12-6904(Published in the Salina
I Journal June 18; 201)
Publisher's Affidavit
I. Christy Fink being duly sworn Iwas riiea
IClefk for
declare that I am a Leal Coordinator "us' ' ma 11e
g on May 7, 20 21 pI
ing certain improves
of THE SALINA JOURNAL, a daily newspaper Ipzrsuant o ae (the
bon'); and
published at Salina, Saline County, Kansas, and of (seW "oorth. fail
(b) P hr
general circulation in said county, which newspaper IP ovement
m or probable c
Ithe p proposed Im{
has been admitted to the mails as second class matter in Iments; (c) the extl
said county, and continuously and uninterruptedly �sesseddt nine to of the
�reposed improvements
tl) the proposed method
published for five consecutive years prior to first `of asses,men (e) the II
IIproposed apportionment
publication of attached notice, and that the j °mprovemenfbdisteci and II
the City at large; and (f) a
IResolution 12 -6904 Notice request be sad improve
-
e made without
notice and hearing as re-
has been correctly published in the entire issue of said gui,ed by K.S.A.
newspaper one time, publication being given in the issue
of
r k��
Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ill
p liW
day of �J1�Q A.D. 20 12-
zo A,4_1� -
'Notary Public
Printer's Fee $1,239.00
IMAWNOTARY PUBLIC - State of Kansas
WENDYCHROBAK
My Appt. Exp. - ZDYDii.
have signed the Petition;
and
WHEREAS, the Petition
expressly states that is
one submitted pursuant to,
K.S.A. 12.6a 4(c) and 'I
that the proposed im
' provement district does
not include all
properties
whch m iay be deemed to
benefit from the proposed
improvements; and
WHEREAS, no signa -,
tures have been with
drawn from the petition .I
before the Governing
Body began consideration
of the Petition; and
WHEREAS, K.S.A.
12 -6a04 provides that the
ve
Gorning Body may
authorize and order public
improvements without no-
tice and hearing after e
sufficient petition has
been filed; and
WHEREAS, the govern-
ing body has reviewed
and considered the Inter -
mediate Engineering Esti-
mate and Feasibility Re
port prepared by the City
Engineer and agrees with
�lhe conclusions set forth
the Petition is •sufficient,
and further finds and de
termines that it is neces
sary and advisable to
make the following im
movements:
(a) The nature of the im-
provements are as fol-
lows:
The installation of ap-
proximate)y 4,414 lin-
eal feet of eight -inch
water main, fire by
drants, valves, fittings,
service connections
l and all appurtenances
t thereto for water lines
within right of way
• and /or utility' ease
ment as shown on.Ex-
hibit A attached
hereto, specifically ex-
1 cluding the portion of
the eight -inch water
main located In the
designated "Cost Fla.
on G%nlell Name o
Waterline improve
ments'y.
The Installation of ap-
proximately 390 lineal
feet of twelve -inch wa-
ter main, fire hydrants,
valves, fittings, sere
ice connections and
all appurtenances
thereto for water lines
within right of way
and/or utility ease
ment to be con
structed from Ohio
Street east as shown
on Exhibit A attached
- hereto (the "North 12"
Waterline Improve
of ap
three hun-
cents
($1,393,071.81). Th
(c) e boundaries of
the improvement dis-
trict to be assessed
are:
Lots 1 through 26,
Block 1; Lots 1
through 27, Block 2;
Lots 1 French 37,
1
k 4;
15,
1
6;
7,
s 1
8 all
Ad-
v of
valves, finings, sew 11
in the Stone Lak,
ice connections and I
dition, in the Ci
all appurtenances
Salina, Saline Ci
thereto for waterlines
Kansas;and
within right of way ,'
an unplatted tra
and /or utility ease
land abutting
men[ to be can
- from Shore- 1
Stone Lake Ad(
structed
line Drive south to I I
and within the cib
its and described
Schilling Road as
shown on Exhibit A at- I
q arcel of Ian
lathed hereto Sthe 1,
1etl ca the S
west Ghana
'South 12" Waterline
Section 31, T
Improvements ").
ship 4 Sc
The installation of
Range 2 We:
curb & gutter, _pave-
the. 6th
ment, and grading for
-Prin
Meridian in S
Shoreline Drive from
County, Kar
Ohio Street east ap
more particu
proximately 190 lineal
described as
feet including four
lanes with a center
median (the "Entrance I
Boulevard Street Im- I
provements ").
The installation of `
curb & gutter, pale
lineal feet of Shoreline' I
Drive (the "Street Im- L ;
pprovements')..
The installation of ap -i,
proximately 847 lineal
feet of storm sewer,
inlets, and all -
s thereto for!
storm !
sewer lines ly-
ing within right of way I
and/or rainage ease -'
men[, nt, (the "Storm
Sewer Improve'
menis ").-
The installation of ap-
proximately 1,911 lin-
eal feet-of eight -inch
sanitary sewer main,
service connections,
manholes and all ap-
purtenances thereto)
for sanitary sewer
,i lines lying within right
of way and /or utility
easement to be con-
structed as shown on
Exhibit A attached
hereto (the "B" Sewer
Line Improvements ").
The installation of ap-
prozimately 595 lineal
feet of fifteen -inch
sanitary sewer main,
service connections,
manholes and all ap-
purtenances thereto
jfor sanitary sewer
lines lying within right
of way and /or utility
[easement to be con-
structed as shown on
Exhibit A attached.
hereto (the "15 ".
Sewer Line Improve-
ments")
Various general and
Imiscellaneous im I
provements related to
kall of the foregoing, In-
cluding but not limited
` to Clearing an rd grub -
! Bing, common exca
vm en, compaction of
earthwork, temporary
( slope barrier and
other temporary con-
struction require
�. ments, . permanent I.
t seeding, construction.)
staking, and traffic
control and barricades
(the "General antl
I. cellaneous Improve'
menu')
(collectively, the "In-
lows.
Commencing at the I
Southeast corner of
said Southwest I
Quarter; thence on I
assumed bear m
ing of N 00 °37'44"
W along the East
line of said South
west Quarter a dis-
tance of 50.00 feet
to a point on the
North right -of -way
line of Schilling'
Road, said point
also being the
POINT OF BEGIN.
NING of the parcel
to be described:
hence S'
89 °33'16" W
along said North
right -of -way line a
distance of
1,628.43 feet;
hence N'i
00 °27'00" W a
distance - oft
216.78 feet;
hence N
24 °22'52 "E a dis-
tance of 442.20
feet;
hence IN
Lance 38" E 95.90
fence of 1,195.90
feet;
hence N j
09 °59'44" E tlis -
tset; of 277 2.64 I
feet;
hence N 1
18°51'25" w a
distance oI:I
1 13.28 feet;
hence N
11 °49'34" E a dis-
tance of 71.271
feet;
hence N
10 °38'25" E a dis-
tance of 104.90
feet;
hence N
06 °22'33" E a dis-
tance of 85.23
feet;
hence N'
54 °59'25" E a dis-
tance of 288.58
feet;
hence N
89 °40'21" E a dis-
tance of 269.44
feet to a point on j
distance of
2,235.18 feet to
the POINT OF
- Said parcel contains
Lots 10, as Assessea ILOr 1 She col ev'mmuyn Iveiopmern ..y „,_,,, — .
Cost Assessetl 37, Block 3; Lots 1' in Section 4 of this
50.42, acres, more
or less and is sub
% of
Per Left
throw h 2, Block 5; Lot 1
yscribed
Resolution), all in actor'
IThe costs of the 8" Sewer
?,Line
through
and2 82 Block
dance
reserval
reservations, and
1; Los thfroughBl l2
The assessed to the follow-
1 6801 et seq., and par-
restrictions of record
Block 2; Lot 1 and 19
5 through 15, Block 4
'.titularly. K.S.A.{
collectively, theihrough
Improvement Dis-
37, Block 3; Lots
1 and 2, Black 5; Lots 1
(Lots
29091%
:Lot 1, Block 6
12- 6a04(c).
Section . The City ex -I
trict'
and 22, Block 8
3.0000%
pects to make capital ez -.
.
(d) The apportionment
2.0093%
ILot 1, Block 7
Ipenditures from and after
of cost beee
twn the
' Lots 5 through 15, Block 4
• 2.1006%
' 2.6625%
costs of the Storm
the date of this Resolution'
in connection with the Im-
Improvement District
antl the city al large
r -
Lot 1, Block
IThe
Sewer Improvements shall
provements described
'is:
2.5486%
be assessed to the follow -
herein, and intends to re-
`Certain costs of the
The costs of the 12” North
inp lots as shown below
ineurse itself for suchex -
the
Improvements shall
Waterline Improvements
(shown as a percentage of
p enditures with pro
be paid by the In
shall be assessed to the
the total actual costs of
`ceeds of one or more se-
provem ant District
following lots as'shown
the Storm Sewer Improve-
ries of general obligation
and certain cost of the
Improvements. shall
below (shown as a per
tentage of the total actual
ments) :
Lots to be Assessed
.bonds and temporary
I notes of the City. In the
be paid by the city at
costs of the 12" North We-
i, %�.of Cost Assessed
maximum rincipal
iarge,as follows:
I terline Improvements):
Y Per otl 1 -
I amount of $1,44.979. 00.
Costs chargeable to
Lots to be AsA�ed_
Lot 1, Block 1; .Lot 1 and
S etion 4That certain
the Improvement D's-
% of Cost Assessed JA5
through 24, Block 2;
. ent.D'strct De-
trict
P_ r�
Lot 1 through' 15 and 20
1 velopment Agreement and
1. One-hundred per
Lots 1 through 26, Block
through 37; Block 3; Lot 5
1 C o t I Cost Recovery
cent 100%) of the
1; Lots 1 lh rough 27, .
througZh 15, Block 4; Lot 1
kLots
A red tic Sp arrow
.provemenisl- Im
Lot 1
I
'Black
and'
the
2. Ode- hundred per
lrothr ugh
IBllack
15, Block 5; "Lots 2,
6 and to and
I22, Black
hawk Lland, LL and
City, dated as of May 7;
cent (100 %) of the
through 7, Block 7; Lots 1
I 1 1.6393%
2012, is hereby %pprof
North 12" Waterline
through 22 Block B
IThe costs of the 8" Sewer
?,Line
In substantially the,fc
the
Improvements. 0.3630%
Improvements shall
presented to pova
l
3. Fifty percent (50 %) Lots 1 through 20, Block 4'�
The assessed to the follow-
Ing body on this date.
of the South 12" Wa- 0.6035% r
terline Improve `I Lots l through 6, Block 6
I In lots as shown below
(shown as a percentage of
Mayor is authorized
execute the Devefopm
behalf
ments. • '
1.3313%
the total actual costs of
Agreement on
4. One-hundred per
II
(Lot 1, Block 7,
lithe 8" Sewer Line In
the City, and the Me,
cent (100 %) of the
';
2.6625 %
rovements):
Asees1
;I Clerk and other City
to f
Entrance. Boulevard
Street Improve
Uncalled Tract No 7
29.000% .,
the
otatobe sed
t %af Cost Assessed?
Pew -
are authorized
such further actions
to carry out
ments . The costs of 12" South
5. One - hundred per (Waterline- Improvements
cent (100% of the chargeable: to the In
,! necessary
I Lots 1 and 20 through 37, transactions conterni
I Block 3; Lots 1 and 2, j thereby.
Street Improve Provement District shall be
ments assessed to the following
I Block 5; Lots 1 and 22,
lock 8 i
Section 5.The City C
shame a certified cop
6. One- hundred.perrt lots as shown below�l
cent (100 %) of the' ((shown. as a percentage of Li
Storm, Sewer Im� jthe total actual costs of
I' provements. the 12" South Waterline L'
" 7. One - hundred per �Improvemenis):
cent (100%) of the ILO($ to be Assesse T
e" Server Line Im- Y o ost Assed IS
Line Improve- IBlock 2; Lot 1 t
Block 3: Lots 1
1 9. One- hundred per, '115, Block 5; Lots 2
cent (100 %) of the (through 7, Block 7j Lai
'General and Miscel- through 22 Block 8
'I. laneous•' Improve 1 0.1815% '-
' ments. • i i Lots 1 through 20, Block 4'
Costs chargeable to the f 0.3018%
.
At -L r e .. ! Lots 1 through 6, Block 6
None 0 %) of the 8" , , 0.6656
Warmllnc Imorrn o 4"Lot 1. Block 7
ments. 1.3312
2. None (0 %) of the Unplaffed Tract No. 1
North 1 Waterline I 14.500%
Improvements Percentage of total 12'
3. Fitly percent (50%) Waterline Improve.
Inlyiovn -I1 50.000% ✓nuai = ,
ments. 50.000% '
4. None (0%) the The costs of the Entrance
Entrance Boulele vard moms Boulevard
shalt It be assessed
Street Improve Ito the shall be assessed
moots. .s the following lots as
5. None (0%) of the shown below (shown
Street Improve percentagetthetotal ai
ac-
men tout costs of f the Entrance
fi. None (e of the Boulevard Street Improve
S -
Storm Sewer Im- 'menlso
provements. 'Late to If Assessed
7. None (0 %) of the 8' '` gf�o2Lg4g ;gP,i
Sewer Line In r
provements. 'Lots 1 ih rough 26, Block
8. Six me percent 1? 1 through 27,
(69%) of the 15" ^Block 2; Lot 1 through 37,
Sewer Line Im Block 3; Lots 1 through
provements ' 15, Block 5, Lots 2
9. None (0% of the through 7, Block 7; Lots 1
General aN Miscel through 22 Block 8
lanecus Improve' 0.3630%
ments. Lots 1 thromh 20, Block 4
(a) The method of asi 0.6035%
sessment agalnsl *Lots l throusgh 6, Block 6
property within the Im- , 1.3313 Y.
provement District (Lot 1, Block
shall be in accordance 2.6625%
with the provisions of Unplatted Tract No. 1
the Petition and as sal 29,000%
forth in the Petition, es The costs of the Street Im-
follows: provements shall be as
the costs of the B" Water- it h—
Improvements snau' 7r as s
Sees sed to the follow- s own as a
lots as shown below l the total ac
Iwn as a oercentace of itha co-oof In
3 1 through 15, Block6
of Dei
2.9097 %
line County , Kai
1, Block 6
section 6.Th
3.0000%
(Register
tion shall take
J costs of the 15"
its passage ar
ver Line Improvements
Lion once in the
uaeable to- the In I
newi
as shown below
wn as a percentage of
total actual costs of
'15" Sewer Line In
Lots 1 and 20 through 37,
Block 3; Lots 1 and 2,
Block 5; Lots 1 and 22
Block 8
0.8761
Lots 5 through 15, Block 4
0.9018%
Lot 1, Block 6
0.9300
Percentage of total 15'
ND
EDOthsEtthh dayof
!012. -
Norman M.
Jennings, Mayor
'u Ann Elsey, CIVIC,
y Clark
Provement urstncr=
31.000%
The costs of the General I,
and Miscellaneous Im F
)rovements' shall be as - -
iessed to the following
ots as shown below
'shown as a percentage of
the total actual costs of
the General and Miscella-
neous Improvements):
Lots to be Assessed
% of Cost Assessed
Per Lott
Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1 and
20 through 37, Block 3;!
Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Lots,l
1 and 22, Block 8
2.7083%
Lots 5 through 15, Block 4
2.9091
Lot 1, Block 6 ,
3.0000
Section 2. The Govern-
ing Body hereby declares
that the Improvements de-
scribed in this Resolution
are necessary, and
authorizes Ahem to be
made in accordance with
the Petition and the find'
inns set forth in this Base-
46:,hn
7
r�