Loading...
10-16-1972 Minutes)14 City of Salina, Kansas Commissioners' Meeting October 16, 1972 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners met in the Commissioners' Room, City -County Building, on Monday, October 16, 1972, at four o'clock p.m. The Mayor asked everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and a Moment of Silent Prayer. There were present: Mayor Jack Weisgerber, Chairman presiding Commissioner Leon L. Ashton Commissioner Robert C. Caldwell Commissioner Norma G. Cooper Commissioner Mike Losik, Jr. comprising a quorum of the Board, also L. 0. Bengtson, Norris D. Olson, D. L. Harrison, Absent: None City Attorney City Manager City Clerk The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 1972, were approved as mailed. Mayor Weisgerber acknowledged and welcomed Harold Jaeger, past Commissioner and Mayor, and Mrs. Jaeger, who were present at the meeting. A TRAFFIC SAFETY AWARD was presented to the Mayor by Mrs. Ethyle Ballard of the Kansas Highway Commission of Kansas from the State Safety Department. Salina earned Third Place in the overall traffic safety program. This program included engineering, traffic enforcement, and safety education. A PEDESTRIAN AWARD was presented to the Mayor by Mrs. Ethyle Ballard of the Kansas Highway Commission of Kansas, from the National American Automobile Association. THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED October 15 to 21, 1972 - "NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK". The proclamation was read by Mrs. Louise Fields, President of the Business and Professional Women's Club. THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED October 17, 1972 - "THE OFFICIAL DAY -IN -COURT FOR LEGAL SECRETARIES." The proclamation was read by Carol Keen. STAFF AGENDA AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE establishing a Board of Metropolitan Zoning Appeals, amending Sections 3 and 25 of Ordinance Number 6613, and repealing the existing sections." A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to adopt the ordinance as read and the following vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5). Nays: (0). Carried. The Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8251. The ordinance was introduced for first reading October 2, 1972. AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE providing for the amendment of Zoning Ordinance Number 6613 and the Zoning District Map therein and thereby adopted and providing for the rezoning of certain property within the City and prescribing the proper uses thereof." (Rezoning the West 60 feet of Block 10, and part of Lot 9, Block 6, in the Replat of Garden Home Addition to District "D" (Local Business District) as requested in Petition Number 3270, filed by Virgil Bagley.) A motion was made by Commissioner Ashton, seconded by Commissioner Losik to adopt the ordinance as read and the following vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5). Nays: (0). Carried. The Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8252. The ordinance was introduced for first reading October 2, 1972. AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE relating to and apportioning and levying special assessments on certain lots and pieces of ground in the City of Salina, Kansas, to pay the cost of constructing Lateral Sanitary Sewer District 514, and relating to and providing for the collection and payment of such assessments." (To serve Lakewood Addition - Engineering Project 72-547) A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to adopt the ordinance as read and the following vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5). Nays: (0). Carried. The Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8253. The ordinance was introduced for first reading October 2, 1972. 1 1 1 1 A LETTER was received from the Metropolitan Planning Commission recommending the approval of the rezoning of Lots 26, 28, and the west z of Lot 30, Cloud Street, Addition to the Grounds of Kansas Wesleyan University, from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "C" (Apartment District) as requested in Petition Number 3274, filed by Hillcrest Agency.) A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to accept the recommendation of the Metropolitan Planning Commission and approve the rezoning and to introduce the ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: (3 30 19iz Number: $25"1 A LETTER was received from the Metropolitan Planning Commission recommending the I approval of the rezoning of tracts 2 and 3, described in Petition Number 3275, filed by C. L. Clark and H. W. Steele, to District "D" (Local Business District). The Metropolitan Planning Commission recommended Tract 1 remain District "A", pending further study and need. A motion was made by Commissioner Ashton, seconded by Commissioner Losik to accept the recommendation of the Metropolitan Planning Commission and approve the rezoning, and to introduce the ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: Number: Z SS A LETTER was received from the Metropolitan Planning Commission recommending the approval of the rezoning of Blocks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Lakewood Addition Number 2 from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "C" (Apartment District); and Blocks 7 and 8, Lakewood Addition Number 2 from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "EE" (Local Service District), as requested in Petition Number 3277, filed by John Ryberg. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the recommendation of the Metropolitan Planning Commission and approve the rezoning and introduce the ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: rY la�� �(e I17 3 Number: s 2 81 A LETTER was received from the Metropolitan Planning Commission recommending the approval of the rezoning of the South 45 feet of Lot 26, and all of Lot 28, Block 6, Bonds Addition, from District "B" (Two -Family Dwelling House District) to District "C" (Apartment District), as requested in Petition Number 3279, filed by Roy Wilbur. Commissioner Losik commented that there is an item (#2) on the public agenda which pertains to this particular item. He said it is a protest petition, and "although that protest petition was available to the planning commission, there is also a letter that we have that was obviously late, but it had some pertinent information and questions that I think ought to be taken into consideration before any action is taken on this." Commissioner Losik added, "There was no consideration given to the fact that the alley would have to be used as an entrance to these units, nor the threat of flood from surface water. These are two areas there that needed to be, if they were considered, they certainly weren't commented on, and these people are concerned with that." Commissioner Cooper commented that she drove by the property, and asked how wide alleys are supposed to be. It was established this particular alley is 15 feet wide. Commissioner Cooper said, "According to the information they have, Planning didn't have all this information at the time they reached their conclusion." Commissioner Ashton commented that the minutes pretty well covered everything that was brought before them. Commissioner Cooper said she would like to be sure that they had all the information available at the time they reached their decision, because there is a considerable number of people who are protesting. Mr. Roy Wilbur was present, and stated, "As far as the entrance by the alley, I don't think that is any real problem because as long as you have sufficient room for a car to get in there, that is all that we would need, and the carport will actually be set back from the alley so there will be no turning problem. Now the water run-off, I have heard this several times, and I don't really know what we are talking about on the water run-off, because the amount of concrete we are going to have in that area will simply be for the carport itself, and the water run-off you are going to get from that is going to be negligible. Now I think the big objection that these people have, is building an apartment house. They are talking about water running off the roofs and having more area, etc. etc.; but if we build an apartment house, actually we are going to have no more roof area or water run-off than we would if we built two duplexes on the same land, nor would we have that much more parking problem. So far as the water run-off, and what we are proposing in the way of an apartment versus two duplexes, is really not that much difference." Mr. Wilbur added that seven units, at the most, would be allowed with "C" zoning, where now 4 units are allowed in two duplexes. Mayor Weisgerber commented that as he read the minutes of the Planning Commission, they state Mr. Wilbur plans to build a four-plex on the two lots. Mr. Wilbur said there was a little misunderstanding there. He said they may build a four-plex, but they are requesting rezoning for apartment, which would give them, legally, the opportunity to build 7 units. Mayor Weisgerber asked if that was based on the amount of ground available per family. Mr. Wilbur said that is right. He added, "We don't want any conditions attached so that it is only for a four unit dwelling." Commissioner Losik said, "This petition, according to the minutes of the planning commission, now are they stating in there that they have checked this petition and over 20% of the people in the benefit area have protested this?" The City Manager said this is correct. Commissioner Losik said, "Alright then, in other words then, this would mean a 4/5 vote of the members of this Commission to approve this, and frankly with what you just mentioned, the legal stuff asked for here asks for a four-plex. Now if you are talking about additional units, does the planning commission, are they aware of this?" Mr. Wilbur replied, "The zoning request is for "C" zoning, which is the apartment zoning, and that would allow up to 7 units, but of course it won't be 7 units, it would probably be more like 6. It presently allows two duplexes. Commissioner Cooper said, "I still think this should go back to planning and make them aware of what you actually intend to do, whether you intend to build a four-p►ex unit or a six-plex unit; and also to make certain that they have all this before them before they make a recommendation, because if you have this number of people in your area protesting this thing it won't get better, it will get worse if you don't reach some kind of an understanding on it." Mr. Wilbur replied that the protesters can be from quite a radius. Commissioner Losik said, "According to the official record of the commission, they stated that the protest Petition Number 3284 contained 9 signatures, 8 of property owners within 200 feet, so this isn't a remote thing, they are within 200 feet of this area you are talking about." Mayor Weisgerber said the planning commission gave a unanimous vote of approval for this rezoning. Mr. Wilbur said, "Well, I don't understand why, whether it is four or whether it is six, or whether it is seven is a problem, because we are asking for "C" zoning, and the planning board is well aware of this, and they realize how many units we can have on that property. Now sure, we can propose something, but why should we be held to a certain number of units when we are asking for apartment zoning which stipulates so many units that we can build on the property?" Commissioner Cooper said, "The only thing that I was thinking of was the congestion." Mr. Wilbur commented that there would be no more congestion if they built a six- plex than if they built 2 duplexes. He said he feels the people in the area are objecting more to having a 2 story apartment house, than they are to anything else. Commissioner Losik moved to refer this back to planning for reconsideration. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cooper. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Mayor Weisgerber said, "In referring this back, I think we might convey to the planning commission the use of the wording in their letter relating to a four-plex, whereas we want to be sure they are aware that it would be more, so they can take this into their consideration." Commissioner Cooper commented, "I think they know, I think planning knows that with the zoning change he is entitled to do this, but I think they were also under the impression that he was only going to build a four-plex unit dwelling. Certainly I think planning is aware what he could build with that kind of zoning." Mayor Weisgerber commented, because of the unanimous recommendation from them on it, they ought to know why we don't take their recommendation. Commissioner Losik said, "In addition to that, we can add in there that the utilization of the alley as the entrance, plus the fact that is there a problem, or would this create a water run-off problem? If all those have been considered, then it is certainly not going to be anything that they cannot shoot right back, and if it is, they can look at it. If,in their opinion,they don't think it is going to pose a problem, they can come back with their same recommendation." 1 1 1 }. Y.4 W A LETTER was received from the Metropolitan Planning Commission recommending the approval of the rezoning of the South 143 feet of the West 175 feet of Block 1, Eisenhower Addition from District "D" (Local Business District) to District "EE" (Local Service District), as requested in Petition Number 3280, filed by William Graves. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the recommendation of the Metropolitan Planning Commission and approve the rezoning, and to introduce the ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: X97- Number: S25 THE CITY ENGINEER filed Plans and Specifications for interior revisions to the Police Administration Building. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the plans and specifications and set the date of November 6, 1972, as the date to receive bids, and instruct the City Clerk to advertise for bids. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for the curbing, guttering, paving, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water for Parkwood Village Addition. (Requested in Petition Number 3271, filed by Presley Builders, Inc.) A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the feasibility report as filed by the City Engineer. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for the curbing, guttering, paving, of Kirwin Avenue, from Ohio Street East 430 feet. (Requested in Petition Number 3269, filed by the Church of the Nazarene.) A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to accept the feasibility report as filed by the City Engineer. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for sanitary sewer to serve Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Brown and Brown Addition. (Requested in Petition Number 3259, filed by C. C. McAninch) A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to accept the feasibility report as filed by the City Engineer. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for sanitary sewer to serve a tract of land in the Southeast corner of the SEr, of the NE4j less highway, in Section 35-14-3. (A tract of land 720' x 9001, 81 Drive-in Theatre location, 14.5 acres - requested in Petition Number 3273, filed by Dickinson, Inc.) A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the feasibility report as filed by the City Engineer. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER reported on Petition Number 3281, filed by Kenneth Nordboe for street lights at the corner of Mars and Meadowlark Lane, and Neptune and Meadowlark Lane, and recommended the installation of the lights. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to accept the recommendation of the City Engineer and authorize the installation of the street lights. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER reported on Petition Number 3282, filed by Charlie Brown for the installation of a street light in the 300 block of South Tenth Street, and recommended the installation of the light because this is an exceptionally long block. A motion was made by Commissioner Ashton, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to accept the recommendation of the City Engineer and authorize the installation of the street light. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed Estimate Number 1 for Engineering Project 72-544B for seeding and planting in Lakewood Park, for Edward Heffel, in the amount of $5,008.50. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to approve the estimate. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed Final Estimate for Engineering Project 72-549, for slurry seal improvement of miscellaneous streets, for Ballou Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $6,991.77. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to approve the estimate. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. COMMISSION AGENDA "DISCUSSION OF CITY BID PROCEDURES". (sponsored by Commissioner Cooper). Tabled at the October 2, 1972 meeting. Commissioner Cooper said, "I would just like to restate my motion, that the Commission adopt a new uniform bid procedure listing basic specifications for products and services, and eliminate all exceptions." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Losik. Commissioner Cooper elaborated on her motion, "That the City adopt a uniform bid procedure listing basic specifications for products and services and eliminate all exceptions. Whereas we list our specifications and then we ask the bidders to list their exceptions. Any exception is just that. They are not meeting specifications. When you say these are the specs, and if you can't meet them, you list exceptions to it. Just like our bid two weeks ago on the vehicles. That bid should have been awarded, at that time, to Long -McArthur. The specs were there, they were the low bidder, but it was not awarded. It was sent back to the same place that it came from, and then it came around again and Long -McArthur got the bid; but this is what I am saying, these are the people who are knowledgeable. These are the people who know what their needs are, they know what their requirements are, they draw up the specs, and the bidders bid on them and they are all bidding equally, because they have to meet specifications. Now, if the department feels like there are areas that could be optional, let them say so, but have a basic bid specifications, so you know." Mayor Weisgerber commented that, "The way the motion was worded, to me at least, is not clear, because it is too all inclusive. I think you can interpret a motion like that to mean to cover absolutely everything." Commissioner Cooper said, "I don't mean everything, I am talking about where there is money involved. I am talking about where the City has to acquire services or products." The City Attorney said, "As I indicated last time, the only time you have to take bids is for construction contracts of public works where the amount exceeds $2,000. This is the only legal requirement for taking bids." Commissioner Cooper explained, "My motion applies to items that the Commission has to be concerned with, where we have to take the bids or where we do make a practice of accepting bids, where the Commission makes this practice to do this on these items, then I think we should have a uniform policy on it. Anybody can bid on it, and all the bids should have basic specifications." The City Manager asked if she was referring to those items that the City Commission had normally been accepting bids on, in the past? Commissioner Cooper replied, "Yes, of course, this is what I am talking about. I am not talking about the things that would fall within your jurisdiction." Mayor Weisgerber said, "Yes, I know what you are getting at, but what I am saying is when you make a formal motion, or when you are actually putting this in the books, so to speak, then you have to add on to it, the defining characteristics of it." Commissioner Cooper said, "Okay, I said the Commission adopt a uniform bid procedure. This would suggest to me that it would only apply to the items that the Commission becomes involved with." Commissioner Ashton asked, "Are you still including the insurance?" Commissioner Cooper replied, "I am including everything that the Commission has to make decisions on." Commissioner Cooper said staff evidently made inquiries of other communities. "Other communities don't have the proposal that was being suggested. They obviously have a system that is very similar to the one that we have, however Manhattan does have a bid procedure of some kind or another." Mayor Weisgerber said they have a man employed, who is knowledged in this field. Commissioner Ashton said, "I feel we would have to hire one more employee just to handle insurance, because we have over 100 policies on just buildings and structures within our City. You take insurance policies and put it up for bid on each one, there would be many times that those policies would lapse." A discussion followed concerning the responsibility of seeing that everything is covered in the policies. The City Attorney said, "I was just sitting here, and off the top of my head, and I am wondering if maybe this is what you are trying to say, Norma? 'That whenever bids are requested by the Board of Commissioners, that the specifications shall be prepared by the department head involved and no bids shall be considered which does not comply with said specifications.' And then I think what you are going to do in the future, you are going to tell us what you want to take bids on." Commissioner Losik replied, "That is right." 1 1 1 Mayor Weisgerber commented, "That gets it nailed down. That is well worded." Commissioner Ashton said, "I think the part where the bids of special equipment, I can go along with, but I can't go along on insurance because I feel like we have to have somebody to place the liability of our insurance on." Commissioner Losik replied, "Right now I think that has been cleared up. I think that was cleared up when the City Attorney mentioned that this Commission will give them a list of items or tentative items that they want to have come to us for approval." Commissioner Cooper said we decide what we are going to put out for bids. A discussion followed concerning the bids on police vehicles received two weeks ago, and bids on the fire equipment received in July. Commissioner Losik called for the question. Commissioner Caldwell said, "Just looking at the list of cities here, Hutchinson, Junction City, Lawrence, Manhattan, Topeka, Great Bend, Wichita. They accept no bids on insurance. There must be a reason if there are seven cities here that fail to receive bids on insurance, there must be a flaw there. I don't think this Commission has pursued that enough to really know. We said the last time when we tabled it, we might have some input on insurance, which we haven't done. Why we shy away from this type of information I don't know; but we still do, and I think it would be quite implemental to the Commission if we would bring insurance people in here and talk about this, and let us know exactly what we are doing. I am not saying that the bid is right or wrong, but I think there must be something lacking there that these other cities do not accept bids for insurance." Commissioner Losik replied, "They are probably doing it like we did, because we have been doing it for 40 years." Commissioner Cooper asked for a vote on her motion. Mayor Weisgerber commented, "I personally see no objection to this particular motion. It doesn't settle the insurance; but we are going to be more careful in awarding the contracts to anyone who hasn't met specifications. We still say nothing about what items we are going to put out on bids. I think what we are really doing is cautioning ourselves a little to take bids as they are presented." The City Attorney said, "I think what you are really saying by this motion, whenever you decide to take bids, that you are going to have definite plans and specifications and unless it meets the specifications, you are going to ignor it. Now, you have batted the insurance back and forth, and the interpretation of this motion would be, I think the insurance is effective from January 1 to January 1, if come November or the first of December the Commission decided to take bids on the insurance you would instruct the City Clerk to prepare plans and specifications for the insurance and let them. At that point you would make the decision as to do you or do you not want to take bids on insurance, but if you decide you do, you instruct the City Clerk to prepare specs. The City Clerk would prepare specs and you would submit it. If, whoever didn't meet specs would not even be considered, and you would accept the low bid of the bidders that did meet the specifications.h' Commissioner Caldwell said, "Before we vote, I would like to just clarify one thing. You are saying, sir, that when the time comes for new insurance it is left up to the Commission to accept it as bids or as we are doing now." The City Attorney said, "That is right. It is your prerogative to say that you want to take bids on it, or to negotiate it. This is the decision you will have to make sometime prior to the renewal of the insurancA." The City Clerk asked Commissioner Cooper if she is substituting the City Attorney's wording for her motion. Commissioner Cooper replied she is. The Mayor called for the vote on the motion. Ayes: Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (4). Nays: Ashton (1). Motion carried. THE MAYOR, with the approval of the City Commissioners, made the following appointments: Housing Advisory and Appeals Board Drew Hartnett, appointed to succeed Phil Aldrich to September 15, 1973. Mrs. Melvin Eshelman, appointed to succeed Mrs. Shirley Jacques to September 15, 1974. .)I PUBLIC AGENDA PETITION NUMBER 3283 was filed by Harry Sinsabaugh and George C. Etherington for the rezoning of Lots 1, 12, 13, Block 7, Replat of Faith Addition from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "C" (Apartment District). A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to refer the petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. PETITION NUMBER 3284 was filed by Warren Hahn for the denial of the rezoning of the South 45 feet of Lot 26, and all of Lot 28, Block 6, Bonds Addition, requested in Petition Number 3279, filed by Roy Wilbur. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to refer the petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. PETITION NUMBER 3285 was filed by Harry Steele for the rezoning of the East 120 feet of Lot 15, and the East 120 feet of the South 60 feet of Lot 14, Block 15, Belmont Addition from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "EE" (Local Service District). A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to refer the petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried'. PETITION NUMBER 3286 was filed by A. B. Seelye Company, Inc., and George C. Etherington for the rezoning of the East 120 feet of the North 5 feet of Lot 14, and the East 120 feet of the South 60 feet of Lot 13, Block 15, Belmont Addition from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "B" (Two -Family Dwelling House District). A motion was made by Commissioner Ashton, seconded by Commissioner Losik to refer the petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A TREE TRIMMING LICENSE APPLICATION was filed by Donald D. Deatherage, d/b/a Modern Landscaping, 616 West Crawford. (New). The City Clerk reported he has paid the required fee and has filed the proper bond and insurance. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to approve the license application and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A CEREAL MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION was filed by Marva Lea Timmons, d/b/a Bob's Place, 316 East Pacific. (New). The City Clerk reported the applicant has paid the required fee, and the application has been approved by the Health Department, Zoning Officer, Police Department. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to approve the license application and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A CEREAL MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION was filed by Colleen Hawk, d/b/a Hurry Back Inn, 115 South Santa Fe Avenue. (Transfer of location.) The City Clerk reported the application has been approved by the Health Department and tha-Zoning Officer. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to approve the transfer of the cereal malt beverage license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Ashton that the Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners adjourn. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. D. L. Harrison, City Clerk City of Salina, Kansas Commissioners' Meeting October 23, 1972 There was no meeting of the Board of Commissioners today because of the Legal Holiday - Veterans' Day. A quorum was not present. D. L. Harrison, City Clerk