7.1 Rplt Presbyterian Manor CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE ~
4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. 7 AGENDA:
rrEM: 'LANNING & DEVELOPMENT
BY: Roy Dudark By:
Item
Application #P95-8A, filed by Salina Presbyterian Manor, Inc.,
requesting approval of a replat of the Salina Presbyterian Manor
Subdivision, a 39 acre tract located on the north side of East
Crawford Street, east of Seitz~Drive. ~,
Background ...............
: '~A final plat of the Saltna Presbyterian Manor, Inc. Subdivision
was approved by the Planning commission on July 19, 1977~ The
approved plat contatned.a single lot with a 50' drainage:easement
i:,'reflecting the course of a drainage way crossing the property, but
i !. no internal streets or utility easements. On December 20, 1994,
the Planning Commission approved an amended final development plan
for a portion of the~ t~'Ct' tO 'alloW constru~tion Of 5 new
duplexes. As part of the duplex development a retention pond was
excavated. One of the conditions of amended development plan
approval was the satisfactory replatting of the property prior to
occupancy of the new duplex units, including a revised drainage
easement and 100 year flood plain boundary line based on
excavation and construction or'the Pond and a utility easement for
a public water line serving the duplex area. This application was
filed to satisfy that condition.
Nature of Current Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a replat of this one lot,
one block subdivision. The replat reflects the need for a revised
drainage easement and new utility easements. The replat drawing
will serve as the instrument to dedicate new easements. Nochange
is proposed in the number of lots or in the boundary or dimensions
of the subdivision itself.
COMMISSION ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY ~
THAT: ,
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
10/23/95 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM
NO. Roy Dudark
Page 2 BY: BY:
Streets
Ail internal streets are private streets and there are no
dedications of street right-of-way proposed. These private
streets were recently named, signs have been installed and
addressing of the duplexes is off of these private streets. The
plat now shows two access openings along the Crawford St. frontage
of the property. The remainder of the frontage has restricted
access.
Easements
Several new easements' will be provided with this replat. The
drainage easement for the drainage course and retention pond has
been relocated and utility easements are shown where needed for
installation and maintenance of City and franchise utility
systems. The location of the southern leg of the 6" water line
serving the existing duplexes has now been pinned down. This line
was originally installed as a private line but the applicant is
requesting that the City take over maintenance of the line. The
route of the line and the utility easement along that route does
not follow or correspond with the route of the private streets
serving the duplex clusters but does avoid passing through or
under any of the duplex units.
Flood Plain and Dratnaqe
The area along and within the dedicated drainage easement for the
channel and retention pond shown on this plat lies within an area
identified on FEMA's maps as a Special Flood Hazard Area (100 year
flood plain) for East Dry Creek Tributary No. 1. The 100 year
flood plain boundary and the applicable Base Flood EleVations
(BFE's) have been indicated on the plat drawing.
The Engineering Department has requested that the location of the
channel and drainage easement along the western boundary of the
plat be shifted to the south to match up with the culvert proposed
as part of the Seitz Drive extension project. This new location
is indicated on the plat drawing.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission considered this proposed replat at its
October 3, 1995 meeting. Following presentation of the staff
report and comments and questions the Commission voted 7-0 to
approve this replat of the Salina Presbyterian Manor, Inc.
Subdivision.
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
10/23/95 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
ITEM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
NO. Roy Dudark
Page 3 BY: BY:
City Commission Action
If the City Commission concurs with the action of the Planning
Commission, a motion should be passed authorizing the Mayor to
sign the plat and accepting the new utility and drainage easement
dedications.
Encl: Application
Vicinity Map
Final Plan
P.C. Minutes of 10/3/95
cc: Ken Bieberly
Fran Paxton
' . Application No. P95-8A
Date Filed July 14, 1995 Initial Deposit $110.00
PreI. Plat Approval Date .May 17, 1977 ReceiptNo. ,~'z'7~'O~
Ownership List Attached Yes Accepted by DA
APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
1. Subdivision Name Replat of Salina Presbyterian Manor, Inc. subdivision
2. Subdivision Location(general) North side of Crawford St. east of Geor~;etown Add.
3. Land Area (sq. ft. and/or acres) 38.12 acres
4. Number of Lots Proposed 1
5. Present Zoning PDD (R-2) Use Retirement Community
6. Pending Zoning (if any) Proposed Use
7. Please explain any provisions of conditional preliminary plat approval and your compliance with
those provisions (attach additional sheets if necessary)
8. Ifany changes have occurred betweenthe approved preliminary andthisfinalplat, otherthanthose
required bythe Planning Commission, please explainthe nature ofthese changes
Relocated drainage course and drainage easement.
Additional utility easements.
9. Explain any waivers of the subdivision regulations granted with the preliminary plat or requested
with this application
10. Applicant Salina Presbyterian Manor, Inc,
Address .... 2601 E, Crawford Phone 825-1366
11. Property Owner Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America
Address 6525 E. Mains~ate,.Wichita, KS 67208 Phone
12. Engineer or Surveyor Monroe & Bodwell Surveyors & Mappers
Address 210 W. Woodland .Phone 827-3708
13. Authorized Representative Ken Bieberly Architectural Services Plus
Address 227 N. Santa Fe Phone 823-9221
I hereby agree to comply with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Salina, Kansas. and all other
pertinent ordinances of'the City of Salina and statutes of the State of Kansas. In addition, it is agreed that
all costs of recording the plat and supplemental documents thereto with the Register of Deeds shall be
assumed and paid by the own~or applicant.
Applicant's Si gnature~.J..~_/~'~ ('?~2 C-.2Z~)'7 Date ,7,~y/' 7'd'''''''
WHITE -- PLANNING ~ CANARY -- CITY CLERK PINK -- APPLICANT
(REV. 12181)
APPUCATION ,t'P96-SA '
SAUNA PRESBYTERIAN MANOR
REQUEST AREA
J-Ul,Y 1977
o I
I
APPLICATION ~P95-8A
PP~SB~AN NANOR R~PLAT
MINUTES
SALINA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COMMISSION ROOM
OCTOBER 3, 1995 4=00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT= Larson, Brown, Hardman, Duckers, McCoach, Allen
Morse
~MBERS ABSENT: Umphrey and Blevins
DEPARTMENT STAFF= Dudark, Andrew and Barker.
OTHERS: O'Leary
The Hearing began at 4500 p.m.
#1. The regular minutes of September 19, 1995, were approved
% as .presented.
· 92. Application #P95-8A, filed by Saline Presbyterian Manor,
Inc., requesting approval of a replat of the Saline
~. Presbyterian Manor Subdivision, a 39-acre tract located on
· the north side of East Crawford Street, east of Seitz
Drive. Continued from September 19, 1995.
Mr. Dudark gave the staff report and stated at your last
meeting on September 19, this item was tabled to give the
applicant and their surveyor a chance to put some
additional items on the drawing. This property is the
Presbyterian Manor Tract. It Is platted as one lot and
one block. All of the streets and drives in there are
private streets. The drawing that is on the screen now
shows the water line, that is the blue highlighted line
coming off of Crawford and there is a public easement
around that line. The line has been built to City
standards and with this public easement would be dedicated
and accepted by the City for maintenance. The sewer line
easement runs around the back and circles the duplexes.
There is also the new pond which is to the upper left-hand
corner. That used to be a drainage easement that was 50
ft. wide along the drainage way. This reflects the
widening and actually the adding of that area in which
they have a retention pond. This is primarily a
recreation feature. The base flood elevation is shown in
two or three locations. The overall master plan shows
housing in and around on either side of that lake. With
this information they will be able to plan the location of
the buildings, the footprints of the structures and the
roadways. The last part was locating the other opening
there on Crawford, which is mostly restricted access but
they do have two driveway openings. With these changes
staff's recommendation is approval of the replat.
Mr. McCoach asked are there any questions of staff?
Hearing none would the applicant care to address the
Commission? If so please state your name and address for
the record.
Ken Bleberly, 227 N. Santa Fe, stated we have no comments
other than we hope that you will approve the application
at this time.
Mr. McCoach asked are there any questions of the
applicant? Hearing none are there any interested citizens
that would like to speak on this application? Hearing
none, we will bring it back to the Commission for comments
and possible action.
MOTION: Mrs. Duckers stated this was continued due to minor
details and it appears to me that they have been most
cooperative in correcting those and bringing them up to
date, so with that in mind I would move that we approve
Application #P95-aA subject to a few minor corrections to
the drawing.
sECOND: Mr. Allen seconded the motion.
Salins Planning Con~aission
October 3, 1995
Page 2
VOTE= Motion carried 8-0.
Application #PDD88-4C, filed by Country Oak Development,
requesting a change in zoning district classification from
#PDD MH-S (Manufactured Rome Subdivision) to %PDD R-2
(Multi-Family Residential) on property legally described
as Lots 10-14 plus the East 27 ft. of Lot 15, Block 2, and
Lots 4-9, plus the East 33.3 ft. of Lot 3, Block 3 in
Country Oak Estates Subdivision (a~k.a. 700 Block Dustin
Rd.).
Mr. Andrew gave the staff report and stated this is a
public hearing item on a rezoning request in the Country
Oaks Estates Subdivision. Because this is a planned
development district the application is actually an
amendment to that PDD. Their request is for rezoning of
11 lots and parts of two others from MH-S which
manufactured home subdivision, or single-family zoning
R-2 which would allow duplexes, town homes or would
allow single-family homes. The area is shaded in
the map. Those are the lots which abut ~stin
is an east-west street in the subdivision. You in
your packet the background on this particular
first saw it as a body in December of 18.
final approval in 1989, there was an in
to adjust the setback requirements and in 1993
was an amendment to this plan based on the
of the Schilling Road and in that
the C-5 and C-2 zoned were expanded.
Those illustrated at the top of map, closer to
Road. And then R-2 zoning introduced along
Huehl ~, on the south side of Circle opposite
the C-5 on the east side Huehl Circle backing
up to the arstate was to allow duplexes and
town homes, noted in our there were 16 of
those lots and 6 of those either
have completed some work is in progress
meaning that 10 still of those 16. Their plan
amendment if rezone 11 lots as noted from
~-S to R-2. They to us they think the
character of their ~pment or subdivision is changing
or has changed and t the original intent of the
manufactured has changed and that the
duplexes and the are more consistent with that
change. We have a PDD ~rlying requirements for each
section based what the zoning is, if th~s
was approved underlying .ng and zoning development
restrictions be R-2 Dss you were to adopt
separate o additional As part of the
issues, t] suitability of the for development under
exist~ what we are at there is whether
you the ~-S zoned lots would be developed that
way, there is a reason that lots are vacant,
if is because they are not zoned or that
are not suitable for development single-family
Whether that is a factor in why are still
~ ....... As far as the character of the nei¢ as we
/noted, they have contended that the cha~ of this
/ development has changed and that more R-2 would be
consistent with that change. One thing we ~ ! out was
that in the original R-2 approval back in 1993, ~at area
served as a natural buffer between the commercial ~d the
single-family and the interstate and the single-family, we
don't have that present here. There ia no natural br~k,
there is no natural transition area or natural buf~r
between the single-family and the R-2 on this p~rtic~a.~
block like we had in that previous case. Also that
previous case was straight R-2, there were no speCial
conditions placed on size or appearance of the duplexes
constructed in that R-2 area so really the question for
you and for this hearing today is the extent to which
lifting those existing single-family restrictions and
allowing duplexes and town homes if that would harm
adjacent residents or property owners. In other words we