02-03-1975 MinutesCity of Salina, Kansas
Regular Meeting of the Board
of Commissioners
February 3, 1975
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners met in the
Commissioners' Room, City -County Building, on Monday, February 3, 1975, at four
o'clock P.M.
The Mayor asked everyone to stand for the pledge of allegiance to the
Flag and a moment of silent prayer.
There were present:
Mayor W. M. Usher, Chairman presiding
Commissioner Robert C. Caldwell
Commissioner Norma G. Cooper
Commissioner Mike Losik, Jr.
Commissioner Jack Weisgerber
comprising a quorum of the Board, also:
L. 0. Bengtson, City Attorney
Norris D. Olson, City Manager
D. L. Harrison, City Clerk
Absent:
None
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 27, 1975 were approved as
printed.
THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 9 through 15, 1975 -
"VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK IN SALINA". The proclamation was read by Mayor Usher.
THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 4th (through 10th) 1975 -
"CLERGY WEEK". The proclamation was read by John Garcia, Vice-president of the
Civitan Club.
THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 9 through 15, 1975 - "NEGRO
BLACK HISTORY WEEK". The proclamation was read by Oliver D. Green.
MAYOR USHER welcomed a group of children and adults from the Martin
Luther King Day Care Center.
STAFF AGENDA
A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the
improvements in Engineering Project 74-560: (Community Theater Site)
The concrete paving, curbing, guttering, sidewalks,
and landscaping
as authorized by Resolution Number 3156, passed by the Board of
Commissioners on the 20th day of August, 1973.
There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed
assessment.
A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner
Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for
first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
Ordinance Passed:_ 1 ,. to 119S Number: �42i
i
19
A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the
improvements in Engineering Project 74-564: (Country Hills #2 and Georgetown)
Paving and grading of Fairdale Road from Country
Hills Road to Fairdale Court.
Paving and grading of Fairdale Court from Fairdale
Road to the Fairdale Court -cul-de-sac.
Paving and grading of Country Hills Road from
Marymount Road to the Country Hills cul-de-sac.
Installation of water mains and service lines to
serve Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 3 through 16, Block 2;
Lots 1 through 20, Block 3, Country Hills Addition
Number 2 to the City of Salina, Kansas.
Installation of sanitary sewer main and sewer line
to serve Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 2 through 21, Block 2;
Lots 1 through 21, Block 3, Country Hills Addition
Number 2 to the City of Salina, Kansas.
Installation of sanitary sewer main to serve all
lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3, Georgetown Addition to the
City of Salina, Kansas.
as authorized by Resolution Number 3176, passed by the Board of
Commissioners on the 11th day of March, 1974
There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed
assessment.
A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner
Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for
first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
Ordinance Passed: io� 197a Number:
A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the
improvements in Engineering Project 74-567: (Planet Avenue and Century Plaza
Drive)
Curbing, guttering, paving and grading of Planet
Avenue; adjacent to the North 300 feet of Lot 8,
Block 2, Wallerius Addition.
Water service for the South 100 feet of the North
300 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, Wallerius Addition.
Curbing, guttering, paving and grading of Century
Plaza Drive in Meadowlark Acres Addition Number 2.
as authorized by Resolution Number 3181, passed by the Board of
Commissioners on the 8th day of April, 1974.
There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed
assessment.
A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner
Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for
first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
Ordinance Passed: Number: x q1 5
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by Commissioner
Cooper to set the date of February 24, 1975 to receive bids to repair and replace
overflow launders, weirs and baffles in Water Treatment Basins Number 1 and
Number 2 at the Water Treatment Plant, and instruct the City Clerk to advertise
for bids. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for street and utility
improvements in Key Acres 2n1 Addition. A motion was made by Commissioner
Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the report as filed. Ayes:
Nays: (0). Motion carried.
COMMISSION AGENDA
Mayor Usher said, "Well, of course that is not the way I understand it.
We have two contracts with the United Way. Cne is a $3,000.00 contract for
referral service and they will provide the central location, they have trained
the personnel, sent her back to New York, Wasington D.C., and we will develop the
telephone number the community will know about and they can call when they have
some kind of a social connected problem or need. The second project was to find
out what the social needs are in our community. This was the meeting we had with
Mr. Edelston, and it was my understanding in visiting with him that this is what
we would like to have done. He represents the Management Community Studies
Institute that specializes in developing this kind of information and he said
that they could do that at the time, the only thing he was having a problem on
whether the City should finance the entire project, and until he could resolve
that in his mind he couldn't give us a commitment. We said fine, you think about
it and write us the proposal back, which he did, and as far as I was concerned
when I got done reading their proposal, it was about exactly the way I thought
the thing was going, and so we have gone ahead and fairly well committed those
Revenue Sharing funds for the project."
Commissioner Cooper asked, "When did we do all this?"
Mayor Usher replied, "December the 9th."
Commissioner Cooper said, "No, we qualified that committment, because
when the Commission discussed this originally, and you know this Bill, you know
these funds were qualified dependent upon.."
Mayor Usher said, ".. qualified based upon what Mr. Edelston sent back.
"DECIDE ON THE PROPOSED UNITED WAY STUDY". (Put on the agenda in a
telephone request by Commissioner Cooper).
Commissioner Cooper stated, "Back in the forepart of December, the
Commission designated Revenue moneys for certain projects. One of those was a
United Way study, which was dependent upon a meeting scheduled for a later date.
We held the meeting, we received the proposal from the United Way people. I
don't believe there has ever been a complete understanding on the Commission as
to what we hope to accomplish by the study. In the beginning it was my under-
standing that the local United Way Agency was willing to act as sponsor for some
kind of a central referral bureau, not only for their different agencies, but
also for governmental agencies. This would provide people with access to
information that possibly they didn't know where to start out to locate a
particular program or a particular service. I could see some advantages to the
community in having this kind of a convenience. I could also see the possibiliti
where it might lessen any kind of duplication or overlap, no guarantee that it
would, but if you had a record on as many of the services and programs available
in the community as possible then you might see some areas where there were
overlaps or duplications. I would be willing and in agreement with, if the
United Way is interested in sponsoring something like this, in supporting it.
I do not believe it requires a $10,000.00 study to implement something like this.
I would like to see the Commission make some kind of a decision on it and if
possible maybe that money could be released for other purposes."
Mayor Usher said, "Well, of course that is not the way I understand it.
We have two contracts with the United Way. Cne is a $3,000.00 contract for
referral service and they will provide the central location, they have trained
the personnel, sent her back to New York, Wasington D.C., and we will develop the
telephone number the community will know about and they can call when they have
some kind of a social connected problem or need. The second project was to find
out what the social needs are in our community. This was the meeting we had with
Mr. Edelston, and it was my understanding in visiting with him that this is what
we would like to have done. He represents the Management Community Studies
Institute that specializes in developing this kind of information and he said
that they could do that at the time, the only thing he was having a problem on
whether the City should finance the entire project, and until he could resolve
that in his mind he couldn't give us a commitment. We said fine, you think about
it and write us the proposal back, which he did, and as far as I was concerned
when I got done reading their proposal, it was about exactly the way I thought
the thing was going, and so we have gone ahead and fairly well committed those
Revenue Sharing funds for the project."
Commissioner Cooper asked, "When did we do all this?"
Mayor Usher replied, "December the 9th."
Commissioner Cooper said, "No, we qualified that committment, because
when the Commission discussed this originally, and you know this Bill, you know
these funds were qualified dependent upon.."
Mayor Usher said, ".. qualified based upon what Mr. Edelston sent back.
21
Mayor Usher said, "..no, we had two separate proposals."
Commissioner Cooper replied, "When I agreed to the funding of the
Revenue moneys, it was with that idea that we would reach a firm conclusion,
depending on what the decision envolved with the United Way people at a later
meeting. I had no way of knowing what that meeting was going to cover."
Mayor Usher said, "We asked him to go back and present a proposal to
us, and based on what he wrote back to us would make up our final decision. Now
information came back to us that was sent out to the Commissioners and if there
was any conflict, any change in what we were thinking when we talked to him, why,
that would have been the time to jump up and say, 'hey now that isn't the way'.."
Commissioner Cooper commented, "..no, that wouldn't have been the time.
The information that Mr. Edelston forwarded to the Commission.."
Mayor Usher commented, "..well, that is the way I think it is."
Commissioner Cooper replied, "Well, okay you look at it differently the
The information that was forwarded to the Commission was sent to us for our leisu
review, or some kind of language like that."
Mayor Usher said, "That was the sixth of January."
Commissioner Weisgerber said, "I am kind of between the two but as I
remember this thing, when we agreed to this we did say that we wanted to review
that part of it, but at the same time we knew that we had a deadline of allocatin
these funds at either January 1st or a few days after, anyway about then. The
actual letter came in after the first of January, but I had the feeling that
really that we passed the deadline, and I think we are way past it now, of making
any change, and by the fact that we didn't counteract it, we automatically
accepted it because we had this deadline of allocation. That is my feeling about
it. I don't think we ever did have a formal motion that said yes we accepted it
but we passed the deadline of being able to make the change in it, is my
conception of the thing."
Mr. Olson said, "You will recall that prior to December 9th, staff
worked up a list and in concert with visits with you, a couple I think anyway,
came up with these various items for the budgeting of the final funds for the
first and second entitlement periods. At those meetings we told you that these
had to be resolved by the end of the year, and absolutely no later than January 8
On the meeting date of December 9, we pulled these minutes because I couldn't
recall specifically, and Mr. Losik raised the question about the item of the
Needs and Services Study, about making a decision on that subject later on.
Mayor Usher stated, 'we need to go ahead and include it in the list subject to
the presentation and then if we are convinced it is a worthwhile project adopt it
A motion was made by Commissioner Los ik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to
approve the appropriations for the balance of the 172 Revenue Sharing Funds.
Vote 5-0. Then Mr. Edelston came out on the 18th of December. He was here and
at that time you discussed the Needs Survey. He discussed the entire gamut of
things and he went back and put together Phase I and Phase II of this program.
Phase I is the accumulation of the data, the resource information, updating it,
or retrieving it as it relates to human services resource information using his
words. He also presented the second program of evaluating the needs to see if
Commissioner Cooper said, "No, based on a decision among the Commission,
which is the same one that we are faced with today. It was my understanding and
I think the Commission knows it was my understanding because before we ever met
with Mr. Edelston we discussed the possibilities of offering some kind of a centr
I
referral bureau i:n this community. When Mr. ElwiII came forward it was with what
I believe the idea that the United Way, because of all their different participating
agencies, because of all the different programs and services that are available
as governmental services and programs, that they were willing to act as the agent
for people who needed to locate a particular service or program. Now this is
what I thought we were discussing. When Mr. Edelston showed up I thought then it
enlarged into maybe other areas, so when I agreed to.."
Mayor Usher said, "..no, we had two separate proposals."
Commissioner Cooper replied, "When I agreed to the funding of the
Revenue moneys, it was with that idea that we would reach a firm conclusion,
depending on what the decision envolved with the United Way people at a later
meeting. I had no way of knowing what that meeting was going to cover."
Mayor Usher said, "We asked him to go back and present a proposal to
us, and based on what he wrote back to us would make up our final decision. Now
information came back to us that was sent out to the Commissioners and if there
was any conflict, any change in what we were thinking when we talked to him, why,
that would have been the time to jump up and say, 'hey now that isn't the way'.."
Commissioner Cooper commented, "..no, that wouldn't have been the time.
The information that Mr. Edelston forwarded to the Commission.."
Mayor Usher commented, "..well, that is the way I think it is."
Commissioner Cooper replied, "Well, okay you look at it differently the
The information that was forwarded to the Commission was sent to us for our leisu
review, or some kind of language like that."
Mayor Usher said, "That was the sixth of January."
Commissioner Weisgerber said, "I am kind of between the two but as I
remember this thing, when we agreed to this we did say that we wanted to review
that part of it, but at the same time we knew that we had a deadline of allocatin
these funds at either January 1st or a few days after, anyway about then. The
actual letter came in after the first of January, but I had the feeling that
really that we passed the deadline, and I think we are way past it now, of making
any change, and by the fact that we didn't counteract it, we automatically
accepted it because we had this deadline of allocation. That is my feeling about
it. I don't think we ever did have a formal motion that said yes we accepted it
but we passed the deadline of being able to make the change in it, is my
conception of the thing."
Mr. Olson said, "You will recall that prior to December 9th, staff
worked up a list and in concert with visits with you, a couple I think anyway,
came up with these various items for the budgeting of the final funds for the
first and second entitlement periods. At those meetings we told you that these
had to be resolved by the end of the year, and absolutely no later than January 8
On the meeting date of December 9, we pulled these minutes because I couldn't
recall specifically, and Mr. Losik raised the question about the item of the
Needs and Services Study, about making a decision on that subject later on.
Mayor Usher stated, 'we need to go ahead and include it in the list subject to
the presentation and then if we are convinced it is a worthwhile project adopt it
A motion was made by Commissioner Los ik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to
approve the appropriations for the balance of the 172 Revenue Sharing Funds.
Vote 5-0. Then Mr. Edelston came out on the 18th of December. He was here and
at that time you discussed the Needs Survey. He discussed the entire gamut of
things and he went back and put together Phase I and Phase II of this program.
Phase I is the accumulation of the data, the resource information, updating it,
or retrieving it as it relates to human services resource information using his
words. He also presented the second program of evaluating the needs to see if
1
1
1
22
those needs precisely or specifically fit what they would consider the overall
community needs to be. That is the second $10,000.00 project. I don't remember
the precise day that Mr. Elwill called me, but it was after the deadline had
passed, as to what the decision of the Commission was. I advised him that as
far as I knew there was no decision contrary to the thinking of the group around
the table with Mr. Edelston. I thought that day that you had pretty much reached
a concurrance that if he could come up with a package that we were all talking
about, whether it be Phase I or Phase II or Phase whatever, that this is what we
were zeroing in on. I told Ron on that basis, in my opinion,they had a contract.
Commissioner Cooper said, "There was never any time in any of this
discussion where I felt like other than when on the December the 9th meeting that
we did earmark Revenue funds for this kind of a study, if we decided that we
needed one. Other than that and the decision was pending, none had been made at
that time as far as I was concerned, and I think the minutes reflect this. Where
you say it was questioned that it would be decided at a future date or something
like this whether we would go for a study or not; but other than setting aside
those revenue moneys should the Commission wish to have the study made, there was
never, as far as I am concerned, any commitment on the part of this City Commission
to confirm any contractual agreement with Mr. Edelston."
Mr. Olson said, "But you are aware that we told you all along that the
decisions had to be made by the end of the year, and no later than the forepart
of January."
Commissioner Cooper replied, Okay, you have to designate what you want
to use those moneys for, we have done this in the past."
Mr. Olson said, "Right."
Commissioner Cooper said, "But at times also, we have changed."
Mayor Usher said, "But you can't do it on this one because this is the
end of it."
Mr. Harrison said, "For the Revenue Sharing money for the first and
secondperiod I had to have a purchase order written because it has to be encumbe
Commissioner Cooper commented, "I think the fact that no body bothered
to explain the fine details is conclusive of the fact, apparently, that you just
simply wanted that and you got it.,,
Mayor Usher said, "I don't think that is fair, because I think that we
sent the information out, a proposal, and you had every opportunity to jump up
then and say I don't want it, I don't like it."
Commissioner Losik said, "I would like to ask one question. Larry, you
can answer this. From the way those minutes are written up, and the fact that
there was not a follow up to that to make a final decision on that expenditures
of funds, did we legally spend those moneys? Did we legally enter into a contrac
based from the information of that minutes which states that we would make a
final decision at a later date, so therefore do we do not have anything as an
official action of this Commission to show that those funds were to be spent that
way."
Mr. Bengtson replied, "Well, the way the motion reads, it says, 'A
motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to
approve.."
Commissioner Losik said, "Read back, Larry, read back the whole thing."
Mr. Bengtson said, "The other items on the agreement - the Community
Needs and Services Study, I think that we were going to make that final decision
later on this month, were we not? Now the actual motion that is in the minutes
is that a motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwel
to approve the appropriations for the balance of the 1972 Revenue Sharing Funds.
Now it appears to be a firm thing. I know in your discussion you were talking
about making a decision later on, but the actual motion itself does not appear
to be qualified."
d." 1
23
Commissioner Cooper said, "The motion itself was not. There is no
question in my mind about that, but I thought we did have.."
Commissioner Losik said, "..it was done on a basis of what Bill stated,
that we'd have to earmark it, which we tentatively did, we made no final decision
on that particular item Larry."
Mr. Bengtson said, "It appears that in your discussion, you are talking
about a final decision at a later date; however the motion is unqualified."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, I don't think though, the point is,
that motion was made in that manner and not qualified, it could a just as easily
been because when that motion was made, again, we did it to fulfill a lump sum
obligation of items. There is no question in anybody's mind here at the bench
here that this was to be decided at a later time, so what I am saying is that
this was the option of this Commission, that we would make that decision at a
later date, which we haven't officially."
Mr. Bengtson replied, "I assume, if you would wish, if there is a doubt
in anyone's mind, you can certainly ratify this action."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I would be concerned about
that since we have already gone ahead and contracted, and I think we need to do
something like that because this, I don't feel,and there was no doubt in anybody'
minds that that decision regarding that particular point was to be made at a late
date, which we haven't officially taken the action on."
Commissioner Cooper said, "We may not have officially taken the action
on, but the agreements have been made.."
Commissioner Losik said, "All I am trying to do is, if we have done it
wrong, let's correct it, and if we haven't done it wrong then.."
Commissioner Caldwell asked, "Do we need a motion to ratify that?"
Mr. Bengtson replied, "If there is some doubt in somebody's mind, maybe
you should; however I think the motion is unqualified the way it is made."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well Larry, let's back up. Bill, you say
yes the motion is unqualified. You can't tell me for a minute there is a one
of us here misunderstood the fact that we were going to make this decision later.
This is what I am trying to point out. Everybody knew that to be a fact."
Mayor Usher commented, "It was based on the proposal, and if the
proposal was satisfactory, there isn't any problem."
Commissioner Losik said, "Right, and we never had any official
designation that that proposal was satisfactory to agree on it."
Mayor Usher said, "Everybody got a copy of the proposal. I presumed.."
Commissioner Losik said, "..that don't mean anything. You don't do
business just by handing out somebody a copy of this stuff."
Mayor Usher said, "Well, that is what we are qualifying here."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I am asking that we do.
Get this thing back on an even keel."
Mayor Usher said, "I will chair the meeting if anyone wants to make the
motion to ratify."
Commissioner
far as I know, this was
Cooper said, "And
the wishes of
I feel sure
the Commission
that on the Commission as
that we do it that way."
Commissioner
Losik said, "I
am not opposed
to the thing, all I am
trying to do is get it
into its legal
form if it is
not in legal form. That is
the only thing that I would like to see
done to it."
Mr. Bengtson said, "It appears that in your discussion, you are talking
about a final decision at a later date; however the motion is unqualified."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, I don't think though, the point is,
that motion was made in that manner and not qualified, it could a just as easily
been because when that motion was made, again, we did it to fulfill a lump sum
obligation of items. There is no question in anybody's mind here at the bench
here that this was to be decided at a later time, so what I am saying is that
this was the option of this Commission, that we would make that decision at a
later date, which we haven't officially."
Mr. Bengtson replied, "I assume, if you would wish, if there is a doubt
in anyone's mind, you can certainly ratify this action."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I would be concerned about
that since we have already gone ahead and contracted, and I think we need to do
something like that because this, I don't feel,and there was no doubt in anybody'
minds that that decision regarding that particular point was to be made at a late
date, which we haven't officially taken the action on."
Commissioner Cooper said, "We may not have officially taken the action
on, but the agreements have been made.."
Commissioner Losik said, "All I am trying to do is, if we have done it
wrong, let's correct it, and if we haven't done it wrong then.."
Commissioner Caldwell asked, "Do we need a motion to ratify that?"
Mr. Bengtson replied, "If there is some doubt in somebody's mind, maybe
you should; however I think the motion is unqualified the way it is made."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well Larry, let's back up. Bill, you say
yes the motion is unqualified. You can't tell me for a minute there is a one
of us here misunderstood the fact that we were going to make this decision later.
This is what I am trying to point out. Everybody knew that to be a fact."
Mayor Usher commented, "It was based on the proposal, and if the
proposal was satisfactory, there isn't any problem."
Commissioner Losik said, "Right, and we never had any official
designation that that proposal was satisfactory to agree on it."
Mayor Usher said, "Everybody got a copy of the proposal. I presumed.."
Commissioner Losik said, "..that don't mean anything. You don't do
business just by handing out somebody a copy of this stuff."
Mayor Usher said, "Well, that is what we are qualifying here."
Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I am asking that we do.
Get this thing back on an even keel."
Mayor Usher said, "I will chair the meeting if anyone wants to make the
motion to ratify."
1
1
1
24
Commissioner Weisgerber said, "Well, perhaps, I do believe we are
obligated for it, but to clear it up and get a vote on it so if anyone wishes to
vote however they want to vote, I would move that we, at this time, ratify, thoug
we just as well ratify that entire list again had we not, Larry, or should we
select just this one item?"
Mr. Bengtson replied, "Apparently the only question is regarding this
one item. The discussion has been that there was some question as to whether it
was ratified, apparently there was no question as to the other."
Commissioner Weisgerber said, "Well then, I move that we ratify that
item."
Commissioner Cooper asked, "Are you saying the United Way Study?"
Commissioner Weisgerber replied, "Yes."
Mr. Olson clarified, "The Needs and Services Study."
Commissioner Cooper asked, "This is the $10,000.00 study, right?"
Commissioner Weisgerber replied, "However the wording in there is."
Commissioner Caldwell seconded the motion. Ayes: Caldwell, Losik,
Weisgerber, Usher (4). Nays: Cooper (1). Motion carried.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner
Losik to add appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission to the agenda for
consideration. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
THE MAYOR, with the approval of the City Commission made the following
appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission:
Maryellen Batt, appointed to succeed Michael Brealey to January 16, 1978
1978. Virginia Burr, appointed to succeed Dr. Dennis Denning to January 16,
Gail Jones, appointed to succeed Jerry Exline to January 16, 1978.
John McGuire, appointed to succeed Frank McBride to January 16, 1978.
Dr. Charles Olson, appointed to succeed Mrs. Richard Morrison to
January 16, 1978.
Barbara Sackri der, appointed to succeed Dr. Wendell Nickell to
January 16, 1978.
1978. Marcia Swartz, appointed to succeed Mrs. Gerald Shadwick to January 16,
PUBLIC AGENDA
PETITION NUMBER 3469 was filed by Russell J. Fraser for the Diamond
Investment Company, for the approval of the preliminary Plat of Diamond Addition.
A motion was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell
to refer the petition to the City Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0).
Motion carried.
A CEREAL MALT BEVERAGE License Application was filed by Gas -a -Way, Inc.
Bill Sargent, Manager, 842 North Santa Fe Avenue. (New application). The City
Clerk reported the applicant has paid the required fee, and the application has
been approved by the Health Department, Zoning Officer and the Police Department.
A motion was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Losik to
approve the license application and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license
Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
9-
'110
A TREE TRIMMING License Application was filed by Raymond Kline, d/b/a
Kline's Landscaping and Turf, Route # 1. The City Clerk reported the applicant
has paid the required fee and has the required surety bond and public liability
insurance on file. A motion was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by
Commissioner Losik to approve the license application and authorize the City
Clerk to issue the license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
A LETTER was received from the Urban Renewal Agency suggesting the
City Commission request an extension of the completion date for site improvements
for the Central City Project, Kansas A-8, to June 30, 1975. A motion was made by
Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to send a letter requesting
an extension of time to June 30, 1975, for the Central City Project, Kansas A-8.
Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner
Losik that the Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners be adjourned.
Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried.
D. L. Harrison, City Clerk
1