The URL can be used to link to this page

7.3 Zone Shalimar Plaza Addition CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION NO: 7 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: ITEM NO. Page 1 3 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES :DA BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: ~''YIf J.i,--"' lfl(~ ITEM: Ordinance No. 06-10338. Application #Z06-5, filed by Monty Gilliam, dba Prime Property, requesting a change in zoning district classification from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) district to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) district to allow the former Shalimar Plaza Nursing Home to be converted to an apartment building. The subject property is legally described as Lot 3, except the Northeast 3 feet thereof, and all of Lots 8-14, Block 11 of the Shalimar Plaza Addition to the City of Salina, Saline County, Kansas and addressed as 2054 Lambertson Lane. BACKGROUND: The Shalimar Plaza Addition, which lies on both sides of Ohio Street between Albert and Wayne was platted and annexed in 1958. The Shalimar Nursing Home, later Shalimar Health Center, was constructed on Lambertson Lane approximately two blocks east of Ohio Street in 1962. The nursing home building contains approximately 11,000 sq. ft. and was designed to house 44 patient beds. The nursing home site was zoned "C" Apartment House District when the facility was built. In 1977, when the city was comprehensively rezoned and remapped, the property was designated R-1 (Single- Family Residential) consistent with the zoning of surrounding property. The Shalimar Health Center has been vacant for a little over two years meaning it has lost its grandfathered status even for nursing home use. It has been actively marketed over the past year and staff has met with numerous parties with ideas for adaptively reusing the property. Virtually any reuse of the existing building would require either rezoning or approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Monty Gilliam, dba Prime Property, has purchased the property and is proposing to convert it to a 12 unit apartment building. He has retained Charles Renz of Jones-Gillam Architects to assist with the code related issues associated with the renovation and the change of occupancy. The applicant has not provided a great deal of detail about the proposed changes to the building. It is staff's understanding that most of the changes are internal with some cosmetic changes to the exterior of the building. The applicant will also be required to add parking because the off-street parking requirements are greater for apartment dwellers than for nursing home residents. Because multi-family apartments are not permitted in the R-1 district, a zoning change from R-1 to R-3 must first be approved to allow this property to be converted to apartment use. Zoninq Ordinance Requirements *The site plan submitted by applicant's architect is conceptual and would not be binding on the applicant. If this request to rezone the former nursing home site to R-3 is approved, any additional development on this parcel would be subject to the following standards and limitations: 1. Uses allowed - All permitted uses listed in the R-3 district which would include a 12 unit CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION NO: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM NO. Page 2 BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: apartment building, plus any conditional uses approved on a case by case basis by the Planning Commission. 2. Setbacks - Front yard - 25 ft Side yard - 7.5 ft. Rear yard - 25 ft. 3. Maximum building height - 75 ft. 4. Minimum lot area - Single-family/two-family dwellings; 6,000 sq. ft. Multi-family; 1,000 sq. ft./dwelling unit Other permitted/conditional uses; 15,000 sq. ft. 5. Maximum lot coverage - 40% 6. Parking - Multi-family dwellings: (2) spaces for each dwelling unit for the first twenty (20) units and one and one-half (1 %) spaces for each unit thereafter. All parking, driving and maneuvering areas would have to be surfaced with asphalt or concrete in accordance with Sec. 42-552 (e) 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. Landscape/Screening - If it is determined that proposed improvements exceed 50% of the value of the building then a landscape plan would have to be submitted with the building permit application for this project. The landscaping/ screening requirements that would apply to this project are as follows: a. Landscaped front yard - 10 sq. ft. of landscaped area per lineal ft. of street frontage (3,530 sq. ft.) b. Landscaped islands - None required because the parking lots contain fewer than 50 spaces. c. Parking lot screening - A 5 ft. planting strip along Lambertson Lane. All open off- street parking areas containing more than six (6) parking spaces would have to be effectively screened on each side that adjoins any property situated in a single-family residential district by a wall, fence or densely planted compact evergreen hedge not less than six (6) feet or more than eight (8) feet in height. d. Buffers - A 15 ft. landscape buffer is required between the apartment building and the single-family lots to the west. Only a 10ft. separation exists today. 8. Signs - One (1) ground sign and two (2) wall signs would be permitted on this zoning lot to identify the apartment buildinQ. CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION NO: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM NO. Page 3 BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: Suitabilitv of the Site for Development or Redevelopment Under Existinq Zoninq This factor deals with whether the site is suitable for development under the existing R-1 zoning. Nursing homes and elderly housing tend to be quiet and innocuous uses. The Planning Commission and City Commission made a policy decision to allow nursing homes in residential zoning districts along with churches and schools. As with churches and schools, nursing homes were made conditional uses because it was recognized that some locations in the center of a residential area might be inappropriate. Nursing homes are listed as conditional uses (uses permitted upon review) in the R-1 district provided they are directly accessible to a collector or arterial street. This Lambertson Lane location is not directly accessible to Ohio Street and would not be considered a suitable nursing home site today. The applicant believes the current R-1 zoning is inhibiting the redevelopment of the property. Staff would agree that almost any adaptive reuse of this building would require some form of zoning change. Many neighboring property owners appear to believe that this property is more suitable for new single- family home sites (see attached letters). Character of the Neiqhborhood This factor deals with whether the request to rezone this former nursing home to straight R-3 (Multi- Family Residential) zoning would adversely affect neighboring properties. The Shalimar Plaza Addition east of Ohio Street contains some commercial and multi-family zoning along the west edge close to Ohio Street but is single-family residential in character throughout the remainder of the area. There is some R-2 and R-3 zoning within the subdivision, including two R-3 zoned lots on Mission Road, but there is no multi-family housing around the perimeter of the nursing home site. Because the nursing home site is so tight, there is very little area available to provide a suitable buffer between the building and proposed parking areas and adjacent homes. This neighborhood is unique in that it is somewhat isolated from an access standpoint. It is bordered by drainage ditches on the east and south and there are only two access points into the neighborhood, Albert Avenue and Shalimar Drive. None of the internal streets connect with other subdivisions, so there is no thru traffic. The question for the Commission is whether it believes a zoning change to R-3 would be compatible with the zoning and uses of nearby property. CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION NO: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM NO. Page 4 Public Facilities and Services BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: This factor deals with whether the proposed rezoning will create traffic congestion, overtax public utilities, cause a drainage problem, overload public schools, jeopardize fire or police protection or otherwise detrimentally affect public services. Adequate water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, gas and electrical lines are in place to serve the existing development on this site. The proposed change in zoning classification from R-1 to R-3 should not overburden existing public facilities and services. That may not be the case if this property were demolished and redeveloped at an R-3 density. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Map - The Comprehensive Plan shows this site as being public/quasi-public based on its nursing home use. Therefore, approval of this request would require an amendment to the Land Use Plan prior to such a zoning change. 2. Land Use Plan - In addition to the plan map, the following Residential Development Policies should be used to guide development decisions: R3 Small scale "infill" residential development within or near existing areas should be compatible and in character with surrounding existing residential development. R4 Where possible, multi-family housing should be located on the edge of residential neighborhoods and near other major traffic generators. R6 Medium-density residential development should be promoted in locations between office/commercial areas and single-family neighborhoods. Abrupt changes in density should be avoided. R9 New medium- and high-density housing should be located in selected areas along major streets, adjacent to major activity areas such as commercial/office areas and large institutions, or adjoining similar existing multi-family development. New high-density development is also appropriate adjacent to public parks or other significant open space features. R10 New medium- and high-density areas should be developed as overall, planned residential environments. Within larger development areas, a range of housing types should be encouraged, with each area sharing a common character and unified environment. Planninq Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this rezoning application on June 20,2006. CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION NO: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM NO. Page 5 Following presentation of the staff report, comments from the applicant's representative, comments from neighboring property owners who were in opposition to the request and comments and questions from Commissions, the Planning Commission voted 8-0 to recommend denial of the requested zoning change to R-3 finding that conversion of this property to apartments would be incompatible with the surrounding single-family neighborhood. BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: Protest Petition A protest petition containing the signatures of 38 lot owners was received by the Clerk's Office on Wednesday, July 5, 2006, July 4 being a legal holiday. All 38 of these property owners are in the eligible "protest area". Staff has determined that these 38 properties comprise 95% of the eligible "protest area" and that the petition meets all other statutory requirements and is therefore a valid protest petition. The effect of this petition is to require that any motion to overturn the decision of the Planning Commission and approve this request for R-3 zoning must receive a super majority (4 affirmative votes). COMMISSION ACTION: Staff has identified the following alternatives for the Commission's consideration: 1. If the City Commission believes this is a suitable location for R-3 zoning and an that apartment building would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, it could overturn the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the attached ordinance rezoning the property to R-3. This action would require 4 affirmative votes. 2. The City Commission could send this item back to the Planning Commission for consideration of a Planned Development District application. If this item is sent back then upon receipt of a specific plan staff would notify affected property owners and a public hearing would be held by the Planning Commission to consider the revised request. The Planning Commission would then submit their recommendation on the proposed Planned Development District and redevelopment plan. This action would require 3 affirmative votes. 3. The City Commission could concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and deny Application #Z06-5. This action would require three (3) affirmative votes and would close this zoning case. The owner or applicant would then have to wait at least six (6) months before filing a similar application to rezone this property. Encl: Application Vicinity Map Concept Plan Protest Petition Correspondence Excerpt of PC Minutes 6/20/06 CITY OF SALINA REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTIOI\! DATE TIME 07/10/2006 4:00 P.M. AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR NO: AGENDA: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM NO. BY: DEAN ANDREW BY: Page 6 Ord. No. 06-10338 cc: Monty Gilliam Charles Renz Ken Wasserman Shirley Gawith JG 2106 PUBLICA TION DATE No Lale, Than May 25, 2006 HEARING DA TE ...J.1Ine 20. 200n VICINITY MAP ATTACHED KG OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE RECEIVED KG APPLICATION NO_ IIZ06-5 DA TE FILED May 19, 2006 FILING FEE RECEIPT NO_ $215.00 (jJ)f'(~ 5.b..?/o{p C!lV (INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION ARE ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORMI APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRICT ZONING MAP (REZONING) Applicant's Name: Mrmt-v (;i 11 i '''". - PT'i"Je Pr')pe"tj e'il 2_ Applicant's Address 919 Sunrise Drive Salina KS 67401 Zip Code: 3 Telephone (Businessl: 785 452 5373 IHomel: 5 Owner's Address Same Same Zip Code: 4 Owner's Name: 6. Legal description of propeny to be rezoned (attach additional sheets if necessary): Lot(sl In Block No. In Subdivision Metes and bounds description if unplatted (a Surveyor's Certificate must be filed with this application and if approved will be required to be platted): Lot 3 except the Northeast 3 feet thereof and all lots 8-14. Block II, Shalimar Plaza Addition to the City of Salina. 7. Approximate street address: 20')4 Lambertson Ln Salina KS 8 9 10. Area of propeny {sq. ft. and/or acres): 5h,9()() Present zoning: Rl Requested zoning: R3 Use: Formerly a nursinJ>: home (conditional IlRe)' clll"l"ently vacant Use: Apartments 11, Are there any covenants of record which prohibit the proposed development? (Attach copy): NORe 12, List reasons for this request. (Attach additional sheets if necessary): 1'hp "P1M ('I1M"P" pl """ t-('I ,.....m'pT't- this bUilding to Apartments. 13. Supply factual data showinj:l the effect the request will have on present and future traffic flow, schools, utilities, refuse collection, surrounding propenies, etc: (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Proposed residential use is consistent with the neiKhborhood. Refuse collection will be on a reJ>:ular basis with screened dumpsters located at the parking lots. Parking will be on site t.... notrestrittctraffic flow on 14, Will there be sufficient off-street parking provided for the requested use? ,.,- YES l;,ambel"tRolll r'''!'Ie Explain: Current olan is to develoo 12 apartments. Reouired on-Rite parkin,," iR fol" 24 cars. Refer to attached plan. 15. List exhibits or plans submitted: AttAched Pl"of1('1RPd "i t-P pl "" PROPERTY 0 SIGNA TURE: APPLICANT'S SIGNA TURE: DATE: If the applicant is to be represented by legal counselor an authorized agent, please complete the following so that correspondence and communications pertaining to this aPhtion n;ay be forwarded to the authorized individual. NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: t ~1':;l;\6:;>I~.1l~ ~~ E...b'~~ ADDRESS: -"1"":>0 i-l.. '\-..1luk. . <=7.A..LrlJA.. ~ ZIP CODE: CoI4r71 TELEPHONE (Business): P,"Z..I'D~ AREA CODE: (P::J;; White - Planning Canary. Inspection Pink. Applicant (Rev. 8/84) 101 rDl ~t:J.c:.~ nn NnT nCTt:J.r~' ~ L-J / 'f 1 61 C-3 D D Application #Z06-5 - I Filed by Monty Gilliam AI Ol":[,,)"T A\I I R-3 ~ \ g R-. , \ R-5 U P C-3 c: .. st A~ \: r---- u: . 3 --- - C-3 C-5 -:Y C-3 & o~ t-.Cj S fyQ:- f-:J"t ~ C'LJA ....~~~ o~ .:r G - / C-2 A-1 / { (( ~ J \#-, "-- SARAHLN K~ ~~ R2 ~ A-1 m l.- \ \ h.--.. ==- T I t"'11 I WAYNE AV cr lit ::J 0 ...~.~ ~ cr ... ...." ~ ~ "~N R-~ : ;c " -2 C -1 :J cr iP 1.: <C 0 I!~ fi1\ f:" ::c z CI) ) ~ ;\.. . " <( IrV ~~~ ""1K~ '~~If IlW I ow <9~ -I .~w "t -~~l If""'" .~..,. iloilo.. . ~ . : ~J ~ I"'\. ~ ..... 1 Inch = 200 Feet 1M lL~C INf h { .... / / / / // / / / / / / / / / / / / / ~' / 9' / / / / / / / / / .I / ! ! I o I i ! ! ! ~ OC W~ d o~ 1r5 U ~i = oc l ; ~...J ffi~ ~~ ~~ ~~. ::>~ ~a U <C:I: o I- c> z a:: <( () (/) Cl (/) Z W <( I -I (/) z G: Cl ~ 0::: ~ Z o () >- I- :J U <( lL . (/) ......:~ .z (/):J 0-1 0<( C!F ~~ c>Cl zVi FW (/)0::: X", W..... >- CD Cl 0::: W o Z W 0::: ~ 0 () ~ (/) ~ W X CD W oc> ::::E W I-~ 0 CD () 0::: (/)z LL 0 <(W I- ~lL ~ c> <(:I: I- Z ~~ Q ~ sz- I- ~ o:::CO ~ Cl <( 0::: 0::: Z a.. 0 0 :=s c> Z ~ 0::: <( 0::: a.. ~ I- Z W - W 0::: l- (/) I lL lL o Cl I ~ c> <( I a.. 0 I- ~ Cl Z ::::E :;: W Z Cl Z W U II &I i!ilil -, 0, <C ~ Cl W Z :;;: I- Z :;;: ::::E >- -I -I o <( I- Z o Vi (/) W lL o 0::: a.. ..-: z :J I U <( W ~~ u It i!UU >- O:z c(c( ~...J :::lEa.. a::~ o:z ~ a..=> " ~ OC ~.., ~~ w I u3; l 0 g ~ ~ ~ OC u. l I wI .~ ~.., = ~~ OC u3; l ",' o EJ 00 0>< ~ ' "0'" ".' m:2 "' <.0.' z~ 5,x :J'? ":2 ~ Planning Commission Minutes June 20, 2006 Page 33 conceptual but not binding, so if the inclination was to have something that was binding through a planned development district then we would analyze that plan thoroughly and look at the drainage implications. The way this area was developed, because it was platted in the late 1950's, there was no detention or any type of requirements like that, that were in place orwould be in place today, but it certainly, anytime we review a specific site plan, that would be something that Brad and his group would look at is that drainage pattern, the sizing of existing facilities, what direction we want parking lots to drain or be directed. So that would be done as part of any thorough site plan review. We didn't feel like we were at that stage yet at this point in time because it's really more of a land use decision, should this building be adaptively reused for some purpose and for what? Mrs. Soderberg asked Mr. Chairman it seems to me that this is kind of a question of the balancing of property rights here, and for most people I think the investment that they make in their home is probably the largest investment that they make in their life. And I think there is a certain right to reasonable expectations when you buy your property, and in a neighborhood, and I think that's what these people have done and I kind of applaud them for pulling together as a neighborhood and having a common vision. On the other hand, I think that when Prime Property bought this piece, that they had to have had some kind of reasonable expectation that there is a risk that what they wanted to do in this neighborhood had to go through just what we're going through right now. So I guess if I have to err on one side or the other on property owners, it would be with the homeowners, and so I'm going to float this and see how far I get. MOTION: Mrs. Soderberg stated I would move that we deny the request to zone this property to R-3. Planning Commission Minutes June 20, 2006 Page 34 SECOND: Mrs. Bonilla-Baker Mr. Simpson stated okay it's been moved and seconded that the application be denied I guess. Mrs. Yarnevich asked may I ask a question? That was denial of the R-3, did that also included denial of any planned development district? Mrs. Soderberg stated that's denial of R-3. I have a feeling about the other as well. Mr. Schneider stated one thing, I had just recently rented a two-bedroom apartment for $675 a month in a ten unit complex, and the picture that i painted of these units is like it's some kind of terrible place to be and where I lived it wasn't terrible at all. It was very quiet and nice, very well-kept,good neighbors. I don't think you know all apartment buildings have to be bad, it depends a lot on who owns them and how they're managed and how they're run, so it's a little sad to think here in Salina that we think any kind of apartment building with ten people is necessarily bad, you know? I don't think all of our neighbors are that way. We don't always get to pick and choose who we live by, but I mean I think there's a lot of control in how it's fixed up, how it's kept care of, how you sort out who you allow to live in there and it doesn't necessarily mean they would be bad neighbors.. Mr. Simpson stated I also think just from a personal standpoint, with Jones- Gilliam if they have anything to do with this, it's going to be a quality project. I don't think, you know they talk about building issues and everything, it'll be built properly, it'll be done right, it'll look good. I think a lot of concerns about drainage and stuff, maybe that will be better when it's done versus worse. Planning Commission Minutes June 20, 2006 Page 35 With the City staff the way they are, they do an excellent job of controlling all of that nowadays. I think some of those issues will be better after than they are at this point. Mr. Simpson stated I think I would also oppose the R-3, but I would certainly be willing to listen to a planned development district where we had specifics of what was going to be done, meaning infrastructure, rehabilitation, whatever, what assurance that is to the owners of the property, but that would be my position. Mr. Ritter stated I think there are just too many variables here that someone commented earlier, "what's okay now but what's going to happen in the future if it's R-3 now," who knows? Mr. Simpson asked and Dean could you clarify that on the planned development district? If we agree to a certain, say we agree to something that is primarily single-story, is there any accountability down the road? Mr. Andrew stated well a future buyer couldn't go in there and alter anything, they couldn't add a second story, they couldn't add units, they couldn't add physically to the building without a public hearing and coming back before this body. The planned development district basically limits it to what it is today and what you decide it should be in terms of the number of units and parking, how that's arranged and all. The implications ofthe motion that's on the table right now would be a recommendation of denial. That recommendation would go to the City Commission, that the application be denied outright. So that is the motion that is on the table and it would go as a recommendation to the City Commission. So the way I'm interpreting the motion, it doesn't involve the PDD option, it's recommending Option 5. Planning Commission Minutes June 20, 2006 Page 36 VOTE: Mr. Simpson stated last question, those in favor of the motion to deny the application indicate by saying aye. Opposed? Motion carried (8-0). Mr. Simpson stated the application is denied. Item #5. Application #Z06-6, filed by Chuck Arnold, dba Super Wash and Detail, requesting an amendment to Article VI, Division 14, Section 42-302 by adding car washes as permitted use in the C-4 (Central Business) district. Mr. Andrew presented the staff report which is contained in the case file. Mrs. Yarnevich stated Dean they opened the car wash without notifying anyone, without checking into the zoning? Mr. Andrew stated well because they were just using the existing building and there was not any kind of permit or anything required to put the mud pit in, the use of the building kind of just modified over time from a taxi dispatch office, to limousine service, to detailing, and then to car washing. So there weren't any building permits or anything that would necessarily give us an opportunity to visit with them about their planned use of the property. It just started operating and that's when it was brought to our attention and we focused our attention on it. Mr. Schneider asked well what are the geographic limits of downtown in the definition? Mr. Andrew stated well essentially the downtown business improvement district extends from Prescott on the south up to Elm. The C-4 district is (Published in the Salina Journal on July , 2006) ORDINANCE NUMBER 06-10338 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 8526, THE SAME BEING CHAPTER 42 OF THE SALINA CODE, AND THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP THEREIN AND THEREBY ADOPTED AND PROVIDING FOR THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY AND PRESCRIBING THE PROPER USES THEREOF. WHEREAS, all conditions precedent for the amendment of the Zoning District Map, the rezoning of certain property therein, hereinafter described has been timely complied with, SO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina, Kansas: Section 1. AMENDMENT. DISTRICT "R-3", MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. That the Zoning District Map of the City of Salina, Kansas, duly adopted and published as a part of Ordinance Number 8526, the same being Chapter 42 of the Salina Code, be and it is hereby amended so that the following described property be rezoned as follows, to- wit: Lot Three (3), except the Northeast Three (3) Feet thereof, and all of Lots Eight (8) through Fourteen (14) in Block 11 of the Shalimar Plaza Addition to the City of Salina, Saline County, Kansas (aka 2054 Lambertson Lane) shall become a part of DISTRICT "R-3", MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Section 2. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The use of said described property shall be subject to all the conditions, restrictions and limitations as made and provided for in Ordinance Number 8526, the same being Chapter 42 of the Salina Code with reference to the "R-3", MUL TIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Section 3. That all prior ordinances in conflict herewith as they relate to the above described real estate are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption and publication once in the official city newspaper. Introduced: July 10, 2006 Passed: Donnie D. Marrs, Mayor (SEAL) ATTEST: Lieu Ann Elsey, City Clerk / Shalimar Nursing Home Petition Area l I I I ~ /1 // N ~ w-\r' ~ s ~ ~ SARAH LN Shalimar Nursing Home Petition .. Did not sign petition ~ Signed petition ~ Request area (f) I ).> C s: ).> ;;0 o ;;0 I L Ma p Creslted By: Dust I Herrs Jul 6,2006 - - - - - -- -- - - - I '>:~.,--.,.:~\ "f, iJ:. . "'..... .', :. -'-.-- ~-. /" i~~.- - " ~.. .....~6j-...' ~,..,.~y '1 . .'~~.4.~ '~..& , '- 1" '.; ;." ':-t~",v':" _', ....;; oA ~., '<i"..... , _: _).-1:1'. :. "L. . ~ ...~.. ~.N.t.:<' '" "1.<. . . '\" '''''1'" I". . .... ,'. "". "'.to.. J l .~" ~~. ':\:;","_ , ," "4" · , ~ _ 'X.'_ 11 "" . . ,'I_ '{ . t ~"",,_. "-. ' "-<." ':.-t:iY.' i #i.'~..~ " ". '... . -.;,>v. "\ ;,. ~")"(""~:"~\-"7:>""._., . ;. ~<~~~".1(ij. ~ 0~'P: . .:'.~t;. "'_~. . ' "i" -'.....#1' :):is- '(' '. ' r. ~~. : . ,.' '.' .:,.. y n. , >.",. <:+,' /'1 ~. , . ",~ '. :/"~~i;:" - . >1 '11.1" ::. . ). . , .) " ,''!',.i#. ., -... '( ~.. '~2t' .''\.... r('<~' t:.... '\ ;". '.' (J...~.\\\\i;:.<,. '~~ "" .';._~~,~ ... -. . . - 1 , . . ".\\Ij,I-... '.',. _~' '- .' <. ., ; ':'-0 ','" '4"r II ._'/- . ':', ; ,/ I...:':.;,' . .. {''J -..... {. f(-- /,0':, "., j ...:,:tIt .;;.>:(~~);~~.;;: '" reF. -, . /" ,- "-.< "'0', ';:;\, '} ., ~.,J','~c> ~';''''/;.~~/;. -" / ,....~.o..,~./"' ...~~}' ~'~~,. :?,-~." I!;/';~\\:'~~'" . , ,,;/, .1' . . .: ~ _ / ,,' ".... '."", . " ';...{ --/;' :\, . "1 ~. "." <.'.,:::,,' ~~',-_" " ,-" ...." ~', " ., - .' t '" ". 'v,. ..':..... '.. ,. ".", .'J ': ~'"?< : "';".+'Jt:" ~ ~J~~:~\;:~\' ': f /' "fl{l'/.'~':'~'}:~~"':I.,.JJ~~ -.~':.':f:~_'!';"-~,~'~,', ",'. '.-"-:., ~t/ ' " · .',"'''.., " "" . "/., ". -"'.','.. .., ',. - , "p:;C-'" . . " ~< "'-:"", ")'2'- " .,. ,_ "'V(tl ., .. .If. . ." ~.. .' :<~, ,'i) ~J;f~~Vr"~,,>,>,/,,,~~ ' , '~, · ,':~"!i;Y I ,/ '/:~":"Lti:'I_ . '~'~'..., ~, .~ ,~ "'" It ;:-- :..., '--~ 1"<.. - ., _ l. \ - "',' .j~ /1..,'1 j' ':'c> ',. . e' (~"J .. '':''~ " 1 tll J . "c '-- , . . t-'I'~~/; : "~';:'..:'-:<; i~, . \- L~' ':"..... J; fjl' I ,- 0 II'.~~ _J.l[. '~l ~ 'I . "I (o:i;:[1 : , ,'! I '.' .. . .., '-.'-c,. J',._" i .' - '~- '!",l i~y,l".H~_"--1 \ ----;;-~~ _,;r II \ ~ , _ -::-r--1--;,_J:' J' _' _ __;-; '_~:=-_ ~ ~-:-- II -0 _ '-, . '.. __-'---- .'- ,Yj;-liJ~'. ~'-'LJ~~i.r,:.- .;::.-: - '-;~---- .I "v."~',;. ~I -- ----=-:'1 --1"'1'1 '"" '-" ~ --- ---'---- ....-' -- ("' -', \... \ .' '.. . i ~.~ ~. j.', . ""'II,"\.. ....~ ~;- ~, ... -~ ...;. ~ ' ~ ~X1 .... -~ '"91 ~=-\. " ~_~.\1O~ -J:) , I.~ - ii:o"- -- ;Y,c . Jt '.... ~' ........ . ... <r-~ ) / ,J .- J ) ~ "... -' . j ;;;, "C .. - , , ..'\. -' ....:::.. '.. '.,,.. ,. ,- " ~ ,~ "." ....-. .....j '. ,. ..~- , -' ~~{ \\, . l -0./ -...'='~- . .", , , ..,1'~~:'''7:':l .;t--~ '. ....,.~ ", 'r~~ '~'J- '"\... . . - ~ '<., - . , ~:- .!-t, . ~~'(... r ~~lL-' I ...~.:~ i'~~1 _ J ~~ .. 1,:// ~ J I~) 1-' " ~/ ., " r' '.. . . -~ 1",. l~ \~ j / ","-, <, .- a: ,~'.'t r~- .~.,)f.~' < 1~,~ ~>j.... '" .~.(".... -', -(;.. l--il .. .,.. .I ~~ ~/' .~,. -, '.., ./ ,-';~ /) -c 11' " ~. ..'...., ",i. .~' v/ ':..-~;-. [l -.-~ :'\.\'~ ".:-'}:'.~~"';;'l . -,,'. , !I ,. , ~ "!::J, \ 9': ..,,'i1 . .~-\ 0: '" ,~ ;7" /. -, ,< ), '.' " .~ ~. ~.'I \'. I, i' I !. I 1 ~ UIJ Ir~;=-=~~ " II i!J II ." j II, . I; Ii I' II Ic- ., '.,11 l .', " k:~.;.~ d.::, '-J' -" -~~ Ii f'~ I 110- :-~1... I :.~~. ' i ~l.'" .. ';~"0r I , .~: k?~~=~~ t,J -', '.~ ,~ '--~-' J----l' "-'I~! . !' 't. .~ ~.. r I · =rl~ 1-/' ';'F~-:::""1 j '~, r'll,: '~bd I I ~,"'f.'1" \ ,;:,.1 ,'.' '1., II '''. - " 'r Ii"; 'I ., -', '~~'II I I ~,- I':. \ I ! , 'I , , j '......----....--- ~f ,.- .., F. ~.~ I ~. r- I I .'11 ~,' l,r 'f! ,J.)-...~ ".' ,<-- " "'~,~'h -~, "~~J , '1 .l ,:~_r~ \ ~. ' 1 . J.i .__a___---, -~ '; .~. ,~.J " , ;I;,.;] t.. ~~ ~:ft 1- ~ .~ 10 rlt I,.' ' '-l ~J ~J.'-' -", I I' " . " I , I ~ F OC III lL ~ o ~ II: ~ lL ~ ~ W , ;Z W IE ~ J I I'i = oc lL j ~ z <( ~ ~ C ~ 0... . A-1 0 C-1 D C-2 . C-3 . C-5 0 R 0 R-1 '-" , ' ;t -, . R-2 . R-2.5 . R-3 0 R-S PROTEST PETITION June 13, 2006 City Clerk's Office Filed '06 JUL 5 AHH: 56 =* 42210 To: City of Salina City Planning Dept. Community Development Room 205 Ref: Protesting of proposed apartment rezoning (R-3) Request #Z06-5 Att: Mr. Dean Andrews Shalimar Plaza Addition (zoned R-l) is a family oriented property owned, for which strongly objects to the proposed R-3 multi-housing zoning. We object to the proposed 12 temporary housing apartments for the following reasons: 1. Salina rental housing subsidized program. 2. Additional Wlfelated (non-renters) residence guests occupants. 3. Additional 3-4 or more vehicles per apartment (visiting or occupants). 4. Uncontrolled noise, parties, and no live-in management. 5. Additional vehicles within the neighborhood constitutes addition traffic all hours of the day or night. 6. Uncontrollable speeding in a family neighborhood raising small children. 7. Trash thrown within neighborhood and on proposed apartment site. 8. Uncontrollable noise from apartment complex affecting existing and surrounding residence's within 75 feet. 9. No proposed buffer zone between zoning buildings. 10. Additional police patrolling required at apartment complex. II. Visitation of undesirable characters. We as property owners STRONGLY OBJECT to any rezoning. The following attached tractum owner's signatures were circulated by Cindy Larson and Mr. & Mrs. Richard Gawith. We hereby acknowledge & witnessed each and all home owners signatures upon this petition. Of all the 42 R-I Zoned Single Family zoned property owners, within the 200 feet of the proposed rezoning property, 38 have signed this protesting petition. ition on their behalf. (g - \3 -0(0 ~ MY. ~~/~~~ Richard Gawith I#Z06-5 Monty Gillam 4pP(.IC~77l)N ~I Fk~pD({ ~IJEICS" Wrt1I,# TRACTNUM I rr OWNER J JMAI FRIEOAJ I Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM J OWNER J Owner's Address I TRACTNUM J OWNER I I 2bC> q ~ p~p ~j ~JVM: J#1 RED FOX LN ]SAUNA rs--167401 I~ 4r/;{{).WD- IP~~~~Y A & ANGel IA 0 . O~'~SALlNA J-at ~, ]. l-Gck. ~ rs--167401 ///O,C)()6 I . ~~ .-ve: ' 12037 SSION RD ~ Lut / I ~iocJ:. /3 rs-- 167401 LW.z Owner's Address J2043 MISSION RD }SAUNA U-:1.., ~'Qd. / '3 Friday, May 26, 2006 rs--167401 Page 1 0/9 TRACTNUM J f5 fJ&iJeJ&r:-f. ()W.v-U,-- OWNER -:. .J.... )PIN [C~V~~ I ~ ~~' Owner's Address TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address J TRACTNUM J OWNER I Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address I Friday, May 16. 1006 2036 MISSION RD 4;)+ 11, ?:JOel g ~r67401 liJJL ~045 MISSION RD L-ot 3 ~locI:. /3 , ~ H I).^\L-\)\.J n ~-r ISCHMIDT BRIAN K ~k~ 2-DLr ~ Glc'\dJc 12045 GLENDALE RD Ls.+ 110 13 / Qck. '8' ~1't:I[ f.-{ iliJo;J I?d SALINA . ~j67401 r lOq Do\) . Sa..llf\4 h J' 61 '-{o I ISAlINA ~ 167401 ra: fl~ w ~ Ou ne./ 1m lEA .:l~~Lh ( l · ~O 4<1 QJ.d~~ JPcl. ~(l~L /", ShILl 0 r 41 I<tO. (JOd ~167401 12049 MISSION RD . (SALINA /-ot ifl ~od:. 13 1/5 OOD / ~D'J I WU')')1ffYl lZd 2051 MISSION RD [SAUNA Lo+ 6-' T3J<.dc.. /3 J ~167401 Page 10f9 TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address f TRACTNUM , OWNER J Owner's Address I TRACTNUM I OWNER J Owner's Address I TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address I TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address J f I I I ~q ffJ!w.~/ )2049 NDAL RD Sf'UNA La+ 18 'Bloc1 8 f1i: lI"m~ "tVn er Ja~ 0 )TURNER MARK & PAMELA SUE //f'~ 71lM'lP 0.. <a.;'l4o.h-- 12055 MISSION RD SAUNA .;t tJ.S.5 /'Vl,:SS;4/l Lot- <'0, ~/~ 13 ~ ps-r67401 IJf- J-!cnv q~(}~ PS-167401 ,fh~P/ Y. q{!U~~ ~"l ~//h h., /~ ( )d Lu .-1..L.5.:. 000 2044 MISSION RD ~ SALINA IKS f67401 1-0+ 14 i3locl. II )NURSING HOME FOUND INC J-/o 1-<-1 C. J d 1;060 PS-J67401 f%ETHERINGTON & CO JPO BOX 213 JABILENE PS-J67410 TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM J OWNER , Owner's Address J TRACTNUM OWNER ~_:'Jt&1fL!'~1!!JJ11 rLl-htvu, IU,CUJ J~LO;?f~ f> 4 1?HfA-1?DS{{) -r; 'AtU~ :8~ dD51 n'\~~ed ~v w Le1LtOl Lat? "Bled:- /3 ~op~ ~ IIIJtItJ ()c.mw VJut I- ~ 1~1oo IUTTLE WESLEY H & CARlJl. S I ~1f~ C~.2dr1l ~ 104 W 22NO AVE jHUTCHINSON F" 167502 ~dSJ Ccusa.Uf 5.J.,'f\.. KS (,,7401) I, ii:~,~llI&L YM><> 6'1urNr _L'/5A?o tSENOER STEVE R r Owner's Address ISAUNA 4-+ L{j 13/tJd J 1 TRACTNUM I OWNER . I Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address f Friday, May 26, 2006 F"167401 !I/LL/,~ F"167401 k"? ?7W - Uf)O Page 40f9 TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER J J Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER I J Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address I Friday, May 26, 2006 I V~ {POD,- \ )O,D b G \Jc, Lt.\.. ~ ~f ho ("'- '- 12061 CORSAUT CT ISALlNA ~ 167401 tr\~~ k' - .J~~-'L- ~r()otir~ OWh~r 12066 (SSIO RD ~SALlNA ~167401 ~66 (L; VYl i s5.. OYl Rd. 4-+ Lfj ~loc.k- /Q..... 167401 ks 07~o/ ~7) (//Zf t!QU. ~~ lLOU ~ \ ~S- ~\';) tl "J ~\\.\~ 5 ~ 1=6 (..-7 <jc) / ~167401 /~o( I chM/1 ~ 12071 LAMBERTSON LN JSAlINA Lo+ I n Jock. /"- Page 5 0[9 \ '\ TRACTNUM OWNER /~OZJO -Wl!...o .~~. Owner's Address JSALlNA Lot ~j 'B/ode- I ~ ~'67401 TRACTNUM f OWNER J Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address 11 /.:3?... ~ov ()~~ dO ~, ~167401 9tJ)~ ~167401 TRACTNUM -- OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM I OWNER j Owner's Address I Friday, May 26, 2006 11233 SARAH LN )SALlNA I;J.J J. S:uv.- "- ~ S::t h ~ ~+?, B Jock /:1- ~167401 ~ ~ 7401 Page6of9 TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address f Friday, May 16, 1006 ~ J67401 ISKILLERN EARNEST A & AuCI JAC ~ 1300 SARAH LN I SAUNA ~167401 1 ~~tAA{J.,L~~, 1q~/{){)+ ~;(wJ I 11228 SARAH LANE 'SAuNA ~ 167401 '/4 r:3T - _(~ l IJIi A;.. . ~ 0 Mvn~<8;;1ONIL{ ~~- ~ 1/&,OoU IDl~ 11224 SARAH LN ISALlNA ~167401 l;l J. ~ J4~1.- Iv"C- f34 I )1220 SARAH LN )SALlNA 4-r 3. Elocle./Y ~167401 Page 70/9 TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address I Friday, May 26, 2006 Ii QIJ, om $ kfJ~{J T R & LEIN DEB JORAH D ~~:J(:J!/b;, 'fld;'~alu /@ .~~~ j12t4-SARAH LN jSALlNA PS--J67401 / :J./l-/ fAJ""-:i", fd"'<<-" ~ & 7</D/ L.o+ ~ 'Rlo~ IL f36 ISALA CARL & SAlA SARAH J f 12207 MCDOWELL AVE 'MANHATTAN PS--!66502 I I PS--167401 ~Rt.r..- I J:1{; /j:OO )(1: / ~;; ~oo I . ~AIIA lci!.~" 12052~~~D ~ kit ~ S J --p) oc.k- 1 n '- '.~,;' }~) ,1 e-{ 12C:ic>D J & ME NDA D f ..1~t~ J'SAUNA ~ 167401 1-d:- ~'1, BJoc.k- '1 IIICI 5/161( I/"l1vvt D-L . Page 8 019 TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address f TRACTNUM I OWNER f Owner's Address TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address TRACTNUM OWNER I I Owner's Address r f40.-}) ~ /?I -;0-1/ t--;'~ / ICtO~~ l;r~ - /01 :200 }HANZUCEK BO G & P GY J JREVOCABlE TRUST - ~ / liUd(11 ,{J ~~~".. o.d (J~ 1125SHAU OR ~~J67401 J4f e:J..b p- 7 / II:lj ~ ~ L-Irdh~r- Dr, f41 IMlllESON ROBERT E & MlllES JON SHIRLEY A ET Al t?/h;/L~ jSAUNA rs-167401 - /. / - K ~ 7Vo/ /~/ o /l,{ol1 ~ P P (J,4R AOD ) t ~oed- 5hq / ( f. SQ/:n4 2082 SHAUMAR OR JSAUNA ~ "81 12:.1oeL, D k s ~ 7'-/01 FI67401 f43 fHOEFFNER HENRY C JR TR &H JANCOCK ROONEY l TRUST #1 1409 S ESTATES OR ) SALINA F167401 Friday, May 26, 2006 Page 90/9 Shalimar Nursing Home Petition Protest Area Calculations LETTERS RECEIVED June 20, 2006 Mr. Dean Andrew, The purpose of this letter is to voice my opinion on the pending rezoning of "Shalimar Nursing Home." It is not a persoruilattack against this person -Who -I ~ sure an" - . . upstanding citizen of the community. If I may ask, if this is such a great opportunity to have a low income facility in our neighborhood, why did the City of Salina not volunteer to have it in their neighborhoods? I feel it would decrease the value of our homes, in which none are less than $100,000.00(+). This will make our property value go down and fewer taxes will be paid. My suggestion would be to tear the building down, which probably has asbestos and bugs etc. and divide the lot for individual sale. Over the years will provide the City with paid taxes on new homes that will. have a longer life than a low income housing facility would. Thank: you, for your time on this important matter. ~ 1). SlJt~Ji. Debra D. Schmid ~ June 16, 2006 Dean Andrew l)~to:r qf Plarmirl9_~_. . Camiunity Developoent 300 W.Ash Salina, Ks. 67401 Re: Application #Z06-5 Monty Gillam-Prime Properties Dear Mr. Andrew: This letter is in regard to the above application requesting a . re-zoning fran single family to multi family on the property located at 2054 Lambertson Lane. Please be advised that I am against this re-zoning change for the following reasons: 1. This building is in an area surrounded by single family residences and a 12 unit aparbnent canplex would be a detriment to this area. 2. This would decrease the property values on every property A_ 3. There would be approximately 24 more cars. in this area which would increase the traffic flow and be cause for concern for the safety of the children that live in the area. 4. There are only two ways out of our area, one on Shal:imar Drive and the other on Albert. Albert has a signal light but -Shal:imar has none and(~ getting out on Ohio now is a1most impossible, let alone adding more traffic to the existing problan. I currently live next to a 4 unit aparbnent so I do have experience with multi family buildings and it has many problems and drawbacks too nllI1ll':!rous to mention and I did build a six foot fence on the south of my property to separate my property fran theirs. We have a very nice area to live in and the property owners and renters take care of their property. :E sincerely hope that you consider everything before making your decision. y~ very truly, ..- /~ .. Shirley Milleson, Property Owner 2077 Corsaut court '. Salina, Kansas June 14,2006 Planning and Community Development. Attn.: Dean Andrew, Director P.O. Box 736 Sali:i1a, KS 67402..()736 Dear Mr. Andrew: We have recently been made aware of Application #Z06-5, filed by Monty Gillam requesting a zoning district classification change from R-l to R-3. We are home owners living close to the former ShaIimar Plaza NurSing Home. We reside at 1310 Sarah Lane in Salina. -We feel very strongly that changing the zoning classification on this property violates our property interest. Converting the property in question to low income housing opens up " many negative possibilities. The potential for the decrease of property values to any nearby properties is very great. We have lived in this area for many years. We chose our home because of the neighborhood, a quiet area, composed almost completely of single family dwellings. We have many grandchildren and they visit often. We've always felt secure in letting them play outside here since there is very little traffic and seldom does anyone speed down this street. If the former nursing home is converted to low income housing, traffic will surely increase a great deal and that will take away the security we have always enjoyed. In addition, should the zoning change be passed and property values drop, as they surely will, we feel that anyone who experiences this loss should be compensated for the decrease in value of their property. Our neighborhood is a very nice middle income area and we do not wish to see either that change or our neighbors moving away due to changes in zoning or living conditions. Areas like this are a disappearing .commodity. Please do not approve the rezoning request. Please notify us of any upcoming me~tings or hearings regarding the proposed zoning change. Sincerely, ""~j..5/J~ 71t~21 ~ Mary J. Sparks lance and Tresha Hoover 2075 Shallmar Salina, Ks 67401 June 11, 2OJ6 To Whom It May Concern, Wf} are "!3.ry concerned about the development that is going to t;ikepl~c:e ~t 2054 Lambertson Lane. " ThiS is the former site of Sha/imar Nursing Home. Currently purposed to be developed into subsidized low income apartments. We have lived in this neighborhcxx:l for tvlelve years. When we were looking to buy our second house in Salina, our search was driven by our children. We wanted them to grow up in an neighborhood where they could play and reside safely and be educated in the environment that we chose for them based on their needs. We found ourselves at 2075 Shalimar at the end of our search. We currently feel that the things thatattraded us originally to this property are being invaded and our family put at risk. By allowing the proposed development to proceed .itwill definitely change the character of our neighborhcxx:l. -/t- is the Character of somethin~f that makeS it valuable." For example the characters of a book makes the story a good one, we all make the character of ot.rneighborhood. By allOlNing the apartments to go in at 2054 Lambertson Lane, you will be adding to the problems we in this area already face_ These would include an increase in traffic, increase in crime, and an increase in schoof population_ The increase in traffic will decrease the safety of all the children. in the neighborhcxx:l. A t.....elve unit apartment complex will increase car population in our neighborhood by at least tvlelve cars but more on the range of twenty-four. There are only two entrances to our neighborhcxx:l, Ohio and Shalimar, and from Albert street If you add that many people to that small of an area the crime is bound to increase. How are we to help protect our neighbors when we won't know who they are due to the turnover rate of an apartment comple>..'? Our elementary school is already over 400 students. Part of the bond issue v.'aS to expand the size of our schools to allow for smaller class sizes, our neighborhood pays for this bond issue. Last year my son's class population was twenty-six. How will this apartment complex help alleviate this problem? This is not an issue of money, for us, or for our neighborhood. I am sure that this will decrease the value Of our homes in the neighborhcxx:l, therefore decreasing our property taxes. We would love the savings but not at the cost Of our children's safety and education. We would hope that the City of Salina would be appreciative of receMng revenue from the six single family houses that could be built at the same proposed sites verses the headaches and increase of problems with adding twelve units of apartments to this neighborhcxx:l. ;c:'~y Lance & Tresha Hoover 1H Mr. Dean Andrew Director of Planning and Community Development 300 W. Ash P.O. Box 736 Salina, KS 67402-0736 Dear Mr. Andrew, In referenCe to our phone conversation on Thursday 06/08/2006 regarding rezoning application # Z06-5, my Wife Marilyn and I are the property owners at 2066 Mission Rd, Salina, KS. While our property does not abut the former Shalimar Nursi~ Home on Lambertson Lane, it is within the 200 feet specified in your letter to us dated May 26 2006. My wife and I would like to go on record as opposed to the rezoning application Z06-5 as filed by Mr. Monty Gillam for the property in question (former Shalimar Nursing Home). -We are opposed to the rezoning application as proposed-for several reasons: We believe.the-: ". '. . rezoning from R-l to R-3 (Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential) will drastically change the 'character' of the neighborhood we live in. This area is made of up entirely of single family dwellings. Some of the families (three in fact) that own property directly adjacent to the proposed complex have small children. These families would most certainly have their lives directly impacted by the proposed complex. We have a number of retired couples that live in this area (one in fact whose deck would be within a few feet of the proposed parking lot for the complex) that I'm sure would not appreciate the increased traffic and noise that a multi family structure would bring. We and our neighbors in this area feel that our property values would most certainly be negatively impacted by such a multi family apartment complex at the proposed location. Moreover the streets in this area of Salina were certainly not designed for a multi family structure of the size of the proposed 12 apartments at the location in question. Are the families in this area going to have to contend with trash and litter on the streets and in adjacent properties from this proposed complex? Will we see an increased Police presence because of this proposed complex? I don't know, but I have yet to see a multi family complex of this size located in this type of neighborhood that didn't require an increase presence oflaw enforcement at any given moment in time. Our opposition to this rezoning is not directed at Mr. Gillam. I am sure Mr. Gillam is a fine citizen and is only interested in the potential income from his investment. I think that a majority of affected and interested property owners would prefer to see the present structure razed and the land that is available be converted into use as single family residential structures or lots for sale as such. As I stated to you during our phone conversation a previous family commitment prevents me from attending the Planning Commission meeting on June 20tli so I am hoping that this letter will serve as our proxy statement. Thank You for your kind consideration in this matter. Sincerely Yours, ~~~lerm~ k:.J~ 2066 Mission Rd Salina, Kansas . "It" - ~ . ---- June 9, 2006 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Dean Andrew - Director of Planning & Community Development Bob & Debby Klein - Homeowner - 1214 Sarah Lane Opposition to the proposed rezoning of Shalimar Nursing Home Thank you for informing us of Application #Z06-5 for the request of change in zoning district classification from R-l district to R-3 district. Monty Gillam is proposing to convert Shalimar Nursing Home into a 12-unit low end apartment building. I am assuming low end apartments because by making it into 12 units there will be very little living space (under 900 square feet) in each unit. This building has sewer problems, grease pit problems; asbestos hazard, mold and urination smell through out the building. This building should be tom down, not converted. This neighborhood has 6 dead end streets with only 2 outlets to Ohio Street. Twelve more families in a small half block area will more than over populate the neighborhood. Twelve exira families will mean 24 or more extra cars on dead end streets which will make it dangerous for kids and everyone else that is living in the neighborhood. If these families have any kids there will be no place for these kids to play except the street or parking lot, which makes the kids and the cars compete for the same space. Also, the proposed south parking lot has it's driveway straight across from ours making it virtually impossible for us to be able to get in and out of our driveway and also the possibility of increased cars means we probably won't be able to park in front of our own house. Many people who live in this neighborhood bought their homes here because of the safety factor ofliving in a low traffic, quiet area. We feel that there will be an increased police presence in the neighborhood because of the quality of people that typically live in this kind of housing. The property value of everyone's home will go down if low end housing comes in the neighborhood. Many people have their life savings invested in their homes. After 50 years of having this zoned single family residential it is not right to change it, and destroy the years of work people have put into their homes just to make one person happy who doesn't even live in the neighborhood. A better solution would be to level the building and put in single family homes in its place. I believe that single family homes would add to the value of the properties in the entire neighborhood and mean more tax income for the city. The flood control ditch behind our house fills to within a foot or two of running over the top when we have a hard rain. Since we are in the flood area of town and have to have special insurance, is the city going to have Mr. Gillam (prime Properties) do a special flood survey to determine if concreting a large section of the half block for two parking lots is going to affect the water run off? If it does affect the water level in the drainage ditch is the city going to concrete the drainage ditch to control the bugs and animals that wash up in the ditch already? It now takes 2 or 3 days for the water to go down and it already leaves dead animals behind. We are 100% opposed to the rezoping of this area of our neighborhood. Sincerely, ?p7~_ ~~~ June 12, 2006 Mr. Dean Andrew, I am writing in reference to application #Z06-5, the rezoning ofR-l, a single-family residence to an R-3, a multi-family residential area. I STRONGLY OPPOSE this idea. I live directly across the street from the old Shalimar Nursing home. I bought the lot and bUilt my home 9 years ago in this neighborhood for what it was and stillis. Our neighborhood is a very quiet and peaceful place, set back from the hustle and bustle of the busy streets. It is a safe place for our children to go out and play, without having to watch their every move. The neighbors look out for each. other. It is a place where the neighbors all drive well below the speed limit, due to the high volume of children in the area. There are two daycares in the area. It is a neighborhood where neighbors sit around in their yards and porches to enjoy the company of their ''neighbors''. There are a number of people who are retired in this area. It is a place where people are comfortable and feel safe. There is no crime rate over here at all. The police are seen at few or far between. The people in our little community take pride in their homes and therefore keep the~ well maintained. Not a day goes by that I don't see children out riding their bikes, or playing in the yards, people out walking their dogs, or just walking. We are a single-family oriented neighborhood and want to keep it that way. I have strong concerns that by rezoning the building across the street, it will change the whole makeup of our neighborhood and not for the good. -NO BUFFER ZONE -Lowering of property value -Safety for all -Increase in traffic -Increase in crime rate -Increase in noise -Trashy area -Undesirable characters -Vehicles parked in front of my house on a continuous basis The Shalimar Nursing home was a great place, but has served its purpose. The building has numerous problems and has seen its better days. It is time for the building to come down. One might then sell the lots and put in more single-family homes instead of rezoning the building and changing the whole makeup of our neighborhood. Please take the time and drive sin Ie-family residential nei our neighborhood so you can see what we all see: a quiet, orho d and vote no for the rezoning. 9 June, 2006 - . To Whom It May Concern: In regard to application # Z06-5, we are strongly opposed to the zoning change from R-I to R-3 for the purpose of converting the property to low income housing. Those who live in low income housing are often uncaring individuals who don't take care of where they reside. Trash wIll be scattered throughout the neighborhood and the property will take on that "run down" look. Often times these areas are populated by criminals and sex offenders, thus more police calls and problems, which we certainly don't need, especially with small children living in the area. We are also concerned about the increased traffic as there are several families with small children and some ladies who supplement the family income by babysitting. As I write this letter I also real.ize that property values will drop significantly. Some property owners win sell their homes and move. Many of the homes win become rentals and in a few years this very nice area of our city will become a slum area. Also there will be a loss of tax revenue for the City of Salina. We have lived on Mission Road for about 12 years and like the area very much. I1's a quiet and caring neighborhood. We want it to continue that way. Sincerely, ~~ Ernest H. Eikleberry ~du, _-. Jane A. Eikleberry 2072 Mission Road Salina, Kansas 67401-6780 ~- - .~.. -. _. v. - .~. ,- -'. '-_.-~ -~ ~""~-' ~.- - ~ -~ . ..-.-."'-,,.....-_-<.- ~"'~ ".~-"~ . .' ';"'.._ .-' .._____ ~__.__..-._..,.,....__.' ..."..."....._-_..._. _'. .. ..'"--'_ ~'.. "_'"" _'.'c'_-&:;"--", ~...._-... ..___...........~....._.'....__,..-'-',~...~..",........,...... .'~" '-~.. ...,...., '-,"'..' r_~<:'; }, .'~~ 06-07-08 Dear Dean Andrew: We oppose the rezoning of the Shalimar Plaza Nursing Home on Lambertson Lane for the following reason. 1. We feel we are already heavy populated with children and no where for them play. 2. There are the dangers of the old river channel between Mission Road and Red Fox Lane. The back of our home faces the channel . and we already have grave concern for the children in the neighborhood. There are instances which have warranted our concerns. There is deep water, glass, snakes and certain times of the year, there are dangerous chemicals in the channel. If there is a possibility of even 20 more kids in the neighborhood this would truly raise our anxiety for their safety and also liability concerns. 3. Our neighborhood is owned by homeowners and we have invested in our quite community. We feel that if the nursing home was turned into rentals there would be more traffic, more crime and lowering of our property value. We have already raised our children so we do not have any living in our home, but our main concern is still the children and their safety. When we drive on Mission Rd, the speed that we drive is 15-20mph because of the children. Will all 12 units with approximately 2.5 people and 2 cars per family, will they care as much as we do about the children in our neighborhood? Can this neighborhood really handle all the extra traffic? '~UJ~ t~l1l. i4~~ Mike & J an WearingC 2037 Mission Rd Salina, Ks 67401 1228 Sarah Lane ~lina, KS 67401 To Whom It May Concern: I am totally opposed to the rezoning of the Shalimar ~rsing Horne property on Lambertson Lane from R-1 pingle family to R-3 multi- family for the folowing reasons. 1. I have owned my home since Oct., 2004. If I had realized what the building kitty-cornered from my home was, I probably wouldn't have bogght the home because of fear that somebody would try to turn the building into apartments. If I had second thoughts, Ehances are anybody who would be an asset to the neighborhood will hesitate when I am ready to sell. This will affect the value of my home and everybody elses home. Adding 12 apartments in a block with 25"....30- vehicles and 20_50. people will totally_ change the.wholesome family atmosphere of the neighborhood. I 2. The main reason I bought my home was the q~ness of the neigh- borhood. Twelve subsidized apartments will attract large numbers of uneducated, unemployed1or underemployed irresponsible people who for many reasons will in all probability leave many unsuper- vis~d minors to run "hog wild" in the neighborhood. I have ex- pe~nced this phenomenon both on ~aturn Ave. in Salina and in Grandview Plaza near Junction City. In both areas, the adven~bf rentals an~oo many people for the size of the homes led tqnolse escalating out of sight. The noise stemmed from screaming kids) screaming spouses, earthshaking stereos, loud motorcycles,and car~ alcohol and drug abuse, and multiple outdoor barking dogs. Even if landlords try to control such behavior, it .eakes ages to evict~ 3. Traffic will increase greatlYrdding to safety concerns. 4.Apartment dwellers tend to corne and go rapidly without assimi- lating into the area. Most of my neighbors appear to have lived here for well over 10 years. They have a long term investment in the neighborhood both financially and emotionally. 5. Many people who qualify for subsidized housing seem to be poorly educated, unemployed or underemp~ed, and/or chronically mentally ill. 6. Many of my neighbors, as well as myself, have expressed con~ cerns about safety of their homes, ch;i!ren and themselves. for these and other reasons, I am very opposed to the proposed zoning change. ':;;r~;(W4 Kandra (~andy) L. West To Whom It May Concern We are writing this in regards to application #Z06-5 requesting a change in zoning from Rl to R-3. We bought our home in 1969 at 1211 Sarah Lane so we have been long time residents. During the years, we have improved our property and have enjoye.d the quiet neighborhood. We have raised two children and now have grandchildren who play in this family friendly, single-family dwelling area. Now someone who has no interest in the neighborhood wants to put subsidized low income housing in what used to be the Shalimar Nursing Home. We are concerned about what this will do to our neighborhood. The proposed 12 units will definitely bring in more traffic. An additional 24 vehicles in this small area will prove to be a real problem as there are only two exits getting cars back on to Ohio Street. This also poses a concern regarding the number of young children that play in the area. As we look at the proposed plan one of the parking lots is adjacent to the back of our home. Even with a fence, there will be car noise as well as streetlights to light the parking lot shining in our bedroom window. In addition, we noted a trash dumpster in the parking lot right in front of our deck. We can only imagine the smell and bugs that that will bring. We really feel that the Shalimar Nursing Home has served its purpose. As a 45-year-old building, it has a number of issues such as mold, sewer problems, asbestos, bugs (as there are now roaches coming into our homes), as well as a strong urination smell. A better idea would be to tear this building down and sell lots for single-family dwellings that fit into the plan of the neighborhood. If this area is rezoned and the subsidized low-income housing becomes a reality what will happen to our home? This years tax appraisal on our home is $137,900. Homes in this area have sold for $120,000 and up in the last few months. The value of all our homes is going to depreciate and with that the neighborhood will go down hill and before long this quiet secluded neighborhood that we have become accustom to for 37 years will be lost Low-income persons who live in subsidized housing don't hav.e very good track records. They don't really care about the property because it isn't theirs. They don't live in one place for very long so it is a constant turn over. Many of these people have some kind of issues such as drug and or alcohol problems, domestic violence as well as other types of crimes possibly sex offenders. We are not stereotyping the people that's just the way it is; these are not the kind of neighbors we want Please take note of the concerns we have and vote against the rezoning of Shalimar Plaza Addition. Leave our neighborhood as R -1 single family residential units. Thank You, Richard and Shirley Gawith 1211 Sarah Lane ~/~~ ~A~~ June 8, 2006 City Planning Commission 300 W. Ash Salina, KS 67401 RE: Development of former Shalimar Retirement Home To Whom ItMay Concern: We are homeowners Scott and Stephanie Holt, at 2061 Corsaut Ct, Salina, KS. We live next to the former Shalimar Retirement Center, the rearside.ofour hoUse faces.the back side of the retirement center and the alley exit is right next to our house on the north side. We have the understanding that the purchase of the center and land is on the contingent that the rezoning go through for low-income family housing. We are opposed to this change because of the following reasons: · Increased traffic in the alleyway: we have small children that will be affected · Increased noise because of the influx of residents that will not be considerate of the longtime residents of the neighborhood, as renters they have no stake in the welfare of the neighborhood · Influence on property values: the value of our property will go down because ofthe low-income housing, when we decide to sell or move in the future it will be more difficult to sell when people do not want to be close to the apartments . b~A - ~-hf~ ~~~ June 13,2006 To Whom It May Concern: Subject: Rezoning, Former Shallinar Plaza Nursing Home Application #206-5 Monty Gillam-Prime Properties As residents of the area directly affected by the rezoning proposal, we would like to express our:concems. We have several concerns, first, the affect this will have on our property value and the property values of our neighbors. This should be your concern also, as. property values. decrease so does tax revenue. This is a beautiful single family residential area and we would like for it to remain the same as when we purchased our home. ' Second, an estimated 300A> increase in traffic. With no through streets in this area and the number of small children residing within the designated area, this could have a large impact on the quality and safety of our neighborhood. An unsightly commercial trash container, odor and litter, these are additional concerns. Free enterprise is the American way, but when it affects so many in a negative manner, for the monetary gain of one, it has to be questioned. It is our sincere hope that you will take these concerns into consideration and vote as the entire neighborhood wishes, to honor the single family zoning now in place. Terry and Christina Hopkins 2052 Glendale Rd. Salina Planning Commission We live at 1307 Sarah Lane which is within 1 ~ blocks of 2054 Lambertson, (property in question for re-zoning for low income apartments). We have lived in this neighborhood forty years. The property values range from 90,000 to $150,000. We have the following concerns: The impact it will have on property values in the neighborhood, the additional traffic it will create, the safety of the neighborhood children, plus low income housing does NOT fit the neighborhood. We have had a very minimal amount of vandalism or crime in the neighborhood now and we want to keep it that way~ We understand the property in question i~ very run down. We do know of other individuals interested.in purchasing this property. Their plans would be to tear down the existing structure and make lots available to build homes which would fit the neighborhood. Of coUrse we would favor this because it would help us maintain the value in our property or even increase in value. Even though this would mean an increase our taxes, we would rather have our property increase in value and pay more taxes, than have its value decrease. We welcome the members of the planning commission to come out and look at the neighborhood plus the facility in question. We think once you look at the neighborhood, you will agree not to rezone this for low income apartments. Thank you for your consideration. e~~~ .' . '. _,....,. "_' .._'._ _~ ~_.' .~__.. _ _._ __._j~~ ~_,<<.._.-", .'_'. ___ ._ _.' . ~~ ~__._ .__....._,._ .'._ ." <-._"_.._ _',' ~,~A'_ . '~_-~'_ .-_ _.~.. ...,.. '.~ ...~. ._ ~._. _._" . <.' ,..~..-' _..'.- '_. <-_.... ,._. _._...~.___.,..~'_'-'#'. _'~......' -___-_',' ~ ~~..~-__ .<<_.... ._~ ._. '.-'_.,..~_ .~~ ,._.,"'..... ",._, June 13, 2006 To Whom It May Concern: We are opPosed to the proposed rezoning of the Shalimar Nursing Home property. We have lived in this quiet neighborhood for a combined total of 12 years. There has been minimal traffic in this area keeping it a safe place for our children to grow up. If you allow low income housing on this proPerty, we will have increased traffic and noise. An apartment complex will bring twice as many cars as houses along that same property. It will possibly also bring in undesirable people into the area that will cause us not to feel safe in our homes. We all have worked hard in our lives to ensure that we have.nice,safe homes for our . families. When we were looking to purchase our house, we looked for areas that would be safe, in a nicer area of town that we could allow our young children to safely play. Our concern is with our children and the type of people that are known to live in low income housing. It normally is not the people that are trying to better themselves. We do not want to have known sex offenders or drug dealers living across the street from our kids. Most people that live in low income apartments do not care about the grounds surrounding the buildings. We have a beautiful neighborhood where everyone tries to keep the outsides of their homes looking nice. This rezone will cause our property values to decrease. I think this will be a lose/lose situation for both the City of Salina and us. The city will be losing tax money and we will not be able to recover our value should we ever need to move. Single family homes will increase the amount of taxes the city will receive. Please consider these reasons when making you decision on the proposed rezoning of this property and do not take away our quiet, safe neighborhood. ;:;;;: f:D~~~~ Melissa and Derek Bridson 2045 Mission Rd r & [J~ t1iIlJviC Jodi and David Calvert 2051 Mission Rd Mr. Dean Andrew Director of Planning and Community Development 300 W. Ash P.O. Box 736 Salina, KS 67402-0736 Dear Mr. Andrew, In reference to our phone conversation on Thursday 06/08/2006 regarding rezoning application # Z06-5, my wife Marilyn and I are the property owners at 2066 Mission Rd, Salina, KS.While our property-does not abut the former Shalimar Nursinl Home on Lambertson Lane, it is within the 200 feet specified in your letter to us dated May 26 2006. My wife and I would like to go on record as opposed to the rezoning application Z06-5 as filed by Mr. Monty Gillam for the property in question (former Shalimar Nursing Home). . We are opPOsed to the rezoning application as proposed for severai reasons. We believe the" rezoning from R-l to R-3(Single-Family Residential to Multi-Family Residential) will drastically change the 'character' of the neighborhood we live in. This area is made of up entirely of single family dwellings. Some of the families (three in fact) that own property directly adjacent to the proposed complex have small children. These families would most certainly have their lives directly impacted by the proposed complex. We have a number of retired couples that live in this area (one in fact whose deck would be within a few feet of the proposed parking lot for the complex) that I'm sure would not appreciate the increased traffic and noise that a multi family structure would bring. We and our neighbors in this area feel that our property values would most certainly be negatively impacted by such a multi family apartment complex at the proposed location. Moreover the streets in this area of Salina were certainly not designed for a multi family structure of the size of the proposed 12 apartments at the location in question. Are the families in this area going to have to contend with trash and litter on the streets and in adjacent properties from this proposed complex? Will we see an increased Police presence because of this proposed complex? I don't know, but I have yet to see a multi family complex of this size located in this type of neighborhood that didn't require an increase presence of law enforcement at any given moment in time. Our opposition to this rezoning is not directed at Mr. Gillam. I am sure Mr. Gillam is a fine citizen and is only interested in the potential income from his investment. I think that a majority of affected and interested property owners would prefer to see the present structure razed and the land that is available be converted into use as single family residential structures or lots for sale as such. As I stated to you during our phone conversation a previous family commitment prevents me from attending the Planning Commission meeting on June 20tli so I am hoping that this letter will serve as our proxy statement. Thank You for your kind consideration in this matter. Sincerely Yours, Michael J. and Marilyn K Schmiedeler - c 2066 Mission Rd Salina, Kansas II d II !l 1\ II ii II . - - . ~11. ik~J:-/Y1rrr0m~L. ..... .......u.~ I -- '. - - . -.... ~ - I , _.-'" -.. -, -- ... -...., .-....._- ,.....~-..--- . I ..... ...d.u . ....... ......... 1._u<Au~ - . . ,~ -I- +ivw.~.. .~. ...'if. .. -.-.-~a~.tdiuL. ~-..-.. ---... - H ____.u,_______.'u u _ _ _ If7 i'.. .... 'tJe.rJ/w.jYd . .... C/)1 .~. Mcd: u .... . -- ---~,-~.uu.LL4-..-.-.... .......,.-- .~~-~~. !Ibt~ ..~.." .. .....01.~.t./ U~ ~ .. ... ~. 10-, .. u.' . ~ dl4.. ~~ #?iL ~~a:td~JiL '-11r~t+.... ~. Yrl~."" j 1!~'u}1:ts /. .op~mnv ~ !~.tJ/u( ':P;~' ~..~ I~<j .~Y!b ~. ~ .~ rMuU il(j~ t2/J'~~C .ctAl ....~ tL I/) . ( I~YLw. L1<-4__ ~ . ~.. ._.'Jutt~ .~.~U~ wad-.-k. ~-__~ -~af, . Ii Lfv!.z .ab>><>. ~GYlAL. Q ~oj ~. . ... . r~~d4td~ ~. t.A...au; .~ tl/JLd d()c(r~o~ l~C) ~ .. .~. ~ ~ ~4d/V1!j2hrzux_-e!. liM:- .... ~-.'-- ___uO -- .- ~~.. 18{Il~. .'-P~. ~ l7V< ~4J I: !j 1: 11 " II ~ I __ ;i " J; {Jur L6&u;}ikutJ..._.TJ e:.__ 5: A ~/ n'~ ~r- C&~ t;;;_ , " iAe --- -- . (JI!I V:/€_ 5 _Pf~ (J/~n 1i 6i f\ ..) (j- D _ F.J u W,rrL .' " 'I -~i ii i: " ~ j 1! :i ., ~ il_ri.., ~ r# . Jill ne_ _un L h~. l~__ II U' ( J Ii - ------~-j ____4 0 _~p; II () " -1+- -- ll-r--j \I I \c T -- - ... n' 'BDt_~5 [J e -r. 11 T _ . <_:i . .. 1: 1J --- :i~~e ~=;~~ ;i~ ,jje~f~ / 'r- 1i2 Ii ,: vr 11 - Ii -H'9/?vte> H-v. s _~r(/~ cL [) () U:--/J'\ Cl$-. . ;;J:.!: I L /71 e <-(/ ~ Or 7VI etA e..... fJdJ'A.~~ S X;;V7h,,-r;:,--.,:?J,,,~ " , -;1- - '.A") / . (ol~'~ ct b-/I-o fa !1 ~~mcl~~{\~~, ..._ ... .m ..!lim_m.t24..~.....~.. ~_~~~~Lm '..~ ~;'J.>.^p.:-,~ _Z- .... ..... .~'1!..... ..... il ~ U . ... _ (fd- .... -.- ..~.=-== ='''dH . ~"'-;-o- ;i~ ~ ~ ~rt>,-~-u......~ 1pM.2+~n~~~.mm -........---...----..... ~-t - .-........-...--.-,..- -..".-- -...., .--..-.....-.,-... .,--..-..-..-.-.-..---..----....-......--....--....,.. .-. -- ~.. . ........ ..... .iij_d~~4.~ _n~-k~_~ ~_o.... --- ---- ---!~-'J--~l--'~---~-~'~d .-.. .........,.~;,.r,d~~.~~~....~.n~ib ,;,.........;J1Q.o.. j( -tL. .~. _d__a_~~A)..~.... . _~d'_ _ ..-.. ..--' -nr"-~~-c=''''-<S --- . ... .' -;---------ra rUO;<T--~ :!...~ +,. -1~-~P-:-^-,"-#__;:I~d(!;;L~._a' ..... ...... ..a~_ - ';'i1~' ........ .--}-'~-V~ -.J- .. ':::1!t H~ t:;;'w7 ~~ n 1- ~.~~~~~__~~~.~ :h1~)~_~~~ ~~~ 1..11.J;w . nt.J.R ) tJv.. ~ <f:: -tL:. ~ ~ :~ ~~._~....~ ~~ ~ .C'~~ ~. ~~ u...~- ~~ ~ ~. U'. ___...___,___ _ -_'-''';-~''-1'- .p'- ~ : ! H .. .WSL, ~<>kn~_t;.~i:i-._~~ 1J...a . ~.~~-~~~#-Q.!..1~---~--ifh.;.- ~~4~ ___d_ ---- ...-U1'~--.-~---~~@~ ..~..~__~ nn':~i::y~~~l+ u._L~----.-~----~........~..---~.-_~......-..~. ;imw.~ ..-tlM..~-.~....a..-,... ...~...~~ di~"'- ~~~.~.. ~.L~-~ iH [,.,-. -~ --~.~ ~d___. ....U ...... ..... ~d_~ :: Y~__I. 0 nj)9~..J... O.Qo ~.I'-: ~ . "7 '. ~ '~~r f':d.~~"!R.~.. ;. ~~-i..~ . -tL.~o!"~,,,. _. ..-'~'L '" ~"F----_~_~_~L_' . ~ ~- .. ----..".-.---....-...--- 61--. ...~~... .....~.....~.......... , -" ..... ---"..- ~~.-,.~ ..:.. .~.:/.~ . ~~... ...Ia.:J.'f_ .. . ....... "-.' .._qe~ <>:-::.t.;~-):: ::.~:~:..:. :~.-:: -'..-.-. ._,_..- . ~ . ".-- . _. ._0, . - - .-5, 'C'\ Ce.('eJ % ~~sse\\ ~ \.",-J.~o- ~~-\-\e< [).os(o ~\~ION \=\0:" 50.\ \ "--a... J 'rZ... ~ . - :-:-.- ~-- ~ ":.-: - '-. .-. " .'. ", .--. ~~-~~=~---~-~~~ a;i. &~~~~ \kn~_cJ --,----~~lt'~i J ~o<t v (};}~- 11 -l t - A t~ .f:DoJ:JfJ""(ll_~_ ~ 0 "" t 1 . N7 _I)... r'l: :,-,.,-":,,,,:,--:;-"cf:"':':"',,-1 __n' ...C& ,,~ ~. u. -- -.U-U-.-'-<>- -G-~---~.-L\_-=-LeLL~:L ---X~;~:?-'J~:;;:.;:;i'?;,;~z ill. uJ' ;1\... . ~ Qr'l.<.'......:.,..""~~/i..;-: L !I-(J cL J. imdic ..c. ....c._,: =-=~__-nn_....:X flO \blL: ~~.3 Q lhtr--%-u.d --~~~{~14{~;~ , \U.., hb6~ '. :>-.' >',-:. .::",';' . ;~,' ~~ .0 ^ ~':i.J" <\ AI (, ~ --"";::--';-':-'-:'::".-->>- U- \..!.o u..;, ~ 1 \. v- t- .~_-~:~~~: .:~'_ <: -;-._-~..-:'"':-;.~.~..- .=:' _ ~ ----..------ -------_._----~-----_._--_._-- ~ . -- --'.:'-", .- .~: ~.-._': ..~ _______________~_~___________n___.__\_~~~a~ - ' -. .----.---c.'~~;j.'-:.~.:..:>;.-~-~O:.);:~ \ t _1\_ \ - - ________ ____________________________5 _:__tlX. o.t> J_______lUQ\L"t__:~_\Jli,_~~___~-~~~-----~.~:::>..:~:;.....;):-::~:::. ~ ~ claw ... ....---. , .. ..". -'. .~. -~.' --- --_==_==__k;__~~~ i-= ~~b~~~ - ~*~_-~~--'"~;~{:\~?; tf\\"...,.... s::. f'~ r~' t on \ ~ \ , oy"(\ '" ~. \ (' \ . I 1<>:_.:-.-<,.,-:...:.';." _n-~ -~~-~t~~~~.C~ b:: 0;~ ~~'U~: ~1~~~~Ll~'~)~'{,;~:, \ , ~__.___1iU~ --','- ~. .', . ',' .. ..... . .-k~--.~--&._n --mn::.u.n---n- _,n___ --;,Vj:JJ,;; _H_l_~ () 0 r 3... ,,-. - - ____H. ----------~--- ....._H_____.______________.____________H__ -- .----~-fLL~----- -------- _._m____ .--.(.<;.'--5.(~}.:<;/ \~-'>:'-:~-,.:;.,::> :. '___=~~=.=-_=n-.~_~-~~ .n_......-=;~,j;~."';.~.;);.j -~-- ---. - tlaJil~f( . ..".;..-.....-.:..-,-,-- ~~--~-. --. - ,".+ -.- - .... -. - -.. .~. _::~-:' 0". ""__ :".<_:.-:', . '-.' -'. "..". - . .;--:- .', :-. ".':--"'_"--._. .,.0: ._:- \~:;.':.,~;~.!.,;~~I~i~;~:*'!:~~~~::~~~~~-:,.;~.,~::~\:~~:~::}.?::~.-:;?{:,!:::.::~;.;.~;-:< ...~::~:;o:{ : T:;,:,',:,- :;.:' ..: _c.'-..,:;. .;.c '. :1/:/ TRACTNUM , fT6T:I! :2'1 - ~ 7 OWNER , Ie c1Lcz;e) Owner's Address I r 1//9.sHAlIMllJe jJ)>~}~ rs-167401 ., #~ TRACTNUM I ,.-rfDT\t2~- ~ 7 OWNER I . I J ~. -. ,- Owner's Address I ,~ 11~~S"~l.1MAIA~~I/E rs-167401 JF5 TRACTNUM I ~-:l-Bl.OC~ II o ~ . OWNER I f 'ANE A f I r u-,(i SH~LI.&1J9A'ID~'l/c ,rs-r67401 Owner's Address :JI:f TRACTNUM I . ~,..:It 8 - B~ 't) OWNER I r -)FER 0 IX Owner's Address I l:t082 S~L'HJ1~ISALlNA rs-167401 t>,1l!'U~ tr5 TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address I rs-~I -fr f/o+-@ ~.Dr-,-Z ::Pf2ole5T _, ',~ 63:5l.~ (yes) . 5'~ ~;J L ~ f\j'O . ~ L rlYL GO~~L-\ / SlIGEr 1/:/~t:ljl #' h, TRACTNUM I . ~)IJ! 2.~ ~lDCK Ilf OWNER I I~~ } ,- ( Owner's Address I fiZ"i S",qIM.t/"JJinE: Js^u~ . JK5167401 I) UuU--ttcJv /{J I . ~ :#7. TRACTNUM f ~ '4:. ~. - 1Jb:JbK Iff OWNER I I ..~ , iJ;JJ. . Owner's Address I ~~, 'Z/ff ~ AllAH AAittt. 'SALlf\lA. . JK5167401 -liB, TRACTNUM I f7il'I--1f 4 -13U:ic~ I 'I- OWNER I I' 'ANE A Owner's Address I J~*#k. .JK5167401 r /2f}1 SAWI. ISALlNA . .:Jt"9. TRACTNUM I ~~S: Bl.OcK Ii.} OWNER I f --:, FER 0 ~v14 Owner's Address I JK5167401 ; nzs .S~AH tpM;iSALlNA, ?< TRAC1NUM I I ~~":'-'Bl<<J}! 1If' OWNER f I r tJO Owner's Address , b1~'c '~i1 /..AilE I. S ~':'Uf'.l . . fKSll. ~~#-f?~ 8 .. :II I/' TRACTNUM , ~7- ~ If OWNER I Ie J +- Owner's Address r 13i'J" .sAtfAtI M~SAUNA FI67401 ') J~ ,~~ #/2. TRACTNUM r ~ B - 'BU>ef!. IIf OWNER I 113(1) ~It.AH M}.J.~_ I $JUJIol 9 Owner's Address I ~~A(J /iL, ~(~ I UNA FI67401 ~A^ ~~ .ltl:!, TRACTNUM I J;;;t-' ~/C' If OWNER J I' lANE A Jt Owner's Address I 1"',3110 !::"ARAH ~A-~~SAUNA -F 167401 :ff / '/; TRACTNUM I ~.Ib- 7JU>CK-/f OWNER I F ~ FER 0 -If Owner's Address 1:'JZo $luiAJI .i.A~E1SAUNA FI67401 (Jwner's Address - I ~#' SI-Bll>CK f-r ~L~ ~.J~ h2.11.;}itItAH I..NJE I SAtllI19 S I' _ # IS; TRACTNUM I OWNER , S7/LE"7 ~ ~F /!J Owner's Address #/1 TRACTNUM f ~ -H:= i> - F{LjcK I ~ OWNER f f _~ fER 0 --,.... ~). ' ./ Owner's Address I: 1307 5~IJE SALINA FI67401 ;#".?I!J TRACTNUM I fA~J2- "'B~ I~ OJ"nvER I I -f 1J/ Owner's Address , IIJ'" S~H MNE ! ~/VR '.. Ff' ~ #-l/ tJl::i~ .#?/ TRAClNUM J OWNER I \ \ \\. '. \>J . '0' Owner's Address , ') #~ TRACTNUM , OWNER . , Owner's Address , :Ir~J TRACTNUM , OWNER , Owner's Address , FI67401 ~ . tt:3 -1!<<JCK IZ I' 'ANE A .It:? / " ,p (~/!/e.s.+/p r 120n MinIoN. ~ ISALlNA FI67401 :/I Z5' TRACTNUM I OWNER , (Jwner's Address. f * ~)d-S- 'ESltJ~ IZ I f /J ~k/W!lJ~I), ~.JJfi).<'-h~ ~72' I'1/Jf.1?!:~NI1 t7 ~fS"t ~/rh~ J/IUr 1J:5 q::- /1 S-~T #-6 <!:JF 15 TRACTNUM I ~Df#/- ~/3 :tJ: 51 OWNER I Ie ) " .~uJ '--. flD17 '1lgllJN . N'~ - ' Owner's Address f FI67401 . ., :ltf2 TRACTNUM I ~;2'-~/3 OWNER I J ~l " Owner's Address r I:~$~ F 167401 #-:1;1 TRACTNUM I I .~#".:9- ~ /3 OWNER I ~/1LL.'IANEA Owner's Address I ~t;tW iiI ,ISALlNA 'F167401 tJ:..lf TRACTNUM I ' ~-I&~ - Bil>CK IY OWNER I II -'FER 0 11 Owner's Address I 1;t64/-9 ,41U1"" i1I ISALlNA Fl67401 #;}'.TRACTNUM I ~4S- - 'BbK:K 13 OWNER r i f (Jwner's Address , ~W *+- Ft, HI.I.f'ItJN . . ~~. ' ~~7 LJ~"/JI ::# Jt TRACTNUM J OWNER , .- .-'" " -...' .... Owner's Address I ., ~~#~- ~ 1'3 Ie ~~~ ^^^ ' " A /'v\/\, .1 I'i ! f26. I1UII RJ, SALlNA'~ Fr67401 :;I- :17 TRACTNUM r OWNER I Owner's Address , .#$? TRACTNUM OWNER I I , Owner's Address VI .J!t TRA CTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address .:H~ f TRACTNUM OWNER f (Jwner's Address f I I f7Df~B-~'~ lANE A 'F167401 ~,;. 'H9....~ /3 r . - J FER 0 ~~ 'ZO ~7 H/si ill SALINA F 167401 ~''HILJ-~cK 1'3 I ~f J1207..1' 11/SJUN Rei ! ~NA. Fl' 5'i/!lT#J1 ~. /!I,~' -::It 4/ TRACTNUM I' OWNER I o Owner's Add~~s f' :/1'/'1 TRACTNUM I ' ~H1..Z;lt>CK9 OWNER I II ~IFER 0 , I I;~ Misir~ ~ ~SALlNA Owner's Address FI67401 (Ij~~d 1I4j- TRACTNUM I OWNER I I r (Jwner's Address , I tJ.__ ~ ,-/~/( Fit IZt>IZ MISS IDI/. ~ ') :/fIt ~ 11 it;:! ~~#11-~13 Ie J \ .... 4v\CY'J~&k.4,\f ~v f1d7TH'S'S'., 1'N ISALlNA .J .' FI67401 / TRACTNUM , OWNER I Owner's Addr~s I ~ #' 1-7!uJc1::. B I , . ..r J~I'I%O .A.i.BEJI!.T ~V.! ISALlNA F 167401 TRACTNUM I OWNER J M .~tJr.:z- ~~ f ' 'ANE A ~~ ::ZOhj~ (OMMi5.5lD J I a.lJ~ ~~ ,ISALlNA .'FI67401 Owner's Address \. ~fF8A~~J..# :I!If TRACTNUM #'15' ~ OWNER ., #47: - #'11:. , _.: ~ Owner's Address I TRACTNUM OWNER Owne;'; A-dd~es;' I TRACTNUM OWNER Owner's Address I I I I ';'11 ~ TRACTNUM , ~~ !? OWNER I I Owner's Address -Vi/~TRACTNUM I -, ~ OWNER I (Jwner's Address' I : , ~.tt _~~':." I ~ , , t:I. ISALlNA . F167401 FI67401 ~ 1'3-Btack'~ II -r; M J-. L16~ lANE A L.-t -t- +- -e.....y--- b c..... <.....1<.... IZOZ8 YiIJftou fit ,ISALlNA'FI67401 '~ \~ ~ #/5"-~~""a I' ;t AA_~RO ;UJ"l isj'CN q lSALINA F 167401 ~~/~~-W~CJ::8 (~~~~~~~ / ~ \S)~~'"\~~ II~-" H~N 1ft/. ISAdNA Ftl ~ET+9 . "'F /.1/ -1f1/t TRACTNUM OWNER f J ~.t/'7-75aJC~/1 Ie <fm {)..;(~ I Owner's Address r~"f ~ISSltW laIlSALlNA ' , F 167401 ., :JI:I/') :It Iff TRACTNUM I ~ :#1-]RM:.K (Z- OWNER I t'Tf\~~~ Owner's Address 1 UJ66'''' I$"IAfI ~ .ISALlNA 'F167401 .JJ:.lf9 TRACTNUM I ~:r- ~ I"Z OWNER I JI ~IFER 0 ~ Owner's Address I;Zo7 ~ HiisiiJA! Q,f 'SAuNA Fr67401 :IISlJ TRACTNUM I ~ JJfO- l:fld.K 7 OWNER I I l' ~(}, f (Jwner's Address J't.IJr,II tilDlPNJ/RcI. ~TvlttJ;;;' /~ {I-~ TRACTNUM , f .10:4!l-1r/&~ ~. 7 OWNER .:""~ I Owner's Address ' F167401 ') H4P TRACTNUM r f7i-r:d" PI-...1Ju.c.K 7 S:l OWNER I I r " ., . ..--.-'--..- r .....~~~ 'F 1~7401' . Owner's Address 1=t.i)J't, tS-l"IILE ) SALI NA "HI/' TRACTNUM I ~<d-/~~~K 7 5.5 OWNER I I' 'ANE A yl , /1 dZ 11;;? &Z fi// . ~t<p/J .;- . ...k- T/J Owner's Address I Ufo &.E~~ IiJSALlNAI 'F167401 .uf!1 TRACTNUM I ~~:21- 'BUJCK 7 54 OWNER I f -'FER 0 ~~ Owner's Address I:U) '14 q~PI1lG-;),SALlNA F167401 :/I~ TRACTNUM I fA~ "# Z5 -1J<<J0!. ~ SS- OWNER I I S6l)lftit{ (N.1rUR.;1 r ~r i T*?'~7'Yi Owner's Address , fl%()'/8 6d.8v NJlE ~I ~NA FJI ~$I/ ~ /!/ :It 51 TRACTNUM , OWNER I ! Owner's Address I #:601 TRACTNUM I OWNER I 1t (Jwner's Address I ~~?1l~ 7 Je / yf'" I, rCb; ~t.~ '--'" , . '" I ,...' ". 7. '"" .;: . \, tZ/t7k t., ,t:.....ajc-.. J 1WC&,::j., .J"'.,"'O ~__~t/. {I . . , L . i r tDSZ ~Mu:~ISAUNA FI67401 r:&r#J-~K B J FI67401 ~ ~.s:.. 'E'ux-K ~ tr lANE A r l()l:r 6t..S11JAlL fi, ISALlNA 'F167401 ~til-7 - J>0cK B V#"' /' i/ ':.. -jFERD fl/"~):--l{XJ-v-a/(.0?' .. I: ZO" L - ijSAUNA qte.a'l>AlE FI67401 rED/-P:9-1J~8 If I~D2'S-6laIlik€~ I ~N"Fl' ~T 0/141:=/4 rNr#//-~8 Ie J ~;.j) '\- ~w.c-~ ~\ fUll 6tsIRfLE ~ ISALlNA . FI67401 f)r".,-iI- /,2 - ~ B I ' J ~/~~~. ~~ - -';U>3'961.g'UAlE a fSALlNA rt-'67401' ',., ~. ~ U~ , ~:II: /9 -1!PJcI:: <f/ ir JANE A ~(f2,e~ I Zbt/-/ 6tstbAl.E 4JSALlNAFI67401 , ~..,f-#/~- ~ilJcK 8 r -'FER 0 I:U) 'IS- &liNlMlE ~ jSALlNA FI67401 f"Ter-#/s - 1:l.fJcK B i f JIZO?,d'.IBl~~' "5~UJ..lA- fKSl' ~r#Jl~r/.# . TRACTNUM H"tl> , I Owner's Address ( OWNER ., ~,#,-~ II I(~t:)~~ r UJt76/t.SAI/T ~;k;;NA · FI67401 #t ~ TRACTNUM I OWNER r O;"n~r's Add~es; 'I :1161 TRACTNUM I OWNER I Owner's Address I fJt6rll.!'S- ~II k~~ I~Z()~I U,Jt.S"1IUT ISALlNA ~If!i ~~~Jf -B'lbc~ ~II f lANE A ---r;;,,/ S . ~~V 120ff 4~1Ir ISALlNA 'F167401 .c~~r F 167401 .fib? TRACTNUM I . ~'~ *3-Bu>c-t::. -1/ W 5" OWNER I I'ZD~I CbJer~ur . -'FERD. _ t!>U s,H€ET*aA J:>qG" "'0 A l~ -11/1 · Owner'sA!ileAsC,fJ<o12..; ~FJ67401 I~~ ) /2 ~J#1~ TRACTNUM I ~~ OWNER I I r (Jwner's Address I (I FI' r1 )-1 1 ~ ,(?I tiS. /11 5#lh-IrltfJe 4tP;ZA 54p,h~AI . ~!~~ 53 - 4:5I~(;tJ ~#~ dmmJtl