Memorandum of Understanding (Distress Survey & Pavement Condition Reporting Agreement) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Cftyof TELEPHONE • (785)309-5725
Michael Fraser, Director of Public Works FAX • (785)309-5713
Daniel Stack, RE., City Engineer TDD • (785) 309-5747
Jim Teutsch, Operations Manager E-MAIL: mike.frasert7a alina.org
dan.stack @salina.org
300 West Ash • P.O. Box 736 jim.teutsch(2 salina.org
Salina, Kansas 67402-0736 Salina WEBSITE • www.salina-ks.gov
DATE: January 29, 2015
TO: Jason Gage, City Manager FROM: Kent Johnson, Civil Engineer 114-
Dan Stack, City Engineer ' Q
Mike Fraser, Director of Public Works
ITEM:
Distress Survey and Pavement Condition Reporting Agreement with Kansas State University (KSU)
BACKGROUND:
The best way to decrease the rate of deterioration of asphalt pavement is to perform preventive
maintenance(PM).There are a number of PM techniques that can play an important role in decelerating
the need for major rehabilitation. However, due to budget constraints and political pressure, agencies are
often unable to place preservation treatments at the optimum time.
Scott Bergkamp, Bergkamp Pavement Preservation Solutions president, and Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D.,
P.E., KSU Civil Engineering Professor, have developed a study proposed to measure the benefits and/or
effectiveness of prompt timing in placing preservation treatments. The main objective of this case study is
to collect and analyze pavement distress data on selected test sections of microsurfacing in the City of
Salina. Concurrent data on the control sections will also be collected.
In cooperation with Bergkamp and Hossain, staff proposes microsurfacing to be placed on three newer
pavement sections (5-6 years old) before very much cracking, raveling or deterioration has occurred.
KSU grad students under Hossain's guidance would then observe the sections over the next five years
for any pavement deterioration or failures. The long term goal would be to continue placing preservation
treatments before failures to determine longevity of the pavement sections.
FISCAL NOTE:
The 2015 sub-CIP budget identifies$870,000 in microsurfacing funds. Staff proposes that a portion of
these funds be allocated for this study ($1,329 per year) during the five-year performance period
(6/15/2015 - 6/14/2020). Bergkamp proposes to contribute up to half of the cost ($2,400)for Emulsion
Drive currently estimated at $4,800 for a 2015 single layer microsurface.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of the Agreement with KSU for services for $6,645.
1. Approve the agreement with KSU to complete the work.
❑ 2. Reject the agreement and give staff further direction.
Comments:
Signature: £ C
f::ngincorin(,1 + tsertr. 4 I raffic Cfti it 01 + t-1oc d i-ortroi + Gcmtr: 1 Ciamue e SarUit 1it)HH 4- I tdf II
Our Mission is to Build and Maintain a Clean, Safe Community
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is entered into this 26th May, 2015 by and between City of Salina, Kansas, 300 W. Ash
Street, Salina,KS 67401 (hereinafter referred to as "Sponsor")and Kansas State University, 2 Fairchild Hall,
Manhattan,KS, 66506-1103 (hereinafter referred to as the "University"). Work will be performed at Kansas
State University in the Department of(Dept.Name).
WHEREAS, the project contemplated by this Agreement is of mutual interest and benefit to University and
to Sponsor and will further instructional and research project objectives of University in a manner consistent
with its status as a non-profit,tax-exempt educational institution.
NOW,THEREFORE,the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. STATEMENT OF WORK. The University agrees to use its best efforts to perform the project as
described in Appendix A hereof.
2. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR/PROJECT DIRECTOR. The project will be directed by Dr. ASM
Mustaque Hossain. If, for any reason, he is unable to continue to serve as principal
investigator/project director and a mutually acceptable successor is not available, University and/or
Sponsor shall have the option to terminate said program in accordance with Clause 15 -
TERMINATION.
3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE. The project shall be conducted during the period of(06/15/2015—
06/14/2020)and will be subject to renewal only by mutual agreement of the parties.
4. PROJECT COSTS AND PAYMENT. In consideration of the foregoing, Sponsor will pay
University for costs incurred in the performance of the project, without an itemized accounting.
Payment shall not exceed the total estimated cost of$6,645. Sponsor shall make payment within
thirty(30) days of the receipt of an invoice from University. University will email invoices in PDF
format to Dan Stack(dan.stack(cp salina.org).
5. REPORTS/DELIVERABLES. Annual reports of the project will be made periodically by
University to Sponsor and a final report will be rendered on completion of the project.
"Deliverables" mean the report(s) submitted to Sponsor by University which contains the resulting
data generated from the project evaluation. The parties agree that Sponsor owns any such
Deliverables provided in accordance with this Agreement and Appendix A and thus may use such
for any purpose without any further remuneration to University. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the
parties understand and agree that University retains the right to (a) utilize the Deliverables for its
academic, educational and research purposes, subject to the confidentiality provisions outlined
herein, and (b) publish project results as permitted per Clause 12 —
CONFIDENTIALITY/PUBLICATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, representatives of
University will consult and/or meet with representatives of Sponsor to discuss progress and results,
as well as on going plans of the project and University will provide project information to Sponsor
as reasonably requested.
6. FACILITIES. The University will provide the utilities and office, laboratory and field space needed
for the project.
7. PROPERTY. All equipment detailed in the project budget and purchased from this fund shall be the
property of the University.
1 MOA (04/14)
8. PUBLICITY. Sponsor will not use the name of University, nor of any member of University's
project staff, in any publicity, advertising, or news release without the prior written approval of an
authorized representative of University. University will not use the name of Sponsor, nor any
employee of Sponsor, in any publicity, advertising, or news release without the prior written
approval of Sponsor.
9. INSURANCE. University represents that it has adequate liability insurance, such protection being
applicable to officers, employees, and agents while acting within the scope of their employment by
University. The University has no liability insurance policy as such that can extend protection to
any other person.
10. BACKGROUND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. "Background Intellectual Property" means
property and the legal right therein of either or both parties developed before or independent of this
Agreement including inventions, patent applications, patents, copyrights, trademarks, mask works,
trade secrets and any information embodying proprietary data such as technical data and computer
software.
Both parties agree to provide the Background Intellectual Property necessary to complete the
objectives of the project. Both parties shall retain all rights to their respective Background
Intellectual Property provided for this purpose. Neither party shall assume any rights in the other
party's Background Intellectual Property provided for this project other than the right to use said
Background Intellectual Property to achieve the objectives of this project.
11. PROJECT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. "Project Intellectual Property" means the legal rights
relating to inventions (including Subject Inventions as defined in 37 CFR 401), patent applications,
patents, copyrights, trademarks, mask works, trade secrets and any other legally protectable
information, including computer software, first made or generated during the performance of this
Agreement.
Ownership of Project Intellectual Property shall vest in the party whose personnel conceived the
subject matter and diligently pursued reducing the subject matter to practice, and such party may
perfect legal protection therein in its own name and at its own expense. Jointly made or generated
Project Intellectual Property shall be jointly owned by the parties unless otherwise agreed in writing.
The parties agree to disclose to each other, in writing, each and every invention which may be
patentable or otherwise protectable under the United States Patent laws in Title 35, United States
Code. The parties acknowledge that they will disclose inventions to each other and the awarding
agency within two (2) months after their respective inventor(s)first disclose the invention in writing
to the person(s) responsible for patent matters of the disclosing party. All written disclosures of
such Inventions shall contain sufficient detail of the invention, identification of any statutory bars,
and shall be marked confidential, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 205.
Sponsor shall receive the first option to negotiate for a license to commercialize the Project
Intellectual Property of University, subject to any rights of the Government therein. Sponsor is
hereby granted an exclusive option to negotiate the terms for a license to Project Intellectual
Property of University, for an initial option period of three (3) months after such invention has been
reported to Sponsor.
The terms of subsequent licensing agreements for University owned and/or jointly owned
Intellectual Property will be negotiated in good faith and by mutual agreement by the Parties to this
2 MOA (04/14)
Agreement.
12. CONFIDENTIALITY/PUBLICATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, and for a period of
five (5) years thereafter, each party will maintain in confidence all confidential Background
Intellectual Property and Project Intellectual Property of a party, as well as all other Confidential
Information of a party disclosed by that party to the other in connection with this Project. Neither
party will use, disclose or grant use of such Confidential Information except as required to perform
under this Agreement. Each party will use at least the same standard of care as it uses to protect its
own Confidential Information to insure that students, interns, employees, agents and consultants do
not disclose or make any unauthorized use of such Confidential Information. Any student, intern,
employee, agent or consultant of the receiving party must be notified of the restrictions on the use of
the disclosing party's Confidential Information and must agree with those restrictions before being
allowed access to the Confidential Information. Each party will promptly notify the other upon
discovery of any unauthorized use or disclosure of the Confidential Information.
Either party may publish its results from this project. However, the publishing party will provide
the other party a thirty (30) day period in which to review proposed publications, identify
proprietary or confidential information, and submit comments. The publishing party will not
publish or otherwise disclose proprietary or confidential information in accordance with the
procedures described in this article and the publishing party will give full consideration to all
comments before publication. Furthermore,upon request of the reviewing party,publication will be
deferred for up to sixty (60) additional days for preparation and filing of a Patent application which
the reviewing party has the right to file or to have filed at its request by the publishing party.
13. MODIFICATION. Any agreement to change the terms of this Agreement in any way shall be valid
when the change is made in writing and approved by authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
14. REPRESENTATIVES. Designated representatives for the parties are:
Sponsor: University:
If Technical Daniel R. Stack ASM Hossain
City of Salina Public Works Kansas State University
300 W. Ash Street Dept of Civil Engineering,2124 Fiedler Hall
Salina,KS 67402-0736 Manhattan,KS 66506
785-309-5725 (785)532-1576
Email: dan.stack @salina.org Email: mustak @ksu.edu
If Contractual Jason A Gage Paul R. Lowe
300 W. Ash Street Assistant Vice President for Research
Salina,KS 67402-0736 Kansas State University
785-309-5725 2 Fairchild Hall
Email: Manhattan,KS 66506-1103
(785)532-6804
Email: plowe @ksu.edu
If Financial Daniel R. Stack Shannon Fisher
City of Salina Public Works Director, Sponsored Programs
300 W. Ash Street Kansas State University
Salina,KS 67402-0736 Division of Financial Services
785-309-5725 10 Anderson Hall
Email: dan.stack @salina.org Manhattan,KS 66506-0108
3 MOA (04/14)
(785)532-6207
Email: fisher'%ksu.edu
15. TERMINATION. Performance under this Agreement may be terminated by Sponsor upon a thirty
day advance, written notice. In the event of early termination of this Agreement by Sponsor,
Sponsor shall pay all costs accrued by University as of the date of the notice of termination,
including non-cancelable obligations, which shall include all non-cancelable contracts and
fellowships or postdoctoral associate appointments called for in Appendix A. In addition, Sponsor
will pay all other reasonable costs incurred by the University during the time period between the
notification date and the termination date, which are necessary to terminate the project. Any
obligation of sponsor for fellowships or postdoctoral associates shall end no later than the end of
University's academic year following termination. Reimbursement for incurred costs and
obligations will not exceed the total estimated project cost as shown in Clause 4.
Performance may be terminated by University upon a thirty day advance, written notice if
circumstances beyond its control preclude continuation of the project.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate as of the day
and year first written above.
SPONSOR: KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY:
, 4 ' -A_
j
)__
By: Jason Gage By: Paul R. Lowe
Title: City Manager Title: Assistant Vice President for Research
Date:
.5b-6 1 - - Date: � ' f
FEIN: 46' O[ a'1
4 MOA (04/14)
Appendix A
PROPOSAL
to
THE CITY OF SALINA
For
Distress Survey and Pavement Condition Reporting for Microsurfacing Test
Sections in the City of Salina
Period of Performance: 06/15/15 - 06/14/20
Project Monitor: Dan Stack, P.E.
Funds Requested: $6,645
from
Kansas State University
Fairchild Hall, Room No. 2
Manhattan, KS 66506-1 103.
Project Personnel:
Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D., P.E
Department of Civil Engineering
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506-2905.
APPROVALS:
Mustaque Hossain Paul R. Lowe \
Principal Investigator Assistant Vice President for Research
TABLE OF CONTENTS
General Problem Statement 2
Objectives 6
Work Plan and Schedule 6
Budget 7
Staff and Facilities Available 8
Reports/Deliverables 8
GENERAL PROBLEM STATEMENT
Introduction
As fewer roads and highway are being constructed every year, maintenance and rehabilitation of
pavements is becoming increasingly important. The best way to reduce the cost is to do
maintenance as soon as the pavement shows some deterioration. Different factors which affect
the pavement are the environment, traffic and maintenance techniques. Maintenance is carried
out to minimize the rate of deterioration from traffic and environment. The best way to decrease
the rate of deterioration is to do preventive maintenance (PM). There are a number of preventive
maintenance techniques that can play an important role to decelerate the need for major
rehabilitation.
Problem Outline
Like many other states, dwindling budgets for pavement construction program are forcing the
City of Salina and other highway agencies to look closely at the pavement preservation program.
Pavement preservation using thin overlay, chip seal, ultra-thin bonded bituminous surface (Nova
chip), and modified slurry seal have proven to be very cost-effective in Kansas. However,
selection any PM action or other rehabilitation strategies depend on the quality of information
about the effectiveness of such a treatment on existing pavements in a locale. Thus the City of
Salina has decided to construct and monitor several test sections using microsurfacing.
Microsurfacing
Microsurfacing is an effective preventive maintenance treatment. Microsurfacing has the
potential to extend the life of a pavement and could be a cheaper alternative to rehabilitation.
2
This treatment is known to improve skid resistance, fill ruts, cure rapidly (resulting in quick
opening to traffic after paving), and it can be applied under fairly diverse weather and
temperature conditions. However, it does not address structural failures and, therefore, there
must be previous treatments for areas that have failed asphalt, pushed up edge line, or reflective
cracking. The microsurfacing will also correct asphalt patch areas, crack sealing, filling of small
potholes, and flushed surfaces or stripped chip seals. Microsurfacing will address the rutting
caused by densification, but for rutting caused by structural failure it will only be a temporary
solution due to structural inadequacy not being corrected by rut filling. Modern microsurfacing
train can lay around 500 tons per day, which is approximately 6.6 lane miles. Thus downtime of
a lane due to construction is minimal. Typically microsurfacing is used to as a preventive
maintenance measure for minor surface irregularities, small cracks usually less than 1/4 in (6 mm)
wide, and can fill a 1 '/2 inch (38 mm) rut in one pass. For areas with snow, microsurfacing has
been proven to be less damage susceptible by snowplows compared to single chip seals or
conventional slurry seals. The surface is also preferred for non-vehicular use i.e. bicycles,
skates, skateboards, etc. to chip seal due to smoother surface texture.
Literature Review on Microsurfacing
History
Microsurfacing was first developed in the late 1960's and early 1970's in Germany. The
researchers were experimenting with the conventional slurry to be able to use it in a thicker but
narrower application for wheel ruts on the Autobahn. The Autobahn had an expensive road
striping and if they could keep this thick application in a narrow strip then there would be no
need to re-stripe after application. They selected good quality aggregates and commonly used
3
bitumen. However, they also had to use special polymers and emulsifiers so the product, even
though had a multi-stone thickness, would remain stable. Micro-Surfacing was first used as a rut
filler,but it has been found to have other uses too. It is to be noted that the use of microsurfacing
would not increase the pavements structural capacity, but it does help reduce the effects of
climate and oxidation. It was finally introduced into the United States around 1980 where it has
been used as a cost-effective surface treatment to give the users a better ride quality and extend
the life of the existing pavement.
Microsurfacing received a great deal of attention in 1996 when the Georgia Department
of Transportation used 430,000 sq. yd. of this product to fix raveled and cracked pavements on
the large interstate system around Atlanta before the Summer Olympics. The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) estimated that the material cost around $0.90-$1.00 per square yard at a
spread rate of 20 to 30 pounds per square yard.
Production
Microsurfacing material is produced in-situ. A traveling train accurately measures and mixes all
materials at the job site. The material "consists of a mixture of less than 6 mm or 10 mm
continuously or sometimes gap-graded aggregate mixture, water, break control additive, and
highly polymerized bitumen emulsion." These materials create a cold-mixed asphalt material
known as microsurfacing. The material is laid through a full-width spreader box, which covers
one lane of traffic, after being mixed. When rutting is the major concern of the paving operation
then a specialized rut-box, that fills the ruts with the largest aggregate particles, is used. The final
product turns from brown to black as the surface cures (water is expelled). This curing period
can be anywhere from 15 to 45 minutes.
4
Microsurfacing Types
There are different types of microsurfacing used for certain situations but all types use polymer-
modified now for longer wear and better resistance to cracking and traffic. Types II and III are
the two grading options for microsurfacing. The difference between the two types is the
aggregate size that will achieve different surface texture. Type III is recommended for rut filling
on interstates and other high-speed roads. Type II is more general in use and is used on most
applications for arterial roads and highways.
Construction Issues
During paving operation, there are certain problems need to be watched for so that the process
does not yield a bad product. If there are noticeable surface drag marks then the lay-down
machine needs to be checked. The drag marks will affect the ride quality of the treated surface.
If the material is breaking too quickly then there might be either a problem either with the binder
or a problem with the total mix. If there are contaminants on the road then there is a possibility
that the material will not bond to the underlying layer. If the contaminants are large in size then
pop-outs may occur. If there is an existing transverse joint, that must be taken care of especially
if the joint is in an unacceptable condition. If the joint is wider than 1/4 inch (6 mm) and not been
previously sealed then there is a probability of the micro-surfacing failing at that location. If
rutting exists then special care needs to be taken if the rut is deeper than a two-rock thickness. If
the ruts are too deep for one pass then a rut filling pass must be made before the full lane-width
is covered. During production, traffic control should hold traffic long enough that there is not
any early traffic crossing the paved section. The polymer-modified emulsion has a certain cure
time and if traffic is allowed on it before full curing then there is a chance that some of the
5
material will be picked up by the tires of the vehicle. This will create a rough and irregular
surface.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this project is to collect and analyze pavement distress data on selected
test sections of microsurfacing in the City of Salina. Concurrent data on the control sections will
also be collected.
WORK PLAN AND SCHEDULE
The tasks needed to fulfill the above objectives will be as follows:
Task 1: Test section selection
Meet the city engineering staff to reconfirm the goals and objectives, to understand expectations,
and to identify locations of test and control sections. It is expected that three will be at least one
500 ft test section on three projects. A control section of equal length on each project will also be
established.
Task 2: Construction Documentation
Document each test section construction. Collect relevant before construction information such
as traffic, existing pavement condition, etc. as well as during construction information such as
climatic data, mixture information, etc.
Task 3: Test and Control Section Monitoring.
Collect pavement distress data following the Micro-Paver methodology of the American Public
Works Association (APWA) for five years. Compute and report Pavement Condition Index
(PCI) data every year.
Task 4: Prepare the final report.
6
SCHEDULE
The project is proposed to start on June 15, 2015 and to end on June 14, 2020.
BUDGET
The total budget for this project is $6,645. Budget details are shown below.
BUDGET FOR THE PROJECT:
Distress Survey and Pavement Condition Reporting for Microsurfacing
Test Sections in the City of Salina
Period: 05/15/2015 - 05/14/2020
6/15/2015
Source of Funds: City of Salina to
6/14/2020
TOTAL
Salaries and Wages
A. 1 Principal Investigator
Hossain 0 0
2 Undergraduate Hourly
40 hours per year, 5 years, $15/hour 3,000 3000
Fringe Benefits
1.0% of A2 30 30
3,030 3,030
Subtotal Salaries, Wages and Fringe Benefits
B Travel- Domestic 1,000 1,000
C. Other Direct costs
1 Communications 200 200
2 Duplication & Report Preparation 200 200
Total Direct Costs 4,430 4,430
E. Facilities&Administrative Costs
50% of MTDC 2,215 2,215
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $6,645 $6,645
7
STAFF AND FACILITIES
This project will be carried out under the direction of Dr. Mustaque Hossain, Principal
Investigator, in close cooperation with the City of Salina. One undergraduate student will also
work on this project.
Mustaque Hossain is the Munger Professor of Civil Engineering at KSU and will act as
the Principal Investigator on this project. Dr. Hossain is the author and co-author of many
publications related to field and laboratory testing of soil and highway materials, and pavement
design, evaluation, and management. He was a Principal and Co-Principal Investigator in many
research projects. Dr. Hossain is also a member of TRB Committee AFD80: Strength and
Deformation Characteristics of Pavements. He is very familiar with the PCI condition survey
methodology since he was the principal investigator of two projects for the Division of Aviation
of the Kansas Department of Transportation to do PCI survey on all generation aviation airports
in Kansas.
REPORTS/DELIVERABLES
The deliverables of this project will include the annual PCI reports and a final project report.
8
1 ,
i . , 4
w
m
v 0 Jo a2pnj z in '3
PH Aapp i s ;asunS t
ui walsan!g aEi 2.,'„ JI vc vc Cm
> V7
co a v V�apt JQ■Mal/1 0 .? _U V
_ 3i .2 v AalleA Q� 2
CL . GCC -- -
_ „�, ) w ✓. .`_
1 a ° _ -,G ,6) z ! 7 E-
0 • v) 0 (2 l�G� m J ■ a)
a o = a o E
a t a p ..„.„,co Ver1• L '77
'-'-'-''' s 0 N
i I m 0 / to u7
Vii o 1 o' •.. /-- . o C o N
H1 a v ?'x .a .�' t 1• d r- CO W
CO ; 3 0.e". ct C .l c
Jto a U i- 3 i.... �, L m v 0
c .x I ;j z . (/)
M
g�u
� l 3
v � U
5,
c
-. ?G 3 J (T E a -0 ° Jo e3nDIe)
.5 o m�m o t N Q , o � r U
ci
L L .3 C t - E JQ aopessegw .Q .E
o !0 Y g r U y ai� CO E'15 d m n >v t � I� ......._______________
I ,c-, ., . T1_ S°MO F, t " ° o any eJOJny L
o O , ASa o > o
N a Q 4 Gd c CU a, . J'
i , E Z a „ /oil �a�IS o > � at O b -' m V
.0 T L 35 �; ¢v - '4aJg s -
/ I/�4 t 1
E d J j �1 '� L 1 S11J W!n O,S A'u!ntj WV _C r` open Rd u1 ui epu!! \.S"' .. ---------::__.
E.1 M 3S pNS .q ye�and Q epu!l
07 4,9 Ja uo!slnw3
DAV poo 3S 41b 2 Q A /)j�a_ �---._
3S 415 p_21£ 41b '1-or N 1Jeyga9 44p 1/0 C'
- - aA ewe . . aS suowwIS �J� C �/� �.ui 7
v � �u [I �
any pu y�!H
eAv 1= 0J ;aued Leotia�T if �aw S�-a 1
.. u cu U .Q a --Id la)IJeW an °JZ __ L
�i3LL �lOL p \U ��pa�Ja �Je i Q J r ;aue, .o�*� I
° 43 Ja s Q °° ' i a. i „ w ==
135- �, L J r
�`� pi�ayS ;S 4 nNTT " ° --�a, 1 H �.y,1i a JioM
m
AS'll! -_ PAagee o sJ anti, E t Y I U v aJ�1I �� b
i _JQE d A E d
Jv e2 Va$ 2(M 2 N c Ja^3 _ CO
spuiM G Ker< o C a ? N r - �� j
0 - m ° m t N a '� o E
Dr\, . 1:,...../.;/....„, ' '' i c E < > 1-,, .... 2 L
-`° � -r ,/.,iac� 'o _ :: F UUa�U a JcJ a /, 7 I N v m a> L o y ai ar
0 > . x a'
ar m m I_- S I
N. a n. m c ��
cb
■-- o
r v
// �----°-i o any u!aH v a, Y di�`O9 a .---++�
- a ' r CO CU
O MO
L d
a)
o i
L
U I,
00 01 CD 0 01 '-I 01 00 00 V1 V1 CD 0 0 LD V1 01 CO ti 01 LO 01 U0 U1 00 V1 01 al a N
00 cn N lD fn M N 00 N O O V LO 1/1 LD LD N N N O N N UI N N LO O N 00 D1
la 0 _ n e-1 n V LO LD O N 00 N n Vl N fb l!1 VI V ti N N W 00 00 Vl a LD c6 V) Ln Vf
Z Z N N lD l0 Ln Ln a en a V) Vl VI .-1 N M Ol V1 M Ln .-I .-1 .--1 .--I .--I V1 N en
VI •--I N a
J K U Z N
R 2 C O
7
H
LY
z 5.7 N N N N N Ln VI Cil N N N N N N N N N VI Ln N N N Ln Cil VI L.11 Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N
Z F H
Z U m
a :1 RAJ
a a
a 00
LY OM N N LD a--1 0 0 0 lD WI LID M 0 CO L!1 V1 V a CD CD 0 0 00 LO M st 00 LD N Ln
N
Z H N n TY N V1 Li) I-- CID CO VI U1 cr N Cr O CO M fn .--1 Vl I\ I- V N cl M Cr Cr O CO
N Z N .-1 V1 tit V V f.'1 N M V V V .--1 LD 0 N V N V .-I 'i NN .-4 .i N .cr-
w Q cc .--I
H 2 a
W 00 fb <- a .--1 .--1 fn, V a N N N N CO a N 00 00 CO fn M CO 00 00 CO 00 a VI
Z Z ry .-1 N en en U1 UI a v a Vl V) Ln Ln en N M N N N en H en N Ln N N N N Q
Q J a 0) 0
n
Z =
Q o > > ~
C7 2 3 co
v,
V V1 0 V1 00 LO V1 V1 00 0 0 0 00 LO 0 0 N t` 0 0 V1 N 0 V1 Ln 0 CO V1 0 V1
Z I I— .-1 V1 en to al 01 en Ol 01 01 LD M N V1 00 LO a N 00 O O 0 to N LO N IN
.-I V1 V M N IN N V) N N IN N M N 0 M M 00 N N V V CD Cr Cr N
W t .--I .-I N hi. .n N .-i .-1 N .i
U Z
Q J
LL
n
N 00
OC
��// C
IJ� U 00
L) O 3
-o -o a,
> > >
> U N m m > 00 Q V '6 '6
LL Q c -O T > Q an C N K d cc
O .' `n > > 0 3 3 u > > > a o c a to OD
_ > c C
4; L Q en in a c Q en en V Q Q Q Q c `^ 3 = Q = _
v v ' .o o s E = o N £ o v O O v u m o o L 3 u 00) u u
CC
o_ U v, 3 _ Q w 3 _■ Q w U O CO CO O! Z Z _ _ Q U V) x V1 v1
Q
2 00
L
n t a
t/) 2 zo = 00
0 v -a 'C a) C
> co
0 0) m c- m Cl) °- Q > u
N > > V1 ' = aJ "O Q -0 l7 C Q U v
-O Q Y in V1 v in Z i^ v O p w — w v a a) o " w 0) w
Z 3 CO CO L C Q N t .O C Q N N ›. ., N -c 3 L '6O Q Q C 9, L v N L
lJ CO d Cl.) 0 fa O L 0 77 . O N E Co a — N 0 0 a) p fa O O 0 a1 O CO C L 0
a U fl C V1 - Q V1 L _■ Q w C u m VI cc N O — — cc Ln a- O1 VI
w
cc
7
N
0
C
1.2 w g o o a, u
cc
FF Y
F LL 0) m O Q > > > > >
0 a) 0) Cl)
VI v -o Q Q Q Q Q , .2 a
WE E N N 01 D a) aJ a) a) , CO Q O u
CO f0 Co CO Co Co .N _
(7 V) N V1 VI V) V7 Cl) V7 V1 to N VI V7 7 7 7 'L-. t Y Y Y Y C C 0) C
Z t L t C C C L L L L .0 L .0 Q) Ql 0 0 O .: 00 f0 Co f0 .0 Co E Co O
In 4 4 Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N u u U U u w 'x 0 0 0 0 to w a in