3937 Sewer System Faith Add
,"II
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
PETITION NUMBER 3~37
fILED
'87 JIJN 3 II 35
¡;iT I' CLERK.
... 0 0" 0 0'" 0"" 0"" .." 0 ... "" 0 ""..."
(A) We, the undersigned, being owners of record of property liable for assessment for the following improvements:
Reauestina the installation of a storm sewer system to drain the rear easement of
Block 3 and Block 7 in Rep1at of Faith Addition to the City of Salina. Kansas
hereby propose that such improvement be made in the manner provided by Article 6a, Chapter 12 of the Kansas
Statutes Annotated, as amended.
(B) The estimate or probable cost of such improvement is
and 501100 dollars
Seven Thousand Four Hundred Seventeen
($ 7,417.50
(D) The proposed method of assessment is: based on the front footaoe of each lot of land and
without rpgard to buildings or improvement of land.
(E) The proposed apportionment of costs between the improvement district and the City-at-large is:
One Hundred percent (-1Q!L.%) to be assessed against the improvement district and
Zero percent (~%) to be assessed against the City-at-large.
(F) We further propose that such improvement be made without notice and hearing as required by K.S.A. 12-6a04(1)
as amended.
UUUUUUAAA"'AUAUA"UUUUUUUUUUUUAUUUUUUUU"'AAUUUAUAU... AUUAUAUUU"'AU
* No name may be withdrawn from this petition after the Governing Body commences consideration *
* of the petition or later than seven (7) days after this petition has been filed with the City Clerk *
* (KoS.A. 12-6a04) *
Respectfully submitted by
~
,-J Residence
Do1<--/î'\hvn~
Date & Time Property owned within the
of 5i qninq proposed Improvement Oi stri ct
~~fJf) J'Ig 7
t:/b1 d ;£Þ1A~:t
(j
íJJ;J; v?J1~¿"
5P7j¡1
.-):55 Pi'!7
,1ø,<ul! 111t~tL rI1;1Jtð411h~
:'liz, ß?
6 ;o{f~\,
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
PET I T 10M NUMBER
TO:
THE COVERNINC BODY
City of Saline. Kanus
: ....." ,................. ......, ...........
hereby propose that such Improvement be Mde In the Nnner provided by Article &t. O1apter 12 of the Kan...
Statutes Annotated. as a...nded.
(B) The estilllate or probable cost of such IlIprovement 15
and 50/100 dollars
Seven Thousand Four Hundred Seventeen
($ 7.417.50
(D) The proposed method of assessment 15: hased on the front footaoe of each lot of land and
without rpg;¡rd to bllilrlings or imorovemPnt of land
(E) The proposed apportionment of costs between the hlprovement district and the City-at-large is:
One Hundred percent C...J.QL') to be assessed against the IlII Irovement district and
7ero percent (----!L-') to be anened against the Clty-at-large,
(F) We further propo.e that .uch improvelll8nt be made without notice and hearing as required by K.S.A. 12-6aOlo(1)
as aøended.
UU I I.J.U -... U I I I I I L.l.l..l....U UUAll I I I I I I 1.1 I"" HAl",,""H I I 1" 1.1 1.1 I I' "' '1 ..1..AI AI"" I I I ..-- Ul
.. No nalll8 may be withdrawn frOli thh petition after the Governing Body ccxrmences consideration ..
.. of the petition or later than seven (7) days after this petition has been filed with the City Clerk ..
.. (K,S.A. 12-6104) ..
U...U.H....1HU1"..U..l..U _H""" Ul..l.."- """".u",," ..IUU.."U',," UU"I""U
Re.pectfully subllitted by
TelepMne Number
I-~OO
I", «-A)u..", ~
Date & Time Property owned within the
of Si qni ng propo.ed hlprovement Oi stri ct
:\"W'-¿ 'l..
9.0DP,lo1f'M :.:1/6 1.jk'9
Siqnature
H C: ~~~ ~1 J:£1
Residence
hdh cuV
eLf' '«..f-
7~ (; {,~<- ~ß!.
I ~o ù \t¡ l:.lIc,t,\.I¡/ ~
.Ju",e -'\.. -.l R L
c¡;o/ ftll l'i\ 1 j..;~ II> &' 1 f..:tl.. ,.... I( cpl,,-r
'-¡ OJ""
, ".
PET! TI ON NUMBER
Page 2
Signature
Resi donee
Oate & Time Property o,"ed within the
of Si gni ng propo5ed Improvement Distri et
, ':;:-;;))7~1
/1);)" Ith1vi!!tVA{¡ fkÚ'F)~ Ìf¡tJ~~,
ff~ CJJ1Jl.J
q < A ' £jb/?l
.' ..c'. fty?U~~ )S'! /ðUu«L<H"',J ¿:ISI'",
~ ¡p~ 7£/11¡~ ?/;/'f7
,,' '. 'M '., ' .£.J.£I'/¡¡'
;tv, a~
r-¡: ,kiÜ- !!I' 47i{(f¡jw.d~IWl
~~&:'f
.'" r¡; "ðff2'1
.if L//J ¡zJqI
'l'?/ '11l"".M1d,~J
G,-;l.fS7
&:<'/0 %111.
71.<; In:WN7j;J¡,.~)
(,;:;.87
~
~t~
7<.t( (t~~ &-v-8)