Loading...
1844 City Attorney Salary11 R1 Y 273 ORDINANCE NO. 1844 (Published in the Salina Evening Journal MaV 1915.) An ordinance fixing the compensation and salary of the City Attorney, and repealing Ordinance No. 1758, passed and approved May 18, 1914, and so much'of'section two of Ordinance No. 1097, passed and approved 'September 16, 1901, as is in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Be it ordained by the Mayor and Councilmen of the City of Salina: Section 1. The salary of the City Attorney of Salim. shall be one thousand dollars ($11000) per annum, payable monthly, which shall be in' full compensation for all his services" as* such; Provided, that for all business and cases outside of Saline county, Kansas, he shall be allowed a reasonable compensation to' be agreed upon by the Mayor and Council before such services are performed. Sec. 2. That Ordinance No. 1758, passed and approved May 18, 1914, being an' ordinance entitled, 'tan ordinance fixing the com- pensation of the city attorney, and repealing Ordnance No. 771, pass- ed and'approved May 25, 1891," and so much of section two of Ordinance No. 1097, passed and approved September 16, 1901, being an ordinance entitled, "an ordinance providing for the salary of the police judge and relating to fines and costs in the police court, and repealing Ordinance No. 90911, as relate to the taxing of any fees or costs for the city attorney by the police judge in the police court are each and both hereby repealed. Sec. 3.. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its publication once in the Salina Evening Journal Passed May J.7th :1925 ', , Vetoed, June 7th, 1915. Attest: Mayor. Chas . E. Banker.' City Clerk. STATE OF KANSAS ) COUNTY OF SALINE ) SS. CITY OF SALINA ) I hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of an,ordinance passed by the Council, May 17th, 1915; and vetoed by the Mayor of the City of Salina, June 7th, 1915. Said veto is recorded in. full on page /� o of Journal No. 8. City .Clerk. T 191:0 . (Published in. the. Salina Evening Journal May—_--, ORDINANCE, No. /q V_ An ordinance fixing the compensat ion and* sal Fary of the city actor. net i Ordinance No . 1758 passed and approved May 18, i�l4, and. repeal ng and so much of section two of Ordinance No. 1091 passed and a roved September 16, 1901, as is in conflict with the provisions opthis ordinance. Be it ordained by the Mayor and Counc ilmen of the city of Salina: Section 1. The salary of the city attorney of Salina shall be one thousand dollars ($1;000) per annum, payable monthly, which shall be in,. full compensation for all his services as such; Provided, that for all business and cases outside of Saline county, Kansas, he shall be allowed a reasonable compensation to be agreed upon by the mayor and council before such services are performed. Sec. 2. That Ordinance No. 1.758, passed and approved May 18, 1914, being an ordinance entitled "an ordinance fixing the compensation of the city attorney, and repealing Ordinance No. 771, passed and ap- proved May 25, 1891," and so mach of section two of Ordinance No. 1097, passed and approved September 16, 1901, being an ordinance entitled "an ordinance providing ,for. the salary of the police judge and relating to fines and costs in the police court, and repealing Ordinance No. 909", as relate #km to the taxing of an',,. b: _,costs for the city attorney by the police i3k judge in the police court are each and both hereby repelaed. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its publication once in the Salina Evening Journal. Passed and approved May 17, 1915. Attest: TO THE COUNCILMEN OF THE CITY OF SALINA: Regarding Ordinance No. 1845, passed by you May 17, 1915, fixing the compensation of the City Engineer at One Thousand Dollars (1,000.00) per annum, will say, if this ordinance is supposed to be in the interest of the City, with a view of reducing cost of engineering, it appears to me unwise, as the records show, during the past four years, the total cost of the Engineering Department of this City to be $49133.00, during which time the City has expended approximately $150,00040 on com- pleted public improvements in the way of paving and sewer alone. There is, at the present time, approximately $60,000.00 of work under way upon which the larger proportion of engineering work has been done. Taking this into consideration, the total cost of the Engineering Department is under 2% of the work, which I am informed is but a trifle over one-half of the ordinary allowance made by commercial institutions for work of this kind. Therefore, we would apparently have no cause for complaint on account of our present method or cost. Ordinance No. 1845 will necessarily increase cost of such services. In addition, the City would have to equip and maintain an Engineer's office, with instruments, etc., not now required, that I aia reliably informed would cost conservatively $500..00. Knowing some- thing of the volatile nature of all public property and particularly anythinE as delicate as engineers instruments, I do not believe it wise to.burden the City with a charge of this -nature. I have made a pretty thorough investigation of the compensation allowed City Engineers by practically all the Cities of the second class with in the State of Kansas, of anything like the importance of Salina and I find that, generally speaking, there are none that pay their engineers less than Twelve Hundred Dollars ($1,200.00) per annum, while fully 58% of them pay more.