2815 Amend Zoning Beebe's #2
APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO TIlE DISTRICT ZONING MAP
Do not Write in this Sp~CL
retition No. '",S:'- I J
Filing Fee $ 'l/F ("e
Paid ,,:::,;) . .-
Date Submitted I. - I{ - f:x)
The Salina City Planning Coœcission
City Planning Department
City Hall - Salina. Kansas
1.
Applicant's N&me17."j '(0)\' '()I.~ Ct B)cl
Applicant' s Address $'11.[0 .Ph , I~:.J --I;
. . ,
3. Phone Number
2.
4.
c
[) ))
1'.eGent Zone
Requested Zoning
5.
Legal Description of property requested to be rezoned and Street address or
location I.()t, 11 J 1? 13. 17: RloCl~ 1 bp",¡-<> I", 5"'(,f"\I',,'-1 .',ìti
,
.:1 Í"' ,';t l ~ "),.. \([,..:(, /(r-;
- '
-
6.
Area of subject property, square feet and/or acres
Present use of subject property P k Lj j>,' { t' ¡.f '" S
I
I ":'~ '<? ¡' IJ Ii:.
n.' "'c'" , r:.....'
7 / " > II ,J4 fc{ \
')f'f~, ~I
l. ¡J.., ( d'
7.
.s.
Desired use of subject property I, "
How are adjoining properties used? North Â(fft"'" ft'l('-I;! Sf d!J f',
South J." t. v -iÐ.. f-((y¡>-\. East (: () Ir 1 .i !;.~ .~(T West J( (',. v) f! '-é~ tt tr t
,j .
What improvement in the existing zoning would be effected by the proposed
zoning? l-v tL+..E to fL it¿'"1.\'~ /tlJ:~t~ ~'ì.V .1 !'Ÿ'W.Jj,,::( l'--[/.- fÍ1~ .
í/ U
How can you justify the proposed zoning change? (See questionnaire on back)
Time schedule for development ~ ,1.L, ")\..,tlv; Jc L £:1 t' Ct, \Q
\)
Exhibits furnished. number and kind. (~urnish plot plan or site plan. showing
existing and proposed structures. easements. water courses. curb cut-backs.)
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Sign¡;:ture of Applicant ~1... !Z<-~ .~ 'a:,:: '). ((.L.. __,f r: 'r ;, þ
l)
We the undcr5ig~cd have read the above petition and recommend that the petition be
grû:lted.
NAHE
ADDRESS
LOT BLOCK
I
ADDITION
..
519 SOUTH SANTA F'E:
TELE""ONE TA .,-"",
SALINA, KANSAS
. Janu~ry 2~, 19~5
JU~TIFIC~~ TION
1.
The ere;:! "rill be used for the extension of an existing bui.ldin¡; for phystc11'!ns office~.
2.
There are no factual data except it is known th~t the ~o~ulation cnn~t~ntly ~rows ftnd
the r~tio of physicia~s to natients is at an o~tirnumof one to one thousand.
3.
4.
At first a 14 foot extension as a waiting room and eventually arlrlitional offices.
The area is already established in a convenient location as a doctor's building.
"'hI".
building :'., ~.~ ... ,.~ this locRtion for more t:-,<1:ï eleven ye:'1rs.
5.
It is prob;;ble that the two older doctors in the building ,;ill practice there for from
10 to 20 years.
Tr.e younger doctors probablly longer up to a ~ossible 45 more yea roc:.
6.
It is believed that at first traffic ,,¡ill not increase and later may wi. thin ten yeArs
amount to 120 cars per. day ~sin~ the building.
7.
!':ost of the neighbors are elderly and already depend on the doctors in th~ bui1 r'.inp; f'or
their professional care.
This should be anythin~ but objectionable.
8.
Surrounding property values probably will not be affected.
9.
There is no other place to extend the buildinR.
'¡'he area W:;IS originally zoned for
professional buildings ¡-Then the building W;¡s erected.
It was under~tood at th~t time
tha t extensions .¡ould be limited only by area of rarkinf', 5!1ace.
10. Teere ~re no restrictive covenants on the building.
11. T:Gffic thorou~hfares should not be affected.
12. Tì:,,::,c -;.rlll be over-:-three times as m;:¡ny square feet for parking ;:¡ s there ~ s bu'lòing space.
13. Area to be s~::,ved is the entire mid-central Kansas area, about 10~ of patients seen are
from out of the County.
14. The building shoúld increase the health of the neighborhood for emergency and d2v-to-è?~
care.
~~,~~ ~. ~ ~
M;:¡urice R. Connol1y M .n. (,)
12.
Will there always b~ sufficient off-street Parki~~
intenae use? .~ regardless of A m~=e
13.
h~at is the estimated boundary of area to be served
this boundary dr~wn? and on what basis is
14.
Hill th~ propo:ed use increase or maintain health s.:¡fet
convenienc~. prosperity or general lf - ' y. mor~ls. order,
this question G~OW some good fact ~ei ~re ot the neigh~orhood? (in ans~crin£
concluaion.) us n ormation that would lead to thib
15.
If the ap?lic~nt does not have a concr~te 1 h
for his own purposes as well as the' p an e must still justify zoninG
the incre~ac of the value of the 1 ~l~nning Commission. (Speculation as to
justification and is not in the be:~ in~c;~~~tion by re~oning is not
.:oupJcd with extensive facts ad",... s of the public unlcss it C..II be
n t1.öUrCD which can c-:mcluvt\:cly .51.0\, c~. :; thiJ
..
"
&1Au.~lc¡t .d? (!.O/1I10[[Y, a1t!. !D.
519 SOUTH SANTA FE:
TKLIt..HDHIt TA '70.'"
SALINA, KANSAS
, JanuAry 25, 19';5
JU~TIFIC~. noN'
l.
2.
The ~re~ wi.ll be used for the extension of an existing building for ~hysiciAns office~.
There are no fflctual data except it is known th...t the 1'Otlulation cnnl'lt/lntly ~rOWð IInd
the rAtio of physicia~s to natients is at an optimum of one to one thouSAnd.
3.
4.
At first a 11 foot extension as a waiting room and eventually anñitional offices.
The area is already established in a convenient location as a doctor's huilding.
",hI".
buildir:g :-.:.. ~-~." ,,~ this locRtion for more t1-..3r1. eleven ye~rs.
5.
It is probñble that the two older doctors in the building ,rill practice there for from
10 to 20 years.
The younger doctors probablly longer up to a possible 45 more year~.
6.
It is believed that at first traffic will not increase and later may within ten yeArs
amount to 120 cars per day ì,Ising the building.
7.
~ost of the neighbors are elderly and already depend on the doctors in th~ buil~in~ for
their professional care.
This should be anythin~ but objectionable.
8.
Surrounding property values probably will not he affected.
9.
There is no other place to extend the building.
'rhe ;:Irea was originally zoned for
professional buildings when the building WAS crected.
It was under5tood at th~t time
th~t extensions would be limited only by area of rarking space.
10. There 2re no restrictive covenants on the building.
11. Tr~Ìfic thorouGhfares should not be affected.
12. Th~rc vdll be over~three times as many square feet for parking ~S there js bu'lriin~ space.
13. Area to be ~é'rved is the entire mid-central Kansas area, about 10% of patients seen are
fro~ o~t of the County.
14. Th~ building snoùld increase the health of the neighborhood for emerg~ncy and dav-to-d~y
care.
~"-~(.,,~ ~. ~ ~
Maurice R. Connolly M.D. ()
12.
Will there alw~ys b~ sufficient off-street Parkin~
1ntc::l:JC use? "0 regardless of f1 ml1'::'e
13.
h%~t is the estimated b d f
this boundary dr~wn? oun Dry 0 area to be served and on what basis is
14.
Will t?C propoced use increase or maintain health safer
conven~encc. prosperity or gener~l If - . y. morals. order.
h ... we are ot the r.e1<"hb h d? (
t is question Ghow some good factual inf t1 h. <> or 00 in answering
concluGio...) . orma on t at would lead to this
15.
If thc applicant does not have a concrete lan he
for his ow.. purposes as well as the Pl iP C must still justify zoning
the increase of the value of the 1 d ~nn ng 0~m18sion. (Speculation as to
an 1n quP8tion by rezoning is not
Applicant PLEASE Read CarefullJ
You Must Justify your Request
In fairness to the applicant as well as to the city at large. the CityPlannin¿
Commission deems it necessary as well as extremely helpful for the applicant to :ak..
a long and careful look at what he is proposing when he requests a change in zonin~
for his piece of property. If the applicant will analyze his proposal carefully he
will note that there are certain questions which he must answer for himself as well
as for the city. It has been evident that previous zoning CGGGS h4vG beon turned
down or tabled bec4U8O the City Planning Commission lacked sufficient information.
The Planning Commission staff does not have the facilities for acquiring all the
information needed. and since the applicant is solely concerned as to his proposal
it appears only just and reasonable that he file with his application all the
information obtainable which may be pertinent to his case.
The justification shoulç be written (preferably typewritten) in narrative form
and follow the points outlined in the questionnaire. Some of the questions may
not be pertinent to your particular caae but all should be looked at closely.
Attempt to find answers to all the questions, however. if certain information is
. unobtainable it will not count in any way against the applicant other than the
fact that the Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners will have less
information upon which to base their decision.
JUSTIFICATION
(Questions to be answered)
1.
What use is to be made of area in queation?
Shopping Center, & Fillin~ Station
2.
Give.some factual data showing need for anticipated use based on population
(present and future) of area to be served.
3.
Will it be necessary to build a new structure?
Yes several
4.
Is there something special about the area in question that makes it more
feasible to rezone this area rather than attempt to acquire property presently
zoned for the type of use anticipated? (other than ownership of the property)
Property is on direct access route to interstate.
Is it possible to give reasonable assurance that for a certain number of years
the use will be that which is anticipated by the a~plicant? Yes
Sli3htlt
Will the proposed use increase traffic in the area? /If so, will an increase
in traffic be detrimental to the adjoining properties? Xo
5.
6.
7.
Will the intended use of the property be in any way objectionable to your
ncighbors? No.
8.
Will surrounding property values be maintained or increased?
the basis for this assumption in detail. Yes.
If so. show
9.
Is the area at present served by a similar type zone and what effect will the
added use have on the overall zoning plan?
10.
Are there any restrictive covenants on the property which would prohibit the
intended use? Attach a copy ~f the covenants and/or deed restrictions if any
are in effect. None
11.
Whst relationship does this have on present and future maj~r traffic
thor~ughfares? Business is anticipated to be partly derived from
Interstate Traffic System.
Will there always be sufficient off-street parking regardless of a ~=e
intense use? Yes.
12.
13.
What is the estimated boundary of area to be served and on what basis is
,this boundary drawn?
14.
Will the proposed use increase or maintain health. safety. morals. order.
convenience, prosperity or general welfare of the neighborhood? (in answering
this question show some good factual information that would lead to this
conclusion.) Yes.
15.
If the applicant does not have a concrete plan he must still justify zoning
for his own purposes as well as the Planning Commission. (Speculation as to
the increase of the value of the land in qu~Btion by rezoning is not
justification and is not in the best interest of the public unless it CJn b~
~oupled with extensive facts and figures which can c'>nclu