N 9th Street Bridge Study Sessi
North N'nth Street Bridge
Replac ment
Salina City Commission Study
Session
December 15, 2003
A
. Background
. Initial Aesthetic Considerations
. Concept Designs & Costs
. Budget Analysis & Considerations
. Refined Concept Designs
. Summary of Estimated Costs
. Sched u Ie & Status of Project
Back
c~««,~~
. Initial Project Scope
0 Replace SB Bridge over Mulberry Creek
. Wilson & Company Selected and
Given NTP in October, 2001
Initial Aesthetic Considerations
ilI2cIIIII_Y..lfiJG¡r...I~.'J"1'J'1'1.'111:1tlJ1J111íl111::lJ:cê..!fCC; c ßc c
. WCI Asked to Develop Concepts for
Aesthetic Treatments
. Sidewalk
. Ornamental Pedestrian Rail
. Lighting (Dropped from Initial Options)
. Field Check Plans Prepared and Submitted
to KDOT on this Basis
. Plans also Included Elimination of Median
Bridge Rails
Concent Oesinn & Costs
if~.JtØl~__'.4Jf'..J..lIl1'.J~1Wt¡l¡1¡lf"11111!11í;1.1êcy,.y
c' Vicki Scuri added to Project Team at
City's Request
. Asked to Develop Community Art &
Design Concepts to Enhance Gateway
. Both the N Ohio Overpass and N Ninth
Street Bridge Projects Included
~.~ Costs
. Several Options Developed by Vicki
. Addressed These Components
0 Lighting (Comm. Avail. vs. Custom)
0 Bridge Railing (Std vs. Ornamental)
0 Decorative Median Paving
. Work to Both Bridges Considered
. Retaining Open Median & Need for
Bridge Rails Considered
,C
0
.-
...,
I! fit
RIm
eL!
lrà
, c
cu .-
." i"
l1li ... ..
~V cø;
... 0')'
" "0
~.-
v' ..:
:..., ~'
cu I'
p!t;;
"".c
(I)""
c
0 'c
.- z:.
.c 't:
0 g
.c.',
-t
0
c
æ
;. i
:J ..
L... .
Ii ICI
2 .
I i
z, VJ
8,.'.",1
ID,I
:J:t
I ~.
: I
~. j
C :sa
u .W
.... ,..
... @
CD
::::Þ
a.
The Project: Overall View
Map showi-' Nt.". -lIoL-of~
" ... """,' ','~"""" ,..: :""""',"',
~:~~.. i~.,i ~~ ~.~\~,~~ ~: ~",: ~.
North Ohio Street Grade Separation: PubliC Art and Urœn Des~n OpportunitieS Page 1
Vicki Scuri Siœwcrlcs with Mark Spitzer DesIgns,
North Ninth Street Gateway Entry
, ,
", :'.. ': ": ~
, \ ,:" ',:", :"::::'::", ,:,::i:~;f;:?:?:,"'~'"" ',":', ':,"-;;;:;'::::{':'/"-:"> :':-<"',:~"K:i,/,';W",i;,;;¿::,:,,:/"::Y:;;'1";:;X,,:~;:::)~;t}:~:::,:1è,~,::':5>(:;t-::'\1f::f~t(;)~;¿:;'>S"r+i;':'c,::;;~"Yi'
Above: Concept sketch, as proposed North Ninth Street Gateway Entry, with wetland ponds, windscreen tree lines and native plants, to announce
"This is a City Enby"
at Interstate 70
While not currently part of the Ninth Street Bridge renovation, consideration is merited, in order to recognize North Ninth Street as an important north
- south connector to Salina, historically (as a boundary) and presently, in future development of the Oty. Below: Heading north to Interstate 70.
Vicki Scurt Sfteworks with Märk SpitZer Dtislgns, " NOrlh Ohio Street Grade $epBtation: PuNK: AftBndUrbàn Design óppòrtunltieS
Resources and Influences
Above; Here a landscaped drainage pond provides a small
wetland with fall color. The \\mll'f'Or' JJOnd Is attractive for
drivers as a local landmark. environmentally, it solves storm
water management issues and it provides habitat for birds
and water fowl. Below: Highway 16, in springtime color.
Above and below: Regional identity and local identity are
two issues that define Infrastructure in terms of community.
Above: Highway 16 in Tacoma, WA, heading to the NalTOws
Bridge, a local landmark. Native plants and perennials
provide a low maIntenance landscape aod seasonal color.
VIckI ScÛ,fSïièW¡jrl(5 with Marlc5PJtzer Designs, NOt1hOl1iÔ 5tieet Grade Sepsiåi1on-: PuiiièArt'aiidlJlban DéSrgn dppodUhl6èS
North Ninth Street Bridge
Above and below: The renovation of the North Ninth
Street Bridge provides an opportunity to enhance the
structure as a Oty Gateway, recognizing its historic and
present signltlcance as an entry to Salina. Below: The
Oakdale Park Bridge provides a posIUve working example.
Above: Crossing Mulberry Creek, North Ninth Street Bridge
could "borrow color" from the Oakdale Park Bridge (below).
Proposed enhancements include: new att:ract'.WeraiHngs, an
overlook to the creek, Identity lighting (on both sides of the
bridge) and retaining the air median for character and form.
viCki Scurf sfteWorics with Mark Spitzer DesJgns,NÒi1Ji ditiO Stieet Grade Separation: ' Public Art and UibäìJQriÖpj1ottamitíes
Resources and Influences
AboVe: This ornamental rail is attractive and functional.
Below (left and right): In E\Ierett, WA, this overtleacl
structure'carries street lights, signalllngl and ornamental
flower baskets. Influenced by historic railroad motifs, the
project includes this overhead and signature light annatures.
Above (left and right): This roadway bridge in Redmondl
WA, features a custom rail and a "candelabra" of street
lightsl creating an arc of light. Similar "retro lighting" could
be added to North Ninth Street Bridge, enhancing its day
and, nighttime image, whliecelebratJng,lts historic role.
VicktSCUrl SIœWOlks with Mark Spitzer DeSignsl NOith õiíiO5tieet GràdéSiipàrátJOO: PUbliC Aitai1dìJrliàn Design ðPPiiiiiiriiiés°
. Page 26
North Ninth Street Bridge
Salina, Kansas
Co,lceptual Sketch
RaUo:
August 22~ 2002
Radius = 580'
Options 1 & 2
Candelabra Options- With Both Open and Closed Median &
Standard & Ornamental Bridge Railings
Option 3
Concrete Pilaster Lights
-Located in Median
with Standard KDOT
Bridge Railing
Bud
& Considerations
Estimated Cost of Initial Concepts
City's Estimated Cost Share Ranged
from $112,000 to $250,000
Least Expensive Option-
Commercially Available Lights
Add
Initial Feedback- Budget Not
Available for Preferred Options
Refined Conce Designs
Budget Target of $85,000 Established
Limit Work to SB Bridge Only
Confine Focus to Lighting & Median
Look at Both Low and High End
Concepts
Other Gateway Aspects to Be Taken
into Consideration Separately
Lighting Options
MTR
MTRColumn (MI'RT& MTR~ [~ =I.FOOT
tapered or round poles
· tT$. 2fie 3T8 or 4T8 laming
· 8" olarneter fixture head, (also
avoicf/o~ ~ 10' - consL~ factory)
· 12', 14' 16' or custom heigh~
MTR 200 (~)
· ¢~le. double and quadruple
pole mount and wail mount
conflgurcri~o~s MTB 20~ (MTROS*W)
· 50w fo 100w mectal halide or
M11~ 360 (MTR14)
single or double pole mount
and wall mount configurcrfions
· 1CX)w to 250w metal haJide Or
· 1/1" diameter fixture head
IvlT'R Bollard (BRM & BTM)
· ~ to 100w metal halide or
· 2', 3', 4' or custom hetgh~s
MTR Wall (WRM & WTM)
· 50w fo 100w metal halide or
· 8' diameter fixture head
· refer to Mfl~ 8olidrd spec
sheet fc4 ordering info
MTR 90 ~ollard (Bgo)
· 3~J/2' dlarneler bollords for
· twin lube or quad ,~Jbe
· 2', 3', 4' or Custom heights
MIR 90 Well (wg~
· 3-t/2~ diameter wall mounts
· lwin tube or quad tube
· see MTI~ 90 spec sheet for
Other ~e'lux klminalres that
utilize MTR technology
· Alt CDO Family luminekes
· Saturn Magnum
· Urbl BalJard
· MTR Refraclor option Is - ." '*
MTR Bollards
(BTM-4) (BRM-4)
j J
· T~
MT[~ Columns
(MfRT); (MmS)
MTR 200 (M'fi~,~
S&5 I O
MTR
MTR - Multi Prisms for Total Reflection
From the roadway scale MTR 360 to the slim and stalely MTR 90 Bolierd,
MTR system lumlnQJfes ore designed for O wide variety of projects. Speclty
MTR systems to illuminate pedestrian and landscaped areas, roadways and
parking lots with comfortable, Iow glare light and excellent distribution,
MTR 360 Wall (MTR2OO-W)
MTR 3~60 (MTR14)
MIR Bollord (BTM)
MTR Bollard (BRM)
MTR 90 Bollard (B90)
MTR 200 (MTR08)
MTR Column (MTRS)
MTR 200 Well (MTR200-W)
MTR Bollard Wall (BTM-W)
MTR 90 Wall (W90)
CONC~ET~ BEAUTY~
ROSE
M£D~U~ ~£ORSPOT ~4~
Alternatives Considered
Variations in Median Paving Materials,
Patterns & Colors
Pavestone
Endicott Tile
Other Materials
Single Row Down Center
Staggered & Offset Pattern
Lighting
Median Study: A, "Railroad CrissCross" with Endicott Pavers
Setux Corral Light Sticks: 14' & 16' tall, angled, 15 lights illustrated in black or red, below
Light Locations, below
Pa~ving Pa~em, be~#
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" 12"x12": ~t'
River Red /~,
Savannah or Pewter ~ ~
Charcoal
Light Sticks Angle: 65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2,25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
GOlden Buff or Desert Imnspot
Manganese lronspot
Median Study: B, "Railroad Cdss-Cross" with Pavestone C~ Squares
Selux Corral Light Sticks: 14' & 16' tall, angled, 15 lights illustrated in black or red, below
Light Locations, below
P~ving Pattern, be~w
, , :
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" 12"x12":
River Red
Savannah or Pewter
C~arcoat
Light Sticks Angle:
65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert Ironspot
Manganese Ironspot
Median Study: C, "Candelabra" or C, "CrissCross" with Endicott Pavers
Selux Con*al Light Sticks: 12' - 24', "Candelabra" with 13 lights illustrated in red, below
: "Candelabra" Eight Locations: C~.nterline, below
I!t:1 ltl ltl l:111 ! ttl itt tl I I!I1{11 !11 tt lit It Il t I t;I11t I It litl Itt ti lilt ii tt llill I I ! t llttlt itl flit t ltl t I lit It Il I!t{t ! tl
· , ; , : : :
Paving!Pattern can support.' Candelabra or CrisP-Cross U~ht Sticksi 13 Iicjht~
Paves*tone Oty Squares 2.38" 12"x12":
River Red
Savannah or Pewter
Charcoal ~
Light Sticks Angle:
65 d~s & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2,25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert lmnspot
Manganese lronspot
Median Study: D, "Candelabra" or D, "Cdss-Cross" with Pave. stone City Squares
Selux Corral Light Sticks: 12' - 24', "Candelabra" with 13 lights illustrated in red, below
"Candelabra" ight Locations: Centerline, below
Paving[Pattern ~n suppor~ Candelab. ra or Crib-Cross Ught Sticksi 13 ligh~
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" 12"x12":
River Red
Savannah or Pewter
Charo~l ~
Light Sticks Angle:
65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert Ironspot
Manganese Imnspot
Median Study: E, "Candelabra" or E, "Cdss-Cross" with Pavestone City Squares
Selux Corral Light Sticks: 12' - 24', "Candelabra" with 13 lights illustrated in red, below
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" 12"x12":
PJver Red
Savannah or Pewter
Charcoal ~
Light Sticks ~ngle:
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert Ironspot
Manganese ironspot
65 degrees & 115 degrees
Median Study: F, "Raitmad Cdss-.Cross" with Pavestone C~ Squares
Selux Corral Light Sticks: 14' & 16' tall, an~, 15 lights illustrated in black or red, below
Light Locations, below
· : : : Pa.:ring Pa~em, belbw :
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" 12'~12":
River Red
Savannah or Pewter
Charcoal
Light Sticks Angle: 65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert imnspot
Manganese Ironspot
D Elements
North Ninth Street Bridge - Cost Comparison of Alternates
Item Quantity Unit Cost
Selux Light Fixture MrRT I 6'
Selux Light Fixture MTRT 18'
Selux Light Fixture MTRT 16'
Selux Light Fixture MTRT 18'
Selux Light Fixture MTRS 12'-24'
lnstallation of Lighting
Installation of Lighting
Traffic Control
Substrate (crushed rock & sand)
Endicott Pavers 2.25x4x8
Endic ott Pavers 2.25 x8 x8
Pavestone City Squares 2.38x12x12
Freight for Pavers
Endicott Pavers Installation
Pavest one Pavers Installation
Pro-So-Co Sealer
Pro-So-Co Sealer Installation
Filter Fabric
Filter Fabric Installation
Contingency
Estimated Construction Cost
8
7
7
6
13
15
13
25%
2500sqft
2500sqft
2500sqfl
2500sqft
2500sqft
2500sqft
24 gallons
2500sqft
231 linear ft
2500sqft
$1850.00
$2,000.00
$1850.00
$2000.00
$3 000.00
$1 100.00
$1 100.00
$4 000.00
$1 500.00
$2.80
$3.65
$2.30
$350.00
$7.50
$6.50
$32.00
$0.50
$1.26
$0.50
Design/Travel/Direct Expenses (Scuri & WCI)
Sub-Total
CM/Site Review Trips & Consultation
Grand Total
$2,500
Total Cost
$14,800
$14,000
$12,950
$12,000
$39,000
$16,500
$14,300
$4,000
$1,500
$7,000
$9,125
$5,750
$350
$18,750
$16,250
$768
$1,250
$291 opt~nal
$1,250 optional
$i3,000
$5,000
Criss-Cross Criss-Cross Candelabra Cfiss,Cross Candelabra Criss-Cross
lVkdian A* Median B & F Median C Median C* Median D & E Median D & E
$14,800
$14,000
$0
$0
$0
$16,500
$0
$4,000
$1,500
$7,000
$0
$0
$350
$18,750
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3.800
$80,700
$93,700
$5,000
$98,700
$14,800
$14,000
$16,500
$4,000
$1,500
$5,750
$350
$16,250
$768
$1,250
$12,950 $12,950
$12,000 $12,000
$39,000 $39,000
$14,300 $14,300 $14,300 $14,300
$4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
$1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
$7,000 $7,000
$350 $350
$18,750 $18,750
$5,750 $5,750
$350 $350
$16,250 $16,250
$768 $768
$1,250 $1,250
$3,800 $4,200 $3,500i $4,200 $3,500
$78,968 $89,100 74,350 $87,368 $72,618
$13,000 $13 ^^^ · ..... $,~ ~nn $~ nan
$91,968 $102,100 $87,350 $i00,368 $85,618
$5,000 $5,000 $5~000 $5,000 $5,000
$96,968 $107,100 $92,350 $105,368 $90,618
Recommended Choices: A Criss-Cross or C Criss-Cross
Recommendations
Median Study: A, "Railroad Cdss-Cross" with Endicott Pavers
Selux Corral Light Sticks: 14' & 16' tall, angled, 15 lights illustrated in black or red, below
Light Locations, below
: ; : :
P ingPa rn bek)w :
Pavestone City Squares 2.38" i2"x12": ~'
River Red
/\
Savannah or Pewter ~
Charcoal
Light Sticks Angle: 65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4'5(8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert lmnspot
Manganese Ironspot
Recommendations
Median Study: C, "Candelabra" or C, "Cdss-Cross" with Endicott Pavers
Setux Corral Light Sticks: 12' - 24', "Candelabra" with 13 lights illustrated in red, below
I
c, --",, "~ight Loca~ons: Centedine, 6elow
· -- 'Candelabra .
Pa~i~::Pattem On suppor~ Candelabra or
Paves'cone City Squares 2.38" :1.2"x12": ~
RJver Red
Savannah or Pewter ~ , ~
Charcoal
Light Sticks Angle: 65 degrees & 115 degrees
Endicott Pavers 2.25"x4"x8":
Red Blend
Golden Buff or Desert Imnspot
Manganese Ironspot
Overall Summary of
P
KDOT Brid g e
Replacement Project
Community Art &
Design Concepts
Proposed CAD
Components
Subtotal
Plan Revisions - Traffic
Control
Construction
Engineering Services
Grand Total
I
ConstrUction
'Remarks
Construction Cost Design Fee
Cost
$1,331,400 $75,632
112,00 to $250,000
$8,709
5.7% See Note 1
See Note 1 -No Options Taken Beyond
N/A Concept Phase
$80,700 $13,000
$1,412,100 $97,341
N/A $7,680
N/A $137,935
[ $1.412.100 I $242.9~6
I ' ' ' I '
6.1% See Note 2
Bridge Project & Proposed CAD
6.9% Components
See Note 2 -'Revise Traffic Control Plans
N/A and Sequencing
See Note 3 - Provide Full Time, On-Site
N/A Testing & Inspection Services
7.2 %1
I
Note 1 - Fees budgeted and paid for in 2003
Note 2 - Design fees pending
Note 3 - Fees pending, includes CRS for CAD components
D
t Share
KDOT Brid g e
Replacement Project
Proposed CAD
Component s
Survey & Design Fees
Construction
Engineering Services
$1,331,400 $1,065,120
$266,280 80/20 Cost Share Basis
$80,700 $0 $80,700
$105,021 $0 $105,021
$137,935 $106,348 $31,587
See Note 1 - Includes Surveys, Bridge &
CAD Design & Traffic Control Revisions
80/20 Cost Share Basis
Totals
$1,517,121 $1,065,120
$483,588
Note 1 - $84,341 in design fees paid and budgeted in 2003
Schedule & Status of
Project
Bridge Scheduled for Dec. '03 Letting
Construction Delayed Until Fall '04 or
Spring '05 Due to 1-70 Construction
Decision Point for Community Art &
Design Elements
New Traffic Control Plans Necessary
for KDOT Project