sewage treatment plant study schilling ind. area 1978NOTICE TO APPLICANT
` ;Revised
Part IV - Narrative Statement"
x r�:
Your grant application, as submitted to the State water pollution conte
trol agency should include, but is not limited to, the following:
r..
ea
For Step I Grant (preparation of Facility Plan Only)
1 x.:
Original and I Copy
Grant Application EPA 5700-32, Delete Part IV - Narrative Statement
'
Resolution of governing body authorizing the filing of an application
4 , i
{
and naming a person as authorized representative to act in con-
a:
nection with the application.
Comments
�� • ;
and Recommendations of the State Clearinghouse, plus the
+'
comments of Regional or Metropolitan Planning Agencies, (NOTE:
Planning agencies may prefer to use their own forms instead ofthis
one. j
Engineering or other existing contracts for services
,>
Name, Address, Telephone No. of consulting engineer
: *A statement by the applicant certifying that the proposed project will
7.
�r ,*
"'�
be constructed to comply with all pertinent requirements'of the-
Clean Air Act and other applicable Federal, State and local
environmental laws and regulations
air
Statement as to proposed method of awarding other contracts for Step
�
I work
Plan of Study presenting:
(I) A map showing proposed planning area boundaries; SMSA, city'.
r`
and county boundaries; lakes and water impoundments; streams;
major existing waste treatment systems.
}
2) Identification of entity(s) conducting the planning
3) Nature and scope of proposed Step I work with a schedule
for completion of specific tasks (Refer to 35.917-1 Plan
content)
,
—(4) Itemized description of the estimated costs
>
(5) Planning area 1970 population and approximate growth rate
(6) A statement of the Water Quality problem, effluent limitations
y
(secondary treatment or more stringent), and tentative facilit -, x'
z
needs
(7) The expected scope of infiltration/inflow documentation (WfT,T
this be state certification that excessive infiltration/inflow
does not exist or an infiltration/inflowanalysis pursuant to
`Tt
applicable regulations and the sewer evaluation guidelines?}
tit
*Revised by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment June 28, 1976L
aS
0
0
PLAN OF STUDY
SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
SCHILLING INDUSTRIAL AREA
SALINA, KANSAS
1978
i
JUL 197, �N
RECEIVED
KSDH v
Salina Office
62
• 1. PLANNING AREA
Location maps defining the area under consideration in this report
are as follows:
(a) Location in Kansas
(Plate 1)
(b) Location in Saline County
(Plate 2)
(c) Location of area within Salina
(Plate 3)
The proposed planning area boundary is shown on Plate 3. This
boundary line includes all of the Schilling Industrial Area.
All future growth, both residential and industrial, is expected
to occur within the boundary lines shown on Plate 3. Major industries
within the planning area boundaries include a frozen food processing
plant, an aircraft manufacturing plant, technical schools, service
facilities for aircraft, municipal airport, etc. Future industrial
growth within the planning period is expected to occur in areas presently
served.by an existing sanitary sewer system. Large tracts of vacant
land is available for this purpose.
The future of residential growth within the boundaries of the planning
area is uncertain at the present time. A government owned housing
complex (Capehart Manor) is the only residential housing within the
planning area. This facility is in the process of being sold by the
Federal Government. None of the housing units are occupied at the
present time. This complex was served by the sewage treatment plant
in the Schilling Industrial Area until the complex was completely
vacated the fall of 1977.
1
0
2. PLANNING ENTITY
The planning entity is the City of Salina, kansas. The City will
be assisted by staff members and a consulting engineer if required for
the completion of future requirements.
3. NATURE AND SCOPE OF PROPOSED STEP I WORK
The specific items of work to be performed are as follows:
(A.) Description of Projects:
(1) Develop population projections,.land use
trends and economic data from existing
studies,
(2) Review existing sewage collection system
and sewage treatment facility.
(3) State existing problems.
(4) Describe the purpose of the project.
(B.) Review existing test resdlts to determine the charactistics
of raw and treated waste.
(C.) Estimate future waste flows and loading.
(D.) Use maps to show all existing sewage collection lines, pump
stations, sewage treatment facilities and all anticipated
extensions or additions to serve the planning area during
the design period (20 years).
(E.) Perform all required infiltrational exfiltration analysis
as specified in Section 35.917-1 of the Environmental
Protection Agency Rules and Regulations.
(F.) Describe alternate treatment facilities including cost
estimates and cost effective analysis.
(G.) Prepare a plan of organization and administration with
procedures for operation, maintenance and testing.
2
(H.) Include a financing plan that lists the various aspects
• of typical financial commitments.
(I.) Prepare a plan of operation to protect the quality of
the receiving waterway (Dry Creek).
(J.) Obtain approvals and comments from all regulatory agencies.
(K.) Prepare an environmental impact report for the proposed
project.
(L.) Present a summary of the study, listing conclusions and
recommendations in a written report. Include appropriate
exhibits.
(M.) Assist the City of Salina in holding public hearings and
record all comments and response.
4. PLANNING AREA POPULATION AND RELATED FLOWS
• The City of Salina officially acquired the Schilling Industrial Area
sewage treatment plant and collection lines on September 9, 1966, from the
Federal Government following the closing of the Schilling Air Force Base.
All military activities ceased, except for the Capehart Housing Complex
and supporting facilities, at that time.
174
A study of popul.ation trends would not be very useful in the prediction
of future sewage flows which might be expected to occur within the planning
area during the design period (20 years).
The future residential flows will be based upon the assumption that
the Capehart Housing Area will be completely occupied within the 20 year
period. There are approximately 750 housing units available for use,
with an increase in population of approximately 2600 residents.
Sewage flows for future industrial growth in the Schilling Industrial
Area would be studied in detail in the Facilities Plan. There are no
3
current plans in progress to greatly expand the size or number of industrial
• plants within this area.
5. -WATER QUALITY STATEMENT
The City of Salina operates its sewage treatment facility under NPDES
permit number M-SH33-IO02. This permit allows the City of Salina to dis-
charge treated wastes to the Missouri River Basin via Dry Creek. At
present, the plant discharge allowances are in accordance with the new
final effluent limitations which became effective July 1, 1977.
The July 1, 1977 final effluent discharge limitations are 30 mg/1.,
B.O.D.5 and 30 mg/l total suspended solids with 85% removal required
in both cases; pH requirements of the final effluent limitations are to
be not less than 6.0 nor more than 9.0.
The NPDES permit requires monthly sampling and testing and quarterly
reporting of these tests to the Kansas State Department of Health and
Environment. The following is a summary of these quarterly reports.
DATE'
D. mq/1 T.S.S. m pH
Infl. Effl. % Red. Infl. Effl. % Red. Range
2-1-76/4-30-76
233
19.6
92
157
1.3.2
92
7.0-8.0
5-1-76/7-31-76
211
17.5
95
174
9.4
94
7.3-7.8
8-1-76/10-31-76
201
19.0
90
196
11.5
94
7.0-11.1
11-1-76/1-31-77
215
30.9
85
401
14.9
96
7.0-9.7
2-1-77/4-30-77
488
21.4
96
288
17.4
94
6.9-8.2
5-1-77/7-31-77
324
11.4
96
107
7.4
93
6.3-8.3
8-1-77/10-31-77
204
11.4
94
143
8.0
94
6.8-7.7
11-1-77/1-31-78
200
19.7
90
216
14.0
94
7.0-7.9
2-1-78/4-30-78
203
24.4
88
282
10.7
96
6.9-7.9
These results listed above indicate compliance with present standards,
with -the. exception of one quarterly report, which shows a B.O.D.5 exceeding
the 30 mg/l requirement and two quarterly reports showing the pH range
limitation being exceeded.
4
The existing sewage treatment facility was constructed in 1942 and
consists of a primary clarifier, trickling filters, final clarifier,
separate sludge digestors, and sludge drying beds. A Parshall'Flume,
with a transmitter and recording receiver, is used to monitor the
effluent prior to discharge into Dry Creek.
Treatment plant flows were not accurately measured prior to March
1978. The Parshall Flume was not installed until that date. The average
recorded sewage flows since March 1978 has been 239,000 g.p.d..
The original design of the sewage treatment facility was based on
an average design flow of 630,000 g.p.d. and a population equivalent of
4,000 people. Due to the reduced flows resulting from the closing of
the Capehart Housing Complex, only one trickling filter is being used
is
at the present time.
A detailed study of existing plant problems, treatment requirements,
and various alternatives in achieving compliance with State and Federal
final effluent limitations will be included as part of the Facilities
Plan
6. SCOPE OF INFILTRATION/INFLOW DOCUMENTATION
The work shall be done in accordance with E.P.A. Rules and Regulations
35.927-1 and also include the following studies:
A. Analyze recorded flow data at the sewage treatment
plant and obtain flow information at key points
within the sewage collection system.
B. Establish a relationship between the existing
• industrial flows and projected domestic sewage
flows.
5
C. The effects of geographical and geological conditions
. that may affect present and future flow rates will be
discussed in detail, in addition to cost estimates for
problems.inflow
correction of infiltration
the/
D. The physical condition of the entire sewer system will
be studied, considering such factors as type of construction
materials, age, etc.
0
9
L
•
0
0
r�
u
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
Revised Part IV Narrative Statement
Your grant application, as submitted to the State water pollution con—y
trol agency should include, but is not limited to, the following:
For Step I Grant (preparation of Facility Plan Only)
I work
Plan of Study presenting:
(1) A map showing proposed planning area boundaries; SMSA, city,
and county boundaries; lakes and water impoundments; streams;
major existing waste treatment systems.
Original and I Copy
Identification ofentity(s) conducting the planning
Grant Application EPA 5700-32, Delete Part IV - Narrative Statement
Nature and scopo
e f proposed Step I work with a schedule
Resolution of governing body authorizing the filing of an application
and naming a person as authorized representative to act in con-
for completion of specific tasks (Refer to 35.917-1 Plan
nection with the application.
Comments and Recommendations of the State Clearinghouse, plus the
content)
comments of Regional or Metropolitan Planning Agencies, (NOTE:
o"
Planning agencies may prefer to use their own forms instead of
Itemized description of the estimated costs
this one
Planning area 1970 population and approximate growth rate
Engineering or other existing contracts for services
Al
Name, Address, Telephone No. of consulting engineer
A statement of the Water Quality problem, effluent limitations
*A statement by the applicant certifying that the proposed project 011
lot,
be constructed to comply with all pertinent requirements -of the
(secondary treatment or more stringent), and tentative facility
Clean Air Act and other applicable Federal, State and local
environmental laws and regulations
needs '
The expected scope of Infiltration/inflow documentation (Will
Statement as to proposed method of awarding other contracts for Step
,
I work
Plan of Study presenting:
(1) A map showing proposed planning area boundaries; SMSA, city,
and county boundaries; lakes and water impoundments; streams;
major existing waste treatment systems.
*Revised by the Kansas Department
of Health and Environment June 28, 1976. 4
Identification ofentity(s) conducting the planning
J2)
3)
Nature and scopo
e f proposed Step I work with a schedule
IP -1
for completion of specific tasks (Refer to 35.917-1 Plan
content)
o"
--(4)
Itemized description of the estimated costs
Planning area 1970 population and approximate growth rate
.k.
(6)
A statement of the Water Quality problem, effluent limitations
lot,
(secondary treatment or more stringent), and tentative facility
(7)
needs '
The expected scope of Infiltration/inflow documentation (Will
,
this be state certification that excessive infiltration/inflow
rD -
P
does not exist or an infiltration/inflow analysis pursuant *to'
applicable regulations and the sewer evaluation guidelines
*Revised by the Kansas Department
of Health and Environment June 28, 1976. 4
{ S iyt
In as much as the City of is applying foratiE.P„q,
Step I Grant I' - F
certain certifications and statements are hereby K;
made as follows:
t . The City hereby certifies - - - - — -
"That the treatment works will comply with all pertinent requirements cf,�,
the Clean Air Act and other applicable Federal, State and local enviroer
laws and regulations.”
2. A statement as to_proposed methods of awarding other c4
contracts -for Step I work, it needed, is: Any professional
or technical contract will be based on a negotiated lump
sum basis. Any- non-professional contract will be awarded
by competitive bidding.
3. The City agrees to submit the draft facility
plan to the
appropriate State -'and -Regional A-95 agencies at least 30 n
days prior to the public hearing on the plan."
r k
loll rup
f4
Authorized .Signer
,
i
1 +�
J V
4"
Ilk �
. _ .:. A: •. Yh1S MdM 1