7.3 Zone Stephanie Add CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
12/26/96 4:00 P.M.
AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVEDFOR
NO. 7 PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT AGENDA:
ITEM ROY DUDARK ~
NO. 3, 3a, 3b & 3d
BY: BY: '"~-~ ~'~
Item
Application #Z96-10, filed by Ted and Geraldine Long, requesting a
change in zoning district classification from A-1 (Agricultural)
District to R-1 (Single-Family Residential) on an unplatted tract
located on the north side of East Cloud St. east of Austin Circle and
addressed as 1601 East Cloud.
Nature of Current Request
Ted and Geraldine Long are the owners of a 5.8 acre tract of land that
is currently unplatted and zoned A-1. They are requesting rezoning of
a 64' x 310' strip of their land to R-1 to allow creation of a separate
building site for a single-family home. The minimum lot size in an A-1
District is 4 acres and this proposed lot is less than 1/2 acre in size.
Therefore a rezoning of the tract from A-1 to R-1 is necessary before
a legal building lot could be created and a building permit issued. In
addition, Sec. 42-8 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that land be
subdivided in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations prior
to rezoning any area to any district other than A-1. A combined
preliminary/final plat for this proposed Stephanie Addition has also
been filed for Planning Commission consideration. This one lot
subdivision would abut the Laurie Subdivision on the north and the
Austin Subdivision is 225 ft. to the west.
Suitability of ~ite for Development
The subject property is a very flat piece of ground. The natural
surface water drainage pattern in this area is from SW to NE, however,
this property does not drain well and runoff tends to accumulate on-
site. Portions of this site are within 1000' of the City's flood
control dike which could affect the construction of a basement. The
property is not located within the mapped 100 year flood plain.
This site is contiguous to existing residential development on the north
and west and needed utilities are either in place or can be extended
fairly easily and efficiently.
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
12/16/96 4:00 P.M.
AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: ;APPROVEDFOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT
ITEM ROY DUDARK
NO.
Page2 BY: BY:
Character of the Neighborhood
This proposed one lot subdivision is located between two other
residential subdivisions, the Laurie Subdivision on the north and the
Austin Subdivision to the west. Directly to the west between this
site and the Austin Subdivision is a 225' x 310' unplatted tract that
is zoned A-1. To the east is a row of houses facing Cloud Street,
including Ted Long's 5.4 acre tract. These houses sit on land that
is also unplatted and zoned A-1 (Agricultural). To the south is
vacant, agricultural land on the south side of Cloud Street.
Construction of a single-family home on this site would be compatible
with the zoning and uses of nearby property. However, this type of
fragmented, piecemeal development is not consistent with good
subdivision design or infrastructure planning and is not conducive
to neighborhood building.
Public Facilities and Services
Adequate water, sanitary sewer, and gas and electrical lines are in
place or can be extended to serve construction of a home on this
site. The proposed change in zoning classification and use proposed
by the applicant should not result in any additional burden on public
facilities and services.
Conformance with Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as low density
residential. Rezoning to R-1 would be consistent with this
designation.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this
application on November 20, 1996. One adjoining property owner
appeared to express their concern about the width of the lot and the
future use of the east wing of their circle driveway. Individual
commissioners expressed concern about the ability to get access to
the proposed garage behind the house and the possibility that the lot
could be divided north-south to create two building sites. At the
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
12/16/96 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM ROY DUDARK
NO.
Page3 BY: BY:
conclusion of the public hearing the Planning Commission voted 5-3
to recommend approval of the applicant's request for R-1 zoning
subject to satisfactory platting of the property.
City Commission Action
If the City Commission concurs with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, the attached ordinance should be approved on
first reading. The protest deadline expired on December 4, 1996 and
nothing was filed. Second reading would be scheduled for January 6,
1997 unless an emergency were declared in which case first and second
reading could both occur at the December 16 meeting.
If the City Commission disagrees with the recommendation, it may: 1)
overturn the Planning Commission and deny the request provided four
(4) votes are in support of such action; or 2) return the application
to the Planning Commission for reconsideration citing the basis for
disapproval.
Encl: Application
Vicinity Map
Plot plan (for illustrative purposes)
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes 11/20/96
Ordinance #96- 9775
cc: Ted Long
Royce Crawford
Ken Wasserman
PUBLICATION DATE No Later Than October' ~A_. I qq~ APPLICATION NO.
HEARING DATE t~o~embez 20. 1996 DATE FILED ~tnhe~- 11
VICINITY MAP ATTACHED ~es FILING FEE $~1
OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE RECEIVED RECEIPT NO. ~
IINSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION ARE ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM}
APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE
DISTRICT ZONING MAP (REZONING)
1. Applicant's Name: ~r~ ~__~c"~E;) f' ~_.~ ~, ,~ ~:~ ~J ~
2. Applicant'sAddress ~4:~ ~-'~. ~.' /,d) (..~d --~::t / I"Y'I~I ZipCode:
3. Telephone (Business): (Home): C~/
4. Owner'S Name: ,,.~rp~'-')"77 ~
5. Owner's Address Zip Code:
6. Legal description of property to be rezoned (attach additional sheets if necessary): ,
Lot(s). In Block No.
In Subdivision
Metes and bounds description if unplatted (e Surveyor's Certificate must be filed with this application and if approVed
will be required to be platted):
7. Approximate street address: /~O// ~". (~__~/d~ (~ c~,
8. Area of prope~y (sq. ~. and/or acr~): ~ ~ ~. ~
9. Pr~ent zoning: ~- / U~: ~, ~ ~
10. Request~ zoning: ~- / Use: ,~/~ ~/~. ~. ~1 /~b ~ o ~ ~
11. Are there any covenants of r~ord which prohibit the proposed develop~nt? (A~ch copy):
12. Li~rea~nsforthisrequ~. (A~acheddEionalsh~ifn~w): ~ ~//O~ ~ ~[~ I'1~'~ /~
13. Supply factual data showing the effect the request will have on present and future traffic flow, schools, utilities,
refuse collection, surrounding properties, e[c: (Attach additional sheets if necessary) .,,'//~,'~ '~-~c~'~'~C-x-'~'
14. Will there be sufficient off-street parking provided for the requested use?
Explain:
15. List exhibits or plans submitted: ,,~.~,
PROPERTY OWN ER(,S~//~ ,/~ ~,3 //~ ..APPLICANT'S
SIGNATURE: ~'~~ ~ _ . .~'~3~_ IGNATURE:
DATE: ~.~-~' ~ .//,, / ? ~'~'~ ('j DATE:
If the applicant is to be represented by legal counsel or an authorized agent, please complete the following so that
correspondence and communicetions pertaining to this application may be forwarded to the authorized individual.
NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ ~//t~f~'J'~l~
TELEPHONE (Business): ?,=;Z, 7- -'~ -~'/'//.~ AREA CODE: C~/p
White - Planning Canary - City Clerk Pink - Inspection Gold - Applicant
(Rev. 8/84) 101
(PLEASE DO NOT DETACH)
C~ FILED BY TED LONG
.~ RICKY CR
CLAFLIN AV
A-1
H
H
iR-S
R-S
1 Inch -- 200 Feet
d k
(915)s27-7o69 sURvEYING & MAPPING
(915) 263-2625
501 N. Broadway, Box 97
Abilene, Kansas 67410
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
~,~ S89'59'50"W 64.62
DESCRIPTION
A tract of land in the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter (SE/4 SW/4) of Section
Nineteen (19), Township Fourteen (14) South,
Range Two (2) West of the Sixth (6th) Principal
Meridon in the City of Solinao Saline County,
Konsoso more particularly described os follows:
:2 :~ Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the South-
~5~ (3- wesf Ouorter (SW/4) of soid Secfion ,9; thence
~ (5 West along the South line of said Southwest
1" -- JO' ,~ ~ U3 ~ Quarter on on assumed Bearing of S90'O0'W o
[~ ~ ~ u~ distance of 433.57 feet; thence NO'JS'E 30.00
~ · ~ :,- feet to o point on the North Right-of-Wayline
~ ~ of Cloud Street, said point being the point of
· beginning; thence N0'$2'41 "E $ I0.01 feet; thence
~n .~ ~: S89'59'50"W 64.62 feet; thence S0'26'55"W
~ 310.01 feet to the North Right-of-Way line of
4.ot Cloud Stret; thence N89'59'$5"E 64. Ia feet
9.0 bock to the point of beginning.
4~'
29X0 = spot elevation 1229.0
R = recorded
M = measured
~'::':'['/~"-':_.~o
..' o -:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE PLAT
OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PROPERTY TO THE BEST OF MY
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
?age 7
Mr. Blevins stated yes I think there is an extra
here on the vacant lot. I had concerns about
~lng of the vacant lot there at least for
MOTION: Mr. Morse to approve Appli, #CU96-9 with
conditions 2, 3, listed in staff report and
would also add a 6 that the applicant
formulate a plan to direc ~ffic flow and the parking to
the north and I on the fact that
the application the out in Section 42-
597.2 (c)(2) Salina Code.
SECOND: Mrs. seconded the motion.
VOTE: carried 8-0.
Mr. Andrew stated Just as a point of information, the
applicant would next need to apply to the City Commission
for the vacation of that right-of-way or a license
agreement.
#3. Application #Z96-10, filed by Ted and Geraldine Long,
requesting a change in zoning district classification from
A-1 (Agricultural) District to R-1 (Single-Family
Residential) on an unplatted tract located on the north
side of East Cloud St. east of Austin Circle and addressed
as 1601 East Cloud.
Mr. Andrew stated what you have on the screen now is a
vicinity map of the area, the area shaded in grey is the
tract that is being requested for rezoning. The present
owners are the owners of a tract that is in total about
5.8 acres. The shaded area is a 64 x 310 ft. strip that
they are proposing to sell off and create a separate
building site. The request is to rezone this to R-1 and
the reason for that is the current A-1 zoning requires a
minimum of four acres for a home site. The home site here
is less than a half acre therefore the rezoning from A-1
to R-1 is necessary in order to get a building permit and
furthermore our zoning ordinance requires that to rezone
any property within the city limits that that property
must first be platted before it can be rezoned. There is
a companion application with this which involves creation
of a one lot plat. Just to give you the general overview
of the surrounding area, there is a home on the A-1 zoned
site right near the A-1 label that is the Long's current
residence. There are three other homes that face Cloud
along that frontage and then to the north and to the
northwest of that site are developed subdivisions. The
Austin Subdivision which has Austin Circle there and then
to the north the Laurie Subdivision which is Courtney and
Ricky Circle. I also point out that the lot directly to
the west of this is also zoned A-1 so you would
essentially be creating a sliver of R-1 zoning between two
A-! zoned tracts. We note that the surrounding sites are
not platted except for the Laurie Subdivision and the
Austin Subdivision. As far as the public facilities and
services, there is a water line in Cloud Street. The
other items there would have to be extended to serve
construction on the site and that would be feasible. This
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
Page 8
change from A-1 to R-1 shouldn't result in any additional
burden on public facilities and services. These other
questions, street access points and utilities will be
addressed in the plat report. We pointed out some of the
comprehensive plan policies about infill development and
also about embracing the traditional neighborhood concept.
We offered in our recommendation some comments that based
on how this area is laid out and parcels are arranged that
we really would prefer to see this area zoned and laid out
in a little more comprehensive manner than Just with this
one piece. This is a rather isolated tract and as we
pointed out we have unplatted agricultural land on either
side so we are not really addressing the whole area. It
is almost Just a request for spot zoning. At the same
time R-1 is not incompatible with what is around there
which is single-family housing. If you feel that this 1/2
acre tract as proposed is suitable for single-family
residential development in this design and that that
change won't adversely affect or discourage development of
surrounding property then we recommend approval of that
zoning request subject to the companion plat being
approved.
Mr. Blevins stated ! would like to remind the Commission
that Policy Number 87-2 is applicable to this request and
any questions of how this application is related to that
policy staff will be able to answer.
Mr. Andrew stated I would point out that we did receive
some correspondence from the adjoining neighbors to the
west and I believe they are here to address that concern.
There is some question about whether that is more
appropriate as a zoning question or for the plat layout.
You have in your packet a diagram, this is the proposed
development layout for that site with the location of the
proposed house and proposed detached garage. Our
understanding is the future occupants of this house intend
to use or share the driveway that currently serves the Ted
Long residence and then this garage would face the east
and they would access it from the Long's driveway. The
marks in the corner of the lot indicate a circle driveway
that serves the residents to the west. And the comments
that we received were that about the east one third of the
driveway to the west goes across this property and there
is some concern that our approval of the zoning and
creation of the building lot would result in the loss of
the use of that driveway because it is not on their
property. I think they can probably state their concerns
better than we can but based on our research short of them
having an access easement or some recorded instrument that
would guarantee them the continued right to drive across
this or have it occupied for a driveway that they would
lose any legal right they had to use it once ownership
transferred and a house was built, but that was the only
correspondence that we received on this application.
Mrs. Duckers asked point of clarification, is there a
house on the lot to the west? Is that correct? But that
is zoned agricultural?
Mr. Andrew stated yes the large lot.
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
Page 9
Mrs. Duckers asked the two lots to the west, that is zoned
A-l?
Mr. Andrew stated correct it is unplatted and zoned A-1.
Mrs. Duckers asked but there is a house existing there?
Mr. Andrew stated right and it has large horseshoe or
circle drive in front of it and the east portion of that
horseshoe drive actually crosses the property that is the
subject of this request.
Mrs. Duckers asked isn't this a rather unusual design for
a lot? This long narrow strip?
Mr. Andrew stated it is not typical as to what you would
find in a conventional subdivision.
Mr. Blevins asked are there any other questions of staff?
Mr. Morse asked on that lot that has the A-1 on it there
is not a house?
Mr. Andrew stated yes there is, that is the home of the
Long's who own this entire tract.
Mrs. Weiner asked I am trying to picture this in my mind
now you are saying that behind 1605 there is a fence and
some landscaping on the property?
Mr. Andrew stated this site would actually be west of the
fence and the proposal is to set it back 100 ft. from the
Cloud Street property line. We don't have any information
in front of us about where the fence is in relation to the
setback for the house, it is quite a ways back. It is
back behind actually it is about where the H is located on
the drawing.
Mr. Blevins stated I would like to emphasize at this point
that we are taking up the zoning change it does not
consider or concern itself with the specific plans for the
land other than the zoning classification so if we could
limit this part of our discussion and questions to that.
Are there any comments from the applicant?
Ken Wasserman, 215 S. Santa Fe, I represent Mr. and Mrs.
Long, Mrs. Long is here and Mr. Monroe is here who has
done some surveying and some engineering work out there
and also the persons who are interested in buying this
tract and locating a home on it are here. We understand
staffs concern about really wanting to have some idea of
the entire large tract that has A-1 zoning on it and its
proposed use, although frankly and we would be happy to do
that if we knew and that is the reason we haven't we don't
know what the future holds. Right now the Long's use that
property for various and sundry things rezoning it could
affect that. They are not prepared to come up with a
design, some of that is going to depend on future interest
and how some of the other access development along Cloud
Street works, so there are a number of things that Just
leave it up in the air as far as they are concerned. It
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
Page 10
isn't that they don't want to disclose the use they Just
don't know what that use would be or what the design
layout of it would be right now. With respect to the tail
end of the horseshoe drive that crosses that property,
even though there may be some concern about the continued
use of that the honest fact is if the Long's put up a
fence tomorrow that right-of-way is no longer useable
anyhow. There is no easement and no legal right to
continue to use that so your action here today doesn't
really affect the use of the adjoining driveway and
certainly there is other access. It is not as if that is
the only driveway to the location that Just completes the
existing horseshoe that is there and that horseshoe could
either be angled differently and still leave it there or
any of a number of things, but the real bottom line is the
folks who use it now have no guarantee that they could use
it anyhow. So based on that we Just simply request that
you approve the rezoning application as you see it before
you, we tried to be as informative as we could be in terms
of submitting the application and working with staff to
try and accomplish a result that we don't feel is
certainly detrimental to the city, the fact is that
probably one day this is all going to be residential. It
is Just a question of timing.
Mr. Blevins asked are there any questions of the
applicant?
Mr. Morse asked Ken is there a reason why the entire tract
isn't being considered for the zoning change?
Mr. Wasserman stated because from time to time Ted likes
to farm a little bit and if we rezoned it we might not be
able to do that. Right now it is agricultural which means
we can have some agricultural uses out of that and have
tractors and other things and the last thing that we need
is neighbors complaining about that and if we zone it
residential and somebody decides that something bigger
than a lawn tractor is too big of a tractor to have out
there. This fits our present use.
Mr. Blevins asked are there any interested citizen who
care to address the application?
Gary Boldenow, 1599 E. Cloud, we own the property
immediately to the west of this proposed tract. This was
originally a part of our property or this house's property
and we purchased this property on July 10, 1993 and
apparently in that same month the previous owner of our
property, Mr. Shelby Steenson sold this strip off to Mr.
Long and when we originally purchased the property we
really thought that that whole piece was ours actually the
entire part, I didn't go out and measure it as I probably
should but we had that and Mr. Steenson was mowing it and
stuff and we went up and visited him and he had his garden
on it and stuff and of course it was his up to that point
and Mr. Long had bought that in the same kind of action
and time frame as when we bought ours, our house was
originally centered between those two outside property
lines and the circle driveway. Our concern is what kind
of a house would fit on a piece of ground that is about 59
ft. wide or so.
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
Page 11
Mr. Blevins asked have you seen the surveyor's certificate
that has been run off? This is what has been presented to
the Commission you might want to direct your comments to
this particular area and also at this stage we are looking
mainly at the zoning situation and we will be taking up
the exact plat as our next agenda item.
Mr. Boldenow stated but ! think that was our main concern
was what kind of a house would go onto it. And then we
have concern about losing the east end of the drive but
like they say it is not our property so we may not have
much say in that, when we back out of our garage which is
fairly close to this property, we usually back onto about
8 ft. of it, so that is going to be a bit of a change in
there too like change the garage around or something like
that but that again Is probably our problem.
Mr. Blevins asked are there any questions of Mr. Boldenow?
Hearing none are there any other interested citizens who
wish to comment? Hearing none we will bring it back to
the Commission for further discussion and possible action.
Mr. Brown stated I have concerns about access with the
garage in back and if there could be an agreement now,
because I am afraid that what could happen in the future
if they want to sell off this tract any arrangements may
not be binding and so they might end up with a detached
garage that is land locked. There is only 9 ft. between
the property line and the house it ts probably not enough
to drive right through there and would there be any
regulations?
Mr. Blevins asked could staff address that as to if there
Is a way to lock that tn.
Mr. Andrew stated in speaking with the building official
he said that if this plan was presented to him with this 9
ft. separation that he would Issue a building permit that
8 1/2 ft. is the minimum that he uses because that is the
width of a legal parking stall but he realizes that there
would be certain vehicles that you would not be able to
fit between the house and the property line to get access
back there so that while legally 9 ft. might be
permissible to get a building permit based on this plan
that practically speaking there would be some trouble
getting a wider vehicle or dual wheel vehicle or trailer,
things of that nature between the house and the east
property line and in asking the building official about
that he said he would issue a permit with the detached
garage in the rear based on that 9 ft. setback.
Mrs. Duckers asked isn't this a matter that should be
considered on the platting rather than the zoning?
Mr. Blevins stated unless we determine that this size of
lot or configuration of lot does not lend itself to
residential construction.
Mr. Brown stated I guess that is why ! brought it up I
have trouble separating this because I can't see it.
Salina Planning Commission
November 20, 1996
Page 12
Mr. Andrew stated I would point out that despite some of
our concerns that the minimum width in R-1 is 60 ft. per
platted lot what makes this unusual is the ratio of depth
to width but it does meet the minimum for a bulldable lot
in R-1.
Mr. Brown asked so if it were approved as an R-1 then we
would have all of this in back that wouldn't necessarily
be used and you may not be able to put a garage in back
but for sure you couldn't build anything else beyond that,
there would be no second residences this couldn't be split
to another owner and then expect access off of that cul-
de-sac to the north on Courtney Drive.
Mr. Andrew stated there are houses in there anyway which
could prevent any access from the north.
Mr. Blevin stated there is a gravel driveway.
Mr. Brown stated and when you get into what was here and
what you buy, I get a little antsy about that.
Mr. Morse stated Mr. Chairman looking at' this I think that
even if we denied the application and said to bring back
the plan to develop the entire tract to rezone it all to
residential and to develop the entire tract we are going
to wind up with this same lot and that design. I also
think that even though it is going to have an impact on
the neighbors to the west they would agree with what the
applicant said it will be better having an R-1 zone to the
east than the agricultural and all the associated uses
that might go with that.
MOTION= Mr. Morse moved to recommend to the City Commission that
Application #Z96-10 be approved based on the finding that
it meets Policy Number 87-2 and that condition number one
of the staff report be complied with.
SECOND: Mrs. Weiner seconded the motion.
VOTE= Motion carried 5-3 (Brown, Davidson and Thompson).
94. Application #P96-5/SA, filed by Ted and Geraldine Long,
requesting approval of a final plat of a proposed one lot
subdivision on the north side of East Cloud St. east of
Austin Circle. (To be known as Stephanie Addition).
Andrew gave the staff report and stated this
preliminary and final plat request.
for I is that this is a simpl~ubdivision_
existing ly one lot. There ~ no easement
dedications, no dedicat4~.,~¥no real drainage
matters that need add~t~d, therefore it was.
combined into one step. -.~ze of the tract as you know
is about a 1/2 acre. ~ are proposing to split
this off and sell an lndivl~a ~. As we noted both
because the has been split ~p~everal times as
well as that this is requested t~.~ rezoned a
A little background, this%u~D was
y retained by an earlier owner to provide a~s
to the property to the north that is now the Laurie~
(Published in The Salina Journal December , 1996)
ORDINANCE NUMBER 96=9775
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 8526, THE SAME BEING CHAPTER 42 OF THE SALINA CODE, AND
THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP THEREIN AND THEREBY ADOPTED AND
PROVIDING FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY
AND PRESCRIBING THE PROPER USES THEREOF.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent for the amendment of the Zoning
District Map, the rezoning of certain property therein, hereinafter described
has been timely complied with, SO NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina,
Kansas:
Section 1. AMENDMENT. DISTRICT "R-l". SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL. That the Zoning District Map of the City of Salina, Kansas,
duly adopted and published as a part of Ordinance Number 8526, the same
being Chapter 42 of the Salina Code, be and it is hereby amended so that the
following described property be rezoned as follows, to-wit:
A tract of land in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter (SE¼SW¼) of Section Nineteen (19), Township
Fourteen South (T14S), Range Two West (R2W) of the
Sixth (6th) Principal Meridian in the City of Salina, Saline
County, Kansas, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Southwest Quarter
(SW¼) of said Section 19; thence West along the South line
of said Southwest Quarter (SW¼) on an assumed Bearing of
South Zero Degrees Ninety Minutes and Zero Seconds West
(S.00°90'00"W.) a distance of Four Hundred Thirty-three
and Thirty-one Hundredths feet (433.31'); thence North
Zero Degrees Thirty-three Minutes and Six Seconds East
(N.00°33'06"E.) Thirty feet (30.00') to a point on the North
Right-of-Way line of Cloud Street, said point being the
point of beginning; thence North Zero Degrees
Thirty-three Minutes and Six Seconds East (N.00°33'06"E.)
Three Hundred Ten and One Hundredth feet (310.01');
thence South Eighty-nine Degrees Fifty-nine Minutes and
Forty-five Seconds West (S.89°59'45"W.) Sixty-four and
Seventy-two Hundredths feet (64.72'); thence South Zero
Degrees Twenty-one Minutes and Forty-six Seconds West
(S.00°21'46"W.) Three Hundred Ten and One Hundredth
feet (310.01') to the North Right-of-Way line of Cloud
Street; thence North Ninty Degrees Zero Minutes and Zero
Seconds East (N.90°00'00"E.) Sixty-four and Six Tenths
feet (64.60') back to the point of beginning.
shall become a part of District "R-I". SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT.
Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its adoption and publication once in the official city newspaper.
Introduced: December 16, 1996
Passed: December 16, 1996
Evelyn Maxwell, Mayor
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
3udy D. Long, CMC, City Clerk