8.7 Adopt 2000 - 2004 CIP CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR CITY COMMISSION ACTION DATE .TIME
04-03-00 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. 8 AGENDA:
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ITEM
NO. 7 BY: Jason A. Gage BY'
Item:
RESOLUTION No. 00-5586, ADOPTING THE 2000-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
Backqround:
The 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) is proposed for the Commission's consideration.
Briefings and descriptive materials on prospective C.I.P. projects were presented to the Commission
in prior study sessions. The C.I.P. is a planning document designed to address the City's infrastructure
needs, consistent with financial resources available. A multi-year planning approach is essential to
conduct thorough analysis, sound project management, and possible accessing of outside resources,
grants, etc. The Commission has adopted a Capital Improvement Program Policy (enclosed) as a
component of the City's Financial Policies document.
Exhibit A to the Resolution includes the following:
1. The overall 2000-2004 project plan, as well as a year-by-year plan with designated funding
sources. Total estimated cost of C.I.P. projects/programs currently scheduled for this five-year period
is just over $48 million.
2. A listing of projects identified as "For Further Review" or "Identified But Unfunded."
All the specific year scheduled projects, including current year projects, have been revised to include
the latest cost estimates and other updates, as presented to the Commission in detail at the recent
study sessions.
Action:
Consider Resolution 00-5586, adopting the 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program.
Enclosures
Chapter II; Page 1
Rev. January 2000
Resolution #00.5555
IL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY
A. The City shall establish a five-year Capital Improvement Program (C~?__.) to
guide decision-making on public improvements and expenditures..T-J3e,:C.I.P.
provides a mechanism for scheduling public physical improvements over a
number of years. It establishes the City's priorities for public projects based on
available financial resources and project criteria.
B. The C.I.P. shall be updated annually following analysis of year-end financial
reports, and prior to the adoption of the City's annual operating budget.
Generally, the updated C.I.P. shall be approved by the City Commission by
April 10 of each year.
C. The City shall use a poAion of its annual budgeted revenues for cash capital
investments. Mill levy proceeds, sales taxes, user fees or other local revenues
may be dedicated for capital improvements.
D. The City will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its
capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs.
The C.I.P. and budget will provide for the major-renovation and orderly
replacement of buildings, facilities and equipment from current revenues
where possible.
E. The Capital Improvement Plan shall include an appropriate reserve for
contingencies for approved projects.
F. City staff, in making C.I.P. recommendations to the City Commission, shall use
the following criteria in evaluating projects.
1. Priority consideration will be given to:
Capital investment projects which preserve existing infrastructure and
maintain basic public services.
Capital projects which implement a component of an approved City plan.
Chapter II; Page 2
Rev' January 2000
Resolution #00.5555
Projects which specifically replace or renovate an essential, but obsolete,
facility.
Projects which reduce the cost of operations, maintenance or energy
consumption .-. ~
Projects identified as addressing important public health and safety issues.
Projects mandated by the federal or state government.
Projects which are funded, in whole or in part, by leveraged or partnership
funding, including grants, private funds, etc.
G. Certain capital improvement projects lend themselves specifically to public-
private partnership, wherein project funding would be dedved partially from the
City and partially from private donations, dedicated user fees and other non-
city sources. Community proponents wishing to initiate such projects should
first present a concept plan to the City Commission, including a financial cost-
sharing plan for both the initial capital costs, as well as the ongoing cost for
operations and maintenance. Generally, the City Commission will consider
proposed partnership projects at its regular C.I.P. planning period during the
first quarter or each year. If approved by the City Commission, proponents
would be encouraged to complete project plans and initiate fund-raising
efforts.
H. Certain non-infrastructure capital projects may be of such type and scope as to
be beyond the financial capacity of the City without additional revenues, and
thus may be appropriate for public referendum. Public Referendum projects
should fall within the following criteria:
Projects not involving public health and safety or basic infrastructure; and.
With a capital cost estimate of $750,000 or greater; or,
Potentially requiring a significant ongoing City appropriation for operations
and maintenance.
Chapter H; Page 3
Rev. January 2000
Resolution #00.5555
Proponents of such projects may circulate a petition in accordance with
state law, calling for a public referendum on the project and'specified
funding source. The City Commission shall determine whether the City
takes an official position on the issue. If approved by the voters, the project
would be completed.
The C.I.P. as approved annually, shall contain the following sections:
1. A listing of preliminarily approved capital projects, inclUding estimated
cost and funding source by years, which have undergone review for
costs and benefits and have identified funding expected to be available
for the project.
2. A separate listing of potential capital projects which require significant
additional information, e.g. concept design, feasibility report, cost
estimates, funding source analysis, etc. before they can be formally
considered for approval and placement in a specific year in the C.I.P.
This section shall be titled "Projects For Further Review."
3. A separate listing of projects for which adequate information exists as
to planning, estimated costs, benefits, etc. and which the City
Commission agrees would be desirableprojects for the community in
the future, but for which an adequate and appropriate funding
mechanism has not yet been determined as available. This section
shall be titled "Projects Identified But Unfunded."
4. An identification within any of the "Five-Year," "Further Review," or
"Identified But Unfunded" categories of any projects specified as
"Partnership Projects" or "Public Referendum Projects."
CITY OF SALINA EXHIBIT A-1 'T A-2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2000-2004
0 2001 2002 2003 2004
!CT co~r PRC,~ECT ~a~;
.....
Sl .~.~ S~I Repmr Fr~,... Sl.3~.~ $l~t Re~a,, Program: Sl .3~.~ ~tr~t Repmr Pr~..,.. Sl.3~.~ S~et Repair Pr~ra,,,: $1 ,~,~
, 52~.~ ~:-.;:~,~, Ramps S1~.~
$5~.~ Vehi~es & Equip Sl 738.~ (~) Bu;;d,,,~s & Facd~t~es $4~.~ Vehicles & Equip. S~5,~ :1) 3uildings & FaG;~es ~,~
gy $387,~ Com~te~nol~ S4~.~ En~a~lM~,a,, Impmvemen~ S~.~ C.I P Planning S50.~ co~p~e~nol~y $2~,~ L
S 1~ ~0 S~o~,water Proj~ts & P;anr,,,,~ $3~,~0 C I P. Plannm~ $50.~ Traffic Signal Upgrades $175.~ Stouter F.~-:~ & Planni~ $~,~ S2~.~
$2~ ~ Water S~slem Enhan~ments $~.~ Tr~c S~gnal UpstaGes $175.~ Waste. S~stem Enhan~en~s $5~.~0 Wat~ Sys~m Enha~me~ $~,0~ $168.~
~ancements $515.0~ ~ater Plant E~ans~on - Phase II S3 ~.0~ Waster Sls{e.~ Enha~cm,~m~[s $~.~ Lan~ll Cell Closures 52.500.~ (3; $~.~0
Ph 2 S4~.~ ~. ~ Comer - Pm-p~ec~ $5~.~ ~2) S. ~ Co~;G~ - Phe~ III and IV $4,~,0~
~s~n $50.0~ Schilling I Centennial Design 5130.000
~ ~a~na~ $4.~,~ ~. Manhunt Rd C~stmcaon $1.2~ ~
S600 000
51~,~ (3) = : 51313400
s~25.o~
Sl~~
S332
~236.0~
~100 3~ Conbngenc~ SlO0 ~ Co~,,,~e,~c~ $1~,0~ Conan~enc~ $100,000 3or,~enc~ $1~,~
S515 ~c
~16,~ (1) EMS - Coup: $95K (1) Repai~ ~ ~n~ll Fees (1) Comb. Leas~pumhase / ~sh e~nd. O~-of-~k~ est: ~K
(2) T~ar Tem~m~ N~es (2) KDOT - $7~,~ ~,0~
~t - ~,0~ (3) Shared ~ C~ a-la~e and Special ~ssment Distd~ (3) Re~id by Landfill Fees
S50.~
~ ~,~.000
~00
Sl .0~,0~
$100 ~0
EXHIBIT A-3
CITY OF SALINA
2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
GENERAL SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD & INFO. SOLID GOLF WATER & G~ O' REVENUE
PROJECT FUND PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI-CENTER SER~CE8 SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEW'rR. OTHER BONDS BONDS TOTAL
Street Repair Prog,am Sl,300,000 Sl .300 000
curb & gutter, crack seabng, brick
asphalt & concrete repair
seats and RR ~oss~n;Is
Sid.__.ewalks & Ramps $100.000 $100 000
Park Improvements S100.000 $100.000
Buildings & Fac;#bes S350,000 Sl 10 000 S2,00.000 $660,000
Vehicles & Equip S650.000 $100.000 ' $33 000 / $120 000 S425.000 S18 000 S300 000 S95.000 {1 $1.738 000
Entry~....ay/Med~an Improvements S50 000 ,._ i $50.000
C._~o.rnputers/Technology I $150 000 ~ S200 000 $100,000 S450.00<~
$50 000
C I P Plann,n~l [$50.000i
Stormwater Proje_cts & Pian.?ng __ · $30.000 $300.000 ~ ~ $330.000
,
Tr.affic S~gnal Up~rades __. $175 000 $175 000
Waler System Enhancements ' '--' ~ $500 000 , .-- $500.000
Wastewater System Enhancements $500 000.~
S500
000
Wa.~.ter P~ant Expansion. Phase tt ' ' ! $3.600.000 S3.600.000
S 9th Comdor- Pre.project $5OO.OOO ~,2; $500 000
Scttilhng/Cente']n,a~ Design $1~0 000 , ' $130 000
S Mar/mount Road Reconstruction $1 200.000 (3; $1·200.000
Con[in~e~c), S100,000 i si00 000
{1) EMS - Counht
{2) lwo-¥ear Tam~orery ~otes
{3) Shered b/~ Ci~ at-le~a and Special .~sassm*nt
Approved: ApNI 3, 2000
EXHIBIT A-4
CITY OF SALINA
2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
GENERAL SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD & INFO. SOLID GOLF WATER & G.O. I REVENUE
PROJECT FUND PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI-CENTER SERVICES SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEWTR. OTHER BONDSI BONDS TOTAL
Street Repair Program _ $1 300.000 Sl.300.000
curb & gutter, crack seaitng, bnct(
asphalt & concrete repair
seals and RR c~ross~ngs
S~dewalks and Ramps $100.000 $100.000
Nmghbo."hood Parks $75 000 S75.000
Park Improvements $100.000 ; $100 000
Buildings & Facilities 5250.000 5110 000 -.. ~ $100 00C S460 000
Vehicles & Equip S650 000 "- S'~0.O00 "-[ 518 000 Sl00.000 $798.000
Entrywa~' I Median Imprpvemeqts $50.000 r ~ ~ i sso.ooo
Computers/Technolog), 5150.300 ...... 5200 000 $__-00 000. $450 00~'
c I P Planning ._ $50 000; ..... . $60.000
Stormwater Projects & Planmn~l $30C.000 _.. $300.000
Traffic S~gnal Upgrades _. S1/'5 000 I ............... i $175.000
Water System Enhancements [ j. 5500.000 .__ S500.000
Wastewater System Enhancements $500.000 S500.000
S 9th Corndor - Phases I~ and IV S4 500.000 $4.500.000
Landfdl Cell #4 $1 500.00~ (1) S1 500 000
i $61 000
Sch,llmg/Centennial LJtdlbeS , . S61 000
I
..... ;. --- I --'
Contingency/ $100.(300 I I I $100 000
[1) Repaid by Landfirr Fees
Approved: April 3, 2000
EXHIBIT A-5
CITY OF SALINA
2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
GENERAL SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD & INFO. SOLID GOLF WATER & G.O. REVENUE
PROJECT FUND PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI-CENTER SERVICES SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEWI'R. OTHER BONDS BONDS TOTAL
Street Repair Program $1 300.000 $1,300,000
cum & gutter, crack sealing Drtck
asphalt & concrete repair.
seals and RR crossings
S*dewalks and Ramps $100,000I $100.000
=an~ Improvements $100.000 I $~00 000
~uild~ngs & Facilities $250,000 $110.000 S100,000 $460.000
~/eh~c~es & Eclu~P $650 000 _. $30.000 S85,000 (11 .$.1.00.000 $865 000
~omputers,Techn .o. logy $150 000 , $100 000 $250 000
.~ I P. Planmng $50.000 $50.000
~torrn~eter ~roRet~ ~ P.~ann~n~ $~00.000 ' $300 000
t'*afflc Signa! Up~lrades $175.000 __ ! $175,000
Water System Enhancements ~ $500 000 ' $500
~/._.astewater System Enhancements ... S500.000 $500 000
S_~.Construct.on ........... $700.000 (2$780.000 S1.480,000_
~andftil Ceil Closures ___ $2.500.000 (3: $2 500 000
~.ontlngency I Sl00,000 [ $100000
rO~l CepItal lmt~v~ment t'l~n J $1,3:;'S,0~ I $100.000 I $1,400.000 I $300.000 I $140,000 $0 ~0 $0 I ~85.0~ J $,,300,000 $?00.000 $3.280.000 I $0
(1) Combination lease-purchase and cash expenditures. Out-of-pocket estimate: $50K
(2) KDOT
(3) Repaid by Landfill Fees
Approved: April 3, 2000
EXHIBIT A-6
CITY OF SALINA
2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
GENERAL SPECIAL GAS TAX FLOOD & INFO. SOUO ) GOLF WATER & G.O. REVENUE
PROJECT FUND PARKS FUND DRAINAGE BI-CENTER SERVICES SANITATION WASTE COURSE WASTEWTR. OTHER BONDS BONDS TOTAL
Street Repai~' Program $1.300 000l $1 300 000
curb & gutter, crack seahng bnck ---
asphalt & concrete repair.
seals and RR crossings
S~dewalks and Ramps $100 000 $100 000
'~ar~ Improvements $100 000 $100.000
Neighborhood Parxs ; $75.000 S75.000
.B._udd~ngs & Facd~bes S25G 000 $110.000 [ $100.000 S460 000
...... .__J-.
Vehicles & Equip, S6§O 000 $30 000 __..t.__$34 000 $100.000 __ $814.000
Computers/Technology I $t 50.000 $100 000 S250 000
,
-
S~orm~ater Projects & ~la,~nmg -- -'~300.000 __.~. $300 000
Traf~c S.o~al Upgrades St 75 000 .._ $~75 00~
_ __ .
Water System Enhancements ' ..... S500 000 $500,000
Wastewate- System Enhancements SS00.000 __ $500 000
.... . ......
Com,n~;ency 1 $100.000 .... I [ i S100.000
To..,
Approved: April 3, 2000
EXHIBIT A- 7'
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FOR FURTHER REVIEW
Am BRIDGES
1. Mulberry Creek/North 9th Bridge- (cost unknown)
Construction of replacement southbound bridge (one of two bridges) on North
9th over Mulberry Creek, south of 1-70. Engineering design/cost estimating
scheduled for 2000. To be submitted to K.D.O.T. for 80/20 bridge construction
funding as future project. Construction date will depend on K.D.O.T. funding
availability.
2. Lakewood Park Historic Bridge- (cost unknown)
Construction of replacement bridge north of Iron, entering Lakewood Park.
Possible relocation of historic bridge to Elm Street, east of Ohio, as
pedestrian/bicycle bridge to new USD 305 middle school. To be submitted to
K.D.O.T. for 80/20 bridge construction funding as future project.
B. MAJOR ROADWAYS
1. South Ohio Corridor, Phase II - ($1,600,000)
Widen and improve to urban standards Magnolia Road, east from Shalimar
Drive to the flood control levee. Construct as three lane roadway. Partially
special assessed to abutting developments, as well as some city-at-large
share. Timing of project dependent on development in this area.
2. South Ohio Corridor, Phase IV- ($2,300,000)
Widen and improve South Ohio to urban standards from Magnolia Road south
to Schilling Road. Either three lane or four lane roadway. Timing dependent
on growth patterns, traffic counts and major roadway funding availability.
3. North Ohio Corridor- (cost unknown)
Potential future project to address railroad grade separation issues, upgrade of
Ohio Street, widening and upgrade of Pacific (Old Highway 40) west of Ohio to
Front Street, and the intersection of Ohio/Pacific. Engineering feasibility report
on railroad grade separation options is scheduled in 2000 from C.I.P. Planning
funds. Application to be submitted to K.D.O.T. for consideration in 80/20 State
Transportation Plan funding.
4. Waterwell Road/I-135 Interchange- ($4,500,000)
Project to add exit/entry ramps to existing Waterwell overpass and 1-135.
Cooperative project with Saline County and K.D.O.T. Application submitted in
1999 for $3.2 million funding under State Highway System Enhancement
program.
C. MAJOR STORMWATER
1. East Pacific Drainage- (cost unknown)
To address current stormwater issues between Front Street and Ohio, and
address overall major drainage challenges for future development in the
Ohio/Pacific area. Some preliminary engineering feasibility analysis is
complete. Most to be incorporated into North Ohio Corridor planning.
2. Far East Salina Drainage- (cost unknown)
To address stormwater detention/drainage system improvements through a
master plan for area between Presbyterian Manor/East Crawford area and
Holmes/Country Club Road area. Engineering feasibility reports to be finalized
in 2000.
3. 4th and Cloud Area- (cost unknown)
To address street flooding during heavy rains in an area receiving flow from the
south. Project needs feasibility report. Will likely be combined with street
reconstruction and coordinated with drainage planning for South Middle School
expansion project.
4. South 9th Street, Belmont Area- (cost unknown)
Off-street drainage near Belmont, between 9th Street and 1-135. Needs
feasibility report in 2001, coordinated with South 9th Corridor pre-project work
and private property development in area.
5. South Ohio Corridor Drainage, Phase III - ($1,900,000)
Off-roadway drainage improvements primarily east of Ohio, including areas
near Huntington Road and Holmquist Oxbow. Includes new stormwater
detention area and improvements to Oxbow. Long-term project which may be
segmented into smaller, more manageable projects. Some portions may be
deferred indefinitely, dependent on success of improvements in South Ohio
Corridor, Phase I.
6. West Dry Creek Channel - (cost unknown)
Improvements to various segments of the major drainage channel between
Waterwell Road and Cloud Street, west of 1-135. Needs further analysis and
planning for Flood and Drainage Fund prioritization.
D. UTILITIES
1. Utilities, West of 1-135/Magnolia Interchange - ($1,800,000)
Extension of water and wastewater system to serve new development.
Engineering concept design is complete. Timing of construction is dependent
on private development plans.
E. BUILDINGS
1. Fire Station Relocation - (cost unknown)
Possible future relocation of existing fire station or stations to improve
response times and address growth patterns. Fire station location study to be
completed in 2000.
2. Municipal Court/Law Enforcement Building Needs - (cost unknown)
Address significant city justice system space requirements. Likely scenario is
expansion of Law Enforcement Center building to allow relocation of Municipal
Court. Concept design and feasibility report to be completed in Spring 2000.
3. Bicentennial Center, Kitchen/Storage Expansion - (cost unknown)
Additions to south side of building to provide needed food service work areas.
Concept design to be completed in 2000.
4. Bicentennial Center, Meeting Room Additions- (cost unknown)
Add to number of meeting rooms available for conventions and meetings, to
attract and retain events. Lower priority than other projects; possible long-
range project. Needs better cost/benefit analysis before pursuing further.
F. PARKS AND RECREATION
1. School Property Re-Use- (cost unknown)
Possible redevelopment of one or more former school buildings or sites for
parks/recreation purposes. Cooperate in future years with USD 305 as they
consider property disposition.
2. River Revitalization Extension- (cost unknown)
Possible extension in Kenwood Park/YWCA area. May continue and extend
projects similar to those accomplished 10 years ago. Possible clearance of
trees/brush, as well as major dredging, dependent on area and goals.
3. Lakewood Nature Center Expansion- ($500,000)
Potential future major project to add more public use/nature class areas at
former house (current Nature Center) in Lakewood Park.
4. Oakdale Park Greenhouse- ($150,000)
Construction of new greenhouse in Oakdale Park to better serve projects and
programs of Parks and Recreation system and gardens.
3
G. MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
1. General Services Parking- (cost unknown)
Possible future project to add off-street parking near east Ash Street for use by
General Services employees. May be possible in conjunction with private
development to the northwest.
2. Public Shooting Range- ($200,000)
Possible cost-shared project with private sector, state, and city. Projected at
$100,000 state funding; $50,000 city. Project is awaiting private sector and
state action. DESIGNATED C.I.P. PARTNERSHIP PROJECT.
3. Fiber-Optic Lines- (cost unknown)
Potential project link all or most city-owned facilities, including fire stations, by
upgraded fiber optic lines to enhance technology capabilities for training,
communication and data transmission. Needs further cost/benefit analysis.
4
EXHIBIT A-8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
IDENTIFIED BUT UNFUNDED
1. Family Aquatic Facility- ($5,000,000)
Construction of a major outdoor pool/aquatic facility in Kenwood Park.
Concept design complete in 2000. DESIGNATED C.I.P. PUBLIC
REFERENDUM PROJECT.
2. Levee Trail Extension- ($400,000)
Expand pedestrian/biking trail to other sections of the flood control levee.
3. Neighborhood/Community Centers - ($1,000,000 each)
Construct neighborhood center or centers to serve particular areas of the City,
such as north Salina. DESIGNATED C.I.P. PUBLIC REFERENDUM
PROJECT.