Loading...
02-03-1975 MinutesCity of Salina, Kansas Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners February 3, 1975 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners met in the Commissioners' Room, City -County Building, on Monday, February 3, 1975, at four o'clock P.M. The Mayor asked everyone to stand for the pledge of allegiance to the Flag and a moment of silent prayer. There were present: Mayor W. M. Usher, Chairman presiding Commissioner Robert C. Caldwell Commissioner Norma G. Cooper Commissioner Mike Losik, Jr. Commissioner Jack Weisgerber comprising a quorum of the Board, also: L. 0. Bengtson, City Attorney Norris D. Olson, City Manager D. L. Harrison, City Clerk Absent: None The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 27, 1975 were approved as printed. THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 9 through 15, 1975 - "VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK IN SALINA". The proclamation was read by Mayor Usher. THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 4th (through 10th) 1975 - "CLERGY WEEK". The proclamation was read by John Garcia, Vice-president of the Civitan Club. THE MAYOR PROCLAIMED the Week of February 9 through 15, 1975 - "NEGRO BLACK HISTORY WEEK". The proclamation was read by Oliver D. Green. MAYOR USHER welcomed a group of children and adults from the Martin Luther King Day Care Center. STAFF AGENDA A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the improvements in Engineering Project 74-560: (Community Theater Site) The concrete paving, curbing, guttering, sidewalks, and landscaping as authorized by Resolution Number 3156, passed by the Board of Commissioners on the 20th day of August, 1973. There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed assessment. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed:_ 1 ,. to 119S Number: �42i i 19 A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the improvements in Engineering Project 74-564: (Country Hills #2 and Georgetown) Paving and grading of Fairdale Road from Country Hills Road to Fairdale Court. Paving and grading of Fairdale Court from Fairdale Road to the Fairdale Court -cul-de-sac. Paving and grading of Country Hills Road from Marymount Road to the Country Hills cul-de-sac. Installation of water mains and service lines to serve Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 3 through 16, Block 2; Lots 1 through 20, Block 3, Country Hills Addition Number 2 to the City of Salina, Kansas. Installation of sanitary sewer main and sewer line to serve Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 2 through 21, Block 2; Lots 1 through 21, Block 3, Country Hills Addition Number 2 to the City of Salina, Kansas. Installation of sanitary sewer main to serve all lots in Blocks 1, 2, 3, Georgetown Addition to the City of Salina, Kansas. as authorized by Resolution Number 3176, passed by the Board of Commissioners on the 11th day of March, 1974 There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed assessment. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: io� 197a Number: A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the proposed assessments for the improvements in Engineering Project 74-567: (Planet Avenue and Century Plaza Drive) Curbing, guttering, paving and grading of Planet Avenue; adjacent to the North 300 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, Wallerius Addition. Water service for the South 100 feet of the North 300 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, Wallerius Addition. Curbing, guttering, paving and grading of Century Plaza Drive in Meadowlark Acres Addition Number 2. as authorized by Resolution Number 3181, passed by the Board of Commissioners on the 8th day of April, 1974. There were no protests, and no changes were made in the proposed assessment. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the assessments and introduce the assessment ordinance for first reading. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. Ordinance Passed: Number: x q1 5 A MOTION was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by Commissioner Cooper to set the date of February 24, 1975 to receive bids to repair and replace overflow launders, weirs and baffles in Water Treatment Basins Number 1 and Number 2 at the Water Treatment Plant, and instruct the City Clerk to advertise for bids. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE CITY ENGINEER filed a feasibility report for street and utility improvements in Key Acres 2n1 Addition. A motion was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the report as filed. Ayes: Nays: (0). Motion carried. COMMISSION AGENDA Mayor Usher said, "Well, of course that is not the way I understand it. We have two contracts with the United Way. Cne is a $3,000.00 contract for referral service and they will provide the central location, they have trained the personnel, sent her back to New York, Wasington D.C., and we will develop the telephone number the community will know about and they can call when they have some kind of a social connected problem or need. The second project was to find out what the social needs are in our community. This was the meeting we had with Mr. Edelston, and it was my understanding in visiting with him that this is what we would like to have done. He represents the Management Community Studies Institute that specializes in developing this kind of information and he said that they could do that at the time, the only thing he was having a problem on whether the City should finance the entire project, and until he could resolve that in his mind he couldn't give us a commitment. We said fine, you think about it and write us the proposal back, which he did, and as far as I was concerned when I got done reading their proposal, it was about exactly the way I thought the thing was going, and so we have gone ahead and fairly well committed those Revenue Sharing funds for the project." Commissioner Cooper asked, "When did we do all this?" Mayor Usher replied, "December the 9th." Commissioner Cooper said, "No, we qualified that committment, because when the Commission discussed this originally, and you know this Bill, you know these funds were qualified dependent upon.." Mayor Usher said, ".. qualified based upon what Mr. Edelston sent back. "DECIDE ON THE PROPOSED UNITED WAY STUDY". (Put on the agenda in a telephone request by Commissioner Cooper). Commissioner Cooper stated, "Back in the forepart of December, the Commission designated Revenue moneys for certain projects. One of those was a United Way study, which was dependent upon a meeting scheduled for a later date. We held the meeting, we received the proposal from the United Way people. I don't believe there has ever been a complete understanding on the Commission as to what we hope to accomplish by the study. In the beginning it was my under- standing that the local United Way Agency was willing to act as sponsor for some kind of a central referral bureau, not only for their different agencies, but also for governmental agencies. This would provide people with access to information that possibly they didn't know where to start out to locate a particular program or a particular service. I could see some advantages to the community in having this kind of a convenience. I could also see the possibiliti where it might lessen any kind of duplication or overlap, no guarantee that it would, but if you had a record on as many of the services and programs available in the community as possible then you might see some areas where there were overlaps or duplications. I would be willing and in agreement with, if the United Way is interested in sponsoring something like this, in supporting it. I do not believe it requires a $10,000.00 study to implement something like this. I would like to see the Commission make some kind of a decision on it and if possible maybe that money could be released for other purposes." Mayor Usher said, "Well, of course that is not the way I understand it. We have two contracts with the United Way. Cne is a $3,000.00 contract for referral service and they will provide the central location, they have trained the personnel, sent her back to New York, Wasington D.C., and we will develop the telephone number the community will know about and they can call when they have some kind of a social connected problem or need. The second project was to find out what the social needs are in our community. This was the meeting we had with Mr. Edelston, and it was my understanding in visiting with him that this is what we would like to have done. He represents the Management Community Studies Institute that specializes in developing this kind of information and he said that they could do that at the time, the only thing he was having a problem on whether the City should finance the entire project, and until he could resolve that in his mind he couldn't give us a commitment. We said fine, you think about it and write us the proposal back, which he did, and as far as I was concerned when I got done reading their proposal, it was about exactly the way I thought the thing was going, and so we have gone ahead and fairly well committed those Revenue Sharing funds for the project." Commissioner Cooper asked, "When did we do all this?" Mayor Usher replied, "December the 9th." Commissioner Cooper said, "No, we qualified that committment, because when the Commission discussed this originally, and you know this Bill, you know these funds were qualified dependent upon.." Mayor Usher said, ".. qualified based upon what Mr. Edelston sent back. 21 Mayor Usher said, "..no, we had two separate proposals." Commissioner Cooper replied, "When I agreed to the funding of the Revenue moneys, it was with that idea that we would reach a firm conclusion, depending on what the decision envolved with the United Way people at a later meeting. I had no way of knowing what that meeting was going to cover." Mayor Usher said, "We asked him to go back and present a proposal to us, and based on what he wrote back to us would make up our final decision. Now information came back to us that was sent out to the Commissioners and if there was any conflict, any change in what we were thinking when we talked to him, why, that would have been the time to jump up and say, 'hey now that isn't the way'.." Commissioner Cooper commented, "..no, that wouldn't have been the time. The information that Mr. Edelston forwarded to the Commission.." Mayor Usher commented, "..well, that is the way I think it is." Commissioner Cooper replied, "Well, okay you look at it differently the The information that was forwarded to the Commission was sent to us for our leisu review, or some kind of language like that." Mayor Usher said, "That was the sixth of January." Commissioner Weisgerber said, "I am kind of between the two but as I remember this thing, when we agreed to this we did say that we wanted to review that part of it, but at the same time we knew that we had a deadline of allocatin these funds at either January 1st or a few days after, anyway about then. The actual letter came in after the first of January, but I had the feeling that really that we passed the deadline, and I think we are way past it now, of making any change, and by the fact that we didn't counteract it, we automatically accepted it because we had this deadline of allocation. That is my feeling about it. I don't think we ever did have a formal motion that said yes we accepted it but we passed the deadline of being able to make the change in it, is my conception of the thing." Mr. Olson said, "You will recall that prior to December 9th, staff worked up a list and in concert with visits with you, a couple I think anyway, came up with these various items for the budgeting of the final funds for the first and second entitlement periods. At those meetings we told you that these had to be resolved by the end of the year, and absolutely no later than January 8 On the meeting date of December 9, we pulled these minutes because I couldn't recall specifically, and Mr. Losik raised the question about the item of the Needs and Services Study, about making a decision on that subject later on. Mayor Usher stated, 'we need to go ahead and include it in the list subject to the presentation and then if we are convinced it is a worthwhile project adopt it A motion was made by Commissioner Los ik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to approve the appropriations for the balance of the 172 Revenue Sharing Funds. Vote 5-0. Then Mr. Edelston came out on the 18th of December. He was here and at that time you discussed the Needs Survey. He discussed the entire gamut of things and he went back and put together Phase I and Phase II of this program. Phase I is the accumulation of the data, the resource information, updating it, or retrieving it as it relates to human services resource information using his words. He also presented the second program of evaluating the needs to see if Commissioner Cooper said, "No, based on a decision among the Commission, which is the same one that we are faced with today. It was my understanding and I think the Commission knows it was my understanding because before we ever met with Mr. Edelston we discussed the possibilities of offering some kind of a centr I referral bureau i:n this community. When Mr. ElwiII came forward it was with what I believe the idea that the United Way, because of all their different participating agencies, because of all the different programs and services that are available as governmental services and programs, that they were willing to act as the agent for people who needed to locate a particular service or program. Now this is what I thought we were discussing. When Mr. Edelston showed up I thought then it enlarged into maybe other areas, so when I agreed to.." Mayor Usher said, "..no, we had two separate proposals." Commissioner Cooper replied, "When I agreed to the funding of the Revenue moneys, it was with that idea that we would reach a firm conclusion, depending on what the decision envolved with the United Way people at a later meeting. I had no way of knowing what that meeting was going to cover." Mayor Usher said, "We asked him to go back and present a proposal to us, and based on what he wrote back to us would make up our final decision. Now information came back to us that was sent out to the Commissioners and if there was any conflict, any change in what we were thinking when we talked to him, why, that would have been the time to jump up and say, 'hey now that isn't the way'.." Commissioner Cooper commented, "..no, that wouldn't have been the time. The information that Mr. Edelston forwarded to the Commission.." Mayor Usher commented, "..well, that is the way I think it is." Commissioner Cooper replied, "Well, okay you look at it differently the The information that was forwarded to the Commission was sent to us for our leisu review, or some kind of language like that." Mayor Usher said, "That was the sixth of January." Commissioner Weisgerber said, "I am kind of between the two but as I remember this thing, when we agreed to this we did say that we wanted to review that part of it, but at the same time we knew that we had a deadline of allocatin these funds at either January 1st or a few days after, anyway about then. The actual letter came in after the first of January, but I had the feeling that really that we passed the deadline, and I think we are way past it now, of making any change, and by the fact that we didn't counteract it, we automatically accepted it because we had this deadline of allocation. That is my feeling about it. I don't think we ever did have a formal motion that said yes we accepted it but we passed the deadline of being able to make the change in it, is my conception of the thing." Mr. Olson said, "You will recall that prior to December 9th, staff worked up a list and in concert with visits with you, a couple I think anyway, came up with these various items for the budgeting of the final funds for the first and second entitlement periods. At those meetings we told you that these had to be resolved by the end of the year, and absolutely no later than January 8 On the meeting date of December 9, we pulled these minutes because I couldn't recall specifically, and Mr. Losik raised the question about the item of the Needs and Services Study, about making a decision on that subject later on. Mayor Usher stated, 'we need to go ahead and include it in the list subject to the presentation and then if we are convinced it is a worthwhile project adopt it A motion was made by Commissioner Los ik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to approve the appropriations for the balance of the 172 Revenue Sharing Funds. Vote 5-0. Then Mr. Edelston came out on the 18th of December. He was here and at that time you discussed the Needs Survey. He discussed the entire gamut of things and he went back and put together Phase I and Phase II of this program. Phase I is the accumulation of the data, the resource information, updating it, or retrieving it as it relates to human services resource information using his words. He also presented the second program of evaluating the needs to see if 1 1 1 22 those needs precisely or specifically fit what they would consider the overall community needs to be. That is the second $10,000.00 project. I don't remember the precise day that Mr. Elwill called me, but it was after the deadline had passed, as to what the decision of the Commission was. I advised him that as far as I knew there was no decision contrary to the thinking of the group around the table with Mr. Edelston. I thought that day that you had pretty much reached a concurrance that if he could come up with a package that we were all talking about, whether it be Phase I or Phase II or Phase whatever, that this is what we were zeroing in on. I told Ron on that basis, in my opinion,they had a contract. Commissioner Cooper said, "There was never any time in any of this discussion where I felt like other than when on the December the 9th meeting that we did earmark Revenue funds for this kind of a study, if we decided that we needed one. Other than that and the decision was pending, none had been made at that time as far as I was concerned, and I think the minutes reflect this. Where you say it was questioned that it would be decided at a future date or something like this whether we would go for a study or not; but other than setting aside those revenue moneys should the Commission wish to have the study made, there was never, as far as I am concerned, any commitment on the part of this City Commission to confirm any contractual agreement with Mr. Edelston." Mr. Olson said, "But you are aware that we told you all along that the decisions had to be made by the end of the year, and no later than the forepart of January." Commissioner Cooper replied, Okay, you have to designate what you want to use those moneys for, we have done this in the past." Mr. Olson said, "Right." Commissioner Cooper said, "But at times also, we have changed." Mayor Usher said, "But you can't do it on this one because this is the end of it." Mr. Harrison said, "For the Revenue Sharing money for the first and secondperiod I had to have a purchase order written because it has to be encumbe Commissioner Cooper commented, "I think the fact that no body bothered to explain the fine details is conclusive of the fact, apparently, that you just simply wanted that and you got it.,, Mayor Usher said, "I don't think that is fair, because I think that we sent the information out, a proposal, and you had every opportunity to jump up then and say I don't want it, I don't like it." Commissioner Losik said, "I would like to ask one question. Larry, you can answer this. From the way those minutes are written up, and the fact that there was not a follow up to that to make a final decision on that expenditures of funds, did we legally spend those moneys? Did we legally enter into a contrac based from the information of that minutes which states that we would make a final decision at a later date, so therefore do we do not have anything as an official action of this Commission to show that those funds were to be spent that way." Mr. Bengtson replied, "Well, the way the motion reads, it says, 'A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to approve.." Commissioner Losik said, "Read back, Larry, read back the whole thing." Mr. Bengtson said, "The other items on the agreement - the Community Needs and Services Study, I think that we were going to make that final decision later on this month, were we not? Now the actual motion that is in the minutes is that a motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwel to approve the appropriations for the balance of the 1972 Revenue Sharing Funds. Now it appears to be a firm thing. I know in your discussion you were talking about making a decision later on, but the actual motion itself does not appear to be qualified." d." 1 23 Commissioner Cooper said, "The motion itself was not. There is no question in my mind about that, but I thought we did have.." Commissioner Losik said, "..it was done on a basis of what Bill stated, that we'd have to earmark it, which we tentatively did, we made no final decision on that particular item Larry." Mr. Bengtson said, "It appears that in your discussion, you are talking about a final decision at a later date; however the motion is unqualified." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, I don't think though, the point is, that motion was made in that manner and not qualified, it could a just as easily been because when that motion was made, again, we did it to fulfill a lump sum obligation of items. There is no question in anybody's mind here at the bench here that this was to be decided at a later time, so what I am saying is that this was the option of this Commission, that we would make that decision at a later date, which we haven't officially." Mr. Bengtson replied, "I assume, if you would wish, if there is a doubt in anyone's mind, you can certainly ratify this action." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I would be concerned about that since we have already gone ahead and contracted, and I think we need to do something like that because this, I don't feel,and there was no doubt in anybody' minds that that decision regarding that particular point was to be made at a late date, which we haven't officially taken the action on." Commissioner Cooper said, "We may not have officially taken the action on, but the agreements have been made.." Commissioner Losik said, "All I am trying to do is, if we have done it wrong, let's correct it, and if we haven't done it wrong then.." Commissioner Caldwell asked, "Do we need a motion to ratify that?" Mr. Bengtson replied, "If there is some doubt in somebody's mind, maybe you should; however I think the motion is unqualified the way it is made." Commissioner Losik said, "Well Larry, let's back up. Bill, you say yes the motion is unqualified. You can't tell me for a minute there is a one of us here misunderstood the fact that we were going to make this decision later. This is what I am trying to point out. Everybody knew that to be a fact." Mayor Usher commented, "It was based on the proposal, and if the proposal was satisfactory, there isn't any problem." Commissioner Losik said, "Right, and we never had any official designation that that proposal was satisfactory to agree on it." Mayor Usher said, "Everybody got a copy of the proposal. I presumed.." Commissioner Losik said, "..that don't mean anything. You don't do business just by handing out somebody a copy of this stuff." Mayor Usher said, "Well, that is what we are qualifying here." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I am asking that we do. Get this thing back on an even keel." Mayor Usher said, "I will chair the meeting if anyone wants to make the motion to ratify." Commissioner far as I know, this was Cooper said, "And the wishes of I feel sure the Commission that on the Commission as that we do it that way." Commissioner Losik said, "I am not opposed to the thing, all I am trying to do is get it into its legal form if it is not in legal form. That is the only thing that I would like to see done to it." Mr. Bengtson said, "It appears that in your discussion, you are talking about a final decision at a later date; however the motion is unqualified." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, I don't think though, the point is, that motion was made in that manner and not qualified, it could a just as easily been because when that motion was made, again, we did it to fulfill a lump sum obligation of items. There is no question in anybody's mind here at the bench here that this was to be decided at a later time, so what I am saying is that this was the option of this Commission, that we would make that decision at a later date, which we haven't officially." Mr. Bengtson replied, "I assume, if you would wish, if there is a doubt in anyone's mind, you can certainly ratify this action." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I would be concerned about that since we have already gone ahead and contracted, and I think we need to do something like that because this, I don't feel,and there was no doubt in anybody' minds that that decision regarding that particular point was to be made at a late date, which we haven't officially taken the action on." Commissioner Cooper said, "We may not have officially taken the action on, but the agreements have been made.." Commissioner Losik said, "All I am trying to do is, if we have done it wrong, let's correct it, and if we haven't done it wrong then.." Commissioner Caldwell asked, "Do we need a motion to ratify that?" Mr. Bengtson replied, "If there is some doubt in somebody's mind, maybe you should; however I think the motion is unqualified the way it is made." Commissioner Losik said, "Well Larry, let's back up. Bill, you say yes the motion is unqualified. You can't tell me for a minute there is a one of us here misunderstood the fact that we were going to make this decision later. This is what I am trying to point out. Everybody knew that to be a fact." Mayor Usher commented, "It was based on the proposal, and if the proposal was satisfactory, there isn't any problem." Commissioner Losik said, "Right, and we never had any official designation that that proposal was satisfactory to agree on it." Mayor Usher said, "Everybody got a copy of the proposal. I presumed.." Commissioner Losik said, "..that don't mean anything. You don't do business just by handing out somebody a copy of this stuff." Mayor Usher said, "Well, that is what we are qualifying here." Commissioner Losik said, "Well, this is what I am asking that we do. Get this thing back on an even keel." Mayor Usher said, "I will chair the meeting if anyone wants to make the motion to ratify." 1 1 1 24 Commissioner Weisgerber said, "Well, perhaps, I do believe we are obligated for it, but to clear it up and get a vote on it so if anyone wishes to vote however they want to vote, I would move that we, at this time, ratify, thoug we just as well ratify that entire list again had we not, Larry, or should we select just this one item?" Mr. Bengtson replied, "Apparently the only question is regarding this one item. The discussion has been that there was some question as to whether it was ratified, apparently there was no question as to the other." Commissioner Weisgerber said, "Well then, I move that we ratify that item." Commissioner Cooper asked, "Are you saying the United Way Study?" Commissioner Weisgerber replied, "Yes." Mr. Olson clarified, "The Needs and Services Study." Commissioner Cooper asked, "This is the $10,000.00 study, right?" Commissioner Weisgerber replied, "However the wording in there is." Commissioner Caldwell seconded the motion. Ayes: Caldwell, Losik, Weisgerber, Usher (4). Nays: Cooper (1). Motion carried. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik to add appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission to the agenda for consideration. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. THE MAYOR, with the approval of the City Commission made the following appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission: Maryellen Batt, appointed to succeed Michael Brealey to January 16, 1978 1978. Virginia Burr, appointed to succeed Dr. Dennis Denning to January 16, Gail Jones, appointed to succeed Jerry Exline to January 16, 1978. John McGuire, appointed to succeed Frank McBride to January 16, 1978. Dr. Charles Olson, appointed to succeed Mrs. Richard Morrison to January 16, 1978. Barbara Sackri der, appointed to succeed Dr. Wendell Nickell to January 16, 1978. 1978. Marcia Swartz, appointed to succeed Mrs. Gerald Shadwick to January 16, PUBLIC AGENDA PETITION NUMBER 3469 was filed by Russell J. Fraser for the Diamond Investment Company, for the approval of the preliminary Plat of Diamond Addition. A motion was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to refer the petition to the City Planning Commission. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A CEREAL MALT BEVERAGE License Application was filed by Gas -a -Way, Inc. Bill Sargent, Manager, 842 North Santa Fe Avenue. (New application). The City Clerk reported the applicant has paid the required fee, and the application has been approved by the Health Department, Zoning Officer and the Police Department. A motion was made by Commissioner Cooper, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the license application and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. 9- '110 A TREE TRIMMING License Application was filed by Raymond Kline, d/b/a Kline's Landscaping and Turf, Route # 1. The City Clerk reported the applicant has paid the required fee and has the required surety bond and public liability insurance on file. A motion was made by Commissioner Weisgerber, seconded by Commissioner Losik to approve the license application and authorize the City Clerk to issue the license. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A LETTER was received from the Urban Renewal Agency suggesting the City Commission request an extension of the completion date for site improvements for the Central City Project, Kansas A-8, to June 30, 1975. A motion was made by Commissioner Losik, seconded by Commissioner Caldwell to send a letter requesting an extension of time to June 30, 1975, for the Central City Project, Kansas A-8. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. A MOTION was made by Commissioner Caldwell, seconded by Commissioner Losik that the Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners be adjourned. Ayes: (5). Nays: (0). Motion carried. D. L. Harrison, City Clerk 1