q.. ~ E
T
1t ~______
>-
,.\
llJ
r-
I
L-
76
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
SEPARATE SITES
Separate City and County Buildings
I
I
I
I
CITY
LAnd Cost. . . .
Site development
Parking. . . . .
Building . . . .
Architect's Fee.
Total value. . .
*Less value of City Hall Property.
(80,000 sq.ft. at .10).
Cost to City. . .
I
I
,J
COUNTY
Land Cost - Courthouse Property - $35,200.
New Property - $81,280.
Site development (110,000 sq.ft. at .10)
Parking. . . . .
Building . . . .
Architect's Fee. .
Total Value. . .
*Less value of Courthouse property.
I
I
I
I
. . . $ 222,280.
. . $ 8 ,000 .
. ... $ 16 , 500 .
.$ 773,990.
.$ 46,440.
.$1,067.210.
.$ 50.000.
.$1,017.210. I
$ 116,480.
. $ 11 ,000.
.$ 19,500.
.$ 955,180.
.$ 57,180.
.$1,159.340.
.S 35.200.
Cost to County . . . . .
.$1,124.140.
r
RF1-1ARKS:
If County Officers were limited to present Court House
Site, "Cost to County" would be $1,042,940, however,
15,000 should be added to this to prevent a double move.
(A double move could conceivably cost upward of $20,000
in additional expenditures.) Also, due to size of site,
$9,000 additional should be allowed for provision for a
future floor for expansion purposes.
I
I
I
I
I
* Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this
amoun t .
I
77
-1l
A. SEPARATE BUILDINGS
I
\II
"1:
~
:J:~
f-' ,
l,~ ':iJ
\ ",-
~
~ ._2'/E '--J'7 ~l
\j
ti
~
EJ
"'"'7'"=:...JT~
IL
I
I
'.' '\_,1 L
_. /.
~ ~. I
.:'.~ l\l
n_
~ :--l "'i rl
E; GH7;-'i
SE:'v' ENTH
5PN"T4 ~ ==
I r-
\ I
I
I
\
I
I
L---
I
78
I
I
I
I
I
I
.J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
---_.._~._-_._.__...-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
SITE A
Separate City and County Buildings
SITE COSTS
CITY OOSTS
COUNTY OOSTS
Land Cost Courthouse property _ 35,200.
New property - 81,280.
$116,480.
Site development (110,000 sq.ft. at .10). .$ 11,000.
Parking. .$ 30,000.
Total . .
. '. .
.$157,480.
43.5% of site costs
Building. . . . . . .
Architect's Fee. . .
Value of City Portion.
*Less Value at City Hall Property. .
I Cost to City.
. . $ 68, 500 .
.$773,990.
.$ 46,440.
.$888,930.
.$ 50,000.
. . $838 . 930. ]
. . . . .
. . . . .
56.5% of site costs .
Building. . . .
Architect's Fee. .
Value of County Portion
*Less value of Courthouse property
[ Cost to County. . . . . . . . . . .
.$ 88,980.
.$ 955,180.
.$ 57,180.
.$1,101,340.
.$ 35.200.
. $1 ,066. 140. 1
REMARKS :
One of the buildings could not be constructed before
the Courthouse was raaed, unless one building was
wrapped around the courthouse. Therefore, one of the
fOllOWing would occur.
1. A double move for the coli. ty (at a cost of upwards
of 20,000.
2. A possible two year delay in the city building.
3. An additional expense to construct one of the
buildings around the existing Courthouse of ap-
proximately $15,000.
In view of the limited size of the site, provision for
an additional floor should be included. This is estimated
to be $7,000 for the City Building and $9,000 for the
County Building.
* Assumes property to be sold or value otperwise realized for this amount.
79
-
"-J '-.J ~ r--1
r - . - .
I : Y i
I r.-..J ....) '; i
. . ' . . \\1 I
.. ". I
- .., . I
. '. I
". ~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
~L
I
I
=- ~ C'./ == ~J-:-.,.-,
~~
-r. I I L
v Ef r
rv L
f ,
L
I,fl
...-r
-:- := "'''; ~ ~
..
II
Jl
II '
I !
~. j
r-
;:::: ,,~..----..
- ""--'" ; ,
,
'---
~
'5~.t :: 'JTri
I-
I I
J
I
L
'SAJ-:-..c. ==::;
,
, I
I I
I I
JL
i
L
A COMBINED BUILDING
80
.
-,' ..- .....'.....--" ..._-~~......*... .._, .,~_...... "'."..--_.~.. .~_. '" '_~_A~""_'___,__"~"____,____."__"__,___~,_,~,,,,,,,___,,."..____w__ ___.__. _._..~,..___ ._.._..____
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
SITE A.
Combined City-County Building
PROJECT COST
Site Development
Parking. . . . .
Bldlding . . . .
Architect's Fee.
Land Costs - Courthouse property - 35,200.
New property - 81,280.
$ 116,480.
(110,000 sq.ft. at .10).$ 11,000.
..$ 30,000.
. .$1,621.820.
. . . . . . . . . I. $ 97,310.
. . . . .
Total. . . . . .
. . . . .
. .$1,876,610.
CITY COSTS
44.~ o~ Total . . . . . . . . .
*Less value or City Hall property. .
I Cost to City . . . . . . . . . . .
.$
.$
. . $
829,460.
50,000.
779 , 460. I
COONTY COSTS
55.8% or Total . . . . . . . . . .
Less value or Courthous4 property.
Coat to County
. . . . .
. . . . .
. .$1,047,150.
..$ 35,200.
. $1 , 011. 950.
RB>tA.RKS:
Building costs would be increased rrom that indicated
i~ building had to be constructed around courthouse.
Estimated increase would be at least $25,000. ($11,000.
~or city and 14,000 ~or County). This could be avoided
.
by razing the courthouse be~ore construction o~ the new
raci1ity. However, it is estimated that the County would
spend upwards or $20,000 additional ror the double move.
In view or the limited size or the site, provision ror an
additional floor should be included. This is estimated
to be $15,000 additional ($6,600 City and $8,400 County)
*Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
81
to
, I
i ,
L-__
.._-~
'."~
t .
[J
\ .
:z
~~ __ :'"~: , ~ '..---1
-...,
I
II
Iii I I
i ~ I
I I
---.l l
I
I
i
, I
!
--.J
I
I
I
'.
I
I
--..J
----r
I
----I
I r
I
I
I
I
.
t.
B SEPARATE BUILDINGS
JL
y
t{
~
EJ
- ::.: ~-.J "-:- ."-'
:~,..:l..::; .-:::, :,',,":-'~..~'::.':"~;~'':.:: ''':',;''~;'.::. :,,:,. ':..,:~::::
I
t
I
~L
Ul
C() J R:
H?'J~e
l'~, ;..:". .,. ,;,";':]
", ,...... . . . ...
,: , , ...._,-
l r-
I i
I :
I
L-
i.
~ 64-.- ~--
s:~, =-1-:-~
Ii
,
i
IL
Ii
IL
:: ':;"'" j .-- ..:... c:: :::
82
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
82
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE B
Separa~e City and County Buildings
SITE COOTS
CITY OOSTS
COUNTY COSTS
Land Cost - Courthouse property _
Meaorial Hall property-
New Property _
$35,200.
$48,500.
$81,280.
$
Sit. Development (187;500 sq.ft. at .10). . $
Parking . . . . . ~
$
Total . . . .. .. . .. . .. .
.. .. .. . .
. . .
-
164,980.
18,750.
30,000.
213,730.
$
92,970.
773,990.
46,440.
913,400.
50,000.
48.500.
814,900. ]
43.S~ of site costs
Building. . . . . .
Architect's Fee. . .
Value of City portion ....
*Less Value of City Hall property. .
.Leas Value of Memorial Hall property. .
. $
......$
. $
. . . $
$
s
56.5~ of site costs.
Building. . . .
Arch! teet's fee . . . . . . . . . .
Value of County portion . .
*Less Value of Courthouse property .
. . $ 120,750.
$ 955,180.
~ 57,180.
1,133,120.
. $ 35.200.
.
I COST TO COUNTY. . . . . . . . . .
. $1,097,920. 1
*Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
r COST TO CITY.
.......
. .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . ..
**Memorial Hall Would be eliminated, so another auditorium facility would
need to be provided by the City. The cost of such a facility (including
land) Would be in addition to the costs listed here.
83
~:
... .,- '- .,-
::..._..::.::: /= -'-4, ~
----, I
I '
. I
I I
LL
I \f I .
j4
l
I
I
I
~
~ -= ~-...; -:- ...~
. '.~.
"-~ '...j -- ~'~
-
~
== St._~-
S~" E---J74
B COMBINED BUILDING
S,A ''-J -:- A == 5:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE B
Combined City County Building
PROJECT COST
Land Cost - Courthouse property -
Memorial Hall property
New Property -
35, :mo.
- 48,500.
81,280.$
:;;
.$
.$ 30,000.
. $1,621. 820.
.~ 97,310.
. 1,932,860.
164,980.
164,900.
18,750.
Site Development (187,500 sq.ft. at .10)..
Parking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bui ldi ng . . . . . . . . . . .
Architect's Fee.
Total. . . . . .
. ,
CITY COSTS
44.2% of total . . . . . . . . . . . .
.Less value of City Hall property . .
**Less value of Memorial Hall property
~T TO CITY
........
.$
. . $
.$
. . . $
854,320.
50 ,000.
48.500.
755 , 820. I
COONTY COSTS
55. 895 of total . . . . . . . . . . .
Less value of Court House Property
I COST TO camTY . . . . . .
'.
.$1,078,540.
..$ 35.200.
. $1 ,043.340. f
* Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
**Memorial Hall would be eliminated, so another auditorium facility would
need to be provided by the City. The cost of such a facility (including
land) would be in addition to the costs listed here.
85
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE B
Combined City-County Building
City Police Building
SITE COSTS
POLICE BUILDING
COST
CITY -COUNTY
BUILDING COSTS
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
Land Cost - Courthouse property
Memorial Hall property
New Property -
$35,200.
- $48,500.
$81,280.
$
.$
. . $
.$
164,980.
18,750.
34,500.
218,230.
Site development (187,500 sq. ft. at .10)
Parking .
Total . . . .
29.4% of site costs.
Building Cost
Architect's Fee
Total . . . .
. $
.$
. $
. $
64,160.
501,290.
30,080.
595,530.
70.6% of site costs
Building Cost .
Archi tect 's Fee
Total . . . . .
.$ 154,070.
. . $1 ,621. H20.
.$ 97.310.
.$1,873,200.
I COST
.$ 827,950.
.$ 50,000.
.$ 48,500.
-.---.--.---~--.---------J
TO CITY (NOT INCLUDING POLICE) . . . . .$ 729,450.
44.2% of City-County Building.
*Less value of City Hall Property.
**Less value of Memorial Hall Property. .
Cost of Police Building . . . . . . . . . . .$ 595,530.
COST TO CITY (INCLUDING POLICE) . . . . . . .$1,324,980.
55.8% of City-County Building. .
*Less value of Courthouse property .
I COST TO COUNTY. . . '.~ .
.Sl,045.250.
.$ 35,200.
. $1 , 0 10 . 050 . J
* Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
**Memorial Hall would be eliminated, so another auditorium facility would
need to be provided by the City. The cost of such a facility (including
land) would be in addition to the costs listed here.
86
~l
I
r
\,{l
-<1'
l
I
I
,
,
C SEPARATE BUILDINGS
..~
.~
::--~_--.' ~ ',j"7" " .
VEJ
',. rt
':~.: f ~:-
:< 1
--~ ,.....,.--
- :.= ~........ j
I i
I I
i
i
I
.~.-.-.
'-.i'--J .,
- ,,0'" ~___
- '-"' .
c,'=, E'-J7~
- -
.
:: A"J --:- A c:: :::
;.
I
I
L I
I
I
I
I
I
;- I
I
!! I
I I
I I
I 1- 'I
I
I
'L
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
: !
, >- !
I I
'lllL
I
---,
i
I
I
r-
I
87
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE C
Separate City and County Buildings
SITE COSTS
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
Land Cost. . . . . . . . .
Site, Development (107,500
Parking.
Total. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . $
sq. ft. at .10) .$
,..,
. . . . . .tor>
.$
162,880.
10,750.
30,000.
203,630 .
43.5% of site costs. . . ~ .
Bui Iding . . . . . .
Architect's Fee. r .
Value of City portion.
*Less va~ue of City Hall property
I COST TO CITY . . . . . . . . . . . .
.$
.$
.$
. . . . .$
.$
.$
56.5% of site costs. .
Buil~ing . . . . . .
Architect's Fee. . .
Value of County portion. .
*Less value of Court House property
.$ 115,050.
.$ 955,180.
. . . .$ 57,180.
. .$1,127,410.
.$ 35,200.
.$1,092,210. I
COST TO COUNTY . . . . . . . . . .
I-
RBMARKS :
In view of the limited size of the site, prOV1S1on for an
addition floor should be included. This is estimated to
be $7,000. for the City Building and $9,000 for the County
Building.
* Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
B8
~
-1 L
l
J~
l!
JI
==-E'/E' "J7!4
I '
I
.~
' '
( .'
N
CJ
~ous ~
.1 L
--=~--.J;- ~
I" "",'"'' '. ',' ; "'J
" . ,.. ',': J., ,...' .......
,", :. >,:...'.. ,J.I'.':,';,;... ':':':'4
a'
~e::v1~.A_
L, H-.;. -- I'
'-J :---.J -:- ri
r
I
!
i
I
1
1
i j
I
UtT
. :)
I ,
, l.IJ
I
e. Gt;~~
5="'./ E~IH
C COMBINED BUILDING
5A"-J-;-A. ==
L-
r-
I
I
I
I
'---
I
L
89
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
al
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE C
Combined City County Building
PROJECT COST
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
/.
Land Cost. . . .
Site development
Parking. . . . .
Building . . . .
Architect's Fee.
Total. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 162,880.
$ 10,750.
$ 30,000.
. $1,621.820.
$ 97,310.
$1,922.760.
(107,500 sq.rt. at .10)
44.2% or total . . . . . . . . .
*Less valve or City Hall property.
r COST TO CITY .
$ 849,860.
$ 50,000.
$ 799,860.1
........
55.8% or total. . . . . . . . . .
*Less value or Court House property
. . $1,072,900.
. . . $ 35,200.
. . 1$1,037,700. 1
I COST TO CamTY . . . -. . . . . . . .
REMARKS :
In view or the limited size or the site, prOV1S1on for
an additional rloor shall be included. This is estimated
to be $15,000. additional. ($6,600. city and $8,400
county. )
* Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized ror this amount.
90
... :: ~ ~:::' w' =- '-~ --_---,
1
f5~ 1
\,:,
:z
I L I.
'i EJ 1-
rt
( 1
\ 1 -I
J
I I j
I 1
l~fTl I I
I ~L
I I-VUSE
I
I 1
I
I
J
_'l'.;' ':. ! 1
. . '. t'.
.:...... ...,...
I . 1
.....::..:.. . I
.;~ . ;"'" :.'
l- 1
1
1
'I
1
I
I
I
I
91
I
~ L.
I
I
r
~'l
'1'
I
-.J
II
~l
.l
I
~
~
D SEPARATE BUILDINGS
- ::: -"J -:- ~
~
~
'-.l '-...1--;-1
= G+~-:--
S ~../ :: ~~T;t
C::A"-J-,c. c::;=::
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE D
Separate City and County Buildings
SITE COSTS
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
Land Cost. . . . . . . . . $
Site, Development (150,000 sq.ft. at .10). $
Parking. . ~
364,720.
15,000.
30,000.
Total. .
$ 409,720.
43.5% of site costs.
B u i Id i n g.. . . . . .
Architect's Fee. . . .
Value of City portion.
*Less value of City Hall property
L COST TO CITY . . . . . . . . . .
$ 178,230.
$ 773,990.
$ 46,440.
$ 99B,660.
$ 50,000.
:-~-$-~~60_J
56.5% of site costs.
Building. . . . . .
Architect's fee. . .
Value of County portion. .
*Less value of Court House property
I COST TO CaJNTY . . . . . . . . . .
$ 231,490.
$ 995,180.
$ 57,180.
$1,243,850.
. $ 35,200.
$1,208 , 650. 1
*Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
I
I
I
I
I
I
92
;.
, I
----.l L
~~
\--
t.J
~ ()
z
I L
\j Ej
t{
I~
I -
I
1 1 I I I
\ I
i I c.ou eT :~L
I WOU%
I 1 ,
I I iUI
L I
I I
--1 J
---
:-. :.~_ c:;..... ---
_-~_.._ -.,. I
I r-
\ '
~I I
~~L
~ :=. ~.J ~ ---
l ~
! I~
I
I
_J
l
I
~
I.
I D COMBINED BUILDING
" '...j-H
[]~,....:...
. .
. .' '.
. . .
.t. 0- ,',
.' ." "
. . .
.' ... ,'..
.' .... ...
..". ......:
J . . f
...,' .., .:. . .: ': .' ..:' " ..... ..
.. . ,", ...., ..,.....
. L-
r-j
I .... ,
:: ." ~ '-" . - . . " .~ ::. , I
. .. . ." . . I ,
::- 6"--:--
1 .
I
I
-I
I
S:-v ='~7-t
I.
I
c:: ,::,....J - ,w.. c:: :::
.
93
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE D
Combined City~ounty Building
PROJOCT COOT
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
1.-a.Dd Co st. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Site Development (150,000 sq.ft. at .10)
Parking. . . . . . . . . .
Building . . . . . . . . .
Architect's Fee. . .
Total. . . . . . . . . .
44. ~ of tota1 . . . . . . . . . .
-Less value of City Hall property.
1 COST TO CI1Y . . . . . . . . . . . .
51.8% of total . . . . . . . . . .
-L.s. value of Court House property . .
{ COST TO COUNTY
............
. $ 364,720.
$ 15,000.
. $ 30,000.
$1,621,820.
. $ 97,310.
. $2,128,850.
$1,187,900.
$ 35,200.
. $1,152,700. 1
-Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
94
__~__.J
_J
----,
I
I
,
,
-...---j
---...,
,
I
_J
----1'
-----4
I
i
_-1
E
SEPARATE BUILDINGS
.,
I \
, I'
: '~'
-1
1--
'L~
f - .
II ";
, .
L
L_________ ________.__ J
I
I r'~---"------'-'---"~
I I
"
,r
~,
I .:0- '
l_~
r---.----: _. ---- .--------... ---....-.... -..... "'j ;----..--------------,
~~.,.-...
I ~-..- -\
1--
I -\
.. '. - ..-
'-.. -' . ,,' " .. .-
. . ' "
. ',_.
I
_,----r-----~~-..,_-.----
.-.~ -
-. -'~',<:: .
..... "
~....... . "'-'
._....__ ....___ _..~. - _.l
F7
'. ..4
: ..~ . '. . t '..
, r
'\1
L___.._____ --------'
G7l\C;-
~IO'::...S E J
_____ _________ ..J
--- 1
_____------.....1
~--.....-.. .-------...- --1
i
L_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r-
/
i
/
L
\-
1
l\l i
1
L__
r-
~
I l.--
.J
1
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I
I L-
--"
9S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE E
Separate City and County Buildings
SITE COOTS
CITY COSTS
COUNTY COSTS
Land costs. . . . . . . . . . . .
Site Development (160,000 sq. ft~ at .10)
Parking .
Total . . . . . . . . . .
43.~ of site costs
Bui lding. . . . ". .
Architect's Fee. . . . . .
Value of City Portion.
*Less value of City Hall property. . . .
"I COST TO CITY.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . $395,320.
$ 16,000.
. ~ 30 ,000.
441,320.
. $191,910.
. $113,990.
. $ 46,440.
.$1012,400.
.~
. . $ 962,400 .1
. .$ 249,350.
. .$ 955,180.
51 180.
. 1261,110.
. . .$ 35,200.
..' . $1,226 ,510.[
- Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
56.5% of site costs.
Building. . . .
Architect's Fee. . . .
Value of County Portion .
-Less value of Courthouse property .
] COST TO COUNTY. . . . . . . . . .
96
I I
----1 I
~
II
I I
~l
E COMBINED BUILDING
:::- _ 2'1 E: '-.l7:-1
1:
\fl
..-{
~ :=.~ -:- ~
~.~~~-I
t-i~ _ _
N '...j-rl
I'" .'.
~
-:------r-
. . . .. ~
. .
'., '., . - :" . ~. .. ~ ': . . -:
S ~./ :: !'J:H
5~--J-:-,Q.. i:'5:
~.i>'."
l ,",
, ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ L
~I EJ
,f
!L
,
!
i
I
I
I
.-l
,. j
r .~!' r'.......
__ ~~ '_ I(" ,
,
I
\" !
L :
, I i
t\ I i
I
I
j L-
~j'::'lJ":",:':'
r-
i
,
'---
r--
I
I
I
I
L-
,
I I
I I
JL
97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE E
Combined City County Building
PROJOCT COST
CITY COSTS
COONTY CCS TS
"
'V.
Land Cost. . . . . . . ~ . . .
Site Development (160,000).
Parking. . . . .
Building . . . .
Architect's Fee.
Total. . . . . . .
_ II . .
44.2% of total . . . . . . . . . .
*Less value of City Hall Property. .
] COST TO CI TY . . . . . . . . . . . .
55.8% of total . . . . . . . . . .
*Less value of Courthouse property.
j casT TO COUNTY . . . . .
, "
I :r'
,}
. "
1 ' "
./
. $ 395,3-20.
. . . $ 16,000.
.$ 30,000.
.$1,621,820.
.$ 97,310.
. . $2,160,450.
.$
.$
. . $
954;920.
50,000.
904,920.1
.$1,205,530.
.5 35,200.
. $1,170,330.\
. Assumes property to be sold or value otherwise realized for this amount.
"
"
98
I ! I
---l L..________________._~
-~l r c.... '" . -"- L._J I
:1 'Ii SITE W- .
1 \Jl
. --1" I
I I
-----.J i
--1 '
I I
! ,SITE Y
I
I
I
----1
l
--.J
".
""
- ~:: ~~ --- -.....
r-. ]
L~
~I
~
3~
I
I
I
SITE xl
I
I
,,~ '-,I -- ~-~
----- .-.--
JL
,
tI Co
~L~-
.
L. : SITE Zl
1
III
L-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l r-
!
~
-1
I
I
i
-~
~ s.-----
l .---
I
! !
i i
!
i
I
I
I
I
L-
I
I
I
. I
L
c~~. ;:::, ,--__
-' '- . - "
SITES FOR CITY POLICE
c: ~ "-J--,c}. --
_.-.. - -, .- "
99
I
I
I
I
CITY POLICE BUILDING
Site W
I
Site Cost.
Site Development
Parking Lot. . .
Building Cost. .
Architects Fee
. . . . . . . . . . $ 74,600.
(45,000 sq.ft. @ .10~). . . $ 4,500.
. . $ 4,500.
... . .' . . $501,290.
. . . . . . $ 30,080.
Total Cost . .
. $614,970.
I
RBMARKS :
I
Site can be used in connection with City County sites A,B,D,E,
and separate sites.
I
Expansion in the future can be realized thru use of the private
p~operty on the remainder of the block.
I
Site X
I
Site Cost. (half of County Jail site value) . $ 7,700.
Site Development (20,000 sq.ft. at .10~) $ 2,000.
Parking Lot (15 at 300). . . . . . $ 4,500.
Building Cost. . . $501,290.
Archi tecta Fee . . . . . $ 30,080.
I
Total Cost
. $545,570.
I
REMARKS :
I
Site can be used in connection with City-County Sites A,B,C,D,E,
or separate sites.
Site coverage high, a two story building mandatory
I
Site limits expansion of both City-Police and County JAil, except
thru the closing of streets.
I
The county would realize an increase o~ $7,700 thru sale of part of .
the site to the City.
I
The County Welfare department would need to be relocated before con-
struction of the City Police Building could begin.
I
I
I
,nn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~TINUING COSTS
i.laintenanee and
Operating
TOlephone :1:quipment
1()2
I
I
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATING COSTS
I
The costs of cleaning, electricity, fuel, and maintenance of equipment was
studied in regard to any possible savings. Sources used for study of these
items were statistics compiled for the Salina Schools by Mr. Fred Brockman,
estimates prepared by the Salina Janitor Service, estimates of Mechanical
Engineers, and the 1962 Office Building Experience Exchange Report of the
National Association of Building Owners and Managers.
I
I
Review of these sources indicates that:
I
1) Operating costs are proportional to the area of the building.
2)
The ~ pe~ square ~ for operation is very nearly the same
for a build ng of 45,000 square foot as for 90,000 square foot.
I
3)
Possible savings in operating costs for a combined facility are
therefore possible only thru reduced size of the combined facility.
I
I
Comparison of required areas indicates that 1,320 square feet less are re-
quired for a combined building than for separate buildings. The 1962 Office
Building Experience Exchange Report indicates operating costs to be $1.50
per square root. Therefore a saving of $1,980 should be realized each
year.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
103
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TELEPHONE SERVICE
Information obtained from Mr. Cloyd Metzler and Mr.
"Frosty" Baer of the Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company.
General Information -
A central switchboard for a building of the size and
complexity of the City Hall, Courthouse, or a Combin-
ation Building is recommended for the most efficient
service.
Installation costs are approximately $8. per trunk
line. Installation costs are approximately $7.50
per telephone set.
A switchboard operator is paid approximately $3,600.
per year.
COURnIOUSE
Installation costs for the various combinations are approximated as follows:
CITY HALL
6 to 8 trunk lines - (8 x $8.) .
100 phones at $7.50. . . . . . .
Total Courthouse phone installation.
. . $
.$
.$
.$
'j
64.
750.
814.
6 to 8 trunk lines - (8 x $8.) . .
100 phones at $7.50. . . . . .". .
Total City Hall phone installation
64.
750.
814.
TOTAL FOR BOTH BUILDINGS ADDED TOGEnIER.
$1,628.
COMBINATION. 12 to 14 trunk lines - (14 x $8.).. .$ 112.
200 phones at $7.50. . . . . . . . . . . .$1,500.
Total Combination phone installation. . .$1,612.. $1,612.
ANTICIPATED SAVINGS FRCJ.1 A COMBINED INSTALLATION. $ 16.
ca.JRnIOUSE.
Monthly Operating Costs for various combinations are approximated as follows:
CITY HALL
COMBINATION
Operator (two thirds of time). . . . . . .$2,400.
Billing - $400. per month for 12 months. .$4,800. * .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7 , 200.
Operator (two thirds of time). . .$2,400.
Billing - $400. per month for 12 months. .$4,800. *
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7 , 200.
TOTAL FOR BOTH BUILDINGS ADDED TOGEnIER. . . . . . $14,400.
.
Opera tor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3 , 600.
Billing - $700. per month for 12 months. .$8,400.
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,000.. $12,000.
ANTICIPATED SAVINGS FROM A COMBINED INSTALLATION . $ 2,400.
J
Saving would be the same for two buildings on the same site if a common
switchboard was used.
A common switchboard would not be practicable for widely separated buildings.
* Eq~pment rental only
does not include toll calls.
104
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTLINE FOR ADl\iINISTRATIV:l AGREEl>'1ENT
The following is not a legally per-
rected wording, but is intended as
an outline of main points of agree-
ment ror a joint venture or con-
struction and operation.
105
I
I
COMMENTS ON CITY-COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT
I
It would appear from the discussions with several cities and counties now
operating on a partial or full cooperative basis that there are advantages
to the formation of a city-county building commission and that this com-
mission be given certain powers and duties which include the selection of
architect, engineers, the award of construction contract, the acquisition
of the real estate and construction of the building as well as the operation
and maintenance of the building. Below is described certain suggested items
which might be included in such an administrative agreement. Certainly the
framing of this agreement and certain of the details in this agreement would
necessarily need be refined and shaped to suit the individual desires of the
County and the City Commission.
I
I
I
I
The County Commission and the City Commission (referred to as Commissions)
would authorize the formation of the Saline County-Salina Joint Building
Commission, (referred to as Building Commission). The Building Commission
would be assigned the following powers and duties:
I
I
1. Select architect and engineers for preparation of preliminary plans
and cost estimates adequate for bond election and bond sale commit-
ments, and would be authorized to approve necessary payments to
Architects, Engineers and other Consultants.
I.
I
2. Review preliminary plans and estimates of the building and submit
plans and estimates for approval of the "COMMISSIONS".
I
3. On approval of the "COMMISSIONS" the Building Commission would hold
informational meetings with citizens groups precedent to bond elections.
I
I
4. Upon approval of the "COMMISSIONS" the Building Commis~ion would
advertise for bond sale and submit bond bids to the "COMMISSIONS"
for review and approval.
5. The Building Commission would appoint and authorize three appraisers
to make a three approach real estate appraisal of the site recom-
mended by the Building Commission and approved by the "COMMISStONS".
I
I
6. The Commissions would conduct separate bond elections.
7. The Building Commission would propose a purchase price of real
estate and on the approval of the "COMMISSIONS", the Building
Commission would purchase the real estate in the title of the
Building Commission.
I
I
I
8. On approval of the "COMMISSIONS", the Building Commission would
authorize the architect and engineer to proceed with the preparation
of final construction plans and specifications and cost estimates.
9. The Building Commission would review the plans and specifications
prepared by the architects and engineers and submit to the "COMMISSIONS"
for approval.
I
106
I
I
10. On approval of the "COMMISSIONS", the Building Commission would
advertise for construction bids, receive bids, review and submit
same for review and approval of the "COMMISSIONS".
I
11. On approva.l of the "COMMISSIONS", the Building Commission would
execute construction contract(s) and issue a "Notice to Proceed".
I
12. The Building Commission would approve interim pay estimates of the
construction Contractors, and approve change orders on construction
within the construction budget.
I
13. The Building Commission would make inspections of the completed
buildings and the final pay estimates and recommend same to the
"COMMISSIONS" for approval.
I
All costs of the performance of Items 1 through 6 would be paid by the res-
pective "COMMISSIONS" in proportion to the square foot area to be occupied
by each governmental unit on the basis of the preliminary plans prepared in
Item 2.
I
I
All costs of Items 7 through 13 would be paid from the proceeds of the bond
fund. A separate cost account shall be maintained for the City and the
County by the Building Commission based on the proportion of cost determined
by the proportion of square foot assigned by the Building Committee to the
City and the County based upon the final construction plans.
I
It would be the duty of the Building Commission to prepare a budget of cost
for the operation and maintenance of the building from the date of final
payment to the construction contractor to the period ending on the termina-
tion of the fiscal year. The Building Committee shall on or before August I
of each year prepare an operation and maintenance budget for ensuing fiscal
year. Such budgets shall be submitted to the "COMMISSIONS" for their individ-
ual approvals. Such budgets shall include but not be limited to the following
items:
I
I
I
Bond principa.l redemption requirements
I
Bond interest requirements
Building Operation Costs
I
Building Maintenance Costs
Building Improvements costs
I
Costs would be in conformance with an operation and maintenance agreement
executed by and between the "COMMISSIONS" and the Building Commission. Any
costs to be incurred in excess of the budgeted amount shall require the ap-
proval of the "C(){\1MISSICNS" prior to incurring liability. for expense.
I
I
..
I
I
107
I
I
A separate operation and maintenance agreement could be executed between the
City Commission, the County Commission and the Building Commission. The
arrangement of the building and the express desires of the City and the County
will have a substantial effect on this agreement and we offer below several
comments that we have collected with regard to such an agreement.
I
I
1. The Building Commission could employ the city equipment and forces
to perform items such as street sweeping, snow removal and other
possible operation items which might be proper to be performed by
present staff and equipment. It would seem desirable that the
City make charges to the Ruilding Commission for either an agreed
amount or the actual charges involved in the performance of these
assigned duties.
I
I
2. The Building Commission should employ and direct the janitorial and
maintenance staff to perform services for the entire facility. We
received these comments from the county clerk, housed in joint
facilities with Quincy, city offices;: - they believed their separate
forces (one for County and one for City) of maintenance and janitor
were costing them considerably more than if the work were performed
by a single staff.
I
I
I
3. The Building Commission should probably pay all utility and maintenance
bills and that these would be included in the items of the budget.
I
4. The Building Commission should perform all redecorations at the re-
quest of the using agency and make charges accordingly.
I
5. In present joint facilities it does appear desirable that such items
as addressograph equipment, microfilm equipment and accounting com-
putors would be items which logically could be operated cooperatively
by the City and County, however, this could be on a rental basis
from one agency directly to the other agency without involvement of
the Building Commission.
I
I
The final operation and maintenance agreement could be drafted and executed
at the time the final plans were prepared.
I
I
I
I
I
I
108
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUTURE EXPANSION
109
I
I
FUWRE EXPANS ION NEEDS
I
Interviews with Department Heads revealed extreme difficulty in estimating
needs for their departments beyond ten years in the future. There are so
many indeterminate factors which would influence such an estimate:
I
Population variations
I
Political developments in the community, state or nation
Changes in duties due to legislation
I
Technological developments
I
Economic developments
Cultural and sociological changes.
I
Though there was hesitancy to predict specific requirements for space use,
there was a general concensus that there is a distinct need to provide for
expansion and change.
I
Provision for change should take the following forms:
I
"Cushion" space within the building(s) as constructed, which would
permit natural and gradual growth, both for personnel and stored
items;
Flexible or movable partitions to permit re-shaping of the depart-
ments and their relationship to each other:
Provision for expansion of the building(s), either horizontally or
vertically, to accommodate increased gross area needs at some
time in the future.
I
I
Either of the three building combinations, (Completely Separate, Separate
on the same site, Combined Facility), would be readily adaptable to the
provisions for change as described above. For sites A and C, provisions
for vertical expansion should be provided. Due to the limitation of these
sites, horizontal expansion should be discouraged. The cost estimates in
this report DO NOT INCLUDE provision for vertical expansion unless noted.
I
I
Provision for expansion horizontally would necessitate the selection of a
site that would permit a generous amount of open lot in addition to the
area used by the building(s).
I
I
I
I
Provision for expansion vertically would of course necessitate the design
of the structural system to accommodate additional loads in the future.
Within a combined building, except where functional convenience required
otherwise, the departments of the two governments would be essentially sep-
arated, and would not interfere with alterations of the other party. If
one government should experience reduced space needs, and the other gov-
ernment should expand, the fl~xible partitioning would permit easy changes.
I
Operation and maintenance costs, and other responsibilities would be charged
on a percentage basis depending on the p*rcentage of departmental space used
by each: The percentages could be re-adjusted, (if necessary), after each,
major sbif~ing of partitions.
110
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECAPITULATION
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
III
I
I
R E CAP I T U L A T ION
I
PHASE I
I
Item 1
I
Item 2
I
I
I
I
Item 3
I
I
I
I
Item 4
I
Item 5
I
I
I
I
I
A Combined project is legally possible.
There are no major legal restrictions to a cooperative building effort
between a County Government and the City Government of a City which is
the County Seat.
Present buildings structurally sound but functionally obsolete
Both the City Hall and the Courthouse are structurally adequate, and
would be able to serve their respective governments satisfactorily for
a number of years.
Both of these buildings are obsolete according to present day stand-
ards of lighting, heating, ventilating, air conditioning, fire safety
acoustics, etc.
Both buildings would require a substantial amount of work to improve
finish and trim materials that have deteriorated due to age, weather-
ing, use, etc.
Existing buildings satisfactorily located
The location of the City Hall is considered satisfactory as to rela-
tion to the central busin~ss district, (CBO), but is not large enough
to give the proper setting and dignified character that is important
to a seat of government.
The County Courthouse is satisfactorily related in relation to the CBO.
It would, however, serve the sommunity somewhat more conveniently if it
were closer to the CBO. The size of the site for existing conditions
is ~atisfactory from a standpoint of character and dignity.
Traffic is not a prohlem
There are no major traffic problems encountered at either site.
Both buildings very short of adequate space
M~ny departments are lacking in necessary space to adequat~ly and ef-
ficiently conduct their present operations.
Several departments, in addition to lack of enough space, are further
hindered by space that does not function properly, and cannot be made
to function properly due to the inflexibility of the existing build-
ings.
112
I
I
PHASE I (continued)
I
Item 6 It is "possible" to expand existing buildings _
"desirability" questionable
I
I~
I
I
Item 7
I
I
Item 8
I
I
I
Item 9
I
I
PHASE II
I
Item I
I
I
I
I
Considered from the standpoint of possibility only, and not necessar-
ily from the standpoint of desirability, it is possible to construct
the needed additional space by addition(s) to the existing bui~dings.
It would not be possible, (except by a multi-story, more than three
stories, building), to construct a joint City-County Governmental cen-
ter on the present City Hall property.
It would be possible to construct a joint City-County Governmental
Center on the present Courthouse property.
Some cities now use a combined facility
Other cities within and without the borders of Kansas have found that
a joint governmental center has been advantageous from an efficiency
standpoint, particularly in the area of law enforcement. This, plus
savings in construction and operation costs, shows an advantage for
this type of organization.
Courthouse neighborhood satisfactory
The adjoining land uses in the vicinity of the City Hall are not the
most ideal for a setting for city or county government.
The land uses in the vicinity of the Courthouse are considered satis-
factory for governmental offices. (Refer to comments under Item 3.)
Existing buildings could be used for other purposes
In the event that either the City Hall or the County Courthouse were
to be replaced by a new structure, there are possible uses to which
the existing building(s) could be put.
The area immediately to northwest of CBD is desirable location
A Governmental Center should be within 600 feet of the periphery of
the CED.
Location on wide, arterial streets is desirable. Ninth street, with
access to Interstate Highway 70, and Ash street, with access to Inter-
state Highway 35W, fit this description.
Area northeast and east of CBD is undesirable because it is zoned for
light industry, and because of the location of the railroads.
113
I
I PHASE II (continued)
Area to southeast and south is zoned for light industry and for gener-
al business. Also traffic patterns are less convenient.
I
I
I
I
Item 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
Item 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Land use to south is suitable for a Governmental Center, but a loca-
tion close to the CBD would inhibit business development.
t-
The land to the southwest and west that is within a convenient dis-
tance from the CBD is already used for largely public and semi-public
uses.
The area to the northwest provides sites which are a convenient dis-
tance from the CBD and are served by both Ninth and Ash Streets.
Three methods of financing possible
,
1. Accumulation of funds
2. Bond issues
3. Sale of property
The City of Salina has no funds available for building construction.
Construction work by the City of Salina in the near future would re-
quire issuance of gen'eral obligation bonds affirmed by a bond election.
Saline County has accumulated approximately $429,000. under a special
building fund levy. Saline County is authorized to accumulate the
special building levy at a maximum rate of one (1) mill. The present
rate of .52 mills should produce $48,322. in 1963 property taxes.
Saline County is authorized to supplement the levy with bonds until
the fund reaches two-and-one-half, (~), percent of the County assess-
ed valuation. ~ percent of the 1963 valuation was $2,323,000.
Ownership and Organization should be by means of a Building
Authority or Building Commission
Kansas statutes authorize building authorities, but apparently do not
permit the use of revenue bonds.
The principal reasoning behind the use of building authorities is
clearly stated in the Indiana Statute:
"The bringing together of various activities and functions of sev-
eral governmental units into one or more modern buildings would
facilitate the carrying on of public business through closer
grouping and more economical housing. However, the financing,
management, operation and allocation of space in a building used
jointly by several governmental units can be handled efficiently,
fairly, and economically only by a body separate and apart from
the governmental units themselves."
..
114
ITE AI
LI
I .1
SITE D I
~
I
I
L.__. __ _._._ ----.--__._____.J
- ~ .,. .:::... -- -.-...
- '~.' -- ~. ,
----,
..
t.
1
Iii
: ~ I
. '--f
o
SITE C
~
SITE B
'-J
r T ,
I ,
i
I i
J I
8 i c..oueT r-
.. .~ ....-
I WO U'?E --oJ
r- ~ _ _. I /. I
I I
I II
I i
i j i
--
I
I
-----J
--,,; "...J "
SITE E
'=
I i
i
I i
,
!
I
I I
I
I I
I
.- .~.... - -- -
---r I l i
I ! I
I
i I
i I
I. I
i ! j
I
I !
I
I I I
I f i
~
'---
I
I
--4 ~_.__
.
~
~ :::". ::J---t
I
1
I
I
j
I
I
____J
c - .--. _ _
--.J>" -i ...-....
SITES STUDIED
115
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
Item 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site "E" judged most desirable
Criteria for judgement:
Ease of building on the site
Appearance of project on site
Walking distance from County Jail
(transporting of prisoners to courts)
Walking distance from CBO
Parking relationships to CBO
Potential for renewal of the area
Appraised value of land
116
I
I
PHASE III
I
Item 1
I
I
I
Item 2
I
I
Item 3
I
I
Item 4
I
I
Item 5
I
I
I
Item 6
I
I
I
I
The City of Salina requires a building area of 37,950. square feet.
Saline County requires a building area of 47,320. square feet.
A joint facility to serve both governments would require a building
area of 83,400. square feet.
The Police Station, (including facilities for the City Court),
would require a building area of 24,940. square feet.
Additional reductions in area might be possible if, by mutual ag-
reement, certain functions could be organized to serve all, (or
several), departments of both governments.
If a Civil Defense Emergency Control Center were included in the
project, federal funds are available for assisting in construction
to meet specific requirements of such a program. (This has not
been included in the areas listed under Item 1, or in the cost est-
imates.)
For purposes of cost estimating it was assumed that the materials
and methods of construction would be consistent with other similar
projects in this part of the country. Specifically, the cost esti-
mates are predicated on a building of durable materials, air condi-
tioning, flexibility and expandibility.
Estimated costs for CONSTRUCTI~1 ONLY are:
City Building.
$ 773,990.
County Building.
$ 995,180.
Total. . . .$ 1,729,170.00
Combined Building.
.$ 1,621,820.00
.$ 107,350.00
Difference.
An estimated
ing costs if
$99,000. over
stant.
saving of $1,980. per year is anticipated for operat-
a combined building is constructed. This amounts to
a period of fifty years if the amount remains con-
An estimated saving of $2,400. per year in personnel and equipment
rental costs for telephone service is anticipated if a Combined
Building is used. This amounts to $120,000. over a period of fifty
years.
117
I
I
Item 7
I
I
Item 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
.-
Operation and ownership of a combined building would be by means of
a "Bui lding Commissi on" . The responsibility of the Bui lding Comm-
ission would be similar to a Ruilding Committee during the con-
struction of the project, and similar to a Board of Trustees for
another public building after the project was completed.
Future expansion would be either by addition of floors in the fu-
ture, or would take the form of horizontal expansion. Either form
of expansion must be provided for at the time the original project
is constructed. Vertical expansion requires special foundation
work, and horizontal expansion requires a site large enough to ac-
commodate it.
"
- ....-
118 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABtn.ATION OF COSTS FOR CITY AND COUNTY OFFICE FACILITIES
SEf'ARATE BUILDINGS COMBINED BUILDING
SITE City County Total City County Total
Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost
Separate ( 7)
J 190.000sq.') 51.017.210 51 124.140 52.141.350 - - -
Site A ( 2) (6) ( 2) ( 6) (2) (6) ( 1) ( 5) ( 1) (5) (1) (5)
110,000sq.') 5 838.930 51 066.140 $1. 905.070 5 779.460 51.011 950 $1.791,410
Site B (3 ) ( 3) (3 ) ( 3)
( 187 , 500sq. ' ) $ 814,900 $1,097,920 $1,912,820 $ 755,820 $1,043,340 $1,799,160
Site B wi tl1 ( 3) ( 4) ( 3) ( 4)
:ity Police - - - $ 729,450 $1,010,050 $1,739,500
Site C (6 ) ( 6) ( 6) (5 ) ( 5) ( 5)
107, 500sq. ' ) $ 859,010 $1,092,210 $1,951,220 $ 779,860 $1,037,700 $1,837,560
1
Site D
150,000sq.' ) $ 948,660 $1,208,650 $2,157,310 $ 890,950 $1,152,700 $2,043,650
Site E
160 ,000sq. ' ) $ 962,400 $1,226,510 $2,188,910 $ 904,920 $1,170,330 $2,075,250
(1) An additional $25,000 should be included ($11,000 City and $14,000 County) for
difficulty of construction around Courthouse to prevent a double move by the
County.
(2) An additional $15,000 should be included for one of the two buildings to pre-
vent either a double move by County, or a two year delay for City facilities.
(3) This eliminates Memorial Hall, so an additional amount would be required to re-
place this facility (including land) by the City.
(4) Amount does not include City Police facilities, which would be $595,530 addition-
al.
I.
(5) Due to size of site an additional $15,000 ($6,600 City and $8,400 County) should
be included for provision for vertical expansion.
(6) Due to size of site, an additional $7,000 for the City Building and $9,000 for
the County Building should be included for provision for vertical expansion.
(7) If County Building were limited to Courthouse site, County costs would be
$1,042,940., however, $15,000 should be added for difficulty of Construction to
prevent double move and $9,000 for provision for vertical expansion due to size
of site.
NOTE:
Costs do not include costs for a City Police Facility. This is estimated to be
from $545,570. to $620,150. depending upon site used.
Except where the County Courthouse property is used as part of the building site,
it has been assumed the Courthouse and City Hall properties would be sold. This
is reflected in the above figures.
119
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECOMlYIENDA TI ON
120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is the recoaaendation at this report that Saline County and the City o'L Salina:
1. - Elect to proceed with theeconstruction and joint ownership o'L a Combined
Bui 1ciing to serve the County and City Governments;
A combined saving of $107,350. in construction cost, and $4,380.
in yearly operating cost should be realized by this action.
In the light of the urgent need of many departments of both City
and County governments for additional and more functional apace,
it is recommended tbat a decision be made at an early date, and
that a building program be started promptly.
2. - Form a Building Commission for the planning, construction and joint own-
ership and operation of the proposed building;
I
I
I
I
I
3. - The Building Commission be invested with the power to select and work
with an Architect for the project as a Building Committee, and after the
project is completed, to serve as a Board of Trustees for the operation
of the project;
-.
4. - Select a site for the Combined Building:
It is the recommendation of this report that Site E be $elected
because of its greater potential for convenience, flexibility
and expansion. (Site D also has many of these advantages except
the shape of site is more restrictive.)
If cost must be the determ\ning factor, Site A is the obvious
choice. However, it should be pointed out that Site E has 45%
more area than Site A.
I
I
I
I
If the City should find it feasible to abandon the use of a Civic
Auditorium for a period of years, or to construct a new Auditor-
ium simultaneously with the proposed City-County Building, then
Site "B" would be the recoDlDlendation of this report. Site "B"
would afford the greatest amount of usable site area for the a-
mount of money spent and at the least expenditure of money.
I
5. - Hire an Architect within four weeks of the first reading of this report
to begin preliminary planning at once in preparation for a bond election
at the earliest date possib.le and practicable;
6. - Coincident with the above recommendations, it is recommended that the
City purchase property and construct a new Police Station convenient to
the existing County Jail.
I
121