8.4 Advis Auth C C Est Add 3 CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
9/22/97 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: DRIGINATING DEPARTMENT: I APPROVED FOR
NO. 8 AGENDA:
Engineering & General Services
ITEM
NO. 4 & 4a
BY: Shawn 0' Leary~ BYe.
ITEM
Report on petition for public improvements and approval of resolution of advisability and
authorization for project.
BACKGROUND
On September 8, 199'7, the City Commission approved a change order on the 1997 Storm Drainage
Improvement Project to allow construction of a gabion wall for erosion control in an existing
drainage channel paralleling South Eastborough Road. This project was requested by the adjacent
property owner, Mr. Stan Lauer. Since that meeting, city staff has been working with Mr. Lauer on
an agreement and payment schedule for the project. The project is proposed to be financed 50% by
Mr. Lauer and 50% by the City at-large.
During our discussions with Mr. Lauer, he requested that the special assessment method of financing
be used for the project and that his lot would be the only property in the benefit district. The City
Attorney reviewed this option and found it to be acceptable in this case, provided that a petition be
submitted by Mr. Lauer and that the appropriate resolutions be approved by the City Commission.
The signed petition and resolutions are attached. If approved, 50% of the cost of the project, or
$10,460, will be assessed to Mr. Lauer's lot to be repaid over ten years with interest.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Commission approve the resolution of advisability and authorization
for the project.
Resolution Number 97-5200
: DO NOT MITE IN THIS SPACE
. ~' : PETITION NUMBER
, : FILED
'?SEP19 AMIO0?
:OlTY OF S~LIN/~, KS
~'o: TH£ COV~mNC ~DOY :OITY OLERK'S OFFIOE
(A) NO, the undersigned, being ~ars of record of pro~r~ liable for assensmn~ for the follmln Im rov~ent
cen~ ~0 Lo~ B]0ck.
hereby propose that such improvement be mede in the manner provided by Article 6a, Chapter 12 of the Kansas
Statutes Annotated, as amended.
(B) The estimate or probable cost of such improve,~nt ts Twenty Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty
andOO..~.O/_~O_O_Dollars
(C) The extent of the proposed improvement district to be assessed as indicated on the attached plat and is
described as follows: LOt 3, Block 1, Country Club Estates Addition No. 3.
(D) The proposed method of assessment is: ~1 Or lump sum for drainage
· ents without ~ --'j ~'".' ........
(E) The proposed apportionment of costs between the Improvement district and the City-at-large is:
Fifty percent ( 50 %) to be assessed against the improvement district and
Fifty percent ( 50 ~) to be assessed against the City-at-lergeo
(F) We further propose that such Improvement be made without notice and hearing as required by K.S°Ao 12-6s0~(1)
as amended.
No name may be withdrawn from this petition after the Governing Body eOmmnces consideration
* of the potttton or later than seven (7) days after this petttlon has been filed with the City Clerk
* (K.S.A. 12-6a0½)
Respectfully submitted by Stanle~ 'E. Lauer
Telephone Number.. 825-6193
Date & Tm~e P~y owned within the
Name ~gDaJU[I ~ ~.~oDJDo ~m:l Imemvemant Diet, et
BENEFIT DISTRICT
COUNTRY I,~'
~ 3 I1 I ).UI . ' ·
· CLUB I' I' '--' - - ~ i -Jj
~" 4 Ii lam I3 ?~ CLUB I L
-----~-' .L II .
a 5 Il lid I2
_--_:___L~L -- _ I= ~ Iff=
· ESTATESI. I ~u,~
a 6 I= I~11 ~ ia
'~' I Il I~
/ ,~.[_~l~I '
· II ·
l;0' D.U/t _~,j ~ 4
12~' I 125'
J
II
I
~ ,~.-- .2o' u~
Ti 5 ~ 5
r
a 6 i la 6
ii
i
Ii
,
~ 8 I1~ 8
NO. 2
=
I
B ~ i~ ~o
I
I,I
~ 24 i~ 11
I
II
a ~5 I la 12
I~' ~ 125'
I iL----42~ U,Alt
pm:.,= o.u,~ I
210'
I
I
a ~7 1,1~ 5
.... J L ....
CLUB ~5~
I
~ 2o I i~ 8
f
I
I
I
ESTATES
I
i'~ 19 ]ii
I 15 18 1~ 9
I ~ HILLS II
Scole: 1" = 200'