08-28-1972 MinutesCity of Salina, Kansas
Commissioners' Meeting
August 28, 1972
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners met in the Commissioners' Room,
City -County Building, on Monday, August 28, 1972, at seven o'clock P.M.
The Mayor asked everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and
a Moment of Silent Prayer.
There were present:
Mayor Jack Weisgerber, Chairman presiding
Commissioner Leon L. Ashton
Commissioner Robert C. Caldwell
Commissioner Norma G. Cooper
Commissioner Mike Losik, Jr.
comprising a quorum of the Board, also:
Ron Barta, Assistant City Attorney
W. E. Harris, Director of Administration
D. L. Harrison, City Clerk
Absent:
L. 0. Bengtson, City Attorney
Norris D. Olson, City Manager
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 21, 1972, were approved as mailed.
STAFF AGENDA
AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN
ORDINANCE
providing
for the vacation of Grove Street in Elm Grove Addition to the City of
Salina,
Saline
County, Kansas." (Requested by Alonzo Wilson, Jr.) A motion was made
by Commissioner
Ashton, seconded by Commissioner Losik to adopt the ordinance as read
and the
following
vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5).
Nays:
(0). Carried.
The Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8242. The ordinance
was
introduced
for first reading August 21, 1972.
AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE providing
for the vacation of a certain alley in Elm Grove Addition to the City of Salina, Saline
County, Kansas." (Requested by Alonzo Wilson, Jr.) A motion was made by Commissioner
Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to adopt the ordinance as read and the following
vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5). Nays: (0). Carried.
The Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8243. The ordinance was introduced
for first reading August 21, 1972•
AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE annexing
certain land to the City of Salina, Kansas, in conformity with the provisions of K.S.A.
1970 Supplement 12-520." (The annexation of Nazarene Addition, as requested by the First
Church of the Nazarene, in Petition Number 3234). A motion was made by Commissioner Losik,
seconded by Commissioner Ashton to adopt the ordinance as read and the following vote was
had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell, Cooper, Losik, Weisgerber (5)• Nays: (0). ,Carried. The
Mayor approved the ordinance and it is numbered 8244. The ordinance was introduced for
first reading August 21, 1972.
AN ORDINANCE was introduced for second reading entitled: "AN ORDINANCE authorizing
and providing for the issuance of temporary notes of the City of Salina, Kansas, in the
sum of $24,000.00 to pay part of the cost of constructing a public building for cultural
events." A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to
adopt the ordinance as read and the following vote was had: Ayes: Ashton, Caldwell (2).
Nays: Cooper, Losik (2). Mayor Weisgerber voted Aye. Carried. The Mayor approved the
ordinance and it is numbered 8245. The ordinance was introduced for first reading
August 21, 1972.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik
to introduce an ordinance for first reading establishing a Housing Advisory and Appeals
Board; providing the procedure for appeals; and providing the procedures for conduct of
hearing appeals. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
L�Ordinance Passed: ,�,� L1 1912- Number: Q �o
fl
1
1
THE CITY ENGINEER filed Final Estimate for Engineering Project 72-547 for
sanitary sewer extension to serve Lakewood Addition, for Stevens Contractors, Inc., in
the amount of $6,465.10. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner
Cooper to approve the final estimate. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
THE CITY ENGINEER filed Estimate Number 1 for Engineering Project 72-549 for the
slurry seal of miscellaneous streets, for Ballou Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$43,634.61. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Ashton to
approve the estimate. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF STATEMENT NUMBER 7 (Final) to Bucher and Willis, Consulting Engineers,
Planners and Architects, in the amount of $11,052.93, for services performed for the City
of Salina, Kansas, in connection with Salina Community Renewal Program Kansas R-53 (CR)
A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to table the
payment of the statement until additional printed material is received, at which time it
can be put back on the agenda by the staff. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
COMMISSION AGENDA
CONSIDERATION OF THE 1972 MANUAL FOR SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION. (sponsored by
Commissioner Losik)
Commissioner Losik said, "To begin with, I would certainly like to thank the news
media for their real fine job all week on telling the people about school starting, and I
think it is real commendable. So far I haven't heard of any accidents, so you can't help
but feel it worked.
"Now this Manual for School Crossing has been printed, has been presented to the
Commission and we have accepted it (for study) but we have not taken any formal action on
it. The manual is set up and was coordinated with the various people, the PTA, the school
principals, and I think Don Bassett can go into this a little bit more, because he worked
on this. Maybe he can elaborate just a little bit more before we put it open to see if
there are any questions, or ideas, or differences of opinion before we attempt to do
something with this."
Mayor Weisgerber commented that Mr. August Zemke, representative of the School
Board is also present.
Mr. Bassett, said he had nothing further to add to the manual, but would be glad
to answer questions.
Mr. Zemke said his only comment would be, "I believe the study made by the traffic;
control department is an appropriate study. I, along with Commissioner Losik, am very pleased
with the safety record that has been compiled in Salina through the cooperation of our
traffic control officers, parents, children, and schools, relative to the safety of the
children. I recognize that change, for various reasons, becomes necessary. This study
was carefully made and is in line with procedures that have been satisfactory in other
locations. As school people, we have been reasonably satisfied with the service we have
received in the past, under the previous program as well."
Mr. Boyer explained, "What we have done, is try to schedule the work to be done
over a three year period. We couldn't do it all at once. We have tried to schedule it
to keep the change in signing, and so forth, as uniform as possible throughout the City.
One matter would be all the post signs. These should go up throughout the city at one
time; and then, mid -block crossings, we don't want to do one mid -block crossing, and then
have another mid -block crossing without signals. We will put in all the mid -block crossings
at one time. Then we will take some of the intersections, which are already signalized to
which we are going to add 'Walk -Don't walk' signs, and install all of them at one time.
We will spread it out financially over three years."
Commissioner Cooper said, "I would just like to mention along with everyone else,
think the Commission is very appreciative of people who have devoted all this time to the
program for this manual, and I think it is a very workable one for the small pedestrians,
as well as the motorists; however, I would like to ask this. The manual did say there
would be some areas where, if you wanted to take advantage of the safety factor, you would
have to go a little ways out of your way. You had your choice. You could go where you had
it, walk wise or pedestrian crossing or whatever, it might be a little bit out of your way;
but if you were concerned with the safety factor, you would do this. However, I was
contacted throughout the summer, after this thing was put into the process of being compiled,
from people who live out on West Crawford in a mobile home court behind the Rocket Drive-in.
I am told that there are considerable number of elementary age children that have to cross
Crawford. I was wondering if anybody had ever done any kind of a study in that particular
area? Now, there was a guard or crossing further East, but we were talking of something
in the neighborhood of 3 to 4 blocks. Is there an area where they would have to walk 3 to
4 blocks out of their way, both ways?"
Mr. Bassett explained, "In this particular area we have a crosswalk planned just
East of Cherokee, and this would not be out of the way for anyone living north of Crawford."
Commissioner Cooper commented that Cherokee is quite a ways east of the Rocket
Theatre.
Mr. Bassett explained, "Yes, but they must come down, because the school they would
be going to is Sunset School, and they must come down Cherokee to get to this school. When
we were planning our routes, our plans show they would come to Cherokee."
Commissioner Cooper said, "In other words, what you are saying, the school is
south of Cherokee."
Mr. Bassett said, "It is south of Crawford, and just directly east of Cherokee.
It is on the east side, adjacent to Cherokee."
Commissioner Cooper commented she did not realize the school is east of Cherokee.
Mayor Weisgerber asked if there are any other questions or any other comments.
Mr. Zemke said he had one other comment. "I have been assured by the Traffic
Control Department that there is no intent to reduce the present procedure until the new
program can be put in to cover a given area. I think this is important. In other words,
we are hopeful we will be able to maintain the present level of protection that exists at
the present time; and that until a suitable replacement factor is in existence, we will
operate as is."
Mayor Weisgerber commented, "One phases in gradually, as the other phases out."
Mr. Boyer said, "This is a very definite statement. At any location where a
guard is required, he will stay there until all other equipment is installed."
Commissioner Losik emphasized, "This is very strong, there will be no removal of
guards until after this equipment is in and operating."
Mayor Weisgerber asked if there were any other comments. There was no response.
Commissioner Losik said, "If there are no other questions, and no disagreements
from the standpoint of what we are doing, and how it is to be done, I move that we approve
and adopt this Manual for School Crossing Protection."
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Caldwell.
Commissioner Losik commented, ''Maybe we should say, later on as the City grows,
this doesn't mean there won't be a chance to look at this thing from the practical standpoint
of review, if the need arises for it."
The Mayor again stated the Manual would be implemented as funds are available and
called for a vote on the motion. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
CITY ENGINEER TO REPORT ON THE WIDENING OF FOURTH STREET FROM PRESCOTT AVENUE
TO CRAWFORD AVENUE. (Sponsored by Commissioner Cooper)
Commissioner Cooper said, "In fairness to the City Engineer's report, the
Commission received this report earlier in the month, but I also felt at the same time,
because the Commission had received the petition in regards to Fourth Street that the
information should be made public so that people who had petitioned the Commission would
have some idea where we were going to go with it. I see that Mr. McConnell is here, and
Mr. Boyer, if you would like to, you can tell him what you reported or I will tell him what
you reported, and then maybe he'd like to make some kind of a comment."
Mr. Boyer said, "Would you care to go ahead?"
Commissioner Cooper said, "We asked the City Engineer's office to provide us with
some probable costs for surfacing a single lane of pavement on Fourth Street. This they did.
The probable cost total is $52,000.00. We also asked they they investigate if the railroad _
had right-of-way in that area between Crawford north to Prescott Street, because north of
Prescott, Mr. McConnell had mentioned the fact the City had simply surfaced or put street
surfacing over the railroad tracks. The City Attorney said, at that time, that that was all
city property, and Dean Boyer confirms this in stating that between Crawford and Prescott
Avenues, the railroad company did purchase right-of-way, so you would have to have railroad
company consent, this is what it amounts to. Mr. McConnell, would you like to say anything?"
Commissioner Cooper asked Mr, McConnell how he thought the people on Fourth
Street would feel about Mr. Boyer's suggestion to ban parking?
Mr. McConnell said they would not like it.
Commissioner Ashton asked Mr. Boyer, "Would that give us any additional help if
we did put black top in there between the slab over to the tracks, would we be allowed to
do that? I have noticed a lot of people moving out and getting into the ruts and the first
thing you know, it is throwing them a little bit, and I just wondered if we had the right
or whether it would be out of bounds to try to put a coating of black top over the area,
up to the tracks and widening it on the other side without going over the tracks, and
doing anything there?"
Mr. Boyer explained that in a sense, you are paving that close to the tracks and
this is what the railroad doesn't want. If you paved up there, you know you would be
inviting traffic to travel on it, and it would be the same as running the pavement over there.
This is one of their basic clearance rules, they want nothing within that distance that can
be prevented."
Commissioner Cooper asked if anyone has any other suggestions for Fourth Street.
Mr. Boyer commented, "The most economical thing to help a little bit, would be
to ban the parking."
Commissioner Cooper said, "Well, the only thing I can add to this Mr. McConnell
is that I just felt like the Commission should make the Engineer's report public, so that
the people who petitioned would have some idea of the recommendations of Engineering.
Frankly, I don't have any place to go. I don't know what else to suggest."
Mr. McConnell said, "Well, I don't know what the plans are as far as widening the
street on the west side of the tracks there, still, my main concern is getting Fourth Street
from Crawford to Prescott made one-way north. 1 don't care what they do on the other side
of the tracks, but I would like to get that one block one-way north. I have been coming
in from the South for about the last 2 months, and just about every day I will run into a
person who is going one-way on the east side of the road, and he is headed south; and
actually he is in the wrong. This would eliminate that. People hit that stop sign, they
continue to go right straight ahead. Granted there is a sign saying 'do not enter', but
either the drivers can't read, or something, because they sure use that as a two-way street
on south, and I would like to find out, can we get it made one-way north from Crawford
Avenue to Prescott Avenue?''
Commissioner Cooper said, "Mr. Boyer, I think your office and Traffic did a study
out there on volume when we were considering the possibility of signalizing that particular
intersection. Did you ever consider, from a traffic point of view, or evaluate the
possibility of making Fourth Street one-way north between Crawford and Prescott?"
Mr. Boyer explained that one of the problems which would probably result from
making Fourth Street one-way north from Crawford, would be to switch the southbound traffic
to Fifth Street, and that would make a more jammed intersection than Fourth Street is.
He explained, "This was the main reason for proposing paving a lane on the west side of the
tracks to allow a lane to go south. It was not recommended in the report, but in conversation
that the next alternative would be to remove parking on the east side of Fourth Street,
from Crawford to Prescott, and then allow the full width of that lane for two lanes of traffic.
It is crowded there, it is not wide enough for two lanes. If parking were eliminated you
wouldn't have this problem because they wouldn't drive off on the railroad right-of-way.
Mr. McConnell asked, "Did Mr. Boyer check with the railroad company to find out
if the city could pave over the tracks? Has any action been taken on that part of it?"
Mr. Boyer said, "No. We have been instructed by the railroad in the past to stay
eight feet off the tracks. I did not approach them again on this."
Mr. McConnell said, "I think that is a feasible idea and worth investigating."
Mr. Boyer said, "They told us to stay eight feet off the tracks, less than
eighteen months ago. What I am saying is, we did not go back again and ask again after
we got your petition. This is their ruling."
Commissioner Cooper asked Mr, McConnell how he thought the people on Fourth
Street would feel about Mr. Boyer's suggestion to ban parking?
Mr. McConnell said they would not like it.
Commissioner Ashton asked Mr. Boyer, "Would that give us any additional help if
we did put black top in there between the slab over to the tracks, would we be allowed to
do that? I have noticed a lot of people moving out and getting into the ruts and the first
thing you know, it is throwing them a little bit, and I just wondered if we had the right
or whether it would be out of bounds to try to put a coating of black top over the area,
up to the tracks and widening it on the other side without going over the tracks, and
doing anything there?"
Mr. Boyer explained that in a sense, you are paving that close to the tracks and
this is what the railroad doesn't want. If you paved up there, you know you would be
inviting traffic to travel on it, and it would be the same as running the pavement over there.
This is one of their basic clearance rules, they want nothing within that distance that can
be prevented."
Commissioner Cooper asked if anyone has any other suggestions for Fourth Street.
Mr. Boyer commented, "The most economical thing to help a little bit, would be
to ban the parking."
Commissioner Cooper said, "Well, the only thing I can add to this Mr. McConnell
is that I just felt like the Commission should make the Engineer's report public, so that
the people who petitioned would have some idea of the recommendations of Engineering.
Frankly, I don't have any place to go. I don't know what else to suggest."
Mr. McConnell said, "Well it is funny that my father was up here years ago
fighting to get the paving we have in there, and now I am up here fighting to have something
done with the problem that is a problem of the City as a whole. They took property from us
when they paved the street, why can't they take property from other people, if this is what
is desired five years from now? It costs $52,000.00 today, what is it going to cost five
years from now if they decide to pave it? They will still take the property."
After discussing the problem further, Commissioner Cooper _moved to deny Mr.
McConnell's petition for one-way north on Fourth Street, from Crawford to Prescott. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Ashton. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
REVIEW AND ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR FUTURE CITY ANNEXATIONS AND REQUEST FOR
IMPROVEMENTS ON FUTURE ANNEXATIONS AS PERTAINS TO THE THREE MILE RADIUS. (Sponsored by
Commissioner Losik)
Commissioner Losik said, "In view of the fact that we have had.approval, and
are in the process of appointing the Metropolitan Planning Commission, the fact that we
have annexed various areas of land into the City before we established a three mile radius
for control, and in view of the fact that we have Resolution Number 3113, dictating the manner
in which improvements are made and paid for, I would like to establish the fact that we have
hired a consultant to assist with the Metropolitan Planning Commission to establish the
zoning criteria and the various ramifications that go with it. We need to have this criteria
established on a very high priority, as one of the first projects; and the reason being,
that developers, people buying property in the developed areas from the present city limits
out to the three mile radius be fully made aware of what the provisions are for requesting
annexation and requesting improvements. We have a lot of geography out there surrounding
us and if we just off the cuff, or piecemeal, approve annexation, we will find that
Resolution 3113 will be usurped. We will find that there are already loopholes in it in
getting around it. We will find that not only are the improvements going to be costly to
the City, but they are services that these people will be entitled to. The water flowing
through the pipes going out, the trash collection, the police protection, the fire protection.
Now this is not to stymie, or to attempt to hold down the growth of the community in any way.
This is just to make it in an orderly manner from a financial standpoint, because if this
isn't done immediately, then we will be forced into making personality type decisions as to
who comes in and who goes out, and how these improvements will be funded. I say right
now, Resolution 3113, the control of the improvement and payment of them, has loopholes
that can be gotten around very easily. This is a good opportune time to close those loopholes.
This is a good opportune time for everybody to know just what they can expect, when they
can expect it, so that when a recommendation comes through from the Metropolitan Planning
Commission, we don't need to bounce around. This takes a lot of the monkey off their back
if they know what can be expected from a cost standpoint. We can act on it very favorably
and quickly. Again, I want to repeat, this is not to delay anything, this is just to make
sure it is done in an equitable manner so that anybody knows exactly what it takes and how
to go about it. As I stated, we have this consultant, I would request at this time, make
a motion, that one of the top priorities given to the consultant and the new Metropolitan
Planning Commission is to set this up, because this is the area we are going to get hit in
first."
Mayor Weisgerber commented about the annexation which was done last year, which
squared up the city limits. He asked about taking the area east of Ohio Street and south
of Crawford into the City - east to the flood control levee.
Commissioner Losik said, "I am not just talking about that property. This can
happen North, South, East, West. We have had requests for annexations here in a very close
proximity of time since we have had our paper work in the Attorney General's Office. The
church is going in, the Presley Addition is going in. What I am saying is this is a very
high priority item for the consultant of the Metropolitan Planning Commission to establish
this criteria, so these people will know what they can expect and how fast. Because we are
not going to be able to fund some of this at the rate the people request it."
Commissioner Cooper commented, "I think Planning would like to see the City
utilize the property it has at the present time within the city limits. We have "F" zone,
"B" zone, "A" zone. We have all of them. Rather than have people go outside the City limits,
and then petition annexation to the City. In other words why don't we try to provide the
services, at least in the forseeable future, for the property we have now, in addition to
what Commissioner Losik suggested, instead of acquiring more?"
fl
1
i
Mayor Weisgerber made the comment that each individual thing probably ought to
be considered on its own, within certain guidelines.
Mr. Boyer said, "I understand what Mr. Losik is requesting. We will have a
meeting with these consultants this week or next week. We are gathering data for them
Perhaps at this time we could carry this information to them and ask that this be included
in their report and recommendation."
Mayor Weisgerber said, "They are going to have to do this in the long run anyway.
They are going to spend their time over 10 months, and this is the thing that will be coming
up continually. Perhaps they can start it this way."
Commissioner Cooper said, "What we are asking is a uniform rule like Resolution
3113. We have a uniform rule that says if the property is less than 50% developed, it is
unimproved. This is what we need in the case of extended services in this three mile
radius. We need a uniform rule to apply, you either meet the requirements or you don't meet
the requirements."
Mr. Boyer said, "We can give them this information and tell them this is what we
want, and this is what we expect from them."
Commissioner Losik said, "This is what I was requesting, again, in all fairness
to the developers, the people wanting to purchase that area, people pressing annexation,
they be given some priority on this because it is coming and it is coming fast. I agree
with Commissioner Cooper, we have a lot of land in this town that already has these services.
Let's put ourselves in the developers position, if he would go out here and buy raw acerage,
have the thing platted, annexed in, and then one or two individuals at the extreme end could
petition the City for these services and pay this 500 of their portion. The developer would
not object to this, so we would go ahead and be pretty much obligated to give them that, and
we are getting right back in the fix we were."
Commissioner Ashton said, "The consultant should bring a lot of this to light and
I think the Metropolitan Planning Commission will be looking forward to getting some
guidelines. I feel this is part of their job in setting that up."
Mr. Frank Langshaw commented that something projected on out would be of benefit
to the commission, and to the City as a whole. "We should have some consultant service
there that would be pretty much of a guideline on what they feel should be done in this
area. This would possibly eliminate some of this spot zoning too, which comes up very much,
and is a detriment in areas."
Commissioner Losik again moved "When the Commission works with Oblinger-Smith,
it has a little bit of support to show that is the priority. This is a vote of confidence
for the Planning Commission."
Commissioner Cooper seconded the motion.
The Mayor called for a vote on the motion. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
THE MAYOR, with the approval of the Commissioners made the following appointments.
Plumbing Board of Appeals
William Lucas, reappointed for a 2 year term to June 24, 1974
Clarence Holm, Jr., reappointed for a 2 year term to June 24, 1974
Glen Robertson, reappointed for a 2 year term to June 24, 1974
Ray Snead, reappointed for a 2 year term to June 24, 1974
Jim Baker, reappointed for a 2 year term to June 24, 1974
Building Board of Appeals
Sheldon Burr, reappointed for a 5 year term to August 17, 1977
Grievance Committee
Richard J. Courter, reappointed for a 3 year term to August 9, 1975
James E. McKim, reappointed for a 3 year term to August 9, 1975
Mrs. Leo (Irma M.) Schaefer, reappointed for a 3 year term to August 9, 1975
Kl
Metropolitan Planning Commission
Ron Richmond, serves without a definite term, Executive Secretary
of the County Planning Commission
Frank Langshaw, appointed for a 1 year term to May 1, 1973
Cecil Beverly, appointed for a 1 year term to May 1, 1973
Elmer Dawdy, appointed for a 2 year term to May 1, 1974, outside the
city limits representative
John Carroll, appointed for a 2 year term to May 1, 1974
Norman Yenkey, appointed for a 2 year term to May 1, 1974
Dr. Neal Jenkins, appointed for a 3 year term to May 1, 1975, outside the
city limits representative
John Ryberg, appointed for a 3 year term to May 1, 1975
Lee Haworth, appointed for a 3 year term to May 1, 1975
Board of Metropolitan Zoning Appeals
Ron Richmond, serves without a definite term, Executive secretary
of the County Planning Commission
Betty Metz, appointed for a 1 year term to October 6, 1973
Roy Presley, appointed for a 1 year term to October 6, 1973
Raymond Snyder, appointed for a 2 year term to October 6, 1974
Dr. Neal Jenkins, appointed for a 2 year term to October 6, 1974
Representative of the Metropolitan Planning
Commission and also lives outside the city limits.
William Grosser, Jr., appointed for a 3 year term to October 6, 1975
John Sabin, appointed for a 3 year term to October 6, 1975
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board
The Community Relations Council will serve in both capacities.
Philip Aldrich, appointed for a 1 year term to September 15, 1973
J. Q. Rodriques, appointed for a 2 year term to September 15, 1974
Shirley Jacques, appointed for a 2 year term to September 15, 1974
N. C. Grant, appointed for a 3 year term to September 15, 1975
Rev. J. E. Jones, appointed for a 3 year term to September 15, 1975
PUBLIC AGENDA
PETITION NUMBER 3275 was filed by C. L. Clark and others for the rezoning of
three tracts of land along U.S. 81 Highway which was annexed to the City last year, from
District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "E" (General Business District)
A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to refer the
petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
PETITION NUMBER 3276 was filed by John C. Ryberg for the approval of the
preliminary plat of Lakewood Addition Number 2. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik,
seconded by Commissioner Cooper to refer the petition to the Metropolitan Planning
Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
PETITION NUMBER 3277 was filed by John C. Ryberg for the rezoning of Blocks 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, Lakewood Addition Number 2 from District "A" (Second Dwelling House District)
to District "C" (Apartment District and Blocks 7 and 8, Lakewood Addition Number 2 from
District "A" (Second Dwelling House District) to District "EE" (Local Service District).
A motion was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Losik to refer the
petition to the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
A CEREAL MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION was filed by Larry Joe Gibson, d/b/a
Road Runner, 616 North Broadway. The City Clerk reported the applicant had paid the
required fee, had been approved by the Zoning Officer, Health Department and the Police
Department. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to
approve the license and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0).
Motion carried.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik that
the Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners be adjourned. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). —
Motion carried.
D. L. Harrison, City Clerk