F-4 Validity Dow AddApril 22, 1977
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Norris Olson, City Manager
Dean Boyer, City Engineer
Petition Number 3632 - filed by George Etherington for G & K,
Inc. requesting curbing, guttering, paving and grading of
£11sworth Avenue from Ohio Street to Courtney Drive and
Louise Lane from Ellsworth Avenue to the south line of Lot
One (1), Block Eight (8), Replat of Lots Twenty-two (22),
Block Three (3) and Lot Nine (9), Block Six (6), Dow Addition.
Water service to Lots Twenty-two (22) through Forty-two (42),
Block Three (3); Lots One (1) through Eighteen (18), Block
Seven (7) and Lot One (1), Block Eight (8), Replat of Lots
Twenty-two, Block Three (3) and Lot Nine (9), Block Six (6),
Dow Addition.
Sanitary sewers to serve Lots One (1) through ~enty-one (21),
Block Three (3) of Dow Addition and Lots Twenty-two (22) through
Forty-two (42), Block Three (3); Lots One (1) through Thirty-
six (36), Block Seven (7) and Lot One (1) and Lot Two (2),
Block Eight (8), Replat of Lot Twenty-two (22), Block Three
(3) and Lot Nine (9), Block Six (6), Dow Addition to the
City of Salina, Kansas.
The ~etitioner owns fifty-one percent (51%) of the property within
the benefit district, therefore, the petition is valid and a feasibility
report will be prepared.
Respectfully submitted,
DB:MKP
Dean Boyer
ENC: (3)
10: Ti;c
C~ ty ,',f Sa11~,~, Kansas
(A) ~.~g. tile t,ndersigned, being owners of record of property liable for assessment for
the fol 1 re. Ii ng proposed i[,~',~rovcmen t:~]_g~.~c~..A~gS~L~_~]9.?_~. ..........
(B)
(c)
]l-~];cTby propose tbaL SLICh improvement be made in the manner p~d-~ ~y
Chapter 12, of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, as amended.
The estimated or probable cost of such improve~ent is one hundred sevent~ive
thom~n~, fiv~ hundred eiq~]y-two and n~lg[] ('~;~,582~Q0
The extent of the proposed improvement district to be assessed is as indicated
the attached plat and is described as follows: Lots 1 throuq}]~l, Bl~ck
~l~i]i~g; Lots 2~. thr~G[gh 42, Block ~; Lots 1 throuqh 3(}~]}~g~ 7; Lots 1 and 2,
Block 8, Replat of Dow Addition to the City. of Salina~(ansas.
(B)
(E)
(F)
The proposcd method of assessment is: based on the fro,it footaqe of each lot of
l_and andwithout regard to building or--improvement of land. '-- '
The prbposed apportionment of costs between the improw.~ment district and the city
at large is percent ~1~5_~5) to be assessed against the improvement district
and percent (_8_~_6_%) ~) be paid by the city at large.
We further propose that stich improvement be made without notice and hearing as
required by K.S.A. 12-6a04(1) as amended.
No name may -be withdraYm from this petition after
the Governing Body commences consideration of the petition
or later than seven (7) (fays after this petition has been
filed with the City Cleric. (K.S.A. 12-6a04)
Respectfully submitted by
Telephone Humber ~.':",'- o;q~',~. ~
'Residence
Date and
Time of
.Signing
Property Owned.
Within proposed
' Improvement Di strict
.s ,,--8_;.. A-----
PEIITIOil IIUHBER 3632
DATE FILED _~!d]_3~.,.]2]C~_.
PAGE 2
(A)
Curbing, glittering, paving and grading of ELLSI,IOP, TII AVEIIUE from ·
OtlIO STREET to COURT[,~[Y DRIVE and LOUIS[ LA!!E fl'oil1 ELLS¥1ORTtt AVEI,JUE to
the SOLiLh 1}ne of LO~ O~IE (1), BLOCK E]GIIT (8), REPLAT OF LOTS TUEJITY-
TWO (22), BLOCK TIIREE (3) and LOT [tINE (9), BI_OCK SIX (6), DO!./ ADDITION.
Water service to LOTS TWENTY-Ti.lO (22) through FORTY-TI,lO (42),
BLOCK I'tlRE'E 131; I_OTS O~';E (1) throu§h EIGtlTEEIi (18), BLOCK SEVEli (7)
and LOT OHE~ I~, BLOCK EIGHT (8), REPLAT of LOTS TWENTY-Il.lO, BLOCK
',THREE (3) and LOT ~iINE (9), BLOCK SIX (6), DO!,/ ADDITIO~i.
Sanitary sewers to serve LOTS ONE (1) through TtIENTY-ONE (21),
BLOCK TIIREE (3) of DOW ADDITIOn,~ and LOTS TWEHTY-TJ-!O (22) through FORTY-
'TWO (42), BLOCK THREE (3); LOTS ONE (1) through TttIP, TY-SIX (36), BLOCK
SEVEN (7) and LOT ONE (1) and LOT TWO (2), BLOCK EIGHT (8), REPLAT OF
LOT TWENTY-TWO (22), BLOCK THREE (3) and LOT ~IIJIE (9), BLOCK SIX (6),
DOW ADDITION to the City of Salina, Kansas.
~ .~ .. RE~LAT of DOW
~Z2 ~ 23 ~ 24 25 26 27 28 29~
- - ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _
~1 ~ - -
95' 80.19' 80,~' ~OJ9' 8049' ~0,~' 80Jg' ~0.19' 80.lg' 80. lg' ~OJg' 80.~' ~O. lg' 80.05'~; go' 90' go' 90' gO" 90' ~9.99'
· ~'.': X '~':.:.:.:.~ ~ , - ~ -
.... ~ ~ .~..:.:..- ~s ~o ~1 ~ ~1
~-.,, ,x_. .......................
I ....-.............~: ...... ...... '-,:-'.- .... ,,.............~..'-'.'
..: .... :.:.~...5~,~. ~:.:.:.: ~...- .~ .:~.:~l.:-~+:.~+.:2x.:~ .:.m.>:.
~:?:~:~J'~ -- ~;'.'~:$':<<<-:~>>:->?.'~.'~'.'.:-'.':':~:- ';-:':':'~<~:~:->:"->>:-:k-
~ ' M ~9.g,
o ~ ,,u~ ~':_?.~'~ "A "~ "
1"=200'
LEGEND
PETITION'NO. 3632
,II II II BENEFIT DISTRICT
!iiii~iiiiii~i!i~i~!~i! PETiTiON SIGNERS (5i% of BENEFIT DISTRIC1