7.2 Annex Valley View Add CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
4/24/95 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. 7 AGENDA:
ITEM PLANNING & DEVELOPMEN~.v~ ~..~
NO. 2 Roy Dudark
~ BY: .
Item
Application #A9§-1, filed by John Heline, requesting annexation of
a 20 acre tract of land located east of the Valley View Addition
at the southwest corner of Markley Road and Cloud Street.
Information
I The applicant has requested annexation of a 20 acre tract
!. contiguous to the existing city limits in order to obtain full
municipal services for a proposed residential development.
~" .' Companion applications have been filed for R (Single-Family
Residential) and R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning and
'~.: i preliminary plat approval for the proposed residential area.
The City of Salina has adequate capacity in its water and sewer
system to accommodate the proposed development. However, the
building lots within the subdivision would be subject to a Capital
Cost Recovery Charge to help pay for the new interceptor line.
The applicant will be responsible for extending utility lines to
the site to adequately meet their anticipated needs. These
improvements will be resolved during the platting process.
Markley Road is a county road but is not within the proposed
subdivision area. Therefore there are no road improvement or
shared maintenance issues that need to be worked out with Saline
County as Markley Road will continue to be maintained by the
County south of the existing city limits. All internal streets
will be constructed to City street standards and will be
maintained by the City.
Comprehensive Plan
The city's recently adopted land use plan shows this area as
appropriate for medium or low-densit~ residential development and
as a Primary Service Area for extension of city services.
COMMISSION ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
'THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
4:00 P,M,
4/24/95
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO, AGENDA:
ITEM PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
NO. Roy Dudark
Pa~e 2 BY: BY:
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission considered this annexation request at its
April 4, 1995, meeting. The Commission approved a motion (6-0)
recommending annexation of the subject property into the city.
City Commission Action
: If the City Commission concurs with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, the attached ordinance should be placed on
. ~ first reading.
Encl: Vicinity Map
Ordinance No. 95 - 9638
cc: John Heline
L"- Hearing Date ))la:eh 21, 1995 Application No. A95-1
; Vtctntty Map Tea Flltng Fee -0-
":' Date Ftled Febzuat'7 10a 1995 . Receipt No.
APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
: 1. Applicant's Name John W. Heline
.:~, Address 239 N. Santa Fe. (Phone) 827-337q
", 2. General Locatton of Property Southeast corner of Markley Road and Cloud
:"~ 3. Legal Oescrtptton of Property (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
.:'~ see attached,
.-:_ 4. Size of property to be annexed (sq. ft. or acreage) 20 acres
,. 5. List reason(s) for applying for annexation proposed residential housing
d,e, velopment
6. Present zoning (Saline County) agricultural Use pasture
7. Proposed zoning if annexed R-I R-2
8. Number of persons residing on property to be annexed none
In submitting this application I do hereby request the Saltna City Planning
Commission to consider the above described property for inclusion .within the
corporate limits of Saltna, Kansas.
Applicant's Signature ~
If the applicant is to be represented by legal counsel or an authorized agent, please
complete the following in order that correspondence and communications pertaining to
· this application may be forwarded to the authorized individual.
':- Name of Representative Les Appleby
Address 2520 S. Ninth St,, SaUna, KS 67q01
~. Telephone (Business) 913-825-0890
x SALINA MUNI / AppLI~TION #Z95'i
~ FILED BY JOHN HELINE
~RIPOSA )D
AREA OUTSIDE SALINA
CITY LIMITS
CLOUD ST.
VALLEY'
I VIEW .........
CITY LIMITS ,ill ,.' ~~"J~J ~ iJ CITY
~ - Jlmmmm I - mmmmm.
!
AREA OUTSIDE SALINA CITY LIMITS
NOTE:
VICINITY MAP NOT DRAWN
TO SCALE
· ? _ Salina Planning Commission
· .'.. April 4, 1995
~.. Page 11
.'.~. zoning.
Mr. Hardman asked if the seconder of the motion agreed to
this addition.
Mrs. Duckers said yes.
VOTE= Motion carried 6-0.
· MOTION= Mrs. Duckers moved to approve Application #P95-2 based on
'.i' the 14 recommended conditions being considered and taken
care of before they file for final plat approval.
SECOND: Mr. Umphre¥ seconded the motion.
~:~ VOTE: Motion carried 6-0.
'~' 96. Application #A95-1, filed by John Heline, requesting
.. annexation of a 20 acre tract located east of the Valley
VlewAddition at the southwest corner of Markley Road and
· Cloud Street.
Mr. Andrew gave the staff report and stated as we noted
: earlier this is a finger of county land almost surrounded
.'-. by the city, at least on three sides. In order to get
extension of City services and connect to water and sewer,
· ~' the property needs to be annexed into the city. There are
~ no real issues. It is in a primary growth area. It Is
serviceable by utilities and by City services. The only
· . thing that is slightly unusual about this is that the
tract doesn't include any of the right-of-way for Markley
.: Road therefore the entire right-of-way for Markley Road
will remain in the county along the southern perimeter of
this plat and continue to be maintained exclusively by the
county. Our recommendation is to approve annexation of
this tract into the corporate limits of the City.
Mr. Hardman asked can you explain why Markley Road would
not be annexed at this time?
Mr. Andrew stated primarily because none of it is within
or came from this property. The general rule of thumb on
streets such as Crawford, Magnolia, streets of that
nature, the property owner owns to the section line and
the center line of the road and then they will dedicate
back to the city a right-of-way for that road. In this
case, the land that the road sits on is owned by the
Oliver Hagg Trust, it was not included in the conveyance
to these developers, so therefore it is still on property
owned by the Oliver Hagg Trust. It is still in the county
and there is not a mechanism by which this party can get
any control over that or dedicate that to the city.
.. Mr. Hardman asked it must be annexed then when there is a
rezoning of the area to the east at some point?
Mr. Andrew stated yes the only difference is that instead
of half and half the road being annexed from each side it
would be dedicated entirely from one tract.
Mrs. Duckers asked where exactly using the map before us
is this Hagg land that was given to the county?
Mr. Dudark stated it is quite a ways south of this area.
Mrs. Duckers asked it does not show on this map?
Mr. Dudark stated no it does not. ! think it is a full
section of land maybe two or three miles away.
Mr. Allen asked is the point on the south triangle to be
altered on this?
Mr. Dudark stated this Final Plat will delete that last
'-.~ -- Salina Planning Commission
... part. The last part will be the road.
Mr. Hardman asked is there anyone here representing the
applicant that would care to comment on the application at
this time? Are there any members of the public that would
care to comment? Hearing no further comments I will bring
it back to the Commission for further comments and or
action.
MOTION: Mrs. Duckers moved to approve Application #Ag§-I which
.' would annex this bit of property which is surrounded by
. the city into the city ll~ts.
'.'~ SECOND: Mr. Umphrey seconded the motion.
~ VOTE: Motion carried 6-0.
[' #7. Application #P94-3A, filed by GICO Inc., requesting
· approval of a final plat of GICO Addition a 63 lot
..' subdivision of a 28.52 acre tract located In the SE 1/4 of
:-" the NW 1/4 of Sec. 19, TI4S, R2W of the 6th PM in Saline
~- County, Kansas (East of the Meyer Addition between
~' Republic Ave. and McAdams Rd.)
-': Mr. Dudark gave the staff report and stated ! think the
Commission Is pretty familiar with the property by this
..... time. This Is coming back to you for final plat approval.
~ It ts for mainly single-family lots with the exception of
': these nine (9) R-2 townhome lots. This Is the final
drawing that shows the actual lot dimensions, right-of-way
widths and all of the easements and the park land. The
-~ City Commission and the owner/developer of this property
.. have signed the agreement for the land transaction that
will be consummated prior to recording of this plat. Our
recommendation is to approve the final plat with three
.. changes. We would like to have the utility easement along
here and down to this point deleted because we may have a
shelter house or something in here and we wouldn't want to
.~ have an easement in the way of any kind of structure. The
City does own land on the north side of this. This will
be an entrance drive with a parking area so it will not be
a roadway or anything going Into there. We would like to
'; have this shown as "Dedicated City Park" along there Just
for clarification purposes that can be done relatively
"- easily and there is one other thing I believe, that the
applicant obtain a letter from the City Engineer approving
their storm drainage plans prior to' submittal of the
subdivision to the C~ty Commission. Their general concept
ts going to be essentially street drainage over to an open
ditch area coming up to a structure that takes the water
under the dike and then also to a drainage easement along
here which takes It to a pond. It appears that this will
also be an open ditch area. It is a little bit different
than the situation we were talking about a couple of weeks
ago where we had lots that were backing up to each other,
-. behind homes where you would have difficulty getting
access. This City Park area will be maintained by the
City. It will not be the responsibility of these lot
:'. owners. Plus It can be easily accessed. We will take
care of that, we will mow that when we mow the park. Also
~ we think it will be relatively shallow. Starting out
fairly shallow and then only getting perhaps three of four
feet deep as it gets down near to the pond and this will
also be an open excavated area so that is really all that
we need to say about that. Our recommendation is to
approve the final plat.
Mr. Hardman asked are there any questions of staff?
Hearing none, would the applicant care to comment on this
application for final plat approval7
Pete Earles, Earles and R~ggs, 101 1/2 S. Main, Llndsborg,
we have no problem with the changes required by staff as
far as the letter from the Clt¥ Engineer, I am getting
(Published in The Salina Journal )
ORDINANCE NUMBER 95-9688
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
LAND IN SECTION TWENTY-NINE (29), TOWNSHIP FOURTEEN (14) SOUTH,
RANGE TWO (2) WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN SALINE
COUNTY, KANSAS, IN CONFORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF K.S.A.
12-519 to 12-526, INCLUSIVE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina,
Kansas:
Section 1. That the following described land, to-wit:
A tract of land situated in the Northeast Quarter of Section
29, Township 14 South, Range 2 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian, in Saline County, Kansas, more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Northeast
Quarter of said Section 29, thence South along the west line
of the said Northeast Quarter on an assumed bearing of S
00°01'00'W, a distance of 2591.96 feet; Thence on a curve
to the right, a distance of 719.30 feet; said curve having a
radius of 1956.86 feet and a long chord of 715.26 feet that
bears N 23°30'05"E; Thence on a curve to the left a
distance of 489.29 feet said curve having a radius of
1856.86 feet and a long chord that bears N 26°28'$5"E;
Thence S 89°$5'45"W, a distance of 90.05 feet; Thence N
00°20'45"E, a distance of 1500.00 feet to a point on the
North line of said Section 29; Thence S 89° 55'45"W,
along the North line of said section, a distance of 421.00
feet back to the point of beginning.
meeting one or more of the classifications for annexation prescribed by K.S.A.
12-519 to 12-526, inclusive, is hereby annexed and made a part of the city of
Salina, Kansas.
Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its adoption and publication once in the official city newspaper.
Introduced: April 24, 1995
Passed: May 1, 1995
John Divine, Mayor
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Judy D. Long, City Clerk