The URL can be used to link to this page

CIP 1988 - 1992 I I I I I I I I .1 I I II I ,I I ]1 I _.1 I I PROPOSED 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS July 6, 1987 RUFUS L. NYE CITY MANAGER' I I I I I I I I I I I I. I Ii I, I,' I, I_~ 1.- City of Salina Board of Commissioners Steve Ryan Sidney Soderberg Bob Frank Vi Justus Joe Warner Mayor Vice-Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Salina City Planning Commission Elizabeth Ann Duckers Sherry Denton Fred Gaines Don Morrison Paul Mott Roy Presley Frank Roth Wally Storey, Jr. Cha i rman Vice-Chairman CIP Administrative Committee Roy Dudark Director of Planning & Community Development Director of Finance Assistant City Engineer Director of Community Services Director of General Services Don Harrison Don Hoff Don Jolley Frank Weinhold Prepared By: Department of Planning & Community Development I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I Table of Contents Page Table of Contents 1 2 List of Tables Abbreviations and Legend Part I - Introduction 3 4 Part II - Policy Guidelines Part III - Capital Improvement Program 6 8 1988 Capital Budget 1989 Capital Program 15 29 1990 Capital Program 1991 Capital Program 36 45 1992 Capital Program Priority IV (Unfunded) Projects 52 58 Project Rating Criteria 59 I I Table I 1 I 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 I 7 8 I 9 I 10 I I I I I I ..1 .1 ,~I .1 .1 .1 List of Tables Pãge GO Bonded Debt, Assessed Valuation and Population GO Debt Service and Sales Tax Capital Outlay 10 11 Projected Sales Tax Revenues and Expenditures General Bond and Interest Fund Projections 12 13 Capital Funding: 1988-1992 CIP 14 15 1988 Capital Budget 1989 Capital Program 1990 Capital Program 1991 Capital Program 1992 Capital Program 29 36 45 52 2 I I I I I I I I /1 I I I .1 I I .1 -I .1 -I ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS Methods of Financing GO GOSA GORB ST F S GF 0 Map Legend x ... ~ ...,.. . p u m General Obligation Bonds - City at Large General Obligation Bonds - Special Assessment District General Obligation Bonds - Revenue Financed Sales Tax Federa 1 Funds State Funds General Fund - Annual Operating Budget Other Street Briåge Drainage Public Building Park Water/ Sewer Utility Miscellaneous 3 I I I I I I I 'I I I I' .1 .1 I .1 .1 1 ,I 1 Part I Introduction A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is one of the major tools available to achieve desired growth and development. The CIP is an important statement of the City's policy regarding long-range physical development of the com- munity. Through the types of public projects funded and their location, private investment is induced resulting in community growth and change. Combined with financial targets, the Capital Program represents a systematic plan for providing needed improvements within a prioritized framework. While there are competing demands for new improvements to urbanizing areas, exist- ing developed areas must be attended to through the replacement of obsolete facilities. These competing demands combined with the scarcity of current revenues and the legal limitations and complexity of long-term debt financ- ing, signal the necessity to formalize a method of prioritizing capital projects and allocating future public resources. The CIP covers a five-year period and sets the general schedule within which pub li c improvements wi 11 be undertaken. The fi rst year is recommended for adoption as the Capital Budget for the coming year with the remaining years considered a Capital Improvement Program. However, it should not be con- sidered as a final and fixed program. The CIP is' intended to be reviewed and revised annually. An additional year is thus added each year to maintain the full five-year period of the program. Reasons for Programmi ng Capi ta 1 ,Investments There are several benefits to adopting a Capital Improvement Program: 1. Provision of valuable information to the City Commission and citizenry for decision-making regarding community development and budgeting. Utilization of public funds to maximum advantage through improved timing of improvements and coordination among departments. 2. 3. Equitable distribution of public facilities according to need and demand for services. 4. Coordination of city projects with those of quasi-public and private entities. 5. Distribution of capital costs over time in order to achieve a more consistent tax rate and maintain a sound debt management policy. I nc'reased pri va te deve 1 opment and orderly growth through i mproved community knowledge of intended public activities. 6. 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Despite the many benefits of capital programming, directing public improve- ments to achieve development objectives is very difficult. Some of the major reasons are: 1. Revenue sources are difficult to predict in advance due to changing economic conditions and shifts in public policy. Operating budgets frequently take precedence over capi ta 1 budgets and reduce the number and scale of public improvements because capi ta 1 projects are easier to eliminate. 2. 3. Certain public facility needs depend largely upon the location, scale and timing of private economic decisions which are difficult to predict. Community objectives are difficult to not only set but may be forgotten at budget time when priorities often are based on subjective reasons. 4. Nevertheless, ways must be found around these. difficulties in order to increase the long-time benefit and return on the investment of limited public funds. The formulation of clear policy objectives requires effective and open communications between elected officials, administrators and involved citizens. Discussions should encompass continuing obligations, emerging needs, alternative solutions, and project benefits and costs. There are several factors which will have a substantial impact on both the scope and impact of a Capital Improvement Program for the City of Salina. Each of these factors will influence either available' resources or the specific projects selected for fund~ng. The most important factors include: 1. Amount and type of des ired economi c actj vi ty and resu 1 tant phys i ca 1 development. Availability and willingness to use state and federal funds. 2. ? "". Statutory debt limits and maximum local mill levy deemed feasible for debt service. 4. 5. . Ability to set priorities among competing public facility needs. Willingness to establish special assessment districts and/or utilize impact/benefit fee financing. In order to address these factors, and in so doing, obtain a reasonable and workable Capital Improvement Program, the Board of City Commissioners, has formulated several policy guidelines which are presented in Part II of this document. Only through establishing a deliberate and reasoned policy posi- tion can a Capital Improvement Program be formulated which reflects the wishes of the general public through the governing body and thus achieve the results intended. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 , I II I I .1 I .1 Part II Policy Guidelines Goal Develop and implement a capital investment plan within the financial capacity of the community sufficient to accommodate both existing and future develop- ment within the City of Salina. Development Policies 1. Conserve and maintain the resources and stability of the entire city. Strive to make the most efficient use of existing public improvements and encourage the expansion of public facilities in a manner which provides the greatest city-wide benefit. Preserve and upgrade public facilities and services in the central business district and surrounding older areas. Create a climate of confidence about the future of such areas to attract the private investment needed to ma i nta in i ndi vi dua 1 properti es. Undertake rehabilitation projects on a selective basis to upgrade deteriorated but promising areas. 2. 3. Maintain the integrity and. character of established neighborhoods. Continue the present level of public services and direct new spending to needed public facility enhancements. Promote the efficient, orderly and economic expansion of public facili- ties and services at the urban fringe. Avoid scattered and premature urbanization of rural areas. Direct public investment to areas directly contiguous to already developed areas and provide only those public facilities essential to support new development. 4. Public Facility Policies 1. In eva 1 ua t; ng cap ita 1 proj ects, fi rs t pri ori ty wi 11 be given to the rehabil ; tati on or replacement of deter;orated/obso 1 ete facil i ties required to maintain public health and safety; second priority will be given to additions to existing facilities or new facilities needed to bring an area up to a standard level of service; and, third priority will be given to expanded facilities above minimum standards. Projects which: a) create or retain jobs or b) contribute to commer- cial area revitalization will be given special consideration. 2. 3. Projects which require little or no land acquisition, result in a decrease in operating and maintenance costs, or increase revenue to the city will be given special consideration. Projects that increase productivity and efficiency in the delivery of city services will be given greater consideration. 4. 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -I 11 ,I ,I ~I ,. ::>. Projects that benefit a larger area, serve a greater population or will be used on a year-round basis will be given greater consideration. Projects which complement related facilities or are coordinated with other improvements, at a cost savings to the city, will be given greater consideration. 6. 7. Projects which support neighborhood betterment, enhance the environment or promote historic preservation will be encouraged. Financial Policies 1. Protect the fiscal integrity of the city and maintain a balance between the city's operating and capital improvement budgets. Develop a Capital Improvement Program within the debt limitations established by State law and which can be funded with a maximum local debt service mill levy of 7.0 mills resulting in an average annual debt servi ce payment of approximately $825,000 over the next five years. 2. 3. Devote a minimum of 67-75 percent of local sales tax revenue or approxi- mately $2.0-$2.5 million each year to capital improvements. Maximize the impact of local tax dollars by recommending projects eligible for alternative financing in the following order of preference: 1) federa 1 and state grants; b) speci a 1 benefi t di stri cts; c) revenue bonds; d) special purpose bonds; and e) general obligation bonds. 4. 5. Finance capital improvements for no more than the useful life of the project. Encourage priority projects which are entirely or partially financed by private contributions or other units of government. 6. 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I I ,I .1 Part II I Proposed Capital Improvement Program Recent Financial Trends The rãtio of General Obligation (GO) debt to assessed value has been stead- ily declining from 8.56% in 1981 to 3.69% in 1987. Currently, the amount of GO debt per capita has been reduced from $197.36 in 1981 to $91.82 in 1987. These two prime indicators of community debt and borrowing capacity have improved because of steady, albeit gradual, growth in assessed value along with little new debt having been issued (see Table 1). The City's allocation for Capital Improvements has changed remarkably since 1983 when sales tax revenues began to be received. Prior to this, capital spending was limited to GO Bond debt service which amounted to 8.7% of total spending. With the addition of the sales tax, total capital spending increased to 18.6% in 1985. This percentage has fallen slightly to 15.2% since that time, however (see Table 2). Projected Financial Capacity There are two main sources of revenue available for capital improvements - the 1 oca 1 sa 1 es tax ana general ob 1 i gati on bonds. It is projected that approximately $1.4 million of sales tax funds will be available annually for a total of $7.2 million over the five year program time frame of 1988-1992. This amount excludes approximately $1.9 million each year or a total of $9.8 million anticipated to be earmarked for various municipal functions (see Table 3). The amount of available GO bonds is a function of growth in assessed valua- tion, existing and committed debt, and the tax levy considered acceptabl,e. ~ecause existing debt is diminishing, due in part to bond refunding in October of 1986, the required mill levy could be reduced from 7.01 mills in 1987 to 1.87 mills in 1992 (see Table 4). If the mill levy for the Debt and Interest Fund were maintained at 7.0 mills over this period, it is estimated that $4.0 million of GO bonds could be issued without a tax increase. Together, these two major sources of local capital financing could provide a CIP of $11.2 million over the next five years. Proposed Capital Improvement Program The proposed CIP includes funding for 55 projects at a total cost of $24.8 million. After excluding $16.4 million in funds represented by nonlocal taxes (federal and state grants, Saline County funds, utility revenue bonds, etc.) $8.4 million in local taxes is needed to accomplish the program. It is proposed that this amount be comprised of $5.6 million of sales taxes and $2.8 million of GO Bonds. This would maintain a sales tax ending balance of $1.7 million (see Table 5). The required mill levy to service the bonds would peak in 1991 at 6.9 mills, slightly below the self-imposed target ceiling of 7.0 mills (see Table 4). 8 I I I I I I I I -I I -I ~I JI ,"I ,~I '..1 ",I ~I ~I 1988 Capital Budget Presented on Table 6 is the proposed Capital Budget for 1988. Consisting of 13 projects at an estimated cost of $3,728,000, these capital improvements are considered to be of relatively higher priority and should receive careful consideration. Each project is outlined on a separate page following the 1988 listing. 1989-1992 Capital Program Each year of the 1989-1992 Capital Program is presented in succession in the above format. These projects have been programmed for the selected year according to rated priority, construction sequencing, and available funds. However, considerable flexibility is inherent in the plan as determined most appropriate to meet community needs and desires. It is intended that this listing would provide the majority of 1989 projects as well as those for subsequent capital budgets, although annual updating will be necessary. Projects Not Recommended for Funding At the conclusion of the CIP document, a recommended list of Priority IV or unfunded projects is presented. These projects, while beneficial, are believed to be of lesser priority, may be more appropriately considered in the annual operating budget, or should seek alternate funding. However, it may also be that certain projects are believed to be sufficiently desirable that they should be reconsidered for inclusio~ within the program. Finally, several requests were submitted for equipment. Such items are not true capi ta 1 improvements and shou 1 d be requested in the, annual operating budget or. the Equipment Reserve Fund. This fund is to be financed at $150,000 each year from the sales tax (see Table 3). To supplement this listing, the rating criteria is also provided. The rating criteria were developed based on policy guidelines presented in Part II. For purposes of further refinement of priorities, projects were classified into one of the following broad categories and shown on each project sheet: ~~~ors~t¡et~: a~~ses~~~~ld be P~~~~~~~edWh:~h s~~~t~~bU:eeas;~l/u~~i~rd~e:li~ prevent harmful effects or avoid undesirable consequences. Priority II: Important - Projects which meet clearly demonstrated community needs or objectives. Priority III: Desirable - Projects which benefit the community but can be delayed somewhat without detrimental effects to basic services. Priority IV: Deferrable - Projects which are not recommended for inclusion in the five-year program at this time. 9 - - - - - - - - _'- - - - - - - - Table 1 Ratio of General Obi igation Bond Debt to Assessed Value and Population Prior Year Assessed Genera I Ratio of GO Total Bond and Interest Budget City Va lue Ohltgatiyn Debt to GO Debt Tax Rate Fund Tax Rate Year Population (in OOO's) Debt Assessed Value Per Capita (Mills) (Hills) 1980 41,843 $105,234 $7,841,592 7.45% $187.40 38.27 9.50 1981 42,309 97,4382 8,350,248 8.56% 197.36 39.45 10.66 1982 42,406 99,239 7,466,704 7.52% 176.07 40.84 10.36 1983 42,787 105,335 6,694,028 6.35% 156.45 36.36 8.75 ..... 1984 42,933 104,1013 6,856,295 6.58% 159.69 36.36 8.41 0 1985 44,029 107,448 4,901,460 4.56% 111.3;1 36.36 6.61 1986 44,620 108,678 4,058,880 3.73% 90.96 36.36 7.74 1987 45,000 111,856 4,131,854 3.69% 91.82 36.36 7.01 ~ Includes Ctty share of Special Assessment Bonds 3 Beginning tn 1981, excludes valuatton of motor vehicles 4 Beginning tn 1984, excludes valuation of farm machinery and aircraft Limited to a maximum of 30% by state statute. - - - - - ... , - .. - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - Table 2 Ratio of GO Debt Service and Sales Tax Capital Outlay to Total City Expenditures Ratio of Debt Ratio of Debt Sa les Tax Service 1. Sales Budget GO Debt Total City Serv tee to Capita I Tax to Tota I Year Principal Interest Service Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expendi tures --- 1980 $ 732.481 $390,480 $I ,122,961 $14.472,179 7.75~ 7.75% 1981 750,950 387,266 1,138,216 14.120.963 8.06% 8.06% 1982 892.553 445.219 1,337,772 15.407.316 8.68% 8.68% 1983 839.304 383.032 1,222,336 19.103.711 6.39% $1.710.924 15.35% 1984 854.896 343, 158 1,198.054 20,763.729 5.76% 2.126.917 16.01% ..... ..... 1985 736,844 372 ,887 1,109,73 I 20,849.836 5.32% 2,775.384 18.63% 1986 842.580 332.785 I, 175,365 23.678.130 4.961 2.917.172 17 .28% - 1987 770.134 302.403 1,072,537 24,269,830 4.42% 2.620,000 15.21% , - " ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Table 3 Projected Sales Tax Revenues and Expenditures Total 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1988-1992 -- Actual Expenditures $3,592,172 Budgeted Expenditures $3,320,000 Planned Expenditures Street Maintenance S 125,000 $ 525,000 $ 410,000 $ 420,000 $ 430,000 $ 440,000 $2,225,000 Equipment Reserve fund 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 General fund Transfer 675,000 700,000 725,000 750,000 775,000 3,625,000 BC Center Transfer 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 1,100,000 Bond and Interest fund 1 410,000 396,000 432,000 416,000 447,000 2,101,000 ..... 2 125,000 N Expected Savings Total Expenditures 3,592,172 3,320,000 1,960,000 1,866,000 1,947,000 1,976,000 2,052,000 9,801,000 Estimated Receipts3 3,158,587 3,250,000 3,300,000 3,350,000 3,400,000 3,450,000 3,500,000 17,000,000 Cash Balance (Jan. 1) 1,028,624 595,039 Cash Balance (Dec. 31) 595,039 525,039 Avatlable funds 1,340,000 1,484,000 1,453,000 1,474,000 1,448,000 7,199,000 1 2 Contribution to Downtown Redevelopment Project. 34th Street Slough Project. Growth of sa les tax rece ipts projected a t I. 52: annua lJy. . - -' " - - , - - - - - _1", - - - - - - - - Table 4 Genera 1 Bond and Interest fund Projections Expenditures and Revenues 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Assessed Valuationl $ 108,678 $ 111,856 $ 114,650 $ 117,520 $ 106,410 $ 108,860 $ 111,360 Existin9 Debt-GO 1,175,365 1,072,537 874,561 178.194 650,569 519,552 426,898 Existing Debt-Other 790,635 1,159,259 784,766 743,331 679,800 612,438 550,433 Anticipated Debt-GO?' 0 0 469,500 470,050 520,600 519,650 564,700 lata I Expendi tures 1,966,000 2,231,796 2,128,827 1,991,575 1,850,969 1,651,640 1,542,031 less: Other Revenues3 1,124,831 1,447,110 1,529,766 1,474,331 1,446,800 1,363,938 1,332,433 .... Taxes Required 841,169 784,686 599,061 517 ,244 404,169 287,702 209,598 w MiJJ levy Required 7.74 7.01 5.23 4.40 3.80 2.64 1.87 1988 to 1992 CIP - G04 ~ 0 207,000 459,000 484.000 MOl levy Increase 0 0 1.95 4.26 4.47 T ota I Ni JJ Levy 5.23 4.40 5.75 6.90 6.34 1 Prior year for budget purposes (in thousands) with 2.5S projected annual growth until 1990 and 2.3% thereafter. The 1990 decrease 2 reflects loss of business inventory valuation. These figures do not reflect property reappraisal. Includes debt service on $3 mOHon for Downtm/ß Redevelopment, $250,000 for Fire Equipment and $100,000 annuaJ1y for City portion of Petitioned Improvements. : Includes special assessments, vehicle taxes, interest, departmental transfers and general fund transfet' for Downtown Redevelopment. Debt service for $1,215,000 of GO Bonds issued in 1989, $1,480,000 in 1990 and $150,000 in 1991 at 7% interest for 10 years. l , - \ - - IÍII - - - - - - - - - - - Table 5 Capital funding Recommended: 1988-1992 tiP Ca tegor.)' 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Iota I Streets $ 845.000 $ 565,000 $1.745,000 $1,935,000 $ 385,000 $ 5,475',000 Bridges 145,000 75,000 85,000 100,000 0 405.000 Drainage 0 715,000 0 0 0 715,000 Public Buildings 0 30,000 155,000 0 64,000 249.000 Parks 245,000 1,110,000 1,120,000 315,000 140,000 2,930,000 Water 2,400,000 5,600,000 0 0 0 8,000,000 I-' Sewer 0 0 6,500,000 0 0 6,500,000 .... Hisce 11aneous 93.000 0 275,000 150,000 115,000 633,000 Total Expenditures 3.728,000 8,095,000 9,780,000 2,500,000 704,000 $24,807,000 less Non-local Taxes 2,640,000 5,725,000 6,762,500 1,270,000 50,000 16,447,500 Sub-Total Taxes 1,088,000 2,370,000 3,017 ,500 1,230,000 654,000 8,359,500 less Available Sales Taxes I 1,484,000 1,453,000 1,474,000 1,448,000 7,199,000 1,340,000 Revenue Surplus (Shortfall) $ 252,000 $ (886,000) $(1,564,500) $ 244,000 $ 794,000 $(1,160,500) less GO Bonds $ 0 $ 1,215,000 $ 1,480,000 $ 150,000 $ 0 $ 2,845,000 Sales Tax Bälance $ 252,000 $ 329,000 $ (84,500) $ 394,000 $ 794,000 $ 1,684,500 1 Excludes projected 1987 year-end cash balance reserves of $525,039. I - - - - . . - L , - - ..' - - - - - - - - - - - - -"- - Table 6 1988 Capital Improvement Budget Project No./Description GO Bonds Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Other Total S1-1 Ohio & Iron Intersection $ $ 435,000 $ $125,0001 $ 560,000 S1-9 Magnolia/Schilling/I-135 Design Study 20,000 20,000 S1 -10 Rubberized Railroad Crossing 100,000 100,000 ST -II Sidewalk Reconstruction 100,0003 100,000 ST-12 Curb and Gutter Reconstruction 65,000 65,000 B-1 Oakdale St. Bridge Renovation 30,000 115,0002 145,000 ..... PR-3 Golf Course Maint. Building 80,000 80,000 U1 PR-4 Memorial HaJJ Use Study 5,000 5,000 PR-6 Community Recreation Center 150,000 150,000 PR-12 N. Salina Neighborhood Park Study 10,000 IO ,000 W-2 Water Plant Renovation 2,400,000 2,400,000 H-8 8i -Center Staging Equipalent 43,000 43,000 M-9 Pave Parking lot ~ 9th & Iron 50,000 50,000 Total $ 0 $1.088,000 n-,400,OOO $240,000 $ 3,728,000 I Federal Highway Safety Funds. 2 3 Federa I Bridge Rep lacement Funds. It is necessary to budget $100,000 in City funds for first year with $50,000 property owner match included each year thereafter. I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I ,I 1.1 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Ohio Street and Iron Avenue Intersection Improvements Project Category Streets Department Engi neeri ng Project Number ST-l Project Priority I Purpose and Justification Widen all four lanes of Ohio Street and Iron Avenue Intersection and install a fully activated signal system. Also widen Ohio Street (531 B-B) from Greeley Avenue to Elm Street. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 ¡ DESIGN JI RIGHT OF WAY 20 20 ,I SITE ,I CONSTRUCTION 475 475 EQUIPMENT 65 65 11 OTHER .1 TOTAL Federal $12 5 ,000 560 560 Sales Tax$435,OOO 16 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 'I I ..1 I "I 1 ~I ~I ~I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Oescription and Location Schilling/Magnolia/I-135 Interchange Design Concept Study Project Category Streets Deportment Planning Project NumOer ST-9 Project Priority II Purpose and Justification Completion of Design Concept Plans in order to define traffic volume, operational char- acteristics, rights-of-way requirements and construction cost estimate. This project, if constructed, would serve the Central Mall, the eastern portion of Salina via Ohio Street and Schilling Industrial Area, particularly Kansas Technical Institute and Highway Patrol Headquarters. The study would examine alternate interchange designs for Schilling and Magnolia and recommend a preferred concept for subs'equent detailed design. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 IQAQ 1990 IQQI 1992 TQTAl FUNOING c::nURCES DESIGN 20 20 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 20 $20 , 000/ 20 Sa,1 es Tax 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I ;1 ;1 I I 1 I ,I CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Comoonion Proiect ( 5 ) : Project Priority Streets Planning ST -10 II Rubberized Railroad Crossings Project Category Oeportment Project Number Locations to be determined annually Purpose and Justification This project provides rubberized railroad grade crossings where major streets cross priority rail locations in the City. Re- placement of wooden ties with rubber cross- ings improves safety, reduces maintenance and decreases vehicle wear and tear. Recom- mended funding is $100,000 each year for four-five crossings annually. - Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1989 1990 19~n 1992 TOTAL FUNOING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 100 100 100 100 100 500 OTHER TOTAL Sales Tax $500,000 100 100 100 100 100 500 18 I I I 1 I I I I "I 1 I -I I .1 -I I I ,I .1 CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Como anion Proiect< s): Project Priority Streets Engi neeri ng ST-11 II Sidewalk Reconstruction Program Project Category Department Project Number - Purpose and Justification Numerous locations exist within the City where the sidewalks are cracked and de- teri.orated. This presents both a safety hazard and a detriment to neighborhood appearance and stability. A Sidewalk Reconstruction Program is proposed with the City providing 50% matching funds for petitioned segments on a first-come, first- serve basis. $100,000 must be budgeted the first year to initiate the program. About 1.2 miles of sidewalks could be rebuilt each year. ' Locations to be determined annually Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 TnTAL FUNOINr. snIIRC¡;:S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 100 100 100 100 100 500 EQUIPMENT OTHER ales Tax $300,000 100 100 100 100 100 500 rivate $200,000 TOTAL 19 I I I I I I I I I I -I I I I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Curb and Gutter Reconstructi on Program Project Category Department Comoonion Proiectl s): Project Priority Streets Engi neeri ng ST-12 II Project Number Locations to be determined annually Purpose and Justification Along many older streets within the City curbs and gutters have broken apart and no longer serve their intended purpose. The City should take the initiative to maintain the public infrastructure and thus enhance community development objectives. A Curb and 'Gutter Reconstruction Program funded at $65,000/year will rebuild about 0.8 miles of curb and gutter. Being public streets, financing is 100% City, but property owner. suggestions will be encouraged. - Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 T A FUNDING SO RCES -I RlJ3HT OF WAY SITE HI CONSTRUCTION 65 65 65 65 65 325 ,I EQUIPMENT ~I OTHER TOTAL Sales Tax $325,00C ~I 65 65 65 65 65 325 20 I I I I I I I I I I -I i,l ,I I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Oakdale Street Bridge at Old River Channel PrOject Cotegory Bridges Deportment Engi neeri ng Project Number B-1 Project Priority II Purpose and Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on this bridge. Serious structural deteriora- tion has occurred. Operating Cost Implications Existing maintenance costs reduced and future costs minor as bridge will be re- bu i1 t. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 988 DESIGN I RIGHT OF WAY I SITE CONSTRUCTION 115 115 -I EQUIPMENT ~I OTHER 30 30 Demolition ~I TOTAl. Federa 1 $115,000 145 145 Sales Tax 30,000 21 - I I I I I I I ,I .,1 I I .1 ,I ,.1 ~I ,I "I ,:1 ~I -. ---q."---"----- - CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Golf Course Maintenance Building Project Category Parks and Recreation Department Community Services Project Number PR-3 Project Priority III Purpose and Justification This project will complete construction of the Golf Course maintenance building which began in 1987. The existing maintenance building must be converted to storage both for private carts and our cart fleet plus storage of necessary irrigation equipment. The new maintenance building will provide fo expanded equipment storage, storage of supplies and a mechanical workshop. The old metal fabricated building will eventually be razed. The new building would be located near the middle of the golf course; thus, reducing operating costs. Operating Cost Implications rd Operating costs funded from Golf Course revenues. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dol I ars) CATEGORY 1988 19A9 '99(1 199' '99? rnTAI FUNOING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 80 80 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 80 80 Sales Tax $80,000 22 -.- -------""------'- -- q- --..- - -.,- -"- I I 1 I I I I 1 --I I 'I I I :1 ,I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and l.ocation Memorial Hall Condition and Future Utilization Study Project Cotegory Pa rks and Recreation Deportment Community Services Project Number PR-4 Project Priority II Purpose ond Justification Memorial Hall has begun to show serious signs of physical stress and obsolescence. For example, hot water heating supply lines are leaking, thus causing damage to the building. This project would provide for an architec- tural/engineering evaluation of its physical condition as well as provide some professional guidance regarding the feasibility of rehab- ilitation and alternative future use. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS af Dollors) CATEGORY DESIGN 1988 RIGHT OF WAY I SITE CONSTRUCTION I EQUIPMENT I OTHER Study L 5 5 I TOTAL 5 5 Sales Tax $5,000 L' 23 I I 1 I I I I I '.1 I .1 .1 I I CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-/992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and L.ocatian Community Recreation Center Project Category Deportment Parks and Community PR-6 II Recreati on Servi ces Project Number Companion Project{ s): PrOject Priority Location to be determined. Purpose and Justification The construction of an indoor public recrea- tion center will complement outdoor facilities and programs currently being provided. At- tendance and participation records show that 100,000 people would be served annually. In 1987, the Recreation Commission will conduct a study of needed facilities, estimated cost and alternative locations. In 1988, design plans and specifications would be prepared for the selected site. This would be followec - by constructi on i n 1989 and 1990. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1989 1990 FUNDING SO RC ., DESIGN 150 150 ,I RIGHT OF WAY 1 SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,000 1,000 2,000 .1 EQUIPMENT ..1 OTHER .1 TOTAL GO Bonds$1,000,000 150 1,000 1,000 2,150 Sales Tax$1,150,00D 24 I 1 I I I I I I ,.1 I I I :1 ~ ~I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location North Salina Park Improvements ComDanion Proiect(s): Project Priority Parks and Recreation Community Services PR-12 I I Project Category Department Project Number Location to be determined. Purpose and Justification This project involves the acquisition and development of a neighborhood park to serve North Salina. A study is needed to determine an appropriate location and design. Creation of a park will necessitate acquisition of de- veloped property. Following completion of site acquisition, development is scheduled. This project is intended to provide area residents with much needed recreation facilities, including replacement of the - Carver Pool. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1991 1992 T TA DESIGN Study 10 10 -I RIGHT OF WAY I SITE 100 100 CONSTRUCTION 100 100 01 EQUIPMENT ",I OTHER -- TOTAL ~I 10 100 100 210 Sales Tax $210,000 25 I I I I I I I I -I 1 I ..1 1 1 CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND /988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Water Treatment Plant Renovation and Expansion - Fourth and South St. Project Category Oepartment Water Water and Sewerage W-2 I Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This project involves renovation and expansion of the Water Treatment Plant which has ap- proached capacity on peak days, These improve ents will increase plant capacity to 20 MGD. The total cost of planned improvements is $10. illion. It is contemplated that $4.0 million of bonds will be issued in 1987 with $6.2 illion issued in 1988. Current plans are to upgrade the filter system in 1987. In 1988, a new river intake, which needs to be coordinate - ith Old Smoky Hill River enhancements, and th presedimentation basin will be completed. Treatment, pumping and lab facilities are sche duled for 1989. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DETAIL(ThousondS of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN "I RIGHT OF WAY , SITE ..-1 CONSTRUCTION I 2.400 5.600 8.000 EQUIPMENT .,1 OTHER TOTAL Revenue Bonds 41 2,400 5,600 8,000 $8,000,000 26 --- .- ----"'-.--.-""'-" - u_---., - _... . -- ---. .. ..- - -------..-.-- --- .-. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Staging Equipment - Bicentennial Center Project Category Deportment Miscellaneous Bicentennial Center M-8 III Project Number Project Priority $1,080 annual maintenance cost $100,000 annual revenue PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 Iq~q ,qq" ,qQ, 199' T"TAL FUNOING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 43 43 OTHER TOTAL 43 43 Sales Tax$43,000 27 I I I I I I I I I I 'I' I I. I, I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Pave City Parking Lot at 9th and Iron Streets Project Category Deportment Miscellaneous Planning M-9 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This City parking lot is presently gravel and presents an unsightly appearance (weeds, pot- holes, dust, etc.) when entering Downtown. This project would provide new asphalt paving and space marking. The major uses would be patrons of the Smoky Hill Museum and nearby businesses and institutions. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY ^' I, SITE CONSTRUCTION 50 I 50 EQUIPMENT I OTHER I, TOTAL 50 50 Sales Tax $50,000 28 ... - N lO - - - - Project No./Descf1~tlon ST-4 Crawford & 9th St. Intersection ST-I0 Rubberized Railroad Crossings ST-l1 Sidewalk Reconstructton ST-12 Curb and Gutter Reconstructton B-3 0-2 Walnut St. Brtdge RenovaUon Slough Drainage Extenston PB-4 PR-5 Museum Steps and Wa1J Joints Kenwood Park Pool PR-6 PR-8 Conmuntty Recreation Center (I) Centennial Park W-2 Water Plant Renovation Total - - - - --- - - - Table 7 1989 Capita I Improvement Program GO Bonds Sa les Tax Revenue Bonds Other $ $ 300.000 100,000 $ $ 50,000 65.000 50,0004 15,000 60,0001 715,000 15,000 80,000 15,0002 500,0003 500,000 30,000 5,600,000 $5,600,000 $125,000 $I ,215,000 $I, 155,000 ~ federal Bridge Replacement funds. 3 Saline County share as per joint agreement. 4 Park Improvement bonds lIay be Issued for $500,000 annual1y, by amendment to Charter Ordinance No. 13 (KSA 13-1024a). Property owners share as per 50/50 ßlatching program. - - - - Total $ 300,000 100,000 100,000 65,000 75,000 715,000 30,000 80,000 1,000,000 30,000 5,600,000 $8.095,000 I I' I I I I I I ,I 'I I I I I I I I I II I ..~ I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Streets Engi neeri ng ST-4 I Reconstruct/widen Crawford and 9th Street Intersection Project Category Deportment Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Widen all four legs of the intersection of Crawford Street and 9th Street and install fully actuated signal system. Operating Cost Implications $1,000 annual maintenance PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY I~~~ 1989 100('1 IQQI lOa? rOTA I FUNOING SOURCE'S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 220 220 EQUIPMENT 80 80 OTHER TOTAL 300 300 Sa 1 es Tax$300 .OO( 30 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I ,I I I I "I ,I ,.1 "I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Renovate Walnut Street Bridge at Old River Channel Project Category Department Bridges Engi neeri ng B-3 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on thi bridge. Serious structural deterioration has occurred. Operating Cost Implications Maintenance cost will decrease with renova- tion. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 19AA 1989 qq(' ,qc:¡. qq~ TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 60 60 EQUIPMENT OTHER 15 15 Demo 1 iti on TOTAL Federal $60,000 75 75 pales Tax$15,000 31 1 I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Extend Slough Drainage at Crawford and Second Street !::::!::JL.-..l-..;. , ¡:::;;:;W~~C]:-ï ==r~ ' - - =Ç;;L....:~c:J: - - ~=Z:¡LQr;~R.::' - -:;:::7LJL..l ., -~ ;;:;æ==c::::=:]'~ Project Category Drainage Engineering D-2 II Department Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Underground drainage structure to expand capacity of slough drainage along Second Street into old river channel at Prescott Street. This project is to be coordinated with Crawford Street reconstruction. Operating Cast Implications $1,000 Maintenance Annually PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN FUNDING SOURC 5 15 I CONSTRUCTION 700 700 EQUIPMENT I OTHER I TOTAL 715 715 GO Bonds $715 .OOC I 32 15 RIGHT OF WAY SITE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPITAL IMPROV,EMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Reset Front Steps and Restore Exterior Wall Joints at Smoky Hill Museum Project Category Oepartment Public Arts & PB-4 II Buildings Humanities Commission Project Number Project Priority Purpose Qnd Justification he building which houses the Smoky Hill Museum as built in 1937. There has been an upheaval f the limestone used to connect the steps to he front door of the museum causing the stairs 0 pull away from the building. When it rains, puddle collects at the low spots; in winter .t turns to slippery ice. The slant of the teps could cause a fall or injury to the pub- ic, leaving the museum open to a liability uit. Wear on the surface of the building has lso caused the mortar between the limestone locks to crumble and fall away. Operating Cost Implications Negligible following repair work. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Oottars) CATEGORY DESIGN 1989 ° EQUIPMENT I OTHER TOTAL ~aline Co.$15,000 1 3 0 3 0 Sales Tax $15,000 33 .. RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 3 0 I I I I " I I I I I ,., I I I I I I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Install New Floor and Recirculating System at Kenwood Park Swimming Pool Project Category Deportment Parks & Recreation Community Services PR-5 III Project Number Project Priority PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN 1989 FUNDING SO RC S RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 80 80 EQUIPMENT OTHER I TOTAL 80 80 ales Tax $80,000 I 34 I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I. I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-/992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Locotion Centennial Park Improvements ê. ~1111 ~~1tJ] lill[iŒIT ~.T!T'C: .I~ -== "T H Project Category Department Parks & Recreation Community Services PR-8 III Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Centennial Park, acquired in 1958 as a neighborhood park, has never been develope It is one of three neighborhood parks for which site plan have been prepared. Im- provements would include construction of sidewalks, hard-surfaced play areas, land- scaping, picnic facilities, a children's playground area, an intermediate swimming facility and a project to correct the drainage problem surrounding Friendship Center. Also, there would be some utility relocations and the conversion of a lighte softball park into a neighborhood practice Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST D ET AI L (ThousandS of Dollors) CATEGORY 1988 1989 ClCln 1991 1992 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 30 30 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 30 30 Salês Tax$30,000 35 - ... ~ - - ... - - ,- - - --,- '. -, _.- Table JL 1990 Capital Improvement Program Project No./Description GO Bonds Sales Tax ST-5 Crawford St. Reconstruction (I) $980,0005 $ 500,000 ST-lO Rubberized Ri!tlroad Crossings 100,000 ST-l1 Sidewalk Reconstruction 50;000 ST-12 Curb and Gutter Reconstruction 65,000 B-2 Mulberry St. Bridge Renovation 20,000 PB-l1 Machinery Barn Roof 21,000 w 0\ PB-13 Cemetery Mausoleum Renovation 14,000 PB-14 Clean and Seal Museum Walls 10,000 PR-6 Community Recreation Center (II) 500,0002 500,000 PR-7 Neighborhood Park Improvements 120,000 S-2 Reconstruct Wastewater Plant 12 M-4 Police/Sheriff Secured Parking 137.500 Total $1.480.000 $1.537.500 Revenue Honds $ 6.500,000 $6,500,000 1 2 Federal Bridge Replacement Funds. 3 Park Improvement bonds Alay be issued for $500.000 annua l1y by amendment to Charter Ordinance No. 4 Saline County share as per joint agreement. 5 Saline County share pending joint agreement. Bonds may be issued for reconstruction of major trafficways under KSA 12-685. Other $ 50.000 65.0001 10.0003 137.5004 $262.500 13 (KSAI3-1024a). - Total $1.480.000 100.000 100.000 65,000 85.000 21.000 14.000 20.000 1.000.000 120,000 6.500,000 275.000 $9.780.000 -- - 1 1 I I I 1 I I I,. I 1 I I I 1 I" I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and l.ocotion Reconstruct and Widen Crawford Street - Phase I Project Category Deportment Streets Engineering ST-5 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Widening of Crawford Street from 9th Street to 1-135 (531 8-8). KDOT has indicated that funding for Crawford will not likely be feasi- ble until 1991. Thus, it is proposed that Phase I be initiated with local funds and Phase II completed largely with federal funds. Operating Cast Implications Maintenance will decrease following recon- struction. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN 1990 1,480 I OTHER TOTAL GO Bonds $980,000 I" 1,480 1,480 Sales Tax$500,000 37 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,480 EQUIPMENT I I I I I I I- I, I.. I I 1- ,I" I, I" 11.. 1'- I- I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Renovate Mulberry Street Bridge at Old River Channel Project Category Deportment Bridges Engi neeri ng B-2 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on this bridge. Serious structural deteriora tion has occurred. Operating Cost Implications Maintenance cost will decrease following renovation. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1989 1990 ,qql ,qq~ TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 65 65 EQUIPMENT OTHER 20 20 Demo 1 iti on TOTAL Federa 1 $65,000 85 85 S~lpc: T-.v(!'.,nnnn 38 I I I I I I I I I 1 I- I' I 1 I : I' I 1 I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Install New Roof on Street Machinery Barn on East Ash Project Category Deportment Public Buildings General Services PB-ll II Project Number Project Priority. Purpose and Justification The existing roof on the Street Machinery Barn has been inspected. One roofer feels work should be done. The second roofer sa wait until the roof leaks. The roof has bubbles and too many layers of roofing for structural integrity of the roof. It is also expected when the roofing is removed that many of the roof boards will need to be replaced. It is expected that the new roof will be required in 1990. Operating Cost Implications Mi,nor PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY ,<:11::11:\ ,gAg 1qQI1 ¡qq, IQQ? TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 21 21 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL ?1 21 1~;:\1øc:- T;lV (?11111( 39 I I' I I I I I I I I I 1- I~ I I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Renovate Mausoleum at Gypsum Hill Cemetery - Project Category Deportment Public Buildings General Services PB-13 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification The mortar in the Gypsum Hill Mausoleum is beginning to fallout in the masonry. The roof should be inspected and leaks correc- ted by professionals. This is a main- tenance project aimed at preserving the 1920's building which the City owns. Operating Cost Implications ~1i nor - PROJECT COST DETAIL(ThousandS of Dollars) FUNDING S URC S CATEGORY DESIGN 1990 4 10 I TOTAL 14 14 Sales Tax $14,00( 40 I . - 4 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 10 EQUIPMENT OTHER I 1 1 I I I I I I' I I I I I I I 1 I 1'- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND /988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Clean and Reseal Exterior Walls Smoky Hill Museum Project Category Deportment Public Buildings Arts and Humanities PB-14 II Commissi n Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification The Smoky Hill Museum is built of limestone. Over the years, stains and dirt have spotted the surface of the building, especially around the statues on the front. To main- tain the looks of this structure, a chemical cleaning of the building is needed. Accord- ing to the architect who helped with the rehabilitation of the building, the surface should then be sealed to keep from staining again. Operating Cost Implications Minor following treatment. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY ClI=!I=! IQRQ 1990 IClQI IClCI~ TnTAI FUNDING snIIRC¡:S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 20 20 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL Saline Co.$10,000 20 20 Sales Tax$10,000 41 -- -- ._-. - uu- I I' I 1 1 I I I I, I I I I I I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Improvements at Phillips and South Neighborhood Parks Project Category Deportment Parks and Community PR-7 III Recreation Services Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This project is similar to the Centennial neighborhood park development project. It provides for development at Phillips and South Parks. Improvements to those sites. which are illustrated in Recreation Com- mission site plans, include sidewalks and hard-surfaced multiple use areas, landscap- ing, playground and picnic facilities and some swimming and/or wading facilities. Operating Cast Implications PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thausands of Dollars) FUNDING SOURC S CATEGORY DESIGN 990 10 10 110 OTHER I TOTAL 120 120 pales Tax $120,00: 42 I- ._"" ,,-- -'-'- --.---------_.-_-- ----" --- "".'--'------"---",,- RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 110 EQUIPMENT I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I' I~ CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Reconstruct Waste Water Treatment Plant No.2 .at Schilling -.--- -- Project Category Deportment Sewer Water and S-2 II Sewerage Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification The present treatment plant at Schilling i not capable of treating the waste to stan- dards set by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial waste processing fees will likely require adjustment. Operoting Cost Implications Maintenance funded by utility revenues. / PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of DoHars) CATEGORY aAA IQAQ 1990 ,QQ, lac? TOTAl FUNDING SOURCE:S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 6,500 6,500 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL Revenue Bonds 6.500 6.500 $ñ ~()() ()()() 43 I I I I I I I I I, I I I, I 1 1 I' I I' I'" CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Secured Parking Area West of Police Building Project Category Department Mi s ce 11 aneous Police Department M-4 III Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification To provide a secured and protected area for prisoner transfer, security of police vehi- cles, vehicles of persons in custody, etc. Project consists of purchasing property on east half of city block located directly west of the Police and Sheriff buildings, raze building and prepare site for re- surfacing, fencing and lighting. Also in- cludes closing 11th Street between Elm and Park Streets. Operating Cost Implications Minor PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY I qFlFl 1989 1990- ,qq, ,qq:;l TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE 175 175 CONSTRUCTION 100 100 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL Sales Tax$137,50C 275 275 Saline Co.$137,5C 0 44 - - - - - - - - - - - Table 9 - - 1991 CapItal Improvement Program Project No./Descrlptlon GO Bonds Sales Tax ST-6 Crawford St. ReconstructIon (II) $ $380,000 ST-8 MagnolIa and 9th St. IntersectIon 150,000 ST-IO Rubberized Railroad Crossings 100.000 ST-Il Sidewalk Reconstruction 50,000 ST-12 Curb and Gutter ReconstructIon 65.000 B-4 State Street Bridge Renovation 20,000 .... U1 PR-IO Forrestry Aerial Bucket 65,000 PH-II East Crawford Softball Diamonds 150,000 PR-12 N. SalIna Neighborhood Park 100,000 M-19 FIre Pumper Truck 150,000] Total $150,000 $1,080,000 I Federal Urban System Funds - KDOT. 2 3 Federal Bridge Replacement funds. Bonds authorized for purchase of fire fIghtIng equi~nent under KSA 12-IIOc. Revenue Bonds $ f - - Other $1,140,0001 50,000 80,0002 $1,270,000 - - Total $1.520.000 150,000 100,000 100,000 65,000 100,000 65,000 150,000 100,000 150,000 $2,500,000 - - I I I I I I I- I I,. II., I I, I I, I- I. I, I I" CITY OF' SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and l.ocotion Reconstruct and Widen Crawford Street - Phase II Project Category Deportment Streets Engineering ST-6 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Widening of Crawford Street from 9th Street to Ohio (531 B-B). This project is a con- tinuation of the Phase I portion of the Crawford reconstruction plan. It appears that this segment will be eligible for future KDOT fundi ng. Operating Cost Imølications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY lOgO loon 1001 IOO~ rnTAI FUNnING snURC:'C:: DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,520 1,520 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL Federal $1,140,000 1,520 1,520 Sales Tax 380,000 46 I I I I' I' I I I I I I I- I. I" I, I I I- I- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND /988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Reconstruct 9th Street and Magnolia Road Intersection Project Category Deportment Streets General ST-8 II Services Project Number Project Priority. Purpose and Justification ~oad and base continually moves such that it requires constant road repair and the road movement causes the traffic activated loop which controls the traffic light to break. This is a high maintenance corner for both the traffic and street departments. Operating Cost Implications Maintenance will decrease following re- constructi on. ij PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY ,QAA 1989 ICI~ 19.91 rClCl::) TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 15 15 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 135 135 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 150 150 Sales Tax$150.00C 47 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Replace State Street Bridge at Old Dry Creek Project Category Deportment Bridges Engineering B-4 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Remove the existing span bridge at this location and construct a reinforced concrete box structure as a replacement. Concrete deterioration is apparent on piers and deck. Operating Cost Implications Replacement will avoid expensive mainten- ance. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY Iq¡:u:¡ ,QFlq 1990 199.1 ,gq? TOTA' FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 75 75 EQUIPMENT OTHER 25 25 Demolition TOTAL Federa 1 $80,000 100 100 ales Tax$20.000 48 I I I I I I I I I I I I- I- I. I, I- I I- I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Purchase Aerial Bucket for Forestry Division Project Category Department Parks and Community PR-10 III Recreation Services Project Number Comoanion FlroiecHs): Project Priority No Permanent Location Purpose and Justification To provide funding to purchase a sky- worker or aerial bucket vehicle to be used in the Forestry Program for main- tenance of trees in the parks and on other public grounds. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY q:\:\ q:\q Iqql1 1991 IQQ? TOTAL FUNDING snURCl='1:; DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 65 65 OTHER TOTAL Sales Tax $65,OOC 65 65 49 I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I- I I 1- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Install Softball Diamonds at East Crawford Recreation Area Project Category Deportment Parks and Community PR-ll III Recreation Services Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This project will complete the construction of softball diamonds at the East Crawford Recreation Area. I"q . Pi ,- - : . .. , , - - , . . . ,..~ . . . . . . . I I . . . I L Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY !9AA 1989 ¡qQn 1991 1992 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 150 150 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 150 150 ~ales Tax$150,OOO 50 I I' I' I I I. I I 1<: Ii I, I,. I I, I,. I, I' I' I- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Purchase of 1500 GPM Fire Pumper Truck Project Category Deportment Miscellaneous Fire Department M-19 II Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Purchase a 1500 GPM pumping engine for Station #1. Will replace a 1963 Ford 1000 GPM pumper which will be sold or scrapped. Operating Cost Implications Maintenance cost will decrease with new truck. PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY I~RR IQRQ IQQI1 1991 IQQ? TnTAI FUNDING SOURC¡:S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 150 150 OTHER TOTAL 150 150 GO Bonds$150.QOO 51 - - - - - - Project No./Oescrjption SI-2 Cemetery Road Paving SI-IO Rubberized Railroad Crossings SI-ll Sidewalk Reconstruction SI-12 Curb and Gutter Reconstruction PB-2 Fire Statton 11 Apron Drive PB-16 Bi-Center Operable Wall 111 N PR-9 Crawford Recreation Area landscaping PR-12 N. Salina Neighborhood Park M-16 Police Public Parking lot Total - - GO Bonds $ - - - Table 10 - - 1992 Capital ImprovE~~ßIent Program Sales lax $120,000 100.000 50.000 65,000 30.000 34,000 40.000 100.000 115.000 $654,000 Revenue Bonds $ f - - Other $ 50.000 rnr;lIUlI - - Iota I $120.000 100.000 100,000 65.000 30,000 34,000 40,000 100.000 115.000 $704,000 - - I I' I I I' I I I I, I I I' I, I I I' I' I' CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Reseal and Pave Gypsum Hill Cemetery Roads - Project Category Streets Deportment General Services Project Number ST-2 Project Priority III Purpose and Justification Renovate existing cement stabilized roads in the cemetery and seal with asphalt. Existing seal has deteriorated to the extent that the sub base will probably need restabilization. At present, the roads are unsightly and rough to travel on. Pave the main roads. Some repairs will be completed in 1987. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DETAIL(Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY DESIGN 1992 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 120 120 120 120 Sales Tax$120,00C 53 I I- - I - I I I I I I I I I. ~'-'. I I I I I I I- I I I CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Locotion Replace Concrete Apron Drive at Fi re Stati on #1. Project Cotegory Public Buildings Fi re Department PB-2 II Deportment Project Number Project Priority Purpose ond Justification Remove deteriorated concrete apron at Fire Station #1 and replace with new concrete (9,000 sq. ft. of drive to be involved). Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY ICI¡:¡¡:¡ 1989 IQQ~ 1991 1992 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCE:S DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 30 30 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 30 30 Sales- Tax$30,000 54 I I I I I I I I I" I I I I I I I I I 1- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND /988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description ond Location Install Operable Wall in Heritage Hall at Bicentennial Center Project Category Public Buildings Bicentennial Center PB-16 III Department Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification At present we have enough operable wall to divide Heritage Hall in half or to close off one quarter. We frequently have need for two quarters. It is not uncommon for an event to use one quarter for a conferenc and/or exhibits and another quarter for lunch. One quarter has to be screened by use of a 81 high divider curtain. So ac- tually three-fourths of the Hall is used to satisfy'a need for one-fourth. This re- sults in the entire 18,000 sq. ft. being headed or cooled. Both HVAC systems have t be operated, as opposed to one. Operating Cost Implications Minimal PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1 qF!F! 1989 IQ~ 1991 1992 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 34 34 OTHER TOTAL Sales Tax$34,000 34 34 55 I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I~ CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Streets cape/Landscape Improvements at East Crawford Recreation Area ,. ~~:\:.'-... I '. \ =- , \\ . = \~ )1 . ,ï I I I I I' I I I . I I - I , I I I h'~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I , Project Category Department Parks and Community PR-9 III Recreation Serv; ces \ i I ) Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification A streets cape or landscaping, sidewalks, etc., is to be constructed along the length of Crawford Street on City property adjacent to the Golf Course driving range and the East Crawford Recreation Area. This allocation would fund the completion of that portion of the Recreation Area pro ject. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1988 1989 ¡CICIO ,qq, 1992 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 2.5 2.5 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 37.5 37.5 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 40 40 Sales Tax$40,000 56 I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I, I I I' I I- CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1988-1992 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Description and Location Develop Public Parking Lot North of Police Department Project Category Deportment Miscellaneous Police Department M-16 III Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification Purchase and clearing site of 4 residen- tial lots in the Bishop Addition for an off-street, 70 stall, public parking lot. - .-:;; Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY ¡qFU:¡ IQ~q ¡qQ(1 IQQI 1992 TOTAL FUNDING ~OURCF~ DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE 65 65 CONSTRUCTION 40 40 EQUIPMENT OTHER 10 10 Demolition TOTAL ~ales Tax$115,000 115 115 57 I I , I' I 1 I, 1 1 I: 1 I I I- I I. I I I, I- Priority IV Projects (Unfunded) Project No./Oescription ST-3 0-3 0-4 0-5 PB-1 PB-3 PB-5 PB-6 PB-7 PB-9 W-3 M-1 . M-5 M-6 r~-l1 M-12 M-14 M-15 M-20 Amount CBD Solid State Traffic Signals South Salina Drainage System (I) South Salina Drainage System (II) South Salina Drainage System (III) $ 124,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,800,000 Fire Station #1 Bay Doors/EMS Office Fire Station #2 Bay Doors 12,500 48,000 Museum Dock Alteration 2,500 15,000 Museum Interior Painting Bi -Center Lobby and Box Office' Fire Station #3 Office Completion 117,000 200,000 Gypsum Hill Cemetery Water Line Police Video Securi~y Monitor 40,000 14,000 Museum Platform Lift 2,700 Museum Transport Van 12,000 Fire Station #2 Generator 16,000 13,000 Fire Station #4 Generator Bi-Center Storage Equipment Bi-Center Forklift 29,000 20,000 Bi-Center Parking Lot 327,000 $8,792,700 Total 58 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CIP PRIORITY RATING CRITERIA Project No./Name Tota 1 Score 1. Need for Facility 6. Supports Related Facility Critical 10 Major 10 Important 6 Minor 5 Desirable 2 None 0 2. People Benefitting 7. Economic Impact Total City 10 Major 10 Several Neigh. 6 Minor 5 One Neigh. 2 None 0 3. Useful Life (years) 8. Funding Source 21 + 10 Grant 100% 10 11-20 6 Grant 50% 6 6-10 2 Rev./S.A. 2 1-5 0 Local Taxes 0 4. Improves Public Service 9. Revenue Impact Major 10 Major 10 Minor 5 Minor 5 None 0 None 0 5. Requires Land/Personnel 10. Public Support Major 0 High 10 Mi nor 5 Moderate 5 None 10 Low 0 Note: Circle appropriate score for each item and total. points. Maximum Score-100 59