CIP 1965 - 1975CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY OF SALINA
KANSAS
1965
0, SALIrVA
�Fti�Iiti1 P,V
a,,
ov
6X401
'
The preparation of this Capital Improvement Program
was financially aided through a federal grant from
the Urban Renewal Administration of the Housing and
Home Finance Agency, under the Urban Planning
Assistance Program authorized by Section 701 of the
Housing Act of 1954, as amended
I L S O N
COMPANY
T
NGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
1
CITY OF SALINA
KANSAS
CITY COMMISSION
Robert M. Stark, Mayor
Charles Casebeer
Ralph Exline
Carl R. R.undquist
G. N. Waddell
PLANNING COMMISSION
C. A. Brooks, Chairman
Raymond Haggart
Wilber L. Johnson
William H. Odgers
W. M. Ostenberg
John Ryberg
Milton Thelander
Gilbert Wenger
Phil Wilcox
CITY OFFICIALS
Norris D. Olson, City Manager
Charles Delgado, Administrative Assistant
Duane Pearce, City Planner
Harold F. Harper, City Engineer
Harold E. Peterson, City Clerk
Donald Harrison, City Treasurer
L. 0. Bengtson, City Attorney
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
The Capital Improvement Program
1
Capital Improvement Programming Procedure
2
Municipal Finance
2
Receipts
3
Table I - Summary of Receipts
3
Expenditures
3
Table II - Summary of Expenditures
3
Tax Collections
4
Table III - Percentage of Tax Collected
4
Table IV - Comparison of Percentage Share of
Tax Dollar by Each Government Unit
5
Tax Rates
5
Figure 1 - Trend in Tax Rate - Major Governmental
Units
6
Figure 2 - Tax Rate in Mills
7
Table V - Tax Rate in Mills
8
Bonded Indebtedness
8
Table VI - Trends in Existing Bonded Indebtedness
9
Table VII - Bond Retirement. Schedule, Board of Education
10
Assessed Valuations
10
Table VIII - Projection of Money Available for 10 -Year
General Government Operations
11
Project Priority List
11
Table IX - Proposed Capital Improvement Projects and
Priorities
12
Financial. Program and Schedule
13
Table X - Capital Improvement Program Schedule
14 -15
Methods of Financing
18
Table XI - Methods of Financing - First Three Years
of Capital Improvement Program
16 -17
Table XI.I - Summary of Methods of Financing 1966 -1968
18
Table XIII - Summary of Capital Improvement Projects,
Priorities and Methods of Financing
19 -24
Water Supply Study
25
A
Page
Proposed Project Requests
26
Civic Center, City Library, .Park Improvements,
Sand Pit Recreation Area, Golf Course, Carver
Center, Fire Stations, Slough Lining
27 -44
Map 1 - Proposed Improvement Projects
after 44
Street Improvements
45-60
Map 2 - Proposed Street .Projects
after 60
Waterworks Improvements
61 -66
Map 3 - Proposed Water Works Projects
after 66
General Construction and Improvement
67 -77
Map 4 - Proposed Sanitary Sewer Projects
after 77
N
THE CAPI`A.L IMPROVEMENT. PROGRAM
The Capital Improvement Program is published as the final part of the
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Salina. The purpose of this report
is to initiate capital improvement programming for the City Officials
to use as a guide to provide, within its financial ability, for the
needed improvements of the City and its future growth and development.
A Capital Improvement. Program can be defined as a listing of all pro-
posed public improvement projects, together with the priority of their
construction. it can provide a sound and orderly approach to long -
range fiscal planning, and furnish a means of assuring that projects
will be carried out in accordance with predetermined priority of need,
coordinated with the community's ability to pay. This programming is
a function of the planning agency and the City Manager, together with
the cooperation and advice of the department heads whose activities
are affected.
The Capital Impr °ovement Program is usually designed for a period of
six years, but it is reviewed and updated annually. The Capital
Improvement Program will include:
1. All public improvements within the city whether they are
paid for by Federal Aid, property tax, special assessment,
water revenue or other revenue sources.
2. All. public projects which have been started but not yet
completed and which require additional appropriation.
3. Replacement and reconst'ructi'on other than ordinary mainte-
nance.
The program involves the construction, acquisition, and improvement of
facilities rendering municipal services, such as streets, parking
facilities, public highways, airports, parks, bridges, public buildings,
water and sewer utilities and other public projects which are necessary
for and benefit the entire community.
Of major importance is the principle that any proposed Capital Improve-
ment Program should be flexible and not create an excessive tax burden.
Should the proposed program. cause a large increase in the mill rate,
the program should be reduced. Should the tax base fail to grow at a
predicted rate, the projects would have to be deferred to a later
starting date than originally planned. On the other hand, if there is
more money than originally estimated, then the projects should be
carried on at a faster rate. In any case, community benefits and
project priorities must be considered carefully,
1
There are many advantages in adopting a Capital Improvement Program.
Project financing and bond issues can be planned to maintain a balanced
and uniform tax rate.. The City Government can schedule bond elections _
and. bond issues to take advantage of favorable interest rates, thereby
saving on total project cost. A Capital Improvement Program will also
permit the purchase of real estate for future improvement in advance
whenever, the price market is fa- orable. All. sections of the community
will receive impartial trea_ment.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMING FROCEL?U
In the preparation of the Capital Improvement .Program, consideration
must be given to the City's history of finance, present standing, and
the future projections, '..n programming capita, improvements, three
major steps are required: a study of municipal finance, preparation
of a project priority li.s7, and preparation of a financial program and
schedule.
The municipal finance study will inchude the following seven items:
receipts, expenditures, p.-operty tax ]a--,ri.es and collections, comparison
of percentage share of tax- dollar by each. government unit, trend in
tax rates, bonded indebtedness, and assessed valuation. With all this
information, a determination can be made of the bonding capacity and
financial. ability of the City to undertake the proposed program.
The project priority list assigns the order of priority to the proposed
program. Careful consideration was given to the most pressing needs
of the community, the projects that offered. the greatest benefits to
the community, and the future needs of the city,
The financial program. will determine the amount. of general obligation
bonds that can be issued, th.e time of issue, th,e interest rate and the
mill levy required in +b.e fuiture.
The proposed Capita'. Improvement Er.og -am, upon completion, is presented
to the Planning Commission, who will in turn recommend it to the City
Governing Body, who h.ave the .final . to decide whether
such proposal will be adopted, modified or
MUNT.CIPAL FINANCE
Income for the municipal government is Jeri,,, -ed from the tax levy on
real estate, unencumbered cash balances from the previous year, revenues
from. State collected taxes, and permits, fines, fees and franchises.
The main expenditures are for general government operation, general
improvements, and ge.n.er.al. we'fare, Bonds are issued to pay the debt
and meet the demand of increasing expenditures. The three most common
bonds issued by the a :. *_y are General t�bl.igar. ion Bonds, Revenue Bonds
and Special Assessment Bonds.
2
On 31 December 1964, the City of Salina had 2.4 million dollars of
General Obligation Bonds and 2.3 million dollars of Special Assessment
Bonds outstanding. As of 30 June 1965, the Salina Board of Education
had 3.5 million dollars of General Obligation Bonds outstanding,
Receipts. The receipts of the City of Salina increased from 3,5 million
dollars in 1955 to 13.3 million dollars in 1961, . as shown in Table I.
The largest sums, besides the General Operating Funds, are for the
Water and Sewage Department, Bond and Interest, Social Security,
parking meters and construction.
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS
CITY OF SALINA
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
1955 1956 1.957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
Total of Funds
Budgeted 2,644 2,.305 2,206 2,563 2,860 3,239 7,591 6,403 6,007 5,069
Total of Funds
Not Budgeted 905 1,873 2,620 3,166 2,186 6,029 5,725 1,871 3,654 1,642
Grand Total 3,549 4,1.78 4,826 5,729 5,046 9,268 13,316 8,274 9,661 6,711
Source: Salina Audit Report, prepared by A, H. Leckband and Company.
Expenditures. Table II is a summary of expenditures by major category
from 1955 to 1964. The general, trend is increasing due to the infla-
tionary effect of the economy and the increase in government operations.
The annual. expenditures from 1955 to 1964 ranged from a low of 3.5
million dollars in 1955 to a high of 12.3 million dollars in 1961.
The expenditures for 1961 were the highest for the past ten years
because of the exceptionally large amount of money spent on the plater
and Sewage Department, street surfacing, and curb and gutter improvements.
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
CITY OF SALT NA
(THOUSANDS OF' DOLLARS)
1955 1956 1.957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
Total of Funds
Budgeted 2,338 2,61.0 2,393 2,638 2,823 3,172 7,021 6,289 6,121 5,069
Total of Funds
Not Budgeted 1,126 1,853 2,558 3,313 2,085 5,971, 5,320 2,195 3,679 1,664
Grand Total 3,464 4,463 4,951. 5,951. 4,908 9,143 12,341 8,484 9,800 6,733
Source; Salina Audit Report, prepared by A. H. Leckband and Company
3
Tax Collections. 'he City of Salina has a high percentage of tax
collections. Table III v-.ows the tax collections for a period of
fourteen years. The percentage of levy collected ranges from. a high
of 100 in 1960 to a low of 98,00 from 1951 through 1.957. The average
percentage is 98.6.
The percentage of special assessment collected is also shown in the
same table. 'The range is from 83.32 percent in 1964 to 99.76 percent
in 1961, with an average of 93.2 percent. 'The reason why 1964 has a
low percentage of special. assessment collection is the closing of
Schilling Air Force Base, When many families are moving out of the
community, ix is likely that some special assessments will remain
unpaid.
The government units which. levy and collect r.ax: in Salina include the
Salina .Board of Education, the City of Salina, Saline County, the State
of Kansas, the Salina Recreation Committee and the Salina Library.
The Salina Board of Education levies and collects the largest amount
in comparison with other units. The Salina i:ibrary became independent
in tax levying in 1.958. Table IV lists the percentage share of the
tax dollar that each unit receives.
TABLE III
PERCENTAGE OF' TAX COLLECTED
CITY OF' S.ALInTA
1951 -1.964
Fiscal Percentage of Levy Collected
Period During Fiscal.Periodl
1951 98,00
1952 98.00
1953 98,00
1954 98.00
1955 98,00
1956
98.00
1957 .
98.00
1958
99.00-
1959
99.001
1960
100.00
1961 99.00-
1962 99.00+
1963 9900+
1964 99,00+
Percentage of Special
Assessment. Collected2
95.00
95.00
9.5.00
95.00
95.00
90.00
9.5.00
95.00
93.00
93.00
99,76
91.76
89052.
83,32
1Figures for 1951 through 1957 are taken from t.h.e Kansas Tax Rate Book.
Figures for 1958 through 1964 are taken from the Annual Financial
Report, City of Salina.
2A11 figures are taken from Kansas Tax: Rate Book.
4
Salina Board
of Education
City of Salina
Saline County
State of Kansas
Salina Recrea-
tion Committee
Salina Library
TAPLE IV
COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGE SHARE OF
IAX DOLLAR BY EACH GOVERNMENT UNIT
1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
37.1
36.21
37.30
37.03
37.99
39.45
39.09
39.58
38.10
39.70
31..0
29.10
30.80
33.46
31.54
30.79
39.79
27.38
29.80
28.60
28.2
27.51
37.70
24.04
25.22
24.52
25.90
27.79
26.60
26.40
2.2
5.74
2.73
2.56
2.30
2.23
2.12
2.09
2.10
2.00
1.5 1.44 1.47 1.22 1.28 1.21 1.15 1.14 1.10 1.10
- - - 1.69 1.67 1.80 1.95 2.02 2.30 2.20
Source: Annual Financial Report, City of Salina
Tax Rates. Figure 1. shows the trend of tax rate in mills for the three
major government units from 1951. to 1964. The graph indicates that
the City of Salina had a relatively stable rate compared to either the
School Board or Saline County. The School Board and Saline County had
similar mill rate increases, both at a faster rate than the City of
Salina.
Figure 2 is the tax rate in mills for the City of Salina for a fourteen
year period from 1.951 to 1.964. The total tax rate includes general
operating, bonds and interest, and all other levies.
According to the 1966 . Budget Report prepared by the City Manager of
the City of Salina, the fund levy limitations are as follows: 17
mills for General Operating, 1. mill for Noxious Weeds, 2 mills for
Firemen's Pension, 2 mills for Policemen's Pension, 1 mill for Flood
Works and Levee, 1 mill. for Tree Maintenance and 3 mills for General
and Special Improvement. There is no fund levy limitation for Social
Security, Public Employees Retirement and Bonds and Interest.
General government operations include. City Commission, City Manager,
City Clerk, City Attorney, City Court, Police Court, Building, Engi-
neering, Fire, Inspection, Park, Police, Street, Waste Disposal, Street
Lighting, Traffic and Parking, Airport, Swimming .Pools, City Planning,
and Group Insurance. For the budget year of 1966, funds for Band,
Cemetery, General Improvement, Memorial. Hall, Public Health and
Industrial Fund are included in the general. government operations.
For the past fourteen years, the general operating mill rate ranged
from a low of 8 mills in 1951 to a b.igb of 11.9 in 1.964. The average
is 10.4 mills.
From 1951 to 1964, the Bonds and Interest mill rate has ranged from a
low of 3.4 in 1951 and 1952 to a high of 9.4 in 1958, . 1959 and 1960.
The average is 7.2 mills.
Levies for other purposes have ranged from 1.1 mills in 1953 to 6.8 in
1964. The average for the total tax levy was 21.3 mills (Table V),
5
TREND IN TAX RATE
Major Governmental Units
...........
...........
. ....................... ......
....................... ....
.......... ...............
................................... .....
...... ....
.........................
...... ................... ..........
...... ....... - ---------- -
.......... ... . ....
... ... .......... .....
..............................................
:
: ; ! + 5 AL INE COUN T Y:
:wi...
A............................
:SCFi00L.B04RD:
..+ . y ..: { 1}'{•. :} }iii::}:•.•.; :.::.: ;.: ;.
k ? ''may. {; #• {:•:.. i {•.;}. }; } r } v •:.: . {;} k ...'.,'::::. r::.::::;,•::
.{• Y:$;. r.�i: .. MEMO., h : {:}} r,...:'$:Y{:• •.{. ...1 f.•:.::::: ::.'.•:::•;:i• {.;; } }• f viii :' ?.G�'`�:b��i • :' ::•::•: :iti :i•; }} } }:: :i: iS:: �: �y: t•:•' t::• :•r:•: {;�:•'.: >:�:•:•r:•:':�:�:
••Xti�•.`•CITY OF•SALINA• :: �::• r• ::::::::::::::�:::::•:
}ire
0
1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
YEAR
Source: Kansas Tax Rate Book
League of Kansas Municipalities FIGURE 1
6
100
80
60
40
20
N
J
J_
2
TAX RATE IN MILLS
City of Salina, Kansas
1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
YEAR
30
25
20
w
F-
Q
15
J
J_
10
5
0
aALL OTHER LEVIES
BONDS AND INTEREST
GENERAL OPERATING
Source; Kansas Tax Rate Book
League of Kansas Municipalities FIGURE 2
7
TA3L ?s V
TAX RATE IN MILLS
CITY OF SALINA
Year General Operating Bonds and Interest All Other Levies Total
1951 8.0 3.4 3.2 14.6
1952 8.4 3,4 4.2 16.0
1953 10.0 5.0 1.1 16.1
1954 8.4 5.3 4.3 18.0
1955 9.1 6.2 3.7 19.0
1956 9.6 6.1 4.2 19,9
1957 11.6 8.4 2.9 22.9
1958 11.4 9,4 3,2 24.0
1959 11.6 9.4 3.2 24.2
1960 11.3 9.4 3.4 24.1
1961 11.6 8.9 4.1 24.6
1962 11.5 8.4 3,0 22.9
1963 11.6 8.7 4.6 24.9
1964 11.9 9.2 6.8 27.9
Average 10.4 7.2 3,7 21,3
Source: Kansas Tax Rate Book, League of Kansas Municipalities.
Bonded Indebtedness. The trends in existing bonded indebtedness for
the City of Salina are shown on Table VI, which shows that, for a period
of twenty -one years, 1964 to 1984, the existing indebtedness of General
Obligation .Bonds and Special Assessment Bonds is decreasing, while
that of the existing Waterworks Revenue Bond is increasing. The
purpose of this increase in Waterworks Revenue Bond principal payments
is that it tends to keep the debt almost constant every year as the
interest payments decrease. In this case, the people in the future
will be paying approximately the same share of the debt as those
citizens living in the city at present. The sums of the three types
of bonds are in a decreasing trend.
Table VII is the Bond Retirement Schedule for the Salina Board of
Education. This table indicates that the School Board is in a sound
financial condition since all bonds will be retired by 1980.
EE.
Total
Source: Annual Financial Report, City of Salina, 1964.
*As of 31 December 1964
G]
Total
Indebtedness
$520,081.79
555,130.34
525,841.40
508,700.10
463,029.80
412,124.80
385,860.60
352,084.10
345,937.80
332,980.70
327,986.70
317,905.60
308,493.60
318,493.60
324,402.10
300,385.70
311,294.20
311,853.70
251,989.20
217,448.40
221,539.90
$7,613,564.13
TABLE VI
TRENDS I.N
EXIST'ING BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS*
CITY OF SALINA
City' s Share
on Special
Waterworks
Fiscal
General Bond
.Assessment
Revenue Bond
Year
Principle
Principle
Principle
1964
$203,000
$2109081.79
$107,000
1965
216,000
229,130.34
110,000
1966
179,000
236,841.40
110,000
1967
167,000
226,700.10
115,000
1968
131,000
217,029.80
115,000
1969
101,000
191,124.80
120,000
1970
101,000
164,860.60
120,000
1971
101,000
131,084.10
120,000
1972
101,000
11.9,937.80
125,000
1973
101,000
106,980.70
125,000
1974
101,000
96,986.70
130,000
1975
101,000
81,905.60
135,000
1976
101,000
67,493.60
140,000
1977
101,000
67,493.60
1.50,000
1978
101,000
68,402.10
155,000
1979
73,000
67,385.70
160,000
1980
73,000
68,294.20
170,000
1981
73,000
63,853.70
175,000
1982
13,000
53,989.20
185,000
1983
13,000
9,448.40
195,000
1984
13,000
8,539.90
200,000
Total
Source: Annual Financial Report, City of Salina, 1964.
*As of 31 December 1964
G]
Total
Indebtedness
$520,081.79
555,130.34
525,841.40
508,700.10
463,029.80
412,124.80
385,860.60
352,084.10
345,937.80
332,980.70
327,986.70
317,905.60
308,493.60
318,493.60
324,402.10
300,385.70
311,294.20
311,853.70
251,989.20
217,448.40
221,539.90
$7,613,564.13
TABLE VII
BOND RETIREMENT SCHEDULE*
BOARD OE' EDUCATION
SALINA, KANSAS
Year of
Years
In Which
Bonds Were Issued
Maturity 1947
1950
1953A
1953B
1956
1960
Totals
1962
$63,000
$44,000
$25,000
$1.2,000
$60,000
$60,000
$264,000
1963
63,000
44,000
25,000
12,000
60,000
60,000
264,000
1964
63,000
44,000
25,000
12,000
60,000
60,000
264,000
1965
63,000
44,000
25,000
13,000
60,000
60,000
265,000
1966
63,000
44,000
25,000
13,000
60,000
60,000
265,000
1967
63,000
44,000
25,000
13,000
65,000
60,000
270,000
1968
44,000
25,000
13,000
65,000
60,000
207,000
1969
44,000
25,000
13,000
65,000
60,000
207,000
1970
44,000
25,000
13,000
65,000
60,000
207,000
1971
25,000
13,000
65,000
65,000
168,000
1972
259000
13,000
65,000
65,000
168,000
1973
25,000
13,000
65,000
65,000
168,000
1974
13,000
65,000
65,000
143,000
1975
65,000
65,000
130,000
1976
65,000
65,000
130,000
1977
65,000
65,000
1978
65,000
65,000
1979
65,000
65,000
1980
65,000
65,000
Totals
$3789000
$396,000
$300,000
$1,669000
$950,000
$1,190,000
$3,380,000
*Bonds
retire 1
February
and 1 August
Sources
Salina
Public Schools
Assessed Valuations, The assessed value of the City of Salina increased
from 43 million dollars in 1955 to 60 million dollars in 1965. There
are two reasons why the assessed value of the City is very important.
The majority of the city revenue is derived from. the real estate and
property tax, which is based on the assessed valuation, and the assessed
valuation will determine the amount of the General Obligation Bonds
that the City may issue.
10
Table VIII is the projection of the amount of money which will be
available for the general government operations for the next 10 years.
The average annual. percentage increase for the past 10 years, which is
5.0 percent., is used to project these figures. The table shows that
19.4 million dollars will be available for general government opera-
tions in the next ten years.
The projection is based on the General Operating Fund from 1957 to
1965, which includes Band, Cemetery, General Improvements, Memorial
Hall, Public Health and Industrial Funds.
TABLE VIII
PROJECTION OF MONEY AVAILABLE FOR
10 -YEAR GENERAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
CITY OF SAUNA
Year _Money Available
1966
$1,541,584*
1967
1,618,663
1968
1,699,596
1969
1,784,576
1970
1,873,805
1971
1,967,495
1972
23065,870
1973
2,1699164
1974
2,277,622
1975 .
2,391,503
Total
$19,389,878
*1966 budget.
PROJECT PRIORITY LIST'
Table I.X is a list of the proposed Capital Improvement projects and
their priorities. The projects are those suggested in the City Plan
of Salina and those resulting from consultations with the City Manager
and City department heads, The project. priority designations are as
follows: Priority 1 includes all projects which will be undertaken
in the first 4 years of the program, Priority 2 includes all projects
which will be undertaken in the second 3 years of the program, Priority
3 includes all projects which will be undertaken in the last 3 years
of the program, and Priority C is a continuous program. Federal Aid
is utilized where applicable so that more projects can be included and
costs to the City will be minimized. The more important sources of
Federal Aid are the uousing and Urban Development Act of 1965 and
revised Public law 660. The Housing and Urban Development Act. of 1965
permits Federal. Grants of up to 50 percent of the cost for open space
development, and 2/3 of the cost for neighborhood facilities. :Public
Law 660 provides funds for the improvement of storm and sanitary sewer
systems.
P1.
The City finances t.h.e projects by General Obligation Bonds, Revenue
Bonds and Special Assessments. Table IX shows that the total. Federal
Aid for the next ten years will be $667,462. The total cost to the
City will. be $6,060,262,
TABLE Ili
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND PRIORI.TIES1
1966 -1975
CITY OF SALT.NA.
�2
Cost to
Federal Aid. Other the City
$1,100,000
675,000
1.20,000
100,000
9,7502
Total Cost
Priority Project of
Project
1
Civic Center $1.,100,000
9,8622
1
Library
675,000
3
New Fire St at ion
22,0002
in East Salina
1120,000
2
New Fire Station
17,5002
in South Salina
100,000
1
Oakdale Park Improvements
1.9;500
1
Sunset Park Improvements
9,500
1
Edgemere Park
19,724
1
Enclosed. Ice Skating Rink
275,000
2
Ind.i.an Rock Park Building
Project
44,000
2
Riverside Park Improvements
15,000
2
Thomas Park Improvements
35,000
C
City -wide Park Development.
70,000
1
Land and Property Acqui-
sition, Sandpit Lake
83,000
1
Sand Pit Recreation Area
Development
300,000
1
New 18 -hole Golf Course
2502000
1
Carver Recreation Center
1.00,000
1
Slough Lining
120,000
C
Street Improvements 1,990,000
C
City -wi.de Str >Pt Overlay,
Sealing and New Pavement
483,0005
C
Waterworks _ xp r ovem.en+ s 1,99S,600
C
City -wide Sidewalks
70;000
C
Storm Sewer on 9t.h from
Bond to Prescott
152, or�o
C
City -wide Sanitary Sewer
Construction
550;000
C
Dry Creek Drainage Project
80,000
C
De-- silting Smoky Hill
River
144;000
C
Separar.i.orn of Sanitary
and Storm Sewers
500,000
�2
Cost to
Federal Aid. Other the City
$1,100,000
675,000
1.20,000
100,000
9,7502
9,750
4,7502
4,750
9,8622
9,862
1.83,0003
92,000
22,0002
22,000
7,5002
7,500
17,5002
17,500
35,0002
35,000
41,5002 41,500
150,0002 150,000
$ 250,0004
66,6003 33,400
120,000
1,980,000
483,000
19998,6006
70,0007
152,000
550,0007
80,000
144,000
120,OOC8 380,000
Priority Project
1
Sanitary Sewer from
project are. 5t,owrn
F+onnie Ridge P�jmpinq
2,
Station to Existing
Aid
24 -inch Easr Main
1?rban Development. Act.
Sewer a mile east of
2/3 Federal
Ohio at Magnolia
by Section 703 of
"Industrial. Area
2
Sanitary Sewer from
Wayne Avenue � e
east of Ohio to Quincy
2
SanLtary Sewer from
East Main Sewer,
5.
Magnolia to .Air Base
total
Road
2
Sanitary Sewer from.
$1,498,600
Schilling Complex ro
Ponds and $ '-00,000
East. Main. Sewer
1
Iron Avenue Bridjae
Repair
iota]
Notes
'o -a.l. Cost. Cosa to
of =P�o jecct Federal .Aid Other. the City
$ 43,000 $ 43,000
40,000 40,000
85,000 85,000
120,000 120,900
15,000 0 15,000
$9,596,324 $667,462 $2,868,600 $6,060,262
I.
Details of
each
project are. 5t,owrn
in a. following section of this report.
2,
50% Federal
Aid
by 1965 Housing and
1?rban Development. Act.
3�
2/3 Federal
Aid
by Section 703 of
1965 Housing and. Urban Development
Act,
4,
Revenue Bonds,
5.
1/3 of rbe
total
cost ,SI,470,0005
of the Con`inuous Program.
6.
$1,498,600
Revenue
Ponds and $ '-00,000
Special. Assessments.
7.
Special Assessmenrs.
8.
Federal Aid
from
- evi.sed Public :law 660.
F I NANC I .Ai; PROGRAM. A �1'
The proposed financial program will include the following!
1, T'se of a�,ailable Fede.xal and state .funds where applicable,
2, Issuance of $6,060,262 in general obligation bonds as follows
Issue Noe 1, S?,000,000 in "967 to run 20 years, obtain
authority of electorate in 1966.
Issue No. 2, $2, ()00,000 in 1968 to run 20 years, obtain
authority of elecrorat. in 1.96?.
Issue No. 3, $2,060,262 in 1910 to run 20 years, obtain
authori ty of electo -ate in 1969.,
13
TABLE X
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE
City of Salina, 7966 -7975
P" y
BOND ISSUE NO. 1 BOND ISSUE NO. 2
�PQ GOO�Oc GOO Pvp v �<1
v{ 0 ���G �0 `QP �5 \QP �y
Q` G
4q �?
1966 $230,720 $295,273
1967 213,617 278,160 $50,000 $60,000
1968 173,040 261,990 55,000 58,500 $50,000 $60,000
1969 139,524 230,039 60,000 56,850 55,000 58,500
1970 126,675 198,344 65,000 55,050 60,000 56,850
1971 133,808 160,058 70,000 53,100 65,000 55,050
1972 130,876 145,320 75,000 51,000 70,000 53,100
1973 127,945 129,114 80,000 48,750 75,000 51,000
1974 124,964 116,064 85,000 46,350 80,000 48,750
1975 121,808 98,337 90,000 43,800 85,000 46,350
* The City's share on Special Assessments does not include the uncollected
delinquent taxes.
14
15
�"I
BOND ISSUE
NO. 3
P4r
GHQ
Pv
PP5
`� JOG p Jp
J�PO
J�P
O
$525,993
$62,505,072
8.4
601,777
64,405,292
9.3
658,530
66,305,512
9.9
599,913
68,255,340
8.8
$60,000
$63,600
685,519
70,155,560
9.8
65,000
61,800
663,816
72,055,780
9.2
70,000
59,850
655,146
73,956,000
8.9
75,000
57,750
644,559
75,856,220
8.5
80,000
55,500
636,628
77,756,440
8.2
85,000
53,100
623,395
79,656,660
7.8
15
TABLE XI
METHODS OF FINANCING FIRST THREE YEARS OF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM _
City of Salina, 1966 -1968
1966 -1968
°All these figures are 1120 of the 20 -year bond principal plus 3% interest
61/4 of total project cost
`30% Federal Aid from revised Public Law 660
d50 Federal Aid by 1965 Redevelopment Act
16
OI- —
P
G
0C G\"
PP
5
/1 p
�p��
�P.JI��J
�p��
�Py�vy��
�O Psi —
QQ
�p
CIVIC CENTER
$1,100,000
LIBRARY
675,000
SEPARATION OF SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
95,0006
$28,500
OAKDALE PARK IMPROVEMENTS
9,750
9,7504
SUNSET PARK IMPROVEMENTS
4,750
4,7504
EDGEMERE PARK
9,862
9,8624
WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS
$630,000
$208,500
SLOUGH LINING
120,000
—
CITY -WIDE SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION
550,000
CITY -WIDE SIDEWALKS
70,000
GOLF COURSE
250,000
—
TOTALS
$2,014,362
$52,862
$880,000
$828,500
°All these figures are 1120 of the 20 -year bond principal plus 3% interest
61/4 of total project cost
`30% Federal Aid from revised Public Law 660
d50 Federal Aid by 1965 Redevelopment Act
16
1967
0
p`' o
1968
o
O to °
2 y o o`er 10 o
P p� J Pvy� ? COQ' Q-P 2 Pyy
�Ov�V 00 CI Oy �try 0 J0 4i 50
0 00 Pyy p 00 C Q Py
$ 86,350
52,986
7,457
766
374
775
$49,455 $16,367
9,420
43,175
5,495
19,625
$158,128 $69,080 $65,037
17
$ 84,700
51,972
7,314 $28,500`
751 9,750d
367 4,7504
760 9,8624
$48,510 $16,054
9,240
42,350
5,390
19,250
$155,104 $52,862 $67,760 $63,794
1966
0
p y
o`'
0
y
O
o� 1Iy
�\o v X02
P Pyy
C11100
PO
0
yQ Pyy
$ 88,000
54,000
7,600
781
381
790
$50,400
$16,680
9,600
44,000
5,600
20,000
$161,152
$70,400
$66,280
1967
0
p`' o
1968
o
O to °
2 y o o`er 10 o
P p� J Pvy� ? COQ' Q-P 2 Pyy
�Ov�V 00 CI Oy �try 0 J0 4i 50
0 00 Pyy p 00 C Q Py
$ 86,350
52,986
7,457
766
374
775
$49,455 $16,367
9,420
43,175
5,495
19,625
$158,128 $69,080 $65,037
17
$ 84,700
51,972
7,314 $28,500`
751 9,750d
367 4,7504
760 9,8624
$48,510 $16,054
9,240
42,350
5,390
19,250
$155,104 $52,862 $67,760 $63,794
Table X shows the principal. and interest payme.o.fi.s for the nexr 10
years. The table indicates the approxima:r_e levy that could be
expected and what margin wo�ild '_,e l.ef�- to finance other programs.
Although there is no debt: li..nita -, ion for first class cities of less
than 50,000 population by the Kansas St.ar.e es, Ihis program. is
designed so that a 9.9 mill n.axlm im would no' be. exceeded when the
existing debt is taken into accoint. The, Bonds and Interest levy for
1966 is 9.9 mills, which was passed as of August 1965, The program
will maintain the current 'revel. of improvements wit...hout. creating an
unusually heavy tax burden.
METHODS OF FINANCING
Table XI shows the methods of financing the first three years of the
Capital. Improvement Program, T`he ' methods include: General Obligation
Bonds, Federal Aid, Revenue Bonds and Special. Assessments. I'ahle XI1.
is the summary of Table Xl..
TABLE XT
S IiKMARY OF M.ET :i ELI! S OF P NANC i NG
1.966 -1968
CI'xY OF SALI_NA
Gene.ra.i.
Obligation Federal
Projects 8on.ds_ Ai.d
Revenue Sp ec Lal
Bonds Assessments
Civic Center
$25a,t�G0
Library
Separation of Sanitary
and Storm Sewers
22,_371
$28,500
Oakdale Park lulproveme.nts
2,298
0
7 5n
Sunset. Park Tmpro "semen *s
1,122
4,750
Edgemere Park
2,325
9
•62
Waterworks Improvem.en+
$148,365 49,10_
Slough Lining
28,260
City -wide Sanitary Sewer
Construction
City-wide Sidewalks
Golf Course.
Totals S474,384
Grand Total
LN'
129, 525
16,4k5
59
$52.u62 $?0 ,240 $191,111
.a
O r
.4
W
:C
N N N N N M M N N N N
rf H rl H rl N N r-+ H H H
N N N N N M M N N N N
r-i H 4 4 �
ra H H H H
O
U2
O
+J
_:T
O
ro u
O
O
•,4
O
O
U u)
O
O
O
O
au
O
O
O
N
to
O
O
O
O
O
c;
•r+
u
O
O
O
O
Lr)
U
c0
a)
O
z
a
> o
O
O
� PQ
O
O
w
O
H
O
O
W
w
O�
0
CZ
c
w
�4 -C�
O
u)
N -4
O
u')
C/J
O
(a)
O
Q
X-
1,
O
+-'
x
�
�
O
r�
—4 o
u1
O
cz _4
M
x4
Q
u `o
,4
S4
Cn
O
w
H
H
E4
H
ai
O
H
/[4�'
H ray
H
W Ei
a U
H O
r
H
z
W
O
H
a--1
U
b�}
414
b4
E�
O
tr4
r E4
-6 °
a
P
�
w
U
w
w
O
U
b4
U
H
H
.l
U
�
ul
I
H
.a
O r
.4
W
:C
N N N N N M M N N N N
rf H rl H rl N N r-+ H H H
N N N N N M M N N N N
r-i H 4 4 �
ra H H H H
O
O
O
O
_:T
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Lr)
cr)
1l
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Lr)
O�
c
Cl)
O
Lr1
O
O
u')
Lr
O
O
1,
.-a
r-I
•ra 00
O
r�
u1
O
-:t
M
—4
�
M
N
N
H
a
4J
r
7�
b�}
414
b4
b4
tr4
r E4
-6 °
:f
b4
b4
b4
-(. �
b4
b4
.l
�
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
m
c
O
a)
+�
+s
a.J
+.1
P-1
4
a -P
r
-W
+3
�%
-P • n
41
a-+
+.+
-P
U)
m
to
ui
-4 M
u
u)
ca
m
a) O
m
m
m
m
O
O
O
0
3
0
0 r-♦ O>
O
O
O
O w
O
O
O
O
U
U
U
U
Z
U
-4 ca U
U
U
U
U a4
U
U
U
U
Q)
U)
r-i
-4
Cl)
-4
1-1
r-+
- r4 H
H
x
r-
r1
r1 b0
r-a
H
O
r1
C
H
ro
ca
+-j
ro
m
ca
ro
m w ro
co
CZ
r
Ca
ro
w
ca F:
CZ
ul
Co
a)
m
a)
cz
4-3
4-3
G
4-J
4-J
+J
u
-P
•a O 4-J
u
+)
•ra
4-i
+-)
u
+-3 •r4
+-+
+5
+-J
5
+J
5
+)
o
O
a)
O
a
0 C0
O::j
o
w
0
0�
0
O
+}
o b
O
c
0
u
O
M.
o
F
F-+
5E-�
�E4
off
v'G)E -1
<4
E-'
�H
H
�H
-4H
a)&A
off
0E4
>
Q)
O
o
a
N
w
�,w
•4
�
�
o
S&
H
Q
rd
a.
I
W u)
m
.4
w
a
H
5
(1) co
(1)
CO
4--1
cz
H
.l
MS (1)
f 4
ca
pa4
H
i4
f-
s-4
o 4
u
u
u
ca
ro
N
x
ro
w +}
a)
u
u
w
x
x
w
rw
cU
w
W
W w
C,
H
ca
U
U
f4
w
ca
o
u
o
m
a)
u
w
o
4
w
�+
u
4
m
o
b
b
1-1
4-J
ct
p.
u)
U
m
u,
�
x ro
(1)
a)
O
(1)
co
ca
x4
I
r� ro
m
u
'd .S&
b
r--1
w
>
• 4
5
(3)
m
z
bD
C~ m
G
u
1-4
w
b
O
>
+-J
a
o
1
C
w
a
C/)
w
c7
u
H
H
x
U
1
n
n
n
H
H r4
N
Cl)
U)
�o
1l
00
m
�
—4
r--i
r1 H r-1 H r-f r-I H H r-I N N N U
19
U
!r
ro
r~
r.,
w
w
O
ul
b
0
N
2
93
+J
ro N
U �
N u)
Ci. N
cn U)
U)
N
� m
G 't7
N �
o
N as
C4
ro
w o
N •,-f
w
r~
-4 0
ca •�4
+-f
bmn DC >C SC SC 5C �< br x 5C —
N �
� A
O
O
O
O
O +3 o
O
O
c
O
O
Cl,
O
O
c
c
O
c
o
O
O
O
C O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
w
a
a
w
w
a
T
O
O
a0
Uf) m
r
O
M
r,
M
�
O
M
—4-
C: _
O
—4 O O
L1
O
N
OC^
4t
00
u9
LrI,
fv
00
00
rl
rl
a--f
b9'
b4
fA
b�} Ef}
{¢i
b9•
(
b
b4
b4
ti4
EA•
�•
tPr
to
tA.
b4.
O
�-
ro
.J
•,4
G
•a
4-:
+%
+}
4-�
N 441
4-
+}
+,
+=
+=
4-3
1
,4 m
• 4
m
ul
(n cz U)
u)
ui
U)
N
a)
to
rjw ua
u)
uJ
ua
u)
m
co
C
v,.
CO 0
rf
o
0
o a G
o
0
o
r-+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
as U
ro
U
U
U U
U
U
U
m
U
U
ro U
U
U
+1
U
Ci
U
U•
^,
r,
U7
C-)
+
G
+
+� CO
+,
ro
m�
CO w ro
ro
m
L
m
ro
ro
r
ro
co co
+j
m
ro
o
m
m
ro
U
ro
m
=J +s
m
+-+
+)
•ter +
4J
}
+,
O
+
}
.0
Co
+s
+a
+,
-P
O O
ro
0
0
ro
0 0 0
O
G
G
O
0
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O.
4
O
+' +`
C,
H ro H
H
F'
H
O
H
•4
F-1
G r'
CO
F-+
H
H
+)
H
o
H
ZI
-+
X C
r-
pa
Sa
2
4-:'
4
-P
ro
C
• 4
of
G N
bD
•r_
N
O
ur
G E
m
•, 4
.4
U) c2
-4
• rr
u)
>
O
b
O
b
4-2
O
O
U w
—
N
O
O
W O
O
O
O
>1
-4
W
+�
4
"
rd
a) R
• 14.
.11
-P
+-
u)
O
ro
�
m
�
O
O
C
N
o
m +J
+1
+=
3
bL
3
bV
w
•ter
>
(15
s
�4
Z ro
ro
b
-4
10
-4
N
V)
U
N
_
H U]
Cl)
04 O
G
�.4
4"
G
O
is
N
•,4
bb
4
L c
)
rz
U
k
b
>1
C'
D bjC
va •14
P
o
.1--.
O
ca
0
GZ4
44
H
b
w
+
v
b
A
±
4-'
�
W
W -P
3
S:
z
+=
m
to
O
3
rx 3
3
f4
ro
--1
o
N
o
a
�j
•4
ro
o
0
0
4- N
_o
O
s
O
4)
O
1
Y
�
—
U
W Z
H
U
U
Cra
F-4.
Uf
a
U
0�
44
O
U
Pa
U
U
C
va
r\
r\
f r
r•e
"a
r..,
s°•.
!�.
O
r-?
N
Cl)
�'
lro
>
N
--4
N
Cl)
-7t
Lr�
r,
--4
--1
�
l4
w
o
N
Cl)
r--,
^
'
N
N
(N
N
X11
M
M
M
M
M
t` 7
•4
S-3
a
20
_
m
+J
ro (1)
-4
u �
ul
a�
C() m
boo
•.4 u
U 7 �
ro a) r~
a > O
•,4 a) pa
rT4 W
44 -1
O ro
O �
-d w
+-)
� G
O
ca 4-;
N ro
O A
O
>� X �< �<
+-,
ca
•4
N
O o r~
O
O
+S
O a-+ O •4
O
O
O
G
O
o 0 ro
O
+-)
O
a
d
te +
-4
4-)
u]
r+ O
N O
4
A
C
b01
y, ro�l
a
a 0
u
v
A+
CIA
Z rCi
+) a+ 4) >a
ro 44
3
0
• z
:
ro C
• 4 >, U 5^
+J
- 3
m 00
a)
O
o
=j
U cn +- u -4
cu
a ro
o
� �
a� �
U)
ro
-A O
w b o
-)
O
O"
+J .-+ • r4 ro 0
w
+1
pa'
O bD
u1 00 A U A
a)
ro
.N
H yg
I bD 8 La
I
a)
I
+-�
U -4
W
•4
-4 UI
ro
+P I
+1 44
4J
O fT4
+I
U) 0 ..
U] r- >,
r--1
ro O
a)
d7
ca r0 (A G
CO
+- a
CO
O cn
bD , o v a
cn
G�4
O
o W o •,4
0
0
O 00
: A r+
G�D ro A
�4 (1)
bD U
a)
U
U O D U
U
ro 0
u
5
bD U O
O F4 +1
(1) ✓~
• r1 ro
O>
v
U w
•,4 O
>,
•.a CO O
44 ro •rl a)
3
m
w • 4
(3) -4
� tll
-4
w ul
x .s-
d' 0 O C
0 r
G
44 W
ca ry
ro w ro 4
ro
O a
ro
U
co o
_r u
u• 4 W
a
•4
M
4-J M
>,
a-J +-J u
+1
a o
+I
Fes-,
P bD 0)
G vi U x 0
0�
ro
m
o u
o
o 3 0 r~
o
bD
0
+-3
N r-+
O
F-4 O p -A
H
ro
H
LO
0 0
a) A
ro
N 0
ro W
—4 G
u1
4-4 t0
-P
>
�,
0 U
+1 +1 A 0
W bD
W a +I
> ro
44
(1
r U)
U
Qi
w x
(1) �-: Ld
+I U U r7
> U
-A 1
+-J
ro
ro 0
.rl
P4
H
w O O
w w
O rO
44 j• 4-3
U
n1
M
Z
A
O
m
O w
u r� A
U +J +- m
m
G
C
a) 44
y,
U \
0
bD
w
H G
O 4- r
ro
u1 •4 U] CO +1 rO
O
a)
U O
A O
ca
to �
C
Pa
•'4
+P • 4
Co ] 4 +I
G-1 U] S
O
U
U W
U
a
G
U• 4
v] ro
a) c0
+-) u1
• 4 A 'O � 7
a)
ro
ro CO Lr4
(W
x
Sa
cn 41
3
4-
xx
>~ c
M. ZI o
CO � � +1 a o
r-
—q �
+, �
u 'O
s-,
a)
to u1
0
• r4 m
ro�d
0 0 U
O m
, CL O a 0 W
U� 0 O bD
ro
,-+
a, .4
N 3
Ul CL +I
�:: W ro
> • 4
0 W
O
-3�
+-)
ro
a) t4
w •4
m
1 a)
�o �3:
uc73
ua
�� c�vla
ark
H
P4 w
r+
u
•,4
Q' N
ro A o
ro
I ro A u b
•4
CO
A u
.b
+I
ro
3 �....��
I
00`.�v..v
H �
N
M
tf1
O
�
r-q
--1
—4
r-4
.4
w
Pa
21
m
- a
0 m
•4
C)
a) U)
a(1)
ul
co
bD �
a
•,4 (1)
U to
r~ > o
-,4 (1) as
w 0
44 r1
o ro
W b
U) (1) •,4
o
4 w
(1) r-
0
ro -r4
W -P
CO
a bD
� A
0
z?
ru
4-�
bD
m
0
o
ro
Q)
0
o
o c
O
O
O
C)
C.:
�
r3
O
O
L= ^
O
o
T)
14
t
I-
E
O
r C
I
a
co
3
0
0
�
m
p
+�
t
ca
N
E o �o
U
o
(1)
rn
w
•,4
ro
+J
+
..
�
o r,
a
3
8
rx
rr
ca o
o
a)
r
•4 O
44
ro
+J
:I
ro •4
m o
0C)
4-3
o>1
w
u
�4
o
w
o
v
f»
•4
�
U
a
o
U
G
R
u
t
0
44
Z
,< v1
Sa
V]
O t
, 4
0
U
C
0
C
N
44
N 1-4
-4
ro
O
CO 7d
4-)
C
+J
+J
+J �71
O
U
O
>
O
a-J
u) —
bD
O
O 4a
a)
O
41 [ii
O
C - O
u)
u
.14
C/) --j
G
u) ro
::1
rd
U
S
U
ra
U
( ,
a) ul
1-a
O
ro 'o
0
0 .n U
1
O ,.
3 w
-
+J
q .o
o
•14
a-V-
"
o u ::�
�
—4
-P or
h -- � -
G
ro
ul
ro
bD
+J M
a ro
O
+ cn C) r
ro ,-,
u
ro�4
o
ro
ro
4J
-W
G
4J
'Ja !~
..
44
.._.
fY7 C
-0
(ar (1) 0
3-j 0c)
!~
-4
1..1
. O 41
X 0 0
0
O
o
0
. - c
u
�4
O.
•,4
o
0
0
+J +J o
0 r-) O
E—
C?
H
—4
C2-1 0
O
in
ol U
O
O
w cn
F-1
0
+,
O
M�
3
•a
W,
o
P4 E 0
1
a
u)
a 4- (N
co
u)
:J ,z-
aJ
O •'-!
+-;
.0
0 •.+
'1-W
C)..
U) a)
U
M
-4
0
0
3 �
+J
� 44 -,4
Z
•4 W
r
a)
ro o t
LO
(1)
o
U)
u
'
r,
co o
ro o
• n
E 4J
Ej
+J O
Q O
R:
44 O
U, a-% C O
\
C
w
o
>,
o
a.
u) +J
o
m
4
0 04�
c
u) +J
--4
0
3
ro
Pa
U :j u
�
r+
.4 = a
• J
+J >, �.
-�2
+.1 +
O
� f u o
G i b
•,±
(1)
cu O o�)
ro
U •-
-t ZJ
E IC
}` _t, u
+J
• ri r-i C15
F 0
::j
Z= G ro
O
bD
ro
�--! a-J 4-1 p
0
0
• r-1
• r-I W.
N
N 3 <4
o
b
.' •- —
.I--
�-, -1
-C
�4 ro
m rn�,
0 0 M 0
�
U)
� o
fL
�
(�
u;✓
U
UHO�o
?3L
U
44
N ro
'n
C
ro-n 1
ro
U
Q) 4� b0 Y
4J
ro
U
r\
o
,4
N
O
N
N
C"!
N
z?
m
+J
r-4 G
ro �
•,4 El
a a�
bD
G
•,4
a b
G > o SC >C >e DC >C bC 5C >C bC
•a a) as
w
w
o ro
w b
co (1) •a
o a)
4 w
(1) a
—, o
cn •,4
r� +)
ro
bD
•a
c5 -4
0
23
q
o
010
o
o
O
O
o
�
O b o
o
+J
o
•a
0
0
0
O N
O
o
O
0
+-)
ul
O ca o
O
ca
o
o W o
0
0
N o
V)
O-4
In
O
0 U O
o
ro
Q)
o
a o
0
a w
00
a
a
3
w
b
3:
N
O
N
O
N
N
O
(3)
O
n>1 N
M
10
j•
Lo
a
U
4-J
vI
G
N
3
+
ro-
o
r,
v�
b
z
O
-64 �
b4
-64 co
�6 •
•A
16}
b
a
a �.
G ti4
10
b4
�
3
b4
O
O00
O
I W
P
x
w Sa
1 O-
P
G
I
ro
(1)
3
-4
P •'a I
a)
U I
ro
O
I
bD I
G I
M
!
G
P
44
C13 -4
A
co
4 CZ
w N
44
+�
w
+J
0
O
N rT4
4-J O cd
m C4
+J
U)
•
a-J
4-J
w
G
W m
'�''
1
O
o
w J
P14
o
O
U
o
—4
O
(10
m
o s O
G ul
ro o
!-+
a)
03
G mA CO
g
m
-4
m
U
U
U� u
U�
U
U U
U
FZ4
o
U
o o
x G U
G
O
U
G
o
U
-a
O
O
bG0
U
-Z
rri
> r7
bD
O
O
O ro
-4 G O
-4
00 O
•-+ ro 44
,-a
yJ
-1
ro
4&
� O -i
!•.c -4
G
r-+
G CO -4
-4
• 4
-4
w •4
ro��
ro
o
ro PQ -4
ro
m
ro
•-1
Co rn ro
o m
U O
ro
o ro
m
ro
ro
3V G
-P +-+ a
+W
a
4J U
+s
G
a-j
rX4
b
4-5 +-J
w +J
O
4J
+-+
G
+J
cam)
+)
G
w Q)
O G 00
H a)
o
U co
o !`c ro
O
O
O
o 17
O 0
3 0
O Lr)
o
ca r- 0
•14
O
G
0
U
H
H•4w
H
U
H
4-
O
H+�H
co F-4
- aH
•4 off
roH
s�
H
U!
I
o
U
ul
U
bD
N
G
w 0
3
(1)
cn
�
4-J
+-) O
W
u a
fy
-4
a) E
o G
G O
ul
G
+)
G U
G G
G m
G •,-c
G
+�
O a
•rI
ro
!
bD +}
U
O
U
.a
4 4
•,4 _-j
-4 G
U -Zt
W O
(1)
ro b0
G
U
a)
•�
ro O
CZ -q
cd O
ro�
ul
a)
U) -4
-4 O
G
G
0
5�
�
5 W
G
a)
U O
O
4�
4
!
0
�
bD
o 1-
0
0.
u)
w P
(z a
x
•4
U) co °
a) ul
P
u
u u
u a
O
G-4
.,4
a
w
ca
4-J
to
a
G
-P
G ro
G CO
G -P
G A O
• 4
a)
ro
w a)
a P
4-1
41
a °
cu
G
..a
G
(1) x
44
O
G
m (1)
•,a a.
• 4
-4 cn
•tea m cn
+s
>
0 3
o
ul
4
ro
G
I a
N fQ
I O
N 4J
1 a)
N ,'�
P ro a
N a) N
G(
O
'd
.�
•'4 O•,4
.� H
,--4
� 00
a)
w
44 0
,.0 -4 4-.
ro 4
Cl)
\
O 0 ol
a
U
U
O
O
41
0)
U C
C
G ,4
G
ro
-P
G
U
• 4 (1)
t
O
N
4-1
bD
1
N
n
ro
1]
a)
-
O
o
.�
O ro
-4
P
ro
ul
ro
G a)
O b
N
Cl)
j°
in
�p
a-+
O
-4
M
M
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
co
Cl)
f-
P44
23
U2
4-1
r4 r
ro w
C.) � X
(� —
P,
m
bD
a
U —
ro w a
r� > o
.,4 U
wx
(44 r4 —
0 cz
o a
+-3
U �
r4 O
cli 4-)
� ca
O A
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
41
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
0
0
0�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
bDa
a
N
0
a
a
a
,
a
O G cU
c`')
Lfl
U
O
Lfl 4J
0
0
N
0
0
U3 O
N • 4 Z •'4
4t
00
N
I!
u1
u'1
00
-:t
i4 O
Q, •r4 -4
N
SG
r4
C Ul
r-+
N u1
� Z G
, 4
f+
-+
+J
,1
N
P4 bD
-b }
�
4>4
cfr
�
fig
O
<A•
4 tfr
4A•
4y4
M <A•
O
4
3
i
U
U
! U U) x
I
I
-It
1
I O
1
1
ca
I
I
I
!
I
O
bD ca
CO
U
Iv
i
I
-4
4-1 7' w 4J
4
4
4J
4,
4-j
4J
W
4J
4-+ 4-�
-P
4-J
(b 4.3
U
m, a c0
m
cn
W
m
ul bD
w
cn
P4
co
U) Ul
w
m
4 m
0 ad X-1
o
o>
0
•'4
0 F~
0
0
0
o
O
0
•�4 0
O
U u 0
U
U
6
U
cli
U
U
U
U
o U
U
w
U
G C7
4J
N r. •i4
; Ti
r4
41
U
4�
U
co
r4 ,r4 •r4 -C:
1-4
CO
r4 r4
r4
r4
a)
r4
r4
U
r--i
>
r4
M r4 —
b
Z 1r 1 0
CO
• 4
CZ
r,
M
4! 0
M •.4
ro
c0
N
0
W CO
N
CZ
•r4
CO
co
W
4J Fes. �
4
M
4
>,
4-%
U) Pa
4, .L"
4J
4-1
w
4%
N 4.1
•r i
4J
C i
4-J
7 4J
O
o O N (4-4
o
0,
O
co
o
cd
o u
o
0
4
O
0
0
0
0
G 0
LW
[-4 W O
H
UH3
H
W UHF
H
H�
4-)H
UH
WFH
—+H
CZ H
off
(
a
ct
+�
U
b
ul
E S•4
0 •'4 W r,
a)
o >1
rro.�vv
0 W
o
�4 —
4J
U V
p 4 c0 m
bD
w CJ
w
w
-4
0 41
i4
bD
o
U
44 U) G) 4!
'l7
Li 4 1--
44 {4
44 w
cz
P-1 Cl)
co
cli
>2
4j
U
I
•.4 Z4
•14
-4
.4
cU
3
4-;
r
.14
CO
n
H
w k U<4
w
s4 ::I
c4 6
3
al
I
•�
.4
0
o
vI bD
U U r4
U o•
U
U U
b
4
r
ro
E
w
P4
0 • 4
(1) O 5 c»
(1) O
G.) 4a
N
CO
W •,4
U)
Q
—
U 1~
u] 4 •r4
Z$
m 4->
w
c/a C
(3) Z
bD
•rf
'417 S4
I.,
cz
•r4
Q)
3
U
,y.
1r
0
i= O m
>
i4 •r4
i4 r4
i4
c
cv . '4 r4 :
cz 'd
m 0
m
3
:
3
w
14
ca
F4 bD
4-} 4-) N '0
41 0
41 Z
4-• 41
i
S rl
I
U
•'4
4t _
7 =$
•'4 cd 3 1✓
C
•r4
•.4 bD
.4 U)
S4 OJ
�
V]
cl
w o
G 4� U F4
O
G w
C M
� ca
0>
�
!
a
C: r4
cz ul CA
w
c0 0
cd
co w
••4
4->
•r4
1.4
N
u
U]
ro
U)
v]
U)
U
v]
U
Q
Q
U)
H r4
N
Cl)
-::t
Ln
n.
00
� •ter
�
�
�
v
v
.�
u
v
u
v
�
4-1
'4
-
W
0
r4
r4
r4
N
N
N
U
U
U
U
U
U
•'4
P4
24
--
WATER. SUPPLY STUDY
Funds have been included in the Capital Improvement Program for a study
of Salina's future waterworks system requirements, including water
supply, transmission, treatment, storage and distribution. The study
would include the .following
1. Projected Water Requirements to the Year 2000. This phase
of the study should update all previous consumption and population
growth projections.
2. Capability of Existing Water Supply, This phase should
determine present and predicted performance capabilities of the
existing water supply sources Smoky .Hill River and local well field.
3. Capabilities of Potential Future Supplies, This phase should
include studies of Kanopolis,�Wi.lson, Glen Elder, and Milford Reservoirs,
possible transmission routes from each., alternate methods of conveyance,
capital and operating costs, water quality and quantity, and legal
considerations in each case. At least three potential routes of
conveyance exist between Kanopol.is Reservoir and Salina, aside from
the Smoky Hill. River. The study should consider each alternate with
all associated costs and preferences due to quality, losses, etc.
4. Location and functions of Additional Treatment and Distribu-
tion Facilities. This phase should include capital improvement fund
projections for required pumping stations, clarification works, storage
facilities and expansion of arterial. and distribution mains.
Creation of the Salina Airport Authority and the sudden upturn in the
industrial outlook require that Salina's water distribution system be
expanded rapidly, The Schilling water system, now being acquired by
the City, can be utilized in an efficient manner only by connection to
the present City distribution system,
This phase should also include a new and comprehensive hydraulic study
of the entire combined systems, updati.ng previous hydraulic studies
and taking into consideration the potenti.a) expansion of the systems
for both industrial and residential. supplies. The hydraulic study
should be made by use of the McElroy !network. Analyzer,. The results
of the analysis would be utilized to determine proper arterial main
sizes and locations and the proper locations and capacities of pumping
stations and underground and elevated storage facilities.
The Capital. Improvement Program. contains $1.2,000 for the water supply
and hydraulic studies and the preparation of *tie study report. This
should be supplemented by approximately $10,000 for City- furnished
flow and pressure recording equipment permanently installed to imple-
ment control of system, but used initially to provide accurate data
for the hydraulic study.
25
PROPOSED PROJECT REQUEST'S
The following pages contain copies of proposed project requests.
Priority designations are as followso
Priority 1 - Projects to be undertaken in first 4 years of program
Priority 2 - Projects to be undertaken in second 3 years of program
Priority 3 - Projects to be undertaken in last 3 years of program
Priority C - continuous program
26
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT --
1. Project Name: Civi:. Center
2. Location: Ninth and Seventh.; Ash and Elm
3. Description: Construction of a City - County Building under the first
Urban Renewal Project,
4. Purpose or Justification: 'To replace the cld and inadequate City Hall
and County Courthouse,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 1965
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1968
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $1,100,000;00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
27
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT - --
1. Project Name: City Library
2. Location: Ninth and Seventh, Ash and Elm
3. Description: Construction, of a new City Library under the first Urban
Renewal Project,
4. Purpose or Justification: To replace the old and obsolete City Library,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 1965
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1968
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $6759000,00 —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
f•']
PRIORITY NO, 1
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUE`?
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Oakdale Park Improvemerit
2. Location: Oakdale Park.
3. Description: Resurfd_t grid llgr,t roi,.r ter�r s cur; s, replace old backstops.
Rebuild six shuffleboa�cd . New ligt_r ir7g for sl,utLlebo-rds, �:roquet, roque and
ping -pong tables- New buiidir,g for shuffiebvazd ar.d games equipment, Shelter
and meeting building,
4. Purpose or Justification: See page 30,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 19'Dr'
Year Construction to be Started 196b
Year Project to be Completed 19(D 6
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction19.50�,0U
Equipment Uncl, furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $19. 500.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion: $1;000:00
8, Estimated Life of Project:10 -15 Years
Submitted by: 1� K. Rirklefs
D2te: -9.65
29
Project Name: Oakdale Park Improvements
Location: Oakdale Park
Purpose or Justificaticn: Tennis court surfaces in bad condition. Old
woven wire backstops should be replaced with chain -link 12 -foot high
fencing. Shuffleboards developing cracks. Lighting for shuffleboards,
croquet, r.oque and ping -gong old and in bad condition. Games equipment
building small and inadequate. Oakdale ParK needs shelter house and meeting
place to replace old Claflin Hall which burned down years ago. This building
was greatly used for large group meetings, union church services, etc.
30
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Sunset Park Improvements
2. Location: Sunset Park
3. Description: Tennis court rebuilding, backstop replacement, shelter
house.
4. Purpose or Justification: Six tennis court. ,s badly cracked, Old woven
wire backstops in poor condition. Need shelter house as there is none there
now.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 1967
Year Construction to be Started 1967
Year Project to be Completed 1967
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction $99500,00
Equipment (incl, furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $9,500,00
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion: $500,00
8. Estimated Life of Project :10 -15 Years
Submitted by: I. R. Ricklefs
Date: 29 -65
31
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Proposed park pla: -+. for the Edgemere Addition
2. Location: Bounded by Cypress Drive, Birch Drive, Hemlock Drive and
Choctaw Avenue
3. Description: To develop a new park over a period of time, not to
exceed three years.
4. Purpose or Justification: A aew park is needed in this part of the
City to serve the nearby neighborhood,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 1966
Year Construction to be Started 1966
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $199724,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
32
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Land and property acquisition
2. Location: Sand pit lake northeast edge of Salina. Land southeast of
Salina adjoining river.
3. Description: Sand pit lake known as Old Putnam Sand Pit and land of
approximately 20 acres, Land southeast of Ohio St. and Belmont Ave.,
approximately 50 acres, along Smoky Hill Rivera
4. Purpose or Justification: City needs sand pit lake for boating (sail
boating, trolling motors), swimming, fishing and picnicking, Need land
southeast of Salina for park in that area as city grows in that direction.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 1,000,00
Land or R of W 75,000.00
Construction 5,000.00
Equipment (incl. furnishings) 2,000.00
Other
TOTAL $83,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion: $5,000.00
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by: I, R, Ricklefs
Date: 7 -2965
33
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Sand Pit Recreation Area Development
2. Location: Putnam Sand Pit Area
3. Description: To develop this area into a recreational area,
4. Purpose or Justification: Part of City's open space program.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $300,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
34
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Enclosed ice skating rink
2. Location: Not definite
3. Description: To build a new enclosed ice skating rink
4. Purpose or Justification: A new recreational facility to serve the entire
City.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $275,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
35
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT - --
1. Project Name: Golf Course
2. Location: Present Municipal Airport
3. Description: Conversion of Municipal Airport land into a new 18 -hole
golf course, pending move of Municipal Airport to Schilling,
4. Purpose or Justification: Part of City's open space and recreational
program.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $250,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
36
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT ----
1. Project Name: Carver Center Improvement
2. Location: Carver Center
3. Description: Rebuild the entire b!ai:ding
4. Purpose or Justification: To replace the existing obsolete building,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $1.00,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
37
PRIORITY NO. 2 —
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Building Project: —
2. Location: Indian Rock Park
3. Description: Shop and storage building, outdoor theater
4. Purpose or Justification: As park develops, there is need for new
building for shop and storage to replace old inadequate building. Salina
needs outdoor theater for band concerts, plays, etc.
5. Project Time Schedule;
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started 1970
Year Project to be Completed 1971
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 1,500,00 —
Land or R of W
Construction 40,000,00
Equipment (incl. furnishings) 2,500,00
Other
TOTAL $44,000,00 —
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion: $1,000,00
8, Estimated Life of Project: 25 30 Years
Submitted by: 1e R. Ric.klefs
Date: 7- 29--65
38
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Thomas Park Improvements
2. Location: Thomas Park
3. Description: Develop east_ side for better picnicking; modern toilet
facilities on both sides of the park; and hard surface drives on east.
side.
4. Purpose or Justification: General improvement
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $35,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
39
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Riverside Park Improvemen *s
2. Location: Riverside Park
3. Description; New toilets, walks, iights, improvement of parking area;
and nine picnic tables, ttree fire p.Saces r.eeded,
4. Purpose or Justification: To make the existing park a better recreational
area and raise it to star.darde
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1912
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $1.5,000.00 —
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
40
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Park
1. Project Name: Park Development
2. Location: City Parks
3. Description: Pave, build picnic areas, construct shelter houses,
construct rest rooms. Water lines and sanitary sewers,
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation; beautification; make more use to
public,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Conti,uous program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 7,000,00
Land or R of W
Construction 63,000,00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $70,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: 50 Years
Submitted by: H� F. Harper
Date: 7-28-65
41
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT
1. Project Name: Fire S, at ion.
2. Location: Quictcy anal Magc)oiia
3. Description: Cor,srr,ctio ! of a new 1-ir.F Statia,.
PRIORITY NO. 2
Fire
4. Purpose or Justification:, serve the soutt; side. of the City,
5, Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans --
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $!00,000,Or" —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by: Fire Department
Date: - - -28 6:5
42
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Fire
1. Project Name: Fire Station.
2. Location: East. Crawford
3. Description: Construction of a new Fire Station,
4. Purpose or Justification: To serve the east side of the City.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $120,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by: Fire Department
Date: 7- •28 -65
43
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Slough Lining)
1. Project Name: Slough Lining
2. Location: Crawford to Cloud
3. Description: To line,, grade and pave ditch
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, beautification
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated 1965
Year Construction to be Started 1965
Year Project to be Completed 1968
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $12,000.00
Land or R of W
Construction 1.08,000,00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $120,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: 50 Years
Submitted by: H, F. Harper
Date: 7- 28•..65
44
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1966 -1975 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
' MAP 1
t
0
t
'
CIVIC CENTER • LIBRARY
SAND PIT RECREATION :•:•
AREA DEVELOPMENT
FIRE STATIONS O
PARK IMPROVEMENTS 001/1
GOLF COURSE t'
'
0 CARVER RECREATION Q
CENTER
SLOUGH DITCH -
'
WI L S O N
. COMPANY
EN6.INEER5 4
ARCHITECTS 1
PLANNING CONSULT gNTS
0 /4 �2
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Ninth, Cloud to Ash
3. Description: Widen both sides from Ash to Iron, Kirwin to Cloud; new
road from Iron to Kirwin.
4, Purpose or Justification: To improve the traffic condition. and to
accommodate the increased traffic volume in the future,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl, furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $448,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
45
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST —
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvemer!t
2. Location: Cloud, Ninth to Highlard
3. Description: Road wideni °.g.
4. Purpose or Justification: To improve street condition.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans —
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl, furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $L'i,000,00 --
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
46
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Crawford, Missouri Pacific Railroad to Ninth
3. Description: Widen from railroad to Phillips, from 11th to 10th,
New road from Phillips to llt'h, from 10th to 9th Street.
4. Purpose or Justification: General street improvement, to accommodate
future traffic.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $109,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
47
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Fourth, Iron to Ash.
3. Description: New road
4. Purpose or Justification: To improve street condition leading to the _
new Community Inn,
5. Project Time Schedule: —
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans —
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $57,000,00__ —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
48
PRIORITY NO. 1.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAIN
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Iron, Fifth to River
3. Description: New road
4. Purpose or Justification: Bad vertical alinement.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $100,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
WE
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: South, Broadway to Ninth
3. Description: Widen. road from Broadway to railroad; new road from
railroad to Ninth, —
4. Purpose or Justification: To improve crosstown traffic.
5, Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972 .
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans —
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $123,000,00 —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
50
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Prescott, Highland to Oakdale
3. Description: New road
4. Purpose or Justification: Bad alinement.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL 87;000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
51
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement.
2. Location: Cloud, Broadway to Ninth
3. Description: Widen both sides of the street,
4. Purpose or Justification: To improve street condition and accommodate _
future traffic,
5. Project Time Schedule: —
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $46,000 00 —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
52
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Republic, Highland to Santa Fe
3. Description: New Road
4. Purpose or Justification: The width of the street is not uniform,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $ 83,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
53
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2, Location: Fourth, Crawford to South
3. Description: New road and wider.,
4. Purpose or Justification: To improve street condition.,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $156,OOOa00
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
54
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM!
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement.
2. Location: Ohio, Greeley to Ash.
3. Description: New road
4. Purpose or Justification: Width of street is not uniform,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $151,00m o
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
55
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Crawford, Ohio to Mary- mount
3. Description: Widen both sides of the street.
4. Purpose or Justification: To accommodate the future traffic volume
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans —
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $270,000°00 --
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
56
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2, Location: Broadway, Ash to Ninth
3. Description: Widen both sides of the street.
4, Purpose or Justification: Improve street condition and accommodate
future traffic volume
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $183,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
57
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement.
2. Location: Cloud, Quincy to Obio
3. Description: Widen both sides of street.,
4. Purpose or Justification: Improve street condition and accommodate
future traffic volume,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL -t8l 000,o�
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
58
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement
2. Location: Cloud, Highland to Quincy
3. Description: Widen the road
4. Purpose or Justification: Improvement of the street and for future traffic
volume,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $71,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
59
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Street
1. Project Name: Street Improvement.
2. Location: City -wide
3. Description: Overlay, sealing, new pavement, to continue overlay
program, pavement to come by petition
4. Purpose or Justification: Street. improvements
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Continuous Program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 1.45,000 —
Land or R of W
Construction 1,305,000
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $1,450,000- —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: 40 Years
Submitted by: H. F. Harper
Date: 7 -28 -65
*Only 1/3 of this amount, or $483,000 will be used on the Capital —
Improvement Program for the next 10 years.
60
PROPOSED
STREET PROJECTS
1966 -1975
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
MAP 2
O
1
�
1
■
■
EtA'1i�i1•r�,
�
•
i
y
ftt11 -
ftltt# #itiiiiiiitli11t11`.
its
■ all i• j�it #11tt11 /111 /!1111! /= Ht /!H,
1966 -1970 1111111t■i
1971 - 1975 111111111
\/\/I L S O N
COMPANY
ENGIN EERS
Nortrx ARCHITECTS
PLANNING CONSULTANTS
'�4 Y2
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT hater
1. Project Name: Waterworks Improvements
2. Location: See page 62
3, Description: See page 62
4. Purpose or Justification: These projects will provide for the connection
to the Schilling system, water supply to the south industrial area and
general reinforcement of the distribution system.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL See page 62�
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
BI
WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENT'S
Location and Description
12 -inch Mains
Glen to Iron on Marymount Road
Wayne to Key on U.S. 81
10 -inch Mains
Loop Sacred Heart High School and South Junior High School
grounds (Cost borne by schools)
8 -inch Mains
Republic to Wayne along West City Limit.
Cloud Street West of U.S. 81 Bypass
South Street to Cedar on Thirteenth
Loop St.. .John's -Military Academy grounds (Cost borne by
school)
Miscellaneous
Replace overhead power lines at plant with underground lines
Install fire alarm signal, at plant
Replace 4-inch main across Crawford at Front Street
Move check valves from. east to west side of Channel. Drive
Total for work described above $180,000
Other Work
Water system study*
Pressure and flow recording equipment*
First 1/3 of 6 -inch reinforcement
mains shown on Map 3
16 -inch Main ._ 1.966
Magnolia tower south to Westinghouse -
10,500 LF
12 -inch Main
Northwest edge of city, Walnut to
St. John's Military Academy - 12,000 LF
Continuous new construction in new
developments, pay by Special Assessments
at $50,000 per year
*See page 25
Tot .a.1
Average
:a
12,000
10,000
44,000
1.26,000
108,000
$480,000 (Revenue Bond)
200,000 (4 years)
$6809000
$170,000 per year
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT —Water
1. Project Name: Waterworks Improvements
2. Location: See page 64
3. Description: See page 64
4. Purpose or Justification: General reinforcement of distribution
system, second connection to Schilling system, and additional supplies
to north and south industrial areas.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972 .
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL See page 64
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
63
WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS
Location and Description
12 -inch Mains
Viemont to Beverly Drive on Crawford (Loop to Schilling)
Cloud to Albert on Ohio
10 -inch Mains
Iron to Ash on Fifth Street
Quincy to Ohio on South City Limit
8 -inch Mains
Ohio to Front on Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way
Ninth to U.S. 81 Bypass on North Street
Walnut to Ash on Oakdale
Marymount to Eastborough on Country Club Road
Country Club Road to Glen on Eastborou.gh
Southeast from Prescott and Ohio
East of Ohio on Republic
Fourth to Quincy on Cloud
Total for work described above $215,000
Other Work
Second 1/3 of 6 -inch reinforcement
mains shown on Map 3
44,000
16 -inch Main
—
Fourth to U,S, 81 Bypass on Crawford -
5,200 LF
62,400
1.2 -inch Mains
St. John's to Stimmel on 5th and west
to U.So 81 - 4,000 LF
36,000
Crawford from U.S. 81 Bypass to Centennial -
_
2,800 LF
25,200
Centennial from Crawford to Schilling -
8,500 LF
76,500 —
U,S, 81 frog. Key to Westinghouse -- 8,000 LF
72,000
Air Base Road, U.S. 81 east to U.PRR -
2,500 LF
22,500
$553,600 (Revenue Bond)
Continuous new construction in new
developments, pay by Special Assessments
at $50,000 per year 150,000 (3 years)
Total. $703,600
Average $234,500 per year
64
PRIORITY NO. 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Water
1. Project Name: Waterworks Improvements
2. Location: See page 66
3. Description: See page 66
4. Purpose or Justification: General. reinforcement of distribution
system and additional elevated storage.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1975 .
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment Unc1. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL See page 66
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
65
Submitted by:
Date:
WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS
Location and Description
12 -inch Mains
Ohio, Prescott to Magnolia and west to
tower - 14,000 LF
$126,000
Ohio. Pacific to dike and west to U.S.
81 - 8,000 LF
72,000
Elevated tank near St. Johns Military
Academy
120,000
Booster station - Crawford and Centennial
30,000
10 -inch Mains
Fifth, Stimmel to Culver Road and west
to U.S. 81. - 6,500 LF
45,000
8 -inch Mains
Wayne to Magnolia on Huntington and Ohio
to Huntington on Magnolia - 4,000 LF
28,000
6 -inch Mains
Last 173 of 6 -inch mains shown on Map 3
44,000
$465,000 (Revenue Bond)
Continuous new construction in new
developments, pay by Special Assessments
at $50,000 per year
1.50,000 (3 years)
'T'otal
$615,000
Average per year $205,000
66
In
W
N
O
CL
O
ce
CL
N
V
W
O
w
CL
Y
O
Ix
W
H
a
1
Q
� M
0—
Q
o�//
m
a.
F-
Z
W
W
O
w
n.
J
Q
F-
0-
Q
V
u�
o.
•o
%0
O�
r-
Z z N F
Z
O Q c v
d w w
,(r) W F zo
J 0 0 u o
z C z
�Uwaa
O
C7 ■
Z
N N
W
0 , =
LLJ
CD
Cl-
� 1
_ W
Z Z
Q Q W �
W O
H
Q
C W
CD
I— 1— W
N W Q J J
W Q J W
LLJ I— W > 3
Z
Q N J o cD o co %o Q C = LLJ
Q
W 3: i�- U 3
•
iirrfrri
Ilk
«• •
.
tt
®:R ;
�iiir-
� � � nnnnririuuiiri�uui�i�uuurrruuni
`
$Bi U lir
_ ■ru.
rig
■
II{
Il�iiiiiiilrril
w
�
. ♦�♦
� w' ♦♦
irrrrit
'riRIIMIiilliiiilAEIIIiIi1I
no r an #II #I!
fi
In
W
N
O
CL
O
ce
CL
N
V
W
O
w
CL
Y
O
Ix
W
H
a
1
Q
� M
0—
Q
o�//
m
a.
F-
Z
W
W
O
w
n.
J
Q
F-
0-
Q
V
u�
o.
•o
%0
O�
r-
Z z N F
Z
O Q c v
d w w
,(r) W F zo
J 0 0 u o
z C z
�Uwaa
O
C7 ■
Z
N N
W
0 , =
LLJ
CD
Cl-
� 1
_ W
Z Z
Q Q W �
W O
H
Q
C W
CD
I— 1— W
N W Q J J
W Q J W
LLJ I— W > 3
Z
Q N J o cD o co %o Q C = LLJ
Q
W 3: i�- U 3
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sanitary Sewer)
1. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer. Construction
2. Location: Bonnie Ridge Pumping Station to existing 24 -inch. East. Main
Sewer, 1/4 -mile east of Ohio at Magnolia ('Industrial. Area),
3. Description: Laying of 12 --inch new sewer and 8 -inch force main.
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, To carry sewage from the developing
industrial area adjacent to the southern portion of the city,
5, Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1966
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $43,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
67
PRIORITY NO. 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST —
DEPARTMENT Construction (Bridge Repair)
1. Project Name: Iron Avenue Bridge Repair
2. Location: Iron Avenue at Fourth Street
3. Description: To repair the bottom of the bridge so that it will be safe to
be used.
4. Purpose or Justification: The bottom of the bridge is in poor condition. The
concrete is falling off and reinforcements are exposed to air,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1969
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL 115,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
.:
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sanitary Sewer)
1. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Construction
2. Location: Wayne Avenue, 1/4 mile east of Ohio to Quincy
3. Description: Laying of 15 -inch rsew sewer
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, To Carry sewage in the developing
southern part of Salip.ae
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1970
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $40,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
.•
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST —
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sanitary Sewer)
1. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Construction
2. Location: East Main Sewer, Magnolia to Air Base Road
3. Description: Laying of a new 21 -inch sewer.
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation. to carry the sewage of the Industrial
Area.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1970
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $85,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
70
PRIORITY NO. 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sanitary Sewer)
1. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Construction
2. Location: Schilling Complex to East Main Sewer
3. Description: Laying of new sewer and building of a new pumping station.
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, Connect the Schilling Air Base
sewer with the East Main Sewer
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed 1972
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
Land or R of W
Construction
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $120,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by:
Date:
71
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sidewalks)
1.
Project Name: Sidewalks
2.
Location: City -wide
3.
Description: Repair present, sidewalks and build new.
4.
Purpose or Justification: Regular program
5.
Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated
Continuous Program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6.
Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans
$ 7,000,00
Land or R of W
Construction
63,000,00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL
�70,000,00_
7.
Estimated Annual Operating Cost After
Completion:
8,
Estimated Life of Project: 20 Years
Submitted by: H. F, Harmer
Date: 7 2 8.- 65
72
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Storm Sewer)
1. Project Name: Storm Sewers
2. Location: Bond Street at Second Street to Prescott Avenue at Ninth Street
3. Description:
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, To carry storm waters in built up
areas.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Continuous Program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $15,200,00
Land or R of W
Construction 136,800.00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $152,000,00
7, Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: 100 Years
Submitted by: H. F. Harper
Date: 7• -2865
73
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Sanitary Sewer)
1. Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Construction
2. Location: City -wide
3. Description: Laying of new mains, laterals and intercepting sewers to
keep up with population,
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Continuous Program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 55,000,00
Land or R of W
Construction 495,000,00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $550,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: 50 Years
Submitted by: H. F. Harper
Date: 7 -28 -65
74
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Water)
1. Project Name: Dry Creek Drainage Project,
2. Location: Walnut Avenue north to dike
3. Description: To straighten, narrow and grade creek south of Walnut
and leave approximately 3 feet deep, North of Walnut to be approximately
9 feet deep,
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation, beautification
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Continuous Program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $_8,000,00
Land or R of W
Construction 72,000, 00
Equipment (incl, furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $80,000,00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project:futureYears
Submitted by: H, F. Harper
Date: 7 -28 -65
75
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Water.)
1. Project Name: De,- silting Smoky Hil: River
2. Location: 3 Miles, Cut -off ?o Dam.
3. Description: To scrape sludge from river after it has been drained low.
Deposit sludge on banks, cover with good earth ar�d landscape,
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitatior and to make more riven water storage,
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated Continuous program
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6. Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 14,+00 --
Land or R of W
Construction 129,600
Equipment Uncl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL $i44 „000.00 —
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8. Estimated Life of Project: Years
Submitted by: H. F. Harper
Date: 7 - - � 8- 6 5
E
PRIORITY NO. C
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUEST
DEPARTMENT Construction (Storm Sewer)
1. Project Name: Storm and Sanitary Sewer Separation
2. Location: Original Townsite
3. Description: Remove storm sewers from sanitary sewerage system.
4. Purpose or Justification: Sanitation. Eliminates or reduces load
on sewage system and plant.
5. Project Time Schedule:
Year Project to be Initiated CQn t inu ou g ,LLogram
Year Construction to be Started
Year Project to be Completed
6, Estimated Cost:
Studies and Plans $ 50.000.00
Land or R of W
Construction 450,000.00
Equipment (incl. furnishings)
Other
TOTAL 1500,000.00
7. Estimated Annual Operating Cost After Completion:
8, Estimated Life of Project: 100 Years
Submitted by:
Date: 7 -28 -65
77
H. F. Harper
43SWONd
S-111SNOJ 9--ld
$1 J311N J:f 'p' N1YOY
SM33 N19N3
A N V d W 0
NO s -1 1 M
0
NOI1d1S ONIdWnd
111..1..®
11.11....
(30403) „ 8
I m a SPIN
Imam
„Zi
10111 M NEW
„Si
SNIVN
V dVW
WVN9ONd 1N3W3A08dWl IVildVJ 9L6L -996L
idlalsnONI
S 1n ro 21 d 213 M 3 S A 2M I N d S
31VA]dd
onond
43SWONd