fhwa hpms kdot 9/26/1983 11/4/1983KANSAS DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION
STATE OFFICE BUILDING -TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612
JOHN B. KEMP, Secretary of Transportation JOHN CARLIN, Governor
September 26, 1983
City Engineer
Dean Boyer
City -County Building
300 W. Ash
P. 0. Box 746
Salina, Kansas 67401
Dear Mr. Boyer:
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has instructed the 50 states to
gather information on their highway system to develop a Federal data base called
the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). Certain random sample
sections of the Kansas highway system have been designated HPMS sections.
Accordingly, some of these sections happen to be in your city.
These city sections are not on the state highway system, and the Kansas
Department of Transportation does not have plans for them. Therefore, the
Bureau of Transportation Planning would appreciate your help by locating and
sending us copies of the cover sheets and plan and profile sheets from the plan
sets of the projects encompassing these sections. We will use these plans to
obtain curve and grade information for the HPMS submittal.
A listing of the HPMS sections is provided. The list displays the street
name, beginning and ending points and the length (along with some extra informa-
tion) of each section.
Send the information to: Mike Quinn, Bureau of Transportation Planning,
8th Floor, State Office Building, Topeka, Kansas 66612. If you have any
questions please call: 913-296-3841. A response is requested by November 1st.
Your help in this matter is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Glenn Anschutz, P.E.
Chief of Transportation Planning
PRIW ZD IN UiA
•N
-
- —I
- —
OIE
is
a m IS,
i
•N
a\ f
1
F a
p N 1
1
F 9
«.N
F a
rz
IS
l
nl
S
IS R
1.
1
r IS
IS
a /
1
I IS
tl k
!
F .a
IS
{
it 6
a 1.
1
(�
• q
F a
q t
F
1 q
ap
i
IS
i o
a 1
1
1
IS
i
vl
nif
11
11 0 1
•
f IS
a W •
{
I n
Is
1`
N z 1
IS
a ►
I
{ u
-B IS UN-
{
17 Pt fm
in rl Iry
in t'R m
fn f7 t1
Pl fork m m P1 Pi
01 P1 m
49 P► In +w1
-
f - IS
U1 in
in m In
Ln So
N to In
in to N 111 IA
in to
a1 in If In
I
1' � u
N i z Q
t[
4 ,
ISf�
s
iIS
�a f U
1
u I a
i p
.,A
I
1
!
IS
N Z M •
1
O UT
a1 in
o O
in o
in Ni 1n o o
N In
o In In
r IS
'az IZO
1
E.
mm
PPN;00
o.. .-i
.�.-. NrmnF-t'{I-
IR
4
deaf
F ip
IS » I a. Z
1 -t
4O
�W �O
A A
hI
A tr 1w h�
t+ f-
I-
1- !- 1� A
r n
a>Is
I d'dd
*
v
ddSdd
v o
ddddd
4 ddadd
ddad
f a
a o 1
/
I
• a
a I z
•
1 !u
IS
i
IS
I
IS 6
1
f 11
IS { 2
{
o0 C
0000Q000000000000Qo
{ a
0% In
.O PQi
00 It
in 4M (ID
!►l --r4 SOP 0i
Q C
CD- 4WM
t :p
a I I9
t z
F dr.N
{
• w
of oUfN
• •
• •
(mm In «�04Nq
• •
Mmwm
• • • • i
• •
MWON
• • i •
E 11
• N
<tl
a 1
1 0
00
♦♦
OOOSOO
t
0 O 0
11
0
1 n
W
J
Q 00000
O OOi0
,p
a W f
1 �
0 0
O O d
0 0
O
I0 0 O O d
O 01
0 0 0 O
F
a t- I 1-
I
dP1
'+P-��d
.+
mm PrP.,'
w.
»».im
I a
p N I L" V)
I Pimw
OO d�•+�
40 oIn
to POoin
in
otogN
I p
a > { J O
I r
• w
• • •
• •
• •
• • • • i
• •
• • i •
t a
ill N 1» a
t
N N
d 3 d'
�+++
cm
CM, 0 d r-
.-+ .�
m I& d in
I : I
IS I ill P I g
I
JJ
JJ
JJ J�JJ
J
! in
Ip
3W
3 W 33
W W3W
3
W
�p
N 1.
;-
F
n> I
t
F a
It
.IS
-
z t
p
q< 1
1 >I-
CL
I u
IS.CL
-1
-1 d r
t
O�
z
-
• .a
IS z 1
IS a I
/ 1
t
R
d
f0O
zz
/- J
I
a I
/ za
--mizm
«+»
ry a
I q
,az 1 0
1
coo
JJ
WW m
F Al
Il O r z
n» I »
I
I
I.- -T,
V
IV>la.
r
iL
Is3
W
I-tn
JJ
»»
oO
>>
-.1 a.
WN m
1 a
• a
u►-• 0
1 x�
-a
m..�aa
ar7�xx
s'Q
oo
Wo �a
O
I a
inU{ z
{ h-.QO
WWUma
►-.+H
VU US
-.1 -
MIX =30
q W 6 W
i WIt►K
>V)taj
uu
w"
Cain ¢C »Voo
om z
r a
J• { i
! ! I
• • i
! • I
! t ! ! { i
• I.
I• {
1 a
i-111 -j
9/
w
IS
In
9
p. U
z
,IS
1.
II Q I
IS
{
1 NS>
M.1
(
Q
f a
Q 1
1 311a
3
- 0
0
z
z
1
11 Q! z
{ UAU
AS
i
z a{vU
O
'41 Z 1 »
in O 1 z
I Z
I 171
Z
.>
O
»»
I J J
H
J J
W W
l- 1-
Z Z
-¢ t) a
O N
•
1
ill »1 z
I
I�
Z NmUS
>
x2'00
2x 1
t
a r i �+
f �•
ZI
> _r:
»
z a1
I z Z x
x
3o.-
au 1 to
r iixO
Qm-4a
p. -
Jcnix'Z�
�O
-5 -j
--x at 4.
I
q. W 1 W
/ H
Mi,
G 1& US
W W
qx
D- t- m F- H
W W a
R O Id O
! �a
In IS m
I d'd
U.
Y>N1Y.tL.
3»
PP »Wvwm
U:Z m:z
{
IS
O i
IS z i w
• 0'001
oorq»
>-W
• t
a O.1 W
t JX'S
M�
tt r'Zi,QQ
QED
I p
U
opq
IS I H
1 t�i�}U.U
i0a.f
1L
O O
IS • to
f 3:,:W
39,
3c 39
4
(
OO
00 O
�I
1
IS /
1 ¢(01'01
0101¢00
0in0xm
sxz»»
»»�92
1 1
q •
1 �'�
tx�
S � tr
OC ¢
X. r<f rl
l- i- $- � r
x s
X :r
! t
'INI i y
1.
V;
UU
mm
9•+.-iIIPP
UPTl!
OO
00
IN,1
n
1 dl�
i
I
,
-ilio
,
•
I
aZr U
1
Pf-it); c
10 r- S1
mP
10 sA dID�
i7matd
r►
m.+dN
q Y I W
11 x f 1x7
{ i't�r+I
1 r�f�,t�Y
m'
Pt'n
1�md
In in r -S
00
In In
OPOtPP
d N ty
P�-NN
N N
N
Nr7 In
Nd� d
tt)R
Cr
i » 1
If U.1 IIS
(O
I
IS z f F�
•
Oc
0 0 c
O O Q
O O O G
O
I O O
0 0Q
• N
p r 1 »
t O}o�o
OOO
00
00000
I= C2
O
00 0
• »
tl s E V
t
�o .D
�
-�D d) %O
0.O
d7 43,
VO 10 10014
1
10 .O
�D 10 rD
1 1
• O
CITY OF I
• •�UdI II.AI ,,v Ii 1' li Cil 1y 111 y,yr„v¢
DEAN BOYER. P. E.
CITY ENGINEER
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
300 WEST ASH STREET
P. 0. BOX 746
SALINA. I(ANSAS 67401
AREA CODE 913 827.9481
September 28, 1983
Mr. Mike Quinn
Bureau of Transportation Planning
Kansas Department of Transportation
State Office Building
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Re: Data for HPMS
Dear Sir:
DONALD E. HOFF. P. E.
ASST. CITY ENGINEER
D. W. BASSETT
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
In response to a letter from Glenn Anschutz, dated September 26, 1983,
we are sending you copies of plan and profile sheets, etc. involving
construction of certain streets within the city limits of Salina.
A large number of the streets outlined on your computer print-out
sheet were State and Federal projects or were very old street construction
projects. We do not have the original tracings of these projects and
therefore, are not able to send you copies of these streets.
DH/mp
Enc.: (6)
Sincerely,
Don Hoff, P.E.
MEMBER ... KANSAS LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES - NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
I
CITY OF SALINA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
300 WEST ASH STREET DONALD E. HOFF. P. E.
DEAN BO V ER. P. E. P. O. BOX 748 ASST. CITU ENGINEER
CITY ENGINEER SALINA, KANSAS 87401
AREA CODE 91382]-9481 D. TRAFFIC
BASSETT
AFFIC ENGINEER
November 4, 1983
Glenn Anschutz, P.E.
Chief of Transportation Planning
Kansas Department of Transportation
State Office Building
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Re: Highway Performance Monitoring System
Dear Sir:
In response to your letter to Mr. Dean Boyer, dated November 1, 1983,
we reviewed the computer listing of all the HPMS sections within the City
of Salina. None of our street improvement projects involved any of the
HPMS sections. Improvements were made on Crawford Street between Starlight
and Marymount (1210), however, final costs have not been determined at this
time by K.D.O.T. personnel. The project number for this work is
85 -U -0295-02/M-4816 (006).
DH:mp
If you have further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
r—
Don Hoff, P.E.
MEMBER ... KANSAS LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES - NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OFFICE BUILDING -TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612
JOHN B. KEMP, Secretary of Transportation JOHN CARLIN, Governor
November 1, 1983
City Engineer
Dean Boyer
City -County Building
300 W. Ash
P. U. Box 746
Salina, KS 67401
Dear Mr. Boyer:
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has instructed the 50 states to
gather information on their highway system to develop a Federal data base called
the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS). Certain random sample
sections of the Kansas highway system have been designated HPMS sections.
Accordingly, some of these sections happen to be in your city.
The Kansas Department of Transportation would appreciate your help in
obtaining improvement type and cost data for all completed non -Federal Aid
capital improvement projects on HPMS sections in your --city. This information
needs to be collected every calendar year. Therefore, this year the Bureau of
Transportation Planning is requesting information on non -Federal Aid projects
completed in 1983.
Enclosed is a computer listing of all the HPMS sections in your city. A
complete description of each section is contained in the listing along with its
HPMS number. Please use the HPMS number when referring to a section. If one of
the description points is vague or unfamiliar please use the length from the
known description point to locate the section. Since your capital improvement
projects may not exactly correspond with the HPMS sections, include project
beginning and ending point descriptions, new bridge locations, a street name and
a length. This will help us determine the prorated costs for the HPMS section
alone. An explanation of improvement types and costs and a data sheet are also
provided. The data sheet(s) should be filled out with the above mentioned
information and returned. If no improvements were completed on any HPMS sections
this year return the data sheet with that fact indicated on it.
Send the data sheet to:
Floor, State Office Building,
please call: 913-296-3841.
in this matter is appreciated.
GA:MQ:dh
Mike Quinn, Bureau of Transportation Planning, 8th
Topeka, Kansas 66612. If you have any questions
A response is requested by January 15th. Your help
Sincerely,
GLENN ANSCHUTZ, P.E.
CHIEF OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
I1 W
N H
n}
N N
N
NN
of
N N
11 >
H
N a
N
If N Q
II �
Vu
N W
I
J
tl J
00
Nu
1 a
N 4
N O
of
i1 z
110
N "
N F
NI w
II_N
11
J
11 O
II m
II p-
it
It 2
uv
A. z O
S O
z
LL
cc w
W W d
F m O
z S O
0M.
razz
F
X w
W w .+
F LL 0
M W O
Ofor —
maz
a
x
H
2
W
J
LU
z
a
J
II I N
11 ' N
11 z 1 u
11 > 1 W
It h 2 1 r
N > 1 •-
go
nxt u
O O O O O O p 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0
•° M MM MMM M ^t MM MM d MM M MT M M M d MMT MMT T
10 4 vp , 40 ,10o to min to to In In ,o in In in In In In In Mtn min to to ut to vo v+ In to In In
O N O 411 0 0 IN 0 U\ N N UN 0 0 6% 0 Ill O O U\ UN O N O O O 111 UN O O U1 O U1
•�-
INNmmmP PPA U\0000m r. wr NNMMPMM ddd PUN
1010,0,0.p ,0.p ,O hAAA M A A A A h A A A MAhhAhhA
AArAdddd,td,T1►dddd,gdddddddd,Oddddddd
O m m m.0.0 W,0 0 ,04 N r A A r U1 A IR A h A r A r M.+ 1.4. rl .4�
U1000�•+.w., .0 010000 M.4 N d d dd d 4
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
d�d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
»»»Oa»>0'0»7»O»770770070»
000000000000000000000000000000000
A M0NMP UI N,0 P U1 M 0001 U1 N m m A h M,0 P P m 00004 0
U1 dNNO. NNOMOUltI M NNM UIUI d dN. MMN U1U' UM PNON
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
O O O Q O O O Q O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O p U U 0 0 0 0 0
Q O p 0 0 0 V U tD U U O Q O U O 0 0 U O O p O W U g p O V p
MoTam.o.M.1MdlMn1r-0.0 doNn,O.,O'4*4In 00
mn00PP0
h0..40%ina006. ON
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
a 0 0 0 N N N M dd d N.Nr NN 00000Qd P. P- .r ..IM Md U• l N1
J J J J J J J J J J J J
W W 3 = W W S S W W 3 W
z a
o z
M > w M
2 a tL J S a
1 F wom i7+ 00 Z«
a 1-tzL tmaaaa c �"r >>uja
>> z 0 O 49000 J J J O W W W a N1
W V'=O Fxz NMmLL. I.I. W W It JJu x 0 0 JJ CLN
\ Z V Z - Z u> f.. x M I.- F WN 0 10- 0 0 W W N m
J•+aJx0accCON4aQa�9xinx2 W x0077OOW WOJa
V MOW F-COaLLW �a Cm F, F+W I... VCNAAO JJa a au7
W OCmdLLmZ 0NW W V VNNmP•+NNQa�+�•NVVOCD6Z2
CD m
N Z
} } CL
J 2 S O z
O W x z CL uu O F OO J
z ZZ 0M v r.n m JJFFFCm V a
a j. 00 •+O JJFFz O W WOzzoo rN
z-.1 x F JS N mmpOr W Z ZVOOLLLLxLL
r xZu . •Zm> F 7oZZ} 111 SZSEN8S33Frm
Cc LD r a 2 x O a m m r W a tl J J J x M x x a o r r W J J a a C u U.
O«+C I-aW W W W W 490901-.491-1-C CI - FC W W CCOa:D
m x O m d It LL N S N J C C 3 3 u a, " P P u r N N M m m u V Z n Z
OOOOOOO »>} CL CL W
C m C C C C C a a a a S x LL
O O O o Q Q u 3 3 3 2 a s
W W WLLW LLtL W I.I. tL x 0 0 0 0 CC a
J 2 2 2 3 S Z S S= 3 F a a a a !+ O O o 0 0 0 0
ay}}aaaaaaaa0000xtntnxxxxxxz........,...,.,
W a a a C C C m C C C O C m m C F M T F F F 1- F H a S S x SSS x
2333uV VuuV VZmmmmP.+.+PPPPPPU'10000000
,O .+ N M O M,0 0,0 P.- d m m P P.O. d in r,0 rM P m P d M mr. dN
O dddMrm.+hmd m0000. PP PP 0 P0% N MN M N M
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O U O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U
10 %Q100 ,0100 0 0 010 10 ,010 0010 ,0,0,0 10,010 %010%0 ,0 ,0414 ,0 o ,O
I I , d
1 II
Capital Improvement Data
Improvement cost data are essential to the evaluation of the effectiveness
of existing highway programs. Additionally, these data are used to determine
the relative effectiveness of various improvement types as the basis of
simulation model cost matrices, and to determine the magnitude and make-up
of future Federal -aid highway programs. The costs reported here are actual
expenditures for improvements. The following must be reported for each sample
section having an improvement completed during the data year. The improve -
went types are shown in hierarchial order which should be followed in
assigning improvement type.
Type of Improvement -- Improvement types are as follows:
2)
Relocation
7)
Resurfacing
3)
Reconstruction
8)
Bridge Replacement
4)
Major Widening
9)
Bridge rehabilitation
5)
Minor Widening
10)
Safety and Traffic Engineering
6)
Restoration and
11)
Other Highway Improvements
Rehabilitation
The type of improvement is determined by the nature of the construction
rather than the source of funding. Only one type of improvement can be
reported for a particular section in a given year.
The relocation improvement type (code 2) should only be used if the existing
section is replaced by a section on new alignment and the original section
is abandoned. Since code 2 will rarely be used, the majority of capital
improvements will receive codes 3 through 11.
Bridge replacement (code 8), bridge rehabilitation (code 9), safety and
traffic engineering improvements (code 10), and other highway improvements
(code 11) should only be used in cases where these improvements are being
made as the sole improvements to the sections. If these improvements
are staged construction associated with a more general improvement (code
3 through 7), the more general improvement code should be used.
Improvement Costs -- The total improvement costs and its components are
to.be reported for each improvement. If two or more improvements were
completed on a section for a particular year, the costs are added and the
total for each cost element is reported, with the major type of improvement
determined by the above mentioned hierarchy. The cost element categories
are:
1) Preliminary and Construction Engineering
2) Right -of -Way and Utility Adjustments
3) Grading and Drainage
4) Base and Surface
5) Structure
6) Other
7) Total Cost
-2 -
Code Improvement Type Definitions
2 RELOCATION - Construction of a facility on new location that replaces
an existing route. The new facility carries all of the through traffic
with the previous facility closed or retained as a land -service road
only.
3 RECONSTRUCTION - Construction on approximate alignment of an existing
route where old pavement structure is removed and replaced. Implies
a complete rebuilding of an existing pavement structure to correct
pavement deficiencies and/or to add capacity. Adjustment to existing
horizontal and vertical alignment can be made and, where possible, work
conforms to approved standards. Such reconstruction may be to the
existing number of lanes or may include widening to provide continuous
additional lane(s) or dualizing, adding or revising interchanges or
otherwise substantially changing the general character of the highway.
4 MAJOR WIDENING - Requires that one or more lanes be added to a facility.
However, it is different from a reconstruction improvement in which a
similar number of lanes are added in that the existing pavement struc-
ture is salvaged. Also included, where necessary, is the resurfacing
of existing pavement and other incidental improvements such as drain-
age and shoulder improvements.
5 MINOR WIDENING - The addition of 2 or more feet of width per lane to .
an existing facility without adding lanes. In many cases, the improve-
ment will include resurfacing of the existing pavement and other
incidental improvements such as shoulder and drainage improvements.
The existing pavement structure is salvaged.
6 RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION - Implies a reworking (rather than
replacement) of the pavement structure or bridge deck to return it
to a reasonable condition. Generally, work is performed in accord-
ance with the design of the existing facility. The level of effort
is significantly less than a reconstruction improvement. There may
be some upgrading of unsafe features or other incidental work in con-
junction with the restoration and rehabilitation. Typical improve-
ments would include replacing spalled or malfunctioning joints; sub-
stantial pavement undersealing when essentail for pavement stabilization
prior to resurfacing; grinding/grooving of rigid pavements; replacing
deteriorated materials; reworking or strengthening bases or subbases;
adding underdrains; and bridge deck repair.
7 RESURFACING - Placement of at 1 inch of material over the exist-
ing roadway or bridge deck to mprove serviceability or to provide
additional strength. There may be minor widening of up to 2 feet, up-
grading of unsafe features, and other indicental work in conjuction with
resurfacing. Where surfacing is constructed by separate project as a
final stage of construction, the type of improvement should be the
same as that of the preceding stage -- relocation, reconstruction,
minor widening, etc.
0
-3-
Code Improvement Type Definitions (Continued).
8 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - This is the replacement of a bridge due to
structural inadequacy or functional obsolescence on an existing
facility. Includes widening to standard and incidental roadway
approach work.
9 BRIDGE REHABILITATION - Work involving the substructure and super-
structure of a bridge that has been determined structurally inad-
equate. This would include the necessary substructure and super-
structure construction to conform to current geometric and struc-
tural standards. Work involving only the bridge deck slab or plate
would not be included here. (See Code 6.)
10 SAFETY and TRAFFIC ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS - Construction which
improves safety and/or capacity which cannot logically be classif-
ied under codes 2 through 8. The higher type improvements predominate
and should be used whenever possible. For instance, flattening an
unsafe horizontal curve using Hazard Elimination Program funds
involves reconstruction or replacement of the existing pavement on
approximately the same alignment (although flatter) and should be
classified as reconstruction, code 3.
11 OTHER HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS - This category includes improvements
that do not provide any increase in the level of service, the condition
of the facility or safety. Typical improvements that would fall in
this category would be noise_ barriers, beautification, and other
environmentally related features not built as part of the above
identified improvement types.
Cost Element Definitions
Costs are to be reported for the following categories:
a. Preliminary and Construction Engineering - Included are the costs
for field engineering and inspection, consultant fees, aerial surveys,
material testing, boring, etc. Also includes preparation of PS & E
and other reports, traffic and related studies on specific projects
and other engineering costs assignable to construction.
b. Right -of -Way and Utility Adjustments - Costs for acquisition of nec-
essary rights-of-way and, where applicable, those for access control.
Include costs for all lands acquired, including any developments thereon,
easements including scenic, access rights and consequential damages,
appraisals, legal fees, special engineering surveys, preparation of
right-of-way plats, relocation payments, etc. Also includes costs
for all types of utility adjustments (private and public) within
(or to clear) the right-of-way. Betterments are not included.
a,.
-4-
Cost Element Definitions (Continued)
c. Grading and Drainage - Includes all earthwork preparatory to surface
channels, flumes, dikes, underdrains, outfalls, and minor drainage
structures, culvert (as usually defined) and special fill treatment.
Also include the same items for interchange and frontage roads.
Include cost of storm sewer adjustment and all new major storm sewer
lines and appurtenances such as pumping stations and equipment. Include
all costs for demolishing buildings, moving fences, clearing and
grubbing, etc.
y d. Base and Surface - Includes costs of all base course and surfacing,
including shoulders, for the through roadway, interchanges, and
frontage roads. Include all curbs and sidewalks.
e. Other - Include all roadway items not included in b, c, and d above.
Includes traffic control devices, roadside improvements (such as sodding,
planting, roadside rests, etc.), lighting, guardfence, median barriers,
and railroad crossing protection (excluding separations).
f. Structure - Includes the costs for all new structures and all structural
improvements. This includes railroad crossing grade separation
structures.
g. Total - Includes all costs for all improvements.
LOCATION DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATIONS
NCL is North City Limits
NUAB is North Urban Area Boundary
NUFB is north Urban -in -Fact Boundary (This description is no longer used, but due
to the large amount of Sections in our
database, we have not yet gotten rid of the
abbreviations made previously.)
0.5 MI N U169 is 0.5 miles north of US -169.
OLD NCL is the city limit before the current city limit was established. (This
description is also no longer used. But again
the abbreviations made previously have not
all been changed.)
WCL PT 2 is West City Limits Part Two (This is the second time the route crosses
the city limits on the west side.)
C & G is curb and gutter
4LDIV/2L is where the.four lane divided changes to two lane undivided.
N CO L is North County Line
KTA is Kansas Turnpike Authority
(Prop) is a proposed route
Westbury/ECL is a dual description both applying to the same location.
Route Prefix Abbreviations
U is Federal Aid Urban
S is Federal Aid Secondary
L is non Federal Aid
Reminder: if any of the description points is vague or unfamiliar, use the
length from the known description point and/or the Federal Aid route number to
locate the section. ,