8.4 Agr Engr Interlocal Corrido CITY OF SAL1NA
REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE TIME
2/24/97 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ROY DUDARK/~
BY:
ITEM 4
NO.
BY: ~'
Item
Consider agreements for interlocal cooperation and planning services
for the South Ninth Corridor Plan.
Background
On November 25, 1996, the City and County commissions met in joint
study session to discuss future development of Ninth Street south of
Schilling Road. A number of planning related issues exist along the
corridor. These include: land use and zoning determinations; changes
in traffic patterns resulting from elimination of the 1-135 slip
ramps; street, utility and drainage improvements; capital improvement
financing; and intergovernmental coordination prior to annexation.
In order to objectively analyze these issues, the involvement of a
professional planning firm was recommended. The commission directed
staff to move ahead and request proposals.
Preliminary proposals for planning services were obtained from three
qualified firms. After thorough review, the firm of Bucher, Willis
and Ratliff (Kansas City Office) was selected by city and county
staff. They will be assisted by Clarion Associates, Denver,
Colorado. The preliminary scope of services was revised and refined
to meet the needs and objectives of the community. The project is
expected to take about eight months and the fee is $36,600. The
agreement is attached.
An agreement with Saline County for implementation of the project has
also been prepared. This agreement provides for 50/50 cost sharing
of the fee and assigns primary responsibility for administration of
the project to the city.
Recommended Action
Staff would recommend approval of the agreement for planning services
with Bucher, Willis and Ratliff subject to approval of the interlocal
agreement with Saline County for cost sharing and administration of
the project.
Adopt Resolution Number 97-5122
AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made this __
Hundred and Ninety-Seven;
day of_
in the year Nineteen
BY AND BETWEEN the City of Salina, Kansas and Saline County, Kansas, hereinafter called
the "Client," and Bucher, Willis & Ratliff Corporation of Kansas City, Missouri, hereinafter called
the "Consultant;"
WHEREAS, the Client desires to secure professional services to prepare a corridor plan for
the South Ninth Street area of the City of Salina and Saline County, hereinafter called the "Project;"
and
WHEREAS, the Client has selected the Consultant to provide professional services for
assisting with the completion of the Project, in association with Clarion Associates, Denver,
Colorado, hereinafter called the "Subconsultant;"
NOW, THEREFORE, the Client and the Consultant, in consideration of their mutual
covenants herein, agree in matters pertaining to the performance or furnishing of professional
consulting services by the Consultant with respect to the Project and the payment for those services
by the Client as set forth below.
ARTICLE I
CONSULTANT AND SUBCONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
The Consultant shall perform for or furnish to the Client professional planning and related
'services in all phases of the Project to which this Agreement applies as hereinafter provided. The
Consultant shall serve as the Client's prime planning professional on this Project. The Consultant
and Subconsultant shall jointly furnish services as a team in certain work elements; and the
Subconsultant shall be primarily responsible for furnishing services for certain work elements, as
indicated below:
Phase 1
Analysis and Reconnaissance -- Base map updates; existing land use trends
identification and analysis; public utilities review.
SubconsuItant Primary Responsibility: review of city and county codes; assessment
of comparable industrial/commercial sites.
Phase 2
Corridor Development Options Matrix - Background studies; stake-holder
and local government staff interviews.
Consultant Team Responsibility: development option matrix construction.
Phase 3
Community Facilities, Public facilities and Street System - utility plans;
local traffic analysis; QRSII traffic model update; major thoroughfare/I-135
linkages; storm water management.
Consultant Team Responsibility: development option matrix construction; capital
improvements financing.
Phase 4
Development Recommendations - Consultant Team Responsibility:
development option matrix construction; Identification and ranking of land use
options by development matrix conclusions; financing and timing of public
investments;
Subconsultant Primary Responsibility: policy implementation-interlocal
agreements/annexation; recommendations on joint development standards.
Phase 5
Land Use Plan and Implementation Element - Land use policy; future land
use plan update.
Consultant Team Responsibility: regulatory options--city/county; annexation
implications.
The standard of care for all professional planning and related services performed or furnished
by the Consultant under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of the
Consultant's profession, practicing under s'unilar conditions at the same time and in the same locality.
The Consultant makes no warranties, expressed or implied, under this Agreement or otherwise, in
connection with the Consultant's services.
ARTICLE II
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Phase 1. Analysis and Reconnaissance
Work Element 1.1: Base Mapping. The consultant team will work with digital map files provided
by the City of Salina through the Saline County GIS system to construct a parcel level base map of
the South Ninth Street corridor study area. Through the GIS system the City of Salina will provide
digital map files necessary for creation of the base map and analysis of the site, including: street
centerline and fight-of-way map files, edge of pavement and building location files, topography map
files and digital aerial photography files.
Meeting: The consultant team will meet with the staff to review mapped data and finalize
base maps.
Work Element 1.2: Current Conditions Review. The consultant team will review existing land uses
and physical elements along the corridor and land parcels adjacent to the corridor. The consultant
team will summarize issues relating to infrastructure, transportation, environmental constraints and
land uses along the corridor. Current city and county codes and intergovernmental agreements will
be reviewed. The availability of other comparable industrial/commerdal property in general will
be assessed.
Current regulations of the city and county will be reviewed with the staffs. The consultant team will
use this information to determine existing development constraints, the nature of development
currently allowed and what additional development controls may be needed.
Phase 2. Corridor Development Options Matrix
A decision matrix will be constructed for comparison of industrial/commercial/mixed-use
development options. Factors affecting development will be compared and analyzed. The matrix
will be constructed as illustrated below:
Development Analysis Factors
Industrial
Only
Commercial
Districts
Mixed-Use
Districts
Effects on existing vacant land.
Traffic studies.
Capital improvements timing and financing.
Effects on vacant land:
· city-wide;
· in the south Salina area; and
· on the corridor, including land remnants
from elimination of the slip ramps.
Traffic studies:
· vehicular access to corridor sites,
including a new interchange at Water
Well Road;
· major thoroughfare implications; and
· compatibility of mixed-use traffic
patterns.
Capital improvement planning-utilities,
roads and storm water management:
· sizing and costs;
· financing and timing of utility
extensions;
· fee/rate structure and revenue capture;
and
· maintenance.
· Jurisdictional coordination--city/county:
· intergovernmental agreements needed;
· utility service policies;
· long-range land use policies--for the
corridor and the entire community;
· regulatory amendments; and
· annexation planning and timing;
· Fiscal issues:
· assessed valuation;
· tax abatement for industrial
development;
· job creation and wage base effects; and
· sales tax revenue.
Development Analysis Factors
Industrial
Only
Commercial
Districts
Mixed-Use
Districts
Private market implications:
· relative competition for and availability
of land for other uses;
· market trend compatibility; and
· local development efforts-public and
private.
Implementation strategies-availability of
outside funding:
· state and federal assistance; and
· timing of other investments.
Industrial Development Factors Analysis
Work Element 2.1: Interviews. The consultant team will interview a select group of stakeholders
in the south Salina market area concerning the corridor planning process and their satisfaction
with current industrial sites. The consultant team will prepare an interview questionnaire with
which to guide the interview process, but interviews will be a "free flowing" exchange of
informatiorc Up to fifteen stakeholders, including plant managers, commercial business owners,
and area land owners will be interviewed.
The consultant team will meet with land owners as directed by the staff, and city/county
representatives to present the preliminary plan. Meetings will be one-on-one, and may include
staff members as appropriate in each case. The purpose of the meetings will be to a) present the
initial findings of the Development Options Matrix analysis, and b) better understand the unique
needs of the land owners. A summary report of each meeting will be presented in writing to the
staff.
Meetings: Variable.
Work Element 2.2 - Competitive Sites. With data compiled with staffs and from local real estate
brokers, the consultant team will complete a brief survey of competitive sites affecting industrial
location decisions in Salina. Competitive site analysis will consider relative strengths based on
standard industrial park site selection criteria:
Visibility from major thoroughfares;
Access to the interstate and major thoroughfare streets;
Access to raft lines and spurs;
Compatibility with non-industrial land uses for mixed-use development;
Lack of constraints on development due to the topography of the site; and
Proximity to existing or planned public utilities capable of serving industrial uses;
Sale price/lease rates; and
Parcel size.
Commercial Development Factors Analysis
Work Element 2.3: Local and Area Business Market Review. To research market factors the
consultant team will conduct the following analysis with secondary data provided by the
city/county staffs to the extent that it is available:
Review current inventories of land uses, zoning and market areas. Historical patterns of
business development will be reviewed to assess whether land use changes to commercial
uses would cause shortage of industrial land.
Work Element 2.4: Commercial Development Alternatives. Based on the findings of the study
the consultant team will summarize preferred alternatives for development of commercial
districts in Salina. Development options for the study area will be presented on base maps.
Should the study area be recommended for continued industrial land use, the consultant team
will summarize other options for large-scale commercial uses in the south-Salina area.
Mixed-Use Development Factors Analysis
The results of Work Elements 2.1 - 2.4 will be used to examine mixed-use developments options.
Unique aspects of mixed use development, such as buffers and screens and access control, will
be assessed and summarized.
Phase 3. Community Facilities.
Work Element 3.1: Public Utilities. The consultant team will inventory and assess necessary
public facilities for development of the corridor by the three matrix options. Facilities evaluated
will include water, sanitary sewer, roadways, power, natural gas and storm water drainage. The
consultant team will provide a review of the capacity of existing facilities.
Water. Alternatives for extending water service to districts along the corridor will be identified
and summarized. The water system service will include the evaluation of the existing system to
determine if the recent improvements in the South Salina area will provide the necessary elevated
storage and capacity needed for general use and fire protection in the planned area.
Sanitary Sewer. Summary of the sanitary service will include the evaluation of the downstream
infrastructure, including the East Dry Creek Interceptor Sewer and treatment facility, and its
ability to accommodate the additional flows. All of the utility infrastructure components will be
phased according to the planned developed schemes.
Other Utilities. Requirements for both the electric and natural gas services will also be
summarized based on the types of industries anticipated as tenants and coordinated with the
utilities.
Work Element 3.2: Storm Water Issues. There have been several storm water studies done in
the past 20 years that have examined the drainage characteristics in this corridor. Bucher, Willis
& Ratliff Corporation completed studies in 1994 and 1986. FEMA completed a flood insurance
study in 1986 and Wilson and Company completed a South Salina Drainage Study in 1978. The
consultant team will assemble all the studies and determine if they completely cover this corridor
plan or if additional studies are needed.
Work Element 3.3: Traffic Study. Traffic studies will determine the type and amount of traffic
associated with the three development options. Background primary and secondary data on
current traffic counts on area roads will be obtained from the city and county staffs. Counts at
Ninth Street and Schilling Road and at the Schilling Road interchange ramps will be reviewed,
as well.
The consultant team will review the plans for an interchange with 1-135 and Water Well Road,
as well as elimination of the slip ramps. The optimal number and locations of entrances into the
development districts along the corridor, and necessary improvements to the existing roads.
Improvements to be investigated include widening, construction of turning lanes, and traffic
signals and controls.
The consultant team will use the existing traffic model developed for the long range
transportation plan to test two new growth scenarios, with a change in geometry, such as the
change in slip ramps. The results will be assessed to determine whether the elimination of the
slip ramps and/or changes in zoning would negatively impact traffic service levels.
Phase 4. Development Options Review
Work Element 4.1: Focus Session. The consultant team will assist the city/county staff in forming
a Steering Committee of city/county representatives, land/business owners, and planning
commission members of both jurisdictions. The consultant team will facilitate one focus session with
the South Ninth Street Development Review Steering Committee to allow the group and staff and
other invited participants to review the results of the development options matrix. Critical issues
will be identified in a carefully facilitated group process. The results of the session will be
summarized by the consultant team for follow-up review and action by the South Ninth Street
Development Review Steering Committee and staff.
Meeting: South Ninth Street Development Review Steering Committee, consultant team and
staffs.
Work Element 4.2: Development Options Matrix Recommendations. Based on the results of the
Phase 1-3 findings and of the focus session the consultant team will prepare a preliminary land use
plan for the South Ninth Street corridor. The development plan will detail how the city and county
should respond to the development factors of the matrix, such as traffic and infrastructure
improvements. In addition, the following will be recommended, as needed:
· Streetscape features to support unified industrial and/or commercial districts;
· Gateway monumentation, given the central place of the corridor as a south Salina entrance;
· Implications of eliminating the slip-ramps east of 1-135; and
· Recommendations for new development standards to ensure compatibility with existing
industrial land uses if commercial uses are allowed to develop in the area.
Meeting: South Ninth Street Development Review Steering Committee, consultant team and
staffs.
Phase 5. Land Use Plan and Implementation Element.
Work Element 5.1: Current Development Standards and Requirements Review. The consultant
team will summarize current development standards and zoning requirements along the South
Ninth Street corridor as reviewed in Phase 1. The consultant team will identify changes in city and
county requirements to protect existing uses or accommodate quality new development along the
corridor.
Work Element 5.2: South Ninth Street Development Standards. The consultant team will prepare
a memorandum outlining an approach to regulatory amendments for the city and county, or jointly
if established through an intergovernmental agreement. The memorandum would position the
jurisdiction to implement the land use policies of the recommended development option. Preferred
regulatory options and intergovernmental strategies will be considered in the memorandum. The
recommendations will address the following as needed:
· Design guidelines which help create distinct districts along the South Ninth Street corridor
and optimize the unique strategic position of the area at Salina's south interchanges with 1-
135. Scale, orientation and location of buildings will be key components of these guidelines
when ensuring compatibility among mixed-use developments, if applicable.
· Added criteria and regulation for the integration of streets, site design, screening, green
spaces, landscaping, and other amenities.
· A zoning overlay district could achieve the unique objectives of the South Ninth Street plan,
integrating site planning standards with the design guidelines.
· Other development-related procedures, such as access control and conditional use permit
review, could be established for the corridor in overlay districts.
An intergovernmental agreement will be prepared to implement the plan jointly with the two
jurisdictions, whether joint zoning control, or annexation or other mechanism.
Meeting: The consultant team will meet with the South Ninth Street Development Review
Steering Committee and staff to review the findings from Phases 1 and 2, the memorandum on
implementation, and the final draft of the corridor plan.
Work Element 5.3: Plan Implementation. A final report will be produced which outlines key
components of the plan and specifies development regulations needed to implement objectives of
the plan. Implementation steps, including annexation of corridor sub-districts, intergovernmental
agreements and related measures, will be reviewed as they relate to the financing and timing of
infrastructure investment by the city and/or county. The final report will include:
· General recommendations about which parties should bare the costs of infrastructure
improvements, such as widening of roads and extending trunk mains of water and sewer lines.
· A summary of different financing options should the territory be annexed to the city, as
compared to remaining in the unincorporated portion of the county.
· A summary of the market implications of keeping the South Ninth Street land out of competition
for commercial land by retaining industrial zoning district classifications.
· A summary of fiscal and market impacts on industrial development, for land in the corridor and
existing available and vacant land throughout the city.
· A summary of options available to the city and the county to establish a more streamlined
development review and approval process in the urban fringe: Either unilateral control by the
city over zoning and subdivision regulation, or a more streamlined cooperative review of
subdivision plats.
Work Element 5.4: Preparation of Photo Quality Artwork. Display size maps and graphics of the
final development plan will be produced. Electronic disks of the mapped materials and graphics will
be provided to the client, along with the report text for the client to reproduce the final report.
ARTICLE III
SCHEDULE
The schedule for completion of the plan is eight months. Work will start within 30 days of an
agreement for services. The Consultant will be represented at five meetings, in addition to the
scoping meeting; the Subconsultant at three. Meetings with individuals, such as plant managers, will
be coordinated with trips to attend other meetings, to the extent practicable. Conference calls by the
Consultant and Subconsultant with city and county staffs will be conducted as needed.
ARTICLE IV
FEE
The fee shall be in an amount of $36,600. The Client shall compensate the Consultant for performing
on a lump sum basis for the percentage of work completed. The Consultant shall submit a monthly
statement itemizing the work completed. The Client shall make payment within 30 days of the date
of the statement.
Hourly billing rates for any additional services, as may be directed by the Client, are as follows:
BUCHER, WILLIS & RATLIFF CORPORATION
CONTRACT RATES
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997
Classification
Hourly Rate
Principal .......................................... $120.00
Senior Project Manager ............................. $ 95.00
Project Manager .................................... $ 90.00
Senior Engineer ..................................... $ 85.00
Design Engineer IV ................................. $ 70.00
Design Engineer III ................................. $ 65.00
Design Engineer II .................................. $ 55.00
Design Engineer I ................................... $ 50.00
Senior Strategic Planner ............................. $ 95.00
Senior Planner ...................................... $ 80.00
Planner II ......... ~ ................................ $ 65.00
Planner I ........................................... $ 50.00
Senior Architect .................................... $ 80.00
Architect II ......................................... $ 65.00
Architect I ......................................... $ 50.00
Senior Landscape Architect .......................... $ 80.00
Landscape Architect II ............................... $ 55.00
Landscape Architect I ............................... $ 45.00
Senior Technician ................................... $ 55.00
Technician II ....................................... $ 45.00
Technician I ........................................ $ 40.00
Draftsman ......................................... $ 40.00
Survey Director ..................................... $ 55.00
Registered Land Surveyor ........................... $ 45.00
Two-Man Survey Crew .............................. $ 90.00
Three-Man Survey Crew ............................ $125.00
Survey Technician .................................. $ 45.00
Administrative Assistant ............................ $ 60.00
Word Processor ..................................... $ 40.00
Clerical ............................................ $ 35.00
Nuclear Testing Gauge ..............................
Traffic Studies Equipment ........................ :...
Computer ..........................................
Intergraph Workstation .............................
Mileage ............................................
Survey Vehicle Mileage ..............................
$ 40.00/Unit/Day
$ 15.00/Unit/Day
$ 12.00/Hour
$ 17.00/Hour
$ 0.29/Mile
$ 0.35/Mile
Hourly rates for Clarion Associates are as follows:
Principal ...........................................
Associate ..........................................
$160.00/Hour
$ 90.00/Hour
ARTICLE V
CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
The Client shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of the
Consultant and shall bear all costs thereto:
Designate in writing a person and/or a department or agency to act as the
Client's representative with respect to the services to be performed or furnished
by the Consultant under this Agreement. Such person, department or agency
shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information,
interpret and define Client's policies and decisions with respect to the
Consultant's services for the Project and to coordinate citizen meetings and focus
sessions.
Further, the Client shall:
· provide staff support for arranging meetings with land owners;
· lead in the formation of the Steering Committee;
· provide primary data on land use and traffic counts, as identified in Phases
1-3, and secondary data on economic trends and patterns as identified in
Phase 2; and
· provide for the printing of the final report from camera-ready originals as
provided in Work Element 5.4.
Make available to the Consultant all existing data and records relevant to plan
work elements, disks of electronic base maps from the Saline County GIS files
and other information possessed by the Client which are relevant to the
Consultant in the completion of the work under this Agreement. The county
base map should include certain formatting amendments to match the corridor
project needs.
Approve all criteria and information as to Client's requirements for the Project,
including planning objectives and constraints, performance requirements, any
budgetary limitations, and furnish copies of all standard forms in use by the
Client relative to the planning area or Project.
Fumish to the Consultant, upon the request of Consultant for performing the
services, data .prepared by or services of others, including without limitation,
electronic base maps, drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing
surface or subsurface utilities or structures within the planning area,
hydrographic surveys, environmental assessments, impact statements and other
relevant environmental or cultural studies pertaining to the Project, the planning
area and adjacent areas.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Times for Rendering Services: The Consultant's services and compensation under this
Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of orderly and continuous progress of
the Project through completion of all Phases. Specific periods of time for rendering
services are set forth in Article III, Schedule, in this Agreement, by which times defined
services are to be completed. If such periods of time are changed through no fault of the
Consultant, the rates and amounts of compensation provided for therein shall be subject
to equitable adjustment.
If the Client fails to give prompt written authorization to proceed with any phase of
services after completion of the immediately preceding phase, the Consultant shall be
entitled to equitable adjustment of rates and amounts of compensations to reflect
reasonable costs incurred by Consultant as a result of the delay or changes in the various
elements that comprise such rates and amounts of compensation.
o
Change in Scope: The Scope of the work described in Article II, Scope of Services, shall
be subject to modification or supplement upon the written agreement of the Client and
the Consultant. At the time of such modification of scope, equitable adjustments,
agreeable to both parties, shall be made in the time of performance and the
compensation to be paid for the services.
Ownership of Documents: Upon completion of the scope of work and final printing of
all documents, maps and the brochure, all original documents, plans design and survey
notes, camera-ready artwork and mylar map originals developed in connection with the
services performed under this Agreement will be delivered to, and remain the property
of, the Client. Consultant may retain reproducible copies of the documents.
Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from
claims under workers' compensation acts, claims for damages because of bodily injury
including personal injury, sickness or disease or death of any and all employees, and
from claims or damages because of injury to or destruction of property including loss
of use resulting therefrom. The Consultant shall list the Client as an additional insured
on the Consultant's general liability insurance policy.
The Client shall list the Consultant as an additional insured on any general liability or
property insurance policies carried by the Client which are applicable to the Project. All
policies of property insurance shall contain provisions to the effect that the Consultant's
interests are covered and that, in the event of payment of loss or damage, the insurers
will have no rights of recovery against any of the insured or additional insured
thereunder.
Indemnification: The Consultant agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to
indemnify and hold the Client harmless from any damage, liability or cost (including
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by the Consultant's
negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of professional services under this
Agreement and those of his or her subconsultants or anyone for whom the Consultant
is legally liable.
The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold the
Consultant harmless from any damage, liability or cost (including reasonable attorneys'
fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by the Client's negligent acts, errors or
omissions and those of his or her contractors, subcontractors or consultants or anyone
for whom the Client is legally liable, and arising from the project that is the subject of
this Agreement.
The Consultant is not obligated to indemnify the Client in any manner whatsoever for
the Client's own negligence.
Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days
written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in
accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party; provided,
however, that in any such case, the Consultant shall be paid the reasonable value of the
services rendered up to the time of termination on the basis of the payment provisions
of this Agreement. Copies of all completed or partially completed reports, maps,
designs and plans prepared under this Agreement shall be delivered to the Client when
and if this Agreement is terminated.
o
Controlling Law: This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of
business of the Consultant.
Dispute Resolution: In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or
construction of the project or following the completion of the project, the Owner and the
Consultant agree that all disputes between them arising out of or relating to this
Agreement shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, unless the parties mutually
agree otherwise.
The Owner and the Consultant further agree to include a similar mediation provision
in all agreements with independent contractors and consultants retained for the project
and to require all independent contractors and consultants also to include a similar
mediation provision in all agreements with subcontractors, subconsultants, suppliers or
fabricators so retained, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for
dispute resolution between the parties to those agreements.
Severability: Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable
under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken and all remaining provisions shall
continue to be valid and binding upon the Client and the Consultant, who agree that the
Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a
valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the
intention of the stricken provision.
10.
Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at the address which appears on the signature page to this Agreement
(as modified in writing from time to time by such party) and given personally, by
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, by facsimile or by a nationally
recognized overnight courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of
receipt.
11.
Successors and Assigns: The Client and Consultant each is hereby bound and the
partners, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of
Client and Consultant are hereby bound to the other party to this Agreement and to the
partners, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of such
other party in respect of all covenants and obligations of this Agreement.
Neither the Client nor the Consultant may assign, sublet, or transfer any rights under or
interest (including, but without limitation, moneys that are due or may become due) in
this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any
assignment, subletffng or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may
be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to
an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or
responsibility under this Agreement.
12. Bucher, Willis & Ratliff Project Team:
Ronald A. Williamson, AICP ......................... Principal-in-Charge
Scott Michie, AICP .................................... Project Manager
John Benson, AICP ...................................... Project Planner
Heather Armendariz .................................... Project Planner
Marolyn Kelley ......................................... Team Assistant
Clarion Assodates ....................................... Subconsultant
IN WlIIqF. SS WHEREOF, said parties have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly
authorized officers in three (3) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, on the
day and year first above written.
CONSULTANT:
BUCHER, WILLIS & RATLI, FF CORPORATION
on . ' 'arnson, AICP
Executive Vice-President
CITY:
CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS
Evelyn Maxwell, Manager
ATI'EST:
City Clerk
COUNTY:
SALINE COUNTY, KANSAS
Mike White, Chairman
ATI'EST:
County Clerk
SALINA - SALINE COUNTY INTERLOCAL CORPORATION AGREEMENT
SOUTH NINTH STREET CORRIDOR PLAN
This Agreement is entered into this day of ,
1997, by and between the City of Salina, Kansas (the "City") and
the Board of County Commissioners of Saline County, Kansas, (the
"County").
RECITALS
ae
The realization of the future commercial and industrial
development potential of the South Ninth Street Corridor is
dependent upon effective comprehensive land use planning.
Be
C ·
The accomplishment of such planning requires the joint
participation and commitment of the City of Salina and Saline
County which share jurisdiction within the corridor.
The planning effort would be greatly enhanced by the
employment of a professional planning consultant with the
knowledge and experience to prepare the corridor plan.
De
The consulting firm of Bucher, Willis and Ratliff Corporation
has been selected to provide the professional planning
services at a cost of $36,600.
The City and County desire to enter into this agreement to
coordinate their efforts in completing the planning project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and County agree as follows:
Project Oversight. Oversight of the project shall be
coordinated through a "Project Team" consisting of the city
manager, city planner, county administrator, and county
planner. The city planner shall serve as the designated
representative of the city and county with respect to
transmitting instructions from the project team to the
consultant.
·
Cost Sharing. The City and County agree that the fee for
professional planning services shall be equally divided with
the cost to each being $18,300.
Administration. The City agrees to perform all administrative
requirements associated with payment of the consultant fee.
Upon receipt of a statement for work completed, the City shall
pay the amount due and submit a copy of the statement to the
County. The County agrees to reimburse the City for fifty
percent (50%) of the amount due within 30 days from date of
receipt.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF SALINA, KANSAS
SALINE COUNTY, KANSAS
Evelyn Maxwell, Mayor
Mike White, Chairman
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Judy D. Long, City Clerk
Shirley J. Jacques,
County Clerk