Removal of Brown & Brown
CAW OFFOCES
ROYCE.HAMPTON, DUNHAM, ROYCE &. ENGLEMAN
0 . OURO" °'0"."
.' ,"a.'o" o<wm
N'N'" 'COOR UN'HD ."oeDONG
SA~'NA, l<ÀNSAS
LARU' ROYce
E S "AMP'ON
H " D"NHAM JO
JOHN 0 "O'oL
HOWARa ENGeEMAN
TELEPHONE 37e'
May 9, 1953
C SU"" NEeSON
Leland Srack
City Manageí'
Salina, l'.ansas
Dear Sir:
Vie represent Brown and Brown, Inc., who have already
written you to the effect that its asphalt mixing plant has been
inspected by a representitive of the State Board of Health and until
report thereof is made, there will be no further operations at the
plant, except for about two hours sometime during the week of may 11th,
this short ti'~le being required on existing jobs.
~ben the city health officer receives the report from
Topeka, we would like the opportunity of inspection and a copy of
the same.
Should this matter be on the agenda or brou¡;rht up at the
meeting of the commissioners Monday evening, we WJuld like for
you to notify the writer at 6550 and have any discussions delayed
until we have an opportunity to appear.
Very truly yours,
E. S. Hampton/pi'
:~CE' ~;4Ð""
..::,
...=
~~
T-
"
~
~!f~,."",
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
w- ...... -
RUlMIl L. Culp, CIùef
w- -- -- ........
Gordon E. Mau, Chief
---
1--. F. Shull, Chief
THOMAS .. HOOD, M.D.. M.P.H~ b....hoe -" TOPEKA
DIVISION OF SANITATION
OWI8HT F. MITZLn. CIoIof E..- - -.
M_" Hell, u......., of Ie.-
LAWRENCE. KANSAS
Kay". 1963
011 F- Soc.....
Willard O. Hillen, OI-
l- 1Ift--
J, L. Moyes, 01-
W- - -- L-..,
C- RIIt8r. ~
H. A. S~. a-Iot
lIre R. S. Fu.naoht
SanitU7 Officer
Cit,. Hall
Bali_. K8J1au
DeU' lIre FaasD&ohtl
Enolo..d is our report on the air pollution Un.8ti-
gaUon e.t am in the srea adjacent to the Brown and Brown
CoZUltrucUon Comp~'8 uphalt mix plant in northeut
SaliM on April 28. 1953. 'fb.e extra copy is t:or your
cou.enience .
We will be glacl to discuss the report with 70u. it: there
lI'e ~ qœstioZUl. It: - can be of further service in
this matter. do not hesitate to call on WI.
We will be interested in further deftlopments in this
problem and the final outcome.
"
Sincerel77Ours.
DIVISION OF SUlTATION
¿f£~
J. L. Mayes (J
.
JUhpb
cc I Stanley Smith
Enclosure
Kansas State Board of Health
DIVISION OF SANITATION
Lawrence, Ken...
nrouSTRIAL HYGIENE SECTION
Date_--__~_7.-1Q5S_____--
R e PO rt on - - - - ! ~ .!I j¡ Jø j¡ iø.lt j) j.' - .IJ.r - ~ u.m .JÙa. .:to...opau;
. Construction COIIIpan;r.
p l.m.. j)~r.aj¡øJ1.. ~.lù'.mm. Å ...BJ:..aJDI,L Date - - - - - - - - ÂI!J'...u. .ze.~
Ci~of ------§al~_KaDa~-----------------App~ed
Purþole!! IDYe.ti£&tioD'
!hi. inw8tigaUoD wu reql»lted b;y 1Ir. R. S. Fu8Daoht, Sanitar;y Offioer for ..
City of SaliDa, 8Dd ita p\U"po" wu to determi. the haalll"4 110 health troa air pol-
luti.1i 08.uaed 'by the operations of 8D a8phalt PI:ring a1z pludl operated Ò7 the Brown
aDd Brown CoD8'truotion CO8Ipau;y, 715 BaIt Crawford, Salina, Kauu.
In'berTi8W8.
1Ir. 11. S. P...naoht, S8D1tar;y Ot1'ioer, Ci1;y of SaliDa.
1Ir. Lel8Dd Sra.lt. Ci1;y Kanapr, Ci1;y ot Saliœ.
Ifr. Fred Brooks, Reporter. !!!!. ~ Journal.
Mr. Brown, Brown 4: BroWD Cona'truotion COIlpan;r.
Ifrs. Harriet T. Johnson, oitizen.
Laboratory !!!! ~ Determinations.
~ !!!t
Dull t
ool1O8n'tration
Dull t
concentration
Acid in air
Total sulfate
aB S04-
Procedures
Sampling Procedure
IISA Kidget Impinger, with 10
ml. ot isopropyl daoho1, .-
pliDg at 0.1 cubic toot per
mi mrte .
~t:;:al
Field DeteZ'llliDation
-~
Miorosoopic count of aliquot usiDg a
Spencer "Brite Li." 0811.
Willson standard iDq>inger. with Microscopic cowrt of aliquot usiDg a
100 ml. 01' isopropyl alcohol. Spencer "Brite Line" cell.
sampling at 1.0 cubic foot per
minute.
Willson standard iDq>inger. with Jlethyl red titration
100 ml. 0.01 Ii NaaH. sampliDg at with 0.02 N H¡¡¡S04
1.0 cubic foot per minute.
Willson standard impinger. with GraT8lll8trio. using BaC12
100 mI. 0.01 N liaŒ, sampling precipitation &: Gooch
at 1.0 cubic foot per minute. tiltration.
Report on Investigation of Air Pollution, Brown &: Brown Const. Co. - page 2
By J. L. Jls.yes and JalllØ8 F. Aiken, Jr.
April 28, 1953
Results
~ Concentrationl Dwlt Conoeutration,
~ Suplin~ ~ Location - IIIJ'po1'*
4/28/53 11100 B..me Baok yud of Johnaon hOD8 1.5
at ~ Chester
4/28/53 11110 B..m. Inside the Johnaon para- 2.4
chute puking buildiDg
at 608 Chester
4/28/&3 111S<> a.m. Back yard of C...8 h~ 3.0
at 600 Chester
4/28/53 2150 p.m. Working 10- of mixer &9.7&
'bender at asphalt mix
plant
4/28/53 3110 p.m. Area south of asphalt 0.74
mix plant (wind from
south)
. Dlppor . tillion particles per cubic root of air. The me:rlmum allowable concen-
tration for dust coming from the asph&l t mix plant for an 8-hour dq i.
5.0JIIIPcf.
~
4/28/53
Samplil1& !!!!!.
Location
Acidity!!.
~
Total Sulfate.
---¡¡ SO -
~e
Samples for Sulfuric ~I
4115 p.a.
Flower nursery behind John- 0.000
son residence and parachute
packing building at 604 -608
Chester
0.000
4/28/53
4150 p.m.
Puking lot behind City
Ball
4.84
0.000
. III.g/CK . milligrams per cubic meter of air. The maximum allowable oonoentration of
sulf'uric acid is given by Elkins (-The Chemistry of Indwstrial Taxicolog"
by IUrVlV B. Elkins) as 5.0 mg/CK.
Report on Investiga.tion of Air Pollution, Brown ð: Brown Const. Co. - pa.ge 3
By J. L. Mayes a.nd JBIIII:IS F. Aiken, Jr.
April 28, 1953
Observations I
1.
The asphalt paving mix plant is located on the south side of the II1ssouri Pacific
Railroad tracks north of llorth Street between Chester and Francis A'Yenueh !he
pla.nt 18 a. hot-mix pla.nt. Materials used and process i8 as followsa
Materials -
(1) The a.ggrega.te used is ohert from southeast Kans.. dno and lead !II1n1nc
and milling operations.
(2) Asphalt, penetration 85-100.
Prooess -
(1) The ohert is dried in .. rotery kiln at .. temperature "tween 271° and 1000 P.
The maximum teçerature allowed is 3250 F. The kiln 18 tired by a Datura! p8
filllll8. Air is drawn through the kiln in oourrtertlow to the chert. FrO1l1 the
kiln, the air, carrying steam. am dust and ezhauat gases, puses throu¡h two
cyclone dust collectors, a suction tan and then to the exhaust stack. 'lhe ex-
haust stack is about 20 feet long a.nd the top of the stack is about ao teet tr-
the ground.
(2) The dried, hot chert puses, by gravity, from the lower end of the kiln to
a.n elevator which raises it to 8. hopper from which it is fed into the mixiDg
chllDlber to be mixed with hot asphalt.
(3) Asphalt is heated to a temperature of 2750 to 3000 F. in a large ta.nk, by
means of heating coils carrying hot oil. From the heating tank, the aaphalt
is piped to a p~ which discharges the hot asphalt into the mixing chamber where
it is mixed with the hot chert.
(4) The hot chert and hot asphalt are mixed in the m1x1Dg ohlllllber, the Jllb:ød
product is disohar gad to a conveyor belt and the conveyor belt disoherges the
finished mix into trucks for conveyance to the job.
The wiDi W8.S strong snd variBhle from the south, the temperature was 600 to
700 F., aZld the sky was partly cloudy to 01011l1y.
.
~
...
2.
3.
The erea affected by discharge from the plant stack. on the day of the 1.mesti-
gation, wa.s principally the properties occupied by the Case snd Johnaon femilies
directly north of the plant across the Missouri Pacific Railroad tracks. 7be
Case home address wa.s 600 Chester and the Johnson properties were at 604 am
608 Chester. The variBhle wind, from the south, carried the stack diaoherge
back snd forth (from east to west) across these properties. sometimes at ground
level and so-ti_8 at a higher elevation.
Discussions
General.
It should be borne in mind that the determinatioISreported here represent oon-
ditions during the time of sampling and on one day. For this reason, the results
obtained cannot be considered as conclusive or average. For such evaluation,
i
Report on Investigation of Air Pollution. Brown &: Brown Const. Co. - page 4
By J. L. Mayes and Jamøs F. Aileen. Jr.
April 28. 1953
many samples should be taken, over an extended period of time. which would inolude
all of the conditions of plant operation. season and weather. However, the deter-
minations do ghe some idea as to the order of magnitude of the air pollution.
Dust Concentration.
. The chert used as aggregate is known to contain about 90 per cent fi'ee dUoa
(Si02). The III8XiJmm: allowable concentration of dust with this high percent. of
free silioa is £) million partioles per cubic foot for an 8-hour a day exposure.
The health h&J:ard associated with silica dust 18 in breathing too high OOMen-
trations of the dust. Ballard due to ingesting the dust is DO greater than for
8IIY other dust.
In order to obtain SOllllll idea as to the amount of dust in the air d\18 to sources
other than the asphalt mix plant, such as street traffic. a semple of air for
determiœtion of dust oonoentration was taken up-wind 011 south of the uphalt
mix plant. This sample contained O. "" million 1:>81'tioles per 01l1lio foot. This
value should be sdJtracted fi'om the dust count Talues made on samples taJœn
down-wind or north of the asphalt m1:z: plant to li)ain so- idea of the ooDCentra-
tion of dust in the air due to the asphalt m1:z: plant alone.
Dust concentration at points in the living and working areas adjacent to the
Case and Johnson homes were all below the maximum allowable oonoentraticn. It
is quite probQble that, under dif'ferent wind and atmospheric conditioDB. dust
coIlØ8ntrations in these areas might be higher or lower than those tb1Ulli on 1;be day
of investigation. A health hallard due to dust fi'om the asphalt ai:z: plant did DOt
exist on the day of investigation and it is our opinion that a health hazard due
to dust from the uphalt mi:z: plant will not exist, under average conditions. How-
ever, in our opinion. nuisance conditions due to dust fi'om the asphalt mix plant
do exist 8.S evidenced by the gray settled dust on equipment. buildings and TElgeta-
tion as well as the dust in evidence in the air. If the asphalt mix plant is to
be permanently lcoated at its present site, more efficient dust collecting equip-
møn1; should be installed in order to abate this nuisance. .
.
~e dust concentration in the working sons of the mixer tender at the asphalt
mix plant was about 12 times the maximum allowable concentration, for s\lOh dust.
for Sooohour daily exposure. This condition poses a health hazard for the mixer
tender even though he may actually work at that particular job aDd pollition only
a part of the time. Dust collecting hoods or enclosures should be placed around
the mixer and maintained and operated in such a manner as to reduce the dust in
the working areas at the plant to below 5 million particles per cubic foot of air.
Until such time as this is done, the mi:z:er tender and other workers in the im-
mediate area should wear dust respirators. approved by the U. S. Bureau of JI1nes
for siliea bearing dust. whenever the plant is in operation.
Samples for Acidity and Sulfate.
It was the belief' of residents complaining of the air pollution that
were being freed from the sulfides no1; removed !'rom the chert by the
ing mi1ls and that these gases were being converted to sulfuric acid
driven oft of the chert during drying.
sulfur gases
ore sep81'at-
in the moisture
Report on IImlstigation ot: Air Pollution, Brown &: Brown Const. Co. - page I)
By J. L. Ma)'es and JaJlls F. Aiken, Jr.
April 28, 1953
An analysis ot: the chert, by the Kansas State Geologioal Survey, rewaled only
0.34 per cent total sult:ides remaining in the chert and present as pyri1öe or
iron lulI:ide (FeSa). The lowe8t temperature at which pyrite will reloa.o 8ult'ur
to form 8ulfur dioxide (S02) under the conditions exi8ting in the plant proceu
(oxidizing) i8 3250 Centigrade or 6170 Fahrenheit. Minimum temperature8 re-
quired to free sulfur '!;ase8 from zinc and. lead 8ult:ide8, under SUGb oonditiolll,
ø.re still higher. Since the drying temperature \lS8el at the uphalt IIix plant
i8 between 2750 and 3000 Io'ahrenheit, it seems unlikely that 8ulfur gaae8 will 'be
reloaseel from the small amount8 of sulfide in the chert. It S- S08 ehould be
formed in the drying of the chert, it is even leas likely that it would be OOD-
wried to sulfurio acid under the ooJlditions existing. S08 in oontaot with
moi8ture will partly be iöaken up in solution and pø.rtly react with 'the water -
fora sulf'llroUB acid (BsSOe). 'rb8 formation of sult'uric aoiel (B"O.) f'rca 8111-
furOUB &oiel (BaSO.) in air take8 place on17 alow17.
For the8e reuoll8, it was felt that the probability of tbll exi8tenoe of uo-
8ignifioant amount of sulfur dioxide in the oommunit;y air 1IU DOt great M4 11M
probability of .ulfurio &oid in the air still Ie.. 11ke17. S8qÞle. for nlfur
dioxide determination were not taken because œoo..ø.r7 ohemioals Gel oqui,..nt
were not aTailable. Preparation for sample8 for sulfur dioxide had DOt been
made in advance because ita prelenoe was oonsidered unlike17. Sinoe oomplain-
iDg oitizena believed that sulfuric acid was preseDt in the air and chemicals
and equipment 1IØre available for sampling for this substance, two such samples
1IØre taken.
The sample taken in the JohDBon flower nursery area shand 118gatiw results for
both acidity and. sulfates. A con1;ro1 sample of air was taken in the parld.Dg
lot behind the City Hall. This lample was taken to determiœ the acidity and
sulfate content of city air not affected by operationa of the aspluù t mix plant.
Acidity on this sample was 4.84 milligr81118 per cubic -tor of a1r, expressed aa
sulfuric acid. Results tor su1tates 1IØre negative. The negative sulfate result
indicates that the acidity found was not due to sulfuric acid. Îhe acidity found
in this s8J1Ple can be accounted for by the oø.rbon dioxide content of the air
whioh ranges 1'rom 0.025 per cent to 0.05 per cent in normal city air. Result.
on these samples indicate that no significant IInO1D1t of sulfurio acid exists in
the air adjacent to the Case and Johnson ho_s.
Rec 0II1II8 ndations 8
'!'he following reoOlllllSndations are presented for consideration,
1.
Installation of more efUcien1; dust collecting equipmøDt at the asphalt mix
plant capable of abating the nuisance to surrounding residences. It is suggested
that commercial wet type collectors be investigated.
2.
Hooding or enclosure of' the mixing equipment at the asphalt plant and collection
ot the dust from this source in a manner capable of reducing the dust at the
mixer tender's posUien and. the plant site to below 5.0 million particles per
cUbic foot of air.
Report on Investigation of Air Pollution, Brown & Brown Const. Co. - page 6
Ey J. L. MB¥es and James F. Aiken, Jr.
April 28, 1953
3. until suoh timll all the duat at the mixer 'bender t s position and the pllUlt site
is reduoed to below 5.0 million particles per oubio f'oot of air. provide duat
respirators, apprOTed by the U. S. Bureau of' Mines for silica bearing duat, f'or
the mixer tender and all other worker. in the immediate lU'ea.
R.-rk..
u.. of' II. 001IIII81"0181 wet t,pe dust collector would also remove &IV aul1'\r gaeee that
lDi~ht be evolved in the ohert drying proo.aa.
Mr. 1rilli- H. Rienieta, Ð1etriot Geologist f'or the Kgsa state Board of Health,
aided in thia iD'WIetigll.tiOD.
The aid IUI1 oooperation of' Mr, R. S. F...naoht. S8Di'tar7 01'1'ioer 1'02 .. eity of
Salina, IUId 811 other persoDDel contacted wre sincerely appreciated.
Beapeothlly submitted,
DmSIOIi' OF SAnTA-TIOK
5t..~.~
Industrial HygieDl Section
JUllpb
oc. Mr. Stanley II. Smith, Samtary Engineer.
Ifr. R. S. Fasnacht. Sanitary Of'fioer.
BROWN & BROWN, Inc.
CONTRACTORS
715 E. Crawford
Phone 6402
SALINA, KANSAS
JlA77,19$3
RALPH E. BROWN, Pres.
HAROLD E. BROWN, Sec.T...s.
Mr. LelaJd Srack, CiV IlaJlalC'
CiV Ball
Sal1Da, laM..
Dear Mr. Sracka
Competent
&-
Dependeble
Build-
In regard to the opC'aUon of oar ..pblJ.t. plant. on
Jut. Iorth Street, 11' the CiV C08I1881on 18 00ll8148'1D1
taId.q aø;r acUon on th18 before the. C088188ion ...t.1JIc ot
11&7 18, I9S3, ... 1IO11ld appreciate a po8t.pol188Dt. of aoUon
untll that date in order to giTe WI time to ...8llb1e
intorution pC'ta1.ning to tbi8 plant.
We are 8&IdDg arr&ngnente 80 that the plant. 11111 DOt
be in operaUon far 8Dl'e tban a couple ot hoUl'll frea nøw
unW 11&7 18th. Oar operatioll8 will be confined to prerloa8
co88i:t...nte on jobs 'Which are a18o.t caaplete.
Tbanlrtng ;you tor -,.oor IdJId conaideraUoll8, I ..
Ver'T 'tn1l7 ;YOUI'll,
BROIB &, BROIrN, IlI:.
/
;¿¿~~L~
A project well planned and designed should also be well consl:ruded
KANSAS STATE COLLEGE
OF AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE
MANHATTAN
DEPARTMENT 01' PATHOLOGY
May 6,1953
R. S. Fassnacht
Public Health Department
Salina, Kansas
Dear Sir:
With reference to the goat which. you had autopsied at
Kansas State College, we found a c~st which contained
possibly 500 mI. of thick rl~id attached to the
pericardium dorsally on the right atrium of the heart.
This cyst extend~d forward into the opening into the
thorax and appeared to bring sufficient pressure on
vital structures in this region to probably cause the
fatal illness and subsequent death of the goat.
Advanced age could possibly contribute to the death
of the animal, although it could hardly be considered
the cause.
tJ.cI
Very truly yours,
>
wlk/ek