Solid Waste Study, Phase II
I CDM Camp Dresser & McKee
~
'il
;~
n
I-~
'j~
'.1
'\'.j
~]
"1
"
oJ
j
Zl
~
~
fA
~
h'!'~
iif';
1'"
DRAFT
DF
~
I
I
~
I
I
I
~
It]
CITY OF SAUNA
SOLID WASTE STUDY
PHASE D .
April 12, 1993
CAMP DIUlSSER It McKEE INC.
I" North MaIbt - Sulle 910
Wic:hitl. ItS 67202
(316) 262_
.~..,.
. .
I
i'
;.}
I'
I.
I
I
I
,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sedlon
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
'.0
6.0
7.0
\SI\UNA\lel.OOI
""""
,,'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r
t
f
I
l
.
.'
.
,
n...trl)IliOD
r;"
, Pqe
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I-I
AssessmontoftheActiveLaDdfillSite ......................... 2-1
~
,~
2.1 Field VisilslDala CoUectioo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2-1
2.2 ReviewofOpenllllDllProccdunla ...................,..... 2-1
2.3 Subsurface Invesliplion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2-2
r
I
~
,
.,
I
"
~
~
.
'.
Closure oftbe Acti.e LaDdfilI Site. ........................... 3-1
3.1 Proposed Final Surface Elevations ......................... 3-1
3.2 LaDdfilI Cap ......;..,............;..,............ 3-1,
3.3 Surface Use and VegetaIioo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3-2
ImpouI She ~A.F . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ... 4-1
4.1 SiteDevelopmelll Plao . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4-1
4.2 Soil1la1ance Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. 4-1
4.3 NPDES Surface w_ Proeedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4-1
4.4 Bue Grade E1evations ................................ 4-1
4.' Final _ E1evations .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 4-2
4.6 LiDor and '--bolo CoUection System Altemaliveo .............. 4-2
4.7 ComttudIoaandDemolitiooW_ ....................... 4-3
4.8 Speoia1 W..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4-3'
-
-
;
"
~
~
I'
ll.....ini\llLife_.................................. 5-1
'.1 Projeeted Solid W.... Oenerationlla... ..................... 5-1
'.2 Active Arei ll....inilli Life ............................ 5-4
'.3 Proposed Expansion Area Remaiuing Life . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ,..
,
,
ConcIuaions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-1
Reco.....q..duions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7-1
c.._ollldfMbtt:.
-
<
il
::,";:~::,~\;~;,j~,:;, ,i;~:'~;~Bt~;:..;~;~e:*?j;ti'~~:'~~~&~~;,~"
~,C'._
e-.v. ''';'' ""-';':
,:':l,;:";;,,.~<-,
Sedlon
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
\So\LINA'ISSUlltl
"',.,.
Gj ~
I'
.~ "
" :'..
:~, t.
~
LIST 01' APPENDICES
[1
Jl
~
ril :
1':1 ~
~-~
i.,'
.
o..crtpIIon
Existing D~ Arei ~elopmeut Maps
Landfill Openllono and ~ Procedures (Draft)
DailyCover~
SubSurface Inveotisaljon Rqlort (Draft)
f,j ~
J .'
:~_. i'
i.
W ~
f<:i
~
~ ~
,?d
~ ~
SIO~IDrainaa. ~
< '-'i.,
Soil Balance Analysis
Landfill LiDor System Eva1~
Pm-nltAFT
, . ".-
. ,
UI
~
;i
~~
[] ~
":';
~ ~
~
I
m '
I
I
~ .'
.
~_"JldMbtt:.
"" - . '.-
Hi
. "]:::~~:,~;Pf:'~,i'::~:"~'-c:', 'k;J:"i~;&~;,.4.:.'~i;~;;;~\~4iF',:;:&1V.t!~~~Mtti!~~ _~~L,;~*"""~~~";-m~titt ' ~ .
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
fl
tJ
l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The primary federal legislation for solid waste management is the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCIlA), first enacted in 1976. The objeetives of RC1lA are aimed at protecting hwnan health and
the environmeot while preserving material and energy resources. The United States Eoviromnenta1
Protection Agency (USEPA) promulgated the Subtitle "0" regUlations in Oorober 1991, establishing
criteria for municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLFs). These new regulations include location
restrictions, facility design and operating criteria, groundwater and methane gas monitoring requirements,
and financial requirements. These regulations are having an immediate impact on municipal solid waste
management and facilities.
The State of Kansas solid waste regulations are found in Kansas Statutes Annotated (KSA), Chapter 6'-
Public Health, Article 34-Solid Waste, and Kansas Admini.trative RegUlations (KARl, Article 29-Solid
Waste Maoasement. In 1992, the Kansas lesis1ature passed HB2801 whiCh amends the Kansas Solid
Waste Statutes. The Kansas th ~ ~HE) is currently reviewing the
task of rewriting KAR Article 29 ,~~OD and State legislation.
~
On October 9, 1993, alllandfiUa in the United States are to be in compliance with 40 CFll Parts 2'7 and
2'8, Solid Waste Disposal Facility Crileris, also known asllC1lA Subtitle "0". To accomplish the task
of compliance, most active landfills will close active ~ ..-- prior to the Oetober 9 """"u.... The
entities owning these facilities will have to choose w_ to reioeate to new approved ..-- or get out
of the disposal business totally.
"
L",
,
,
,
,
,
"
~
~'
.,{
,i
iii!
D'
'It:
:1'
,
I
I
,~
~
LD
Regulations for closing an active disposal site are covered by both federal and state statutes. RCRA
Subtitle "0" states in Pll1'll8'aph 2S8.I(d):
"MSWLF units that receive waste after October 9, 1991 but stop receiving waste before Oorober
9, 1993 are exempt from all the requirements of this part 258, except the final cover requirement
specified in 2'8.60(1)."
State of Kansas closure requirements are outlined in KAR 28-29-12. This regulation discusses the genera1
fonn of required closure plans and IOIig term care for disposal areas to be closed.
,'~
t
Camp Dnsst!r &: McKu In&.
\SAlJNA\I"UIOl
"',.,.
I-I
},T;\\"~;~}1,:,'~i'\;;,,,f:-&'
';~t.;:'''['_'
Ii
'-.J
Ii
U
o
o
, ~
2.0 ASSESSMENT OF TIlE ACTIVE LANDFILL SITE
2.1 FIELD VlSlTSlDATA COT.T.F.cnON
Ii
L
Camp Dresser It McKee Inc. (COM) conducted field visits to'the City of Salina Municipal Solid Waste
Landfill and met with Jim Hill and Bob Helm of the City of Salina (City) to discuss present and past
landfill operational procedures. CDM collected all additional data required which was not availal>le in
the Phase I files. This included existing site disposal sketches which denote approximate locations of
wastes which have been disposed on she. The types of wastes which have been disposed are recorded
in the landf1ll historical site sketches and files.
;
i;
U
r:
I.'
1';1
'--'
CDM subcontracted Bucher, Willis and Ratlit'f (BWll) to provide a current aeria1 survey and topographic
map of the site to assist in assessing available cover material, available airspace, application of solid waste
~
,
,
c.:_'
at the workilli face, and ~o
map have been provided to the cl sl.
..JtL)V
",iT the landfill site. Copies of the
I
L~'
2.2 IlEVIEW OF OPEJlATIONAL PROMmIJRF.~
~
COM mapped the progressive locations of past 1andfill developmeut (Appendix A) from exislill8 records
and site sketches. The following conclusions were reached:
,~
,c--
!
.
Precise (surveyed) locations of landfill trenches are not available but site sketches provide
sufficient data to determine the approximate "footprint" of past disposal areas.
~
I
,_J
. Landfill records and site sketches also denote approximate locations of "other-than-ordinary"
wastes which were disposed on site.
o
o
il
w
The current working face is progressing in an east-to-west direction and has crossed the east/west midway
point. The current disposal operation constitutes the third vertical layer within the total "footprint" of
Camp Dreuu d: McK<< l1Ic.
J
\SAlJNA\&S5UKll
""""
2-1
'n;', '
11
~
the landfill. The types of wastes which hav. been disposed of in these three lay.rs are recorded in the , ,
laodfill historical sit. sketches and files. Th. horizontallimi18 of the current workilli face is best depicted
by the topographic map which was completed by BWR in November 1992.
,
,
COM revi.wed all current operation and maintenance references, observed the operational practices
taking plac. at the landfill, and cooducted ....ral meetinga with City staff to discuss the operational
procedures at the facility. COM reconnnend$ that the City begin plaooing the preparation of a complete
Landfill Operations and Maintenance Plan which will be pan of the Stat. permitti\ll require.-s for
subsequent landfill .xpaosion. A draft fonnat is included as Appendix B which outlines those items
gen.rally required in a solid waste facility operations plaos.
COM has reviewed current daily cov.r requirements to assist the landfill staff in identifying oew sources
of daily cov.r. A summary of this analysis is included as Appendix C. An estimated 24,700 C.Y. of
daily cover and 116,200 C.Y. oflina1 cap ial'l be~red to close the ac!iv.landfill sit.. COM
r.commends these materials be D _A."W,ji.tf tfl No. I expansion.
2.3 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
COM reviewed previous hydrogeologic investigations of the landfill site and exislill8 data concernins the
current groundwater monitoring program. COM additionally eva1uated other maps, publications, w.ll
reports, and any available data related to subsurface conditions in the area.
! ,
,
A report on COM's analysis of the subsurface eonditions is included as Appendix O. Th.report includes
a discussion of the groundwater modeling and analysis that was used in the development of a sampling
and analysis program which will meet EPA gujdel~ as well as properly ......ing the current and future
.
groundwater quality of the site. The report develops specific conclusions and recoJ1V'1e1'dltions for the
further analysis and development of groundwater proteCtion controls for the existing and expansion areas.
.1
i I
;
- ,
,
C4rJfJ Drus~r cI: McKu Inc.
J
]
\SAUNAIWS.OOl
""" "
2-2
.'~
1
I r
3.0 CLOSURE OF THE ACTIVE LANDFILL SITE
3.1 PROPOSED FINAL SURFACE F.I.F.V.o\TIONS
, I
i I
! ]
,
I
'I
"1
, I
I
Utilizing the aerial survey information previously developed', preliminary final grade elevations were
developed for the active disposal area. Preliminary drawin8s are included as Appendix H. These
drawings represent the elevations of the final CAPPED area which will be ready for re-vegetati.on.
Using these final elevations and comparing them tathe elevations of the landfill from the aerial survey,
CDM calculated an estimated closure date of November I, 1993.
3.2 LANDFILL CAP
I
I:
1
,
I
I
The program to cap the active
(Appeodix H). Additionally, a
into the preliminary drawillis
'as a preliminary drawing detail.
CAP MATIi'.RIAI.~ - Assessment of the current application of cover at the working face and quantities
and sources thereof, were discussed previously and an analysis provided in Appendix C. Closure of the
active landfill must be in accordance with USEPA "Subtitle D" regWations, which require that the landfill
cap coosist of a minimum 6-inch erosion layer capable of sustaining native plant growth,' wtderlain by
an IS-inch infiltration layer havilli a permeahility less than or equal to the permeability of any bottom
liner system or natural subsoils present, or a permeability no greater than' lx:tO'"' cmIsec, whichever is
less.
The intended post-closure use of the landfill is wheat cultivation. Under USEPA Bulletin 40 CPR Ch.1
'[ (7/1/91 Ed.) Section 2'7.3-', the land surface overlyilli a solid w.... faeility cannot be used for
cultivation of foockhain crops if it is within three feet of the solid waste, unless it can be demonstrated
-
that the faeility is in compliance with the requirements set forth in said section. Furtber investigation
~
Cdmp DTU3U cI: McKu Inc.
r.)
\5AUNA",""O(lI
"',.,.
3-1
-'-
would be needed. to determine the costs. associated with demonstrating compliance with these
requirements. Initial estimates suggest that it would be more cost effective to design the cap a minimum
of three feet thick and thereby avoid the costs of attemptiDg to demonstrate compliance, which may in
actuality not even be possible.
Utilizing the results of geotechnical investigations, it is evident ~ the soils in the area are adequate for
use as infiltration and erosion layers for capping the active landfill area.
CLOSURE CONSTRUCTION COSTS - The costs for closure construction are outlined in Figure 3-1.
In this figure, CDM shows the construction costs for materials found on-site as wen as the coats should
materials have to be delivered from an off~site source. It must be noted that these costs reflect the overall
costs associated with the 1andfill closure, much of which will be perfonned by the landflll operations
staff. However, these costs do reflect the closure cost impact to the City.
- The sideslopes
slope in most cases. These slopes
are depicted in the preliminary drawings included as Appendix H.
Stonnwater and seneral site drainage has been reviewed for the eotire site and the atl8iysis is included
as Appendi>: E. Additionally, aU preliminary site stonnwaterldraiDage requirements ha.e been addressed
in the Site Development Plinand the preliminary drawings of proposed future expansion (Appendix H).
3.3 SURFACE USE AND VEGETATION
This analysis was done taking into account that closure of the existing landfill will be in accordance with
,
USEPA's "Subtitle D" replations as discussed in the previous sections. These regulations require that
the landf1ll cap consist of a miniJnum 6-inch er\lSion layer capable of suaW.ning native plant B'owth,
uoder1ain by an IS-inch infiltration layer having a permeability less than or equal to the permeability of
any bottom liner system or natura1 subsoils present, or a permeability 00 sreater than
Camp DrasO' d: McKn Inc.
\SALINA\85S8.001
"',.,.
3-2
,
,
I
j
Ii
I
__J
.. ~
; i
J
I
~J
1
,
-
]
J
j
'-"l
I
,
-,
--,=--
- ----:=::=.......
..! [_..1 1- I
CITY OF SAUNA MUNICIPAL SOUD WASTE LANDFILL
CLOSURE COSTS
Quantity Units Malerlals Labor Equipment Total Cost Total Cost
Cost Cost Cost perUnil
perUnil perUnil per Unit
Final Cover - Clay (Onsile) 141,570 CY $0.40 $2.50 $2.90 $410,553
(OfIsite) 141,570 CY $15.80 $5.64 $14.32 $35.76 $5,062,543
Final Cover - Topsoil (Onslte) 141,570 CY $0.40 $2.50 $2.90 $410,553
(OIfsile) 141,570 CY $12.10 $5.64 $14.32 $32.06 $4,538,734
Final Cover - Compaction 283,140 CY $0.21 $0.39 $0.60 $169,884
.Flnal Cover - Testing 58.5 Acres $667.00 $39,020
Final Cover - Seeding with Wheal 58.5 Acres $1,250.00 $73,125
Methane Gas Venting 58.5 Acres $2,750.00 $160,875
Stormwater Drain System 58.5 Acres $1,a67.00 $97,520
, Total Costs with Final Cover Obtained Onsile = $1,361,529
Total Costs with Final Cover Obtained OIfsile = $10,141,700
Final Cover Area =
Clay Layer Thickness =
Topsoil Layer Thickness =
Distance to Haul from OIfsite =
58.5 Acres
18 Inches
18 Inches
20 Miles (Round Trip)
FIGURE 3-1
Page 3-3
I
,-.i
lxlO"S em/see, whichever is less. However. conversations with KDHB indicate that the State will require
a minimum of three feet of final cover if the land is to be utilized to support food chain crops.
Additionally, the infiltration layer will likely be required to rruUtVA1n a permeability less than or equal
to lxlO-s em/sec. The seeding information contained in this report is based upon conversations with Tom
Maxwell, the Agriculture Agent at the Saline County Extension Service.
The three alternative post-closure uses originally proposed by CDM were:
. Cultivation
. Pasture
. No use
Eachaf these alternatives requires seeding the cap of the closed landfill with some fonn of vegetation that
will be capable of holding the erosion layer in lace, and at the sametime whose roots will not penetrate
the infiltration layer as litis woul~l;~" ~f~r~'(n,\.. cover vegetation with shallow
":.:.:. '~'>,~ .' ,'~ ~ilil:
root systems is preferable. HowJ!&/4t ritti - ., cons. of a tight, continually hydrated and
impermeable clay. root penetration will be minimized.
The first alternative will convert the area to agricultural use for cultivation. The recommended crop for
this alternative is wheat because it is well adapted to the area soils and bas a relatively shallow root
system in comparison with other crops. Given the right soil conditions, wheat roots can penetrate as deep
as 5 feet. Therefore, a 5 foot earthen layer would be required to prevent penetration into the infiltration
layer unless a tightly hydrated impermeable infiltration layer is in place. With an existing landfill closure
area of approximately 58.' acres. a , foot earthen layer depth would require 472,000 cu. yd. of fill
material. However, if a tightly hydrated infiltration layer is utilized, only a 36 inch final cap system is
,
required. This equates to 283,000 C.Y. of fill material. Another point of consideration for this
alternative is that grades on the closure area may be as high as 3:1 (20.5%) in some places. This could
pose an erosion risk if cultivated, with resulting degradation of the cap. The maximum grade to have
minimal erosion risk under cultivation is 10-15 percent.
Camp Druser cl McKee Inc.
lSALINAlll:I'S.OOI
415mb
3-4
',I
II
i
I '
'..1' ~
"
"
, ,
,I!'
'I!' "
'I '
!I
:!
II,
I:
'i
, -,
,
I
,
Ii
Ii
11-
,
The second alternative is to convert the area to pasture. The recommended cover for this alternative is
a mixture of native grasses, Indian grass, big bluestcm, little bluestem, and side oats grama. These
grasses are aU well adapted to area soils. Given the right soil conditions, big bluestem roots can penetrate
as deep as 10 feet. while little bluestem and side oats grama roots can penetrate as deep as 7-8 feet.
Therefore, a 10 foot earthen layer would be required to prevent~root penetration into the infiltration layer
unless an impenneable infiltration layer is provided. This would require approximately 944,000 cu. yd.
offill material.
The third alternative is to Dot use the area, and simply plant it with some vegetative cover to prevent
erosion. The recommended vegetative cover is a native grass with a short top growth, as a native grass
would require minimal maintenance and short top growth would pose a much smaller fire hazard than
long top growth. Two short grasses recommended were buffalo grass and blue grama, both of which
have a 10-12 inch top growth. Buffalo grass and blue grama roots can penetrate as deep as 5 feet.
Therefore, a 5 foot erosion layer would be ired to prevent root tion into the infiltration layer
unless an impenneable infiltratio~(I;~~:;tr. .'I":"l: ire approximately 472,000 cu. yd.
of fill material. Seeding an area Jl:.tlffil ~t .~o as much as Seeding it with blue
grama seed. Therefore, blue grama is the reconunended cover for this alternative.
The City of Salina staff has indicated that the cultivation option is preferred, and all subsequent analysis
has proceeded with this option in mind.
Camp Drus~r d: MclU~ l1Ic.
\SAlJNA\&5;5l.llOl
"''''.
3-'
4.0 DISPOSAL SITE EXPANSION
, .
"I l.j
<
4.1 SITE OEVEWPMENT PLAN
! -
I
I
I
COM has prepared a site development plao (SDP) as part 6f the preliminary drawings presented in
Appendix H. The SDP drawing depicts the active landfill footprint in relation to future expansion
alternatives. Initial lateral expansion to the north is recommended with development continuing to the
west, south, east and north in that sequence.
4.2 SOIL BALANCE ANALYSIS
The soil balance modeiing was completed and the resnlts included as Appendix F.
II
4.3
, 'W-p<w'~'
Ab. &'4 1, ~!~ \
CDM has investigated the impacfb ~~~itJ~ thJ~relate to development of the landfill
site and recommends the City submit for a pennit once the site drainage plans are complete. The initial
filing deadline has passed but indications suggest that the USEPA does not plan to penalize those entities
that put forth a good-faith attempt to comply.
J
'I
"I
!
j
!
4.4 BASE GRADE ELEVATIONS
,I -
I
1
Utilizing groundwater depth data from the 1985 and 1988 O.S. Fent reports, base grade elevations were
established for the disposal site expansion. Base grades were designed to maintain five (5) foot minimum
separation between the top of the upper most groundwater aquifer ~ the cell base. Preliminary base
grade drawings are included in Appendix H.
Camp Dr~ss~r .& McKee Inc.
\SALINAIB55I.llOl
415193]1
4-1
\
L.
~
4.' FlNAL SURFACE ELEVATIONS
The final surface elevation drawings for the landfill expansion area are included in Appendix H. The
primary design criteria for these drawings was two-fold. First, the final contours were designed to have
an end use of cultivation, thus requiring gently sloping top elovations. Second, the overall height was
designed to correspond to the final height of the active landfill closure.
4.6 LINER AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES
CDM has spoken with State and Federal regulators with respect to regulatory requirements regarding
application of liners and assessment of materials for this application; leachate collection systems and
related materials needs; groundwater monitoring programs; operational guidelines and record keeping;
and anticipated closure and post-closure requirements at the site. The State, in conjunction with the
USEP A, is currently funding a ~tud
landfills. The future of landfill
"':' ~4fff alternative lining systems for State
. J:i.inir: n the outcome of this study.
'" --1 ...
,"." ,
However, until this study has been completed, which may not be until the later part of 1993, landfill
owners must proceed with design plans which comply with current regulations. CDM has prepared a
preliminary analysis of potential liner systems for the Salina MSWLF. This study is included as
Appendix G. CDM is recommending a modified composite liner for the Salina MSWLF. The liner
system alternatives are included in the preliminary drawings (Appendix H).
Leachate product is typically handled in two ways. In many cases it is collected in a leachate evaporation
pond where it is allowed to dissipate through evaporation. In other cases it is collected and then
transported to a treatment facility (Le., municipal waste water treatment facility) for processing. CDM
,
is recommending the use of the evaporation pond system for the Salina MSWLF due to the positive
evapotranspiration index for the area.
1
1
.1
I
I
J
Camp DruS~T d: Mc~~ Inc.
lSAUNA\85S8.<101
4ISI93Is
4-2
,
I.
4.7 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES
"Construction and demolition" wastes are generally defined as materials considered to be not water
soluble and non-hazardous in nature. This includes. but is not limited to; steel, glass, brick, concrete.
asphalt roofing material, pipe, gypsum wallboard, and lumber from the construction or destruction of a
structure. Also included in this category are rocks, soils, tree remains, trees and other vegetative matter
which normally results from land clearing or land development operations for construction projects.
,I
Construction and demolition (C&D) wastes are exempt from RCRA Subtitle"D" landfill criteria provided
they are not mixed with MSW. C&D waste landfills are required to be permitted by KDHE, but are not
currently required to be constructed as lined facilities. Co-location of C&D waste disposal facilities and
MSW landfills is allowed under current Kansas llegulatioos.
il
,
It is highly reconunended that unlined areas oortheast of !he g~~l'!!sed expansion area be used for C&O
waste disposal. The precise area : l~l.!~ P clearly apparent after subsequent
drilling has taken place to better eIo~iC stticturcs in this area.
I
,
1__-
C&O wastes are typically handled as a bulky waste during disposal. Special care must be taken by the
landf1l1 operations personnel to ensure that all C&D wastes are free of deleterious, hazardous materials
and conunon MSW. both of which are not to be commingled with an unlined CltO waste disposal
facility .
4.S SPECIAL WASTES
~
Special wastes are typically defined as the wastes accepted at MSW landfills which necessitate special
.
handling, separation, and/or recovery. Special wastes should not be' confused with hazardous wastes
which cannot be accepted in MSW landfills. Special wastes consist of but are not limited to, animal and
food processing wastes, bulky wastes, and low density wastes. The handling of these wastes are
discussed in Section 5.4 of the Draft Operations and Maintenance Plan included as Appendix B.
I
I, r~
Qunp DruSe/' de McKee Inc,
lSAUNA.W'S.OOI
4/'l93b
4-3
II
""1
An area of concern for the City of Salina is the co-disposal of sludges with MSW. The Part 258 Criteria
for MSWLF's were jointly promulgated under the Cleao Water Act (CW A) and RCRA authorities and
apply to all MSWLF's in which sewage sludge is C<HIisposed with household waste. Under this rule,
the co-disposal is permitted given that the sludge is not" classified as a liquid waste containing "free
liquid" as defined by Method 909' (pain Filter Liquids Test), as described in "Test Methods for
evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods" (EPA Pub. No. SW-846).
Ii
An area for the handling of special wastes has been shown in the preliminary drawings. The area is
located in the same proximity that the City is currently using to collect and recover tires and white goods.
This area can be expanded to include other items the City determines salvageable. This might also
include an area designated as an aeration site for hydrocarbon contaminated soils, sand trap sludges and
other materials designated by the City for similar treatment.
'-""'" , ')447"'"''
'{:-',: ''';:J. ffi ::::~::: .:::
fi~w ;,\ J M':
H')~bf' jJ~0)\~1 ~ I
,A. ~%-""'~'" _..,,~K:;b'i:':'Y;^',. A.
I
II
I
Camp Dresser &: Mc~e IN:.
\SAUNA~R.OOI
4151931.
4-4
,--
,--
,
,
L
5.0 REMAINING LIFE ESTIMATE
,
, '
'.1
I
! i ,--
j ,~
'.1 PROJECTED SOLID WASTE GENERATION IlATES
Prior to analyzing landfill capacities, an analysis of solid waste generation is in order. Analysis of the
projected future disposal rates for the City of Salina MSWLF was approached using current data supplied
by the City Landfill operations staff. It must be stressed that this data was gathered usilli a cubic yard
estimation of all vehicles entering the landfill. No scales were in use to measure weight. The system
in use was very well documented, however, and should serve as a fair approximation of quantity
received.
, ,
I'
1 -
Using 1992 yearly figures, the gate house quantities were adjusted to reflect in-place compacted quantities
after disposal. Using population projections supplied by the City of Salina P1anning Department, a 'Per
Capita Disposalllate (lbs/dayr,gvRd (Fil'" p- . ..P'i~; rate was 9.0 Ibs/day which is
higher than the conunoniy pubh , fVer!!ai>>f .0 II/day.
___ ,,' _ ,,,t. "1h""./(, ":Sl j~t.
Because most communities anticipate local, state, and federal requirements mandating waste reduction,
CDM conservatively projected future disposal rates to remain constant and not grow. As the City
develops programs to further reduce the waste stream, these projects will likely decrease accordingly.
This analysis only accounts for the current population base encompassed within Saline County. If the
City expands its service area to include any neighboring counties. these projections will increase
proportionately. Figure '-2 graphically portrays the projected disposal quantities throughout the year
2050.
"
L
,
II, !
Ii' ,
Ii
j r-:
! '.I,
~
i ,_
,
Camp Dresser cI: McKee Inc.
,-
\SAlJNA\898.CIOI
41'1931.
'.1
'-
-----
"
...
OIlY OF SAUNAISAllNE COUNTY
PROJECTED WASTE GENERATION
(WITHOUT REDUCTION)
1980 ,_ 1995 2000 2IlO5 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Actual Actual projected projected Projected projected Projected Projected projected Projected
:;ity of Salina Population * 41,840 42,300 013,300 44.300 45,500 46,700 47,932 49,196 50,493 51,825
&line Coo lation** 49,900 49,300 50,167 51,029 52,058 53,079 54,121 55,183 56,265 57,370
~. Quant' ross- 217,464 262.4n 298,996 304,134 310,263 316,351 322,559 328,889 335,342 341,922
OisJXlS8t Quantity (adiusted. CY]*** 120,149 145019 165,195 168,004 171,420 174,784 178,214 181,711 185,2n 188,912
.. Cacita O' Rate ladiusted. tbsIdiP..11 6.7 8.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
* Salina Comprehensive Plan (through 2010, estimated after 201 0)
** s.Iine County Planning Oepartment (estimated efter 1990)
*** Adjusted for in-pIace compaction
FIGURE 5-1
Page 5-2
L._--c_
,--------
-
I
-~----.'--------'----'-- -
- --- -- -. --- - ------ -
_ _ _ . _ __H
------- -- ---- -- ---
I I i 1__ , C --1 I i ii
-:i 1-" ,i
i_ !
CITY OF SALINA MSW LANDFILL
PROJECTED DISPOSAL QUANTITIES
2050
2040
2030
...
~ 2020
2010
2000
1990
145,019 169,389 176,156 180,312 184,563 188,912
'165,763 173,439 178,214 182,424 186,731
Disposal Quantity (CY)
(Adjusted)
Figure 5-2
-,-
1
iJ
5,2 ACTIVE AREA REMAINING I.TFF.
Utilizing the previously developed topographic map, a preliminary fina1 grading plan was developed for
the active disposal area (Appendix H). Comparing this grading plan to existing grades, CDM determined
the remaining available airspace as of November 16, 1992 tO,be 302,000 C.Y. This quantity can be
further subdivided into three categories of fill material; waste, daily cover, and fina1 cap.
I
,
I
Ii
CDM estimates that nearly 34.5 equivalent acres of the approximately 58.5 acres which comprise the
existing landfill area have been final capped with the minimum three foot thick material cap. The
remaining 24 acres will require 116,000 C.Y. of final cap material. The remaining airspace, 186,000
C.Y., will consist of waste and daily cover, typically at a four (4) to one (1) ration. This will account
for about 37,000 C.Y. in remaining daily cover and 149,000 C.Y. of waste.
From the table shown as Figure ~16-~7'~~pond~ g~'~"i~?li'f^'ii Figure 5-2, th~ projected ~~te
g~neration quantity for 1993 is .15"''\'fj~{. J1"f01 the 149,000 of estlmated remammg
airspace for waste will last until al!ibu(NolIll..&4, ,Mi93,",""""
5.3 PROPOSRn EXPANSION"RF.~ REMAINING UFF.
Using a similar process to the previous section, the available airspace of the proposed expansion area was
determined by comparing the design base grade and fina1 grade elevations. The available airspace was
calculated as 20.13 million C.Y.
This quantity was further subdivided into final cap for 300 acres, daily cover and MSW. The breakdown
of these three quantities is:
. Final Cap - 1.45 million C.Y.
. Daily Cover - 3.74 million C.Y.
. MSW - 14.94 million C.Y.
Comparing 14.94 Million C.Y. of MSW to the cumulative projected generation rates shown in Figure
5-3, it is estimated that the proposed expansion will have an estimated life through the year 2076.
,
I
Camp Drustr &: McKee Inc.
\SALINA\1I558.001
4/519311
5-4
\
1- r J
_.~_~__..__._____.m____
"-.---..."-. -, -...._--
- - .---
.,
_ __'~;'-C-':U' ._~_ __ ~_
r-.) L~-] C.-1 r i '-I :..
[ -! 1- -) (1 ! I 11
il r--l
; J i
CITY OF SALINA MSW LANDFILL
PROJECTED SW GENERATION QUANTITIES
2080
2070
2060
2050
... 2040
III
CD
>- 2030
2020
2010
2000
/"
/ V
./
/
/
- /
/ .
/' /
/ /
/
I1III1 I1III111 1IIII1 IIII11 III III III1IIII 11111111 I II I I II I I I II I II I I
1990
161,160 3,228,968 6,446,449 9,778,469 13,178,524
1,669,014 4,823,640 8,097,892 11,478,315 14,878,733
Generation Quantity (CY)
Figure 5-3
(Adjusted)
r
,
r:
r'
I
w
,
w
1 :
tJ
r
I
,
r-
" j
r
)
I
L_
r-.
L
~
! !
,--!
~
,
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
1.
Under current disposal rates, the existing City of Salina MSWLF facility ~ill reach capacity by
November I, 1993.
2.
An estimated 24,700 C.Y. of daily cover material and 116,200 C.Y. of final cap material will be
required to complete the close out of the current landfIll site.
3.
Although previous hydrogeologic investigation has been completed, additional drilling, testing,
and evaluation is required to meet current regulatory guidelines with respect to groundwater
protection.
4.
The uppermost aquifer underlying the entire landfill site has not been positively identified.
5.
--.,W"'"~;"" ";:;;;:;:::"49:: b. "y~~w""":':;'~: ::~~;"';'<::::f""~.:
Re ional oundwater fIo' Ie W ii, 1 JL ti,tti~' ~ol.:;
g gr _~~#v ."I::t"AC*:Jl\.3L.. ' Jill.
6.
Extensive silty to sandy clay sequences underlie the landfiJl site.
7.
To date, ground water quality standards have not been exceeded for the parameters analyzed at
landfill monitoring well locations.
8.
After closure, the landfIll site will be convened to agricultural use - cultivation for wheat.
9.
The City of Salina MSWLF will require an NPDES surface water permit.
10. KDHE will require a composite liner and leachate collection system as well as all Subtitle"D"
design criteria on all future permitted MSWLF's.
Camp Dresser'! McKu Inc.
\SALINA\mS.OOl
4"193 It
6-1
'1
l
,
J
II. The evapotranspiration index for Salina allows for the positive evaporation of leachate as a source
of handling/processing.
12. Construction and demolition materials can be disposed of in unlined cells at site co-located with
a MSWLF.
13. Saline County currently disposes MSW into the City of Salina MSWLF at a rate of 9.0 lbs/day
per person.
14. The active disposal area will reach capacity around November 1, 1993.
15.
The proposed MSWLF expansion area has a projected lifetime through the year 2076 at current
population growth rates and a stabilized MSW generation rate.
~~F'''''~~~ '-YT^'<W\k'''1~f>>>~~1
*~ ~-J ~;::: ''>.<, 0%" ~~ ~
Jd^.j'i~j Jl:~\~..__..lL'~,.,J~J;::
II
,I
II
,I
;'1
I
1:1
I;
I
Camp Dnsstr d: McKee Inc.
\SAUNAW58J101
41"93 b
6-2
II'
1,1
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The City of Salina accept no MSW into its existing MSWLF facility afler October 8, 1993.
2. The City of Salina begin the preparation of a complete Landfill Operations and Maintenance Plan
for future operations.
3. Daily cover and final cap materials should be taken from the area designated for Cell No. I
expansion.
4. Six additional groundwater monitoring cluster wells and three single wells should be driiled at the
landfill site to further analyze and monitor groundwater quality. Sampling of these wells should
begin immediately in accordance with federal and state regulatory requirements.
5.
Seven additional borings slwu\4 bed:o!!!pleteg at thl;,[an4fllLsile to further identify this lithology
:0:::'::: :;:~::: :,:,>;, i,::::.' .,,:;:. ;:::,,:, _ :: ::' :::~:::: ':
.""" ',.,., .w. ........,. .....w. ,',',,", ," , ....,._
of the area. Additional ge~lJl!I4J-@.Oty~t~!~oul~e coiucted to more fully characterize the
'N.",_ :.".:.
.... ....
soil materials.
6.
Two additional pump tests should be performed to detennine groundwater transmissivity and flow
velocity in the landfill area.
7. The City of Salina should submit for a NPDES surface water discharge permit upon completion
of site drainage plans.
8. The City of Salina should utilize a modified composite liner system in its future MSWLF
expansIOn.
9. A leachate evaporation pond should be constructed for leachate collection and ultimate handling.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALINA\8558.001
4/5/9315
7-1
,
i f-~
i
J
10. An unlined Construction & Demolition (C&D) waste pit could be sited to the northeast of the
proposed MSWLF expansion area.
11. An area be designated for the recovery and collection of special waste items which the City can
sell, reuse, or reprocess.
12. The City of Salina should not accept MSW into the active disposal site beyond October 9, 1993.
'''Mr''''''''i &'T'f'~;~
i!h,) ,.~ 'I} ':
..~~,...~. .;
.Jl~L. ~ ."Ut,
Camp Drtss~r &: McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\~58.001
4/519311
7-2
"1
,'-
!
I!
I'
I
I
"'W"'~IX"I'-'W,w"'~
Jlbll;"l;~1L :'tl' (,i 'i
EXISTING DISPOSAL AREA DEVELOPMENT MAPS
~
c
,
Comp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
,
,-
\SAUNAW.58.00t
4/.5l93b
,-
[,
'. /
-
/
. I
L..-
I
LEGEND
DISPOSAL TRENCH BOUNDARIES
LANDFILL BOUNDARY
COM
onvironmental engint!/(!Jf'$, scientists,
planmlnt. dr management consultants
CITY OF SALINA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
FIRST LEVEL TRENCH DIAGRAM
r MAINTENANCE
~ ,",CO",
STORAGE
BUILDING
n
I
LEGEND
D
DISPOSAL HI-RISE SEGMENT BOUNDARIES
LANDFILL BOUNDARY
CDM
environm.ntol .ngin"". scjiJnt~tlJ.
planners. 4c management consultants
CITY OF SALINA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
SECOND PHASE - HI RISE
STORAGE
BUILDING
r MAINTENANCE
~ '""""
'1
I,
~
,
LEGEND
o
DISPOSAL HI-RISE SEGMENT BOUNDARIES
LANDFILL BOUNDARY
CDM
environmental fHIginHf'$. scientists.
planners. 4r management consultants
CITY OF SALINA MUNICIP AL SOLID WASTE
FINAL PHASE - HI RISE
STORAGE
BUILDING
r MAINTENANCE
rr:'o '"U'"
11
II
,
,I
Ii
II:
1_.'.
,
I'
II
Ill, r
I:
Iii
11[]i4"HC;'1
,"".,-" -, I)""
,,~ . . . ,
)@LJ\t:~~..~:::.. ~. .';:..,A>~L. ;
LANDFILL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
Camp Df'tSSer dr: McKu Inc.
\SAUNA\8558.lXU
415193 b
'-
,~
,
, ,
L_
r
L
r-
L
I
,I '-
,-
,
l_._
c-
I
i
'--
,
i
L"
I-
i il_
I
Ie
"
[:
I
I l~
1_-
APPENDIX B
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
(DRAFT)
1.0 INTRODUCTIeN
This attachment is prepared as a proposed outline for an operations and maintenance manual for the
Salina Municipal Sanitary Landfill. It is designed to be used as a guide for the preparation of a
manual to outline the operational and maintenance procedures necessary to ensure the safety and
environmentally sound practices for the City of Salina and its constituents.
2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
2.1 Saline County Solid Waste"'f-]1i..~.',J'I8q,\
JI"JIII"I[iC:, i~l\'
2.2 A.....,Dtable Wastes
Incoming wastes should be monitored by a waste inspector at the facility entrance and by the operator
at the active landf1ll face. The facility superintendent or his staff bas the authority and the
responsibility to exchllle any wastes that they believe are unaccepta)>le.
Containers having a capacity greater than or equal to 20 gallons should be only accepted if they
contain a nonhazardous waste which bas been completely discharged, as evidenced by the removal of
both the top and bottom ends, and/or the presence of numerous large punctures in all sides of the
container. All labels must be removed or covered over.
Camp D,.,ss~r &: McKn Inc.
\SAUNA\1I558.00t
4151930
B-1
2,3 Site Lavout and Onenrtina Facilities
I
I
,
2.3.1 Stonn Water Control
Run-on must be prevented from draining into the excavated section of the landfill by dikes constructed
of fill material.
Ii
'I
, '
,
Run-off from the active landfill areas must be physically controlled by the use of intermediate cell
berms and passively controlled by limiting the placement of solid waste (solid waste set backs) from
the inside edge of the landfill berms.
To comply with EPA stormwater regulations, a stormwater permit must be obtained unless it can be
shown that all stormwater is retained on site.
I
Final cover of the landfill should be interfaced with the bottom liner containment such that, when
used in conjunction with this sysl' '{~i\1t-~iecti~ry 'P,"\~l~ isolate the disposed wastes.
)i _:U*11r~?,~~ ,j~!1~~ ,1..'1: ;w~1
All surface contours should be gfl11lelfto';\:~\nJMn-I~'of two!tercent on the top with 4: I side
slopes, and desigued to collect runoff and direct it to a perimeter drainage system.
! i
2,4 Ooeratina Schedule
The first half hour of each day should be spent performing daily equipment maintenance checks and
preparing for daily operations. The end of each day should be spent performing equipment
maintenance checks, refueling, recording operation and maintenance data, repositioning litter fences
and working face markers, performing general site clean up and securing the site. For security
purposes, the site access gates should be locked when the landfill is closed. A security guard should
,
be considered during all closed hours and holidays.
2.5 SalinSl T .s:rondfill Staff
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\lW8.001
4'"'' b
B-2
I
,
2,6 Emel'l!encv TeIeohone Numbers
r
L
A list of emergency telephone numbers should be prominently posted near all telephones, in the
scalehouse, maintenance building, and administration building, and should be updated whenever one
of the emergency contacts or phone numbers changes.
L_
3.0 CELL OPERATlNG'PLAN
3,1 Introduction
3.2 Initial Ooeration and Fin! Lift
c.
Only residential or "fluff" lift material should be placed in the firSllift. This "fluff" layer is initially
applied to protect the liner from intrusion from large objects that are typically found in conunercial
solid waste. Once a "fluff" lift thickness of 5 feet is reached, connnercial waste may be placed.
Cover will be placed over the reY1"u,~ of Th ~ ~.~ with Section 4.0 of this
manual. ..,I:t..,.)J~r .JIC\tl;:';... ..i:'~::~ll\.. .JI~~~~' .-~It
3,3 Second and Subseo1- Lifts
,-
,
All lifts, except the first, should be no more than ten feet in depth until the fina1lift. A cell depth of
ten feet is considered to be near optimum for compaction machinery and provides safe lines of sight
for the equipment operators and personnel at the top of the active landfill face.
3.4 Fina1 Cover anll Closure
,
i,
.~~
i
l_
The proposed fina1 cover should consist of a layer of an impermeable, cover material, and a native soil
and cover and vegetative layer which will promote vegetative growth. The final cover should prevent
migration of water through the refuse layer, which will prevent the formation of leachate. Final
cover should only be placed when between six to seven acres are in the fina1 grade elevations. At
areas less than this, it becomes uneconomical to efficiently install the fmal cap.
, I
, -
I
Ill'
Il
,
Comp Dresser &: McKu Inc.
L\
\SAUNA\8S:58.001
4r.i1931.
B-3
I
,
II
4.0 BASIC LANDFILLING PROCEDURES
1
,
4.1 Introduction
This section describes the basic procedures for daily landfill operations including l~fill management
objectives, the "area" method of landfilling, working face practices and startup of first and subsequent
lifts. The landfill should be operated in strict accordance with ihe procedures described herein.
4,2 Method of Oneration
The landfilling technique used will be the "area" method. Unlike the "trenching" method, where
solid waste is buried in a trench, the "area" method involves the placement of solid waste in lifts of
approximately ten feet. The final arrangement, after capping, resembles a pyramid which stands at a
height greater than the original elevation. The primary considerations in the area method of
landfilling are truck unloading position, the distance to the borrow or stockpile storage area for cover,
the method of transporti~ cover Mt,lllft Wjf'g .B!~ ~~ over which the cover material
IS transported to the working f""':hE~JhI~:~lli.~t~mtal<lrrmement of refuse at the
working face.
Properly locating unloading trucks facilitates the spreading of refuse, compaction, covering, and
cleanup. Trucks are positioned at the top of the lift being developed. Lateral confmement of vehicles
and refuse is especially imponant to avoid wasting soil cover material. Temporary barricades such as
55-gallon drums or wooden horses should be used as daily width markers for guiding equipment
operators, and for traffic control. Vehicles transporting refuse and cover material to the working face
are routed over previously filled areas, whenever possible, for additional compaction of refuse and
soil. However, vehicles are not routed over areas that have been completed and landscaped.
Alternatively, except for first-lift operations, unloading vehicles can ill' positioned at the base or toe
of the landfill being developed, whereby spreading and compacting can occur in an "uphill" direction.
The fill will be graded and maintained at all times to prevent ponding.
Camp Dresser ,& McK6t Inc.
II
I
"
11--
\SALINA\~II.OOl
4/5/9311
B-4
i-
4.3 WorJclm. Face Practices
4.3.1 Startup and First Uft
To preserve the integrity of the liner system, no vehicles are permitted on top of the protective layer
to avoid damage to the cell liner . The waste is dumped at the top of the active ramp, spread toward
the base and compacted. At the end of each working day, theTefuse should be covered with soil to
control odors, vectors and litter. Daily and intermediate cover material should be available from the
next phase of development. Scrapers can be used to excavate and haul the material from the borrow
area to the working face where it may be spread by either the compactors or the bulldozer. Six
inches of soil is applied each day, as daily cover. Excavated material from on-site borrow areas
should be used to supply daily cover requirements.
In addition to applying required cover, the following tasks should be perfonned at the working face at
the end of the day: position litter fences downwind of the active area, redefine the next day's working
area b~ ~epoSiti~ning portable IDlIft~.t:.,'t, ~%w'1t, :p~ 55-gallon drwns, and inspect
the facIlity's perlDleter fence and IPP~' s.lm
AL,}F J1k-.'h.....A.. :..mk)&L"' ..JlL
4.3.2 Subsequent Lifts
Trucks and the compactor will be permitted to operate on subsequent lifts. Bulky wastes delivered to
the facility, and any stockpiled bulky wastes received during construction of the first lift, can be filled
in subsequent lifts. Daily operating procedures including positioning traffic controls and litter fences,
application of daily and intermediate cover, and soil erosion control and site maintenance tasks should
be implemented throughout the development of all lifts. Once the final landfill elevations bave been
reached, fmai cover should be applied to the landfill in accordance with Section 3.3.
4.4 Cnn1onAMiOD
Compaction of the solid waste placed should be in accordance with best operating practice to acbieve
an average in-place density of at least 1350 pounds per cubic yard based upon 20 percent cover
Camp Dnsser &: McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\8S58.001
41519311
B-5
material by volume. The waste should be compacted to a uniform grade which is not steeper than
four horizontal feet to each one vertical foot, or as shown on the operations and maintenance contract
drawings. To achieve the maximum compaction, three to five passes of the compactors should be
performed. Lift thickness should be placed in lifts of two feet.
4.5 SOU US8l!e
Soil usage should be monitored on a daily basis. Counters should be installed on the scrapers for use
by the operators. The monitoring of soil usage is important for maximum use of airspace at the
landfill.
5.0 OPERATING PROCEDURES
5.1 Waste JlAnler Resoonslblllties
The Solid Waste Management D, ~"~'Id TIf'~'lrlf ~Uling V~iCles comply with
all state and local laws and regult~1~4t~~~~I\Of this operating plan. All waste
haulers will not allow waste from their vehicles to litter the area or local roads. In addition, waste
haulers will observe local speed limits and traffic and safety regulations.
5.2 Vehicle AI'AIRCI. WRaltb.- smtllTnlftllldlno
All vehicles disposing of waste at the facility enter and leave the facility through the access control
gate located at the southeastern comer of the site.
,
i,
Ii
5.2.1 Waste HaulIng Vehicles
All waste hauling vehicles entering the site will proceed directly to the vehicle Weigh Station where
the gross vehicle weight is obtained and recorded.
Camp Druser &: McK~e l~.
\SALlNA\~5lI.001
"'193'
B-6
-!
rc
!
After being weighed, all waste hauling vehicles will proceed directly to the working face, where the
Landfill Attendant will direct them to their unloading points. Once unloaded, the vehicles proceed to
i , the Weigh Station so that their vehicle tare weights can be recorded for billing purposes before they
,
leave the facility.
5.3 Access Roads
/
II
I
Good maintenance of site roads is of uuncst importarice. Potholes, clogged ditches, and debris on the
roads should receive immediate attention to avoid damage to equipmetl\ and to allow proper ,
stormwater handling. Mud should be removed for safety and for
efficient vehicle movement.
L
Future access road construction will be necessary as other landfill areas are developed. These access
roads will generally be gravel based. All roads will be cross-sloped or crowned to ensure adequate
drainage.
5.4 SnIIlf"iAI Wastes RAndllno
,-,,'->-,~... "%'~"i"@.. 1- 'Thf^'"^'> >~"''''''':,:"''''VM
..,..,.,. "*"" ..,... -":,:,,,. .::~. " ~ ,
~:;:~: .~:< .~>: '~*'"".::' ~ '<:1.:'
~#, k>.; t.h~' ~w r,: AA"'~ --.,.
~,~ %: ~~: L .,..:\ M-l: if.,.
.:' ~ >>" .~>;:' .~*, j.:>>>:< . .~. IN '"' '
." ~, 'M'. ""'. ^' ,~,~>" 'w.,
.A~;:~".",~:W ,A,L 'l~L..;;L. ,j@>.j[~:;:,,," :b.
,-
I
I
Section 2.0 identifies the types of waste that are acceptable for disposal at the facility. If chemical
drums or any unacceptable wastes of a hazardous, infectious or liquid nature are delivered to the
landfill, the identity of the collectorlhauler delivering the waste and the identity of the waste generator
must be reponed to the Kansas Department of Health & Environment. The waste generator is
responsible for removal of the unacceptable material from the landfill and for proper disposal. Most
of the wastes accepted for disposal at the landfill can be received, unloaded, and disposed of as
described in Section 4.0. However, certain wastes require special handling because of their physical
or chemical nature. These wastes are discussed below.
r
,
L
i
L_
5.4.1 ,l.n;mal and Food ~'1ll Wastes
[
[
Food processing wastes include materials generated in canneries, packing plants and similar
operations which are often highly putrescible and offensive. A trench must be dug at the toe of the
I'
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
~-
(.::-
\SALINA\85S8.001
41"" b
B-7
,
L
working face where the food processing waste is to be dumped. The trench must then be covered
immediately. Dead animals should be deposited near the toe of the working face and covered along
with the other refuse. If a large number of dead animals are received, they should be buried in a
specially dug trench or pit and covered as soon as possible.
,{
5.4.2 II~ ~aste
Bulky waste consists of large items, such as furniture, appliances, trees, branches and stumps. If not
handled properly, these wastes can rapidly deplete landfill capacity and shorten the life of the site. If
possible, special programs should be developed to provide alternative uses for these materials to
eliminate landfill disposal.
In.order to avoid damaging the liner system, no bulky waste should be landfilled directly on the
landfill base. Instead, it should be temporarily stored in a designated area until the first lift is
completed.
h*-.'W.....,"'.., "~m"""f: .f ,..-:.~.r''4:-. r'Mr"'''>'':~
During development of the seco~ul~ent.i', bier ~.;a. ~hould be deposited at the toe of
~y! ..Wf if. "1.;&.-" .r>:*' .*,;ffi~': tV
the working face during the day,llf"tfiifflt'jlerilli(g; 'pflofto plac€rilent in the cell, compressible
bulky wastes should be crushed, if possible, by the compactor to the smallest practical size. Any
remaining voids should then be filled with general refuse.
Low density wastes such as brush, leaves, yard trimmings, synt\)etic fibers, loose plastic film or
foam, and robber and plastic scraps or shavings also require special handling. These materials may
present problems because they rebound after being run over by the compaction equipment. To
improve compaction, low density wastes should be spread into layers one to two feet deep, covered
with regular waste, and then compacted as usual. The weight of the ,regular waste helps keep the low
density material compressed and contained.
Special handling procedures are necessary for powdery wastes such as sawdust and other dusts that
can be disturbed by the equipment and blown by wind. 0_ in the air, they may be ha2ardous or
annoying to facility personnel if they are inhaled or come in contact with the skin. Personnel working
J
~ Dress" &: McKee Inc.
/. ,
II
,:
II
\SAUNA\8558.001
41519311
B-8
i
"
in areas with powdery wastes should wear protective clothing and the appropriate respirators.
Depending on their properties, powdery wastes may be controlled by applying soil or regular refuse
to reduce the amount of airborne particulates in the area.
.i
I
Demolition materials will be disposed of in specially designated areas which do not require lining.
Demolition materials consist of material such as "brick, mortar, broken concrete, and similar material
produced in connection with the construction or demolition of buildings or other structures.
5.5 Scav_n.. Policy
Scavenging through waste is prohibited.
5.6 Surface J)pinAOe
All surface water runoff will be managed in accordance with applicable permits. Storm water
facilities should be inspected re~fQjI~fiC"itinu~rly 'I;illt~i!J.~~ described herein. Storm water
should be directed to the drainageIihailliel;flichi!!1 ~~gelat' a minimum of once per year.
Jf.1......jW .JiliL~ilkj~j~L Jt\., ' AR..
5.7 I..""g,.hAfp UAnAlhllnent
Discharge of leachate will not be permitted except through the leachate collection system.
5,8 SoU Erosion and ~<!Dt Control
The on-site soils are very susceptible to wind and water erosion. Every effort should be made to
minimize erosion of landfill side slopes and avoid sedimentation of adjacent areas.
5,9 Litter. Dust and Vector Control
Camp Drtsstr cI: McKzt Inc.
\SAUNA\85:18.()OI
"''''.
B-9
5.10 Site Cover MSIInAoNllflftt
.t
Sufficient quantities of cover material should be available at all times to ensure proper operation of
the landfill. All daily cover material should be obtained from borrow areas on the landfill site. Solid
waste management staff should be required to conduct excavation of these borrow areas, which are
the future landfill cells, to proposed bottom grade to the extent to which cover material is needed.
I
.~ ,J
Each evening, 6 inches of soil, as daily cover, should be placed on all exposed fill areas. The depth
or thickness of cover material should be measured after compaction with at least one pass of a
bulldozer or other suitable equipment having a gross weight in excess of 10,000 pounds.
Daily records of the amount of cover material used should be kept. The Facility Superintendent
sllould keep a detailed report of the amount of cover material used on each day of the preceding
week. Use of daily cover should be closely monitored by the Facility Superintendent.
5.11 ODeD Burnin.. Pollcv
",::6^ ~.::~ . i~~'V":1:~ i\ -"'t.'1^''':::::;' ?:"j:::~W"1
:~n ,v " '~";~ t:::,: , ~~~, ~:' 1~:' :,
;$\ ~~~ t~, ;.~~ :" VA N\4. . d
., ~ < ~~~ ~ ~ '~~;;, .r ,O:::?'- :::::;.~ x w..
jF~, ,#' M "{h. F",:,'x~n-m ~ ~m
Open burning is prohibited on the'faii'dfilfi'ile:",,,,,,.,,A ",''''.""",
5.12 Fire Prot.....ion and Control
An adequate water supply, personnel, andlor fire fighting equipment should be readily maintained on
site to extinguish any and all fires.
'_ ,I
5.13 T....I.....ent Weather and Stonn F.merI!eDCV Procedures
S.141~!U'hSllte and Stonnwater UAnAOPment I>uriIU! Maior Storm EVMlh
.
i
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\1IS58.001
41519311
B-IO
5.15 Site Insoection and !\fAint.."once
,~
During both the active operating and post-closure periods, routine site inspection and maintenance
should be required at the landfill to ensure that the facility can be operated efficiently and in an
environmentally-responsible manner.
,~
I
,
'j
5.16 Noise Control
Noise levels at the facility must comply with applicable OSHA and Kansas requirements.
5,17 Odor Control
'1
,
Ii
Operation of the landfill should not result in odors associated with solid waste being detected off site
by sense of smell in any area of human use or occupancy. Adequate cover material should be placed
to control odors.
I
':7
5.18 RecorrllcH!nino
"'ff(...~t:\ J,.. 'iii'"""':::: t~"% ""',
''''::' ,:;::;:., ."'.->. ~ < ~,
",., ..,...., ,",.,,,., ~." ::;:?
<':;:;: f.<'" "." ....,... ~m ~." >>h<
.,J~C%~:I.\.,..):,~ ~~~l\N~w ~ ~.,Ii,
r'
I
The site operator should be responsible for maimainlng logs and records of all visitors to the facility,
all facility inspections, and of all accidents.
6.0 EQUIPMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The equipment operator should be responsible for seeing that landfill equipment is properly
maintained and carefully used to maximize its productivity, and should be required to provide daily
maintenance.
6.1 Heavv Eaui......nt
,-
u
6.2 S,tJatinnAI"V OnPratino Ii'nni'l'WltlOnt
r
I~
C-,
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
,~
\SAUNA\85SUXlI
"''''b
B-11
L'
6,3 EouiOOlent MAim....Ante Reouirements
7.0 MONITORING OF GROUNDWATER MONITOR WELLS
7.1 Introdl1f"tion
7.1.1 Gauging Water Levels in Monitor WeDs
7,1.2 Sampling Groundwater from Monitor WeDs
8.0 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
8.1 Data MAnSllDPIIlNd' Rnd Accountina
8.2 MSIIn1U1I1 Scale House OnIaJoAtif'IIH
"'=$W"",*"-. "1g;""<::1:.. #: r""*' }:_,%~ff.%
. ~~ilii ~~i~~~t~{t:$' l'~t~. ID.l4 1 t :~' '>
8 3 l.AndfiU Onerations MRnD~"~ b *8 i:~.}:Ap, :j-, ~t<
. .._;.~,.:;..:,.~. ,- ' "..dC. 'Vh.-A.-...@L..At.. ;1..,~
!
The Landfill Superintendent should constantly monitor certain key parameters in order to keep the
landfill operating smoothly and efficiently throughout its active life. These parameters include: 1)
Rate of site utilization; 2) Rate of cover material expenditure; 3) Leachate generation; 4) Machinery
use, maintenance costs and fuel consumption; 5) Operating costs; and 6) Safety records.
I,
8.4 Penn"",.' MSlnAOMnIPJlt and Tndnino
I'
I'
All landfill personnel should learn their own tasks as well as proper landfilling procedures, and should
also understand the purpose and importance of sanitary landf1lling. Tfaining guides are available
from the U.S. EnvirolUllenlal Protection Agency through the Technology Transfer Program, as well
as training programs and seminars presented by private firms and educational institutions. In
addition, equipment manufacturers generally offer training in the use of their specific products.
Camp Dresur &: McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\8S58.00l
4~1931s
11-12
8.5 Work Safetv Prol!ram
Safety precautions and procedures are implemented at the landfiU in order to minimize accidents and
job-related illnesses and maintain a weU functioning waste disposal facility. Strict adherence to
proper operating methods and maintenance procedures, as described in this operating plan, will
reduce the number of potentially hazardous conditions.
8.5.1 Responsibility For Safety
'I
I
,
It must be emphasized to all facility personnel that each individual is persoually responsible for
exercising safe working procedures during hislber own job performance.
8.5.1.1 Management Responsibilities
,
I ~'
The LandfiU Superintendent must: I) Have a copy of all operating safety procedures on-site at all
times; 2) Provide safe working CQ~;~i~e~r~R"rsTel "mln4jpg,I9jvision and maintenance of safe
equipment, tools, materials, and .Ql.,,1n1i\&t'3) PIlIvidcf&u!erDplyees with necessary safety
-:::;-.:. '("'::'":::_ -:.;:::::_:__ :.':''''''''':'':'', V:' .~:-
information; 4) Select employees<<'ho!~re'lli1~ifiia t6li~rfbtm th~d~ork required of them; 5) Provide
equipment, education and training on safety procedures, which should be continually reviewed and
upgraded as necessary; 6) FoUow OSHA standards; 7) Contactloca1 police and fire departments to
apprise them of potential hazards at the waste disposal facility, and to ensure that they are familiar
with access routes to and around the site; 8) Keep a list of emergency telephone numbers at each
telephone site at the facility and update this list as numbers or contacts change.
i
8.5.1.2 Employee Responsibilities
Site operator employees will: I) See that safety procedures are foUowed; 2) Learn to recognize
.
, I
~
potentially hazardous actions or conditions by analyzing jobs, work areas, and procedures from a
safety standpoint; 3) Eliminate hazards as soon as they are recognized; 4) Identify non-correctable
hazards with warning signs and devices, establish and maintain safety procedures for these hazards;
and 5) Use protective clothing and equipment whenever appropriate.
Camp Drustr &: McKee Inc.
\SALINAW,S.OOl
4/519311
B-13
8.5.2 Safety EquiJBDent
Certain types and items of safety equipment are provided at the landfill in fulfillment of OSHA
standards .
8.5.2.1 Protective Clothing
8.5,2,2 Safety Devices
8.5,3 EquiJBDent Hazards
Personnel should be well trained in the use of all equipment and tools which they may operate.
8.5.4 Explosion and Fire Hazards
Gas detectors should be used to tc;M.Ml! 100000Qps w~re ~I!jV$ljj;~iIf' may be present.
J!t.,.,'i"llr<ll;' ):!!jtLJI~1 i 1 Ji .
8.5.5 Traffic Hazards
8.5.6 Facility Housekeeping
8.5.7 Safety PrOp.....
A safety program must be established at the facility to ensure that safe working procedures are
understood by all site operator personnel, to provide an opportunity for all to discuss safe working
conditions, and to keep everyone continually aware of safe operating procedures.
8.5.8 Accidents & Injuries
8.6 Communications
Camp Dnsstr &: McKee Inc.
\SALJNA\855B.OOI
41Sf931s
B-14
:1
APPENDIX C
".,"......M,. ":<''''''"^''''',', }:': ".,., ",." ,.,...:,,:;~;.;.,,:::;
JQK~!~~s
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SAUNA\lI:558.001
4/5193 Is
APPENDIX C
DAILY COVER REQUIREMENTS
Current Area
Using DCA engineering software, the remaining airspace of the currently operating landfill area was
calculated. This was accomplished by comparing existing landfill contours to final estimated
contours. The following daily cover requirements were developed.
As of November 1992, a total of 302,000 cubic yards (C.Y.) of material was required to bring the
hll1dfill to the desired final contours depicted in Appendix H. It is further estimated that 24 acres of
the 58.5 acre landfill site remain to be capped.
Twenty-four (24) acres of three (~lf~~ilJi:iP -'tes'IJM':tlibf cap. This leaves 186,000
C.Y. of fill to be completed. 'il::i;;"ii,AltL JII:ip
The daily cover to waste ratio is typically four (4) to one (I) which amounts to 37,000 C.Y. of daily
cover required to complete the close out of the existing landfill area.
CDM recommends this daily cover be taken from t1ie area designated for CellI. By using the Celli
area, the City will save money in future excavation costs as well as maintaining the shortest haul
distance to the northern fill areas of the existing landfill site.
Exoansion Area
The area designated in the preliminary drawings (Appendix H) as the future expansion area,
encompasses approximately 300 acres. Again using DCA engineering software, the airspace volume
between base and fmal grade contours was calculated at 20.13 MM C. Y.
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
\SALINA\1I:558.001
4'''''' .
C-I
Final cover will account for approximately 1.45 MM C. Y. of the expansion area volume which leaves
18.68 MM C.Y. Assuming a 4to I waste to daily cover ratio, 3.74 MM C.Y. of daily cover will be
required for the expansion area.
W'^;1ir'\
,:;:,,<
@
,.".,
.8t.
\SALINA\8SS8.OCll
41~193 b
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
C-2
APPENDIX D
I
SUBTt";~:lrl~RT
(Bound As A Seperate Report)
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALINA\8S58.(XII
41~193 Is
DRAFT
~.". '<Co,"''''''
.@,w
.,,' .., "'
" & ::
~~~
m",
....,~,~~v.
CITY OF SALINA
SOLID WASTE STUDY
PHASE m
APPENDIX D
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
REPORT
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC,
155 North Market, Suite 910
Wichita, Kansas 67202
(316) 262-004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
fBG
1.0 INTRODUCTION....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
2.1 STATE OF KANSAS SOLID WASTE REGULATION. . . . . .. 2-1
2.2 USEPA 40 CPR PARTS 257 AND 258 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
2.3 USEPA 40 CPR 265/TEGD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS SITE HYDROGEOLOGIC
INVESTIGATIONS ................................. 3-1
3.1 PREVIOUS SOIL BORING PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
3.2 VERIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE GEOLOGICAL DATA ... 3-6
3.3 MATERIALS TESTING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF GROUNDWATER USAGE AND FLOW
PATHS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
4.1 AREA WATER SUPPLY WELLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
4.2 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
4.3 SEASONAL AND TEMPORAL FLUCTUATIONS IN
GROUNDWATER LEVELS ....................... 4-4
4.4 IDENTIFICATION OF THE UPPERMOST AQUIFER. . . . . .. 4-4
5.0 CHEMICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY .................. 5-1
5.1 mSTORIC WATER QUALITY DATA ................ 5-1
6.0 PLACEMENT OF DETECTION MONITORING WELLS ......... 6-1
6.1 PLACEMENT OF DOWNGRADIENT DETECTION
MONITORING WELLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.2 PLACEMENT OF UPGRADIENT MONITORING WELLS . . .. 6-1
7.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ..................... 7-1
8.0 CONCLUSIONS................................... 8-1
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.............................. 9-1
10.0 REFERENCES ................................... 10-1
8558.001193/1 rev 416..
1
Fi2llre
1
2
3
4
5
liST OF FIGURES
LANDFILL SITE CITY OF SALINA - SALINA, KANSAS
1985 LOGS, O.S. PENT
1988 LOGS, O.S. PENT
AREA WATER SUPPLY WELL LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED BOREHOLE/MONITOR WELL LOCATION MAP
BS58.CK1419311 rev 4/6 am
ii
lm
3-3
3-4
3-5
4-3
9-2
LIST OF TABLES
Iabk
llI&t
1 HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATORY TECHNIQUES 3-1
2 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUSLY COMPLEI'ED SITE TEST BORINGS
AND MONITOR WELLS 1985 3-7
3 SUMMARY OF MATERIALS TESTING RESULTS 3-9
4 SUMMARY OF LOCAL WATER WELLS 4-1
'I
8SS8.(I04J93/1rev4l6_
111
LIST OF APPENDICES
Annendhc
A SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
B WATER SUPPLY WElL LOGS (Refer to Figure 4 for Well Locations) DATA
C TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY LABORATORY REPORTS
D KDHE MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS
SSS8.004J93l1rev 4/6 lID
iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
This report presents the results of Subtask A2 - Subsurface Investigation for the Salina
Landfill Project. The scope of work for this subtask, pursuant to the agreement for
Study and Report Professional Services, is listed below.
· Review previous site investigation reports;
. Review the current groundwater monitoring program;
· Evaluate additional maps, publications, and well data;
· Develop a sampling and plan program to access current groundwater
quality;
· Provide recommendations for program expansion, based upon United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) groundwater
monitoring guidelines.
Previous available investigations in the area were performed by O.S. Fent with
associated reports dated 1985 and 1988 (Hydrogeology of the Salina Landfill).
Additional geologic maps, topographic maps, and well log data were compiled and
evaluated from various state and public agencies for the Salina area.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Salina landfill is located approximately 3 miles southwest of the City of Salina,
Kansas. The site is located in Section 7 of Township 15 South, Range 3 West in
Saline County. The landfill currently occupies 60 acres of the 640 acres the City
8558:004193/1 rev 416 lID
1-1
owns at this location. The site exhibits relatively flat topography in the central and
southern portions of the property with increasingly higher topographic relief to the
north.
The facility has received municipal solid waste from the City of Salina from the mid-
1970's to the present. The central, 60 acre portion of the site has been filled and will
soon be closed. The entire site is fenced. An access road surrounds the site with the
current facility entrance located on the east side.
The existing site facilities include:
. a gate house;
. an access road;
. maintenance building/shop; and
. a limited monitor we11 network.
Based upon personal communication with Mr. D.S. Fent, the Salina landfill site was
previously developed by a Federal Housing facility called Camp Phillips. Word of
mouth from former residents/workers indicates the possibility that hospital wastes may
have been disposed of in the area of the current landfill. The specific type and/or
volume of wastes are unknown and not verifiable.
SS58.004I93/lm>4f6_
1-2
2,0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The current governing regulations applicable for the Salina Landfill site include the
Kansas Statutes Annotated (KSA) Chapter 65, Article 34, and Kansas Administration
Regulations (KA1l) Article 29 and the USEPA, 40 CFR Parts 257 and 258, Solid
Waste Disposal Facility Criteria; Final Rule (dated October 9, 1991). In addition, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Groundwater Monitoring
Technical Enforcement Guidance Document (TEGD) is used to evaluate and design
groundwater monitoring systems at waste disposal facilities. The TEGD primarily
refers to regulation 40 CFR 265. The specific section of these regulations which
apply to the hydrogeologic characterization and site monitoring are described below.
2,1 STATE OF KANSAS SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS
The applicable sections of the KAR include:
. gas generation <2'% (LEL) in on-site structures and at facility
property line
. Closure plan to include:
leachate collection
gas control
cross-sections of site
post closure O&M - treatment
monitoring plans
detailed site description
These state regulations are generally silent on specific groundwater monitoring and
water quality standards.
855UI04f93fllW4I6-.
2-1
2.2 USEPA 40 CFR PARTS 257 AND 2S8
Subtitle D of RCRA establishes the fiamework for controlling the management of
nonhazardous solid waste. The specific parts of these regulation which refer to
hydrogeologic characlerization and site monitoring relative to Task A2 of this contract
are:
. Section 257.3-4
. Section 257.3-8
. Section 258, Subpart B
. Section 2'8, Subpart D
. Section 258, Subpart E
. Section 258, Subpart F
These regulations address groundwater and wellhead protection, groundwater
monitoring and corrective action, fault areas, seismic impact zones, unstable areas and
explosive gas control.
2.3 USEPA 40 CFR 26S1TEGD
These regulations govern the guidelines presented in the TEGD. The six major
aspects addressed are:
. characterization of site hydrogeology;
. location and number of groundwater monitoring wells;
. design, construction and development of groundwater monitoring wells;
. conlIaCt and implementation of the sampling and analysis plan;
. statistical analysis of groundwater monitoring data; and
. the contract and implementation of the ......ment plan.
Appendix A presents the site specific sampling and analysis plan compiled based upon
the TEGD guidance.
&S58.004I93/IMV4/6.1l11.
2-2
3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS SITE HYDROGEOWGIC INVESTIGATIONS
There are certain investigatory techniques that landfill owners, at a minimum, should
use to characterize their sites. Table I below enumerates these investigatory
techniques. An owner who has performed the level of site characterization necessary
to design a RCRA groundwater monitoring program will be able to supply any of the
necessary deliverables (cross sections, maps, etc.), listed in the final column of Table
1.
TABLE I
HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESI1GATORY TECHNIQUES
Investigatory Tasks lDvestiKalory Todmlquos Data Presentation FormaUAss_..ent
Outputs
Definition of Subsurface (Geology) . Survey of existing geologic . Narrative description of geology
information
. Soilboriap . Geologic ctOfifHieCtioas
. Geologic mappiDa: aDd material '. GeoloJic Soil Map (I' - 200')
tests (grain-size. standard
peodntion_,olc.)
. Geophysical we1110gs . IIorin& Logs
. Aerial photograpby . Raw data md interpretative
analyses of maIcrial test
Identification of Groundwater Flow . InstaIlatioD of piezometers; . Narrative description of
Paths (Hydrogeology) water level measurements at groundwater with flow pattems
differa11 depths and locatioos
. Slug tests and/or pump tests . Water table or poteDtiometric
maps (plan view) with flow
IiDes ( l' - 200') capture
mnes, aquifer characteristics
Determination of Groundwater . Tracer studies .. Hydraulic cross-section. flow
Flow Directions (including vertical velocities
and borizonal components of flow)
asSlt(IOU93/1 rev 416 IIll
3-1
To date, most of these techniques have been completed with the exception of detailed
geologic cross-sections, definition of the interre1ationship of the shallow and deeper
aquifers, close-in landfill site water quality analysis, and identification of impacts to
area receptor wells.
The investigations and data collection to date were performed by O.S. Fent, in 1985
and 1988. The hydrogeologic inveatigation report (Hydrogeology of the Salina
Landfill; 1988) included information on soil borings, materials testing, installation of
monitor wells, and aquifer pumping tests. A narrative description of the geology with
one cross section of the area were included. A site plan was also included depicting
locations of the monitor wells and soil borings, as well as general geologic areas and
groundwater contours. No hydrogeologic maps were used to indicate major areas of
recharge, discharge, or regional groundwater flow direction.
3.1 PREVIOUSSOlL BORING PROGRAM
Figure I illustrates the site configuration and borehole/well locations. The
methodology for placement of the soil borings shown on Figure I is unknown. The
drilling methods used included both hollow stem auger and the air rotary. The
sampling method is not well documented in the reports with the exception of the use
of thin-wall tube samples collected during the 1985 investigation. The soil
descriptions provided in the O.S. Fent reports generally follow a Soil Conservation
Service (SCS)-type format. This format is general in nature and typically oriented
toward agriculture purposes. Major descriptive elements generally not included in
these logs are items such as moisture content, depth of water-bearing units, sampling
methods, reasons for termination of borehole, and drilling conditions ob~rvations.
Based upon the lithologic logs presented in the O.S. Fentl985 and 1988 reports,
CDM has prepared interpreted generalized graphical logs for monitor wells I through
9 (1985) and wells 88-11 through 88-15 (1988). Figures 2 and 3 present the
graphical logs of these borehole/wells including well construction details provided in
these reports.
8558.004193/11W1J6_
3-2
10
a
/
g
,
.
o
o
.
/
o
.
u
-.
/
U
]
11
II
A
88-12
88-13
88-14
88-15
88-1
88-7
88-9
A
B
'--
15
a
8
.
c
B
LANDFIL~ ACCESS ROAD
88-10
4
188-11
. 4
r-
SALINA SOLID WASTE AREA
MONITOR WELLI
TEST BORING
LOCA TION MAP
r:l.AWPI SA1 nwr.
t
.
~
800
,
o 800
- -'1
J.f.Q.EMll
A KIOWA F~ATION
15a
1
(!)
88-16 A
B
c
o
TERRACE AREA
ALLlJY1Al tIElH WATER TABLE ARE"
ALLU~IAL-COU1lVIAL IIASTE BIJRlAL AREA
IITW rATER TABlE CONTOURS
198!5 TEST HOLE 112. 13. 14 OFF
MAP TO THE SOUTtEASl1
1185 TEST 'fELL
19S5 TEST HOLE
SEC-nON 7. TOWNSHIP 15 S. RANGE 3 W. SALINE COUNTY, KANSAS
COM ..................
.OITI" Il'ANMS
..4_.....,.......... -*'IIlIrIII
,....,..., ....I~~,_,t -..It...
1-1Q-Q.,
R<P
ASSR-11n-rr.- TASI<A
LANDFILL SITE
CITY OF SALINA
SALINA. KANSAS
Figure
No.
1
~
D
n
. WELL NO. I
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
5
~
10
'"
~
20
25
30
35
.
I
~
40
45
50
,
55
r
60
65
,
I
70
75
~
N
o
-
I
~
~
~
/
o
~
/
o
~
L
WELL NO, 2
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DET~IL
'%/,
I.. '2
"'= -
=
WELL NO. 3
5
.,
..
20
25
30
35
=~
. WELL NO. 8
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
=
=
.~
WEll NO.4
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
,
:t:l
10
15
20
.;::.:
20
30
35
.WELL NO.9
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
.m
",'. .
. ~/%
;-;~
/.
~."
~
~"".
rd
10
15
20
25
30
35
.. ~.
4.
.
50 . . I
.
"'=
55
sz
=
~
~
1985 - O. S. Fent
WELL LOGS
GWL5C5Al.DWG
WELL NO. 5
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
WELL NO.6
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
5
5
10
.,
"
15
20
~
~.
20
20
20
30
=
.~
30
- ~---
"
35
LEGEND
[[]] SILT. sandy, ML
~ CLAY. silty to sandy. CL
I3;f:l SAND ond GRAVEL. SM-GM
!;l:g
p=-~l SHALE. bedrock
fill'.",'.
~:.T.. ..
~:.~..
_~.:.l_ .
SANDSTONE
~ WATER TABLE ELEVATIONS Cl9851
COM
LANDFILL SITE
CITY OF SALINA
SALINA. KANSAS
CAW DREDlt .. IU:'EE INC.
IIICHITA,IMt&lo1i
"'''''"'"''tOll..,~__oId..._
pI__ ."~t_Iu..t.
1-19-93
RSP
B558-110-CG- TA5KA
.~
Figure
No.
2
~
o
D
n
.wELL NO. 88-11
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
,
10
~
"'~
20 .,~
25 . ~
:j
.
I
r
40
..
I
00
56
r
'0
50
r
!
:i~
80 _ . ~~~.~.~_;.
:';:~:'"
./:.~
. ~~l.:.~~:':
~
==
I~
e,
,
N
o
eo
L
..
00
I,
u
~
~
.
()5
L
~
/
,-
I
~
ro
/
n
I'
e;
I,
~
I
~
-
-
t=
.~
~
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
,
I.
10
'"
--
~
20
.~
....
25
30
36
I
40
"~
~
. .
'="
..
00
. ~.
~
.!f .
'.
60
.,
70
70
WELL NO. 88-13
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
,
{?j- ~
r#
....
'.~
,'.c,
~~
--
~
~
-
.l\'..ELL NO, 88-)1
BOREHOLE LOG WELL DETAIL
,
10
10 ~--
20 :~
25
,.
30
.~ --
..
~
22Z ""'"
- ,
40
.
1988 ~ O. S. Fent
WELL LOGS
GWLSCSA2.DWG
't
CDM
LEGEND
ITIll 51L T. sandy. ML
~ CLA'f. silty to sandy, CL
I:I:r:l SAND ond GRAVEL. SM-6M
!;j$J
f----:1 SHALE. bedrock
D SAND. poorly graded
~ WATER TABLE ELEVATIONS (19881
C#rllP' DII'D!EJI'.1Ilc<<EE INC.
lIICHTA,kJoNSI,S
LANDFILL SITE
CITY OF SALINA
SALINA, KANSAS
Fi9ure
No
3
...............LIf...~_..~
pf__ a _,......,t _1*'-
1-19-93
RSP
8558-110-CG- TASKA
I
,
3,2 VERIF1CATION OF SUBSURFACE GEOWGICAL DATA
The number and location of the completed boreholes do not fully characterize
hydrogeologic conditions in all """'" of the property. Table 2 provides a summary of
the completed test holes and monitor wens.
[
As indicated on Table 2, to date, a total of 17 test borings and 14 monitor wells have
been installed/completed at the site since 1985. These borings have been concentrated
primarily within the vicinity of, or in the landfill area and along the southern
boundary of Section 7. The northern area of the property, as well as the """'" east
and west of the current landfill lack detailed subsurface information. The soil borings
presented in Figures 2 and 3 suggest that the unconsolidated materials beneath the site
consist predominantly of silty to sandy clay, with several thin sandy layers. The
predominance of clayey materia1s, as reported, would indicate a low potential for
vertica1leachate migration. The previous site investigation reports did not contain
sufficient detail, however, to inleIpret the continuity of the subsurface clayey
deposits. Therefore, it is not completely possible to accurately assess the leachate
migration potential, or rates, into any of the sandy water-bearing layers that exit
beneath the site.
3.3 MA TERIAUl TESTING
In conjunction with both the 1985 and 1988 site investigations, limited materials
testing was perfonned on selected site materials encountered. Table 3 lists the
materials tested and the testing results.
8558.00If93flrev4l6_
3-6
TABLE Z
SUMMAll.Y OF PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED SITE TEST B01lINGS AND
MONITOR WELLS 1985
WelllIIorina Date lief........
NlDDber IDstaIJed Type Location Document
No.1 1985 Temporary weU (1") 0.22 mile welt of SE 0.5. Fent, 1985
comer of Sec. 7
No.2 1985 Temporary well (1") ZSOll. N ODd 180 ft. W O.S. Fent, 1985
of NE comer of NE pit
No.3 1985 Temporary weU (Z") 8SO ft. W ODd 100 ft. N O.S. Fent, 1985
of No.2
NO.4 1985 Temporary weU (1") 633 t. W ODd 110 ft. N O.S. Feat, 1985
of No. 3
No. S 1985 Temporary weU (1') 0.18 mile N and 84 ft. O.S. Fent, 1985
E of SW comer of
Section 7
No.6 1985 Temporary well (1") 1900 ft. E of SW corner O.S. Fent, 1985
of Sect. 7
No.7 1985 Temporary well (1') 2350 ft. E ODd 1600 ft. O.S. Fent, 1985
N of SW COrDet of Sect.
7
No.8 1985 Temporary well (1') 0.2 mile S of HE corner O.S. Fent, 1985
of Sect. 7
No.9 1985 Temporary weU (2") 0.24 mile N of SW 0.5. Fen', 1985
comer of Sect. 7
No. 10 1985 Test borina 460 ft. 5 ODd 650 ft. W O.S. Fent, 1985
of HE comer of Sect.
, 12
No. 11 1985 Test boring. NE corner of Sect. 13 O.S. Fent. 1985
No. 12 1985 Test boring NE corner Sect. 13 O.S. Fent, 1985
No. 13 1985 Test boring 950 ft. 5 ODd 420 ft E O.S. Fent. 1985
of NW comer of Sect.
q
No. 14 1985 Test borina 710 ft. 5 ODd 360 ft. E O.S. Fent, 1985
of NW comer of Sect.
17
No. 15 Test boring 900 ft. E ODd 180 ft. N O.S. Fent, 1985
iii....i JIGii _;~Hl Of5.....~.1
8358.004l93flrev."Ci_
3-7
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF P1lEVIOUSL Y COMPLETED SITE TESr BORINGS AND
MONITOll WELLS 19811
WelllBorina Date lief........
NlDIIber InslaIIed Type Location Documenl
No. 88.1 1988 Test BoriDg 85011. W.... SO II. S O.S. Fent, 1988
of NE comer of 1985.
1988 N. waste pit
NO. 88-1 1988 TestBoriD, 5 ft. E olNa 88-1 0.5. Fent, 1988
No. 88-3 1988 Test Boring S ft. N ofNa. 88-1 O.S. Fent, 1988
No. 88-4 1988 Test Boring 93 ft. Eand69 ft. Nof 0.5. Fent, 1988
Phillips Rd.
No. 88-5 1988 Test Boring O.S. Feut. 1988
No. 88-6 1988 Test Boring 10 ft. E of 88-1 O.S. Fent. 1988
No. 88-7 1988 Test Boring 11311. W....69 II. N 0.5. Fent. 1988
of S. sect. line rd.
No. 88-8 1988 Test Boring 30011. E....65 II. N 0.5. Fent, 1988
GW intercepted @ of S. section Line Rd.
11.35 II.
No. 88-9 1988 Test Boring 300 ft. E of 88-8 0.5. Fent, 1988
GW intercepted @
15.41 II.
No. 88-10 1988 Test Boring 400 ft. E. of 88-9 0.5. Fent, 1988
GW intercepted @
18.31 II.
No. 88-11 1988 Mom"" Well (1") S64 ft. E of 88-10 0.5. Fent, 1988
No. 88-12 1988 Monitor Well (r) 85 II. E....65 II. Nof O.S. Fent, 1988
Creek bridge
No. 88-13 1988 Monitor Well (r) 3S ft. E of No. 88-12 0.5. Fent. 1988
No. 88-14 1988 Monitor Well (4-) 23.5 ft. S-SE of No. 88- 0.5. Fent. 1988
11
No. 88-15 1988 Mom"" Woil (4") 22 ft. S-SB of No. 88- 0.5. Fent, 1988
13
No. 88-16 1988 Soil Boring 480II.E.... 13011. S O.S. Fen', 1988
.. w of ravine ii I
I ~c::: ,.
&jSUl04193/Irev4l6_
3-8
TABLE 3
SUMMA1lY OF MATE1UALS TESTING RESULTS
Hydraulic
Sample Depth .f Conductivityl Dry Unit Natural
Locationl Sample Permeability Weight Moisture Transmissivity Velocity
Borehole # (ft) Date (an/see) (pound/ft') oo.....t ('lI>) (gpd/ft) (ftJday)
85-6 Clay 1985 2.17 x 10"' emf&<< 115.2 19.4
85-1 Clay 1985 1.66 x 10'" em/see 93.1 22.7
88-1 3-4.5 1988 2.3 x lcr; cmJsec
88-2 base of pit 1988 4.03 x 1(t11 em/see
(1988)
88-3 band dug hole 1988 (remolded)
6.2 x 10" em/see
88-4 3 1988 9.41 x 10-7
(vertical) em/see
88-5 10 1988 4.81 x 10.1
(vertical) em/see
88-6 base of pit 1988 5.32 I 1()"6
(1988) (vertical) em/see
88-11 1988 0.24 ft/day 123.8 0.041
12.4 ftlday
88-14 1988 56 ft/day 1269 2.5
423 8ft'/day
88-15 1988 0.33 ft/day 66.84 0.2
33.4 ft'/day
88-16 1.4 1988 9.45 x 1lt'
As indicated by this testing data, reported soil permeability is relatively low ranging
from 2.3 x 10-" to 1.66 x 10.8 em/sec. The methods used to determine these soil
permeability values were not provided, therefore the accuracy of these permeability
can not be verified. Based upon O. S. Fent, 1988, the velocities for groundwater flow
calculated by the Jacob method from aquifer pumping tests range from 0.2 to 2.5 feet
per day (shallow sand 34-36 feet). The deeper aquifer (65 to 67 feet) has a calculated
velocity of 0.2 feet per day. The absence of data and/or calculations used to develop
these groundwater flow estimates creates some degree of uncertainty.
8558.004f93/lrev4/6am
3-9
4.0 IDENTIFlCATION OF GROUNDWATER USAGE AND FLOW PAmS
4.1 AREA WATER SUPPLY WELlS
Twenty-three water well logs have been compiled for the area of the landfill based on
the 1985 and 1988 O.S. Fent reports. The water quality from a well located near the
southern end of Section 18, south of the site, is reported to be "hard" and used for
domestic purposes after softening. Inadequate water is reported for wells drilled west
of the disposal site. Table 4 summarizes the available area well information. Copies
of the logs are provided in Appendix B.
TABLE 4
SUMMA1lY OF LOCAL WATE1l WELLS
((deplhlin.....a1s in ftOt)
WelINo. Static
(see Figure 4 and Completion Lepl Ground Screened Total W....
Append;' B) Dale Description Elevation Interval Depth Level
I 02/01188 S7,T1S,R3W NA NA NA NA
2 02122/71 S6,T15,R3W NA 41-56 56 31
3 10/[2/81 S6,TI5,R3W NA ~ 60 25
4 O4l25nB S6.T1S,R3W NA ~ 60 25
5 09/fYl/76 S6,T15,R3W NA 13-22 68 7
30-68
6 04/19/80 S6,T15,R3W NA 35-35 35 [8
7 03/16/71 S6,T15.R3W NA 25-60 60 24
8 03/15/71 S6,T15,R3W NA 24-59 59 24
9 09122/84 S6,T15,R3W NA 4~-55 55 28
10 11/08n6 S6,TlS,R3W NA 35-50 50 25
11 09/11n6 S6,TI5,R3W NA 14-30 74 11
50-74
12 11/04/88 S7,T15,R3W 1306 647-70 70 14
13 11/14/88 S7,71S,R3W 1306 36-39 39 14
14 IO/02n9 S[.T15,R4W NA 42-52 52 23
85SS.<XN193/1rev4l6l1lll
4-1
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF LOCAL WATER WEU.S
((deptMntervals in reel)
Well No. Static
(see Fqpu-e 4 and Completion Legal Ground - Total W.....
Appendix B) Date Desoiption Elevation Interval Depth Level
15 12/06191 S13,TI5,R4W NA 33-53 53 29
16 06/04/87 S8,T15,R3W NA 38-48 48 11
17 11/08/88 S7-T15,R3W 1306 65-68 68 14
18 11/17/88 S7,TI5,R3W 1306 32-37 37 14
19 11/07/88 S7,T15,R3W 1318 78-88 88 23
20 02/01/76 S6,T15,R3W NA 50-70 70 40
21 09/30/76 S6.TlS.R3W NA 28-34 34 22
22 12123/76 S6,TI5,R3W NA 58-78 78 32
23 NA S18,T15,R3W NA NA 54 NA
A cluster of supply wells are located north of the site, in Section 6. Most of the on-
site monitor wells are situated along the southern property line. Only two wells are
located off-site to the south and southwest. Figure 4 iliuslIates the locations of the
compiled well information.
4.2 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
The groundwater flow regime was characterized utilizing compiled water level
monitoring data (Fent, 1988). A potentiometric contour map has been prepared, O.S.
Fent Reports dated 1985 and 1988, indicating a general hydraulic gradient to the
south. The vertical component of groundwater flow is not known at this time.
The monitor wells appear to have been located to record a generalized depiction of
groundwater flow. An overall flow direction has been determined from the existing
wells, however, a detailed characterization of groundwater flow has not been
prepared. The reported groundwater flow infonnation appears to represent a
combination of water levels from wells that intersect at least two separate sandy
SSS8.004I93/1rev4/6....
4-2
~ ~ 10"': c:;;) r-' r-~
I
I
I
I
I
T 14 S
T 15 S
.
I
I
'en>
OC::D
()"tJm
>"tJ>
-I,
O-<:::E
z=:>
3:m-l
>r-m
"tJr-::D
I
I~
I~
I "
I
Ii
'"
HO
:l c
11~
II ~ ~
" ~ ~
~q ~
. .
~
'"
(fJ
'U
'"
en
en
'"
I
-
o
I
(")
"
I
..,
,.
(fJ
^
,.
~Q,
,-I>
--<z
z
>00
. "Tl:!!
~en::
z>en
enr--
>Z-l
en>m
,
'1
Z<ij'
"" 0 C
. "
m
I
-
-
t """ r""
!
1
1
j
] ::.=J ~
I
.,0_ _ ____;-- ) '\\ -"-.>~
~ ;1 /, I ~. ~
, I ( -" ,-~ ( <,!' r~ \'-.'-- .~....
+ 31 ,:,r- .'1. I !-.- ....., ~ , "'"
"---::> ,3d -.t,:- ..1 ." 133/ I Ins 32 ~~.....--------,~ ~,
.',-'] C' :..')~ ! .J r\~} . \ -'0
}\ ;';-j (', / ~, >--' I, "', '--
I ~ '- Q . _..~__.;;_.: '--
"", i', I "I \ .'
I '\' ,7".; I '. L, ~ ,r" ~ _ ',,' t"",
{. ,~' I " "" I (' r" ,,"~"" ,.' I
(,C ",' _"l-r-,.,- _ r""/ ''\ .'J -r ';- ,..---.", f 1'1, '--
~, ) )"" ~ v~, "J - i J I' <(, \. Q. ~.
,'____~_~~- l-..:..-__---.:~_,__L.:=_.!..:,.- :::-.:~___L_~.I+---o~ '
/401 I ' /365. -- KJZ3 \ ., 1.34/1 ':., ,r IJ2:" 1,,..- '~'"" ,_ /215.{. .
., "~I "I ,..' '- 'j ,. ,'..(' ,:
') 1 '~j~C" - ~"~ ~'\ : oI~-- '''', '. I' ""'--J' I ~,
~' I, .''', I \' ~.\ "~-" <:J" ",~" ~
% .-> (.," -_',,, \': I =" '"-, '\ - ~ ,'" /)
I~' {jJ \ -, I I, f \,. IJ. ~ 0 I 'I 1 ,J---".r
~ ! _ '"-~~ o,~ to ~ '~ ~'~ 11~7( VJ/5~/\ -;''-' ('12
1;1:>4....-; "J '1404..: f( (~^15 '''_' ~.' 1388 (.,~ I;J4.;1 -' '<~2,7/ 17(16, --<=Z'
.f . ~''') '., W,
II I ; 20 8 \'A ,
I r' [, i,... - -' .-- '1 ' I t-
o' ~\,.r\ , I I I,.~ \l \ .~'~' ~ \ '- ,I,,-}'~lr.'l! '_=
_ \. r~ _J f" ,/," t~\.~. I ''j i'l I ~W:, (!
) ~ '. I \! .~ :,.1: ,., 22' ~i : \ \ ,r ~
\.- /;156 I 1375 '<3:17 "-~':"-..v~ 1 ---..' /
" -",,!aterT.nk I
'-"' --- ~_. ',- ~
I '-
,_~ :~r' ,,:l"\ I'~\
r~ '\ ~,\ 0' '}
t'\', (-~ ",\ 36~--, '
H .
13"iC ,/"'! I /391
~_ I .
- "
,-- \ \
" I
I <\~,-,/
:J8~
,,.
.~_ J .
= :';'.~In
. C/'
/' r
,
~,----
J/- --., )
r- 0-- N--
,
,
/
I -
,,'
'\
--
1__ )
M
o:'";'._S'.1
. ,
.
i
j
,
I
)
.JIV
8
7'338
1342
'. .
~ 1~20
1325
I'
, )1"
~
t""9
,,~
i
,I
,
,
I .
, ", I,
_.
, ,
) II., f.
,\ .
.,' --,
\''---~'
~______ 16~~
~ I ~ ? "
,,_ I"
'\.
l
"
~~=....'
.
"
,
,
I I
\ -I
)
.
r
....,
(~
(13
\
, >' ~,
~,:~
142'..
.
129"1
,,,ge--' '. ;::-
"---
IJJO
1317 I
II
1\
1308
1,-'17
\
Ij! \
',)
,
,
I.
17
~ '("
'~
i
,
'--'.
,
'---
13
':~ I.
.,
, I
'.
13
18
17
16
~
,jj
24
19
21
20
.
p
" "
<T '"
<< <<
SCALE 1: 24 000
o
'''''
~
~
t
1110O 0
.......... .....
1000 "'"
. .
"""
.
.... """
,
..., ""'..,
,
FROU, USGS 7.~ "INUrE: SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) SAU"A sw.
QUADRANGLE. SAUN~ CCUNTY. KANSAS.
Legend
CD Area Supply Well Locations (see Table 4)
.
water-bearing zones. As discussed previously, it is not known if these water-bearing
zones are hydraulically connected. Groundwater flow directions and rates in each of
the water-bearing zones could be significantly different from each other. In addition,
existing information does not document if the water level measurements were taken
within a 24 hour period, or if the water levels were allowed to stabilize after
construction and development of the wells. A contour map of the deep aquifer (that
overlies the shale bedrock) was not compiled.
4_3 SEASONAL AND TEMPORAL FLUCTUATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
LEVELS
Not enough detailed information is available to derive conclusions on fluctuations in
the static water levels resulting from both seasonal and long term climatic conditions.
Fluctuations on-site could be affected by off-site well pumping, local recharge or
discharge areas, waste disposal practices, and seasonal variations. These fluctuations
can affect the area groundwater flow patterns and gradient directions. Short-term
recharge patterns may affect groundwater flow patterns that are markedly different
from groundwater flow patterns determined by seasonal averages. Therefore,
additional information is needed to determine these factors of fluctuations.
4,4 IDENTIFlCATION OF TIlE UPPERMOST AOUIFER
The landfill owner is required under 40 CFR 258 Subpart E (Section 258.51) to
monitor the uppermost aquifer beneath the facility in order to immediately detect a
potential release. Proper identification of the uppermost aquifer is, therefore,
essential to the establishment of a compliant groundwater monitoring system. The
USEPA has defined the uppermost aquifer as the geologic formation, group of
formations, or part of a formation that is the aquifer nearest to the ground surface and
is capable of yielding a significant amount of groundwater to wells or springs and
may include fill material that is saturated (40 CFR 258 Section 258.2).
IlSSIl.004193/lrev4l6.1D1
4-4
The uppermost aquifer needs to be further defined, especially in close proximity to
the current fill site. The lack of specific subsurface information in the northern and
the east and west-centra1 parts of the site could reveal the potentiai for a hydraulic
interconnection to exist, such as from lateral discontinuity between geologic units,
facies changes, fracture zones, or aiteration of geologic units by landfilling and/or
leachate.
8558.00(193/1 rev 416-.
4-5
s.o CHEMICAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY
5.1 HISTORIC WATER OUALITY DATA
Groundwater quality data has historically been collected and reported for wells 88-11,
88-14, and 88-15. Table' in Appendix C summarizes these data. The laboratory
repons provided in the O.S. Fent, 1988 repon, are also included in Appendix C. As
illustrated by the available well completion data on Figure 3, the potential exists that
the sampled wells could monitor conditions in either the uppermost or lower aquifers
beneath the site.
The reported monitor well water quality sampling dates inciude:
. November, 1988;
. April, 1990;
. January, 1991;
. March, 1991; and
. July, 1991.
Appendix D includes the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) list
of maximum contaminant levels. As indicated by this data, no maximum contaminant
levels are exceeded in the sampled wells for the parameters analyzed except for nne
occurrence for selenium in well 88-14. Both prior and subsequent sampling of this
well have shown compliance with the State standard for this constituent. As was
previously indicated, the well construction and the distal location from the solid waste
of these monitored wells may significantly affect the relative value of the analytical
results.
8351.00$/93/1 NY 4/6 lIlll
5-1
r
~
"]
10
a
i
i
~
I
~
L
-
. 5.
II
9
.
."",
A
o
4
o
MW.A-
. fiizo ~
03
- A gg-2
SS-3, "
S8-6
EXISTING LANDFILL SITE
1-:!1l0 . A 88-16
B
2 .','
,~I
I
I
I
I 0
IJM~ ~.-'-~_
-f=" A88-S
.1300
IJ
8S-12
S8-13
S8-14
88-15
88-7
D
S8-9
A
C
MW
-$-
....
8
.
B
o
LANDFIL~ ACCESS ROA
88-10 188-11
A . A
D
,-
15
a
SALINA SOLID WASTE AREA
PROPOSED
BOREHOLEI
MONITOR WELL
LOCATION MAP
CPRMWSA1.0WG
~
.
~
800 400
'--
o
800
,
LEGEND
A KIOWA F~ATION
B . TERRACE AREA
c
ALLUI/IAL IiIGH WATER TABLE AREA
o
ALLUVIAL-COLLUVIAL WASTE BURIAL AREA
WITH WATER TABLE CONTOURS
15a
1
o
88-16 A
1985 TEST HOLE n2.. 13. ~ OFF
t.lAP TO -mE SQlJTHEASTJ
1985 TEST WELL
1988 TEST HOLE
M~ PROPOSEO WEl..L LOCATION
C PROPOSED BORIt~ LOCA T10N
SECTION 7. TOWNSHIP '5 S. RANGE 3 W. SALINE COUNTY. KANSAS
CDM ...."""""......NO
NOllTA"ICAHSIoS
LANDFILL SITE
CITY OF SALINA
SALINA, KANSAS
Figure
No,
..-..........~
pi--. "_I CIClrIId"",bo
5
I-Ig-g}
RSP
8ooR-l1n-CG- TASKA
6.0 PLACEMENT OF DETECTION MONITORING WELUi
6.1 PLACEMENT OF DOWNGRADIF..NT DETECTION MONITORING
WET.I &4\
In order to immediately detect releases for a solid waste facility, as required by the
USEPA regulations (Section 258.54), the landfill 6wner must install downgradient
detection monitoring wells adjacent to the waste management units. In a practical
sense, this means that additional monitoring wells should be installed as close as
physically possible to the southern edge of the current waste management unit.
As shown on Figure 4, the current downgradient groundwater monitoring wells are
not located immediately adjacent to the waste management area. The majority of
wells are located over 1,'00 feet downgradient of the site (USEPA suggests 150 feet
as a maximum distance). There is no explanation for the current well density and the
proximal distances of the existing groundwater monitoring wells. The screened
intervals (less than , to 10 feet in thickness) have been identified to include depths
ranging from 15 to 80 feet (see Figures 2 and 3).
6.2 PLACEMENT OF UPGRADIENT MONITORING WELlS
No upgradient monitor wells currently exist at the site, since previous upgradient
wens were reported to have been plugged. Upgradient wells must be located and
constructed to provide representative samples of groundwater in the same portion of
the aquifer monitored by the downgradient wens to pennit a comparison of
groundwater quality (40 CFR 258.51 and 2'8.'3). The' USEPA regulations indicate
that the landfill owner should install multiple background monitor wens in the
uppermost aquifer to account for spatial variability in background water quality. The
owner should also install enough background monitor wens to allow for depth-discrete
comparison of water quality. This means that for downgradient wens completed in a
85SBJX14193/IffN4I6am
6-1
particular geologic fonnation, the owner should install upgradient wells in the same
portion of aquifer, so that the data can be compared on a depth-discrete basis.
Recommendations for the locations of additional monitoring wells is presented in
Section 10. These wells will fulfill the USEPA municipal landfill groundwater
monitoring requirements.
i
I
!
;
I
I
US8.004f93/1n:v4/6am
6-2
7.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
The design, construction, locations, sampling program, and monitoring schedule for
the existing wells and any newly installed wells needs to be clearly planned and
documented in order to pennit the detection or assess the nature and extent of a
release of hazardous constituents to groundwater from the monitored waste
management facility. A site specific Sampling and Analysis Plan has been developed
(Appendix A) to aid in these activities.
USUK14f93/Irn-416_
7-1
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based upon review of the published and available data on the site and area, the
conclusions presented below were compiled.
. Wells MW-2 and MW-3 located as upgradient wells with screened
intervals within the air/water interface have been plugged.
. There are no downgradient wells with screened intervals within the
air/water interface. This condition may be due to confined or semi-
confined conditions present at the site. All the downgradient wells are
screened at a depths below 30 feet with static groundwater levels
measured at depths of approximateiy 15 to 16 feet.
. Well MW-5 is an upgradient well with the screened interval
approximately 14 feet below the air/water interface have been plugged.
. Well MW-7 is the only downgradient well directly adjacent to the waste
management area. The screened interval is between 38-48 feet whicb
is 26 feet below static water level (11 feet).
. Regional groundwater flow has been reported to be to the south.
. Extensive silty to sandy clay sequences underlie the property. This
clayey unit reportedly bas a low permeability (10" to 10" cm/see).
. It is unknown if bydraulic communication exists between the different
water-bearing sandy intervals present beneath the site or if the well
construction has resulted in communication between these two
groundwater zones.
lISSII.004I93flrcv4f6_
8-1
. The uppennost aquifer beneath the site has not been defined in detail.
. Twenty-three water wells reportedly exist within a one-mile radius of
the site. Three of these wells (monitor wells) are located at the
southern limit of the property and two wells (supply wells) lie within
one mile further downgradient. The remainder of the wells reportedly
exist at upgradient (northerly) locations relative to the existing waste
disposal unit.
. Based on sampling results from November 1988 to July 1991, water
quality standards have not been exceeded for the parameters analyzed at
monitor well locations 88-11, 88-14 and 88-15.
. No methane gas concentration information is available for the site
. Groundwater flow velocities based on three aquifer pumping tests
reportedly range from 0.041 to 2.5 feet per day. The procedures used
to perform the pumping tesls, data collected during the test, and
calculations employed have not been tabulated or included in a
calculation brief in the available reports. The accuracy of the reported
groundwater flow velocities needs to be verified.
8553.C104193f1 rev 416 am
8-2
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our review of site investigation and area reports, and the conclusions
derived regarding site conditions, CDM has compiled the following recommendations.
Refer to Figure 5 for proposed boreholelwelllocations.
. Two upgradient cluster wells need to he installed adjacent to the north
side of the current landfill area. The shallow screened interval well
should traverse the air/water interface, andlor be placed within the
uppennost saturated sandy deposit encountered (if confined conditions
are measured). A deeper screened interval is warranted at these
locations to evaluate vertical groundwater flow gradients, and the
aquifer hydraulic and geochemical properties of the deeper saturated
sandy deposits.
. Three additional upgradient monitor wells should be installed (screening
the air/water interface within the designated terrace and high water
table areas.
. Two additional downgradient cluster well pairs should he instalied
directly adjacent to the south boundary of the waste management area.
An additional shallow monitor well should he installed next to the
existing monitor well 88-5.
. Two additional downgradient cluster wells should be installed just north
of the present southern property boundary.'
85S8.004I93/lrrN4/6am
9-1
. Seven additional borings located east, west, and south of the waste
management site should be completed to further identify the lithology
of the area, accompanied with the boring information from previous
monitor wells. Soil/materials testing should be completed on
representative samples to define the geotechnical properties of the
underlying formations.
. Two additional pump tests need to be performed to determine
transmissivity and groundwater flow velocity results at various
depths/aquifers. The tests should be performed at nested well locations
(upgradient and downgradient of the site).
. Survey all existing and new well locations, both horiwnta1ly and
vertically.
. Collect groundwater samples from the existing and the proposed new
monitoring wells. Analyze the samples in a manner consistent with
USEP A regulations, and evaluate the results using recommended
USEP A statistical procedures. All sampling and analyses procedures
should follow those described in the sampling and analysis plan
(Appendix A).
. Verify that the existing monitor wells, which penetrated into the deeper
aquifer, were sealed properly at the upper aquifer. If these wells were
not sealed properly, the wells could be considered a potential pathway
for contaminants to penetrate to the deever aquifer. If they were not
sealed properly, they should be properly abandoned.
8558.00l193/1 rev 4/6 am
9-3
. In conjunction with the completion of the soil borings/wells adjacent to
the existing landfill unit, methane gas concentrations should be
collected. A MSA model 260 combustible gas meter, or equivalent,
should be used.
8558.004193/1 rr:v 4/6 am
9-4
.
10.0 REFERENCES
Pent, O.S., 1985, Unnamed Report.
Fent, O.S., 1988, Hydrogeology of the Salina landfill.
8558.00419311_416...
10-1
8S58.00II93/lm4/6....
APPENDIX A
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) is written in conformance with the RCRA Groundwater
Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document, September, 1986; 40 CFR Part 258,
Appendix I; and 40 CFR Part 264 Subpart F.
1.1 SITE ffiSTOllY
Refer to Section 1.0 Introduction, Subtask A2 Rej)Ort Subsurface Investi2'ations Salina Landfill
Proiect.
1.2 OBmCTIVES
Groundwater monitoring wells will be installed and existing wells monitored to detect the presence of
a suite of inorganic and organic parameters intended to be typical of landfill leachate constituents.
The analytical suite will be consistent with the parameters required for detection monitoring by 40
CFR Part 2'8, Appendix 1. EPA SW-846 methods (Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, U.S.
EPA SW-846; third edition) and other EPA methods will be used to satisfy the RCRA requirements.
1.3 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN OIlGANlZATION
The purpose of the SAP is to provide the procedures and protocols to be maintained during the field
investigative and sample analysis activities. The SAP is divided into the following sections:
Section 2.0 provides a description of the field activities associated with equipment calibration and
maintenance, record keeping, sample custody and documentation issues, decontamination procedures
and waste handling and disposal.
Section 3.0 specifies the analytical methods, required detection limits, sample bottle requirements, and
holding time requirements fur all of the collected samples.
Section 4.0 describes the sampling protocols including well installation, field measurements, sample
collection and field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples.
1-1
751\ALBUQ-SAP\!lI.TIrf
4/51'13"1
2.0 FIELD PROTOCOLS
This section describes the protocols associated with field activities that are necessary to maintain field
instruments. document sample custody, decontaminate sampling, handle and dispose of all field
generated wastes, and maintain a record of all sample related activities.
2.1 CALIBRATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FIEI.D EOUWMENT
All field equipment used during the investigation will be operated, maintained, calibrated, and
standardized in accordance with manufacturer specifications. A brief description of each of the field
instruments to be used follows:
. M-Scope
An electronic device used to measure static water level
elevation.
. PlD
Photoionization detector used to measure the presence of
organic vapors in the weIlbead.
. Interface Probe
Identifies the presence of immiscible layers and indicates water
level depths.
. pH meter
Measures pH of tested water samples.
. S-C- T meter
Measures salinity, conductivity. and temperature of selected
water samples.
2.2 SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION
The purpose of the chain-of-custody procedures is to document the identity of the sample, and its
handling, from its first existence as a sample until its ultimate disposal following analysis. Custody
records trace a sample from its collection through all transfers of cu~tody until it is transferred to an
analytical laboratory. Internal laboratory records then document the custody of the sample through its
final disposition.
2-1
1S11ALBUQ-SAFon.TXT
41"9311
A sample is under custody if one or more of the following criteria are met:
. The sample is in the custodian's (sampler, lab personnel, etc.) possession.
. It is in the custodian's view after being in possession.
. It was in the custodian's possession and was locked up to prevent tari1pering.
. It is in a designated secure area.
The remainder of this section discusses the chain--of-custody and document control requirements which
are appropriate for the site. These procedures will be followed. If any deviations occur, appropriate
personnel will be notified and deviations will be noted in the field log book (see Section 2.4).
2.2.1 FlELD CUSTODY REQUIIlEMENTS
Chain--of-custody for samples collected in the field and transported or shipped to laboratories for
analysis will be maintained. The field team will have a designated field sample custodian with overall
responsibility for sample custody, and for field document control. The custodian will ensure that the
sampling teams have and use the appropriate identification and custody records, will resolve custody
problems in the field, and will handle the shipment of samples to the analytical laboratories. It is
assumed that each analytical laboratory will have an identified sample custodian and document/sample
control officer.
Samole Labels
Each collected sample, including duplicates and travel or field blanks, will have a completely tilled-in
sample label securely attached to it. Duplicates, and blanks will be shipped "blind" to the laboratory,
but will be assigned a unique identification code in order to facilitate identification of the laboratory
,
results. Sample collection labels will be preprinted to ensure that the required infonnation is provided
on each tag. Labels will include the Sample Identification Number, the location of the sampling site
(both address and site code), the type of sample and the analyses required, the time of sampling, and
the signature of the Sampler. The person who physically co1lects the sample is the Sampler and will
sign the sample label.
2-2
7mAUlUQ-SAP\S2.. TXT
4/"9311
Chain-of-Custody Record Sheets
Custody records will be used for the samples collected at the site. The multipart carbonless copy
forms will be correlated with the sample collection labels; requested information will have the same
heading on both. The sampler or sample custodian will complete a Chain"f-Custody Record to
accompany each sample shipment from the field to the laboratory. An example Chain"f-Custody
fonn is shown in Figure 2-1.
The custody records will be used for a packaged lot of samples; more than one sample will usually be
recorded on one fonn. More than one custody record sheet may be used for one package, if
necessary. The purpose of these records are to document the transfer of a group of samples traveling
together; when the group of samples change, a new custody record is initiated. The original custody
record travels with the samples; the initiator of the record keeps a copy. When custody of the same
group of samples changes hands several times, some people will not bave a copy of the custody
record. This is acceptable as long as the original custody record shows that each person who had
received custody has properly relinquished custody.
General use Custody Record instructions follow:
Usine a Tw.Part Custody Record Sheet
. The originator fills in all requested information from the sample labels.
. The originator signs in the top left "Relinquished by" box and keeps the copy.
. The original record sheet travels with the samples.
. The person receiving custody checks the sample label information against the custody
record. This person also checks sample condition and notes anything unusual under
"Comments" on the custody fonn.
. The person receiving custody signs in the adjacent "Received by" box and keeps the
original.
. The Dateffime will be the same for both signatures since custody must be transferred
from one person to another person. When samples are shipped via common carrier (e.g.,
Federal Express), the date/time will not be the same for both signatures.
2-3
7'7IALIlUQ-SAP\S2.TXT
4131\1'311
.
!
J
~11
.. e
-l>-...
!
'"
s
TI
15
c:
:xl
m
~ '
,":1"
,:.A/"-)
Figure
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
2-1
PROJECT NUMBER
F8280
CDM
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJECT NAME
Field Log Book
Reference No._
i ----
~ ----
~ ----
I" ----
----
---
----
---
----
----
----
----
---
----
---
----
E
,
>;
'"
SAMPLE NUMBER
ANALYSES":' /.i>~i>J%~
SAMPLE LOCATION SATMyPEPlE ttcf' -{P,:W / / / ~"R
14~~'Zql7 / """"""'
REMARKS
LOO
BOOK
"""",
OATE
TIME
------ ---
------ ---
------ ---
------ --
------ ---
------ ---
------ ---
-------- ---
------- ,..---
------ 1--
------- f---
,..------- 1---
------ ---
------ ---
------ ---
------ ---
SAMPLED BY (SIGN)
, , ,
, , ,
RELINQUISHED BY (SIGN) REUNOUISHED BY (SIGN) RELINQUISHED BY (SIGN) RELINQUISHED BY (SIGN) RELINQUISHED BY (SIGN)
CD @ " @ @
DATElTIMEI I I DATEfTIMEI I I OATElTtMEI I I DATElTIME I I I DATEnlME I I I
RECEIVED BY (SIGN) RECEIVED BV (SIGN) RECEIVED BY (SIGN) RECEIVEO BY (SIGN) RECEIVED BY (SIGN)
CD @ @ @ @
OAlEITIMEI I I DAlMIMEt " I I DA TElTIME I I , DATElTIME I I I DATElTIMEt I I
METHOD OF SHIPMENT SHIPPEO BY (SIGN) RECEIVEO FOR LABORATORY BY (SIGN) DATElTIME
( I )
~
g
"
ili
~
. When samples are shipped via common carrier, the original travels with the samples and
the shipper (e.g., Field Sample Custodian) keeps the copy. The shipper also keeps all
shipping papers. bills of lading, etc.
. In all cases. it must be readily seen that the same person receiving custody has
relinquished it to the next custodian.
. If samples are left unattended or a person refuses to sign, this must be documented and
explained on the custody record.
OuestionslProblems Concerninc Custodv Rerords
If a discrepancy between sample label numbers and custody record listings is found, the person
receiving custody should document this and properly store the samples. The samples should not be
analyzed until the problem is resolved by contacting the field sample custodian or other designated
responsible authority.
The responsible person receiving custody should attempt to resolve the problem by checking all
available information (other markings on sample container, type of sample. etc.). They should then
document the situation on the custody record and in this project logbook and notify the appropriate
sample custodian by the fastest available means, followed by written notification.
Changes may be written in the "Comments" section of the Custody record and should be initialed and
dated. A copy of this record should accompany the written notification to the sample custodian. A
complete copy of the documentation of the problem and its resolution should also be submitted to the
project files.
2.2.2 SAMPLE SHIPMENT
Each sample shipped will be packed in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT)
regulations under 49 CFR 171-173 which include documentation requirements. Samples obtained at
uncontrolled hazardous waste sites are classified as either environmental samples or hazardous
samples. Environmental samples are those which contain low levels of contaminants and require
implementation of limited precautionary procedures. Hazardous samples are those which could
possibly contain dangerous levels of contaminants. All samples collected during this investigation,
unless data to the contrary is obtained, will be classified as environmental samples. In addition, each
2-'
7~7\ALBUQ-U.P\S2.. TXT
41~f1J3 "&
sample will be identified with a sample identification label, and wi1l be listed on the chain-of-custody
record completed for each sample shipping container. The field sample custodian will notify the
laboratory sample custodian of sample shipment. The Chain of Custody will be placed inside a
plastic bag and taped inside the cooler cover.
Custodv Seals
Custody seals are narrow strips of adhesive paper used to demonstrate that no tampering has
occurred. The seals are placed across the first point of opening and/or sample bottles. The field
investigator shall write the date and signature on the seal.
2.2.3 LABOIlATORY CUSTODY PROCEDU1lES
Laboratories will use sample identification records and custody records to satisfy the requirements
outlined below:
. Upon receipt at the laboratory, each sample shipment wiU be inspected to assess the
condition of the shipping container and the individual samples, and the condition or
integrity of the custody seals on a received shipment of samples will be documented at the
time of receipt of the laboratory.
. Enclosed chain-of-custody records will be cross-referenced with all the samples in the
shipment; these records will be signed by the sample custodian and placed in the project
file.
. The sample custodian will continue the chain-of-custody by assigning a unique laboratory
number to each sample upon receipt; this number identifies the sample through all further
handling.
. Internal log books and records that maintain the chain-of-custody throughout sample
preparation and analysis, and data reporting will be kept.
2.3 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDU1lES
This subsection presents the decontamination procedures to be maintained during the investigation. In
general, all drilling and sampling equipment will be cleaned prior to initial use, between drilling and
sampling locations, and before leaving the site. The decontamination procedures will consist of a
combination of steam cleaning and/or scrubbing and washing with a detergent hot wash-water,
2-6
7S7\ALBUQ-$AI'\S2.TXT
4/5193'1
followed by a water rinse, and triple distilled water rinse. More specific procedures are discussed
below for varying situations. A lined or paved decontamination pad will be used for decontamination
of all sampling equipment. The decontamination pad will have a perimeter berm and contain a sump
for collection of decontamination liquids and solids.
2.3.1 DRILLING EQUIPMENT
Drill rigs, support vehicles, and associated drilling tools and equipment will be steam cleaned on-site
prior to commencement of drilling to minimize the potential for cross contamination. All drilling
equipment wilt be unloaded from the drill rig and the storage compartments and steam cleaned.
Storage compartments will also be steam cleaned where appropriate. Cleaned tools will be returned
to the cleaned storage compartments. Augers, drill stem, bits, and other downhole equipment will be
stored on plastic and covered in an agreed-upon storage area. The storage area will be clean, easily
accessible, and away from most daily site activity.
All downhole drilling equipment and associated tools will be steam-deaned between boreholes. In
addition, excess soil on the drill rig will be removed by steam cleaning between boreholes, as
appropriate. Pipe racks will be used to elevate the augers and drilling rods during steam cleaning. In
addition, the bed of the truck used to transport the augers or drill rods from the decontamination
staging area to the dri1ling site will also be steam cleaned, when appropriate. After transport to the
drilling site, augers, and drilling rods will be stored on additional pipe racks and covered with clean
polyethylene sheeting.
All downhole sampling equipment will be cleaned between samples as follows:
. Scrub with potable water to remove soil particles.
. Wash with a non-phosphate detergent.
. Triple-rinse with distilled water.
. Wrapped in plastic or aluminum foil and protected from contamination between sampling
locations.
2-7
7!!7\AUlUQ-SAP\S2.TXT
4J!!l'13og
Equipment decontamination will be supervised and documented by a qualified field hydrogeologist or
geologist.
Drill rigs, support vehicles, and associated drilling tools and equipment will be steam cleaned on site
upon completion of drilling activities. prior to final demobilization, to ensure that no known or
potential contaminants are carried off site by the dril1ing contractor.
2.3.2 GllOUNDWATER SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
The groundwater sampling equipment utilized at the site will be decontaminated prior to its initial use
and between sampling locations to prevent potential cross-contamination. The decontamination
procedures are as follows:
. scrub with potable water;
. wash with a non-phosphate detergent;
. triple rinse with distilled water;
. store equipment in clean plastic sheeting between sampling locations; or
. steam clean.
2.3.3 SAMPLE JARS AND CONTAINERS
All sample containers for chemical analyses will be provided by the laboratory. All sample containers
used will be pre-cleaned and include documentation by the supplier in accordance with EP A
protocols.
Following sample collection, the outside of sample jars and containers will be decontaminated to
remove any excess solids or liquids before shipment to the laboratory. The decontamination
procedures are as follows:
. Wipe sample container exterior with a clean cloth and detergent wash-water solution.
. Rinse with distilled water.
. Dry with paper toweling.
2-8
1S7\ALBUQ-SAPlS2.TXT
4/S/!l3'1
. Prepare the samples for shipment.
Wastes generated within the area of potential contamination will be containerized in labeled 55-gallon
DOT-approved and cleaned drums and stored within a designated location at the facility. Each drum
will be labeled with the site name, phone number, drum number, date. and nature of contents. Drill
cuttings and excess soil materials. liquid investigative--derived wastes, and disposable personnel
protective equipment will be stored as separate wastes. The handling of wastes generated will
conform to all applicable health and safety requirements. Drill cuttings and excess soils from
background locations will be replaced into the hole from which they were derived or scattered in the
immediate borehole area.
Based upon the nature of the investigative--derived waste (i.e., decontamination liquids, soil solids,
etc.) and analytical results, investigation-derived wastes will be classified and appropriately disposed
of.
2.4 FIELD WG BOOKS
Field notebooks will provide the means for recording all data collection activities performed at the
site. As such, written entries will be as descriptive and as detailed as possible, so that a particular
situation or incident could be reconstructed without reliance on the collector's memory.
Field notebooks shall be hard backed and bound. The pages of the logbook will be consecutively
numbered prior to initial entry for the purpose of identifying missing pages after completion.
Notebooks shall be permanently assigned to field personnel, but are to be stored in the project master
file when not in use.
The cover of each notebook must contain the following information:,
. person to whom the book is assigned;
. book number;
. project name; and
. project number.
2-9
7S71ALBUQ-SAP\S2.TXT
4151931&
If a notebook is transferred to another staff person, notation shall be made of the transfer, date, and
both signatures.
Entries into the logbook may contain a variety of information. At the beginning of each daily entry,
the following information will be recorded: the date, start time, weather, all field personnel present,
level of personal protection being used on-site, and the signature of the person making the entry. All
field measurements, observations, and information pertinent to a field activity will be recorded using
indelible ink. All data will be recorded directly and legibly in field logbooks and all data entries are
to be signed and dated.
Entries in the logbook for sampling activities will include, but are not limited to the following:
. Date and time of entry.
. Date and time of sample collection.
. Measurement units and instrumentation used.
. Purpose of sampling.
. Sample identification for laboratory analysis.
. Sample media.
. Sampling location and measurement type.
. Any field measurements collected, such as pH, conductivity, and temperature.
. Sample collector's name.
. Initialed changes.
. Field observations.
All field personnel and visitors and their respective times of arrival and departure will be identified in
the field logbook.
2-10
757\ALBUQ.sAP1S2. TXT
415193'11
Any changes in entries will be made in a manner that avoids obscuring the original entry and the
change initialed and dated by the individual at the time of the change. All pages in the logbooks will
be accounted for; no pages are to be removed. If there is a change in the person recording field notes
during a particular day, that person will be identified in the logbook prior to making entries.
At each station where a sample is collected or a measurement made, a detailed description of the
location of the station will be recorded. Photographs taken at the site wi1l also be noted and
described. All equipment used to make field measurements will be identified (including owner and
modellserial numbers), including the date on which the equipment was calibrated.
The equipment used to collect samples wil1 be noted, along with the time of sampling, sample
description, depth at which the sample was collected, volume, and number of containers. In addition,
the analytical parameters for the sample, the sample identification number, and chain-of-custody
numbers will be recorded. Where possible, sample numbers will be assigned prior to going on-site.
Samples, field blanks, decontamination rinsate blanks, and trip blanks which receive an entirely
separate sample number, and will be noted under a separate sample description. Significant field
notebook entries (e.g., health and safety incidents) will be countersigned by another member of the
project team.
Field recording forms will also be used for data collection in a variety of sampling and activity
situations. The forms may include borehole logs. It is not necessary to duplicate information
recorded on field forms in the field notebooks. However, the field notebook will identify any other
forms which were completed each day which constitute supplemental records to the field notebook
entries and a reference to these forms will be made.
Field notebooks and field documentation forms will be stored in the project master file when not in
use and/or upon project completion. If notebooks or completed docu~entation forms need to be
used, copies of used pages should be made and the originalS directed back to the project master file.
The field notebook should not remain out of the project file for a period exceeding two weeks, to
minimize data loss if a notebook should be lost or destroyed.
2-11
1.t7\ALBUQ-SAP\S2.TXT
415193'8
,
1
2.5 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
To prevent misidentification of samples. the owner/operator should affix legible labels to each sample
container. The labels should be sufficiently durable to remain legible even when wet and should
contain the following types of information:
I'
,
. Sample identification number;
. Name of collector;
. Date and time of collection;
. Place of collection;
. Parameters(s) requested (if space permits);
. Internal temperature of shipping container at time sample was placed;
. Internal temperature of shipping container upon opening at laboratory; and
. Maximum and minimum temperature range that occurred during shipment.
2-12
7S7\AUiUQ-SAP\S2.TXT
41~I93 '.
3.0 CHEMICAL ANALYSES
3.1 ANALYTICAL PROCEDUllES
The chemicals analyses performed on the groundwater samples collected from the site will all be
performed according to EPA approved methods. All method-specific quality control measures, such
as external and internal standard calibration procedures, instrument performances verifications,
quanitation using method of standard additions, etc., which are suggested within any referenced
method, must be performed. Section 3.2 provides a detailed description of laboratory QC
requirements. Table 3-1 is a summary afthe parameters of concern, the required analytical methods,
and the method detection limits.
In general, the contracted laboratories will adhere to those recommendations as promulgated in 40
CFR 792, "Good Laboratory Practices"; criteria described in "Methods for Chemical Analysis of
Water and Wastes," 1983 (EPA.{j()()14-70-020, revised 1983); "Test Methods for the Chemicals
Analysis of Solid Wastes," (SW-846, 3rd Ed.); and "Federalllegister 40 CFR Part 136", Octoher
1984.
All samples will be collected in bottles appropriate for the analyses to be performed. Sample
preservative, minimum sample volume and holding time requirements will all be adhered to.
Table 3-2 identifies the sampling and preservation procedures necessary for detection monitoring.
3.2 LABORATORY OUALlTY CONT1l0L REOUlREMENTS
The contracted laboratories will have an approved quality assurance plan in place which describes
corrective actions and delineates QA responsibilities within the laboratory. The general practices
required of the laboratories are presented below. Specific requireme,nts for the frequency of analysis
and control-limits for general QC sample types described below, are summarized in Table 3-3.
3.2.1 PURITY OF STANDARDS, SOLVENTS AND REAGENTS
All reagents will be of reagent-grade (equivalent) or higher quality whenever obtainable. Organic
solvents are to be pesticide-grade or equivalent. Where applicable, reference standard solutions will
3-1
7,7\AI.BUQ-M/'IS3.TXT
4/119311
TABLE 3-1
P A1lAMETE1lS 1lEQUl1lED FOR DETECTION MONIT01lING
i,
iiVi,. .iiil.iilITliIM:::~~:;i< ........ ",'" ...
<. i< Mellioa 1l.r.....wA
~ iii
Antimony 7041 0.003 maIL SW-846
Arsenic 7060 0.001 mEIL SW.846
Barium 7081 2 m2IL SW-846
Beryllium 6010 0.0003 m2IL SW.....
Cadmium 6010 0.004 m2fL SW.....
Chromium 6010 0.007 mgIL SW.846
Cobalt 6010 0.007 mglL SW-846
Copper 6010 0.006 mgfL SW-846
Load . 6010 0.042 mJt/l. SW-S46
Nickel 6010 0.015 mgIL SW.....
Selenium 7740 0.002 m2IL SW.846
Silver 6010 0.007 m2/l. SW-a46
Thallium 7481 0.001 ffil!fL SW-846
Vanadium 6010 0.008 ffill:fL SW-846
Zinc iga ~ 0,002 mg/L ii~
.;;:, ~ iii
Benzene 8240 S.2IL SW-846
Carbon Tetrachloride 8240 S.g/L SW-846
1,2 Oichlorocthane 8240 S.2IL SW-846
1,10ichlorocthvlene 8240 S.2IL Sw-846
Cis-I,2 Dichloroethylcne 8240 S..IL SW..a46
TI'lULS.t,2 Dichloroethylene 8240 5/JgIL SW.....
1,2 Dichloropropane 8240 S ..IL SW-846
Ethylbenzcne 8240 S.g/L SW-846
Chlorobenzene 8240 , ..,L SW-846
Styrene 8240 ,..IL SW-846
Tetrachloroethylene 8240 S ..IL SW-846
Toluene 8240 S ..IL SW.....
1,1,1 Trichloroethane 8240 S ..IL sw.....
1,1,2 Trichloroethane 8240 S.g/L SW.846
Trichloroethylene 8240 ,.2IL SW-846
Vinyl Chloride 8240 S ..IL SW-846
Xylenes 8240 5 1l2fL SW-846
Chloroform 8240 5/12fL SW.846
7S7\ALBUQ-SAP\3.1.TBL
3117193 mm
3-2
TABLE 3-1 (Coni.)
PA1lAMETERS REQUl1lED FOR DETECTION MONITOlUNG
~
Bromofonn
Bromodichloromcthanc
~
8240
8240
-,....,-/",.,./.....,....... ..../............ .........---
M<Ihod DeteelioD LImlt Mothod R,(..-.'
5 ,.JL SW....
5 ,.IL SW....
5 ...n SW.B46
5 ,.JL SW.B46
5 ,.JL SW-B46
5 ,.IL SW....
100 Hf~1L SW-846
Dibromochloromethane 8240
o-Dichlorobcnzcne 8240
n.Dichlorobcnzenc 8240
Dichloromethcne (mclh"lenc chloride) 8240
Acetone 8240
Acrvlonitrile 8240
Bromochloromethanc 8,260
Carbon Disulfide 8240
Chloroethane 8240
DDCP 8.260
Trans-l,4-dichloro-2-butenc 8.260
l.1.0ichlorocthane 8240
Cis-l,3 Dichloronro....nc 8240
Trans-t,3 Dichlornnronanc 8240
2-Hexanonc 8240
Methvlbromidc 8240
Mcthvl Chloride 8240
Methvlene Bromide 8240
Mcthvlcthvlkctonc 8240
Methyl Iodide 8240
4-Meth"I-2.....ntanone 8240
1,l,l,2-Tetrachloroethane 8,260
1.1.2,2-Tetrachlorocthanc 8240
Trichlortluoromcthanc 8240
1,2.3-Trichloronrn....ne 8240
VinvJ Acetate 8240
1,2-Dibromoethane 82'"
NL
0.04 u~lL
5...1L
10...n
0.26 ,.JL
NL
5...n.
5...n
5...n.
50...n
10 ..JL
10 ,.JL
5,.1L
100 ...n
Su.JL
50 ,.IL
0.05 ,.IL
5 ,.IL
5...1L
....IL
50 ,.JL
0.06 p.1L
SW-846
SW B46
sw....
SW....
SW.846
SW.846
SW-846
SW-&46
SW....
SW....
SW.846
SW.846
SW.846
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
SW-846
SW....
SW....
sw....
SW....
SW-B46
. The Method 8260 partlmcters may be able to be analyzed by Method 8240 depending on the capabiliticl of the se1eeted Iabomory.
b SW-846 ~Test Methods for Evaluating Solid W.stc~ EPA 3rd Edition.
NL = Not Listed
3-3
7S7\ALBUQ-SAP\3-1.TBL
~117193 mm
TABLE :3-2
RECOMMENDED SAMPLE CONTAINERS FOR
PRESERVATIVES, HOLDING TIMES, AND SAMPLE VOLUME REQUIREMENTS
Metals
HOPE HN03 pH < 2
6 Months
1 x lL
VolatileOrganiC5
Glass, teflon, lined cap Hel pH <2
14 days
4x40mlvials
HOPE = high density polyethylene.
1$7\ALBUQ-SAJ'\3.2.TBL
311719:J mm
3-4
TABLE 3-3
LABORATORY QC SAMPLE FREQUENCY AND CONTROL LIMITS
Volatile Organics Groundwater Lcsslhan I pcr-20 +/.35 for 1 per 20 40-]50 1 per 20 75-125 1 per 20 70-120 Each sample
SW-846 8240 MOL samples MSfMSD samples samples samples
Volatile Organics Groundwater Len_ I per 20 +/-35 for I per 20 40-150 1 per 20 75-125 1 pe<20 75-125 Each sample
SW-846 8260 MOL samples MSIMSD samples samples samplel
Motab Groundwater less than 1 per 20 +/-20 I per 20 75-125 1 per 20 80-120 1 per 20 N/A N/A
SW-846 6010 and MOL samples samples samples samples
7,000 series methods
MOL = Method detec:tion limit
MS/MSD = Matrix spike/Matrix spike duplicate
N/A Not Applicable
'"
0.
157\ALll1JQ\SAP\3-3.1llL
3/17193......
be traceable to EPA or the National Bureau of Standards (NBS). Each new lot of reagent-grade
chemicals will be tested for quality of performance, and laboratory records will be kept to document
the results of lot tests. Alternatively, reagent blanks will be prepared from each lot. If method blank
(see Section 3.2.2) contamination is found, the reagent blank will be analyzed to evaluate the source
of contamination.
3.2.2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL QC SAMPLES
Laboratorv "Rea2'ent-Grade" Water
Laboratory pure water is generally prepared by a special deionized water system augmented by
individual filter cartridges and polishers located at each outlet point. The polishers include special
particulate filters, organic resins and inorganic resins. Distilled/deionized water may also be used.
Laboratory water will be tested to demonstrate that it is free of contaminants at levels below the
detection limits for the applicable analytical procedures.
Method BlankfReaeent Blank
A laboratory pure water blank is analyzed along with all aqueous and nonaqueous samples submitted
for analyses. The method/reagent blank is processed through all procedures, materials. reagents and
labware used for sample preparation and analysis. The frequency for method blank preparation and
analysis is a minimum of one per twenty field samples or per analytical batch, whichever is most
frequent. An analytical batch is defined as samples which are analyzed together with the same
method sequence and the same lots of reagents and with the manipulations common to each sample
within the same time period or in continuous sequential time periods. Samples in each batch are to be
of similar composition or matrix.
Calibration Standards
The calibration standards are prepared in the laboratory by dissolving a known amount of pure
(nominally 100%) analyte in an appropriate matrix. The final concentration calculated from the
known quantity is the true value of the standard. All calibration standards must be traceable to
certified reference materials or certified check standards. The results obtained from these standards
3-6
757\ALBUQ-SAPIS3.TXT
4151<J30I1
are used to generate a standard curve which can be used to Quantify the compound in the
environmental sample. A minimum of three (3) calibration standards and a blank will be used in
generating a standard curve for all analyses. Specific requirements are outlined in the applicable
methods as referenced. For GC/MS analysis, an instrument tune must be performed using the
standard materials and following criteria as specified in SW-846 method 8240.
C~eck Standard
j'
The check standard is prepared in the same manner as a calibration standard. The final concentration
calculated from the known quantity is the true value of the standard. The check standard is .DQt
carried through the same process used for the environmental samples as it does not undergo the
sample preparation procedure. The check standard result is used to monitor the continuing validity of
an existing calibration curve or concentration calibration standard file. The "check standards" are
also known as the "continuing calibration verification standards" .
,
I ~
The check standard can provide information on the accuracy of instrument performance and response
consistency independent of various sample matrices and of the sample preparation procedure. Check
standards are analyzed at a minimum frequency of 10 percent. Specific requirements and procedures
for calibration and check standards are outlined in the referenced methods.
To verify the accuracy of the analytical system at the low concentration end of the calibration curve, a
second type of check standard is prepared at a concentration of two to five times the instrument
detection limit and analyzed at the beginning (after calibration) and end of the day or analytical "run".
Quality Control Check Samples
The Quality Control (QC) Check Sample is a reference standard aCQll;ired from an EPA-approved
source (e.g., EPA Standards Repository, NBS) that is analyzed "as is" or diluted according to
instructions provided with the reference material, to provide independent verification of instrument
calibration.
3-7
7S7\ALBUQ-SAI'\S3.TXT
41S1'J3..
The QC Check Samples for most types of analyses are available from EPA Cincinnati, free of charge
and will be used at a specified frequency as a means of evaluating the analysis techniques. It is
analogous to the "initial calibration verification standard" in the inorganics Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP) Statement of Work (SOW). The QC check sample analysis is to be performed in
conjunction with organics analyses as well.
QC Check Samples will be analyzed at the frequency specified 'in the referenced protocols or at a
minimum of each time a new calibration curve is established. Corrective action, in the form of
reanalysis of all associated samples, is required if a QC Check Sample is outside control limits. The
control limits are typically a recovery of:f: 10 percent of the true value except when the established
limits provided by the supplier of the standard reference material are different. Documentation of the
source and the applicable control limits must be provided with the data.
Control Samples
The Laboratory Control Sampte (LCS) or Method Control Sample (MCS) is a QC Check Sample
(Le., reference standard) that is carried along with the samples through the entire sample
prep/analysis sequence. Solid matrix control samples are to be digested/extracted and analyzed when
applicable and as available. The true values of these PE samples is unknown to the laboratory. The
frequency for the inclusion of control samples is 1/20 or as stated in the reference protocols.
Spikes
A sample Matrix Spike is prepared by adding a known amount of the pure analyte to the
environmental sample before extraction/digestion. The added analyte is the same as that being
assayed for in the environmental sample.
An Analytical Pike is prepared by adding a known amount of analyte(s) to a known amount of sample
digested or extract.
For organics analyses, every sample is spiked before extraction/analysis with a surrogate mixture of
compounds which are considered to behave similarly during analysis, but are not identical to analytes
potentially found in naturally-{)ccurring sample matrices.
3-8
7S7IALBUQ..SANJ.TXT
415m'l
il
Background and interferences having an effect on the actual sample analyte will have a similar effect
on the spike. The calculated percent recovery of the matrix spike is considered to be a measure of
the relative accuracy of the total analytical method, i.e., sample preparation and analysis. The
calculated percent recovery of the analytical spike is considered to be a measure of the relative
accuracy of the sample analysis procedure only. The matrix spike, the surrogate spike, and the
analytical spike are also measures of the effect of the sample matrix on the ability of the methodology
to detect specific analytes. When there is no change in volume due to the spike, it is calculated as
follows:
%R = lOO(A-X)rr
Where: %R =
A =
X =
T =
Percent Recovery
Measured value of analyte ifW: spike is added
Measured value of analyte concentration in the sample ~ the spike is added
Value of spike
,
I,
I
"
Tolerance limits for acceptable percent recoveries are established in some of the referenced methods
and are summarized in Table 3-3. Project-specific QC acceptance limits may be established on a
parameter-specific basis for each analysis method if after sufficient data have been compiled it is
apparent that different limits than those specified in the referenced methodology should be applied.
Matrix spikes will be analyzed at a minimum frequency of 1/20 samples of similar matrix or
analytical batch. Analytical spikes and surrogate spikes are reql,lired for every sample for some
analysis routines (see Table 3-3).
Matrix SDike Duplicate
For organic analyses. Matrix Spike duplicate samples are required at, a specified frequency of 1/20
samples. A Matrix Spike duplicate is prepared from a second aliquot of the sample that was analyzed
as the Matrix Spike. The duplicate relative percent difference (RPD) value between the Matrix Spilt
and the Matrix Spike duplicate for each spike anaIyte must be reported. The RPD control limits vary
by analyle.
3-9
7S1\ALBUQ-S.AP\S3.TXT
4ISI93'1
Laboratory Duolicate Samole
Aliquots (e.g., subsamples) ~re made in the laboratory of the same sample, and each aliquot is treated
exactly the same throughout the analytical method. The relative percent difference (RPD) between
the values of the duplicates, as calculated below, is taken as a measure of the precision
(reproducibility) of the analytical method:
RPD = (D, - D,)/[(D, + D,)n] x 100
Where:
RPD
D,
D,
= Relative Percent Difference
= First sample value
= Second sample value (duplicate)
i:
The duplicate is a measure of the precision of the laboratory sampling (Le., aliquoting) and analysis
procedure and of the homogeneity of the sample matrix as provided to the laboratory. Laboratory
duplicates will be analyzed at a minimum frequency of 1/20 samples or per analytical batch.
ICP Interference Check Sample aCSl
To verify interelement and background correction factors for inductively coupled plasma (ICP)
analysis, the laboratory must analyze and report the results for an ICP Interference Check Sample at
the beginning and end of each analysis run or a minimum of twice per eight hours, whichever is more
frequent, but not before initial calibration verification. The ICP Interference Check Samples may be
obtained from EP A (EMSLIL V), if available, and analyzed according to the instructions supplied with
the ICS. If not available, the instructions for preparation and analysis of an ICS can be found in the
ClP Inorganics SOW.
3-10
7S7\AI.JIUQ-SAPIS3.TXT
4/!Jm'lI
1
,
4.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION
Groundwater quality in the area of the existing landfill as well as in the area of the proposed landfill
will be evaluated. In addition, background water quality wil1 be determined. Ten new monitoring
wells will be installed prior to the sampling event. Selected existing monitoring weBs will also be
included in the sampling. Monitor well installation is presented in Section 4.1. Section 4.2 describes
sample collection procedures. QA/QC samples are defined in 'Section 4.3.
4.1 MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
Refer to Section 9.0 Recommendations, Subtask A.2 Renort Subsurface Investie:8tions. Salina Landfill
proiect.
4.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION
Field measurements of static water level elevations and detection of immiscible layers will be
performed prior to well evacuation. A PID will be used at the wellhead to detect the presence of
organic vapors before any other field measurements are made. The static water level will be
determined to within a depth of 0.01 feet using a M-Scope. Each well will have a pennanent, easily
identified reference point from which the water level measurement is taken. The reference point will
be established hy a licensed surveyor in relation to an established National Geodetic Vertical Datum
(NGVD). The presence of light andlor dense phase immiscible layers will be detennined by an
interface probe. Any immiscible phased will be collected before the well is purged for sampling
and/or the well will not be sampled.
All wells to be sampled will first be purged by evacuating three casing volumes. Temperature,
conductivity and pH will be monitored in the field to ensure that the ;well has stabilized prior to
sample collection. Bailers will be used to collected water from the well. Prepared sample bottles
(i.e., containing necessary preservatives) will be filled directly from the bailers.
Sample bottles to be analyzed for volatiles will be filled first in order to minimize volati1e loss.
Samples to be analyzed for metals will not be filtered.
4-1
7S7\ALBUQ-SAP\!l4.'tXT
3/17193_
All equipment that comes in contact with the well water. including probes, pumps. bailers, and
valves, will be decontaminated in accordance with the procedures in Section 2.3 between sampling
stations.
4.3 FIELD OUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
The following types of QC samples will be collected in the field and shipped to the laboratories along
with the other samples. The type and frequency of these field QC samples are given below. Note
regarding "blind" field blanks: The laboratory may not use field blanks for duplicate analyses or for
matrix spiking; therefore, since all field blanks must be shipped "blind", it must be specified to the
laboratory which particular nonfield blank sample(s) must be used for duplicate and matrix spike
analyses. Three times the required sample volume must be collected for the matrix spike and matrix
spike duplicate samples.
4.3.1 BLIND DECONTAMINATION RINSATE BLANK
A decontamination rinsate blank: will be prepared and submitted for analysis at a target frequency of
once per sampling event per sampling team. as well as additionally whenever there are changes in the
sample collection procedures, sample decontamination procedures, or sampling equipment. This
blank will consist of analyte-free water collected by rinsing sampling equipment after equipment
decontamination.
4.3.2 TRAVEL BLANKS
The travel blank (required only when VOA analyses are to be performed) is a sample bottle filled
with analyte free water that is carried to the sampling site and remains with other field sample bottles
during any storage and shipping to a project lab. A minimum of on~ travel blank per sampling event
per sampling team will be taken.
4-2
7S7IALBUQ.SAP\S4. TXT
3117/93 mm
4.3.3 BLIND FIELD BLANK
Field blanks (required only when VOA analyses are performed) are sample bottles filled with analyte
free water that are opened in the field and transferred back and forth (three times) between bottles.
Field blanks will only be analyzed if the decontamination rinsate blanks exhibit contamination during
laboratory analysis.
4.3.4 BLIND FIELD DUPLICATES
Field duplicates are collected identically and consecutively over a minimum period of time. This type
of field duplicate provides a measure of the total system variability (field and laboratory variance)
including the variability component resulting from the inherent heterogeneity of the field sources.
Field duplicates will be collected at a minimum frequency of one per sampling event.
4.3.5 BLIND STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIALS (SRMj/PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION (PE) SAMPLES
SRM and PE samples are materials of known composition which have been prepared by. and obtained
from EPA-approved sources, and which have undergone multi-laboratory analyses using a standard
method. SRM/PE samples provide a measure of analytical performance and analytical method bias
(accuracy). The frequency of SRMIPE samples to be submitted blind to the contract project
laboratory is one per sampling event. One SRMIPE sample wiII be submitted for selected volatile
parameters and one will be submitted for selected metal parameters.
4-3
1S7\ALBUQ-SAPIS4.TXT
3111/93 mm
SSSS.004/93/lrev4/6am
APPENDIX B
WATER SUPPLY WELL LOGS
(Refer to Fhmre 4 for Well Locations) DATA
r
,
I
W A T E R W E L. L S Y S T E N poAGE 1 OF 2
,H~:O:' LEGr';L DESCr-(lPTItll'~ *** WELL DWR APFL FORI'I- ACTIVEI
C!',:TY PF(ACT!\I S T R EX TV ID NO. WELL OWNER NUNBER ATlON INACTIVE
085 E2SESW 061503W 0011 NA 0000 A
Gr-iND
ELE'v'
j)OOC
* ~UMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEaT DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD WHO
CHEM
DATA
N
WELL.
DEPTH
0078
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
STATIC
WTR LV
OQ32
r{r~'E OF
SCF;EEN
***************** SCREEN
FF\:OI'I TO FROM TO
0058 0078
INTERVALS *****************
FROM TO FROM TO
.
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
TYPE OF
I: 3FOUT
0'
,
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
EST
YIELD
0001
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
'll-**'*'*****'M-*
FROM TO
TYPE OF
*************** CASING ***************
DIe). FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
Cr-~stNG
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
O()12 01
0056 19
0058 23
,__,J 0076 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
(>2 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANOY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
(>7 FINE SAND
08 MED IUM SAND
(>9 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 8RAVEL.
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND & GRAVEL
16 80ULDER
,
I
-~-'
Il,~ **DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
U STHEET ADDRESS OF WSLL **
.
"1
, 0
u
o i
I'
,
I
WEL.L
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
761223
CDNTRACR
LlC. NO.
0138
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
2(> LIMESTONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK & SAND
30 ROCV ll< CLAY
31 CALI CHE
32 FL.I NT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSLII'I ROCK
I;
o
0'
I
I"~.
'"
W ?-1 T
,Eo-l!..lE- LEGAL DEScnIFTIOI\i **.;..
CNTY FRACTN S T R EXTK
085 NWi\lESE 061503W 0012
I
"
E R
WELL
ID NO.
W E I.. I..
S Y S
T E 1"1
DWR APPL
NUMBER
NA
PAGE 1 OF 2 ,i
FORM- ACTIVE/ 1
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
WELL OWNER
* PUMP TEST DATA *
GF:ND WELL *GRh!DWTf\ EI\lCTRt.* STATIC WATER HOURS YIELD EST CHEi,
ELEv DEPTH FEET FEET FEET WTR LV DEP,TH PUMF'D (GPM) YIELD DATA
0000 0034- 0022 0002 N
TYFE OF ***************** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
SCREEN FROM TO FROM TO FROM TO FROM TO OPENINGS
0028 0034
TYFE OF
GROUT
**********..11-
FF<O., TO
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
iYPE OF
C:ASiNG
WELL
USE
01
I
CONTRACR U
LIC. NO.
0126
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
COMPLT
DATE
760930
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
0003 04
0018 19
0030 23
0034 19
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL**
*
WELL
CLSSIF
I
PAGE 2 OF 2 1
*********** LITHOLOGIC LOG CODES ***********
01 CLAY 1<;> SHALE f
02 SILT 20 LIMESTONE i
03 SILTY CLAY 21 SHALE & LIMESTONE i',-,
',j 1
04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE ,
I
05 SAND 23 SANDSTONE i:-
06 VERY FINE SAND 24 SANDSTONE & SHALE , ,
07 FINE SAND 25 DOLOMITE : i
08 MED IUM SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL [I
10 VERY COARSE SAND 28 ROCK
"
11 GRAVEL 29 ROCK & SAND i
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCK & CLAY ,
[." i'
,...1
13 FINE GRAVEL 31 CALICHE !J ,
,
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL 32 FLINT ,
,15 COARSE GRAV~L 33 CHEln I
"I
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34 PYR ITE , ,
17 SAND & GRAVEL 35 CLAY & GRAVEL d
18 BOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROCK ,'"
n[
fll
l I
'I:
id
L.""
!"
J '
r'
I
,-.:-
W A T
.;......* LEGAL OEseR I PT r ON ***
CI\iTY FHACT!\I S T R EXTt(
(l8~5 NWNWSW 061SO:3W 0013-
E R
WELL
ID NO.
W E L. L
s Y S T
WELL OWNER
E ~I
DWR APPL,
NUMBER
NA
PAGE 1 OF 2
FORt'I- ACTIVE/
ATlON INACTIVE
0000 A
GR!\lD
ELEV
0000
WEL,L
DEPTH
0070
* PUMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPM)
CHEI'1
DATA
N
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FE2T FEET
STATIC
WTR LV
0040
TYF'E OF
SCHEEN
.***************** SCREEN
FRO~I TO FROM TO
0050 0070
INTERVALS *****************
FROM TO FROM TO
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
TYPE OF
GROUT
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
**********-lfo
FROM TO
EST
YIELD
0015
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
,
TYPE OF
ii,
CASING
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
i
I
I
I DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
~ 0000-
0005 01
0010 21
0040 01
0045 23
0065 04
0070 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
06 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
1.4 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARS~ GRAVL
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL
16 BOULDER
"
"
,
I
: !
'-
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL**
*
II
~
u
L
l:
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
760201
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0199
PAGE :z OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE 8< LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE 8< SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK .& SAND
30 ROCK 8< CLAY
31 CALI CHE
32 FLI NT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY 8< GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
f
,
!
F
I
I
,
I
,
~
i
r
hI A T
~..*.... U:~G':::lL rESCRIPTION ***
Ci\IT'"( FRr::.:TN S T S' EXTf<
085 SL~SESE 071503\1,) 00(;2
E R
WEI_L
ID NO.
GHN:
ELE')
1318
WELL
DEPTH
0088
*!3RNDW.,Fi. ENCTRD*
F~ET FEET FEET
0068 Oi)78
i
j
l') E. L L
E 1"1
CWR APF'L
NUl'lBER
NP,
i
,
:; Y S T
F'?'IGE 1 or- 2
FOf\:I~I- ACTI'v'E/
?\T I 01\1 INACTI......E:
0000 A
WELL C:;WNER
CITY OF SALINA
STATIC
WTR LV
0023
'* F'1..iMP T:::ST DATA '*
WAT~R HOURS YIELD
DEPTH PUMPD (GPM)
0045 002 0002
CHEri
DATA
N
EST
YIELD
TYFE OF *'*****'110****.****** SCR'EEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEt\1
-3CPEEN FROI"! TO FROM TO FROM TO FRO!"l TO OPEN I NGS
07 0078 0088 03
7YP;::: OF
GRO~T
***********
FROI'" Ta
0073 0078
GROUT INTERVALS
FROI'! TO
b _I
3
**********
FROM TO
" NEAREST CONTAdINATIoN "
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
TYPE OF
C.;-=1SI:__iG
02
***.******.****** CASl NG ******'*********
DIA. FT. ;:lIA. FT. DIA. FT.
02 0078
[]
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
0068 01
0071 05
0078 OJ
0091 19
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION DR
ST~EET ADDRESS OF WELL**
.+ 3 !'1I W ;'-'1ND 4 i'"II S CF 3AL!j"~A
WELL
USE
10
COMPI.. T
DATE
881107
CoNTRACR
L'lC. NO.
0126
WELL
CLSSIF
1
.
PAGE 2 OF 2
*********** LITHOLOGIC LOG CODES ***********
01 CLAY 19 SHALE ,.
I ,
02 SILT 20 LI MESTONE i,
I
03 SILTY CLAY 21 SHALE 8< LIMESTONE I ~ r
04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
05 SAND 23 SANDSTONE r'
. I !
06 VERY FINE SAND 24 SANDSTONE " SHALE
07 FINE SAND 25 DOLOMITE
08 MEDIUM SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL
10 VERY COARSE Sf4ND 28 ROCK
11 GRAVEL 29 ROCI< 8< SAND
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCK 8< CI_AY
13 FUJE GRAVEL 31 CALICHE
14 MED IUM GRAVE;;L 32 FLI NT ,
15 COARSE GRAVEL 33 CHERT ,'.11
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34 PYRITE U
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL :35 CLAY 8< GRAVEL l.'
18 BOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROCK fJ "
,
,
,
,
,j
,
[1 I
,J ,
i"
,
'I i'
!-
o
I[
:If
~
W A T
;hH,. LEGc:'IL DESCF( I Pi ~ ON ***
l-., CnTY FR/'iCT:\1 S T '::;: EXTt<
':~8::,: SI.<J::;ESW 071. ~503~J 0003
I
I J 3R!\iD
WELL
DEPTH
"".GRi\lDWTF( Ei\lCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
0025 0033
ELEV
J.306
I.,A,)..::O/
I
U
TYFE OF
2CF:EEI\!
1'7
FROI'1
***,*"1f-************
FROi"! TO
0032 0037
I
I
TYPE elF
GFd)UT
~
,
.f
E R
WELL
ID !\iO.
W E: L L
S Y S T
E M
DWR APFL
NUMBER
NA
PAGE 1 OF :2
FORI~I- (';CTIVEI
ATION INACTIVE
0000 f'~
WELL OWNER
CITY OF SALINA
STATIC
WTR LV
0014.
'* PUMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA "
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GF'M)
00l. 0003
CHEM
DATA
N
EST
YIELD
SCREEN
TYPE OF SChEEi\1
OPENINGS
03
INTERVALS
FROM
*****************
TO
TO
FROM
TO
"
***********
FROM TO
0000 0.)20
GROUT INTERVALS **********
FROM TO FRQM TO
0028 0030 0037 0062
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION '*
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
7
"
TYPE i."-
CASING
0'"'
WELL
USE
10
1_
**********.***** CASII\lG ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
02 0032 07 03(10 32 0037
1
,.~,
,..'
L.>
1;:,1
:JYj
I".:
--'
DEFTH LOG
0000-
0)1)25 01
0027 05
0033 01
0036 05
0055 01
0056 05
0062 19
DEPTH LOG
[,1
I.,.,'
II
L'.'.'
I
'I~,'
"; ';)
;;ij
'1_0
II
"""
jl ;H~'DISi'ANCE (4ND DIRECTION OR
~ S7REET ADDRESS OF WELL**
* 3 Mr ~ & 4 MI S OF SALINA
I'
I'
~
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMFLT
DATE
881117
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0126
PAGE 2 OF 2
*********** LITHOLOGIC L.OG CODES ***********
01 CLAY 19 SHALE
02 SILT 20 LIMESTONE
03 SILTY CLAY 21 8HALE & LIMESTONE
04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
05 SAND 23 SANDSTONE
06 VERY FINE SAND 24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
07 FINE SAND 25 DOLOMITE
08 MEDIUM SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL
10 VERY COARSE SAND 28 ROCK
11 GRAVEL 29 ROCK & SAND
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCK & CLAY
13 FINE GRAVEL, 31 CALICHE
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL 32 FL1NT
15 COARSE GRAVEL 33 CHERT
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34 PYRITE
:L7 SAND & GRAVEL 35 CLAY &: GRAVEL
18 BOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROCK
,
I
I
I
k
,'-
i
f
I
i--:;
I"
"."
I:
,
,
,..
('
.
f
I
1 '
W I~ T
'''''':0:'';':' LEGAL DESCRIPTIO,"I *-M.*
CNTY FRACTN S T R EXTK
085 SESESW 071503W 0006
E R
WELL
ID NO.
W ELL
s Y S T
E ;1
DWR APPL
NUMBER
[\IA
PAGE 1. OF 2
FORM- ACTIVE/
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
WELL OWN2R
CITY OF SALINf:1
* PUMF' TEST DATrC'1 *
GRND WELL 1l.Gm..JDWTR ENCTRD* STATIC WATER HOURS YIELD EST CHEM I
EL.EV DEF'TH FEET FEET FEET WTF, LV DEPTH PUMPD (GPM) YIELD DATA J
1306 0068 1)022 0029 0065 0014 0054 001 0001 N
TYFE OF ***************** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
;;CRE:EI\I FRO!"! TO FROM TO FRO!"I TO FROM TO OPENI~IGS
(;7 0065 0068 03
TYFE OF
GROUT
~
,~
**.u.********
FROM TO
0000 0020
GRQUT INTERVALS **********
FROM TO FROM TO
0061 0063
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
16
,'!
:'j
TYFE OF
CASING
02
*************** CAS I hlG ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
04 0065
WELL
USE
10
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
S81108
CONTRACR
LIC., NO.
0126
I
.J
PAGE 2 OF ~
~
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG *********** L ITHOLoG I C LOG CODES ***********
0000- 01 CLAY 19 SHALE
0022 01 02 SILT 20 LIMESTONE
0026 05 03 SILTY CLAY 21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
0029 01 04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
0034 05 05 SAND 23 SANDSTONE
0065 01 06 VERY FI NE SAND 24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
0067 05 07 FINE SAND 2~ DoLoM ITE
(J068 19 08 olED 1Ut'1 SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL
1.0 VERY COARSE SAND 28 ROC/(
11 GRAVEL 29 ROC/( & SAND
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCK &.: CLAY
13 FINE GRAVEL 31 CALI CHE
14 MEDIUM GRAV~ 32 FLINT
15 COARSE GRAVEL 33 CHERT
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34 PYR ITE
*~.DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR 17 SAND & GRAVEL 35 CLAY & GRAVEL
STREC:T ADDRESS OF WELL** 18 BOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROC/(
" 3 l"',ILES W:=:ST A;\IO 4 MI:"'ES SOUT:~i OF SALINA
1
,
,
c
, , ,
-~
, , l
,
, I I
;__J ,
I
"
il
LJ
i
U'I
h
!I f;
Iii
r11
'1
:,j
L__ ~.<
"
"I ,~
'..'1
I'
n
, ,
~
o {:., T
"..'.:.'!, LE(3A~_ D:::G:;I~IF:'T:::JN .,,+;+
C::l...:TY FF:;~ICT!\I S -;-;:::, EXTV
:)i':l5 [ijtIJS!:;:S:: OE.H503W 0001
E, p,
1'JELL
ID NO.
__ -:iR:\iC
WE~";,,,
DEPTH
"1-Gm<n~T::;: ENCTHD.;,.
FEET FEET FEET
0011
~LEV
00.,+8
, -i'VPE OF
SCm::EN
07
l.<J S L L
E. if!
I
PAGE 1 OF 2
FORt"i-' ~lCTIVI::/
ATION r:\lACTIVE"
0000 A
1JAT~~1 *
YI:::LD
(GF'I'D
EST
YIE.LD
0008
CHE:M
Df;TA
N
s Y S T
D~iR AFFL
**-~*.,o:'*****'!i'****** SCREEN I i\lTERVALS ****************-<1,
FRO!"I TO FROi"1 TO . FRQM TO FROM TO
0038 O(j48
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
10
'"i"YPE Or
GROUT
.jI;,,;,,,'***'iIr*****
FRO.; TO
OOGO 1200
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
i--:
"
~
'~ TYPE 0"-
":A3ING
WELL OWNER
l\iORDSTRDM
!\iUt1SEF:
:\lA
ST,~TIC
WTR LV
0011
.Il- F'U/"'.P
WATER
ljEPh-i
TEST
HOURS
PUMPD
-11.*********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION ..
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
01
02
0038
***********..l(o.i'E-** Ci=15 I NG *****.-*********
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
07
r'-"'"
.'~
--j
DF-F'TH LOG
0000-
-.)(l:t5 01
0048 1-71
DE:PTH LOG
"
,'"
'__.J
,
~
:~'*DI3TANCE {;"~D DIRECTIGN iJR
Sr~EET AI.;DR2::SS OF WELUH('
o iIi' F:.'l-~ SMCLAI'J 1<5
n
Ii
LJ
;---1
.~
,
*********** L.ITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FI NE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MED ruM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GPAVEL
14 MED ruM 8RAVEL
15 COARSE GRAV~L
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND & GHAVEL
18 BOULDER
WELL
CL5SIF
1
COt'IPL T
DATE
870604
,
,
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0138
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOM ITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK &: SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY &. GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCl<
I
I
i.
I'
i
I
,
; ,~
,
,
I
I,'
I..
,
I
,
,
'.
',-
,
I.
,
W 1'-1 T
;,. lH.: L..EGAL DES:::'R I F'T r ON ***
C!'.iTY Fi=:i-1CTN E T R Exn,;'
;:..8::':i :;WSWSW 13:l. 504W 00(11
E R
WELL
ID NO.
:.:)RND
:::lEV
lA:ELL
DEP7H
0053
*GRNDWTR EI\ICTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
0029
TYPE OF
SCREEl\1
07
W E L .L
S Y S T
E M
DWR t~F'FL
NUMBEF: .
NA
WELL OWNER
~I;~CDONALD
STATIC
v,iTR LV
0029
"*' FUMF'
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPrl)
CHEI1
DATA
N
*************.lHI"!Hl- SCREEN INTERVALS
FRON TO FROM TO FROM
0033 0053
FROM
****************~
TO
TYPE DF SCF:E:EN
OPENINGS
03
i
.J
r(FE OF
::JRQUT
TO
******.i't**** GROUT I hlTERVALS *******11.**
FRO I"! TD FROJ"i TO FRO~1 TO
0005 0025
.l'i. NEf~F:EST CONT;lrlINATION *
SOUFCE D! F;;=:CTI ON FSET
16
1
J
--'
TYFE OF
,",.-
'.'''':'
**-ll'*.,ll.********** CASING ***.************
D!?'1. FT. OrA. FT. DIA. FT~
05 1)033
WELL
USE
12
::ASII\~G
DEPTH LOG DEFTH L.OG
0000-
')010 OJ.
00.20 03
,JU...::.::, 1 i
OQ31 :)1
U03'7' 1 1
.).:,~. '2: ')1
0043 1 1
0045 01
0052 35
0055 19
*';!.DISlAt\iCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDHESS OF WELL**
* 2 MILES ~EST OF SMOL~N~ KS
*-lI.********* LITHOi....OGT.C
Cl CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND 1.. GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
'--, ~
,
,
,
I ~
,
_.J
PAGE 1 OF 2
FClRI"I-- ACTIVEI
ATION INACTIVE
0000 i=l
EST
YIELD
0003
WELL COMPLT
CLS5!F DATE:
:L 911206
CONTR{,\CR
i
Ii
:11"
" I
, ,
,J.
~IC. NO.
0138
FAGE 2 OF 2
UJG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE 1.. LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOMITE.
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK & SAND
30 ROCK &: CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLI NT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSUI"I ROC.(
! I
__.J
1)
,J
I
IL
:J
, I
~ t,'"
'_.I .
[) ,
~., -
,-I
\.~.
~
Ii
,
L"
W A T
n_ ,,\.:+* LEGAL DE:~;CF\IF'TIOhl 1HHE'
CNT;, FRI:',cn~ S T R EXTK
:)S)S ,,lESESE 0 11504-W 0001
81~Nr,.
" i:::LEV
,
- ;)0(;1)
WELL
DEFTi-!
.)052
'*.GRh:m..}TR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
I TYFE OF
_--.! SCREEN
**'.Il..li--)f.****.******** SCREEN
f:-ROl"i TO FRO!"I TO
0042 0052
, TYF'r::. OF:-
-- GROUT
,
I
,
i
E R
WELL
ID NO.
s Y S T
E M
DWR AF'F'L
NUNBER
NA
F'I::'1f:JE 1 CF 2
FORM-'. I;CTI'jE/
ATlON INACTIVE
O(jOO A
W ELL
WELL OWNER
STATIC
WTR LV
0023
* F'UI'1F'
W~ITER
DEF'1H
CHEM
i)ATA
N
TEST DATA ;:I-
HOURS YIELD
FUI'1PD (GFM)
EST
YIeLD
0008
INTERVALS
FROM
TYPE OF SCREEI\!
OF'ENINGS
**************,***
FRO~I
TO
TO
**,*.**,:+*.If.*~~* GROUT INTERVALS
FRO!"I TO FRO!"I TO
*****.",****
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAl"IINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
_nj
TYi-E OF
CASING
*************.** CASING ****.***********
OIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
"
, "
'i--.:.1 D2PTH LOG DEF'TH LOG
~-, 0000-
, 0002 01
0031 19
0037 ~~
~'J
r_ 0041 19
0051 "':<"'l'
~,~
0052 19
!
~
~*~ISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STFi:EET ADDRESS OF WELL**
O.
r:'1
,
U
i---i
,
WELL
USE
01
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMF'LT
DATE
791002
CONTRACR
f_IC_ NO.
0126
PAGE 2 OF 2
*********** LITHOLOGIC LOG CODES ***********
01 CLAY 19 SHALE
02 SILT 20 LII~ESTONE
03 SILTY CLAY 21 SHALE I< LIt1ESTONE Ie-
04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
0:5 SAND 23 SANDSTONE
06 VERY FINE SAND 24 SANDSTONE I< SHALE
07 FINE SAND 2:5 DOLOM ITE
08 MEDIUM SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL
10 VERY COARSE 5?'tND 28 ROCK
11 GRAVEL 29 ROCK I< SAND
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCl< &: CLAY
13 FINE GRAVEL 31 CALICHE
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL 32 FLINT
i5 COARSE GRAVeL 33 CHERT
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34 F'YRITE
17 SAND I< GRAVEL 35 CLAY I< GR?WEL
18 !lOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROOK
,
i
r:
"
, 1 ~
"
J
W A T
,~*_* LEGAL. DEseR I F'r I ON >11'**.
CN":Y FRACTN S T R EXT1<
;)85 SWSESW 07:L 503W 0005
E ;::;,
WELL
ID NO.
W ELL
s Y S T
E ~I
DWR APPL
NUMBER
NA
PAGE 1 DF ::
FORrl- ACTlVEI
ATlON INACTIVE
0000 A
~
WELL OWNER
CITY OF SAU NA
,
,
I
GRl\1D
ELEV
1::::;06
WELL
DEPTH
0039
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
0026 0036
STATIC
WTR LV
0014
'* PUM1::;'
WATER
DEPTH
0029
TEST DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPM)
001 0002
EST
YIELD
CHEI1
DATA
1\1
I
TYPE OF
~;CREEN
07
*****.If*********** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
FROM TO FF.Ot'l TO FROt'1 TO FRm1 TO OPENINGS
0036 0039 03
TYPE OF
GROUT
~
'-'
*il.*********
FROt'l TO
0000 0020
GROUT INTERVALS
FROt'l TO
0033 0(:,35
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAt'lINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
16
1-1
"
!cJ
TYF'E OF
CASING
02
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
04 0030
WELL
USE
10
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
881114
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0126
\
,
Hi
PAGE 2 OF 2
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG *....JIl.******** LI THOLOG I C LOG CODES ***********
,
0000- 01 CLAY 19 SHALE , "
, , .
0026 01 02 SILT 20 LIMESTONE I
__.J
0027 05 03 SILTY CLAY 21 SHALE 8< LI MESTONE
0036. 01 04 SANDY CLAY 22 CHERTY LIMESTONE :j
0038 05 05 SAND 23 SANDSTONE
0042 01 06 VERY FINE SAND 24 SANDSTONE ~ SHALE
I
07 FINE SAND 25 DOLOMITE ,
!'-
08 MEDIUM SAND 26 CHERTY DOLOMITE 1:--
.' " I~..
09 COARSE SAND 27 COAL ',j ['
10 VERY COARSE SAND 28 ROCK ,
11 GRAVEL 29 ROCK ~ SAND J r
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL 30 ROCK ~ CLAY f
13 FINE GRAVEL 31 CALI CHE
14 MEDIUM GRAVI;:L 32 FLINT ,
15 COARSE GRAVEL CHERT ,
33 ,
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL 34- PYRITE iJ
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR 17 SAND ~, GRAVEL 35 CLAY ~ GRAVEL ,1
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL*'* 18 BOULDER 36 GYPSUM ROCK fl ,
* ., MILES WEST AND 4- MILES SOUTH OF SALINA
[j "
!,
0..
'I
k
n
.1
i 1
Lj
r'"
W A T
", i ".'*'*' LEG~~L O:=:SCRIF'T!OI\J ***
-J' :1\,lTY FF~ACTi\I S T F( EX:K
085 SESESW 071503W 0004
E (:;
WELL
ID (\iO.
-' 13R>iw
WC:L.L.
DEPTH
:)0"70
*GRi\lDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
0017 0028 0037
_. e_,)
~Lc::.'.
;,3(;6
W E L l_
s Y S T
E M
DWR APPL
NUMBER
"IA
I
PAGE :l OF 2
FORM- ACTIVE;
ArION II\lACTIVE
0000 A
STATIC
WTR LV
0014
* PUI~IP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA .~
HOUR,S YIELD
PUI"IPD (GPN)
001 0001
EST
YIELD
0006
CHEM
TYPE :JF
GF(:JU'T
~
.J
**'**''''*****.)t GROUT INTERVALS **********
FRO!"I TO FRO!"I TO FROM TO
0000 0020 0063 0065
* NEAREST CONTAMINAT.IO!\l *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
16
I
WELL Ol,1jl\IER
C!TY OF SALI NA
TYP~ OF
Cr1S~NG
c,,,;'
02 0067
***'I'i'*;;,*'*'~****** CAS I NG 'Jio*'*************
DII~. FT" DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
10
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY.
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
II GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 ME~IUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE'GRAVL
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
OF SAl.INA
DATA
N
7\1l-'i:: CF ***-!!>i'l'************ SCREEN INTERVALS -JIo******,*-********* TYPE OF SCREEN
-I SC;;EEN FRCll"1 TO FROM TO FROM TO FROM TO OPEN t NGS
()7 0067 0(:70
I'
WELL
CLSSIF
I
COMF'LT
DATE
881104
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0126
, ~
,
IJ
, ~,
Lij
DEPTH LOG DEF'TH LOG
0000-
0017 01.
0018 05
0028 01
0028 05
0037 01
0037 05
0066 01
0068 05
0072 19
~_J
n
I'.,'
, '
,
1
,\
n
i ,I
j
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL**
* 3 MILES WEST AND 4 MILES SOUTH
~
:1
uJ
n
LJ
,~
,
jl
! )
F'AGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES *****.'11'*****
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE 8< LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOM!TE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCb~ &: SAND
30 ROCK 3-. CLAY
31 CALI CHE
32 FLINi
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
,...
.
I~
I_
I
(.j
I'
,
I
I.
"
,
,
,
,
W A T
*** :..-EGAL. DESCF( I PT I Ol\! ***
eNTY FRACTN S T R EXTI<
0135 SWI\IESW 061503W 0003
E R
WEL.L.
ID NO.
GRND
ELEV
0000
WELL.
DEPTH
0074
*r:lRNm..,lTR ENCTFl:D*
FEET FEET FEET
W E L. L.
S Y S T
E J'1
DWR APPL.
NUMBER
"iA
~
U I'
PAGE 1 OF 2
FOF~M- ACTIVE/
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
L .'
WELL OWNER
STATIC
WTR L.V
0011
* PUMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA '*
HOURS YIEL.D
PUMPD (GF'M)
CHEM
DATA
N
EST
YIELD
0002
TYPE 0:= ***************** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************.** TYPE OF SCREEN
SCREEN FF,OM TO FROM TO FRDl1 TO FRD~1 TO OPENINGS
00i4 0030 0050 0074
TYFE OF
GRQUT
***********
FROM TO
GROUT INTERVAL.S
FRO!"I TO
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE D I RECTI ON FEET
TYPE OF
CAS I I\lG
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WEL.L.
USE
01
DEPTH l_OG DEPTH L.DG
0000-
0014 01
0021 23
0056 19
0056 23
0061 24
0071 19
0075 23
0090 19
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL**
*
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CL.AY
02 SIL.T
03 SIL.TY CL.AY
04 SANDY CL.AY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MED IUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL.
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL.
13 FINE GRAVEL.
14 MED IUM GRAVEL.
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND ~ GRAVEL.
18 SOUL.DER
WEL.L.
CL.SSIF
1
COMPL.T
DATE
760911
CONTRACR
L.IC. NO.
0138
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 8HAL.E
20 L.! MESTONE
21 SHAL.E & L.IMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE ~ SHAL.E
25 DOL.011 ITE
26 CHERTY DOL.OMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK ~ SAND
30 ROCK ~ CL.AY
31 CAL.! CHE
32 FL.! NT
33 CHERT
34 PYR ITE
35 CL.AY ~ GRAVEL.
36 GYPSUM ROCK
8'
t"
_1
~
:-l
d
W A T
Cl.~.",. LEGAL OEseR I PT I DN ***
~NTY FF\i~CT!\: S T R EXTh:
085 SWSENW 061.503W 0001
E R
WELL
ID NO.
"",
I";
},I \.:1RND
L:_"", 2:LEV
0000
'WELL.
DEPTH
0050
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
-- TVPE OF
SC7.:;EEI\1
"
W ELL
S Y S T
E M
DWR APPL
NUMBER
NA
I
PAGE 1 OF 2
FORI1- ACT! VEl
ATIO"I INACTIVE
0000 A
STATIC
I,TR LV
0025
* P~11P
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA "
HOURS YIELD
F'UMF'D (13PM)
CHEM
DATA
N
TYFE OF *********** GROUT INTERVALS **********
iD GROUT FROM TO FROl"! TO FROI"! TO
IA
1"'1
WELL OWNER
EST
YIELD
0005
****'/!o************ SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
FRO/YI TO FROI'1 TO FRQM TO FROM TO OPENINGS
0035 0050
TYPE: OF
CASING
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
-t!.************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
L'
J
Ir,,':l
.'-.,\
I
2.J
DEPTH LOG
0000-
0004 03
0011 19
0040 23
0050 19
DEPTH LOG
r--,
1<
<
~
~'"
"/ ~
I-:{
Ci
fl
:..:J
1';(
I ~1
tc:J
; i
" ,
','j
U
m**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
I!J STREET ADDRESS or- WEL~ -:'(.11.
.
n
ill
N
"q
U
o
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
OS MED IUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MED IUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND & GRAVEL
1 G BOULDER
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
761108
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0126
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE &, SHALE
25 DOLOM ITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK & SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALI CHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSUI1 ROCK
I
I
I
,
,
,
~
,
,
r'.
10..
,
I-
i
I
I.
"
I
i
. J j.
I,~ A T
-:;..;r'c;. LE;3AL DESCRIF'TIClN ***
,"';"1 i ~ FFP,CTi\i S T F; ,Exn:
C85 S~'JSW:;W 061503W 0002
E R
WELL
10 NO.
W ELL
S Y S
T E f"l
DWR APPL
i"U~'IBER
NA
F;~GE 1 OF 2
FORl"I- ACT I VEl
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
1
, I
1_'.
WELL OWNER
!"fjITCl-iELL
'"'-'hl-.
_.'K.....
:::LEV
WE:LL
~8RNDWTR EN::TfiD*
FEET FEET FEET
(;1)28
STATI~
WTR LV
0028
"*' F'ut1P
lliATER
DEPTH
TEST DAT~, '*
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPi"')
E;;jT
i
nJ
DEPTJ-:
YIELD
0020
CHE!'1
DATA
"
O:)::i~i
TVF:=: CF
SCREEN
(:.7
***************** SCREEN
FRO!"l TO FROM TO
()()45 1)055
INTERVALS
FROM
*****************
TO
FROM
TO
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
03
,
,.
TYPE. OF
G~G~JT
:i
****'Ifo****** GROUT l!\ITERVALS
FROt'1 TO FROM TO
0005 0015
**********
FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION .
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
OJ
, ,
l,'_
O~
*''''****')1-**..****** CASING ***'Jlo***********
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. OIA. FT.
05 0045
WELL
USE
01
WELL
CLSSIF
1
CQiV\PL T
DATE
840922
COriJTRACR
LlC. NO.
0138
LJ
TYPE OF
CASING
il
'_.J
F'AGE2DF2'
DEPTH LOG D2F'TH LOG
0000-
0020 01
0034 19
0053 23
0055 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEPIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FI NE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE'GRAVL
17 SAND 1, GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
SMOLAN KS
~] I
n
1
,
i'-
1',,:
U
*oi"DIS7ANCE AND DIRECTION OR
:;TI~EET ADDRESS OF WELL **
* 2 ~I NORTH & 1 HI WEST OF
.
~ Q,
':1 U
,
,
:1 ~,
"
,
,i 1-
,
,I :~i
ii
Ii :~
Ii
I cC
i
,
W A T
.~"'** LEGAL DESCRIPTION ***
CNTY FRACTI\I S T R EXTK
085 SI;JI\lESW 061503W 0004
E R
WELL
ID NO.
GRND
"LEV
*GRI\IDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
00:);::
WELL
DEPTH
0059
W E L. L
S Y 5 T
E M
DWR APPL
NUMBER
NA
I
PAGE 1 OF 2
FORM- ACTIVE I
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
STATIC
WTR LV
0024
* PUMF'
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA '*'
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPM)
CHEi'1
DATA
N
**********
FROM TO
EST
YIELD
q002
TYPE OF **********.11-****** SCRE:EN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
SCf-:':EEN F'RDN TO FRO!,,! TO FROM TO FROM TO OPEN I NGB
0024 0059
I f-~'
(
1.,-;
!.::cJ
TYPE OF
CASING
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
!~1
~J
~
,.-,
,
DEPTH LOG
0000-
0015 23
0059 19
DEPTH LOG
TYPE OF
GF:OUT
*********** GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO FROM TO
n
'';_!
0;)
':,,-'1
,
~
u
,
, ,
" \
'.:.J'
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
~ "* STREET ADD::<:ESS OF WELL**
R
lj
Q
LJ
n
U
WELL OWNER
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
()2 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
0:5 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
OS MED IUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
WELL
CLSSIF
1
CONTRACR
LlC. NO.
0126
COMPLT
DATE
770315
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE 8< LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE 8< SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK 8< SAND
30 ROCK 8.: CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FI.-INT
33 CHERT
34 PYR HE
35 CLAY 8< GRAVEL
36 GYPSUI'"I ROCK
.
i
,
,
,
,-
~
I
!-
'.
,
-0
"'-
W A T
*** U=.GAL DEseR::: PT I OIl.; .~**
Ci'.ITY FRACTN S T R EXTK
'>65 SWNESW 061503W 0005
E R
WEl.l_
ID NO.
W E l. '-
S Y 5 T
I
] I
j
WELL OWN2:R
E M
DWR APF'L
NUMBER
NA
PAGE 1 OF 2 1.1
FORM- ACTIVE/,'
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
81-':1\1D
ELEV
0000
.;+ PUMP
WAT!:R
DEPTH
TEST DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GP~I)
CHEM
DATA
N
~~ELL
DEPTH
OOI!:,O
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
STATlC
WTR l.V
0024
EST
YIEl.D
0002
TYPE OF ***************** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TYPE OF SCREEN
SCREEN FROI'I TO FROM TO FRO~I TO FROM TO OF'ENINGS
0025 0060
TYPE OF *********** GROUT INTERVALS **********
GROUT FROM TO FROM TO FROM TO
I
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION * "
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
TYPE OF
CAGING
*************** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
0002 04
0031 19
0038 23
0060 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC'
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SflNDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
1I GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND & GRAVEL
18 BOUl.DER
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET At DRESS OF WELL**
*
WELL
Cl.SSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
770316
CONTRACR
UC. NO.
0126
PAGE :2 OF :2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHAl.E
20 l.IMESTONE
21 SHALE I< l.IMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHAl.E
25 DOLOM ITE
26 CHERTY DOl.OMITE
27 COAL.
28 ROCK
29 ROCK I< SAND
30 ROCK I< CLAY
31 CAl.ICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY I< GRAVEL.
36 GYPSUM ROCK
i
; l.
I I 'J,;.
',J
"
[ I j,.
,
I
'---)
"C"l t.:
: I
!. J
'j
I..:
i.'
I
,
I
t,
'1 !'
[JI
I;
:11
I I
"II~
~ ,
,
,,;,
j,'"
,jO',
~
W A T E F< W E L , S Y S T E "' F'AGlE , OF 2
~ ,
*>);.-Jj. LEGAL DESCRIPTION H* WELL DWR APPL FORM- ACTIVEI
--: UJT'I FRACTN S T R EXT/< ID NO. WELL OWNER NUMBER ATION I NACTI VE
, Of..l1503W 0006 NA 0000
' ~)85 SWSENE A
GRND
* PUMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPM)
CHEM
DATA
N
WELL
DEPTH
0035
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
STATIC
WTR LV
0018
,. ELEV
(lOOt)
EST
YIELD
0002
TYFE OF ***************** SCREEN INTERVALS ***************** TY~E OF SCREEN
SCREEN FROi"1 TO FROM TO FROJ'1 TO FROM TO OPENINGS
0025 0035
'7Yf'E OF
, "ROUT
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
***********
FRO!"1 TO
**********
FF,OM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
TYPE OF
: CASING
*'If-*~''''*')HI'***'lf-**** CAS I NG ***************
DrA. FT. orA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
,
, ,
,
~ I '
DEPTH LOG
0000-
0008 01
0028 23
0035 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
'10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVgL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
DEF'TH LOG
,
,
I _i
~,**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
;;/ STREET ADDRESS OF WELL **
~" .ji-
,'-1
, ,
c.J
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
800419
CONTRACR
LlC. NO.
0138
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE 8< LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK 8< SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALI CHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYR IrE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
,
,
I'.
.
I
j,
,
ic;
i..
,
W A T
~.*,*, LEGr;L DESCRIPTION ***
CNTY FRACT!\I S T F: EXTK
085 NWI'.!l...JL::;lJ..1 Obi :i03v.J 0007
E R W E
WELL
10 1\)0.
L L S V S T
WELL QWNEF<
GRND
ELEV
\)1)(;1)
'* PWMP
WATER
DEPTH
WELL
DEPTH
0068
*GRNDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
STATIC
WTR LV
0007
TYPE OF
SCREE!',!
****.*******,*'***** SCREEN
FRO"I TO FROM TO
0013 0022 0030 0068
INTERVALS
FROM
E M
DWR AF'PL
NUMBER
NA
,
1
o
'._-1 '
.
PAGEl 0;-- 2
FORM- ACTIVE/
ATION IN(.\CTP-,iE
0000 A
,
'j
TEST DATA ,'to
HOURS YIELD
PUMF'D (GF'Ml
FROM
EST
YIELD
0008
CHEM
DATA
N
TO
****************.lJ!o
TO
TVP~ OF SCREEN
OPEi'1I NGS
"YPE OF
CROUT
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
***********
FROl1 TO
*~********
FROM TO
TiPE OF
CASING
*************** CASINO ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
DEPTH LOG DEF'TH LOG
0000-
0002 01
0013 04
0014 ?~
-~
0020 01
0022 23
0027 01
0042 --
...::...)
0044 19
0046 34
0057 19
0057 34
0075 19
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION'
SOURCE D I RECTI ON FEET
WELL
USE
01
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SIL'TY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
OS ~IED ruM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL,
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
.7 SAND & GRAVEL
IS BOULDER
*'.*DISTANCE AND DIRE::CTION OR
STRE~T ADDRESS OF WELL**
*
WELL
CLSSIF
1
COMPLT
DATE
760902
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
013S
,
,
--" i..
PAGE 2, OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK & SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYR ITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK'
:'
I"~
I I
I:_J 1
I
,
LJ .
f!
I...
'.
'j ~
:1
~,
L-
,., I
..1,
- ~
c--
W A T
~j'** L.EGAI_ DESCFI I r'T I ON ***
CI\i";"Y FRP.CT!\I S T R EXTJ<
08',5 NL-'J8W8lAl 061.50.3W OOOS'
E F
WELL
lD NO"
I:
GF(ND
~ELl_
DEPTH
*GRNDl,.:JTR ENCTF-:D.!<-
FEET FEET FEET
ELE'v'
O(l\)(J
0060
TYPE OF
S':F~cEi\i
*******",,*.;i-******* SCREEN
FF:O!"I TO FROI"! TO
0040 OO(SO
TYPE OF
(:I::'iOUT
***********
FROM TO
GROUT INTERVALS
FHOM TO
TYPE CF
CASII\IG
~~ELL
S Y S T
E 1"1
DWI:;: APPL
NUI'1BER
NA
WELL OWI\IER
STATIC
WTR LV
0025
* PLiI'1P
WATER
DEPTH
TEST Dr-nA *
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GP~I)
CHEri
DATA
N
INTERVALS
FROM
I"
~
F'1:1GE 1 OF 2
FORI~I- ACTIVE/
AiION INACTIVE
0000
^
~
EST
YIELD
0010
FRot1
*****************
TO
TYPE OF SCFIEEi\1
OPENINGS
TO
**********
FROM TO
.lE- NEAREST CONTr;I"'lII\IATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
*'**'**'*********-IE- CPISrl\iG **********.*,****
CIA. FT. CIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
01
DIO:FTH LOG
0000-
OOO:!. 01
0006 07
(IC):l8 01
0055 23
0060 19
DEPTH LOG
!f~[-ISTAi\lCE AND DIRECTION OP
STREET p,DDnESS Of:;" l.--JELL**
,f
**'*,******** L I THOLOG I C
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY F I I\lE SAND
07 F H.IE SAND
08 NED I UI'1 SAI\IO
09 COARSE SAhlD
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY F I l\iE r.;)RAVEL
1.3 FINE GRAVEL
:t 4 MED I ut1 GRAVEL
15 COAf:;;SE GFIAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND & GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
WELL
CLSSIF
1
CoMPLT
DATE
780425
COblTRACR
LIC. NO.
0138
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES **,*.********
19 SHALE
20 L I l"1ESiONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE & SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK ~" SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY & GRAVEL
36 GYFSUM ROC/<
I
"
W A T
*** LEGAL DEseR I PT I ON iHHI'
CNTY FRACTN S T R Exn:
085 NWSW8[,IJ 06150:3W OOCJ6
E R
WELL
ID NO.
'"3RNC'
WELL_
DEPTH
0060
*GF.:l\iDWTR ENCTRD*
FEET FEET FEET
ELEV
0000
TYPe: OF
SCREEN
~'J ELL
S Y S T
E ~I
DWR APPL
NUMBER
NA
WELL OWNER
STATIC
WTR LV
0025
* PUMP
WATER
DEPTH
TEST DATA '*
HOURS YIELD
PUMPD (GPli)
CHEI1
DATA
,I
***************** SCREEN INTERVALS
F!:;:O!"I TO FROM TO FROI"!
004() 0060
FROrvl
*****************
TO
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
TYPE ,OF
"ROUT
GROUT INTERVALS
FROM TO
***********
FROt'1 TO
,
_I
!
TY",E OF
CASING
TO
J
1
i
F-AGE 1 OF 2
FORM- ACTIVE/
ATION INACTIVE
0000 A
EST
YIELD
0025
**********
FRO~I TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION *
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
I
,
*******-****'11-*** CASING ***************
DIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
USE
05
,
II
1'1
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
0004 04
0008 07
0056 23
0060 19
-I
I
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELUHt-
*
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SILT
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
08 MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL....
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAVEL
16 VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND ~ GRAVEL
18 BOULDER
WELL
CLSSIF
1
CONTRACR
LiC. NO.
013S
COMPLT
DATE
811012
PAGE .2 OF .2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LiMESTONE
21 SHALE ~ LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE ~ SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK ~ SAND
30 ROCK ~ CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLi NT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY ~ GRA~EL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
j I
I
I
(1 ,
1_1 ,
1 I
I
r
,
,
,
,
,
i
i
,
It
. ,
L1
~'J A T
I
I.
;~''+* LEC.,{-il_ DESC::( I Pi" I Oi'.: *,;..ir
::;'ri"l FFli;CTl'J S T F~ EX,-K
C8;5 S:=:E;:::I\II"; 061503W (lOll)
E R .; E L L S y S T E M PACE 1 0:;;;' ~
WELL DWR APF'L FORt'I- (-\CTI\./EI
!D NO. WELL OWI\IER NU;'lBER ATIOhl INACTIVE
NA 0000 A
WELL.
~'GRhJDl-'JTR ENi:TRD*
FEET t='EET F2:ET
* ~'U:'1F TEST D.;TA *
STATIC WATER HOURS YIELD EST CHEN
WTF( LV DEFTH PUI'IPD (GP~'j) YIELD D.c.TA
0031 0005 N
; 3::::1\ID
, ELEv'
DEPTH
OC!56
ooce
< TYPE: OF
,...J SCF~EEI\I
'IHi+,,"'~***'l'l'**'."'***** SCREEN I hlTERVALS *.jHHH************ TYFE OF SCREEN
FRON TO FROl'l TO FROM TO FROM TO OPEN: NGS
004:L 0056
r:;, TYF:=: elF *********** GROUT INTERVALS **********
.1
GROUT FRO!"I TO FRON TO FROM TO
* NEAREST CONTAMINATION '*
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
IT]
~ TYPE OF
.**.jj'*.!l-********-ll.* CAS I l\:G ***************
CIA. FT. DIA. FT. DIA. FT.
WELL
IJSE
01
CASING
c-
j-','
'~
DEPTH LOG DEPTH LOG
0000-
0036 23
0048 19
0055 23
0080 19
*********** LITHOLOGIC
01 CLAY
02 SlL T
03 SILTY CLAY
04 SANDY CLAY
05 SAND
06 VERY FINE SAND
07 FINE SAND
OG MEDIUM SAND
09 COARSE SAND
, 10 VERY COARSE SAND
11 GRAVEL
12 VERY FINE GRAVEL
13 FINE GRAVEL
14 MEDIUM GRAVEL
15 COARSE GRAV~L
lb VERY COARSE GRAVL
17 SAND 8< GRAVEL
. IS BOULDER
n
i':;j
I....J'
r<Jc
U
fl
c
il
LJ
;j
6
**DISTANCE AND DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL**
~*
~
G
1m
WELL COMPLT
CLSSIF DATE
1 770222
Cot'l/iRACR
LlC. NO.
0126
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE & LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE 8< SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL
28 ROCK
29 ROCK t: SAND
30 ROCI< &; CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYRITE
35 CLAY I< GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
I
I
c
"
I
-
.~
ILLEGIBLE
DOCUMENT
THE FOLLOWING
DOCUMENT(S) IS OF
POOR LEGIBILITY IN
THE ORIGINAL
I
I
I
,
i'
I'
1--
I
.
,
.
,
.
i" ~
THIS IS THE BEST
COPY AVAILABLE
.
,
ii.'
I"
~~-
,
f,,-,
\
"
....74
-
i"::-\hiD
1"-' ,
WI::.l-L..
'~GRNDWTr-~ ENCTRD*
F:=:ST FEET FEET
STATIC
WTR LV
, I
j
;'.,'i~ T
*,\'"';-1- :""'EGPL DE.sL~fUFTIOhl ***
C>.i:'/ FF",ACThl S T ,q EXT!<
035 NW~JENE 071503W 000 l
ER (\JELL
WELL
ID NO.
E M
'DWR APPL
: NUMJlE~
~NA
PAGE 1,OF2
FORM- Acn VEl
AnD," INAcnVE
(;000 A
~L~'/
DEPTH
EST
YIELD
CHECI
DATA i")
T'/PE: OF *.J!'-!I"***,'+li-'il'******* SCREEN INTERVAL
SCHEEN FRO)'"! TO FROM TO FROM
TYPE OF SCREEN
OPENINGS
T'"/~-;'E OF '********"~** GROUT INTERVALS **.l",*,*,
GF~OUT FROM TO FROJ~l TO -FROM
* NEAREST CONTA['1INATION * ''o.J
SOURCE DIRECTION FEET
TYF'E OF
CfiSING
*********'Il-*'J(.**~- CASING **********
DtA. FT. D:A. FT. DIA.
WELL
USE
10
WELL
CLSSIF
3
COI'IPLT
DATE
880201
CONTRACR
LIC. NO.
0138
. :1
LI
D.E;:-~'TH LOG
0000-
DEPTH LOG
'-, ~
~,,;.
***~;*~:~~H'lLITHOLOGIC
02 aIL, ^#
.,
03 SIL ,~; CLAY
04 SANDt CLAY
05 SAND~
06 VER~~ INE SAND
07 FI NE AND
08 MED I SAND
09 COARSE SAND
10 VERy;cDAriSE SAND
11 GRAV}
12 VERYINE GRAVEL
13 FINE .AVe:::...
14 MED! U GRAVEL
15 COARsa GRAV~L
16 VERY Ill':'RSE GRAVL
17 SAND &;,ERAVEL
18 80ULDEll
PAGE 2 OF 2
LOG CODES ***********
19 SHALE
20 LIMESTONE
21 SHALE ~ LIMESTONE
22 CHERTY LIMESTONE
23 SANDSTONE
24 SANDSTONE << SHALE
25 DOLOMITE
26 CHERTY DOLOMITE
27 COAL.
28 ROCK
29 ROCK 8-. SAND
30 ROCK & CLAY
31 CALICHE
32 FLINT
33 CHERT
34 PYR HE
35 CLAY ~ GRAVEL
36 GYPSUM ROCK
:1
,-
: 1'1;;
,I;j
il
.-j I
'1
~ j
.-j
I,
h
,
"
ft
f1 r,~
,
U
i J
,
n I
J ,
I'';'
,
IL
'1 ,
,
'._,
'}
;~.;;.:JlSTAi\lCE Ai\ID DIRECTION OR
STREET ADDRESS OF WELL*'*
*
.
llSS&'<X1419311 rev 4/6 un
APPENDIX C
TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF WATER OUALITY
LABORATORY REPORTS
IAOLE 5. !UtWlT OF lIAIE~ GJAllfll>AIA
Clll OF SAlIMA lNIlFIll
Co:o:entra,;ons in~/l
...".""...........................................11..................................".......".... "...".......................""".. .".."......................
11 "",-11 II "",-14 II "'H5 l:lI"E II
PAoWlt:TU II 111M 14/11190 I 1115/91 13/01m 11/1519111 111M 14/11/90 11/15191 13/011911111519111 111118 14111/ro 1115191 3/01191 7/1sm ISIAIIO.uDSII
................................11.........1"..."...1"........1.........1.........11.........1.........1.........1........"1.........11".......+.......1......... 1.........1.........1.........11
Nrmcnh,local 111EI(0.01l I 0.1 I 0.111EI(0.1l IW(D.I) IINO(O.\) I D.l I O.lIN1l(O.1l IIIl(D.1) 1I1E1(0.1) 11EI(0.1) 11EI(0.1) IW(O.1l I O.lIMA II
o,lorlde II IlO I 111 n 1 n I 11411 1381 1161 1101 1241 mil 541 40 I 40 I 391 3lI1MA II
Olr...h.. 111"l(0.04) 11EI(0.02l IW(0.02l 11EI(0.05l jlEl(O.O!i) 1I11D(0.04111lD(0.02l INO(O.lll)jlEl(O.O!i) IND(ll.ll5) 111EI(.llll IlCl(O.()l) INO(ll,ll2) IlID(.OS) llD(.05) I 0.111
llll lIMO(IO) 1 3oIND(10) 11D(10) '....(ill) IIl1D(lG) I 4DIIID(10) I 151110(10) 111EI(lll) 1 5lI1ND(lOl I l11 351MA II
Nhrn./~lcrlle II 0.5 1 ll.5 IlID(O.\) I 0.6' 1.811 1.6 I 1.61!<D(ll.n I \.71 1.9 II ll.3 1 0.4 I 0.lIND(0.11 I ll.ll 11111
Kjeldohl NhrO!jen liMA INA INA IMA IMA II~A I~A INA 11M INA I IlIA I~A 11M IMA IlIA IItI. II
pit II BI 7.51 7.11 7.51 7.311 7.81 7.51 71 7.31 7.411 BI UI 7.31 7.61 7.711t1. II
s<>llds,lllnolved II 4441 44B I 4161 44ll I 4Slll1 564 1 56111 4501 510 I 600 II 4061 wi 34lI1 3lIO I 350lMA II
Sui.... II 67 I 52 I 61 1 811 5811 65 I 44 I 441 70 I 56 It 100 I 631 53 I 92 I 61 1400/500 II
To.aIDrlla'll.Cal'tu>{Spatlledl II II zl....m I 3111Clll1 II 161 BIIIO(1) I 31llO{11 II 71 ZI....(1) I 31 IIIt1. II
Arnnie. Total IIND{0.OO5JIW(10.01 1110(10.1) It(I(O.lll) IllO(ll.lllllllLl{O.OO5)IILI(1O) IW(I11J IlG(O.OIlIW{D.Dl) 11101.005) 110(.01) ]110(.01) 110(.011 llIl{.llll I 0.05 II
aarh.., ToCa! 11110(11.21 IW(ZOO) 11IO(100l I 0.51111>(0.l) IIND(O.Z) IND(2001 I 0.mIND(0.2) IIIO(O.Z) IllO(ll,l) IND(.ZI 1110(.1) 11ItI{.l) 11lI(.l) I zll
~i...,Tout IIl1Dfo.1l1J11ItI(5.ollllD(5) 11ItI{0.OO1JIIID(0.oollllll;l(D.01)11ItI(5.01INDf.OO5lIIllID.ooullltl(D.001l111ltl(0.01J INIl(.005) 11ItI(.005) I 0.00111E1{.OOIl1 ll.00511
tal.I"',lotal It 471 70.71 5B.61 1001 10011 871 991 89.11 1101 9511 361 55.1] 411.81 rol S51l1A II
"'ranlun,loul ltllO{O.(4)I'-'lI{\O.O>I'-'lI{1O) ]1ItI{0.04111lD(0.ll') 1111;I(0.04) 1'-'lI(10.0) 1'-'lI(.0l) 1l<<l1O.(4) 1l<<l(0.04l IllEI(O.ll') Il<<l(.ol) 1l<<l(.olllllllfO.04JINIl{.04) I 0.111
Ire.... To.al II 1.491 6.B I 0.771 1 451 B II 0.561 1.9 I 0.283 I 81 3.5 II 1.\IIi I 0.112 I 0.15Z I 31 5.51~A II
had, To.al lINO(0.02) I 7.SI 28.91 0.0181 O.om 111ItI(0.002)1 0.0059 10.0332: I 0.006111;I(.003) 111D(.002) I 0.0071 0.011 0.0061 O.llU]"" 1
llagr>estun.lo.al II 31 I D.51 27.S1 Sol 0511 lSt 22.51 21.71 201 ZSll 261 25.71 25.51. 301 2SllIA
I'Ier~";y. IoU' 11l<<l(0.oDZ)IND(0.2) IllO(D.Z) lNO(0.OO2)INOfO.OOZ)IIII;I(ll.002)INO(0.Ol) INO(0.OOllll<<ll.0021 11ItI(.00021111ll(.OOOZ)III;I(.llOOZ)IIItI(.OOOZ)IIIl(.0002)11EI(.OOO211 0.002
potanh.., TOlal II 3111;1{S.Ol lNO(5.0) I 9INlI{S.0) II 3.B 11I;I{5.0) 111;I(.005) lNOl51 IlItI(5) II 4111t1{S> 111;I(51 IICI(SI INIl(S) IlIA
5ohnl....loul 111ItI(O.ooslllltl(s.ll) INll(1ll.01INO(ll.00511 0.009 I IIItI(O.OOS) I 5.911L1(.OOO I 0.0071 0.009111l'1(.005) IlEIf.005)11EI(.01l 111)1.005) llEI(.OO5) I 0.05
silver, To.al IIND(ll.Ol)IIEI(lOl INDllO) lIIlIO.02) 11III{0.021 IINO(ll.llZ) 111II(10) 11l'I(.OOOIND(.02) II<<IIO.OZ)IIII)(O.02)III;I(.01l 1110(.01) IMQI(.02) 11EI(.02) I""
Sodl"",lo,al II 411 36.21 331 y;1 S211 691 5UI SUI 5Z1 nil S71 41.11 39.31 381 37 IlIA
9:Xl liMA INA IWA IlIA IlIA liMA IWA lMA I~A jNA 11"'- I.... INA In IItI. In
011 atd Or...., Gravl...crk I]"~ INA Iw~ IlIA ]..... II~~ INA INA IWA ]NA liMA IMA I~A IMA IItI. IlIA
Sol;<!s Sulpctded IINA INA !~A IlIA 11M IIM~ IMA INA IWA INA IIItI. I~A IlIA I~~ IItI. IlIA
.'
, (.
-
.1
~
y.~\-
-
J.(:. BUTLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
1801 GLENDALE - SALINA. KANSAS 67401 - {9131-B27-1273
LABORATORY REPORT
PAGE:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CLIENT: 0.5. FENT ['ATE REPOIHE[': 11/22/813
ATTN: [lATE RECF.IVEfI: 1111111'313
3573 N. CRYSTAL SPRINGS ROAD CAS FILE NO: e.8-5081
SALINA. KS 67401 ORDER NO: 606
~~~-~5~t~?6~?f~:~b~~o[r~~ri~~~~~17~J~~}~-----~~~~~~=:-~~::~~--------
LAB NU~1BER: 88110290 [lATE SMIPLF.[o: 11I8 /88
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: 5-15 TIME SAMPLED:
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA
(:OD
CHLORIDE
CYANIDE, TOTAL
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC. TOTAL
BARIUM. TOTAL
CADMIUM. TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMiUM. TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD. TOTAL
MAGNESIUM. TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM. TOTAL
MANGANESE. TOTAL
ND(). WHERE NOTED. INDICATES
iN PARENTHESES.
CONCENTRATION
-------------
ND( 0.1)
ND (! 0)
5'
ND( 0.(1)
0.3
8.0
406
100
7
ND(D.ODS)
ND(O.2)
ND(O.OI)
36.
NDCQ.04)
l. 9'
NO(Q.002)
26.
NDlO.0002)
,
NOlO. DOS)
NDCO.02)
57
0.06
NONE DETECTED
UNITS
M(i/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L AS N
STD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
'MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
HG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
~lG/L
WITH THE
BOOV,/PAGE
Hi 129
42B/8
37 /25
6S /6
39 /14
38 /9
40 115
47 /7
67 /12
72B/9
78 /2
73 /7
63 /27
74 /6
63 /35-
67 /23
63 /45
70 /10
63 /62
'62 199
75 /5
59 146C
63 /54
[JETECTION LIMIT
ANALYSES WERE PERFORMED ON SAMPLE AS RECEIVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PROCEDURES PUBLISHED IN THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 136.
JULY 1. 1986 OR IN EPA PUBLICATION, 5\01-846. 3RD EDITION. NOV. 1986.
SAMPLES WILL BE RETAINED FOR 30 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTIFIED.
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
CLr::t!J~'B~:
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
-.-..-:-'",;-...~:"..:r:.;,:..."~
...'~'
ILLEGIBLE
DOCUMENT
THE FOLLOWING
DOCUMENT(S) IS OF
POOR LEGIBILITY IN
THE ORIGINAL
THIS IS THE BEST
COPY AVAILABLE
P-474
......
)
"!llllll,lil,\1 .",/!.'.!.'., j. ;,1, '".k- II
1 ~!'" !':.'\ j", ,I" Y II) '/1 ~; 11 '11
I :~~ I . .\
,:II.!!i,/\!.I;
I':'!ll.I..!',
'~." 1.1 nl\.
, d~'
.". '_~::' ,I' 1 !' T!: :.,' . ! !-I'
I : ^_ I I ~;, .".:' 1','''.1'' I ' .', I
1 I., 11'.'1:; l\ r.'!~ \
,.f "F'T
, 1.1.1.'.IT: '.'.~;. ;.1,,=)1
A'pH:
.~~~7 ~ 1'1, !'I1YS"fl.1 ~~PI~ll-V;S p,.'^!,
SftL I HJ\. I'\~ I.'; ,!HI
..'
I ',t.. r I. r 1_ ! -'. .;. 'I' I.: ~': 'I
~-'I'\ n: \:i.:'-'" i -.'i.;': i \ I I,
:,>
".fl,;..' FII I. ;.).,: :;:I_'",:)!
'.'fH';::h' 111': ,'of'
,
','!~;L.J._l'i9~ _ ~?:-J 1 J.. Pl:1.~P~~. !ro~_ ~_€,~~Y .17_'_1/ej.~~,~~~!1_e',
sand 78 to 88 ft. below surface 11 7 88
l~h'a~i1~1 ..1.'l,I.I.;
1_.AP Ill_1HEir-r.': 'Il.l t"~'~!'!'J
:--: AI1PLE ['ESCE II' T' ':'N: ~~. I 1
fl, [! ^ I.,'r' S I ~-.~
,:nl"-/(EHTr.' fl.T I ',:'\01
.._ .._ - - ." - - ._u
.I!I!,d-II!,
fll"". '
.."
pr.!I""
iiL'..'I:; I 1"1-::
HII
IIt"".'.tl
\ 1\,P \ L'E: 1''-' "'1\.!.
1l1lHfl,TEllIJ n:I'p;:
i"ll
r.' i .".1.. I' I !~~:'.'L V~,I' ,~;, 'I. Il'~'
-.:111.,1,/\ rE
j "~I AI. 1}1'.!';.f\H I" !',1\I-'Pf)N
.'.I.';::!.Illl.'. TO]'.",!.
i,l,i~ 1111-1. l('TAI.
'.:,<\['1'1 I IJi'l. T')TAJ..
""''.L'.:ilJN. TI)TAL
'''HW.q'lI I..I!-l. T,yr At.
I t,'.'I'!. T(IT.f\L
I.,E/\[!. T()T^I~
i'1.I\I~HF.S 111M. "(ITAL
l'IF.H.~l.lFc'l'. T('TP1~
rllrl\:';slll\,1. .'lPTAI.
SEt.!-:.H 11.111. TOT At.
~-:(IYF.:R. TOTAl
:-~')l'!Ur'l. T'JTA'
MANGANESE, TOTAL
"]I" '. \oJHEf<F. 1I'.'TEl>.
It.' PM?ENTHESF.S.
,.'.,',
;'Ll'
-1".1
,,-.-
.,
'-
N!.III,l. ,}nl, I
I-!PI(,'.;':'
!-l['(". 1I!
47.
1'11',('.'.').1
1. tJ '.1
I,ll." 'I . (1 'l;: ~
='1.
1-1[111I.1I'.11.1(;)
.'
NVI I). (HI'; 1
I'll)' (I. (I ~~ )
011
0.04
1 Hr' I ('ATES I-J(II'lE l'~TF.:':TF.['
i'l-' n: ," .\1:" , 1 1 7 A8
,.
T 1 I'IF ~ 1\ '.1;' i ;'-i' ,
....'
lH!IT~'
11.;'1
!,!,;.I
i i'~, ! ,
"'(;/1.
H':;':! 1\::'
~:'rr'
HI;'\..
1,1,-:/1,
/-l'~/! .
1'1(;/1.,
HI;.'\..
I'tG/f..
11'~ . !.
1'l'i/1.
1-1';/ i.
HI;:'L
H'';/L
l'I(i/l~
I'I'~ ' I..
HG/I,.
f1G-'I.
H'3/1.
I'.G/L
WITH nu::
L ~, " " " , ,
, . ,.
"
..
, , , , , , ..
, , , . "
'1 , , , '.
., .. ,
f. , , ,
,. ";~ : CI
...
"-'
7 ,. , "
.". , .. ... 7
, j .".
.. '. j .~ ,"
,
.. , , .. ,
" , . "
, ,', , 1 (I
,. ,. ..
," ,'':' .,
,
" ..' , ,
~q :.1 f.,"
63 /54
l,r:'rJ:"'-:-I':'!1 I..!I!IT
,o\.I"/\,.LY5E5 lJEHE F'!:~.rlFr"RI'lFI' (!~I ~,"1-IPLI-: 1\,':: P'~I:F.IYf?I.' 11.1 '\"(,'r,r,.I"\!i"L~ 1.1IT,1
rp.'_".'ElIIJRE:; PIlr.1.15HFI.' JI--I THE ,~n[.lE (q: FE[lI~Rl\L RE';I.ll.^TI,-.!.I~:: 1'/t,(1' ! ~l;.
Illl.Y 1. l~F.I-:; I"R 1101 F.:I'A r'llnl.II:^TI~iN. S\oI--l'l"~, ,H..:[l F.'''"I'!'''I-I. 1;..../. I"~"~'.
:'.,fl.HI'l.ES l.lll.l Ill- HF.T^INI~" FI"lI~ .:to ('^'{~-; I1I-1LE~";::; ('THER;JI'~i~ P'li Il"il:!',
""lnINE",T"". Ml^l:iTl"f\l, SF.F'VICE~::;
1~.1 ;.~~:
.^I1,q~.^,TU~Y 1'1 h'EcrnH
'''HTF,Il-.lll'.\I. ,\I'll,.1 Y;'\,',AI. ~:F!~'JI' i.
! .'\H"P,I\'ll oI~-l' 1'1 iJ I '" i, -i.]
p!,
,.,. 1.'lli"I.~:P 1\~,:::-:,u'I.II.T~'~::'. It-I"
!',Il.1 li!.l.:I'J!,,\II-: _ :.;f\.! IH.'\, 1-:1\1":';.1\'::: h7"','! '''1,\'
1. ,'\Ill,'h'/\T"RY !)~!-,IIP.T
~'.iI' . ;.: :
.-----. .,------.--' ..--,-
'I.IEIIT: tl,::~. f-1:I.rr t':\"IT r:'!.,i" ,:"r;.I':
t\rTll~ l'A'n.: !~i;"'I~'I',~.'I':
~,:,.j'" I. tl. '''r,''-i~'I^1. :-;r'F'1P';S f,(',hl.' ':^~ FII.i.. I-!": r,:,,:
SAlol i1A. I':~: 1;'j.1" I ,'oI_:'1':.I-:r 1.1": ,-.[ ,I
Pl'jJ'.H....~.I: . .j.'l,~'l-"
'.lel1_1.19_,_I3~:-14_ pUlllpeli. from. shallow. alluyial__ --.. ....: -. -. -. ..... :
sand 36 to 38 ft. belo" surface 11/14/88
i.^P, Hlll'lBF!~: ~);_~II"I,\I';
:~~l\f-IFI.E OES',:R I PT I':-i'l: :;j- 1"
"HAL 'is 1:=
'~('I'I'."'Et,ITR/I,T! ('1.1
-------------
1\1'11-1.'1'11 ^
Nl"','.!
Hr. I ! ]~, I
.,.1,
1 ".n
(:
,'111.l'F11"'.
"'U\NIT'E. '\'.;1'/\1.
II I TF.'ATfo".'l-Il rRITF
F'H
r',"L^.'_ [II ~S')I..VF.r' ~~':".I I';:'
'~I"I,F,"'TF.
l('TAL ORGAN I ':. ': APJ10I'!
.\HSEHI('. T,yr,IIL
:'^,ii !IIH. T'.lTAL.
".''.l'I'1I I.q'l. TOTAL.
':AU'IPI1, TI)T!\\'
,'HR':'!'! I UH. 1'01'.0\1.
I rWI"-I. TOTAI~
LEAl'. T'JTAL
11.'\(;I-./I-::::II.lI1. Pfl'Al.
IIER':I./R-!'. '\"'1.1"1"1\1.
1',r^:'~SIIH!. T"TAt:
::t:.1..EI'111.lIl, T"TAL
S II,VER. "1'0'1"/1_1.
:;','1'1'.111. TOTAl.
MANGANESE, TOTAL
IJI"H '. \JHERF. ",,'rrF[I. !!lPI('i\TF.";:
11.1 r'^RENTlIESES.
0.07
,.IONE. PETF./;"Tt;:I)
l!l',r:'.l.l!
! J.
-; tl
~l~ .1
Eo"
16
Nrl' 'I. ll"~}
Ni'l .., . :? ~
NP' ..... (It,
--
'-".
!-l[" I). n4)
Ol,!;ifi
Nl"'J, I)(I~)
~~.3 .
N(I~II.Il"1l2)
'::.Il
Nf"','."I.!" ,
I'll' I l~ . li,~ 1
..I).
I! "j::-:
11.\.j:...::
','_I:Jl
!'J\n~ ::~,~I-]1'1 !-l': 11.' 14. 88
T 11'11= :,....HFI.F'.:
111-1 \ 1 :.~
1;'-"".': l";::
P';'!.
I.I',-'!
I ".,;; i~
.1', '"
,I"f','::
.,;
!<If:..],
c. , .- "
, --, , ,
.. "
., .. , "
,.1';' I, ^:~ 1,1
S"\'!,
l'IG/l.
11':1.'1..
!'I,.;.'I..
'1'~ II..
11'3"-1.
"''';/1,
t.l'.....t.
.1'" .-;
,:,: ; I :~
i:'.l';r,
':1,
- .- 0
.'
, , , , -;
., , , -;
" , -' "
.
" . .- j
,. .- 1 ,
-' ,
.. 1 -.
--
'.', (. '.
f .- ., 9
., -. , "
:, ., .- , ~
M<i.l,
'1'./1.
1-\'~11.
11,;/L
1'1';Il.
M'.;" .~
I'I'-~ .' i..
HG/L
I'Vi/l.
MG/L
WITH Till?
63 /54
1.~:l'r..-TI';~-r !.l:"IT
AHlI,L'iSES WEtiF r ~!:'r:,,,'{fI!.:r' '.'1-1 ~;'VtF'l,E ^~; !?Er:EIVt=!1 'I'~ A(.I'(..,.'r'/,.!,I.',- UI'lll
l'Er~'~'Er}IJHES !'I.IBI.I ~':;IIEI' I H THE .:OLIE N: n=.I:'F.R^I.. REI)IJLJ\ T I (1H', j.';\ j;..j' , 1 .0'
11..II:i I. 19~6 oJ-;: 11'1 FI ^ nll.H.ICAT1N,J. ~"1,.1~~:4~. ~rw Et.!TII'.H. !I'-";. I.l~l':'.
:-"^"!'I.ES HILI. PE Ii:ET,1I [UEI' foY'f,' :'0 I:'^\"~-:-: !,II'lLESS 1.'TlIER1..J I S~ 110."1; :-: I,."
1.."1"1 r I m:.:NTAI. r.tl/tl.:,"'r 1/:.'1.1.. :.:;E:HV I C!.::S
'lo/J::Pl:~r~
1.!\P'(.IIl/t.'I"'.'RY l.'I.Hi':T~:'H
5t1o" ,_d
-
,;"A/C' ~Yf.
~ I:i ~ /) L/, ,,_ ~
1"190
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - SAL~. KANSAS 67402-1820 - (913)825-7186
APRIL 20. 1990
CITY OF SAL~ - 2
P.O. BOX 736, SOLID Wl\S'IE DIVISICN
SALINA KS 67401
ATIN : JIM HILL
RE: WILSCN l.AllORATO!UES FILE ro. 90-9542
ENCIDSED ARE '!HE ~lS FOR '!HE SMlPLES AS LISTED BELOI:
WILSCN
U\B ID #
(mER ro.
SM1PLE DE.SCUPI'ICJiI
9004045200
9004045300
9004045400
05661
05661
05661
#11
#14
#15
NO(), WHERE tm'ED, INDICATES N:N!:: Dt:i't).;J:W WI'lli '!HE LltiJ..t:.t...:uClil LIMIT IN PARENIHESES.
ANALYSES WERE PERFORMED CN SMlPLES AS RECEIVED IN AC:CXl!lD!\N:E WI1H PRlCElXlRES
REFEREN:ED IN '!HE F'EDERAL P.mISTER, WL. 49, NJ. 209, ocr. 26, 1984; PUBLISHED IN EPA
PUBLICATICN, 5W 846, 2ND ED., JULY 1982 AND IN '!HE P!lOPOSED AOOITICN 'IO 5W 846,
1984; OR IN EPA PllBLICATICN, SW846 3RD ED.,SEI'1'E21BER 1986. WHERE APPRl\IED MF:IHX>S
ARE NJl' AVAIlJo.BLE, I:;HUt(l.$ ARE MACE '10 USE APPRJPRIA'IE ~ ME'IH.DS.
IU!W>.ININ; SMlPLES WILL BE REIlUNED FOR 30 JYo.YS t.NLESS OIIIE!M:SE =FIED.
WILSCN l.AllORATO!UES
~~L
ENCUJSURE
Client:
$1/,...
L4tJJJ,c,11
@ tRfIP/
o P':.;~x~~~. L~. NORT~~~~;~~ET
SAUNA, KANSAS 674D2-182D (913) 825-7186
File No:
@OOill~m rum @OOg)'[f@OOW OO~@@OOOO
Seal No.:
Date
Sealed:
By:
PRO~~~N~~~/l L."wo,.-i / SAMPLER~l/ / ~
SAMPLE TYPE :~~~'~ WILSON
SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE DATE TIME WATER AIR .0,>0 SEO. LABORATORIES
IDENTIFICATION o O..tl. '0. NUMBER
~rM.A I.4.ot:Jlj ~ // r-, or 3
,~,QIJ.;A kS
S<C!;L',(., 'K!/'" d! ILl "" ~ .3
()
S~I,"" ';,woe,'" c\J,15 I 1/!3- 3
:;4lfNtl .ItS
BOTTLE SAMPLER LAB
No Type 5'.. Preurv. ANALYSIS FIIt.(YJIlI) Oblerntlons ObMrvaUona
:3 "'I t=r JJ.(..qc.... ~""';A CmL ~ 1<< ',9.€ .,,11.
:s 1'L M HIlo? ..j.J,.....b.J~rlr~tJ... 'IDS ~..."'~1~
'<1. I'L.. Gf' /J/4 -r,c. ift1~' d.~.: ' -rn,' 6.<;~
7~7AI 'c::.oolno.:v"" 7U7A I c..olC:,~
pltrDf"\l~~ <:k 7..r~/
7111211 Z'4>.J T4)'fA1 L~4cJ.
-r,;TIlL ,. 'u_ "'''7AI Mtr. .
nT4./---:';'. "".on., ,
, ~
71174/';,1.---: ~""I s..n:v_
nf&TR/~ ;j,~e'..t,;,.
,
CHAIN OF CUSTODY CHRONICLE'
lA. FlEL.D Opened By: Date: Time:
PERSONNEL Seal II:
Condition 01 Materials:
,.. Sealed By: Date: Time:
jJ ./ Seal II:
-~// .# / V ~ , Date: f'-//- ?lJ Time: /1730
.C. ReUnquiShed By: 1-/1- ~1J
Received By: (; L .f_ - --1 r.: L:. L Date: Time: 30
Condition 01 Materials' f) I
2. LABORATORY Opened By: {' "7 12.. l Date: d_ '" Time: 1/30
PER$ClNNEL Condition 01 Materia::. / Seelll:
Dlstrlbullon: Orlglnal(W)_MlUIOClIenlwlthReport
2nd Copy(Y)-LaboraIorYFlln
3rd Coov 11'1 _ 14ftld Coordll'!81ll1" Fll"
****T HIS I S
WIISCN IJ\ECilATCRIES 0ll'.IG!: !lEVU'"
NOT A N I N V 0 I C E****(913) 825-7186
01MGES FCR ORDER 00.05661
PAGE: 1
a.IENr: CITY OF SALIw. - 2
JIM HILL
P.O. I!OX 736, SOLlD WASTE DIVISICN
SALIw., KS 67401
= ==: 04;11;90
Pl1RCE1\SE Al1IH. :
0IlDER 00.: 05661
FILE 00.: 90-9542
ANl'.LYSES
AM1'CNIA, 'lUI'AL
CXlD
NI1W<rn;NITRITE
= <:JRGI>NIC CARllCN (SPARGEDJ
ClItDRIDE
PH
SOLIDS. DISSOLVED
SULFATE
CliRCJ1It.!i, HEXAVALENI'
TEMPEflATIJRE
PH, FIELD ANl'.LYSIS
SPECIFIC ~, FIEID .ANN..YSIS
STATIC WATER LEVEL
= HEAVY MSmLS
CALCIUM, 'IOmL
IRCtiI, 'IOOO"
~IUM, 'I'OrAL
POrASSIUM, 'lOrAL
SCDIUM, TOmL
AN1\LYSES 01MGES, StJIl1lm\L (COST LIST: S'ID90)
SPECIAL INS'mOCTICNS
AS ==
MSmLS DIGF.STICN (JlAI(;E
QJ1INr COST E1IOl % DISC
3 15.00
3 23.00
3 13.00
3 25.00
3 13.00
3 6.00
3 10.00
3 13.00
3 20.00
3 00 0ll'.IG!:
3 00 0ll'.IG!:
3 00 0ll'.IG!:
3 00 0lAR3E
3 140.00
3 15.00
3 15.00
3 15.00
3 15.00
3 15.00
'lUI'AL
45.00
69.00
39.00
75.00
39.00
18.00
30.00
39.00
60.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
420.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
1059.00
QJ1INr COST E1IOl % DISC
3 00 0ll'.IG!:
3 15.00
'lUI'AL
0.00
45.00
SPEcr!\L INS'mlJCTICN 01MGES, SUB'lUI'AL (COST LIST: S'ID90)
= ORDER 01MGES
45.00
1104.00
FOR PERICD ENDIID 04;20;90
SI\MPLE DESCRIPrICNS
#11
#14
#15
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH "~r - P.O. EOK 1820 - 5'L~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
U\8ClAATORY REPORl'
pJ\GE 1
a.IENl': CITY OF SALINA. - 2
AnN: JIM HILL
P.O. EOK 736, SOLID WASTE DIVISICN
SAL~, KS 67401
= RPID: 04;20;90
= RCVD: 04;11;90
PUIlOlASE J\IInl:
FILE NO.: 90-9542
alDER NO.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040452 = Sl\MPLED: 04;11;90
SAMPLE DESCRIPl'ICN: #11 TIME Sl\MPLED: 0930
!\NI\LYSIS cx:N:ENrnATICN IN.lTS a:oK-PAGE
TE>lPEFA1URE 14 LJtO<EES C
STATIC WA'mR LEVEL 27.20 FEET
PH, FrEID ANN..YSIS 6.95 . srm:>MD tl;ITTS
SPECIFIC ~, FIEID ANM"YSIS 736 . . t\'l!tS;tM
AMM;MA, = 0.1 M:;,I1. AS N 1248-31
OlIDRIDE 71 M:;,I1. 1022-635
OIRCMIUM, HEXAVALENI' N010.021 1'G;1. 187-90
COO 30 M:;,I1. 1018-90
NITRATE;NI'IRI'll!: 0.5 1'G;1. AS N 1023-644
PH 7.5 srm:>MD IN.lTS 869-95
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED 448 1'G;1. 1118-98
SULFA'll!: ",-",. 52 1'G;1. 1024-471
'!UrAL ORGI\NIC CAROCN ISPAlG:D) 2 M:;,I1. 1236-63
ARSENIC, '!OrAL . . NOI10.0) U3/L 1318-17
lWUUM, '!UrAL , NO(2001 U3/L 1324-12
CACMIUM, '!OrAL ,'J I NO(5.0) U3/L 1324-28
CALCIU1, 'IOIN. 70.7 M:;,I1. 1342-49
an:01IUM, 'IOI1\L, I ~ NO(10.01 U3/L 1324-17
IR:N, romL . 6800 U3/L 1324-79
.
LEI\D, = 7.8 Ul;1. 1295-79
~ItI1, 'IC1OO. 33.5 M:;,I1. 1342-49
MERC!JRY, 'IOI1\L ," ..... NO(0.2) U3/L 1238-66
POtASSIUM, rorAL NOls.OOI M:;,I1. 1342-49
SELENIUM, 'IOI1\L ,'1 NOls.O) Ul;1. 1273-69
SILVER, '!orAL ," N0110.01 Ul;1. 1324-38
SOOIUM, 'IOmL 36.2 1'G;1. 1342-49
---<X:N:UJSICN-LAB lUlBER: 90040452 #11
7fJ{'!'. 7'0 8" if -r-T.
,J f.~ / L
v
It,:I' r.':'-'~_...:..~.
._- ,
tlf/;..' .,",.. / ~ __.'-""
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH ,,~, - P.O. BOK 1620 - 5AL~, KANSAS 67402-1664 - (913)625-7166
CUALIT'l ASSU1Wa;'~i'.LIT'l a:NI'IDL
orvcc 1
a.IENI': CIT'{ OF SALIND. - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. OOX 736, SOLID W\STE DIVISI~
5AL~, KS 67401
IlI\TE RPID: 04/20fiO
IlI\TE RC\ID: 04;11fiO
PUROll\SE AlJIll:
FILE 1>0.: 90-9542
O!IDER 1>0.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040452 mn;; SI\MPIJ!Il: 04;11fiO
SAMPLE DE'.SCRIITICN: U1 TIME SI\MPIJ!Il: 0930
IlI\TE IlI\TE
J>N.r>.LYSIS M'/ALYSr M'/ALYZED PREPPED ME."llOl
'I'EI'!PEPA'lUR 04;12fiO N>. AD100
S=C WA1ER LEVEL 04;12fiO N>. AD102
PH, FIEID ANALYSIS 04;12fiO N>. AD150
S!'El:IFIC ~, FIEID M'/ALYSIS 04;12fiO N>. AD151
J\MlOlIA, mL - 04/20;<)0 N>. EPA 350.3
OlLORIDE JMM 04;16;<)0 N>. EPA 325.2
QtRCM[1JM, HEXAVALENI' - 04;12;<)0 N>. 8M 312B
ceo JMM 04;13;<)0 N>. O.!. CORP.
NITRATE;NITRIn;; JMM 04;16;<)0 N>. EPA 353.2
PH D!.S 04;11;<)0 N>. EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED D!.S 04/20;<)0 N>. 8M 209B
SULFATE JMM 04;17;<)0 N>. EPA 375.2
mL ClRGANIC Cl\RECN (SP1II<GED) - 04;16;<)0 N>. EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, 'IomL eN; 04/20fiO 04;17fiO 206.2;7060
BI\RIlI'I,mL SPA 04;16;<)0 04;17;<)0 200.7;6010
CALl1IUM, 'IOTAL SPA 04;16;<)0 04;17fiO 200.7/6010
Cl\LCIUM, mL SPA 04;19;<)0 04;17fiO 200.7;6010
0lI01IllM, mL SPA 04;16;<)0 04;17fiO 200.7;6010
IR:N, 'I'O'IM. SPA 04;19;<)0 04/l7fiO 200.7;6010
!.FAD, mL eN; 04/20;<)0 04;17;<)0 239.2;7421
~ItI1, '!OrAL SPA 04;19;<)0 04;17fiO 200.7;6010
MEOC'URY, mL eN; 04/20;<)0 04;17;<)0 245.1;7470
POrASSIUM, 'IOTAL SPA 04;19;<)0 04;17;<)0 200.7;6010
SELENItJi, 'IOTAL eN; 04/20;<)0 04;17 fiO 270.2;7740
SILVER, 'IO!AL SPA 04;16fiO 04;17fiO 272 .1;7760
SCDIt.I1, 'IO!AL SPA 04;19fiO 04;17fiO 200.7;6010
--a::rn.usIll'I-LAB NUMBER: 90040452 #11
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORIH EIGHTH .1~' - P.O. BaK 1820 - SAL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
I.'\llCIRA'roRY IlEPORI'
PAGE 1
CLIEN!: CIT'f OF SALIN!\. - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. BaK 736, SOLID WASTE DIVISla;
SALIN!\., KS 67401
D1>Il'E 1<PlD: 04;20;90
D1>Il'E RCVD: 04/11;90
PUROIl\SE AI.1lH:
FILE ro.: 9()'-9542
ORDER ro.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040453
SAMPLE DESCRIPl'Ia;: #14
ANALYSIS
1ll1PERA'lURE
STATIC WIUnl LEVEL
PH, FIEID ANALYSIS
SPECIFIC cc::NIX.J::rAtQ, FIEID AN1\LYSIS
AMM:;MA, =
OILORIDE
CE01IUM, HEKAVALENI'
CCD
NI'l'RAn;INI1RlTE
PH
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED
SULFATE
'!OrAL OR7INIC CAIlOCN (SPAI<GED)
ARSENIC, 'I'OIN.
BARIlI'!, =
CAIX1I1lM, =
Cl\LCIUM, =
Cll101IUM, =
IRCN, 'IOD\L J 1
LEAD, =
~IUM, n::rw.
MERalRY, =
FOrASSIlI"I, 'IOrPJ..
SELENIUM, '!orAL
SILVER, 'IOrAL
SCDIUM, 'I'OIN.
= SAMPLED: 04/11;90
TIME SAMPLED: 1015
c:rn::ENmATIa; IN.ITS
8OJK-PAGE
13.8
17.5
6.74
910
0.1
116
NDIO.021
40
1.6
7.5
560
44
8
ND(lO.O)
ND(200)
NDI5.0)
99.0
NDI10.01
1900
5.9
22.5
ND(0.2)
ND(5.00)
5.9
NDI10.0)
54.2
003REES C
PEEr
STl\NCl\RD IN.ITS
UMII:lS/OI
l'G;L AS N
l'G/L
l'G/L
l'G;L
l'G;L AS N
STl\NCl\RD IN.ITS
l'G/L
l'G/L
l'G/L
U3;L
u;;L
u;;L
l'G/L
U3;L
u;;L
u;;L
l'G;L
U3;L
l'G;L
u;;L
U3;L
l'G;L
1248-31
1022-637
187-90
1018-90
1023-644
869-97
1118-98
1024-471
1236-63
1318-17
1324-12
1324-28
1342-49
1324-17
1324-79
1295-79
1342-49
1238-66
1342-49
1273-69
1324-38
1342-49
--a:N::llJSICN-LAB 1UlBER: 90040453 #14
.J ~ >(1', .,.-.. :Jog- '(7,
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. EOK 1820 - SAL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
CUllLITY AS~ITY amroL
QI\,IQC 1
CLIENt: CITY OF SAL~ - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. BOX 736, SOLID W>STE DIVISION
~. KS 67401
DM'E RPIIl: 04;20;90
Il'\TE RCVD: 04;11;90
PUROll\SE AIJIH:
FILE rD.: 90-9542
ORDER rD.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040453 C/\TE SAMPLED: 04;11;90
Sl\MPLE DESCRIPI'ION: #14 TIME SAMPLED: 1015
DM'E DM'E
!\N1\LYSIS !\N1\LYSr !\N1\LYZED PREPPED ME:IKD
'ImPEFA1URE 04;12;90 "" 1\0100
STATIC Wl\TER LEVEL 04;12;90 "" 1\0102
PH, FIEID ANN.,YSIS 04;12;90 "" 1\0150
SPECIFIC cmw::rm:E. FIELD !\N1\LYSIS 04;12;90 "" 1\0151
MKNIA, ID!l\L - 04;20;90 "" EPA 350.3
OlLORIDE JMM 04;16;90 "" EPA 325.2
OiRCI1IUM, HEXAVALENT - 04;12;90 "" SM 312B
COO JMM 04;13;90 "" O.r. CORP.
NITI<ATE,lNI1RITE JMM 04;18;90 "" EPA 353.2
PH DLS 04;11;90 "" EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DLS 04;20;90 "" SM 2098
SULFATE JMM 04;17;90 "" EPA 375.2
= ORGANIC CAIlEON (SPARGED) KMM 04;18;90 "" EPA 415.1
AFSENIC, '!OrAL Cl\G 04;20;90 04;17;90 206.2,17060
B1\RI1JM, = SPA 04;18;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
CAIX>tIUM, 'I'C7rAL SPA 04;18;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
CAlCIUM, 'IomL SPA 04;19;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
0lI01ItI1, ID!l\L SPA 04;18;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
I:flI:N, 'IorAL SPA 04;19;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
LFAO, = Cl\G 04;20;90 04;17;90 239.2/7421
~It.I1, 'IOrAL SPA 04;19;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
. MERC!JR'i, '!OrAL Cl\G 04;20;90 04;17;90 245.1,17470
POrASSIt.I1, 'IOrAL SPA 04;19;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
SELENIUM, TOTAL Cl\G 04;20;90 04;17;90 270.2,17740
SILVER, = SPA 04;18;90 04;17;90 272.1,17760
SCDIUM, '!OrAL SPA 04;19;90 04;17;90 200.7;6010
--a:N:UlSION-LAB NUMBER: 90040453 #14
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - ~,~ 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
(.U\LITY ~ITY CXNmOL
ClVQC 1
a.IENr: CITY OF SALINP. - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. BOX 736, SOLID WI\S1E DIVISICN
~,KS 67401
= RPID: 04;20;90
= RCVD: 04/11;90
PUROll\SE !\IJnl:
FILE ro.: 90-9542
CJRPER ro.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040454 = SI\MPLEIl: 04/11190
SI\MPLE DESCRIrnCN: #15 TIME SI\MPLEIl: 1115
= =
AN1\LYSIS AN1\LYST AN1\LYZED PREPPED MEmOl
TE>IPERA1URE 04/12;90 NA ADI00
SOOIC WATER LEVEL 04/12;90 NA ADI02
PH, FIElD AN1\LYSIS 04/12;90 NA AD150
SPECIFIC o:NXX:Il\N:E, FIElD AN1\LYSIS 04/12;90 NA AD151
AMl'[MA, 1UmL IN; 04;20;90 NA EPA 350.3
OIlORIDE J!oI1 04/16;90 NA EPA 325.2
OiRCI1IUM, HEXA'v'ALENI' IN; 04/12/90 NA 5M 312B
COO J!oI1 04/13;90 NA 0.1. aJRP.
NITRATE:INI'IR!TE J!oI1 04/18;90 NA EPA 353.2
PH DLS 04/11;90 NA EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DLS 04;20;90 NA 5M 209B
SULFATE J!oI1 04/17;90 NA EPA 375.2
1UmL OR:;ANIC CAROCN (SPARGED) KMM 04/18;90 NA EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, 'ltTI:M.o ex; 04;20;90 04/17;90 206.2;7060
BI\RIlJM, 1UmL SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
Cl\lJ1IU1, 1UmL SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
CALCItI1, 'IOJX. SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
Q!IOolIUM, 1UmL SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
IRCN, TOrAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
LEAD, 1UmL ex; 04;20;90 04/17;90 239.2;7421
~ItI1, 'IOlM. SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
MERClJRY, 1UmL ex; 04;20;90 04/17;90 245.1;7470
rorASSItJi, '!OrAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
SEI.!NIUM., 'IOmL ex; 04;20;90 04/17;90 270.2;7740
SILVER, '!OrAL SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 272.1;7760
SCDIUM, 'lOIN.. SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
--a:N:UJSICN-LAB 1U1BER: 90040454 #15
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. eaK 1820 - SALINA, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
lJ\EOAA1ORY REPORT
PAGE 1
CLIENI': CI'IY OF SALINA. - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. 80K 736, SOLID WASTE DIVISION
SALINA, KS 67401
01\11;; RPID: 04;20;90
01\11;; RCVD: 04/11;90
PURQlASE AlJIH:
FILE ro.: 90-9542
~ ro.: 05661
LAB NUMBER: 90040454
SAMPLE DESCRIPrICN: #15
AN>.LYSIS
TIMPERA1tlRE
SThTIC WATER LEVEL
PH, FlEID AtW..YSIS
SPECIFIC ~, FIELD ANALYSIS
..---cP1fl:NIA, 'ItJrl\L ...:.=
CELORIDE c.--
QIRCMIUM, HEKAVALENI' '--
=~
NITRATE,INI'IRI'IE l-
PH'-
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED ...-
SULFA'IE (...- _
= ORG!\NIC Cl\RBCN (S~I'-
ARSENIC, 'IOrAIt-- ,-
BARIU1, 'IOmL t,.-
CAI:MIUM, ~
CALCIUM, 'IOrAL t---
QlIOo1IUM, =
IRC::N, 'IOmLv
I..E.ZID, 'IO'mL"'-
MAGJESIUM, 'IO'mL V"
MERCt.lRY, TOrAL - __'
rom.sSIUM, '!orAL
SELENIUM, 'I'OrALv
SILVER, rooo.-
SCDIl!ot '!OrAL'/
~ '
~J,1t
1'"'
tJl>.TE SAMPLED: 04/11;90
TIME SAMPLED: 1115
c::cN:ENrPATICN lNlTS
13.2
17.35
7.46
656
NIl(O.ll
40
NIl(0.02)
58
0.4
7.8
366
63
2
NIl(10.0)
NIl(2001
NIl( 5.01
55.1
NIl(10.01
112
7.5
25.7
NIl(0.2)
NIl(5.001
NIl(5.0)
NIl(10.01
41.1
--<X:.N:LUSICN-LAB NUMBER: 90040454 #15
t-S- o/'i; -To {; 7 {'f,
DEGREES C
FEET
5n\NCI\RD UNITS
UMIfJS;Ol
mIL AS N
mIL
mIL
mIL
mIL AS N
5n\NCI\RD UNITS
mIL
mIL
mIL
tJ:>IL
u:;;L
tJ:>IL
mIL
u:;;L
u:;;L
tJ:>IL
JoG;L
u:;;L
mIL
tJ:>IL
tJ:>IL
mIL
EC(lK-PAGE
1248-31
1022-635
187-91
1018-90
1023-644
869-97
1118-98
1024-471
1236-63
1318-17
1324-12
1324-28
1342-49
1324-17
1324-79
1295-79
1342-49
1238-66
1342-49
1273-69
1324-38
1342-49
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 r=H EIGH'll! s=r - P.O. sax 1820 - SllLIN!>" I<l\NS1IS 67402-1884 - 19131825-7186
CUALITY ~ITY o::NlRlL
Q1VQ: 1
MTE !<PID: 04;20;90
MTE RCVD: 04/11;90
pUR(J!l\SE !\I1nI:
rILE ID.: 90-9542
0RIlER ID.: 05661
CLIENT: CITY or SllLIN!>, - 2
ATIN: JIM HILL
P.O. sax 736, SOLID WASIE DIVISICN
SllLIN!>" K5 67401
LAB NUMBER: 90040454 MTE SAMPLED: 04/11;90
SAMPLE DESCRIPrICN: #15 TIME SAMPLED: 1115
MTE MTE
~YSIS Nil\LYST Nil\LYlfI) PREPPED ME:IIOl
TE>lPERAnmE 04/12;90 Nl>. AD100
STATIC WATER J.EIJEL 04/12;90 Nl>. AD102
PH, FIELD Al'W.,YSIS 04/12;90 Nl>. AD150
SPECIFIC ~, FIELD ~YSIS 04/12;90 Nl>. AD151
NKNIA, = ~ 04;20;90 Nl>. EPA 350.3
QlLORIDE JMM 04/16;90 Nl>. EPA 325.2
OJRCMIUM, HEKAVALENl' ~ 04/12/90 Nl>. 51'! 3128
alD JMM 04/13;90 Nl>. O.I. a:mP.
NIn<ATE;NI'l1UlE JMM 04/18;90 Nl>. EPA 353.2
PH DL5 04/11;90 Nl>. EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DL5 04;20;90 Nl>. 51'! 209B
SULFATE JMM 04/17;90 Nl>. EPA 375.2
= ORG\NIC CAR9:N (SPAJ<GEDI KMM 04/18;90 Nl>. EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, '!UrAL = 04;20;90 04/17;90 206.2/7060
BI\RIUM, = SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
CMX1IUM, = SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
CALCIUM, '!orAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
CHRCflIl!1, = SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
IBCN, '!orAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
lEAD, = = 04;20;90 04/17;90 239.2/7421
~tuM, 'rorAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
MERCURY, = = 04;20;90 04/17;90 245.1/7470
rorASSIUM, 'rorAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
SELENIUM, 'rorAL = 04;20;90 04/17;90 270.2/7740
SILVER, '!OrAL SPA 04/18;90 04/17;90 272 .1/7760
SCOIUM, '!OrAL SPA 04/19;90 04/17;90 200.7;6010
-a:rn.usICN--LAB NUMBER: 90040454 #15
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH Sl~l' - P.O. BOX 1820 - SALINA, KANSAS 67402-1820 - (913)825-7186
FEBRUARY 19, 1991
eI'IY OF SALJNr\. - I.J..NDFILL
BOX 736
~ KS 674020736
ATIN : JIM HILL
RE: WILSCN LI\l3O!lAroRIE:S FILE 110. 91-990
ENCLOSED ARE TIlE REPORI'S FOR TIlE SI\MPLES AS LISTID BEl(>I:
WILSCN
LAB ID #
ORDER NJ,
SAMPLE DESClUPI'ICN
9101057800
9101057900
9101058000
9101058100
7395A
7395A
7395A
7395A
BI\IOI SPEX:IFIC SPIKE
BI\IOI SPEX:IFIC MSD;IXJPE
BATCH SPEX:IFIC BlANK
BATCH SPECIFIC CXNl'PDL
ND(), WHERE N:JI'ED, INDICATES N:NE Dt...I.U,;.l'W WIlli 'lEE Dt;u:L.""I'ICN LIMIT IN PARENIHESES.
ANlILYSE:S WERE: PERroIlMED CN SI\MPLES AS R&:EIVED IN ACaJRI:W<:E WIllI PRJCElXJRES
REFEREN:::ED IN 'lEE FEDEP.AL REGtSl'ER, \U.. 49, ID. 209, OCT. 26, 1984; PUBLISHED IN EPA
PUBLICATICN, SW 846, 2ND ED" JULY 1982 .AND IN 'lEE PPDFOSED AOOITICN 'IO SW 846,
1984, OR IN EPA PUBLICATICN, SW846 3RD ED. ,S~ 1986. WHERE APPFO\/ED MEI!D:lS
ARE WI' AVAIIABLE, t;UUH'.L~ ARE MADE 'IO USE APPFDP!UATE ~ MEIH:DS.
********************************************************************************
'IHIS IS AN AMENDED REPORl' IX.lE 'IO A CXlBRECnCN IN SUBMI'ITER.
********************************************************************************
REl'IAINIl'<3 SI\MPLES WILL BE RE:r!\INED FOR 30 = lNLESS OIHEImSE NJrIFIED.
WI
1ORIE:S
=aJ~ -
OIIEF OIDlIST
EN::l.OSURE
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - ~,RANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
lABClRAIDRY REroRI'
PK;E 1
CLIENI': O'lY OF SALINA - lANDFILL
A'I'IN: JIM HILL
BOX 736
SAL~, KS 674020736
= RPID: 02/19;91
= =: 01/15;91
PURC!l1\SE l\lJIH:
FILE !D.: 91-990
ORDER !D.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010578
S>MPLE DESCUPTICN: B!\TOI SPECIFIC SPIKE
ANALYSIS CI:N:ENmATICN troTS EOJI(-PK;E
J\MrolNIA, = 50/44.3;89 % 1248-57
OlLORIDE 80;81/101 % 1332-151
CliRCMIt.t1, HEXAVALENI' 1/0.55195 % 187-92
= 62.5/70.4/113 % 1378-7
NI_TI:;NI'lRITE 3/1.1/37 % 1333-196
SULFATE 127/122;96 % 1343-101
= ORGANIC CARBCN (SPAA:;ED) 5/4.5;90 % 1375-33
ARSENIC, 'I'C1rnL 40.0/36.9;92 % 1397-17
BARIUM, 'IOrAL 2000;2220/111 % 1405-330
CAttillI1, = 50/36/72 % 1405-341
CALCItI1, 'IOrAL 50.0/36.6/73 % 1405-316.
am:JiIUM, TOrAL 200/171;86 % 1405-329
IRCN, 'IOIAL 1000;972;97 % 1405-315
LE'AO, = 20.0;'20.3/101 % 1398-24
MAQIlESIUM, 'IOrAL 25.0/19.6/78 % 1405-292
MEROJRY, 'IOrAL 1.00;0.89;89 % 1382-16
PCJI:to.SSItJ1, 'IOrAL 25.0;'24.7;99 % 1401-418
SELENIUM, 'IOmL 10.0/7 . 3/73 % 1362-42
SILVER, '!OrAL 50/33/66 % 1405-29
SCOIUM, 'IOIAL 50.0/46.1;92 % 1401-426
---=,CN-LAB lUI8ER: 91010578 B!\TOI SPECIFIC SPIKE
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH S~r - P.O. BOX 1820 - SALINA, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
=ITY ~TY a:NmOL
Q1VQ: 1
eLIEN!': CITY OF SALINA - lRIDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
BOX 736
SALINA, KS 674020736
mTE RPID: 02;19191
DI\TE RCVD: 01;15191
PUllCllASE AlJIH:
FIrE NJ.: 91-990
CIl1Do:R NJ.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010578
SAMPLE DESCRIPrICN: BAn:ll SPECIFIC SPIKE
DI\TE DI\TE
AW.LYSIS AW.LYST AW.LYZED PREPPED ME"Ilm
~,= IN> 01;28191 Nh SPA 350.3
OlIDRIDE CRE 01;21191 Nh SPA 325.2
0iP!:MItI1, HEXAVALENr IN> 01;15191 Nh EM 3128
ax> mE 01;28191 Nh D.r. aJIlP.
NITRATE/NInuTE CRE 01;16191 Nh SPA 353.2
SULFATE CRE 01;17191 Nh SPA 375.2
= ORGI\NIC CAAECN (SPARGED) CRE 01;18191 Nh SPA 415.1
ARSENIC, TCJrAL PUl 01;24191 01;22191 206.2;7060
B'\RIUM, = C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
CI\l:tIIUM, = C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
CALCIUM, TCJrAL C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
cmamJM, = C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
IRCN, TCJrAL C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
LFAO, = PUl 01;24191 01;22191 239.2;7421
~IUM, TCJrAL C!\G 02;'07191 01;22191 200.716010
MERa.IRY, = PUl 01;25191 01;22191 245.1;7470
rornsSIUM, 'IOmL C!\G 01;24191 01;22191 200.716010
SELENIUM, TCJrAL PUl 01;25191 01;22191 270.2;7740
SILVER, 'IOTAL C!\G 01;29191 01;22191 272.1;7760
SCDIUM, 'IOTAL C!\G 01;25191 01;22191 200.716010
-<XN:LUSICN-LAB mMBER: 91010578 BAn:ll SPECInC SPIKE
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. 80K 1820 - SNL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (9131825-7186
lAEORAroRY REroRr
pJ>[;E 1
CLIENI': CIT'f OF SALI~ - L1INDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
80K 736
SNL~, KS 674020736
"'''' IU'ID: 02;19;91
"'''' =: 01;15;91
PUROl1\SE =:
FILE NO.: 91-990
ORDER NO.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010579
SAMPLE DESQUPl'ICN: BlITCH sm:rnc MSD,IIUPE
ANi\LYSIS CCN:ENI'IlATICN UNITS roJl(-PJ>[;E
AMM:mA, IDrl\L ND,IND;O RID 1248-57
CJlWRIDE 22;22;0 RID 1332-151
0IRCr1Ilt1, HEKAVALENI' ND,IND;O RID 187-92
0::0 ND,IND;O RID 1378-7
NITRATE;NITRITE 0.2;0.2;0 RID 1333-196
PH 7.1/7 .1;0 RID 1341-13
SOLIDS, OISSOL\lED 3481334/4.1 RID 1137-37
SULFA'IE 27;24;12 RID 1343-101
IDrl\L CJR3I\NIC CARECN (SPARGEDI ND,IND;O RID 1375-33
ARSENIC, 'rorAL 35.9136.9;2.7 RID 1397-17
BARIUM, '!OrAL 111;101;9 RID 1405-330
CI\tt1IU'I, IDrl\L 7216816 RID 1405-341
CALCIU1, IDrl\L 73/7113 RID 1405-316
OiRCI1IUM, '!UrAL 86/78;10 RID 1405-329
IOCN, 'lOIN. 97;96;1 RID 1405-315
LEAD, IDrl\L 20.3;22.5;10 RID 1398-24
MAGESIUM, rorAL 78/75/4 RID 1405-292
MERaJRY, IDrl\L 0.89;0.89;0 RPD 1382-16
romsSIUM, rorAL 24.7;24.6;0 RPD 1401-418
SELENIUM, 'IOrAL 7.3/7.0/4 RPD 1362-42
SILVER, rorAL 3313516 RPD 1405-29
SCOIUM, 'IOrAL 46.1/45.4;1.5 RPD 1401-426
--a:N::LUSICN-LAB lUI8ER: 91010579 BlITCH SPECIFIC MSD,IIUPE
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH ~" - P.O. BOX 1820 - SALINh, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
CUALITY J\.SSllRI\N:E~TY =
01VQC 1
CLIENI': CIT.{ OF SALINA. - LANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
EOK 736
SALI~. KS 674020736
IlI\TE RPID: 02;19;91
IlI\TE RCVD: 01;15;91
PURCHASE J\tJIH:
FILE NO.: 91-990
OPDER NO.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010579
SI\MPLE DESCRIPI'ICN: BI\TCIl SPECIFIC MSD;tIJPE
IlI\TE IlI\TE
AN.t\LYSIS AN1\LYST AN1\LYZED PREPPED ME1KD
AMM:NIA, =- >l<S 01;28;91 ~ EPA 350.3
OlIDRIDE CRE 01;21;91 ~ EPA 325.2
otE01IUM, HEXAVALENI' >l<S 01;15;91 ~ SM 3128
COD >l<S 01;28;91 ~ 0.1. CO!1P.
NI'ffiATI;INITIUTE CRE 01;16;91 ~ EPA 353.2
PH DLS 01;16;91 ~ EPA 150.1
SOLIDS. DISSOLVED DLS 01;17;91 ~ SM 209B
SULFATE CRE 01;17;91 ~ EPA 375.2
=- OI<GI\NIC Cl\ROCN (SPARGElJI CRE 01;18;91 ~ EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, '!OrAL PUl 01;24;91 01;22;91 206.2/)060
BARIUM. =- CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
CAtMIUM, '!UrAL CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
C!\LCItlM, =- CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
otE01IUM, 'IOmL CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
IRCN, 'IOrAL CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
lEAD, =- PUl 01;24;91 01;22;91 239.2/)421
M.n.GJE'.SIUM, '!orAL CAG 02;07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
MERa.lRY, '!OrAL PUl 01;25;91 01;22;91 245.1;7470
romsSIUM, '!orAL CAG 01;24;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
SELENID1, =- PUl 01;25;91 01;22;91 270.2/)740
SILVER, '!UrAL CAG 01;29;91 01;22;91 272 .1/7760
SCOIUM, '!UrAL CAG 01;25;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
-<XNCUJSICN-LAB lU!BER: 91010579 BI\TCIl SPECIFIC MSD;tI.lPE
WILSON LABORATORIES
lM!ORATORy t\l:.t'ORT
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - SAL~. KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
PPa 1
CI..IENT: eI'IY OF SALINIlI. - I.ANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
BOX 736
SAL~, KS 674020736
mTE RPID: 02;1.9;')1
mTE RCVD: 01;1.5;')1
PURCHASE AI1IlI:
FILE NO.: 91-990
ORDER NO.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010580
SAMPLE DESCRIPl'IO'I: ""'-1"01 SPECInc BIANK
lWILYSIS
ronNI'llATIO'I
AMM:NIA. 'lOD\L
CllLORIDE
0iE0iJll1, HEXAVALENI'
=
NI'IRATEINI'IRI'IE
PH
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED
SULFATE
'lOD\L ORGI\NIC CARBCN (SPARGEDI
ARSENIC, 'IOI1>.L
BARIUM. 'lOD\L
ClIlrotJM, 'lOD\L
CALCIUM, 'I011\L
CHE01IUM, 'I011\L
IR:N, 'IOrAL
LE'lID,'lOD\L
l1AC3ESIUM, 'I011\L
MERCURy. '!OrAL
POmSS:nJ1, 'I011\L
SELENIUM, 'I011\L
SILVER, 'I011\L
SCDIUM, 'IOmL
NO(O.l)
ND(21
ND(0.021
ND(10)
NO(O.ll
5.6
6
NO(101
ND(l)
ND(10.0))
ND(1001
ND(51
NO(5.01
NO(lO)
ND(100)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.0)
ND(0.2)
ND(5.0)
ND(5.01
NO(10)
NO(5.0)
UNITS
roiL AS N
M3,IL
roiL
roiL
roiL AS N
~ UNITS
roiL
M3,IL
M3,IL
1.l3;L
miL
miL
M3,IL
miL
miL
1.l3;L
roiL
1.l3;L
M3,IL
miL
1.l3;L
M3,IL
--<XN:UlSICN--LAB NUMBER: 91010580 BI\= SPECIFIC BIANK
BOJK-PJol;E
1248-57
1332-151
187-92
1378-7
1333-196
1341-13
1137-37
1343-101
1375-33
1397-18
1405-330
1405-341
1405-316
1405-329
1405-315
1398-24
1405-292
1382-16
1401-418
1362-42
1405-29
1401-426
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. ECOC 1820 - ~~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
(.U\LITY ~ITY a:NlRlL
~ 1
CLIENT: CI'IY OF SALINA - LANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
ECOC 736
~~, KS 674020736
= RPlD: 02/19;91
""TE =: 01/15;91
PUROlASE Al.IlH:
FILE 10.: 91-990
ORDER 10.: 739S/>.
LAB NUMBER: 91010580
SAMPLE DESOUPI'ICN: BATOi SPECIFIC Bl'..ANK
= =
Al@.LYSIS 1\NI\LYST 1\NI\LYZED PREPPED MEIlOl
AMImIA, = ><<5 01;28;91 NA EPA 350.3
OlLORIDE eRE 01;21;91 NA EPA 325.2
CERCr1IUM, HEXAVALENI' ><<5 01/15;91 NA SM 3125
ax> ><<5 01;28;91 NA 0.1. CORP.
NITI<ATE,lNITIUTE eRE 01/16;91 NA EPA 353.2
PH DLS 01/16;91 NA EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DIS 01/17;91 NA SM 209B
SULFATE eRE 01/17;91 NA EPA 375.2
= OFGINIC CAI<BCN (SPAFGED) eRE 01/18;91 NA EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, 'I'OmL FIR 01;25;91 01;22;91 206.2/7060
BARIUM, = CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
CM11It.1M, = CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
CALCIUM, TOrnL CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
QffiClillJM, = CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
IOCN, '!'OrAL CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
LEAD, = FIR 01;24;91 01;22;91 239.2/7421
MlIGESIUM, TOrAL CI'G 02;lJ7;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
MERalRY, = FIR 01;25;91 01;22;91 245.1/7470
romsSIUM, 'IOrnL CI'G 01;24;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
SELENIUM, 'lO'IN.. FIR 01;25;91 01;22;91 270.2/7740
SILVER, 'I'OmL CI'G 01;29;91 01;22;91 272.1/7760
SODIUM, '!OrAL CI'G 01;25;91 01;22;91 200.7/6010
--cc:tOIJSICN-LAB NUMBER: 91010580 MroI SPECIFIC BIlINK
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - SAL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (9131825-7186
IAEOPATORY REPORT
PAGE 1
a.IENI': CITI OF SMJ:NA. - U>.NDFIIJ,.
ATm: JIM HILL
BOX 736
SALI~, KS 674020736
D1\'lE RPID: 02;19;91
D1\'lE RC\ID: 01;15;91
PUROlASE !\l1IlI:
FILE NO.: 91-990
ORDER NO.: 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010581
SAMPLE DESCRIPl'ICN: BI\TCII SPECIFIC =-
ANALYSIS =CN UNITS BCOK-PAGE
AMM:NIA, = 2.0;1.88;94 % 1248-57
OiLORIDE 50;54;108 % 1332-151
0lRCHIUM., HEKAVALENI' 1. 0;1. 05;105 % 187-92
ceo 104.5;123.8;119 % 1378-8
NI1FA'lE;NITIU'lE 4/4.2;105 % 1333-196
PH 7.0/7.0;100 % 1341-13
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED 408/440;108 % 1137-37
SULFA'lE 50/49;98 % 1343-101
= OR3I\NIC CARECN (SPl\IlGED) 10;9.9;99 % 1375-33
ARSENIC, 'lUl:AL 50.0;51.9;104 % 1397-18
BI\RIUM, = 2000;2307;115 % 1405-330
CAtmUM, = 50139/78 % 1405-341
CALCIUM, 'lUl:AL 50.0139.9;130 % 1405-316
aiRCMIUM., 'I'OmL 200;183;92 % 1405-329
IRCN, '!UrAL 1000;1052;105 % 1405-315
LEAD, = 50.0;51. 7;103 % 1398-24
~ItJII, '!'OrAL 25.0;19.7/79 % 1405-292
MERCURY, = 1.00;U.93;93 % 1382-16
POrASSItJII, '!OrAL 25.0;23.1;92 % 1401-418
SEUNIUM, '!'OrAL 25.0;21.1;134 % 1362-42
SIL\1ER, '!OrAL 50/40;130 % 1405-29
SODIUM, rorAL 50.0/48.7;97 % 1401-426
---<XN:lllSICN-LAB NU1BER: 91010581 BI\TCII SPECIFIC CXNIroL
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - SAL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
CU\LITY ASSlJ!W1:E-Q:J1ILITY CCNIroL
ClIVQ: 1
CLIENl': CI'IY OF SALINA. - LANDFIll..
ATIN: JIM HIll..
BOX 736
SALI~, KS 674020736
!l'.TE RPID, 02;1.9;91
!l'.TE RC\ID: 01;1.5;91
FUROlASE AIJIH:
FILE NJ.: 91-990
ORDER NJ.' 7395A
LAB NUMBER: 91010581
SAMPLE DESCRIPI'ICN, BATCH SPECIFIC <XNm:JL
= =
l\NALYSIS l\N.>.LYSr l\NALYZED PRt.t'.t'ED ME:IHD
AMM:NIA, = WNS 01/28;91 ~ EPA 350.3
OILORIDE em 01/21;91 ~ EPA 325.2
OIRCMIUM, HEXAVALENr WNS 01;1.5;91 ~ SM 3128
cro WNS 01/28;91 ~ 0.1. CORP.
NITRATE;mnuTE em 01;1.6;91 ~ EPA 353.2
PH DLS 01;1.6;91 ~ EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DLS 01;1.7;91 ~ SM 2098
SULFATE em 01;1.7;91 ~ EPA 375.2
= OOC/INIC CI\I<ECN (SPARGED) em 01;1.8;91 ~ EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, '!'OrAL PLll 01/25;91 01/22;91 206.2;7060
BARIUM, 'IOTAL CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.716010
CArr11U1, '!'OrAL CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.716010
CALCIUM, = CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.716010
CllIOmlM, = CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.716010
I~, 'IUI1\L CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.716010
LE>\D, = PLll 01/24;91 01/22;91 239.2;7421
fI1AG'E)IUM, '!OrAL CllG 02/07;91 01/22;91 200.7/6010
MERa..lRY, 'IOmL PLll 01/25;91 01/22;91 245.1;7470
POTASSIUM, '!OrAL CllG 01;24;91 01;22;91 200.716010
SELENIUM, '!orAL Pili 01;25;91 01;22;91 270.2;7740
SILVER, '!OrAL CllG 01;29;91 01;22;91 272.1;7760
SCOIUM., 'IOOO., CllG 01/25;91 01/22;91 200.716010
--o:N:llJSICN-LAB NUMBER, 91010581 BATCH SPECIFIC <XNm:JL
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BaK 1820 - SAL~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
CUALITY AS~ITY =
~ 1
a.IENI': CIT'{ OF SALINA - lANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
BaK 736
SAL~, KS 674020736
!l".TE RPlD: 02/19;91
!l".TE RCVD: 01/15;91
PURClII\SE AI1IlI:
nLE N:>.: 91-9501
<:>IDER N:>.: 07395
LAB NUMBER: 91010576 !l".TE SAMPLED: 01/15;91
SI\MPLE DESCRIPI'ICN: WI U4 TIME SAMPLED: 1045
!l".TE !>\TE
ANALYSIS !>NALYST !>NALi'ZEI) PREPPED MEIH:XJ
AMM::MA, =. iNl 01;28;91 "" EPA 350.3
OlLORIDE CIlE 01;21;91 "" EPA 325.2
0iRCMIl!1, HEXAVALENT >N.; 01/15;91 "" SM 3128
COO iNl 01;28;91 "" 0.1. aJRP.
NITRATE;NITRITE CIlE 01/16;91 "" EPA 353.2
PH iNl 01/15;91 "" EPA 150.1
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED DLS 01/17;91 N1\ SM 2098
SULFATE CIlE 01/17;91 "" EPA 375.2
=. ORGlINIC CARBCN (SPARGED) CIlE 01/18;91 "" EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, '!OrAL PLlI 01;24;91 01;22;91 206.2/7060
BARIUM, =. eM; 07/02;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
CAI:r1IUM, '!urAL eM; 02/07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
CALCIUM, '!OrAL eM; 02/07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
Qffi(HIUM, '!OrAL eM; 02/07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
IRCN, 'lOTAL eM; 02/07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
LEI\D, =. PLlI 01;24;91 01;22;91 239.2/7421
~IUM., '!OrAL eM; 02/07;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
MERCURY, =. PLlI 01;25;91 01;22;91 245.1/7470
POmSSItlo1, '!OrAL eM; 01;24;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
SELENIt.!1, 'lOTAL PI.II 01;25;91 01;22;91 270.2/7740
SILVER, 'lOTAL eM; 01;29;91 01;22;91 272.1/7760
SCDIUM, '!OrAL eM; 01;25;91 01;22;91 200.7;6010
---<XN:WSICN-LAB NUMBER: 91010576 WI U4
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH S"~l' - P.O. BOX 1820 - ~,KANSAS 67402-1884 - (9131825-7186
P>GE 1
tJ\EORAIDRY REPORT
CLIENI': CITY OF SALINA - I.l>lIDFILL
AnN: JIM HILL
BOX 736
SAL~, KS 674020736
Dl'<1E RPID: 02/19;91
= RCVD: 01/15;91
PUROlASE At1lH:
FILE NO.: 91-9501
ORDER NO.: 07395
lAB NUMBER: 91010576
SAMPLE DE:SCRIPITCN: n; #14
Dl'<1E SAMPLED: 01/15;91
TIME SAMPLED: 1045
!\N1\LYSIS
aN:ENlR'\TICN
ooTS
lIMl'D'lIA, =
OlLORIDE II ~
0iRCl1IUM, HEXAVALENI'
= </0
NITRATE;NITIUTE I, "-
PH /,,:;
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED S (" 0
SULFA1E
= ORGANIC CARECN (SPARGEIl) 8-
ARSENIC, '!OrAL
BARIUM, = JJr
Cl\IX'IIUM, =
CALCIUM, '!OrAL q't. 0
OiFO'tIUM, TOrAL
IR:N, 'IDI1\L ,QOo
""'LEAD, '!orAL s: <;
~IUM, 'I'OIN. 12,'5'
MERCURY, =
POTASSIUM, 'IomL
-~
SELENIt.R1, '!orAL; I 1
SILvm, '!OrAL
SOOIUM, = .,~, 2..
0.1
110
NO(0.02)
NO(10)
NOIO.11
7.0
450
44
NOll)
NOI10.0)
135
NO(5)
89.1
NO(101
283
33.2
21. 7
NO(0.2)
NO(5.0)
NO(10)
NO(10)
51.3
l'I3IL AS N
l'I3IL
l'I3IL
l'I3IL
l'I3IL AS N
STI\NOMD UNITS
l'I3IL
l'I3IL
M3/L
u>;L
!NIL
!NIL
M3/L
!NIL
!NIL
u>;L
l'I3IL
!NIL
M3/L
!NIL
!NIL
l'I3IL
--<XN:LUSICN-lAB NUMBER: 91010576 n; #14
d.;rl, O..{ k/<,'-G- 3" 70 38"
BCOK-PAGE
1248-56
1332-151
187-92
1378-7
1333-196
1341-13
1137-37
1343-101
1375-33
1397-17
1405-330
1405-341
1405-316
1405-329
1405-315
1398-21
1405-292
1382-15
1401-418
1362-41
1405-29
1401-426
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. BOX 1820 - SALI~, KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
U\BOlWIORY REPORr
PN;E 1
Cl..IENT: eIT'f OF SALINA - lANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
BOX 736
~,KS 674020736
!l'.TE RPlD: 02/19;91
Il'\TE RCVD: 01/15;91
PUROlI\SE !\IJlR:
FILE 00.: 91-9501
ORDER 00.: 07395
LAB NUMBER: 91010577 Il'\TE S1\11PLED: 01/15;91
SAMPLE DESCRIPl'ICN: ,.., #15 TII'lE S1\11PLED: 1136
AN1\LYSIS CXN:ENIRATICN tNITS ECXlK-PN;E
AMM::NIA, mrAL NO(O.l) >G/L AS N 1248-56
OILDRIDE 40 M:;/L 1332-151
amao:UM, HEXAVALENT NOIO.02) >G/L 187-92
= ,i;" NO(lO) >G/L 1378-7
NITIlATE;NITRITE O. ~ 0.2 >G/L AS N 1333-196
PH 7,f! 7.3 5T1\NrWID tNITS 1341-13
SOLIDS, DISSOLVED .3, c.. 348 >G/L 1137-37
SULFATE (, 3 53 >G/L 1343-101
mrAL ORGANIC Cl\ROCN ISPAR3EIJ) 2- NOll) >G/L 1375-33
ARSENIC, 'IOl:AL ...... NO(10.0) Ul/L 1397-17
E'ARIUM, '!orAL ...v"V ( 10 C ) NOI1001 Ul/L 1405-330
CACt1Itl1, mrAL NO(5) u;;L 1405-341
CALCIUM, 'rurAL ~~ I 48.8 M:;/L 1405-316
alRCl'IIlJM, mrAL NO(10) u;;L 1405-329
IR:til, '!'OrAL Ill.. 152 Ul/L 1405-315
.......--LFAD. =t. 7,' 10.0 Ul/L 1398-22
MAG'ESItlM, rooo.. ;.t;', ? 25.5 >G/L 1405-292
MERCURY, mrAL NIJ(0.2) u;;L 1382-15
rorASSItI1, '!OrAL NIJ(5.0) M:;/L 1401-418
SELENIlI1, mrAL"'" D (!J. 0) NlJ110.01 u;;L 1362-41
SILVER, 'IOrAL. NIJ(10) u;;L 1405-29
SCDIl!1, rooo.. ~ I. I 39.3 M:;/L 1401-426
---a::N:LUSICN-LAB NUMBER: 91010577 ,.., #15
cA.,,7"1,
.'f
w....L L
t.s-' 70
67
,
WILSON LABORATORIES
525 NORTH EIGHTH STREET - P.O. 80K 1820 - SAL~. KANSAS 67402-1884 - (913)825-7186
CUl\LITY AS~ITY a:NI'PDL
OVQC 1
CLIENT: CITY DE' SALINA - lANDFILL
ATIN: JIM HILL
80K 736
SALI~. KS 674020736
DATE RPID: 02;19~1
DATE RCVD: 01;15~1
PUROlASE AlIIH:
FILE 1<).: 91-9501
ORDER 1<).: 07395
LAB NUMBER: 91010577 DATE SI\MPLI'D: 01;15~1
SAMPLE DESCRIPI'Irn: l'W #15 TIME SI\MPLI'D: 1136
DATE DATE
.ANALYSIS mALYSr mALYZEIl PREPPED MEIHD
!\M1OlIA. = <<<; 01/28~1 ~. EPA 350.3
CllIJORIDE CRE 0l/21~1 NA EPA 325.2
OffiCHIUM, HEXAVALENI' <<<; 01;15~1 ~ SM 3126
COD <<<; 01/28~1 NA 0.1. CORP.
NITRATE;NInuTE CRE 01;16~1 NA EPA 353.2
PH <<<; 01;15~1 ~ EPA 150.1
SOLIDS. DISSOLVED Drs 01;17~1 NA SM 2096
SULFATE CRE 01;17~1 NA EPA 375.2
= ORGANIC ClIRBCN ISPARGED) CRE 01;18~1 NA EPA 415.1
ARSENIC, 'IOrnL PUl 01/24~1 01/22~1 206.2;7060
BARIUM, = = 07102~1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
CAImUM. = = 02107 ~1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
C!\LCIUM. = = 02107~1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
CBRCMIUM, 'IOTAL = 02107;')1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
I~, 'IOTAL = 02107;')1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
LFAD. = PLI! 01/24;')1 01/22~1 239.2;7421
MAGJESIUM, '!UrAL = 02107 ~1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
MERCURY, =- PUl 01/25~1 01/22~1 245.1;7470
POrASSIUM, '!orAL = 01/24~1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
SELENIUM, 'IOrnL PLI! 01/24;')1 01/22~1 270.2;7740
SILVER, 'IOTAL = 01/29~1 01/22~1 272.1;7760
SOOIUM, 'IOTAL = 01/25;')1 01/22~1 200.7;6010
-=.usICN-LAB NUMBER: 91010577 l'W #15
CL%S
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
1804 GLENDALE ROAD . SALINA. KANSAS 67401
1913) 827.1273 . (800) 535-3076 . FAX (9131823-7830
,J ".,
---
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
ATTN:JAMES L. HILL
PO BOX 736
SALINA, KS 67401
LAB NUMBER: 91030044
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW11
ANALYSIS
""' I'
PAGE:
1
DATE SAMPLE RPTD: 03/18/91
DATE SAMPLE RECD: 03/01/91
CAS FILE NO: 91-5369
CAS ORDER NO: 5941
CLIENT P.O.:
DATE SAMPLED: 03/01/91
TIME SAMPLED: 1125
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
ND(O.l)
ND(10)
n.
ND(0.05)
0.6
7.5
440.
87.
3.
ND(O.Ol)
0.5
ND(O.OOl)
100.
ND(0.04)
45.
0.018
50.
ND(0.0002)
9.
ND(0.005)
ND(0.02)
34.
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91030044
UNITS BOOK/PAGE
MG/L AS N 89 /53
MG/L 393/14
MG/L 179/57
MG/L 69 /78
MG/L AS N 387/18
STD 388/12
MG/L 389/8
MG/L 47 /66
MG/L 229/20
MG/L 426/3
MG/L 392/58
MG/L 405/16
MG/L 341/21
MG/L 419/15
MG/L 343/31
MG/L 427/9
MG/L 340/24
MG/L 406/30
MG/L 339/10
MG/L 415/12
MG/L 377/78
MG/L 342/20
LAB NUMBER: 91030045
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW14
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
'-
CONCENTRATION
ND(O.l)
15.
124.
ND(0.05)
1.7
7.3
510.
70.
-CONTINUED-
DATE SAMPLED: 03/01/91
TIME SAMPLED: 1150
UNITS BOOK/PAGE
MG/L AS N 89 /53
MG/L 393/15
MG/L 179/57
MG/L 69 /78
MG/L AS N 387/18
STD 388/12
MG/L 389/8
MG/L 47 /66
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
LAB NUMBER: 91030045
ANALYSIS
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
3.
ND(O.Ol)
ND(0.2)
ND(O.OOl)
110.
ND(0.04)
8.
0.006
20.
ND(0.0002)
ND(5)
0.007
ND(0.02)
52.
UNITS
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91030045
PAGE:
2
BOOK/PAGE
229/20
426/3
392/58
405/16
341/21
419/15
343/31
427/9
340/24
406/30
339/10
415/12
377/78
342/20
LAB NUMBER: 91030046
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW15
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
ND(O.l)
2l.
39.
ND(0.05)
ND(O.l)
7.6
380.
92.
3.
ND(O.Ol)
NO(0.2)
0.001
70.
ND(0.04)
3.
0.006
30.
NO(0.D002)
NO(5)
NO (0.005)
NO(0.02)
38.
DATE SAMPLED: 03/01/91
TIME SAMPLED: 1200
UNITS
MG/L AS N
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L AS N
STD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91030046
BOOK/PAGE
89 /53
393/15
179/57
69 /78
387/18
388/12
389/9
47 /66
229/20
426/3
392/58
405/16
341/21
419/16
343/31
427/8
340/24
406/30
339/10
415/13
377/79
342/20
-CONTINUED-
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
LAB NUMBER: 91030046
ANALYSIS
CONCENTRATION
UNITS
PAGE:
3
BOOK/PAGE
Quality control analyses were performed on samples at time of analysis in
accordance with procedures published in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Re~lations part 136, July 1, 1986 or in EPA'Publication, SW-846, 3rd
ed~tion, Nov. 1986. NDe), where noted, indicates none detected with the
detection limit in parentheses.
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
~.".JB~
! /"
Clif rd \I. Baker
Labo atory Director
,
s
s
o
"
c~s CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
, 604 Glendale
Salina. Kansas 67401 .913/827-1273
lod
FIELD CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Q/.5.3..,Q
Si.eName: t!.JTV OF'Y!UNIl (SI1uNll, U!t{i:i',L0 Sample Date: 3-/-1/
- COOLER CONTENTS -
SAMPLE FIELD TEST
SAMPLE OESCR1PTlON TIME COMMENTS ASSIGNMENTS
muJl! 1/1-<;' .:1." CASING.
MIA,} 1'1 /J<;O '-J" (AS/N4. ( ^
/V\w Ie:; fLOO LP' Cf.I!.ING.., JllIL1C.H/llL,' iT'
- CHAIN.Of.CUSTODY CHRONICLE -
(M1.rOpe~: (print) ~~~Pf>1ttD ''< f"lf! Date: '3 - ,- 'f [ Time: NfJ.
SeeINo.:' NA Intact: Nll
Signature: I J Q A_
.
I have f9Ceived these materiaJs in good condition from th. above psrscn.
Name: Signature:
Date: Remarks:
(MJ.rs.al~(P<intl'\2~{l.O :.:JAtno'Y\<)rV Date: 3+'11
Seal No.: 0:)01 'II SL
SlQnature: 1..... u.. ".^. ^
FOR LAB USE CNLr Y /, h/4~' ~- 31.q( /;;1:30
Opened By: Date: Time:
....-_I~- "'_ . . . ISL
T",..,.,,, ,...
C;"'~! N.., QP~______ l"f~M _~
fr::> 0- (Ql CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES Sample Date: '~-f-'i {
~ ~~ 1804 GLENDALE. SALINA, KANSAS 67401 . TELEPHONE (913) 827-1273 Sample Time: I / L~-:;-
FIELD INFORMATION FORM Sample Point: W mJLllJ
-~
~
PURGE OA1~
,vvl,ll,l00,
Purging Equipment.
Purging Device
Sampling Device
lLh.tLtJ v. ~
STAIITPURGE WAHRVCIl,IHCASING 3 WnlVOllNCA$j~
(2'OOH,ClOekj (....lOI\Sl l~_'
PUR~AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
. . .Dedicated I Y I N Sampling Equipment. . . . . . . .Dedicated I Y I Q
laodI larclo J...:Y
A-Submersible Pump O.Gas Lift Pump G-8ailer X.
B-Peristaltic Pump E-Venturi Pump H-Scoop/Shovel X.
C-Bladder Pump F-Dipper/Bottle I.Piston Pump
PURGING INFORMATION
L11mY
Lfu
L6..J
Will
AClUALVOLUt,lEPWlGEO
(G~SI
"UIlGlNGOTHEAISl'fCINI
SAM....'OIGor..E..'s..ECIN'
Purging Material
Sampling Material
Tubing-Purging
Tubing.Sampling
Well Elevation
Depth to water
From top 01 well casing
Groundwater Elevation
Well Depth " 0
Lb.J
LllJ
Ie I
~
C-Polypropylene
D-PVC
E-Polyethylene
A-Teflon
B-Stainless Steel
F-Silicon
A-Teflon
B. Tygon
D-Polypropylene
E-Polyethylene
C-Rope X- N. 'It;) 1-./
!SPEC'''''l
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
LlRULJ (Itlmsl) Land Surface Elevation
G-Combination teflonl
Polypropylene
'''w
~Ift)
~lfUmSI)
~Ift)
tst Ll1IullJ
'-.tond,
Sample Temp.
Depth to water
From land surface
Groundwater Elevation
Stickup
",m/cm
at 250 C
.
LWLJ ISTO)
1st
T .
BOTTLE
Size PreHrv.
P L N()t-JE
"J
IZ ",I
I
ANALYSIS
1"[
X-
X-
X-
X-
F>UAtI''lGOTHE'''SPEC'FV)
SA~...t10TI<E"lSPEClFYI
PlJAGING01'>!E"tsPEC....1
~On<EArsPl!C'1'V1
Wl18...W
W?Jm1iJ
(ttlmsl)
1ft)
LJ1I'.tlLlJ (ft/msl)
~Ifl)
~('C)
FIELD
Fih. Y/N
FIELD COMMENTS
Sample Appeaca"e' Dl (uy Odor: 'NONE! Color: 111 ^'- Turbidity:IYlO&~rB
WealherCoodilions LlG.il7fl./JJI{, /AI/NO fflO/VI 5J)wft /O-(I)mPH .7-e.fl1{J S3<>F
. .
Other:
WELL VOLUME CALCULATiON
V -(O-Ow) (A) (7.48 gallft3) where
V _ volume 01 standing waler in welt
D = depth 10 bOllom 01 well below measuring point
DW" depth to water below measuring point
A_ cr sectional area
2N dia.A_ 0.0218
Source s:
We~ 11'1I
D<w."nngl~""U"~',of 101
c........._..._."..._...
Well Appearance NQfmat: Yes
IINo. Explain
)(
No
4N dia. A_ 0.0872
Samples Split? IJ A
Split Sample Recipient N 4
Da" '''<'1#h ~
Signature: ' C' ' .---
Employer: .q. ..J
leloCh",Sysltm
c..ll#olen~"
'"
I,~!
~"'Jlltmenlfooi1y.. .. II'!
Innuent IUl
<"'''"''T '1'
lRl SoIl."..,
(ll 8<lnomSecllmonl
'01 No<..
IlrWIrlSlmmlflrDall
LidO/Oeo.,_
OJ~'"
IS'
'"
'"
Gonl"~,", PI
om,,_.
SOO<',f\'
'"
'"
([;~~ CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES Sample Date: 3+'11
1804 GLENDALE. SALINA. KANSAS 67401, TELEPHONE (913) 827.1273 Sample Time: II5D
.
FIELD INFORMATION FORM Sample Point ~ ~
_.~
PURGING INFORMATION
~ llJill]Qj v. Lil.NlJ ~ WtIQ9
PURGEOATE STAR1PUAGC \'I"'TERVOlIN~NG 3 WEllVlllINC.l.SlNG ACTUAL VOLUME PlJAG.EO
"VMMOOI ,2'OOHfClOI:kl rG.lllansl lc..lIoln., 1G.lIOnSI
PURG.l:f!) AND SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
Purging Equipment. . ..... . .Dedicated I Y I N Sampling Equipment. . . . . . . .Dedicated I Y I l~
,<"... ".do_
Purging Device L0..J A-Submersible Pump D-Gas Lift Pump G.Bailer X-
L0..J PUI'G'''''OT''e~ISPl!e,rv)
Sampling Device a-Peristaltic Pump E-Venluri Pump H.ScoopfShovel X-
SA"PL"'''otHe~ISPEC1F'Y'
C.Bladder Pump F.DipperfBottle I.Piston Pump
Purging Material U2J A-Teflon C.Polypropylene E-Polyethylene X-
lOJ puIIG'''GOT>tEII'SPEC'FY\
Sampling Material B-Stainless Steel D-PVC X-
S.....~L..GOT>teRlS~ec'FYI
Tubing.Purging LCJ A. Teflon D.Polypropylene F.SlIicon X-
~ ~UI<GINGOT>teR'Sl'EcFYl
Tubing-Sampling B-Tygon E-Polyethylene G-Combination teflonl X-
Polypropylene S~"~LtNGOT~eR1S~ECIFYI
C-Aope X- N\JLO/oJ
,s~eC>Nl
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Well Elevation WH..tilJ (turns!) Land Surface Elevation LlilflllJ (tumsl)
Depth to water UJlJJ.OO Depth to water UJ115lll{d
From top of well casing . '\v (ft) From land surface (ft)
Groundwater Elevation Lill1:lW (ftfmsl) Groundwater Elevation LlJ::t.&lJ (ftlmsl)
Well Depth .D UBW(ft) Stickup LUJJ.MJ (ft)
~(STD) ~/Jmlcm LMtiJ (oG)
1st 1st at 250 C Sample Temp.
"' .oec.COI'CI
BOTTLE ~ALYSIS FIELD
T e Size Preserv. Flit. (Y/N
P L- I~/..In" " 1'" 1/'\
P L- 1.lnN'" 1\
p CD...J I-h~O", n ,t" kl
r..- II'" ~I I~ Y 1M
I
FIELD COMMENTS
Sample Appearance: OllLf\l Odor: NON'; COlD" TA '"* Turbidity: L1.)vJ
Weather Conditions: L\CkT Rnl N J INI NO R((J1V\ ~\A I O-tO /VlPI-\ ~p S-"of
Other:
WELL VOLUME CALCULATION WeliAppearanceNormal: y" Y- No
V ''C~-Owl (A) (7.48 gaUft3) where II No. Explain
V.. volume of standing water in well
0.. deoth to bottom of well below measuring point Samples Split? N(\
OW" depth to water below measuring point Spli' S'3~ R~'iP~A
A. "'" "'1i0"" "'0
2~dia.A= 0.0218 4-dia,A.. 0.O87~ D." I ~ ~
Signature:' .\ 1 . -- -,
Employer: C A ~
Source Codes:
Well ,m L"d'IIt.SySllm '" P,mulmetltf'C1lly. ", RiW'lSUUmlBtnal '"' ,., '" G......,"""Pl '"
O.".I.nnQlP..uu"A....f tOI Ua$CMil""'" '" Inf......,1 <", L...Of Cleun. '" SonomSeOt1'llllll .IB) o~, '"
<...,.. W".. ''''00_'"'_''' I" A.-. '" Em"..,1 ill Ou~.~ ,0) NOISI '" ,-,
c~s
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
1804 GLENDALE ROAD' SALINA. KANSAS 67401
(913) 827-1273 . (BOO} 535-3076 . FAX (913) 823.7830
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
ATTN:JAMES L. HILL
PO BOX 736
SALINA, KS 674Dl
LAB NUMBER: 91070558
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-14
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
ND(O.l)
ND(10)
124.
ND(0.05)
1.8
7.3
450.
58.
ND(l)
ND(O.Ol)
ND(0.2)
ND(O.OOl)
100.
ND(0.04)
3.5
0.003
25. -
ND(0.0002)
ND(5)
0.009
ND(0.02)
52.
PAGE: 1
DATE SAMPLE RPTD: 07/30/91
DATE SAMPLE RECD: 07/15/91
CAS FILE NO: 91-5369
CAS ORDER NO: 7458
CLIENT P.O.:
DATE SAMPLED: 07/15/91
TIME SAMPLED: 0915
UNITS
MG/L AS N
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L AS N
STD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91070558
BOOK/PAGE
89 /76
393/62
179/79
69 /91
387/78
551/3
389/36
47 /90
229/46
559/15
541/23
529/33
505/17
542/27
343/88
503/62
507/15
476/89
339/25
499/93
530/43
537/6
LAB NUMBER: 91070559
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-14 FIELD DUP
DATE SAMPLED: 07/15/91
TIME SAMPLED: 0915
ANALYSIS CONCENTRATION UNITS BOOK/PAGE
AMMONIA, TOTAL ND~O.l) MG/L AS N 89 /76
COD ND 10) MG/L 393/62
CHLORIDE 128. MG/L 179/79
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT ND(0.05) MG/L 69 /91
NITRATE/NITRITE 1.9 MG/L AS N 387/78
PH 7.4 STD 551/3
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED 600. MG/L 389/36
SULFATE 56. MG/L 47 /90
-CONTINUED-
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
LAB NUMBER: 91070559
ANALYSIS
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
ND(l)
ND(O.Ol)
ND(0.2)
ND(O.OOl)
95.
ND(O.04)
3.5
ND(0.003)
25. .
ND(0.0002)
ND(5)
0.009
ND(0.02)
53.
UNITS
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91070559
PAGE:
2
BOOK/PAGE
229/46
559/15
541/23
529/33
505/17
542/27
343/88
503/62
507/15
476/89
339/25
499/93
530/43
537/6
LAB NUMBER: 91070560
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-15
~
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
0.2
35.
38.
ND(0.05)
0.2
7.7
350.
61-
1-
ND(O.Ol)
ND(0.2)
ND(O.OOl)
55.
ND(0.04)
5.5
0.013
25'-
ND(0.0002)
ND(5)
ND(0.005)
ND(0.02)
37.
DATE SAMPLED: 07/15/91
TIME SAMPLED: 1020
UNITS
MG/L AS N
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L AS N
STD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91070560
BOOK/PAGE
89 /76
393/60
179/79
69 /91
387/78
551/3
389/36
47 /90
229/46
559/15
541/23
529/33
505/18
542/27
343/88
503/62
507/15
476/90
339/25
499/93
530/43
537/6
-CONTINUED-
CLilS CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
LABORATORY REPORT
CLIENT: CITY OF SALINA - SANITATION DIVISION
LAB NUMBER: 91070561
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: MW-11
ANALYSIS
AMMONIA, TOTAL
COD
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT
NITRATE/NITRITE
PH
SOLIDS, TOTAL DISSOLVED
SULFATE
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
ARSENIC, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CALCIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
IRON, TOTAL
LEAD, TOTAL
MAGNESIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
POTASSIUM, TOTAL
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
SODIUM, TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
ND(O.l)
52.
70.
ND(0.05)
0.7
7.5
460.
57.
1-
ND(O.Ol)
ND(0.2)
ND(O.OOl)
70.
ND(0.04)
0.5
ND(0.003)
35.
ND(0.0002)
ND(5)
ND(0.005)
ND(0.02)
38.
PAGE:
3
DATE SAMPLED: 07/15/91
TIME SAMPLED: 1100
UNITS
MG/L AS N
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L AS N
STD
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
CONCLUSION OF LAB NUMBER: 91070561
BOOK/PAGE
89 /76
393/61
179/80
69 /91
387/78
551/3
389/36
47 /90
229/46
559/16
541/23
529/33
505/18
542/27
343/88
503/62
507/15
476/90
339/25
571/1
530/43
537/6
Quality control analyses were performed on samples at time of analysis in
accordance with procedures published in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Re~lations part 136, July I, 1986 or in EPA publication, SW-S46, 3rd
ed~tion, Nov. 1986. ND(), where noted, indicates none detected with the
detection limit in parentheses.
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
~o..~
Clifford J. Baker
Laboratory Director
.
C,;\\S CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
~
~
.
CAS CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC. 'I J - 53 it,ci
1804 Glendale
Salina. Kansas 67401' 9131827-1273
IOF (
FIELD CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
Site Name: SAUAJI4 SANlfAflI( U4NDflL.L Sample Date: 7-1'5-'1 J
- COOLER CONTENTS -
SAMPLE FIELD TEST
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TIME COMMENTS ASSIGNMENTS
MW-I4- 0915'
HI.\J-( 4 flE,U) D4-PU ({-lIE' 0'\ IS" .<1
r\'\w-l5" {OW ".oJ'
MW-fl 1100 ~
'';: ,\!\ '- '" ,<;
~o'j.""
,(i$fi
- CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY CHRONICLE -
CooIe'OpeqzSY: (Print~~PI1DOIN ~E:1D Dalo: '1-IS"-'\ ( nm.: N'A
Sea/No,: _MIoI. Intact: "-1\<\
S9n.W~: 1 ~
I haw f9Cf1ivBd these materials in good condition from the above person.
Name: Signature:
Oat.: Rematkl:
CoolerS. : (print) /I """,n r\ ~'Al'Y"'Y\ON Dalo: -.J -I S' -'11
S9n.tur~'\Y:' J J M- \ Seal No.: 01lSq ISSL
. "-'
FOR LAB USE ON~ D f1u..<- Oat.: 1-1C:;~ q, \I:~o
Openad 8y: . ct ":J nm.:
\I'{ Sea/No.: (';. ISq I">'>L. Intact /"
Cooler No.: Temp. .C:
.
3
CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
ISll4Glcndalc 1{"i1d S,llina. K,lnsilsb7-101 <lIJ.H:!7-1273 SllO-5)5-:~07n fAXQ1.1-H23-7Klll
Client: CITY OF SALINA SOLID WASTE DIVISION
ACtn: JAMES HILL
P.O. BOX 746
SALINA, KS 67401
Page: 1
Date Sample Rptd: 01/20/92
Date Sample Reed: 12/20/91
CAS File No: 92-5513
CAS Order No: 9333
Client P.O.:
Lab Number: 92010209
Sample Description: SAMPLE 1 & 2
Date Sampled:
Time Sampled:
/ /
Analysis
Concentration
Units
Book/Page
BOO
COD
Nitrate/Nitrite
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Oil & Grease, Gravimetric
pH
Phosphorous, Total
Solids, Suspended
ND(5)
36.
3.5
ND(l)
16.
7.4
ND(0.2)
74.
mg/L
mgjL
mg/L as N
mg/L as N
nig/L
Sed
mg/L as p
mg/L
92010209
100 /52
640 /36
575 /71
568 178
707 /7
551 164
609 /15
729 11
Conclusion of Lab Number:
Lab Number: 92010210
Sample Description: SAMPLE 3,4,5,6.7,8.9,10,11
Date Sampled:
Time Sampled:
/ I
BOD
COD
Ni trat:e/Ni tri ee
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Oil & Grease, Gravimetric
pH
Phosphorous, Toeal
Solids, Suspended
ND(5)
35.
3.7
ND(l)
ND(l)
7.5
0.3
180.
~ Book/Page
mg/L 100 152
mg/L 640 /36
mg/L as N 575 171
mg/L as N 568 178
mgiL 707 17
Sed 551 164
mg/L as p 609 115
mg/L 729 11
Analysis
Concentration
Conclusion of Lab Number: 92010210
Quality control analyses were performed on samples at time of analysis in
accordance with procedures published in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations part 136, July 1, 1986 or in EPA Publication, SW.846, 3rd edition,
Nov. 1986. ND(), where noted, indicates none detected with the detection limit
in parentheses.
Samples will be retained for thirty days unless otherwise notified.
SERVICES, INC.
Analysis Request (Q;&~
Coollnont.&1 A"",Iy1I~1 SOfV1.ooc. Inc-
-
nl: i_ i\)-',[L' w)JJ'(J\\\'\
;~nl Contact: crtent P.O. or Job It. .
.'<::tat ReportioJ Requirements:
~te Requested: . Date Due:
S Contact: . Date ~es Sent Of Received:
(~Ocw,
Lab 1/./ Sample Desa~n Analyses Roquosted Spoc:iallostrudons
%j 1J\,l- L,4\e L
4,M ^~ i",,~l.L '\\ r _-....(.>();,1q
J.." \ \
6,COi)
~S \ Go ~, G gLO.W
v"'-<
':i.b i,Go bOW 9U~~
~\ \ 10 U LD'o 9 L 14-0
,. . \ \00 \"1-."- IjU~<+~
,,& - - aL ,cr,,,,-=--
,.:.'..... \100 -1~\~ 1j1, 'Cld-,
~ \\) \\)0, ~LL<:,) 1'6
\'J.v L,;)I \
-
,
.~ \\ <rJ -\ov0 n-'
:'"!;'o:::_,
.
-- '<\. ,
, . ......-..
,
- -
c.<.s1'~J:
Chain-aI-Custody Record
.Cl~:" u{ -lk\~E'6~~;i.I.?
PflOJECT. ----- -~--lpROJECTw.ME .-------.. - --- --- -------- ---"\ - ---
__ Sa.-J;\']Q..-J1fd5': It ..S^. . o. _~~ ''-___
BSIGNATUREI $NM'lEDBY(PAIN'ED)~
~~ _ R<:>b,,,L Jl-!dm ~..,.,
-S.o.LIPlEI/lFOFIUATION - ..<!t<Y
L '" ".
._- ---_.~,,~
-2.~/-r-: g -
.. 3 .. - '-Y'~ I~~'
_L_ 'Z''<l . II.:Jr-
_.;L.n P/~L ~~". v
'Ph. //:/0 V ----S.
-7. n f!1*,;"IL:~Q v ___ ~.~ A_{g~'--___
_'iL.._Q,~l";'-(JV _~~ ~ A 1.1<1-_
(\~)a?J!\la;JIl v._____~ o___..A-l."lC..l___
_10_ 1"/2f:/9.l !~:3o. ./ I , ' I V\ )
II "'!"ill !~?If _ ____ I I " I I .J"x1'.1 ..__
S~MPHIO'
D~TE
,.,
D8YISIGU~tlJllEI
~\/(\
~ ,-~-
AHlt,lQUlSHEIlB [I;
AECEIVEll'
'''~Of''r~'L:'"''''
TO (_)
SEt,(JR(
,..;,-
Continental Analylical Services, Inc.
1804 Glendale' Salina. KS67401
(913) 827-1273 '(600) 535-3076
FAX (913) 823.7830
PARIJ.IE1ERS
)
/
/
/
""" ""
SA.YPlElOCATOl
REMARKS
.
~
/
~
~
/
.'
" lUZ,_
3~ e.AM"~d l.
_S~~~,,.- "ll".12.15..1fz.
'I " I' X ~
S "Q" 't.
"A"
RElffOUISIlEDBY1PAflTEDI
2,\,..~U lid""
AElINlltlSHEOBVIPRlNfEOl:
OAfEflIME /4/:JJ
RECENEOBV(SlGtlATIIRE)
RECENfOBV(PAlIllEOj
OATE.lIl.lE
~~I
RECEIVEOBVIPRINTEOl
OAT[,1!1.lE
RECENEODVISlGNAMlEj
DAT[-11.lE
\l\..~SHIPPEOVIA:
\
AElMRKS
LL\p;:,C"--"\ ,~~ Ie
SEND INVOICE 10
WMe-LBbOrBIO/)'Copy
CAS 1390 l)9.1 OK
Ye!low_ChenlCop-,
r---'
Cooler No.: (o{lO
CAS CONTINENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
1804 Glendale Date Sealed:
Salina, Kansas 67401 .913/827-1273 Seal No.:
By:
SHIPPING ORDER CAS Order No.:
Order Requested By: Order Received At Lab By: DaJr.:Pf9/9/
SHIP TO: cn:>,.~~ ~ (A~ ,
Att?;(q
Street Address
City, State, Zip
Client Job Number
.
- SAMPLE CONTAINERS -
QUANTITY CONTAINER TYPE PRESERVATIVE TEST ASSIGNMENT
'l ~,L)'-':;:: w-1 _-7-,' :S^dIS'< '7;> Ll
. Ul , .-
.:::t ,~"', ,,,,I ) 0, .7. . JJ, <;",,, T"v,J' dk, -r-A y /J,/
'J. x?,T,. , ) n ,~, '- -.z.. -1 -;:--';:' "
:J >>",^'.,."Or:::'-o 77_'. LI~ ') ru TV.I ,It\~ -'-"y"?
I
IV " I' -r- 0 in J.. O. .I'. lo..r'
I .-
U
speciallnstructio/r
)t";~ 'OJ ,7f" /P ;! , 0
Enclosures: Ship Vi~ (it ,J, AI I "-<u!-
Date Required at Destination:
Order Completed By: Dat.:/d/9/ q / Chocl<od By: V
Cooler Opened By: (print) Date:
Signature: Seal No.:
DID VOU RECEIVE ALL VOUR BOTTLES? V.. No
DID VOU RECEIVE VOUR BOTTLES ON TIME? V.. No
WERE ANV BOTTLES BROKEN OR LEAKING? V.. No
------ . ---.-
.
~
S
"
"
.
gS.'i8.00419311~416am
APPENDIX D
KDHE MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS
"
MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS-CURRENT AND PROPOSED
PREPARED BY KOME AUGUST 1992
INORGANICS MCL Comments
Antimony 0.006 109/l Effective 1/9.
Arsenic 0.05 109/l current
Asbestos 7 MFL Current
Barium 2 109/l Effective 1/93 (Raised)
Beryllium 0.004 lng/l Effective 1/94
cadmium 0.005 109/l Current (Lowered)
chromium 0.1 109/l current (Raised)
copper na Treatment Technique
Cyanide 0.2 lng/l Effective 1/94
Fluoride '.0 lng/1 Cu.rrent
Lead na Treatment Technique
Mercury 0.002 lng/l current.
Nickel 0.1 109/l Effective 1/94
Nitrate 10 109/l . Methemoglobinemia
Nitrite 1 lng/l . CUrrent
Total N03/NOz 10 lng/l Current
Selenium . 0.05 lng/l CLlrrent (Raised)
Silver na Secondary Std 7/92
SuI fate 400/500 lng/l Deferred
Thallium 0.D02 109/1 Effective 1/94
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride(CC1')
para-Oichloroben~ene
a-Dichlorobenzene
, 1 f 2 Dichloroethane
1,1 Oichloroethylene
cis-l,2 dichloroethylene .
trans-l,2 dichloroethylene
oichloromethane '
1,2 Dichloropropane
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Monochlorobenzene
styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,2,4 Trichlo~oben~ene
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
1,1,2 Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
0.005 109/l
0.005 lng/l
.0.075 lng/1
0.6 lng/1
0.005 lng/l
0.007 lng/l
0.07 109/l
0,1 109/l
0.D05 nig/l
0.D05 mg/l
0.7 lng/l
0.D01 mg/l
0.1 mg/l
0.1 lng/l
0.005 lng/l
1 lng/l
0.07 lng/l
0.2 lng/l
. 0.005 mg/l
0.005 lng/l
0.002 11\g/1
:10 11\g/1
current
Current
Current
CUrrent
Current
Current
Current
Current
Effective 1/94
Current
Current
Effective 1/94
Current
current
current
current
Effective 1/94
Current
Effective. 1/94
current
Current
Current
~DH~ ~orbes Word Proe TEL NO.913-296-6247
TRIHALOMETHANES
Chloroform
Bromoform
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
0.1 mq/l
0.1 mq/l
0.1 mg/l
0.1 mg/l
SOC'S, PESTICIDES AND PCB'S
Acrylamide na
Adipates(diethylhexy) 0.4 mg/l
Alachlor (Lasso) .0.002 mg/l
Aldicarb (Temik) 0.003 mg/l
Aldicarb sulfone Oe002 mq/l
Aldicarb sulfoxide 0.004 mg/l
Atrazine (Atranex) D.003 mg/l
Carbofuran (Furadan 4F) 0.04 mg/l
Chlord.ne 0.002 mg/l
D.lapon D.2 mg/l
Dibromochloropropane(DBCP) 0.2 ug/l
2,4-D 0.07 mg/l
2,4,S-TP (silvex) O.OS mg/l
. Dinoseb 0.007 mg/l
Diqu.t 0.02 mg/l
Endothall 0.1 mg/l
Endrin 0.002 mg/l
.
Epichlorohydrin na
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) O.OS. uq/l
Glyphos.te 0.7 mq/l
Hept.chlor (H-34, Heptox) 0.4 ug/l
Heptaohlor epoxide 0.2 ug/l
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 mg/l
Lindane . 0.2 ug/l
Methoxyohlor (DMDT) 0.04 mg/l
PAR's [Benzo(a)pyrene] 0.2 ug/l
Pentachlorophenol o.ooi mg/l
phthalates(diethYlhexyl) 0.D06 mg/l
picloram O,S mg/l
Polychlorinated Biphenyls O,S uq/l
Simazine 0.004 mg/l
2,3,7,8 TCDD (Dioxin) 3E-8 mg/l
Toxaphene 0.003 mg/l
Vydate (oxamyl 0.2 mq/l
Dual and Sencor are not regulated yet
Dee 2,92 11:04 No.005 P.OI/OI
Total of all THMS
"
"
"
Treatment Technique
Effective 1/94
current
Deferred
Deferred
Deterred
.Current
Current
current
Effective 1/94
Current
Current (Lowered)
current (Raised)
Effective 1/94
Effecti va 1/94
Effective 1/94
Effective 1/94 (Raised)
Treatment Technique
CUrrent
Effective 1/94
current
current
Effective 1/94
Current (Lowered)
Current (Lowered)
Effective 1/94
Current
Effective 1/94
Effective 1/94
eurrent
Effective 1/94
Effective 1/94
Current (Lowered)
Effective 1/94
~DHE Forbes Word Proe TEL No.913-296-6247
RADIONUCLIDES
Radon-222
uranium
Gross alpha
Gross beta
Radium-226 & 228
300 . pCi/1
20 uq/1
15 pCi/1
4 mrem/yr
5 pCi/1
MICROBIOLOGICAL
Giardia Lamblia
Leqione11a
Total coliforil1
na
na
5% positive
RHG KDHE 9/92
Dee 2.92 II :06 No.006 P.OI/OI
proposed
Proposed
current
current
Proposed 20 pCi/l each
Treatment Technique
Treatment Technique
Current
APPENDIX E
."iF'
";:~
"..... ,', ,.....-
',--."-'-- ',',',',',,',',
- ---- """'" ...
STORMWATER DRAINAGE MEMOlUNDUM
\SALlNA\8~'8.001
4151931.
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
DRAINAGE LETTER REPORT
FOR
SALINA LANDFILL
SALINA, KANSAS
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Salina Landfill is located in Section 7, Township 15 South, Range 3 West, approximately 3 miles
southwest of the City of Salina, in Saline County, Kansas. The active landfill site currently occupies
approximately 60 acres of a total city-owned parcel of 640 acres. South, west and east of the active
disposal area the land is relatively flat, and is covered in a variety of native grasses and moderately-
sized trees, and the grades increase to approximately 4-percent and greater.
2.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND CHARACTERISTICS
The existing 60-acre landfill site is located at the upstream end of a larger drainage basin. An area of
90 acres contributes surface run-on to the existing landfill from the north. The majority of this
surface flow is diverted around th'1"acti:ve;~ismsal ~~a bYJ1""~l1fi.'1Uld natural surface gradient.
, '::<;; J},.,};,'-,i\~t ~~~~~t",,)~ ' @'
The channel to the north intercept~suuac~--;rtfmr an<F~.rri~~ it we~into the adjacent drainage basin.
Stormwater from the north-northeast flows to a natural drainageway which empties into culverts under
the road to the south.
3.0 HYDROLOGY--RATIONAL METHOD
The computation of peak flows throughout this analysis utilized the modified Rational Method. This
has proven to be a simple yet effective procedure for dealing with drainage basins less than 100 acres
in size and of uniform characteristics. The method yields conservative flow rates. With firsthand
knowledge of the basin, the method is easily applied and the results are universally understood.
Qp ~ CIA
where: Qp =
C ~
[ ~
A ~
peak flow (cfs) in cubic feet per secc.'md
an empirical factor ranging from 0 to 1 which represents the amount
of water running off as a proportion of the total amount of
precipitation falling on the area
the intensity (inches per hour) at Tc
the area of the basin (acres)
Camp Dresser'" McKee Inc.
ISAUNA\855S.001
4151931.
E-I
Using topographic maps at a scale of I" = 200'. the drainage basins were delineated, and their areas
were calculated with a digital planimeter (see Figure I). Points of concentration where peak runoff
flows enter existing culverts were identified for future pipe analysis.
The selection of basin factors, slopes, and general basin characteristics was made on the inspection of
topographic maps and onsite walkdown investigations.
The rainfall depth for a l00-year storm was derived from graphs supplied by the City of Salina
Engineering Department (P100=2.1 inches). A time of concentration (Tc) of 10 minutes was used
for all areas within the landfill site.
The following equation was used to calculate the rainfall intensity (I), using a P100 of 2.1 inches and
a Tc of 10 minutes:
1= 4.PlOO/l+O.OS.Tc
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALlNA\8S38.001
4151931,
E-2
The table below summarizes the peak flows calculated for all drainage basins:
PEAK FLOWS SUMMARY TABLE
BASIN AREA (acres) PEAK FLOW (cfs)
A 40 75
B 64 120
C 40 75
D 30 56
E 70 131
F 50 93
G 40 75
H 37
Where 1=5.33 inches/hour, Tc=
To determine the peak flows from the upstream basin, a new time of concentration was calculated
using the formula provided by the City of Salina Engineering Department. It yields higher than
average times of concentration typical for the area based on vegetation and soil types:
Tc = Ko*Lc(^0.37) I S(^0.2)
where Ko = 1.040, an overland flow coefficient representative of pasture land (from City of Salina
Design Criteria, 1988).
Tc = 1.040*2400(^0.37) I 0.04l(^0.2)
Tc = 35 minutes
Camp Dresser & McKee Ine.
ISALlNAI8558.001
4/51931,
E-3
The new intensity derived from Tc=35 minutes is:
I ~ 4'3.0 / 1+0.05'35
I = 4.36 inchesfhour
The peak flow from the upstream basin is:
Q100 ~ 0.35 . 4.36 . 90
QIOO = 140 cf,
v~ I.486/n'R S
and discharge Q = V* A
I
where,
v =
R ~
S =
Q ~
A ~
~Xr,r~i,e 'iflRg;ity, A
f:'~d~t;t':["J&,
quantity of flow, cfs
area of flow, square feet
A roughness coefficient of 0.027 was used, characteristic of unlined charmels with short grasses and
sandy bottoms.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNAI8558.001
4/51931,
E-4
0100 "" 140 cts
I
2
EXISTING CULVERT CROSSINGS' ,
CHANNEL
1
2
3
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE
PLAN
M"~'M"M,,~,M""""
........ .~""',.."M' ,,""'M"
CDM ,-"""""".""...,"'"
~
l
1"""600'
CONTRIBUTING FLOW
195 CFS
224 CFS
243 CFS
SALINA LANDFILL
SALINA, KANSAS
Figure
1'10
1
APPENDIX F
Camp Dresser & McKu Inc.
\SALtNA\8S"~8,OOI
41519315
APPENDIX F
SOIL BALANCE ANALYSIS
The proposed Salina MSWLF expansion area depicted in the preliminary drawings (Appendix H),
encompasses approximately 300 acres. Ideally, the site will be. designed such that all soils excavated
during the construction of the individual landfill cells will be balanced to equal the quantity of soil
required for daily cover and the final cap. This would constitute the perfect soil balance solution.
The City of Salina site is somewhat limited, however, because of the moderately shallow
groundwater. Excavation of landfill cells are thereby restricted and thus ideal soil balance design is
similarly restricted. To maximize the efficiency of this situation the following design parameters
were established:
. Using existing groundwater depth information (O.S. Fent), base contours of proposed cells
":"""":"'" ...,/.,/.....c/,_c_ ,,:. ..-c.,-,-".',',..',',',:""",......//....._,,'c'
were designed to maxi'e"::&cav~r s9'~:~::~:9uanti~ij~::.:: H~wever, a minimwn of five (5) feet
of separation was maintMned betwe~h the cell hise andithe projected groundwater depth.
. Minimum fill for roadwork, berms, etc. was designed to ensure minimal requirements for
on-site soils materials.
Using DCA engineering software, available airspace quantity was calculated between the base grade
and final grade contours on the proposed expansion site. Over the approximately 300 acres which
define the site, 20.13 MM COY. are available for total filL Considering a three (3) foot final cap and
a four (4) to one (1) waste to daily cover ratio, this can be further sub-divided as:
. Final Cap
. Daily Cover
. MSW
1.45 MM ex
3.74 MM C.Y.
14.94 MM C.Y.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\S^LlN^\~558,OOl
4151931,
F-l
Additionally, the quantity of soils available through cell excavation was calculated by comparing the
difference between existing topographic contours and proposed cell base grade elevations. A total of
4.09 million C. Y. of soils will be available through cell excavation.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc,
\SALlNA\8558.001
4/5/931,
F-2
-;:'0" "':':':':':"""""':< :~:::"""@{--------
APPENDIX G .
::~:::,.:",_o?__};:,-,-,-o'oo\t :y:("':\ &ill,
LANDFILL LINER SYSTEM EVALlJATION
\SAUNA\&I~8.00]
4151931.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
1.0 INl'RUUucnUN
1.1
1.2
Regulatory Background
State Regulations
2.0 SYNTHETIC LANDFILL LINER MATERIALS
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
3.0 CLAY LINERS
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
Synthetic Liner Materials
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
Chlorosulphonated Polyethylene (CSPE)
High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)
Seaming Technologies
Adhesive and Bodied Solvent Seams
Dielectric Seams
Thermal Seams
~ Fusion Bond
- Extrusion Bond
Ultrasonic Bonds
Seaming Testing
DestructiVf#P~~!
Non-DestrtWtivii:
On-site and Off-site Clays
In-Situ Clays
Soils Admixture
Failure Mechanism
Test Pad
Testing Requirements
4.0 ALTERNATIVE LINER SYSTEMS
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3
4.4
Types of Landfill Liner Systems
Single Liner
Composite Liner System
Double Liner System
Evaluation of Alternative Liner Systems
Regulatory Design Criteria
Compatibility with Landfill Environment
Installation and Quality Assurance Quality Control
Proposed Liner Alternative Systems
Estimated Construction Costs of Alternative
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALlNA\8:l58.001
41519315
G-i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SKtion Page
5.0 COST COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNA\8SS8.001
4151931.
G-ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Land disposal of solid waste has historically been the method of choice for final disposal of municipal
solid wastes. Over the past decade, documented incidents of groundwater contamination from
landfills around the United States, coupled with increased reliance on groundwater for potable water
supplies, have resulted in the development of more restrictive design and performance standards for
siting, construction, operation, and closure of municipal solid waste disposal facilities.
The intent of the existing federal and proposed state regulations is to prevent the contaminated liquid
from moving out of landfill facilities into groundwater supplies. The primary mechanisms for the
prevention of contaminant release are containment, collection, and treatment of the leachate generated
by land disposal facilities.
The following sections present technical, regulatory, and design related information regarding the
most connnonly used methods for containment, synthetic flexible membrane liners (FMLs), natural
soil liners, and soil admixtures.
In this analysis, the various lining are
economics of each alternative lining system.
on perfonnance, reliability, and
1.1 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
Land disposal of municipal solid waste is regulated at the federal level under Subtitle D of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 40 CFR Parts 257 and 258, dated October 9,
1991. This act establishes performance standards for the design and operation of non-hazardous
municipal solid waste (MSW) (hazardous waste is controlled under Subtitle C of RCRA). The
"Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills" (40 CFR 258) consist~ of location restrictions,
operating criteria, design criteria, groundwater monitoring requirements, closure and post-closure
requirements, and financial assurance criteria perfonnance standards that must be met by all solid
waste management facilities.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALIN^\8S~8.001
4151931,
G-l
1.2 STATE REGULATIONS
The Kansas solid waste program is administered by the Kansas Department of Health and
Envirorunent (KDHE). The state's solid waste regulations are found in two parts: Kansas Statutes
Annotated (KSA) Chapter 65 - Public Health, Article 34 - Solid Waste, defines the state statutes
pertaining to solid waste issues: Kansas Administrative Regulations Chapter 28, Article 29 - Solid
Waste Management, defines the solid waste management standards and regulations. The state
regulations have not been currently updated to address those issues covered by the federal RCRA
regulations.
2.0 SYNTHETIC LANDFILL LINER MATERIALS
Landfill liners are primarily used to contain and prevent the movement of contaminated liquid (landfill
leachate) into the groundwater. ~e,~~:::al~g"s'rIve t~:,mirur:~~~:::,~atera1 migration of gases resulting
from solid waste decomposition (~th:~1 H~'ne)i2Irsit~}o~~adja9int properties. In addition, liners
..... '" ,',','. '",.. , --,'-- '......' ",,',
,... "" ,,-- ,..-- , ----" ""
can be used as a closure cap to inliib1t:pe'#~tril1bifof:gUrfite watEfP'into the deposited solid waste,
thereby reducing long-term leachate production.
This section briefly describes the commonly used synthetic flexible membrane liner materials,
seaming technologies and seam testing techniques. Section 3.0 of the report discusses the use of
native or imported clays and soil admixtures as liner materials.
2.1 SYNTHETIC MATERIALS
Synthetic materials typically used in lining the base and sides of sanit~ry landfills are:
. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVe);
. Chiorosulphonated Polyethylene (CSPE) (HYPALON""); and
. High-Density Polyethylene (HOPE).
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc,
\SAUNA\8S58,OOI
4/519315
0-2
These materials are installed in the landfill excavation in sheets or panels seamed together to cover the
base and sidewalls of the landfill excavation.
2.1.1 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC)
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is what is known as a thermoplastic polymer compounded with plasticizers
(25 to 35 percent) to make the sheeting flexible and rubber-like. PVC membrane also contains one to
five percent of a chemical stabilizer and various amounts of other additives. Over time, the
plasticizers contained within the PVC have a tendency to migrate out of the liner (in a leachate
environment) leaving the liner material brittle. In some burial tests and in some liner applications,
PVC FMLs have become stiff due to loss of plasticizers to the soil and biodegradation by
microorganisms (EPA/60012-88/052, Lining of Waste Containment and Other Impoundment
Facilities, published September 1988, page 4-25). Exposure to ultraviolet radiation also causes rapid
loss (migration) of the Plasticizer',i2.~~~n~.::~~~~~~~g~:Gels of;she~~:,.,.~,ff:~t~:~ together in the field through the
use of solvent based adhesives coiPri~Wl :9~:::~lve~%fwd ~q.' : Altesive and bodied solvent seams
~""'" ,,::::,. .,.., "'-",',',-,-
are discussed in Section 2.2.1. .".,,----, ".
2.1.2 CHLOROSULPHONATED POLYETHYLENE (CSPE)
Chlorosulphonated polyethylene (CSPE), (most common trade name is HYPALON'fM) has been in use
since the early 1970's. Although CSPE liners are typically manufactured in five -foot widths,
dielectric factory seams can be used to create a single panel of up to 25, 000 square feet, thereby
dramatically reducing the number of in.field heat/welding or solvent seams required. CSPE is
typically installed as an uncured membrane to permit seaming by heat or solvents. Because of this, it
is important to transport and store the fabricated panels away from excessive heat to prevent the
panels from sticking together.
HYPALON™ is a CSPE that is constructed with a reinforcing fabric scrim between two sheets. The
scrim strengthens the final product thereby increasing its dimensional stability properties.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNAI8SS8.001
41S/93ls
G-3
2.1.3 IllGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE)
High-density polyethylene (HOPE) is a thermoplastic polymer based on ethylene. Most HOPE used
in landfill applications is actually medium or low density polyethylene. HOPE fabric was originally
manufactured at densities of 0.95 gmlcc or greater. These specific gravities were subsequently
reduced to around 0.93 gmlcc to 0,94 gmlcc to reduce occurrences of stress cracking and polymer
degradation during heat welding and seaming. Although the modified densities are not technically in
the high density range as classified by ASTM standards, the industry has generally agreed to continue
the use of the acronym HOPE for liner systems of this type.
HOPE exhibits superior resistance to oils, most chemical solutions, some solvents, and permeation by
water and gases. HDPE membranes are free of additives, such as plasticizers and fillers, except for
the addition of carbon black to prevent ultraviolet degradation.
2.2
":i8W""<::::::,
SEAMING TECHNOLO!I,u:~>
T;l
11
The method and quality of both in-field and factory seaming techniques playa major role in the
quality and integrity of the installed liner and the performance of the landfill system. There are two
basic types of field seams used for joining synthetic liner panel--adhesion solvent and thermal weld
seams. The adhesion of bodied solvent seam is used for PVC and HYPALOr{I'M and the thermal
weld is used for HDPE. Within these two basic categories of seams there are a variety of seaming
techniques and seam testing methods utilized by liner fabricators and installers. The following
paragraphs briefly describe these alternative methods.
2.2.1 ADHESIVE AND BODIED SOLVENT SEAMS
PVC and HYPALONTM produce liner panels up to 103 feet wide and 750 feet long by using a factory
seaming process (nonnally one-inch wide dielectric welds). These panels are then field seamed
together using a three- to four-inch wide bodied solvent or adhesive seam. In a bodied solvent seam,
the adhesive used to bond the seams in the field contains the same liner material that makes up the
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNAI1IS58.001
4/5193b
G-4
liner sheet. The "adhesive" is applied to both surfaces, and the two surfaces are pressed together
after becoming "tacky". When the liquid solvent evaporates, the bond remaining is then composed of
the same material as the sheet itself.
The application of heat with heat guns at temperatures of apprOi'<imately 2000F during the seaming
process is reconunended to speed up the solvent evaporation process. As the solvent evaporates, the
seam approaches its ultimate strength. If heat is not used, it could take a number of weeks (up to 28
days) for the seam to reach its full strength.
2.2.2 DIELECTRIC SEAMS
Polar polymers such as HYPALON'fM and PVC can be joined together in the factory dielectrically to
produce larger panels that are shipped to the job site where the panels are field seamed. This fusion
type of weld uses large amounts of electrici to bond sheets in an environment similar to a
{,'\J(""'"""" V'Wt"":::~:
microwave oven. This process e n~(l beQii\~e ofllhe :bulky equipment and the power
ill%
needs. 'C_';'."_
2.2.3 THERMAL SEAMS
HOPE uses thermal-type welds in field seaming. Although this process is often referred to as a
thermal weld, there is no molecular interchange like there is in the welding of metal. This process is,
therefore, often referred to as bonding rather than welding. HOPE fabricators use two basic types of
thermal seams--the fusion bond and the extrusion bond. Since HOPE is nonpolar, dielectric welding
is not possible.
Fusion Bonds:
Fusion bonded seams are produced by melting a portion of the liner sheet (10 mils of a 60 mil sheet)
to seam two sheets together. No additional material (extrudate) is used in fusion seams. This
seaming method uses a hot wedge consisting of a hot electrically-heated element in the shape of a
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALlNA\8S58.001
415193ls
G-S
blade, or V-shaped wedge, that is passed between the two sheets to be sealed. When the hot wedge
contacts the two sheets to be seamed, the heated element melts and smears the two surfaces causing
fresh material to come to the surface. Immediately following the melting, roller pressure brings the
molten surfaces together to form a homogeneous fused bond.
Extrusion Bonds:
Extrusion bonds are usually performed using a hand-held extruder in which an HDPE rod (called
extrudate. made of the same material as the liner) is fed and melted, placing the molten HDPE
extrudate at the fillet of the overlapped liner sheets. The surfaces to be seamed must be prepared by
HDPE cleaning and grinding. Care during the grinding stage is important to avoid any over-grinding
that would unnecessarily reduce sheet thickness. Some seaming methods temporarily tack the sheets
together with a hot air gun at about 5000P to hold the sheets in place prior to applying the
::7:::~~:e~~::::~;:,d I;p:i~~~r~J.~t~~I;;;ij:1:t can cause weakening of fue
-;-,-,-,. -,-,-;-, -'-'-',' '-"""'. .;" ';;;';;:". :';;;';;' ",--,
----- ---- --- -- .. ----
2.2.4 ULTRASONIC BONDS
This bond seams two HDPE sheets using a high speed vibration to generate the heat needed to fuse
the sheets. This bond is typically used for top capping landfills and is not recommended for use in a
bottom liner application. Some installers also use this method to temporarily hold the sheets in place
prior to extrusion welding.
2.3 SEAM TESTING
2.3.1 DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
Destructive testing of the seams is very important because it provides the only direct evaluation of
seam strength and bonding efficiency. The two most widely used destructive tests for liner seams are
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALINAIlI5S8.001
41S1931s
0-6
the peel test and the shear test. The shear test is generally considered more representative of the
forces most likely encountered during service as a bottom liner.
Samples for destructive testing are cut out of the seams in approximately 2S-centimeters x 40
centimeters (to-inches x IS-inches) rectangular sections at SOO,foot intervals along the seam.
Destructive testing for shear can be accomplished in the lab or in the field with the use of a
tensiometer. The tensiometer is a device used in measuring tensile strength of synthetic liners and
seam samples. The device has two members (shafts), a fixed member carrying one grib (similar to a
clamp), and a movable member carrying a second grib. The test sample (approximately one-inch
wide and six-inches long) is held by the two gribs in such a way that either shear or peel strength of
the sample can be measured. The movable member is then pulled at a rate of two inches per minute
with a load indicator measuring the tensile strength of the sample. The sample passes the tests when
the film yields before the seam separates (sheet fails before weld), and the yield strength of the sheet
for shear is 90 percent and peel is 70 percent.
2.3.2 NON-DESTRUCTIVE
There are a variety of non-destructive testing methods being used to test field seams. The most
common and effective methods are the vacuum box and air pressure testing methods.
The vacuum box is often specified as a required testing method for liner seams. The method uses a
plexiglass-faced suction box, typically three feet long and wide enough to cover the weld, placed over
a section of the seam which has been moistened with a soap solution. When suction is applied to the
seam through a suction pump cOlUlection on the box, leaks are detected by the formation of bubbles.
The seam is maintained under suction for to seconds. This testing method can be conducted by two
men at a rate of approximately 30 meters (34 yards) per hour.
Air pressure testing is typically used when double-track seams are installed. The test is conducted by
sealing both ends of the seam and pumping air between the two seams. Through the use of a
manometer, the air pressure is maintained at about 30 psi. The maximum allowable loss in air
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALlNA\81~8.001
41S193I'
G-?
pressure shall not exceed four psi after 15 minutes.
Camp Dresser & McKu Inc.
ISALlNAI8.'iS8.001
4/5/9315
G-B
3.0 CLAY LINERS
Liners constructed with clay soils have been used extensively for water and wastewater impoundments
as well as for solid waste landfill liner systems. Properly placed and compacted clay soils provide a
homogeneous low permeability liner that limits seepage. The thickness of clay liners varies according
to seasonal high groundwater levels and the type of solid waste material to be deposited in the lined
facilities.
By definition, clay soils have fine particles consisting of clay minerals and other materials which pass
through a number 200 sieve (opening size 0.075 nun). The clay minerals in the soil provide the
necessary plastic and cohesive properties to enhance the low permeability of the soil and making it
suitable for liquid containment. In order to achieve the desired hydraulic conductivity of clay liners
through compaction, the soils should have the following general properties:
1.
Minimum of 50
the 1.5-inch sieve.
:?' itl ~!
siW material and 100 percent passing
__2::':
2. Maximum clod size of three inches or half the lift thickness.
3. Maximum particle size of 1.5 inches.
4. Minimum plasticity index of 15, with a minimum liquid limit of 30.
5. Be free of roots, woody vegetation, and other deleterious or original material.
In addition to the above clay soil properties, compaction rate and construction techniques play an
important role in achieving low permeability characteristics. The liner material should be compacted
to 95 percent of standard proctor density in six- to eight-inch thick layers (lifts). The moisture
.
content should be kept wet of optimum during compaction (zero to four percent above optimum).
Compaction of clay material at a moisture content wet of optimum tends to realign soil particles
resulting in a more dispersed soil fabric and less voids.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALlNA\8.'iS8.001
4/519310
G-9
3.1 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE CLAYS
Generally speaking, the feasibility of using a clay liner at a landfill facility depends on the availability
of suitable liner material on or near the site. For a three-foot recompacted clay liner, the cost of
transporting and handling off-site clay material is usually higher than using a 6O-mil synthetic liner
material. However, should a clay source be located on or near a proposed facility site, this can
significantly reduce the installation cost of the liner by reducing or eliminating transportation costs.
3.2 IN-SITU CLAYS
The presence of an in-situ continuous low permeability layer of sufficient thickness underlying a
proposed facility site would be an ideal situation for the use of recoIDpacted clay liner. Basically, the
overburden material would be excavated and stockpiled. and the top three feet of the clay layer would
then be graded and recompacted. The excavated overburden material can be used for daily cover
during landfill operation, or for ;'113!f~I;~~ri1\:tF~~]lllr;~uired.
3.3 SOILS ADMIXTURE
Native soils on-site can be augmented with a soil admixture to further decrease the natural
permeability of the soils. Commonly used admixtures include asphalt, soil cement, and polymer
treated or natural bentonite (clay) minerals. The amount of bentonite required varies between 3 and
15 percent by weight depending on the native soils type. The amount of required bentonite and the
proximity of the source to a proposed waste disposal site will significantly impact ,the economics of
this approach.
3.4 FAILURE MECHANISM
Laboratory tests suggest that dilute leachate would not adversely impact the permeability of clay liners
if the liner is compacted unifonnIy and the moisture content is maintained wet of optimum during
compaction. However, strong acids and bases can dissolve solid materials in soils and form channels,
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALlNA\8.'iS8.001
4/5/9315
G-lD
thereby increasing the permeability of the liner. There is also a potential for the permeability of the
liner to increase with time due to limited ion or cation exchange capacity.
Before construction of the actual clay liner, a test pad is usually constructed and evaluated by required
testing for Construction Quality Assurance (CQA). This is done to ensure material suitability and the
ability of the construction technique to achieve a homogeneous low permeability liner.
3.5 TEST PAD
The purpose of the test pad is to develop and verify construction techniques, testing, and quality
assurance requirements for use in construction of the primary liner system. The test pad is usually
constructed of the same soil material to be used in the construction of the actual liner . The following
layers are commonly used in a test pad:
1. Two 6-inch layers of high permeability (1 x 10-3 cmlsec) gravel to provide free drainage
under the liner.
2. ~;;::~: :ri~:~:~dtc:r~1~1!,~+~;l;roposed liner, compacted to 95
Width of the test pad should be a minimum of four times the width of the largest equipment to be
used in the compaction. The length should be a minimum of four times the width of the compaction
equipment.
3.6 TESTING REOUlREMENTS
Prior to test pad construction, the soil liner material should be tested to support conformance of
material suitability. The following liner source tests are typically performed: (1) grain size analysis,
(2) auerberg limits, (3) moisture-density curve, and (4) hydraulic con'ductivity.
During test pad construction, the soil liner material is tested to provide a correlation between the
laboratory testing results and the construction techniques required to achieve a homogeneous liner
base.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNA\8.'i58.001
4/5/931,
G-ll
The following tests should be performed as each lift is placed: (1) nuclear or sand cone density, (2)
moisture content, and (3) laboratory and infield permeability tests. Density and moisture content tests
are usually performed every 250 cubic yards of emplaced material. Undisturbed permeability tests
are usually performed every 1,500 cubic yards of inplace material.
4.0 ALTERNATIVE LINER SYSTEMS
4.1 TYPES OF LANDFILL LINER SYSTEMS
Common types of landfill liner systems are: (1) single liner, (2) composite liner, and (3) double
liner. All types of landfill liner systems presented will require a minimum of 12 inches lateral
drainage layer with 1 x 10-2 cmlsec permeability rate. The following sections briefly describe these
liner systems and their applications.
4.1.1 SINGLE LINER
Single liners are usually constructed from clay soils or synthetic geomembranes. Types and
thicknesses of single liners vary according to the geological and hydrogeological information,
groundwater depth and use, and site specific information. Most frequently used single liners are:
1. Three feet of recompacted clay with hydraulic conductivity no greater than
1 x to-7 cmlsec.
2. Sixty-mil HDPE liner which has an average equivalent hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-12
cmlsec.
4.1.2 COMPOSITE LINER SYSTEM
Composite linefs consist of a clay layer underlying a synthetic liner. The thickness of the clay layer
in a composite liner typically varies between one and three feet, depending on the type of solid waste
materials and associated groundwater contamination risk factor. A minimum of 6O-mil synthetic liner
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAUNA\8158.001
4/5mls
G-12
material is commonly used over the clay layer in composite liner systems. Use of composite liner
systems is becoming more popular in municipal solid waste landfills due to the lower leakage rate and
improved durability.
4.1.3 DOUBLE LINER SYSTEM
The double liner concept was initially developed by EPA for hazardous waste disposal sites. The
double liner system consists of a primary liner (top liner) and a secondary liner (bottom liner). Both
liners should have at least one l2-inch thick lateral drainage layer with hydraulic conductivity not less
than 1 x 10.2 cm/sec, and a drainage system of pipes to efficiently collect and remove leachate. The
leachate collection system of the secondary liner is often referred to as a leak. detection system.
The primary liner acts as a first line of defense for the containment and removal of leachate. Should
a leak develop in the primary liner, the secondary liner detects the leak., contains the leachate, and
removes it through the leak detecd.~~~bl~ltiI Sy~.
'" ,""''''tt. /C)1ft
..,.".".
The double liner system could consist of two synthetic liners, a synthetic and a clay liner, two
composite liners, or any combination of liner systems with a leachate collection/detection system for
each liner layer. Double liner systems have been used for incinerator ash disposal monofills
(ashfills).
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALlNA\8S58.001
41S193ls
G-!3
4.2 EV ALUATlON OF ALTERNATIVE LINER SYSTEMS
4.2.1 REGULATORY DESIGN CRITERIA
RCRA Subtitle D requires the installation of a composite liner system or a demonstration that the
landfill will not discharge contaminants in violation of federal groundwater standards. The composite
system consists of:
1. A composite bottom liner consisting of a 60 mil flexible membrane liner (FML) and a
clay layer. The clay layer should be of a sufficient thickness to prevent leachate
migration (three feet), and have hydraulic permeability no greater than 1 x 10-7 cm/sec.
2. One-foot thick minimum lateral drainage layer having a hydraulic conductivity of 0.01
cm/sec (0.02 ft/min), at two percent minimum slope toward the collection pipes
(perforated).
3. The lateral drainage layer should be installed at the bottom and sidewalls.
4.2.2 COMPATIBILITY WlJllJInI~ A~I
The selected liner material should resist the chemical components of leachate. and demonstrate the
ability to maintain quality performance standards under the influence of a concentrated composition of
leachate chemicals.
Clay liners react differently with leachate depending on the chemical components of the clay particles.
The best evaluation results can be obtained by performing aD in-situ permeability test using a
representative leachate liquid to reflect the actualliner/leachate interface conditions. The hydraulic
conductivity of clays usually increases when leachate is used in lieu of water.
EP A's document Lining of Waste Containment and Other Impoundment Facilities, EP A/600/2-88/052,
(published September 1988), presents test seam evaluations for several flexible membrane liners
exposed to chemical solutions simulating service conditions. Among the samples are PVC and HPDE
liners. The samples were immersed in the following chemical solutions:
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALINAI8'iS8.001
415/9315
G-14
Chemical ConcentrationA (%) Type
Phenol 10 Organic acid
HydrocWoric acid 10 Inorganic acid
Sodium hydroxide 10 Inorganic base
Methyl ethyl ketone 10 Ketone
Furfural 5 Aldehyde
Methylene chloride 100" Halogenated hydrocarbon
NaCl at 23 degrees C 36.1 (saturated) Brine
NaCl at 50 degrees C 37.0 (saturated) Brine
Water 100 Tap water (Denver, CO)
.
Parts per tOO parts of water, by weight.
Neat methylene chloride (100 percent concentration).
o
Pure chemicals or aqueous chemical solutions were selected, rather than actual waste/leachate from
waste sites, to simplify the verifiCNiGupf4~g prpced~,s~"-:'c~4lqwugh some of these chemical
::::::::: '::::::", :::::~: :::::::~, .>^':,,& "'::< ,': c_ 'c' """~:
compounds may not be found in tr~cl:11t~~~ _~Mtft~pallid waste sites, there is no
certainty in controlling the types of solid waste received at a landflii site.
The changes in weight of the FML samples inunersed in the various test liquids for 52 weeks are
shown in Exhibit 4-1, Table 5-56. Results show the HDPE has the least percentage change by
weight.
The results of the peel and shear tests of the inunersed seams are summarized in Exhibit 4.2, Table 5.
57. Performance of the seams was considered to be satisfactory if 20 percent or less loss occurred in
either shear or peel strength after exposure. The table shows that HDPE seams have satisfactory
results after exposure. On the other hand, PVC seams have unsatisfactory results in five solutions
after exposure.
Exhibit 2 shows stress-strain performance curves for HDPE, PVC, and CPE (chlorinated
polyethylene) liner materials. In both uniaxial and biaxial stress-strain performance, HDPE material
maintains higher strength than PVC and CPE materials. respectively.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALlNA\SS5S.001
4/51931,
G-15
Exhibit 4-4 depicts the comparison of leachate collection efficiencies for compacted soil liners with 1
x to-6 cm/sec and 1 x 10-7 cm/sec hydraulic conductivities, intact composite liner system, and
composite liner systems with a small FML hole. The results show that composite liners have better
leachate collection efficiencies than soil liners.
According to the presented information on seams, the evaluation of flexible membrane liners, and
stress-strain performance, it is proposed that HDPE liner material be used as a single synthetic liner
alternative for evaluation. The HDPE liner was chosen over PVC and CSPE/CPE liners due to the
hie:her strength oerformance and abilitv to maintain HDPE's ohvsical orooerties and field seams
inte2ritv in an aqueous chemical enviromnent.
4.2.3 INSTALLATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL
Skilled and experienced persormel are required to successfully complete a liner installation project.
Dry and moderately warm weather conditions are preferred during installation. Installation in
extremely cold or extremely hot -w~~0:r'i'~tionsjran 1t~9DIle4. only if it can be demonstrated
that adverse weather conditions WQY.ld)jJ~:~~Ct ~':::mte~ of tij installed liner and seams. This
.) ,,' ,.:::,~ '(C'-~"" <'r" ,,:':':': , . ..,.,.,.,
can be accomplished through fOrfui1lB.ted--4~lIfiY ~Stii~~)ijualityklontrol (QA/Qc) procedures for the
calibration of welding machines and test seam sampling prior to commencing actual liner installation.
The following general installation procedures are normally used for synthetic liners:
1. An anchor trench is excavated around the perimeter of the area to be lined. The anchor
trench should be cleaned and smoothed before placing (anchoring) the liner. The liner
should be unrolled along and parallel to the anchor trench in the width direction.
2. The surface of the subgrade should be inspected to confirm that it is firm, free of sharp
rocks or debris, and graded adequately for the leachate collection system to perform
properly.
3. The liner sheets should be placed and seamed according to an approved panel layout
drawing.
Camp Dresser &: McKee Inc.
lSALlNA\8S5S.001
41519315
G-16
.'
~.,L,
1
TADLE 5-56. C/lMlGE ItI WE IGIIT OF FilLS EXPOSED TO VARIOUS TEST LIQUIDS FOR 52 WEEKSa
Change. percent by weight
tlominal Saturated
Type or thickness, Tap lIaCI b 101 lOX 101 lOX 100X 51
Polymer Samp 1 eC compoundd mil '-later 23'C 500C Phenol /lCl NaOIl fiE K CII2C12 Furfural
CPE L TP 30 10.1 9 I. 41 1.10 25.61 I. 41 -2.07 29.89 -100.00 67.60
II TP 30 9.78 1.27 1.99 25.88 ). 24 -2.22 J8.63 -100.00 80.00
A(R) TP 36 22.10 2.37 3.09 37.11 9.47 8.25 18.25 -100.00 47.81
O(R) TP 36 9.27 1.20 0.40 6.10 -0.22 -5.37 12.72 -100.00 24.92
CSPE C(R ) TP 30 4.06 0.65 1.74 14.53 0.60 I. 20 4.60 -100.00 14.Q9
O(R) TP 36 8.10 2.23 4.\5 16.54 2.9U 2.25 16.01 -100.00 23.89
E(R) TP 36 5.81 3.00 4.~6 17.54 2.68 2.15 7.25 -100.00 10.09
F(R) TP 36 6.77 1.27 3.29 38.04 6.04 3.60 10.19 -100.00 38.55
G(R) TP 36 4.92 2.46 2.96 16.64 9.15 14.05 6.30 -100.00 17.43
/I(R) TP 36 5.12 2.46 2.73 16.68 3.68 14.59 6.47 -100.00 17.76
I(R) TP 36 I I. 72 2.96 4.15 19.03 .20.15 I), 94 14.82 -100.00 22.01
E1A J(R) TP 38 4.03 1.81 2.38 -100.00 7.12 -5.22 5.77 -100.00 32.30
EPOH K(R) XL 30 3.55 I. 55 2.94 8.61 3.76 ). 29 4.74 4.03 11.80
/lOPE II CX 30 -0.01 -0.01 . 0.14 -0.48 -0.28 0.32 0.39 6.74 0.83
0 CX 80 0.05 0.06 0.13 0.12 -0.29 0.19 0.55 4.07 0.59
P ex 80 0.01 0.01 -0.01 -0.31 0.12 0.18 3.17 0.34
Q CX 00 0.06 0.02 0.00 -0.41 -0.26 0.14 0.28 4.78 0.51
LLOPE R CX 30 0.00 0.07 0.27 -0.50 -0.79 0.21 0.63 7.52 0.72
PVC S IP 30 ). 57 -0.97 -0.54 -16.38 6.41 -18.11 2.91 -100.00 5.55
T lP 30 2.42 -0.81 -0.57 -15.90 3.69 -19.6S 5.51 -100.00 13.12
U IP 30 ). 53 -0.18 -0.50 -12.78 7.04 -14.97 I), 37 -100.00 15.35
." antI solutIons are aqueous; expo:jllre was at room temperature (230(), except where otherwise indicated.
x
::T A "5X" .or "lOX" solution means 5 or 10 9 or solvent per 100 9 1120, respectively. flethylene chloride was neat.
~.
0'" bSaturated,olutlon at 23'C is 26.5X by weight (36.1 9 per 100 9 /120); saturated solut;on at 50'C is 27.0X by
~.
M" weight (37.0 9 per IDa 9 /120).
~ Cldentlflcation code; R ~ fabric reinforced.
I
-
dyp = thermoplasttc; XL. crosslinked: ex .. semicrystalllne thermoplastic.
Source: Hard son and rarkh i 11 , 1987, PP 81-85.
"
l^8l( $.57, r[prORllhll([ or rill UAH SNlrtES (lfOnD 10 YMlIOUS 1[51 liQUIDS'
hit IIquldb
Ilolllln.l S.t\lf,l'!d
thl(\IItu. 5uIII l,.p~ h, Il,Clc lOt lOt 101 \0' 100S I'
Polprr 5'/IlIltd .11 U"'Pht of su..' ",.tff 2J'C ~O'C rhtnol )ICl fl.Oll "" (112(12 rwrfuo'
cr. L 30 II IA S S I . . . . . .
L 30 ,. $A . S S . S . . . .
" 30 \1 101 . S S . S . . . .
" 30 " $A . S S . S . . U u
A\'l " I IliA. U U U . U U . U u
'\' " 11 '$A . U . U . U . . .
'\'l 36 I 1IlA S S S U . . . U .
'\' " " SA S S . U . . . U .
r1;rf Cflll 10 , IliA S . \ . S . S " S
C\'I 30 19 ISA S S Q S S . S U .
0\') " . iliA U . . U S . . . .
0\') " '0 IS' U U . . S . . U u
'1') J6 S ilIA S S 0 . Q u . . .
n:l J6 II .. S S S u Q u S U S
J6 6 IliA U U S . U . U . .,
FI" J6 II ISA S S S u S . S . u
01'1 J6 , IS' S S 0 . S U S U S
0\' J6 " SA S S S . S . S U .
11(11 J6 8 101 S S S U S . S . U
11(11) J6 l4 $A S S S U S u S U 0
1\'1 J6 " $A S S 0 U U . S . S
'" J\') JI . 11'''' S S U S U . U u
JI') JI 16 HIA S S . S . U U U
HUl 'I" .0 10 VI S S S S S . S S S
l(R) '0 " Olt . U S . . U U 0 .
lIf1rf " JO ]0 HW S S S S S S S S S
0 80 J! "" S S S S S S S I I
p 80 J! "" S S S S S S S S S
0 '0 JJ 1011 S S S S S S S S S
llDrt , 30 IJ 1I1W' S S S S S S S S S
, 30 " 111" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
rYf': . 1" H .. . S \ II . " II U II
S 3D 31 SA S S S U I U U . .
1 30 IS 101 S S S . S . U U U
1 3. J6 $A S S S U S . . . .
. 30 " SA S S S . S . . U .
rvc.crt 30 16 ,., . . . U . U . U .
", .SU_'fr of tht ftlul!.! of lull"', ""'Ill" .ft,!f l.6. ,-. Il ~O"t"s of r'r~sutt', U . uns ~t Is' 'ct",y; 0 G',~st lon.blt:
X :5. ,.tlsl.CIUft. rerfor~.nc, lollS tonsldtrtd uns.tlsfatlofY If thef' wU ",ort t'h.n . 201 loss In tlth" shur or P'!tl
::r ttr'"9th "ttr t~Posurt.
0- bAll Joluttons 1ft .qul!:aUS; t.pO~U't wu Jl roo" tt/rIPl'rlturr {lrC}, tJ""t ..hrrt ctht,...,ht ,..dluttd. A "Sl"
~. 0" -101- solution IIIU'" S or 10, 01 IOht..l rt' 100, IIZ0. rUPtctl.~l,. "rthy'r..t chlorldr .." "~It.
.-+ Chtunhd solutio" .t U-C Is 26.51 by wrl,ht (36.1 9 prr 100,- ltZO)i utur.ttd lolutlo.. It SO.C Is Z1.01 by "~'9ht
..,. (31.0 t per 100 9 1120).
I dldt'ntlrlullon for fill 11 luhd In I""'t'rslo... , . f.brlc-rrl..lorctd.
N rldtntlrlutlon for rill .,.d s"..1"9 S,st"....
'^O _ .dhtsht'; ISA _ bodlrd Jolunt .dhul.ti (I" . ,_,rUllo.. flllrt ..,ld; (t" . t.tru,lo" l.p __"d; Gle . 9\1'" tu', ,-.
crlll,n'i SA. sohr..t .dhrshri 101 . thr'....I..dltltctrlc: 1171' . thtn,..I-.hot du.l ..~d9'; lItA . lhtr~.I--hol IIr;
"'" . th".""lnhot wrd,,: VI . .,ulCllnlrrd plus 0.15-1... up slrlp.
SourCrl Horrlso" .nd r.r.hlll. 198'. pp 10-15.
"000
3000
;;;;
..
.,;
~
~
~
~ 2000
~
-.-
.___-~.-. TO )ebO PSI
.....i"\).-- :1
pt p...l"'.=-- - --,...
'r\y.:::-- _-
..--. --- --.--
"...-.__. ---:_."'"i,a\)
__. __ ~c. \"U1\\&
.;"'. __ I
/' ,..........
,,/" ..........
./ ./
./' /'
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
/
I PV
I,....-r.
,
I
"
,
X HOPE lBiaxiall
i
j;t, ./
I '-'
Ii
.'
II
,
I
,
1000
o
'00
AT 1'!O'l.
CPf (\.Jnialliloll
(KEORNER,RICHAROSON-UNIAXIAll
(STEffEN-BIAXIAll
200
)00
'00
500
STRAIN, "
Figure 6.3 FML Stress-Strain Performance
Exhi bit 4-3
COMPARISON OF LEACHATE COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES
..
>-
u
z
w
u
...
...
w
z
0
l- so
U
W
..J
..J
0
U
w
I-
<
:t
U
<
W
..J
com'pacl.d solt.....
k.l k 10-rcm/~ec
.....Comp.cl.d .011
k'" x 10~ em/see
100
Compo aU.
(tnlacl)
'. CompoaU. with
.mall FML hole
o
1
10
100
1.000
10.000
TOP LINER LEAKAGE RATE IGal/acr./day)
.....,
Comparison of leachate collection efficiencies for
compacted soil. and composite bollom liners.
Source: 52 FR 12572. April 17. 1987
Exhibit 4-4
The installation rate for synthetic liners varies between 3/4 of an acre to one acre per day depending
on the weather. site conditions, and installation crew experience. Quality assurance/quality control
during construction consists of conformance testing of delivered material to the site, and quality
control testing during installation of the liner material. Section 2.3, Seam Testing, discusses the
importance of seaming quality to the successful installation of synthetic liner materials.
To achieve a homogeneous low permeability clay liner, it is important that the liner be constructed in
six to eight inch lifts, and that required construction quality control tests be performed upon
completion of each lift. Due to the time requirement for completing each lift and performing QA/QC
tests, the construction of clay liners requires a considerably longer period of time than for synthetic
liners.
Based on the presented technical information and EPA's test results in comparing the performance of
selected liner systems, composite liners have demonstrated high performance standards for leachate
containment and durability in resisting chemical components of leachate.
":::~:~t"""::~:;:... V'~:::"""'"
tt: it',: iN
Without consideration of site-spedfic:::fb it-appears that composite liners would
be the best choice due to their durability and performance standards. A single synthetic liner system
using HDPE material will be ranked second. Clay liners will be ranked third as a single liner
material.
4.3 PROPOSED LINER ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS
The hydrogeologic investigations performed on the City of Salina landfill site indicate a fairly
consistent clay layer overlaying the suspected uppermost aquifer. Alternative liner systems were
developed assuming the possibility that clay liner material is available on location. Bentonite
admixture was also considered to be sued with on-site soils to achieve a 1 x 10"7 cmlsec permeability
for soil liner material. High density polyethylene (60 mil) was used 'for a single synthetic liner
system.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALlNA\81S8.001
415193L1
G-21
The following liner alternative systems were developed for cost comparison analysis and evaluation.
Alternative 1 Composite liner, 60-mil HDPE and 24-inches of in-place clay
Alternative 2 Composite liner, 60-mil HDPE and 24-inches bentonite admixture
4.4 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF ALTERNATIVES
Estimated construction costs of these alternatives are shown on the following tables (Tables 4-1
through 4-2). The estimated construction costs of all alternatives are based on developing an eight
acre area.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALlNA\8.'i5S.OOI
415/9310
G-22
,
TABLE 4-1
ALTERNATIVE I
COMPOSITE LINER 60 MIL + 24" CLAY
Unit Total
Unit Quantity Cost ($) Cost ($)
SF 348,480 0.12 $41,818
Each 1 2,500.00 2,500
Item
1. Disk & Compaction of Top
2. Test Pad 50' x 30'
I-foot thick
3. In-situ Permeability Test
4. Lab. Permeability Test @ 2/acre
5. Density/Moisture Tests @ 6/acre
Each 48 75.00
Each 16 150.00
Each 48 25.00
Each I 5,000.00
Each 348,480 0.85
3 50 500.00
Each I 75.00
Each ................1' C.O< 5,000.00
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Certification of Construction
60-mil HDPE System
Conformance Test Every 100,000 SF
Seam Tests Every 500 feet of seaming
Certification of Constructj,qn:\::::., '
TOTAL COST
- u___ "
":':':":, ,/-,.,.e<"-:'F:". ,~:~:)
",!:'l.
NOTES:
1. Construction cost estimate is based on an eight-acre area.
2. Estimated construction cost per acre = $45,372.
3. Estimated construction cost per square foot - $1.04.
3,600
2,400
1,200
5,000
296,208
1.500.00
3.750.00
5.000
$362.976
4. Construction materials for leachate collection system were not considered in the evaluation
since they are going to be installed under each alternative.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALINA\~S8.00]
415193]s
G-23
l
TABLE 4-2
ALTERNATIVE 2
COMPOSITE LINER 60 MIL + 24" BENTONITE
Unit Total
Item Unit Quantity Cost ($) Cost ($)
1. Bentonite Material 4.5 Ib/sf/6" Lift Tons 3,136 170.00 $533.120
2. Installation 2' TH $0.15/,1/6" Lift SF 348,480 .00 104.544
3. Test Pad 50' x 30' I-foot Thick Each 1 2.500.00 2.500
4. In-situ Permeability Test @ 6/acre Each 48 75.00 3,600
5. Lab. Permeability Test @ 6/acre Each 16 150.00 2,400
6. Density/Moisture Tests @ 2/acre Each 48 25.00 1,200
7. Certification of Construction Each 1 5,000.00 5,000
8. 60-mil HDPE System Each 348,480 0.85 296,208
9. Conformance Test Every 100,000 SF Each 3 500.00 1.500
10. Seam Tests Every 500 feet of seaming Each 50 75.00 3.750
11. Certification of Construcai~' 5,000.00 5.000
TOTAL COST $958.822
NOTES:
1. Construction cost estimate is based on an eight-acre area.
2. Estimated construction cost per acre = $119,853.
3. Estimated construction cost per square foot - $2.75.
4. Construction materials for leachate collection system were not considered in the evaluation
since they are going to be installed under each alternative.
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
\SALINA\8.'iSS.OOl
4151931,
G-24
TABLE 4-3
ALTERNATIVE 3
COMPOSITE LINER 60 MIL + 24" CLAY (OFF-SITE BORROW)
Unit Total
Item Unit Quantity Cost ($) Cost ($)
1. Off-site Borrow Clay Material CY 28,800 15.80 $455,040
2. Installation 2' TH $0.06/sf/6" Lift SF 348,480 0.24 83,635
3. Test Pad 50' x 30' I-foot Thick Each 1 2.500.00 2,500
4. In-situ Permeability Test @ 6/acre Each 48 75.00 3,600
5. Lab. Permeability Test@ 2/acre Each 16 150.00 2,400
6. Density/Moisture Tests @ 6/acre Each 48 25.00 1,200
7. Certification of Construction Each 1 5,000.00 5,000
8. 60-mB HDPE System Each 348,480 0.85 296,208
9. Conformance Test Every 100,000 SF Each 3 500.00 1,500
10. Seam Tests Every 500 feet of seaming Each 50 75.00 3,750
11. Certification of Construc@~"'lb~: 5,000.00 5.000
TOTAL COST $859,833
NOTES:
1. Construction cost estimate is based on an eight-acre area.
2. Estimated construction cost per acre ::= $t07,479.
3. Estimated construction cost per square foot - $2.47.
4. Construction materials for leachate collection system were not considered in the evaluation
since they are going to be installed under each alternative.
Camp Dresser &- McKee Inc.
ISAUNA\SS5S.001
4151931,
G-25
5.0 COST COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 COST COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES
The estimated construction cost of each alternative includes quality assurance and quality control
(QA/QC) costs during construction. Construction cost estimates are based on dev~loping an 8-acre
area in the initial phase. Unit prices used in preparing these cost estimates ere obtained from
contractors, suppliers, and available bid information.
The liner system used in Alternative 1 is a composite liner consisting of 24 inches of in place clay
and a 60 mil HDPE liner. The construction cost estimate for this alternative is $362,976.
Alternative 2 is similar to Alternative 1, except that 24 inches of soil bentonite mixture is used in lieu
of clay. The cost of this alternative is $958.822.
Alternative 3 is similar to Alternative 1, except that the clay material is brought in from off-site. The
construction cost of this altemati~~i8~4_85fh8iR'
III: II-_,_,,:::~;::::
'<~":', ,.,
The feasibility of using Alternative 2 is ruled out because the additional cost required for the
bentonite soil additive. The construction cost of Alternative 3 is high compared with Alternative 1,
due to the imported clay material for clay liner construction.
Alternative 1 is the most economically viable option for liner systems. The construction cost of this
alternative is 62 percent less than Alternative 2, and 58 percent less than Alternative 3.
The cost of installing one square foot of liner material in this analysis ranges between $$1.04 for 60-
mil HDPE/clay and $2,75 for HDPElbentonite/soil mixture. Table 5-1, Page 5-3, summarizes the
total construction cost and cost per square foot of liner material for e<\ch alternative in ascending
order.
5.2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
To be completed later
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISAL]NAI8158.001
41519315
G-26
.
TABLE 5-1
CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF CONSIDERED ALTERNATIVES
IN ASCENDING ORDER
Total
Construction Cost Per
Alternative Cost ($) SF ($)
I. Alternative 1, 60-mil HDPE/On-site Clay 362,9'76 1.04
2. Alternative 3, 6O-mil HDPE/Off-site Clay 859,833 2.75
3. Alternative 2, 60-mil HDPE/Bentonite/Soil 958,822 2.47
Camp Dresser & McKee 1m:.
ISAUNA\8.'iSS.OOl
415/931.
G-27
APPENDIX H
~aE~ARt1>RAW:;ds
.... ----- . -... ..... ---
Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ISALINA\8.'i5S.OOl
41519315
CDM
environmental engineers, scientists,
planners, & management consultants
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE
offices worldwide
PrintedonRecycledPaper
.
THIS ROLL CONTAINS
DOCUMENTS THAT
ARE OF POOR
QUALITY
AND LEGIBILITY.
THESE ARE THE BEST
REPRODUCTIONS
AVAILABLE.
, - ,,_ ,: II" :-"-', . j'" ,
"--...II',-"~->",, :
--At -.,-...~ d'/I '" .
11.-:------13110-'"'. / '"
,- 'lJ"'" ,
:'11,-. '-" , ,","
II '-.
II
. ---'1" ;\
>..,P' t 1'-, / )
o II '-~. L ~
II -~---. \"
'1 J '- ....,...
II ~-'-
. (-
,11,_,
II ~'
" .
" /1
'J I
H
/ I ,-
~. :/ ,....-/'"';
~-/ r--r '\
II '
1/
II.
II
II
II
II
, 'II
, II--
I f
f I
f I
I I
II
:, ,"
II
"
II
:.11
I'll
1\1
-. : I ~
"n-,.
II
II
II
Ii
II
(I
II
II
'II
II
II
II
"
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
I!
J ,
If
II
II
11
II
II
i I
, I
II
II
I I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
/ J
/ ,
Jf
I f
If
"
1/
f/
.---- I I
1/
II
II
. II
/ I
-'; II
:It
~ I I
;II.
, I t:
",\ ';
; It.
~, (
I J '-
II
II.
II
II
II
H
II
t I
II
II
II
II -
rJ
II
1\
f I
fI
"" .
__/ \__.:-______---'~ " . _ . __ _. ..-l .." ___
_, _-----_ _________~ . 0 ~_ . ~
'\ r/..--- " . h - -~-------------=:--:-..::-=- - - -::.--=-- --:. ~-:-=-=-==.-:-==-:~-- ------------
; . ~~----------~~~~~~---------
!, ,. : n ,/'/ .."'. -",' ',' ---------
/" ../
,
REV. OA TE 0R1rN O<<n
NO,
~AR'PtS
J",
.
o
c
c
o
F
E
G
H
'\" '" ~ -', ,'. \,." ,.; \ ' . \ '.
- . \... ". '. ~" \ ',.,' .\~:.:\~\-;. ~<<~'\' O' '\
:,\\",'\ .'\. ,':.\\:'.,\,:~.\,.-",<.
,', "",~,. ... , . \
. '\, ,\ \: <>~\t~1l2:-;:'- :~-:~:~~ -~~:" \,'.'.'
\. ' ". , -...... .
. ~ \~.. ~ - -.... ..,...... ~ .. .
",\. '... ~i.;~l~~ii.=,~'.~.:
" .....~' , '
~
I
\ '
, \'
.\,
'\
'\
I
\
.\
, I,
,
'.... .
~
\
\
, ,
-"
/
,.,'.
\~--
:
'. " .
#
, '
I '
c:~
': ---- - ...,-~
'.
-.,
:-.-"':-- -:-..' -= -....- -: T
'.
"
j
,. -
.,"
,\
\
"
I'
, ,
\
i
......-'.
\
~. --
#
~
" ,
-..,"-
\
'- .
\
\
;!>
~
~'- ~-, ....
, \ '
!
t.
. f
\
.f
. , I
\
. ". \
. ' ,
~ -..............
---',
- , " ',,-
i
~_.-----
~'
,
/,/
"
'.
---
.'
'.
'- '~"':"'....., '" -
-. -_::~ ---,-_..". -'
-------- -
,
\,
'.
-'-, -.
i.
- _.' ..2:::,
'~,_-
...-\ \
\
\.
,
\
,
\
-.--........
,
\
i
\
I
\
, ,
'-.'~.
'. , ,"\ ""
.,---'"
,
'I~.. ..,'
'. -. ---- - -..:....:..-<
'----.. - -
. --- ,....--..-..
...
.~
.'
...
. '~\,
~
'\
"
--- -.
...
._--- __ ,3ID" -......--
~
-.
'+:
\
"
. \
\,
'---.
......
.....,
'-.
..._,-F"
, .
----
'.
'....
\.,
.
,
--'
.--
'.
~---
....---
.
I
\
..-...--.......-.
''''-.
"
.rpl--'
\
.../
~-
I'
-'3Cl -......
i
CELL.! - SEE1'
SHEET C-3 _
, .
. -
~ ~, , ~ --
, ' -.' ~--/ ,
r - - - ----'. .,-.---:-..... .....;.... ......: .'- ,.
. ""-, " '. "". 0......,. ~----:,-T---'--'~
'-. ' ...., I
\
>.....---....-- ...~
/"
"'f).
\
'- ,
'......, '
'\ "
'\ .
"
-.-
"
i
'.\
--
,,'
.'
J'/
,
/
.~'---....
- '~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-=:-:--:...- - ------- 'JClO- I
-~ ~,- :'"-:-----... ~~
~ < '. 1
- -..
------.I'
I~
POTENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION'!
DEMOLITION
WASTE AREA
I<IItJ_.
;' ;
---
!
~
I
\
,
....,
....
'-
~
,
--
.---
1I.,......~ a1j-...L' . ~i",,:~~:(i
~~~~~=~~~~~~~~~-_._~~~~~~~~~-----------------~~------------~
------------------------~-~----
-1(-~
O. CHASE
D. CHASE
T. .....L1..MS
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE 1<<:.
CJ($lGllEO aT,
OIIllll"5 ,.,.
5o'€ET 0<<1) n.
(;lIIlICSS ~i) ...,.
~V5) 8T:
Di'TE. APM.. 1993
CITY OF SALtNA. KANSAS
..
5
~
&.UQIl
PROPOSEO IfOAQ$
A
~
~
"'-
100 0
,- . 200.
"
. -
.
200
2
3
4
L,-,
, ~ 1
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
PRELIMINARY SITE DE'JELOPMENT PLAN/BASE GRADES
~......."" ~~.... CDII
IIl-.s. , ,T4_.__' ~,.,,,,
.
C
.
B
.
A
.
I
t ,
I
i I
. I ' I '
I
MJ
.
A
.
.
B
.
C
\,
:,.1.
1
5
NOTE...;
THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
NOT INTENDED FOR CONS TRUCTION PURPOSES.
.
o
,,:\
5
.,..~--. ;- J ~ :.:-. - ~ :--- ~ -, ~..... "':"
. .
[ :'.',"C
~
~
_12~
PftO.!E:Ci NO.
S558-00-CG
St€ET NO.
C-l
!
t:f.\
'- ':...- J I.' \:~/,..,!
-. ..II.'...:>:~...,;:/.
','r~. "'''~)
..jl. .
, II.
I .
II
',1 t . " /'-;
. ~ .'11, ,/
./' II '-\ i
. "'11 '-___J
- . " J~~ 'k,
II
" , 1-. ~ .
"
II
II
. .,
, I
I 1
, I
II
-..__, .:; i. _ I-~
-I ,--'
I I
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
tJ
II
II
II
II
II
il
11
II
II
II
II
Ii
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
i I
II
II
\I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
i I
tJ
If
11
I \
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I ,
If
i f
II
II
f I
II
II
II
I ,
II
"
II
, I
II
--:-, ,
/ r II
I'
/I
. "
- II
-: II
:tt
:11
:11
111
~tl
; I ,
; I I
I J
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
If
II
II
II
J I
.:..._/\-
~
to;
o
E
G
F
H
:\\ 0'. '~" :.: "', \ \ . .'
';" " .. '. 'Yo " ,:. . \. ... " " '. \
'. \ .' ':'\\ :.' .,' \.":. \.:..:~~;:' '~~Y. /0'" ><, '- ~
'.' '. \'" ,,\. '.., ',' ',.,....... :,... :.......... '. .,...' . '.. ..",: '. \, ; Q
. \ ',' " \ \" ........' 'l. . ~ .
\ '" \ \,"<./,;:y--~~:~~:~~~-~:;\ \\ \. \ '
\'\ ,',' '.." .----....:._~ ,'-,.\.',\ ( ,'".,
" '-, _u__ ..' ,\'. .....:----..." .,
'\ .. ,,-. ......-.. . . ~.. .... . -,.. ~
'<...... '" ..-~:'~--=~~ ---~-".:~~_::':~~_:_--'-.:-'/. ';/.< ,: . .','
. - ~ ....... - .-:---:-._~_/;
- '. ", . ..... - ~ .'........--.....". - ..
I
i
, . ,
. \ \
. ,~
~
...,,'
~
'. . iI" .
.:--.-' ,
.-'
'l
0:'
.r
.~
.....__.-r-
-.-'
,t.
-~- ---
..~ :'--
(
\.
, ,
#
'- .,....--...
'.
~
.
\
\
',<- '- \ '.....
;
;
,/
i
.i ;
/.
/
'.
\,
\
-.....,
\.
'\
J
't.
"7
\
,
-->.,:.......~
..... .....-.
,/
'-.
"
'<
- -
....--..--
-.
--"'-'\..
.-
'.
1".>0
_.-....~_.-----~-~
...,.",.._..
',.......
%
".
,.
'.
~.
\310 ~---
'\
~
\'
---
~....
'-'-
~-~-'
---~
.~
'.
~.
/
IJoe .
,
~
~
,
"
\.
~
~
12wj) .
'~
'.31:0-..
D
5
_ J
! I
I
~
~
-'w------------- -=-=--=- 0 -n--=--=- " -', -=-. // -~: - :-. --=-- . - ',"- -=- '_ _ '. - -. . ,~=--=-=--=--=--=-=-=- -=-=-=--=- --=- =-=--=--=--=- -=-=-=-~-= -=- ~-=-===-=- =-=-==-=-=-~ -".-. '-,0, .- =-=-=-=- =-=--=-= -=- -===-== -=- =-=- =- =- = ---~ -- ,.- - -- - - - - -- - --~
. .' ---------------------, (--
Ii
REv. 0
NO. .. TE OP.WN Ct!'I'(j)
J"
.
o
RE\44R1'CS
iJESQEO ,:sT. O. CHASE
011....... 8!. D. CHASE
So€ET O-C1) .1'. T. .....U..MS
~5 0<<"0 51'.
~1'ED aT.
0. TE. APRl.. 199:5
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
PRELIMINARY FINAL GRADES
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
CITY OF SAl tNA. KANSAS
1J#i.....""'~.....l"It ....--.. ........."10"'" CDII
-... 11'I" J _ r 1 ~"
.
c
.
B
.
A
.
1"
. I .
r f r
5
, I ' 1 I :
f r
10
.
A
.
.
B
,
.
C
. .
" .
~
~
'.,'
:"',
t
i
rL.-.... .
roo 0 200
r z 200'
~
PROPOSED ROADS
it:"-'::--\~:' :- ~
l : r',
i -.
~
f'; --i-
t.; ! .'
.
o
,1:\
t:d
NOTE;
iHIS 15 A CONCEPiUAL OEVELOP~ENT PLAN
NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
2
3
4
5
L-
,
6
:"'"--"'" .,
; ,
.. lZ f63
PR'o..ECi NO.
8558-TlCrCG
s.EET NO.
C-2
~,
~
.t\~. \
A
'"
B
\,
.... ,
<t. , "
\5"0 " "
....
"- , , '.
"--.
.. - -_/ .
c
o
'-
-..-----~
"
"
.......
'.
......
"
"'-,
"
"
..~
'.
'-
"-
-...,
"
",
'"''
.......
,
...... .",. . .., .........-
:,:.;: ~::.:.:::::::.<:::::::::::.:::... .::.:: ::.::::::::::::::.:.::. :.::::..::..::::: ::--::.:. .:.'..- ""'" . ":"'. ..............
. .... <'>::-:;~:'::':':,,:: ::.:.>:<.::: :.: ::}:::::.:./>::<::.:.). :':. ....':::...::::::::::.: :.: :.:: - '.::::: ,,: '-::'::~~~~<<F': '.' ':::::':.'-
". . ...........- .
~
...J
en
... . ~ ~-:'-~'....--. -
.' ~..: _........~
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
\
,
,
I
, I
.....
----I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
l
I .
\
I
- . I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.' , -
\
,
I .
L
.'
. -
'Il~/\
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I--
I
I
I
- - I
_.. I #
.- ----===:~ - -.-(---..
..-/ -------. ---,------ .--
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
3.1 S PE I
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--.1----.-------- -------------------- . --- .. -.-- -..
-. ,---.- --- - - --. . -- -- ~ ..- -'- ---
I
I
--.J
~
!!j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
1- --- - --
_ ~h~~ _ ____
I
I
I
I
~II
~~ :
_ L.
1
'1
I
1
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I - -. .
;---- ----~oEo-. '...-- . - .-.-.-.--- _n ---
on
. ,.
- --.- -- ----,,-
------- .
~Q
~
...
2S SLOPE __
..... 0.5.: SLOPE
~ --...-. ....... ....... --
~ ~ ~ ...--. -.... --
--
. . .. .
. ....
- . .. ~ -.... . - .
,
-. J320
---.... -............-. ..............-......--....
--- - - -
,.
......
REV. 0
ll<<>. It. lE ~ C.'<<:D
~s
OESGPEO 5", D. CHASE
CC!AW'll aT. O. CHAse
~i ~jj ~'t, T. ....llAMS
t."tOSS 09t jj 1) '1',
A?PROY!.O ey.
o.TE. A?R'IL 1993
~.'t'.tWI ....-.-.. KI'Ir.mI.... CDII
_ --...Jf __...., ~,..,.
J"
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
.
o
.
C
.
B
. .
A
~
z
~
b
01
.,
E
F
, .,
"
",,-
"
,
''\.,
"
o~
~/
I
o
--,
/350
1340
----- . ~ --_._~,._--~----
13QO
CITY OF SALINA. KANSAS
,
,
". 0
. ~.
'. ..... ~
" r'"
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
I' I . I . ! . i ' I ! I : j I I I Ii' ·
, 5 Kl
I
.
A
.....
G
o
~
.
B
"
H
, ,
. ,
~
~
'. ".
.. \
\, \~
.. \
\:,""'JO
13 0
c..oJ
r\)
o
,
J
I
I
u
I
~
:- -, -
~
~
~
2S 0
,- . 50. -
Ii::-;-;-
VIH t
, -
~ ... ~:.-_"'::-__.... i. ~ .:i ...;. .:a _.. .\ eo: _ ...
1tft 12 ~
PRELIMINARY CELL I LAYOUT WITH
LINER AND LEACHATE SYSTEM
. \
C
. ~ !
o
\1~\ t:=l
-
PROJIEtT NO.
!558-no-CG
S~ET NO.
C-3
,
tr.'-
~
,
I
~
2
6
".
J"
1380
1570
1360
1350
-
1340
1"3 "3()
-
1320
-
-
1360
1350
-
1340
13'30
-
1320
1310
-
-
1360
1350
"
-
134i\O
1330
-
1320
1310
-
Fl'EV.
NO,
"
"
S .. 2lf
-
-
O"'-.E ~ Cl<<D
.
o
~
--
I
I
~
t NEW DRAINAGE
CHANNEL
I
I 20'
\
I
I
ACCESS
ROAD 35'_
-
-416'T
" I":"
"
"
6~'
( NEW
ORAIllAGE
CHANNEL.
I
I
I
I "...1$' A-CC~SS: . -
: : J ~OAO (TYP~ : .
i ACCESs I 20' - - \-l- - . . 1 . .
I, S.~V'
~ I
"'~~-y
I .16' "I .
rl. -.
l
'1 !
s-o_ :
~:
. ,:
~---
:~~"
,,~ - o.
"
"
I
cy
~
80'
SO"
20'
L.
/
0;
"
"
-
1
-
80'
"
"
"
~ NEw DRAINAGE
r"NNEL' "
" .
. ~ -
~..
: 1. - :
~'~.n_ ,I. I
'~I
REMARIC$
I
I
---t 'D I"
SECTION
c-c
SCALE H r - "to'
V r . 10'
IXSiG'ED llT. O. CHASE
011.... aT, M. STUCKY
Sl€El 0<<1) aT, T. aUAUS
I
~
I
cv
e . :'..
-
-
"
"
"
530'
S.z..5-
"
"
"
"
-
-! 20' '....
SO'
,
~
<it _ ,~
-
CAMP DRESSER & McI<EE ltC_
I
CJII'ClSS 09it 1) !IT,
~~D aT:
OAT~: "~1'993
I
.
C
.
B
~-'II' ~ -----.~~ CDII
~$. . "'---'-" ~., ;lIII'~l'J
I
I
I
I
.
A
.
I'
530'
SECTION
SCALE H 1- .. 40"
VI- . 10'
SECTION
SCALE H 1- .. 4H)"
v.r - 10'
"
I
~
"
I
"
"
"
"
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
- I . , . i . ,
5
"
"
"
A-A
I
.1
"
-
B-B
"
"
"
CITY OF SALINA. KANSAS
I
I
. I . I '
.
. I
10
I
.
A
~
80'
I
20' I
8'
"'- I--!
.~.
"'-IS ~ J
"'-
"'""
J'
"'-I
377'
2-2.5%
---====
s - 21:
.-
I
.
B
"
"
~
I
S.- oJ/
)/'
7.
. .
. . .
. .
5-0- Y
-I
I
I
I
t NEW DRAINAGE
CHAN!'lEL'
.
'"
I
>0' L
I
"
ACCESS
ROAD 35'
s = Ox
'lA,
.../16' I.
I ,.
"
"
.
n
Cl NEW ORAINI.GE
CHANNEL
liS' ACCESS-
~OAD lTYPI \-
. " I 20' I.ACCE5S~
I/} I /. I I"~""-/
~ La)': I I s.o~
..'~ \ AI'
.......-
I 16' J
.. ---..
I I
"
....! 20' '- 60' , 20' I
r'"~Si ~~ES T-T
.~~ I
'- I I
IT,! I
""-Is . 0""" \
~/
80'
J
-
cp
-
r
0-0
PRELIMINARY LANDFILL SECTIONS
I
- .
'. .
.
C
I
/
/
L . ~J/
/
~ 20"'~ ACCESS /TI
ClYP) i ROAD 35' . ..
. I (fYPI . .
. ~ .. aa V
.
.
(BEN
\
(
'~"'J ;::~:~1 ,. .. L~ i 'i ~ .
I~ JI "'
J__'" I
...11'6'1...
I I
SECTION
s,:~LE H.. .v'
V I .~-
I
I
\
I
.
o
. I
"
"
. .
,..-aan&
1380
)370
1360
1350
1340
\330
1320
.1360
:1350
:1340:
-\330
1320
1310
-1390-
1380
Y3?()
1360
1350
1340
DATE
~ .~ 1:.. __ ___ ~ L- r: .. _- 'p ~ ~ ~~ ~
_12_
I
~
..d.
PRO..E:C i NO.
8561-ftO-CG
StEEl NO,
C-4
~
~\..,
!
"," l
~
.!
i
r0
'-
~
~
-0
-
l0
~
~
.
I
-
-0
t
REV_
NO_
J)r
A
B
C
DISK AND COMPACT UPPER 8- SUB-BASE
TO 95::1 Of" MCOIFlED PROCTOR. THE
SUB-BASE SHALL BE FREE FROM
PARTICLE SIZE GREATER THAN 3/S".
AND HAVE A PERMEABIUTY K(MIN)
~ 1 )(10-7 CM/SEC.
LINER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
,; ., ... .. < ,...iC;;~:~~~1X'''' CM/SEe
1111
TOP OF" S'YNTHETlC
UNER
SYNlHEl1C FILTER FABRIC
8" MIN. OVERLAP
. ........... -....
...... .. ".. .--....- ...........-...
.... ... ...
.-. ... -
6" DIA..
PERFORA lED PIPE
SLOPE 2"~(TYP_)
-
SLOPE 0.52: (NP.)
...
1\ll=1\ll=1I11
111I 111I
LEACHATE COLLECTION DETAIL
NOT "0 SCALE
-'i
t/2" DlA. PERFORATIONS, STAGGERED AT 5" INTERVALS
IN 2 ROWS WHICH ARE 120 APART FR~ EACH OTHER
AND LOCATED BELOW THE SPRINGUNE Of THE PIPE.
Ct.
. . . . . .
6- OR 8" DlA. PIPE
120.
HOlE LOCA nON
LEACHATE COLLECTION PIPE DETAIL
@
Ii
~ E~~D OF SYNn-tETlC UNER
POL ~M STAKE
Iti::...
11!1~=_ "
"r.=it!I~li=-
rm~~;;;IJ!l-~=::.. _ "
~=IiII=I:I=lfll=_
o
E
F
35'
.,
I ELECTED, LOCP.L nLL ~ATERIAL I
/ 'i.. ' MAXIMUM PERMEABILITY OF 1 X 10-.CM/iEC
~OAD SURfACE
DRAINAGE SAND
DASHED UNE REPRESENTS [LEVA TlONS
SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN
StiEET C-l. C-2. AND C-3
=---.Jl
3
SYNTHETlC UNER
COMPACTED SUB-GRADE
95" or- MODIFIED PROC TOR
ANCHOR TRENCH AND ROADWAY DETAIL
N. T.5
DRAINACE SAND
35'
LECTED. LOCAL FILL MATERIAL
MAXIMUM PERMEABIUTY Of" 1 X 10 "'CM/SEC
I
ROAD SURFACE
11
DASHED LINE REPRESENTS ELEVATIONS
SHOVllN ON GRADING PLAN
SHEET C-t. C-2. AND C-3
COMPACTED SUB-GRADE
95~ or- MODIFIED PROCTOR
3
SYN1HETlC UNER
6- DIA SOLID PIPE
ANCHOR TRENCH AND ROADWAY DETAIL
N.T.S
UNER PROTECTION
MATERIAL
SYNTHE11C FILlER r-ABRIC
GEONET
DISK AND COMPACT UPPER 8- SUB-SASE
TO 95~ (K MDOIFlED PROCTOR. THE
SUB- BASE SH ALL BE FREE FROW
PARnCtE SIZE GREATER 1HAN 3/S-.
AND HA.'4: A PERMEABILITY K{WIN)
L. h:1O" eM/SEC.
LINER AND LEACHATE COLLECTlON ALTERNATE NO.1
NOT TO SCALE
POL YlOCK
SEE SEcnON
EXTERIOR CRADE Pl YWOOO ~ fl8ER BOARD
END OF lEAO-IATE PIPE AND SYNTHETlC UNER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
IXSClI'EO ft. T. ....LI..MS
0.... aT. ST "f"F
SMEEl 0<<"0 ST. T. ....U"'MS
C'lC$S (;1<<1:1 .T.
--
PlAN
PIPE PENETRATION DETAIL
NOT TO SO~LE
CAMP DRESSER I Mct(EE 1tC.
011 TE t'JIRWN 0<<0
,IllI1I~t) IT.
Dltt. AoPRI.. 1993
REMARPCS
.
o
.
C
.
B
l
z
~
b
CITY OF SALINA.. KANSAS
",A_ -,""'~...,..,.,. CDII
"......, "M___--.-~' .._ _Jl.....-f..
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL
.
A
.
Oil
~
G
CONCRETE SLAB
6- Oi~. PIPE
H
ERO~10~~ ~;;rt.t( CAPABLE OF
SUSTAINING PLANT GROWTH (WH~
. . ..-.
INFIL TRA TlON LAYER COMPACTED
TO 95% OF MODIfiED PROCTOR.
SHALL BE FREE FROM PARTICLE SIZE
GREA TER THAN 3/8" AND SHALL HAVE A
PERMEABILITY K(MIN) ~ t )(10-1 CM/SEC.
.
(Q
.
CD
....
FINAL LANDFILL CAP DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
!.
I
SELECTED, LOCAL FILL MATERIAL
WITH MAXIMUM PERMEABIUTY OF 1 X 10- CM/SEC
\
DASHEO UNE REPRESENTS ELEW,TlONS
SHOWN ON -mE GRADING PLANS
SHEETS C-t, C-2. AND C-3
ANCHOR TRENCH ENLARGEMENT DETAIL
N.T.S
CD
SYNTI-lEl1 UNER
BOOT SLEEVE WELD
I
- POL noel(
EXTRUSION YiIElD TO PIPE
OR FASTEN STAINLESS STEEL ClAMPS
CHAMF'ER CORNERS
SUPPORT AS NECESSARY
L- SYNTHETlC UNER
SECTI ON
HOfS PIPE PENETRA nON DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
----.-.. _ p__ ~ _ _ ._ _ - t'.
.~ ,':-:.:. -" --- -t",,- Si
L;J t 1In'''
P'RQA:C T NO.
8$58-WO-CG
PRELIMINARY LINER AND LEACHATE SYSTEM DETAILS
SHEET NO.
C-5
,. '~
I
2
:3
5
6