7.5 Plat Golden Eagle Estates CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
4:~ P.M.
R/16/9~ ..........
AGENDA SEC~ON: Development O~GINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. 7 AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark~
NO. 5
By: BY:~a''~
Item
Application #P93-3A, filed by Golden Eagle Estates Inc.,
requesting final plat approval of a 40.19 acre tract of land
located in the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 30, T14S, R2W of the
6th P.M. in Saline County, Kansas (North of Magnolia Rd., East of
Mayfair Addition).
Information
The applicants are requesting final plat approval for a 40.19
acre tract that would consist of 85 platted lots. Two lots (Lot
30, Block 5 and Lot 1, Block 1) would be the site of future
townhome developments of up to 40 and 50 units respectively. The
remaining 83 lots would be platted and zoned for single-family
homes. The request area is on the north side of Magnolia Road
east of the Huntington Road ditch. The area proposed for
platting is vacant and unimproved and currently used for
agricultural purposes. The Planning Commission approved a
preliminary plat / development plan for this tract on June 15.
On June 28 the City Commission voted to approve the rezoning and
annexation of this property on first reading subject to
satisfactory platting of the site.
Street7 Access and Design
The proposed subdivision will be connected to the Mayfair
Addition by extending the south leg of Sherwood Lane from
Huntington Road east across the ditch into the development.
Three street connections to Magnolia Road are proposed -
Huntington Road East, Eaglecrest Avenue and Redhawk Lane. Plans
for Huntington Road East, call for a matching twin to Huntington
Road West (21' of pavement from back of curb within 30' of R/W).
COMMISSION AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
~1~61~ 4:~ P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: O~GINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 2
Because of roadway narrowness, both sides of Huntington Road
should be converted to one-way traffic. Huntington Road West
would be one-way south from Sherwood Lane to Magnolia Road with
parking permitted on the west side. Huntington Road East would
be one-way nOrth with parking permitted on the east side. This
change should be made upon completion of Huntington Road East
from Magnolia to Sherwood Lane. This will enhance traffic safety
and emergency vehicle access as well as eliminate through traffic
from using Huntington Road for two-way travel between Magnolia
Road and Ohio Street. In addition, Huntington Road East will be
extended all the way to Wayne Avenue when the area north of this
subdivision is developed.
In terms of phasing the opening of streets, the applicants have
proposed four phases. Phase I would be Huntington Road, Adam
Travis Court, Lorianna Court, and Sherwood Lane to a point 400'
east of Huntington Road. A second means of access would be
provided during Phase II by connecting Phase I to Magnolia Road
via Sherwood Lane, Falconview Drive, Eaglecrest Avenue and
Redhawk Lane. Remaining streets would be opened during Phases
III and IV. Eaglecrest Avenue is platted to accommodate future
extension to the east should that property ever be developed.
With the exception of Huntington Road East and the three proposed
cul-de-sacs, all interior streets would be standard residential
streets with 60' of right-of-way and 33' of paving. This
includes the Sherwood Lane crossover. Sidewalks would have to be
constructed within the nonpavement right-of-way on both sides of
all interior streets except the cul-de-sacs and the west side of
Huntington Road East.
COMMISSXON AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
8/16/93 4:~ P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: O~GINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
AGENDA:
NO. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 3
Staff would note that it has not been determined whether Magnolia
Road was constructed to city standards. The property owners
adjacent to Magnolia Road have never been assessed for a public
street as have other lot owners in the city. While no
reconstruction or upgrading of Magnolia is currently planned,
staff ~would still recommend that the applicants be required to
submit legal assurances to the city consenting to the
establishment of a special assessment district and obligating the
lot owners in the subdivision for one-half (1/2) of the total
cost to reconstruct Magnolia to city standards along the frontage
of the subdivision. Such assurances would be recorded and valid
for 10 years.
Lot Design
All lots and blocks are numbered in a logical manner. All lots
shown would have adequate frontage on and access to a public
street. The applicants have requested R (Single-Family), which
requires a minimum lot size of 8,500 sq. ft., as the underlying
zoning classification for the single-family lots. It appears
that the width, depth and area dimensions on all lots shown on
the final plat would comply with the minimum standards of the R
district.
Storm Drainage
The City's stormwater management regulations require the
developers to design a storm detention system to accommodate or
detain the additional runoff caused by the development of the
site (the difference between existing conditions and developed
conditions). The applicants' general drainage system concept for
the 110+ acre tract is to maintain existing runoff volumes into
the west ditch (Huntington Road) and south ditch (Magnolia Road)
COMMISSION AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
4:00 P.M.
~11~1~~
AGENDA SECTION: 'O~GINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 4
south ditch (Magnolia Road) and develop a detention basin on the
old river bed located northeast of the property.
The' Engineering Department has requested that the proposed
detention basin be discharged with pumps and pipelines over the
levee at appropriate rates. Any off-site easements necessary for
ditches, pipelines, etc. must be obtained and recorded prior to
any development of the site beyond Phase I. The detention basin
itself must also be encumbered as a drainage easement to serve
Phase II of the development. Arrangements must also be made for
continued maintenance of the detention pond either by a
homeowner's association or by the city following the payment of a
lump sum maintenance fee and dedication to the public. A
stormwater detention plan and construction plans for the
detention pond, pumps and any proposed ditch improvements must be
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any building
permits beyond Phase I. The details of the drainage system will
be established during the design of the public improvements for
the subdivision.
Easements
Existing public utilities, including gas and electricity, can be
extended to serve this site and the needed right-of-way and
utility easements have been provided. The City's new sewer
interceptor line has been installed in the southeast corner of
the subdivision in what will be dedicated Magnolia Rd.
right-of-way. The developers are proposing a 30'
drainage/utility easement along the rear of the lots along the
eastern edge of the subdivision to carry runoff to the detention
basin and the Magnolia ditch. A 20' drainage easement is
COMMISSION ACTION
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
8/lfi/q
AGENDA SECTION: O~GINA~NG DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 5
proposed at the east end of Sherwood Lane to carry runoff to the
detention basin in the old river channel. As noted above, the
applicants must also prepare and record a drainage easement with
a legal description of the proposed detention basin to insure
that this area will be available for stormwater detention.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission considered this final plat at its August
3rd meeting. Following presentation of the staff report and
discussion and questions, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to
approve the plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Phase One of street and utility development shall include
Huntington Road East, Adam Travis Court, Lorianna Court and
a portion of Sherwood Lane from the Huntington Road ditch
400 feet east.
2. Any petition for or completion of public improvements
beyond the first phase of development shall include a
revised drainage study and construction plans for an
off-site detention pond and necessary discharge ditches,
pipes or pumps for approval by the City Engineer prior to
issuance of any building permits.
3. The applicants shall prepare a drainage easement with a
metes and bounds description of the off-site detention pond
and the location of the ditch or pipe carrying discharge to
the Smoky Hill River. This area must be described and
encumbered and the easement dedicated prior to issuance of
any building permits outside Phase One.
COMMISSION AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
TSAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION DATE TIME
4:~ RM.
AGENDA SECTION: O~GINA~NG DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING a DEVELOPMENT
ITEM: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 6
4. The applicants shall satisfactorily complete construction
of the pond area and shall sign and record a maintenance
agreement providing for maintenance of the ponding area and
any pipes, ditches or pumps associated with ~moving
stormwater to the river prior to issuance of any occupancy
permit for any welling outside Phase One. In lieu of the
maintenance agreement, the applicants may record a covenant
obligating future lot owners in the subdivision to maintain
the off-site detention and other drainage facilities
through a Homeowner's Association or may make a lump sum
payment to the city for public maintenance. Upon payment
of the fee, the city will accept ownership and perpetual
maintenance responsibility. In order to exercise the
alternative of city acceptance and maintenance of the
detention pond, the developer shall pay the fee in full
prior to approval of the final plat and acceptance of
dedications by the Board of City Commissioners.
5. Each development phase of the subdivision must have paved
streets and an operational water system and plans and
specifications for drainage must be submitted and approved
by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a building permit
for any lot within that development phase. All required
public improvements must be completed prior to the issuance
' of a certificate of occupancy for any building.
6. The applicants shall submit legal assurances to the city
consenting to the establishment of a special assessment
district and obligating the abutting land within the
proposed development for one-half of the total cost to
COMMISSION AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
CITY OF SALINA
REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION ~ TIME
8
3
/~Ul~
4:~ P.M.
AGENDA SECTION: O~GINATING DEPARTMENT: APPROVED FOR
NO. AGENDA:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Fr~M: Roy Dudark
NO.
BY: BY:
Page 7
reconstruct two lanes on Magnolia Road to city residential
street standards. Said assurance shall be valid for a 10
year period and legally binding on existing and future
owners of land within the development. This covenant shall
be recorded with the final plat.
City Commission Action
If the City Commission concurs with the action of the Planning
Commission, a motion should be made to approve the plat and
authorize the Mayor to sign the plat drawing.
Encl: Application
Vicinity Map
Plat Drawing
Excerpt of PC Minutes of 8/3/93
cc: Tim Howison
Dan Meinhardt
COMMISSION AC~ON
MOTION BY SECOND BY
THAT:
Application No. P93-3A
Date Filed July 2. 1993 I'nitialDeposit $181.00
Prel. Plat Approval Date ,.June 15. 1993 Receipt No. ',/-C~/,;
Ownership List Attached Yes Accepted by DA
APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
1. Subdivision Name c43Tn~ EA_~.w. ESTATES..
2. Subdivision Location(general)Adjace_nt and ]~'~-~t of _lVlay-F~i~- ~r~]. & adjac~-nf'_ & North of
Magnolia
3. Land Area (sq. ft. and/oracres) 39.~
4. Number of Lots Proposed 81
5....Present Zoning Aqricultural Use Fa~'m~ng
6. Pending Zoning(if any) T~ g ]~-2; pr~ Proposed Use
7. Please explain any provisions of conditional preliminary plat approval and your compliance with
those provisions (attach additional sheets if necessary)
8. If any changes have occurred between the approved preliminary and this final plat, other than those
required by the Planning Commission, please explain the nature of these changes
9. Explain any waivers of the subdivision regulations granted with the preliminary plat or requested
with this application None
10. Applicant ('~olrT~n 1~0.1¢_ 1~.~i-~t-~.~; Tn~._
Address 14~R R wa~: ~1~: ~ PhoneT~-823-1151
11. Property Owner ~y G ~i~t & T~y B ~~
Address 1408 E Wa~e~ ~1i~r ~ Phone~-~25-0985
12. Engineer or Surveyor ~1~ & ~
Address 101~ S ~i~, L~n~~ ~ Phone 227-3787
13. Authorized Representative ~l]. ~ell or ~les & ~
Address 639 ~ ~or ~[J~ ~ Phone 827-3708
I hereby agree to comply with the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Salina, Kansas, and all other
pertinent ordinances of the City of Salina and statutes of the State of Kansas. In addition, it is agreed that
all costs of recording the plat and supple/mental documents thereto with the Register of Deeds shall be
a ssumedandpaidbyth~~n~.,t...
Applicant's Signatur~__~_,~.~.,./~'~/~//'__/~_~/J~ Date '~-/-.~'_~.
WHITE -- PLANNING CANARY -- CITY CLERK PINK -- APPLICANT
(REV. 12/81)
~N[onroe and Boclwell Surveying and l~apping Inc.
Dgscril tion
Golden Eagle Estates Addition
A ~rao-l; of land Ioc~at, e.,d In ~,he Eael; One HaE (E 1/2) ~o 5o~w~
~ 5~on ~i~ (~), To~ehi~ Fou~n (l&) 5o~,
rdn~i~l Median, ~aline ~un~, Kaneae, da~db~ ~ m~e a~ ~u~e aa followe:
5~innin~ aS ~o ~o~oae~ ~mor ~ ea~ ~~ ~ua~r (~W 114),
- ~en~ w~ along ~e ~ line ~ ea~ So~w~ Queer (SW 1/4) on an
a~u~ beafin~ ~ ~ &9 d~er~ 15 minu~ ~
- ~en~ No~ O0 d~re~ ~ min~ O0 ~nde ~ a dle~n~ ~ 11~.0D f~;
- ~enca No~ ~ d~ee O0 mince O0 ~onde ~ a dle~n~ ~ 1~.~ f~;
- ~en~ No~ ~ d~r~ 05 mince 57 ~e ~e~
- ~en~ No~ ~ ~r~e 07 minute 15 ~e ~e~
- ~n~ No~ ~ d~r~ 01 mince 42 ~e ~ a die~n~ ~ 57~ f~ ~ a
non ~n~ ~we ~ a ~ord beefing 5o~ ~ de~ ~ mince 15 ~e Ea~
a dle~n~ ~ 59.~ ~, eaid ou~o ha~n~ a ~iue ~ ~.~ ~ a~ a o~1 anglo
~ 09.d~r~e ~ mince 14 ~onde:
- ~an~ ~u~a~ alon~ ~o aw ~ ea~ ou~a a dle~n~ ~ ~2 ~ W a
~n~ Iln~
- ~en~ 5o~ ~ de~r~e 52 minute 55 ~nde Ea~ a~n~
- ~en~ No~ ~ d~reee ~ mince 05 ~nde ~ a dle~n~
- ~enoe 5o~ ~ de~r~e 52 minu~ ~ ~e ~
~ a ~i~ on ~e ea~ line ~ ~e ~et One Ha~ (E 1/2) ~ ea~ ~a~ ~a~r
(~W
- ~en~e 5o~ O0 degre~ ~ minute 05 ~nde W~ a~ne ea~ ea~ line a
die~n~ ~ 1~.07 f~ ~ ~ ~in: ~ b~innin~.
~o able d~db~ Fa~l ~ la~ ~n~ine 1,~15~ ~uam
more or
MONROE and BODWELL ~urw3,ing md ~ ~
1027 YORK, BOX 2387 SALLY^, KS 67402-2387
913-827-3708 FAX 913-827-1333
Application #PDD93-6
Golden Eagle Estates
_~ Nagnolla Road
.I
i ' Request Area ,
~PD093'6 & A93-2 '
Golden Eagle Estates No.
I
I
Salina City Planning Commission
August 3, 1993
Page 10
The vote~~nimous (5-0) in favor of the motion. Motion ~
VOTE~ carried. ~ ~
Mr. Dudark stated I would 1 me at this item will be
heard by the City Commission rd. On August 23rd they
will also hear ~ng of the zo~~rdinance and the
#7. Application #P93-3A, filed by Golden Eagle Estates No. 1.
Chairman Seaton asked if the applicant was present? The applicant
was present.
Mr. Dudark stated this is a final plat application. This is for
the proposed Golden Eagle Estates development. This is Magnolia
Rd. and Huntington and the drainage ditch between the west side of
Huntington and the proposed development. Huntington is to be
opened on the east side one-way north with a reduced width here, a
couple cul-de-sacs and also a street - Sherwood Lane - open to the
east in Phase I. About 400' would be the extent of Phase I. This
section of Sherwood, Huntington, the two cul-de-sacs out to
Magnolia Road would be the first phase of development. That would
make several lots here accessible with streets and utilities for
the first phase which are single-family lots. The street system
for Phase II would be an extension of Sherwood and working down and
out to Magnolia Road. It is a requirement that they complete the
connection to Magnolia Road to provide a second means of exit out
of the development. The other phases would simply be the
completion of the street system. Phase II could be more than that
if they wanted more. There are two townhome areas, 50 units
maximum and 40 units maximum. Ail of the lots except the two
townhome units would be subject to the R Single-Family Residential
standards. It appears that all of those lots do meet those
requirements as far as size and shape. There are a couple of
irregularly platted lot lines. This lot line around the cul-de-sac
does not radiate from the center and neither does this one. It
creates an awkward side yard or fence but that is not something
that is a design requirement. If they wish to retain that shape
they may. As I understand it, they want to get greater frontage on
this lot and this lot so they did that by moving this side lot line
over here to create greater width in front. I do not know which
way is the right answer on this. We simply pointed this out for
them to take a second look at. I believe they have done that. The
other thing is the jog back here. City Engineering was wondering
why that was the case. Apparently they did that because of future
development to be fitted in here like this and we were wondering
why you could not connect those two points. They do not have to do
that but they need to label the width of this easement if they are
going to have it that way. Other than those wrinkles we think the
design is fine. Ail of the requirements of the preliminary plat
have been satisfied and some of the things that would be a
condition of this final plat. The available utility system is more
than adequate. We have sewer mains both on the west and south and
water lines in both locations so they can make those connections
without much difficulty. Drainage will be to an old ox-bow
detention pond in this area that will be discharged to the
northeast to the dike and they probably will have a pump that would
take the water up over the dike to the Smoky Hill River. That is
not required until they get into Phase II and beyond. The
easements are all shown. We have drainage easements on the back
side, a fairly wide drainage easement and utility easement along
the east side to take the water to the rear of these homes, to the
north to this detention pond to the drainage easement in this area
for the street drainage to go down through. Ail the other
easements and utility easements would be in the rear of the lots.
Our recommendation is to approve the final plat subject to six
Salina City Planning Com~lssion
August 3, 1993
Page 11
conditions. #1) is that Phase I be completed as I described it.
92) is that any petition for or completion of public improvements
beyond the first phase would involve the drainage facility. #3)
that they prepare a drainage easement with ditches, pond area and
so forth and record that and dedicate by separate instrument prior
to any building permits outside Phase I. #4 is that they complete
the construction of the pond area and all the lmprovoments
necessary to get the water from the pond area to the river before
any occupancy permits could be issued outside of Phase I. They
could have a maintenance agreement and record a covenant obligating
all of the lot owners to maintain those facilities or they could
pay a fee. The City adopted a new policy where a developer can pay
a charge and have the City take over the maintenance of that pond.
They would have a choice of either handling it by the lot owners
themselves through the Homeowner's Association or paying a fee to
the City and dedicating that as a public facility. They would need
to do that prior to presenting this plat to the City Conunission for
their approval. When they record this plat they record those
covenants which would inform any lot buyer so they would know what
they are getting into. #5 the standard condition that you have
paved streets and water systems and so forth before you get any
building permits and that you complete those facilities as well as
the drainage and sewers before you occupy any homes. #6) deals
with the future reconstruction of Magnolia Road to city standards.
We have not determined whether that meets city standards. If at
some point it needs to be rebuilt, we would have a covenant in
place that would obligate this subdivision to contribute half the
cost of a residential street for this segment of Magnolia Road.
Mrs. Duckers asked about the low spots on the property that appear
to be collecting and holding water.
Mr. Dudark stated it is very iow. They will have to move some dirt
around, cut these roads in at a lower level and use that dirt to
build up the building sites and import additional dirt if needed in
order to get that to drain. They have not designed their final
grading plan yet. Their private engineer will have to design that
and the city engineer review it to see if there is adequate slope
and grade.
Mr. Morris asked if staff could refresh his memory about the
routing of traffic.
Mr. Dudark stated what was recommended by the Planning Commission
and what was approved by the City Commission was upon the
completion of Phase I which is Huntington up to Sherwood that
Huntington be converted to a one-way system, one-way south on the
west side, one-way north on the east side and that the existing
section of Huntington Roach north of Sherwood Lane would continue
to be two-way until such time that Huntington was extended to Wayne
and then it would be converted to one-way south and one-way north.
Chairman Seaton asked if the applicant would care to make a comment?
Tim Howison stated on the lots on the cul-de-sacs, the ones we
would market on Lorianna Court, the reason they were laid out that
way was to maximize the building area towards the front of the lot
so you are not limited to a shot gun plan on the house that is 55'
wide or 60'. In other words you can have the garage off the front
because you can squeeze the kitchen in behind it. The only way to
change that was to change a couple of lot lines. The other reason
was that we did not want some of the cul-de-sac lots 15,000 sq. ft.
and the other at 10,000 sq. ft. because we are trying to create
some harmony on the construction as to the price range. If you
have a smaller lot typically you are going to have a cheaper home.
As far as the other two lots that are on the top of the plat in
regards to utility easements, I asked the same question. He said
/ Salins City Planning Commission
" '- August 3, 1993
....'...-'i.:~:,...-:;,-~:,::.,.-{ Page 12
"i'~':""~":'~"'i'¥?:':" t it had something to do with the utility easements on the lot but it
· , was not something that was easy to change. If it was there would
---'":," I have been no problem with us platting that out either. In
reference to the duck ponds, Huntington Road will probably have to
be taken down close to 3' which is going to be a tremendous amount
'" . ::~,-::~' t of dirt shifted to the east which would take care of part-of that.
We are going to raise all of that. The dirt will have to be
shifted around and the drainage focused to the northeast part of
~ the plat so it drains Into the big oxbow. The plus side of this is
that the 30" of rain we have had in the 6 weeks is that everybody
I can see what we are going to have to do including our engineer. As
' that thing gets filled up we will not be looking at that any longer
because we will have to shift the dirt around in that area plus
maybe haul some in, whatever it is going to take to make it come
out so there is no standing water.
Chairman Seaton asked if there were any comments by any interested
persons? There were none. Has there been any correspondence?
Mr. Dudark stated not since the PDD application.
Chairman Seaton asked if there were any questions regarding this
application?
I MOTION: Mr. McCoach moved that Application #P93-3A be approved subject to
the six conditions listed in the staff report.
I SECOND: Mr. Allen seconded the motion.
VOTE: The vote was unanimous (6-0) in favor of the motion. Motion
carried.
~airman Seaton asked about Application #Z93-6 filed by Asbury?
stated the policy says you will table this if there
not Perhaps they did not understand that.
MOTION: Mr. that Application #Z93-6 be tabled to the on
August 17
SECOND: Mrs. Duckers ~nded the motion.
VOTE: The vote was una~ s (6-0) in favor of the mot Motion
carried.
#8. Other Matters.
Mr. Dudark stated we ns scheduled for the
meeting on August 17th. for a zoning change at
Fourth and Walnut. They are commercial zoning. Stimmel
School will be on the a, and plat to create two lots.
There are people tnteresl the cottage for a home. We
:' also have a major for Oak Estates requesting
~ rezontng for a motel convenience ~re on the agenda. This
includes a replat a~ re: ing to R-2 well. If you want to
pursue C-3 zoning ~East Iron we can 4~ something to you in
the future. Weh~e had interest in this expr~ed.
Mrs. Duckers~sked are the two office bulldin~behind Hardees
zoned C-~C-57 Is a veterinarian clinic permitted~
Mr. ~k stated those are zoned C-5.
/Duckers asked if a veterinarian clinic is permitted in
~r. Dudark stated I think so. We will check this out. ~He
' introduced Phyllis Dahl from Manpower who will be filling in whi~
Marcia Stock is on maternity leave for 12 weeks.