Loading...
01-13-2020 Minutes CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS January 13,2020 4:00 p.m. The City Commission convened at 3:45 p.m. for Citizens Forum at City-County Building, Room 107B. Mayor Davis asked the Clerk for verification that notice had been sent for today's City W Commission meeting.The Clerk replied yes. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Commissioners was called to order at 4:00 p.m. in Room 107, City-County Building. Roll call was taken followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Those present and comprising a quorum: Mayor Trent W. Davis, M.D. (presiding), Commissioners Joe Hay,Jr.,Melissa Rose Hodges,Mike Hoppock,and Karl Ryan. �J'AIso present: Michael Schrage, City Manager; Greg Bengtson, City Attorney; and Shandi. Wicks, City Clerk. AWARDS AND PROCLAMATIONS (3.1) The month of January 2020 as "National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month" in the city of Salina. Sheila Beeson, DVACK Sexual Assault Advocate read the proclamation and announced associated events. (3.2) The month of January 2020 as "National Stalking Awareness Month" in the city of Salina. Whitney Russell, DVACK Parent/Child Advocate, read the proclamation and announced associated events. �f (3.3) The day of January 20, 2020 as "Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Commemoration Day" in the city of Salina. Eleanor Jones of the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Ad-Hoc Committee,read the proclamation and announced associated events. CITIZENS FORUM None. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR A CERTAIN TIME (5.1) Public hearing on the proposed 2020 amended budget for the City of Salina. Debbie Pack,Director of Finance and Administration,explained the amendments. Mayor Davis asked if this affected the balancing of the budget. Ms. Pack stated no. Mayor Davis opened the public hearing. There being no further comments the public hearing was closed. 20-0022 Moved by Commissioner Ryan, seconded by Commissioner Hoppock, to authorize the 2020 budget amendments, Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA (6.1) Approve the meeting minutes of January 6,2020. Page 1 j (6.2) Authorize the City Manager to pay the annual invoice for dues and subscriptions to the League of Kansas Municipalities in the amount of$20,720.37. 20-0023 Moved by Commissioner Ryan, seconded by Commissioner Hodges, to approve the consent agenda as presented. Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. ADMINISTRATION (7.1) Second reading Urdinance No. 20-11023 establishing a moratorium on future building permits in the Grand Prairie Addition in the City of Salina,Kansas. (Potential Executive Session: I move the city commission recess into executive session for _ minutes to discuss with legal counsel the proposed moratorium on future building permits in the Grand Prairie Addition in the City of Salina, Kansas i based upon the need for consultation with an attorney for the public body which would be deemed privileged in the attorney-client relationship pursuant to K.S.A. 75-7319(b)(2). The open meeting will resume in this room at p.m.) Lauren Driscoll, Director of Community & Development Services, explained the revised ordinance,memo from the fire marshal and action options. Troy Long, Fire Marshal, explained information on subdivision regulations in other communities in Kansas. He continued to explain the email he provided the City Commission between himself and Stuart Bevis, Fire Marshal with the City of Wichita. He further stated he would provide a copy of an email chain regarding Exception#2 of D Michael Schrage, City Manager, also provided additional information regarding subdivision regulations for the City of Wichita and Sedgwick County. Commissioner Hodges asked what our current subdivision regulations were regarding the maximum length of a cul-de-sac. Ms. Driscoll stated she was going to verify it and let the commission know. Commissioner Hodges asked if staff had a chance to do an inventory and evaluation of the Csingle access subdivisions. Mr. Schrage stated he had tasked development services staff with that initial inventory due to it being more of a planning and platting requirement question. He continued to state he asked development services to focus on single entrances as well as where approval was conditioned on provision of some emergency access. He further stated once the inventory was complete, he would like the fire department staff to go out and inspect each to see if the road was installed and remained in place according to those conditions. Commissioner Hodges asked fire department staff to take a look at Riverrun Addition to see if it was accessible and useable. She continued to mention a tree in the access lane and the steep slope. Mr. Schrage stated that he had not had a chance to look at Riverrun but knew that multiple staff had visited the location and he understood it was initially installed as required and if looking at aerial photographs, you could see the road was in place and the rock was in place and he was advised that it was allowed to grow up in grass. He continued to state that the question becomes whether there was still a sufficient road bed there under the grass. A conversation ensued between Commissioner Hodges and Mr. Schrage regarding the ongoing inspection and maintenance of the road, Ms. Driscoll stated the Subdivision Regulations state 600 feet from the right-of-way line of the commencing street along the center line right-of-way. She continued to state 600 feet for �� Page 2 a dead-end cul-de-sac. Commissioner Hodges asked what the length of the cul-de-sac was in this case. Mr. Schrage stated it depended on where you measured from, but it was his understanding that Phase III was about 900 feet but did not know the additional distance of Phase II. Ms. Driscoll stated from Markley Road to the end of Phase III was 758 feet. Commissioner Hodges asked what the measurement was from Bentgrass Drive through Phase II to the end of Phase III. Ms. Driscoll stated she would need to look. A conversation ensued between the City Commission regarding the phasing of the project. Mayor Davis stated in the email from Stuart Bevis, it brought up the same question he had last week, and asked if the exceptions granted created a life and safety issue or were more for a convenience to turn around the vehicle. Fire Marshal Long stated Mr. Bevis provided an example regarding a situation that the City of Wichita had regarding a fire unit having to back the unit down a long access road due to the inability to turn the unit around. Commissioner Hoppock asked if the cut outs affected the length of the street. Mr. Schrage stated he thought it was part of the original intent for the design of the subdivision. He continued to state there was sufficient discretion to use the exception. He further provided information on the ability to amend the code. Mayor Davis asked what the timeframe was before the access road must be installed. Fire Marshall Long stated his comment was that no vertical building could occur in Phase III without the emergency access road being built. Mr. Schrage stated that it was currently listed that the emergency access road would not be installed until the end of Phase M. Mayor Davis provided his thoughts on the timing for the emergency access road. A conversation ensued between the City Commission, Mr. Schrage, and Fire Marshal Long regarding the timing of the emergency access road. Commissioner Hodges read part of an email from Stuart Bevis regarding what she would see as a potential goal pertaining to conformance with the IFC. Mr. Schrage stated the IFC articulated 30 for the standard and then it articulated exceptions, there was a way to deviate from strict adherence to 30 but there was an opportunity to be more formal than we were in this instance in terms of when you get the benefit of the exception, how do we codify that and what would need to be done in the way of financial securities. He continued to state there was an opportunity to improve our practices. Commissioner Hoppock provided his thoughts on the item, the motion made last week regarding the 60 day moratorium. Mr. Schrage provided information regarding staffs meeting Iast week with the developer regarding the access road. Ms. Driscoll stated that Phase II was approximately 900 feet in length and Phase III was approximately 800 feet in length. Mayor Davis asked what distance the boulevard to where it becomes a single road without a median in Phase H. Ms. Driscoll stated that she would determine that answer and let the commission know. Mike Montoya, representing Cornerstone Development and Bill Sheppard, provided information regarding the moratorium, the exception used, the phasing of the subdivision, construction and layout of the emergency access road. He continued to state that when we come back to you, we would like to come back to you with a collaborative effort with City staff with a plan to move forward. He further provided information on the financial effect Page 3 on the developer, asked that the ordinance be amended to 35 building permits and provided information on the decline of lots sales that had recently occurred due to the moratorium potential. Commissioner Hay asked if we find that the access road was best placed through the golf course, how it would be maintained if it was located within the golf course. Mr. Schrage stated that there were examples of other access roads,not through a golf course but in other instances that were not regularly traveled. He continued to state the whole issue of maintenance during snow, may have been a consideration previously but did not think it was sufficiently taken into account in the past. He further stated that we've identified that this property was a challenging piece of property in terms of its configuration, we've consented to the two (2) peninsulas going into the golf course,and we have looked at some alignments to configure the access road to denote the boundaries of that road so it was visible during snow or during good weather and we need to revisit or perform ongoing inspection on not just this road but all access roads in the community. He lastly stated that we need to revisit the ongoing maintenance in terms of snow plowing by way of either landscaping the edges of the fairway or something more prominent in the way of bollards. Commissioner Hodges asked if staff had contemplated the requirement of residential fire systems for additions over 30 homes. Mr. Schrage stated that it was originally prohibited to require the installation of residential fire systems for new homes. He continued to provide information regarding the prohibition and the need for legal review to look at the prohibition. Mayor Davis stated Mr. Montoya's comment suggested tying the fire access road to the replat and asked if there was a plan b,if Phase III was not replatted as far as the access road was concerned. Mr. Montoya stated it was tied to the development of Phase III and what happened with the replat but at the same time, if there was an issue with the replat, it becomes a matter of trying to work out financing of the access road in the developer's agreement that we're working with the city right now. Mayor Davis stated we are obviously not discussing the replat as our business today and wanted it to be tied to that one issue. Mr. Schrage stated that staff was able to identify an alternate option for financing, the construction of the emergency access road was eligible for community improvement district financing. Commissioner Ryan asked if the commission chose to make a motion to postpone the ordinance on second reading how long would staff need to bring the item back. Mr. Schrage stated approximately 60 days. Commissioner Hodges wanted to confirm from 2008 this was always a plan to be a three (3) phase development. Bill Sheppard, Cornerstone Development, stated it had always been a development and did not see a relevancy on the phases of the development. Ms. Driscoll stated the distance from the boulevard to where it became a single road without a median in Phase 11 was 1871 feet. Abner Perney, 101 Overhill Road, provided his thoughts on the emergency access road, approval of the final plat relating to the emergency access road and the options to move the item along. Mr. Schrage clarified that the requirement for no occupancy permits until the emergency access road was built,was part of the preliminary plat but went away as part of the final plat. Page 4 Commissioner Hodges mentioned that the amount of time for Mr. Perney was more than the typical amount of time, she would ask that the same happen for the rest of the public speaking. Dr. Justin Hanke provided his thoughts and concerns on the documents provided in his open records request and in the staff reports and the timing of the emergency access road. He continued to provide his thoughts on the moratorium. Jon Blanchard,250 S. Ninth Street, stated he looked at the documents provided to Dr.Justin Hanke in his open records request regarding the phasing of the development and asked if there were other subdivisions that the exception was granted. He continued to state he had done his own research regarding his question. He further provided his comment on the inconsistencies of the process. Commissioner Hoppock asked staff to provide information on the documents previously held and why staff provided the documents. Mr. Schrage stated Development Review Team (DRT) notes and notes, memoranda and preliminary policy decisions could be held as part of the open records act and the letter explained the reason the documents were originally not provided and why staff decided to provide the documents. He continued to provide the process for Kansas Open Records Act, the fulfillment of the requests and his intent going forward. Commissioner Hodges asked is it best practice to not acknowledge a documents existence or was it best to redact the document and provide a reason for why it was not allowed. Mr. Schrage stated that he wanted to formalize the process for filling an open records request. Commissioner Hodges stated in the future,would it be disclosed that the document existed or just a non-response on a request. Mr. Schrage stated he did not know how to answer that question for two (2) reasons; (1) it would take legal review that he had yet to have and get that answer back and (2)he was not sure he could provide a blanket answer across all types of documents. Mayor Davis asked that questions asked stick with the agenda item currently being discussed. Mr. Schrage stated he would be happy to reach back to the commission of the process documentation put together on the process of open record requests. 20-0024 Moved by Commissioner Hoppock, seconded by Commissioner Hodges, to adopt Ordinance No. 20-11023 establishing a moratorium on future building permits in the Grand Prairie Addition in the City of Salina,Kansas. Greg Bengtson, City Attorney, stated that he would appreciate the opportunity to speak with the Governing Body in executive session. He continued to state that his advice had not been discussed publicly and once that was provided,the Governing Body could handle it at their discretion.. 20-0025 Moved by Commissioner Hoppock, seconded by Commissioner Ryan, to recess into executive session for 10 minutes to discuss with legal counsel the proposed moratorium on future building permits in the Grand Prairie Addition in the City of Salina, Kansas based upon the need for consultation with an attorney for the public body which would be deemed privileged in the attorney-client relationship pursuant to K.S.A. 75-7319(b)(2). The open meeting will resume in this room,at 6:02 p.m. Aye: (4). Nay: (1) Hodges. Motion carried. The City Commission recessed into executive session at 5:52 p.m. and reconvened at 6:02 p.m. No action was taken. Page 5 i Also present in executive session: Mike Schrage, City Manager; and Greg Bengtson, City Attorney. Commissioner Hoppock stated that based on some discussion at this time,he would like to remove his motion to approve Ordinance No. 20-11023 on second reading. Commissioner Hodges stated she would withdraw her second. 20-0026 Moved by Commissioner Ryan to postpone consideration of Ordinance No. 20-11023 on second reading until and when the developer has applied for 35 permits. Greg Bengtson,City Attorney,stated if you look at the proposed ordinance and if you wish to consider allowing whatever number you might choose of additional permits,if you look at Section 2 of the draft ordinance: "There is hereby established a 60-day moratorium on future building permits in excess of_(insert number) total in Phases I and H of the Grand Prairie Addition. He continued to provide information on the concept of the proposed compromise. Mayor Davis stated there was motion on the floor that either needed to be retracted, clarified or seconded. Commissioner Ryan stated he could clarify his motion based on the information Mr. Bengtson provided, which was suggesting option #2, that we approve the ordinance but with amendments that the moratorium not go into effect until there are X number of units. Mr. Bengtson stated that was correct. Commissioner Ryan revised his motion to approve the ordinance with an amendment that the moratorium not go into effect until 35 building permits were issued in Phase I and II. Commissioner Hay seconded the motion. Commissioner Hodges made a few remarks regarding the comments of Dr. Hanke, the information presented, Dr. Hanke's open records request and wanted the open records request to be a matter of public record. Mayor Davis provided his thoughts regarding Commissioner Hodge's remarks. Mr. Schrage stated his staffs organizational commitment and organizational values of the organization and mentioned that he did not recall a conversation with Commissioner Hodges regarding staff. A conversation ensued between Commissioner Hodges, Mayor Davis and Mr. Schrage on the conversation regarding staff. Commissioner Ryan restated his motion to approve Ordinance No. 20-11023 amending it to allow 35 building permits in Phase I and II. Aye: (4). Nay: (1) Hodges. Motion carried. The City Commission recessed at 6:13 p.m. for a 2 minute break. The meeting resumed at 6:15 p.m. DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS None. OTHER BUSINESS (9.1) Comments from outgoing City Commissioner Hay. I Commissioner Hay thanked Vice-Mayor Hoppock and Commissioner Ryan for their help, thanked the citizens of Salina, noted the projects completed under his time as a Page 6 commissioner, thanked City staff and City Attorney, and said goodbye to four (4) commissioners he sat alongside. (9.2) Comments from Mayor Davis at the end of his Mayoral term. Mayor Davis provided Commissioner Hoppock with a list of issues, he mentioned his W intentions as the Mayor of Salina, he thanked his wife; his fellow commissioners and their spouses; Holly McKain, Executive Assistant to the City Manager; his nurse Rhonda; the m employees, department and division heads; his employer, Salina Regional Health Center; d his patients; his trainer, Allison; the entire Parks & Recreation Department for pulling off the Christmas tree;Judy Larson, Joan Ratzlaff and Norman Mannel for keeping us on our toes; and lastly thanked Mike Schra e, City Manager; Greg Bengtson, City Attorney; and Shandi Wicks,City Clerk. 10. ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING(CITY CLERK PRESIDING) (10.1) City Clerk administers Oaths of Office to new Comxrdssioners (Davis,Franz,Ryan) (10.2) Organizational meeting is called to order and roll call taken. Those present: Commissioners Trent Davis, Rod Franz, Melissa Hodges, Mike Hoppock and Karl Ryan. (10.3) Nominations for Mayor and Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. 20-0026Moved by Commissioner Hodges, seconded by Commissioner Davis, to nominate Commissioner Hoppock as Mayor and Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. (10.4) Nominations for Acting Mayor and Vice Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. 20-0027 Moved by Commissioner Davis, seconded by Commissioner Ryan,to nominate Melissa Hodges as Acting Mayor and Vice Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. (10.5) City Clerk turns the gavel over to the new mayor. (10.6) Mayor presents a "Plaque of Appreciation" to Joe Hay for his term as City Commissioner. (10.7) Mayor presents a "Plaque of Appreciation" and gavel to Trent Davis for his term as Mayor. (10.8) New Mayor comments. Mayor Hoppock did introductions of his family; thanked his co-workers; stated it was an honor and privilege to be the 119th Mayor; looked forward to work with City staff on projects we have before us;in 2020 we will continue to see the rebirth of downtown; look at getting our commission meeting information out to the citizens of Salina. Mayor Hoppock welcomed Rod Franz and wanted to give him the opportunity to say a few words. Commissioner Franz thank those who supported him in this endeavor and was looking forward to an interesting and challenging two (2) years ahead. I Page 7 ADjoURNMENT 20-0028 Moved by Commissioner Ryan, seconded by Commissioner Davis, that the regular meeting of the Board of City Commissioners be adjourned. Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 6:43 p.m. [SEAL] Michael L. Hoppoc ,M r ATTEST: Maud' wit Shandi Wicks,CMC,City Clerk Page 8 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE awor TELEPHONE - (785)309-6700 Michael D.Schrage FAX • (785)309.5711 City Manager TDD - (785)309-5747 300 West Ash • P.O. Box 736 ► E-MAIL- rn[keAg)UW@jkWjIn2.ofu Salina. Kansas 738 ■a January 3,2020 Via Hand-Delivery Dr.Justin J. Hanke 1322 Bentgrass Dr. Sauna,KS 67401 Re: City of Salina--Open Records Requests Dant Dr.Han lou: The City of Salina is in r+eoeipt of your five (S) separate open records raquests dated December 30, 2019 (` cqm&)- UPan receipt of yaur Requests, City staff diligudy undertook to identify and assemble all records rcgmmve to your Requests, $object to any exemptions firann disclosure under the X=w open records act. Enclosed we copies of the public records which have identified as responsive to your Requests, as of the close ofbusirms on Friday,Jammy 3,2020. Due to the breadth of the Requests and the relevant time pmiod covered by the Requeata, them may be additional public records responsive to your Requests, which would be subject to disclosure eurcler the Kansas open records act. At the tame of this response, we have not let identified any such re=ds. Further emits to resest* identify, and copy Pablic r�emds responsive to your Requests would rogL= substm*W additional ofi fftime and resources, Please contact me directly if you wish to discuss additional research and investigation of reooa*that may be responsive to your Requests. If requested, additional research and copying of records will be subject to applicable flees as authorized by the Kansas open records act. Sino fir, . Sbrmuga City manager Enclosures Summary of Resufts January 3, 2020 Open Records Request, December 30, 2019, Dr.Justin Hanke Request#1 A) Email from Roger Williams dated 2/21/2006 Email from Steve Snyder,dated 5/14/09 8) Letter from Steve Snyder dated 12115/2008 C) Email from Roger Williams dated 2/21/2008 D) Letter from Steve Snyder dated 12/15/2008 E) City Commission report with attachments,dated 11/09/09 and City Commission report with attachments,dated 7/25/16 Request tit A) City Commission report with attachments,dated 11/09/09(see also#1E) B) City Commission report with attachments,dated 12/19/15. (Benefit district documentation has been attached but does not specify addressing a secondary emergency access road). C) Document does not exist. D) Document does not exist. E) Multiple documents,including emalls(151 page of each document is labeled"2E") F) Engineer's Estimate G) Document does not exist. Development Agreement definition of"improvements"does not Include secondary emergency access roads Miscellaneous email correspondence,generally related to Request#2 Request#3 A) Correspondence re:Certificate of Completion B) Correspondence re.City Approval of Costs &City Commission report with attachments,dated 4/18/11 C) Documents re:cost of improvements,special assessments D) Document does not exist. E) Correspondence from William Umphrey,dated 8/19/10 F) Document does not exist. Request#4 A) Document does not exist.The City Commission does not approval final plats,they accept right- of-way and easement dedications. Revised plat conditions were approved by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission staff report,dated 12/16/08 and excerpted minutes are provided. 6) City Commission report with attachments,dated 12/19/15. {see 211)and Email re. Phasing from Don Dean,dated 10/23/09 Request#5 A) Conceptual plan B) Document does not exist. Myof S)h REQUEST FOR OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS RECORD REQUEST INFORMATION(To be completed by Requestkor-Lease print) lull Name: Phone: 'f95--V'7-65-V/ Address: /fZ E & 6 &r 9WA01 (3 ) a- (Citi (state) Clap Code) Email Address: ikulw- @ Sr h c. c cam„ Record Requested(please be gx:wrc) RE:, Request Type(ase ckcic * Inspection On u 'an eta (Moat records wM be p m,&W wiAkin*w(3)fau buakm days f m Ake date of request) I hereby declare that I do not katend to,and will not (a) Use any list of names or addresses contained in or dadved from the records or information fbr the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed, or (b) Sell,give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer for s y property or service to any person who resides at any address listed. 2 a 9 Requestor ftature Date RECORD FEES(To be oompleted by Record Custodian) The Kansas Open Records Act aw%orked.public agencies to charge reasonable,flees(which Wray be requested in advance),for providing access to or,furnishing copies of ublic records. � O Retrieval Time: s�HourMinutes $ r� r First is Mh res No charge 112.0 Each 3o rr ak V k 13up1ication:Total Pag� X $.30 per gage +{Zr lr= � _ $ , 11 pagesandovcr XMperpage Other(may include postage,data processing, etc.)at actual cost VIA TOTAL FEE DUE - �'3• YOUR COPY OF TMS FORMSI U.L SERVE AS YOUR RECEIPT RESULT OF RECORD REQUEST(TojweWpleted by Record,Custodian) Was the Request Fulfilled? (please circle) YES 4VO If"YES",the date provided: 1-.3-2oib If"NO",reason for not providing request check): --,Request not in record form —Record does not exist quest not specific enough —Record is closed per K.S.A.45-221 —Other(please specify) ^Record restricted by Federal law,State statute,or Kansas erne sitIj IM ►� ZOZD Signahnc LAAIF Date .Iflm Jkave say ques&nm sb mtymr mmrd regm4phme eat this Chy of 5akm Freedom sf Iafs s Qaw 1srekd Is the C IQ C AMO Owe ee(785)3®9 5735. Bar.Ills Request for Open Public Records Dr. Justin Hanke December 30, 2019 RE: Grand Prairie Addition Final Plat Staff Report-Application P08-2A December 16, 2008 Wait 991 Documentation and/or correspondence related to: A) Formai and/or Conceptual Approval of Plan and Specifications for Emergency Access Road, per Preliminary and Final Plat Condl#ion No.2 (Staff Report 12-16-2008 pg.31. B) Letter from Parks 8 Recreation director to applicant approving proposed easement location of emergency access road,per Final Plat Condition No. 3 (Staff Report 12-16-2008 pg.4). C) Documentation of review and conceptual approval of emergency access road from fire Marshal. (Staff Report 12-16-2408 pg. 6). D) Documentation of review and conceptual approval of emergency access road from golf course staff. (Staff Report 12-16-2008 pg.6). E) Documentation of Phasing change and schedule of installation of Improvements. (Staff Report 12-16-2008 pg. 11). Far dates: March 28, 2006-December 30,2D19 Andrew. Dean From: Wmbm Roder Sent: TThursday�February 21:20DS 8:18 PM To: "ad: RE:Comer Stare Developmern Doan, I have looked through the pans and do not have anything to add it appears to the that they have addressed all fire department items identified during our meeting. Thanks, Roger. 1;Raper D.Wllll■atew• R m mwdw•public Infwm tlon OMloer BmIlm Mm Deparbnnatt.=W.am.Salley Mama 67401 Ofte 78S.826.7M a Feat 788.826`7348• Entail "UMVMW Thr To PA**A6 A Mbb rL~oy'Me&LM per Older s Nelson.Wayne From: Snyder,Steve Sent Thursday,May 14,2009 848 AM TO: Lyne,Manic Cc: Nelson,Wayne;Hardesty,Stere SUbjecl: iii::Grand Prairie tf millings ars used,then General Servion will have to assist In maintaining and repairing milling& More In I nei with heir Mm of work then us. STEVE morn: L^Mark §Mb Thurso;!►,Mel+14,2009 8.40 AM Tb: Snyder,arra cc: Ndwir Weynee Hardesty,-RM au"we RE:[,bard PrArle Steve, Millings are fine,taut who will be responsible for maiIntaining ttte Integrity of the path in years to come? Thanks,Mark FNMI Snyder,gm $Nib nus ft May 144,2M 8:22 AN Tee ty,Medt Hordeft Sbm ses : Pw:cYaria Kahle Mark and SWwa,what do you think of this idea? STEVE Frere: Nelron,Wayne► soft ThwWay,May 14,2009 8.40 AM To SNOW,Sbw ttv"aob Land PraMe (food r mming SwVO- Qum regsaft tine amergancy access road off of Msdby Rd.The plans cun=tly show gran pars m areas crossing the golf wme.Tve talked with the fire d+cpaxtment and they am okay with nn311jp on the path as it is a ssiar to see and foUaw.What is your t xm&t on this issue?Bring is okay with mi lings. Wayne B,Nie mik P.JL Ciwil E 300 W4t Ash P.Q.Box 736 Salina,Kansas 67402-0736 XUMnebon@saHua.= 785-349-5725 785-309-571.3(Fax) 1 PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT C Wof telephoner (785),309-$786 Stephen L Snyder FAX: (785)309-5769 Dlr+ector TDD: (W)909-6747 3Q0 West Ash Street, Rrm#1Q0 E-MaII: $Ww.9nyder6aalina,ag Salina, Kansas 87401 Website: www ssllna-m4;0v December 15, 2008 Steve Snyder Director of Parks and Recreation Room 100, C*County Building Sagne, KS 87401 RE: Proposed Golf Course Easements Salina City Planning Commission: On behalf of the$allne Municipal Golf Course operation I nm reviewed the proposed drabWe, utely and ernwIlency access' easemsnia for the Proposed Grand Prelfie demelopmant that would aftW onto and crass golf course Property and have no objection to any of the easement locations. proWed that any excavation work on the golf course is done Pry' to Peak playing season in the spring and that the w=vstion areas are restor9d to playable condition when the work is completed. Slncsr+edy, 4 a i er Director of Parks and Recreation r 0AC CAMPBELL & JOHNSON, PA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • LAND SURVEYORS Match 11,2008 � 1 Dean Andrew,Director / City of Salina Department of Planning and Community Development P4 Box 736 Salina,KS 66402-5713 RE: Application#PDD 05-2 Cornerstone Development Group,LLC City of Salina,Kansas Dear Mr.Andrew: In response to your letter dated Manch 3, 2009. for Application #PDD 08-2, 1 offer the following responses. Item No.2: The following exceptions are being requested: 1. Street length being limited to 600 feet The streets are all ending in a cul-de-sac and the Eastern most arm of the development will have a roundabout constructed ted part way up the stmt,so vehicles(particularly emergency vehicles can turn around without going to the end.An emergency bgress and egress will also be provided out the north end of this aim across the golf course for emergimcy vehicles. 2. The requirement for 150' of tangent betwm curves. Item No.3:The proposed-property at Lot 1,Block 1 is intended to be used as a building lot. Surveying Items: Item No. 1: The BFE/coxt = line is being p1mad on the Preliminary Plat drawing by Landmark Surveying. Item No. 2: Land going from the Golf Course to the Development: 1.50 acres Land going from the Development to the Golf Course:0.27 acres Item No.3: Four lots for the drainage easement/golf course crossing: 1.33 acres Use of Rear Yard DMIMe Easement Area Please see the drawing submitted showing the typical easement section Water and Sanitary Sewer Item No. 1: There are two locations where the Sanitary Sewer and the Water lines cross. Th,e crossing in the area of the drainage easements (Lots 6 &45)is unavoidable. The other crossing (Lot 67) is avoidable, but will add a big cost as it would require at least two more manholes to eliminate the crossing. We will design the depths of the pipes at these crossing to meet the rvequiremeuts of the KDHE. Rgpf#PD r � 113 WEST SEVENTH STREET •CONCORDM,KANSAS 6590 f-2801 • PHONE.(785)243-1755 •FAJ[:(�JMOM, -At'tk, P.O.BOX$332 •JUNCTION CITY.KANSAS 66441.733? -PHONE:(785)23B-0M r r Leiter to Dean Andrew March 11,2008 Page 2 Item No. 2: The developers are continuing to work an obtaining the formal appmval of the Mariposa Homeowner's Association to excavate and install buried Wwer line in the Mariposa Conte Area. Storm Drainage Item No. 1: Lots 46,47 and 56 through 60 will dram directly to the golf course.Lots 48,54, and 55 will drain to the rear Yard drainage easemout Lob 49 through 53 will drain to the street. Item No. 2: Cross Section drawings are being famished of the propsed golf course pond. We anticipate utilizing the existing Pipelines unda r the 140"and I r holes and we feel they willbOed,adequate Am but we will confirm dile befe final infi truclm ph= re a sWx Item No. 3: A dnming of a proposed structure to slow the water down and spread it curt to the original drainage cross section is being furnished. Item No. 4: I believe Lot 37 should have been listed as Lot 38. Lots 6,45, 39. and 18 are proposed to become the property of the golf course and to be maintained by the golf a mmm Ekwuic Seryicc. Item No.2:RequirW easements for lots 70 and 75 are being added to the plat. S&MNaxnes Developers arae working on the street nomas and they will be submitted as soon as they become available. i The developers are workbag on the proposed phasing and vrill be submitted as soon as possible. Cornerstone Devckgmurt Group, LLC requests a special assessment benefit district be set up for this project. If you have questions or need anything further at this time please feel fi=to contad me. Sincerely, Greg7-Admns,P.E. SNCL Campbell and Johnson Engrs.PA. f I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' TELEPHONE (785)308-5720 PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAX•(785)308-5793 Dean Andrew, Director of Planning TDD•(785)309-5747 300 West Ash •P.O. Box 736 E-MAIL•deen.andaLvd aellm,ora Salina,Kansas 67402-0736 WEBSITE • www.salinarke.aov March 3. 2008 Comerstone Development Group, LLC P.Q. Box 401 Salina, KS e7402-0401 RE: Application#P08 2 Preliminary Plat of Grand Prairie Addition Dear Bill, Steve and Cork: Representatives of the departments comprising the City's Development Review Team (DRT) have completed their initial review of your preliminary plat for development of 37 acres on the north side of Cedar Ridge Drive and offer the following comments and requests for additional information. 1. The Planning Department has tentatively scheduled March 18,2008 as the hearing date far public comment on your application. The Planning Commission will hold that hearing on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. in Room 107 of tate City- County Building, unless a quorum cannot be met to hold the meeting. The 1 e falls during Spring Break week and there have been times when the Commission has not had a quorum to be able to hold a public meeting that week. If that Is the case, your applications would be heard on April 1,2008. 2. Prior to the Planning Commission meeting we will need to have a complete itemization of the subdivision regulation exceptlons being requested as part of this plat. To date, staff has identified street length (800 ft)and street curve radius exceptions being requested. 3. Please indicate whether proposed Lot 1, Block 1 is intended to be a building lot. Surveying items 1. Your surveyor needs to plot the BFE/contour line in a bold line on the plat and clearly delineate those areas within the proposed subdivision that lie within the 100 year flood plain (Flood Zone A). 2. Please provide an acreage breakdown for the goff course property you are proposing to incorporate into your subdivision, your property that yod are proposing to give to the golf course and the drainage/golf cart trail corridors you are proposing to dedicate to the City. Grand Prairie Addition Application V08-2 Page 2 3. Please indicate the acreage of the drainage easement the proposed detentiont retention pond on the golf course property would occupy. Use of ftar Yard Easement AINg With the proposal to install electric service in the rear of the lots, the 20 ft. utility easement along the rear lot line may get very crowded with electric, phone, cable, a walking trail and possible drainage swale or other improvements. Westar would prefer to be on the inner portion of the easement, inside of the walking trail. Please provide a cross-section or profile of how the typical easement section will be used and how rear yard drainage will be accommodated if an elevated trail is constructed with the easement. Water and Sanitary Sews 1. The Utilities Dept staff hes noted that there are still locations shown on your plans where proposed water and sewer lines criss-cross under the street. 2. Have you received formal approval from the Mariposa Homeowner's Association to excavate and Install buried seiner line In the Mariposa Common Area? if so, please provide confirmation of that. Storm Drainaae 1. Will the rear yard drainage on Lots 46-60, Block 1 be In the rear easement or on golf course property?' 2. Please provide preliminary cross-sections of the proposed golf course pond indkating proposed side slopes and where Water will enter and exit the pond. Please indicate how water will get from this pond to the Mariposa pond. Will you utilize the existing pipelines under the 10 and I& holes? Are those existing pipelines large enough to accommodate the discharge? 3. Please provide a preliminary design of the proposed detention facility on Lot 30, Block 1 and how discharge across the le and 131'holes will be controlled. 4. What is your plan for ownership and maintenance of the drainegeways adjacent to the golf cart corridors, particularly Lots e, 46, 37 and 18? The golf course staff is willing to maintain the trail area but is not interested In maintaining the drainage fb llitles. Electric Service 1. All electric lines serving this subdivision must be placed underground. 2. Westar reports that you plan to install electric service at the rear and not the front of the lots. if this Is the case, 10 ft. side yard utility easements need to be added to serve Lots 70 and 75. Grand Prairie Addition Application#P08-2 Page 3 Street Names Please add proposed street names to the preliminary plat drawing. Phasin IFinancin In order for the schedule calling for a March 18 public hearing before the Planning Commission to be maintained, we need to receive four(4)copies of the preliminary plat and preliminary infrastructure pian drawings and an 11'x 17"reduction of each containing the above noted revisions and additional Information by Tuesday, Manch 11 In order to stay on that agenda. You have not submitted a plan for the proposed phasing of streets and other public Improvements and have not indicated on the plat or in your application whether these improvements will be financed privately or through creation of a special assessment benefit district. Please Indicate any pians you have for phasing in Improvements and your plan for financing these public improvements. If you have any questions about any of these items, please feel free to contact me at 309- 5720. If you would like to set up a follow up meeting to discuss any of these items, please contact me or Jennifer Rein, Development Coordinator, at 309-5715. Sincerely, CD-L-aL,6��� Dean Andrew Director of Planning cc: Greg Adam, Landmark Surveying and Mapping Campbell 3 Johnson Engineers Steve Snyder VCRT File#296 ase File CITY OF SAUNA I(k) REQUEST FOR CIN COMM18 K)N ACTION DATE im 7W2018 4:II0 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATINd DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: 7 P'ubkc Warlm ®Y: tT1 I !'FINAL APPRDVAL, NO: $ ire I BY: DenW R.ftok BY: Request to authorize elta#f to prepare a Special Assessment Engineering FeaslbIlity Report fior Phase ft of the Grand Pralde Addion. @&Q5G10UM Vin- 2007, the Cornerstone Development Q*nup purchased a portion of the Graves 'Frust property began filar Ridge Drive and the Munkipal Goff Course with pians � di evelap a residential Kdd*Iort. They retained the servim of a land surveyor and civil engineer to develop potenti l subdMWbn layouts for ft aMe. Th*jayoLb.led them to have some prailminary discueskm with the gWMIrso stefP.about pOWN land swaps and boundary adjustments'between their subdlvlslon and the Wlf course property. They fde itiBed areas whom the addftn of the golf course land"ooutd ware -off the subdivision boundary to pride better lot oo�gundlons. and areas they would Ike. willing to transfier to the golf course to widen areas adjacant to the 7th hole fairway. Swouso all parties whose land is included in a subdivision play#mast consent to participate In the plat application, the Comem#one Development,Group made a trrnal written request that the governing body aulhorlis the City of Salina to be a co-appllcant In the platting of the property to allow portions of the golf oDurie property to be Included within.the subdivision boundary. In term. of net land area, the propos land-sWs would result in more golf i courso land beadded to the subdivWDA then Cornardone land being added to the golf courser however,the developem arra, MOO proposing to grant tral easements or rights-of-way to the City to 8110w golf Dour ee personnel to trawl through the eubdivlsion to got between Boles 7 and 12 and 6 and 12 to 'Perform golf OCUTS mairdenarm tuncl on& These-iced owrrldors for City use contain approximately 6,840 sq. ft. Other h3queeled areas of City parUdpaiton and cpoperation were the dedication of utility easements to allow u#* extensions under golf course property, the granting of an em"noy access easement over to Markley Road and the possible construction of a stormwater datentlonlreterrtion pond on golf coume property between th9 13th and 14111 fairways. In:addlItion to the cart #roll oonrtdors, other potential beneHta to the Municipal Golf Course opehition from pertlrsipaling In this plat would be sel;ablishing a sunreyedr monumented bwMary along the woUM side of the golf course, and the potential for connecting-the eslsting golf course morns to the public sir system in the Grand PrWda Addition. The City Commission considered Cornerstone's request for tatty padlcipatlon at tit®Ir January ? , 20Mauthorizing the Indusion of Municipal #ng and approved a resolt.rt#on (4-0) Golf Course land In Comeistcne's subdivision plat and rezoning applioadans. The resolution essentlally authorized the City. Of Salina to be a co-applicant on the plat as a landowner and authorized the Parr and Recreation Director to sign the rezoning and plat applications ori bahaff of the City but preserved the My Commission's authority to approve or disapprove the amount of City owned land included in the final layout. A preliminary plat application was filed on February 16, 2008. The Plannin Commi ion roved the.proposed final Plat of this 70 lot sIngle-farnily roslder lad CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR C17Y COMMISSION ACTION 26M ,ME. 7/2612018 -41.00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: BY: public works FTEM :FWK&APPROVAL: NOP Page 2 BY: Dania!R.stock :BY: abdivislo;, including the'two (2) requested variances related to dea end sheet length and street curves, on December 18, 2008. The Planning Commission's approval,ulnas made subject to turn (10) conditions. On May 4, 2009, tha City Commission apPrinved a motion authorising the Mayor to sign the plat and accept the offered easement, goif course maintenance right:of y, sW a et right-of-way and r trtcted accss dedications on behalf of the City. The City Commission also egr"W to,dedicate seven.(7) public utility, dretnage and access easerneri s across the Municipal Goff Course property in support of this proW. On November 9, 2000, the City Commission approved a Resolution of Advisablii -and Authorization to establIM a special Improvement district (benefit district) for street, drainage, Water and sanitary sewer Improvements in Grand Prairie Addition. There were 34 buildable lots In Phase I of the Grand Prairie Addition but all lots in the subdivision received some assessment fur streets, detention and water"service. Each lot in.Grand Prairie,Addition was assessed Its proportionate share of the oast of constructing Cedar Ridge Drive. Phase 1 of the Grand Prairie Addition is approaching build out (22 of 34 lots sold) and Comerstone Development has filed a peWon regupsbno approval of the use of special assessment financing to finance the installation of public Improvptnents ((streets, water taps, and so.nlWry saw) to serve Me lits:in proposed Phan il, Qontaining-17 lots. If the 01ty Comrnisstorl is suppottive of the developer's request, the action that ie being requeeW is to autllofto staff to prepare a feasibility report and Resolution of Authorization to form a special assessment benefit disht Staff has not iter received a. de#alled -estimate for. Phase Il. from the. petitionali is desfigtr engineer. Prior Mice upon receipt of a request for special assessment financing has bean for staff to proceed with preparation .of a Prellrninary Engineering Report and. Respiution of Advisability for City Comnnlssion consideration. However, the consideration Qf the Quall Meadows Estates retoning aril replatting request and the requested anne aVon of the Ryan Addition at the southeast Domer of Schilling Road and Ohio Street] in 2013, resulted in cohsiddtable discusslon and consideration of the CiWs special assessment policy on the part of the City C.ommisigion over the next four.months. After the inatitultlon of a mon odunt and multiple study session presentations on the topic, ft City Commission amended€2e lutiorn No..89-4088 regarding �spesclol assessment fl,- nang-by aid Ing,the word °i Ile from the molutfon and replabing it with -WW such that the City's policy was no longer a mandatory provision of special momentfinancing making special afteossment financing discretionary. Based on those cornments, City Mff reviewed the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan end developed a checklist of residential subdIVIslon guidance based on the CvmprehansIve Plan. 'Wtwn this checklist was submitted with a previous sped asII;Bssment, financing regpest the City Commission Indicated it was not a decisive favor In its.decision making and no direction was: re lved to fomnal adopt the use of the checklist. Nonetheless the Residential Subdivlatan CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION 2&_E TT 7/25MIS 40 P.M. AGENDA SECTION 01111GINATING DEPARTMENT: Fit C APPROVAL: NO: PIM Waft BY. tTElyl F IMNL AR V'AL: NO: Papez 3 BY: Daniel R.Stack BY. An�errlties c,heciclist has been used by staff and the Planning Commission In their review of plata A dheckllst has been prepared,far the Grand Prairie Addition,whits.is attached to this. report. CO MAN n THE I PLAN: The proposed action is vonsis nt with the following components of the City's shared vision staterwrit: • Salina will a city that Is excitors;to live in and thrrwng both economically and sociplly.. • The city will be dean, attracl1ve and invtdng. • The city of Selina will be attractive and well maintained. It WIN be evident that good housekeeping and high communftyr,standards are valued. • Salina will be envimnimontally Conscious, balancing the-m9e0atrons of a-growing--c oonn u*, with 'the necessity to preset nature's-assets and our fidwe quality of life. • The City Commission of Salina Will have comm'If#ed to providing the highest quality City serr+loes possible within rmilable resources. The City Commiseldrs recoopizes their role and meponsiblllly to provide the needed policy dirediora and riewur�cee.to Ills ardminfsA Wan. At the salute time, the'Clys adrhlnilstrertive personnel aro oammiNed rally to transformlreg f his dlMdIo s and resour+oas -into the highest possible qu$lfty of munk"I servlees, consistent w t the expectotions of bath the City Commission and the citizem of Salina. op Salina wall encourage and be supportive of lndire l clevslapment, economic expansions, rrierket-drivers tart base grvvrth, and home grown entrepreneurialism. The proposed action is also conaistent with the following goals contained in the City's strategic plan: Goal#1: The city will create a community of mixed-use, quality development and redevokpmrit Goal#3: The city will provide the highest quality of services, conaletent with governing body direction, avesllable resou=s.and staff cornmitment fa quality, Goal#4: The city will maintain growth and development poifcies that are updated to rem current conditions and desired growth direction. Goal-ft The city will work to r%lee,Salina a city that has connectivityr physically and socially. NOTE: Specfaf,l�ssessment firtancing involves the issuance of municipal bonds to finance the construction of eligible Infrastructure items wdh as water, sewer, storm- sewer & streets with aRmsemsift ung Wed upon the benefitting propardes such that the principal, Intprest, bond Issuance costs and an a rnfnietrative fee are recovered thru the special asseMMi gnts. if a s ec!N assessment dietrfct is CITY OF SALINA Rr;QuEST FOR CITY W&IMISSION ACTION DATE: Till l_E, 7125=16 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING btr.PARTMENT.: FISCAL APPROVAL: N(3: Public Works BY: r rEm RNAL APRRDVAL: Alco: Pas 4 BY; Daniel R.Stw* BY: approved the developer roust either put up 20% of the estimated project cost In cash or submit a letter a(credit for 35% of the est mated project as financial sacurity. in the event Qf a property owner default, a Kien may be placed upon the property than can result In foreclosure proceedings with the proceeds of a foreclosure action being distributed proportionally to the various taxing entities that may have a lien-against the property. C0Njjlffr§10N ACTION; City staff have identified the b1loyWrip.options for the City Cornmiss"rori's considetation: 1. Apthorizze staff to preparae an engineering feasibility report and Resolution of Advisabglty for Phase i)of the Grand Prairie Addition for future consideration by the'C ty"Cornmissloh'. 2.. Postpone consideration of this item and provide additional direction to staff andl+or the applicant regarding additional lnfbnnatbn that is needed prior tar acting upon this request. 3. Vote to Instruct staff not to prod with preparation of an engineering feasibility report at this time. Use of spepiat assessment financing is. discretionary on the. part of the, City Commission per Resoluti*n 13-7055. If th* Cammisslon is reoeptive to further consideration of special assesaments for Phase tl of this subdivision,then stoff believes d would.6e appropriate to authorize staff to proceed with preparation of an engineeNng feasibil y report and Resolution of Advisability for future ronsideration. pc. OKI Sheppard Comprehensive Pian Residential Subdivislon.Amisnity Checklist Grand Prairie Addhifon Proposed subdMslon is inside or contiguous to city1irnits and adjacent to existing developmarg supported by public initirastructyre The Grand Prairie Addition was developed on properly thart was within the cadsff g chi limits adjacent to the Salina Municipal Golf Course wldch was developed in 'low. The Grand Prairie Addition was s pail of the Graves Trust Master Plan for thin a which was adored in 4888. Grand Prairie is adjaimt to#its Medposa,Cedar Ridge pnd Floc de Sol Additions which are served by public fi rk fiructum. Street Connectivity between developments • Pr+ovlde, 09 Interconnected network of local and collector streets that Woo supports waiidng, bicycling and transit une, while avoiding excessive trakifle in .residential neighborhoods * Promote direct routes between subdivielons fbr pedestrians and bicycles The sidewalk system In the Grand Prairie Addition connects.to the public sldew+aik on the north side of Cedar Rldoe Drive and 'there Is a network of roar yard raoc k trolls at the rear of the resider ial lots. Cedw Ridge Drive Is a designated bike route on the W6 BlWale Master Pion. Map and pmvldea connectivity to tihe east to Markley Road and to the north Aria Marymoynt'Rood. 0 Implement a system of off-street tralls that support and Integrate whth the linear- park network The Grand Prairie Addition has a network of internal rear yard wsiiking paths but there Is no linear park network to connect to at;thls time. Require new residential development to install sidewalks on bath sides of public streete and require these sidewalks to be Cpl ted from tete *had by a landscaped parkway • (Required by Svctfon 38-77 of the Subdivision Regulations ("Exception tor' cut- do-sacs I00 ft.or Isso In iength)l There are public sidewalks on both sides of the internal streets in Grand Prairie Addition,: e=ept for the Coblmn Circle.cul-de-sac. Incorporate parks into ndw neighborhoods so ffmt they are accessible to rroslderits and connected to the ci#ywiids park system huge vd s. PLL 139,412014 Comprehensive Pian ices dentias Subdivision Amenity Checklist There is no neighborhood park in existence or future park area Identified on the Neighborhood Park Pian in this area. The East Crawford RecnkWon Area serves as the recreation sppce for this area of the city, promote subdivision layouts around open. space sysums (public, private or common areas) that link to adjacent sites and public spaces (right-at-way, trails or parks) The Grand Prairie Addition is laid out around the boundaries of the Salina Municipal Goll Course which provides public open space surrounding the subdivision. There are connecting trails across Grand Prairie for the use of golf course maintenance personnel. There Ore shard detention basins that serve both Grand Prairie and the golf course. Require dedicated public connections between new neighborhoo and the linear park system. There is ria linear park system In this part of the immunity. Cedar Ridge Drive does -provide a connection to the East Crawford Recreation Area. Encourage the development of different styles and types of Nous ing, Including single-family, muhi4amlly,townhomes and lofts. Grand Prairie currently has only single4lamily home. Page 2 of 1 PLS-339,+4M14 DO WT WRr1E fN'M 8 SP*W PE7li1Flfl WJWF.A TO: THE G VINING SMY Coy of Seine,l omms WA the undamVW,bskV nWfuss and pwWly owrf in ft Coy &",Kansas, 44 herby pMftn your honor*body 16; raapproval of spec W awwoment ftnani ft to finenm fhs grmft and instahaft of caabbrg, oqdsdm*an OrLd paft an extension of Bentgross Dfts.and for inslellft of wow twx ofmnflerr sewer Anes in Pftaee,li of the Carand Pralrls Addttlr m to the My of Cornerstone Development Group Tolophons 785-822-7282 Bal . w"Wppmrd hoo.mn n1 ss.o+w� t�rxnon�s►o�xxtsases x�EL.OihR) f r f I f t :�,�� �• 1.y, ,i Add It* sra ; • :' t tSt ,r f r Phase 11 of r. r� Grand Prairl'le Addition r iy r Application OM-5A Grand Prairie Addition Final Plat r quo IL . � R f ti R ! r i i - s � • w� I w M r i a N� rr.w G r 1 ...- F +II art of Lx A yr 16 i i '_ •L�'S" � � kkk ■ i' Tia ! Y4 •� ti'f+ i1 -•+ y{ - S_I a 1� F N'. ♦ Slr r' 1 2 , tf 1 - 9��A. •� �.� 41 f- rf.R. ' .95 r o. • i # _ Y ' 41 �a�" .tri _ •�".: � �.��� - • �� - r a - ,ter,�:= r� '} r Ll _F ' � - �_ `...� 'r¢ �'+l,,�+'�Q�..ay`s'! t I�{Y I i �Jk�lNa4 � � -- F f •`.,'�`,j�� - - . [re'i- � � a J' •`} °' a I A s ` �4 , r.: r Ve) CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION PAS I 51412000 4a00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMM APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. 2 @Y pop i TA 8Y: ITEM Application#1309-2A Consider the acceptance of offered Willy, drainage and pedestrian easement, street and cart path right-of-way and restricied access dedications from Comecatone Development Group and the dedication of off-site utility, drainage and emergency access easements soon Municipal Golf Course property to serve the Grand Prairie Addition, a proposed 70 lot residential subdMeion adjacent to the Salina Murdckml Golf Course. The subject property Is a 37.74 am tract located on the north We of Cedar Rldge Drive east of the Mariposa Addition. in 1963, the Graves family acquired the Southwest Quwler of Section 20 In Saline County. This quarter section is bounded on the south by Cloud Street and the west by Marymount Road and contains 160 acres. Shortly alter their purchase, the Schilling Air Force Base dosed pwm tdng the Salina Municipal Airport to relocate to the former air base. In 7967,a plan was put forward to construct a municipal golf course at the ibrrner site of the municipal airport Because of the nofflHwulh runway alignment the airport land was flat and narrow and was configured in a manner that would have required all the long holes on the course to run on a north-south axis. The City approached the four Graves brothers (Bill, Dwight, John and Lowell)about the passibility of contributing some of their land for use In the design and layout of the golf course so as io provide some rolling terrain and allow for a layout that was not strictly north-south. Following some careful planning, 26 acres of Graves family land was given to the City for Inclusion In the golf course leyouG One result of this land donation is that Owe are now peninsulas of Graves Trust owned land betwhaen holes T and 12 and between tholes 43 and 14. In 1988, a master plan for the remaining Graves Trust land, J rKwn as the Mariposa Master Plan, was approved in concept by the City of Salina and Saline County. The plan called Tor the closure of Cloud Street adjacent to the Elks Club and construction of a now, maligned collector street connecting Marymount Road and Marldey Road with residential development occurring north and south of the now s#rea Phase 1,the Maripose Addition, Blocks 1-B,were platted In 4989. Phase 11,the Flor De Sol Townhome and Briargete areas close to Markley Road, were platted and developed In 2pg0. Phase III,the Ceder Ridge Addition, was platted In 2004 and Cloud_Street was eliminated and Cedar Ridge Drive was constructed as part of development of that subdMilom. The-Comersthne Development Group has purchased a portion of the Graves Trust property behmn Ceder Ridge Drrive and the Munk4W Golf Course with plane to develop a residential subdivision. They retained the services of a land surveyor and civil engineer to develop potentlal subdivision layouts for the area. Their layouts led them to have some preliminary discussions with the golf course staff about potential land swaps and boundary adjustments be+bveen their subdivision and the golf course property. They kiendiied arcs where the addition of the golf course land cmW square off the subdivision boundary to provide batter lot configurations and areas they would be venting to transfer to the golf averse to widen areas adjacw A to the r hole fairway. Because all parties whose land is Included in a subdivislon plat must consent to pertidpate in the plat CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CRY COMMISSION ACTION � �E 614ri= 4W P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO; 7 AGENDA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. BY: Page Z 8Y: Dean bam application, the Cornerstone Development Group made a florrnal written request that the governing body authorize the City of Salina to be a co-applicant in the platting of the property to allow portions of the golf arae property to be included within the subdivision boundary. In *me of net land area, the proposed land swaps would result In more golf course land being added to the subdivision than ComersWrw land being added to the golf course, however, the developers are also proposing to grant trail easements or rights-d-way to the City to allow golf course personnel to travel through the subdivision to get between holes T and 12 and B and 42 to perform golf course maintenance functions. These trail corridors for City use contain approximately 6,840 aq. ft. Daher requested areas of City participation and cooperation were the dedication of utility easements to allow utility extensions under golf course property, the granting of an emergency access easement over to Markley Road and the possible oonstrucdon of a st mw ter detentionlretmdon pond on gaff course property between the IP and 14°i fairways. In addition to the cart troll corridors, other poLnAlal benefits to the Municipal Golf Course operation from participating in this plat would be establishing a surveyed, monument,ed boundary akxV the south side of the golf course,and the potential for connecting an existing golf course restrooms to the public sewer system In the Grand Prairie Addition. The City Commission considered Cornerstone's request for tfty participation at #rein January 28, 2008 meeting and approved a resolution (4-0)authorlzing the inclusion of Municipal Golf Course land in Cornerstone's subdivision plat and rezoning applications. The motion essentially authorked the City of Salina to be a co-applicant on the plat as a landowner and atithorlmd, the Parks and Recreation Director to sign the rezoning and plat applications on behalf of the City but preserved the City Commission's authority to approve or disapprove the amount of City owned land included In the flnel layout. A preliminary plat application was filed on February 15,2008. The Salina City banning Commission met on March 118, 2008 and cansidered Cornerstone's proposed preliminary plat of the Grand Pralde Addition. Following presentation of the staff report, comments from the Parks and Recreation Director, comments from the design engineer and comments and questions by Cornmissioners, the Commission voted 8-0 to approve Cornerstone's proposed preliminary plat of the property. The Planning Cornrnlssion's approval was made subject to the following oonditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a letter from the Mariposs Homeowner's Association authorizing excavation within the Mariposa Common Area and connection to the sanitary sewer system located within the common area prior to Planning Commission consideration of a final plat. WOW by Planning Commission Deommber 2,2008» 2. An emergency entrance and all weather access road from Markley Road over to the public street In the north peninsula shag be constructed as part of the development of the north peninsula area. The Fire Chief shall approve plans and specifications for the proposed fire access read prior to oonaideratlon of a final plat by the Planning Commission. Construction CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME W41200 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROIA D FOR NO: 7 ANDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING N4. BY: FWD 3 BY: 2W Amar shall be completed prior to issuance of any certilicate of occupancy In the subdivision. Conceptually approved by Fire Marshal. 3. The applicant shall obtain a letter from the Director of Parks and Recreation approving the proposed boundary adjustments to the Municipal Golf Course boundary, the proposed location and design of the detentionfreftntion pond located between holes #13 and #14, proposed easement locations and the emergency access road design prior to Planning Commission canelderatlon of the final plat, The Dhvdor of Paries and Recreation and the golf course staff did not approve of the proposed location and design of the golf ©ouras pond and the pond has been relocated to Cornerstone property. The other easement locations were acceptable but the golf course staff did not want any excavation work on the golf course to occur between April and November. 4. The City Engineer shall approve preliminary pians and specifications for the internal public streets, on-site and off-e,te water and sanitary sewer line extensions and darrimMer collection and detention facllkbs needed to serve this subdivision prior to Planning Commission consideration of a final plat. Needed utility and drainage easernards shall be provided on the final plat. Draft descriptions of proposed off-site easements shall also be Included with the final plat Approval letter attached. 5. The applicant's engineer shell provide the City Engineer with confirmation that the turning radii on the proposed cul-desacs within the subdivision are adequate to accommodate fire trucks and trash trucks prior to Planning Commission conslderation of the final plat. Reviewed and conftrmed by City Engineer. 8. A maintenance plan for the drainage ways adjacent to the golf cart trail corridors shall be agreed upon prior to Planning Commisslon consideration of the final plat. Golf course staff will maintain cart trail corridors. Developers erre proposing to pay a be and have the City take eyv+se'ownership and maintenance of their detention pond. 7. Proposed treat names shall be provided on the final plat. Shown an plat. 8. Section oomer ties,subdivision and block corners and a curve data table shall be provided on the final plat. Shown an plat. Nature of Current Recu®st The Cornerstone Developmecd gaup is requesting final plat approval to allow the residential development of a 37.14 ecru tract bordered by the Mariposa Addition on the west, the Salina Municipal Golf Course on the north and east, unplatted agricultural land on the southeast and Cedar Ridge Drive on the south. As proposed,this 37.14 acre tract would be subdivided Into 70 residential building late for single-fsmlly homes. The entire 37.f4 acre tred now being proposed for reeldential development is vacant pasture Mend. The property dInictly to the wed was platted, razoned and CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE Im Wrmw 4:�o P.M. AGENDA SECfIQN ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. sr. Page 4 BY: Dm Andrew annexed Into the city as part(Block 6) of the Mariposa Addition In 1989 but no development has ewer occurred on this property. A separate request to rezone this property from A-1 io R-1 was filed with the preliminary plat application. Chaff from EMIminsof Plat Following approval of the prellmineiy plat, the proposed location of the golf course detention pond between holes 013 and 14 was staked out In the field. After reviewing the staked out location in relation to fairway landing areas on the two holes, both gollem and golf course staff expressed dissatisfaction with Its proposed location and k orr6gurstion. Therefore on the proposed final plat the primary detention basin has been relocated to Cornerstone property between holes#6 and#12 on the golf course and is no longer an golf course property. This decision eliminated the po6iential for Comerstone to construct a water feature on the golf course which could also serve as a supplemental source of Irrigation water. Consequently, all proposed detention is on Cornerstone property. %Mg Ag=s and Dgian It appears that the applicant has designed a street network that generally conforms vial gee a dsdng topography an this site. The applicant's plat Isput shows a single public street connection to Gear Ride Drive. Ideally, m;*r entrances to subdivisions on opposite sides of a collector or arterial street should line up with one another. In this case the street connection was dictated by the location which had the best sight lines east and west on Cedar Ridge Drive. A second connection to Cedar Ridge Drive was not proposed because no other location offered safe sight distances. All Internal residential streets would all be public streets with 60 it. of dht of--way, curb and gutter and 33 ft.of paving,except for Bentgrass Drive at the subdivision entrance.The South 900 ft. of Benfgress Drive would have 66 ft. of right-of way to accommodate a boi4evard or parkway design with a large renter medlen. These proposed right-of-my and paving widths meet city standards. The paving width of the original section of Mariposa Drive Is 41 ft. but the width of the remaining Cedar Ridge Drive section Is 29 ft. Forty-five (46) of the TO lots proposed would have driveway access on Bentgrass Drive, the main entrance road. Although several lots abut or back up to Cedar Ridge Drive, there would be no individual driveways onto that street. Proposed Street Names Bentgress Drive L.arkepur Lane Coblren Circle(short cul-le-sac) These proposed street names do not appear to conflict with any existing street names in the city or CITY OF SALiNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE IM 514!2000 400 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGWATINiG DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO.' 7 AGENDA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I'mm PLANNING NM Sr. Page 5 0Y. RW Andrew county. The Planning Commission has the authority to approve or not approve proposed street names and accepted the times(3)proposed names. Variance BMWs The applicant is requsstIng two(2)variances from the city's Subdivision ftgulatlona. 1) A variance to the maximum length of a dead and(cul-de-4sac)street;and 2) A varlance to the requirement for a 160 ft.tangent behveen all street curares. The length of the proposed dead end street in the peninsula Is over 2,300 ft. and Is 2,6511 tt. from the entrance to the subdivision K the length of the parkway Is included. Section 36-10 of the Salina Code states that ff the Planning Commission finds that particular hardships or practical dllticubies may result from strict compliance with the subdivision regulallon, it may approve varlatlons of exceptions to the regulations so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest served_ This awdon also states that the Planning Commisslon shsil not approve vadatlons unless it shall maim flndings based upon tins evidence pnmwftd to It In each specific case that: 1) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public safety, MGM or waffare or Injurious to other properly or improvements In the neighborhood In which the property is located; 2) The conditions upon which the request for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation Is*aught,and are not applicable generally to other property; 3) Because of the particular physical surroundings. shape or topographical conditions of the specific property Involved, an extraordinary hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a more inconvenience, if the strict letter of this chapter Is carried out, 4) The variation will not In any manner vary the provisions of the zoning regulations, ordinance, comprehensive plan, oftlal street classlfic &n plan andlor major street plan or official map of the dlY Starff Anal sp The two conditions that make this properly unique are Ith relatively landlocked location and the shape and topography of the etre. The property is bordered on the west by a phdW lot and on the north and east by the Salina Municipal Golf Course. That leaves only the Cedar Ridge Drive frontage as potential stmt soma to the site and the choice of access points Is Urn1W by the hills and curves on that street which siren#sight lines. CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST"M CITY COMMISSION ACTION 2= TIM 614ram 4.00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO. 7 AGENDA' DEVELOPMENT SHRViCES ITEM PLANNING NO. OY: Page 5 BY,• DOW Andrew With the total length of this property (2,840 ft. from north to south), the golf course to the north and east and the natural slopes and dropotts, the developer Is very limited as to how they can lay out lata and streets within the developable portions of this 37 we tract. To mitigate concerns about having a second way into the development for emergency vehicles if the Cedar Ridge entrance Is blocked,the aWlcant Is proposing to work with ftle gaff course to construct a secondary ernergency access road from Markley Road to the northern caul-de-sac. This emergency access road would be located on golf course property crossing the 3's and 701 holes of the course. This plan has been reviewed and conceptually approved by the Fine Marshal and golf course staft. As to sidewalks, the developer Is proposing an extsrhslve network of rear yard pedestrian trails which will be owned and maintained by the abutting owners. This trail network would provide residents with off-street walking paths within the subdivision but in stelFs opinion would not substitute fior an on street sidewalk system. The Planning Commission has the authority to require sidewallks as a condition of granting any street length variance. Lot LMon All lots and blocks have been numbered an the plat drawing. Staff recommended that this subdlvlslon be divided up Into separate blocks at natural dividing, points and a total of 74 numbered lots divided Into two blocks are shown on the final plat. Not all 74 of the lots on the plat are buildable. Staff recommended that open space areas (Lot 2 and Lot 37, Block 2) and drainage easements (Lot 30, Block 1 and Lot S, Block 2)be labeled as separate lots which would put the number of buildable lots at 70. All lots shown would have adequate frontage on and access to a public street. It appears that the width, depth and area dimensions of all lots shown on the plat would meet or exceed the minimum standards of the R-1 district. It does not appear that there would be any foreseeable dncufties, for reasons of topography or other conditions, In obtaining building permits to build on any of the proposed building lots lots, except for proposed Late 3, 4. 8 and 6, bock 1 which have substantial slopes from east to west. Creative site planning or substantial regrading will be required on these lots. Public WIN Pr r`e 1. Water Supply and Fire Protection - This area is fed primarily by an 8"water line running west from Markley Road along the alIgnment of Cedar Ridge Drive. There is an existing 8" line in Marymount Road that runs from Crawford south to the Elks Club. The Fire Code would require that the water distribution system servft this subdivision be capable of providing 1.000 g.p.m. fvr Hire protection. The Utilities Director has determined that adequate volume and pressure exists In the existing water distribution system to serve this 37 acre site. However without a second connection,this subdlvlalon would have a long dead end system. A looped system with two sources of flow C TY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COWISSION ACTION QATE TIME 54IM009 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. W. fie 7 RX: 2M 691ft would be created by extending a water line from the north end of Bentgrass Drive across the golf course over to a 20'water line In MarMey load. Internal water lines could be financed over 15 year$through creation of a benefit dhrw with the developer putting up 20%of the cost In cash or a letter of credit equal to 35%of the estimated cost. 2. Sanitary Sewer - Preliminary plans show that this subdivision can be served by a gravity system. The nearest point of connection Is a manhole adjacent to the Mariposa de*%m pond and Lot 12, Bock 1 of the Mariposa Addition. This would require the construction of an oft-We sewer line across golf course property to reach this manhole. There erre two Was or options for connecting to this manhole. Option B would cross the Mariposa pond and would require Homeowner's Association approval. Option A would be to utcltze an existing utility easement north of Lot 12, Block 1. Staff and the developers prefer Option B but it Is dependent on the Mariposa Homeowners Assocladon granting a server line easement A network of 8' sewer lines located In the street right-of-way is proposed to serve Individual building lata. The details of the sanitary sewer mem and the design and layout of Internal sewer lines will be resolved during the Errglneering DepartmenVe review of actual design plans. Intend lateral lines and the off-sine sewer connection could be financed through creation of a benefit district with the developer putting up 2D%of the cask In cash or a letter of credfl equal to 35%of the estimated dost. 3. Natural Gas - Kansas Gas Service has an existing gas line that extends south fiom Crawford along Marymount Road. They have extended another gas line west from Marldey Road along vacated Cloud Street to prrdvide a second gas feed Into the RlverRun area. The Cedar Ridge Addition on the south side of Cedar Ridge Drive has a gas distribution system and this could be extended north Into Grand Prairie. 4. Electricity-Westar Energy has electrical lines serving the golf course and the nearby Mariposa and Cedar Ridge Additions which could be extended to serve the Grand Prairie Addition. All electrical fines serving this subdivision must be placed underground. This would not Include high voltage distribution lines crossing the property or pre-exacting overhead lines. 5. Storm Drainage - The City's stormwater management replations require the developer to design a stormwater drainage system to either accommodate or detain the additional runoff caused by developnrert of the site(the difference between existing and developed conditions), The applicant`s stormwater drainage plan has been approved In concept by the City Englnner and the proposed detention basins located within the subdlvlslon have been sized mostly to accommodate aft'-afie runoff corning from the south. It will really function more as a pass through basin than a storage pond. Final design and construction plans fbr any proposed surface flumes or ditches, storm sewers and detention facilities must be approved by the City CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION 2= BE 514=08 4130 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. BY: Page S Y: DunAndrew Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits in this subdivision. The applicant will need to obtain off-eke drainage easements from the Municipal Golf Course (the City) In 3 locations to allow stor mwater discharge to enter and flow across golf Course property. S. l=ire Protection - Fire response from Station#4, footed at Marymount and Crawford. is about 5 minutes to the entrance of the subdivision. An emergency access drive connection from Markley Road across the golf course to Bentgrass Drive would provide a second means of emergency access should there be any type of blockage at the Cedar Ridge Drive entrance. This access drive would follow a paid that is already In use. 7. Police Protection- Provided by the Salina Police Department once internal streets are built and opened to traffic. 8. Schools - Students In this proposed development would attend the fallowing schools: Meadowlark School - Grades K-5; Lakewood Middle School - Grades 7-8; Sahara Central High School - Grades 9-12. U.S.D. #305 has not lndkceW to City staff that this development will create any crowding problems at the above mentioned schools. 9. Parke - This property Is shown as being located In Neighborhood Park Service Area #8 in the City's Neighborhood Park Plan. There are no Neighborhood Parks within this area. Under the City's Paris Land Ordinance, developers of residential subdivisions have the option of dedicating land within their subdivision for public park purposes or paying a The in lieu of dedication. The fee Is set at $2DD 1 dwelling for single-family dwellings. This fee may be reduced by 50% when the developer provides private recreation and .open space for subdivlslon residents such as what was proposed In RiverRun. 10. Streets & Traffic - The applicant's engineer has not submitted an analysis of projected tre fic fi orn this development. A traffic study was not requested because Cedar Ridge Drive is a newly constructed collector street that was designed to accommodate the ultimate build out In this area. Based on a trip generation rate of 10 vehicle trips per day per household, staff estimates that a total of 700 vehicle trips per day would be generated If the entire platted area were fully developed with homes. This is leas than the projected 1,088 vehicle trips per day that would be generated by RIverRun, all entering or leaving that subdivision through one aooeso point(RiverRun Parkway). Easernerrts and Dedicatkm - The applicant is proposing to dedicate all street rfght-of-way aril Improvements shown on this plat to the public for City maintenance. Ni utility and drainage easemwtts shown on the plat would be dedlcated public easements. Platted restricted access is proposed along all of Cedar Ridge Drive except for the street opening for Bentgrass Drive. There is already 80 R. of existing dedicated right-d-way for Cedar Ridge Drive adjacent to this property. The right-of-way for Cedar Ridge Drive was dedicated jointly by Haworth Construction and the Graves Trust. Cf TY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CRY COMMISSION ACTION 51411= AIMP.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT; APPROVIM FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES O. PING NO. Pape 9 Bir: IM RM And AN needed onsite utility and drainage easements are provided on the plat but the appiked is also r+esimsible for oblaining utlilly, drainage and access easements from the CRY of Salina and Mariposa HOA o Blow utility Ilnes and shunmeter runoff to flow across the golf course properly. These easements will need to be deecxibed and dedicated by separate instrument and will need to be finalized and executed prior to City Commission consklenndarr of the final plat ftodaid Pu Ila lmizma�nfn The devstoper of Grand Prairie Addition would be Mesponslble for the folloaring public Impro�nemenIs: 9. Stroets-Approximately 4MO ft. of asphalt or concrete paving, 2 lanes. 33 ft. wide with curb and gutter for internal sheets, except for the wider parkway secgon on Bentgrass Drive. 2. Sidewalks - 4' sidewalks along both sides of (Ben% ees Drive and Lradmpur Lane) unless an exemption Is requested and granted. Cul-de-sacs We than sM fl. In length are exernpt from the sidewalk requirement. 3. Drainage—Construction of the primary and secondary delerldon basins and ab"Inleto and pipes or flumes needed to cavy runoff to the collection end discharge points shown on the dmhrsgs plan. 4. Mi les—Design and conelruuciloff of internal public sewer Pees and water mains needed to serve individual budding lots as well as cuff-8119 utility 0*1nslons/connections. The City of Salina would be mponalbls for the follow kq public lmp1mrnents: 1. If special assessment flnencing Is used,oversight over the contracbcr installing all on-site and off- db public Improvements. 2. Design and °onsbuOPon of any repah or modlAcations that need to be made to the concrete drainage flumes carrying water from the Municipal Golf Course Into the Marlposa Pond. 3. Design and construction of the cart trails running through the subdivision. 4. Design and construction of any sewer lines serving golf course resftK ms. SpIdal s ntsImpact Portions of this property received assessments In 1999 for the On water line comection #rom Marymount Road to the Markley Water Tower and the sewer pump station construcM at the Intersecton of Marymount Road and Mariposa Drive. These assessments were Initially deferred In 11900 because this property was outside the city limits. CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION 2&TE IImE 5/412009 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. BY; Page 10 BY. Dean Andrew Property owners outside of this proposal subdivision should not be impacted by assessments for Internal sb eets or public utliities that serve only this development. The Graves Trust property received a substantial assessment (39% of the Host) for Cedar Ridge Drive in 2004. All costs for on-site improvements vAll be borne by the ownerldeveioper of Grand Preirle or passed on to lot buyers as a special assessment. Phasing of Public Improvements The developers have indic aW that they plan to install all public Improvements upfront in the first phase of development but they would have the option of phasing In some public improvements. gmmnants The developers have submitted a draft set of Reebic Live Covenants for the subdivision far staffs review. Covenants and an architectural control committee will be used to establish private housing design requirements and other building restrictions. QnLmanpe with Comprehensive EW 1. Land Use Map- The City's Land Use Plan shows this area as being appropriate for kr*density residential development and in a Primary Service Area for the extension of city utilities and services. The proposed residerrtial density of this subdivision (70 units on 37.14 acme)computes to 1.88 units per acne which Is substantlaily less than the low density residential classification of 4.0 units per acre. Salina Comprehensim Plats Residential Development Policies for New Subdivisions R4 Future residential growth should embrace the traditional "neighborhood unit" concept, updated to reflect current needs and desires. Neighborhoods should be self-contained areas designed primarily for residential use. Through4mft should be rerouted afound the neighborhood, with a Ilmited number of collector streets penetrating it. Neighborhoods should have access to a small convenience shopping area, accessible by foot or bicycle. Each neighborhood should be adequately served by an elementary school. Safe pedestrian walkway systems should connect homes with schools and other neighborhood facilities. Where possible, multi-famYy housing should be located on the edge of residential neighborhoods and near other major traffic generators. R5 New housing awls should be served by a safe and convenient circulation system with streets and roadways relating to and connecting with existing streets in adjacent areas. However, CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE 1116 5J4M= 4:00 PX AGENDA SECTION ORN31NATM DEPARTMENT. APPROVED POR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NO.NPLANNING D. Peps 11 BY: BY: residentlal traffic should be separated from non-residential traffic whenever possible. New residential street should generally follow the contour of the land and seek to highlight the natural features of the area. Access to reside" properties should be limited to local streets wherever possible. R7 Any significant new residential development should include a small new park site to serve new residents R8 Major new residardial daueloprnenia should be devokpid as planned unit developtnente(PUD) or as planned development district(PDD). PVDs or PDDs give the City maximum control over residential area design and development,and also gives the patentlel developers tlexiblI ty and Incentives fiar creative and high-quality projects, R14 No new residential development should be permitted until adequate water and sanitary sewer service are provided. Every effort should be rads to discourage growth in locations where provision of these services are not available or planned as part of the CltYs future urban service growth areas. RIS Natural environmental features within residential areae should be preserved and protected. Natural vegetation, developed wooded areas, and large mature trees In residential area add greatly to the ambiance of the City as a whole and should be maintained. Changes to the natural topography should be minimal. Manning ComMisslon Action The Salina City Planning Commission met on November 4, 2008, December 2, 2008 and again on December 16. 2008 to resew and consider Cornerstone Development's application 1br approval of a final plat of the Grand Prairie AddMDn. Following presentation of the staff report comments from Mr. Umphrey and comments and questions by Commissioners,the Commission voted 7-0 to approve the proposed final plat of the property, Including the two (2) requested variances related to dead end street length and street curves, at the December 9 8e' meeting. The Planning Commiicslon's approval was made subject to the fbkWng conditions: 9. The developer shall be responsible for installation of all public improvements shown on the approved preliminary plat and Infrastructure plan drawings through private financing or by petitioning 1br the creation of a benefit district. 2. The subdivision plat shall be divided Iota separate blocke at natural dlvlding points. The Intended use of Lot 2, Block 2 shall be dearly labeled on the plat 3. Golf course trail corridor easements and drainage easement detention pond areas shall be separated out from each other and dearly labeled on the plat. CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY OOMMISSION ACTION PAIE 514r2M 4A0 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. 13Y- PKe 12 1 BY; Dow Andrew 4. Mapped A Zone (Floodway Fringe) arms and the Base Flood Elevation shall be identified on the plat drawing. 5. All utlilkles in the subdivision shall be placed underground. 5. Sidewalks shall be Installed on both sides on all public atreets except for Cobiren Circle. 7. Final engineering design plans, including the final sanitary sewer alignment and plans for the emergency access ss road, must be approved by the City Engineer prior to beginning construction of any public Improvements on the property. 8. A lot grading / drainage plan shall be revimed and approved by the City Engineer prior to beginning construction of any public ImprovemenIs on the property. 9. The covenants, conditions and restrictions far this subdivision shall prohibit the splitting of lots. 14. A Certficate of Completion for all public improvements shall be issued by the City Engineer and payment of the pond maintenance fee must be received prior to Issuance of any building permits in this subdivision. A .revised ! corrected final plat containing all required corrections to the plat drawing and plat certificates must be received and all off-site easements across Municipal Golf Course property must be executed and In place prior to City Commission consideration of the plat COMMISSION AMN if the City Commission concurs with the action of the Planning Commission, a motion should be made to authorize the Mayor to sign the plat and accept the offered easement, golf course maintenance righW- ray, street right-cf-%W and restricted access dedications on behaff of the C ty. The two detention pond areas are shown as drainage easemerb on the final plat which means Cornerstone would retain ownership. Upon completion and acceptance of the detention ponds, a pond "Maintenance Feep calculated by staff would be paid by Cornerstone Development and a dead would transfer flee simple title to Lot 31, Block 1 and Lot 6, Block 2 from Cornerstone to the City. There are seven (7) public utility, drainage and access easements outside the boundaries of the plat that would be dediasted by the City In support of this project. If the Commission Is in agreement with making these dedications, a motion should be made to authorize dedication of these off-slte easements as well. Enclosure. Application Vicinity Map Utility Layout Drainage Plans Final Plat CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION IgM TM 514/2009 4.'00 P. I. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATM DEPARTMENT; APPROVED FOR NO: 7 AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM PLANNING NO. BY: Page 13 BY: Duan Andrew Excerpt of PG Minutes 111 a, urns. and 12 iwe GO: Cornerstone Development Group Mariposa HOA Lary Smith A= Johnson, Landmark 3ur#Wng and Mapping April 16,2009 Jason Gale City Manager City of Salina,Kansas Dear Mr. Gage, Please accept this letter as a formal written request to appear before the City Commission on Monday April A2009, in order that we may seek Approval of the Final Plat of Grand Prarie Addition. At this point in time, we are content to defer to the City Staff to use their collective wisdom to determine which sewer option would be in the best interest of all concerned. Thank you for your attention in this matter. 1e tfullY, iaiani . p y William Sheppard Stephen E Renich Co. Michael Schrage Dean Andrew Greg Bengtson Wayne Nelson F.E. Andrew Dean Fran: Andrew,Dean 8W* Wednesday.April 22,200812:35 PM To: Gage,Jason;Schrage,Milne;Stack, Dan;Tasker,Martha Cc: Hobble,Cary;Nelson,Wayne;Harvey,John,landmark Surveying&Mapping, lnc.;'Gng;L. Adams' Sum Grand Prairie Off-site Easements John and I ane finding enough deviations bd we m the design plans and the legal descriptlons and alt rmw is of the off- oft easements prepared by Landmark Surveying that we will have to took at dem one by one. Options are to move the plat consideration and acceptance of off-eR9 easements both to May nth or keep the plat which is ready on to 27th and kBow up with acceptaroe of dw off-sibs easements(10 of them). John and I believe that revised surveys are going to be needed to match the design pians received from Campbaii and Johnson In several locations and that will take time for Landmark to revise. Dean Andrew Phone:786.30720 FAX:7135-308. 713 1 REQUEST FOR OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS dna RECORD REQUEST EMRMATION(To be completed by Requeotor-Please Print) lH'ull Nance: 1, Phone: �J4�--►5"' '�- S"'��� Addrea: A x F d (SUM) (MY) (state) (gyp CO&) EmallAddress.- Record Requested a be Request Type(please eu � � nrsspectiori �plication stn � 1 (Most?words will bw provided watkin floe�3)fulI bmh,.m days f m Ate AWe of regwa) I hereby declare that Ido not intoW to,and will not: (a) Use any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any Property or service to any person listed or to any person Who resides at 8ny address listed;or (b) Sell,give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer y property or service to any person who resides at any address listed. R Wstor Signature Date RECORD FEES(To be conVeted by Record CostoMm) The Kansas Open Records Act authorized public agencies to charge reasonable fees(which may be requested in advance)for providing access to or furnishing copies of pudic records. Retrieval Tme: Hours Minutes e $ Pini t 13 mimetic No t wow Emb M micas d wre*erorpsrt of V&W Duplication.-Total Pages S $.30 per Page $ 11 prgea mid over $aJo perpage Other(may include postage,data processing,etc.)at actual.cost $ TOTAL.FEE DU - $ YOUR COPY OF THIS POW SHAU,SUVE AS YOUR RECZW RESULT OF RECORD REQUEST(To be completed by Record Custodian) Was the Request Ftiilfilled7(please circle): PES AVO U"YES",the date provided: If"NO",reason for not providing request(please check): _.-. =est got b+r;. Md faze —Record does not exist —Request not specific enough _Record is closed per K.S.A.45-221 _._.Odd(please specify) —Record restricted by Federal law,State statute,or Kansas Supreme Court decision Ifyou have any gerestww abort your rword mimed,please eontad dw Cloy of Salina FMmbn of hjfenra&n Offlow laoased in the C16 Clerk's Odea d(783)36M733. RW.UIS Request for open Public Records Dr.Justin Hanke December 30, 2 019 RE. Grand Prairie Addition Development Agreement- Phase 1 Request Documentation and/or correspondence related to: A) Certificate Of FUN Completion, per Section 4.07.A. (Development Agreement 12-05-2009 pg. 11). 8) City Approval of Certificate of Improvement Costs, per Section 5.04.0. (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. 12). C) Financial commitment of developer, per Section 6.02.8.1. (Development Agreement 11-005-2009 pg. 13). D) Special Assessments past due nofice(s) and/or annual payments from Developer's Financial Commitment, per Section 6.02.8.2. (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. 14). E) Requests and/or release for the portion of Developer's Financial Commitment related to Phase I Lots. per Section 6.02.0. (Development Agreement 11-0.5-2009 pg. 14). F) Requests and/or release for the portion of Developer's Financial Commitment related to Phase II Lots, per Section 6.02.D. (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. 14). For dates: November 5,2W9-December 30, 2019 VftI%R'!'M9XT OF PI1BLiC WqWq 111DGhIWRaser DVreataroflubk vW cwor TELEPHONE - (786)309.v26 Dw*f Ac, PE.. Cfiy Engfnw FAX • (785)309-5713 dlnr Teat h. OAera&W Marregar TOD - (788)309-5747 E MAIL: 300 west Ash-P.O. Box 736 dsu.stack sly a Sarna,Kansas s74oz one Ir wF.9SfTE • i -1 u 3 64) TO: Gary Hobbi%Director of ty and Deva went Services FROM: Wayne Nelson, P.B. SUBJECT: Grand Prairie Addition Project No.08-2729 DATE: August 24,2010 A Certificate of Completion for infrastructure imus fior the Graad Prairie Addition has been issued by the City&�pitteer.Additionally,the pond maintatanee fee has been ree�ived by the City.These two cations fu]frll the requinat"of item#10 of the conditions far approval for the final PhIt of(grand Prairie Addition by the PlanningCormnfssian and accePtcd by the City Commission 4 May 2004 H*mcripg authorixes the iswance of building Permits for this addition, Cc: Dan Stuck,P.E.,City Engineer Paul Cerny,,Building Oflrtcial Project file Engineering 4 Streets 4 Trefoc Control s Flood Control 4 Central Garage 4 Sanitation #Landfitl Our Mission is to Build and Maintain a Glean,Safe Community August 199 20101 , city of Salim KanSM Dep went of Engineeting Attn: Wayne Nelson re: Grand prairie AdditiOn to the City of Salina,KBI►ses Dear Wayne, Please accept thils letter as our written vqUeSt for a CERTIFICATE OF COwnmoN on the e referenced Imo • Thank you very much for your attention in this matter, RespectfullY, William R. mp ey DEPAWnWENT OF PUBLIC WOM48 Mar TELEPHONE • )30$-SM. A haW AMW,,f�ut' r of Pub9p t1 i FAX • (785)30"713 a caok P.E., myarrorrrae�r � TQp (M)soW47 m Dpirallor�s Manager E- `; BQQ-Web#Auh FAQ,Sox 73E; Sel#mXaraaeS 67402-0738 WES91TE . - - r— TV Franw,Finam:(hand! Mayne Nom,P.L,6iibiodo' ftj6ct No.08-2729 #Ctrnlftr=rW9 of*ligible eNpaiw Acte; Soptbuibep 2,2,2010 'ice ane DMJQPmmU Grmp has requeMad paynaw for mfiusjnwtvm urpmVepaus made in the Cfirand T'rairie Addition as per the Deveiapirient mart.Engjneet'1ng,W r4.+iewcd.dre.srrbmitW and finds that "Via ex d t"10W$TA11,770.90. Tht's at} WU end adW fees Wil be PMMed kb the fnai projed CM 4nd vein be$MM4.to tine t fit &ft ict.please I t Me!Drava if you have my qVMimrp. [k: miahael 10. Sabngo,ogmty City mmga baru4l R. 1k,P.E.CityFaSro►e >�ock#lie �C1�!{z�Ft{�!}r, '�cl "i �• 1 '��.' :.. .3`.°ry1F ;:�� ��. S'�,.•il ti Y�f,s1�,i14•�+ i° , r' ' � Our Mimion is do Build and Mah*in a Cie am6 Safe Cody 3 (6) w' "Oftm Auer sr,� yam„ -Inm� AFiUC3.74 A6GAO aMMIU W 3Qx7 m t91,'�P7rwiloz, L�st�o >tm.tm >Qtly IN fe.11e 7? 19T.1 I9 aS00 0 3 1 UUM T 117 57,'" MAIM NOW -u ��� 16"Aim-tiff "Alm � 1 ! MOM �,19i93 11yetM,UQ 66;7e 4111M, I9,T3Em Woor 72,185.!4 LASEbah4c �31y139 ! 3A72m nad I"Kw 160,6912+1 Admbdawft MAIL" htpm hmdy b. 71499'M CITY OF SALINA (8 REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE 71 E W18111 4:00 P.M. GENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL.APPROVAL: NO: 8. DEPARTMENT OF BY: ITEM PUBLIC WORKS FINAL APPROVAL.: NO: 4 Page 1 BY: Daniel R. Stack 13Y. Ordinance No. 11-10599 a� Certification of final costs for 2010 Special Assessment Projects and setting May 9, 2011 as date of public hearing, b) First reading Ordinance No. 11-10599 levying special assessments for improvements. BACKGROUND: The final certifications of costs have been filed by the Engineering Division for the following public improvement projects constructed in 2010. A summary of finances for these projects Is shown below: Project Props Owners.Share City Shag Total Cost Replat of the Bergkamp Subdivision $ 165,653.63 $ 0.00 $ 165,653.53 Project No. 08-2715 Grand Prairie Addition $1,458,635.64 $0.00 $1,458,6~35.64 .P 'ect No. 08-2729 TOTAL= $1,624289.17 $0.00 $1,624.289.17FI The public hearing is intended to receive input from interested parties and particularly property owners within the special assessment benefit district. The primary issue at this point in the process is ;not whether the special assessments should be levied against the properties, but rather that the final costs have been properly calculated and distributed. A calendar of events is attached and here is a summary of City Commission action items: April 18, 2011 Set assessment hearing date and first reading of assessment ordinance; May 9, 2011 Conduct hearing and second reading of ordinance; June 20, 2011 Resolution approving preliminary official statement and authorizing sale of bonds with first reading of bond ordinance; July 11,2011 Bond sale date and second reading of bond ordinance. FISCAL NOTE: This action sets the foundation for the final determination of assessments after the public hearing. The assessments wilt play a significant role in retirement of the associated debt over the next 15 years. OMFORMANCE WiTH STRATEGIC PLAN: Goal 3: The City will provide the highest quality of services, consistent with governing body dire lion, available resources and staff commitment to quality.. EC ND TION Staff recommends the City Commission set May 9, 2011 as the Special Assessment hearing date and pass Ordinance No. 11-10599 on first reading. Attachments:Ordinance 11-10599, calendar of events and final engineering reports NO'T'ICE OF BEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMEM FOR PUBLIC EWPROVEIv32 1TI'S TO ALL PERSONS CONCE1gNED 7.he Board of Commissioners of the City of Salina, Kansas, will meet in the City Commission 107, City-County Building, 300 West Ash Street; Salina,Kansas, on A+Ianday,the 96 of �Room p.m., CST to consider the proposed assessmarts for the lir ' May,2011, at 4:00 objections will be considered at the -meati end thereupon improvements fisted below. Written or oral objections ned. The n8 ereupon the amount of the assessment wd1 be fnoy Proposed a rant rolls are on file for pub�iic inspection in the Ofice of the City Clerk, Suite 206,City-County Building,300 West Ash Street, Selina,Kansas. PROTECT NO.0&2729 GRAND PRAIRM ADDITION,PHASE I STREET,DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IWROVEIMEN'I'S The curb, guttering, paving, grading and drainage for approximately, 901 lineal feet of Ban BenWass Drive Street Tmpzovemarrts); 1.,1.25 lineal feet of s Dom, (the ImProven=ts); and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle, tine Colman Circle Street e' (the Larkspur Lane Stmt die"Street Improvements". { Improvements)and aollatively The installation of approximately 1,386 lineal feet of six-inch water main,923 lineal feet of eigh*inch wager main, firo hydrants,valvas,fittings,service conmec ions for water lines and all appurtenances thereto (the Phase I Water SYatOm Inrrprovements); 42 lineal ;feet of six-inch water main, 2,851 lineal feet of eight-inch water main fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connections for water lines and all appurkmees thereto (the Eight-ice Loop Water S3►stenr Improvements)and collectively the"Water System ImpMvernents". The irsta]latiars of eisht inch sanitary seww main, Semce camu m forsewer lines lying within right of way sndlor utility easement; manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described- Lateral A approximately 1,186 lineal feet(the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer its);Lateral A'appoximW*690 lineal feet(the Lateral X Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral B approximately 1,357 lineal feet (die 1ZWW B Sanitary Sewer hnpoovements) LabesW C approxyrnafiely 973 lineal feet(the Lateral C Sanitary Sewer moments)Lateral D approdu stdy g09 lineal fleet(the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer hWz0vements, The mon of Mormwater detrition and all app rt ancw thereto(ilia"Stormwater Detrition Pond"). The ani of���mately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets, and all appur�natrcas thereto (tire a The above improvements were authorized by Resolution No. 09-6675 passed by the Board,of Commis inners on November 9, 2009. The total east of such improvement is $1,458,635.36 acrd is proposed too be assessed to the properties within the improvement district. The extent of boundaries of the improven=t district to be assessed is described as fellows: Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1, 3 through 5,7 though 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. PROJECT NO. 08-2715 REPLAT OF THE BERGKAMP SUBDIVISION STREET AND SIDEWALK I MPRO r1MENTS Ilse m' Vmvements are generally described as: The curb,Sir,Paves and grading for approximately 430 lineal feed of Emulsion Drive;and The installation ofapproximately 1,138 square fat of sidewalk and all appurtenances thereto. The above improvements were authorized by Resolution No. 08-6557,passed by the Board of Commissioners on September 15,2008 and amended by Resolution No. 09-6532,passed by the Hoard of Commissioners on July 17, 2009. The total cost of such innprovernent is$165,653.53 is proposed to be assessed to the properties within the improvement district. . The a mt of boundaries of the improvement district to be assessed is described as follows: Lata I through 5,Block 1,Replat of the Bergkamp Subdivision;and fatted Tr N :A tract of land situated in the Ncydwast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE14,NW/4)of Section Ona(1),Township Fifteen(15)South,Range Tbree(3)West of the Sixth (6'h)Principal Meridian,in Saline County,Kansas,which is more particularly described as follows. Commencing at a point on the North line of said Section One (1), which point being we thousand eight hundred thirty-two and sixty-seven hundredths(1,832.67)feet North 89 degrees 44 minutcs 29 seconds East of time Northwest corner of mid Section One(1); thence continuing North 89 degrees 44 mninutea 29 seconds East along the North line of said Section One (I) a distanoe of throe hundred twenty-me and eighty-alit hundredths (329.88') feet; thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 37 w mds Fast a dishmoe of four hundred (400') feet;thence South 89 degrees 44 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of three hundred twenty-nine and eighty-eight hundredths (329.88') feet; thence North 00 degrees 20 minutes 37 sods West a distance of four hmmndred (400) feet to the point of beginning, Except the North sixty (N60') thereof as conveyed In county for use as public street. Together with all appurtenances and rights of grantors in and La time real estate, including all might,title, and interest of grantors iri the land underlying any dedicated roadway easements or right-of-way. Lieu Ann Elsey City Clerk CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS GENERAL UBUGATYON DUERNAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2011-A APR 1 Finalize Benefit District Project Costa and Spread Ass smarts 18 First Rending of Assasment Ordinance Approve Final Benefit District Costs and Establish Aasasment Hearing Date 19 Notice ofAsrsessment Ekaring Forw&Tded to Loral Papa s 9 r w r F s 22 Notice of AU88MRIent bring Published 1 2 3 4 6 a T 11 6 MAY 9 Assessment Hearing Date M It 12 13 14 15 15 Second Reading of Assessment Ordinance and Pala iT 18 10 m 21 27 23 10 Distribute Final Assessment Statements 24 25 zs 27 29 as 30 Assmssment Ondiumm Forwarded to Local Paper 13 Publish Assessment Orfaneie 20 Preli mi �pnt Period D��official Stal went Distributed for Comments Distributed for Comment W21341518 WIT F a TJM 10 Comments Due an 1z 13 14�i �� � Statement t9 20 z1Offi'ieW Statement Forwarded to City for ApprovalCommenis Due on Draft Bond Documents zs zr 2aResolution Approving PMhmMmy Official StatCM=t and Authorizing Sale of Bonds Forwarded to City 13 Prepayment Period Babes 14 Finalize Bond law Size 15 Submit Rating laformation to Moody's Investors Service 20 City Passes Remluti m Approving Preliminary Official a +a r w r, F s Statement and Authorising Sale of Bonds First Reading of Bond Ordinance 1 2 s 4 23 Notice of Sale Sed to Local Paper and to Kansas RegisW 5 0 r a s 10 11 30 Notice of Sale Published in Kansas Register and Local Paper 12 0 14 1s to 17 16 18 20 21 2Z 23 24 2a JUL 5 Preliminary OffcW Stalument Distributed to Bidders 28 27 2s 28 130- 6 Rmive BondRating 11 Bond Sale Date Second Reading of Bond Ordinance Pass Bond Resolution P 12 Bond Ordinance FormMied to Local Paper S M r w T F a 'Danscn Assembly Begins 1 s 14 Final 1 4 Hund=Sit Distributed s 4 s e T e s 19 Published m Local Paper 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 e > stration In�tions to Stat Tri asurer Bond Printing Completie-Forward to State Treasurer iT ra 19 20 21 22 23 Transcript Assembly Complete 24 25 Zg V T anscript Forwarded to Attorney General 31 21 Closing Memorandums Distributed 25 �d RegisA proved ration Complete-Forward to DTC 28 Closing and Delivery of Funds Note: Bold items indicate actions of City Commission Much 4,2011 FINAL ENGWEERING REPORT PETITION NO.4310 REPLAT of the BERGKAMP SUBDIVISION STREET and SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Emulsion Drive FILE NO.2008-03 March 2011 WAYNE E.NELSON,P.E. CIVIL ENGWEER SQM OF YMM The curb,gutter, Pavement and grading far WPUximaWy 430 lineal feet of Emulsion Drive(the ,Street Improvements'). The installation of WrdMstely 1,138 square feet of sidewalk and all appurtenances thereto(the "Sidewalk lmprovements"); BEl1T,GF r DIS't'k1C3r Bold of the Berykan SubdmzMW Lots 1 through 5,Block 1,in the C'aty of Salina,Saline County,Kansas. 3l=18tted Tract Tract No.1: A tract of land situated in the Nordwast Quarter of the Northwest Qua W(NE14,NW14)of Section One (1),Township Fifteen(15)South,Range Three(3)West of the Sixth(6� Principal Meridian,in Saline County,Kansas,which is more partic ulady described as follows: It at a point on the North line of said Section one(1),wig point being one thousand dght hundred thirty-two and sixty-sermon hundredths(1,832.67)feet North 89 dogma 44 minutes 29 swmxb Bast of the Northvmt cornea of,said Section One(1); thence continnIng Noah 89 degrees 44 W outca 29 seconds But along the Norm line of said Section One(1)a distance of three hundred twenty-nine and eighty-eight hundredths(3.29.881)feet;theum South 00 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of f°'m'hundred(400') ;thence South 89 degrees 44 minutes 29 second&gest a distance of three hundred twenty-nine and eighty-fight hundredths(329.88')feet; thence North 00 degrees 20 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of four hundred(400')feet to the point of beginning,Except the North sity (N60')thereof as conveyed to county for use as public street. Together with all appurtenances and sights of grantors in and to the real estate,including all right,title,and interest of grantors in the land underlying any dedicated roadway easement$or d&-of-way. ADOPTION-OF ASSESSMENT The assessment with acerued interest to be levied as a special assessment tax upon the property included with dae benefit district concurrent with the general property tax and shall be payable in MBO equal annual installments. Each lot and parcel of lanai m the Improvement District shall be assessed equally per square foot. AMRTIQNNENTQF COST COST CHARO_ LE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY. One hundred percent (100%) of the total cost of improvements shall be assessed to the Improvement District and no portion of costs sha11 be paid by the City at Large. Petition No.4310 Replat of do Bergkamp Subdivision to tbo Chy of Salina Final Cost of the bnprovements items Qmtity Umt Unit Cost Exftsion I Mobilization 1.00 Ls 7,196.15 7,196,15 2 Borrow(Contractor fuirniaheci) 950.00 CY 11.40 10,830.00 3 Embankment 907.50 Cy 10.80 9,801.00 4 Clearing and Grubing 1.00 IS 1,394.60 1,394.60 5 Aggmit Pavement,8" $47.25 Ton 71.80 39,292.55 6 Curb&Sum' 1127.00 LF 13.50 15,214 50 7 Cancnft Pavement,8" 42.00 SY 54.95 2,307.90 8 Concrete Pavement,6" 496.30 SY 52.65 26,130.20 9 Removal of pavement 911.00 SY 3.45 3,142.95 10 Renmoval of curb&ger 55.00 LF 15.50 852-50 11 Sidewalk,atop,'lope 1 1.00 Ea 533.50 533.50 12 Sidewalk 4' 1138.00 SF 5.35 6,088.30 13 Water 1.00 LS 333.45 333,45 14 Temporary FerdilizW,Seed and Mulch 0.35 Ac 8,800.00 3.080.00 15 Couatruction staking 1.00 LS 1,815.00 1,815.00 16 Traffic control 1.00 LS 3,324.20 3,324.20 CO-1a Addition mobiliamtion 1.00 LS 500.00 500.00 CO-1b Additional Eard wark(awAvation) 1236.22 Cy 6.00 7,417.32 CO-2a Ph'Rack for driveway 15.00 Tact 20.00 300.00 CO-2b Additional seeding 0.50 Ac 1,760.00 880.00 SUB-TOTAL $140,434.12 ENGINEERING 11,176.00 ADMINISTRATION 7,021.71 TEMP NOT$LVIERBST,BONDING&ISSUE 7,021.71_ TOTAL: $165453.53 Petition No.4310 Replat of the BergkmV Subdivision to the City of Salina Final Cost of the Street Improvements Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension I Mobilisation 1.00 LS 7,196.15 7,196.15 2 Borrow(Contractor furnished) 950.00 CY 11.40 10,830.00 3 Embankment 907.50 CY 10.80 9,801.00 4 Clearing and Grubing 1.00 LS 1,394.60 1,394.60 5 Asphalt Pavement,8" 549.2.5 Ton 71.80 39,292.55 6 Ccub&gutter 1127.00 LES 13.50 15,214.50 7 Concrete pavement,8" 42.00 SY 54.95 2,307.90 8 Concrete pavement,6" 496.30 SY 52.65 26,130.20 9 Removal of pavement 911.00 SY 3.45 3,14295 10 Removal of curb&gutter 55.00 LF 15.50 852.50 13 Water 1.00 LS 333.45 333.45 14 Temporary Fertilizer,Seed and Mulch 0.35 Ac 8,800.00 3,080.00 15 Construction staking 1.00 LS 11815.00 1,815.00 16 Traffic control 1.00 LS 3,324.20 3,324.20 CO-1a Addition mobilization 1.00 IS 500.00 500.00 CU-Ib Additional Earthwork(excavation) 1236.22 CY 6.00 7,417.32 CO-2a 1ss"Rock for driveway 15.00 Ton 20.00 300.00 CO-2b Additional seeding 0.50 Ac 1,760.00 880.000 SUB-TOTAL $133,812.32 ENGINEERING 10,617.20 ADMINISTRATION&INSPECTION 6,690.62 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 6,690.62 TOTAL: $157,810.75 Replat of the Bergkamp Subdivision to the City of Salina Final.Cast of the Sidewalk Improvements Item Qutity Unit Unit Coast Extension 1 I Sidewalk ramp,TXx 1 1.00 Ea 533.50 533.50 12 Sidewalk,4' 1,138.00 SF 5.35 608$.30 SUB-TOTAL 6,621.80 ENGINEERING 558.80 ADMINISTRATION&INSPECTION 331.09 TEMP NOTE.INTHREST,BONDING&ISSUE 331.09 TOTAL- 7,842.78 Pfopmty Ownemship ' n Owner Replat ofBeigkomp SubdivWon Block 1 Lot I Melvin A.Bmgkamp Trust Lot 2 13 ,Inc Lot 3 Melvin A.BeigkmV Trust Lot 4 Melvin A.Bckamp.Trust Lot 5 Melvin A.HergkanV Trust Unplat#ed Tract No. 1 Jerry F.Callabtesi Petition No.4310 Replat of the BergknV Subdivision to the City of Salina Distributim of Assessment Propedy Dcsc ' tion Replat-o8 B Subdlvldan ITrad Sias.ftp Enmisios Drive Sidewolkk Total Bk ek 1 Lot 1 1 77,098 14,409.26 $25.79 15 235.05 Lot 2 1 440,145 82,261.27 4,714.38 86,975.65 Lot 3 1 94,251 17,615.08 1,009.521 18,624.60 Lot 4 ] 74,226 . 13,872.50 795.031 14,667.53 Lot 5 1 46,500 8,690.64 498.06 9,188.70 UUPUAW Trod No.l 1 112,159 20,962.001 20,96200 Totals 6 944,3801 8157,810.75 $7,842.78 $165,653.53 FINAL ENGINEERING REPORT PETITION NO.4322 GRAND PRAIRIE ADDITION,PHASE I STREET,DRAINAGE,and UTILITY D&ROVEMENTS Benigms Drive,Larkspur Law,Cobim Circle FILE NO.2009-01 Mawh 2011 Wayne E.Nelson,P.B.,Civil Engiwa h%OFEaMM The curb,guttering,paving,grading and drainage for approximately 901 lineal fleet of Bentgrass Drive, (the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements); 1,128 lineal feet of Larkspur Lane,(the Larkspw Lane Sq=t Improvements);and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle,(the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements)and collectively the"Street Impmvements". The installation of approximately 1,386 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 923 lineal feet of eight inch water main, fire hydrants, valves,fittings, service connections for wafter lines within right of way and/or utility easement and all appurtenances thereto(the Phase I Water System Znaprovements);42 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 2,851 lineal feet of eight inch water main fire hydrants, valves, fiWAgs, service connections for water Imes and all appurtenances thereto (the Eight-inj Loop Water System Improvements)and collectively the`Water System Improvements". The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main, service connections for sewer lines lying within right of way =&Or utility easement, manholes and all appurtenanCes thereto as described: Lateral A approxiluately 1,186 lineal feet(the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improveiments); Lateral A' approximately 690 lineal feet(the Lateral A' Sanib"Sewer Improveruents) Lateral B approximately 1,357 lineal feet (the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements) LAtceral C approximately 973 lineal feet (the LatwW C Sanitary Seaver Improvements) Lateral D approximately 809 lineal feet (the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the:Sanitary Sewer Improvements, The installation of stormwater detcnWn and all appurtenances thereto(the"Stmnwater Detention'). The installation of approximately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets, and all appurtenances thereto (the"Drainage Improvements), BMWMT R)ESTItICT A Lacs 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 dump 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline Ccwnty Kansas. (the 1:1 mill'O''ement District"), The fallowing lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they are not developable lots and dwefore are not benefitted by the Improvements:Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainage and utility casement on the plat;Block 2 trot 2,is dedicated as an open space easement on the plat,Block 2 Lot 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easeumt on the plat;and Black 2 Lot 37,is dedicatW n a drainage, Utility,and%pen space easement of the plat. Aff-TJLQD.0F AS$F The assessment with accrued ingest to be levied as a special assessment tax upon the Property included With the benefit district ccmurrem with the general propezty tax and shall be payable in fifteen equal annual installments. Each parcel in the Improvema nt District shall be assessed equally per lot far sorts of the various Improvements benefitting such lot,as described in"Apportionment of Cost"below. AP'l'OAll NT OF COST One hundred percent (10096) Of the total cost of improvements shall be assessed to the Improvement District and no pardon of costs Bhall be paid by the City at Large. The costs of the lmpmvemmts Within Me hnprmmmt District aball be further allocated as follows: One hundred percent(10D%)of the Larkspur Lane Strom hWWvMMts and the Cobwm Circle Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lots 1,3 through 5. Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. Sixty percent(60%) of the Bentgraas Drive Stmt Imp wwments' shall be assessed to Low 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1, 3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Grand prairie Addition,in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas; faxty percent (40%) of the Bentgirrnss Drive Suva Improvements shall be assessed to Lois 7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all is the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent(10D%)of the Drainage Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lofts 1, 3 through 5, Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent(10096)of Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Blom 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2, all in the Grand prairie Addition,in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent (100%) of the Laterai B Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 d magb 30. Bloch 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Block Z, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the [Sty of Salina, Saline County Kansas. One hundred pent(10Q96) of the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43. Block 2,all in the{'fraud Ptairie Addition,in the City Of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred pert (10D%) of the Ph me 1 Wates Imgrravements and forty percent (40%)of Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lots 1,3 throw 5,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas; sixty pea=t(60%) of Eight-inch Loop Watw Systm Impmveaments shall be assessed to Lots 7 dmmgb 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2,all in the Grand prairie Addition,in the City of Sahina,Salinc Coawy Kansas. One hundred Percent(100%)of the StmnwaWr Detention shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 throw 5,7 tlmough 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Salmi County Kansas. I Bentgrass Drive is s boulevard style shmet to wbeutco ttte entryway into the entire subdivision;costs are allocated such that all praparties dun ne in a portion of the benefit provided to the entire subdivision. 2 Eft inch hoop Water System Impmwmants is required to meet firy Raw minimums in these 1.All lots in Phwe 2 wilt be directly tapped to this system.Since the Zits is Phase 2 will tap directly to this system,costs ale WIWated Mich that the Phan 2 properties bear a greater proportion of tate oosts. Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to tha City of Salina Total Improvements Item# 'onE�rt Quantity unit Unit Cast ensioa 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 16.300.00 16,300.00 2 Common llxcavatioa 17,603 CY 3,95 69,531.85 3 Clearing&Grubbing 1 LS18,90(}00 18,900.00 4 Asphalt Pavement,8" 5 �'�gutter 4,3W Ton 57.20 245,960.00 6,640 LF 13.50 90,304.!10 6 Removal of Curb&Guth 109 LF 6.04 634.00 7 Sidewalk,4' 1,612 3F 5.10 $,221.20 8 Sidewalk ramps,Type Y 16 Ea 563.3(1 9,012.9'0 9 Sidewalk ramp,8' 3 Ea 906.I0 Entrance approach,6"'concrete(Markley 2,718.30 10 Rd) 4 SY 51.55 0.00 Hntranee approach @ Cedar Ridge,T, 11 conerete 83 SY 55.50 4,6(16,50 12 Brick stamped rod concrete,6"' 409 SX 125.55 51,349.95 13 Emexgeacy ac cess path,asphalt millings,6" 0 SY 4.55 0.00 14 Maintenance path,asphalt miiiinp,4" 572 SY 3.615 2,087.80 15 Grass pavers 0 SY 50.00 0.00 16 Type A5.2 curb inlet 12 Ba 4,300.00 51,600.00 17 Type AS-3 arrb itch 4 Ea 5,800.00 23,200.00 IS Area inlet,Tx 7' 2 Ea 5,000.00 10100.00 19 5t fm sewer junction bM 6 x 6' 0 Ea 3,000.00 20 Storm manhole,4'diameter 0.00 21 Storm 3 � 2,2{10.00 6,600.00 Pipe, 12"RCP 24 LF 25.00 60000 22 Strom pipe, 15"RCP 30 LF 28.00 840.00 23 Storm pipe, 18"RCP 1,585 IF 30.00 47,550.00 24 Storm pipe,24'"RCP 42 LF 35.00 1,470.00 25 Storm Pipe,30"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 26 Storm pipe,36"RCP 117 LF 75.00 8,775.00 27 End section, 12"RC 2 Ba 350.00 700.00 28 Snd section, 15"RC 2 Ea 350.00 700.00 29 End section, 18"RC 4 Pa 400.00 1,600.00 30 End section,24"'RC 1 Ea 500.00 500.00 31 End section,30"RC 0 Tia 800.110 0.00 32 End section,36"RC 1 Ea 1,000.00 11000.00 33 Concrete flume,2`primary pend 38 SY 59.05 2,243.90 34 Rock rip rap,Day,6"' 113.2 SY 4000 4,528.00 35 Coarse aggregate 8 SY 500.00 4,000.00 36 Widen flume&rocks I SY 2,600.00 2,600.00 37 Water Pipeline,6" 1,445 LF 17.00 24,5165.00 38 Water Pipeline,8" 3,778 LF 20.00 75,560.00 39 Water fittings 1 Ton 4,500.00 5,708.25 40 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 7 Ea 2,750.00 19,250.00 41 Resilient gate valve,6" 2 Ea 700.00 1.400.00 42 Resilient gate valve,8" 3 Ea 875.00 2,625.00 43 Corporation stop, l" 20 Ta 275.00 5,500.00 44 Curb shutoff valve&box, 1 34 Ea 250.00 8,500.00 45 Copper service line,l" 574 LF 12.00 6,888.00 46 Corporation stop, 1%" 7 Ea 450.00 31150.00 47 Wye, 1%" 7 En 100-00 700.00 48 Copper service line, 1%" 270 LF 15.00 4,050.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 8" 1 Ba 3,400.00 3,A00.00 50 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Bs. 2,800.00 2,800.00 51 Sewer Pipeline, 8" 5,034 LP 28.00 140,952.00 52 Sewer service pipeline,4" 1,259 Ll~ 25.00 31,475.00 53 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 34 Ea 75.00 2,550.00 54 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 1 Ea 2,000.00 2,000.00 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 18 Ra. 3,000.00 54,000.00 56 Drop Manhole 2 Ba 3,400.00 6,800.00 57 Extra Depth Manhole 119.9 LF 200.00 23,980.00 58 Trench&Backfill,0-6 946.3 LF 2.00 1,892.60 59 Trench&Bacl ft 6'-8' 645.7 LF 3.000 1,937.10 60 Trench&Backfill,8'-10' 932.7 LF 4.00 3,730.80 61 Trench&Backfill, 10'-12' 817.5 LF 5.00 4,087.50 62 Treneb&Backfill, 12'-14' 907.1 LF 600 5,442.60 63 Trench&Back1iii, 14'-16 566.4 LF 8.00 031.20 64 Trench&Backfill, 16'-18' 150.5 LF 10.00 1,505.00 65 Tmich&Backfill,18'-29 71.1 LF 1100 853.24 66 Special trench compaction 5,010 LF 4.00 20,040.00 67 Water 1 LS 2,257.50 2,287.50 68 Construction staking 1 LS 16,565,00 1.6,565.00 69 Temporary traffic.control 1 LS 1,395.00 11395.00 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 14.90 Ac 1,000.00 14,900.00 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 5387 LF 2.25 12,120.75 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable 72 LoW 300 LF 5.00 11500.00 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel 73 bags) 2240 Lb 1.25 2,800.00 74 Temporary construction entrance 60 Ton 50.00 3,000.00 Permanent Sorftg(Lebien) 1 LS 7,117.00 7,117.00 Lana acquisition 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 35,162.18 35,162.18 SUB TOTAL: ENGINEERING $1,274,573.98 Insertion&review 103,151.22 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 164566.74 TOTAL: 63,743.70 $1,455,635.64 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of saline Total Street IMFGV meats Item# Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension I Mobilization 1 LS 4,075.00 4,075.00 2 Common Excavation 17,603 CY 3.95 69,531.85 3 Clearing&Grubbing 1 LS 18,900.00 18,900.00 4 Asphalt Pavement,8" 4,300 Ton 57.20 245,960.00 5 Curb&gutta 6,640 LF 13.60 90,304.00 6 Removal of Curb&Gutter 109 LF 6.00 654.00 7 Sidewalk,4' 1,612 SF 5.10 8,221.20 8 Sidewalk ramps,Type 1 16 Ea 563.30 9,012.80 9 Sidewalk ramp,8' 3 Ea 906.10 2,718.30 10 Markley access approach,6"concrete 0 SY 51.55 0.00 11 Entrance approach @ Cedar Ridge,7"concrete 83 SY 55.50 4,606.50 12 Brick stamped red concrete,6" 409 SY 135.55 51,349.95 13 Emergency access hath,asphalt milli W,6" 0 SY 4.55 4.00 14 Kdntenance path,asphalt mfilings,4" 572 SY 3.65 2,087.80 15 Gass paven 0 SY 60.00 0.00 67 Water 1 LS 571.88 571.88 68 Construction staking i LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 69 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 348.75 348.75 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 3.73 Ac 1,000.00 3,725.00 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 1346.75 LF 2.25 3.030.19 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Lag) 75 LF 5.00 375.00 73 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(ravel bags) 5600 Lb 1.25 700.00 74 Temporary construction entrance 15 Ton 50.00 750.00 Parm hent Seeding(I.ebien) 1 LS 1,779.2.5 1,779.25 Land acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 8,790.55 8,790.55 SUB TOTAL: $531,633.26 ENGINEERING 25,787.81 Inspection&review 4,216.69 TEMP NO'T'E,INTPREST,BONDING&ISSUE 26,581.66 TOTAL., $588,219.41 Petition No.4322 Gram Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Drainage JnWmwx=M item# pqnigam2n�wdty Unit Unit Cost Exteasiarr 1 Mobilization 1 L.S. 3260,00 3,260.0(1 16 Type A5-2 eUr6 inlet 12 Ea 4,300.00 51,600,00 1T Type AS-3 cacfi inlet 4 Ba 5,800.00 23,200.00 18 Area islet,7'x T 0 Ba 51000.00 0.00 19 Stern sewer junction box,6'x 6 0 Ela 3,000.00 0.00 20 Storm manhole,4'diameter 3 Ea 2,200.00 6,60000 21 Storm.pipe, 12"RCF 0 LF 25.00 0,00 22 Storm pipe, 1pRCP �R/cp 0 LF 29.0y0� 0.0/0 23 St m pipe, l8" 1,556 LF 30./00 46,680.00 24 St=pipe,24"RCP 42 LF 35.00 1,470.00 25S- pipe,30"RCP 0 LF 60.00 000 26 Storm.pipe,36"RCP 0 LF 75.00 0.00 27 End section, 12"RC 0 Ea 350.00 0.00 28 End section, 15"RC 0 Ea 350.00 0.00 29 End secdm 18"RC 3 Ea 400.00 112A0.00 30 End section,24"RC 1 8a $00.00 50000 31 End section,30"RC 0 Ea 800.00 0.00 32 End section,36"RC 0 Ea 11000.00 0.00 33 C.on=te fWme,2'pdmwy pond 0 SY 59.05 0.00 34 Rock rip rap,Dip,6" 113 SY 40.00 4,528.00 35 Coarse aggregate a SY 500.00 4,000.00 36 Widen flume&rock 0 SY 2,6IXL00 0.00 66 Special trench cm paction 787 LF 4.00 3,148.00 67 Waw 1 LS 457.50 457.50 68 Construction staking 1 LS 3,313.00 3,313.00 69 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 279.00 279.00 70 Temporary fertiliser,seed and mulch 2.980 Ac 1,000.006 2,980.00 71 Temporary slope harrier(silt fence) 1077.4 LF 2.25 2,42415 Tempwary Slope Bate'(Biodegradable L.og) 60 LF 5.00 300.00 72 Tempoa'w7 inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 448 Lb 1.25 560.00 73 Temporary mon entrance 12 Ton 50.00 600.00 Permanent Seeding(Ld&n) 1 LS 1,423.40 1,423.40 Land acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's interest 1 IS 7,032.44 7,032.44 OTTA �S 7U�B�-*Ts �L,�: $1�6,55,(5��5/5�..4�w9 Inspection&review 3,373.35 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 8,277.77 TOTAL: $197,$36.85 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Stormwater Detmdon Item# Description Quandy Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 815.00 815.00 16 Type A5-2 curb inlet 0 Ea 4,300:00 0.00 17 Type A5-3 curb inlet 0 Ea 51800.00 0.00 18 Area inlet,Tx 7' 2 Ea 5,000.00 10000.00 19 Storm sewer junction box, 6 x 6' 0 Ea 3,000.00 0.00 20 Storm manhole,4'diameter 0 Ea 2,200 00 0.00 21 Storm pipe, 12"RCP 24 LF 25.00 600.00 22 Sturm pipe, 15"RCP 30 LF 28.00 840.00 23 Storm pipe, 18"RCP 29 LP 30.00 870.00 24 Storm pipe,24"RCP 0 LF 35.00 0.00 25 Sty pipe, 30"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 26 Storm.pipe,36"RCP 117 LF 75.00 8775.00 27 End section, 12"RC 2 Ba 350.00 700.00 28 End section, 15"RC 2 Ea 350.00 700.00 29 End suction, 18"RC 1 Ea 40000 400.00 30 End section,24"RC 0 Ea 500.00 0.00 31 End section,30"RC 0 Ea 800.00 0.00 32 End section,36"RC 1 Ea 1,000.00 1000.00 33 Concrete flume.2'primary pond 38 SY 59.05 2243.90 34 Rock rip rap,Dom,6" 0 SY 40.00 000 35 Coarse aggregate 0 SY 500.00 0.00 36 Widen flume&rwk 1 SY 2,600.00 2600.00 66 Special trench compaction 40 LF 4.00 160.00 67 Water l LS 114.38 114.38 68 Construction stakitag 1 LS 828.25 828.25 69 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 69.75 69.75 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.745 Ac 1,000.00 745.00 71 Temtporary slope barrier(silt fence) 269 LF 2.25 606.04 Temporary SIope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 15 LF 5.00 75.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 112 Lb 1.25 140.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 3 Ton 50.00 150.00 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 355.85 353.85 Land acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's Interest I IS 1,758.11 1,758.11 SUB-TOTAL: $34,546.27 ENGINEERING 5,157.56 Inspection&review 843.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 1,727.31 TOTAL: $42,274.48 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the city of Salina Water Improvements Item# Item ti Unit Unit Cost EXt rasion 1 Mobilization 1 LS 4,075.00 4,075.00 36 Water Pipeliw,6" 1445 LF 17.00 24,565.00 37 Water Piped 8" 3778 LF 20.00 75,560.00 38 Water fittings 1.26$5 Ton 4,500.00 5,708.25 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 7 Ea 2,750.00 19,25000 40 Resilient gate valve,6" 2 Ea 700.00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gate valve,8" 3 Ha 875.00 2,625.00 42 Corporation stop,l" 20 Ea 275.00 5,50000 43 Curb shutoff valve&box, 1" 34 Ea 250.00 8,500.00 44 Copper service UM% 1" 574 LF 12.00 6,888.00 45 Corporation stop,1%- 7 Ea 4$0.00 3,154.00 46 Wye, 1%11 7 Ea 100.00 70000 47 Copper service line, lih" 270 LF 15.00 4,050.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,12"x 811 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Ea 2,80000 2,800.00 65 Special trench compaction 2258 LF 4.00 9,03200 66 Water 1 LS 571.88 571.88 67 Comtruction staking 1 LS 4,141.25 4,14125 68 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 348.75 348.75 69 Temporary fertilizes,Beed and mulch 3.725 Ac 1,000:00 3,725.00 700 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 1346.75 LF 2.25 3,030.19 72 Temporary Slope Banie.r(Biodegradable Log) 75 LP 5.00 375.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 560 Lb 1.25 700.00 73 Temporary constrwdon a mumme 15 Ton 5000 750.00 Permanent Seeding(JA&n) 1 LS 1,779.25 1,779.23 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's hama 1 LS 8,790.55 8,790.55 SUB-TOTAL: $201,415.11 ENGINEERING 25,787.81 Inspection&review 4,216.69 TEMP NOTI3,IMEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 10,0700.76 TOTAL. WAI1 90.33 Petition No.4322. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Saline Phase 1 Water improvements item# item (quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 2,037.50 2,037.50 36 Water Pipeline,6" 1445 LF 17.00 24,565.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 923 LF 20.00 18,460.00 38 Water fittings 0.63425 Ton 4,500.00 2,854.13 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 7 Ea 2,750.00 19,250.00 40 Resilient gate valve,6" 2 Ea 700.00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gate valve,911 1 Ea 875.00 875.00 42 Corporation stop,l" 20 Ea 275.00 5,500.00 43 Curb shutoff valve&box, 1" 34 Ea 250.00 81500.00 44 Copper service line, 1" 574 LF 12.00 6,888.00 45 Corporation stop,Pia" 7 Ea 450.00 3,150.00 46 Wye, 1%' 7 Ea 100.00 700.00 47 Copper service liner M' 270 LF 15.00 4,050.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,12"x 8" 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Ea 2,800.00 2,800.00 65 Special trench compaction 1,093 LF 4.00 4,372.00 66 Water 1 IS 285.94 285.94 67 Construction staking 1 LS 2,070.63 2,070.63 68 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 174.38 174.38 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 1.863 Ac 1,000.00 1,862.50 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 673 LF 2.25 1,515.09 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 38 LF 5.00 187.50 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 280 Lb 1.25 350.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 7.5 Ton 50.OD 375.00 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 889.633 889.63 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,0M.00 0.00 Developces Interest 1 LS 4,395.27 4 395.27 SUB-TOTAL: $117,507.55 ENGINEERING 12,893.90 Inspection&review 2,I0B.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 5,875.38 TOTAL: $138,385.18 Petition No.4322 Grund Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Eight-inch Loop Water Improvey =tB Item.# item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Fxtension 1 Mobilizatian 1 L.S 2,037.50 2,037.50 36 Water Pipeline,6" 0 LF 17.00 0.00 37 Nater Pipeline,8-- 2855 LF 20.00 57,100.00 38 Watex fittings 0.63425 Ton 4,500.00 2,834.13 39 Fire hydrant c&valve assembly 0 Ea 2,750.00 0.00 40 Reailient gate Va1w.6" 0 Ea 700.00 0.00 41 Resilient gate valve,$" 2 Ea 875.00 1,750.00 42 Corporation stop, 1" 0 Ba 273.00 0.00 43 Curb shutoff valve dt box, 1" 0 Ha 250.00 0.00 44 Copper service line. I-- 0 LF 12.00 0.00 45 Corporacion muA 1%,- 0 Ea 450.00 0.00 46 Wye, 1%-- 0 Ea 100.00 0.00 47 Copper service linc, 1%* 0 LF 15.00 0.00 48 Tapping sleave$valve,12"x 81, 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 0 Ea 2,800.00 0.00 65 Special trench con"dion 1,165 LF 4.00 4,660.00 66 Water 1 LS 285.94 285.94 67 Construction staking 1 LS 2,070.63 2 070.63 68 Temporary tratlic comm 1 LS 174.3B 174.38 69 Temporary fa liner,aaod and mulch 1.863 Ac 1,000.00 1,862.50 70 Temporary slope bander(silt fence) 673 LF 2.25 1,515.09 71 TenWerary Slope Bandag(Biodegradable Log) 38 LF 5.00 187.50 72 Temporsry inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 280 Lb 1.25 350.00 73 Temporary c onsbuction c=auce 7.5 Ton 50.00 375.00 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 889.63 889.63 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's h t m I LS 4,395.27 ,395.27 SUB-TOTAL: $83,907.55 ENGINEEtZII1TG 12,893.90 Inspection dt review 2,10$.34 TEMP NOTE,MERBST,BONDINCI&ISSUE 195.38 TOTAL: $103,105.18 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improvements Item# Desai tion ti Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 4,075-OD 4,075.00 51 Sewer Pipeline,8" 5,034 LF 28.00 140,952.00 52 Sewer service pipeline,4" 1,259 LF 25.00 31,475.00 53 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 34 Ea 75.00 2,550.00 54 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 1 Ea 2,000.00 2,00D.00 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole I8 Ea 3,000.00 54,000.00 56 Drop Manhole 2 Ea 3,400.00 6,800.00 57 Extra Depth Manhole 119.9 LF 200.00 23,980.00 58 Trench&Backfill,0-6' 946.3 LF 2.00 1,892.60 59 Trench,&Backfill,6'-8' 645.7 LF 3.00 1,937.10 60 Trench&Backfill, 8=10' 932.7 LF 4.00 3,730.80 61 Trench&BacIT" 10'--12' 817.5 LF 5.00 4,087.50 62 Trench&Back ill, 12'44' 907.1 LF 6.00 5,442.60 63 Trench&Backfill, 1,V-16' 566A LF 8.00 4,531.20 64 Trench&Backfill, 16'-18' 150.5 LF 10.00 1,505-OD 65 Trench&Backfill, 18'-20' 71.1 LF 12.00 853.20 66 Spacial trench compaction 1,925 LF 4.00 7,700.00 67 Water 1 LS 571.88 571.88 68 Construction staking 1 LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 69 Traffic control 1 LS 348.75 348.75 70 Tempormry fertilizer,seed and malch 3.725 Ac 1,000.00 3,725.OD 71 Temporary slope harrier(silt fence) 1346.75 LF 2.25 3,030.19 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 75 LF 5.00 375.00 73 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 560 Lb 1.25 700.00 74 Temporary eanstruction entrance 15 Tan 50.00 750.00 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 1,779.25 1,779.25 Land Acquisition 1 LS 20,000.041 20,000.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 8;790.55 $,790.55 SUB-TOTAL: $341,723.86 ENGINEERING 25,787.81 Inspection&review 4,216.69 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE _ 17,4$6.19_ TOTAL: $388,514.54 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improvements Lateral A Item# Desai tion 1 0on Unit Unit Cost Extension SI Sewer Pipeline,$" 1,186 LF 28.00 33,20$.00 52 Sewer service pipeline,4" 0 LF 25.00 0.00 53 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 0 Ea 75.00 0OD 54 Connect to Rewting Sewer, 8° 1 Ea 2,000.00 2,00000 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 Ea. 3,000.00 12,OOD.00 56 Drop Manhole 1 Ea 3,400:00 3400.00 57 Extra Depth Mm&& 15 LF 200.00 3,000.00 58 Trench&BacIM,0-6' 485.3 LF 2.00 970.60 59 Trend&Backfill,6'-S' 92 LF 3.00 276.00 60 Trench&Backfill,&10` 189 LF 4.00 756.00 61 Trench&BackfidL 10'-12, 419 LF 5.00 2,095.00 62 Trench&Backfill. 12=14' 0 LF fi OD 0.00 63 Trench&BackBll, 14'-16' 0 LF 8.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfin, I6=18' 0 LF 10.OD 0.00 65 Trench&Backfill, 18'-20' 0 LF 12.00 0..00 66 Special trench compaction 522 LIF 4.OD 2,088.00 67 Water 1 LS 71.48 71AS 69 Consttuction staking 1 LS 517.66 517.66 69 Traffic control 1 LS 43.59 4359 70 Temporary fatilim,seed and mulch 0.466 Ac 1,000:00 465.63 71 Tempmmry slope harrier(silt fence) 168 LF 2.25 378.77 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Logy 9 LF 5.00 46.88 73 Tempamary inlet int barrier(gravel bags) 70 Lb 1.25 8?.5D 74 Temporary construction engnnce 1.875 Ton 50.00 93.75 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 222.41 222.41 Land Acquisition 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS I,758.11 1,758.11 SUB-TOTAL: $83,988.75 ENGIN EEMG 5,157.56 Inspection&review 843.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 4,199.44 TOTAL- $94,189.08 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improvements Lateral A' Item# Des anti Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 J-S 509.38 509.38 51 Sewer Pipeline,8" 690 LF 28.00 19,32000 52 Sewer service pipeline,4" 0 LF 25.00 0.00 53 Sewer tees, 8"x 4" 0 Ea 75.00 0.00 54 Connect to Exisdng Sewer, 8" 0 Ea 2,000.00 0.00 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 2 Ea 3,000.00 6,000.00 56 Drop Manhole 1 Ea 3AM-00 3,400.00 57 Extra Depth Manhole 18 LF 200.00 3,600.00 58 Trench&Backfill,0-6' 194 LF 2.00 388.00 59 Trench&Back=6--8' 119 LF 3.00 357.00 60 Trench&Baaldall,S'-10' 317 LF 4.00 1,268.00 61 Trench&Backfill, 1(Y-12' 8 LF 5.00 40.00 62 Thneb&Backfill, 1T-14' 52 LF 6.00 312.00 633 Trench&Backffl, 14-16 0 LF 8.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfill, 16'-18' 0 LF 10.00 0.00 65 Trench&Backfill, 18'-20' 0 LF 12.00 0.00 66 Special trench compaction 0 LF 4.00 0.00 67 Water 1 LS 71.48 71AS 68 Comtruetion staking 1 LS 517.66 517.66 69 Traffic control 1 LS 43.59 43.59 70 Temporary fertili=r,seed and mulch 0.466 Ac 1,000.00 465.63 71 Temporary slope bmier(silt fence) 168.3438 LF 2.25 378.77 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 9.375 LF 5.00 46.88 73 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 70 Lb 1.25 87.50 74 Temporary construction entrance 1.875 Ton 50.00 93.75 Pexmanent Seeding(L ebien) 1 LS 222.41 222.41 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 1,758.11 1758.11 SUB TOTAL: $38,880.15 ENGINEERING 5,157.56 Inspection&review 843.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUB 1,944.01 TOTAL: $46,825.05 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improvemuft Lateral B Item# Desai 'on Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 I..S 1,018.75 1,01.8.75 51 Sewer Pipeline,8" 1,376 LF 28.00 38,528.00 52 Sewer service pipe,4" 696 LF 25.00 17,400.00 53 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 22 Ea 75.00 1,650.00 54 Connect to RVating Sewer,8" 0 Ba 2,000.00 0.00 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 6 Ea 3,00000 18,000.0 56 Drop Mau 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 57 Extra Depth Metihoole 433 LF 200.00 8,600.00 58 Trench&Backfill,Ofi' 0 LF 2.00 0.00 59 Trench&Bacldill,6'-g' 259.7 LF 3.00 779.10 60 Trench&BackfiH,8'-10' 159.7 LF 4.00 638.80 61 Trench&Baeffill, la 12' 178.5 LF 5.00 992.50 62 Trench&Bacffill,IZ--14' 230.1 LF 6.00 1,380.60 63 Trench&Backfill, 14'-16' 330.4 LF 8.00 2,643.20 64 Trench&Baokfll, 161-18' 150.5 LF 10.00 11505.00 65 ZYench&Backffil, I W-20' 71.1 LF 12.00 853.20 66 Special trench compaction 841 LF 4.00 3,36400 67 Water 1 LS 1.42.97 142.97 68 Consttuction staking 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 69 TMMC control 1 LS 87.19 57.19 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.931 Ac 1,000.00 931.25 71 Temporary slope bmrier(silt fence) 337 LF 2.25 757.55 72 Temporary Slope Barra(Biodegradable Log) 19 LF 5.00 93.75 73 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 74 Temporary construction entrance 3.75 Tan 50.00 187.50 Permanent Seeding(Dien) 1 LS 444.81 444.81 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 DEMoper's Interest 1 IS 1,758.11 1,758.11 STJB-TOTAL: $102,866.59 ENGINEERING 5,157.56 Inspection&mVWW 843.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 5,143-33 TOTAL: $114,010.81 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improvements Lateral C Item# Description ( uantit unit Unit Cost Extension wr 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 1,418.75 .1,018.75 51 Sewer Pipeline,8" 973 LF 28.00 27,244.00 52 Sewer sm ice Pipeline,4" 16 LF 25.00 400.00 53 Sewer mss, 8"x 4" 2 Ea 75.00 150-OD 54 Connect to Existing Sewcr,8" 0 Ea 2,000.00 0.00 55 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 Ea 3,000.00 12,000.00 56 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 57 Extra Depth Manhole 18.9 LF 200.00 3,780.00 58 Trench&Backfill,0.6 153 LF 2.00 306.00 59 Treneb&Backfill,6-8' 134 IF 3.00 402.00 60 Trench&Backfill,8'-1D' 176 LP 4.00 704.00 61 Trench.&BaakflL IV-12' 129 LF 5.00 645.00 62 Trends&Backfill. 12'-14' 145 LF 6.00 870.00 63 Trench&BwJMll, 14=16' 236 LF 8.00 11888.00 64'Trench&Backfill, 16-18' 0 LF 10.00 0.00 65 Trench&Backfill, 18'-2(Y 0 LF 12.00 0.00 66 Special trench compaction 17 IF 4.00 68.00 67 Water 1 LS 142.97 142.97 68 Construction staldag 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 69 Traffic control 1 LS 87.19 87.19 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and nwich 0.931 Ac 1,000.00 931.25 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 337 LF 2.25 757.55 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 19 LF 5.0D 93.75 73 Temporary inlet sediment bander(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 74 Temporary construction entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 1.87.50 Permanent Seeding(Lebien) 1 LS 444.81 444.81 Land Acquisition 0 IS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 1,758.11 1,758.11 SUB-TOTAL: $55,089.19 ENGINEERING 5,157.56 Inspection&review 843.34 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 2,754..46 TOTAL: $63,844.54 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Sanitary Sewer Improv Lateral D Item# Description ggg ty Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 1,018.75 ..... 1,018.75 51 Sewer Pipeline,8" 809 LF 28.00 22,652.00 52 Sewer service pipeline,4" 547 LF 25.00 13.675.00 53 Sewer tees, 8"x 4" 10 Ea 75.00 MOD 54 Connect to Existing Sewer, 8" 0 Ea 2,000.00 0.00 55 Standard Sadawy Sever Manhole 2 Ea 3,000.00 6,000.00 56 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,400.00 000 57 Extra Depth Merle 25 LF 200.00 5,000.00 58 Trench&Bacldxll,0.6' 114 LF 2.00 228.00 59 Trench&Back011,6---8- 41 LF 3.00 123.00 60 Trench&Backfill,81-10' 91 LF 4.OD 364.00 61 Trench&Baciffi11, 19-12' 83 LF 5.00 415.00 62 Trench&Backfill,12=14' 480 LF 6.OD 2,880.00 63 Trench&BadMl, 14'--16' 0 LF 8.00 CLOD 64 Trench&BacicK lb'-1$' 0 LF 10.00 0.00 65 Trench&BwAlin, 18'-20' 0 LF 12.00 0.40 66 Special trench compaction 545 LF 4.00 2,180.00 67 Water 1 IS 142.97 142.97 68 Construction staling 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 69 Traffic control 1 LS 87.19 87.19 70 Temporary fertilizer,send and mulch 0.931 Ac 1,000.00 931.25 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 337 LF 125 75755 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Loo 19 LF 5.00 93.75 73 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 74 Temporary co=ku2dnm entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.50 Permanent Seeding(Lehien) 1 LS 444.81 444.$1 Land Acquisition 0 LS 20,000.00 0.00 Developer's Interest 1 LS 1,758.11 1,758.11 SUB-TOTAL: $60,899.19 ENGINEERING 5,157.56 Inspection&review, 843.34 TEMP NOTE,,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE _ 3,044.96 TOTAL: $69,945.04 Petition No.4322 Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Property Ownership Block 1 Lot 1 Carner36M Development Croup,L.L.C. Lot 2 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L,C. Lot 4 Cornerstone Development Croup,L.L.C. Lot 5 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 6 City of Salina Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 8 Marilyn K.Scott Rev Inter Vivos Trust Lot 9 Corueratone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 10 Tomas R.&Lori A.Perez Lot 11 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 12 Cornerstone Devclapmrent Group,L.L.C. Lot 13 Martha Jean Knrc anyer Trust Lot 14 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 15 Samir Fahid&Snhair Magawish Lot 16 Ommmtone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 17 Carnersttme Development Group, L.L.C. Lot 18 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 19 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 20 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 21 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 22 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lost 23 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 24 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 25 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 26 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 27 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 28 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 29 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 30 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 31 Co marstone Development Group,L,L.C. Block 2 Lot 1 Carne bone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 2 Corner UM Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone Development Omup,L.L.C. Lot 4 Carnerstotte Devdn ment Group,L.L.C. Lot 5 Michael K&Beverly A.Lindsay Lot 6 City of Salina Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 8 Comerstaxac Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 9 Cornerstotte Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 10 Cornerstone Development Group,LLC Lot 11 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 12 Cornenum Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 13 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 14 Cornerst m Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 15 Comeratone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 16 Cornerstone Development Group.L.L.C. Lot 17 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 19 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lat 19 Carnerstane Development Groep,L.L.C. Lot 20 Cormerstane Development Group.L.L.C. Lot 21 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 22 Cororrstaue Development Group,L.L.C, Lot 23 Cornerstone Devel%nneant Group,L.L_C. Lot 24 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 25 Carnerstow Developm=t Group,L.L.C. LAA 26 Coromtone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 27 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 28 Cornerstone Deverlopment Group,L.L.C. Lot 29 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 30 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 31 Coruerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 32 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 33 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 34 Carneantone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 35 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 36 Cornerstone Development Group.L.L.C. Lot 37 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 38 Carnemtone Davelopnent Group,L.L.C. Lot 39 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 40 Cosrneastwe Development Croup,L.L.C. Lot 41 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 42 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 43 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. 16 a`°ca a�Oo oma � a'� wa oo n`� o`� 00 00 000 ao oo cc 000 ao 00 no goo o� w" en in in �--� r-i .--r .� .--� rti r-i r+i ,•ti s-i en en Q .-� ,••� 11 r-1 " r-1 ..4 -4 -4 .--1 -4 —4 .-r ,-1 ,-y .-4 .-4 rti r-1 .-•1 N N ei t1ri ti vriy yCi•y {{ei Ci Ci ��Nyy ei 11N�� Q v ei N " ei ei iV�V� uCii uN�� "+y1 O C i-� C7 O O Q O Q Q p G e G 2 p a O O p G7 O N {' N eq CV of IN Cif C4 of N Cv N R hl CV of C4 C* Cd C4 ni CV N V Ot 0% Ca � a Qr v, ro G1 g a� a Qt D+ O► C� Gti o+ O. a Dt Ch 0+ '� ao 0o ca 0o ao 0a o0 c. 09 ao 00 0o ao ap cR 0a ap w aq m 0a OR cod *6 ° *6 a6 06 ad od od oo ad 06 06 cc co 00 ccc 00 00 00 w c06n ew N N C d N N 'DACC i• N N N N [* N el ca c* N N t N (+i ! cri m cr i rn fn M m M en cri eri cn tti 1 �n M t�f t+i cn cn M rri m m m lry v� �! v7 M'S vI Y3 cry v'f m Al m m m m m ' " kn W, n2 rrk c"! P. �` M. cn c+s c rn c"� m eq c'k e rn cn rn rry m on M c+� trY cri r► cn e+Y rn ri eri ori eri cn crs rn � ch eri On d z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z z x z � � �n � v� �a �n � tia +ow >,a �c ,c �o � tio �o +o �pcn � vD �dtio va Vi r In vZ Rn W? v7 vi W? In vn vs vsv. . vi va » vi vi v} %n v) in %n eon vi in iri w) tri v� ori v� ori ori cri n wn vs ui to Q in cin c , cn r c�`k rrrLAi s'k N +-1 r-1 .--� r i �--� �-r �--) ..� ,--� , .••� ra .-� .--t r-1 ,-4 —4 .-a .-d ,--1 �--� r-1 ■-r rM en z , ; aM v+ nv doo ao oa 00 OCR '0 So�+; rvr►; 0000 aceta a0a 1110; �a coo m t+i tri C4rri V4 C4rri vri M" ri cri ren' m ori tri c*i r6 � of M C4 cr r1 Cri O; vNjO; Ni, o�s, v�r, �ia} o�. a�ti, Gtio�+ �+`i, � �► � � � o�jv�r, r-; � nnnrt� nrrr� nt� rr• r- � �+' n rne� t� t� 00 00 od od ad o0 0v ad cd 06 ad ad ao ad co w o0 00 0n oo w w 0o ac r-1 rr " r I " .-•r .-� ri .--1 " ,1 ,--1 .i rti ri r-f r4 -4 .--1 r4 ac no 00 00 00 0o ac aci 0o ao co on oa oq c4. 0c 0o nco m a0 00 00 0c V) vi vi v; vi v� vi vi vi va vi vi vi Ln to vi in vi in +ri wi vi vi vi 00j ONN• � + a+ ati, a ci a a a+- a,� oC m od 00 ad 00 00 oc 00 0o ad as 00 co 00 00 ad Go 06 00 cd 06 aD Cr n r- n n n 11-0 t4 n R n oa ao 00 00 00 00 00 oa 00 oa oc aq ac 0c 0o ac 0o cc OR ao oa 00 riC rnrnfnriririririmerienC4menniriMM (nmm (n ,-4 r-I .-e -4 .--1 .--1 r-1 -4 1-4 P-4 rr " 11 rK .-•1 r.1 "H r-4 "1 r•1 ti "" � 1ssa Alm ° MAI AQ 114 4 � 8 � � � � 45 � %d � %6 � k6 to � %d � e+i en rn cn rn eri c+i cfi en m e+s e*i r+-i t*i t+i eri rri eYi eri an cc oa ao oo i R CL R R rlcc40rr .c00 00 600000 ri H r-i r-1 Ty rl rl W H M rl �I rl r-t rf T'I .� ri ri rM H r+i rl 7'H r-r N r`f e+i rl m On em [r! m M m m "q " ry r-1 r-1 W rl r•I r-1 r-1 r! ri r-1 rl H r4 401F V3 " #R fR V V! 9►3 59 69 fig 6s 69 ff} fie 6e 64 f14 Ge 43 V5 603 " so i9 V} 5R} N N ry ry N N � N h1 O it 1� z `z-r z zi Zi zi 4 zz z `4. 4.. dam, ZZ ZZ Z Z `Zi 4 etif e*i eri of e~i ni en 04'0 0�0 0I0, ca+a o�'o, aaa 009 ado Oq rm- I n n N n 00 ari ao 0o 00 0a z od z cc 00 cc z 16 � `� o� eo e o 0o ao o 6 a'6 m `° M5 � '40 0 %D ata m M M e+7 !►) M en m m 00 00 00 app Ct Ch tfi Cti M 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0D aC 00 Do aq 00 00 00 N hf N !9 N 4�t lei N N N nn en en Fmn nimr► F+n zzzzzZzzzZzzZzzzZzxZZ M eZ en eq "I en men m m en en M m cn M gnnml 99 tri �o ►c, � ws �o .o do � � � tia tic � � � tia tic tia ro �o �o �o its �n �o +o rn acs �o ca u� w► Fn v7 en er? +n In In v; Fn ;n +n In �rx +n Fn >n v, en Fn �; ery In en �n Bei �n �7 Fry Fri us Z Fey y 7 eri vz Fri Vi eri v i Fri n to v� F/y Fri F/i � �V e� r�+� Z � V� � ��''L 4 tp� c�i, e�+3, t�+x� epi m e�+3. c�•k e�+s +"1 .a � ry r-I r+l rl p'y W r-1 rl rf ri w-1 rl ry rl ri rl rl r•1 r] ry r-! r+l rL rl rl � ry m m ee s er1 e+i m m en w} 49 m" F�y >� FA 'r7 �n �n vt In eA kn �r i Fn +rs h 47 vl Fr� Q; Ot O� Ct 01 t7t O+ O� t7m+, � m m [*! :*F eh m m cn er1 m en "n e*s en M m m en aC'o ado o ado oho z o+ Z Ci 6 cK vi Fri vi vi Fr'i Fri v7 vi F�wii Fly vQi vQ�s !ay��� wQ7 wQ�i 7+� 7N H 1r1 rgo w do go •1 rl rl rl "-1 r[ V min �Y 'G 1O Vw Y �G m m e+9 eri V Mi cn m rn of M m m m ens M m M rn en m m en r4 to en en M ai M QN►, pN, O± O; ONi Cr ONi C; oN+ CN► &! % 9 N) N � N C; NC; t71 g N V CNN q N N N COr th ambo—oa—cO-4r-Io go z n z0° 1 °M° zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz m oq oo ao as ao at 000o as vi Fn in Fn Fr} Wi wl wl tiD �d �G �p �D 1p �O 12� N N N N N tV N N N N N N N N N cV N N N N m*a w w 000 0000 o00 Gatly 1a�n�0 lOaR�v4 ta��0 'ern' t'rn3 '�rry: cv+�ti vy c�� v� v} v; wri +�nj rWl W? v� vs Fn Wl rr, +n 0�00O0� � o�O. a0_ oho„ ' 00 04 00 ` ttii �*i N c+! n N tV N [ iy [d M tMj •-t •~ ~�yy � W "4 —4—t ,-i .-1 ry r~ m m cri e*'f M. en en m en q m rn C6 m ery m m cn R N N N N N M ~ r-i hl en v kn tip a0 0% v Fn +D t+ ooC+ O ,-� 11 FZ � � p „ o R c o „ r-I 0� 6eGe60464V% W% ra4a96s69 €19- 69 es Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 4 m to M M M M M M en M cn en M M cn to W; t� 11rrttl: t-: t': tl; n r~ ttit6- r �; r raNO % %0 %a00 zm ►c , a +D %Q 00 ao as co w 00 W M M W0o oa o� oa 0o 0a as a0 00 on ao m o0 w 00 0o 00 0o as o0 00 00 0 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ �r" w n o o a o 0 0 te o 0 0 99m98kM8 9 9 Z 9 9 9 g 8, g , w e-i w w wV-1 rr 4 tiD w 9 % 0 %09 In nIn w! W? u; Ln v� +n rn to �n v� to in in 1►'i 1f'1 r�'i v7 w+ V'� �Yi �i ,t� �7 �s art ev�a � �p vs %n to v1 w� +n vy vn W) W� tin WI +n to v3 %n Cn cn m ci ri cn cn cn cn M M ci cn rh Ci M [n vi +n tm vi vy vi vi vm to vm Z vIi vi vs �n v; tri Cn t+� to M M rn M M M M rn rn M M M l*1 oppp el p;N 0% ci 4 G9: Ow D► Oti O; Q► Ot �1 t cc zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzg S a In W1 i� InW In InInInV) ..a —4 ww .-4 w w —4 I-L Z w w NCell cc V.; Cri Men en en m cri c*� M rn cn cr V m c as oo o w N M et Vs A t- A A dN � N N to en (*) t� en M M cn to crS Q Corfim/ Sea.Y+F AL+xrs O$R Took t 'adm S _ Did Etaewa date ddl/269 -'02 Ms 10MA-t:-u',uj%or6* . Elft dala nna '99W- IS--6-46-oftfi h PA1f0lENT t hsA4LtsP#hpioYnk:a om ytDaflAG. -"' . . . . New omit At atm' Fln&Adm hall 7Cp�tsfO Of163Z9 - Ueardda Yrpy,r;akrr:Tpfi 1pwbyom inplf] `2086SP�dASf f Tuts PaWbyreromme L PbRQUPLo —- — Payment me*od f-L'4MK Mi 'aet dada '7jp2f 111 Ctm*rumor r Cid ___......._. . .. '�r1Derladlinurnal -2016 12 l83 =7p—,bow a=wA ,O Paskid Reverser!SK dame *V,&W LA96�SRANDPAA9UAAbDANA .. . _ 1 r _• lA�llav�rs► i7Z,328r14 .. :,LC, Grand Prairle Phase 2 Developer Cosu Final Total Cast of Improvements $422,300.85 Developer Percent 21" Total Developer Share $8,461.77 Less Initiar Contribution ($112;328.44) Rafuno pile Developer $�7,8e5.67 i >I i Cornerstone 1levelapmant GnDup,1LC i Attn:wrlllarn a 5hppard P.O.Box 14$1 Salina,KS 67402=1481 M own.4580 Pr*ct 16315£ i i a r 5 LC) Pack,Debbie 1 From; Nebon,Wayne ! gent: FrkWk,Nowhber 34 2018 433 PM t To: Pack,Debbie co suck Don 5ubjacu Gwd Pralria devdioprnent fee paymelit eelmbi+nMngnt i Good aftritecon Debbie: Rill Sheppard Con mrstane DBv.@ mng oallmd to inquire abet*robWa raasnant of a fee~be paid as}Tart of a dgvelcpmat 9 opmment for therCrated Pa ie Phbc 2 project.That agre"unl;exeeumd on Dee.19.2017,ragrtited the developer 16 1 provide funding hl the amount or$,12,321144,which qgi Ill 201*dFthe eatimde$pto&ct•cpst.The devalg VMffl ft wee reWved by ttre city an Dal.21,2016. Wirer the mvind statement of tural costa for special assessment costs were set via Resolution No.16.2194.the til + constmotI&cost sod city ct mma were much lomu their the preliminary estlmato.The developer's 2D-A share was deb mriaed to be$80,914.83,or$31,413.54 leas tlraa what Ira paid.He is stating that he has not lieen reWburapd lhri f at diil'e vboo.Please check into this quas6bb.Thank yea. i Wayiis r,Nelson,P.6. Ovillingtmaer 11 City OfSalins i 300 W.AA St. P.Q.Hoot 736 Salina„0 67402 MC i s Telaplianc:7$5-3.095725 Fac nib. 785-309.5713 `r 1 t a t Patition 4382 Grand ParrisAddit[on Phase I1 coa oi~lmodwMuntta br.m lla Quantity Ilnk t3iait Cost $xtcnston 1 Mobilfsatim 1 U 10,240$0 10;240.90 2 Eurbnnkmedt 2,390 L3 3.30 7,887.00 3 Embankment Contractor fumisbed 2,488 SY 14.75 35,698.00 4 Clearing do Iambbing 1 5Y 2,106.00 2,140.110 ' S Gcotechnieal Report 1 LS 4,500.00. 400.00 6 Asphalt Pavenusn[,6" 039 Tan. 63.05, 122,253.95 7 Subgrade madifwatim 6,290 SY 4.50 28,305.00 8- Curb&gutter 2;936 LF 15.15 44,480.4D 9 Sidow4lk(41(4'D 51 SY 41.50 2,116.50 i 10 Sidewalk(4')(G") 19 SY $1.05 969f.95 9 11 Sidewalk ramps,Typo 1 4 Ea 682.50 2,73.0.00 ! 1,2 5idewmk ramp,8' i EP 787.50 1,575.00 13 Brick s4AOped rid wnctway 6" 79 SY 124.71 9,855.25 i 14 WaW PipelO%On 5l 1F 58.10 1,934.05 l5 Fire hydrant&valve mmembly 3 LY X4,054 05 12516.2.15 A. Unit sarvlec,I W' 3 LF 1,Op3.50 5,019.QQ 17 Long service, i" 1 ER 815:30 $25.30 18 Short eervlae,l" 6 401.10 2,406,511 19 $ewer plpielinq,8" 1,023 LF 95.76 36,521.10 20 Sawa aesvW pipellne,4." 830 LP 27.30 7.1,645.3.5 21 Sewer rets,8"It 4" 20 ER 159.60 3,192.09 22 C001104 to Existing Sewer,8" 1 Be 4.20.00 40.00 23 Connect to Existing Manhole 2 $.e 1,240.00 2,.52Q•00 24 SbWatd Sanitaty. Sewtr Manhole 3 1#a 4,095.00 12,285.00 15 Zutra Depth Mauhols- Is LF 3D811O 56550.40 26- ConstnwYoa staking 1 S 9,219.00 9,219,110' 17 9�d g 1 LS 3153150 3,538.50 2$ Tamporfry tnefflc MkIml 1 L5 151.80 251,$0 29 Temporary fertirmt,amed and muleh 0 ,Ac 3,013.50 '0.00 30 Temparmyslop�e..-batrier(ailtf+anca) 697 LF 3.15 2.19555 3.1 Terngitrary 811ape 8wdar(SiodaPdable•1AgJ 55 LF 6.30 3185.49 32 Temporary inlet eadimant barrier(BM"i h1m) v Lb 2.90 t)A!0 33 Temporary aanstrttatioa vntrando 60 Ton 31.56 1,890.00 34 Zi1sW Contml(Class f)min C) %560. BY 1.10 3,915.56 co 1.1 Storm Brief Madit"mattoa 1 LS 1,743.90 1.143.90 L.I3. Li uidated 17amagas 1 LS -17,100.00_ -17,14.0.00 Iubumi 5385,3158 51 ' City Expanses 12.6a01(d)(5%) 19,26504 jawmit,Banding&Issue 77,734.$0 Total 542248$5 � 5 CUBMMER COPY Mi cell aus e E of CRr of Selina Ram 8987' Pp SM 788 Numkier Ins,SCS 07402-0736 '�md (785)309.5735 Fmc(785)309.5738 / Rke."Dew l�eoeh�d tom: CORNERSTONE DEVELOPM TvM 15:OB CLML.YAW Code -A De AmRP, S09ri WASSP IENTS ;11?a 44 80004 9810 83156 Dfftd pe M#Fee $112,926.44 000 1000 Owh 5712,826.44 PAID SY; CORNOMME DEVELOPM PAYMENTMEM., CHEM APATTMORM: SJUM.44 AMTAPPLIM 4112,928.44 WAGE— suD 0 0 .,.- .3 (15) Y 2010 ,kUpst 19, City of Salina, Kansas Repent of E,ngsnmrnng e NeLso� Atte: Wayne -` end Prairie Addition to the City of Salina, Dear WaYne, request for a his let�x as our v�rit Isle ��� CCy�pI�'Y'��N on the above R'TI� p�ject, referencod Thank You very muclh for your attoo in this matter. Respectfully, William R. nip 4r+! REQUEST FOR OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS Sana RECORD REQUEST II&ORMAITON(To be completed by Requester–Please print) Full Name: Ld_,A Phone: .r rlr j=aJ31Z Address: �s� &.2•fc.uss � - (s (City) (s'tdc) MP Code)` Email Address: 11 .i4�LaE4 , at,an•. ._ Record Requested(p ma be spam) Request Type(pleas real �= ?rAIrIP. f n Inspection 1Dr Cicada t s of swats Rhal M4I PP (Most mcorda wW be pravidea within three(y)frail bum ft from the date of tea) I hereby declare that I do not intrad to,acid will not: (a) Use any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the pmpose of walling or offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed;or (b) Sell,give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in-or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer any property or service to any person who resides at any address listed. re Date RECORD FEES(To be completed by Record Custodian) The Kansas Open Records Act authorized public agencies to charge reasonable fees (which may be requested in advance)for provtdheg access to or furnishing mples of public records Retrieval Time: Hoots Minutes $ FbS 15 MhWW Na charge FaA 30 moue m dkreV%rorpart of $16'.00 Duplication:Total Paged X $.30 per page . – $ 11 paged and over W3operpw Other(may include postage,data processing,etc.)at actual cost - TOTALFREDUS = $ YOUR COPY OF IMS FORK SHALL SREVEAS YOUR JWCEIPr RESULT OF RECORD REQUEST(To be completed by Record Custodian) Was the Request Pulfidled7(please circle): YES AVO H"YEW",the date provided: If"NO",reason for not providing request(please check): —Request not in record form —Record does not exist —Request not specific enough —Record is closed per K.S.A.45-221 —Other(please specify) _Record restricted by Federal law,State statute,or Kansas Supreme Court decision Sign W= Data If you bare grey�rssrlaaa aGeret�rr raaerd nequaN,please carifad err idly of Ser@ee F�sarJars of 1prr toao wd in Nie CI&Ctertr'rr Q7LV ag(7m)Mo-nn Re.urs Request for Open Public Records Dr. Justin Hanke December 30, 2019 RE: Grand Prairie Addition City Commission Finan Plat Approval--May 4, 2W9 Staff Report (Dean Andrew) Rea e9s# Documentation and/or correspondence related to: A) Amendment to City Commission approval of Planning Commission Condition #2 "An emergency entrance and all weather access road from Markley Road over to the public street In the north peninsula shall be constructed as part of the development of the north peninsula area. The Fire Chief shall approve plans and specifications for the proposed emergency access road prior to consideration of a final prat by the Planning Commission. Construction shall be completed prior to the Issuance of any certificate of occupancy in the subdivision. Conceptually approved by Fire Akarshal." (Staff Report 5-4-2009 pg. 2-3). B) Amendment to City Commission approval of"Phasing of Public Improvements" Indicating a change/clarification at "The developers have indicated that they plan to install all public improvements upfront in the first phase of development but they would have the option of phasing In some-public improvements. (Staff Report 5-4-2009 pg. 101. For dates: March 28, 2008—December 30, 2019 � (,4) STAFF REPORT SALINA CITY PLANNING COMMi5SION Case M?Q87-2 Hearing Date:go hK 16,2QQ8 rdftuad2 Request: Final Plat approval of the Grand Prairie Addition Location: North side of Cedar Ridge Drive east of the Mariposa Addition Owner/Applicant: Cornerstone Development Group/Bill Sheppard City of Salina/Steve Snyder Surveyor: Jason Johnson, Landmark Sunray V&Mapping Engineer: Greg Adams. Campbell&Johnson Engineers Land Area: 37.14 acres Number of Lots: 70 Zoning: A-1 (R-11 zoning requested) Proposed Use: Residential Subdivision e of Regi The applicant Is requee4ng final plot approval to slow the residential development of a 37.14 acres tract bordered by the Mariposa Addition on the west the Saline Municipal Golf Course on the north and east, unplatted aWtuftwal land on the southeast and Cedar Ridge Drive on the south, As proposed,this 37.14 acre tract would be subdivided kit 70 residential building lots for single-family homes. The entire 37.14 acre tact now being proposed for residential development is vacant pasture land. The property drrectly to the weest was platted, rezoned and annexed into the cKy as part (Bb* 5) of the Marlposa Addition In 1989 but no development has ever occurred. A separate request to ranine this property was filed with the preliminary plat applkatlon. Bac karound In 1963,the Graves family acquired the Southwast Quarter of Section 20 In Saline County. This quarter section is bounded on the south by Ckwd Street and the west by Marymount Road and contains 160 saes. Shortly after their purchase, the Schilling Air Force Base closed permitting the Saline Municipal Airport to relocate to the former air base. In 1967.a plan was put forward to construct a municipal golf course at the formerske of the nwnk*l airport. Because of the north-south runway alignment the airport land was flat and was Staff Report Application#P08-2A Page 2 configured In a manner that would have required all the long holes on the course to run on a north-south axis, the City approached the four Graves brothers(81I, Dwight, John and Lowell)about the possibility of contributing some of their land for use in the design and layoW of the golf terse so as to provide some rolling terrain and allow for a layout that was not stri*north-south. Following some careful planning,25 acres of Graves family land was given to the City for Inclusion In the golf course layout. One result of this land donation is that there are now peninsulas of Graves Trust owned land between holes 7 and 12 and between holes 13 and 14. In 1988,a mesterplan fear the remaining Graves Trust land,known as the Mariposa Master Plan was approved In concept by the City of Salina and Saline County.The plan called for the closure of Cloud Street adjacent to the Elks Club and construction of a new,realigned collector street connecting Marymount Road and Markley Road with residential development occurrirhg north and south of the new street. Phase 1,the Mariposa Addition, was platted In 1980. Phase ll, the Flor De sot Townhome and Briagp to areas dose to Markley Road,were platted and developed'ln 2000. Phase III.the Cedar Ridge Addition, was platted in 2004 and Cloud Street was eilmfnated and Cedar Ridge Drive was constructed as part of development of that subdivision. The Cornerstone Development Group has purchased a portion of the Grave's Trust property between Cedar Ridge Drive and the Municipal Golf Course with plans to develop a residential subdivision.They retained the services of a land surveyor and civil engineer to develop potential wbdivislon layouts fear the area. Their layouts led them to have some preliminary dhmsslons with the golf course staff about potential land swaps and boundary adjustinents between their subdivision and the golf course property.They Identified areas where the addition of the golf course land could square off the subdivision boundary to provide better lot configurations and areas they would be wiling to transfer to the golf course to widen area adjacent to the a hole fahway. Because all parties whose land Is included In a subdivision plat must consent to participate In die plat application,the Cornerstone Development Group made a formal written request OW the governing body authorize the City of Salina to be a co-applicant in the platting of the property to allow portions of the golf course property to be Included within the subdivision boundary. In terms of net land area,the proposed land swaps wed resuft In more golf course land tieing added to the subdivision than Comerstone land being added to the golf course, however,the developers are also proposing to grant trall easements or rights-of-way to the City to allow golf course personnel to travel through the subdivision to get between holes 7 and 12 and B and 12 to perform golf course maintenance functions.These frail corridors for City use contain approximately 34,000 sq.ft.Other requested areas of City participation and cooperation are the dedication of utility easements to allow utility a denslons under golf Staff Deport Appilcatlon VOO-2A Page 3 course Property,the wanting of an emergency actress easemeMomio Monday Road and the possible Urrastrucftn of a stormwater defendonlretention pond on golf oourae pnapgq between the 43 and 141hfairways. In addition to the cart hail contdors,other potential benefits to the Munlcipal Golf Course operation trot participating in this plat would be establishing a surveyed, monumented boundary along the south side of the golf course, the potential fvr adding a water feeture1water hazard to the golf course which could also be a supplemental source of Irrigation water and the potential for connecting the two eAsting golf course r9estronms So the public sewer system. The CkyCommbsion considered Comerstone's repast atthelrJanuary28,2009 meeting and approved a resolution(4-0)auffwdit the induslan of Municipal Golf Course land in Cornerstone's subdivision plat and rezoning errs. The resolution essentially authorized the CRY Of Salina to be a co-applicant on the plat as a landowner and authorized the Parks and Recreation Director to sign the rezoning and plat applications on bdmff of the City. A preliminary plat application was filed on February 45, 2008. The Salina. City Planning Commission met on March 18, 2409 and considered ComenrtorWs propos0d preliminary plat of the Grand Prairie Addition. FollwA ft presentation of the staff report, comments from the Parks and Recreation Director, comments from the deeign engineer and comments and questions by Commissioners.the Commission voted 8.0 to approve Cornerstone's Proposed preliminary plat of the pmpwty. The Planning CommisaWs approval was made subject to the f+ollovWng condRion.. 1. The applicant shall obtain a letter from the Mariposa Homeowner's Association authorizing excavation within the Mariposa Common Area and connection to Me sanitary seww system located within the common area prior to Planning Commission consideration of a final plat. Modified by Planning Commission December 2,200L 2. An emergency entrance and all weather access road from Markley Road over to the public street In the north peninsula shall be constructed as part of the development of the north peninsula area. The Fire Chief ahall approve plains and specifications for the proposed fire access road prior to mulderation of a final plat by the Planning Commission. Construction shall be completed priorto Issuance of any certlficate of occupancy in the subdivision. Conceptually approved by Fire Marshal. 3. The applicant shell obtain a letter from the Director of Parks and Recreation approAng the proposed boundary adjustments to the Municipal Golf Coarse bourxiaryr, the proposed location and design of the dethntionfretention pond Staff Report Application#PQ8-2A Pape 4 located between holes #13 and #14, proposed easement locations and the emergency access Woad design prior to Planning Commission consideradon of the final plat. The Director of Parka and recreation and the golf course staff did not approve of the proposed location and design and the pond has been relocated to Comerstone property. 4, The City Engineer shall approve preliminary plans and specifications for the Internal public suets, on-site and of-slle water and sanitary sewer line extensions and stormwater collection and detention facilities needed to serve this subdivision prior to Planning Commission considamtion of a final plat. Needed utility and drainage easements shall be provided on ft final plait. Draft descriptions of proposed off-elle easements shall also be Included with the final plat. Approval letter attached. 5. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City Engineer with conflmration that the turning radii on the proposed cul-desacs within the subdivision are adequate to accommodate fire tricks and trash tricks prior to Planning Commission considerativn of the final plat. Revlewed and confirmed by CHy Engineer. 6. A maintenance plan for the drainage ways adjacent to the golf cart trail corridors shall be agreed upon prior to Planning Cornmisslon consideration of the final plat, Golf course staff will maintain cart trail corridors. Dowlopers are proposing that the City take over ownership and maintenance of the detention pond. 7. Proposed street names shall be provided on the final plat. Shown on plat. S. Section corner On,subdivision and block corners and a curve data table shall be provided on the final plat Channel from Preliminary Plat Following approval of the preliminary plat, the proposed location of the golf course detention pond between holes#13 and 14 was staked out in the field.After reviewing the staked out location in relation to fairway landing areas on the two holes, both golfers and golf course staff expressed dissatisfaction with its proposed location and configuration. Therolbre on the proposed final plat the primary detention basin has been rokmated to Cornerstone property between holes #6 and #12 on the golf course and Is no longer on golf course property. Staff:Report Application#POS-2A Pap 5 It appears that the appflcant has designed a sheet network that generally confornw with the ung topography on this site. The applicant's plat layout shows a single public great 00rinec6bn to Cedar Ridge Drive. Ideally, major entrances to subdlvivions on opposite sides of a collector or arterial streets should line up with one another. In this case the, ShOM connection was dictated by the location which had the best sisht lines east and we on Cedar Ridge Drivoe. A second connection to Cedar Ridge Drive was not proposed because no other location offered safe sight distances. All Internal residential streets would all be public streets with 60 ft,of right-of-may,Cab and gutter and 33 ft. of paving. These proposed right-of-way and paving widths mea# cly standards. The poWng width of the original sector Offdarfposa Drive is 41 ft.but the width of the remaining section lb 29 ft. Forty-sk(46)of the 70 lots proposed would have driveway access on gentgress Drive,the main entrance road. Although several lots abut or back up to Cedar Midge Drive, there would be no individual driveways onto that street Pro 8entgrass Drive Larkspur Lane Coblren Circle (short and cul-de-sac) These proposed sheet names do not appear to conflict with any existing street names in the city or county.The Planning Commission has the authority to approve or not approve proposed sheet names. Variance ReQuesfis The appNcent is requesting two (2) varlances from the city's Subdhdelon Regulefions. 1) A variance to the maximum length of a dead end(cul-de-sec) street; and 2) A vadenoe to the requirement for a 150 ft.tangent between all street curves, The length of the proposed dead end street in the peninsula is over 2,300 ft. and Is 2,850 ft. from the entrance to the subdivision If the length of the parkway Is Included. Section 36-10 of the Salina Code states that N the Planning Commission finds that Staff Report Application#Po8 2A Page B particular hardships or practical ditircullies may result from strict compliance with the subdivision regulation, it may approve variations of exceptions to the regulations so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest served, This section also st" that the Planning Commission shall not approve varindons unless it shall make findings booed upon the evidence presented to it In each sp nMc case that: 1) The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare or injurious to other property or improvements In the neighbodmod In which the property Is located; 2) The conditions upon which the request for a variation are based are unique to the Property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable generally to other property; 3) Because of the particular physical surroundings,shape or topographical condMons of the specific property involved,an extraordinary hardship to the owner would result,as distinguished from a mere Inconvenience,If the strict leterafthls chapter Is carried out 4) The variation will not in any manner vary the provisions of the zoning regulations, ordinance, comprehensive plan, official street clasaftation plan and/or major street plan or official map of the city. § .YAI8 The two conditions that make this property unique are its relatively landlocked locadon and the shape and topogrophy of the site. The property Is bordered on the west by a plotted lot .and on the north and east by the Salina Municipal Golf Course. That leaves only the Cedar Ridge Drive frontage as potential street access to the site and the choice of access points Is lirrtited by the hills and curves on thud scree#which offer eight linea. With the total length of this property(2,000 ft.from north to south), the golf course to the north and east and the natural slopes and dropoffs,the developer is very llmited as to how OW can lay out lofts and streets within the developable portions of this 37 acre tract. To mitigate concerns about having a second way Into the development for emergency vehicles if the Cedar Ridge entrance is blocked,the applicant is proposing work with the golf course to construct a secondary emergency access road from Marldey Road to the northern cul-d"ac. This emergency access road would be located on golf course property crossing the a and 7"`holes of the course. This plan has been reviewed and conceptually approved by the Fire Marshal and golf course staff. Staff Report Applk ation#PO&2A pap 7 As to eldewalks,the developer Is Propoeing an extensive network of rear yard pedestrian traps which will be owned and maintained bythe abuts owners. This ftH network wmW Provide res<derts with off-street walking paths within the subdivision but In stall's opinion would not sub"119 for an on street sidewalk syelem. The Planning Commission has the authority to require sidewalks as a oondition of granting any street length varlanoe. All Iota and blokafts have been numbered on the plat drawing. A total of numbered 75 lob all In one large block arra shown an the final plat Staff is recornm subdivision be divided up into separate blocks at natural dividing 8 that thb areae set aside as common poh�ts. Thm are no open space. Not al 75 of the lots are buildable. Staff is recommending that onnservalon ansas and drainage and tram CoMdors not be lsrbelad as separate kft which would put the number of bukdable krts at 70. All lots shaarn would have adequate fioritage on and access to a public sheet. bIt appears that the width.do uld and area dimenalons of ail lots shown on the plat would n or eockaeed a minimum standards of the I-i district. It does not appy that there would be any foreable dlffit W**, for reseons of topography or other conditions, to obtains bold' ymb 10 build ng pe on any of the proposed lois. except for proposed Lots 70, 71,72. 73 which have substantial slopes from east to west. Creative she planning or substantial regrading vcl be required on these logs. Egbilc Loft gad&OiM 1. Water Supply and Fire Protection - 'Phis area Is fed plin-Adly b an B running wrest from Markley Road along the y "water line is an existing 8"line in Ma alignment of Cedar Ridge Drive. There Club. The Fie Code r3mrount Road#hat runts from Crawford south to the Elim subdivision be bis of providing uire�h�a water distribution sysfierri ung the g.p m.for fire protectlon. The Utilities Director has determined that the existing water distributions �volume and pressure exp In wound c onnection'thle subdlvislon would h0w8lonerve this g did e d However ��s looW system with two sources of now would be created by extending a we a Inlr Afrom the north Meriden ROBS Drive across the golf Course over to a 20" water line in Internal water lines Could be financed over IS years through aGaWn of a benefl# district with the devoloper putting up 20% of the host in cash or a letter of credit equal to 35%of the estimated Cost. 2. Sanitary sewer- Preliminary plans show that this subdiWslon can be served by a Stuff Report Application#1308-2A Page 8 gm* system. The nearest point of connection Is a manhole adjacent to the Mariposa detention pond and Lot 12,Block 1.This would require the construction of an off-eite sir line across golf course property to reach this manhole.Thera are two routes or options for connecting to this manhole. Option A would cross the Mariposa pond and would rerqulne Homeowner's AssodaWn approval. Option B would,be to utilize an existing easement north of Lot 12, Block 1. A network of ti" sewer lines located in the street right-of-way is proposed to serve individual building lots. The details ofthe sanitary sewer system and the design and layout of internal sewer lines wtil be resolved during the Engineering Department`s review of actual design plans. Internal lateral lines and the off sibs sewer connection could be financed through creation of a benefit district with the developer putting up 20%of the oast in cash or a leiter of credit equal to 35%of the estimated cost. 3. Natural Gas-Kansas Gas Service has an existing gas line that extends south from Crawford along Marymount Road. They have extended anothergas fine wed from Markley Road along vacated Cloud Street to provide a second gas feed into the RiverRun area. The Cedar Ridge Addition on the south side of Cedar Ridge Drive has a gas diWbutlon system and this could be extended north Into Grand Prairie. 4. Electricity-Wester Energy has electrical lines serving the golf course and the near by Marlposa and Cedar Ridge Additions which could be extended to serve the Grand Prairie Addition. All electrical lines serving this subdivision must be placed underground.This would not include high voltage distribution lines crossing the property or pre-exleting overhead lines. 5. Storm Drainage - The City% stomwvethr management regulations require the developerto design a stormwaterdralnege system to either accommodate or detain the additional runoff caused by development of the site (the difference between existing and developed conditions).The applicants storm ater drainage plan hays been appmed In concept by the City Enginner and the proposed detention basin located within the subdivision has born sized mostly to accommodate off-site runoff coming from the south. It will really function more as a pass through basin than a storage pond. Construction plans far any proposed surface flumes or ditches,storm sewers and detention facilities must be approved by the City Engineer prior to Issuance of any building permits in this subdivision. The applicant will need to obtain off-site easements from the Municipal Golf Course (the City) to allow stormwater discharge to enter and flow across golf coarse property. Staff Report Application#P06-2A Page 9 B. Fire Probection Fire response from Station #4, loud at Mmyrnount and Cnndord. Is about 5 minutes to the entrance of the subdivision. An emergency access d1lin connection from Markley Road across the gaff course to Benigma Drive would provide a second means of emergency access should there be any We of blockage atthe Cedar Ridge Drive entrance.This access drive would follow a path that is already In use. 7. Police Protection -Provided.by the Salina Police Department once irdemel streets are built and opened to traft. S. Schools - S In this proposed development would attend the falk w hg schools:Meadowlark School-Grades K45;Lakewood Middle School-Grades 7-6; Sallne Central High School-Grades 9-12. U.S.D. #305 has not Indicated to Cky staff that this development will create any crowding problems at the ave mentioned sdrools. 9. Paries-This property is shown as being beefed In Neighborhood Park Service Area #8 In the CWs Neighborhood Park Plan. There are no Neighborhood Faris within this area. Under the Cityls Park Land Grdinanoe, developers of residential subdivisions have the option of dedicating land within their subdlvlslon for public park purposes or paying a fee In lieu of demon. The fee is set at S20O/dw6 ft lbr single-family dwellings. This fee may be reduced by 50%when the developer provides private r+ecneatlon and open space for subdivision residents such as what wads proposed in RiverRun. 10. Abft & rraft - The applicant's engineer has not submitted an analysis of projected traffic from this development. A traffic study was not requested becxiuse Cedar Ridge Drive Is a newsy construed'collector street that was designed to acwmmodate the ultimate build out in this area. Based on a trip generation rate of 10 vehide trips per day per household, staff estimates that a total of 700 vMIde trips per day would be generated If the entire platted area were fully developed with homes. This Is fess than the projected 1.088 vehicle trips per day that would be generated by RiverRun,all entering or leaving that subdivision through ane a comm point(RhrerRun Parkway). EWJ=O%-and Dedications-The applicant Is proposing to dedicate all street right-of and Improvements shown on the plat to Ow public thr qmaintenance.City maintenae. All utility and drainage easements shown on the plat would be dedicated public easements, platted restricted scows Is proposed along all of Cedar Ridge Drive except for the street opening for Bentgrass Drive. There is already 60 IL of existing dedicated right-of-way for Ceder Ridge Drive adjacent to 1 Staff Report Application #P08 2A Page 10 this property. The right-of--way for Cotler Ridge Drive was dedicated jointly by Haworth Construction and the Graves Trust. All needed on site utility and drainage easements are provided on the plat but the appikant is also responsible for obtaining utility, drainage and access easements from the City to allow utillly tines and stormwater runoff to flow across the golf course property. Theca easements will need to be described and dedicated by separate instrument and will need to be finalized and executed prior to City Commission approval of the final plat Regulred Public lmp +moments The developer of Grand Prairie Addition would be responsible for the fonowing pubild Improvemsnle 1. Streets-Approximately 4,200 ft,of asphalt or concrete paving,2 lanes, 33 ft.wide with curb and gutter for Internal streets. 2. Sidewalks - 4' sldewalka along both sides of (Bentgrass Drive and Larkspur Lane) unless an exempflon is requested and granted. CuWesacs less than 600 ft.In length are exempt from the sidewalk requirement. 3. Drainage Construction of the primary and secondary detention basins and street Inlets and pipes orflumes needed to carry runoff to ttto collection and discharge points shown on the drainage plan. 4. Utilities — Design and construction of internal public sewer linea and water mains needed to serve individual building lots as. well as off-site utility extensions I connections. -The City of Salina would be responsible for the following public Improvements: 1. If special assessment financing is used,oversight over the contractor installing all on- eke and off-aft public Improvements. 2. Design and construction of any repairs or modifications that need to be made to the concrete drainage flumes carving water from the Municipal Golf Course Into the Madposa Pond. 3. Design and constnicti Staff Report Application#Poe-2A page 11 5iAssewmnis f lmasg Fees Portions of this property received assessments in 1989 for the 8"water line canredian from Marymount Road to the Markley WaW Tower and the sewer pump stun construct d at the intersection of Maryrmount Road and Mariposa Drives These aswssments were InIlauy deferred in 1899 because this property was outside the city limits. Property ownen3 outside of this proposed subdivision should not be impacted by assessments for Internal streets or public utlflties that serve only this development. The Graves Trust property received a substantial assessment (39% of the cost)for Cedar Ridge Drive In 2904. All costs for on-elle Improvements A be borne by the ownerldeveloper of Grand Prairie or passed on to lot buyers as a special assessment, Phaligg of Publia The developers have Indicated that they plan to install all public improvements upkHnt in Me first phase of development. Covenants The developers have not submitted a drat set of Restrictive Covenants for the subdivision. It is not dear whether conrenents and an amhltecb nW control committee will be used to establish private housing design requirements and other budding restrictions. Confb=13ce with en Jan 1. Land Use Map-The CIVO land Use Plan shows this area as being appmprk to for low-density residential development and in a Primary Service Area for tine extension of city utilities and services. The proposed residentiel denskyofthis subdivision(70 units on 37.14 acres)computes to 1.88 units per acme which is substantially less than the low density residential classification of 4.0 units per acre. A summary of the City's Residential Development policies is attached. 2M Recommend Staff believes this plat is in order for Planning Commission consideration but will have some specific recdrvnendatlons relating to items that still need to be addressed at the Planning Commission meeting. Salina Planning Commission December 16, 20OB Page 3 of 5 #4. Application #A015-2, tiled by Landmark Development Co., requeAV anneurtion of a 36.15 acre tract of land located at the northeast corner of Crawford Street and Holmes Road In Saline County, Kanses. MOTION: Mr. MIkeaall stated I move that we postpone aondieration cf Appllcefitons#P08-Q and #A08.2 to allow possible areas of cooperation bsfroen Todd Welsh. the First Christian Church and Landmark Development to be w9lored. SECOND: Mr. Meler VOTE: Motion carried 7-0. • Appy #PO@2A, filed by Comomtone Development Group, requesting approval of a final plat of a proposed 70 lot residential subdivision to be known as the Grand Prairie Addition to the Cky of Salina. The subjed property Is a 37.14 acre tract located an the north We of Cedar Ridge Drive east of the Mariposa Addition and Includes poftras of the Sentra Municipal Golf Course property. Cowed from December 2,2006 meeting. Mr.Andrew presented the staff report with visual graphics which are contained in the case filo. He summarized haw each of the conditions of prellminary plat approval had been=L William (Cork) Umphrey, ngxm mrat®tive of Cornerstone Development Group, stated that . Cornerstone was fine with the 11 conditions of approval recommended by staff. He said they would be Sing covenants and there would be a Homeownses Association. Mrs. Soderberg asked whether the connumber for this appiketion was*PO®-2A or#PO84 A as printed on the agenda page. Mr.Arydr"6brdP i*I dost KW l -2A.' MOTION. Mr.Ritter stated I move that we approve flnW plat Application #3106-2A with the 11 cmWItlons recommended by staff. SECOND: Mr. Householter. VOTE: Motion carried M. A. Application WO&II0I10A. disci by Kew Valley Engineering an behalf of D.L. Rogers Corp., requesting approval of a replat of Lots 173 and 175 on Santa Fe and Lcb 174 and 1713 an Seventh Stmt In the Original Town of Salina to create Salina Planning Commission December Z 2000 Page 3 of5 SECOND: Mr. Sdmeider. VOTE: Motion carded 5-0. F14. A dcodm MVV-2A, flied by Comeratone Development Group, n3QU"&9 approvai of a final plat of a proposed 70 loft residenN subdb4slon to be known as the Grand P4rairie Addition to kite City of Sallne. The subject property is a 37-14 acre tract k ailed on the north We of Cedar Ridge Drina east of the Markma Addition and indudee porffi s of the Salina Munk*al Golf Course property. Mr. Andrew presenled the ataff report wkh vhRW graphics which are cor alned in tine case file. Mr. Andrew ex kkm d them Plan kV staff was still missing two documents needed for the Grund Prairie final plat. One of these documents Is a letter from the City Enginewr approvlirrg the overall prbdividon **Ago plan and the char Is a letter from the Marl4Posa Honneowner's Ase dedon 9MV p mnlselan for a aewer pipeline lb sere the Grand Prairie Addltfon to peas the Mar tee detention pond area to connect to a public line sendrtg the Modposa Addition. Mr. Stack aqd*ed that the Engineering Department received rovleed drainage plane for the Grund Prairie Addition at 2AIPM that day and sUnply did not hWo enough time to review and approve them. Paul Carper for. 2143 Columbine Court. President of the Marlposa Homeorme�s Assoaadon, explained that hie group was fine with the sewer pipeline going under their pond, but would not agree to that unless they were given same help with the nonce of the pond. He ouggested that the City of Selina take oxer malnlenance of the pard due to lis proodn*to the golf course. Willem (Cork) Umphrey reproonting Cornerstone I]ev0kgMent GmW stated that ahaugh It would be les$ WWaft and Basler to run the @ewer under the Mo*om pond. they would not be blad m sled fast to accomplish that. He explained theft due to Marlpose's nor--w" radon. the sewer would have to be routed to the rorty. This option would be more dlem plivie to current landscaping on private property and would require dangerous 17 ft. deep trenches. Mr. Andrew earplained that when the preWnirmy plat of the Grand Prairie Addition was approved in March It was bejeved that there was only one feasible notate for proMbig gravity sewer service to the Grand Salina Planning Commission December 2,2008 Page 4 of 6 Prairie Addition and that was thmugh hire Mariposa Common Area. Marl osa's cants state that no sewer linea or other ud lWs may be Placed In the Common Area wllhout the Homeowners Action's approval. Theretorre, the Planning Commission required that the MwOosa Homeowners Association Indkele their approval in writing prior to Planning Conwrdselon consideradmi of the final plat so that everyone was assured that a sewer solution was in fact available. Since that time, ComerstotWs engineers have demonstateel that therm Is an Option B avabble (#m north mute) that Is teedmk slly and legally possible and that does not requrre Mariposa homeowner's Association approval.The question Is whether the PlarrnlV Commission Is,wiling to modify Condition #1 to tole into account #rare Is now an altemative to going through the pond. N so, that would allow the final plat to be considered w thout requiring the pond route. Steve Snyder, Parks & Recx+satlorr Dkiector, has wAewed the two routes and does rot believe that one route would have any more Impact on they golf course than the Wier. MOTION: Mr. Ritter stated I move that Condition 01 of our prshhmhnaary, plat approval be amended to allow elth er sewer option. SECOND: Mr. Schneider, VOTE. The motion carried 5-0. —to Approval of this motion eliminated fire requirement that written approval be obtained from the A+lariposa Homeowners Assodafion but dow net preclude the sewer going through the pond if some agreement is reached. #5. Application #P0848A, filed by James Hall an behalf of Great PIMns Manufacturing and multiple owners. requesting approval of a replat of portions of the White Armes Subdlralsion, Idiewlide Gardens Addison and Brown and Brown Addition to create the Great Plains Campus Addition. The subject property consists of 54,57 acres located on the north side of North Street east of Ohio Street In the City of Salina, Saline County, Kansas. Mr. Andrew presented the gat report with visual graphics which are contained In the case file. James Hag, Great Plains Manufacturing, 1525 E. North Street, explained that this replat was an effort to dean up an outdated and confuskV system. The replat would radically simplify the description of Iota In this area. Safina Planning Comnialon November 4,2DOB Page 3 of 5 MOTION: Mr. Hau@Ww tier stated I moble that vm approve Preliminary Plot Application #P064 with ow T recon mendatlons made by staff, with the arWweac an Virginia Court being addressed in the final plant. SECOND: Mrs. Soderberg. VOTE: Motion coaled 7-0. #4. Application 008-1, filed by Magnolia Development Partners LLC, premier Properties and Com.Co. of Kansas Inc. requesting the annexation of a 9.3,nor@ tract of land to aiow It to be added to the proposed Magnolle Cornrnons Addition. Mr. Andrew presented the staff report wl#h vbuai graphics which Is contained In the case file. MOTION: Mrs. Soderberg steed I move we recormmnd approval of Application #A08-1 requesting that 9 additional acres be annexed into the city. SECOND: Mr. Mlkesell. VOTE: Motion carried 7-0. F-45. Consider proposed changes to the dorm drainage / slamnn+aater detention plan for to Grand Prairie Addition residential subdivision located on the nxlh side of -'.Cedar Ridge Dries oast of the MorlposeAddidon. Mr. Andrew presented the staff report wtfh visual graphics as oontained In the can file. Greg Adarrw of Campbell S Johnson Engineers. PO Box 1332. Junction City. KS spoke regarding the plan for on-aft and off-elle drainage and slur woler deterhtbrr as a rspresentaBve of Cornerstone Development Group. He explained that this site was very difficult as water flows in many directions.The preliminary plat showed a plan to Include a dehotion pond an the golf course b&veern hales #13 and 014 as a permanent water hazard. However,In order to acwmphh this, a number of mature trees would have been out dawn. To ahold this, the pond was then moved north, but it was then determined that it could poienddy cause flooding of the fairway if there was a grader than 25 year rainfall event. Mr. Adams eqlained that he was able to deslpn a system that would hold back Bre volume of waver oomtng from the south In order to ott the water that the Cornmatone Development would genensts. He designed a channel that spreads out the water wW would slaw it to 2 th per second. He explained that after this design was tmptemented, there wxdd actually be less water going info the Modpose pond than before. There was some thought about adding a second SnV Saline PlanniCommission Nove 4, 2006 Page 4 of 5 small detention pond uut R would only hold a small event. a 5 or 10 year rale. Since this wcufd cause water to cross the golf course as well, he didn't sea the merit In a secoradery pond on the golf course property. SWft Snyder provided his perspective on the reasons for abandoning the golf Mures pond Was. Wayne Nelson noted that a secondary pond world be a dry bottom porA He stated that City staff met with Mr. Adam earlier #his afternoon and looked at several optlons. Oro was another pond bewean Lata 59 and 80 In Block 1 and another We was to add an energy dissipation device in the form of a nock garden where a drags flume diad ges runoff from Larkspur Lane on to the gaff cow". Darold Hough. 2144 Columbine CL, and Paul Carpenter, 2143 Columbine CL spoke as nepnaseratallv+es for the Mariposa HomeownWs Assoclatton. owners of the pond where runoff will end up. A video taken by Mr. Hough was shown to .Alustraete the amount of water the Mariposa pond receives from the golf course. Mr. CerP8nter e*ained that the Horneowns *s Association spends a considerable amount of money on maintenance of their detention pondldrainage system and also on erosion repairs needed due to flooding. The pond dam coltepsad In 1993 and had to be replaced at a cost of$25.OW. The Mariposa Homeownefs Association Is concemed that runoff from the Grand Prairie Addlflon and golf course could POMP&by cause an addltkonal burden an their detention pomkiminage system and end up matin$there more money. Mrs. Soderberg sum Met the Marlposa HomemmWa Assocetion vokre their concsms to the City Commission and show them the flooding video. The funning Commission tools no tonal action but asked staff to the drainage concern in their staff report when the final plat of Grand Prairie Actdrtlon comes before the Commission. R. Other Matters. Mr. Andrew stated that their avid be Hollow up action on Magnolia Commons and the Grand Prairie Addltlon as early as your next meedng on the 186'we also have some plats that are currently scheduled to be conskiered on December 2"d The rnemfing adjourned at B-09 PA, sec documett Nelson,Wayne From: Donald N.Dean cumr72@sbcgiobal.net> Sent: Wednesday,October 21,2009 2:21 PM TO: Nelson,Wayne Sum Grand Prairie Addition Athchments: Sheet 1.pdir Sheet B pdf Sheet 5.pdf Here are the changes I have made to note the phasing.I have not Included all of the sheets,but with the following narrative you should be able to follow what I have done. Sheet 1 Title Sheet.Placed a line and labeled It to show where Phase 1 ends and Phase 2 begins.Also added notes specifying exactly what Is to be done In each phase In regards to Sewer and Water.(PDF Copy included) Sheet 5 Site Layout Sheet.Placed the some line and labels that are on the Title Sheet.(PDF Copy included) Sheet 8 Plan Profile Sheet:This Is the first sheet that has both portions of each phase on It.I have noted the location with the line showing the spilt between Phage 1 and Phase 2.You will note that In the label at the lower right of the drawing I have noted which phase ft is in.In this case It lists both phases.(PDF Copy Included) On the remaining StmeVStorm Sewer Pian Profile Sheets,I merely put what phase it was on the label In the lower right of the sheet,I have not Included these sheets in this e-mail submlltal Sheets 6.7 are Phase Z Sheet 9-11 are Phase 2 Sheet 12-15 are Phase 1 Sheet 23-24 arse Phase 2 Sheet 25 is Phase 1 Sheet 26 is Phase 2 On Sheets 1&18,Storm Sewer Profiles,I labeled each St+om Sewer Run and noted on them if they were in Phase 1 or 2. (PDF Copy included) Sheet 16.17 are Phase 1 Sheet 18 Is Phase 2 on the Erosion Control Sheets,I will contact Larry Hooks and Bet his opinion.But for now hero are the sheets or at least part of there.Since they may be pretty large I will send the sheets for your review In 2 or 3 e-mails. Donald N.Dean,PE Campbell ami Jolnnon Eagm,PA 113 W.Snm&Sued Concordia,SS 66901 Pbom,785-243-1755 Cela:785-24315 F=785-243-1757 a-mail:urn�!'2,,,,@sl�Sl�La� a MCI"- REQUEST FOR OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS RECORD REQUEST MORBUTION(To be completed by Requesbor–Please Print) F+>R Name: ---- Phone: S''7I-drff Address: If 17 A.14 'G-7/g/ (S (City) (State) (Tap Code) Email Address: �r+e•*►� ��hc eta A= Z4R (pleaso be 006i ) I Request q easst Type st Onlydtcatian (Most records wilt be pnw dad w9ma Am(3)full bwbws r days from the dabs of nWmst) I hereby declare that I do not iatoad to,and will not: (a) Use any list of names or addresses cwtained in or derived from the records or infororation for the purpose of selling or offering for We any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed;or (b) Sell,gives or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from tln reads or information for the purpose of allowing that person to .WE or offer fo„ any property or service to any person who resides at any address listed. R04ue5tor Signature Date RECORD FEES(To be.ea n&ted by Record Custodian) The Kansas Open Records Act auMaraed public agencies to charge reasonabk fees(which may be. requested in advance)forpmvlding access to or furnishbng copies gfPublic records. Retneval Time: Hours Minutes I = $ Ara 15 n No chore Each 30 6ierc4*r or part a# $16.00 Duplication:Total Pages X $.30 per page r $ 11 pggss sed over XUO per page Other(may include postage,data processing,ere.)at actual cost = $ TOTAL FEE DUE _ $ YOUR COPY OF THIS FORM SIHAU SERVE AS MUR RBCWT RESULT OF RECORD COED REQUEST(To be completed by Rwwd CwWWkn) was the Request F ulf'i&A?(please circle): YES AVO If"YBS",the date provided: If"NO",reason for not provxdmg-request WM6 check): Request not in record form —Record does not exist _Request at sp wift enough Record is closed per S.S.A.45-221 —Other(please spocify) .`Record restricted by Federal law,State statute,or Kansas Supreme Court decision Sly DM tfyon have any vuesdour aboul your raord rs+p =4 please 9009=1 aw Qq of Sa&a M"dom of'Ong cion OBeer bcowd an Me C*C krk's Office ad(M)3010-5735 aff 7110 Request for opera public Records Dr.Justin Hanke December 30,201 9 RE: RiverRun Addition ReeiuestA Documentation and/or correspondence related to: A) Fire Marshal/ Fire Chief conceptual/final approval of plans and specifications for a proposed emergency access road in RiverRun Addition. 3) Waiver of emergency access road by fire Marshal/Fire chief in RiverRun Addition. for dates: January 2003-December 30, 2019 1 � 11 i `+ f � k S s IF w. f I} � C REQUEST FOR OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS Sad" RECORD REQUEST IWORMATION(To be completed by Requestor–Please Print) Full Name: . .,, } .. Phone: Address: dZ it Ort „</Iftft 6zw r- (Street (City) (State) (73p Code) Myna Address: Record Requested(ptease be apedfiic) Request Type(please ciwk) fr" ?m1fir– Ag-kInspection O kation [opm� �4grrec+r+ sec (Most records WE he provided within three(3),fali hudneas dam from the date of regteen) Ihereby declare that I do not intend to,and will not: (a) Use any list of games or addresses contained in or derived from the records or infbzmation for the purpose of selling or offering far sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who reside8 at any address listed;or (b) Sell, give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer for y properly or service to any person who resides at any address listed. RegnesWr Sigpature Date ^� RECORD FEES(To be completed by Regard Custodian) The Kansas Open Records Act authorked public agencies to charge reasonabk fees (which may be requested i Request for Open Public Records Dr. Justin Hanke December 30, 2019 RE: Grand Prairie Addition Development Agreement--Phase 1 Request#D2 Documentation and/or correspondence related to: A) Secondary Emergency Access Road in Petition for Creation of a Second Improvement District, per Recital No. 4 )Development Agreement 11-05- 2009 pg. 1). B) Amendment addressing Secondary Emergency Access Road In Subsequent Improvement District, per Recital No. 5 (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. 1). C) Revised Phasing Plan that addresses Phase 3. See Section 1.02 Definitions of Words and 'terms, "Phase I Lots" and "Phase 11 Lots". (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. 5). D) Approval of change In Secondary Emergency Access requirement In Phase I to a later subsequent phase, as per Section 2.02.G. Approvals. (Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg. J). E) Construction Plans,Specifications, Contracts and Change Orders approved by the City Engineers or City Staff regarding Secondary Emergency Access Road, per Section 4.01.A. #Development Agreement 11-05-2009 pg.9). F) Engineers Estimate of Cost for the construction of the Secondary Emergency Access Road, per Section 4,02.8 Engineers Estimate. (Development Agreement 11-0,5-2009 pg. 9). G) Development Schedule relating to the Secondary Emergency Access Road, per 4.05.A. Development Schedule. (Development Agreement I I- 05-2009 pg. 10), For dates: November 5, 2009-December 30, 20119 CITY OF SALINA 2 (A) REQUEST FOR CITY COMMIS M ACTION DATE TI 8122118 4.00 P.M. AGt=MDA SECTION ORIGINATWO DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: 7 DEPARTMENT OF BY. rrEM PUBLIC WORKS FINAL APPROVAL: NO: 3 Page 1 or Daniel R.Stack BY: ITEM: Petition No.4382 Consideration of a Petition and Improvement District Deveiopment Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development Group, LLC related to a special improvement district for water, sanitary sewer, street, and drainage improvements in Grand Prairie Addition, Phase Il. INKGND; The attached Petition No. 4382 was submitted by Mr. William E. Sheppard, President of Cornerstone (Development Group, LLC, on August 17, 2018 requesting c,erhm street, drainage, water,and sanitary sewer Improvements to nerve seventeen residential tote In Grand Prairie Addition. The attached engineering feasibility report for these emetic Improvements describes the scope of the project, the Improrrement district, the method of assessment, cost estimate breakdowns for each improv®mertt, and identifies and describes the properties In the benefit district. One hundred percent(100%)of the. cost of the improvements are shower to be assessed to the beneild district as a default number since the City Commission has not yet set the percentage. These cost estimates include construction, construction contingencies, Inspection, design, and bondinaAnteraest costs. The City Commission may modify the special assessment percentage appointment as they would like. City staff has worked with Cornerstone Development Group, LLC on a development agreement to address Issues related to the construction and financing of the improvements. The attached development agreement Is similar to previous agreements approved far subdivision development where the developer cow privately with the cantraclar"s and constructs the improvements. The city then reimburses the developer for eligible coats. it is prescribed by Kansas statutes that the City Commission consider a petition far street, drainage, sewer, and water improvements and establish sufficiency on the basis that any one of the fohlowing three conditions be met: 1, The petition is signed by a majority of the resident owners of record of property liable for asseesment under the proposal. 2. The petition is signed by the resident owners of record of more than half of the area liable for assessment under the proposal. 3. The petition is signed by the owners of record, whether resident or not, of more than haft of the area liable to be assessed under the proposal. In title case Condition No. 3 above is met and therefore meets the statute requirements for srAkdency. The Saline County Treasurer has indicated there are no delinquent special assessment taxes on any property owned by the petitioners. The property owners may choose to pay their share of the project costs ae a lump sum payment or as a special assessmerrt tax over a 15 year period beginning on the date that General Obligation bonds are issued by the city. The development agreement coincides with Resolution 13-7055 regarding financial guarantees and provides that the developer may either submit a letter of credit equal to 35% of itis costs or cash or financial securities equal to 20%of the ftect costs. CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE LLME ami a 4:00 R.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT. FISCAL APPROVAL: Np: DEPARTMENT OF BY. ITEM PUBLIC WORKS FINAL APPROVAL: NO: Page 2 BY: Daniel R.Stack BY. FISCAL„ ntoTE: Me hundred pat of the estimated costs of$439,872.92 are proposed to be assessed agalrat the Improvement district, With a per lot assessment projected to be $25,874.92, These lots were originally assessed $11,063.77 for part of the work done In 2011 for Phase I of the subdivision. COMFORMAKE WrrH STRATEGIC PLAN: Goal 3: The City will provide the highest quality of services, consistent with governing body direction, available resources and staff commitment to quality. RECGM N: Staff hes ldendW the fbilowing options. 1. Approve Petition No. 4382 end authorize the Mayor to execute the Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development Group, LLC. 2, Amend Petition 4382 and the improvement District Development Agreement to an amount eligible 11or speoiai assessment of less than 100% and rye-consider these amendments at a later date. 3. Deny the request from the petitioners whereas the City of Salina Is under no obligation to approve any petitioned Improvements as per Resolution dumber 13-7055. Attachments;Petition 4382 Engineering F'eesibility Report Improvement District Development Agreement Resolution 13-7055 cc: William E. Sheppard dba CorWratone Development Group, LLC City Clerk's Office Flied PINION 4= TO TJEX BODY OF THE Cl'I'Y OF BALER&KANW: We,the■ndete%PA ONROWN of reead of property tecated widdo.the Or of diner 3Gw (the 11CW)do b wft IVIPI4dVVIY rogm t twat the Gnnmbg Body of the Chy ante cad dedlpaabe ma hoprovesommit dbbld fwr the purpose of r mbWg outdo hopmVwerats lh the mummer provided by NSA.12-601,vicoag I. The gew wd mtom of the proposed hmprvxomma one as fanorre: TU each, pftw. P and wading for approap aft I,070 hoeal fee! of Beatgatrsa Drive(the"ft ed Jmpr4vema-a"I The indba7ldtlwa of epp mximataly 56 N oc feet of■burin sewer gips,WW,and all a�aaeteaames tia�bc(Ibe"Drana.pe Improv�eaarerttsP'�. The instep dm of sppmx m t* 49 Haasi that of sixes w&W mak, ffe hYdI8ntI6 Valves,fifthkA WrVMV ODWACdOM hr vacuo:liw sad an gVmkoan= dmvb(dw'Wwwsydm ca IU fmsWladosr of appmadmately 1,165 lined feet of abet tneh amboy sewer Me*service eowctlans for sourer>itw,mmdwk&=d all appudaugaoca dwr*o (the"Saaitmy Sawar Ttupigvemsats' . (may,do L The esBmatad or probable cost of the b*nvemn*in FourRLmdrad Thuty-NiaeThousand $Meaty-TWD Dalian and Ninety-Two($439,872.92 3. The aateINt sf the proposed fmp t dh&M to be wmead L; Lots 7 theoargh 17 and Lobe 38 6mugh 43,Block 2, all in the(Mend Pnhic Adffdmk City of Belies,Saline may,l amm (the"lmproveraeat Diqwet"). 4r The proposed weMod of assommnasd chap be: 1N6 lot is the haProvemaad Df atria dud be aesaosed equally Per kit ibr coots of die various hapsovawmis. s. at Lpwp: rg�oatlom�of est brtw.oa the h*rwnunt BlakW m d&a CIW Dare hundred pmwg(1000A)of the total coat ofthe in;wvea ab daall be aseaa,ed m the h2pmVemAM District cad no potion of coats slash be > by►dwChystLwV. 1 The dPd this Pedaeo hereby ra t that the hWwemmb be made without Wdee and hsaft a:ftw&W by K.S.A.12-6aWo). NAVIES MAY NOT u WITHDRAWN FROM TUE PETITION BY THE SIGNERS T$BREOF AFTER THE GOVERMG BODY COM11i MCES CONSIDERATIIDN OF TSR PETITION OR LATER THAN 8EvxN(7)DAYS ArMR FILING OF TBE PETITIUM WITS THE CM(IAMIC,wiUCHEM OCCURS FIRST. The petitio M ewt*.under oath,Got gm have no fm mng inert is any pmp uty with doNKpwd q*cW mgmmed wywhm within Ik oky of&dim CORNERSTO14E DEVLOPMENT GROUp,LLC Y LEGAL DRSCPJPTWN OF PROPERTY ovvM WrnM THE PROI!O&W EM%OVMMW DISTRICT: Lcds Add I th all the b t Leh 14 nm&17 and LOU 37 b 43,Bk&2;Grand Fnirk Clty ax Salbi,Maiiae Coeur,Km=L STATE OF XANSAS ) ) SALME COUNTY ) I,the aoderd Notmy Pubtk,hereby ceNEY#het thea i ga i e and,that th do+�m t was pl r .bone b me am tlds ay or mom,. Netkyruldk My oppatotent"Mm.. 2 CITYOF SA[XVA„KANSAS AS U MWMG OF THE BOARD OF COLO ' AMpo i►W6 600 pAL I convened at 2:30 p m.for Sm wky Hfll River pl mx ft lis mim and at 3,1 The Regulw Tty�fy M of the Bowd Of was called to order at do pXL in Room 107 8wildm g. Roll call was Wken followed.by the Pledge of AllegWrice amaseeeeef silence. T110m Fund and=m a gwrm: Mayan XaY0 J.Crawford Blazedwrd,Tit Davis,Randall Ham,,and Karl Ryan, �$�'Cmneiesimm jmi Also proem: *on Gage,City ManaW,� City Adommey:and S Wbdi 1�Vfc%city c fezk g AWARMANDPROCLAI"TKM (3.1 ) �> er�y Coach,iember�d ffie Reoo�y �w in the dfy of Urn �� flow and armoww d associated evedL t C-oasear Blanchard stated he wrote a iet6ar in support of theXmmsW Sa�eII team for flue NADA Sofibell Funds Five-StHe conthwedar�Of Cl�rac�,Award. bD read a pmas release wq&hft the award and aanounced that the Knum: vmea,new head coachoftheICyy[T eaB Hwy, inn �► Pm���on the#oit6a11� PUSUC H'"BO AND ftW0 SCMMtttM PM A CZrAuv 7WE (5.1) STAR Board Project Plan and Tax k=en eat JFina ring.ftm i (5.1a) Public Hearing to ao:vd,der adoption of a STAR bond pelt phm p � to K.'AA.12,17,160 et seq (5.1b) First reading Ordhuice W Ifr10S66 adop ft m SCAR Bond the Downtown SPAR Bored District: Pude far: 3 (5.14 Public Hearing to =alder mon of a Tax k=enmt � p�J puresant to K.SrA.72-17M at a q !! (5.1d) F>of eminence No. 16-20057 adopft the E Plan for the Salm Downtown Redevelolmmt Vahjct t� Mayor CravAl6 d opened the STAR Bond PfajectpWWk head. � Michael Sdu%*.Deputy city MamSer,zq*ined the prqm ply,upwnft OPUGM + district pebtuores pending,devepeent mfiscal ! Mr.SduW adwd if the City Commission rid be August 29,2016 to adapt a resalutim�the public eg date to hold a spg m hea of September 49 pop 1 20ib for the ciaumunity=pwvemyt districts. He continued to explain the STAR Boar41 77F Project Plan and con atr a ty InIFA%AW diddet organization and proceeds. C unissianer Davis asked if d mve were any procedural unplicadons to Cbft the per. hearing versus leaving the public heaft open. Mr.Sdtrage stated no,the public hearb4 could be closed today and the ordbu nice could be ached an today.Cary Andersory Gdmcre &Bell,explained fmm a legal standpoint there was no differ*nce if the publicheinbigwast closed today or left open. He continued to ante n xicea were sent vis, cMtMWnunto the' P mPay owhers affected along with the resolutions published In the newspaper. Commissiorher Blanchard asked if there was a re-notice nKpxh=ent if the pwbak kuhv woWd be continued.Ur.Atldersaar slated dim was no nqpkanent but publication an the d s website or other in provide �'` veh�se=tory be a good ice, Jason Gage,City Manager,stated if the public hauft was and the public h�hg closed and the action to aPPS 'dozen y w input received that would give time for the City dams edon to Pmt Plwas Pte'' pmceas lila iryfasahation hneaeived. Caanmiseiorher Manclu rd asked if the SPAIN Bond and TIF Project phew would changs AW aMWvaI Of the development sgreeawnt W Schrage slated the apFaval would allow' staff to submit the plan to the Departnnent of conunerm He continued to stale the plan: would be submitted but wopld rent be used until the developnwm aunt was adopted.. Trace Walker, Salim 2020, hr, dwAked the City Cbmwh ion for the support and encouregemenk and thanked Buff for all their work on the pmjfect He continued to thank individuals within the cmrmunity fur allof their effaft . Larry Bnkank Salina 2020,fir,provided his thoughts on the project Andrew Brain, 207 S. Thud,stated the individuals in the buil ft he lived in were on a fixed mane and adad what would happen to the people m the neighborhood and whM it. was going to happen,,Mr:Schrage stag the project Plane would not affect the aputmt building unless the owner intended chary M to the building in the future. A cmvembm ensued between Mr. BMW26 Jason Gage, City khmager, Mr Schrage and the City' C,onmQission r+egsading the increased tastes witim the distzK wqdmft they were onaales' tax and rat property tax. Mr.Wall=clarified that%e hotel eonhmu uty irrrprovement district pftmnbV woad only- be paid by the hotel Sue" [mamma Amm Blanchard stated he thought the project was hWV enopgh that the: Commission dmld receive a formal presentation.Mr.S&mge stated the project platy was, in harm and arnline for several weeks.Cmc sinner Bluxhard asked for an update oat the' �pOerrts of the pnaject.Mr.Gage Stated staff did not ask for Saline 2MO,hW too"M a preserdatkm but stared staff could tag hmm with Salina 202D, hrc to eacplaiyy the- components. C. owns over Blanchard stated he would h have hiked staff to mak a presmiation,on the project, Convu skaw Hardy stated the C7ty Gosh had mare lmowledge on the project Hurn: the public but felt condortable with the h4om atim the had an the project. Mr. stated the public nodoe was provided to the property Owners and tenants w1dire' dfisbwt aiprast a awnth COmmdisskxW Davis stated he felt the process of the project was always done backwards. He continued to stage he was hesitant to take any action until the ecoanonde feadMilitp study' Page 2 waaid and reviewed and the Plan for downtown,�' �." plan nlyfg an the use of sales taK money,also He thouSM the plan needed to be dort,e dee way.Mr. stated at souse point fhwe would lee wAm cn the p qe t*,e,the MOSOmia pity study would be ampked, flee housing aspect was kneaded in , but it would be up to the Cly Coasuniae M an what to.do wide eat portion, Cotrmvseioauer Davis asked if deere were would be any*ft within ties ecmwndc hui6ility study that would alter the'plan that would be Bent to floe Deparkrient of Comaaeet+re. ll(r. Cage stated flee plan would be sub witted as it was and the qw could be made in tl,e f stare if needed.Mr.Anderson stated there would be an additimW process to follow if dM wereOgnUkant . dwiges to the Plat,. He eantitmed to abate the plan annum was estalaWied bye the Monetary with the Departmnent of Caaannei ice. C dwesr Bhochard asked why With over Salina Mum=was xemoved frau, plan and provided additional dwUgbfs on the project plans and dee knowlecp of public an the plans. Mr.Gap reqwded to David question peru& g to use of galas tax[sands.; He stated the utility prajeet wocild be taken from the utility fur ds� the ape project: would be up to the City C.o�aatission to deled,e the ampe of the project and dee fu„dht decision would be brought to flee City Cwwadote in the fiftre. Mr. Walker responded to questions pftWMkW t D trn"W necy and housin& Ib sated; these were nwhiple pubbc naetir,ge sae the etreeba"plan, and dee P�did iodide an. apartzm t la,ii bg friar world use moody private doreaitons and sotYee TIF f,rnMis. Efe, cosethmOd bashers see KUSCI cal of Medkkwwould use pf aye M of the Public parking lot He Wateed �D, bw wmW ie 10 �WWe DWI Balite mnseum but the cost of the snvseum wand take up a mgatiiy of the fieding . Mr. Q�p stated if the Caverning Body would wont a iuv pram t dm prior to actions an deo platy it may affect the actfote items. Contmiss3oner, Davis askedJf ffie.1 documents refinutsaad in the blue sheet were offidialty part of the plan and available inthe' saline packet.Mr.&h=ge stated the Pbm ae their Oftety were abadeed. Cansatissicner Ryan staffed he was satisfied with the pla m and would like ba mane on. Cvmndmkzw Blanchard asked how Mang study seem=*were held on the Reld Home.' Mr.Scl"Se stated 6MO)or four(4).Cotnn,#eenaner 8lanchar+d stated dint ald"gh&ere; were executive wedons there had teat been one study seasian ars the,STAR Booed project; Plan or TIP Pict Plan and would bice flee gVwturdty to hear the plans and reoetvej public input an gum in an open meeft C'or:stniesaiorrer Ryan ached R Ilse Bret a mit of the ordinances were posepmeed,could else 1, public union be done in between beat time. Judy Lawn, 215 N. Chicago,, stated dist sot everyom had acce" to floe interne,or the hiforneation on the plans. Adayor Crawford stated she was comfortable and the information was available. Jane AnderI04 6%ll.Lyon Avernus,stated as a adiun,people are hustled that it takes so: IOM for=*on to telae place but thought drat the project needed to nave forward, Cotnttdasiareet Hardy stated the level of cotta would be achieved when the economic' PMSC3 r r 1 fimfiffity study WAS,MilaWs and stated he was wring to go Whatever mute needed' today. CbDUni5WkM T BIffin Lard asked if staff had dates for tie r !� if the CID pebtiOn wa8 received and a special g ,k t Mr.Shctag�e stated, C!D P h Oft would be 5ep�aiber 19,2816, p ort August 29,2016,fhe' C.anuniaslarter Davis asiaed if all of the item would have to be addressed at the game times: Mr. Gage stated IAuY no but Pry qmkft all Items would be reWmmd is tom, devekoPnmrt ogr+ea rant aced same pmlions of the Project could affect nudlipie gouz6as. John lieteeson,Poshmffi Law Furry explaiued thewere C,mpliWa d and stated these was an Initial fessibility study performed da, p Ions to divelop%e per. 16 75Moved by Cbvmdapiorw Rye,seconded by Cbrmugsimer Hardy,to ewe the pub g!anthe STAR Bond ti Pr*d Pare. Ayer(4). NAY-(1)DEv1S. Motion carried. Mr.Srhrage stated the special nWe&W to set the public hearing for the CLD could be treldl no Later than August 29,2016 setft Sepbtmber 19,2M6 as the CID pub heaft date. 76 26 Moved by GROMissia m RyM Bemmiled by mar Davis, to p l etpone eormddendm o!G Ordinance No. 16-IMM a$opling the SPAR Bond Pmject plan kr the Downtawu STAR Bored; District an first reeding to Sept 19,M16. Aye(5). Nay.(0). Mntim carried, r Mayor Crawford opened the Tax irwnenmtt Finargtg plan pub h". Mr. Gage explained flee Tax ieent gig plan and ft structure of Azdmm of the Mr.; explained tax increumt financmg sand stated dmx+e would not be a tax and the new taxes created would go towards the plan. m Mr. Gage stated the plana was a pay as you go plan. Coantiisior1er Blww,, d stated dee plan stated It could be a pay as you go plana or ftou gh bonds. Lv . the bEWUge was SEMberal and was not Undhn g huge, ap Conti UW to s t ate . 16.0327 Moved by CommkWom Ryan,seconded by Canwamoner Harvdy, to c�laee fife the Tac Ott Firwucing Place. Aye:(5). Nay:(Oj. M publicffi fnsr: Commissioner Blandrar! asked If the Unguege for the low kwmw houft at the Lee Building was still within the plass.Mr.Schrop staled the Lee . the plan and the dev+dopammt of the Lee VUildigF would be v Wde of this pb COnwIlssimm Blanchard asked for adddKnW inforaration are the hmm%porwoof the; Plan' Mr, Schrage staffed the details of those plans would be wi hin deede ltfpmnentI amt' 164 028 Moved by Cbmwissioner Ryan, se=eded by Cbmn* over Hard to : Ordinance No.1640857 adopbt�g a Redevelopment y' p°*W D atlort of; �PLart for the Salina Doz►atbawn District an first reading to September 19,2016. Aye.(5). Nay: (0), Motion Corned. Cc MMT AGENDA (&1) Approve the minutes of August 15,2016. (b.2) Approve the minutes of August 16,2016. PAp4 (63) Approve Re cdution No. 16-7M appointing nun berg to varus boards acus o�nissiaets. (6.4) Award cmur ct fior electrical iatpreverttenb to the hiiptim systgm at do SMM. F Murddpal Golf CourM Pk+oject No.63]35,to PncWion Ebcb*W Ca*UdM k the, amount of$8709,plus SW for alt mates and 7 in cmubucKm��,+ for a total project coat of . (6.5) Award the canhvd for the Greeley Averaw 5idewaW prate pmjedNo,&Ift to- Lmtcwter Cors hucdiost of SOW Kamm,in the aatomtt of SNAM 2Q, with a 5% aanstrucdan aontfrtgancy of SIAL11. lb-Q329 Moved by Ryas,nonded by Coarnmissloner Hardy,to appzc the smote as presented. Are:(5). Nay.(0). Motioncartle& AttirtOr MATtat+r (71) Seaud reading Ordinance No.i6-UW levying special aeseusntenb aettaht, lots and pbm of property too pay the card of abatamuow of num sa,,tended. Mayor C mfmd-toned that Ordimuma No.16-I065g was passed are first on Ate* 15,M&Since firm the=part and ordinance hove been modif W to dww paymmb reaeivedE after the first reading of the arahu nae in 60 mm mt of$991.09.An add paynVW was' received today in the amount SM36. 164WO &aved by Commiae3anar Ryan, seconded by mow Davis, to adopt Na W 108H an seoand readhl& a$ am deed. A rail cull vote wag tarn. Aye: (b) EWWbW4 Dorb,: Hardy,Ryas,Q mvimd. Nay:(0). Motion carried. , (7.4 Second reading Ordinance Na 16-10855 k qft special asseganumb OTtdn lots and pieces of property to pay tha cost of tate repair of sidewa&4,as s. Mayor Ckawforrd noted that Ordinance No. 16-10855 was passed an first reaftg an AUSMA 15,2016.Since thea the mport and ordinum have been mad&W to slaw payumnis received. after r the first reading of the ordfimwe in the amount of 61418.SQ. 16-0391 Moved by iorrer Davis, sero Wed by Comm1811ivner Ryan, to adopt OR&Wwe No. I& IN% an seannd reading, as anumded. A roti ceQ vo6e was bakers. Aye: (5) Wmjwrd. Dail. lkrdy,Rye^C mwlomj Nay:(0). Motion carried. Mayor C mwfiord reamed for a 6 minute ream returning at Go p.m. (73) Ce4aiderattan of a PPeNan and Iatprntrearertt District Devabop hent Agreemwt: betxneat the City of Sadina and Carnerseone Developmem C;raup, LLC rued ua ai special imPxvveane:nt dtstrlct for water, sanitary sewer, street artd drainer i is in Grand Prairie Addictor;,phase IL Dari Stad4 City Engineer, explwhid the engitraern fees" -apart Wit, district,fiscal impact and s,atlon opHons. Cn n missioner Davis asked if diacusdcm haw preceded Oft= t for spm IMISMeft to determine tine status of the item.C u nisskmw I#lanchard stated he thought the dish: m study se don was an 80/20 split, with the City pvfng Sit p T • M: Pop Manager, stated the discuadon at the study session was 75/25 or 70/3iD. A Gor"setia� ensued bud ween the Cmm*wm and Mr.Gage riding the sp&W assamment qft a* horn fug study and type of housing hom the study session p�nration and co n versatiom 13;11 Sheppard,Cornerstone Developmmt;Group,LLC,provided inforawtion on the frrt ur °�the development. Courmisskw= Blanchwd asked if the townhomne portion contained enkance and exalt' Pte•bb Sheppard stated&ere was an engemy exit at the end of dw kwag ogre area. i Comae edoner Davis a*ed R there was a dine of setting a pMUxdWWe jew asses.Mr.Gage stated there should be consistency and the aIy to met reasons varying ftm that; i Mkhael Schraga,Deputy QtY Matnager,stated he could ague with Mr.Gap but could alai say the developer was able to develop the axes fur order to make the property work, eo�rmissi. Davis asked d cost was a factor, where would the deve1opm nt fal. Mr I Sheppard tasted the second phase could fall in the range of$2M ODO to MOM 0=11"Orm Blanchard asked ff there were additional amerdfift to be added to �± development`Mr.Sheppard stated the addition of IwWkgft in the round*=t wowd lam} added. 16-0329 Moved by COMOdione r Hardy,se emded by Commissior►er Davy, to appmve Petition Na 4382 and authoerbe the Mayor to execute the Improvement District Development d e City wof ater, and � Developmeant Group, LLC niated to a spedal Phase Il with amts at 75%., street and ��� �� in Grand Pri�irle Addi�rr,! Commissioner Ryan asked if the applicant was satisfied with the 75%. Mr. Sheppard stated he would take whatever he could get,he didn`t know if he hard much choice. A conversation ensued between the Comwdsd m regardfng the ananfies of the subd4 ftm and: RPWW asMsnV!n`t split, Mr. Sheppard stated the landscaping was paW kw by the damper,Mr.' Gage stated if the developer would include amenities that he did not have to hwhrde, them l could vary the special assesu neat split fist that. y� Greg Bengissm,City Attorney,stated in order to not create a precedent it would be best to include; Ow matters In the retard. Comer Hardy stated he was particularly interested in the townhon ke portion of ft development He continued to state he had a pro and a can, the con beim the price point of the; homes, Mr.Sheppard stated d e would be no addifiortal engbwaft oasts for the project 164DW Moved Comm%doner Hardy, seconded by Y b3' C.ornnussioner Ryan, to amend .the cnalion to: e the page from 75%to 809 with the reason of the curvilhmw streets and hVjusiw of, public art piece.Aye;(4). Nay.(1)'Olanchard. Motion carried. - 16-031 Mavecd by Coaraniasioner Hardy,mcmided by COMMIssiom Davis,to approve Ptt tion No4M and autfunize the Mayor to execute the bTwveawnt District Development A� .�� Page 6 the City of SRUM and Ckrsurstone Development(yup, LLC related to a specM imps# district for water smnihry Sewer, sly and drakageiexrp� in Grand Pndzie Plisse II with special sit:at 80'%with the reasons of fire ca nr"ihNW et�pats OW a pdv dy znden aur in a Public place whae it can be seen by the pub&Aye(4). Nay:(1) Mr.Cee a*ed staff who"UM coact fr tim%wk of the prvIM the Ca of Salm cer the � ' SMk Stated the �WMW pay the mftW east of ft work an4 awn be NW)MMM by the City laf Samm (1.4) &WAft Related Codes. (•4a) Fast reading Ordina ux No. 16-20845 nuMfing Chapter 8, Article Division 1 of the Salina Cade adapting the 2012 lrterrdado ael Duadmg t and load ameadmenta, (M) ph* nest Orodfira aw Na 1&1.0847 anaerrding Chapter 4 Article B� Code acrd local a�ncuendzrren rile 2012 lnnat#onal Reaideni (9Ac) Pira rea&g CWhMM IVa 10-20848 aiding ChOpter 8, ,Arty L Division S of the Salam Cade adopting the 2012 IhW rm Phmnbft Cade and local am,endmenta. (7-d) Irmat ceding Ordinance No. 16-10849 aameadmg Chaps 8, Amick 4 Divklarr 4 of the Salina Code adopting the 2012 Uniform Med u*al Code and local amendments. (Me) Phst reading Oedinanee Nm 1,6-10850 amending OMPW 8, Artist 1, Divisim 5 of the Salina Cade adapting die 2011 National Electrical Code and hmml its. (7•41) Mot reading Ordbwwe No. 16-10851 anwnding Chapter a Article 1, Division 6 of the S dinaa Cade adapting the 2022 hdOtnedoEW bergs! CanKMtian Code. (7AS) Pint reading Ordinwwe No. 16-10852 amending Chapter 06 ArH& IW Division 1 of the Saliina Code adopting the 2012 ho naflonal pine Code SM local amendments. Jim BrOynk BWWk9 dRi:WL explained the its acid actierr optic m Davis asked if fhm ware any UMWdaamb staff had raErvai u an.Edi: Brawn shred nM Conn *sianer Blanchard asked If the energy code kduded bcal ate,Mr. &Own stated yes,it"indust hxvl ament3merrts. CbRIMInioner Blanchard stated he had heard opposition ficin plumbing cordraebara an uw of the irrterrudkm l ply code. Mr. Brown staged the plumber code and woWd be the Urn PEunbing code. CammiaaIM"Blanchard asked about the re" enunt of Mies for hNARIMM of fire sprinkler'systems in Single fam0y haaws. Roger Williams, pine Maned,ahted there was currently state law prohibiting mtrr>�ipaiitM hom re phing hvWwcn of 5re! Page 7- sir q8tam in sinee fly homes. . 16.0932 Moved by Ryan,seconded by Co wdssieaier Davis,to pass Ordinance No.16-l0 aa<e uft Chapter 8, Article h Dfvlsion 1 of the Salina Cotte adopting the 2K2 lnb matwn g re Building Cotte and local ammulzuents,on first reading. Aye;(5). Nay:(0). Motion carried, W43 Moved by Commissiaa<es Ryari, seLlmded by Coamniasfam Hardy, to peas Ordtwve No 16{ 1j10847 anmwding Chapter 8,Article 1,Dividon 2 of the Salina Code adopting the 2D12 Mteoa bong Residential Code and local am mdrneynts can&*waft. Aye:(5). Nay.(0). Motim carried, ' Moaned by Commissioner Blmdiard,seconded by Coto *siorm Rywr ,to pass Ordhwme No.i6+ 10848 ammding Chapter 8, Article L D'vision 3 of the Salina Code adopting alae 2012 MdoM PhmbhV Code and WW amendments on first reading. Aye:(5). Nay:(0). M.E.ranted, 16-0335 Moved by Q=WW=w Blancha4 nmded by Cbmadmicam Hm*,to Paw Ordiraanae Na 16- 40849 aawAng Chapter 8, Ardcle l;, Dh►ision 4 of the Salina Code adoptatig the 2K2 QWOTM Merhaniaal Code and local anxvdna wo an Brat radkg. Aye:(5). Nay:(0). Motorr carried. 16-OS36 Moved by Comnnni <er Hardy,seconded by Conuzziniongr Blanch"to Paw Orditmw Na 15: 20M mundfng Chapter 8, Article 1, Division 5 of the Salina Cade adopting the 2D11 Nati" Ekctrial Code and local anvmdments.on firat readfn& Aye: (0). Motjnn cat'rined. 164)337 Movedby Comonisaiorrez Hardy,seconded by Coanamissiontr Blantr wrd,to paw Ordinance Na 16+ 1001 ameatding C hfiPtOr A.ArWe L Division 6 of the Salina Code adapting the=2 kft=*m a( BnerU Compervabm Code and local almOubBents cm first reading. Aye: (5). Nay: (0), MM. 16.09,38 Moved by Comadasaoner Davis,seconded by Commies Blanchard,to pass Ordina ve No I& 10852 aa<endigg Ctrapt er $, Article RL Division 1 of the Salina Code adopting the 2012 International hire Code and local anu mdwent s an firstr wiing. Aye:(5). Nay:(0). Motion carded. DE+M.ot'Mff Buslta" (8.1) Second reading Or mance Na 1.6-JORM reques g a comprehensive review ar Wondment of Sedion 36-74 and 86-741 of the Salina Subdivialm Regulations Platmfng Commission Policies Nunnber 86-1 and O&M to address fi,oa�prg� mg t ataM jr'IX�enJ4 impraM1►errae:at standards and a fair share mechanism for perimeter streets abutting new=bdiviatom Dean Andrew, Director of Planum& oTlabred the changes, meeting his", and 1 KnI numended action. law GaV.City hdanager, stated the n quiz ments and the funding piece were separated out and the funding piece would be handy separately. He rontirmed to state thq Mquimementis would be contained widdn the code and thought the reguumeab were well developed- Commissioner BIarwbard asked for additional irtfaa:=tion an the requirements of duct aom perimeter streets and connecting streets. MrGap stated the requbenma would WP Cite Pis of development. Greg Bengtsork, City Att+oomy, stated the fa dm regarding the direct access pafnaeter streets and connecting streets would be addressed by the Govemtng &dy. W. Andrew stated tate factors would be nnoved to the C,overni i Body irmbed o4 the Fianrring Com, A oanvem*m erased betwm the CNMWBskft Mr. GEN% Mr. Andrew and Momm, _ �strsebs factors.DOFuty city �, agarding the direct aaoess perfinei�er streds 16-Q 9 Moved by COMmIsdaffier Davis, seconded by.Coamniesiarer Hardy, to adopt�No. 16f 101136 xequestiang a gve review and ammdm t of Secum 36-74 and 3fr74.1 of 64 addres ac � Number m and k d to � for perimeter strrels �mtdar+ds acrd a fair sham vote was taken. Aye:(a}Blarraltaxd,l7aviay� �On seed reading. A wU c ag Hardy.Ryan,Crawford. Nay;((k lctlear earned. 07MR BUaDmm (9.1) Request for maecutive elan(leVQ. Jam Gm9k CRY MaoeW,staffed thea woW d not bean executive sesslan Comndrstom 10fin and asked about a specid n aftg date and ftm Conmmnelr Dav>s ached if the mee ft could talree place an Friday,at°rnin8(August,26y 2D14). 16-0340 Moved by Cowmanam Blanchard, OecmW by C.aaUMase Omw Hardy, to hold a spat City Commission meeting an Friday,August 26,2016 at SM am in Rooam 107 to set the public haft dote for the mrkm mnunwdty&Vwvmwm&fticls. Aye:(5). May..(0), MOSS MmW, Com Blanchard caked if a study sessioai aodd be held to r ►iaw the STAR liar Project Plan and TIF Project Flan. A convermUm ensued between the Cmmd"jon Od jam Mme . rWft the to be hw uded In ft study session. , C.omnmisalaarsr Blanchard ashad if a [canal per, could amu cake fire eeo wn* &aWbft shady was available. A coarversodm ensued between the City COMMWm and Mr.G&W regards the ecntent of the formal p mommu ar. GmS BWSWA16 City Aft mey,aft"d airs executive Seakwo held in the past had hzhmW finwlcW ns[ornmttm Or k3d mfczawdm nn piers. He stated thwe would be faro* exemaive sessimn regarding the devebpnmt agremm*there would be a lot of pnvatq elmmft and public elements m the future. ADlovRNNENr 16-0341 Moved by Coamafa lacer Blanchard,seconded by Comm.Dam that the regam Moe"of theme of at City Camamissianers be adjonmed. Ayr:(5). Nay:(0). Mmm antes#. The nm" pmL PEAL] Ilk ATTESP. Smkh 11. Wicks,CW,Catty Clerk Pop 9 18. 8/22/18 City Commission Meeting - Handout provided by Bili Sheppard during the meeting r � •�. it..4- � 1 �~� ,r i'+ t r or i •• , ••`• •t•• • ~ 1� , 19 1. ' 4 ` " R�$••F +. '.s,.: ,�' ° .i.. GOP • �., '�' �,•� �3 r y, �'. ill• .. '3?`75 a ��.` ✓ • i. dop ' } 4�.,'��• {r ,Y may• •�`r Fi,. • 40 +t~ 'ter r• �� -•�� l '` � •• r � •711 °. �� '- � � i s Lmaw I Ems AhmM Labor Ebub Ahlsip OMM CADw 4 a • Ign mm • N • f f Lbgaoforri 1 Fn�pb�eee 1 harMl�pitlwpifu��i10 2.-1 1 F 2ho n Mh Ymolod umm aS100 a w4m u Ygc 1E. K 2 hwAs Mb+rM IR■ 4.8 1 R Am x2homw h per-ilOR Chem"MS46PIW1PPI MIon RFmmC 2r- II sx2howAYh2aalwWWduAW t*-lW Attachment A _Apolioation#M19-18 YaYa's Euro Bistro Possible Findings In Su ort of Application In review of this project for compliance with the Sidewalk Dining Ordinance, and administrative guidelines, it appears that the f©ilowing findings can be made to support a recommendation to the City Commission to approve Barolo Grille's proposed Sidewalk Cafe License application: 1. The proposed outdoor patio, including the fencing design and materials, the method of attaching the barrier to the plaza surface and the proposed outdoor furniture would comply with all applicable provisions of the Sidewalk Dining Ordinance and the administrative regulations adopted pertaining to sidewalk dining area,except forthe size of the sidewalk dining areas,which exceeds 200 sq. ft. and; 2. The Homewood Suites Hotel has 113 ft. in total frontage facing Santa Fe to the west. The proposed sidewalk dining area for YaYa's Euro Bistro would be 58 ft. in length. The additional outdoor dining area is justified by the size of the dining area along the street frontage of the Hotel fagade. The 9'-4" by 58'-0" (542 sq. ft.)dimensions of the patio area are needed to provide adequate seating capacity and circulation and would not impede pedestrian travel in this location; 3. The YaYa's Euro Bistro and their proposed outdoor dining area will contribute to the welfare of the public by increasing the activity level and vibrancy of the 200 block of South Santa Fe in the downtown area. Andrew, dean From: Stack,Dan Bert: Tuesday,January 13, 200911:53 AM To: Andrew,Dean;%asheppardayahoo.com' Cc: Fraser,Milne Siuwct: RE:Marlposa Pond Attw hmente: Mariposa Pond Maintenance Schedule.)& It looks good. Here is the detailed edmaita of yearly maintenance costs as reference for a middle ground solution. Thanks, Dan From:Andrew, Dean Sem Monday,January 12,200910:19 AM To: Ca: Stack, Dan Subief i FW: Mariposa Pond This was my response to Paul Carpenter. Dan-What do you think? Dean Andrew dean.andlina.om Phone:785409-5720 FAX 785-300-5713 Frwn: Andrew, !Jean Seeb Monday,January 12,200910:14 AM To: 'Pau[Carpentee Cct doMWhOrplanduLcorn IsmItfvPW1f6hotma1&pm; 'Bruce Mordmer';'Alen E: mat: RE: Marlpow Pond The design plans submitted by the Cornerstone group still snow the sewer going thr+oWh the pond area trem this plan can not be built without an easement from the Mariposa HOA. I have suggested to the Cornerstone group Out they owelder elfiaring the Mariposa group some consideration on their part(contribution to pond maintenance fund)In atchenge for the easement Independent of the City.I mailed out a packet containing info an the process for transfering detention pond ownership to the Clly.Our Public Works staff estimates that it would cost S 50.000 for the City crews to mow and mehisin the pond over a 10 year period. Under normal circumstances this would requim the HOA to deposit$50,000 In the City's pond maintenance fund for the City to take over ownership and maintenance of the pond. However there could perhaps be a middle ground posithn whereby owrmrship and mowing responsibilty Is maintained by the Mariposa HOA but the City takes responsibilty for major maintenance and repair items misting to flumes,the dam,etc. Than the only question Is how much 3 if arty should the HOA have to deposit with the Cityto take on that responsibility_ If that is a possible solution then it would be worthwhile to set up a meeting with City staff to negotiate those details, Dean Andrew dean,andsmmftalins. 1 Phone:7tt5s30"720 FAX:785-309-5743 From: Paul Carpenter Sent: Monday,January 12,2009 9:09 AM To:Andrew,Dean Cc: daraldhOrolandus.eam:lsrnithfiBDi2hotrna1.mm: 'Bruce Mortimee; 'Alan E! SubjwZ Marie Pond Dean, Just checking on what's been happening with the proposed sewer line. Tne mariposa H.O.A.is stili open icor suggestion on how to settle this issue. We and I am sure you do not want the sewer line to go in North of Larry's house but we feet that with the existing storm water from the Golf Course and now the additional storm water from the new development will cause us problems in the future. Maybe the next step would be to set down with the City Manager and your staff to work this out. Thanks Paul Carpenter 785-577-5088 2 2 (74) CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TI 7125/2016 4:00 P.M, AGENDA SECTION QR GINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL.: N0: 7 BY: Pul fic Warks ITEM FINAL APPROVAL NO: 3 Page I BY: Darfel R.:tack BY: ITEM: Request to authorize staff to prepare a Special Assessment Engineering Feasibility Report for Phase 11 of the Grand Prairie Addition. MURMUR In 2007, the Comerstone Development Croup purchased a portion of the Graves Trust properly between Cedar Ridge Drive and the Municipal Golf Course with plans to develop a rlesidentiol subdivision. They retained the services of a land surveyor and civil engineer to develop potential subdivision layouts for the area.Their layouts led them to have some preliminary discussions with the golf course staff about potential land swaps and boundary adjustments between their subdivision and the golf course property.They identified areas where the addition of the golf course land could square off the subdivision boundary to provide better lot configurations and areas they would be willing to transfer to the golf course to widen areas adjacent to the 7th hole fairway. Because all parties whose land is included in a subdivision plait must consent to partiidpalle in the plat application, the Cornerstone Development Group made a formal written request that the governing body euthortze the City of Salina to be a co-applic crit in the platting of the property to allow portions of the golf course property to be Included wOln the subdivision boundary. In terms of net land area,the proposed land swaps would result In more golf course land beim added to the subdivision then Cornerstone land being added to the golf course, however, the developers are also proposing W grant trall easernerb or rights-of-voy to the City to allow golf course pensannel to travel through the subdivision to get between hales 7 and 12 and B and 12 to perform golf course maintenance functions. These trail corridors for City use oontatn approximately 6,&W sq. ft. Other requested areas of City parliclpa*m and cooperation were the dedication of utility easements to allow utility extensions under golf course property, the granting of an emergency access easement over to Markley Road and the possible oonstru:tion of a stomrwater detentionlretention pond on golf course property between the 13th and 14th fairways. In addition to the cart trail corridors, other potential benefits to the Municipal Golf Course operation from participating in this plat would be establishing a surveyed, monumented boundary along the south side of the golf course, and the potential for connecting the existing golf course restroom:s to the public sevver system In to Grand Prairie Addition. The City Commission considered Comerstone's request for City participation at their January 28, 2008 meeting and approved a resolution (4-0)authorizing the Inclusion of Municipal Golf Course land In Cornerstone's subdivision plat mW rezoning applications. The resolution essentially authorized the City of Salina to be a co-applicant on the plat as a landowner and authorized the Parks and Recreation Director to sign the rezoning and plat applications on behalf of the City but preserved the Citic Commission's authority to approve or disapprove tine amount of City owned land included in the final layout. A preliminary plat application was filed on February 15,2008. The City Planning Commission approved the proposed final Vat of this 70 lot slngis-fsrnlk residential CITY OF SAL INA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 702 OIG 4,00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL. N4: Public Vibrio„ BY. ITEM FINAL APPROVAL: NO: Page 2 BY: Donlei R.Stack BY: subdivision, including the two (2) requested variances related to dead end street length and street curves, on December 10, 2008. The Planning Commission's approval was made subject to ten (10) conditions. On May 4, 2409, the City Commission approved a motion authorizing the Mayor to sign the plat and accept the offered easement, golf course maintenance right-of-way, street right-of-way and restricted access dedications on behalf of the City. The City Commission also agreed to dedicate seven (7) public utility. drainage and access easements across the Municipal Golf Course property in support of this project. On November 9, 2008, the City Commission approved a Resolution of Advisability and Authorization to establish a special Improvement district (benefit disbict) for street, drainage, water and sanitary sewer improvements in Grand Prairie Addition. There were 34 buildable lots In Phase I of the Grand Prairie Addition but all lots In the subdivision received some assessment for streets, detention and water service. Each lot In Grand Prairie Addition was assessed its proportionate share of the cost of constructing Cedar midge Drive. Phase I of the Grand Prairie Addition Is approaching build out (22 of 34 lots sold) and Comerstone Development has filed a petition requesting approval of the use of special assessment financing to finance the Installation of public Improvements (streets, water tape, and sanitary sewer) to serve the lots In proposed Phase Il; containing 17 lots. If the City Commission is supportive of the developer's request, the action that is being requested is to authorize staff to prepare a feasibility report and Resolution of Authorization to form a special assessment benefit district. Staff has not yet received a detailed estimate for Phase U from the petitioners design engineer. Prior practice upon receipt of a request for special assassment financing has been for staff to proceed with preparation of a Preliminary Engineering Report and Resolution of Advisability for City Commission consideration. However, the consideration of the Quail Meadows Estates rezoning and replatting request and the requested annexation of the Ryan Addition at the southeast comer of Schilling Load and Ohio Street, In 2013, resulted in considerable discussion and consideration of the City's special assessment policy on the part of the City Commission over the next four months. After the institution of a moratorium and multiple study session presentations on the topic, the City Commission amended Resolution No. 89-4066 regarding special assessment financing by striking the word "will"from the resolution and replacing it with "may"such that the Cky's policy was no longer a mandatory provision of special assessment flnencing making special assessment financing discretionary. Based on those comments, City staff reviewed the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and developed a checklist of residential subdivision guidance based on the Comprehensive Pian. When this checklist was submitted with a previous special arse ment financing request, the City Commission indicated it was not a decisive factor In its decision making and no direction was received to formai adopt the use of the checklist. Nonetheless, the Residential Subdivision CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE 7W2016 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: Public Warks I3Y; ITEM FINAL APPROVAL: NO: Page 3 BY: Dwdel FL Slack BY: Amenities checklist has been used by staff and the Planning Commission in their review of plats. A chedclist has been prepared,forthe Grand Pmlrie Addition,which is attached to this report. CONFORMANCE WITH THE_87RATEGIC PLAI�k The proposed action is consistent with the following components of the City's shared vision statement: • Salina will be a city that Is exciting to live in and thriving both economically and socially. • The city will be clean,attractive and Inviting. • The city of Salina will be attractive and well maintained. It will be evident that good housekeeping and high community standards are valued. • Salina will be environmentally conscious, balancing the expectations of a growing community with the necessity to preserve nature's assets and our future quality of life. • The City Commission of Salina will have committed tQ providing the highest quality City services possible within available resources. The City Commission rMecognizes their role and responsibility to provide the needed policy direction and n3sources to Its adminletration. At the same Ime, the City's administrative personnel are committed daily to transforming this direction and resources Into the highest possible quality of municlpal services, consistent with the expectations of both the City Commission and the citizens of Salina. • Salina will encourage and be supportive of Industrial development, economic expansion, market-driven tax base growth, and home grown entrepreneurialism. The proposed action is also consistent with the following goals Contained in the City's strategic plan: Goal#1: The airy will create a community of mixed-use,quality development and redevelopment. Goal#3: The city will provide the highest quality of serviow, consistent with governing body direction, available resources and strrlff commitment to quality. Goal#4: The city will maintain gruMh and development policies that are updated to reflect current conditions and desired growth direction. Goal#6: The city will work to make Salina a city that has connectivity physically and socially. FISCAL NOTE= Special assessment financing involves the issuanra of municipal bonds to finance the construction of eligible infrastructure items such as water, sewer, storm sewer & streets with assessments being levied upon the benefllfing properties such that the principal, interest, bored Issuance cel and an administrative fee are recovered thru the special assessments. If a special assessment district Is CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE im 7125/2018 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: BY: Public Works ITEM FINAL APPROVAL: NO: Page 4 BY: Daniel R.Stack BY: approved the developer must either put up 20% of the estimated project cast in cash or submit a letter of credit for 35%of the estimated project as financial security. In the event of a property owner default, a lien may be placed upon the property than can result in foreclosure proceedings with the proceeds of a foreclosure action being distributed proportionally to the various taxing entities that may have a lien against the property. CDiY4PdISSION ACTION: City staff have identified the following options for the City Commission's consideration: 1. Authorize staff to prepare an engineering feaslbllity report and Resolution of Advisability for Phase li of the Grand Prairie Addition for future oansidembon by the City Commission. 2. Postpone consideration of this item and provide additional direction to staff and/or the applicant regarding additional Information that Is needed prior to acting upon this request. 3. Vote to Instruct staff not to proceed with preparation of an engineering feasibility report at this time. Use of special assessment financing is discretionary on the part of the Cly+ Commission per Resolution 13-7055, If the Commission is receptive to further consideration of special assessments for Phase ll of this subdlvislon,then staff believes it would be appropriate to authorize staff to proceed with preparation of an engineering feasibility report and Resolution of Advisability for future consideration. cc: Bill Sheppard Comprehensive Plan Residential Subdivision Amenity Checklist Grand Prairie Addition ® Proposed subdivision Is inside or contiguous to city limits and adineent to sadstin g development supported by public Infrastructure The Grand Pralde Addition was developed on property that was within the existing city limits adjacent to the Salina Municipal Goff Course which was developed in IM, The Grand Prairie Addition was a part of the Graves Trust Master Plan fbr this area which was adopted in 1088. Grand Prairie Is adjacent iQ the Modposa,Cedar Ridge and Fior de Sol Additions why are served by public Infrastructure. Street connrctivity between developments Provide an inisrcanrmated network of local and collector streets #hat also supports walking, blcycling and transit use,while avoiding excessive traffic In residential neighbortIoods Promote direct routes between subdivisions for pedestrians and bicycles The sidewalk system In the Grand Prairie Addition connects to the public skkn alk on the north side of Cedar Ridge Drive and there Is a network of rear yard rex*trails at the rear of the residential loth. Cedar Ridge Drive Is a designated [tike routs an the City's Bicycle Master Plan Map and provides connectivity to the east to Markley Road and to the north via Marymount Road. implement a systsm of off-street tells that support and Integrate with the linear park network The Grand Prairie Addition has a network of internal rear yard walking paths but there is no linear park network to connect to at this time. Require new residential development to Instill sidewalks on both sides of public streets and require time sidewalks to be separated from the street by a landscaped parlaM [required by Beaton W77 of the Subdivision Regulations (*Exception for oul- daeaca 600 ft.or less In length)] There are public sidewallm on both sides of the internal*sets in Grand Prelde Addition, except for the Cobimn Chula cube-sac. �] Incorporate pada Into new neighborhoods so that they ere accessible to residents and connected to the catywlde park system Pape 1 of 2 Comprehensive Plan Residentlal Subdlvisloa Amenity CheckhU There is no neighborhood park in existence or future park area identified on the Neighborhood Park Plan In this area. The East Crawford Recreation Area serves as the recreation space for this area of the city. CO Promote subdivision layouts around open Espace systems (public, private or common areas) that link to adjacent altos and public spaces(right-of-way, trails or parks) The Grand Prairie Addition Is laid out around the boundaries of the Salina Municipal Golf Course which provides public open space surrounding the subdivision. There are connecting balls across Grand Prairie for the use of golf course maintenance personnel. There are shared detwdbn basins that serve both Grand Prakfe and the golf course. ® Require dedicated public connections between now nelghborhoode and the linear park system. There is no linear park system in this part of to community. Cedar Ridge Drive does prnvide a connection to the East Crawford Recreation Area. ❑ Encourage the development of different styles and types of housing, including single4 nilly, multifamily,townhomes and lofts. Grand Prairie currently has only single-family homesites. Pop 2af2 PCF-139,412D14 DO Wt VOM IN IMM MUM FIErmorr MUM R TO: THE[3011E4ia M D= Clly of 8alna,Bans go Rin fid.bft oWd &e d pmpwW ��in the Cly of .KeraM, do AppnwW of spe"�Wnfflyt Inanafig to flnanoe ft graft and lnslalletlon of azWng, u8erirrp and paving for an edenobn of Benigaes;D*m.and far lrrstsllatlon of wets Ps end oxkmion of wrtA y sewer Ines in Phase it of On Grand Pralrta Addition to Um CRY of 5allna. Kopec** Cornerstone Development Group TNepltone Numinr' 785-822-7282 lml M@hGmmm0y* mm ii pU11AE8l1c1OYV) MTOOPOMAWRIESM DELM f,D. 4 '� r � r r � I r r { r r� Op pimp f 1 ! r r r + r y r rr r � r�! ` �'�• 1 # � �•.� &may �, � i� •i, �i �,wt is �Y. kAL �� �,.sem. � � •� - '�r � r,� t Phase ii of Grand Prairie Addition r 1 r w J� r r Applicst1 n W0 Grand Pra|rig Additlgn Final Plat - Jr � � � - r . � . • I � � . | ■ r - ; ƒ _ � / , . � | � � � � ! ' • � � ' � @ , / �� � • - , � . ■& • . | �� / ,| � i / | gr �, - . , \ • | • � lee- « , � �-� • � / . � \ Ar 04 .Y �•■!� {pl S i - '• �i•" •Jr�.'B�.tL � ' � ft � }''�� s►afr; 3y ,: .,Ar -{h �y('J:-. 1 �s'��.le�'.. � �' • 5 rlii�"r�i ,' _�'���' ,ti 1 .i '- • i, py,��rY 711 n' 1 1 4v Start YL Laterel Iel A _..ia i .'• An , - 4' 4` F 5' .• a - f 5 Me4-4 - ! d:?. Al •�'.� ;°'••_,{�ri, ,;gip 1� ,f �� �•� - c y >r Way r�, �T�z l+,'� � r S( • 5'' f, ru � • �MW , 13 f�4{,} ; t �' ��J�.,t 3.4-�' Yjry' -# � r. ,i ...r✓.• L _ iti }•. 13 AN y �• a y � �"„ + ' ;; h' �,� ���ta. ['U Nr r'9 i � T: , � ��1 '4- � � •�. - F ;Z2r 7ev .F. i 43f40 f I =pp v i �'•II �y ° � gyp! �� o x `%��,r l�,• - , L,a. ,•.,....�.'��..,,.r•�:�t.td� �- a�[�tb � '�'r c^'-�C'� T� �€�v� ;3�ffi� �c a��s ��.w.. - . _ * .. CrrX OF SAUNA,KANSAS REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS July 23,2016 406 p.m. The City Commission convened at 2:30 p.m. for Budget(Visit Salina/Salina Dowmmzt,Inc.)and. at 3:45 p.m.for Citizens Forums. The Regular Meeting of the Board of Camnwsw hers was called to order at 4:06 p.m.in Room 107, City-County Building. Roll call was taken followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and a nmment Of. silence. Those present.and comnprisft a quorum: Mayor Kaye J.Cmwfo d(presiding),Commoners Jon Blanchard,Trent Davis,Randall Hardy,and Karl Ryan. Also pAsent: Jason Gags,City Mamger;Michael Sdmage,Deputy City Manager,Greg Bengtsaa, City Atiomey,and Shendi Wicks,CLty Clerk AWARDs AND PaoC'tAss&mNs None, CM ZENs FORUM None. PUBLIC HSGs AND ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR A CERTAna Tn a (5.1) Comments an the proposed 2017 Budget. Mayor Crawford arawranced that(Ws was an opportunity for citizens to provide a ma u to an the proposed 2017 Budget. No comments received. CONSZQT AGENDA (6.1) Approve the minutes of July 16,2016. (6.2) Approve the minutes of July 19,2016. (6.3) Approve Resolution No. 16-7366 appointing members to the Saline County Commm-jLy Corrections Advisory Board. (6A) Consider rs+commendations for grant fund sllncation to local agencies for the 2016' Kansas Emerg=7 Solutions Grant: 160296 Moved by Commissioner Ryan,seconded by Comn*sianer Davis,to approve the consent agenda as presented. Aye:(5). Nay:(0). Motion carried. ADKEMSTRATION (7.1) Second raiding Ordinance No. 16-10844 requesting annexation of the ;-;.; unannexed portion of South Ohio Street south of Schfilmg Road. Mayor Crawford noted that Ordinance No.16-10844 was passed on first reading an July 18,2016 and since that time no comments have been received. 1 15-0297 Moved by Commissioner Ryan, seconded by Coenmissioner Davi{, to adopt Ordinance No. 16- 10894 requesting annexation of the remaining unannexed portion of South Ohio Street south of SchilUng Road on second reading. A roll, call vote was taken. Aye: (5) Blancharrd,Davis,Hardy, s Ryan,Crawford. Nay:(0). Motion carried. (7.2) Authorize publication of the Notice of Budget Hearing for the 2417 budget which• i sets August 81h and August 15th as the dames of public hearings on the 2017 budget;. and establishes the maximum limits of the 2017 budget. Michelle Meyer, Director of Finance & Administrat> , explained the process, public, hearing dates,mill levy and maximum limits of the 2017 budget. 16-0298 Moved by Commiseioater Blanchard, seconded by Cao iMmoner Hardy,to authorize pulAcatim: of the Notice of Budget Hearing for tate 2017 budget which sets August 8t*and.August 15&as the dates of public hearings on the 2017 budget, and establishes the maximum limits of the 2017 budget, Aye,(5). Nay:(0). Motion carried. (7.3) Request to authorize staff to prepare it Special Assessment Engineering Feasibility. Report for Phase II of the Grand Prairie Addition. Dan Stack,City Engineer,explained tate request,fiscal impact and action options. Commissioner Blanchard asked for information on the build outs for phase 1 of the development Mr.Stack stated the lots had been sold to other individuals or builders. Bill Sheppard, 430 Greystone, stated Cornerstone Development owned eleven(11) lots in the development and the remaining properties were either already sold or were in the' process of being sold. Commissioner Blanchard asked if the request for special assessments was due to a need or a want.Mr.Sheppard stated there was a need for the special asaessments. A conversation ensued between,Camntissioner Blanchard and Mr.Sheppard regarding the amount of special assessments and the development of the lots. 16-0299 Moved by Commissioner Ryan,seconded by Commissionerr Davin to authorize staff to prepare an engineering feasibility report and Resolution of Advisability for Phase II of the Grand Prairie Addition for future consideratiot by the City Commission. Contntissioner Blanchard asked staff what the number of un4milt vacant lots were m the development. Jason Gage, City Manager, stated that inkumation would be available from Mr. Sheppard. Commissioner Blanchard asked if there was an idea of the number of lots that currently had special assessmmnts of do same sih as the vacant lots in this development. Mr. Stack stated thy' were 169 lots that were comparable to the size lots in this development W.Gage stated it might be a good idea to ask Mr.Sheppard to provide input on the cast of hoar in the development.W.Sheppard stated the cost for the homes started at$3W OW and go up from there. He continued to state there was a bigger desire to build homes in the second phase of tate development. Page 2 Commissioner Blan Bard provided his thoughts an the development and asked each con�nissioner individually, knowing then what you know now, would you have voted on approving the special asseamunla for the Stone Lake Addition as it was approved in 2M3. Mayor Crawford stated there was a motion and a second on the floor. Commissioner Ryan called the question. Motion died due to lack of second. Commissioner Blanchard staffed he thought the question was relevant, the question pertained to lots that were comparable to other development additions in the City,would each commundoner vote on the request today. Commissioner Hardy stated he would not vote in favor of it today. Comnumd mer Davis stated he could only answer the question vaguely.He continued to State until the strategic plan was in line with the development plan it would be hard to make a decision on special assessments. Commissioner Davis asked if the 169 lots were in the same pride range as Luras II of Grand Prairie Addition. Mr. Gage wTbhW the developable lots within the various subdivislOm and additiew with special assessment&Michael gchrage,Deputy City Manager,provided additional raf==t= on the lots available in the various subdivisions and additions with special assessments. Mr. Gage stated wiflrin Table 3.2 of the Housing Study referenced the high price range as higher than$25D,000;there was the ability for partial special assessments if contiguous. Commissioner Hardy provided his thoughts an special assessxnents for this phase of development. Commi�ioner Davis provided his thoughts an special amts for tints phase of development A conversation ensued between the Commission on current special assessments and developable lots in Salina, Mayor Crawford stated the Commission did not know this information at the time the species assessments for Stone Lake Addition was requested. Mr.Gage stated the Coinmission needed to take the totality of the information in front of them to make a decision. Commissioner Davis stated he did not think everyone should agree but did think everyone needed to consider the saw factors when making ft decision. He personally thought tine disa3 sicm should be delayed until after the special assessment study session CDmxinissjoirter Ryan stated the request was simply for the engineering feasibility report Commissioner Davis asked Staff how much time it would take to complete the report. Mr. Stack stated staff had the cast information needed in order to determine the lot cost. Mayor Crawford stated the motion was made to complete the engineering feasibility report. Page 3 Mayor Crawford called the questkm to authorize staff to prepare an engineering feasibility report. and Resolution of Advisability for Phase 11 of the Grand Prairie Addition for future consideration by the City Commission.Aye:(4). Nay:Blanchard(1). Motion carried. (7.4) Resolution No. 16-7386 audiorizing the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the Crossland Constrmtron Company Field House C wmiuctian Contract confirming that Builders Risk Insurance shall be provided by Crossland Consb uction Company rather than the City of Salina. Michael Schragre, Deputy City Manager, explained the amendments, fiscal impgxt and action options. Commissioner Blanchard asked at what point did staff feel we are completely out of the woods for the Board of Tax Appeals. Mr. Sehrage stated the Board of Tax Appeals was property tax but an application was submitted by the City of Salina to the Kansas. Departt of Revenue for the sales tax exemption and was approved by the Kansas Department of Revenue. Jason Gage,City Manager,stated the IRB also was a way to get the property tax exemption. 16-0300 Moved by Commissioner Blanchard, seconded by Commissioner Hardy, to adopt Resolution No. 16-7388 authorizing the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the Qmdand Construction Company Field House Construction Contract confirming that Builders Risk Insurance shall be provided by Crossland Construction Company rather than the City of Salina and to add the provision should there be sales tax added to the construction cost to be eligible for change order. Aye:(5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. DSVst.OPMsrrr BUMMS Now. O t[tint Bt mNrEss None. AD10 NT 16-033 Moved by Comaniseicxiwr B1aYtrhuA seconded by Commissioner Hardy,that the regular meeting of the Board of City Commissioners be adjourned. Aye: (5). Nay: (0). Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m [SEAL) Kaye , Mayor ATTEST: hicks Ci Clerk Page 4 2(A) (E) CITY OF SALINA RE=QUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE IIAXV20W 4.01)P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR Na: a AGENDA: ITEM city Managers Olticoe NO. 4 Sr. Mike Sdhrege.Deputy City Mgr. BY. Page X IS Resolution No.094WS Approval of the Advisability and Authorization of Resolution No. o949675 related to establishing a special improvement district for street, drainage, water and sanitary sewer improvements in the Grand Prairie subdivision. And, ALftrization of the Mayor to execute a Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development BCKGROUND: The attached petition has been developed in coordination with City staff accounting for the proposed phasing of development in the Grand Prairie subdivision and the resulting installation of on-site and off-site improvements_ The Grand Prairie subdivision is a golf-eoursee development to be located on private property located within golf holes on the Salina Municipal Golf Course. Due to the unique configuration of the subdivision, considerable planning and coordination was neoessary to design off4te improvements and secure the necessary permissions to install those improvements across the Municipal Golf Course as well as adjoining private properties. Additionally, It was necessary to further coordinate phased construction and allocation of improavements oosts such that special assessments for each lot were minimized. The Developer also indicated a desire to solicit private construction contracts in order to more definitively determine acyl construction costs before proceeding with formation of a benefit district. In light of the project specific challenges identified above, City staff coordinated with the Developer to plan and secure the necessary elf-site easements; identify appropriate construction phases for the development; allocate benefit oasts throughout both phases of the development; and negotiate a Development Agreement that complied with State Statutes and provides for private negotiation of construction contracts and reimbursement of eligible expenses with benefit district proceeds once the required improvements are approved and accepted by the City. The proposed benefit district provides for installation of all the necessary improvements to develop Phase i. Ous to the configuration of the subdivision, some of the improvements proposed by this benefit district will ultimately benefit both Phase I and Phase 11 of the development. Consequently, some costs are allocated to Phase II of the subdivision with additional development costs to be applied to Phase ll when it is completed. In the interim, Cornerstone Development will be liable for the assessments applied to Phase Il of the development. K is prescribed by Kansas State Statutes that the CU Commission consider a egition for street CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 11109/2009 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT. APPROVED FOR ND: 8 AGENDA: ITEM City Managers Ofte NO. 4 BY. Mike Schrage,Deputy City Mgr. BY. Page 2 drainage, sanitary sewer, and water improvements and establish sufficiency on the basis that any one of the following three conditions be met: 1. The petition is signed by a majority of the resident owners of record of property liable for assessment under the proposal. 2. The petition is signed by the resident owners of record of more than half of the area liable for assessment under the proposal. 3. The petition is signed by the owners of record, whether resident or not, of more than half of the area liable to be assessed under the proposal. In this case, condition No. 2 is met since Cornerstone Development awns 100% of the area liable for assessment under the proposal. The engineering feasibility report for these public improvements is attached for your review. The report describes the scope of the project, the improvement district, the method of assessment, taut breakdowns for each improvement, and identifies and describes the properties in the benefit district. In summary, lots in Phase I of the development are subject to an estimated special assessment of $34,531.52 with the final assessment being determined once the project is complete and costs are finalized. Lots in Phase II of the development are subject to special assessment associated with this request of$12,334.01 with the final assessment being determined once the project is complete and costs are finabod. Lots in Phase 11 will be subject to additional improvement costs (funded privately or through a benefit district) at the time additional improvements such as streets and sewer are Installed to complete Phase ll. Resolution No. 09-6675 makes findings about the advisability of the proposed improvements. Such a determination can and should take in to account the total special assessments proposed in light of the proposed development. Both the Developers and City staff gave considerable consideration to the allocation of costs: to the development and whether the total assessments were advisable. The proposed assessments of up to$34,532.52 are significant, but could be considered advisable, in light of the unique nature of this subdivision as a golf coir development. The property owners may choose to pay their share of the project costs as a lump sum payment or as a special assessment taut over a 15 year period beginning on the date that General Obligation bonds are issued by the City. The Development agreement coincides with City policy regarding financial guarantees and provides that the developer may either submit a letter of credit equal to 35% of the project costs or cash or financial securities equal to 20% of the project costs. City policy further provides that financial securities will be released by the City when 35% of the development is complete or after 5 years whichever occurs first. The Development Agreement provides financial securities for Phase Il must be provided in conjunction with this project and that the 5 year timeframe CITY OF SAUNA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION QATE TIME 11101=08 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR Na: a AGENDA- ITEM City Manager's Omce NO. 4 BY: Mice SMmae, Deputy City Mgr. BY: Page 3 will not commence far Phase II until all of the necessary public improvements have been completed. The Developers have negotiated construction contracts and are prepared to provide the contractors authorization to proceed upon City Commission approval of the Benefit District and Development agreement. Cg fiEQ iIAANCE WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: The proposed action is consistent with the following components of the City's shared vision statement: • Salina will be a city that is exciting to live h and thriving both economically and socially. Salina will be a place with a quality of life that not only appeals to residents, but also to visitors. • The City Commission of Salina will have committed to providing the highest quality City services passible within available resources. The City Commission recognizes their role and responsibility to provide the needed policy direction and resources to its admink&ation. At the same time, the City's administrative personnel are committed dally to transforming this dirsation and resources into the highest possible quality of municipal smioes, consistent with the expectations of both the City Commission and the chess of Salina. • Salina will encourage and be supportive of industrial development, economic expansion, market-driven tax base growth, and home grown entrepreneurialism. The proposed action is also consistent with the following goals contained in the City's strategic plan: Goal#1: The city will create a community of mixed-use, quality development and redevelopment. Goal#3: The city will provide the highest quality of services, consistent with governing body direction, available resources and staff commitment to quality. Goal#4: The city will maintain growth and development policies that are updated to reflect current conditions and desired growth direction. FISCAL NOTE., All oasts (estimated to be $1,618,096.94) are to be assessed against the improvement district. This projed will be temporarily financed through temporary notes and rolled into long term bonds either 2010 or 2011 depending on the completion date of the project relative to the issuance date of bonds in 2010. Property owners will have the opportunity to pay the assessment in full prior to the bond issue. D CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION GATE TJME 11109/2= 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT, APPROVED FOR NO: 8 AGENDA: ITEM CRY Manager's 00m NO. 4 BY: Mike Schmga,Deputy City Mgr, BY: Page 4 Possible actions for the City Commission's consideretion Include the following: 1.) Vote to approve Resolution No. 0943675 and authorize the Mayor to execute the improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development. 2) Provide additional direction to City staff regarding the terms and conditions contained in the Resolution and/or Development Agreement and request that revised documents be provided for future owsideration. 3.) Conclude that the proposed improvements are not advisable and vote to deny Cornerstone Developments request to create and designate an improvement distdot for the purposes of making public improvements as proposed. It is recommended that the City Commission vote to approve Resolution No. 0945875 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salinas and Cornerstone Development, PETITION TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SAUNA,KANSAS: We,the undersigned,owners of record of property located within the City of Salina, Kansas(the "LSty")do herehY res M&Tely request that the Governing Bod9 of the City create and designate an improvement district for the purpose of making certain improvements in the manner provided by KS.A.12-6aO1,et sem 1. The general nature of the proposed improvements are as follows: The curb, guttonng. pavft. 8wft and drainage fur app m invaly 901 lineal fieet of Beutgrass Drive, (the Bemgrass Drive Sheet 1,128 lineal Suet of Larkspur 1MM6(the Larkgw Lane Sued Iu:prnvemonts); Z� ' feet of Cob' Carole, (the CoUren Chdo Stneet Irnprovarne ) coI t y the "Street hwovemenfs . The installation of appnnfinatoly 1,386 lineal f '.bf six4nch wait main,92$'Upeal f0d of night-inch waW main, fire hydrants, valvM$ttmBs, vice connection water lines and all appurtenances thcmto(the Phase IIN SYMM-J*P ov=cnts); 42 lineal sect of six-inch vveter main, Z,BS 1 lineal feet of water main fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connectionfor water lines Y. appurtenances thereto (thc Eight-inch Water System *w meats) and y dw "Water System pmmn . nc inStallati0n of a4k-ina SaAltarydevwCr CG GOeCtJOd1S for BCW GT H= lying within caul;linea,manholes and all as dwmibed: Labral A appraxrmately 1,18 1(the I.at$r � aartarySdoft Tin pmvenients)D LabuW A' grolew hely 0(the Latmal A!, Sanitary Impmvc arts) Lateral B am --imabely4057 lineal Nk(the Lso aW 11=Sanitary Sewer Impmvem u)Lateral C approxmstely 031kcal £set(the Lateral C $wry Sewer hVrovemmtB) Lateral D appnaorirnately 8O9 cul t (*a. Lee* - Sanitary Sewer Imprav�) and cpll�r Sanitaiy.%wer Imo. 'due installation of mwa'er Meatian and all appumenances thereto (the "Stdrmwater ';k*ntion Pond'). r The -*60lation of approximately 2,466 lineal fact of samm sewer, inlets, and all gwv, -tMMOes t (&"Drainage ImFovemenFs'). (collectively,ibe' Cdvemdnti"). 3. The estimated or probable cost of the Improvements is: One million six hundred eiglht+om thousand ninety-five dollars and ninety fora cents(81,619,095.94.) 1 3, The extent of the proposed improvement district to be assessed is: Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 duough 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. (the'%nprovement District'). 'The following lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they an not developable lots and therefore are not bane teed by the lmprovelnents:Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainsge and utility easement en dk plat;Block 2 Lot 2,is dedicated as an open space easerawt.co the plat;131o&2 Ldt 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;and Blgckll L&37,is dedicated as a drainage,unity,and open space easement ofthe q •`;�� 4. The proposed method of assessment.shall be: Each tat in the Improvement District shall.be assessed apally. 5. The proposed apportionment of cost between tdre!lE�psprovemact District and the city at large One hundred parent(I0 54-of the ental coat of dents shall be assensed to the briprovenwat District rl' portion of oasts be paid by the City at Large. The costs of ft Impmv�>Yi the hnprdM neat District shall be furter allocated as follows: One lumd , (I00"Yo)of the j adwpur Low Street Imprvvo cab and the Cobiran Std Xmprovetne* shall be assessed to Lois 1 through 30, Block .Lvid Lots 1, 3 dlrongb 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City ofutna,Saline County Kansas. .�*�+�.'*T..p=cd ) 0 Mlle Drive Street InlprlDVPiltlelt$' Sb81l be asioess Jo Lots 1. ngh 30, ifiA 1, and Lots 1, 3 duough 5,Block 2,all in the Grand,;airic Ad lou, in the City of Salina, Saline Cowry Kansas; forty percent(4 of the Drive Street Impmvemen s shall be assessed to Lots 7 thr+ou&.16 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. Onp hundred percent(1 0096)of the Drainage Improverna is shall be assessed to Lots' 13 t)lroto 30, Block 1, and Lots 1,3 through 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie A dhim in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent (10016) of Kral A Sanitary Scwex Improvements and Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Tntprovernents shall be assessed to Lata l through 30, Block 1,and bats 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent(100%)of the Lateral B Sanitary Sower Improvements and Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots I through 30, Block 1, and Lacs 1, 3 through 5, Bloch 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salm,Saline County Kansas. 2 One hmdred per (100%) of the I ebm, A' Sanitary Sawa Imgfnvemants shall be atua med to Low 7 through 36 and 38 d uough 43, Block 2, all in the Oland Prairia Addition,in the City of Salim Selina Coutdy Kansas. One hundred pmcent (100°x5) of the Phase 1 Water Improvements and fifty pmac d (40'96) of Fight-inch Loop Water SyMm Impmyme shall be assessed to Lots l dough 30, Block 1,sad Lots 1,3 through 5.Block 2, all in the Omnd Prairie AdMcn, in the City of Saluda, Sialine Quay Kansas; sixty pamant(60%)of Eight inch Looe Water System ImpmvwwM shall be assessed to Lots 7 ftuugh 36 and 38 (tough 43, Black 2, all im''the Crraltd Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Renese. , One hundred pence (100°!0)of#ire 3tormwater Defenilshall be assessed to Lots 1 ihfvggh 30,Block 1,ad Lots 1,3through tltrofV36 and 38 though 7 43, Blo& 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addifink �r.the City' 1t•Salina, Saline cmmty Kansas. y; i Rvdgrasa Dtrdve is a boulevrad styli steno!tti Oflmm do arlryway into the entire sabitivrsiar5 costs are allaaatad each that all pmpmlim share in p'V"aM.bmefit provided tD.tk satin subdivwm >3&bmb Leap!Meter Sys6am lmprovomcirta is Yucet fin flaw miWm=s in Pbam 1. All lata in Phaea 2 will be directlyto On syaddne_HA"lata in Pba®e 2 vAll tW dire* Lo this eyebm.carts are aliombd 1hat ft Phme 2 pmpc ibgp boar a greater proportion of Iter d. The signes of tMs Mition hereby rgpW that thdOommmmeab be made without notlee and hearing at rega}n 4. K.S.A,.1Z 04 , r• NAM>l;S MAY NOT BW' -ITHD NN FROM PISTMON BY THE SIGNERS TIMJIZOF AFTER THE GOV�BOWCOMMENCESICONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION OR LATER THAN SEVEN M IDAYS ASTER FILING OF THE PETITION WITH THE CITY CLERK,WHICHEVER OCCLV~.. `FHiv°91 .. 3 The petitioners certify,under oath,that they have no financial interest in any property with delinquent special assessment anywhem wilhin the city of Salina. CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C. William R.Umphrey,Member Stephen.K Renidr,Member William E.Sheppard,Member LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPS TY O WITBON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: Lots 1 thapaa 30;ff %4 1,and Lod. ,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Bl 2, all in';p Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salim, Saline Canty Fabian. STATE OF KANSAS, SALII COUNTY . . i,the undumgned Notary Public,hereby certify that the s appearing above is genuine and that this d aanent was signed ire me on this day of .20 Notary Public My appointment expires: 4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ESTIMATE AND FEASIBILITY REPORT PETMON NO, PROPOSWJ' GRAND PRAEME ADDICT,PHA IM I STREET.DRAINAGE,and UTILITY�%p%mmmm Bcn%rm Drive,fur 1=cj CobbinCWo FILE NO.2009-01 Novembor 2009 Wayne B.Nelson,P.E.,Civil Engineer SCOPE OF wOlftK TUe curb,Pttarm&paAn8,gradiinB and drainage for approxim4ftly 901 lineal feet of Bentgrass Drive, (the Bentgrm.Drive Street Improvements); 1,128 lineal fact of Larkspur Lane,(the Larkspur Lane meet Intpr'ovemenb);and 225 lineal feet of Cobinen Circle,(the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements)and collectively the"Skeet rnprovements". The installation of approximately 1,396 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 923 lineal That of eiight inch water main, fire hydrants, valyl fittings, serw ee CaMMMbons for water lines and all appurtenances ftnabo(tho Phase 1 Water System Improvmeuts);42 lineal 6d of six-inch water main,2,951 lineal feet of ei&inch water main fue hydrants, valves, Vis, service owmecdow for water lines and an appurtr mees thereto (the Eight-inch hoop Water System Iraprovome* and collectively the "Water System Improvements". The installation of cigl*mc r sanitary sewer mom,service caonccams fur, lines lying within curb Ems,manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described_La wal lkappro4rn 1,186 lineal fact(the Laaeral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements); Lateral A' ap od ely 690 lin*'Sd (the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvemern~s)Lateral B approximatelyjt 57 lineal feet(the IAft,B Sanitaty Sewer Improvmab) Lateral C appwxamately 973 lineal fixi,fthe Iaterl C Sanitary Se 4mpravaments) Lateral D appra daw ely 809 lineal lit(d w Lateral D Salfi r Sewerlwgrovaments)and pollectively the Sanitary Sewer improvements. ► The installation of sbomawaber detection and all appurtenances then Eo(the"Stormwater Detention"}. The installation of appmM aately 2,466 lineal.. : ` sewer,i 9a*and all thereto (the"Drainage Improvements"). " fig. , M=r ANSrRICT Grana d igWe Ad iMon Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through S,7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Ada,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. (the"Improvement AMPWI. The fallowing lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they are not developable lata and therefore an not benefitted by the Improvements:Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 2,is dedicate as an open space easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;and Block 2 Lot 37,is dedicated as a drainuwe, utility,and open space easemnm of the plat. ADAPTION OF ASASSESSMM The awessment with accord interest In be levied as a special anowinent tax upon the property included with the benofat district ocnamrout with the gonoml property tax and shall be payable in fifteen equal annual instalbnents. Each parcel in the hupmvenumit District shall be assessed equally per lot. APPORTIONMENT OF COST COST CHARGEABLE TO PR_VATE PROPERTY: One hundred percent (100%) of the toil cost of itnpmvemaafis dqU be asito the Imp winuent Di trrrict and no portion of acts shall be paid by the City at i(!h*.The costs of within the Impravcmmt District"be further allocated as fo[l G: One hundred percent(100%)of the Larkspur Lane SUpot bRxurnionts and the Cobs=Mule Street Improvearerrts shall be assessed to Lots 1 thmujk3k Hock 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5, Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in dw City of :Saline County Kansas. Sixty percent (60%)of the Bentgrass >)ir%o fit ImprvervieW shall_bo assmod to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 thnnuo 5, 2,all in the OW Prairie Addition,in the City of SalinaSalmi County SalCounty Kansas; per'J4 of 1� Benrass Drive Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 •36'iM • 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,.k:t�City ofiiin% Comity ohms. One hundmd per {100%)ol't6 Drainage linpmvernents shall be assessed to Loin 1 thmv* 30,Block 1,and Lilts I,3 thro*5.Block 2,all-in the[band Prairie Addition,in,the City of Salina,Saline County lCrqw. . One h►aidred penpM.{10096)of Lateral A Santary Sever lmprovemuients and Lateral C Sanitary Smw ImprovemenlikA l be assabplxed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lams 1,3 through 5,7 ftoqb 36 and 38 thrvq ju 43,Bf6sk 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina, Sahnd Comity Kangas. One hundred percent (100%) of the Lateral B Sanitary Server Improvements and Lateral D Sanitary Souter Wpmavemabb aha11 be assessed to Lots 1 dhragg)h 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Bloc, ,all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansa1r. One hundred percent(100°%)of the Latent A'Sanitary Sewear Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 3 thm ugh 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kan=. One hundred percent(100%)of the Phase 1 Water Impmuvements and forty percent (40°x)of Eight-inch Loop Water System lrnprovementiP shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 34,Block 1, and Lots 1,3 through 5,Black 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas; sbay percent(60%)of EWM-inch Loop Water System Improvenhents shall be assessod to Lots 7 doopgb 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Sam Cmurty Kansas. One hundmd percent(100%)ofdw St=water Dematfim shall be assessed to Tats 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through S,7 through 36 and 38 through.43,Block 2,all is the Gu nd Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. I Booagramm Drivo is a boulevard style shvet to enhance the entryway into the cntixv suMvialo%wets are allocated such that all properties dmm in it portion of the benefit p ovidad to the entire subdivision. 8 Hight 4wh Lapp Wdw System Impramnomia is required m meat fire flow miimmumm in Phase L All lob in phase 2 will be directly tapped to this system.Since the lots in Phase 2 will tap direody to this system,cash are allocated snob that the Phaac 2 properties boar a greater proportion ofthe casts. .3 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the[Sty of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Total Imprommuts hem!t Description anTt iY Unit Unit Cast ExhM an I Motion I L.37AOUU.UO 22,600.00 2 Common Emmvatkm 13,609 CY .' 3.95 53,755.55 3 Clearing&Grubbing 1 LS. 18;900.00 18,900.00 4 Asphalt Pave,8" 4,532 Tem 57.20 259,230.40 5 Curb&gutter 5,83$. 13.60 92,996.80 Removal of tkub&Gutter LF- 6.00 654.00 6 Sidewalk,4' SF 5.10 3,309.90 7 Sidewalk ramps,7 +pe 1 _ 16 Ea *d a0 9,012.80 8 Sidewalk ramp,8' 2 Ea 9KO 1,812.20 9 Entramae approach,6"concrefio[Maddey Rd) 0 SY 51.55v 0.00 10 Entrance approach @ Cedar Ridge,7"c m"dtc 173 SY 55.50' 9,601.50 11 Brick stamped red anKm e,6" 276 SY 125.55 34,651.80 12 FmeWucy accera path,asphalt millings,6" 0 SY 4.55 0.00 13 Maintenance path,asphalt millingg;4" SY 3.65 2,102.40 14 Grass pavers 0 SY 60.00 0.00 15 Type A5-2 curb inlet 12,'ka 4,300.00 51,600.00 16 Type A5-3 cert inlet 4 5,800.00 23,200.00 17 Area inlet,7'x 7" 2 5,000.00 10,000.00 18 Stena sewerjuncdw box,6'x 6' , 0 'Ea 3,000.00 0.00 19 Stmanhole,4' ' ' •3 13a 2,200.00 6,600.00 ZO Stoxmarr p:q 2" ' • ;4. 22 LF 25.00 550.00 21 worm pipe,;;,. "x;;• 30 1.F 28.00 840.00 22 StormpipMr 38`'liE `P 2,354 LF 30.00 67,620.00 23 Storm pipe,24oV RrF 43 LF 35.00 1,505,00 24 Storm pipe.j0"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 25 5tonn#4w; '1kCP 117 LF 75.00 8,775.00 26 Bid section, l INC 1 Ea 350.00 350.00 29' d sedian, 15"* 2 En 350.00 700.00 28 searon, 18"RC 4 5 Ea 400.00 2,000.00 29 24"RC 1 Ea 500.00 500.00 30 End sermon,30"RC =. 0 Ea 800.00 0,00 3I End seodm 36"RC 1 FA 1,000.00 1,000.00 32 Concate flume.2'PxiaraaY pond 38 SY 59.05 2,243.90 33 Rack rip ;-%6" 576 SY 40.00 23,040.00 34 Rock dam,Dn in 15 CY 120.00 1,800.00 35 Conne u&VvVft 0 SY 500.00 0.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 1,428 LF 17.00 24,276.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 3,774 LF 20.00 75,480.00 38 Water fitting 1 Ton 4,500.00 4,500.00 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 12 Ea 2,750.00 33,000.00 40 Resilient gab valve,6" 2 Es. 700.00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gate valve,8" 3 Ea 875.00 2,625.00 42 Corporation stag, I" 34 Ba 275.00 9,350.00 43 Carta shutoff valve&bar, l" 76 Ea 250.00 19,000.00 44 Copper service line, 1" 780 LF 12.00 9,360.00 45 Corpondon stop, 1%" 18 Ea 450.00 8,100.00 46 Wye,IW 18 Ea 100.00 1,800.00 47 Copper service line,I Ys' 625 LF 15.00 9,375.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 8" 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Ea 2,800.00 2,800.00 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 5,015 LF 28.00 140,420.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 1,135 LF 25.00 28,375.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 34 Ea 75.00 2,550.00 53 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 1 Ba 2,000.00 2,000.00 54 Standard Sanitary SowerMaeahole I$x•16 3,200.00 57,600.00 55 Drop Manhole 2 Its 3,400.00 6,800.00 56 Exp Depth ManholeJ29 LF 200.00 25,800.00 57 Trench&Bac&U.0-6' 97 LF 2.00 1,894.00 58 Trench&Backfill,614' 586 LF 15N 1,758.00 59 Trench&BaJill,8=10' 928 LF 4:000.� 3,712.00 60 Trench&BackEll, IO-12' 05 LF 5.00 :'--z 4,225.00 61 Trench&Backfill, 12-14' 920,LF 6.00 5,520.00 62 Trench&Backfil , 14'-16' -ft3 I:F 8.00' 4,664.00 63 Trench&Backfill, 16'-t8' '4143 LF 10.00 1,430.00 64 Trench&Ba"ll, 18'-20' ` :*3 LF 12.00 756.00 65 Special trench compaction 6,767-'LF 4.00 27,068.00 66 Water 1` , 2,287.50 2,287.50 67 Construction staking 1 16,565.00 16,565.00 68 Temporary uafic control 1 7,S 1,395.00 1,395.00 69 Temporary fertilizer,sated and mulch a t-540 Ac 1,000.00 5,000.00 70 T�slops*-MMI .' ace ) 3520 LF 2.25 17,840.00 7I T S1 -Barriicr` . • blc 3520 LF 5.00 17,600.00 72 Temporarydiment tear(gravel bad 2240 Lb 1.25 2,800.00 73 T mparmy oonstrwon entice 60 Ton 50.00 3,000,00 SUB-TOTAL. • . 76.75 ENTERING&CONMGENCM 258,895.35 TIW W JNTERE§T,$ONDING&ISSUE 64 723.84 TOTAL: $1,618,095-94 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina pnolmwwry Ed mate of Tach]aftat Lnprnv=mb Item# Item I ia�}tR Unit Cost Exton 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 5,650.00 5,650.00 2 Common Eua ndm 13,5& COY 3,,95 53,735.55 3 Clearing&Gmbbing 1 LS 18.9060 16,900.00 4 Asphalt Pavement,r 4,53 Ton 57.2d;' . 259230.40 5 Cwb&gmw 6,338 XY 13.60 '' $x,996.80 Removal of Curb&Clutter 109, LF 6.00 654.00 6 Sidewalk,V 649 SF 5.10 3,309.90 7 Sidewalk ramps,Type 1 '1*. Fa 563.30 9,012.80 8 Sidewalk ramp,8' 2 906.10 1,812.20 9 Markley access approach,b"cvncrabO `.. 0 Sy 51.55 0.00 10 Entrance approach @ Cedar Ridge,7"VncreW 173 St 55.50 9,60150 11 Brick stamped red cebe,6" 'SY 125.55 34,651.80 12 Bmerpmy aceo ' .. millings,$" Y' 0 SY 4.55 0.00 13 Maiatananae�, AUl€ngs,4" 576 BY 3.63 2,102.40 14 {bass paves;'. + 0 SY 60.00 0.00 67 Water 1 LS 571,88 571.88 68 Cama 1aldug 1 LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 69 4woraryftirtcontrci - . 1 LS 349.75 348.75 76 Temporary ferN ,aeed at+drnulab 1.25 Ac 1,000.00 1,25x.00 11"`IiQrnporsry slope fiftdW(silt i) 1760 LF 2,25 3,960.00 72 Tesqprwy Slope Ba*r(Biodegradable Loi 880 LF 5.00 4,40000 73 Terrippkry inlet sedinkent.barrier(gravel bags) 360 Lb 1.25 700.00 74 Temporary=mtracbm entrance 15 Ton 50.00 750.00 SUB-TQTAU ..• $507,799.23 ENGROMRRW&CONTINGENCIES 101,559.85 TEW NOTE,IIfI73 WT,BONDING&ISSUE 25A9-96 TOTAL: $634,749.03 Petition Na. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Es kuk of Dnunage Improvements Rem# Desorption Quantity Unit Unit Cost Ekterwon 1 Mobilizatim 1 L.S 4520.00 4,520.00 16 Type A5-2 curb inlet 12 Ea -4kV0.00 51,600.00 17 Type A5-3 curb inlet 4 #% 5,800.00 23,200.00 18 Ares.inlet,Tx 7 0 "84" 5,000.00 0.00 19 Storm sewer junction boor,6' ",x 6' 11 Ea00.00 0.00 20 Storm manhole,4'diameter 3 Ea 2fi:00 6,600.00 21 Sum pipe,12"RCF 0 LF 2� 0.00 22 Stmm pipe, IF RCP p LF 28.DD 0.00 23 Stoam pipe, 18"RCP 2,214 ,-j.F 30.00 „ 66,420.00 24 Storm pipe,M'RCP 43 4 35.00 1,505.00 25 Storm pipe,3011 RCP .`', 0 LF 60.00 0.00 26 Stxm pipe,36"RCP ' 0;LF 75M 0.00 27 End section, 12"RC 0 34 350.00 0.00 28 End section, 15"RC 0 La 350.00 0.00 29 End section, 18"RC f1: 3 .Ea 400.00 1,200.00 30 End section,24"RC 4 Ea 500.00 500.00 31 End section,30,"-,k 0 Fes. 800.00 0.00 32 End section,W RC `� 0 Ea 1,000.00 0.00 33 Concrete flim", 'PMnary ptnd 0 SY 59.05 0.00 34 Rock rip rap,Dsg;6! 124 SY 40.00 4,960.00 35 Ro .6" 15 CY 120.00 1,800.00 36 Coyairee d 0 SY 500.00 0.00 b6 special trench 040edon 1,077 IF 4.00 4,308.00 67-W, oer 1 LS 457.50 457.50 68 C w inn ghdant: 1 IS 3,313.00 3,313.00 69 Tempopky traffic cel 1 LS 279.00 279.00 70 TempatWire Wizer.geed and mulch 1.000 Ac 1,000.00 1,000.00 71 Temparary' e barrier(silt fence) 140.8 LF 2.25 3,168.00 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradablo Log) 704 LF 5.00 3,520.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(SmveJ hags) 448 Lb 1.25 560.00 73 Temporary construction o nt ince 12 Ton 50,00 600.00 SUB-TOTAL: $179,510.50 ENGINSBRING&CONTINGENCIES 35,902.10 TEMP NOTE,DMMEST,BONDING&ISSUE _ 8,975.53 TOTAL: $224,388.13 Pdtit w No. Omand Prairie Additum to dw City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Drainage hwovements Stormwater Detcution I em# Description Quwaty Unit 1 't Cost Erman 1 Niobili dm 1 L$' 1130.00 1130.00 16 Type A5-2 curb inlet 0 $ x4,300.00 0.00 17 Type A5-3 cmb inlet Ea '461800-00 0.00 18 Ara inlet,7 x 7 1 Ea 5700 10000.00 19 Storm sewer junction box,6'x 6' 0 Ea 3,06(o 0.00 20 Morn manhole,f disunder 0 Ea 2,200.00 0.00 21 Swm pipe,l2"RCP 22'• LF 25.00 +""550.00 22 ,St an pipe, 15"RCP 30-)LF 28.00 $40.00 2.3 Roan pipe, 18"RCP :40 LF 30.00 1200.00 24 Stone pipe,24"RCP t : 0 LF 35.00 0.00 2.5 Storm pipe,30"RCP 01.4 60.00 0.00 26 Storm pipe,36"RCP 117 .Eg• 75.00 8775.00 27 End section,12"RC 1 350.00 350.00 28 Fad section, 15"RC I Ea 350.00 700.00 29 End sectim,18-AC e 2 Fa 400.00 800.00 30 End seWop,20BX 0 Ea 500.00 0.00 31 Fad sectiOOC 3V,. 0 Ea 800.00 0.00 32 End soction,36" f 1 Ea 1,000.00 1000.00 33 C4* .9-Ppow 38 SY 59.05 2243.90 34 ap i*.Viu 6" ► 452 SY 40.00 18,080.00 3517ack dam,D,6-�`-- 0 CY 120.00 0.00 36 twme 0 SY 500.00 0.00 65 Sp=#1 trench C=F*.ftM 40 LF 4.00 160.00 67 Wifii ':" 1 LS 114.38 11439 69 ConsftdOw sWdng 1 LS 828.25 528.25 69 Tcaipam*4 t oWnol 1 LS 69.75 69.75 70 Temporary fbitiiit .seed and mulch 0.250 Ac 1,000.00 250.00 71 Temporary elope barrier(silt fema) 352 LF 2.25 792.00 Tarnporary Slope Bamier(Biodegradable Log) 176 LF 5.00 884.00 72 Temporary inlet se&m=t barrier(gravel bags) 112 Lb 1.25 140.00 73 Temporary constmadon cntww 3 Ton 50.00 150.00 SUB TOTAL: $49,05328 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCES 9,810.66 T W NOTE,EVTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 2,452.66 TOTAL: $61,31659 Petition No. Giand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Esgmate of Water Improvements Item# bm Quark Ung Unit Cost Enamoon 1 Mobilization ...... 1 L.S 5,650.00 5,650.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 1428 L :. ; 17.00 24,276.00 .37 Water Pipeline,8" 3774 O� 20.00 75,480.00 38 Wer fiuings 1 Tba 4,500.00 4,500.00 39 Fire hydm*&valve assembly 42 P,a'-..A750.00 33,000.00 40 Resilient gate valve,6" "• 2 Ea .00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gate valve.8" 3 Ea 8'f ,M 2,625.00 42 Coiporatim stop, l" 34 Ea 275.dO 9,350.00 43 Curb shutoff valve&box, l" -M Ea 250.00 1Q;b00.00 44 Coppet service line, l" 730 .LF 12.00 9,360.00 45 Corporation stop, l'/a" .c' 18 Ei 450.00 8,100.00 46 Wye, 1%" g.8 Ea 100.00 1,800.00 47 Copper service line, I%" '6a..LF 15.00 9,375.00 48 Tapping sleeve&c valve,20"x 8"' 1 ,ta. 9,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 1k 2,800.00 2,800.00 65 Spacial tmneh compaction -3049 'LF 4.00 12,196.00 66 Water ^ : -'I LS 57L88 571.88 67 Constructionlow 1 LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 68 T=poraW#dk contr+d ',". 1 LS 348.75 348.75 69 Tempary Y fuer,sw4ond mulch 1.250 Ac 1,000.00 1,250.00 70 Temporary slopeUqiaW�$epqp) 1760 LF 225 3,960.00 71 T dopeAwM(Biodep a Log) 880 LF 5.00 4,400.00 TemporaryWd eedtm �t%arrier Wavel bags) 560 Lb 1.25 700.00 73 Temporary capon a oae 15 Tart 50.00 750.00 'SUB=TOTAL: rY _' 3.- 8238,433,88 Il�iEERIIwTG&+IONT11C1ENCdES 47,686.78 TOP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&MUE 11,921.69 TOTALO. $298,042.34 Petition No. {band Prairie Addition to the City ofSalinQ Pmliminary Estimate of Phase I Wator bnpnavmnmu ham# item Quantity Unit Unit Coat Eldension 1 Mobilization 1 L,S 2,825.00 2,825.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 1386 LF 17.00 23,562.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 923 LF ." X0.00 18,460.00 38 Water f dbo 0.5 Re 4,50.00 2,250.00 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 7 S ,2,750,00 19,250.00 40 Resilient gate valve,6" 2 Ea .700,00 1,400.00 41 Resilient grpte vah%8" _t 1 Tse 0",00 875.00 42 Cowation atopy I" 16 Ba 274 Q0 4,400.00 43 Curb shu4ofvalwe&box, 1" 38 Ea 250.t*, 9,500.00 44 Capper service line, 1" 9W LSF 12.00 #,152.00 45 Corpomtioa*qk I S 9a 450.00 3,600.00 46 Wyey I W :"' 8 Ea 100.00 800.00 47 Copper service line, IVs'p .*XR9 LF 15,00 4,485.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 80 �.Rat 3,400.00 0.00 49 Tapping sleeve dt valve,8"x 8" 1.; 2,800.00 2,800.00 65 Special tro"ceapaction 1,476 4.00 5,904.00 66 Water 1 'IS 285.94 285.94 67 Condmotian 4' "'1 LS 2,070.63 2,070.63 68 T63q rwytmwr#ooh ` 1 LS 174,38 174.38 69 Toa ii .sei and mulch 0.625 Ac 1,000.00 625.00 70 Ta gwwy do", mnier(Olt ince) s .. 880 LF 2.25 1,980.00 71 Temporary Slope ftrigr{ odpdAble Ipg) 440 LF 5.00 2,200.00 72 T y inlet t barrier bags) 284 Lb 1.25 350.00 71�'fcn�poiai`j►�cti enc;e 7.5 Tarn 50.00 375.00 SUB-TOTAL:".•= 81.12,923.94 $NGIIJEffiiI1+fC*WNTO-MMCIE3 22,58 4.79 ' VAP NOTE,DfnM ST,'BONDM&ISSUE 5,646.20 TOTAL. $141,154.92 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimato of Eight-inch Loop Water lmpromnonu Item# hem ' Unit Unit Cast Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 2,825.00 2,825.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 42 LF 17.00 714.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 2851 LF 20.00 .57,020.00 38 Water fittings 0.5 4,500.00 2,250.00 39 Fine hydrant&valve assembly 5+ EbSO.00 13,750.00 40 Resilient gate valve,6" t 0 Ea %80.00 0.00 41 Resilient gaffe valve,8" 2 Ea 874:00 1,750.00 42 Corporation stop, P 18 Ea MAP 4,950.00 43 Curb dmtoff valve&box,l" 49 Ea 250.00 9,500,00 44 Copper service line, l" 394 LF 12.00 4,608.00 45 Corporation stop, 1 '10 9a 450.00 4,500.00 46 Wyee,1 W 10 Ea 100.00 1,000.00 47 Copper service line, 1%" LF 15.00 4,890.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 8" ! : .3,400.00 3,40000 49 Tapping slue&valve, 911 x 8" 0 2,$00,00 0.00 65 Special treacle mon •11.,573 4.00 6,292.00 66 Waftr r'. :, f LS 285.94 285.94 til Construction sing r` i` 1 IS 2,070.63 2,070.63 68 TenVorarybaffic contrail'_ 1 IS 174.38 174.38 69 Temporary Amer,seei and mulch 0.625 Ac 1,000.00 625:00 70 Temporary slope•bu"Mr ce) 880 LF 2.25 1,980.00 71 Tem Slaps r(B Log) 440 LF 5.0+1 2,200.00 72 t& porgtiy 3 #K"mint barrier(gravel bags) 280 Lb 1.25 350.00 73 Temporary exon fumes 7.5 Ton 50.00 375.00 SUB-TOTAL. $125,509.94 I NOMMMO CONTINGGEENCIES 25,141.99 TidP NOTE,INTOEST,BONDING&ISSUE _ 6,275.50 TO`j' =' $156,887.42 Petition No. Oland Prairie Addition to the Chy of Salina Prdiminery Esummu of SrurkW SmW Improvements Bern# Damajodon Qua" Unit Umt Cost Extension I Mobilizatkm 1 LS 5,650.00 5,650.00 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 5,015 U. ... 28.00 140,420.00 51 Sower service pipeline,4" 1,135 J 25.00 28,375.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" �4 F* 75.00 2,550.00 53 Connect to E"ng Sewer,8" .1 Iia 26000.00 2,000.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sower Manhole IS Ea 3400,00 57,600.00 55 Drop Manure 2 Es 3,40P 6,800.00 56 Ewa Depth Manhole 129 LF 200-W'- 25,800.00 57 Trench&Hkdc£iA,Ofi' 047 LF 2.00` 4',894.00 58 Trench&Bacldill,6'-8' 160 v 3.00 1,758.00 59 Tmnch&Backfill,8'-IO' .,TA LF 4.00 3,712.00 60 Trench&Badfdk 10=I2' -11 5 LF 5.00 4,225.00 61 Trench&Bacldi11, 12-14' M.LF 6.00 5,520.00 62 Trench&Backfill, I4' 1B 51LI-% 8.00 4,664.00 63 Trench&Bacldill, l6'--18' 143 10.00 1,430.00 64 Trench&Baclfil1,18'20' _'.. .63 lF 12.00 75600 65 Specie]tr+ 1 LF 4.00 10,404.00 66 Watcr ,{, ti: i LS 571.88 571.8$ 67 Construco a4iilk� 1 LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 68 Trafl io cc�ty . •. 1 LS 348.75 348.75 69 Temporary fhrdlixer.0.004 00 merle* 1.25 Ac 1,000.00 1,250.00 70 T�e b r(Wt fence) 1760 LF 2.25 3,960.00 71 Temporary E arrieF . apdegradable Log) 880 LF 5.00 4,400.00 12 Temporary inletinvent (gravel bogs) 560 Lb 1.25 700.00 7 ' mporary 0 entrame 15 Ton 50.00 750.00 G&ftT1TItTGENNaES 63,935.98 TEMP mous,7NTBEEsT,Bf1NDING&ISSUE 15,983.99 TOTAL: $399,599.84 Petition No, Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Saline. Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Sewer Improvoments Lateral A )tem# Description Unit Unit Cast Extension 1 n , , W623 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 1,186 LF 118.00 33,208.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 0 iF 25.00 0.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" = 0 Ha 75.00 0.00 53 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 1Ea X400.00 2y0U0.0o 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 Ea 3,? l:Qi1 12,800.00 55 Dwp Manhole 1 Ea 3,4{d-AQ 3,400.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole r s15 LF 200.00: 3,000.00 57 Tied&Backfill,0-' 4k .LF 2.00 972.00 58 Trench&Backfill,6'-8' 102 tF 3.00 276.00 59 Trench&Backmi,8'-10' :189 LF 4.00 756.00 60 Tnvneh&Backfill, i0'-12' 41."9 LF 5.00 2,095.00 61 Trc nch&BacMI, 12'-14' �� 6.00 0.00 62 Trach&Backfill,14-16' 09' 8.00 0.00 63 Trench&Baclfll, 16-18' 0 10.00 0A0 64 Trench&Backfill, 1$':20' 4 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Sperid trench '_ "521 LF 4.00 2,084.00 66 Weber k-. ,' i LS 71.48 71.48 67 Constrnctibu g ti I LS 517.66 517,66 68 Trac oontrol 1 LS 43.59 4159 69 Temporpry Wd1izcr,-jW and multi ,. 0.156 Ac 1,000.00 156.25 70.3+amponvyl W barner J fence) 2.20 LF 2?5 495.00 71,Temporary Slot B rrior Log) 110 Ll:{ 5.00 550.00 72 T-eemporary inlet sAAit =b (gmvel bags) 70 Lb 1.25 87,50 73 n _omy�enbuice 1.875 Tan 50.00 93.75 S1�Jl.lOTAL. $63"`8 ENCIDGM G&CONTINGENCIES 12,662.50 TEMP NU.M INMEST,BONDING&ISSUE 3165.62 TOTAL: $79,140.61 Petition No. [stand Prairie Addition to tlta City of Salim Prolirttirraa y Estimate of Sanitary Sewer Lnpyov=vW Laterals A' hem# _ Description Quentin+ Unit Unit Cost Extendon 1 Mobilization . . 1 L.S. 706.25 706.25 50 Server PipcHM 8" 690 Ll! 29.00 19,320.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 0. 0 25.00 0.00 52 Sewcr two,8"x 4" 0 Ea.;,: 75.00 0.00 53 Conned to Edff ag Saver,8" 0 Ea - 0.00 0.00 54 Staadwd Sanitary Sower Manhole 2 Ea 3, x00 6,400.00 55 Drop Manhole 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 56 Extra Depth Manbote 'il$ LF 200.00 3,60000 57 Trench&Backfill,0-0 194 LF 2.00 388.00 58 Tronch&BacMil,61-8' 119 LF 3.00 357.00 59 Tre wh&BaG1c511,r-10' 4!U7 LF 4.00 1,268.00 60 Trench&Bad&k 10'-12' 1 LF 5.00 40.00 61 Trench& ,12'-14' si,w 6.00 312.00 62 Trench&X11,14'-16' 0 LF 5.00 0.00 63 Trench&Backfil[,16-18' o 'LF 10.00 0.00 64 Tumch&BaAfllk 11'40' 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special trienehpo4 0 LF 4.00 0.00 66 Water "qty `�.; 1 L3 71.48 71.48 67 Consta m6n mWft 1 L3 517.66 517.66 68 Traffic cowl 1 LS 43.59 43.59 69 Tem"p•*hW=,-Need and mulch 0.156 Ac 1,000.00 156.25 79,TwPorpiYa bardetbW£ante} 220 LF 2.25 495.00 71 Temporary Slope parrier --- 1149) 110 LF 5.00 550.00 "7Z`'$`empmwy inlet saobnent barest(gravel bags) 70 Lb 1.25 87.50 73�raTry entrance L975 Tan 50.00 93.75 AL: $37,806.48 ENG24MMO&CONTINGENCIES 7,561.30 TEMP NOT%RG REST,BONDING&ISSUE 1,890.32 TOTAL: $47,258.11 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimai c of Sanitary Sewer Improvcm" Laterals B Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension I Mobilization 1 LS,,:1,412.50 1,412.30- 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 1,357 Ll� 28.00 37,996.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 6340 25.00 15,850.00 52 Sewerteea,8"x 4" Ea 75.00 1,650.00 53 Connectto.Existing Sewer,8" : 0 Ea X0.00 0.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 6 Ea 3MJW 19,200.00 55 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,40040 0.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 49 LF 200.00. 9;800.00 57 Trench&BaekSll,0-6' i LF 2.00 0.00 58'Bench&Baclr611,64' 200 LF 3.00 600.00 59 Trench&Backfill,8'--10' 155 LF 4.00 620.00 60 Trench&Backfill, 10'-12' . LP 5.00 1,030.00 61 Trench&Bacl&ill, 12=14' 243,JR 6.00 1,458.00 62 Trench&Bac&H, 14-16' 347 8.00 2,776.00 63 Trench&Backfill, W.18' 143 LF 10.00 1,430.00 64 Trench&Bscldill� '63 LF 12.00 756.00 65 Special trench `rripi; ,, (,242 LF 4.00 4,968.00 66 Water 1 LS 142.97 142.97 67 Canstrwctian sleki 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 68 Traffhc control ` ' 1 LS $7.19 87.19 69 Tempowy£c Wizer,"ed and mulch 0.313 Ac 1,000.00 312.50 79' pnporaryt sB barriei�( ,fe�noe) 440 LF 2.25 990.00 171 Temporary Slee finer(N6dqpadable Log) 220 LF 5.00 1,100.00 "72 Tempmry inlet sAgaent hard(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 73'1 arary caaratru ibe entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.54 SUS=TOTAL: 5103,576.97 ENG04WWMG&CONTINGENCIES 20,715.39 TEMP NM INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 51178.85 TOTAL. $129,471.21 Pewon No. Grand Prairie Addidom to the Cary of Salina Preliminary Esdnu&of Sanitary Sewer Improvements IaDDIals C hem 2mm Unit,JjkS Coat E ommom I Moliliadon 1 LS' IAU50 1.412.50 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 973 iF 28.00 27,744.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" X16 LE•, 25.00 400.00 52 Sower teal,8"x 4" t 2 Ea 75.00 150.00 53 Connect to RA $evm,8" d Ba 400,Q0 0.00 54 Stye Wm d Saattary Sewer Manhole 4 Ea 3,2do�*. 12,800.00 S5 Drop Manhole k 0 Ea 3,400.00.- 0.00 56 Extra Dcpth Manhole 22 LF 200.00 4,400.00 57 Trench&Badc611,0-6 153 LF 2.00 306.00 58 Trench&Backfill,6'-S' 134 LF 3.00 402.00 59 Trench&B=M.8'l �` LF 4.00 704.00 60 TMWA&Bark6ll,10'-12' IN, 5.00 645.00 61 Tmacb&Bac ll,12'-14' 145 1 6.00 870.00 62 Trench&Baddll, 14=16' . 236.4;F 8.00 1,888.00 63 Trench&Backfill, 1 18' r 6 LF 10.00 0.00 64"bench&Baff L it '. 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special WX 25 LF 4.00 10000 66 Water ":"; I LS 142.97 142.97 67 Coutniction.sWft 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 68 Tmflk aeWol ` I LS 87.19 87.19 69.i`e6lpbratq Maar,seal 4nd mulch 0.313 Ac 1,000.00 312.50 30 Temporary slopeUrrier{s *nce) 440 LF 2.25 990.00 'l-TCmporary Slopelt mer(Bi radable Lz* 220 LF 5.00 1,100.00 72'Wemporary inlet wd*nt bawler(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 73 Teitary construclhm entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 18750 SUB-�'1AL: $55,35197 ENGDMRW C>t&CONTINGENCIES 11,07039 TEMP NOt%WMUST,BONDING&1SSUE 2,767.60 TOTAL: $69,189.96 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition iv the City of Saliva Preliminary Estimate of Sauitwy Sewer Improvements Lateral$D low 4 Desmi tion 9TEftUnit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S�f 1412.50 1,412.50 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 809 LF $8.00 22,652.00 51 Sower service pipeline,4" 485 0 25.00 12,125.00 52 Sewerteea,8"x 4' .10 Ba 75,00 750.00 53 Comreet to HArting Sewer,8" •7 0 Ba X0.00 0.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole °. 2 Ea 3,29C.00 6,400.00 55 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,406,90° 0.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole '23 LF 200.00 5,000.00 57 Trench&Backfill,0-6' 11{4 LF 2.00 22$.00 58 Tranch&BwJM,6'-8' .41 LF 3.00 123.00 59 Trench&Ba�ill,8-10' ,°, 1 LF 4.00 364,00 60 Trench&BwAM, 10'-12' .;S3,jY 5.00 415.00 61 Trench&Bmc i11, 12'-14' 480 JR 6.00 2,880.00 62 Tmnch ilk Backfd1, 14'-16' 0 I rF 8.00 0,00 63 Trench&Backfill. 10-18' 0 `LF 10.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfill,IW,20' "'.-° 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special trend ', 813 LF 4.00 3,252.00 66 Water :``4 , 'F': 1 LS 142.97 14297 67 Coostnmer"iiWm Mg 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 68 T'raffiC e0utro1 .4 1 LS 87.19 87.19 69 Te pMy,*Wize4*W and muleh: 0.313 Ae 1,000.00 312.50 704_Tanporaq*p baL*r{*,*nce) 440 LF 2.2.5 990.00 '7.1 Tempot ary Slo Soyier[> d cable Lag) 220 LF 5.00 1,100.00 -7i'1T mporary inlet oumt barb (gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175'00 73'Vary oanstme0ba entr9ace 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.50 SU R40 TAL: '. $59,631.97 ENGINWWMG&C014TINGENCIES 11,926.39 TEMP NOT7,IAITE EST,BONDING&ISSUE 2L981_50 TOTAL: $74,539.96 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to*a City of Salina ft)FILY Owncrft Bloch 1 Lot i Comerstome Devda wwM Group,L.L.C. Lot 2 Comerstome Development ,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone DevelopmGlraap9 L.L.C. Lot 4 Comeratane Davelopribit oup,L.L.C. Lot 5 Cornersbome Devplppmetrt +aap,L.L.C. Lot 6 CowcaWme Dachpment nrqww,L.L.C. Lot 7 Comersta" Gtaup, 4-111.C. Lot 8 comerowe Develapume t Croup,L3,.C_ Lot 9 Cor 'w' Deve1hoent Croup,L.1:C. Lot 10 ComwffIWe3?evelqPiWGroup,L.L.G. Lot 11 Comerstomi*-Vopment Group,L.L.C. 1.an 12 C;omerswncmeat Group,L.L.C. Lot 13 Cgrnerskm D nt Group,L.L.C. Lot 14 tjowam Development Glroup,L.L.C. Lot 15 ' Coiripcvelopme�it Croup,L.L.C. Lot 16 Comer aeaat Group,L.L.C. Lot 17 Cqs D�moeirt Getup,L.L.C. Lot* Co aoo Deftlopment Gaup,L.L.C. 9 Com Dovalopmaat Group,L.L.C. Loth Com6pWe Development Gawp,L.L.C. Lot 21 Coigarstone Development Group,L.L.C. .1,422 O*nerst me Development Group,L.L.C, I*A3 Comena me Dcvckpmcut GmV,L.L.C. 1161'.- Comerstane Development Group,L.L.C, W25-- Corncnow Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 26 Comerskine Developnaeut Group,L.L.C. Lot 27 ComersGoaac Development Croup,L.L.C. Lot 28 Cornerstome Devekpmea Group,L.L.C. l[429 Comersh me Dmlopmmt Group,L.L.C. Lat 3U Cornersom Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 31 Comerstame Development Group,L.L.C. Block 2 Lot 1 Cornerstone Development Getup,L.L.C. Lot 2 Cornersbne Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone Develop xcM Group,L.L.C. Lot 4 Comerstone Developmnt Group,L.L.C. Lot 5 ComanWw Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 6 Comersiome D$velepmeut Group,L.L.C. Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 8 Cornerstone DevWopmant Gip,L.L.C. LA 9 Cornerstone Dmlopmeatbroup;L.L.C. Lot 10 Cornerstone Develot Group,L.L.C. Lott 11 Cornerstone Deve1�pma ,L.L.C. Lot 12 C.anaessbaaie vvA�atL.L.C. Lot 13 Comersbue loprnent Gr+ou . .,L.C. Lot 14 Comersto'4 Develop mat Group,�,,LZ. Lot 15 Comer pe Devel meat Group,L.L$C.. Lot 16 Comexwv!x.Develoomma Group,L.L,C, Lot 17 ComwomoDw.Wapmem Croup,L.L.C. Lot 19 Comersbne Group,L.L.C. Lot 19 Comentone Group,L.L.C. Lot 2D :�rabue Developi�i6at Group,L,L C. Lot 21 Cc ifidopw Davelopmlaet"Yltoup,L.L.C. Lot 22 "Omer loprp&Group,L.L.C. Lot 23 rpt&Ww ent Group,L.L.C. 14011 CiWerstwa DevOopment Group,L.L.C. W25 Corit�6 -Development Group,L.L.C. M4 Come Development Group,L.L.C. Lot�T. Cormnonc Deve4oprnent Group,L.L.C. Lot 28 Comiistme Development Group,L.L.C. ,Iloq9 Cftersmae Development Group,L.L.C. Lot,;-Q ' Comersbw Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 311. Comershma Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 32 Comerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 33 Comer fim Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 34 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 35 Comersbne Development Group,L.LC. 1406 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 37 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 38 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 39 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 40 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. .Lot 41 Comersbne Developareat Groep,L.L.C. Lot 42 Comer==Development Croup,L.L.C. Lot 43 Comersbne Development Group,L.L.C. F Q 49C9cY'nC9Cii, cm+lc* M[m*� cm*tM � chMm9nRn in Vimvi (leiLn �m nln O1� �S 01 O1 t710�5R0�40�fa4i Of Or Of G1 Q1 p1-L T01 01 ,a cc V;elf ri'NNNe'3'3 in ieici C4 i f �1 OP OpOo0 0al v] � $! G 1q1 �C1V0Y+an +A +� 1c11Qi1Qi1�r, m■rf 1n vx of wl Vf rr~ t— t– nt– ri► t► t. r.r � c► Wi 0,4 -�o,ao, o, oao,00aggogqocg,oq, ...1r 44 'AA vkpqpC� SQQ vaoi -Nn+oar} ON! 1.0- wbo .°� Ono %oar, Go fA M Slf Mdf ltS L�If R�'r�jj m I g M .•-� ..� J1 .-� .ti .r .� .y air r.+ .� ,a .r .� i�.� � .-e.-i.-i�.i►-i.moi'+i�i ri}�� .� ►�'wi�.w .-i.-i.�r?-i.-i.��-i.-i MIN 444mmm m �m m ri'+n m m m m me*i' C� C+ C� C� of 611 R .' '4's; S�311 m V%-Ni, n on,,1,-'a 11i 4i vi h Ui V1 VI V1 vri U% tri 611 v1: kn 11'i on�ri 0 % 1f'f' �+ ot'tl ono ot'D awe anb at'a et'o oF'6 �o �o Sa �o So �'a Y,1 Y1 111 YI 41 1A 4'! ,A V1 1A V1 V1 Y'1 Y1 N N N V1 IA1R 11�v4� 14 Iq IQ 'qq%q]�1,"R q IQ 1Q v� �1{%q � 1Q�y�R]y{,1vD�►O �11b��D h01O101 '1tl- 1�22U10'1d' 1�- �AAryC*I' II- qR IC s oa t' [� " g, ot, %� , c4W r-4 r,Vn9IWAOC.00vaw, , .P�, e4 11 i9 N 0U9 iA R9 n5 t9 ifJ ri4 iR i9 4J M wi in wi Rn If, al Tq N[T CIA O101 ; F" � OGv Az+,7a.7iziziziz+ z+ x+ fzz Fuzz z+zz 4l lrl VS Vl kIj +� v? '�3 � � P P�Q OXY t75 Clt rh QAS� Get,attt . O. . ppp000 o vC7,C Grp=.-i.-i.--�,--�r ^.' 'pp-pp' .•r ep i x zzzzzxxzzzzxzxxzzzz mm4nm 1*1 + m 41 m is C 4,41% ;1aft r.% V.4%mqqeq 00 ee M 00 Ob a0 Ge oe 06 Ce OD m eo eo 00 rfi 40 Oa in n n m w'1 Yf m•'Ifs f -rf kr9 �Y!Vf vY`•.�$dR7 ii, in kn L �gn �eY vf. ':.-r.+i�ti r .•-i .•i r-i.•-i r�ri r+.-i r-i.�;iw�wK ri i'��±i� �--i.-i r��.-i.-i cryi, c�yfi � mrrirr VKer ri fe rnmm etT�+f�" � a vvv k rnnvan w u, �nu� Wn YMgn •r� nnuti � n • +n hn o o+ a o, a enema, otaoto, vwo+ o± v� � r' oaa~v±°1 �+' 'a+' In WI VIbA � tri �tri � � nn� w � v�, tA. seri% 1106 ao 6EEEa koo� oe ee w -rooa, Doog€`o, rr.., `n4•nq "R ina, A �3 ts t � � zzn� zzzzzxzzzzxxzzxxz WL Go Do 00 Cl Cl Cli R I.WC �p ✓imvi�nvlm tri utivs .n m mrimasmm m m m mmrri m m m Mm n A R N �v en .r'�r 11 4f`yd r� Wdt .w. r �e 1pO ti Cq C4 w c00000i 4G4444WA 4ft1 Go zzzzxzzzzzzzzxzzxzx . zzzzxxzzxz*'zsr.zxzzzA R�1 +"1 I F r'i,S"i.K t!e^a3 4� WL�!. - t atp � iprcow i +oQQonvosi rani,�ool °°�i, °pt �ii �°�i °p �r[~7aS K fry IY}lei m {�(� to tQf M cdn �+'�t tart 9 9 � ,:� '•: Vu r � ,.+ .. .-+ ...�r-r .w .r .A.—e r+ w+ ►+ .r.mac i:. r. •.i.—i.�.�n r+.r ri.—i� ri .+�w!w ri r+.r �•rr zzzxzzzzzzxzxzzzzzZI M on No a� a. aore. ao► aaaa� aaa mrhM � m mt*a �1MFiMM MmtnMmsrt erJ �O 01 N b ry fi t r Rt� 1� Start of Loral A t ft kk 413 Jia x P a io '1 ,: ut01.4 L yy ■ CRT or"MAI"You A VF LJS 40D p m. Ile Chy C mmbmim aoamad at 3A5 pan.in a 8ludy Saadaa lbr a Cl" Open Fa , 7ha MwftwMBomdufuasoelledi6adxet4cODpm.imRaoml97,C3W- CmMWDdWb&A=UmffvmbimhDmWbyftPhdpofAS*mmda==Wofd=oL TlaaaMteplSSM- .. Ca=bdow7kwAqim OmymisataaerNoewnm 7e�r Ceuwdmk erAa Pxk gq�i1D a gaanm ayfhs 8omdf a6o pneeeaf� ,CbyA%oniqY L%sAne»bey,«4'Clwk I Abased: Name Noes, AWMN-PSOCLAWATIOM Naue. ' )M[lil uc HRAR1Nm AND 1'!'1 MBICHMOMUMPMACSRTAINTM Nona CO1Wl "ASA I (6.1) AWw Owe mi w*m dWuwmmbw Z,2009 (6m Rammicallo 0946"13mdappmdmdcnfDMWroa&WwAJbrLie employcat wi9r dye t3iyof l�Ifaa$wwm�, �9d9 to Nareowbex f�2DD9. r 09-70 Moved by Q=Wmb ar Awpioe,ap000ded by Co=Wmimw kmb*,to app m do aoeeoef mycmk as pmmmted. Ayw:( , Ne4':i01. M0dwoei", ��BUNN= (7.1) Aocspf�o�u6iltyhiwalaaSe Nraaat dediaadoau n<Bloek 5 afie t�lr6aedow� > Addilta� DmAnkew DxmaaoofP#,m bq.cgieiaedtbed@dcs im 16 Andrunagwndedw edr Atploe's as ivhcther tlhl�nw wowdd be a�'tpaee daae. Q4-7ffi Mwmdby Cm ww Pack madWW by Coumduiom Ampg eo amp do offmea i tllilyl&Wm a a omm dada Wm in No*,N of dye Qma mamdam wee Addkk m. Aye;(f?r Nay:(0). Nofioe caerW AUMBUfliATI ON (6.1) Second noftg odkom No,IM IOS21 bevyft Bobew b*wmm mi DiNdAfta No.l amici Sees hff 201a PW i malas Add=A Ianbm repaRlOd ON Md4W Na 09. MI' mm pmned am*9 tooft on Nay=bu 2,2489 mti dmme bd time no 000Wmmofm b m bema wodvmL. 09.7828 Uwmd bP Cemmimiiww Agj*L 4mamded by CwmbdmwP%uk to adopt Oedlmmooa i Na.09`10521 on ummmdmmdb&A wl omff*w tdm Ayec Ae AOlom,Jmatda�,Peo)<. • Lamm, NW.(0), MONm nub& I j (R,2)• AwW ofoomM atlbtda WmkmiiwPm*B MioandWhObAm at PUMP 8mionNox I 10 Ood 9S,Prq�eot Na�I:P�. ' � Mutha'�eloe�D�acOaro�'1Jtilitie�,at�i�adtitep�ec�,6fi�w�oaiwd,aadl�dloB]oda. TadoerierpaodedbM�Ia�agaartban �eagpVedse�Me�a�bu�eeed fbr8repeq� . 0967829 Moved by Cmededom AMA io=M by Cawmd die � gugo l br tbt W P®p 8tahbn RdAWIii Wm at Pmmp ftfm m N L 10mad 38 to Saaky HMS LLC Jmdm m wWd$16k?IS. Aye:(4 NW(% Motiono■tbd. � (8.3) Amdofea■lesatlhrdmWdWTCNI=ntPhWgo ftBadneBdmbMokc,P Na.094779 Mmt&a D O%DkeOW of 1[]VilidmM, do ptdsA W6 mdv4 and p Fus" WL TWw gw n dGM M bm PWmft Compm W bdrrlO"m&*bid and#btIll I 6*bbd bamd. f �• Ad�artonsoliowed6atlM�M�Le�aandldLl� tbaimpo�paaaM i;fG a�gbdaumoy mmmi vrerle vrim�r. 09.7830 iMmedbyaaamieMooaPbd�.eaonaeabycanAepim�taad�eoaedsaoat 6orffie+1f1�er7�tu�tPls� ae�rfma�babNp.a9�ri9ioc�f,mas iaa�a emmmtof$17MV.-AjW ft Nw.{ eazried. Ra1�.09-6�5 �eadvnebiN,yaeda�ti�ionofi�ubrm do aapd PON@ ad No.094EM I die dW 30 MEOW 0 hqw mneet Ddb DirdopmW ABwmwd wilds Dotasiam!DrAbV mint. I�1b6adSeLt�,>Qepu�►CitY �i � mPm.pCded 1 • 1Fkw@ depdopasaa gp=mOK mnd fi=AW Wimmm ibm 6w,rcumpor.&Klk d coy i3ftff fr dmmir wadL 09LL783t MwWbytmabio AMeLmAomWbyCommiml mwAWklieedoptRaoiOm Na.~,'L AW(A NW.(0). Motlan Co" X7832 Moved by Amy msamded by Cmmmbmmw kmmb*% to "dap MWAUtiom No.0!1.6676. Aax M Nay:(d}. Mcdom mmied. (LS) Rmep"hr=aid =Wm 0084 W703 MmvedbyD mmbmioae ?Wk,ma ooMbyC=mddm Aginitotemes Mom=Wm eemeiom Avr7AmiOmtealadleawwMhiaBal a � ����� Ilse man dmd poblio dimmnmdom aftboem mpmttmdm vmou�ld vdve daepelsNism and odrer1*0 Ot 04 CWS b*md in die mmlem mmdt maomvmm mt 4:47 Pm Am M »(0} M miam aareliaL ' 'iLaG`i�0a�amaminimmnevaeadimtv�ma�tivomaRammt437�t.mdmowivemmdat+4:S3 pps.No actiem vmm tdoeia_ OTHFABUSMM Nw. Pap 2 k Q9�-783 Moved by Cie Audi. oconamrx by Ca Po*,ied Ge Radu Mnaft of ft Board of Qmmedoe be oemed. Ap M Nw.(off Motion coded. Tm a*vmwMPJL C1 A71 i Lice Ado Prey►.L'M�.ow c3mk f i t i 1 i i i i ftPa3 s CITY OF SALIVA (19) �(8) REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION MM IN � s 4: . N AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL; ITEM DEPARTMENT OF BY ITEM NO: 4 PUBLIC WORKS FIN APP AL: PopI By, DanW R_Shwk sy- Resolution No. is-7,3g4 Approval of(1) Petition No 4385, (2) Advlsabilfty and Authortzatlon Resolution No. 16-7394 and (3) Improvement i?Istrict Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Comerstone Development Group, LLC for a special Improvement district fbr water, sanitary ewer, streel, and drainage improvements In Grand Praaide Addition. Phase II. BACBROUNQ: On August 22, 2016, the City Commission approved Petition No. 4382 requesting certain stniet, drainage, water,and sanitary sewer improvements, authorized dteff to nW8e the Improvement District Development Agreement YM Cornerstone Development Group, RLC (Developer)and bring It back for action at the same time as the Resolution of Advisability. This approval was based on the Phase tl special assessments being set at 80%due to "...curvilinear streets and incluslon of a privately funded art piece in a place where it can be seen by the public." D+raBing and dlecussfon of the proposed Development Agreement with the Developer resulted In multiple postponements. On September 19, the City Commission voted to postpone action on this item and directed SWIT to amend the terns of the development agreement related to warranties and performance bonds. Action Was again postponed on October 3 and E3ctob t 17 to rantlfinalize this language. However,the Developer elected not to pursue the private funding approach and lin,October 24, the City Commission postponed action on the Revolution of Advisability and directed staff to revise the documents th redact City procurement per Resolution 13-7455 and bring them all bank at a later date. The attached Petition No. 4386, engineering and feasibility report, advisability and authorization resolution, and development agreer nt noon► reflect the updated estimates and related 20% cash deposit by the duper with terms further oudlned below. EN"N In the revised approach the Developer will deposit an amount equal to twenty percent of the estimated project cost of$561,642.10 at the outset. As per the development agreement, If the total project cost veere to exceed the estimated project coK the developer`shall pay to the City the amount of any such excess to the City within 24 days of reoelpt of an Invofos from the City for Brach excess pn*d Casa,, Conversely, "lf the total actual Project Cost Is lase than$576,482.19(as determined by the Ordinance levying assessments against the improvement District),there the City shall refund any of the Developer oontrlbution paid pursuant to Paragraph 1.1 above in excess of an amount that Is equal to 20% of such total aril Project Cost, with such amounts refunded to the Developer within 20 days of the City's adoption of the Ordinance levying the assessments against the Improvement District.• Eighty percent of the estimated 0081A of are to be assessed agairot the Improvement district, with a per lot assersernent projected to be $26,430.22. These lots were originally assessed $11,053.77 for part of the work done in 2011 for Phase I of the subdivision.This project will be financed through long tern bonds to be Issued In 2017. Property owner; will have the opportunity to pay the essesunent In cult edor to the bond Isere. if the elect not to do so the assessment plus related interest costs will be CITY OF SAUNA REOUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION ATE M9 12fl o/l a 4:W P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATM DEPARTMENT: FISCAL APPROVAL: NO: DEPARTMENT OF 13Y.- ITEM Y:ITEM PUBLIC WORKS FINAL APPROVAL: look ftp 2 BY: Denial R.Stock BY: spread over 15 years in equal annue-1-Ins—tallments. 0010FORMANCE WITH S pLA • Goal 3. The City will provide the highest quality of services, consistent with governing body direction, available resource and staff Commitment to quality. REC SNDA Staff has IdentPfied the following options and recommends option 1. 1. Approve(1) Petition No 4385,(2)Advisability and AutlhorbZatlon Resolution No. 15-1904 and (3) Improvement Dlstriat Development Agreement for a special improvement district for water, sanitary sewer, street, and drafhage Improvements in Grand Prairie Addition, Phase It. 2. Do not approve these documents and give staff further direction. ABachmerft:Petition No. 4365 Engineerings and Feasbillty Report Resolution No. 16-1394 Improvement District Development Agreement cc: William E. Sheppard dba Cornerstone Development Group, LI-C wtv clerk's omm Flied PhlrTl'MON TO TRE GOVMMQ BOD'OF TIB CITY OF NMMA,KA[MM We,We=dwd5w4 acme,of v l nd tdpr pu*braatad vv so Ch►of hla&U1,Katt (66 wCk ''")do bmWW"Wedb*roqowt G*fm Gamid"body eZ do Cky ere@le wd deehga 69 eel huprovenuat dhald fm foe porpm of mahbg t, hWwmgnb is on man Wpm waved by K.hlrA.j24k 1,at aal. L The SONOW mrtar a of&e prepoeed hoprovasaft are m s The mb, PVar, 1mmment ed pkftg for apgencorimakay I,rM lineW fec of Drive Ok-Sbw hVwvemeb"� T1ua hwtektlan ofair 56 liWW hd of NUM em wp%mW and all eppttrWnwa fiwrdo�ft"Dmicp bV*,.,., • 'w mom of qvxzumty 49 HmW that of aix inch order mm% fm k*=U,vahve.attqp.a rdw oamneeum flu gamer!bees and all waftmm t (tea"WSW gym=Ympmve mu-). The mom of fly 1.166 llnael hd of awn4mb; mmimy surer MIK eerlim 0=0060nr foc www lbak menholee,and all qwmtamm 2mb (&"ipantmySom ( voly,tlb %" OMM s') 3 1~. Tyre aflo�d�ptobabl!�of the�pq�pee�e hi: � Five -Ow Tbou=d Ills HradmdForW-Taro Dollar o d Nbmbaem Cams($3614C.19) 3. The edea!a[ifra praped h�dbfrkt fo h�e+eHmeed Loft 7 the 17 ltd lA*38 tlrrnuglt 43, Blodt 2, all im the [amend PmhimAdMom,City Of Swismi sdim cmgl xmm 4. 7U pr+opaeed armed of■ommod dwR bee Fath lot is the hraproveowd Diskim 40 be anomod a p al[y pw hot dor amb of the Mdmu Iuvrovmom!NL 5, 7w propomd oppordamaot of art bet"=thke Ian Dfetrk!MA than C j one Iam&m pemum(Iowa)oftlmtodd cost offig bwwmuonu eleall be eek to than 17bbtt end no pedant of ooeb dmg bg paid fi►do Ckyat LmVL NAS MAY NOT BZ DZAWw room Tnz PR?nwN SY Tm smaum TMERBOF APT $TM RM t~[t CONBM$RATWN OF T=PXTMW ORI ATBR MAN (7)DAT8 Arr=MMG OFTHS PsTrnm NITS 72M Iffy CIS OCLuRS ran. Tic pet d0m 00*,Daft Oats,*saw hmm f=NW iWome in aay peoparty with deft epode awm mwd awwbomwubfndwdwdsauoL CSTON&SMT GO ILC IA& fZ44— —04001", a - pos6owlw— Wldia■i S Pm—ml# iF,GkL DSL @l 1T OF PROPZRTY OWrMD WrIMM T93 PROPOMM namovElAENrmwwmm LAb7Qm9hJA L U 14SWOU0 X7 odLala 37 lis, gb436Xkw&2jGmdPr*b Add OS,alt in the My of 8ada k BmDw Comdr,Ratoeaa. STATS OF SAN ) CATHY BOLL $AXRM COMM ) +P.M -ttmof 141I� M �M 16 do um6nWwd7l`OWy Pa hwft a zdtr Gg be ra Waft abne is opubm o d tint Sh dommoot wa alined bWmv mean dds _aw of NORM Pebi 2 PwHMiMrY FmOmming Report Petition No.4385 Graad h"Addition P}m Ii Utility,Stns.and Dmi.=I a hopmcntg Fila No.0155 Dcc=ber 2016 6 ,; IV ' 4 Wayne E.Nebon)PR i This Page Intentionally Left Bunk i i i a 1 Y Petition 4.382 Grand Prairie Addition Phase Il am OF 8 The curb, Vetter, pavement and grading for appraxiaaately 1,470 lineal feet of Bentgram Drive Obe "Street Impmvemer"�ts"). The ietstallatian of app=imamtely 56 lineal feeet of storm aevrer piper iaaile%and all appurtenanoes thereto (the"Drainago Improve menbl). The installation of apprmxim4tely 49 lineal dart of six-inch water main, tine hy&ants, valves, fi#kinim servioe onneotiorts for water lines and all appuitenanres ffim to(the"Water System Improvements'). The installation of approximately 1,165 lineal fbd of eight hunt sanitary sewer nN ia,service mmootions for sewer lines,manholes,and all appo rtenanm thereto(the"Sanitary Sewer Improvements"). (Collectively,tlae"knpmveme:nts"), DENNIT DISTRICT Lots 7 through 17 and Lots 38 Waugh 43,Bkck 2,all in the:Grand Prairie Addition,City of Salina,Saline County,Kansas. s i (the"Improvestaeset 1?istrW}. OFAISESS 7W assessment with accreted irrtenest to be levied as a special assessmexet in upon the pmpedty igerhww with the be neflt district ooncrtrr& with the; general pmpeity tact and shall be payable in flA= cqual antral installments. Each pared in the finpmement District WWI be assessed equally per lot for costs of the various Improve5mews benefitting such tat as described under the beading Apportimm nt of Cast below. c S ! Eighty lit(80%)of the total cost of im � twenty pe�cemt(2Qeyo)sbrall be paid by the:d��shall be assessed to the Isupmvemcat District,Large. � perr(s)and no portion of costs shall be paid by the City at i E i 3 Petition 4382 Grand Prairie Ad btima Phase B Cast of Irnprovemcats Item Rena Unit Unit Cost Extension I Mobilia d(m 1 LS 1,650.00 11650,00 2 Clearing and drubbing 1 LS 2,250.00 2,250.00 3 Strom gnKft 5,858 SY 3.40 19,917.20 4 Ball of Curb and Gutter 4,677 8Y 1.00 4,677.00 5 Connect to Faokft met 0 Ea 950.00 0.00 6 Storm Pipe, 18"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 7 Curb&Gutter,Sidewallm&6 Ramps 1 LS 58,115.00 58,115.00 S Sail stabilization,8°fly ash(15%) 5,858 SY 6.50 38,077.00 9 Asphalt Pavement S" 44b8 Tions 37AS 171,071.60 10 6"wow Main 0 LF 0.00 0.00 11 Fine hydrant&valve sswmbly 3 IF 5,000.00 15,000.00 12 Cmpxxtion step.l" 9 LF $70.00 5,130.00 13 Curb shutoff valve&box, 1" 9 VA 1,100.00 91900.00 14 Water.Seavloo line,In 300 He 33.00 9,900.00 I5 Cmrporation$top,Ifs" 8 Ea 25.00 200_Ii0 16 Wye,I Apo 4 Fa 1,300.00 3.200.00 17 Water Service Line, I%a 17.2 IF 35.50 4,331.00 � 18 Sanitary Sewer PtwHw$" 1,261 LF 42.00 52,962.00 1 19 Sanitary Sewer Pipeline 4" 475 LF 33.00 13.67300 20 Sewer tees S"x 4` I7 Na 96.00 1,637!.00 21 Connect to Exisft Sewer,$" 1 Ba 265.00 265.00 22 Connect to Bxisting Maw S" 0 Fa 300.00 0.00 23 Standard Sanitary Seam Manhole 4 Ea 8,500.00 34,000.00 24 Extra Depth Manhole 0 LF 300.00 0.00 25 Trench&Backfill,6-8 0 LF 2.00 0.00 26 Trench&Backfill,8-10 0 IF 3.00 0.00 27 7WWh&BachAll,I N12 0 IF 6.00 0.00 28 Tench&H4,ckfHl, 12-14 0 LF $.00 0.00 29 Trench&Baddill,14.16 0 LF 30.00 0,00 30 Silt fierce 2,000 EF 1.50 31000.00 31 Inlet pion 4 Ea 150.00 600 .00 32 Temporary om*n edn en uw@ I L5 2,750.00 2,750.00 J 33 Tempoasay seeding 1 LS 2,600.00 2,600.00 €I _ 34 Construction Stal°a ..._ I L3 7,450.00 7,450.00 ! Subtotal $466,352.8D' Contingency(5'Yo) 23,317.64 Developer's Intered 30,000.00 City Fxperims 12-WI(d)(5%) 23,317.64 Inst,Botkdiing A low(4%) 10,654.11 Total $561,642.19 ' i 4 ftdtion 4382 Grand Prvairie Addition Phase 11 Cost of{general Iteral Item# item usnti Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization I IS 1,650.00 1,650.00 2 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 2,250.00 2,250,00 3 Stmt Bmf 5,858 SY 3.40 14,91710 4 BarJill of Curb and Gutter __ 4,677 - SY„1.00 4,077.00 Subtotal Generd Items $28,494.20 Contmvncy(5%) 1,424.71 Dmdoper'"s Inte mK 3,750 00 City Expenses 12-6aOI (d)(5%) 1,424.71 lnter+est,Handmg&is$ua 1,139.77 Total $36,233.39 1 COSI of Sbvd and Storm Impmements I( Item# _ — item Quaattity Unit Unit Coat Extension 5 Conned to Mstigg bm 0 Ea 950.00 0.00 6 Storm Pipe, 18”RCP 0 Ll' 60.00 0.00 7 Curb and Gutter,Sidewallm&6 Ramps l LS 58,115.00 58,115.00 8 Soil stabilization,S"fly ash(15%) 5,858 SY 6.50 38,077.00 _- 9 ASM_Pavewnt 8" !J68 Tau 37A5 171.3071.50 Subtotal Stry d&Storm $267,263.60 ContbWncy(5i0A) 13,363.18 Developces Interest 7,500.00 City l3xpe:ases 12 6a01 (d)($96) 13,363.18 Intcmma4 Banding&Issue 10,690.54 Total $312,180.50 l 1 3 Mtion 4382 Grand Prairie Addition Phase H Coat of Water Imp waments Item# it Unit Unit Cost fttengon 14 6"Water Main LF 0.00 $0.00 I 1 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 3 LF 5,000.40 15,000,00 12 Corporation atop,1" 9 LF 570.00 5,134.00 13 Curb shWoff volve&box, l" 9 FIR 1,144.00 9,900.00 14 Water Service Lin% I n 300 Ea 33.00 9,9,000.00 15 Corpo ration stc ,1.+" 8 Ba 25.00 2/00.0 0 16 Wye, I%n 4 Ea 11300.44 5,200.04 17 Water E20ov 1% 122 LF 35.50 4,331.00 Subtotal Water Mak 84901.00 cozq(5%) 7,483.05 Aavelopses latmmt 7,5011.00 City Expenses 12.6aO1 (d)(5%) 2483.05 Interest,Bomling a Iasne 1,986.44 Total SM,113.54 i i i R 6 Petition 4382 Grand Pram Addition Phase II Cost of Sanitary Sewer hnprovements .item# item anti Unit Uin."st Cost Extension 18 Sanitary Sewer Pipeline 8" 1,261 LF 42.00 $52,962.00 19 Sanitary Sewer Reline 41, 475 LF 33.00 $15,675.00 20 Sewer teas,O"x 46 17 Ea 96.00 $I,632.00 21 Sewer wye,8"x 4" 1 La 265.00 $265.00 22 Connect to Existing Manhole,8,, Fa 300.00 $0.00 23 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 lis 9,500.00 $34,000.00 24 Extra Depth Manhole LF 300.00 $0.00 25 Trench&Baddill,6-9 LF 2.00 $0.40 26 Tnert h&Backfill,8-10 IF 3.00 50.00 27 Trench&Backfill, 10-12 LF 6.00 $0.00 28 Trewl&Backfill, 12-14 LF 8.00 $0.00 29 Trench&Bwj&lj 14-16 LF 1000 SOHO Subtotal Sanitary Sewer $104,534.00 Contingency(5%) 5,226.70 Developert Intent 7,500.00 City Expemm 12-WI (d)(5%) 5,226.70 Interest,Handing&Issue 4,181._36 Tote1 $126,668.76 Cost of Miscellanvous Items Unit Item# item Quantity Unit Cost $xtension 30 Stilt fame 20M LF 1.50 3,000.00 ! 31 Inlet protection 4 Ea 150.00 60000 32 Temporary construction entrance I LS 2,750.00 2,750.00 33 Temporary seeding 1 LS 2,600.00 2,600.00 34 Construction 1 LS 7 460.00 57 464.00 SubtaW Miscellancous $16,40x.00 Contingency(5%) 820.00 De:velopees]merest 3,750.00 City Expe nsca 12-W I (d)(5%) 820.00 htmst,Bonding&3saue 656.00 Total $22,446.00 E k 1 7 Petition 43$2 Grand Prairie AMC=Phase 19 ftVertyOwnwwp Grand Prairie Addition pmpwty owner Block 2 Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,LLc Lot 0 Cornenatone Development Group,LLC Lot 9 Cornewtow Development Group,LLC Lot 10 Catrnerstons DaWopment Group.LLC Lot 11 Stephan R Renich Trust Lot 12 Stophcn B.Rcmch Trust Lot 13 Stepban R Rccaich That Lot 14 COMMtona Dcvdop=t Group,LLC Lot 15 ane Dn elopment Group.LLC Lot 15 Cuae Development Group,LLC Lot 17 Comewtone Dav+alopn=t Group,LLC LAX 37 Comemtona Dovelopwnt Grnop,LLC Lot 38 Cornerstone Develgm=Group,LLC Lot.39 Camentone Dav+d q ment GrouA LLC Lot 40 Comeratone Developmant GroW,LLC Lat 4l Cornentane Development Group,ILC Lot 42 Coraw t ee Devckpm,aa CroaA LLC Lot 43 Camastone Dcydommm �L I s a r 1 B Petiticm.4382 Grand Pmi+rie Addithm Plmw 11 DiAnNdion of Cost Block 2 Water 5s Stmt Storm Genera! Mies 'Tot d Lot 7 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot S 3,017.11 5.960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 9 3,017.11 S,9b0,88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705,10 1,0556.28 $26,430.22 !rot 10 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.2.8 $.26,430.22 Lot 11 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,055.28 M6,430.22 Lot 12 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056,28 $26,430.22 Lot 13 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.55 0.00 1,703.10 1.056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 14 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 15 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 16 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,036.28 $26,430.22 Lot 17 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,70510 1,056.28 U4430.22 Loi 37 Platted Open 3paoe&DIU BasumW Platted Open SpEwe&DVU Txaaomcnt Loi 38 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Let 39 3,0I7.11 5.960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 40 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 526,430.22 � Lot 41 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.55 0.00 1,705.10 1,036.28 $26,430.22 Lot 42 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 D.00 1,7055.10 1,056.28 $26,430.22 Lot 43 3,017.11 5,960.88 14,690.85 0.00 1,705.10 1,056.28 $2.6,430.22 Tota] $51,290.83 $101,335.01 $249,744.40 $0.00 $28,986.71 $17,456.80 $449,313.75 s i''Mc vaium in Chet ditAoue rd1ws Etre 0%ofdw total value of the io&vidtW improv to cOvided by dte number of buildable � late in the benefit district. i t 9 ,(Published in the Salina Journsl on_a Rti RESOLUTION NUMBER 16-7394 A RESOLUTION WTI'JING FORTS FINDINGS AND DETERKMATIONS OF TM GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS ON TIIE ADVISAHS.I'I'Y OF AND AUMORXUNG TSE CONSTRUMON OF CERTAIN AZPROVEMMM PURSUANT TO ILLA.1T4woi et sef VAN-REM,a petition was filed with t1ie City Clak for the City of Salina,Kansaa(thr 'Vitt')on Deeamba S. 2016, proposing certain iniPMV0 tants pursuant to K.S.A. I2-Wl et seq. (the"Petition);and MMUAS,the POW=sets forth: (a)the ge M'd nWM of the proposed impro (b) the estim ded w probable cost of the proposed iaTro ts;(c)the extent of the, ps apowd 1"Wro ement district to be Offimsed for the coat of dw p+opoap laments; (d) the pro pwW matltod of areessoneat;(e)dm p Wood apporq,a =w of the cost bo vem the improvement district and the City at]atge;and(1)a request that grad►frrepcovei MU be made without notice and heaft as rewired by K.S.A.12-baK*and WHMEAS, the owners of record of 82% the property liable to be assessed under the Petition have signed the Petition;wid WBMRAS,no upstut+es have beam withdrawn f mire the peptics►before the Gov emmg Body began oars idenstion of the Petition;and � W=RX4A K.S.A. 12-604 provides that the Governing Hedy may stithoa'iae and order Public hDPVVWMW without w0ce and baring after a petition has been filen;and WHERXA% the Pmnwg body bas reviewed ad msidered the Pnelttnhwy t H4Weeni1Lg Bstimata and Fbaalbility Report psap=W by the City Sxtg ner and Mmes wltii the conclusions set f vb d wain. NOW 1 LMRW,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVF. M'qG BODY OF TISK CITY OF SALINA.KANSAS,AS FOLLOWS.- Sieedgn I. The OuvKning Body hereby in& that the Petition is Kdfimknt„ and + further finds and dcknnia=that it is necessary and advisable to MWM the following imPmve (a) The nature O'thc improvements areas follows: Tate cud. Sutra'. pavement NDd RMADS for aRMArnately 1,070 H aal font of Bentgrass Drive(the"Street Improvamene), The fnatallati"i of ap mdmately 56 lineal of Storm sower pipe, inlets, and all APPwftmwmthawo(the"Drainage lrnpniveme&a , f Tia insteps im of sppnoximatoly 49 lineal fid of six-inch water mains, $gg hydrask valvm. fitting, sMicc oaanocbm for water lfszes and all appurteaanoes tlnemo(the"Water Bystam Improvements''). 1 i The installation of apprvxitately 1,163 lineal feet of eightrincb sanitary sewer main, service corwActions for sewer lines, manholes, and all appurtenances thereto(the"Sanitary Sewer Improvements"). (collectively,the"Improvwnents"). (b) The estimated cost of the Improvennents is: Five Hundred Sixty-One Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Two Dollars and Nineteen gents($561,642.19. (e) The boundaries of the improverneut district to be assessed ere: Lots 7 tlmgh 17 and Lots 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,City of Salina,Saline County,Kansas. (Collectively,the"b*wYaurent District"). (d) The apporbonment of cost between the Improveanmt District and the city at kW is: Eighty percent(80%)of the total cost of improvements dO be assessed to the Improvement District, twenty p (M) shall be paid by the developer(s) prior to the City commencing corutraction of the s Improvements and no portion of casts shall be paid.by the City at Large. € (e) The method of assessment against property within the improvcment District shall be equally per lot against all lots within the Impmv ement District. Section 2. The Govmmg Body hereby declares that the Improvements deam*a in this Resolution are:necessary,and odx rimes them to be made in accordance with the Petition and the findings set f,w&in than Resolution,and fwther authorizes the levying of asses and the issuance of bands dmvf m(upon the satisktion of certain conditions set math in the Development Ap mint described in Section.4 of this Resolution),all in scomdance with K.S.A. 12-ta01 et seg.. r t Section 3. 'The City wWm to rooks capital apenditur+es framr and after the date of this Rraoktion,m wanection wkh ft Impmvwnuts described haeft and intervals to reimbnr^se it$elf for such eacpendatmm with the pmooeds of one or more series of genera]obligation bonds and temporary notes of the City in the maximum principal amount of$561,642.14. 8eeflon 4. That cartain Development Agrement between Cormrstone Development(Troup,LLC and the City is hereby approved in mibstantudly the form presented to the governing body on this date. The Mayor is sutharized to axecute the Dvvekgwaent Agreement on behalf of the City,and the Mayor,Clark and other City staff are authorized to take such f'irrther actions as necesmry to carry out the transactions ao Vx*lated thereby. Section S. The City Clerk gall file s cartified copy of this Resohaw with the Register of Deeds of Saline County,Kamm. 2 swilm& This Resohttion shall tale effect after its pammp and pubHoWm once is the offieW city newspaper. ADOP1119D AND PAB$XD inns day of .2016. (SEAL) Kerr Crawford,Mayor Shendi L Wicks,City Clak i a F i F 3 DWELAMIENT ACx JUENENT This Dervelopnmt Agra hent(the '°Agaemea dated aB of Ramba 19. 2016, by and between *a City of gdbu4 Kann (%o "CW% and tae Development Gkmp, LM,it Klmm lbdW lisbality cumpm y(the"DWMIWWs RRA%on pgngjw 1 ,2016,to Dmdopar fled with tm Cly(Teak Petit oo No. 4M( :T ll phttsuaft to 1C..8.A, 12-6a01 et seg.(tha"Ad- and WHEREAS,the Pates requdsta Ma ate City sasses Me linFaymeat Diets*crostxt tb,a Loapsnvement� mm%e-costs ffievd against do Impmweand Dirb ict(dl as drfiaed in the Patition),and issrws&a C a mml obligadm bands to ire the casts of ft Wd WRERXAA the(qty has pfd dw Pte►Bq*=mg and Fessibilfty Repast(the eadbllfdy a+eiated to#two Ihn11 ory ;and WEMRU4 on gaaamber 19 2016,the City's adopted Resolution No. 16-2M which eroded the I Vmmmmt DMiot and mAwrjzed the ACE-alim%ommentm to be Constructed in acoabnce with fim terms offln Petition and upon ss Wholion of ceaWn condWons set brih in $riff!fit(the"AdvbabMW Rmaludom"};sad WH EREA,%as a coo dWm to the City eoalati*the ftFuVlmenh6 the Developer mW liusush fbading egmd to 20%of to CW s cub of engmee6*deair, oonoftvodon, fimpeofin, tenon ry not h2emst,and ',119 ratiamh(the"Pro jt Oeat."�,TMch shall be used by the City tri reduce the ams of Pwjeat Coat cQvaeri by apodal assesmsed bona fmmwimg. NOW,'T�R�',ihs cansida lion of the fiosegai &and of the morel covemmm ad Wmnaft hatin odd,amd o&w gaud and valuable aaneWarshGE4 the mcalpt and mffidamy ofwhieh ane hereby acknowl 4m4 the City and ft Dmmlqw hereby agm as fol1oWE X. mdogges Ducal Conkagm. LL Amount and,Tlmlieg of C**Yibudm. Whbin 10 days of c motion of this Agreement,the Davel w stw11 p rd&the city will gmding in the amasmt of$112,375.44, winch egnala 20%ofdw aelimated Projact Cost. 2.2. City's Use of Fumb. TLa City shed apply the ftmds paid by Daveloper pursuant to Paragraph 1.1 toward d w PMad Cost,m a pmpayment of apodal ass chem to be levied a&nat property in the hgmvraaeat Dieftiot. 1.3. Addled DevebW C:antrlb fbr any Excess Praject Cost If lha total ac ual Pr©jed Cost exceeds $361,64219, that'► tha Developer shall pay to the City 20 mnmmt of any snrk excess to do City within 20 days of receipt of an invoice ftom the City for mch atcase Froject fit. The City shall apply snA atnevvatt BoWy to payment of Project Costa sa that the mount m be asnued to pmoperty m We MWrommut Distda does sat mead flue m x3m ad>ioc&fn fits Pcdtlon and Rasohtim to Iu*wvmm@ t DiWcL 1.4. 1MI-Up of Developer bdbsdtea< sued en Fkal "ed CmL If flue total amt Pry Cast is leas gm $561.642.19(m d+ mudnod by to Oldmaocc kvyhg ammounamis against the kuptvva and District). tum to My shush rdand my of the Dcvdaprx cot*&&im paid pumma Io Paragraph 1.1 above in emms of=mmm=tltst is upd the of such total actual Pmjan Coat, with such ummots mb"to the Developer within 20 days of the Clys adc"on of fire Ordinance levying the asset against the hnprovanent I)i wkL 2. 71mChy dhall dmi.m andihntdl dw at its awn ahpaase ahbjed to the novdop Ws payments as pmvided in Paragraph 1.1 above. The Chy abali eolibi 6. Dff and Tom. The Davd� WuR be in ddntlt of this Aareement if the Dmftcr fails to *o>nply with any ObEpthm at# m dais Agm merest. Thh; A manod may be totminated at Ie oPHOn of#hue City if wrlt4M not m of event ofd hu been deli wW tQ the Devadopar by fire City and the�woe is delivered. has not Bach fault or is act natively pareaiag such oar-within!bitty days 7. All MUM rmgWred ar pcm fitted to be iii pmunt to this Ag=IW shall be in wing and deUvaeaed Perky or sat by wgWwad of certiflod merit,vt=modpt rapestc3, or by gully reaonmzed, "xd, cmMMUSI WMW m' tsvwught air ootuior service. Notlae ]1 be csflm tiered givw wheal mmvcd an the date appaenlug an the rc um mockk but if the apt is ng reh med whin live(5)days,thea►fim(3) days 4 if rgeat by rt stared or tied mail or ammamW c out'iw service:, or the ncmt businese day,of ret by ovemig�dt air 0oudiear service. Nafiioes shard be ed amc d w beltsw fOr cub Party,pea 4M that if any pet'g1vanodes of a cbm p of name or addrt md=to the glvw of duet is 0 a aM Abe gem sa danwWed in that natlaa. C17y, City Clerk Atte:lesson A.GGA City MEmW P.O.Bcm 735 Salim,,KS 67+402-0736 DEVELOPM Coasrstm Developma t Omup,L.L,C. Atte:WMiam B.Rbqqwd,by dent P.O.Bane 1481 afts,KS 67402-1481 L GIMERIPMUM A. ND waiver of my praviaiesa of tbis Assent viH be deemed or aonri raft a waivea of any utter provision, nor will it be doomed or comet[tM a waiver imUm ezpmmly providad fir by a wduen ami W ffis Agrecumd signed by bath fhe City and the DeYvelopw, ow will the waiver of any ded'avt under this Agmemeag be deam@d a waiver of any pbsoquent daft* deaaalts of the"M typo The:G'uy's hHum to exercise any right=derr thing Age,wM tact =zdtWo the app mal of any wmqftd apt by Ow Dcvelaper or &0 aooapMM of any vamemta, B. The pwtieg to tbs`s Amt may amen air modify ibis Agit amly by written haft mmeant duly er wmAed by ft Parties hmeto. C. No person or aetity Who or which is not a party to this Agmcmeart will have any right of anion=der this Agrc=alt 3 D. This Agreanent omufttm the entire Agit between the parties, and ao sem, peamism, or Wbeeamb tort me not aaabdmd in this Agmemmt will be bin ft as the parties,This 1pamm t may not be assigned to any oar parties wlthont flee prior writhm aonseat of ft City. E, if any pert.tem,per provision.ofthis Apvwaent is hold by a court to be MWd or wise unant'o c, sash illegality or der lity will not afoot dw valft of any other paw term,or pmmldon,and the rigs of the parties will be oaostrLmd as of the part,farm,or providon vasa now part of tlds Amt. F. Tho City may Me a oapy of this A,gmment in the orae of dw Register of Deeds fDr Same County,K®mas. [ . Naddog eanhad m this Aveemax emob"a4 waiver of the OWs sovwdp iffimudty under any agplieable dam law. H. This Agumment Bosh bo cowtcued m aawnh ruoe with and govemed by do Sams of die State of Kaesas. MM REAdAMER OF THIS PAGE IN'PVl'TSONALLY DEFT BLANK] 4 IN W1TNM V[ F:due Pzt=bmsuo have mocMd die Awwmwd dwjRNwaf PI Ralf ,2016. cnT OF&A Eqk SANSAS imIL (904 7-- 1 Xlyciar ATX'B,ST: nrojiaLIDIBIA i VV'wu cmc,city Cis& BrATB OF KANSAS tOMY OF BALM � Car 2016, b&m ma. mliggpirlps% a Notary POW in aid f0f said dokk P Y Up I Q=Mvd and Mutdl Wiabs,l's' to=m do b u6 of aalieimc hzy awwwo to bete pmwm whe mm an madto the within tnowimat as 'md CRY Cbd6 MPOdkft of to Cl'1'Y OF SALWA, KANM md wjmowbdpd to me 69 tray amcmd the same in thea amb.md mmobm d d*by**Apohm m dna go a + bdmlf of avbidt the puns noted,mood the iseilmmeak. wTngi SS myhead anda MM seal. w .tM G 'RJB ff Notiffy ftbHo modNr m Aft 5f2D y 4 S Schrage, Mike From: Schrage, Mike Serer Friday, November 06,2009 4:07 PM To: Bill Sheppard;Steve Renich;Corky Umphrey Subject: Special Assessment District Documents I have attached a copy of my staff report to the City Commission as well as the related documents to this email. Bond Counsel had some revisions to the Development Agreement Thursday evening and Friday morning. I think they were all clarifications, but I have attached a document that notes the differences between version 5(the most recent version)and version 3 (the last verison I believe you received). If you have any questions,feel free to contact me. If it is something pressing,feel free to contact me over the weekend on my cell phone at 643-2094. Mike Schrage Deputy City Manager City of Salina,Kansas 300 West Ash Street, Room 202 P.O.Box 736 Salina,Kansas 67402-0736 Phone: 785.309.5700 Fax: 785.309.5711 TDD: 785.309.5747 website: www.sarfna-ks.aov (Published in the Salina Journal on ® _-,2009) RESOLUTION NUMBER A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS AND DETERNUNATIONS OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS ON THE ADVISABILITY OF AND AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO KS.A. 12-6a01 cit seq. WH1i;REAS, a petition was filed with the City Clerk for the City of Salina, Kansas (the "City") on 2009, proposing certain improvements pursuant to K.S.A. 12- 6a01 et seq. (the"Petition");and WHEREAS, the Petition sets forth: (a)the general nature of the proposed improvements; (b) the estimated cn probable cost of the proposed improvements; (c) the extent of the proposed improvement district to be assessed for the cost of the proposed improvements; (d) the proposed method of assessment; (e) the proposed apportionment of the cost between the improvement district and the City at large; and(f) a request that such improvements be made without notice and hearing as required by KS.A. 1.2-604(a),and WHEREAS, all the owners of record of property located within the proposed improveneut district have signed the Petition; and WHEREAS, no signatures have been withdrawn from the petition before the Governing Body began consideration of the Petition; and WHEREAS, K.S.A. 12-6aO4 provides that the Governing Body may authorize and order public improvements without notice and hearing after a sufficient petition has been filed; and WHEREAS, the governing body has reviewed and considered the Preliminary Engineering Estimate and Feasibility Deport prepared by the City Engineer and agrees with the conclusions set forth thagim NOW THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Governing Body hereby finds that the Petition is sufficient, and further finds and determines that it is necessary and advisable to make the following improvements: (a) The nature of the improvements are as follows: The curb, guttering, paving, grading anis drainage for approximately 901 lineal feet of Bentgrass Drive. (the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements); 1,128 lineal feet of Larkspur Lane, (the Larkspur Lane Street Improvements); and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle, (the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements)and collectively the"Street Impr'avements" The installation of approximately 1,386 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 923 lineal feet of eight-inch water main, fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connections for water lines within right of way and/or utility easement and all appurtenances thereto (the Phase 1 Water System Improvements); 42 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 2,851 lineal feet of eight-inch water main fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connections for water lines and all appurtenances thereto (the Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements) and collectively the "Water System Improvements". The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main, service connections for sewer lines lying within right of way and/or utility easement, manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described: Lateral A approximately 1,186 lineal feet (the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements); Lateral A' approximately 690 lineal feet (the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral B approximately 1,357 lineal feet (the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral C approximately 973 lineal feet (the Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral D approximately 809 lineal feet (the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The installation of stormwater detention and all appurtenances thereto (the "Stormwater Detention Pond"). The installation of approximately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets, and all appurtenances thereto(the"Drainage Improvements'). (collectively,the"Improvements"). (b) The estimated cost of the Improvements is: One million six hundred eighteen thousand ninety-five dollars and ninety-four cents($1,618,095.94). (c) The boundaries of the improvement district to be assessed are: Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas (the"Improvement District"). The following lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they are not developable lots and therefore are not benefitted by the Improvements: Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 2,is dedicated as an open space easement on the plat; Block 2 Lot 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat; and Block 2 Lot 37, is dedicated as a drainage, utility, and open space easement of the plat. (d) The method of assessment shall be: 2 Each lot in the Improvement District shall be assessed equally per lot for costs of the various Improvements benefitting such lot, as described in paragraph (e) below. (e) The apportionment of cost between the Improvement District and the city at large is: One hundred percent(100%) of the total cost of improvements shall be assessed to the Improvement District and no portion of costs shall be paid by the City at Large. The costs of the Improvements within the Improvement District shall be fiu Ther allocated as follows: One hundred percent(100%) of the Larkspur Lane Street Improvements and the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. Sixty percent (60%) of the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Bloch 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas; forty percent (40%) of the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 thrown 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Issas. Cine hundred percent(100%) of the Drainage Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lois 1, 3 through 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent (1000/9) of Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Lawral C Sanitary Sewer hWovem shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Loa 1,3 Wough 5, 7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas, One hundred percent(100°/x)of the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Bloch 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas, One hundred percent (100!®) of the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 3.8 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina, Salute County Kansas. One hundred percent (100%) of the phase 1 Water- Improvements and forty percent (40%) of Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas, sixty percent(601%)o€Eight=inch Loop mater System Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. 3 One hundred percent (100%) of the Stormwater Detention shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. Section 2. The Governing Body hereby declares that the Improvements described in this Resolution are necessary, and authorizes them to be made in accordance with the findings set forth in this Resolution, and further authorizes the levying of assessments and the issuance of bonds therefore,all in accordance with K.S.A. 12-6a01 et seq. Section 3. The City expects to make capital expenditures from and after the date of this Resolution in connection with the Improvements described herein, and intends to reimburse itself for such expenditures with the proceeds of one or more series of general obligation bonds and temporary notes of the City in the maximum principal amount of$I,618,095.94. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make progress payments to the contractors for materials furnished and for labor performed under the contract when estimates therefore are presented to him/her which have been properly certified by the City Engineer, so long as the aggregate payments do not exceed the total contract price. Section 5. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Register of Deeds of Saline County, Kansas. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect after its passage and publication once in the official city newspaper. ADOPTED AND PASSED this day of 2009. (SEAL) M. Luci Larson,Mayor Lieu Ann Elsey, CMC, City Clerk 4 CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: NO: City Manager's Office ITEM NO. BY: Mike Schrage, Deputy City Mgr. BY: Page 1 ITEM: Resolution No. 09- Approval of the Advisability and Authorization of Resolution No. 09- related to establishing a special improvement district for street, drainage, water and sanitary sewer improvements in the Grand Prairie subdivision. And, Authorization of the Mayor to execute a Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development BACKGROUND: The attached petition has been developed in coordination with City staff accounting for the proposed phasing of development in the Grand Prairie subdivision and the resulting installation of on-site and off-site improvements. The Grand Prairie subdivision is a golf-course development to be located on private property located within golf holes on the Salina Municipal Golf Course. Due to the unique configuration of the subdivision, considerable planning and coordination was necessary to design off-site improvements and secure the necessary permissions to install those improvements across the Municipal Golf Course as well as adjoining private properties. Additionally, it was necessary to further coordinate phased construction and allocation of improvements costs such that special assessments for each lot were minimized. The Developer also indicated a desire to solicit private construction contracts in order to more definitively determine actual construction costs before proceeding with formation of a benefit district. In light of the project specific challenges identified above, City staff coordinated with the Developer to plan and secure the necessary off-site easements; identify appropriate construction phases for the development; allocate benefit costs throughout both phases of the development; and negotiate a Development Agreement that complied with State Statutes and provides for private negotiation of construction contracts and reimbursement of eligible expenses with benefit district proceeds once the required improvements are approved and accepted by the City. The proposed benefit district provides for installation of all the necessary improvements to develop Phase 1. Due to the configuration of the subdivision, some of the improvements proposed by this benefit district will ultimately benefit both Phase I and Phase II of the development. Consequently, some costs are allocated to Phase II of the subdivision with additional development costs to be applied to Phase II when it is completed. In the interim, Cornerstone Development will be liable for the assessments applied to Phase 11 of the development. It is prescribed by Kansas State Statutes that the City Commission consider a petition for street CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME ##1##/#### 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: AGENDA.- ITEM GENDA:ITEM City Managers Office NO. BY: Mike Schrage, Deputy City Mgr. BY: Page 2 drainage, sanitary sewer, and water improvements and establish sufficiency on the basis that any one of the following three conditions be met: 1. The petition is signed by a majority of the resident owners of record of property liable for assessment under the proposal. 2. The petition is signed by the resident owners of record of more than half of the area liable for assessment under the proposal. 3. The petition is signed by the owners of record, whether resident or not, of more than half of the area liable to be assessed under the proposal. In this case, condition No. 2 is met since Cornerstone Development owns 100% of the area liable for assessment under the proposal. The engineering feasibility report for these public improvements is attached for your review. The report describes the scope of the project, the improvement district, the method of assessment, cost breakdowns for each improvement, and identifies and describes the properties in the benefit district. In summary, lots in Phase l of the development are subject to an estimated special assessment of $34,531.52 with the final assessment being determined once the project is complete and costs are finalized. Lots in Phase II of the development are subject to special assessment associated with this request of $12,334.01 with the final assessment being determined once the project is complete and costs are finalized. Lots in Phase II will be subject to additional improvement costs (funded privately or through a benefit district) at the time additional improvements such as streets and sewer are installed to complete Phase II. Resolution No. makes findings about the advisability of the proposed improvements. Such a determination can and should take in to account the total special assessments proposed in light of the proposed development. Both the Developers and City staff gave considerable consideration to the allocation of costs to the development and whether the total assessments were advisable. The proposed assessments of up to $34,532.52 are significant, but could be considered advisable, in light of the unique nature of this subdivision as a golf course development. The property owners may choose to pay their share of the project costs as a lump sum payment or as a special assessment tax over a 15 year period beginning on the date that General Obligation bonds are issued by the City. The Development agreement coincides with City policy regarding financial guarantees and provides that the developer may either submit a letter of credit equal to 35% of the project costs or cash or financial securities equal to 20% of the project costs. City policy further provides that financial securities will be released by the City when 35% of the development is complete or after 5 years whichever occurs first. The Development Agreement provides financial securities for Phase II must be provided in conjunction with this project and that the 5 year timeframe will not commence for Phase 11 until all of the necessa ublic improvements have been completed. CITY OF SAL.INA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME #9 M/#### 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: AGENDA: ITEM City Manager's Office NO. BY: Mike Schrage, Deputy City Mgr. BY: Page The Developers have negotiated construction contracts and are prepared to provide the contractors authorization to proceed upon City Commission approval of the Benefit District and Development agreement. CQNFORMANCE WITH STRATEGIC KLAN: The proposed action is consistent with the following components of the City's shared vision statement: • Salina will be a city that is exciting to live in and thriving both economically and socially. • Salina will be a place with a quality of life that not only appeals to residents, but also to visitors. • The City Commission of Salina will have committed to providing the highest quality City services possible within available resources. The City Commission recognizes their role and responsibility to provide the needed policy direction and resources to its administration. At the same time, the City's administrative personnel are committed daily to transforming this direction and resources into the highest possible quality of municipal services, consistent with the expectations of both the City Commission and the citizens of Salina. • Salina will encourage and be supportive of industrial development, economic expansion, market-driven tax base growth, and home grown entrepreneurialism. The proposed action is also consistent with the following goals contained in the City's strategic plan: Goal#1: The city will create a community of mixed-use, quality development and redevelopment. Goal#3: The city will provide the highest quality of services, consistent with governing body direction, available resources and staff commitment to quality. Goal#4: The city will maintain growth and development policies that are updated to reflect current conditions and desired growth direction. FISCAL. NOTE: All costs (estimated to be $1,618,096.94) are to be assessed against the improvement district. This project will be temporarily financed through temporary notes and rolled into long term bonds either 2010 or 2011 depending on the completion date of the project relative to the issuance date of bonds in 2010_ Property owners will have the opportunity to pay the assessment in full prior to the bond issue. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Possible actions for the City Commission's consideration include the following, CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME #IAWMI#### 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: AGENDA: ITEM City Managers Office NO. BY: Mike Schrage, Deputy City Mgr. BY: Page 4 1.) Vote to approve Resolution No. and authorize the Mayor to execute the Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development. 2.) Provide additional direction to City staff regarding the terms and conditions contained in the Resolution and/or Development Agreement and request that revised documents be provided for future consideration. 3.) Conclude that the proposed improvements are not advisable and vote to deny Cornerstone Developments request to create and designate an improvement district for the purposes of making public improvements as proposed. It is recommended that the City Commission vote to approve Resolution No. and authorize the Mayor to execute the Improvement District Development Agreement between the City of Salina and Cornerstone Development. GILMORE&FELL,P.C. DRAFT. November 5,2009 Grand Prairie Development Agreement v5 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS and CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C. DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 9,2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PM ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Section 1.01. Rules of Construction...................................................................................................l Section 1.02. Definitions of Words and Terms...................................................................................2 ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.01 Representations of City................................................................................................5 Section 2.02. Representations of the Developer.................................................................................6 Section 2.03. Conditions to the Effective Date of this Agreement.......Error!Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE III THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Section 3.01. Creation of the Improvement District...........................................................................7 Section 3.02. Special Assessments.....................................................................................................8 Section3.03. City Expenses..............................................................................................................8 ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.01. Design and Engineering of the Improvements...............................................................9 Section 4.02. Construction of the Improvements................................................................................9 Section 4.03. Rights-of-Way and Easements....................................................................................10 Section 4.04. Dedication of Improvements......................................................................................10 Section 4.05. Completion of Improvements.....................................................................................10 Section4.06. Rights of Access.........................................................................................................I I Section 4.07. Certificate of Full Completion....................................................................................11 ARTICLE V REIMBURSEMENT OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS Section 5.01. Improvement Costs,Generally...................................................................................I1 Section 5.02. Developer to Advance Costs.......................................................................................11 Section 5.03. City's Obligation to Reimburse Developer..................................................................11 Section 5.04. Developer Reimbursement Process.............................................................................12 Section 5.05. Right to Inspect and Audit..........................................................................................12 ARTICLE VI IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS Section 6.01. Conditions to the Issuance of Improvement District Obligations.................................13 Section 6.02. Security for the Improvement District Obligations......................................................13 Section 6.03. Terms of Improvement District Obligations................................................................14 i ARTICLE VII ASSIGNMENT-TRANSFER Section 7,01. Transfer of Obligations...............,.,.................................,...........................,...,..........,14 ARTICLE VIII GENERAL COVENANTS Section 8.01. Indemnification of City...........................,..................................................................15 Section8.02. Insurance ........... ........—....,....,,...........,.............,........... .........., .............,.................16 Section 8.03. Non-liability of Officials,Employees and Agents of the City......................................16 ARTICLE IX DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Section 9.01. Developer Event ofDefarat.........................................................................................16 Section.9-022. City Event of Default..........................................,---.................... ...............................16 Section 9.03. Remedies Upon a Developer Event of Default............................................................17 Section 9.04. Remedies Upon a City Event of Default......................................................................18 Section 9,05. Excusable Delays............... . ... .................................................................................18 Section9.06. Legal Actions... ................................. ............................. .........................................18 ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 10.01. Mutual Assistance....................................................................... ..................... ..........19 Section 10.02. Effect of Violation of the Terms and Provisions of this Agreement;No Partnership.............................................................................................................19 Section 14.03= Time of Essence.................<....,..............................,,............._.....................................19 Section14.04. Amendments.............................<...,................................................<.......<............,.......19 Section10,05. Agreement Controls.............•......,......................................................,.........................19 Section10.06. Conflicts oflntcarest..............................................................................................<....,..19 Section10.07. `1 ............................................................................................................................20 Section 10.08. Validity and Scvemhility..............................................................................................20 Section10.09. Required Disclosures...................................................................................................20 Section10.10. Tax Implications.:.......................................................................................--............20 Section10.11. Authorized Parties.......................................................................................................20 Section10.12. Notice.............................................................................................................<............20 Section10.13. Kansas Low...............................—... ............................ ........---...............---........21 Section10.14, Cowterp ts.,.,. ....<.......................................................................................,............21 Section 10,15, Recordation of Agrecment...........................................................................................21 Section10.16. Consent or Approval....<....>...........................................<.,............................................21 ii IMPROVENnUff DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas as a city of the third class(the"City"),and CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C.,a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas(the"Developer,"and together with the City,the "Parties'),and is dated as of November 9,2009. RECITALS WHEREAS, on 2009, the Developer Bled with the City Clerk the Improvement District Petition,pursuant to K.S.A. 12-6aO1 et seq.(the"Act");and WHEREAS, the Improvement District Petition requests that the City create the Improvement District, construct the Improvements,assess the costs thereof against the Improvement District, and issue the City's general obligation temporary notes and bonds to finance the costs ofthe Improvements;and WHEREAS,the City and the Developer desire to enter into this Agreement to address issues related to construction and financing ofthe Improvements;and WHEREAS, the Developer may, at some future date, submit a petition for creation of a second improvement district pursuant to the Act, whereby certain additional improvements will be constructed and assessments levied against certain property within the Improvement District (a "Subsequent Improvement District");and WHEREAS,at such time as the City receives a petition for a Subsequent Improvement District,the City shall consider such request and,unless later amended in writing by the Parties,this Agreement shall not be interpreted to address any issues related to any Subsequent Improvement District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained,and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,the Parties do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Section 1.01. Rules of Construction. For all purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, the following rules of construction apply in construing the provisions of this Agreement. A. The terms defined in this Article include the plural as well as the singular. B. All accounting terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them, and all computations herein provided for shall be made, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. C. All references herein to "generally accepted accounting principles" refer to such principles in effect on the date of the determination, certification, computation or other action to be taken hereunder using or involving such terms. 1 D. All references in this instrument to designated "Articles," "Sections" and other- subdivisions thersubdivisions are to be the designated Articles, Sections and other subdivisions of this instrument as originally executed. E, The words"herein,""hereof'and"hereunder"and other words of similar import refer to this Agrecmunt as a whole and not W,miy particular. Article, Section or other subdivision, P. The Article and Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof. O. The represeritatious, covenants and nwitations set forth in the foregoing recitals are material.to this Agreement and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement as though they were fully set forth in this Section. The provisions of the Petition, and such Improvement District Proceedings, and the provisions of the Act, as amended, are hereby incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement, subject in every case to the specific terms hereof. Section 1.02. Definitions of Words and Terms. Capitalized words used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Recitals to this Agreement or they shall have the following meanings; "Act" means the General Improvement and Assessment Law, K.S,A. 12-6a01 et seq., as amended and supplemented fiom time to time. "Agreement" means this Improvement District Development Agreement, as amended as supplemented frotm time to time. "Applicable Law and Requirements" -means any applicable constitution, treaty, statute, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, directive, code, interpretation, judgment, decree, injunction, writ, determination, award, permit, lice-ase, authorization, directive, requirement or decision of or agreement with or by Governmental Authorities. "Bond Counsel"-meats Gilmore&Hell,P.C. "Bond Proceeds" paeans proceeds of any Improvement District Obligations issued by the City, less costs of issuance,capitalized interest and any required reserves. "Certificate of Improvement District Coats" means a certificate relating to Improvement District.Costs in substantially the form attached hereto as E ib' "Certificate of Pull Completion" means a certificate evidencing Pull Completion of the Improvements, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. "City"means the City of Salina;Kansas. "City Event of Default" means any event or occurrence defined in Section 9.02 of this Agreement. "City Expenses"means the expenses described in Section 3.03 of this Agreement. "City Representative" means the City Manager of the City, and such other person or persons at the time designated to act on behalf of the City in matters relating to this Agreement. 2 "Construction Plans" means plans, drawings, specifications and related documents, and construction schedules for the construction of the Improvements, together with all supplements, amendments or corrections,submitted by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with this Agreement. "Developer" means Cornerstone Development Group, L.L.C., a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas, and any successors and assigns approved pursuant to this Agreement. "Developer Event of Default" means any event or occurrence defined in Section 9.01 of this Agreement. "Developer Representative" means and such other person or persons at the time designated to act on behalf of the Developer in matters relating to this Agreement as evidenced by a written certificate furnished to the City containing the specimen signature of such person or persons and signed on behalf of the Developer. "Estimated Special Assessments" means the City's estimate of the total amount of Special Assessments to be levied against the Improvement District,based on actual Improvement Costs submitted by the Developer and the City's estimate of additional costs related to the Improvements to be levied against the Improvement District pursuant to the Improvement District Proceedings. The Estimated Special Assessments shall not exceed the Improvement Costs Cap without the written consent of all owners of property within the Improvement District. "Excusable Delays"means any delay beyond the reasonable control of the Party affected,caused by damage or destruction by fire or other casualty, power failure, strike, shortage of materials, unavailability of labor, delays in the receipt of Permitted Subsequent Approvals as a result of unreasonable delay on the part of the applicable Governmental Authorities, adverse weather conditions such as, by way of illustration and not limitation, severe rain storms or below freezing temperatures of abnormal degree or abnormal duration,tornadoes,and any other events or conditions,which shall include but not be limited to any litigation interfering with or delaying the construction of all or any portion of the Improvements in accordance with this Agreement, which in fact prevents the Party so affected from discharging its respective obligations hereunder. "Governmental Approvals" means all plat approvals, re-zoning or other zoning changes, site plan approvals, conditional use permits, variances, building permits, architectural review or other subdivision, zoning or similar approvals required for the implementation of the Improvements and consistent with the Petition,the Improvement District Proceedings,and this Agreement. "Governmental Authorities" means any and all jurisdictions, entities, courts, boards,agencies, commissions, offices, divisions, subdivisions, departments, bodies or authorities of any type of any governmental unit(federal,state or local)whether now or hereafter in existence. "Improvement Costs"means the costs of the Improvements,and such other costs to be charged to the Improvement District as set forth in the Petition, including interest and costs of issuance related to any Improvement District Obligations issued by the City to finance the Improvements, all determined in accordance with the Act. 3 "Improvement hosts Cap" means $1,553,372.10 (the total cost of the Improvements, as shown in the Petition and Preliminary Engineering Estimate and Feasibility Report related thereto,less estimated costs of the Improvements related to the financing thereof by the City). "Improvement District"means the improvement district to be established by the governing body of the City pursuant to the Act and the Petition. "Improvement District Obligation Conditions"means those conditions precedent to the City's obligation to issue Improvement District Obligations,as set forth in Section 6,01. "Improvement District Obligations" means bonds, notes or other obligations., singly or in series,issued by the City pursuant to the Act and in accordance with this Agreement. "Improvement District Proceedings" means any of the proceedings of the governing body of the City creating the Improvement District and/or levying Special Assessments. "Improvement District"means the improvement district to be established by the governing body of the City pursuant to the Act and the Petition. "Improvements"means the construction of the following improvements,all to be constructed as shown on the Preliminary Engineering Estimate and Feasibility Report related to the petition: The curb, guttering, paving, grading and drainage for approximately 901 lineal feet of 13ent$rass Drive,(the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements); 1,128 lineal feet of Larlopur Lane, (the Larkspur Lane Street Improvements); and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle, (the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements)and collectively the"Street Improvements". The installation of approximately 1,386 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 923 lineal feet of eight-inch water main,fire hydrants,valves,fittings, service connections for v-ater lines and all appurtenances thereto(the Phase 1 Water System Improvements);42 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 2,8.51 lineal feet of eight-inch water train fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connections for water limes and all appurtenances thereto(the Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements)and collectively the"Water System Improvements". The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main, service connections for sewer lines lying within right of way and/or utility casement, manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described: Lateral A approximately 1,186 lineal feet (the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements); Lateral A' approximately 690 lineal:fect (the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral 13 approximately 1,357 lineal feet (the Lateral E Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral C approximately 973 lineal feet (the Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Improvemems) Lateral D approximately 809 lineal feet (the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The installation of stormwater detention and all appurtenances thereto (the "Stormwater Detention"). The installation of approximately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets, and all appurtenances thereto(the"Drainage Improvements'). 4 "Permitted Subsequent Approvals" means the building permits and other governmental approvals customarily obtained prior to construction which have not been obtained on the date that this Agreement is executed,which the City or other governmental entity has not yet determined to grant. "Petition"means the petition submitted by the Developer to the City Clerk on November 2009, requesting the construction of the Improvements, as further described of ed therein, and that the casuch improvements be assessed against the property described therein,all in accordance with the Act. "Phase I Lots"means the real property within the Improvement District legally described as Lots 1 through 30, Block 1, and Lots 1, 3 through 5, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. "Phase II Lots" means the real property within the Improvement District legally described as Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. "Plans"means site plans,Construction Plans and all other Governmental Approvals necessary to construct the Improvements in accordance with City code, applicable laws of Governmental Authorities and this Agreement. "Prepayment Period" means a period of time within 30 days from the publication date of any ordinance levying Special Assessments. "Related Entity" means any individual or legal entity related to the Developer, determined in accordance with federal tax regulations. "Special Assessments" means any special assessment levied or proposed to be levied against any property within the Improvement District, as determined in acewdance with the Act and the Improvement District Proceedings. ARTICLE It REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.01 Representations of City. The City makes the following representations and warranties,which are true and correct on the date hereof A. Due Authority. The City has full constitutional and lawful right, power and authority, under current applicable law, to execute and deliver and perform the terms and obligations of this Agreement, and this Agreement has been duly and validly authorized and approved by all necessary City proceedings, findings and actions. Accordingly, this Agreement constitutes the legal valid and binding obligation of the City, enforceable in accordance with its terns. B. No Defaults or Violation of Law. The execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and the fulfillment of the terms and conditions hereof do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach of any of the terms or conditions of any agreement or instrument to which it is now a party, and do not and will not constitute a default under any of the foregoing. 5 C. No Litigation. There is no litigation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the City, threatened against the City with respect to the Petition or this Agreement. In addition,no litigation,proceeding or investigation is pending or, to the knowledge of the City, threatened against the City seeking to restrain, enjoin or in any way limit the approval or issuance and delivery of this Agreement or which would in any manner challenge or adversely affect the existence or powers of the City to enter into and carry out the transactions described in or contemplated by the execution, delivery,validity or performance by the City of the terms and provisions of thi.5 Agreement. D. Governmental or Corporate Consents. No consent or approval is required to be obtained from, and no action need be taken by,or document filed with,any governmental body or corporate entity in connection with the execution and delivery by the City of this Agreement. E. No Default. No default or City Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, and no event has occurred and is continuing which with the lapse of time or the giving of notice, or both,would constitute a default or an event of default in any material respect on the part of the City under this Agreement. Section 2.02. Representations of the Developer. The Developer makes the following representations and warranties, which are true and correct on the date.hereof. A. Due Authority. The Developer has all necessary power and authority to execute and deliver and perform the terms and obligations of this Agreement and to execute and.deliver the documents required of the Developer herein, and such execution and delivery has been duly and validly authorized and approved by all necessary proceedings of the Developer. Accordingly,this Agreement constitutes the legal valid and binding obligation.of the Developer,enforceable in accordance with its terms. B. No Defaults..or Violation of Law. The execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and the fulfillment of the terms and conditions hereof do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach of any of the terms or conditions of any corporate or organizational restriction or of any agreement or instrument to which it is now a party, and do not and will not constitute a default under any of the foregoing. C. No Uiption, No litigation, proceeding or investigation is pending or,to the knowledge of the Developer,threatened against the Improvements,the Project.,the Developer or any officer,director, member or shareholder of the Developer. In addition,no litigation,proceeding or investigation is pending or, to the knowledge of the Developer, threatened against the Developer seeking to restrain, enjoin or in any way limit the approval or issuance and delivery of this Agreement or which would in any manner challenge or adversely affect the existence or powers of the Developer to enter into and cavy out the transactions described in or contemplated by the execution, delivery, validity or performance by the Developer,of the terms and provisions of ibis Agreement. D. No Material Change. (1) The Developer has not incurred any material liabilities or entered into any material transactions other than in the ordinary course of business except for the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (2)there has been no material adverse change in the business, financial position, prospects or results of operations of the Developer, which could affect the Developer's ability to perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. E. C'ros=erntnental or Corporate Consents, No consent or approval is required to be obtained from, and no action need be taken by,or document filed with, any governmental body or corporate entity 6 in connection with the execution, delivery and performance by the Developer of this Agreement, other than Permitted Subsequent Approvals. F. No Default. No default or Developer Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, and no event has occurred and is continuing which with the lapse of time or the giving of notice,or both, would constitute a default or an event of default in any material respect on the part of the Developer under this Agreement, or any other material agreement or material instrument to which the Developer is a party or by which the Developer is or may be bound. G. AMrovals. Except for Permitted Subsequent Approvals,the Developer has received and is in good standing with respect to all certificates, licenses, inspections,franchises, consents, immunities, permits,authorizations and approvals,governmental or otherwise,necessary to conduct and to continue to conduct its business as heretofore conducted by it and to own or lease and operate its properties as now owned or leased by it. Except for Permitted Subsequent Approvals, the Developer has obtained all certificates, licenses,inspections,franchises, consents, immunities,permits, authorizations and approvals, governmental or otherwise, necessary to acquire, construct, equip, operate and maintain the Improvements. The Developer reasonably believes that all such certificates, licenses, consents,permits, authorizations or approvals which have not yet been obtained will be obtained in due course. H. Construction Permits. Except for Permitted Subsequent Approvals, all governmental permits and licenses required by applicable law to construct, occupy and operate the Improvements have been issued and are in full force and effect or, if the present stage of development does not allow such issuance, the Developer reasonably believes, after due inquiry of the appropriate governmental officials, that such permits and licenses will be issued in a timely manner in order to permit the Improvements to be constructed. I. Compliance with Laws. The Developer is in compliance with all valid laws,ordinances, orders, decrees, decisions, rules, regulations and requirements of every duly constituted governmental authority, commission and court applicable to any of its affairs,business, operations as contemplated by this Agreement. J. Other Disclosures. The information furnished to the City by the Developer in connection with the matters covered in this Agreement are true and correct and do not contain any untrue statement of any material fact and do not omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make any statement made therein,in the light of the circumstances under which it was made,not misleading. ARTICLE III THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Section 3.01. Creation of the Improvement District: A. The Developer has taken all actions required by the Act to present the Petition to the City Council. The Developer agrees to cooperate in good faith to provide such additional information, as deemed necessary by the City,to allow for full consideration of the Petition by the City Council. B. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the creation of an improvement district by the City is a legislative act,that the City cannot agree by contract to take future legislative action,and that the City will diligently consider the Petition in good faith pursuant to the Act and the terms of this Agreement. 7 C. The Developer hereby agrees to waive any rights that it may have pursuant to state statute;the Kansas Constitution,the United States Constitution,or as otherwise provided by law to object to any Special Assessments requested in the Petition and imposed pursuant to the Act. Developer acknowledges and agrees that this waiver is fieely given and with full knowledge of the extent of all statutory, constitutional or other legal rights being waived thereby, and is given in consideration of the Pity forming the Improvement District and assisting in providing for the financing and construction of the Improvements. Section 3.02. Special Assessments. Upon(a) completion of the Improvements, as evidenced by the City's execution of the Certificate of Full Completion pursuant to Section 4.07 hereof, and(b)the Developer's submission of all Certificates of Improvement Costs pursuant to Section 5.04 hereof the City shall initiate proceedings pursuant to the Act to levy Special Assessments against property within the Improvement District. The Special Assessments shall be payable in — _(A) equal annual installments. The City shall allow all piWerty owners within the Improvement District an opportunity to prepay all or any portion of such Special Assessments within the Prepayment Period. Section 3.03. City Expenses. A. Censes. Generally. The Developer acknowledges that the City does not have source of funds to finance costs incurred for non-employee legal,financial and planning consultants or for direct out-of-pocket expenses and other reasonable costs resulting from services rendered to the Developer and the City to review, evaluate, process and consider the Petition and this Agreement (the "City Expenses"). E. Initial Dgipsit. In order to insure the prompt and timely payment of the City Expenses, the Developer shall establish a fund in the amount of Seven'Thousand Five Hundred Dollars($7,500.00) (the "Deposit") by paying such amount to the City contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. The City shall pay initial City Expenses from the Deposit and shall promptly submit an itemized statement for such City Expenses to the Developer. The City shall submit monthly statements itemizing the City Expenses paid from the Deposit during the preceding month. C. Disbursement of Funds. The City shall disburse the Deposit for reimbursement of costs to the City on or before the thirtieth(30th)day of each month,and for consulting fees and the payment of all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the 0✓ity in connection with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement as payment for such expenses become due. Upon reasonable notice, the City shall make its records available for inspection by Developer with respect to such disbursements. D. reimbursement Ey the City. All amounts paid by the Developer to the City pursuant to this Section shah constitute costs chargeable to the Improvement District and shall be approved for reimbursement as such by the City(Int only from proceeds of Improvement District Obligations and only to the extent such amounts together with the actual Improvement Costs do not exceed the Improvement Costs Cap), except for (i) any amounts attributable to the preparation and review of any agreements between the Developer and the City or among the Developer, the City and any third patty, to the extent such agreements are related to the Developer's reimbursement to the City or any third party for all or any portion of any costs to be assessed against the City's or such third party's property as a result of the Improvement District and (ii) any amounts that are not "costs" as defined by the Act. The Developer acknowledges that the actual fees and expenses of the Developer in negotiating and entering into this Agreement are not reimbursable costs pursuant to the Act. 8 E. Refunding of Dqposit. The City shall return to the Developer any unspent Deposit on the date when the City reimburses the Developer for the Improvement Costs from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations. ARTICLE l V CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.01. Design and Engineering of the Improvements. A. The Developer has submitted and the City has approved Construction Plans for the Improvements pursuant to City Code. All Improvements shall be designed, engineered, constructed, and installed in accordance with all Applicable Law and Requirements of the City. The Construction Plans shall be in sufficient completeness and detail to show that construction will be in conformance with the Petition, the Improvement District Proceedings and this Agreement. All plans, specifications, contracts and change orders related to the Improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. B. All costs associated with the preparation of the Plans far the Improvements shall be paid by the Developer, but shall be reimbursable from proceeds of the Improvement District Obligations in the manner provided by Article V hereof. C. Any firm preparing Plans for the Improvements shall receive prior written approval of the City Engineer on behalf of the City. Section 4.02. Construction of the Improvements. All Improvements shall be designed, engineered and constructed by the Developer as agent for the City. The Developer agrees that all construction, improvement,equipping,and installation work on the Project shall be done in accordance with the Petition,the Improvement District Proceedings,Construction Plans and related documents to be approved by the City in compliance with City Code. The Developer, as agent for the City, shall comply with the following requirements: A. Construction Permits and Approvals. Before commencement of construction or development of any work or Improvements, the Developer shall, at its own expense, secure or cause to be secured any and all permits and approvals which may be customarily required by the City and any other governmental agency having jurisdiction as to such construction, development or work. The City shall cooperate with and provide all usual assistance to the Developer in securing these permits and approvals,and shall diligently process, review and consider all such permits and approvals as may be required by law; except provided that the City shall not be required to issue any such permits or approval for any portion of the Improvements not in confarmance with the Petition or this Agreement. B. Engineer's Estimate. Before the Developer shall enter into any contract for the Improvements, an estimate of the cost of the Improvements shall be prepared by the City Engineer and submitted to the City Commission. The Developer shall not enter into any contract for construction of the Improvements if the price exceeds the amount set forth in such estimate of the City Engineer. C. Bonds. The Developer or the Developer's contractor(s) shall provide for all public works bonds required by K.S.A.60-1111 and any other performance and/or payment bonds reasonably required by the City prior to the commencement of construction of the Improvements. The premiums for such bonds shall constitute costs chargeable to the Improvement District. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its 9 officers and employees for any damage resulting from failure of the Developer to provide the bonds set forth in this subsection, I), Antidiscrimination DuriW -Constntction. The Developer, for itself, its successors and assigns, and any contractor with whom the Developer has contracted fat•the performance of work on the Improvements,agrees that in the construction,renovation,improvement,equipping,repair and installation of the Improvements provided for in this Agreement,the Developer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, marital status, disability, national origin or ancestry. E. Cost Overruns. The Parties acknowledge that the estimated and probable costs of the Improvements included in the Petition are based upon calculations prepared by the Developer. The Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the estimated and probable costs set forth in the Petition, The Parties further acknowledge that the City may not impose Special Assessments for any cost in excess of the Improvement Costs Cap. The Developer shall pay for all Improvement Costs that exceed the Improvement Costs Cap. Section 4.03. Rights-of Way and Easements. Developer will provide or cause to be provided, in a form suitable for recording in the real property records of Saline County, Kansas, within ten (10) days after written demand by the City, all rights-of-NvTy and easements across oir encumbering the respective portion of the property necessary for the construction; ownership and operation of the Improvements at no cost to the City. All Improvements shall be located within standard storm drainage and utility easements or rights-of-way dedicated to public use and constructed in compliance with all Applicable Law and Requirements. Section 4.04. Medication of Improvements. The Improvements will be dedicated to the City once the Improvements are completed. The Patties acknowledge that any Improvements which remain private in nature cannot be financed under the Act, and cannot be paid for with the proceeds of tax exempt bonds or ft°om Special Assessments. The City shall not be obligated to accept dedication of any Improvements until the City has verified that the applicable Improvements have been built in accordance with all Applicable Law and Requirements; until the City has verified that the Improvements have been built in accordance with the specifications approved by it:; and until the City has issued a Certificate of bull Completion for the Improvements to be dedicated, Section 4.05. Completion of Improvements. A. J2cydgWM=Schede. The Developer shall commence construction of the Improvements in good and workmanlike manner in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Developer shall cause the Improvements to be completed with due diligence. Upon reasonable advance notice,the Developer shall meet with the City to review and discuss the design and construction of the Improvements in order to enable the City to monitor the status of construction and to deterruine that the Improvements are being performed and completed in accordance with this Agreement, B. Continuation and Completion. Subject to Excusable Delays, once the Developer has commenced construction of the Improvements; the Developer shall not permit cessation of work on the Improvements fur a period in excess of 45 consecutive days or 90 days in the aggregate without prior written consent of the City. C. No Wjiver. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of the City's right to consider and approve or deny Governmental Approvals pursuant to the City's regulatory authority as provided by City Code and applicable state law. 10 Section 4.06. Rights of Access. Representatives of the City shall have the right of access to the Improvements, without charges or foes, at normal construction hours during the period of construction, for the purpose of ensuring compliance with this Agreement, including,but not limited to,the inspection of the work being performed in constructing, renovating, improving, equipping, repairing and installing the Improvements, so long as they comply with all safety rules. Representatives of the City shall conduct all inspections the City deems necessary to ensure the Developer's construction of the Improvements in accordance with the Construction Plans and City Code. Except in case of emergency, prior to any such access, such representatives of the City will check in with the on-site manager. Such representatives of the City shall cavy proper identification, shall insure their own safety, assuming the risk of injury, and shall not interfere with the construction activity. Section 4.07. Certificate of Full Completion. A. Promptly after completion of the Improvements in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement,the Developer may submit a Certificate of Full Completion to the City. The Certificate of Full Completion shall be in substantially the form attached as Exhibit B. The City shall, within ten (10) days following delivery of the Certificate of Full Completion, complete such inspections as it deems necessary to verify to its reasonable satisfaction the accuracy of the certifications contained in the Certificate of Full Completion. The City's execution of the Certificate of Full Completion shall constitute evidence of the satisfaction of the Developer's agreements and covenants to construct the Improvements. B. The City shall have the right to withhold delivery of the Certificate of Full Completion until such time as the Developer has: I. completed the Improvements in accordance with the Improvement District Proceedings,the Construction Plans,and all Applicable Law and Requirements;and 2. provided the Developer's Financial Commitment described in Section CONK ARTICLE V RMOURSEMENT OF HKPROVEMENf COSTS Section 5.01. Improvement Costs, Generally. In consideration for the Developer's agreement to construct the Improvements,the City agrees to reimburse the Developer for Improvement Costs,up to the Improvement Costs Cap, subject to the terms of the Improvement District Proceedings, the Act, and this Agreement. Section 5.02. Developer to Advance Costs. The Developer agrees to advance all Improvement Costs as necessary to complete the Improvements, until such time as the City issues Improvement District Obligations in accordance with Article VI hereof After the City has issued Improvement District Obligations,the Developer may request that the City directly pay Improvement District Costs in accordance with Section 5.04 hereof. Upon or prior to execution of this Agreement,the Developer shall deposit with the City the funds set forth in Section 3.03 for the purpose of reimbursing the City for City Expenses related to planning, legal, administrative and other casts associated with the Improvements, the Improvement District and this Agreement. Section 5.03. City's Obligation to Reimburse Developer. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the conditions in this Section,the City agrees to reimburse Developer for Improvement Costs I in a total amount not to exceed the Improvement Costs Cap less any Improvement Costs incurred by the City and interest and costs of issuance related to the Improvement District Obligations. Developer may be reimbursed for Improvement Costs only from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations as provided in Article VI hereon and the City shall have no obligation to reimbmse Developer until proceeds of Improvement District Obligations are available. The Parties agree that all rennbursement to the Developer shall be made only from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations and not from any other source. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the City to issue Improvement District Obligations to reimburse Developer for any cost that is not both an Improvement Cost and a"cost"as defined by the Act. Section 5.04. Developer Reimbursement Process, A. All requests for reimbursement and/or payment of Improvement Costs shall be made in a Certificate of Improvement Costs in substantial compliance with the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. All requests for reimbursement and/or payment shall be submitted by the Developer to the City within 30 days after the Certificate of Full Completion is executed by the City. (1) With respect to costs requested to be reimbursed, the Developer shall provide itemized invoices, receipts or other information reasonably requested, if any, to confirm that any such cost has been paid and qualifies as an Improvement Cost,and shall further provide a summary sheet detailing the costs requested to be reimbursed. Such summary sheet shall show the date such cost was paid by the Developer. the payee, a brief description of the type of cost paid, the amount paid. The Developer shall provide such additional information as reasonably requested by the City to confirm that such costs have been paid and qualify as Improvement Costs. (2) With respect to costs required to be paid directly by the City. the Developer shall provide itemized invoices to confirm that any such cost qualifies as an Improvement Cost,and shall further provide a summary sheet detailing the costs requested to be paid. Such summary sheet shall show the payee, a brief description of the type of cost, the amount to be paid, and the.payment due date. The Developer shall provide, or shall cause its contractors to provide, such additional information as reasonably requested by the City to confirm that the such costs qualify as Improvement Costs. B, The City reserves the right to have its engineer or other agents or employees inspect all work in respect of which a Certificate of Improvement Costs is submitted,to examine the Developer's and others' records relating to all expenses related to the invoices to be paid,and to obtain from such parties such other information as is reasonably necessary for the City to evaluate compliance with the terms hereof, C. The City shall have 30 calendar,days after receipt of any Certificate of Imliruvement Costs to review and respond by written notice to the Developer. It the submitted Certificate of hnprovement Costs and supporting documentation demonstrates that (1) the request relates to the Improvement Costs; (2) the expense has been paid or is due and owing to a third party;(3)Developer is not in material default under[hiss Agreement; and(4)there is no fraud on the part of the Developer.then the City shall approve the Certificate of Improvement Costs and snake, or cause to be made, reimbursement or payment from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations, within fifteen (15) days of the City's approval of the Certificate of Improvement Costs. If the City reasonably disapproves of the Certificate of Improvement Costs, the City shall notify the Developer in writing of the reason for such disapproval within such 30-day period. Approval of the Certificate of Improvement Costs will not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or delayed. Section 5.05 Right to Inspect and Audit. The Developer agrees that, up to one year after completion of the Improvements,the City,with reasonable advance notice and during normal business hours, shall have the right and authority to review,audit,and copy,from time to time,all the Developer's books and 12 records relating to the Improvement Costs (including, but not limited to, all general contractor's sworn statements, general contracts, subcontracts, material purchase orders, waivers of lien, paid receipts and invoices). ARTICLE VI II"ROVEMENT DISTRICT OBLIGATIONS Section 6.01. Conditions to the Issuance of Improvement District Obligations. After the following conditions have been satisfied, the Developer may make a written request to the City to issue Improvement District Obligations, and the City agrees to take all reasonably necessary steps to consider the issuance of Improvement District Obligations upon receipt of such written request and when the following conditions have been satisfied(collectively,the"Improvement District Obligation Conditions"): A. the City has executed the Certificate of Full Completion; B. all Improvement Costs have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City pursuant to Section 5.04 hereof;and C. If the request is for the issuance of Improvement District Obligations in the form of temporary notes to be issued until such time as bonds may be issued pursuant to the Act, the Developer has provided the security described in Section 6.02(B). except that such security shall be based on the Estimated Special Assessments. D. If the request is for the issuance of Improvement District Obligations in the farm of bonds: 1. the City has adopted an ordinance levying the Special Assessments against the Improvement District;and 2. the Developer has provided the security described in Section 6.02(B). Section 6.02. Security for the Improvement District Obligations. A. The Improvement District Obligations shall be general obligations of the City,payable as to both principal and interest in part from special assessments levied upon the property benefited by the construction of the Improvements,or from general obligation bonds of the Issuer and,if not so paid,from ad valorem taxes which may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount upon all the taxable tangible property,real and personal,within the territorial limits of the City. The full faith,credit and resources of the City shall be irrevocably pledged for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Improvement District Obligations as the same become due. B. In consideration for the City issuing its Improvement District Obligations,and as additional security for such Improvement District Obligations and to secure prompt payment of the Special Assessments, the Developer shall provide certain financial commitments to the City (the "Developer's Financial Commitment"). I. The Developer's Financial Commitment shall be in one of the following forms: 13 a. cash,cashicr's check or an escrow account equal to 20%of the total Special Assessments levied against all properties within the Improvement District;or b, an irrevocable letter of credit equal to 35%of the total Special Assessments levied against all properties within the Improvement District. 2. The Developer's Financial Commitment may be applied annually to satisfy the principal of and interest on the Improvement District Obligations,if any Special Assessments are not paid when due. 3. The porion of the Developer's Financial Commitment related to the Phase I Lots shall be relms d upon the request of the Developer at the earlier of(i)five(5)years from the date the governing body of the City adopts an ordinance levying the Special Assessments or (ii) the date when certificates of occupancy dre issued for at least 35%of the Phase I bots. 4, The portiou of the Developer's Financial Commitment related to the Phase II Tats shalI be released upon the request of the Developer at the earlitr of(i) the date when certificates of occupancy are issued for at least.35%of the Phase H Lots or(ii)five(5)years a#Iea completion of all public infrastructure necessary to seave the Phase H Lots; including but not limited to water, ,sewer, stormwater,stormwate r detention,street and emergency access. Section 6,03= Terms of Improvement District Obligations. A. Upon the Developer's satistion of the conditions set forth in Section 6.01 hereof the City shall use its best efforts to issue Improvement Digit Obligations to finance the Improvements. B. The Parties acknowledge that the City may not issue its general obligation bonds to finauce the costs of the Improvements until 30 days after the publication of an ordinance levying Special Assessments. After construction of the Improvements is complete (as evidenced by the City's execution of the Certificate of Dull Completion), all Improvement Costs have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City pursuant toSection 5.04 hereof,and the 30-day protest period following publication of an ordinance levying Special Assessments has expired,the City shall use its best efforts to issue its general obligation bonds to finance the costs of the Improvements. C. The City shall have the sole right to select the designated Bond Counsel, financial advisor and underwntor (and such additional consultants as the City deems necessary for the issuance of the Improvement District Obligations). The City will approve the method of marketing the Improvement District Obligations. The Improvement District Obligations shall bear interest at such rates, shall be subject to redemption and shall have such other terms as the City shall determine in its sole discretion. The City shall have the sole control of the disbursement of the proceeds of the Improvement District Obligations,subject to the requirements in the documents governing the Improvement District Obligations and this Agreement. ARTICLE VII ASSIGNMENT;TRANSFER Section 7.01. Transfer of Obligations. A. The rights, duties and obligations hereunder of the Developer contained herein may not be assigned, in whole or in part,to another entity, without the prior approval of the City Council by resolution 14 following verification by the City Attorney that the assignment complies with the terms of this Agreement. Any proposed assignee shall have qualifications and financial responsibility,as reasonably determined by the City Manager,necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations ofthe Developer with respect to the portion of the Improvement District being transfierred. Any proposed assignee shall,by instrument in writing,for itself and its successors and assigns,and expressly for the benefit of the City, assume all of the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement and agree to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to which the Developer is subject(or,in the event the transfer is of or relates to a portion of the Improvement District,such obligations,conditions and restrictions to the extent that they relate to such portion). The Developer shall not be relieved from any obligations set forth herein unless and until the City specifically agrees to release the Developer. The Developer agrees to record all assignments in the office of the Register of Deeds of Saline County,Kansas,in a timely manner following the execution of such agreements. B. The Parties' obligations pursuant to this Agreement, unless earlier satisfied, shall inure to and be binding upon the heirs,executors,administrators,successors and assigns of the respective parties as if they were in every case specifically named and shall be construed as a covenant running with the land, enforceable against the purchasers or other transferees as if such purchaser or transferee were originally a party and bound by this Agreement Notwithstanding the foregoing, no tenant of any part of the Improvement District shall be bound by any obligation of the Developer solely by virtue of being a tenant; provided, however, that no transferee or owner of property within the Improvement District except the Developer shall be entitled to any rights whatsoever or claim upon any rights of the Developer to reimbursement of Improvement Costs as set forth herein,except as specifically authorized in writing by the Developer. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL COVENANTS Section 8.01. Indemnification of City. A. Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City,its employees, agents and independent contractors and consultants (collectively, the "City Indemnified Parties") harmless from and against any and all suits, claims, costs of defense, damages, injuries, liabilities,judgments, costs and/or expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorneys fees, resulting from, arising out of, or in any way connected with: 1. the Developer's actions and undertaking in implementation of the Improvements or this Agreement;and 2. the negligence or willful misconduct of Developer, its employees, agents or independent contractors and consultants in connection with the management, design, development,redevelopment and construction of the Improvements. 3. any delay or expense resulting from any litigation filed against the Developer by any member or shareholder of the Developer, any prospective investor, prospective partner or joint venture partner,lender,co-proposer, architect,contractor,consultant or other vendor. This section shall not apply to willful misconduct or negligence of the City or its officers, employees or agents, independent contractors or consultants. This section includes, but is not limited to, any repair, cleanup, remediation, detoxification, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remediation, response,closure or other plan(regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action)concerning 15 any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in (i)the Cornptebensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"; 42 U_S.C, Section 9601, et seq.), (ii)the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"; 42 U.S.C, Section 6901 et seq.) and (iii) Article 34, Chapter 65, K.S.A, and all amendments thereto, at any place where Developer owns or has control of real pieperty pursuant to any of Dn eloper's activities under this Agreement. The foiegoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107 (e) of CERC:LA to assure,protect,hold harmless and indemnify laity from liability. B. In the event any suit, action, investigation, claim or proceeding (collectively, an "Action") is begun or made as a result of which the Developer may become obligated to one or more of the City Indemnified Parties hereunder, any one of the City Indemnified Parties shall give prompt notice to the Developer of the occurrence of such event. C. The right to indemnification set forth in this Agreement shall survive the termination,of this Agement. Section 8.02, Insurance. A. At all times, the Developer shall maintain such insurance on the Developer's Property as required by any lender(s)to the Developer. B. During construction of the Improvements, the Developer or its agents shall maintain insurance in favor of the City against all such risks and in such amounts, with such deductible provisions as are customary with connection with the construction of similar improvements. Semon 8.03. Non-liability of Dfl icials,Employees and Agents of the City, No recourse shall be had for the reimbursement of the Improvement Costs or for any claim based thereon or upon any representation,obligation,covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement against any past,present or future official, officer, employee or agent of the City, under any rule of law or equity, statute or constitution or by the enforcement of any assessment or penalty or otherwise, and all such liability of any such officials, officers, employees or agents as such is hereby expressly waived and released as a condition of and consideration for the execution of this Agreement. ARTICLE IX DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Section 9.01. Developer Event of Default. Except as fufther provided herein, and subject to Section 9.05, a"Developer Event of Default"shall mean a default in the performance of any obligation or breach of any covenant or agreement of the Developer in this Agreement (other than a covenant or agreement, a default in the perforce or breach of which is specifically dealt with elsewhere in this Section), and continuance of such default or breach for a period of 30 days after City has delivered to Developer a written notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be remedied; provided, that if such default or breach cannot be fully remedied within such 30-day period, but can reasonably be expected to be fully remedied and the Developer is diligently attempting to remedy such default or breach, such default or breach shall not constitute an event of default if the Developer shall promptly upon receipt of such notice diligently attempt to remedy such default or breach and shall thereafter prosecute and complete the same with due diligence and dispatch. Section 9.02, City Event of Default, Subject to SeW2n_9.05.the occurrence and continuance of any of the following events shall constitute a`City Event of Default"hereunder: 16 A. After closing of any Improvement District Obligations, the City fails to use the proceeds of such Improvement District Obligations to reimburse the Developer within 30 days, and such delay is not cured or corrected for a period of 45 consecutive days;or B. Default in the performance of any obligation or breach of any other covenant or agreement of the City in this Agreement(other than a covenant or agreement,a default in the performance or breach of which is specifically dealt with elsewhere in this Section),and continuance of such default or breach for a period of 30 days after there has been given to the City by the Developer a written notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be remedied;provided,that if such default or breach cannot be fully remedied within such 30-day period,but can reasonably be expected to be fully remedied and the City is diligently attempting to remedy such default or breach, such default or breach shall not constitute an event of default if the City shall immediately upon receipt of such notice diligently attempt to remedy such default or breach and shall thereafter prosecute and complete the same with due diligence and dispatch. Section 9,03. Remedies Upon a Developer Event of Default. A. Upon the occurrence and continuance of a Developer Event of Default, the City shall have the following rights and remedies, in addition to any other rights and remedies provided under this Agreement or by law: I. The City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement or terminate the Developer's rights under this Agreement. 2. The City may pursue any available remedy at law or in equity(including specific performance) by suit, action, mandamus or other proceeding to enforce and compel the performance of the duties and obligations of the Developer as set forth in this Agreement, to enforce or preserve any other rights or interests of the City under this Agreement or otherwise existing at law or in equity and to recover any damages incurred by the City resulting from such Developer Event of Default_ B. Upon any Developer Event of Default,the City shall have no obligation to(i)reimburse the Developer for any amounts advanced under this Agreement or costs otherwise incurred or paid by Developer or(ii)issue any Improvement District Obligations. C. If the City has instituted any proceeding to enforce any right or remedy under this Agreement by suit or otherwise,and such proceeding has been discontinued or abandoned for any reason, or has been determined adversely to the City, then and in every case the City and the Developer shall, subject to any determination in such proceeding, be restored to their former positions and rights hereunder, and thereafter all rights and remedies of the City shall continue as though no such proceeding had been instituted. D. The exercise by the City of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other remedies for the same default or breach. No waiver made by the City shall apply to obligations beyond those expressly waived. E. Any delay by the City in instituting or prosecuting any such actions or proceedings or otherwise asserting its rights under this Section shall not operate as a waiver of such rights or limit it in any way.No waiver in fact made by the City of any specific default by the Developer shall be considered 17 or treated as a waiver of the rights with respect to any other defaults, or with respect to the particular default except to the extent specifically waived. Section 9.04. Remedies Upon a City Event of Default. A. Upon the occurrence and continuance of a City Event of Default, the Developer shall have the following rights and remedies, in addition to any other rights and remedies provided under this Agreement or by law: 1. The Developer shall have the right to terminate the Developer's obligations under this Agreement; 2. The Developer may pursue any available remedy at law or in equity by suit, action, mandamus or other proceeding to enforce and compel the performance of the duties and obligations of the City as set forth in this Agreement, to enforce or preserve any other rights or interests of the Developer under this Agreement or otherwise existing at law or in equity and to recover any damages incurred by the Developer resulting from such City Event of Default_ B. if the Developer has instituted any proceeding to enforce any right or remedy under this Agreement by suit or otherwise, and such proceeding has been discontinued or abandoned for any reason, or has been determined adversely to the Developer, then and in every case the Developer and the City shall, subject to any determination in such proceeding, be restored to their former positions and rights hereunder, and thereafter all rights and remedies of the Developer shall continue as though no such proceeding had been.instituted. C. The exercise by the Developer of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times,of any other remedies for the same default or breach. No waiver made by the Developer shall apply to obligations beyond those expressly waived. D. Any delay by the Developer in instituting or prosecuting any such actions or proceedings or otherwise asserting its rights under this paragraph shall not operate as a waiver of such rights or limit it in any way, No waiver in fact made by the Developer of any specific default by the Developer_ shall be considered or treated as a waiver of the rights with respect to any other defaults, or with respect to the particular default except to the extent specifically waived. Section 9.05. Excusable Delays. Neither the City nor the Developer shall be deemed to be in default of this Agreement because of an Excusable Delay, Section 9.06. Legal Actions. Any legal actions related to or arising out of this Agreement must be instituted in the District Court of Saline County, Kansas or, if fedcra.l.jurisdiction exists, in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. 18 ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 10.01. Mutual Assistance. The City and the Developer agree to take such actions, including the execution and delivery of such documents, instruments,petitions and certifications as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to carry out the terms,provisions and intent of this Agreement and to reasonably aid and assist each other in carrying out said terms,provisions and intent. Each party agrees that all actions to be taken by it under this Agreement shall be taken diligently and in good faith. Section 10.02. Effect of Violation of the Terms and Provisions of this Agreement; No Partnership. The City is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Agreement,for and in its own rights and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties,public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit this Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been provided. The Agreement shall run in favor of the City,without regard to whether the City has been, remains or is an owner of any land or interest therein in the Improvements or the Improvement District. The City shall have the right,if the Agreement or covenants are breached,to exercise all rights and remedies,and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breaches to which it or any other beneficiaries of this Agreement and covenants may be entitled Nothing contained herein shall be construed as creating a partnership between the Developer and the City. Section 10.03. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The Parties will make every reasonable effort to expedite the subject matters hereof and acknowledge that the successful performance of this Agreement requires their continued cooperation.. Section 10.04. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by the mutual consent of the Parties, by the adoption of a resolution of the City approving said amendment, as provided by law, and by the execution of said amendment by the Parties or their successors in interest,. Section 10.05. Agreement Controls. The Parties agree that the Improvement District will be implemented as agreed in this Agreement. This Agreement specifies the rights, duties and obligations of the City and Developer with respect to constructing the Improvements, the payment of Improvement Costs and the payment of certain Special Assessments. The Parties further agree that this Agreement contains provisions that are in greater detail than as set forth in the Petition and the improvement District Proceedings. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed an amendment of the Improvement District Proceedings. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations and discussions relative to the subject matter hereof and is a full integration of the agreement of the Parties. Section 10.06. Conflicts of Interest. A. No member of the City's governing body or of any branch of the City's government that has any power of review or approval of any of the Developer's undertakings shall participate in any decisions relating thereto which affect such person's personal interest or the interests of any corporation or partnership in which such person is directly or indirectly interested. Any person having such interest shall immcdiatcly, upon knowledge of such possible conflict,disclose,in writing,to the City the nature of such interest and seek a determination with respect to such interest by the City and, in the meantime, shall no participate in any actions or discussions relating to the activities herein proscribed. B. The Developer warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any officer, employee or agent of the City any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. The 19 Developer further represents that, to its best knowledge and belief,rc officer, employee or agent of the City when exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the Impravernews during his or her,tenure, or who is in a,position to participate in a decision making process or gain insider information with regard to the Improvements, has m will have any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or subcontract, or the proceeds thereof for work to be performed in connection with the Improvements, or in any activity,or benefit therefrom,which is part of the Irmprovements at any time during or after such person's teniae. Section 10.07. Term. Unless earlier terminated as provided herein,this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until such time as all Special Assessments are paid in full and all Improvement District Ubfigations are no longer outstanding. Section 10.00. Validity and Severability. It is the intention of the parties that the provisions of this Agreement shall be enfna ced to the fullest extent permissible under the laws and public policies of State of Kansas,and that the unenforceability(or modification to confonn with such laws or public policies)of any provision hereof shall not render unenforceable,or impair,the remainder of this Agreement. Accordingly,if any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed invalid or unenforceable in whole or in pant,this Agreement shall be deemed amended to delete or modify, in whole or in part, if necessary,the invalid or unenforceable provision or provisions, or portions thereof and to alter the balance of this Agreement in order to render the same valid and enforceable. Section 10.09. Required Disclosures. The Developer shall immediately notify the City of the occurrence of any material event which would cause any of the information:furnished to the City by the Developer in connection with the matters covered in this Agreement to contain any umtrue statement of any material fact or to omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make any statement made therein,in the light of the circumstances under which it was made,not misleading. Section 10,10. Tax Implications. The Developer acknowledges and, represents that (1) neither the City nor any of its officials, employees, consultants, attorneys or other agents has provided to the Developer any advice regarding the federal or state income tax implications or consequences of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,and(2)the Developer is relying solely upon its own tax advisors in this regard. Section 10.11. Authorized Parties. Whenever under the provisions of this Agreenrcut and other related documents, instruments or any supplemental agreement, a requcst,demand,approval,notice or consent of the City or the Developer is required,or the City or the Developer is required to agree or to talc some action at the request of the other Pavy, such approval or such consent or such request shall be givers for the City,unless otherwise provided herein,by the City Representative and for the Developer by any officer of Developer so authorized;and any person shall be authorized to act on any such agreement, request, demand, approval, notice or consent or other action and neither Party shall have any complaint against the other as a result of any such action taken, The City Representative may seek the advice, consent or approval of the City Council before providing any supplemental agreement,request, demand, approval,notice or consent for the City pursuant to this Section, Section 10.12.Notices All notices and rcquests required pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent as follows: 20 To the City: To the Developer: City Manager Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. City of Salina Atm: 300 West Ash Street Salina,Kansas 67402 With a copy to: With a copy to: City Attorney City of Salina 300 West Ash Street Salina,Kansas 67402 or at such other addresses as the Parties may indicate in writing to the other either by personal delivery, courier, or by registered mail, return receipt requested, with proof of delivery thereof. Mailed notices WWI be deemed effective on the third day after mailing; all other notices shall be effective when delivered. Section 10.13. Kansas Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Kansas. Section 10.14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same agreement_ Section 10.15. Recordation of Agreement. The Parties agree to execute and deliver an original of this Agreement and any amendments or supplements hereto, in proper form for recording and/or indexing in the appropriate land or governmental records, including, but not limited to, recording in the real estate records of Saline County, Kansas. This Agreement shall be recorded by the Developer, and proof of recording shall be provided to the City. Section 10.16. Consent or Approval Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, whenever the consent, approval or acceptance of either Party is required hereunder, such consent, approval or acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or unduly delayed. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 21 THIS AGREEMENT has been executed as of the date first hereinabove written. CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS Mayor (SEAL) ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF KANSAS SS. COUNTY OF SALIN ) On 2009, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared and ._ , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS,the city of the third class therein named,and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities,and that by their signatures on the instrument the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted,executed the instrument, WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: 22 THIS AGREEMENT has been executed as of the date first hereinabove written. CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company By Title: Member By Title: Member By Title: Member STATE OF KANSAS ) )SS. COUNTY OF SALINE ) On 2009, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument as members of Cornerstone Development Group, L.L.C. and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by such person's signature on the instrument the entity upon behalf of which such persons acted,executed the inserunent WITNESS my Band and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: 23 EDIT A FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS CERTIFICATE OF EMPROVEMENT COSTS TO: City of Salina,Kansas Attention: City Manager Re: Grand Prairie Improvement District Terms not otherwise defined herein shall haw the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Improvement District Development Agreement dated as of -- _.— ----_- 20-__ (the "Agreement')between the City and the Developer. In connection with the Agreement, the undersigned hereby states and certifies that: 1. Each item listed on Schedule 1 hereto is an I uprovement Cost and was incurred in connection with the construction of the Improvements after 20 [INSERT DA TF DISTRICT CREATED BYRESC)LU17ON]. 2. These Improvement Costs are reimbursable under the Improvement District Proceedings, the Act and the Agreement. 3. Each item listed on Schedule 1 has not previously been paid or reimbursed from money derived from any project fund established by the issuance of any Improvement District Obligations, and no part thereof has been included in any other certificate previously filed with the City. 4. There has not been filed with or served upon the Developer any notice of any lien,right of lien or attachment upon or claim affecting the right of any person, firm or corporation to receive payment of the amounts stated in this request, except to the extent any such lien is being contested in good faith. 5. All necessary permits and approvals required for the work for which this certificate relates were issued and were in full force and erect at the time sucb warm was being performed. h. All work for which payment or reimbursement is requested has been performed in a good and workmanlike manner Knd in accordance with the Agreement. 7. The Developer is not in default or breach of any term or condition of the Agreement, and no event has occurred and no condition exists which constitutes a Developer Event of Default under the Agreement. 9. All of the Developer's representations set forth in the Agreement retrain trite and correct as of the date hereof A-1 Dated this day of 20 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company By: Name: Title: Approved for Payment this day of 2 n. CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS By: Title: A-2 EXHIBIT B FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF FULL COMPLETION Pursuant to S'etWen 4.07 q the Apvement, thc;City shall, within tern (IO)drys following delivery of this Ce:-tifxcate, carry out such iuspc.;tions as it deems neceFsarl-to verify to its reasonable satisfaction the aecm aey of the certy?<vdons rvntained in this Cert fic rte. CERTIFICATE OF FULL COMPLETION The undersigned, CORNERSTONE DEATLOPMENT GROUP, L.L.C. (the "Developer), pursuant to that certain Improvement District Development Agreement dated as of 2Q , between the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS (the "City") and the Developer(the "Agreement"), hereby certifies to the City as follows: 1. That as of 20 the construction of all Improvements related to the Improvement District (as such terms are defined in the .Agreement) have been completed in accordance with the Agreement. 2. The Iiupfeveraexits miated w the Improvement District have been completed in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with the Construction Flans (as those term are defused in the Agreement). 3. Lien waivers for applicable portions of the Improvements havo been obtained, or, to the extent that a good faith dispute exists with respect to the payment of any construction cost with respect to the Improvements, Developer has provided the City with, a bond or other security reasonably acceptable to the City. 4. This Certificate of Full Completion is beim; issued by the Developer to the City in accordance with the Agreement to t,vidence the Developer's satisfaction of all obligations and covenants with respect to the construction of the Improvements. 5. The City's acceptance and the recordation of this Certificate with the Saline County Recorder of Deeds, shall evidence the satisfaction of the Developer's agreements and covenants to construct the Improvements. C®1 This Certificate shall be recorded in the office of the Saline County Recorder of Deeds against all of the Developer's Property which is subject to the Agreement. This Certificate is given without prejudice to any rights against third parties which exist as of the date hereof or which may subsequently come into being. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. IN WITNESS VV=OF, the undersigned has hereunto set his/her hand this day of 20 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C. a Kansas limited liability company By: Name: Title: ACCEPTED: CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS By: Name: Title: (Insert Notary Form(s)and Legal Description) C-2 GK MORE&BELL.P.C. DRAFT: November al 2009 Grand Prairie Development Agent WROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS and CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LL C. DATED AS OF TABLE OF CONTENTS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT k& ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Section1.01. Rules of Constrimlion...................................................................................................I Section 1.02. Definitions of Words and Tema...................................................................................2 ARTICLE H REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.01 Representations of City................................................................................................5 Section 2.02. Representations of the Developer.................................................................................6 Section 2.03. Conditions to the Effective Date of this Agreement.......Error!Bookmark not defined. ARTICLE III THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Section 3.01. Creation of the Improvement District...........................................................................7 Section 3.02. Special Assessments.....................................................................................................S Section3.03. City Expenses..............................................................................................................S ARTI IV CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.01. Design and Engineering of die Improvements...............................................................9 Section4.02. Construction of the Improvements................................................................................9 Section 4.03. Rights-of-Way and Easements....................................................................................10 Seed=4.04. Dedication of Improvements......................................................................................10 Section 4.05. Completion of Improvements.....................................................................................10 Section4.06. Rights ofAwAss.........................................................................................................11 Section 4.07. Certificate of Full Completion....................................................................................11 ARTICLE V REII4IBI1$SEM M OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS Section 5.01. Improvement Costs,Generally...................................................................................11 Sagan 5.02. Developer to Advance Costs.......................................................................................I I Section 5.03. City's Obligation to Reimburse Developer..................................................................I I Section 5.04. Developer Reimbursement Process.............................................................................12 Section 5.05. Might to Inspect and Audit..........................................................................................12 ARTICLE VI BIPROVEKENT DISTRICT OBaGATION9 Section 6.01. Conditions to the Issuance of ingx vammt District Obligations.................................13 Section 6.02. Security for the hnprovement District Obligations......................................................13 Seed=6.03. Terms of Improvement Dishict Obligations................................................................14 i ARTICLE VII ASSIGNMENT:TRANSFER Section 7.01. Transfer of Obligatiom.................»»..................»....,,.».............................................14 ARTICLF.VIII GENERAL COVENANTS Sesstlou 8.01. Indmnification of Qty,.—,....».......»»..,................................................................15 SmOon8.02. Insor®ace....,.»..........................................................».....,....................,......,»...........16 Section$.03, Nomliability of Officials Employm and Agents of the City..................................—,16 ARTICLE IX DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Section 9.01. Deeloper EVm of DdRult.......................».......,........,»».......,,...........................„....16 S tim9.:)2, City Fsseuto#17 t31t..,...,....».»...,..»».».,,.,,..,.<.........................................».,.....,,...16 Smntion 9.03. Rmedies Upon a Developer Event of Default,,,,,,»...................................<.,.»<.,.......17 Section 9..44, Femadies Upon a City Event of Wault.•.......»...................»».,....»»...........»,..,.......1 S $coition 9,05. Excusable Delays...............................................»....,..,.<.........»,..»........................,1E SeMou9:06, Ugelllcliom........................................................................................... , .........19 .ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS sewm10.0.1. INIi uw Amiatauix.....................,........................ .............. ... ................»......19 Section 10.02, Effect of Vtc+la on of the Terms and Previsions of this Agreemom No Pwtnerwp...... ......................—..............—...............................,..»,....».............19 Section10,03. 'rmw of Es etee...»......»................,.....»............,...................., ............................I9 Sectim10.04, ab.»..,....»_.».»............................»......,.......,,..».,.......»...............................19 Stvtion 10,05. Agreetneet Controls.............................».,,._......,,...».»,...,».....,...........................».».19 Soction10.06. Conflicto of Intmt.»..»................................................................ ....,.....»..,...........19 Section10.07. Tenn....... .. ..... ...................................................»...........................................=.20 Section 40.08. Validityand kvigability.....................................................................,.......................20 Section 10,09. ReqohW DWo ...........................................................,.,,..,............... ...............20 Saction10.10. Tax Implicatietts......................».................,.......,.......,..».......»...........,......................20 Section10.11, Autb"i Me ...........<.........................................................»..........»...».,,...........20 Section10.12. Nodco.. ..........—.........,.......................--.......................—........................_».............20 Secdon 10.13. Kwae eY...,......—..»»..,»..............,.»»...»».. .».,..........»,........,»,....».».,».............21 Sc--tion 10.14. Coummpmu.....................»....,. »,.,»., ..21 Section 10,15. .........................................................ofAgreement . .............<»....»...'.....21 Soctimm 10.16. C uentorAppwvol,»...................,.»»»..........................................,...........................21 0 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas as a city of the third class(the"City'),end CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C.,a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas(the"Developer,"and together with the City,the "Pnrcties'�and is dated as of ov MM 9 2004. RECITALS WHEREAS, on J, 2009, the Developer filed with the City Cie& the Improvement District Petition,pursuant to K.S.A.12-6a01 el seg.(the"Act`);and WHEREAS, the Improvement District Petition requests that the City create the Improvement District;contract the improvements,assess the coats thereof against the Improvement District,and same the City's general obligation temporary notes and bonds to Sconce the costs of the Improvements;and WHEREAS,the City and the Developer desire to enter into this Agreement to address woes related to construction and financing of the Improvements;and WHEREAS,the Developer may,at some future date,submit a petition for creation of it second improvement district pursuant to the Act,%bereby certain additional improvements will be constructed and assessaicats levied against certain property within the Improvement District(a"Subsequent huprovemennt Distrkn;and WHEREAS,at such time as the City receives a petition for a Subsequent Improvement District the City shall consider such request and,unless later emended in writing by the Patties,this Agreement shall not be interpreted to address any issues related to any Subsegment Improvement District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration sof the foregoing, and of the mutual covenants and afire mew herein contained,and otter good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which am hereby acknowledged,the Parties do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Section 1.01. Rules of Conshvctim For all purposes of this Agreement,kept as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires,the following rules of construction apply in construing the provisions of this Agreement. A. The terms deemed in this Article include the plural as well as the singular. H. All accounting to=not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them,and all computations herein provided for shall be made, in accordance with gnncrally accepted accounting principles. C. All references herein to "generally accepted accounting principles'° refer to such principles in effect on the date of the determination,certification,computation or other action to be taken hereunder using or involving such terms. 1 D. Ali references in this instrutuent to designated "Articles." "Sections" -ad other subdivisions are to be the designated Articles, Sections and cnher subdiNisions of this instrument as originally executed. E. The words"horcin,""hcrcof'and"hereunder"and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article,Section or other Subdivisiom F. The article and Section beadings herein are for oonvcnicncc culy and shall not affect the construction hereof. 0. The rapresa t tions, covenants and recitations act forth in the foregoing recitals are material to this Agreement and are hereby incorporated into and shade a part of this Agreemeut as though they were fully sat forth in this Section, The provisions of the Petition,and such Improvement District Process.and the provisions of the Act,as ameW4 aro hereby incorporated herein by raference and made a part of this Agreement subject in every case to the specific terms hereof. Section 1.02. Definitlons of Words and Terms, Capitalized words used in this A art shall have the meanings set forth in the Rocitals to this Agreement or they shall have the fallowing meanings: "Act" paeans the General Improvement and Assessment Law, K.S.A. 12-t91 el seq., as amended and supplemented from time to time, "Agreement" m:dw this lmlrvvjmQit District Development Agreement; as amended as 5typ w&-nttd frunt time to time. "Applieablc Low and Requirements"mesas any applicable constitution,treaty,statute,rule, regulation, ordinance, order, directive, code, interpretation, judgment, decrea, inunction, writ, determination,award,permit,license,authorization,directive,requirement or decision of or agrcnt with or by Govan mental Authorities. 'Bond Co m i"means Gilmore&I#sll,P.C. "Bond Proceeds"means proccWs of any Intpreveluimt District Obligations issued by the City, less casts of issuance.capitalised interest and my requited rescrees. *Certifleate of Improvement District Costa" means a certificate relating to Itnprov=cnt District Casts in substantially the form attached hereto as Txhihit "Certificate of Full Completion" means a cardficate evidencing Foil Completion of the Improvements,in substantially the forth attached hereto as Exhibit B. "City"means the City of Salina,Kansas. "City Event of Default" mcaw any cvcat or occtttterxe deed in Section 9.02 of this Agreement. "City Expenses"means the expenses described in Section 303 of this Agreement. "Cite Representative"means the City Manager of the City.and such other person or parsons at the time designated to aa on behalf of the City in matters relating to this Agreeineut. 2 "Construction Plans" means plans, drawings, specifications and related documents, and construction schedules for the construction of the improvements, together with all supplements, amendments or corrections,submitted by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with this Agreement. "Developer" means Cornerstone Development Group, L.L.C., a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas,and any successors and assigns approved pursuant to this Agreement. "Developer Event of Default"means any event or occurrence defined in Seedoa 9.01 of this Agreement. "Developer Representative"means and such other person or persons at the time designated to act on behalf of the Developer in matters relating to this Agreement as evidenced by a written certificate fturnished to the City oontaining the specimen signetm9a of snob person or persons and signed on behalf of the Developer. "Estimated Special Assessmeuts"means the City's estimate of the total amount of Special Assessments to be levied against the improvement District,based on actual Improvement Costs submitted by the Developer and the City's estimate of additional costs related to the improvements to be levied against the Improvement District pursuant to the improvement District Proceedings, The Estimated Special Assessments shall not exceed the hnprovement Costs Cap without the written consent of all owners of property within the Improvement District. "Excusable Delays"means any delay beyond the reasonable control of the Party affected,caused by damage or destruction by fun or otbaa: vaulty, power failure, strike, shortage of materials, unavailability of labor, delays in the receipt of Permitted Subsequent Approvals as a result of umeasonable delay on the part of the applicable Ouvermmental Authorities,adverse weather conditions such a%by way of illustration and not limitation,severe rain storms or below fining tautperatrues of abnormal degree or abnormal duration,tornadoes,and my other events or conditions,which shall include but not be limited to any litigation interfering with or delaying the construction of all or any portion of the Improvements in accordance with this Agreement,which in fact prevents the Party so affected from discharging its respective obligations hcreunder. "GovernmeaW Approvals"means all plat approvals,rn-zoning or other zoning changes,site plan approvals, conditional use permits, variances, building permits, architectural review or other subdivision, zoning or similar approvals required far the implementation of the Improvements and consistent with the Petition,the Improvement District Proceedings,and this Agreement. "Governmental Authorities"means any and all jurisdictions,entities,courts,boards,agencies, commissions, offices, divisions, subdivisions, departments, bodies or authorities of any type of any governmental unit(federal,state or local)whether now or hereafter in existence. "Improvement Costs"means the costs of the Improvements,and such other costs to be charged to the Improvement District as set forth in the Petition,including interest and costs of issuance related to any Improvement District Obligations issued by the City to finance the Improvements,all determined in accordance with the Act. 3 "Improvement Costs Cap" means .1.553.372.10 (the total cost of the Movements, as shown in the Petition and Preliminary Engineering Estimate and Feasibility lteoort related thereto,less estimated costs of the Improvements related to the financing thereof by the Cit rte. "Itnprovemsnt District"me=the in4mvemem district W be established by the governing body of the City pttrmant to the Act and the Petition. "Improvement District Obligation Conditions"means those conditions precedent to the City's obligation to issue Improvement District Obligations,as set forth in Section 5.01 "Improvement Distilet Obligations°' means bonds, notes or other obligations, singly or in serics,issued by rise City pint to the Act and in accordance with this Agreement. "Improvement DWdct PromWings"means any of the proceedings of the governing body of the City creating the hnprovemew District and/or levying Special Assessments. "Improvement District"means the improvement district to be established by the governing body of the city pursuant to the Act and the Petition. "Improvements" means the construction of following raven all to be constructed as shown on the 1 neerin Estnnate --------------------- Pie �•.' Femmtted:Font Not Italic and f=easfti y E"related to the 1? petition: _lite curb. Battering,paving, grading and drainage for approximately 901 lineal feet of Bentgtass Drive.(the Bentgrass Drive Street Itnprovements):1.128 lineal feet of Larkspur Lane.(the Larksour Lane Street It>m3rcmentsh and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle. fthc CobjuM Circle Street jMpMyMqLts)and collective) the"Street Inivrovements". The installation of approximately 1.386 lineal feet of six-inch water main 923 lineal feet of 9ght-inch water main,fire hydrants,valves,fittings,service connections for water lines Lad 411 upurtenances thereto(the Phase 1 Water System hWovemems):42 lineal feet of s' -i c 2,951 lineal feet of e' 1 inch water main fire hydrants, valves fittinnM service connections for water lines and all apnurtengages tbexeto(the Eight-inch Loop Water System b=vements)and collectively the"Water By=jWm%Mj;Wr, The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main. service connections for sewer lines lying within tight of way and/or util]ty.essement.manholes and all iWAI enances thereto as described: Lateral A am coximately 1.186 linea]feet(the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Imtxovements).Lateral A'appmximately 690 lineal feet(ft Lateral A',SonjU y Sewer 1mgmyemeats)lateral B approximately 1,357 lineal feet(the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer 1arovements) Lateral C atmroximately 973 lineal feet(the Lateral C Sanitary Sewer b=vementg Lateral D approximately 809 lineal fact We Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer lmproyemcots. The installation of stormwater detention and all appurtenances thereto(the"Stormwater Detention'h. Tim inoLlatiomof a e 2,46§ lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets and all appurtenances thereto(the"Drainage Improvements"). 4 "Permitted Subsequent Approvals" means the building permits and other governmental approvals customarily obtained prior to construction which have not been obtained on the date that this Agreement is executed,which the City or other governmental entity has not yet determined to grant. "PedflGe means the petition submitted by he Developer to the City Clerk on 29 Nov ,requesting the construction of the Improvements, as feather described therein,and that the costs of such impmYcracuts be assessed against the property described therein,all in accordance with the Act. "Phase I Lots"means the real property within the Improvement District legally described as Lots 1 thresug 30 Black—L and Lots=�-l.3 fdureugh S,Block 01 in the Grand Prairie Addition, of Satins .Safes golft Kougs. "Phase Q Lots"means the real property within the Improvement District legally described as Lots So 7 through 36 and 3$through 43.Black and F.90_as_, all in the Grand Prairie AddiWuu,in the City of Salina..Saline Cotmty Kansss. "Plans"means site plans,Construction Plans and all other Governmental Approvals necessary to conshvct the Improvements in accordance with City code,applicable laws of Governmental Authorities and his Agreement. "Prepayment Period"means a period of time within 30 days from the publication date of any ordinance levying Special Assessments. "Related Entity"means any individual or legal entity related to the Develops,detained in accordance with federal tax regulations. "Special Assessments"means any special assessment levied or proposed to be levied against any properly within the Improvement District,as determined in aocardance with the Act and the Improvement District Proceedings. ARTK E 11 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.01 Representations of Chy. The City makes the following representations and warranties,which are true and correct on the date hereof. A. an Authority. The City has full constitutional and lawfid right,power and authority, under current applicable law, to execute and deliver and perform the terms and obligations of this Agreement,and this Agreement has been duly and validly authorized and approved by att necessary City proceedings,findings and actions. Acoor'diiigty,this Agreement constitutes the legal valid and binding obligation of the City,enforceable in accordance with its teams. B. No Debults or Violation of Law. The execution and delivery of this Agreement the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,and the fulfillment of the terms and conditions hareof do not and will not conflict with or result in a breach of any of the terms or conditions of any agreement or instrument to which it is now a parry,and do not and will not constitute a default under any of the foregoing. 5 C. Pjo Litigation There is no litigation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of the City,threatened against the City with respect w the Petition or this Agreement, In addition,no litigation,proceeding or investigation is pending or,to the knowledge of the City,threatened against the City seeking to restrain,enjoin or in any way limit the approval or issuance and delivery of this Agreement or which would in any manner challenge or adversely affect the existence or povom of the City to enter into and carry out the transactions described in or contemplated by the execution, delivery,validity or parformance by the City of the terms and provisions of this Agrocinc . D. Ciovernmemtal or Corporate Consents. Pio consent or approval is required to be obtained from,and no action need be taken by,or document filed.with,any governmental body or corporate entity its connection with the execution and delivery by the City of this Agreoru m, E, t. No detbult or City Event of Default has oceurred earl is condmang,and no event has occurred aW is continuing which with the lapse of time or the giving of notice,or bout,would constitute a d utlt or an event of default in any material respect on dw part of the City under this Agreement, Section 2.02. Rgwesntatigns of the Developer, l'hv Davi lapse tnalcvs tits foiioiviitg ettresentaHons and warranties,which are trate and ctxrrect on the date bran£: A. Dug Authority. The Developer has all necessary power and authority to execute and deliver and perform the twms and obligations of this Agreement and to axed and deliver the documents required of the D@Woper herein,and such execution and delivery has bean duly and validly authorized and approved by all necessary proceedings of the Developer. Accordingly,this Agreement constitutes the legal valid and binding obligation of the Developer,edomeable in acwrdawc with its terms. B. No Defaults or Violation of La4y. The execution and delivery of this Agrnem=4 the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,and the Nfilltnent of the terms and conditions hereof do not aid will not conflict with or result in a breach of any of the teams or conditions of any soapotate or oa , tional restriction or of aY agreertteot or inatiumtent to Which it is now a party,and do not and will not constitute a default tinder any of the foregoing. C. Ido Iati¢atfon Pio litigation,proceeding or investigation is pending or,to the knowledge. of the Developer.threatened against the Improvements,the Paoject,the Developer or any officer,director, member or shareholder of the Developer, In addition,no litigation,proceeding or investigation is pending or,to the knawledga of the Developer,threatened against the Developer seddng to ruin,enjoin Or in any tray limit the approval or issuance and delivery of this Agreement or which would in any manner challenge or adversely affect the existence or powers of the Developer to enter into and Cary out the transactions desedbed in or contemplated by the exocution, delivery, vatidity or performance by the Developer,of the turns and provisions of this Agroon%42. D, No Material Ch . (1) The Developer has not Incurred. any material liabilities or catered into any material transecdor•.s other than in the ordinary course of business except ft the transactions comtemplate4 by this Agreement and(2)there has been no material adverse change in the business.financial position,prospects or results of operations of the Develop_or,wluich could Mot rite Doveloperss ability to perform its obligations purmmt tot his Agreement. B. Covet3n q=J or!gnorate CoMMs Pio consent or approval is required to be obtained from,and no action meed be taken by,or document filed with,any governmental body or corporate entity 6 in connection with the execution,delivery and performance by the Developer of this Agreement,other than Permitted Subsequent Approvals, F. No Defauh. No default cc Developer Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, and no event has occurred and is continuing which with the lapse of time of the giving of notice,or both, would constitute a default or an event of default in any material respect on the part of the Developer under this Agreement,or any other material agreement or material instrument to which the Developer is a party or by which the Developer is or may be bound. G. A�r_vals. Except for Permitted Subsequent Approvals,the Developer has received and is in good standing with respect to all certdreates,Homes,inspections,franchises,eoms®ts,immunities, permits,authorizations and approvals,governmental or otherwise,necessary to conduct and to continue to conduct its business as heretofore conducted by it and to own or lease and operate its properties as now owned or leased by it. Except for Permitted Subsequent Approvals, the Developer has obtained all cardfcates,licenses,inspections,franchises,consents,immunities,permits,authorizations and approvals, governmental or otherwise, necessary to acquire, construct, equip, operate and maintain the Improvements. The Developer reasonably believes that all such certificates,licenses,consents,permits, authorizations or approvals which have not yet been obtained will be obtained in due course. A. Construction Permits. Except fm Permitted Subsequent Approvals, all governmental permits and licenses required by applicable law to construct,occupy and operate the Improvements have been issued and are in full force and effect or,if the present stage of development does not allow such issuance,the Developer reasonably believes,after due inquiry of the appropriate governmental officials, that such permits and licenses will be issued in a timely manner in order to permit the Improvements to be constructed. L Comaliarsce with Laws. The Developer is in compliance with all valid laws,ordinances, oriter:,decrees,decisions,rules,regulations and requirements of every duly constituted governmental authority,commission and court applicable to any of its affairs,business,operations as contemplated by this Agreement. L Other Disclosures. The io£omation fitmished to the City by the Developer in connection with the matters covered in this Agreement are toe and cooed and do not contain any untrue statement of any material fact and do not omit to state my material fact required to be started therein or necessary to make any statement made therein,in the light of the circumstances under which it was made,not misleadifl& ARTICLE III THE EMUFROVEIM ENT DISTRICT Section 3.01. Creation of the Improvement District. A. The Developer has taken all actimns required by the Act to present the Petition to the City Comwil. The Developer agrees to cooperate in good faith to provide such additional information,as deemed necessary by the City,to allow for fiat!consideration of the Petition by the City Council. B. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the creation of an improvenuo district by the City is a legislative act,that the City cannot agree by contract to take future legislative action,and that the City will diligently consider the Petition in good faith pursuant to the Act and the terms of this Agreement- 7 C. Tltp Developer he=eby &grecs to waive any ruts that it may have pursuant to state statute,the K&was Constitution.the[;cited States Constitution,or as otherwise provided by law to object to any Special Ammments requested in the; Pgdtlen and iutpo-et pursuant to tho Act. DevelOTrex acicncu:xdScs and agrees that this waiver is freely given and with fu11 keiowledge of ffic extent of all statutory,eo aitutlonel or othev legal rights being waircd thzicby,and is givcn in consideration of the City forming Hie ItWovement District and assistant iv ptvviding for the finanring and constructiru of'thr hwrovemeuts. Section 3.02. Special Assessments. Upon(a)completion of the Improvements,as evidenced by the City's execution of the Certificate of Full Completion pursuant to Sge flgg 4.tt T hereof,and(b)the Developer's submission of all Certificates of Improvement Costs pursuant to:cfios 5.04 hereof,the City shall initiate proceedings pursuant to the Act to levy Special Assessments against property within the Improvement District. The Special Assessments shall be payable in_ (`^)equal annual instalhneats. The City shall allow all property owners within the Improvement Distract an opportunity to prepay all or any portion of such Special Assessments within the Prepayment;Period. -secttstn 3.03, 1:91y4ptaws. A. OWEWM&Gencrally_ The Dever aclatowlesdges that the city does not have a source of funds to finance coats iWWW"d for non-employee legal,financial and planning consultants or for dimer out-of poclret expenses and other reasonable costs resulting from services xcudere d to the Developer and the City to review,evaluate,process and consider the Petition and this Agreement(the ..City Expenses"). B. bW1Lft2ML In order to insure the prompt W timely payrttcnt of the City Expenses, Me D*voloper shall sstabliah a thud in the amount of Seven 17tousand Five l tutaMd Dollars($7,500,00) (tire "DPosit") by Paying eimb amount to the City contempomeously with the, executioax of No Agracmnent,receipt of which is h=by admowledged, Ther City shall pay initial City Expenses from the Deposit aced shall promptly submit an iten*ad statement for swh City Expenses to die Developer. The City 613611 shit nnottfbiy &taunts itemizing the City Exymios paid fkom the Deposit during the pmmft month. C. ®i6buxf of l 2rmt The City shall disbur6e tits Nposif for teinmburacntent of costs to the City an or before the:thirtieth(30th)day of wh montro, ftrr coarsetlting fees end the payment of all ow-of—pg"expenge iacurrW by the City is wamotiou with the porformanoe of its obligations under this Agreement as payment for such expenmem,become dire. Upon reaspuble notice,the Cary shoo walm its records available for inspwion by Dryolo"with respoot to much dixburammts, A —the–= All anmounta paid by the Developer to the City pursuant to this Section shall constittt`se costs chargeable to the huprovnuueut District and_ tltall be approved for rWmbwscmm as such by the City(but only from prtaoesdm of Improvememtt District Obligations and only to fife extent such amounts together with the actual Improvemat Costs do not excs®d the Improvtment Costs Cap). except for(i) any amounts attributable to the preparation and review of any agreements between the Devololm ad the City or among the Developer,the City and any third party,to the extort such ogreeuttents are tt luted to the Developer's reimbursement to time City or any dtird party for all or any Portion of any costs to be a d ogWkot this City'6 or mach ibittt patty's pwpaty tam a result of the Improvisnim District and(ii)6ny aawunts Omit oxo not"costa"ua defined by the Act, 112e Developer acknowledges that the actual fess and expenses of the Developer in negotiating and entering into this Agreement are not reirnburumabis costs pursuant to flee Act. 8 E. Refunding of Deposit. The City shall return to the Developer any unspent Deposit on the date when the City reimburses the Developer for the Improvement Costs from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations. ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF MPROVEMENTS Seethe 4.01. Design and Engineering of the Improvement L A. The Developer has submitmd and the City has approved Construction Phms for the bVwv menta pursuant to City Code. All Impr+ovemeds shall be designed,engineered,eoustruco4 and i wWW in accordance with all Applicable Law and Requivernaft of the City. The Construction Phms stall be in indwent completes and detail to show that oonetruetion will be in coformance wilt the Petition, the Improvement District Proceedings and this Agreement. All plans,specifications,conaacb and change orders related to the Improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. B. All coats associated with the prgwatiwn of the Plans for the Dmprovemems shall be paid by the Developer, but shall be reimbursable from proceeds of the Improvement District Obligations in the manner provided by Article V hereof. C Any firm preparing Plans for the improvements shall receive prior written approval of the City Engineer on behalf of the City. Seetbn 4.02. Construction of tke Improvements. All Improvements shall be designed, engineered and constructed by the Developer as again for the City. The Developer agrees that all onnstruatien,improvement,equipping,and installation work on the Project shall be done in accordance with the Petition,the Improvement District Proceedings,Construction Plans and related documents to be approved by the City in comphanoe with City Code The Developer,as agent for the City,shall comply with the f nowigg requirements: A. Contraction Permits and Approvals_ Before commencement of consaucstion or development of any wodr or Improvements,the Developer shall,at its own expense,secure or @ease to be secured any and all permits and approvals which may be customarily required by the City and say other governmental agency having jurisdiction as to such construction,development of wort The City shall cooperate with and provide all usual assistance to the Developer in securing these permits and approvals,and shall dr Deady process,review and consider all such permits and approvals as may be required by law', except provided that the City shall not be required to ism any such permits or approval for wry portion of the Dmprovemems not in conformance with the Petition or this Agreement. B. Enoneer's Estimate. Before the Developer shall enter into any contract for the improvements,an estimate of the cost of the keprovements shall be prepared by the City Engineer and submitted to the City Commission. The Developer shall not enter into any contract for construction of the improvements if the price c=cds the amount sat fat&in such estimate of the City Engineer. C. Bonds, The Developer or the Doclopces conhBcuot(s)shall provide for all public works bonds required by ICSA.60-1111 and any other perferroance and/or payment bonds reasonably required by the City prior to the commencement of construction of the Improvements. The premiums for such fronds shall constitute costs chargeable to the lmprovemont District. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its 9 eflleers and employees for any da arna a restilting Rom failure of the Developer to provide the bonds set forth in this subsection. D. action. The Developer, for itself its successors and assigns,and any contractor with whorn the Developer has contracted thr the perlbrmance of work on the bripmvewnts.agrees that m the construction,renovation,improvement,equipping,repair and installation of the Improvements provided for in this Agreement,the Developer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant far employment because of race, color. creed, religion, age, sex., marital status, disability, national origin or ancestry. E, Cost Overttans. The Patties acknowledge that On estimated and probable costs of the Impmvments included in die Petition arc based aapon calculations prepared by the Dcvelopma 'lie Improvements shall be com trticted in accordance with the emoted and pivbable costs set forth in the Petition. The Parties furdrer admowledp,e that the City may not impose Special Assoments for any cost in ertcoss of the Improvement Costs Com, Tao,Developer shall pay for all Improvement Costs that exceed the Improvement Costs Cap, Section 4,03. Right"May ay and Easepitearts. Developer will provide or cause to be provided, in a fors suitable for racorft in the real property records of Saline County,Kansas,within ten(10)days after wratten demand by the City, all ngbts-oPway and easements across or encmnberl S the aospacbve portion of the property noceasaty for the construction,ownership and operation of the improvements at no cost to the City. All bnprovemonts sball be located within standard storm drainage and utility easements.or rights PAW dedicated to publiio use and constructed in compliance with all Applicable Law and Requirements. Section 4.04. Dedication of I oprovements. 11c:Irnprovements will be dedicated to the City once the Improvements are completod. The Parties acknowt4c that any Improvements which.romain private in natitre cannot be financed under the Act and cannot be paid for with ft proceeds of tax exempt bonds or from Special Amossments, The City shall not be obligated tv accept dedication of any Improvements until the City has verified that the applicable Improvements have been bunt in accordance with all Applicable Law and Requkements;until the City baa vied that the Improvements have been built in accowme with the speeificotions approved by it; and MW the City has issued a Ocifficato of Fall Completion for the Improvemems to be dedicated. Sin 4,0'3. Completion of Improvements, A. T vela anew a The Developer shall commence construction of the Improvements in good and wm mtanlike manna r in socorda=with the u=is of this Agreement, The Devw�elopm shall cause the Improvements to be completed with due;diligence. ISlpon reasonable advance notice,the Developer AM meet with site City to rerview and discuss the design and consmiction of the Improvements in order 40 ziable the City to monitor the status of consUw ion and to determine#last the Improvements are being performed and completed in accordance with this Agreement. B. Contimtati letierr Subject to Fixe sable Delays, once tltri Developer has commenced esxistiarttiotr of the ImprvvcuacnU, the Developer sball not permit ceasation of vvc*on the Improvements for a period in excess of 45 consecutive days or 90 days in the aggtrgate without prim written cont of the City. C. No Waiver, Nothigg in this Agreemetat sball cunskme a waiver, of the City's right to consider and approve or deny Governmental Approvals pt mart to the City's regulatory authority as provided by City Code and applicable state law. 10 Section 406. Rights of Access. Representatives of the City shall have the right of access to the Improvements,without charges or fees,at wrmal motion hours during the period of construction,for the propose of ensuring compliance with this AgreemeM including,but not limited to,the umec>ion of the work being performed m constructing, renovating, nuprovmg, erlWppin Mv" and installing the Improvements,so long as they comply with all safety rules. Representatives of the City shall conduct all inspections the City deems necessary to ensure the Developer's oanstructian of the TaWnweme>ts in accordance with the Construction Plans and City Code. Except in case of emergency,prior to any such aooesa,such representatives of the City will check in with the on-site manager. Such rcp=m ad m of the City sball carry proper identification,shall insure their own safety,assuming the risk of injury,and shall not inteafere with the construction activity. section 4.07. Cer Mcate of Full Comptl dw A. Promptly alter completion of the br4 rovenents in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement,the Developer may submit a Certificate of Full Completion to the City. The Catificate of Full Completion shall be in substantially the form attached as Exhibit Ilse City shall,within ten(10)days following delivery of the Certificate of Full Completion,complete arch inspections as it deems accessary to verify to its reasonable satisfaction the accuracy of the certifications contained in the C4rfficMz of Dull Completion. Tia City's execution of the Certificate of Full Completion shall constitute evidence of the suffiAction of the Developer's agreements and covenants to construct the Improveneats. B. The City shall have the right to withhold delivery of the Certificate of Drll Completion until such time as the Developer has: i. completed the Improvements in accordance with the Improvement District Proceedings,the C nctk m Plans,and all Applicable Law and Requirements;and 2. provided the Developer'sFinancial Commitment described in SedhM"M ARTICLE V RFBOURSEME11Tl'OF EWPROVENTM COSTS Section 5.01. Improvement Coals,Genial. In consideration for the Developer's agreement In construct the Impmvements,the City agrees to wimbum the Developer for Improvement Coals,up to the Improvement Costs Cap, subject to the tams of the Improvement District Proceedings,the Act,and this Agreement. Section 502. Developer to Advance Cash. The Developer agrees to advance all Improvement Costs as necessary to complete the Improvemeits,uuW such time as the City issues Improvement District Obligations m accordance with Article VI hereof: After the City has issued Improvemet District Obligations,the Developer May request that the City directly pray Improvement District Coats in acwrdame with Section 3.01 hereof. Upon or prior to cucution of this Agreement,the Developer shall deposit with the City the fimds set forth in Section 3,M for the propose of reimbursing the City for City Exprnres reLted to pbmn m&legal,administrative and other costs associated with the Im>provaaerms,the improvement District and this Agreement. Section 5.03. City's Obligation to Reimburse Developer. Subject to the hams of this Agreern"and the conditions in this Section,the City agrees to reimburse Developer for Improvement Costs 1I in a total amount not to exceed the Improvement Costs Cap less any Improvement Costs incurred by the City and interest and costs of issuance related to the Improvement District Obligations, Developer may be reimbursed for Improvement Costs only from the proceeds of Improvement District Obligations as provided in AAI havo1 and the City shall have no obligation to reimburse Developer until prods of Improvement District Obligations are available. Tho Parties agree that all rehtbtttsemtait to the Developer shall be made only from the proceeds of Improvement Digit Obligations ad not from any other source. Nodbj;in this,4p=mett shall obligate the City to issue linpro emcut Dishict Obligations to reimburse Developor for any cost that is not both an Improvement Cost and a"cost'°as defined by the Act. Secdou 5,04, Developer Relmhursesamt Process. A. All miucsts for reimMscment mWor payment of Improvement Costs shall be made in a Certificate of Improvement Costs in substantial compliance Wah the f mm attached hereto as Exhibit A. All requests for reimbursement and/or payment shall be submitted by the Developer to the City within 30 days after the Certificate of Full Completion is exmutcd by the City, (1) With respect to costs requested to be reimbursed, the Developer shall provide itemized invoices,receipts or other information reasonably regaeeted,if any,to uncut OW any such cost has been paid and qualifies as an Improvement Cost,and shall further provide a stitnntary sheet detailing the costs rmueOW to be mitibursed, such summaty sheet shall show the date such cost was paid by the Developen the payee,a brief description of the type of oost paid,the amount paid, The Developer shall provide such additional information as reasonably requesW by die City to confirm that such costs have been paid and qutdify as Improvement Costs. (2) With revoct to costs required to tc,paid directly by the City,the Developm,spall provide itemized invoices to confxnu that any such cast qualities as an Improvetwit Cos`end shall tinther provide a summary sheet detailing the costs requested to be paid. Such sitauuaty sheet sbalt show the payee;.a brill dewn'ption of the type of cost,the.account to be paid,and the payment due date, no Developer shall provide, ur shall cause its rcmtraetars to provide, such additicual aifa-mation as reasonably requested by the City ro ronin that the such costs qualify as Irnwravement costs. B. The City roc�t;w rod I)have its eatgitceer•cur othm agents or mWiloym inspect ail work in respect of which a Certificate of Ini1xvvetnem Cosis is submitted.to examine the Developer's anal others' records relating to all cxpmQcs related to the invoices to be paid.and to oWin from suurh parb<;such other information as is reasonably necessary fax die City to evaluate compliance with the terms hereof C. The City shall have 30 calendar days aft cwt of any Certifies of Improvement Coss to review and respond by written lichee to the Developer. If the submitted Certificate of Improvement Costs and supporting documentation demonstrates that(1)the request relates to ft lmpr ,cmc+w Coss,(2)the expense has been paid or is due and owing to a 9*d party,(3)Developer is not in material de>bult tinder thin Agreement;and(4)there is no fraud on the pati of the Developer then the City shall approve the Certificate of Ituproverna t Costs and make,or cause to be made,miriburscrricut or paymed from the proceeds of Improventat Dislrict Obligations, within fifteen (13) days of the City's approval of the Gate of lmpsovement Costs. If tk City reasonably disappiroves of the Certificate of Improvement Coats,the City shall notify dw Developer in writing of the reason for such disapproval within such 30-day period: Appfowl of the Certif cafe of Improvement Costs will not be unreasonably Witliheid,conditioned or delayed. Section 5,05 Right to Inspect and Audit. 11v D.-Muller agars that_ up to one y(ar aftea completion of the Improvements,the City,with reasonable advance notice and during normal business hours, ;shall have the light and authority to review audit,and copy,from time t<tithe,all the Developers books and 12 records relating to the Improvement Costs(including,but not limited to, all general cwdractor's sworn statements, general coutmcts, subcontracts, material purchase orders, waivers of lien, paid receipts and invoices}. ARTICLE VI IMPROVEMENT DMWCT OBLIGATTONS Section U1. Conditions to the Inannce of Improvement District Obl%pdb ns. Alter the following conditions have been satisfied,the Developer may make a written request to the City to issue Improvement District Obligations,and the City agrees to take all reasonably necessary steps to consider the home of Improvement District Obligations upon receipt of such written request and when the following conditions have been satisfied(collectively,the`7mtprovmmtent District Obligation C=Utiens'): A. the City has executed the Certificate of Full Completion; B. all Improvement Costs have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City pursuant to Section 5.04 hereof;and C. if the request is for the issuance of Improvement District Obligations in the form of temporary notes to be issued until such time as bonds may be issued pursuant to the Act,the Developer Us provided the security described in Section 6.OWM except that such security shall be based on the Fstimated Special Assessments. D. If the request is for rho issuance of hnprovement District Obligations in the form of bands: 1. the City has adopted an ordinance levying the Special Assessments against the Improvement District;and 2. the Developer has provided the security described in Section 6A Section 6.02. Security for the hunt District Obligations. A. The Improvement District Obligations shall be general obligations of the City,payable as to both principal and interest in part from special assessments levied upon the property benclitad by the constrncdon of the Improvements,or from general obligation bonds of the Issuer and,if rot so paid,fiom ad vakK=taxes which may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount upon all the taxable tangible property,real and personal,vAbin the territorial limits of the City. The full faith,credit and resources of the City shall be irrevocably pledged for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Improvemeat District Obligations as the same became due. B. In consideration for the City issuing its Improvement District Obligations,and ea additional security for such Improvement District Obligations and to secure prompt payment of the Special Amsentents, the Developer shall provide certain financial commitments to the City (the 'Dawlo nei Financial Cammitracne). 1. The Developer's Financial Commitment shall be in one of the following forms, 13 a. msli cashier's eheok or an ewtuw account equal to 20%of die total Special A..ssessmenu levied against ali pmpetties within the Improvement District;or b. an hxevocable letter of credit equal to 35%of the total Special Assessments levied against all properties within than Improvement District, 2. The Developer's I'mandal Conmulment may be applied annually to satisfy the priwipal of and interest on the Impiw wont District Obligations,if any Special Assessments are not paid wben dim. 3. The portion of the Developer's Finamial Cornmiment reload to the Phase I bots shall bo releascd upon the request of rho Developer at the earlier of(i)five(5)yon tions the dato the gavar*body of the City adopts as ordinance levying the Special Assessments or(ii)the date when cam' testes of occupauoy are issued for at least 35%sof the Photo I Lot& 4. The portion of the Developer's Financial Commitment relate to the phase 11 Lots chap be released tenon the reW@o of the Developer at the earlier of(i)the date when ceatilteates of oecupang are issued for at least 35%of the Phase II Lots or(it)11ve(5)years alter costpletion of all public infastmsture womary to serve the Phase U Lots,mcludiat$but not limited to water sewer, storrawater,stormwatc dawtion,street and emergpncy access. Sfttlon 603, Terms of Improvement District Obligations, A. Upon the Developer°s satisMon of the conditions set fortis ill 6eetion 6AJ heroot the City shall use its best a RwN to issue Improvement District Obligations to finance the Improvements. H, Tlac Parties acknowledge that the City may not issue its general obligation bonds to fico e, the cow of the Improve rents until 30 days after the publication of an ordinance levying Special Assessments. Atter construction of the Improvements is samplers(as evidm"d by the City's v=ution of the CUrtificate of Full Completion), all Improvemeaat Costs have been submhW by the Developer and approved by the City pursuant to Sectlon 5A4 hemog and the 30-dsy protest period foMwAng publication of an ordinance lavyiug Spwial Assessments has expired,the City shall use its best efforts to issue its gerunal obligation bonds to time the costs of the Itnprovema ts. C. '17ae City shall have the sole right to select the designated Bond Counsel,finaavial advisor and usdwiniter (and such additional consultants as the City deems necessary for tbo issuance, of the Improvement District Obligations). The City will approve ate method of madming the Improvement Mstrict Obligations. The Improvement District Obligations shall bear interest at such rates, shall be s*eat to redemption and shall have such othar tam as the City shall determine.in its sole discretion. 1U City shall have the sole control of the disbursemeaat of the proccoh of the Ianprovetnest District Obligations,subject to the requiremals in the documents governing the Iuuprovenment District Obligations and this Agrcomett. ARTICLE VII ASSICINWNT-,TRANSM Seedon7M. Transfer of Obligation& A, The rights,ditties and obligations hevwxler of the Developer contained herein array not be, assigard..in whole or in part,to another entity,without the prior approval of the City Council by resolution 14 MDWiog verification by the City Attorney drat the assignment complies with the terms of this Agreement. Any proposed assignee shall have qualificatier s and finucial responsibility,as reasonably determined by the City Manager,necessary and adequate to fulfill the obligations of the Developer with respect to the portion of the Improvement District being trunsferred. Any proposed assignee*4 by instrument in writing.Jbr itself and its surccessars and assigns,and expressly for the benefit of the City,assume all of the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement and agree to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to Which the Developer is subject(or,in the event the trate is of or relates to a portion of the Improvement Distrito such obligations,conditions and restrictions to the extend that they relate to such portion). The Developer shall not be relieved from any obligations set forth herein unless and until the City specifically agrees to release the Developer. The Developer agrees to record all assignments in the office of the Register of Deeds of Saline County,Kansas,in a timely amarmer following the execution of such agreements. B. The Parties'obligations pursuant In this Agreement,unless earlier satisfied,shall inme to and be binding upon the heirs,exacutors,admioismatom successors and assigns of the respective parties as if they were in every can specifically named and dell be construed as a covenant running with to land, eafauoeaMe against the purchasers or other mins nes u if such purchaser or transferee were originally a party and bound by this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no tenant of any part of the Improvement District shall be bound by any obligation of the Developer solely by virtue of being a tenant; provided,however, that no transferee or owner of property within die Improvement District anent the Developer shall be entitled to any rights whatsoever or claim upon any rights of the Developer to reimbursement of Improvement Costs as set forth herein,except as specifically authorized in writing by the Developer. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL COVENANTS Section 8.01. Indemn@leation of Cky. A. Developer agrees to indemnify ed hold the City,its employees,agents and independent onncaetors and consultants Cconwdvely,the`City Indemnified Parties')harmless from and against any and all suits, claims,costs of defense,damages, injuries, liabilities,judgments,costs and/or expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorneys fees, resulting from, arising out of or in any way connected with: I. the Developer's actions and undertaking in implementation of the Improvements or this Agreement;and 2, the negligence or wrillCol misconduct of Developer, its employees, agents or independent contractors and consultants in connection with the management, design, development,redevelopment and coustructiam of the Improvements. 3. any delay or expeaae resulting from any litigation filed against the Developer by may member or shareholder of the Developer,any prospective investor,prospective partner or Joint venture partner,lender,co-proposer,architect,contractor,consultant or other vendor. This section shall not apply to willful misconduct or negligence of the City or its officers,employees or agenda,independent contractors or consultants. This section includes,but is not limited to,any repair, cleanup,remediation, detoxification,or preparation and implementation of any removal,remediation, response,closure or other plan(regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action)concerning 15 any hazardous substance or hazardous wastes including petroleum and its fractions as defined in()the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"; 42 U,S.C. Stiction 9601, et seq.), (ii)the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"; 42 U.S,C. Section 5901 et seq.)and(ii!)Article 34, Chapter 65,&S.A. and all amendments thereto,at any place Where Developer owns or has control of real property pursuant to any of Developer's activities under this Agreement. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agmentcnt pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA to assure,protect,hold harmless and indemnify City from liability. H. In the event any suit, action, investigation, claim or proceeding (collectively, an "Action')is bopm or made as a result of which the Developer may bccomc oblipicil to one or more of the City Indemnified Parties hereunder,any me of the City Indeunaified Parties shall give prompt notice to the Developor of the occurrence of ouch avant, C. The right to indemnification set forth in this Agreement.shall survive the termination of this Agreement, $ectlon 8.02. Insuramee. A. At all times,the Developer shall maintain such iuismauce on the Develope<'c Psopelty as requked by any londer(s)to the Developer. 8. During constion of the Improvements, due Developer or its ageum shall maintain insurance in favor of the City against all such risks and in such amounts,with such deductible provisions as are customary with connection with the construction of similar improvements. Seetian 8.03. Non-ilability of O111<elals,Employees and Agents of the City. No recoursc shall be had for the reimburnment of the Improvement Casts or for any claim based thereon or upon any representation,obligation,covenant or agreement contaii ted in this Agreement against any past,present or future official, officer, employee or agent of the City, under any rule of lad° or equity, tutatute or constitution or by the oethrc ant of any msaumM or penalty or otherwise,and all such liability ofWW such officials, offisors, employees or agents as cutch is hereby expressly solved and relveacd as a condition of and consideration for the=ecution of"Agrocracut, ARTICLE IX DEYAUL TS AND REMEDIES Section 9.01. Developer Event of Dothult, Except as t wdw provided b ire,and object to MgW2n 9.05.a"Developer Event of Defoull"shall mean a Moult its the performance of any obligadnn or breach of any covenant or qpmmt of the Developer in this Agrocrocat(other than a covenant or agteinent,it default in the performance or broach of which is spechically dolt with ekewime In tie Section).and continuance of such default or breach for a period of 30 days after City bno delivered to POW10M a IKTinm notice specifying such default or h and requiring ti tut be remedied;provided, float if such default or broach cannot be fully amedied within such 30-day period,but can reasonably be expected to be lolly rgm@died and the Dov€loper is diligently attempting to mmody such default or breach, snob du:m*or breach Mall not constitute a4ovent of"utt if the Developer shall promptly upon receipt of such rtofico diligently attempt to rMady Awh dchult or breach and shall thereafter grp cute and complete the same with dune dil*upp rind dispatch. $ectbn 9.02. City Event of Default. Sibert to Section 9.05,the occurrence and continuance of any of the following evcvt5 shall constitute a"C'.lt}Event of Default''hereunder: 16 A. After closing of any Improvement District Obligations,the City fails to use the proceeds of such Improvement District Obligations to reimburse the Developer within 30 days,and such delay is not cured of corrected for a period of 45 consecutive days;or B. Default in the performance of any obligation or breach of any other covenant or agreement of the City in this Agreement(other than a covenant or agreement,a default in the performance or breach of which is specifically dealt with elsewhere in this Section),and continuance of such default or breach for a period of 30 days after there has been given to the City by the Developer a,written notice specifying such default or breach and requiring it to be remedied;provided,that if such default or breach cannot be fully remedied within such 30-day period,but can reasonably be expected to be fully remedied and the City is diligently attempting to remedy such default or breach,such default or breach shall not constitute an event of dethult if the City shall immediately upon receipt of such notice diligently attempt to remedy such default or breach and shall thereaflmr prosecute and complete the same with due diligence and dispatch. Section 9.03. Remedies Upon a Developer Event of Default. A. Upon the occurrence and continuance of a Developer Event of Default,the City shall have the following rights and remedies,in addition to any other rights and remedies provided under this Agreement or by law: 1. The City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement or terminate the Developer's rights under this Agreement. 2. The City may pursue any available remedy at law or in equity(including specific performance) by suit, action, mandamus or other proceeding to enforce mad compel the performance of the duties and abligations of the Developer as set forth in this Agreement,to enforce or preserve any other rights or interests of the City udder this Agreement or Otherwise existing at law or in equity and to recover any damages incurred by the City resulting&aur such Developer Event of Deihult. B. Upon any Developer Event of Default,the City shall have no obligation to(i)reimburse the Developer for any amounts advanced under this Agreement or costs otherwise incurred or paid by Developer or(ii)issue any Improvement District Obligations. C. If the City has instituted any proceeding to enforce any right or remedy under this Agreement by suit or otherwise,and such proceeding has been discontinued or abandoned for any reason, or has been determined adversely to the City,then and in every case the City and the Developer shall, subject to any determination in such proceeding, be restored to their former positions and ruts hereunder,and thereafter all rights and remedies of the City shall continue as though no such proceeding had been instituted. D. The exercise by the City of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it,at the same or different times,of any other remedies for the same default or breach. No waiver made by the City shall apply to obligations beyond those expressly waived. E. Any delay by the City is instituting ur prosecuting any such actions or proceedings or otherwise asserting its rights ender this Section shall not operate as a waiver of such rights or limit ft in any way.No waiver in fact made by the City of any specific default by the Developer shall be considered 17 for treated as a waiver of dhc rights with respect to any other defaults,or with respect to the particular default except to the extent anecificaily waived. Section 9.04. Remedies Upon a City Event of Default. A. Upon the occurrence and centirrrance of a City Event of Dofault,ft Developer shall have the following rights and remedie4,in addition to any other t%hts and rean@dies provided under this Agreement or by law; 1. The Developer shall have the right to terminate the Developer's obligations under this Agreement; 2. The Developer may pursue any available remedy at law or its equity by shit, action,mattrlamus or other proceeding to enforce and compel the pm ohm ioce of dw duties and obligations of the City as set forth in this Agraetnourt,to enfbt ee or preserve any other rights or interests of the Developer under this Agreement or otherwise existing at late or in equity and to recover may damages incu trcd by the Developer resulting from such City Event of Default. I If the Developer baa imdtuted any proceeding to enforce any right or remedy under this Agreement by suit or otherwise,and such proceeding bas been diwontintaecd or abandoned for any reason, or has been determined adversely to the Developer,liken and in every case the Developer and the City aball,aubjeat to any determination in such proceeding,be w0ored to their former positions and rights and thereafter all rights and remedies of the Developer shall continue as though no such proceeding bad been instituted. C. The exercise by the Mn-eloper of any one remedy shall not preclude the exercise by it,at the sante or ditTercnt titnes,of any other remedies for the samc default or breach.No waiver made by the Developer shall apply to obligations beyond those expressly waived, D. Any delay by tie Doveioper in instituting tu•pruswixting any such a4tioas or iuocMiings ar othrawise asierting its rights under this patngraph shall not operaw as+a waiver of such rights or limit it in any tray.No waiver in fact made by dna IAweloper of any specific detaiulr by the Developer shall be considered or treated as a waiter of the rights with rospoct to any cutter defaults.or axth respect to the par:icular default except to the extant speeificaliy w Lived. Section 9.05. Excusable Delays. Neither the City nor the Developer shall be doomed to be in default of this Agreement because of an Excusable Delay. Section 9,06, Legal elcUons. Any legal audons related to or arising out of this Agreement must be instituted in The District Court of Saline County.Kansas or,if federal jurisdiction exists,in the United States Distnet Court for the Dism of Kansas. l ll ARTICLE X GENERALPROVISIONS Section IUL Mutual Assistance. The City and the Developer agree to take such actions, including the execution and delivery of such documents,instruments,petitions and certifications as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to carry out the terms,provisions and intent of this Agreement and to reasonably aid and assist each other in carrying out said terms,provisions and intent. Foch party agues that all actions to be taken by it under this Agicement shall be taken diligently and in good faith. Section 10.02. Effect of VioLHon of the Terms and Provisions of this Agreement•, No Pdatnership. The City is deemed the beneficiary,of the terms and provisions of this Agmemed,for and in its own rights and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parses,put&or private,in whose favor and for whose bemmafu this Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been provided. The Agreement shall run in lava of the City,without regard to whether do City has been, remains or is an owner of any land or interest therein in the Ju4novements or the Improvement District The City shall have the right,if the Agreement w covernnts are breached,to exercise all rights and remedies,and ID maintain say actions or suits at law or in equity or oder proper proceedings to enforce the wring of such breaches to which it or any other beneficiaries of this Agreement and covenants may be entitled. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as creating a partnership between the Developer and the City. Section 10.03. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The Parties will make every reasonable effort to expedite the subject matters hereof and acknowledge that the successful performance of this Agreement r"Wrres their continued cooperation. Section 10.04. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only by the mutual consent of the Parties,by the adoption of a resolution of ire City approving said amendment,as provided by law, and by the execution of said amendment by the Partes or their successors in interest. Section 10.03. Agreement Cont>v& The Parties agree that the Improvement District will be implemented as agreed in this Agreement. This Agreement specifies the rights,duties and obligations of the City and Developer with respect to ung the Improvements, the payment of Improvement Costs and the payment of certain Special Assessmets. The Parties further agree that Shia Agreement contains provisions that are in greater detail than as set forth in rho Petition and the Improvement District Proceedings. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed an amendment of the Improvement District Proceedings. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement supersedes all prior agreements,negotiations and discussions relative to the subject matter hereof and is a full irmtegration of the agreement of the Parties. Section 10A6. Conflicts of Interest. A. No member of the City's governing body or of any branch of the City's government that has any power of review or approval of any of the Developer's undertakings shall participate in any decisions relating hereto which affect such person's pet=al interest or the interests of any corporation or partnership in which such person is dhectly or indirectly immacd. Amy person having such interest shall immedistdy, won knowledge of such possible conflict,disclose,in minting,to the City the nature of such interest and seek a determination with respect to such interest by the City and,in the meam>Eimne,shall no participate in any actions or discussions relating to the activities herein proscribed. B. The Developer warrents trot it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any officer, employee or agent of the City any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreennera. The 19 Developer mrther represents that,to its best knowledge and beltaE no offtcor,employee or agent of the city who exercises or has exercised any Ainctions Of respoasibilitie$with respeet to the ImlaoVangnts during his or her team,or who is in a position to participate in it dcchion mailing process or gain insider information with reSW u) the Irnprovemooh. fres or will have any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or subcontract,or the proceeds tiweK for work to be peforowd in connection with the Imprcvemats,or in any activity,or befit tnereftom,which is part of the Improva aunts at any time during or after such person's tenure, Sin 14.01 Term. Unless earlier terminated as pmvided h this Agr shell retrain in M force and eft until such time as all ficial Assessments ara paid in fWl and all Improvernottt DLqftkt Obligations are reo longer outstanding. S Or,10A8. Validity suad Severabillty. It is the intention of the parties that the provisions of Ws AVw=m shall be edomcd to the fidlest extent permissible ruler On laws and public policies of State of Faeces,a_aa]that the unenforceability(or nakUcation iD conn with such laws or public policies)of any provision hereof shall not render uwaftweable,or impair,the of this Agreement, Acmdiagly,if any provision of this Agreement shall bo deemed invalid or uwaftneable in whole or in part,this AgreowaV shall be deemed amen to delete or rt o ft in whole or in paM N necessary,flur invalid or twenfor able provision or provisions,or portions theraot mrd to alter the balance of tWs Agreement in order to render the samo valid and adorceuble. Section 10.09. Aequla-ed Dissiosures, The Developer shall immediately notify the City of the occurrenev of any material event which would cause any of the information furmsW to the City by the Developer in comtection with tho matters covered in this Agreement to contain any untrue statment of any material fact or to emit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or neecssary to snake any statement made therein,in the light of the cirsomstances under which it was made.not rni€leadi%. Sedbe 14,10.Tax Fmpffeadons. The Developer acknowledges and represents that(1)mither the City nor any of its ofcials,employcos,consultants,attorneys or other agents has provided to tbo Developer any advice regarding the federal or state inFomo tax implications or conwqmoes of this Agreement and the Uvwactions contemplated hereby,and(2)the Nvaloper is relying solely upon its own tax advisors in this regard. Section 10.11. Autborked Party. Whenever ander the provisions of this Agreement and other related documents,instruments or any mppfementnl agreement,a rust,demaW.oval,notice or concept of the City or the Developer is required,or the City or the Developer is required to agroe or to take some action at the request of die other Party,such approval or mob consent or such request shall be given for the City,runless otherwise provided herein,by the City Reprativ€and for the Developer°by any offer of Dovvelop€r so authorized;and any person shall be authnrizsd to not on arty such agreement, regttes'tk demand,approval,Mice or consent or other action and neither Party shall have any complaint against the outer as a result of any such action taken. The City ItWmwntative may seek the advice, consent or approval of the City Coumil before providing any supplemental a8reemaK roqu€n,dmtattd, approval,notice or consent for the City pura+,rant to this Section. Soutton 10,12.Notice, All notices and requoib required pursuant to this Agreetam shall be sent as feRetU,: 20 To the City: To the Developer: City Manager Cornerstone Development Croup,L.L.C. City of Salina Attn: 300 West Ash Street Salina,Kansas 67402 With a copy to: With a copy to: City Attorney City of Salina 300 West Ash Street Salina,Kansas 67402 or at such other addresses as the Parties may indicate in writing to the other either by personal delivery, courier,or by registered mail,return receipt requested,with proof of delivery thereof. Mailed notices shall be deemed effective on the third day atter mailing; all other notices shall be effective when delivered. Section 10.13. Kansas Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Kansas. Section 10.14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same agreement Section 10.15. Recordation of Agreement The Parties agree to execute and deliver an original of this Agreement and any amendments or supplements hereto, in proper £oro for recording andlor indexing in the appropriate laud or governmental records,including,but not limited to,recording in the real estate records of Saline County,Kansas. This Agreement shall be recorded by the Developer,and proof of recording shall be provided to the Chy. Section 10.16. Consent or Approval Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, whenever the consent, approval or acceptance of either Party is required hereunder, such consent, approval or acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned or unduly delayed. [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEF]r BLANK] 21 THIS AGREEMENT has been executed as of the date ffrst hereinabove writt€L CITY Or,SAUNA,KANSAS _mayor (SLIQ ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF KANSAS ) )8S. COUNTY OF SALINE } on �, 2049, 1-vAi. me, do undasigned, a Natty I'uNk ice and for said ate, permnally amend and pmved to me an the basis of satidactory evideme to be the pmts whom twos are mbactibed to the within kaftow tan Mayor and City Car*,respectively,of the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS,the ashy of the third eines therein naml,and as kwwlodScd to me that they owcuted thaa sem in thea suftmod cgmities,and that by their signatures on the"mwumgnt rho entity upon behalf of w*h the Pam=acted,s xecutcd the instruinca WITNESS xray hand and ofytcial Seal. )Votes i'ublic My cataud*. ion v4pitv3: 22 IIHS AGREEMENT has been executed as of the date first hereinabove written. CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company By Title: Member Hy Title Member By Title: Member STATE OF KANSAS ) )SS, COUNTY OF SALINE ) On _, 2009, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared and who proved m me on the bads of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within iushumeat as members of Cornerstone Development Croup, L.L.C. and acknowledged to me Vast they executed the same in their authorized capackim and that by such person's signature on the instromcm the amity upon behalf of which such persona acted,executed the instrument. Vt'1TNESS my hand and offiial seal Notary Public My commission exphw-. 23 EXHIBIT A FORTH OF CERTIFICATE OF U4PROVEMENT COSTS CERTIFICATE OF IMPROVEMENT COM TO: City of Salina,Kansas Attention:City Manager Re: brand 1 nub ie I.mproventent District Yearns .tat otherwise defined kown shall hav4 the meaning ascrlbed re mach lemis in the Impvvenwi2t District Deeeiopinart eirvemew dated as of A� 20 (the 'Agrramem)6efuwn the City and the Dcnwfopw% In conneetimi Frith the AgrremcuL the undersigned hereby states and certifies that: 1. Each item listed on Schedule I hereto is an Improvement Cost and was incurred in commion with the construction of the Improv€eatr nts after 20 [INSERT DATE DISTRJC'TCR ATM. BYRESOLUITON, 2. Tlaes<Improl ement Costs are reirabirsabk tundw the Improvement District Proceedings, the Act and the Agrettnent, I Each item listed on Schedule I has not previously been paid or reimbursed from money derived f m any project fend established by the ismuce of any Improvement District Obligations,arum no part thereof has been included in any outer eartiftaw previously filed with the City. 4. Thi has not been.filed with or served upon the Developer any notice of any lien,right of lien or attachment upon or claim affecting the right of any person, firm or corporation to receive payment of the arnortnts stated in this requeg.=Vpt to the extcaat any awlt lien is being contested in good faith. 3. All necessary permits and approvals rewired for the work for which this certificate relates were issied and we in full force wd offtet at the time tach weak war being performed. 6. ASI wmk for which payment orycimburnment is requested has been performed in a good and evorkrnanlike manner and in accordance with the Agreement. 7. Th9 Dcvcloper is not in default or breach of any term or condition of the Agreement,ad no event has occurred and no condition exists which constitutes a Developer Event of Default under the Agreertrent. % All of the ikveloper's representations set forth in the Agmernent remain true and con-ect as of the date hereof A-1 Dated this day of €s - CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company By, Name: TWO: Approved for Payment this_day of ,20 CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS By: Title: A2 EdOiII3rr R FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF FULL COMPLETION I'w=4-,t to�47 of the Agrwmem,the City sloth,within len 110)dmys foU6w-ng delivat�,,of this Cerfi wale,carry cart mcb InVcctions m it deems nweessswy to verb to w tea mable Fatisfacttor,the mcumcy of the effiocattoav conts2lun t to fhis Gorliftwm CERTIFICATE OF FULL COMPLETION The undersigned, CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT 4ROLT,L.L.C. (the"Developee), pursuant to that certain lmpwvemM District Development Agreement dated as of_ _,_., 20_,betweM the CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS(the"Clty,•)and the Developer(the"Agreement'), hereby certities to the City as follower: 1. That as of _ , 20—, the consttachart of all I ulnrevarncmts related to the hnprovamat District(aa slich gone are defined in the.A.-Toemeut)have been completed in accordance with the Ag!intent. 2. The lMj71VVT;r+ents related tai tit,. Iml»tOuernc114 Uistrirt have been completed if, a wo,,rimunlike raamwr and in accor�aance with the Construction Plans(as those tomos arc daLtued in the 'Urecrucat). 3 Lien waiver,-,for applicable portions of the huprovetawts have been obtained,or,to the e;u,:nt that a good faith c?ispute mis&-With P PW to the payntMt of any eonsmxction a+st with respect to the Improvements,Developer has pnwvided the City with a and ar oilwr wcuiity reasonably acvep4able te the 4, This Certificate of Full Completion is being issued by the Developer to the City in accordance with the Agreemcut to evidence the Developer's satisfaction of all obligations and covenants with respect to the construction of the Improvements. 6, The City's acceptance and the recordation of tlds Ccrfficatc nith the Saline County Recorder of Deeds; shall evidenm the satisfaction of the Developer's agreetncnts and covenants to construct the Improvements, 1 -1 This Certificate shall be recorded in the office of the Saline County Recorder of Deeds against all of the Developer's Property which is subject to the Agreement. This Certificate is given without prejudice to any rights against third parties which gist as of the date hereof or which may subsequently come into being. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms m the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set histher band this day of 20 CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L,L,C. a Kansas limited liability company By: Name: Title: ACCEPTED: CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS Nemo: Title: (Insert Notary Form(s)and Legal Description) r-- formatted:Left,Tab slops: 232",Left+ 649",Right BC-2 RESOLUTION NO. AN RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C. WHEREAS,on November 9, 2009,the Governing Body of the City of Salina,Kansas(the"City') adopted Resolution No.__ creating the Grand Prairie Improvement District pursuant to K.S.A. 12-6a01 et seq.;and WHEREAS, the Governing Body hereby finds and detennines it to be advisable to enter into a development agrewnent with Cornerstone Development Group, L.L.C. to address certain issues related to the improvement district, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCE,KANSAS,AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approval of Development Agreement. The Development Agreement between the City and Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. is hereby approved in substantially the form presented to and reviewed by the City Commission at this meeting,with such changes therein as shall be approved by the officers of the City executing such document,such officers'signatures thereon being conclusive evidence of their approval thereof and the Mayor and City Clerk are herby authorized to execute and deliver such document. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage by the Governing Body of the City. ADOPTED by the Governing Body of the City this 90'day of November,2009, M. Luci Larson,Mayor (SEAL) Lieu Ann Elsey, CMC, City Clerk PETITION TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SALINA,KANSAS: We,the undersigned,owners of record of property located within the City of Salina,Kansas(the "City")do hereby respectively request that the Governing Body of the City create and designate an improvement district for the purpose of making certain improvements in the manner provided by S.S.A.12-6a01,et se+q, 1. The general mature of the proposed improvements are as follows: The curb, guttering,paving,grading and drainage for approximately 901 lineal feet of Bentgrass Drive, (the Bentgrass Drive Street Impprovements); 1,128 lineal feet of Larkspur Lane,(the Larkspur Lane Sued Improvements);and 225 lineal feet of Cobiren Circle, (the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements) and collectively the "Street Improvements". The installation of approximately 1,386 lineal feet of six-inch water main,923 lineal feet of eight-inch water main, fire hydrants, valves, fittings, service connections for water lines within right of way and/or utility easement and all appurtenances thereto(the Phase 1 Water System Improvements);42 lineal feet of six-inch water main,2,851 lineal feet of eight-inch water main fire hydrants,valva,fittings,service connections for water lines and all appurtenances thereto (the Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements)and collectively the"Water System Impmvements". The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main, service connections for sewer lines lying within right of way andlor utility easement, manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described: Lateral A approximately 1,186 lineal feet(the Laval A Sanitary Sewer Improvements);Lateral A'approximately 690 lineal feet(the Lateral A'Sanitary Sewer Improvements)Lateral B aptely 1,357 lineal feet(the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements)Lateral C approximately 973 lineal feet(the Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Improvements)Lateral D approximately 809 lineal feet(the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The installation of stormwater detention and all appurtenances thereto(the"Stocmwater Detention Pond'). The installation of approximately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer, inlets, and all appurtenances thereto(the"Drainage Improvements"). (collectively,the"Improvements"). 2. The estimated or probable cost of the Improvements is: One million six hundred eighteen thousand ninety-five dollars and ninety-four cents($1,618,095.94.) 3. The extent of the proposed improvement district to be assessed is: Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. (the"Improvement Disirict'7. The following lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they are not developable lots and therefore are not benefitted by the Improvements:Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 2,is dedicated as an open space easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;and Block 2 Lot 37,is dedicated as a drainage,utility,and open space easement of the plat. 4. The proposed method of assessment shall be: Each lot in the Improvement District shall be assessed equally per lot fir casts of the various Improvements benefitting such lot, as described in paragraph 5 below. 1 5. The proposed apportionment of coat between the Improvement District and the city at large is: One lruttdred percent(100'/0)of the total cost of improvements shall be assessed to the Improvement District and no portion of costs shall be paid by the City at Large. the costs of the Imprmi ements within the T.mprovoment District shall be further allocated as follows: One hundred percent(100%)of the Larkspur Lane Street Impivvemerts end the Cobiren Circic Street lntprovcments Shall be assessed to Lots I through 30:. Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas, Sixty percent (60%) of the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements' shalt be assessed to Lots I throttgh 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5.Block 2;all in. the Strand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Masi forty p ent(4(°/.)of the Bentgrass Drive Street Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 throw 34 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas, One hundred percent(I Me)of the Drainage Improvements shall be assassod to Lots I through 30,'Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred pcmfmi (100°/x) of Lateral A, Sanitary Sewer Intprovetueots and Lateral C Sanitary Sewer 1mprwrcraonts shall be assessed to Lots I tluough 30, Block J.and bots 1.3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 thaout h 43,Binck 3.,all in th,)Grand Prairia Addititm,in the City of Salina;Salinc County Kattcas. One hundred percent(100%)of the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots I through 30, Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Gerund Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas, One hundred percent(10010) of the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. Otte hundred percent (100%) of the Phase; I Water Improvemenu and forty percent (40%) of Eight-inch Loop Water System Improvements` shall be assessed to Lots I through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline Crotty Kano"; suety percent(60%)of Eight4nch Loop Water System Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. One hundred percent(100°/4)of the Stormwater Detention shall be assessed to Lots I through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. I gems Drive is a bmknvard style nesse to eab=ce dw cayway into the cutin s+udivislon; costs arm alleeaW such that all proportin shore in a portion of the bee51 provided to the settles subdis Aka 2 Eight-inch Loop Water Systema Improvotnents im rcquured M meet fire flood minim m in Phase 1. All lots in Phase 2 will be directly tapped to this system.Biwa the lots in Phase 2 will top duectly to this system,gnats are sllccate d mash that the 1'ltosc 2 props bear a grower propartiun of the cats, 6. The signers of this Petition hereby request that the Improvements be made without notice and hearing as required by 1K.S.A.124 44(n� NAMES MAX NOT BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE PETITION BY THE SIGNERS THEREOF AFTER THE GOVERNING BODY COMMENCES CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION OR LATER THAN SEVEN(7)DAYS AFTER FILING OF THE PETITION WITH THE CITY CLEM WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. 2 The petitioners certify,under oath,that they have no financial interest in any property with delinquent special assessment anywhere within the city of Salina. CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP,L.L.C. William R.Umphrey,Member Stephen E.Remick,Member Williams E.Sheppard,Member LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED WITEOIN THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,T through 36 and 36 through 43, Block 2, all in the Grand Prairie Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kansas. STATE OF KANSAS ) SALINE COUNTY ) I,the undersigned Notary Public,hereby certify that the signature appearing above is genuine and that this document was signed before me on this day of .20 Notary Public My appointment expires: 3 PRELUMNARY ENOINEURING FST IMATI: AND FFASIBILM REPORT PETITION NO., PROPOSED GRAND PRAIRIE ADDMON,PHASE I STREET,DRAINAGE,MW UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS B=Wm Dave,Lakspur Lone,Cobtren Circle FILE N0.2009-01 Nown1bor 2009 Wayne E.Nelson,P.E.,Civil Engineer SCOPE OF WORK The curb,guttering,paving,grading and drainage for approximately 901 lineal feet of Beatgrass Drive, (the Bemgrass Dhrive Street Improvements);1,128 lineal feet of Larkspur Lane,(the Larlorpur Lane Street Improvements);and 225 lineal feet of Cobiicu Circle,(the Cobiren Circle Street Improvements)and collectively the"Street Improvements". The installation of approximately 1,386 lined feet of six-inch water main,923 lineal feet of eight-inch water main,fire hydrants,valves,fittings,service connections for water lines within right of way and/or utility easement and all appurtenances thereto(the phase 1 Wafter System Improvements);42 lineal feet of six-inch water main, 2,851 lineal beet of eight-inch water main fire hydrants, valves, SrtdnjA service connections for water lines and all appurt me ccs thereto (the Eight-inch Loop Wer System hoprovements)and collectively the"Water System Improvements". The installation of eight-inch sanitary sewer main,service connections for server lines lying within right of way and/or utility easement, manholes and all appurtenances thereto as described: Lateral A approximately 1,186 lineal feet(the Lateral A Sanitary Sewer Improvements);Lateral X approximately 690 lineal feet(the Lateral A' Sanitary Sewer Improvements)Lateral B approximately 1,357 lineal feet (the Lateral B Sanitary Sewer Improvements) Lateral C approximately 973 lineal fed(due Lateral C Sanitary Sewer Improvements)Lateral D approximately 809 lineal feet(the Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements)and collectively the Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The installation of stormwater detention and all appurtenances thereto(the"Stormwater Detention')- The installation of approximately 2,466 lineal feet of storm sewer,inlets,and all appurtenances thneto (the Drainage Improvements")- BENEFIT DISTRICT Grand prairie Addition Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kansas. (the"Improvement DlsftkV). The following lots are excluded from the Improvement District because they are not developable lots and therefore are not benefitted by the Improvements:Block 1 Lot 31 is dedicated as a drainage and utility enownt on the plat;Block 2 Lot 2,is dedicated as an open space easement on the plat;Block 2 Lot 6 is dedicated as a drainage and utility easement on the plat;and Block 2 Lot 37,is dedicated as a drainage, utility,and open space easement of the plat. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The asmsrnent with atwrucd intcrest'to be levied,as a special aesessrmatt tau upon the property included with the bearefit district comment with the geperaI property tat and shall be payable in fifteen equal anntaal installments. Each limeel iu the bmprovcment District shall be assessed mualiyj_P-e� lot ig'- 3ts of lite vatiousr, - mat+ead(tA1MA)s1ms �e e4Aems ane Improvements benefitting such lot,as desctihed in"Apportionment of Cost"below APPORTIONMENT OF COST COST CHARGEABLE TO PRrVATE PROPERTY: One huadted percovt (100%)of Ilse total cost of improix ments shall -� assessed to the Improvement Disairi and no portion of costs shall be paid by the City at large.Thr coq*s of the Improvements within the lutprovement DisUici shall be further allocated as foUow ; One hundred pacout(1001N)of the E wksp,u I wrto 5treat Imp ovesuents and tits Cohiren Circle 5ttret Itmaror,ements shall be assessed to Lots I through W.shook L and Lots 1,3 thrau-jx 5, Blvd-2,at!m. the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Stdiva,Sabue County Kxusm'. Sixty percent(60%)of thea Bentgrass Drive SUW lmprovments'shall be amcssed to Lots i through 30.Blook 1,and Lots 1,3 thronah i,Black 2,all in the(band Prairie Addition,in the City of Balite, Saline County ; forty percent (40%) of the Ilentgrass Drive Street Improves shrill be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 aW 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grants Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,dine County Kansas. One hundred percent(1001%)of the Drainage Improvements shall be awned to Lots 1 thrmpb 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Selina,Saline County Kansas, One hundred parent(1000/6)of Lateral A Sanitary bower Improvements and Latml C Sanitary Sewer bnprovomente.shall be ammomd to Lats I through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 tbroush 5,7 through 36 and 38 timono 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Saline, Saline minty Kaesas. Ono hundred percent (100°x6) of the Lateral B Sanitary Server Improvetnonts and Lateral D Sanitary Sewer Improvements shall be assessedgt�oe;Lots 1 though 304 Block 1,and lots 1,3 tit ouo S,Block 2, all in ft Owd Ptah Addition, in the City of Salina, Saline County Kmm One huWred pamont(109%)of the Kral A'Santry Sower Improv encs shall be Finessed to Lot4 7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the brand Prahie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County KMOS& One hundred percent(100%)of the Pharms 1 Watu Improvements and forty percent(40%)of Eighth hoop Water Sya m ImprovewaW Amll be assessed to Lots 1 fitmugh 30,Block L and Lots 1,3 t1ltmSh 5,Block 2,all to ibe Orand Praire Addition,in the City of Salina,Salt County Kimono;sixty psrcont(60%)ofEigh such Loop Water System Improvements shall be assessed to Lots 7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Black 2,all in the Cmmd Pmirle Addition,in the City of Salina,&aline County Vis, One hundred percent(100%)of the Sumnwater Detention shall be assessed to Lots 1 through 30,Block 1,and Lots 1,3 through 5,7 through 36 and 38 through 43,Block 2,all in the Grand Prairie Addition,in the City of Salina,Saline County Kanas. I Bentgrass Drive is a boulevard style street to®hsoce the entryway imo the entire subdivision;cosh are allocated such that all properties share in a portion ofdw bawriit pmvided to the entire subdivision 2 Eijht-inch imp Wow System Improvements is required to meet fire flow minimums in phase 1.All lois in Phase 2 will be directly tapped to this system.Sims the lots in Phose 2 will top directly to this system,costs we allocdBd sucht o6cPhwe2 properties beer a greater proportion ofdw costs. Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City Of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Total Improvements item# Description _ ti Unit Unit Cost Extension I zataon I L.S 22, 2 ,6 2 Common Excavation 13,609 CY 3.93 33,755.55 3 Clearing&Grubbing 1 LS 18,900.00 18900.00 4 Asphalt Pavement.8" 4,532 Ton 39.20 239,230.40 5 Crab$gutter 6,838 LF 13.60 92,996.80 Removal ofclub da Gutter 109 LF 6100 654.00 6 Sidewalk,4' 649 SF 3.10 3,309,90 7 Sidewalk ramps.Type I 16 Ea 363.30 91012,60 8 Sidewalk romp,8' 2 Ea 906.10 1,812,20 9 Entrance approach.611 conerm(Markley ltd) 0 SY 51.35 0100 10 Fntrtarce approach @ Cadar Ridge,711 concrete 173 SY 33.30 9,601.50 11 Brick staanpO red cOacrote,6" 276 BY 125.35 34,631.$0 12 Emcrgcncy 0=00 potb,asphalt Millings,611 0 BY 4.35 0.00 13 Maintenance path,asphalt millings,4" 576 SY 3.65 UNA0 14 Grass pavers 0 SY 60.00 0.00 IS`type AS-2 cmb inlet 12 Ea 4,300,00 51„600.00 16 Type A5-3 curb inlet 4 ka 5,800.00 23200,00 17 Am inlet,7 x 7' 2 Fa 5.00D.00 10,000.00 18 Storrs sewar junction box,Ox 6 0 FAA 3,000,00 0.00 19 Storni manhole,4'diamptar 3 Ea 2,2.00.00 600.00 20 Storm pipe,1211 RCP 22 LF 25.00 550.00 21 6tolatr pipe,15"RCP 30 Ly 21,00 $40.00 22 Stena Tripe,I V'RCP 2,254 L.F 30.00 67,620.00 23 Stmm pipe,24"RCP 43 LF 33,00 1,505.00 24 Stoats pipe,30"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 25 Stoma pip¢,36"RCP 117 LF 75,00 8,775.00 26 Fad Wttart,121,RC 1 Ea $30.00 3.50.00 27 End wtion,15"RC 2 FA 350.00 700,00 28 End se u m I S"RC 5 Ea 400.00 2,000.00 29 End section,24"RC I Ea 300.00 500.00 30 ftd Wtion,301'RC 0 Fs 600.00 0.00 31 End sects m,36"RC I Ea 1,000.00 11000.00 32 Concrete flume,T primary pond 38 SY 39.05 2,243.90 33 Dein rip rap,D;a.6" 376 9Y 40.00 23,040.00 34 Rock darn,Dy,,,6" 15 CY 120.00 1,800.00 35 Coarse aggregate 0 SY 500,00 0,00 36 Water Pipeline,6" IA26 LF 17.00 24,276.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 3.774 LF MOO 75,480,00 38 Water ratings I Ton 4,500,00 OWN 39 Lire hydrant&valve assembly 12 Ea 2,750-00 31,000,00 40 Resilient gate valve.6p" 2 lea 700.00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gate valve,O" 3 Fa 873.00 2,625.00 42 Corporation stop,1" 34 Ea 275.00 9,350.00 43 Curb shutoff valve&box,1" 76 Ea 250.00 19,000.00 44 Copper service line,l" 780 LF 12.00 9,360.00 45 Corporation stop,1%:" 18 Ea 450.00 8,100.00 46 Wye,IK' 18 Ea 100.00 1,800.00 47 Copper service line,IY2" 625 LF 15.00 9,375.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20'x 8" 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Ea 2,800.00 2,800.00 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 5,015 LF 28.00 140,420.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 1,135 LF 25.00 28,375.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 34 Ea 75.00 2,550.00 53 Connect to Existing Sewer,8' 1 Ea 2,000.00 2,000.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 18 Ea 3,200.00 57,600.00 55 Drop Manhole 2 Ea 3,400.00 6,800.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 129 LF 200.00 25,800.00 57 Trench&Backfill,0"6' 947 LF 2.00 1,894.00 58 Trench&Backfill,6'-8' 586 LF 3.00 1,758.00 59 Trench&Backfill,8'-10' 928 LF 4.00 3,712.00 60 Trench&BacMI,10'-12' 845 LF 5.00 4,225.00 61 Trench&BaclTAl,12'-14' 920 LF 6.00 5,520.00 62 Trench&Backfdl,14-16' 583 LF 8.00 4,664.00 63 Trench&Backfill,16-19 143 LF 10.00 1,430.00 64 Trench&Backfill,18'-20' 63 LF 12.00 756.00 65 Special trench compaction 6,767 LF 4.00 27,068.00 66 Water 1 LS 2,287.50 2,287.50 67 Construction staking 1 LS 16,565.00 16,565.00 68 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 1,395.00 1,395.00 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 5.00 Ac 1,000.00 5,000.00 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt face) 7040 LF 2.25 15,840.00 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable LTJ 3520 LF 5.00 17,600.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 2240 Lb 1.25 2,800.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 60 Tan 50.00 3,000.00 SUB-TOTAL: � EKOWEERING&CONTINGENCIES 258,895.35 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 64,723.84 TOTAL: Petition No. C3rand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Proliminaty Estimate of Total Strom Impmvtsments Item# ltetn Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension I Mobilization 1 L.S 5,650.00 5,650.00 2 Common Excavation 13,609 CY 3.95 53,755.55 3 Clearing&Cirubhin; 1 L5 18,900.00 18,900.00 4 Asphalt Pavcmim 8" 4,532 Ton 57:20 159.230.40 5 t vz b&gutter 6,838 LF 13.60 92,996,80 Rciiiwml of Curb&Cvttic 109 LF 6.00 654.00 6 Sidewa;K f 649 SF 5.10 3,309.90 7 Type 1 16 Ea 563,30 9.0:12.80 d Sideuvik ramp,8' 2 Ea 906.10 1,812.20 9.Mark-ley acv�ss approach,6"4otu•rete 0 SY 5i,55 0.00 10 Taitaance approach(0..Cedar Ridge,7"ceucm-te 173 SY 55.50 9,601,50 11 .Biick 3tampvd YW colic Ytc,6" 276 SY 12.5.55 34,631.80 12 Emergeucy acce,u path,asphalt 3iilinp,6" 0 SY 4,55 9.00 13 Mainttaianee pati,,,uslihalt millings,4" 576 `;Y 3.65 2.102.40 let Grass pavers 0 SY 60.00 0.00 67 Wates 1 LS 57LM 571.83 68 Construction stakinS 1 LS 4,141,25 4,14115 69 Ttmiporarytra.fficwwrol 1 LS 348.75 348,75 70 Temporary tbrtilizcr,seod and ntulclr 1.25 Ac 1,000,00 1250,00 71 Temporary slope bovicy(silt fmce) 1760 LF 2.25 3,9600 72 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 880 LF 5,00 4,400.00 73'Tcmporary inlet sadimett barrier(gravel bags) 560 Lb 1,25 700,00 74 Tumpurary con3twtitni catmoice 15 Ton 50.00 750.00 SUB-T(FI AI.: $507,799,23 ENCiINEEMNI G do CONTINGENCIES 101,559.81 TF—MP NOTE,LN11RLST.BONDING&ISSUE 25,389.96 Tt3T4r.: $634,749.03 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Drainage Improvements Item# Description_ _____Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 4520.00 4,520.00 16 Type A5-2 curb inlet 12 Ea 4,300.00 51,600.00 17 Type AS-3 curb inlet 4 Ea 5,800.00 23200.00 18 Area inlet,Tx 7 0 Ea 5,000.00 0A0 19 Storm sewer junction box,G x 6' 0 Ea 3,000.00 O.00 20 Storm manhole,4'diameter 3 Ea 2,200.00 6,600.00 21 Storm pipe,12"RCP 0 LF 25.00 0.00 22 Storm pipe,15"RCP 0 LF 28.00 0.00 23 Storm pipe,18"RCP 2,214 LF 30.00 66,420.00 24 Storm pipe,24"RCP 43 LF 35.00 1,505.00 25 Storm pipe,30"RCP 0 LF 60.00 0.00 26 Storm pipe,36"RCP 0 LF 75.00 0.00 27 End section,12"RC 0 Ea 350.00 0.00 28 End section,l5"RC 0 Ea 350.00 0.00 29 End section,18"RC 3 Ea 400.00 1,200.00 30 End section,24"RC 1 Ea 500.00 500.00 31 Encs section,30"RC 0 Es 800.00 0.00 32 End section,36"RC 0 Ea 1,000.00 0.00 33 Concrete flume,T primary pond 0 SY 59.05 0.00 34 Rock rip rap,Dso,6" 124 SY 40.00 4960.00 35 Rock dam,DEQ,6" 15 CY 120.00 1,800.00 36 Coarse aggregate 0 SY 500.00 0.00 66 Special trench compaction 1,077 LF 4.00 4308.00 67 Water 1 LS 457.50 457.50 68 Construction staking 1 LS 3,313.00 3313.00 69 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 279.00 279.00 70 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 1.000 Ac 1,000.00 1,000.00 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt Brace) 1408 LF 2.25 3,168.00 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 704 LF 5.00 3520.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gavel bags) 448 Lb 1.25 560.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 12 Ton 50,00 600.00 SUB TOTAL: $179,510.50 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 35,902.10 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 8,975.53 TOTAL: 5224,388.13 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of.Dtamage Improvements Stormwater Detention Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 1130.00 1130.00 16 Type A5=2 curb inlet 0 Ea 4,300.00 0.00 17 A5.3 curb inlet 0 Ea 51800-00 0.00 18 Area inlet,7 x 7 2 Ea 5,000.00 10000.00 19 Storm sewer junction box,6'x 6' 0 Fa 3,000,00 0.00 20 Stortm manhole.4'diameter 0 Ea 2,200.00 0.00 21 Storm pipe,12"RCP 22 LF 25.00 550.00 22 Storm pip:,I5'RCT 30 LF 28.00 840.00 23 Storm pipe,18"RCP 40 LF 30.00 1200.00 24 Storm pipe,24"RCP 0 LF 35.00 0.00 25 Storm pipe,30"RCP 0 LF WOO 0.00 25 Storm pipe,36-'RCP 117 LF 7511)U 5775,00 27 End section,12"RC t Fa 350.00 350.00 28 Ead walion,15"RC- 2 Ea 359.00 70000 29 Lad metiou.18"RC 2 Ea 400.00 809.00 311 End section,24"RC' 0 Ea 300.90 =0100 31 End section,30"RC 0 Ea 800.90 0.00 32 1aid titvtiou,36"KC: 1 F.a 1,000.00 1000 00 �3 t oueNte flume.2'primary pond 38 SY 59,05 214?.90 34 Buck lip rap.U�').6" 452 8 v 40.00 18.080.00 35.leek lout,D,i,,6- 0 C;Y 120.00 0,00 36 Coanw aggregate 0 SY 500.00 0.00 66 Special trench compaction 40 LF 4.00 160.00 67 Nater 1 LS 114.38 114.38 68 Construction stalling 1 LS 828.25 828,25 69 Temporary tr ffic.control 1 LS 59.75 69.75 70 Tompora:y fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.250 Ac 1,000.00 650.00 71 Temporary slope barrier(silt tence) 352 LF 2.25 792:00 Temporary Slope Battier(Biodegradable Log) 176 LF 5.00 880-00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 112 Lb 1.25 140.00 73 Temporary construction entmuce 3 Toff 50.00 150.00 SUB-TOTAL; $49.053.28 ENUINTELRING&CONTINGENCIES 9,810.66 II•;MP NUFF,tN-I FRFST,BOMING&1SWE 2,452.66 TOTAL: $61,316.59 Petition No. Grand prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Water Improvements Item# Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 5,650.00 5,650.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 1428 LF 17.00 24,276.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 3774 LF 20.00 75,480.00 38 Water fittings 1 Ton 4,500.00 4,500.00 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 12 Ea 2,750.00 33,000.00 40 Resilient pte valve,6" 2 Es 700.00 1,400.00 41 Resilient gale valve,S" 3 Ea 575.00 2,625.00 42 Corporation stop,1" 34 Ea 275.00 9,350.00 43 Curb shutoffvalve&box,l" 76 Ea 250.00 19,000.00 44 Copper service line,l" 780 LF 12.00 9,360.00 45 Corporation stop,IV2" 1S Ea 450.00 8,100.00 46 Wye,IW 18 Ea 100.00 1,800.00 47 Copper service lime,1'/2" 625 LF 15.00 9,375.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 8" 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 1 Ea 2,800.00 2,800.00 65 Special trench compaction 3049 LF 4.00 12,196.00 66 Water 1 LS 571.88 571.88 67 Construction 8taldnt 1 LS 4,141.25 4,14125 68 Temporary traffic control I LS 348.75 348.75 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 1.250 Ac 1,000.00 1,250.00 70 Temporary slope barrier(sih fence) 1760 LF 225 3,960.(10 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 880 LF 5.00 4,400.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 560 Lb 1,25 700.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 15 Ton 50.00 750.00 SUB-TOTAL: $238,433.58 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 47,656.78 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 11,921.69 TOTAL: S298,04234 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Safina Preliminary Estimate of Phaw 1 Water huprovaments Item 0 Item tbmtity UnitUnit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization i LS 2,825,00 2,525.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" l3Sri LF 1700 23,562.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 923 LF 20.00 18,460.00 38 Water fittings 0.5 Ton 4,500.00 2,150.00 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 7 Ea 2,750,00 19,250.00 40 Milicat pate valve,6" 2 Ea 700.00 1,400.00 41 MiUcal gate valve.8" 1 F& 875,00 875.00 42 Corporation stop,l" 16 Ea 275.00 4,400.00 43 Club shutoff valve&bon,l" 3S Es 250.00 9,500.00 44 Copper service lines 1" 3% 1.F 12.00 4,752.00 45 Corporation stop,134" Q Es 450.00 3,600.00 46 Wye,l%" 8 Ec. 100,00 800.00 47 Copper mviee line,l%" 299 LF 15.00 4,455.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve.20"x S" 0 Ea 3,400.00 0,00 49'yapping sleeve&valve,S"x 8" 1 Ta 2,800,00 2,800.00 65 Special trench compaction 1,476 LF 4.00 5,904,00 66 Water 1 LS 285.94 285.94 67 Construction staring I LS 2,070.63 2,070.63 68 Tompomty trafte control 1 LS 174.38 174,38 69 TcmpQrary fertilier,seed and mulch 0.625 Ac 1,000.00 625.00 70 ToLnupm y wlyv barrier(silt fend€) 880 LF 2,25 1,980,00 71 Towporary Slope Hatriei(liiociepra hie Lei 440 1.F 5,00 2,200.00 '77 Tcmporavy iniac.sscxli€ueut barrier(Lauv4 l begs) 280 Lb 1.25 350.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 7.5 Tan $0.00 375,00 SUB-TOTAL: $112,923.94 ENGIaRING&CONTINGENCIES 22,584,79 TEMP NG-M,lis3` FREST,13C).rN.'7llt O&ISSUE 3,646.20 TOTAL. $141,154,92 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Eight-ineh Loop Water Improvements Item# Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization �. I L.S 2,825.00 2,825.00 36 Water Pipeline,6" 42 LF 17.00 714.00 37 Water Pipeline,8" 2851 LF 20.00 57,020.00 38 water fittings 0.5 Ton 4,500.00 2,250.00 39 Fire hydrant&valve assembly 5 Ea 2,750.00 13,750.00 40 Resilient gate valve,6" 0 Ea 700.00 0.00 41 Resilient gate valve,S" 2 Ea 875.00 1,75000 42 Corporation stop,l" 18 Ea 275.00 4,950.00 43 Club shutoff valve&box,l" 38 Ea 250.00 9,500.00 44 Capper service We,l" 384 LF 12.00 4,608.00 45 Corporation stop,I W 10 Ea 450.00 4,500.00 46 Wye,1%" 10 Ea 100.00 1,000.00 47 Capper service line,1%" 326 LF 15.00 4,890.00 48 Tapping sleeve&valve,20"x 8" 1 Ea 3,400.00 3,400.00 49 Tapping sleeve&valve,8"x 8" 0 Ea 2,800.00 0.00 65 Special trench compaction 1,573 LF 4.00 6,292.00 66 Water 1 LS 285.94 28594 67 Construction staking 1 LS 2,070.63 2,070.63 68 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 174.38 17438 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.625 Ac 1,000.00 625.00 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt knee) 880 IF 2.25 1,980.00 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Bicdegsdable Log) 440 LF 5.00 2,200.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gavel bags) 280 Lb 1.25 350.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 7.5 Ton 50.00 375.00 SUB-TOTAL: $125,509.94 ENGINEERING&OONTINGENCIES 25,101.99 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 6,27550 TOTAL: $156,887.42 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition tD the City of Salina Preliminary Eskmte of Sanitary Sewer Improvements Item k_ Description 2ttaartity Unit Unit Cost E»sion 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 5.650.00 5,650.00 50 Sewer Piueline,8" 5,015 Lx' 28.00 140,420.00 51 &ewer saV.ce pipeline.4' 1.135 LF 25.00 28,575.00 52 Sourer toes,8'a 4" 34 Ea 75.00 21550.00 53 Cmumt K)Fxistia8 Setvar,8" 1 Ea 2,000..00 2,OOO.Ot) 54 Standard Sankay Smar Manhole 18 Ea 3,200.00 57.600.00 55 Drop manhole 2 Ea 3,400,00 6,800.00 56 Ewa Depth Manhole 129 LF 200.00 25,800,00 57 Trench&Ba ll,M' 947 LF 2.00 1,894.00 58 Trench&13ack-fill,G-t3' 586 LF 3.00 1,758.00 59 Trench&Ba ll,8'-10' 928 IF 4,00 3,712.04 60 Trench&Ball,10"12' 845 LF 5.00 4,225,00 61 Tach&Ba ll,IT-14' 920 LF 6.00 51520.00 62 Trcrach&BacUll,14'=16 583 LF 8.00 4,664.00 63 French&Bat 11,16518` 143 LF 10,00 1.430.00 64 Trench&Ba Mil,18°=20' 63 LF 12,00 756.00 65 Special#arch compaction 2,601 LF 4.00 10,404.00 66 Water l LS 571.88 571.88 67 Consiraaction stalda►g 1 LS 4,141.25 4,141.25 68 Tragic control 1 LS 348.75 348.75 69 Temporary ferdlim,nod and mulch 1.25 Ac 1.000.00 1,250.00 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 1760 LF 2.25 3,960.00 71 Temporary 91t Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 880 LF 5.00 4,400.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gavel bags) 560 Lb 1.25 790,00 73 Temporary construction entrance 15 Taal 50.00 750.00 SUB-TOTAL,. $319,679,88 ETOWEERING&CONiIsNGENCIES 63,935.98 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDINt3&ISSUE 1S9,83,99 TOTAL, $399,599.84 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Sewer Improvements Lateral A Item# Descri tionti Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 0 ¢a on i"N 1070 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 1,186 LF 28.00 33,208.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 0 LF 25.00 0.00 52 Sewer teas,8"x 4" 0 Ea 75.00 0.00 53 Connect to Existing Sower,8" 1 Ea 2,000.00 2,000.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 Ea 3,200.00 12,800.00 55 Drop Manhole 1 Ee 3,400.00 3,400.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 15 LF 200.00 3,000.00 57 Trench&Baclifill,0.6 486 LF 2.00 972.00 58 Trench&Back il,6'-8' 92 LF 3.00 276.00 59 Trench&Backfill,8'-10' 189 LF 4.00 756.00 60 Trench&Backfill,10'-12' 419 LF 5.00 2,095.00 61 Trench&Backfill,12'-14' 0 LF 6.00 0.00 62 Trench&Backfill,I4'-16 0 LF 5.00 0.00 63 Trench&Backfill,16'-1 S' 0 LF 10.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfill,18'-20 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special trench compaction 521 LF 4.00 2,084.00 66 Water 1 LS 71.48 71AS 67 Construction stalting 1 LS 517.66 517.66 68 Traffic control 1 LS 43.59 43.59 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.156 Ac 1,000.00 156.1.5 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 220 LF 2.25 495.00 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegadable Log) 110 IF 5.00 550.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment batriea(gravel bags) 70 Lb 1.25 87.50 73 Temporary construction entrance 1.875 Ton 50.00 93.75 SUB-TOTAL: $63,312.48 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 12,66250 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 3,165.62 TOTAL: $79,140.61 Petition No. (hwW Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Sower Improvements Laterals A' Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost _Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 706.25 706.25 50 5ever.Pipclinc,L'•" 690 LF 29.00 19,320.00 51 Server•service pipcliue;4" 0 LF 25.00 0.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 0 Ea 75.00 0.00 53 Cowed to Existing Sewer,ll" 0 Ea 2,000.00 0.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Mauhole 2 Ea 3,204.00 6,400.00 55 Drop Manhole 1 Ea 3,400.00 3x400,00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 18 IF 200.00 3,600.00 57 Trench&Backfill,OR 194 LF 2.00 3138.00 56 Trench&Backfill,0-8' 119 LF 3.00 357.00 59 Trench&Bac' %8'=10' 317 LF 4.00 1.268.00 60 Tr:nch&Baoliili.10'42' 8 LF 5.00 40.00 61 Trench&Backfill,IT-IN 52 LF 6.00 312.00 62 Trenkh&Backfill,14-16 0 LF 8,00 0.00 63 Treuch&llaekfill,16-19 0 LF 10.00 0.00 64 Tram-&I3ae: 11,18'.20' 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special i;web cmpsction 0 L1< 4.00 0.00 66 Water 1 LS 71.45 71,48 67 Construction staking 1 LS 517.66 517.66 68 Fraffic conttol l LS 43.59 43,59 69 1'+zmporvy:rni'iar,wW:uta imt v i 0.156 Ac 1,000.01 156.25 70 Tanpo ary slope barrier•(412 bete) 220 LF 2.25 495.00 71 1'rrnp�y }-Stn aw Rmr i (Hi�de�n adalrie I o ff; 110 Ta 5.00 550.00 72 Teiuixr.v-y°rule,ic,&urc it bavier(gra*ci bags) 70 Lb 1.25 87.50 73 Toupmary amtrwtion entrame 1.675 Ton 50.00 93.75 SUB-TOTAL: $37,806.48 F:NCiI!'<ELICIIV(i [:()?�i'Ilti(il:tiC11.S 71561.30 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 1,890,32 TOTAL: $47,256.11 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Sewer Improvements Laterals B Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Cast Extension 1 Mobilization I L.S 1,412.50 1,412.50 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 1,357 LF 28.00 37,996.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 634 LF 25.00 15,830A0 52 Hewer tees,8"x 4" 22 Ea 75.00 1,650.00 53 Connect to Existing Sawer,8" 0 Ea 2,000.00 OX 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 6 Be 3,200.00 19,200.00 55 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 49 LF 200.00 9,800.00 57 Trench&Backfill,0-6' 0 LF 2.00 0.00 58 Trench&Back611,6'-S' 200 LF 3.00 600.00 59 Trench&Backfill,8'-10' 155 LF 4.00 62000 60 Trench&Backfill,10'-12' 206 LF 5.00 1,030.00 61 Trench&Backfill,12'-14' 243 LF 6.00 1,458.00 62 Trench&Backfill,W-16 347 IF 8.00 2,776.00 63 Trench&Baciffill,16'-18' 143 LF 10.00 1,430.00 64 Trench&Backfill,18'-20' 63 IF 12.00 756.00 65 Special trench compaction 1,242 LF 4.00 4,968.00 66 Water 1 LS 142.97 142.97 67 Construction staking 1 LS 1,035.31 1,035.31 68 Traffic control 1 LS 87.19 87.19 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.313 Ac 1,000.00 312.50 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt fence) 440 LF 2.25 990.00 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Log) 220 IF 5.00 1,100.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.50 SUB-TOTAL: $103,57697 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 20,71539 TRIP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 5,178.85 TOTAL: $129,471.21 Petition Tdo. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Server lmpmvemeW I.Aterals C Item# Beier Ep on Quantity Unit Unit Cost Extension 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 1,412.50 1,412.50 30 Sewer Pipeline,8" 973 11 28.00 27,244:00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 16 LF 25.00 400.00 52 Sem tees,8'x 4" 2 Ea 75.00 150.00 53 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 0 FA 2,000.00 0.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer li3anhole 4 Ea 3,200.00 12,800.00 55 Arop Manhole 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 22 LF 200.00 4.400.00 57 Trench&Backfill.C-C' 153 TIT 2.00 .506.00 58 Trench&Backfill,04 134 LF 3,00 402.00 59 Trench&Backfill.8'-10' 176 LF 4.00 704.00 60 Trench&Bukfill,10:-12' 129 LF 5.00 645.00 61 Trench&Baci ii11,17-14' 145 LF 6.00 970.00 62 Trench&Backfill,IV-16 236 LF 8.00 1,888.00 63 Trench&Backfill,16'-1V 0 LF 10.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfill,18-20' 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special trench compaction 25 LF 4.00 100.00 66 Water 1 LS 142.97 142.97 67 Construriion staking 1 L6 1,035.31 1035.31 68 Traffic control 1 LS 87.1.9 57.19 69 N-inporery k=ilizel,seed mud mulch 0,313 Ac i,000.D0 =12.50 70 TeiV ary slope bariicr(siit ti.ace) 440 LF 2.25 990.00 71 reminirw-y Slope Barrier(Biculegadable Log) 220 LF 5.00 1.100.00 72 Tenipm-wry inlet sediment ben ier(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 73 Temporary o nistraction entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.50 SUB-TOTAL: $55.351.97 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 11,070.39 TEMP NOTE,I T MST.BONI)INIO&ISSUE 2,767.60 TOTAL. $69,189.96 Petition No_ Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Salina Preliminary Estimate of Sanitary Sewer Improvements Laterals D Item# Description Quantity Unit_ Unit Cost EKtC== 1 Mobilization 1 L.S 1,412.50 1,41250 50 Sewer Pipeline,8" 809 LF 28.00 22,652.00 51 Sewer service pipeline,4" 485 LF 25.00 12,125.00 52 Sewer tees,8"x 4" 10 Ea 75.00 750.00 53 Connect to Existing Sewer,8" 0 Ea 21000.00 0.00 54 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 2 Ea 3,200.00 6400.00 55 Drop Manhole 0 Ea 3,400.00 0.00 56 Extra Depth Manhole 25 LF 200.00 5,000.00 57 Trench&Backfill,0-6' 114 LF 2.00 228.00 58 Trench&Backfill,6-8' 41 LF 3.00 123.00 59 Trench&Backfill,8'-10' 91 LF 4.00 364.00 60 Trench&Bacldll,10'-12' 83 LF 5.00 415.00 61 Trench&Backfill,12'-14' 480 LF 6.00 2,880.00 62 Trench&Bac1fll,I4'-16' 0 LF 8.00 0.00 63 Trench&Backfill,16-1 S' 0 LF 10.00 0.00 64 Trench&Backfill,18'-20' 0 LF 12.00 0.00 65 Special trench compaction 813 LF 4.00 3,252.00 66 Water 1 LS 142.97 142.97 67 Construction staking I LS 1,035.31 1,03531 68 Traffic control 1 LS 87.19 87.19 69 Temporary fertilizer,seed and mulch 0.313 Ac 1,000.00 312.50 70 Temporary slope barrier(silt fimce) 440 LF 2.25 990.00 71 Temporary Slope Barrier(Biodegradable Lop) 220 LF 5.90 1,100.00 72 Temporary inlet sediment barrier(gravel bags) 140 Lb 1.25 175.00 73 Temporary construction entrance 3.75 Ton 50.00 187.50 SUB-TOTAL: $59,631.97 ENGINEERING&CONTINGENCIES 11,92639 TEMP NOTE,INTEREST,BONDING&ISSUE 2,981.60 TOTAL: 574,539.96 Petition No. Grand Prairie Addition to the City of Saline Property Ownership Block 1 I.ot 1 Cornerstone Development group,L.L.C. Lot 2 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.G. Lot 4 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 5 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 6 Corncrtrone Deveiopmimt Group,L,L,C. Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,L,L,C, Lot 8 Cornerstone Developmmt Shoup,LIR, Lot 9 CRrnerstone Developmout Group,L.L.C. Lot 10 C. atone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 11 Cmuorstonc Developmem yup,L.L.C. Lot 12 Cornerstone Development Group,LI,C. Lot 13 Cornerstone Developinvut Croup,L,L,C. Let 14 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L,C. Let 15 Corna%touc Development Owup.LI.C. Lot 16 Cornerstone Dcvclopmmt Group.L,L,C. Lot 17 Cmemtone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 18 G<ornarstone VwWopm at Group,L,L,C. Lot 19 Comorsono Dewelopmat Group,L.L.C, Lot 20 C:omceratone Development Group;L-LC. Lot 71 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 22 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 23 Cornerstone Development Gwup.L.L.C. Lot 24 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C: Lot 23 Comastonc Development Group,L.L.C, Lot 26 Cornerstone Developmot Group,L.L.C, Lot 27 Cornerstone DevaloptrMo Grow,1,11C. Lot 28 Cornerstone Dcvelopmot Group,L.L.C. Lot 29 Cornerstone Development Group;L�L.C. W 30 Cornarstonc Dcvoloprmt Owup,L.L.C. Lot 31 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L,C. Block 2 Lot 1 Cbrnerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 2 Carnerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 3 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 4 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 5 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 6 Cornerstone Development Group,L.I.C. Lot 7 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 8 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 9 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 10 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 11 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 12 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 13 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 14 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 15 Cornerstane Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 16 Cornerstone Development Group L.L.C. Lot 17 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 18 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 19 Caractstone Development Croup L.I.C. Lot 20 Cornerstone Development Croup,L.I.C. Lot 21 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 22 Cornerstone Development C=roup,L.L.C. Lot 23 Cornerstone Development Group,L.LC. Lot 24 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 25 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 26 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 27 Carserstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 28 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 29 Cornerstone Development Group,L.I.C. Lot 30 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 31 Cornerstone Development Croup,M.C. Lot 32 Cornerstone Development Group,LJ-C. Lot 33 Cornerstone Development Group,U.C. Lot 34 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 35 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 36 Comerstame Development Group,L.I.C. Lot 37 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 38 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 39 Cermemstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 40 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 41 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. Lot 42 Cornerstone Development Group,L.I.C. Lot 43 Cornerstone Development Group,L.L.C. ea N rs N h e-1 "N"M lVN N rl rl r!N r4 N ed rq rt rt rA M M M'~M ^+MMM~nl'~^'.r�,-�M.a•-i Lr a�. '�iql 'a�5+��3. Q 52 Qnrir.R r.-nh A m W,w•n w r,+r.•n•n a-u in�m nr, M 1en .'ne Me r•iMM •ryMMMrry rn 01 In r•i mIn"i a-y f4!ti 4J rl ni nl N n,ev ni ni Si n�f+l nj!•i [V r[ni f�1^7 Pj P! .1 ry ni ON r8 r-i ni ri•-i m ni ni ri ri r•+i:3 of of r!•i ri ri ri ri c: c7a L 00 10 cc as C, 0 0 41 0 0 000 00 o e Ly V[Ll v.V! '�V3 to+.l: h Vt V:V.1n V.in Vi V,V1 VI ri iti�• [�•h� ter• r•ri l�r'N f• r-n[�{`� h�f+M1rir•h 40 o s� d O c74O0640 Oa 000- -—00d Ce '1 0. JO w w w to b A w w 00 S)w w w J r w w d0 ,.t O+•A a 0+00 Ol Ot O,UrA 0,00,0S 0411 Ot 0±.1•A 0T 01 T G! �; 1+i•M1 [+r+f• 6'�M1 f-1 rM1 R R h M1 M1 1` f�r•h M1 !+ (1 a z w O O C Om O W 1 m^J- b GOO r7 W G O W O .n rn f w m w w •.o r m o�pg•n 4 Ni ri M rn .i n f<i c .nIn i., In 11 in r :� www �wmwwaa� wweo�w3erg}rw�woewwwwoe 4D 4;n r '� r�r 'f'1 C d rl t'rl'ri v1 rl°r2 af9 ® 0 9x396 0 .� cjOU DOO .r rn.�-� "w`' �fn.Mi ti.M..Mr.Mi.M-iMrM-+in fq fry M MM�!� N, ev N M 'i r ri�%ry rs iy fEa, M r`i P9 rN H rl�Y N rl � rq ea 1•q ri ri ri n ni nt n ni ri ri N ns rl ra r4 rt ey''�+�lptbb£o''�'�,a .e�c +oww+a�oc"a,'ag� 39 w o »mxw ao nw eowtoeao '�f � M 1+1 f/j r•!M f•1ori hi fh•7/K NS ni°n ri€5 M•-'!M h1 •M f'.� n�°n rrr vr�hln r, r.rnMln vl Irl v, wr: f�!rn®4�'alrnacT� .1.1��c�a�r�syc;a c;�1`,oq€w °.1 hr,fFl N vl iw;rt}V1n i n PP 1-[••[�ro h s+ ry r,rn ry s�r.�- ri ri 'ro` r r ex ro a „c �wfloaaw r�eaawm,� w��m�:�� ac��w w d x r r.v, L• Ir.x-; •n�n IIn v %Q vt rl 10 `c? o`?`s '4. sc'a�n'R`�aqiR'a '4'o aX 1c,o`d u v�.c�b 3 m b•o+o u�'w uS ae en�w ,_:us r++o wwwwmwwwaoa ro oc n a co w w w oo oa ,w m cow txnlrYcirynrj[ry ni cv, ri rurni rq r{rlroryr•; tv,ryri ra r3 ww gav:• vi r, hen Zn hr.�n soo c�eoa,a.;Ztoa oa oa gccra•o, �hlnv+n rn of ri hw rl vi•n vi v,vi ri�n�z`n Ll�n��rc i� fv rl a rI s9R w o1��. °�'.�..�...m..h.,�.�® n eY CR vNg vN{vHi,vNi,vNj ani, YNin .Nit,MNj In gogo gg000000 ooa o en Me�i+�en�n an �en en�n eYn can ean'an can can ran can can rannr�n�ran r�i��r�i tea$��� a N NN HN N NN ii 14 32 m2 2 22 wMMHrAtifHHMHNHYIHHHNH Mer'nM MMr%i w�i e�n�ngi zzzzzzzzzzzzvmzzzzz N ci rf N N fV N Cry f4 f4 000000 hQ00n wn z V4zrZr4t-: ze eeceoccco occc 000000 C CtCLCt ee eew 00 W WWW C aGl ole: o; aaq s z kz$kkzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz y� ^M1 A N F�M1 M1 M1 ti N M1 A M1 ti M1 F� zz z z zz z z x+zzz z r u ------mmmmmm ..i-ta ri aa."I.n.-i'.S.i 00 W W W e0 00 W W m W W W W W W W W 00 W W W W W W W W W W vj r ri r v�Id r� r.,�n a vi 0 0 0 v;0 d o o"T d 4D'•i n r b b b O b 0 6 O C O O C O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. ........ ........ ................".. Cl O� Zi N z N N b I.(n M M M M M M 1A ~MM——r+——� av,oowW�eo eS eB eSW �o �o to woo�o•c.n 3+o�d�e"d+'d t3"d"d,o rn wi ni e.iri wi ri .�i�i ai a v:asa�v5�.v�'v]v5 a.fv y.��v re vihhnh X ri Xrti X � v vih� nhh h ri vnt v{s W W m W a W eno ono p w ono ono one one one on6 ane 5e a='e one 5e W M 00 W 10 V7 1p 1p b, �O a,47, Z az aaazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 00000 Z Z Zcj CV NA tj NCI N(H N CIN NN NN N N N N N N N N N N N �.rv, .►.rv.rav v, a ^^m r 2^ ^ �^^ M M M M M M M M M M M M AI PI M f'1 M M TV N N N N t'�i•fn ��N M a r�•�^ W Ot� ��„M.„������.„W.��.N N�N N O C OC 00,60000.r'O, 00,8 OG J m vvv.rvv�aav � �va.rya�J M f3 M M M M M M MMM M M M M rr.A cm N N M N N Mr.fR."t• *'1.^k°."l,PrP ry.^'!.e'1: N N N m N N N N I V N N N N r] Z,v N 9] b9�'4 Y~1 fA fR hH 44 r H ✓tR �-A to`b n sidc,'d198®rs�� dsi � In N qi nl T r�r r�r r �I rl u n!rl �i nl ntl rl t4 �1 nl re�J JO�W uPl W,C A ✓3 W:& 3 P.9 4'J?1 iq b A 47 ' vil ,re v! vl O w 6O6 ®i34pw 'rl rnr .D vl vl G G G G Q g Q Q S7�Sh.".f GJ D K A!A 01!R CP,A�A PtR P. A to a T 14,.T ulM '+ ry��� �ryr�ry.ryrNrysy rpnryr� yl r>)� �, +ores' b"J +3�+aw+JalrwY; � �c`��Owb`o"� a tl 0 In r k f n In va n.n In+nv,1471a rn n a rags gga,qqqqq ac ant M F7 r- W M ri M �q`�Tava � rtv $��h*n4 ri nrlNniryNri�iniri nrlrlNrlNa n M rJ nl N Nze n rl n Orf M fry M r+!!r1<r, [^RI i7 M fr1 M M M M on M M w' �` ro MIA 9 ±n — �y-��� 1••J Hamm, Allison From: Cline,Sue Sent: Thursday,January 09,2020 4:29 PM To: 'Justin Hanke, MD' cc: Hamm,Allison;Wicks, Shand!;Wood,Jacob Subject: Letter to Dr. Hanke Re:Open Records Request Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dr. Hanke, Please see email below and the two attached documents. Thank you, Sue Cline Administrative Supervisor Cltpof Community&Development Services 300 W.Ash,Roam 205 Salina,KS 57401 785-309-5715 1 sue.clineRsalina.ore Our mission is to encourage and promote safe,quality development and construction in the city of Salina. From:Wood,Jacob Sent:Thursday,January 09,2020 4:10 PM To:Cline,Sue<sue.cline@salina.org> Subject:Letter to Dr. Hanke Re:Open Records Request Sue, Can you please e-mail the attached documents to Dr. Hanke? We are providing some additional information based on the discussion that took place at the Commission meeting on Monday. Thanks Jacob Wood, ICMA-CM Deputy City Manager City of Salina P.O. Box 736 Salina,KS 67402 1 785-309-5700 iacob.wood@salina.org www.salina-ks.gov KPGF PGF 20220-1-1Q Ltr.to 2020-41-09 Ltr. Or.Hanke,pd.., Enclosurm.pdf... 2 i - n - 6 # p !1 4F �`C-� ;�.;\`i�l •�i�r� fir' - -��, oil� OWI RI \ ��1����rl`l ')���I���E����I�If����►;�✓ice'` � sr IN ui� I �IIl;11111111�IININII IYIIIIIYRIiI��YI���llllll�' IIWII f I�II�IIIIIIIlIei1lIIIIIII�I ISIII ItllfsqllIl''!IIIINi!WIIIIIIIIIIIIIrIIIII� II��RIYI� WNpj��IlHl�l Il�lmlp�� r b11111�IWl�l�WlelI�IIIIIIIII�II {; I�Illlllllllllla III I��'llNllllllll � + tlll i11111119A�II,IIINNII uiini iiiinoiw�iiiimiiIII � p 111111111111�� � WillIII 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ai t �8�� IIT Y a6O I I y � r tit Ir _ r K Y w 6 Y C 0 � p t a C t t S $p 1 t $ s r I A INA x L �� 3 Site Layout 3 s Grand Prairie Addition City of Salina, KS I Ueyof Development Review Team Project Notes Sana PROJECT: Proposed Plat North of Cedar Ridge DRT#: 296 DATE: January 16,2008 APPLICANT: Bill Sheppard, Steve Renich, Cork Umphrey Cornerstone Development Group. Greg Adams, Donald Dean-Campbell and Johnson Engineers. STAFF: Mike Schrage,Gary Hobble, Roger Williams, Kent Johnson, Jennifer Rein, Dean Andrew,Steve Snyder, Dustin Herrs, Mark Kruep, Martha Tasker,Wayne Nelson,Amy Lange. Overview: Bill Sheppard, Cornerstone Development Group, requested this DRT meeting to discuss the proposed platting of the property located on the north side of Cedar Ridge Drive, adjacent to the Municipal Golf Course. Reference proposed plat drawings provided by Greg Adams for this meeting. Reference map prepared by Mark Kruep for this meeting. Greg Adams, Campbell and Johnson, stated there are approximately 70 lots proposed, with access to the golf course. Zoning &Platting: ➢ Dean Andrew stated there are surveying/ land ownership issues. Boundaries need to be established for the golf course and subdivision. The City Commission would need to approve inclusion of golf course land for the plat. The City needs to dedicate offsite easements for sewer and water crossing the golf course. The common area for Mariposa subdivision is a `blanket utility easement`. However, the Mariposa Homeowners Association would have to consent to the excavation within the blanket utility easement. ➢ Dean Andrew stated that access corridors for golf course maintenance personnel would have to be granted as part of the plat of this property. ➢ Steve Snyder, Parks and Recreation Director, estimated 12'for mowers to cross the property. Steve thought the proposed layout is wide enough. Utilities: D Greg Adams stated there is an 8 inch existing water line adjacent to Cedar Ridge Drive and a 20 inch water line adjacent to Markley Road. ➢ Greg Adams said the plan is to build a gravity sanitary sewer and avoid lift stations. Proposed plan Is to tie into the existing manhole to the west across the golf course in the Mariposa common area. The proposed sanitary sewer line will provide City sewer to the existing golf course restrooms. Our Mission is to encourage and promote safe quality development and construction in the City of Salina DRT F#15,08.04 ➢ Martha Tasker expressed concerns with the sanitary sewer line running under the proposed pond at the Golf Course. Greg Adams said the drawing is conceptual, and running the line through the pond could be avoided by moving the line slightly. ➢ Martha Tasker would prefer the sewer and water lines to not criss-cross within the street right-of-way. This will cause maintenance problems if repairs are needed. Greg Adams stated once again, drawing Is conceptual and this can be fixed. ➢ Martha Tasker stated all KDHE Standards appear to be met on the proposed plan. Traffic & Emergency Access: Greg Adams stated there are interim roundabouts proposed as turnaround for long N-S cul-de-sac. ➢ Greg Adams stated there is a proposed access easement at the north end through the golf course to connect to Markley Road for emergency access. The existing path provides a second access. ➢ Greg Adams stated the 'Boulevard' entry is wide enough for two way traffic on one side. Greg Adams stated the proposed entry is located with good visibility from both directions. Roger Williams with the Fire Department saw no major concerns from a Fire Department standpoint. Cul-de-sac, roundabout, and limited access exit is ok. D Roger Williams asked what type of material is proposed for the limited access road. ➢ Dean Andrew suggested grass pavers that would be camouflaged once the grass grew over them. This would maintain a hard driving surface. A Steve Snyder said the cart paths in front of#3 and#B fairways are already reinforced. D Dean Andrew stated there is a 600' limitation on dead end streets. The Planning Commission can approve variances for this provided emergency access is adequate. > Greg Adams stated that his roadway design does not include the tangent lengths required by the Code. Dean Andrew replied that the Planning Commission may grant a variance for this. Drainage: ➢ Greg Adams stated the storm drainage will follow natural contours with a 'detention pond' as proposed. The golf course will need to give approval for this 'detention pond/water hazard'. D Dean Andrew asked how the water will get from the detention pond to the Mariposa utility easement. Greg Adams said there are many options for draining the water there, Including natural flow or a shallow channel. ➢ Mike Schrage asked if it would be helpful for the golf course to mark where the landing spot's are on the course. Greg Adams said yes,then the detention pond/water hazard could be changed (smaller, deeper, slope changes, etc). Our Mission is to encourage and promote safe quality development and construction in the City of Salina DRT-F#15,08-04 D Steve Snyder said the pond on the golf course would be a welcome thought if it is located in a rough area. Steve Snyder asked with the development of these lots, what Increase in water would there be at holes 12 and 13. Greg Adams thought it would Increase somewhat. ➢ Dean Andrew suggested a detention device to slow down the flow in those areas. > Mike Schrage asked if the downspouts on the homes would adversely affect drainage at the golf course. Greg Adams said he did not think so, but would check more into it. Dean Andrew agreed that other backyards at Mariposa do not adversely e affect the course. Mike Schrage stated staff would like to look at the drainage study that has been proposed. Greg Adams said there is a B to 1 slope proposed for the detention pond. Site Plan: Dean Andrew stated once the boundaries have been established and the plat ' is recorded, the City can quit claim ownership of its portion of the individual lots to Cornerstone. ➢ Greg Adams stated as shown, some of the minimum street design standards are not met. D Dean Andrew said to call those items out on the plat drawings. Staff would identify them for Planning Commission items and if they are not met the Planning Commission could grant variances. Fees: ➢ Filing fees for a preliminary plat application are $215.00 + $2.00 per lot. ➢ The zoning application fee is $270.00. Timeline: ➢ ASAP. D Greg Adams gave the goal to propose this at the January 28, 2008 City Commission meeting, and February 1, 2008 filing deadline of a preliminary plat. Steve Renich thought this goal might be a little optimistic. ICev Discussion!Decision Items ✓ Greg Adams will draft a letter requesting that the City Commission participate as a co-applicant on the plat and submit that letter to Dears Andrew to include in the preparation of the staff report for the January 28, 2008 City Commission meeting. This letter will need to be received by staff by January 22, 2008 in order to be included in the staff report for the January 28, 2008 City Commission meeting. Approval was granted by the City Commission on January 28, 2008 by Resolution#08-W3. NOTE: These meeting notes were prepared based on items discussed and plans submitted for this meeting. aur Mission is to encourage and promote safe quality development and construction in the City of Salina DRT-F#15,08-04 If you feel this information Is not correct based on what you understood from the meeting, please contact Amy Lange at 785-309-5715. Quick Problem Regolution: The City of Salina offers a Quick Problem Resolution (QPR) process that provides an opportunity to promptly have any concern regarding a specific development project addressed at the highest administrative level. This process is available to owners, architects, engineers, contractors and other project-related parties. QPR meetings are scheduled within 48 hours of the request and are moderated by the City Manager or Deputy City Manager. A written response is given within 24 hours of the QPR. Appeals can be made to the appropriate governing appeal board or the City Commission. Please contact Amy Lange, Development Coordinator at(785)309-5715 if you wish to request a QPR. Stay Informedl Please visit the City of Salina website, www.salina-ks.gqv, to sign up for an email subscription list that notifies you of upcoming Building Advisory Board code change 1 update discussions, new local code amendments and new administrative interpretations. Existing local code amendments and administrative Interpretations have been posted on the website. You can also subscribe to the Development Services Newsletter from the City website. The Newsletter Includes timely information about "hot topics" In our local development industry. If you do not have internet access and would like to subscribe to this information, please contact Sue Cline, Development Services Supervisor, at (785) 309-5715 to sign up for these mailing lists. Our Mission is to encourage and promote safe quality development and construction in the City of Salina DRT-F#15,08-04 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TELEPHONE - (785)309-5700 Michael D.Schrage FAX - (785)309-5711 City Manager TDD - (785)309-5747 300 West Ash - P.O.Box 736 - E-MAIL- mike sc:hra4e@salina.arc Salina.Kansas 67402-0736____- YVIi :y�aetyu.salinag�gov January 9,2020 Dr.Justin J.Hanke 1322 Bentgrass Dr. Salina,KS 67401 Re: City of Salina—Supplemental Response to Open Records Requests Dear Dr.Hanke: On January 3, 2020, I furnished you with the City of Salina's response (the "Response") to your five separate open records requests, dated December 30,2019("Requests"). The purpose of this letter is to provide you with additional information and records to address three issues that you have raised with respect to the Response. First, at the City Commission meeting on January 6, 2020, you stated that the City's Response omitted certain records consisting of attachments to email(s). Based on your comments,we have reviewed the records included in the City's Response and identified three records which were inadvertently omitted. The omitted records consist of three attachments to an email from Donald N. Dean to Wayne Nelson, dated October 21, 2009. Enclosed are the three attachments previously omitted. If these attachments are not the missing attachments to which you referred during the meeting, please let me know which specific attachments you believe are still missing,and we will make every effort to provide them. In addition, during the City Commission meeting, you stated that records related to the City's Development Review Team ("DRT'} were not included in the Response. The only DRT record we have identified to be responsive to your Requests is a document titled"Development Review Team Project Notes,"dated January 16, 2008. The record consists of notes from, and preliminary opinions expressed during, a January 16, 2008 DRT meeting. The record was withheld from the Response under K.S.A. 45-221(a)(20),on the basis that the record constitutes notes and/or a record in which opinions are expressed or policies or actions are proposed. Based on the discussion during the City Commission meeting, however, the City is willing to voluntarily furnish this record. A copy of the Development Team Project Notes, dated January 16,2008,is enclosed. Finally, in the Requests, you requested a copy of "Documentation and/or correspondence related to: . . . "Maiver of emergency access road by fire Marshal/Fire chief in RiverRun Addition." For the sake of clarification,the Response did not include such a record because no such record exists. The requirement of an emergency access road in the RiverRun Addition was not waived by the City. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sinc , ichaie Dfchrage ity Manager