8.4 Feas Tulane CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE
4:00 P.M.
3/2s/o4
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVBD FOR
NO. AGENDA:
Engineering
ITEM:
NO.
~ BY: Shawn O~Lear~' BY:
Item
Report on validity and submittal of engineering feasibility report for ~Petition
No. 4079 filed by Mr. Abner Perney, representing the Housing A~thority,
requesting certain street and utility improvements in Tulane Court Addition.
Background
It is prescribed by Kansas State statutes that the City Commission consider a
petition for street and utility improvements and establish sufficiency on the
basis that any one of the following three conditions are met:
1. The petition is signed by a majority of the resident owners of record
of property liable for assessment under the proposal.
2. The petition is signed by the resident owners of record of more!than
one half of the area liable for assessment under the proposal.
3. The petition is signed by the owners of record, whether resident or
not, of more than one half of the area liable to be assessed under the
proposal.
In this case, the petition signatures represent 100% of the owners of record of
the area liable for assessments. Therefore, the petition clearly meets the
statute requirements for sufficiency. The Saline County Treasurer has Certified
that there are no delinquent taxes or special assessments on any property within
the benefit district owned by the petitioner.
The engineering feasibility report for these public improvements is attached for
your review. The property owners within the benefit district shall be iassessed
for 100% of the project costs which are estimated to be $41,088.00. EaCh of the
nine (9) properties will pay their share of the costs by the equal disUribution
method. The project may be initially financed 80% by the City and 20% by the
petitioner, with the 80% to be repaid by the property owners over a !10 year
period with the special assessment system. The petitioner would also Ihave the
option of submitting a letter of credit for 35% of the project co~ts and
assessing 100% of the project costs to the property owners.
COMMISSION ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUF~T FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
3/2s/94 ~:00P'M'
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
Engineering
NO.
BY: Shawn O'Leary By:
Petition No. 4079
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Commission approve the engineering feasibility
report for street and utility improvements and adopt the resolution determining
the advisability of the report.
Attachment: Feasibility Report
COMMISSION ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ESTIMATE
AND
FEASIBILITY REPORT
PETITION NO. qO'~q
PROPOSED
STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
TULANE COURT ADDITION
TO THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS
FILE NO. 94-3 ~ARCH-1994
DON HOFF, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING & UTILITIES
SCOPE OF WORK
The curbing, guttering, grading and paving of Tu)ane Avenue from the north line of
Lot 1, Block 1, Tulane Court Addition to the south line of Lot 1, Bloc~ 2, Tulane
Court Addition to serve Lots i through 7, Block i and Lots I and 2, Block 2,
Tulane Court Addition.
The installation of a water main to serve Lots i through 7, Block i andiLots i and
2, Block 2, Tulane Court Addition.
BENEFIT DISTRICT
Lots i through 7, Block i and Lots i and 2, Block 2, Tulane Court AdditiOn to the
City of Salina, Kansas.
ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT
The assessment with accrued interest to be levied as a special assessment tax upon
the property included within the benefit district concurrent with t~e general
property tax and shall be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments.i
The method of assessment is that 100% of the total cost assessed ~gainst the
property shall be based upon an equal share per lot for street and drainage and
water assessments without regard to buildings or improvements of the lanU.
APPORTIONMENT OF COST
COST CHARGEABLE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY:
1.100% of the total cost of street and drainage improvements, includin~ grading,
pavement, curb and gutters, valley gutters and any incidentals there'Co to
complete the street and drainage improvements.
2.100% of the total cost of water mains, fittings, hydrants, water services,
valves, and any incidentals thereto to complete the water system.
COST CHARGEABLE TO CITY:
1. None
DISTRIBUTION OF COST
TULANE COURT ADDITION
TO THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS
PETITION NO.
COST COST
CHARGEABLE CHARGEABLE COST
PER EACH TO BENEFIT CHARGEABLE TOTAL
DISTRICT TO CITY COS~
IMPROVEMENTS ~
STREET & $2,808.44 $25,276.00 $0.00 $25,~76.00
DRAINAGE
WATER
SYSTEM $1,756.89 $15,812.00 $0.00 $15,512.00
TOTAL: $4,565.33 $41,088.00 $0.00 $41,D88.00
PETITION NO.
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF
TULANE COURT ADDITION
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
(Including Streets and Drainage and Water)
1. COMMON EXCAVATION 380 C.Y. @ $ 5.00 = $ 1900.00
2. ASPHALT OR CONCRETE PAVEMENT 720 S.¥. @ 15.00~= 10 800.00
3. VALLEY GUTTER 77 S.Y. @ 25.00 = i 925.00
4. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 470 L.F. @ 8.00 = 3 760.00
5. SIDEWALK RAMPS 2 EA. @ 500.00 = I 000.00
6. C. I. PIPELINE, 6" 320 L.F. @ 12.00 = 3 840.00
7. C. I. FITTINGS 0.15 TON @ 3,500.00 = 525.00
8. FIRE HYDRANT i EA. @ 1,700.00 = i 700.00
9. GATE VALVE, 6" i EA. @ 400.00 = 400.00
10. TAPPING VALVE AND SLEEVE 6" x 6" i EA. @ 1,500.00 = I 500.00
11. WATER SERVICE, 1" g EA. @ 500.00 = 4 500.00
12. TREE REMOVAL 3 EA. @ 300.00 : 900.00
13. SPECIAL TRENCH COMPACTION 50 L.F. @ 6.50 = 325.00
14. WATER I L.S. @ 200.00 = 200.00
15. CONSTRUCTION STAKING i L.S. @ 1,000.00 = lrO00.O0
SUB TOTAL: $34 275.00
10% ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY: 3 428.00
TEMPORARY NOTE INTEREST, BONDING, ISSUING: 3 385.00
TOTAL: $41 088.00
PETITION NO.
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF
TULANE COURT ADDITION
Preliminary Estimate of
PROJECT COSTS (Street and Drainage Improvements only)
1. COMMON EXCAVATION 380 C.Y. @ $ 5.00 : $?,900.00
2. ASPHALT OR CONCRETE PAVEMENT 720 S.Y. @ 15.00i'800'00
3. VALLEY GUTTER 77 S.Y. @ 25.00 ,925.00
4. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 470 L.F. @ 8.00 ,760.00
5. SIDEWALK RAMP 2 EA. @ 500.00 ,000.00
i2. TREE REMOVAL 3 EA. @ 300.00 : ! go0.o0
I4. WATER I L.S. @ IO0.O0 = i iO0.O0
I5. CONSTRUCTION STAKING i L.S. @ 700.00 = i 700.00
SUB TOTAL: $2~,085.00
i0% ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY' ~,iOg. O0
TEMPORARY NOTE INTEREST, BONDING, ISSUING' ~,082.00
TOTAL: $25,276.00
PETITION NO.
TULANE COURT ADDITION
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF
PROJECT COSTS (Water System only)
6. C. I. PIPELINE, 6" 320 L.F. @ 12.00 : $,840.00
7. C. I. FITTINGS 0.15 TON @ 3,500.00 = i 525.00
8. FIRE HYDRANT i EA. @ 1,700.00 = 1,700.00
9. GATE VALVE, 6" I EA. @ 400.00 =~i 400.00
10. TAPPING VALVE & SLEEVE, 6" x 6" i EA. @ 1,500.00 = !,500.00
11. WATER SERVICE, 1" 9 EA. @ 500.00 :4,500.00
13. SPECIAL TRENCH COMPACTION 50 L.F. @ 6.50 = 325.00
14. WATER I L.S. @ 100.00 = 100.00
15. CONSTRUCTION STAKING i L.S. @ 300.00 = 300.00
SUB TOTAL: $1i,100.00
10% ENGINEERING & CONTINGENCY: ,319.00
TEMPORARY NOTE INTEREST, BONDING, ISSUING: ~303.00
TOTAL: $1 ,812.00
TULANE COURT ADDITION
TO THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION PROPERTY OWNER
BLOCK i Salina Housing Authority
Lot i "
Lot 2 "
Lot 3 "
Lot 4 "
Lot 5 "
Lot 6 "
Lot 7 "
Block 2 Lot I Salina Housing Authority
Lot 2 "
: DO NOT NRITE IN THIS ~PAC~
I~TITION NUHBER
TO~ THE GOVERNIHG BODY
Clt'y of ~lllm~ ICinsea
IA) 11l, the und.ratgned, being mrs of record of property liable for assesmaco~ for the folloldn, Itmprov~e~. ;I
Curbtne- =utterine. Grading and yawing of Tu!one Ave. from the north line of Lo~ 1p B1. ,..
T, lane court Addition to the south line of Lt. 1, B1. 2, ~l!sne Ct. Addition to~secve Lis.
I ch~, 7. B1. 1 & Cts. I & 2. Bi. 2. Tulane Court _Addition.
Tnseallation of a water main Co serve Lis. I tht'u 7, B1. I and Lis. 1 & 2, B1. ~, Tulane
Ct. AIl~ltt ton.
hereby propose that such tmprovmect be Nde In the manner provided by Article 64, Chapter 12 of the Kansas
Stltutoa Aneotltnd~ sa amended.
(B) The esttmto or problble cost of such tmproveaent ia Forty One Thousand Et=ht¥ EiKht a~d 00/100
($ al. t088.00 )
(C) The extent of the proposnd tmprovement..dintrJet to he assessed as Indlcotnd on the aetachnd plat and la
desgrtl~d as follow~s T.tS. I thru ?, *B]L 1 and Lis. 1 & 2, B1. 2, Tul-ne Court Additt~n.
(O) The proposed nethed of assessment ta~ Based on an eoual share Der lot of land for street and
(E) h proposed apportionment of costs ~stoonn the tmprovmmnt dtntrtnt and the CitT-nt-large tis
(~e Hundred percent ( 100 ~) to bt assessed against the lmprovmaent district an~
Zero percent ( 0 ~) to be allllSed IglJnat the City-ns-large.
IF) lie further propose that such Improvement be made without notice and hearing aa required by K.S.~. 12-6a0~(1}
sa amended.
*No nm rely be wtthdrlwn free this petition after tile Governing Body emmences constd+ratton
* of the petition or later thin seven (7) days after this Petition hll beefl filed with the.City, Clerk
* (K.S.A. 12-h0~) * ' i *
Respectfully suhettted by Abner Peg"neY
Telophone Number R:) ?-0~.~.1
Date & Tine Property owne~ within the
Signature Restdenco of Stqntnq proposed Improvement