Loading...
Cost Study Proposed Rec Center 1988 CITY OF S ALINA ' �.'� DEPT. OF COMMUNITY SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS PARK DEPARTMENT ROOM X110,CITY COUNTY BUILDING DIRECTOR GOLF COURSE 300 WEST ASH DON M.JOLLEY RECREATION COMMISSION SAUNA,KANSAS 67401 Area Code 19131 823-9141 FORESTRY MEMORANDUM From: Don M. Jolley To: Peter Brown Subject: Attached Committee Report Date: January 21 , 1988 The Recreation Commission, at its meeting last Tuesday, directed me to supply a sufficient number of copies of this Committee Report to be distributed to the Board of the City Commissioners and City Manager. If you have further questions, please advise. MEMBER . . . KANSAS LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES - NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES A Study of Relative Costs for the Proposed Recreation Center and for the Aquatic Needs for The City of Salina This is the report of a three member Salina Recreation Commission special committee that was appointed to attempt to answer questions that have arisen regarding recommendations by a task force on potential sites for a community indoor recreation facility. Our charge was to determine any unusual or unexpected additional costs that might be incurred during construction at the three proposed sites. We were also asked to determine what connection, if any, the municipal swimming pool in Kenwood Park might have on the proposed indoor-outdoor aquatics facility as part of a new recreation center. We held two meetings with employees of the City Engineering Department, who reported on studies they had made at the three sites. Roy Dudark, Director of Planning and Community Development, and SRC director Don Jolley attended one of the meetings. The Salina Journal was also represented at each session. The results of our study follow: Kenwood Site No. 1 . This was the first choice of the task force. It is directly east of the municipal pool in Kenwood Park on ground now occupied by a rodeo arena. Additional costa include: $43,000 for foundation piling because of unstable ground conditions; $20,000 to lay 300 feet of water line; and $10,000 to demolish the existing rodeo facility. Thane items total $73,000. There also could be additional coats in relocating the rodeo arena, depending upon what sort of agreement was reached with the Saline County Commission. � If it is was determined that only the arena itself was needed and rodeos were held inside the Bicentennial Center, then seating would not be required and relocation costs would probably be about $10,000. If another outdoor arena complete with spectator seating is required, the relocation costa would be considerably higher. We did not attempt to determine what that cost might be. Kenwood Site No. 2. This was the second choice of the task force. It is directly east of the Bicentennial Center's east parking lot. ' Additional costs include: $43,000 for foundation piling; and $24,000 for 1700 feet of water line. Total coats would be $67,000. At this site, the rodeo grounds would not be disturbed. East Crawford Site No. 3. This was the third choice of the task force. It is on the new recreation complex on East Crawford St. Page 1 • It is anticipated the building would be built east of Markley St. and south of the existing ball fields. Additional coats include: $27,000 for a sanitary sewer . This sewer would tie into the sewer that is already. planned for the club house at the ball diamonds; $158,000 for a water line. This expense is to provide two eight inch "loops" that provide adequate pressure for fire protection, and to adequately service the new center. There would be a $100,000 savings at this site because little if any additional parking lot construction would be required. Existing runway would be utilized for that purpose. The additional coats total $85,000 with the parking lot taken into consideration. If an indoor-outdoor aquatic facility were built in Kenwood Park, it then could replace the outdoor municipal pool . It is suggested that future consideration should then be given to constructing neighborhood swimming pools to serve other areas of Salina, with Centennial Park in west Saline and Jerry Ivey Park in south Salina and East Crawford as possible sites. If the aquatic facility were built on the East Crawford site, then a third neighborhood pool probably should replace the municipal pool to serve central and north Salina. The Carver pool, which now serves north Salina, should be closed or replaced because of its poor condition. Costs to repair the municipal pool to gain an additional ten years of use are $80,000. When considering the possible sites for a new recreation facility, we believe it is important to recognize the intangible factors that may affect the decision. Our studies have shown that the costa associated with the three proposed sites will not vary significantly when all factors are considered. So other related factors may largely determine the beat location for the new facility. One consideration should be who largely will be the users of such a facility. The consultant for the study, Key and Company, dealt primarily with general population measures. Perhaps of equal importance would be a demographic study now under way by the Salina Recreation Commission which seeks to plot the residences of all SRC facility users. While incomplete, it does reveal an emerging pattern. Iron Ave. seems to be the north boundary of users, with relatively few users living north of it. There also are large clusters of users living in east Salina, particularly where apartment complexes are located. Another consideration is the likelihood that expansion of the city will continue to the east and southeast. If so, and particularly if a new elementary school should be built on a site reserved for that purpose one mile south of Crawford on Markley, then a water tower and new 20 inch line would need to be built at a coat of 9770,000. That amount is too large for for any developer, the Salina School District, or the Salina Recreation Commission to absorb individually, and may eventually have to be authorized by Page 2 the City . But there now is no such project included in the city' s current five-year capital outlay program. This committee feels strongly that a joint meeting of all concerned parties should be held regarding a possible recreation facility site. This meeting should include representatives of the City Commission, Saline County Fair Board, Saline County Commission, Recreation Commission, and the Task Force that recommended the sites. Those representatives should address the possibility of using either of the Kenwood Park sites or the East Crawford site, or other possible sites if none of the proposed sites are acceptable. Finally, this committee was not charged with recommending a site to the Recreation Commission, but we nevertheless are unanimous in our opinion that the East Crawford site has the beat potential for fulfilling the recreation needs of Salina. The land is there, abundant parking is available, it is served by good access roads, and it would tie in well with other facilities planned or completed there. With our experience with KTI,• it is apparent that "central location" is not a major concern for the users of our programs. Our second choice would be the rodeo arena site in Kenwood Park, assuming the site were made available. We have serious reservations about the second Kenwood site, believing it simply is too small for our requirements. Our sources included Don Hoff, Mike Peterson, Roy Dudark, and Don Jolley. • Lato..314 1, . Randall Hard 2 Chia/ man I Ray S yder, & ommittee Member Larry ,tthews, Committee Member Page 3