The URL can be used to link to this page

CIP 1990 - 1994 ADOPTED 1990-94 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS DENNIS M. KISSINGER CITY MANAGER DECEMBER, 1989 City of Salina 8oard of Commissioners Joe Warner Bob Frank Ca ro 1 Begg s John Divine Steve Ryan Mayor Vice-Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Salina City Planning Commission Peter Brungardt Kristin Seaton Dale Anderson Sherry Denton Fred Gaines Eric Hardman Bob Haworth Ray Kline Don Morris Chairman Vice-Chairman CIP Administrative Committee Roy Dudark Bill Harris Bob Biles Don Hoff Frank Weinhold Director of Planning Assistant City Manager Director of Finance Acting City Engineer Director of General Services Prepared By: Department of Planning & Community Development Table of Contents Page Table of Contents 1 2 Resolution of Adoption Abbreviations and Legend Part I - Introduction 3 4 Pdrt II - Policy Guidelines Part III - Capital Improvement Program 6 8 1990 Capital Budget 1991 Capital Program 10 24 1992 Capital Program 1993 Capital Program 37 45 1994 Capital Program 1990-1994 Capital Financing Plan 55 64 Potential Projects 65 66 Priority IV (Unfunded) Projects Project Rating Criteria 67 RESOLUTION NUMBER 89-11132 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1990 - 19911 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS. WHEREAS, the expansion and improvement of public facilities is a valuable means available to local government for stimulating prlivate economic activity and directing long-term physical growth and development. .and WHEREAS, the investment of available public resources must be properly directed to both existing development areas and newly urbanizing areas in order to achieve balanced community growth, and WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Program provides an effective and systematic plan for selecting valuable public projects and scheduling required expenditures in accordance with available revenues, SO NOW, THEREFORE Kansas: BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Body of the City of Salina, Section 1. That the 1990 - 19911 Capital Improvement Program is hereby adopted as a policy document to guide decision-making reqarding public facility improvements and capital expenditures. Section 2. That no project shall be initiated nor funds be expended thereon unless said project is contained in an adopted capital budget or otherwise authorized by the Board of -Commissioners of the City of Salina. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners and signed by the Mayor this 23rd day of October, 1989. Joseph A. Warner, Mayor [SEAL] ATTEST: Jacqueline Shiever, City Clerk 2 ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS Methods of Financing GO GOSA General Obligation Bonds City at Large General Obligation Bonds - Special Assessment District GORB General Obligation Bonds - Revenue Financed Sales Tax ST F Federal Funds s State Funds GF General Fund - Annual Operating Budget 0 Other Map Legend Street X Bridge ... ..........-.: Drainage . Public Buil ding p Park U Water/....Sewer Util ity m Miscellaneous 3 Part I Introduction A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is one of the major tools available to achieve desired growth and development. The CIP is an important statement of the City's policy regarding long-range physical development of the com- munity. Through the types of public projects funded and their location, ~rivate investment is induced resulting in community growth and change. Combined \tith financial targets, the Capital Program represents a systematic plan for providing needed improvements within a prioritized framework. While there are competing demands for new improvements to urbanizing areas, exist- ing developed areas must be attended to through the replacement of obsolete facil ities. These competi ng demands combi ned with the scarci t,y of current revenues and the legal limitations and complexity of long-term debt financ- ing, signal the necessity to formalize a method of prioritizing capital projects and allocating future public resources. The CIP covers a five-year period and sets the general schedule within which public improvements will be undertaken. The first year is recommended for adoption as the Capital Budget for the coming year with the remaining years considered a Capital Improvement Program. However, it should not be con- sidered as a final and fixed program. The CIP is intended to be reviewed and revised annually. An additional year is thus added each year to maintain the full five-year period of the program. Reasons for Programming Capital Investments There are several benefits to adopting a Capital Improvement Program: 1. Provision of valuable information to the City Commission and citizenry for decision-making regarding community development and budgeting. Utilization of public funds to maximum advantage through improved timing of improvements and coordination among departments. 2. 3. Equitable distribution of public facilities according to need and demand for services. 4. Coordination of city projects with those of quasi-publ ic and private entities. 5. Distribution of capital costs over time in order to ach"ieve a more consistent tax rate and maintain a sound debt management policy. 6. Increased private development and orderly growth through community knowledge of intended public activities. improved 4 Despite the many benefits of capital programming, directing public improve- ments to achieve development objectives is very difficult. Some of the major reasons are: 1. Revenue sources are difficult to predict in advance due to changing economic conditions and shifts in public policy. Operating budgets frequently take precedence over capita 1 budgets and reduce the number and scale of public improvements becð.use capital projects are easier to eliminate. 2. 3. Certain public facility needs depend largely upon the location, scale and timing of private economic decisions which are difficult to predict. Community objectives are difficult to not only set but may be forgotten at budget time when priorities often are based on subject-ive reasons. 4. Nevertheless, ways must be found around these difficulties in order to increase the long-time benefit and return on the investment of limited public funds. The formulation of clear policy objectives requires effective and open communications between elected officials, administrators and involved citizens. Discussions should encompass continuing obligations, emerging needs, alternative solutions, and project benefits and costs. There are severa 1 factors whi ch wi 11 have a substanti a 1 impact on both the scope and impact of a Capital Improvement Program for the City of Salina. Each of these factors will influence either available resources or the specific projects selected for funding. The most important factors include: 1. Amount and type of desired economic activity and resultant physical development. Availability and willingness to use state and federal funds. 2. 3. Statutory debt limits and maximum local mill levy deemed feasible for debt service. 4. 5. . Ability to set priorities among competing public facility neE~ds. Willingness to establish special assessment districts and/or utilize impact/benefit fee financing. In order to address these factors, and in so doing, obtain a reasonable and workab 1 e Capita 1 Improvement Program, the Board of City Commi ss i oners, has formulated several policy guidelines which are presented in Part II of this document. Only through establishing a deliberate and reasoned policy posi- tion can a Capital Improvement Program be formulated which reflects the wishes of the general public through the governing body and thus achieve the results intended. 5 Part II Policy Guidelines Goal Develop and implement a capital investment plan within the financial capacity of the community sufficient to accommodate both existing and future develop- ment within the City of Salina. Development Policies 1. Conserve and maintain the resources and stability of the entire city. Strive to make the most efficient use of existing publ icimprovements and encourage the expansion of public facilities in a manner which provides the greatest city-wide benefit. 2. Preserve and upgrade public facilities and services in the central business district and surrounding older areas. Create a climate of confidence about the future of such areas to attract the private investment needed to maintain individual properties. Undertake rehabi 1 itati on projects on a se 1 ecti ve bas i s to upgrade deteriorated but promising areas. 3. Maintain the integrity and character of established neighborhoods. Continue the present level of public services and direct new spending to needed public facility enhancements. 4. Promote the efficient, orderly and economic expansion of public facili- ties and services at the urban fringe. Avoid scattered arid premature urbanization of rural areas. Direct public investment to areas directly contiguous to already developed areas and provide only those public facilities essential to support new development. Public Facility Policies 1. In evaluating capital projects, first priority will be given to the rehabilitation or replacement of deteriorated/obsolete facilities required to maintain public health and safety; second priority will be given to additions to existing facilities or new facilities needed to bring an area up to a standard level of service; and, third priority will be given to expanded facilities above minimum standards. Projects which: a) create or retain jobs or b) contribute to commer- cial area revitalization will be given special consideration. 2. ~ v. Projects which require little or no land acquisition, result in a decrease in operating and maintenance costs, or increase revenue to the city will be given special consideration. Projects that increase productivity and efficiency in the delivery of city services will be given greater consideration. 4. 6 r:; ~ . Projects that benefit a larqer area, serve a greater population or will be used on a year-round basis will be given greater consideration. Projects which complement related facilities or are coordinated with other improvements, at a cost savi ngs to the city, wi 11 be gi ven greater consideration. 6. 7. Projects which support neighborhood b~tterment, enhance the environment or promote historic preservation will be encouraged. Financial Policies 1. Protect the fiscal integrity of the city and maintain a balance between the city.s operating and capital improvement budgets. 2. Develop a Capital Improvement Program within the debt limitations established by State law and which can be funded within the financial capacity of the City. 3. Devote the maximum percentage of local sales tax revenue available each year to capital improvements. 4. Maximize the impact of local tax dollars by recommending projects eligible for alternative financing in the following order of pre- ference: 1) federal and state grants; b) special benefit districts; c) revenue bonds; d) special purpose bonds; and e) general obligation bonds. 5. Fi nance capita 1 improvements based on the useful 1 i fe of the project. 7 Part III Proposed Capital Improvement Program Projected Financial Capacity There are two main sources of local revenue available for capital improvements - the local sales tax and general obligation bonds. Since 1983, when the one cent county-wi de sales tax was approved by the voters, many major capita 1 improvements have been completed with thi s source of revenue. It is projected, however, that during each succeedin9 year, more of the sales tax revenue will be needed to finance current operations. During recent years, two major sources of funding have been lost: federal revenue sharing and the intangibles tax. Escalating health insurance costs, state and federal program mandates, and general inflation all combine to require more resources to maintain public service levels. The availability of the second major revenue source, general obligation bonds, is a function of growth in assessed valuation, existing and committed debt, and statutory borrowing limits. Because existing debt is diminishing each year, the required mill levy for the Debt and Interest Fund could be maintained at a relatively constant level over this period and still permit additional GO bonds to be issued. Taken together, however, these two revenue sources will be insufficient to maintain more than a minimum level capital improvement program duri ng comi ng years. For major infrastructure improvements to be conti nued to support development and generate additiona 1 economic growth, new revenues will be needed by 1992. Proposed Capitaì Improvement Program The proposed CIP includes funding for 74 projects at a total cost of $42.3 mi 11 ion. After exc 1 ud i ng $33.6 mi 11 ion in funds represented by non 1 oca 1 taxes (federal and state grants, Saline County funds, utility revenue bonds, etc.) 8.7 million in local taxes is needed to accomplish the program. It is proposed that this amount be comprised of $4.4 million of salE!s taxes and $4.3 million of GO Bonds. 1990 Capital Budget Presented on Table 1 is the adopted Capital Budget for 1990. Consisting of 14 projects at an estimated cost of $3,295,000, these capital "improvements are to be funded by multiple sources. In addition, total bonding proposed is $1,550,000, well below the $5 million limitation required for simplified federal reporting. 1991-1994 Capital Program Each year of the 1990-1994 Capital Program is presented in succession. These projects have been programmed for the selected year according to relative priority, construction sequencing, and available funds. The 1991 program is considered to be of higher priority and should recE!ive careful consideration during the 1991 budget development process. However, considerable flexibility is inherent in the plan if alternate projects are 8 appropri ate to meet community needs and des ires. It is i ntenclea that thi s listing would provide sound guidance for subsequent capital budgetst although annual adoption and updating will be necessary. Projects Not Recommended for Funding At the conclusion of the CIP document, two lists of projects are presented. The first list includes projects which may warrant inclusion in a given year depending upon securing a funding commitment or completion of a feasibility study justifying benefits. The second list are identifiE~d potential long-range needs but presently unfunded. These projects, while beneficial, have no identified funding source, are believed to be of lesser prioritYt may be more appropriately considered in later years, or should seek alternate funding. To supplement this listing, rating criteria are also provided. The rating criteria were developed based on policy guidelines presented in Part II. For purposes of further refinement of prioritiest projects were classified into one of the following broad categories and shown on each project sheet: Pri ority I: Essenti a 1 - Projects whi ch shoul d be completed as soon as feasible in order to enhance health and safety or avoid undesirable consequences. Pri ority II: Important Projects co~munity needs or objectives. which meet clearly identified Priority III: Desirable - Projects which benefit the community but can be delayed without detrimental effects to basic services. Pri ority IV: Deferrable - Projects whi ch are not recommended for inclusion in the five-year program at this time. 9 Project Crawford St. Widening - 10th to 1-135 Rubberized R.R. Crossings Sidewalk Construction ~ C) Curb and Gutter Repair Street Maintenance Schilling and 1-135 Interchange Temporary Fire Station Bi-Center Roof Central Garage Improvements Museum AIC Park Improvements Recreation Improvements Vehicles and Equipment Contingency TOTAL 1 2 Gas Tax. Recreation levy. 1990 Capital Improvement Program GO Bonds Sales Tax Revenu~ LJulids Other $1,550,000 $ $ $ 50,0001 40,000 40,0001 600,0001 40,000 20,000 75,000 50,000 10,000 150,000 120,0002 450,000 100,000 --- $I ,550,000 I $810 ,000 $935,000 $ - ° - Tota 1 $1,550,000 50,000 40,000 40,000 600,000 40,000 20,000 75,000 50,000 10,000 150,000 120,000 450,000 ----l 00,000 $3,295,000 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAr~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL Title and Description Crawford Street Widening - 10th to 1-135 Location l IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Cotegory Streets Engineering ùepartment Project Number Project Priority II Purpose ond Justification This oroject is the first phase of widening Crawford to four, full-width travel lanes (53' B-B) to Interstate 135. Each major intersection will have a center left turn lane. Operating Cost Implications Maintenance will decrease after reconstruc- tion. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 1990 1991 IQQ? IQQ7, 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,550 1,550 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 1,550 1,550 G.O. Bonds 11 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Rubberized Railroad Crossings Project Category Streets Department Engi neeri ng Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose ond Justification Locations determined annually. This project provides rubberized crossings where major streets cross main line locations ln the city. Replacement of wooden ties with rubber crossings imoroves safety, reduces maintenance and decreases vehicle wear and tear. Recommended fundinc is $50,000 each year which will complete two - three crossings annually. The City \..¡ill purchase the materials and the rail- road companies will complete the installa- tion. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199:> 1='" 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 50 50 50 50 50 250 OTHER TOTAL 50 50 50 50 50 250 Gas Tax 12 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Sidewalk Construction Project Category Streets Deportment Engi neeri nç Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justificotion Locations determined annually. A total of 24 miles exists within the City along arterial streets where sidewalks have not been built. This presents both a safety hazard and a detriment to neighbor- hood appearance. A Sidewalk Construction Program is proposed with the City providin 50% matching funds for identified segments on a priority basis. About 1.0 mile of sidewalks can be built each year. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 1992 1993 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 40 50 50 50 50 240 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 40 50 50 50 50 240 Sales Tax 13 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Curb and Gutter Reconstruction Project Cotegory Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose ond Justification Locations determined annually. Along many older streets within the City curbs and gutters have broken aoart and no longer serve their intended ouroose. The City should take the initiative to maintain the public infrastructure and thus, enhance community development objectives. A Curb and Gutter Reconstruction Program funded at $40,OOO/year will rebuild about 0.5 miles of curb and gutter. ßei n9 pubii c streets, financing is 100% City, but property owners will be involved in the reconstruction of deteriorated sidewalks in affected areas. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonós of Dollors) CATEGORY 19C() 1991 IClCI;:> 1993 ,994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 40 40 40 40 40 200 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 40 40 40 40 40 200 Gas Tax 14 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 199\ -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Street Maintenance Project Category Streets Department Engineering Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose ond Justification Locations determined annually. This project involves crack sealing. followed by either heavy asphalt overlay or light slurry seal. Periodic maintenance prolongs the need for complete reconstruc- tion. -- Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19C1n Iq91 Iqq;> ICIQ... Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 600 600 600 600 600 3,000 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 600 600 600 600 600 3,000 Gas Tax 15 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~w1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Schilling and 1-135 Interchange Location t I / Project Cotegory Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority II Purpose and Justification This project consists of the constructirn of new interchange ramps at 1-135 and. Schilling Road, the widening of the inter- section of Schilling Road and 9th Street. This is a joint project of the Salina Airport Authority, Saline County and the City of Salina and has been aoDroved by KDOT for construction in 1992. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 ¡qq? IQQ7, qq4 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 40 40 I !! RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 40 40 Sales Tax 16 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAI\I1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL T ¡tie and Description Temporary Fire Station Location -- IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Cotegory Public Buildings Department Fire Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification This project provides a temoorary fire station for protection of North Salina during reconstruction of the Broadway R.R. Overpass. Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qO ,q91 Iqq, ,qq, ICfCf4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 20 20 OTHER TOTAL 20 20 Sales Tax 17 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Bicentennial Center Roof Location Project Category Public Buildings Bicentennial Center Department Project Number Project Priority I Purpose ond Justification This project involves the installation of a new single membrane roof over Heritage Hall. Water leaks need to be stopped to prevent damage to the building. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19C1() 'Cl91 1992 ,qq.., ,ClCl4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 75 75 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 75 75 Sales Tax 18 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Central Garage Improvements Locot ion Project Category Public Buildings General Services Department Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification This project involves: 1) Glans and specifications for Draper storage of ga$- oline, diesel and proDane fuel and 2) construction of a building addition to the Central Garage for vehicle repair and service work and storage of valuable equipment. Operoting Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qO 1991 Iqq? ¡qq.., ,qQ4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 25 25 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 25 25 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 50 50 Sales Tax 19 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Museum Air Conditioning Location Project Category Public Buildings Arts and Humanities Department Project Number Project Priori ty II Purpose and Justification This project involves upgrading the temp- erature control and air conditioning distribution system for the Smoky Hill Museum. Operating Cast Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dallors) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199::> 199~ 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY I I SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 10 10 OTHER TOTAL 10 10 Sales Tax 20 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArv1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Park Improvements Project Category Department Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Project Number Project Priority I I I Locat ion Purpose ond Justification Locations determined annually. This oroject involves various imorovements to the city's community and neighborhood parks. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board submits an annual priority list of orojects to the City Commission for approval -- Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY 19q() ,q91 Iqq;> QQ'I; ,qq4 T()TAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 150 75 75 100 100 500 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 150 75 75 100 100 500 Sales Tax 21 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArV1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Recreation Improvements Project Category Parks and Recreation Deportment Parks and Recreation Project Number Project Priority III Location Purpose and Justification Locations determi~ed annually. This project involves various imorovements to the city's recreation facilities. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board submit an annual priority list of proiects to the City Commission for aoproval. -- Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19C1() 1991 IClCI? 1993 Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 120 100 100 100 100 520 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 120 100 100 100 100 520 Recreati on Levy 22 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArV1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Project Category Miscellaneous Vehicles and Equipment Department Various Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose ond Justification This includes various veh"icles, machinery and equipment such as police ca rs, dump trucks, computers, etc. -- Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199:' 1993 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 450 450 450 450 450 2,250 OTHER TOTAL 450 450 450 450 450 2,250 Sales Tax 23 1991 Capital Improvt:mt:nt Program Project GO Bonds Sal~s Tax Revt:llue Bollds Oth~r Total Widen Crawford - Highland to Ohio $219,000 $ $ $1,372,0001 $1,591,000 Broadway Median Modifications 40,000 40,000 Cloud and 9th St. Intersection 65,000 65,000 Street Maintenance 600,0002 600,000 Rubberized R.R. Crossings 50,0002 50,000 Sidewalk Construction 50,000 50,000 N Curb and Gutter Reconstruction 40,0002 40,000 -Þ North St. Bridge Reconstruction 68,000 67,0003 135,000 Central Garage Fuel System 100,000 100,000 Drainage Studies 12,000 12,000 Bi-Center Operable Wall 34,000 34,000 Prescott St. Drainage Improvements 110,000 110,000 Park/Recreation Improvements 75,000 100,0004 175,000 Vehicles and Equipment 450,000 450,000 Land Use/Transportation Plan 75,000 75,000 ~i~^ C+,+iM' II? ðnn".,hoc R",c 4R,000 48,000 , .". ...~u~.u" u~ ,,!'!'u. u~u~ ~~J~ Sewer Plant Improvements 7,700,000 5 10,900,000 3,200,000 Fire Pumper Truck 185,000 I 185,000 --- TOTAL $647,000 $884,000 $7,700,000 $5,429,000 $14,660,000 1 Federal Aid Urban System Funds - KDOT. 3 Saline County. 5 KDHE Grant. 2 Gas Tax. 4 Recreation Levy. CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIV1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Crawford Street Widening - Highland to Ohio Location !.:.JU~~.:.: Project Cotegory Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification Widening of Crawford Street from 9th Street to Ohio (53' B-B). This project is a . continuation of the Phase I portion of the Crawford reconstruction plan. It appears that this segment will be eligible for future KDOT funding. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19C1() 1991 IClCI? IClCI'" 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,591 1,591 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 1,591 1,591 219 GO Bonds 1,372 KDOT 25 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAr~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Broadway Median Modifications Location Project Category Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification Construction of left turn stacking lanes on Broadway Boulevard at two (2) existing. median breaks that currently do not have left turn stacking lanes. This constructio would provide safety for the existing left turn movements. Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dallors) CATEGORY 1990 1991 ¡99? 199'" 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 40 40 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 40 40 Sales Tax 26 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAr~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Cloud and 9th St. Intersection Locat ion Project Category Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification It is anticipated KDOT will fund a traffic signal imorovement oroiect at this intersec- tion in June 1990. This proiect request is for geometric modifications to fully utilize the new traffic signals at this intersection Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1C¡91 1992 Iqq, 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 65 65 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 65 65 GO Bonds 27 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAr~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description North St. Bridge Reconstruction Location 7\\ J ':¡r-- -- "I ,II ." Project Category Bridges Department Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This project involves the replacement of the span bridge at Dry Creek with a . reinforced concrete box structure (2-10' X 5'). The conditi on of the present bri dge structure is poor. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of DolJors) CATEGORY 19qO ,q91 Iqq? Iqq... I ClCI4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 135 135 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 135 135 68 GO Bonds 67 County 28 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArv1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Central Garage Fuel System Location Project Cotegory Public Bu"ildings Genera 1 SE~rvi ces Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification Install two new EPA Approved underground petroleum tanks. Construction should include a constant electronic/computerized monitoring and inventory system. New automated fueling terminals should be installed for gasoline, diesel and oropane. Th~ present underground tanks at Central Ga~age are appx. 12 yrs. old and orobably of the uncoated steel type. Complete tank records are not available. One fuel Dump is 26 yrs. old, the other is 10 to 12 yrs. old. Record keeping is by hand. There is no leakage monitoring system or underground Operating Cost Implicotions containment. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollors) CATEGORY 199() 1991 1992 IQQ, 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 100 100 OTHER TOTAL 100 100 Sales Tax 29 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAfv1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Drainage Studies Location Project Category Drainage Engineering/General Services Oeportment Project Number Project Priority II Purpose and Justification Two drainage studies are needed: 1) Old Dry Creek Channel - several storm sewers empty into the channel and some sections are being filled; 2) Schilling Area - the existing flood pump is a constant maintenance problem. Study would determine if it is still needed. Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Doliors) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199:> 199.., 1994 TnTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 12 12 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 12 12 Sales Tax 3D CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArV1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991-1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Bicentennial Center Operable Wall Project Cotegory Deportment Public Buildings Bicentennial Center Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justification Provide 60 additional feet of moveable wall for Heritage Hall. This would permit completely enclosing the two quarters of thE ha 11 adjacent to the lobby. At present, we have adequate wall to divide the hall in half or wall off one quarter. Frequently, we have need for two quarters. For examole to have a meal function in one quarter and a meeting in the adjacent quarter. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199? 1993 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 34 34 OTHER TOTAL 34 34 Sales Tax 31 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Prescott St. Drainage Improvements Location Project Category Drainage Engi neeri ng Deportment Project Number Project Priority II Purpose ond Justification Replace storm sewer on Prescott from Santa Fe to 4th Street railroad tracks. As a result of a storm cave-in, the Prescott Street storm sewer was inspected. As far in each direction a person can see from the sewer line break and manholes, each section of the vitrified clay pipe is cracked or broke near the springline of the pipe. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qn ¡q91 ,qq:;> IQQ7, qq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 110 110 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 110 110 GO Bonds 32 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAI~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Department Miscellaneous Planning Land Use/Transportation Plan Project Category Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justification City-wide The existing Future Land Use Plan and Transportation Plan were preoared in 1980 and 1982, respectively. Numerous changes have occurred ln the community during the intervening years such as Central Mall, Downtown revitalization, and more recently Wal-Mart. In addition, major street projects have been comoleted or approved for construction including Ohio, Crawford and the Schilling Interchange. Federal fTood hazard area regulations and a proposed major sewer interceptor will also have a major influence on future developmer t Operating Cost Implications oatterns. A major uodate of these two play ~lements should be c~mpleted to guide the community to the year 2000. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 Iqq? 1993 ,qq4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN 75 75 RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 75 75 Sales Tax 3.3 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIV1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Fire Station #2 Apparatus Bays Location Project Category Public Buil di ngs Deportment Fire Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justificotion Create drive through apparatus bays to alleviate the dangerous practice of backing equipment across a busy four lane street. This has been a problem for many years and may result in employees being injured if no corrected. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 1992 1993 Iqq4 TOTAl FUNOING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 48 48 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 48 48 Sales Tax 34 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Sewer Plant Improvements Department Sewer Engineering and Utilities Project Category Project Number Project Priority I Location Purpose ond Justification This project provides major modifications to the existing plant plus upgrades teatmen to advanced water quality levels. .. r~ . ¡j Hi !).)?( h!.i //..'/ I '; I / r-:r~ " I / /; c. >..ç->.----,...",..,:;:-'~n Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199/ 1993 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 10,900 10 ,900 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 10,900 10,900 7,700 Rev. Bonds i ?nn KnHF 35 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRArVi 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Fire Pumper Truck Project Category Department Miscellaneous Fi re Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justification Replace a 1963 1000 with a 1500 four door cab custom pumoer. -- Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199? 199~ 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 185 185 OTHER TOTAL 185 185 GO Bonds 36 Project GO Bonds 9th St. Drainage Improvements 185,000 150,000 Broadway and 9th St. Intersection Schilling & 1-135 Interchange 242,000 Street Maintenance úù ~ Rubberized R.R. Crossings Sidewalk Construction Curb and Gutter Reconstruction Vehicles and Equipment Central Garage Roof Replacement Museum Steps/Wall Joints Schilling Force Sewer Main Park/Recreation Improvements Emergency Si rell TOTAL -- $577,000 ~ S,iline County, Salina Airport Authority and KDOT. 3 Gas Tax. 4 Saline County. 5 Recreation Levy. Grant. 1992 Capital Improvement Prograßl Sales Tax Revenue Bollds $ $ 50,000 450,000 75,000 5,000 6,500,000 75,000 9,000 $664,000 $6,500,000 Other Total 185,000 ]50,000 1 2,210,000 1,968,000 600,0002 600,000 50,0002 50,000 50,000 40,0002 40,000 450,000 75,000 5,0003 10,000 6,500,000 100,0004 175,000 8 ,0005 ]7,000 $2,771,000 $]0,5]2,000 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description 9th St. Drainage Improvements Location Project Category Drainage Engineering Department Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification Ninth Street is a major arterial street. which becomes adversely effected by poor drainage due to heavy rains. This area is largely an older residential area. When- ever there are heavy rains, the intersec- tions from Republic to Cloud on 9th become mostly impassible. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19C1() IC¡C¡ I ,CleI? ,C¡C¡:>, I C¡C¡4 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 185 185 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 185 185 GO Bonds 38 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAr~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL Title and Description Broadway and 9th St. Intersection Location IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Cotegory Streets Engineering Deportment Project Number Project Priority II Purpose ond Justificotion Construction of additional traffic lanes, installation of traffic signals, etc to minimize the traffic congestion oroblems at or near the "Wye". Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 150 150 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 150 150 GO Bonds 39 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991-1994 CAPITAL Title and Description Schilling and 1-135 Interchange Locat ion ------ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Category Streets Engineerinq Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification This project consists of the construction of new interchange ramps at I-135 and g th Street and the improvement of the inter- section of Schilling Road and 9th Street. This is a joint oroiect of the Salina Airport Authority, Saline County and the City of Salina and has been approved by KDOT for construction in 1992. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 199/ 19q2 1993 Iqq4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 2,210 2,210 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 2,210 2,210 242 GO Bonds 1,968 County M I rUUf"[, MU h. 40 KDOT CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Central Garage Roof Locat ion Project Category Public Buildings Department Genera 1 Servi ces Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification The galvanized roof on the utility building has deteriorated. There are rust holes clear through the roof. A new galvanized tin roof and new insulation should be installed on the existing building. In addition, the existing roof on the street Machinery Barn has bubbles and too many layers of roofing for structural integrity of the roof. It is a 1 so expected when the roofing is removed that many of the roof boards will ',need to be ret)laced. It is expected that rigid insulation will be Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 19CJ() ICJ91 ¡9CJ? l<:¡q'l 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 75 75 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 75 75 Sales Tax 41 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Museum Steps and Wall Joints Locat ion Project Category Pub 1 i c Buil di ngs Arts and Humanities Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification The front steps of the Museum are pulling away from the building foundation at a slight angle. This situation allows water to pool and freeze constituting a mainten- ance problem and pedestrian hazard. In addition, mortar has fallen away between the limestone block wall joints in some areas. These joints need to be tuckpointed Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qO Iq91 Iqq? IQQ, Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 10 10 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 10 10 5 Sales Tax ¡:; rf""\lIn+\I 42 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Schilling Force Sewer Main Locat ion Project Category Sewer Engineering and Utilities Department Project Number Project Priority Purpose and Justification This project involves installation of a force sewer main from the Schilling. Industrial Area to the main sewer treatment plant. The Schilling Treatment Plant will be removed from service. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY r9q() rq91 ,qq? rqq, rqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 6,500 6,500 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 6,500 6,500 Rev. Bonds 43 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Emergency Si ren Project Category Miscellaneous Emergency Preoaredness Department Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justification '~, I - -..:., - . :"'-';~i'. r--:- -I : '. I -- ,,~, - ~.,!..I : ~ '~c--- -, ',r4 --- :: u...~d~ I~ , - ==:=dI:'-- -rilr.~- , ~\ I'~ II 11=,1 II vel -~ - IJ lQWJ]]t[Gr~IL_- ~ ~~~1@ r ..~~" ~. ì.~.1 - : ~ ,~~~ ~ 8- ¡ ~~ ' _I \ \ ': : \~~ ìfTI'I-¡ 4) ) f~ I The municipal golf course is an area that is growing and the closest system is located at Meadowlark School. We need more coverage. This would be a Thunderbolt siren, 3 phase 240 volt. Operoting Cast Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qn ,q91 ¡qq? Iqq, Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 17 17 OTHER TOTAL 17 17 9 Sales Tax 8 Grant 44 Project Street Maintenance Rubberized R.R. Crossings Sidewalk Construction Curb and Gutter Repair oakdale St. Bridge Channel Road - Iron to Glen ~ un State Street Bridge Museum Handicapped Ramp Broadway Drainóge Improvements Cutoff Channel Stabilization Mausoleum Renovation Vehicles and Equipment River Redevelopment Water Plant Improvements Park/Rprrp~tinn Tmn~ovømøn~c .--- ---.-.. ""r' -'-"'-"-~ TOTAL 1 2 Gas Tax. KOOT. : Saline County. Recreation Levy. GO Bonds 1993 Capita] Improvement Program Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Other Tota] $ $ $600,0001 $ 600,000 50,0001 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,0001 40,000 26,000 296,0002 322,000 200,000 8,000 97,0002 105,000 9,000 9,0003 18,000 190,000 190,000 62,000 62,000 14,000 14,000 450,000 450,000 650,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 1nn noo .nn nnn4 -~ûû,ûûû .uu,uuu LUU,UUU $909,000 $5,000,000 $1,192,000 $7,951,000 $ 200,000 650,000 $850,000 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991-1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Project Category Oakda 1 e St. Sri dge @ 01 d Ri ver Channel Department Location Bridges Engineering Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on this bridge. Serious structural deterior- ation has occurred. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollors) CATEGORY 19C1n 1991 ,ClCI? Iqq... 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 322 322 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 322 322 26 Sales Tax 296 KDOT 46 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~" 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Channel Road Reconstruction Project Category Streets Deportment General Services Project Number Project Priority II Locat ion Purpose and Justification r Channel Road between Iron a nd Glen undulate so bad that the street is becoming a traffi hazard. The marks and gouges in the pave- ment is evidence of vehicles bottoming and dragging due to the uneven road surface. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 200 200 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 200 200 GO Bonds 47 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description State Street Bridge @ Dry Creek Deportment Bridges Engineering Project Category Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose and Justification .11 .n -~ \ l'[ ¡, ::::::!:_~::::: Remove the existing span bridge at this location and construct a reinforced concrete box structure as a replacement. Concrete deterioration is apparent on piers and deck. Operating Cost Implications I I I I I ~ !~ PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 19CJO ICJ91 ,CJCJ? IQQ, 1994 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRuCTION 105 105 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 105 105 8 Sales Tax 97 KDOT 48 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Museum Handicapped Ramp Project Category Deportment Public Buildings Arts and Humanities Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose and Jus titicotion " -T An access ramp would be located at the west entrance (8th Street) of the Smoky Hill Museum. Currently, the only handicap access to any floor of the museum is through the front door, therefore, a staff person must be on duty to unlock the museum, disarm the security system, unlock a second door, and direct people to the passenger elevator adjacent to the west entrance. -As the building (the community rooms on the second floor) is being increasinç¡ly used during off hours, staff is not always available to lmlor:k the only ar:cessible entrance to those Operating Cost Implications -, areas. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 1990 1991 199? 199" ,994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE I CONSTRUCTION 18 18 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 18 18 9 Sales Tax 9 County 49 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRANI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991-1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Broadway Drainage Improvements Project Category Department Drainage Genera 1 Senti ces Project Number Project Priority I I Locat ion Purpose ond Justificotion During heavy rains, Broadway west of Sunset Park becomes flooded for a short oeriod'of time. As a major arterial street carrying a large volume of traffic, ponding of water makes this street hazardous. Secondly, all of the inlets along Broadway are in need of repair. The deterioration and repair needs are largely due to age and movement of the pavement. Finally, a storm sewer that once drained Broadway near North Street and the Railroad tracks has been plugged by develop ment. This project should include new inlets and storm sewer to rid this section Operating Cost Implications of Broadway of storm run-off. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY Iqcln 1991 IQQ? 1993 ,qq4 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 190 190 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 190 190 Sales Tax 50 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~' 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -/994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Department Drainage General Services Cutoff Channel Stablization Project Category Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose ond Justification There are four ditch checks in a drainage creek emptying into the Dry Creek cutoH channel. The purpose of the ditch checks is to keep the floor of the creek from eroding. The problem was first recorded by the Army CorD of Engineers in 1981. When the cutoff channel was built, large rubble was placed in the plunge pool area to dissipate the energy of the ~ater drop- ping to a lower elevation (about 12 ft.). There must be more energy than anticipated because the rubble has been moved and many have been broken. The plunge 0001 is now Operating Cost Implications cutting or scouring back under the concrete check. If the cut becomes large enough, the concrete ditch check will fail. The Army Corps Inspector has suggested placing concrete in the plunge pool to stop the cutting action of the water. PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY ,qq() 1991 ,qq? ¡qq.., 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE 62 62 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 62 62 Sales Tax 51 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRANI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Mausoleum Renovation Project Category Deportment Public Buildings General Services Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose ond Justificotion The mortar in the Gypsum Hill Mausoleum is beginning to fallout in the masonry~ The mortar should be re-pointed. The roof should be inspected and leaks corrected by professionals. There is copper flashing coming loose and should be repaired. This is a maintenance project aimed at preserv- ing the 1920's building which the City owns -- Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollars) CATEGORY I CC() 1991 19°2 1Cj93 I CC4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 14 14 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 14 14 Sales Tax 52 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~~ 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description River Redevelopment Locat ion Project Category parks and Recreation Deportment Project Number Project Priority III PurPOSe ond Justification This project involves the dredging of the old river channel adjacent to Oakdale . Park from approximately 1,200 ft. south of the Oakdale Bridge downstream to a point approximately 300 ft. north of the Mulberry Bridge. A desilting basin is also required prior to any additional channel dredging. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollars) CATEGORY 19C1n 1991 ClCI? qq7, 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 650 650 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 650 650 GO Bonds 53 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAWI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Water Plant Improvements Location Project Category Water Engineering and Utilities Deportment Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification This project will complete the upgrading of the city's water plant by expanding treatment capacity. Operoting Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY Iq",n """'I IClCI;> IQQ7, 1"""4 TnTAI FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 5,000 5,000 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 5,000 5,000 Rev. Bonds 54 Project Ohio - Johnstown to Elm Magnolia & 1-135 Street Maintenance Rubberized R.R. Crossings Sidewalk Construction un un Curb and Gutter Repair Downtown Drainage Inlets Walnut St. Bridge Renovation Mulberry St. Bridge Renovation Police/Sheriff Secured Parking Interceptor Sewer Repairs Vehicles and Equipment Water Tower - E. Salina Park/Recreation Improvements 1994 Capital Improvement Program GO Bonds Sales Täx R"ve,ut: Bonds $ 481,000 $ $ 50,000 270,000 80,000 105,000 144,000 585,000 450,000 600,000 100,000 $666,000 $1,014,000 $1,185,000 TOTAL 1 2 KDOT and Special Assessment Bonds. Gas Tax. 3 Saline County. : Special Assessment Bonds. Recreation levy. Other Total $ $ 481,000 1,750,000 1 1,750,000 600,0002 50,0002 600,000 50,000 40,0002 50,000 40,000 270,000 80,000 144,0003 105,000 288,000 585,000 450,000 400,0004 100,0004 $3,084,000 1,000,000 200,0003 $5,949,000 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Ohio - Johnstown to Elm Location " Project Category Streets Engi neeri ng Department Project Number Project Priority III Purpose and Justification This project consists of widening Ohio from 4 narrow lanes to a 5 lane section (4 standard thru lanes with a center turn lane) from Johnstown to Elm Street. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollars) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 ,qq., Iqq~ Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 481 481 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 481 418 GO Bonds 56 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~1 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Magnolia/I-135 Interchange Location I I ' ~ , ,I- r" Project Cote gory Streets Department Planning Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose and Justification This project consists of new interchange at Magnolia and Interstate 135. This improve- ment would provide interstate access for traffic destined for the Schilling Indust- rial Area, Kansas College of Technology, and the 9th Street shooping centers (Central and Mid-State Malls). Potential funding may be available from the Kansas Department of Transportation under the new System Enhancement Program. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousonds of Dollars) CATEGORY 199() 1991 199::> Iqq~ IGG4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1, 750 1, 750 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 1, 750 1, 750 KDOT Special Assessmen ts 57 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~' 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Downtown Drainage Inlets Project Cotegory Deportment Drainage General Services Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose and Justification Age and deterioration has left most all. of the downtown inlets in poor condition. Several of the inlet fronts are in need of repair. However, the handicao criteria make it necessary to have engineering draw-~ ings and a Dlan before proceeding. Also, due to the sloDe criteria, extensive sidewalk replacement may be nec~ssary. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qn ,c¡c¡ Iqc¡? qq", qq4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 270 270 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 270 270 Sales Tax 58 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title ond Description Walnut Street Bridge at Old River Channel Locat ion Project Category Deportment Bridges Engineering Project Number Project Priority I I Purpose ond Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on this bridge. Serious structural deterior- ation has occurred. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of DolIor5) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 Iqq? ,qq, Iqq4 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 80 80 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 80 80 GO Bonds 59 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAWI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Mulberry Street Brige @ Old River Channel Location Project Cotegory Bridges Engineering Department Project Number Project Priority II Purpose ond Justification Remove and replace the concrete deck on this bridge. Serious structural deteriora- tion has occurred. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (Thousands of Dollors) CATEGORY 19qn 1991 ,qq? Iqq~ 1994 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 105 105 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 105 105 GO Bonds 60 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Police/Sheriff Secured Parking Project Category Public Buil di ngs Deportment Police Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose and Justificotian To provide a secured and orotected area for prisoner transfer, security of ooli'ce vehicles, vehicles of persons in custody, etc. Project consists of purchasing property on east half of city block locate directly west of the Police and Sheriff buildings, raze building and orepare site for resurfacing, fencing and lighting. Also includes closing llU Str~t between Elm and Park Streets. Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousandS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19<:\1"\ 1<:\91 ,GG;> 1 c\c\... 10<:\4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 288 288 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 288 288 144 Sales Tax 1/1/1 rf'llln+1I 61 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRANI 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Deportment Sewer Engineering and Utilities Interceptor Sewer Repairs Project Category Project Number Project Priority I I Location Purpose ond Justification This project involves rehabilitation of various sewer lines and pump stations. -- Operating Cost Implications PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollars) CATEGORY 199() 1991 IClCI? Iqq~ Iqq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 585 585 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 585 585 Rev. Bonds 62 CITY OF SALINA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~I 1990 CAPITAL BUDGET AND 1991 -1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Title and Description Water Tower - East Salina Project Category Water Deportment Engineering and Utilities Project Number Project Priority II Location Purpose ond Justification This project would provide a new water. tower to improve water pressure to developing areas east of the Smoky Hill River. Operating Cost Implicotions PROJECT COST DET AI L (ThousondS of Dollors) CATEGORY 19Qn ,q91 ,qq? Iqq.., ,qq4 TOTAl FUNDING SOURCES DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,000 1,000 EQUIPMENT OTHER TOTAL 1,000 1,000 600 Rev. Bonds /Inn <::nor';;'Il AC"C"ðC sment 63 1990-1994 Capital Financing Plan Year GO Bonds Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Ga~_.!ax Other Total 1990 $1,550,000 $ 935,000 $ - 0 - $ 690,000 $ 120,0001 $ 3,295,000 1991 647,000 884,000 7,700,000 690,000 4,739,0002 14,660,000 1992 577,000 664,000 6,500,000 690,000 2,081,0003 10,512,000 1993 850,000 909,000 5,000,000 690,000 502,0004 7,951,000 0) 1994 666,000 1,014,000 1,185,000 690,000 2.394,0005 ~49,OOO -Þ TOTAL $4,290,000 $4,406,000 $20,385,000 $3,450,000 $9,836,000 $42,367,000 ~ Recreation levy. KOOT. KDHE, Saline County, Recreation levy. ¡ KDOT. Saline County, Salina Airport Authority, Recreation levy. KOOT. Saline County, Recreation levy. 5 KOOT, Saline County, Special Assessments, Recreation levy. Projects with Potential for Inclusion in 1990-1994 crp but Awaiting Funding Commitments and/or Feasibility Analysis Project Schiiling Road Bridge @ Dry Creek Cost Estimate ClOUd Street Bridge @ Dry Creek $360,000 85,000 Crawford and Centennial Traffic Signals Fox Theatre Renovation 80,000 850,000 Memorial Hall Renovation Bi-Center Lobby/Office Expansion 160,000 191,000 Par 3 Golf Course 350,000 Water Main Replacement - Water Well Road 65 Projects Identified but Unfunded in 1990-1994 CIP Project Belmont and Magnolia Intersection Schilling Pedestrian Bridge Recreation Center Police Parking Lot General Service Parking State Street Reconstruction Ohio Street R.R. Overpass Schilling Road Improvements Centennial Road Improvements South Salina Drainage 66 Cost Estimate $ 300,000 200,000 2,500,000 121,000 80,000 3,000,000 9,000,000 1,300,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 CIP PRIORITY RATING CRITERIA Project Tota 1 Score 1. Need for Facility 6. Supports Related Fac:i 1 ity Critical 10 Major Assist 10 Important 6 Minor Assist 5 Desirable 2 None 0 Questionable 0 2. People Benefitting 7. Economic Impact - Jobs, Income, etc. Total City 10 Major Stimulus 10 Several Neigh. 6 Minor Stimulus 5 One Neigh. 2 None 0 Fewer 0 3. Useful Li fe (yea rs) 8. Funding Source 21 + 10 Grant 51-100% 10 11-20 6 Grant LT 50% 6 6-10 2 Rev. Bonds 2 1-5 0 Local Taxes 0 4. Improves Pu.b 1 i c Service 9. Revenue Impact - Taxes, Fees, etc. Major Advance 10 Major Increase 10 Minor Advance 5 Minor Increase 5 No Charge 0 None 0 5. Requires Land/Personnel/Equipment 10. Public Support Major Need 0 High 10 Minor Need 2 Moderate 5 None 6 Low 0 Net Savings 10 Note: Circle score for each item and total. Maximum Score-l00 points. 67