hpms monitoring in city 1/11/1985KANSAS 'DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION
STATE OFFICE BUILDING -TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612
JOHN B. KEMP, Secretary of Transportation
Mr. Dean Boyer, P.E.
City Engr's Office -
City -County Bldg., 300 W. Ash
P.O. Box 746
Salina, KS 67401
Dear Sir:
JOHN CARLIN, Governor
January 11, 1985
Section 10-A
Highway Performance
Monitoring System
We are requesting your assistance in the annual Highway Performance Monitoring
System (HPMS) cost study. Enclosed is a computer listing of all HPMS sections
in your city.
Please use the HPMS section number (on the computer listing) in reporting
improvement type and cost data for all non -Federal -Aid capital improvement
projects completed in calendar year 1984 on HPMS sections.
Since your capital improvement projects may not exactly correspond with
HPMS sections, please include: 1) project beginning and ending point
descriptions; 2) new bridge locations; and 3) route or street names and
lengths. This will allow us to determine the prorated costs on HPMS sections
only. An explanation of improvement types and costs are enclosed with the
reporting'form. If no improvements were completed on HPMS sections, return
the data sheet with the word "None" indicating this.
We would appreciate your returning the data sheets to Verne L. Craig, Chief
of Transportation Planning, State Office Building, Topeka, Kansas 66612 by
February 1, 1985. If you have any questions, please call Harvey Hill of this
office at (913) 296-3841.
We appreciate your assistance and look forward to hearing from you.
Yours truly,
�/-� � .�7
Verne L. Craig, P.E.
Chief of Transportation Planning
VLC:HHH:nh
Enclosures
'�' •�- • � ix'��a {�`,Y II�j F'u #- Ili ��:rL�.�l'��1�4: �'fi��.
DEAN BOYER, P. E.
CITY ENGINEER
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
300 WEST ASN STREET
P. 0. BOX 746
SALINA. KANSAS 67401
AREA CODE 913 827 9481
January 16, 1985
-0r. Verne L. Craig, P.E.
Chief of Transportation Planning
Kansas Department of Transportation
State Office Building
Topeka, Kansas 66612
Re: HPMS Cost Study
Dear Mr. Craig:
DONALD E. HOFF. P. E.
ASST. CITY ENGINEER
D. W. BASSETT
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
In reviewing your computer listing of all HPMS sections within our
City limits, we have determined improvements were performed during the
1984 calendar year on only two (2) sections of the streets listed on the
print-out. Construction was completed on HPMS Section #4695 and on HPMS
Section #4675.
Both of these sections were constructed as 85U -0295-03/M4816(007).
Notice of Acceptance was issued by KDOT on August 22, 1984, but no final
cost breakdown has been received by the City of Salina to date. We,
therefore, can not supply these costs to you at this time.
DH:mp
Enc.
If /nu need additional information at this time, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Don Ho f, P.E.
MEMBER ... KANSAS LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES - NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
1��
I
Ln
aD
I
WI
I.-
F-17 51 -F
if
it
it
It
I it
II
1: if
If
If f
At
of
cr Ir
,c %c rd ',r ;r s r, r- r- r-, t- Lr r-- t-- r r Y- r- I-- tr
I . Inc c Cc r.,A .• - (k 't'.4 It .4 4
t CI as cr cc w m cmc CaE aW w ¢ cr, m (I CID cr cc CO (COD cc W, tr cc cc Im Qw (T m it
G -C II 1 -4 4 di 4 .1 11 -d '44 4 44�111& �1dId -1d 1& Id <t
13 If
it
If
M, M, (Iti M (I en M -d M M, M, M rn mW rn fl, -4 1.) m In
-r c c -n in Ln T im, tr fir c u) tr to tn Lr In In Lr In In In In Lr) Lr In u) u In tr Lr Lr
It i
U C, T T = fr; a Lr� M Lr LF v LC tv c4 Er c fjr, Lf)
If
0-( m a. Ir a 'a 10ri f� In 10 L: Lri
C, a �. - � C%� m m ;� L�Cjl �� I Irr-1, 9
IC Ic Ic 11 1C.1,11C 14 IL I- r� t- v f- r- f� t-- �, (-- r- -. r,,- r- r- N t --
It 4 It'11'j 44.1 dL T I 11 11 13c71 J I
if 11 1
if
15 0 O"" C, zi it
I If
-I in j J, i -P %o sl rn � c -j) tin m JD: a, 0,
Ln i%j c, .r. ".n It 'N Lr r, 4 4 % m T: Lp tr u,
it
x 4 n aj N 'r Si .0 X
IP �t m
f-, • c -& 'I Pj m ur 1�, Lr, 1 4 Lf Lt. If of
"t N v rf 4 't f 4 t! vlr 131 Ln
If
-j -j -j -1 J -j I j -i r J -i J -i
LO LL 71
LL it
if
m
2 z I- -j
L
LL. L, g
.4 C, cL 11
S toti T U- U :d C- C. -j 0. A I it
tv (r
-j :D < X. Z A L 7n m W, :12
C) -_I c ILI Ix C I- u U T 0 or 0:
LL 't
< 13 z :7
I I I 1 1, 1 1 it I
LLI C A �n
I it
tr
y- 15
I— cr if
C �:. j
-4 -.3 111 w S z z 0 1 it
If 7 u if
i- 1� w K. rr rr n 3; 7 0 n C, I, a- L�
L 7, % 5- f4 -:1 -1 -1 7, T H Z1, 7T zr tn :F - 4
J c LA. 3, cl, -i In T T!,r,< 0 -j -1 if it
I- f.4 < �z, w lo t,v < < x 1-11, ;,� " q it
-a� P? x •41, Ag • v) -j -r �r -Y, -4 o A fl r-1 12 z M. II
If
It
I it
w it
_Y.. ]f y yy y 'r
It
If
-5 -.5 D 2 r
Lq IL.� W, If LL U- W W If- Ij T C C1 C C
Z
j zt 3% 1� A f- J'4 trr c
C:, c c c
< < < X 3 Z� 1� m ::I r
u: q �T a r 0- 'r fj� r4- c -f -r, T, 7: 1: r T
0
V'
It
11 c 'N rt (n 4 r.!> -C` p cy, Cy, a Ln 3, m N,II
T, - = a, 3% �al N r
cmc rn (Vt rn Is
In It' 4 ru N N rj: CC IN It 1z, 4
-,C, S,�D L, c 1:11C JD 10
J -
%W,
I
LOCATION DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATIONS
NCL is North City Limits
NUAB is North Urban Area Boundary
NUFB is north Urban -in -Fact Boundary
(This description is no longer used,
but due
to the large amount of Sections in
our
database, we have not yet gotten rid
of the
abbreviations made previously.)
0.5 MI N U169 is 0.5 miles north of US
-169.
OLD NCL is the city limit before the
current city limit was established.
(This
description is also no longer used.
But again
the abbreviations made previously have
not
all been changed.)
WCL PT 2 is West City Limits Part Two
(This is the second time the route
crosses
the city limits on the west side.)
C & G is curb and gutter
4LDIV/2L is where the four lane divided
changes to two lane undivided.
N CO L is North County Line
KTA is Kansas Turnpike Authority
(Prop) is a proposed route
Westbury/ECL is a dual description both
applying to the same location.
Route Prefix Abbreviations
U is Federal Aid Urban
S is Federal Aid Secondary
L is non Federal Aid
Reminder: if any of the description points is vague or unfamiliar, use the
length from the known description point and/or the Federal Aid route number to
locate the section.
3
OK
Capital Improvement Data
Improvement cost data are essential to the evaluation of the effectiveness
of existing highway programs. Additionally, these data are used to determine
the relative effectiveness of various improvement types as the basis of
simulation model cost matrices, and to determine the magnitude and make-up
of future Federal -aid highway programs. The costs reported here are actual
expenditures for improvements. The following must be reported for each sample
section having an improvement completed during the data year. The improve-
ment types are shown in hierarchial order which should be followed in
assigning improvement type.
Type of Improvement -- Improvement types are as follows:
2) Relocation
3) -Reconstruction
4) Major Widening
5) Minor Widening
6) Restoration and
Rehabilitation
7) Resurfacing
8) Bridge Replacement
9) Bridge rehabilitation
10) Safety and Traffic Engineering
11) Other Highway Improvements
The type of improvement is determined by the nature of the construction
rather than the source of funding. Only one type of improvement can be
reported for a particular section in a given year.
The relocation improvement type (code 2) should only'be used if the existing
section is replaced by a section on new alignment and the original section
is abandoned. Since code 2 will rarely be used, the majority of capital
improvements will receive codes 3 through 11.
Bridge replacement (code 8), bridge rehabilitation (code 9), safety and
traffic engineering improvements (code 10), and other highway improvements
(code 11) should only be used in cases where these improvements are being
made as the sole improvements to the sections. If these improvements
Ore staged construction associated with a more general improvement (code
3 through 7), the more general improvement code should be used.
Improvement Costs -- The total improvement costs and its components are
to be reported for each improvement. If two or more improvements were
completed on a section for a particular year, the costs are added and the
total for each cost element is reported, with the major type of improvement
determined by the above mentioned hierarchy. The cost element categories
are:
1) Preliminary and Construction Engineering
2) Right -of -Way and Utility Adjustments
3) Grading and Drainage
4) Base and Surface
5) Structure
6) Other
7) Total Cost
w
-2 -
Code Improvement Type Definitions
2 RELOCATION - Construction of a facility on new location that replaces
an existing route. The new facility carries all of the through traffic
with the previous facility closed or retained as a land -service road
only.
3 RECONSTRUCTION - Construction on approximate alignment of an existing
route where old pavement structure is removed and replaced. Implies
a complete rebuilding of an existing pavement structure to correct
pavement deficiencies and/or to add capacity. Adjustment to existing
horizontal and vertical alignment can be made and, where possible, work
conforms to approved standards. Such reconstruction may be to the
existing number of lanes or may include widening to provide continuous
additional.iane(s) or dualizing, adding or revising interchanges or
otherwise substantially changing the general character of the highway.
4 MAJOR WIDENING - Requires that one or more lanes be added to a facility.
However, it is different from a reconstruction improvement in which a
similar number of lanes are added in that the existing pavement struc-
ture is salvaged. Also included, where necessary, is the resurfacing
of.existing pavement and other incidental improvements such as drain-
age and shoulder improvements.
5 MINOR WIDENING - The addition of 2 or more feet of width per lane to
an existing facility without adding lanes. In many cases, the improve-
ment will include resurfacing of the existing pavement and other
incidental improvements such as shoulder and drainage improvements.
The existing pavement structure is salvaged.
6 RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION - Implies a reworking (rather than
replacement) of the pavement structure or bridge deck to return it
to a reasonable condition. Generally, work is performed in accord-
ance -with the design of the existing facility. The level of effort
is significantly less than a reconstruction improvement. There may
be some upgrading of unsafe features or other incidental work in con-
junction with the restoration and rehabilitation. Typical improve-
ments would include replacing spalled or malfunctioning joints; sub-
stantial pavement undersealing when essentail for pavement stabilization
prior to resurfacing; grinding/growing of rigid pavements; replacing
deteriorated materials; reworking or strengthening bases or subbases;
adding underdrains; and bridge deck repair.
7 RESURFACING - Placement of at least 3/4 inch of material over the exist-
ing roadway or bridge deck to improve serviceability or to provide
additional strength. There may be minor widening of up to 2 feet, up-
grading of unsafe features, and other indicental work in conjuction with
resurfacing. Where surfacing is constructed by separate project as a
final stage of construction, the type of improvement should be the
same as that of the preceding stage -- relocation, reconstruction,
minor widening, etc.
aI
L
-3-
Code Improvement Type Definitions (Continued)
8 .BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - This is the replacement of a bridge due to
structural inadequacy or functional obsolescence on an existing
facility. Includes widening to standard and incidental roadway
approach work.
9 BRIDGE REHABILITATION - Work involving the substructure and super-
structure of a bridge that has been determined structurally inad-
equate. This would include the necessary substructure and super-
structure construction to conform to current geometric and struc-
tural standards. Work involving only the bridge deck slab or plate
would not be included here. (See Code 6.)
10. SAFETY and TRAFFIC ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS - Construction which
improves safety and/or capacity which cannot logically be classif-
ied under codes 2 through 8. The higher type improvements predominate
and should be used whenever possible. For instance, flattening an
unsafe horizontal curve using Hazard Elimination Program funds
involves reconstruction or replacement of the existing pavement on
approximately the same alignment (although flatter) and should be
classified as reconstruction, code 3.
11 OTHER HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS - This category includes improvements
that do not provide any increase in the level of service, the condition
of the facility or safety. Typical improvements that would fall in
this category would be noise barriers, beautification, and other
environmentally related features not built as part of the above
identified improvement types.
Cost Element Definitions
Costs are to be reported for the following categories:
a. Preliminary and Construction Engineering - Included are the costs
for field engineering and inspection, consultant fees, aerial surveys,
material testing, boring, etc. Also includes preparation of PS & E
and other reports, traffic and related studies on specific projects
and other engineering costs assignable to construction.
b. Right -of -Way and Utility Adjustments - Costs for acquisition of nec-
essary rights-of-way and, where applicable, those for access control.
Include costs for all lands acquired, including any developments thereon,
easements including scenic, access rights and consequential damages,
appraisals, legal fees, special engineering surveys, preparation of
right-of-way plats, relocation payments, etc. Also includes costs
for all types of utility adjustments (private and public) within
(or to clear) the right-of-way. Betterments are not included.
f '
-4 -
Cost Element Definitions (Continued)
C. Grading and Drainage - Includes all earthwork preparatory to surface
channels, flumes, dikes, underdrains, outfalls, and minor drainage
structures, culvert (as usually defined) and special fill treatment.
Also include the same items for interchange and frontage roads.
Include cost of storm sewer adjustment and all new major storm sewer
lines and appurtenances such as pumping stations and equipment. Include
all costs for demolishing buildings, moving fences, clearing and
grubbing, etc.
d. Base and Surface - Includes costs of all base course and surfacing,
including shoulders, for the through roadway, interchanges, and
frontage roads. Include all curbs and sidewalks.
e. Other - Include all roadway items not included in b, c, and d above.
Includes traffic control devices, roadside improvements (such as sodding,
planting, roadside rests, etc.), lighting, guardfence, median barriers,
and railroad crossing protection (excluding separations).
f. Structure - Includes the costs for all new structures and all structural
improvements. This includes railroad crossing grade separation
structures.
g. Total - Includes all costs for all improvements.
V