Saline County 2004 Solid Waste Characterization Study Summary Report
r
l__1
I,
iC
.[
r,
,j
..L
r'
L
[~
"G.,
'C', ,
. ~
0:'
[
D.,
c
rr
{j
r'C
. .
t.'.,
'.'
[t
"~[
r
t>
r
L:
r
I
.,-,
r
,Lj:
- ';'
. 'I ~~
,~' ,,'
.'. 'c
j~>
. )")
. ^.
,. ,,<.
\'
,',
~"''''',~._-=, - ~. """~,,,.,~
Jo- >
,,'
. ,. '
.)
u
,.
.Cbntents
;^\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Contents
Executive Summary
Comparison of Waste Sampling Results......... ............................ ....................... .............. ES-l
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Data ........................ .......... ............... ...................... ..... ES-2
Section 1 - Introduction
1.1 Purpose of Study......................................... .................................... .......................... 1-1
1.2 Scope of Work... .............. .................... ......... .......... ...................... .......... ................... 1-1
1.3 ' Report Structure.... ....................... ..... ................. ........ .............................. ..... .~......... 1-2
Section 2 - Spring 2004 Sampling Event
2.1 Field Sampling Activities...... ........ ............. ...... ..... ........... ............. ............... ........... 2-1
Section 3 - Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
3.1 ResidentiaL................................ .;................. ........... .................. ................... ............. 3-1
3.2 CommerciaL................... ....... ............. .................. ........ ........ ............................... ...... 3-2
3.3 Combined Residential/Commercial Waste Stream...........................:................ 3-2
3.4 Industrial.... ...........~........................................................... .............................:.... ...... 3-3
: 3.5 Construction and Demolition............ ...................... ..................... .......................... 3-8
3.6 Total Landfilled Waste Composition .................................................................... 3-3
Section 4 - Comparison of Waste Composition Results
4.1 Waste Categories..... ......................................... .............. ....... .................. ................. 4-1
4.21 LandfilIed Waste Composition Comparison........................................................ 4-2
4.2.1 Residential Waste Stream ........................................................................ 4-2
4.2.2 Commercial Waste Stream ....................................................................... 4-4
4.2.3 Combined Residential/Commercial Waste Stream............................. 4-6
4.2.4 Industrial Waste Stream.............. ,..... ................. .............................. ........ 4-8
4.2.5 Construction/Demolition Waste Stream....................,.......................... 4-8
4.2.6 Total Landfilled Waste Stream.............................................................. 4-10
4.3 Spring 2004 Waste Characterization Conclusions............................................. 4-11
Section 5 - Annual 2004 Waste Composition Results
5.1 Introduction ..... ................. ..................................... ........ ........................................... 5-1
5.2 ResidentiaL................................................................... ............................................. 5-1
5.3 Commercial........ ... ...... ........ .... .......... ...... ................. ..... .... ..... ............... .................. ... 5-3
5.4 Industrial............ ;'..... ......................... ........................................ ................................. 5-5
5.5 Construction and Demolition............................................ ................................ ..... 5-5
5.6 Total Landfilled Waste Composition .................................................................... 5-8
CONI
P:\8558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\TOC.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Table of Contents
Section 6 - Conclusions
6.1 Summary of Activities ........ ...... ........ ............ .............. ................ ....... ............... ....... 6-1
6.2 Comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004
Waste Compositions ............. ................... ............. ........... .... ...... .............................. 6-1
6.3 Annual 2004 Waste Characterization .............. ........... .......................... ................. 6-2
Section 7 - References
Appendices
Appendix A - Photographic Log
Appendix B - Solid Waste Characterization Study - Sampling Event Work Plan
Appendix C - Spring 2004 Sample Results
Appendix D - Comparison of Waste Composition Results
CONI
ii
P:\8558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\TOC.doc
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
Figures
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
5-6
CDIVI
Table of Contents
Residential Waste Composition by Weight (Spring 2004) ................................. 3-4
Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (Spring 2004) ...............................3-5
Combined Residential/Commercial Waste Composition by Weight
(Spring 2004) .. ........ ...... ... ...... ... ...... ..... ....... ........... ...... ...... ... ..... ....... ....... .......... ..... ... 3-6
Industrial Waste Composition by Weight (Spring 2004).................................... 3-7
Construction/Demolition Waste Composition by Weight (Spring 2004)...... 3-10
Total Landfilled Waste Composition by Weight (Spring 2004)....................... 3-12
Residential Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) .......................... 4-3
Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) ........................ 4-5
Combined Residential/ Commercial Waste Composition by Weight
(1996-97 vs. 2004)........................ ......... ................. ....................... ......... .................... 4-7
"
Industrial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) ............................ 4-9
Construction/Demolition Waste Composition by Weight
(1996-97 vs. 2004)................................... ............................ ..................................... 4-12
Total Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004)...................................4-13
Residential Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) .......................... 5-4
Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) ........................ 5-6
Industrial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004) ............................5-7
Construction/Demolition Waste Composition by Weight
(1996-97 vs. 2004)..... ............................................................ ............ ......................... 5-9
Total Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs. 2004)...................................5-10
2004 total Waste Composition by Weight........................................................... 5-11
iii
P:\8558sallnalwaste studyIPhase 2 revisedlSummal'f ReportlTOC.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tables
3-1
3-2
4-1
5-1
6-1
CONI
Table of Contents
Saline County Landfilled Waste Quantities by Waste Stream ..........................3-1
Composition of Landfilled Waste Streams by Weight (Spring 204) ...............3-11
1996-97 to 2004 Waste Category Conversion Table............................................. 4-1
Composition of 2004 Landfilled Waste Streams by Weight............................... 5-2
Saline County Landfilled Waste Quantities by Source....................................... 6-2
iv
P:\855Ssalina\w8ste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\TOC.doc
:[
'r:
" ,
'--
I - r:
! L"
r
L:
L'
C
0'
C'"
,[
[:
"u'
[:,'
,'-'
,[
r:
'L"
, ,
"["
" -...:..'
i
[
r'
L
r-
I
I .
L,.'
: ~[
, ,
,
" '
5"
'~ .-
,; "
~. ~
"
..'~
.:-...
'~
<.:
',' .
" ,
, "
"
_ t L
,"
",
.;',-
'Y,'
, ~'
,~
'.........., '
, ,
(;
Executive
$urllrIlqry
, ., - . ' ~ .-
r - ,~ , . '"
'. " ~
c'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
Executive Summary
The City of Salina is currently completing a pilot curbside recycling program within
the city. To assess the effects of the pilot recycling activities on the City of Salina
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility (Salina MSWLF), the City of Salina contracted
with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) to characterize the waste stream prior to
implementation of the pilot curbside recycling program. The goal of this study is to
provide an accurate waste stream characterization needed to assess the impact of a
full-scale residential curbside recycling program.
The following tasks have been completed to achieve the goals of the study:
. Work Plan: Design of waste characterization sampling plan including identification
of waste collection and hauling companies utilizing the Salina MSWLF;
. Waste Composition Study: Performance of one sampling and sorting event
(sampling refers to the selection of specific samples of waste from within vehicles
selected for sampling: sorting refers to the separation of waste samples obtained
from the selected vehicles) to estimate the composition of residential and
commercial waste and of one visual characterization to estimate the composition
of construction/ demolition and industrial waste;
. . Summary Reports: Preparation of interim report of findings after the spring
sampling event; and
. Comprehensive Study: Evaluation of comparison of Spring/Summer 1997, Annual
1996-97, and Spring 2004 results to develop the Annual 2004 Waste Composition
Data.
Comparison of Waste Sampling Results
In 1996 and 1997, CDM conducted a three-season waste characterization study of the
waste stream generated within Saline County and landfilled at the Salina MSWLF. In
Spring 2004, CDM conducted a similar waste sampling event although this time
focusing solely on waste being landfilled at the Salina MSWLF. Using the results of
the Spring 2004 sampling event, CDM was able to estimate the waste composition for
the entire year, the Annual 2004 Waste Composition. Comparing the Annual 1996-97
waste composition results with the Annual 2004 waste composition results, the
following observations can be made about the changes in the waste stream over the
past seven years:
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, PET Bottles, and Other Plastic in the residential
waste stream;
. An increase in Newsprint and PET Bottles in the commercial waste stream;
. An increase in Other-Paper in the industrial waste stream;
CONI ES-1
P:18558salinalwaste studyIPhase 2 revisedlSummary Reportlexec summ.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Executive Summary
. A decrease in Other InorganicsjNon-Combustibles in the industrial waste stream
and the totallandfilled waste stream, which can be attributed to the removal of
Phillips Lighting's glass debris from the waste stream;
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, Food Waste and Wood in the totallandfilled
waste stream;
. An increase in PET Bottles in the totallandfilled waste stream, which is likely due
to the a national trend toward increased consumption of bottled water and
increased use of single serving containers;
. An increase in Other Plastic in the totallandfilled waste stream, which is likely
due to a national trend towards increased use of plastics in packaging;
. A decrease in Newsprint, Clear HDPE Containers, Colored HDPE Containers and
Steel and Bimetal Food and Beverage Containers in the totallandfilled waste
stream;
. A decrease in Leaves and Other Yard Waste in the totallandfilled waste stream,
which can be attributed to the implementation of a yard waste composting facility.
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Data
The Annual 2004 Total Landfilled Waste Composition data shows that the most
abundant materials by weight percentage are:
. Food Waste (14.3%);
. Other Plastic (12.5%);
. Other Paper (12.0%);
. Corrugated Cardboard & Kraft Paper (9.9%);
. Wood (8.3%); and
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (7.2%).
The analysis also revealed some information to be considered when developing a
future recycling program:
. approximately 80% of the residential waste is from the City of Salina, and
approximately 20% is from Saline County;
. Tony's Pizza generates 71 % of the waste in the industrial waste stream;
· Tony's Pizza's Food Waste comprises 6.5% of the total waste stream which is
slightly less than half of the total Food Waste landfilled in Saline County; and
P:18558salinalwaste studyIPhase 2 revisedlSummary Reportlexec summ.doc
ES-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
)
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDIVI
I
Executive Summary
. Yard Waste represents approximately 7.2% of the total waste stream, comprising
13.0% of the residential waste stream and approximately 9.5% of the
construction/ demolition waste stream.
P:\SSS8salina\waste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\exec summ.doc
ES-3
,[
[;."
[,:
",
.[ ,.
'/'
'.' [
c
, ,>
, r.
.".LI'
C' \
"
r,
L:
,,[,
'.,,[:
, (
C"
, ,
. '
'C
c. "
c,
[.
[>'
'-
[
:[ ,
'\ '
, ~" '
.' ~
)',
,,;-
, "
. l~
I.',
" }
"
'( ..'":.
i,
t/ J
"
"
:"
:>
-);
. '"
,,'
., '
"
.\ ~.
,
<,,'
: :~:.
....
~ ..l
.-!+ . /
. ,,-,
"'j,'
I.:
.,
''c
, .
i\ "
, " ~ .."..
--'~"."-'_~"f"'l"!"""""'~"!'1'..._. _ .__...,.'_"""'~
,-.
" .
'\"
. ",
-,' ,,'
,....... "
.):-
, c ~.
~ , ., -
".:, I
~ ~~,
~ , +
, ,
"
"
'.j'-
. ",' -I ~ .
,. ,
~ ..1 ,'I_
, "
~ 1
Jion
,Orle
"
0.,1.:..
..-; " '-
? '
'",'.~
'"' ~ -
, .i;.
Of, .'
, ~ ~.
"
,', .,.
'vt" . <t'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDIVI
Section 1
Introduction
The City of Salina is currently completing a pilot curbside recycling program within
the city. To assess the effects of the pilot recycling activities on the City of Salina
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility (Salina MSWLF), the City of Salina contracted
with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) to characterize the waste stream prior to
implementation of the pilot curbside recycling program. The goal of this study is to
provide an accurate waste stream characterization needed to assess the impact of a
full-scale residential curbside recycling program.
,
1.1 Purpose of Study
This report summarizes the results of a study updating the previous Saline County
waste characterization study. In 1997, CDM conducted three waste sampling events
(Fall 1996, Winter 1997, and Spring/Summer 1997) to characterize the solid waste
stream at the Saline MSWLF as described in the City of Salina Waste Characterization
Study Final Report dated August 1997. In May 2004, CDM conducted a waste
characterization sampling event at the Salina MSWLF (Spring 2004) and provided a
summary report, City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring
Summary Report dated June 2004. CDM then compared the results of the
Spring/Summer 1997 sampling event, the Annual 1996-97 sampling event, and the
Spring 2004 sampling event. This statistical evaluation provided the basis to estimate
the Annual 2004 Waste Composition. The Annual 2004 Waste Composition data will
be used to determine the impacts of the current recycling program.
1.2 Scope of Work
The following tasks have been completed to achieve the goals of the study:
.
Work Plan: Design of waste characterization sampling plan including identification
of waste collection and hauling companies utilizing the Salina MSWLF;
.
Waste Composition Study: Performance of one sampling and sorting event
(sampling refers to the selection of specific samples of waste from within vehicles
selected for sampling: sorting refers to the separation of waste samples obtained
from the selected vehicles) to estimate the composition of residential and
commercial waste and of one visual characterization to estimate the composition
of construction/ demolition and industrial waste;
.
Summary Reports: Preparation of interim report of findings after the spring
sampling event; and
.
Comprehensive Study: Evaluation of comparison of Spring/Summer 1997, Annual
1996-97, and Spring 2004 results to develop the Annual 2004 Waste Composition
Data.
P:18558salinalwaste studylPhase 2 revisedlSummsl)' ReportlSection 1.doc
1-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
Section 1
Introduction
1.3 Report Structure
This report discusses the results of the spring 2004 sampling event, estimates the
annual waste composition, and provides conclusions based on the findings of this
waste characterization study. This report includes the following sections:
. Spring Sampling Event Activities (Section 2)
. Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results (Section 3)
. Comparison of Waste Composition Results (Section 4)
. Annual 2004 Waste Composition (Section 5)
. Conclusions (Section 6)
. References (Section 7)
CDIVI 1-2
P:18558salinalwaste sludylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSeclion 1.doc
"','
"
,"','
-,
'"('
[~-:
~,
~ -'
:,'.--;.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDIVI
Section 2
Spring 2004 Sampling Event
2.1 Field Sampling Activities
CDM conducted a waste sampling event from May 17 through May 21,2004; the
results are referred to as the Spring 2004 waste composition. Three CDM employees
and eight City of Salina and Salina MSWLF employees participated in the sampling
activities. Photographic documentation of the field activities are provided in
Appendix A.
The waste sampling event was conducted according to the Solid Waste Characterization
Study Sampling Event Work Plan, City of Salina, Kansas (Work Plan) dated May 10,2004,
provided in Appendix B. The City of Salina and Salina MSWLF employees were
trained in the waste sorting procedures, health and safety requirements, and the
waste categories prior to the sorting activities on May 17, 2004. Fifty-two waste
samples, thirty-one residential and twenty-one commercial, were sorted. A total of
12,575 pounds of residential and commercial waste was sorted, an average of 242
pounds per sample.
The samples were selected based on the source (by city or township) and generator
(either residential or commercial) of the waste. The selection process equally
distributed the sampling between source and generator types. Samples were
collected from the active face of the landfill and brought to the Salina MSWLF
maintenance building and placed on a tarp. Each sample was then taken to a sorting
box and separated into the 34 waste categories described in the Work Plan. After
sample sorting was complete, each waste category was weighed and recorded. The
samples were then placed in either a packer truck or a front end loader and taken
back to the active face of the landfill for disposal.
The industrial and construction and demolition loads are typically bulky and consist
of only a few categories; therefore, they were visually inspected for composition.
Visual characterization of 15 industrial loads and 17 construction and demolition
loads was conducted at the active face of the landfill by a CDM solid waste engineer.
P:IB55Bsalinalwasle sludylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSection 2.doc
2-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDI\II
Section 3
Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
The Saline County landfilled waste stream is comprised of materials generated by
residential, commercial, industrial, and construction/ demolition sources. The weight
percentages of the four waste streams based.on 2004 Salina landfill tipping records are
displayed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1
Saline County Landfilled Waste Quantities by Waste Stream 1
Jan 1, 2004 through Dee 31, 2004
Type of Waste Tons %
Residential 25,686 36.4%
Commercial 23,017 32.6%
Industrial 13,487 19.1%
Construction! 8,322 11.8%
Demolition
TOTAL 70,522 -
1. Data provided by the 2004 Salina MSWLF tipping records.
3.1 Residential
For purposes of this report, the residential waste stream is defined as solid waste
collected by City and private haulers from residential units and multi-family
residential buildings with up to three units within Saline County and disposed at the
Salina MSWLF. Samples were obtained from vehicles serving residential and
residentialj commercial routes in the City of Salina and the townships of Saline
County .
Data from the spring sampling event indicated that approximately 60 percent of the
waste was comprised of the following waste categories as defined in Appendix B:
. Other Plastic (13.1 %);
. Other Paper (12.8 %);
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (12.6%);
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper (7.1 %);
. Newsprint (6.9%); and
P:18558salinalwaste studylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSection 3.doc
3-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDIVI
Section 3
Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
. Food Waste (6.8%).
The results of the Spring 2004 sampling event are provided in Appendix C. The ~ost
abundant material (by weight) was Other Plastic; however, Other Paper and Leaves
and Other Yard Waste are within the sampling error. A detailed residential waste
composition by weight is shown in Figure 3-1.
3.2 Commercial
For the purposes of this report, commercial waste is defined as solid waste generated
by commercial businesses and multi-family residential buildings with more than
three units within Saline County and brought to the MSWLF. Samples were obtained
from vehicles serving commercial routes in the City of Salina and the townships of
Saline County.
Data from the spring sampling event indicated approximately 60 percent of the
commercial waste was comprised of the following waste categories as defined in
Appendix B:
. Other Paper (16.2%);
. Other Plastic (15.0%);
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper (9.7%);
. Food Waste (8.7%); and
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (7.7%).
The results of the Spring 2004 sampling event are provided in Appendix C. The most
abundant material by weight was Other Paper; however, Other Plastic is within the
sampling error. A detailed material distribution of this waste stream is provided in
Figure 3-2.
3.3 Combined ResidentiaVCommercial Waste Stream
To evaluate statistical changes in the landfilled materials, sampling results for the
residential and commercial waste streams were combined. These waste streams are
the largest by weight of the waste streams landfilled at the Salina MSWLF. In
addition, these streams were sorted manually during the sampling events, which are
considered to provide more accurate results than visual inspections used for the
industrial and construction/ demolition waste streams. Combining the waste streams
allows an evaluation of the majority of the waste with a more realistic statistical
evaluation than the total waste stream.
Data from the spring sampling event indicated approximately 60 percent of the
combined residential/ commercial waste was comprised of the following waste
categories as defined in Appendix B:
P:18558salinalwasle studylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSection 3.doc
3-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 3
Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
. Other Paper (14.2%);
. Other Plastic (13.9%);
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (10.6%)
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper (8.2%);
. Food Waste (7.6%); and
. Newsprint (6.2%).
The results of the Spring 2004 sampling event are provided in Appendix C. The most
abundant material by weight was Other Paper; however, Other Plastic is within the
sampling error. A detailed material distribution of this waste stream is provided in
Figure 3-3.
3.4 Industrial
Waste included in this waste stream is generated by industries and manufacturing
companies within Saline County and brought to the MSWLF. Samples deposited at
the active face, by vehicles serving industrial routes in the City of Salina and the
townships of Saline County, were visually inspected and the percent (by weight)
estimated for each category.
Based on the 2004 Salina landfill tipping records approximately 71 % of the industrial
waste stream originates from Tony's Pizza. Tony's Pizza waste contains mostly Food
Waste, Corrugated Cardboard, Other Paper, and Other Plastic.
Data from the spring sampling event indicated approximately 95.5 percent of the
industrial waste was comprised of the following waste categories as defined in
Appendix B:
. Other Paper (12.8%);
. Wood (15.4%);
. Other Plastic (14.1 %);
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper (19.5%); and
. Food Waste (33.7%).
The results of the Spring 2004 sampling event are provided in Appendix C. The most
abundant material by weight was Food Waste. A detailed material distribution of this
waste stream is provided in Figure 3-4.
P:18558salinalwaste sludyIPhase 2 revisedlSummery ReportlSec\ion 3.doc
3-3
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
PETE bottles
Clear HOPE bollles
Colored HOPE bollles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Unclassifiable fines
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Other recyclable metal
Balleries
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
CJl
CD
~
0'
:J
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
-"
.&.
-;
Ql
e-
m
en
f<o
'"Tl
cO'
c
CD
en
x
en
'"Tl
cO'
~
Electronics
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
Percentage (by Weight)
o
~
o
->.
o
~
o
->.
N
eft.
N
~
o
~
~
o
0> ex>
eft. eft.
Grass
Wood
Bricks
I
->.
~
~
o
I
I
I
I
I
:;0
(I)
tII
a:
(I)
::s
-
iir
I
I
:E
ll)
tII
-
0(1)
;:;:0
'< 0
2,3"
C/) "0 -.
ll) g CO
_ _. c
5- ~ @
ll)Ow
::o::S I
:::'lj"..Jo.
c/)'<
:E:E
1(1)
" -.
(Q
::l"
-
en
"C
:!.
::s
CO
I\J
o
o
.I:loo
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
PETE bottles
Clear HDPE bottles
Colored HDPE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Un classifiable fines
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Other recyclable metal
Batteries
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
(f)
CD
n.
0"
:J
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
....
I
.j:>.
-l
OJ
0-
m
'"
po
."
cO"
c
iil
'"
x
en
."
cO"
w
N
Electronics
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
Percentage (by Weight)
o
eft.
I\.)
-;:R.
o
.j:>.
eft.
0)
eft.
ex>
eft.
o
eft.
I\.)
eft.
.j:>.
eft.
0)
eft.
Grass
Wood
Bricks
ex>
eft.
:E
II)
(II
....
OCD
::;:0
'< 0
S,3
(/)'0
e!.g
5' a:
II) 0
:s::::J
(/)0"
:E'<
r-:E
"T1 !!!.
CO
:r
....
en
'0
~,
::J
CO
I\)
o
o
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
3
3
CD
.,
(')
iii'
I
I
I
"T1
c.Q'
r::
.,
CD
W
I
I\)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
__ In
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
PETE bottles
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Wood
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Unclassifiable fines
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Other recyclable metal
Batteries
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
(fJ
<1l Other inorganics/non-combustibles
$l-
0.
::J
--' HHW & special
./:.
--l Electronics
III
0-
m
VI Roofing material
I/O
"
cO. Poured concrete
c
ro
VI
x Bricks
iii
" Blocks
cO.
w
W Gypsum board and plaster
Percentage (by Weight)
o
;::R
o
->.
o
?fl.
N
;::R
o
N
?fl.
~
;::R
o
0>
;::R
o
())
;::R
o
~_._~
~
;::R
o
I
->.
0>
;::R
o
I
I
I
(")
o
3
C-
:::l
CD
C-
:;0
CD
!!!.
C-
CD
:::l
-
iii'
::::
(")
o
3
(")~
::t:'"
'< 0
o iii'
(;;:::!!
ll) ll) (Q
:: Ul !:;
~ CD CD
s(")Cf
(J)Ow
::~
1"'"0
-nUl
a:
o
:::l
C-
'<
::
CD
(Q
::r
-
en
'0
::!.
:::l
(Q
I\)
o
o
-1:00
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
nnJ
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Wood
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
PETE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
en
(1) Electronics
s:l.
o'
:J
..... Batteries
J,..
-i Unclassifiable fines
[U
c-
eo
CJl Roofing material
(/0
TI
to' Poured concrete
c
CD
CJl
x Bricks
Ul
TI Blocks
to'
w
J,.. Gypsum board and plaster
Percentage (by Weight)
N N
o C11
eft eft
c.v
o
:$!.
o
--"
o
eft
--"
C11
:$!.
o
o
:$!.
o
C11
:$!.
o
.
I: I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I
I
0 I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I : I I
I I
I I I
I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
0 I I
I I
I I
~ I I
I I
I
I
I
0 I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
c.v
C11
:$!.
o
:E
tIl
C1l
-
CD
Qo
-0
'< 3
S,-C
cng
e!.;::;:
:i' 0'
tIl ~
sC"
cn'<
:E:E
rCD
" cO'
::r
-
en
-c
~.
~
(Q
~
o
o
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
Co
e
C1l
-
..,
iii'
I
I
I
"
cO'
e
..,
CD
Co)
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 3
Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
Due to the nature of the waste, this material was not manually separated during the
sampling event. This data was obtained from visual characterizations of industrial
waste loads, and tipping records for the week of the sampling event.
3.5 Construction and Demolition
For the purposes of this report, the construction/ demolition waste stream is defined
as waste generated from construction/ demolition activities within Saline County and
brought to the MSWLF.
Data from the spring sampling event indicated approximately 75.6 percent of the
industrial waste was comprised of the following waste categories as defined in
Appendix B:
. Wood (39.7%);
. Roofing Material (19.1 %); and
. Gypsum board and plaster (16.8%).
The results of the Spring 2004 sampling event are provided in Appendix C. The most
abundant material by weight was Wood. A detailed material distribution of this
waste stream is provided in Figure 3-5.
Due to the bulky nature of the waste, this material was not manually separated
during the sampling event. Data was obtained from visual characterizations of the
waste, and tipping records for the week of the sampling event.
3.6 Total Landfilled Waste Composition
The material percentage compositions from the four landfilled waste streams as
determined by the Spring 2004 sampling event were applied to the total tonnages in
Table 3-1 (page 3-1) to estimate the total weighted composition of waste currently
being landfilled in the City of Salina MSWLF, as shown in Table 3-2
Combined data from the spring sampling event indicated approximately 64.2 percent
of the total waste stream was comprised of the following waste categories as defined
in Appendix B:
. Other Plastic (12.5 %)
. Other Paper (12.0%)
. Food Waste (14.3%)
. Corrugated Cardboard & Kraft Paper (9.9%)
. Wood (8.3%)
CONI 3-8
P:18558salinalwasle sludylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReporllSeclion 3.doc
I'
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 3
Spring 2004 Waste Composition Results
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (7.2%)
Figure 3-6 provides a more detailed breakdown of the combined waste stream by
material type and complete results are provided in Appendix C.
P:IB55Bsalinalwaste studylPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSection 3,doc
3-9
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
PETE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
en
<D
n-
o"
:J
Electronics
Batteries
-"
./:..
-;
OJ
0-
m
en
\10
"
<5"
c
ro
en
x
(jj
"
<5"
w
0,
Unclassifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
o
~
o
....>.
o
eft.
Percentage (by Weight)
N N eN
o C11 0
eft. eft. eft.
eN
C11
~
o
~
o
eft.
....>.
C11
~
o
C11
~
o
Wood
Grass
Bricks
~
C11
~
o
(")
o
::J
Ul
-
..,
s::
n
-
cr
::J
-
o
(I)
3
o
::+
0'
(")::J
::+:E
'< I>>
o Ul
....-"T1
C/) (I) -,
I>> (") c.c
= 0 ~
::J 3 (I)
I>> "0 eN
SO'
C/) ~, CJ1
:E!:!:
,0
"T1::J
C'"
'<
:E
(I)
cO'
:T
-
en
"tl
::::!,
::J
c.c
I\)
<<:)
<<:)
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3-2
Composition of Landfilled Waste Streams by Weight (Spring 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
Total Weighted
Industrial C/D Commercial Residential Composition
Mean Mean Mean Mean
Waste Category Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Mean Percentage
Corrugated & Kraft Paper 19.47% 3.41% 10.06% 6.9% 9.94%
Newsprint 0.00% 0.03% 5.53% 6.6% 4.22%
High-grade paper 0.27% 0.14% 2.65% 2.4% 1.82%
Mal!azines 0.00% 0.00% 1.82% 2.7% 1.57%
Other paper 14.83% 1.27% 14.09% 12.1% 12.00%
PEE bottles 0.15% 0.10% 1.51% 1.5% 1.07%
Clear HDPE bottles 0.63% 0.07% 0.56% 0.7% 0.57%
Colored HDPE bottles 0.00% 0.01% 0.75% 0.7% 0.50%
Other plastic 13.30% 1.54% 15.61% 12.7% 12.46%
Food waste 33.71% 0.01% 12.75% 10.1% 14.29%
Grass 0.00% 0.39% 1.86% 2.3% 1.47%
Leaves and other yard waste 0.05% 9.45% 4.14% 13.1% 7.24%
Wood 9.97% 35.32% 4.24% 2.3% 8.31%
Textiles, rubber, and leather 1.13% 2.64% 4.26% 4.8% 3.66%
Diapers sanitary 0.00% 0.00% 1.42% 3.3% 1.68%
Unclassifiable fines 0.00% 0.39% 2.24% 1.9% 1.48%
Other organics/combustibles 1.36% 1.24% 2.48% 4.2% 2.75%
Steel food & beverage containers 0.44% 1.35% 1.79% 2.0% 1.56%
Aluminum food & beverage containers 0.03% 0.09% 0.92% 0.8% 0.61%
Ferrous metal 2.85% 2.47% 2.44% 1.3% 2.12%
Nonrecycleable metal 0.07% 0.27% 0.12% 0.4% 0.21%
Other recyclable metal 0.69% 0.63% 0.42% 0.3% 0.46%
Batteries 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.1% 0.10%
Clear glass containers 0.00% 0.02% 1.07% 1.8% 1.00%
Brown glass containers 0.00% 0.00% 0.89% 0.6% 0.51%
Green/blue glass containers 0.00% 0.00% 0.07% 0.2% 0.11%
Other inorganics/non-combustibles 0.33% 0.62% 2.05% 1.5% 1.34%
HHW & special 0.11% 0.00% 0.41% 0.5% 0.34%
Electronics 0.16% 0.58% 0.74% 1.3% 0.83%
Roofing material 0.00% 23.33% 0.71% 0.3% 3.09%
Poured concrete 0.45% 2.39% 0.32% 0.2% 0.56%
Bricks 0.00% 0.95% 0.43% 0.0% 0.26%
Blocks 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.1% 0.03%
Gypsum board and plaster 0.00% 11.28% 1.44% 0.1% 1.85%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
CDIVI
Section 1.4 Tables & Figures.xls Table 3-2 Totals Spring 2004
~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
PEE bottles
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Un classifiable fines
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Other recyclable metal
Batteries
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
(f)
Cl>
n-
o'
:J
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
.....
./:..
-l
III
0-
m
VI
po
"
cO'
c
ro
VI
x
(j)
Electronics
Roofing material
Poured concrete
"
cO'
w
0:.
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
Percentage (by Weight)
o
~
o
N
~
o
.f:-
~
o
O"J
~
o
Grass
Wood
Bricks
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
co
~
o
-"
o
~
o
-"
N
~
o
-"
.f:-
~
o
I
O"J
~
o
I
,I
I
I
~
o
-
!E..
r
lU
~
Co
:!1
CD
Co
:E
lU
O!e.
;:;:CD
'<
o 0
.....O"T1
en 3 -.
lU1:IlQ
=O~
~ (I) CD
lU;:;:w
::::0 o' I
;::o~O')
en
~~
"T1:E
CD
lQ
::T
-
en
1:1
~.
~
lQ
t\,)
o
o
~
-
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,:::;:..
-....:.
-. '-~-""'''''''''"';:''-'""'~7",,~~~''
:" 'f~' '- ~\' .;'" I: - "
"
~.
,"~ ---' '"','~ .'.
.' ~. ~ ".-'
,,'
0,; "
~'~l' ;-
'. ;
. I -'-
i~~"r" ",
-. I:'
~ ,~j- --~;.
I~ . :
~ r '\ .
:0::,:
'4<'.
I' ..
,
I
':"'j' "
j ,_' '-I
: 'L~' ,~
.' }"";~t .
':r' ';'
'- ,,~.
" '.
..'I~:'.
,.'
-;~,",.'~: <:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
One of the objectives of the 2004 waste characterization study is to determine
statistically significant changes in the City of Salina MSWLF waste composition
between 1996/1997 and 2004. This section compares the waste composition results
from the City of Salina Waste Characterization Study Final Report dated August 1997 to
the spring 2004 waste composition results presented in Section 3.
4.1 Waste Categories
The waste categories for the Spring 2004 sampling event are described in the Work
Plan provided in Appendix B. The categories used in the 2004 study vary from the
categories used in the 1996-97 study. The 1996-97 categories were updated to better
represent solid waste categories that are typically recycled, may require future
tracking, or are otherwise important to evaluate. For example, Household Hazardous
and Special Waste and Electronics were added in the 2004 study as they have recently
been targeted for recycling nationwide. In some cases, the 1996-97 waste categories
were converted to the 2004 waste categories as shown in Table 4-1. For example, to
determine the quantity of Other Plastic in 1996-97, the 1996-97 results from the Other
Plastic Containers, Polyethylene Film, Polystyrene Foam, and Other Plastic categories
were combined.
Table 4-1
1996-97 to 2004 Waste Category Conversion Table
2004 Waste Category 1996-97 Waste Category Conversion
Other Plastic Other Plastic Containers + Polyethylene
Film + Polystyrene Foam + Other Plastic
Wood Clean Wood + Treated Lumber
Unclassifiable Fines % Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles Y:z Other
Non-Recyclable Metal Other Nonferrous Metal + Y:z Metal
. Other Recyclable Metal Aluminum Scrap + Y2 Metal
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles Other Glass + Y:z Fines + Y2 Other
Roofing Materials Roofing Materials + Asphalt (only in C/D
Samples)
P:\8558salina\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Sectlon 4.doc
4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
4.2 Landfilled Waste Composition Comparison
The waste stream results from Spring 2004 were compared by percentage by weight
to the Spring/Summer 1997 and Annual 1996-97 results. This comparison was used
to determine statistically significant differences in the waste streams. Upper and
lower 90 percent confidence limits provided a range for each category per sampling
event to account for variability of waste categories. If the three ranges
(Spring/Summer 1997, Annual 1996-97, and Spring 2004) of a particular category are
different (Le., do not overlap), the category of waste composition is considered to
have a significant difference. For example, in one residential waste sample, there may
be various types of construction debris, but this material is not in all residential
samples and therefore has a large confidence interval. A difference in the waste
stream was only considered statistically significant if the 90 percent confidence
intervals did not overlap.
4.2.1 Residential Waste Stream
The residential waste stream results from Spring/Summer 1997, Annual 1996-97, and
Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any statistically significant
differences in the residential waste stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Other Plastic;
. PET Bottles;
. High-Grade Paper;
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper;
. Food Waste;
. Unclassifiable Fines,
. Other Organics/Combustibles; and
. Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles.
Results of the residential waste steam comparisons are provided in Appendix D. A
detailed residential waste composition by weight is shown in Figure 4-1.
Other Plastic increased the most between the Spring/Summer 1997 and Annual 1996-
97 waste compositions and the Spring 2004 waste composition. Possible causes for
this difference could an increased use of Other Plastic in packaging. PET Bottles also
increased significantly, possibly caused by an increased use of PET bottles in
4-2
P:\8558salina\waste studv\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Sedion 4.doc
I
I
I
Figure 4-1
Residential Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I
25%
I
o Spring 1997
. 96-97 Annual Data
o Spring 2004
I
200/0 . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .. ..... - . . . . . . - . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . .
I
I
15%
I
-
-
.s::
Cl
'Qj
3:
>.
e
Ql
Cl
III
-
ai 10%
u
...
Ql
ll.
I
I
I
I
0%
(j; 1: (j; Ul (j; Ul ~ ~ ,~ Q) Ul Q) 'C (j; Ul Ul Ul Ul Q)
Q) Q) ti Ol ti a (j; Q) Q) (j;
a. .~ a. c: a. E Q) Q) t) c: a .s:: c: ;Q Ol
III III 'N III c: c: III III 'Q. III s: iii a. u: c: III
0- Ul 0- 0- a '(ij '(ij a:: s: s: III ti '(ij (j;
;: III m ,9- Q)
4:: Q) Q) Ol (j; 'E 'E (j; 'C U 'E ...J Q Q) ::) 'E >
III Z 'C III .s:: I- a a a ~ Q) :c .0 a Q)
~ ~ :2: w () () .s:: III III E (,) .0 ~
5 a Ul :c
q> 0- 5 u. Ul >- ai <;: a Q) ~ Q)
~ w w ~ (j; III 'w ~ Ol 'C ,E
0- 0- .0 Ul Ul
.s:: a III a III
'C ,21 Cl Cl Cl .s:: .0 a. III 'c (j; J2"E
Q) 5 ::) (3
iii :J: :J: :J: 0:: Ul c: III > a
Ol ro 'C -. Q ::l Ol Q) E (,)
2 Q) Ul vi 0 .0 ::)
Q) 0 Q) ~ ~ ,E
0 U '0 > x (j; 'C E
() III .s::
() Q) Q) 5 a ::)
...J I- .E <(
a;
Q)
en
5%
I
I
a; a; a; Ul ~ Ul ~ Ul a; Ul Ul Q) Ul (j; Ul
(jj (jj (jj Q) Q) (j; Q) Q) '13 (,) a; ~ ~ t) ~
~ ;Q 'c (,) (,)
:2: E E c: c: ,E Q) e .~ (,) ~ III a
iii '(ij '(ij III t) a. iii c: a:: a:i
Ul Q) Q) 'E 'E 'E ::) CI) '0 a
::) :c :c m a a a .0 'C Q) :2: () ~
e III III () () () E c: W Ol 'E
(j; (3 (3 Ul Ul Ul a III c:
i)' i)' 't s: <;: III
U. Ul Ul Ul a
III III III c: a
~ ~ (5 (5 (5 a :J: a m
(j; -E :J: 0:: E
c: .... c: c:
a Ul ::)
Z .s:: III ;: Q) (,) Ul
5 Q)
u a ~ 'c a.
00 Cl III >.
Ol Cl
0
,E
I
I
I
Notes:
1. Data from 1996-97 Adjusted to Correlate to 2004 Categories. Error Bars Indicate Upper and Lower 90% Confidence Interval.
2. Spring 1997 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by CDM from May 12 to May 16, 1997, provided in City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study Final Report, August 1997.
3. Spring 2004 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by CDM from May 17 to May 21, 2004, provided in City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring Summary Report, June 24, 2004. Draft.
(j;
.s::
5
I
CDM
Section 1-4 Tables & Figures.xls Fig 4-1
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
packagingand/ or an increased use of bottled water. High-Grade Paper increased
significantly in Spring 2004.
Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper in Spring 2004 was slightly below the
Spring/Summer 1997 composition, but significantly below the Annual 1996-97
composition. Food Waste decreased in the Spring 2004 waste stream from the Annual
1996-97 but was not significantly different from the Spring/Summer 1997. The
differences in Unclassifiable Fines, Other Organics/Combustibles; and Other
Inorganics/Non-Combustibles were likely due to the change in the categories used in
the Spring 2004 sampling event.
4.2.2 Commercial Waste Stream
The commercial waste stream results from Spring/Summer 1997, Annual 1996-97,
and Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any statistically significant
differences in the commercial waste stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper;
. Newsprint;
. Magazines;
. Other Paper;
. PET Bottles;
. Food Waste;
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste;
. Wood;
. Non-Recyclable Metals; and
. Other Inorganics / Non-Combustibles.
Results of the commercial waste steam comparisons are provided in Appendix D. A
detailed commercial waste composition by weight is shown in Figure 4-2.
Newsprint increased in Spring 2004, slightly greater than the Annual 1996-1997 and
significantly greater than the Spring/Summer 1997. Other Paper and Magazines
increased significantly in the Spring 2004 waste stream from the Annual 1996-97 but
only moderately from the Spring/Summer 1997; the difference may due to seasonal
4-4
P:\85S8salina\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Section 4.doc
I
I
Figure 4-2
Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I
I
25%
I
o Spring 1997
.96-97 Annual Data
o Spring 2004
I
200/0 - - - . . - - - - - - - - . . . - - - . - - - . . . - . - - . . . . - - - . - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - . - . . - . - - - - - - . . - . . - . . . . . - - . - - . - - - . - - - - - - - - - . . - . . - - - - . - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - . - - - . . - . . - . . - - - . . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - . -
E
::>
c:
"E
Notes: ~
1. Data from 1996-97 Adjusted to Correlate to 2004 Categories. Error Bars Indicate Upper and Lower 90% Confidence Interval.
2, Spring 1997 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by CDM from May 12 to May 16, 1997, provided in City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study Final Report, August 1997.
3. Spring 2004 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by CDM from May 17 to May 21,2004, provided in City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring Summary Report, June 24, 2004. Draft.
I
I
-
....
-E, 15%
'(jj
3:
>.
.c
-
CI)
C)
'"
....
I:
CI)
~ 10%
a.
I
I
I
I
5%
I
I
I
0%
lii 'E lii '" lii '" ~ '" () <1l '" <1l -0 lii ~ '" '" ~
<1l <1l lii ~ tl OJ tl a <1l <1l
0- .~ 0- c: 0- ~ <1l c: 3 ..c: <1l c: :0 <1l
III III "N III (5 c: c: III ~ "0. ~ ro 0- iL c:
ll... '" ll... ll... "m ~ 0:: III ~ "m
~ III CO "9- <1l
<l= <1l OJ lii 'E -.J Ci <1l ::> 'E
<1l c: lii -0 (} -e :0
~ Z -0 III ..c: I- a a a o/l <1l ..c a
:.:: III 2 5 w () () ..c: a '" III :0 III E ()
t? ll... 5 LL '" >- lii q:: a <1l
w W III "w
o/l ~ lii '" () OJ
..c: ll... ll... ..c a '" C3 III
-0 OJ Cl Cl <9 ..c: ..c III lii
<1l 5 ::> 0- (3 "c
ro I I I c::: '" III >
Ci c: OJ <1l
OJ ffi -0 vi :J 0 ..c
2 <1l <1l '"
0 (} 0 <1l ~ Q; o/l
0 > x -0
() III ..c:
() <1l <1l 5 a
-.J l- S
Qj
<1l
iil
'" ro ro ro '"
lii q; q; q; <1l
.....
c: 2 E E <1l
"m ::::
'E '" <1l <1l III
::> :0 :0 CO
a e
() III III
<1l lii (3 (3
LL >, ~
OJ ()
III ~ ~
Q; c: lii
>
<1l a ..c:
..c Z 5
o/l
-0
a
S
I
I
I
I
COM
~ '" ~ '" ro '" '" <1l '" '" lii
lii <1l () ro q; -'" -'"
<1l <1l :0 "0 "c () () tl
c: c: c: <1l e .~ l3 ..... a III
]9 ]9 'm ~ 0- ro c: co m 0::
c c: C ::> (/) U 2 a
a a a ..c -0 <1l () o/l
() () () E c: iiJ OJ -e
'" '" '" a III c:
'" '" '" '1 S q:: III
III III III c: a a
(5 (5 (5 a I a CO
c: I c::: E
ffi c: c: Cii ::>
<1l ~ <1l () '"
a <1l 'c 0-
(} 00 t5 III >,
OJ <9
0
.5
lii
..c:
5
Section 1-4 Tables & Figures.xls Fig 4-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
variations. PET Bottles increased significantly, caused by an increased use of this
material in packaging and the increased use of bottled water.
Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper, Food Waste, and Wood in the Spring 2004
waste stream was slightly below the Spring/Summer 1997 composition, but
significantly below the Annual 1996-97 composition; the change may be due to
seasonal variations. The difference in Leaves and Other Yard Wast~ is also likely due
to seasonal variations rather than a change in the waste stream. The differences in
Non-Recyclable Metals and Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles were likely due to
the change in the categories used in the Spring 2004 sampling event.
4.2.3 Combined ResidentiaVCommercial Waste Stream
The combined residential! commercial waste stream results from Spring/Summer
1997, Annual 1996-97, and Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any
statistically significant differences in the combined residential/ COnimercial waste
stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper;
. High-Grade Paper;
. Magazines;
. PET Bottles;
. Other Plastic;
. Food Waste;
.. Unclassifiable Fines;
. Other Organics/Combustibles; and
. Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles.
Results of the combined residential/ commercial waste steam comparisons are
provided in Appendix D. A detailed residential! commercial waste composition by
weight is shown in Figure 4-3.
Other Plastic increased the most between the Spring/Summer 1997 and Annual 1996-
97 waste compositions and the Spring 2004 waste composition. This increase is most
likely due to an increased use of Other Plastic in packaging. PET Bottles also
increased significantly, possibly caused by an increased use in packaging or an
increased use of bottled water. High-Grade Paper also increased significantly in
4-6
P:\B558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\Sectlon 4.doc
I
I
I
20%
I
I
Figure 4-3
Combined Residential/Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
o Spring 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
.96-97 Annual Data
o Spring 2004
150/0 - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - . - - - . - - - - - - - . - . - . . - - - - - - . - - - . . . . . - - - . . - . . - . - - - . - - . - - - . - - - . - - - - - - . . . - - . . . . . . . . . - - . . - . . - - - . - - - - - - . . . - - - - - . . - . . - .
0%
0; "E 0; '" 0; '" ~ '" .2 Q) '" Q) "0 0; Ul '" Ul ~ Q) iii iii iii '" '" ~ ~ '" iii '" Ul .l!! '" Ul 0;
Q) ~ 0; u; C) u; 0 0; Q) Q) Q) 0; Q) u ]i -'" -'"
a. .~ a. c: a. Q) u; c: ~ .c c: ;Q Q) C) Gi Gi Gi ~ Q) Q) ;e .0 .2 Q) .2 u u;
lU lU .N l'II (5 c: c: lU lU .0.. l'II m a. u: c: lU ::: E E c: c: c: Q) e 0; 0 Cii 0 l'II
0. '" 0. 0. .Iii .Iii 0: ;: ;: l'II u; .Iii 0; .Iii .Iii .Iii u; a. m
3: l'II al .8- Q) 0 m m c: 0:
<;:: Q) C) 0; "E "E ...J Q) ::;) "E > Ul Q) Q) "E "E "E ::;) en ti 0
Q) lU t- O; "0 C3 "0 :0 Q) ::;) :0 :0 al .0 ::: (,)
lU Z "0 0 0 0 <<; c6 Q) .0 0 e 0 0 0 "0 Q) c6
~ l!! ::: .c W (,) (,) .c lU E u .0 ~ l'II lU (,) (,) (,) E c: W
0 0. 0 0 Ul >- ai :0 I;::: c6 Q) 0; u u 0 lU C) "0
<;> W W U. '" lU .iii 0 Q) Ul '" Ul c: <<;
c6 lU 0; Ul ~ C) "0.5 u. >- ~ Ul '" Ul Y ;: I;:::
.c 0. 0. (5 .0 0 '" U lU o l'II U .!!! l'II .!!! c: 0 0
"0 .2> 0 0 .c .0 a. l'II .2 0; ~"E l\! ~ a 0 ::r: 0 al
Q) 0 ::;) u C9 C9 ~
m ::r: ::r: ::r: ~ Ul c: lU > 0 c: 0; c: ::r: E
0 e> Q) E u ... c: c: u;
C) <<; "0 ::l 0 l'II ::;)
2 Q) '" <Ii .0 ::;) Z .c Q) 3: Q) u '"
Q) 0 0 ~ .2
(; Q) ~ c6 .5 C3 0 a.
(; C3 > (jj Cii C9 l'II >-
(,) (5 l'II X .c "0 E C) C9
(,) Q) Q) 0 0 ::;) (;
...J t- oE <i: .5
Qj
Q)
Notes: Ci5
1. Data from 1996-97 Adjusted to Correlate to 2004 Categories. Error Bars Indicate Upper and Lower 90% Confidence Interval.
2. Spring 1997 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 12 to May 16, 1997, provided in City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study Final Report, August 1997.
3. Spring 2004 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 17 to May 21,2004, provided in City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring Summary Report, June 24, 2004 - Draft.
I
I
-
...
J::
Cl
'Q)
3:
>.
.0
-; 10%
Cl
l\:l
...
I:
Q)
o
...
Q)
a..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5%
0;
.c
o
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----
spring 2004. Magazines increased significantly between the Annual 1996-97 and
Spring 2004 waste streams but only moderately between the Spring/Summer 1997
and Spring 2004 waste streams; the difference may due to seasonal variations.
Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper decreased in the Spring 2004 waste stream.
The change may be due to some Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper recycling
being conducted in the area. Food waste decreased significantly between the Annual
1996-97 and Spring 2004 waste streams but only moderately between the
Spring/Summer 1997 and Spring 2004 waste streams; the difference may be due to
seasonal variations. The differences in Unclassifiable Fines, Other
Organics/Combustibles; and Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles were likely due to
the change in the categories used in the Spring 2004 sampling event.
4.2.4 Industrial Waste Stream
The industrial waste stream results from Spring/Summer 1997, Annual 1996-97, and
Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any statistically significant
differences in the industrial waste stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Other Paper;
. Ferrous Metal; and
. Other Inorganics / Non-Combustibles.
Results of the industrial waste steam comparisons are provided in Appendix D. A
detailed industrial waste composition by weight is shown in Figure 4-4.
The most significant difference in the Spring 2004 industrial waste composition was a
decrease in Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles. This decrease is likely due to the
fact that Phillips Lighting is no longer disposing of their glass waste at the landfill.
Other Paper and Ferrous Metal increased in Spring 2004.
4.2.5 ConstructionfDemolition Waste Stream
The construction/ demolition waste stream results from Spring/Summer 1997,
Annual 1996-97, and Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any
statistically significant differences in the construction/ demolition waste stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Wood;
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste; and
. Textiles, Rubber, and Leather.
-
~!'3.....z
o
-
CIl
III
enenc
""Ill
:!. :!. Er
c5 c5 :r
1\).....0
oco3
o CO.....
.1:>0..... CO
0. 0. CO
III III Q)
- - I
III III CO
C"C".....
III III )>
l{ll{la:
o.o.C
oo!!l
~ ~ ~
CIl CIl -
III III 0
~~O
III III ~
00'"
........CIl
,...,.....s;-
::r::r-
CIl CIl CIl
:E:Eo
III III I\)
III III 0
--0
CIl CIl .1:>0
(') (')
::r::rO
III III III
Cl Cl CD
(')(')cc
CDCD~
.., .., -.
N' N' lJ:
III III ,
- -
O' O' m
::::l ::::l ~
III III 0
- -..,
C C [0
0. 0. III
'<'<..,
(') (') III
o 0
::::l ::::l ::::l
0.0.0.
C C c:;'
(') (') III
CDeDCD
o.o.c
C" C" "
'<'<"
OOCll
CC'"
S:S:~
:r:ro.
o 0 r-
330
s:s:~
III III ..,
'< '< co
.......... 0
.....I\)~
- -
o 0
S:S:
III III
'<'<
I\) .....
~..... ~Q)
1\).....
oco
o co
~.I:>o ~.....
""
.., ..,
o 0
< <
0:0:
CIl CIl
0.0.
::::l ::::l
00
::;;:;:
'<'<
o 0
.... ....
en en
!!.!!.
5' 5'
III III
"en
III 2.
ill 0:
III ::E
III III
en III
2. CD
0:0
::E~
III ..,
III III
-(')
CIl -
O~
::r N'
III III
.., -
III o'
a ::::l
~. en
N -
III C
e.~
g :!!
~S
C -
0.;;0
'< CIl
en"
" 0
.., ;+
5' ">
cc C
encc
C C
3 !!l
3 .....
III co
~ ~
;;0'
CIl
"
o
,;:l-
f..
C
::::l
CIl
I\)
~.I:>o
I\)
o
o
.1:>0
o
o
::::l
....
0:
CIl
::::l
(')
CIl
:;-
-
CIl
<
!!.
c
..,
III
?1
-
-
-
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
PETE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage
containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
Unclassifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
-
o
~
o
-
-
c.n
~
o
.....
o
~
o
-
.....
c.n
~
o
I
, I
, I
, I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I , I
I I
I , I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I , I
I I
, I
I , I
. I I
, I
I I I I
I I I I .
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I . I , I I .
I . I . I I .
I I . I I .
I . I . I I .
I , I I I .
I . I I I .
I , I . I I ,
I . I I I .
I . I I I ,
I , I I I
I , I I I ,
I . I I I ,
I ,
I , I , I ,
-
-
-
Percentage (by Weight)
I\J
o
~
o
, I
, I
I
I
I
I
, I
, I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I
, I
, I
, I
Wood
I I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I\J
c.n
~
o
I ' I
I I
I I
I I
I ' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ' I
I ' I
I . I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I . I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
. I
. I
I '
I
I '
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
-
w w .j:>. .j:>. c.n
0 c.n 0 c.n 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0
I I I I I
I I I I I
I . I I I I
I I I . I I
I I I I
I I I I
I . I I I
I . I I , I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I I
I , I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I , I , I I
I I , I I
I I , I , I
I I , I I
I , I I I I
I I I , I . I
I I I , I . I
I I I . I I
I I I I I
I , I I I I
I , I I , I . I
I . I I . I I
I . I I . I I
I . I I I I
I , I I . I I
I . I I . I I
I . I I , I I
I . I I , I . I
I . I I I I
I . I I I I
I I I I I
I I . I I I I
. I I . I I I I
I . I I . I I . I I .
I I I . I . I I .
I . I I , I I
I I I . I I
I I I . I
I I I . I
I I I . I
I I I I .
I I I I
I I I I .
I I I I .
I I .
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
- - -
"- - --
I
I .
I ,
I
I
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I
I I
I I
I I ,
I I
I I
I I ,
I I .
I I .
I I
I I ,
I
, I
I
. I
I
. I
I , I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I .
I I I .
I . I I . I
I , I I .
I ,
I
I , I ,
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I , I
I . I
I , I
I I
I , I
I I
I , I
I , I
I I
I , I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I , I I , I
I , I I I
I I I I
I . I I , I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I , I
I I I
I I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I , I
I I I , I
I I I , I
I , I I
I . I I
I . I I
I . I , I
I . I , I
I I , I
I . I , I
I . I , I
I . I . I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I , I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I , I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I , I
I I . I
I I , I
I I I
I , I , I
I . I . I
I . I . I
I .
I '
I .
I .
I '
I '
I '
I '
I
I
I .
I '
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
I
I
I .
I
I .
I
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I '
I '
I '
I
I '
I '
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I ' I
I
I
I
I
I .
I .
I .
I
I
I '
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I '
I '
I '
I ' I
I '
I '
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I '
I '
I
I '
I '
I
I '
I
I
I
I '
I '
I
I
I '
I
I '
I '
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ' I
I . I
I
I
I '
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I
, I
I
I
, I
I
I
, I
I .
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I ' I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I ' I
I . I
I ' I
I I
I ' I
I ' I
I I
I I
I ' I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
, I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
, I
. I
I . I
. I
, I
. I
. I
, I
. I
. I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
I
I
, I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I ' I
I ' I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I
I
I .
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
, I . I
I I , I
I I . I I
I I . I I
, I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
, I I I I
I I I I
, I I I I
, I I I I
, I I I I
, I I I , I
. I I . I . I
. I I I I
. I I I , I
. I I , I I , I
. I I , I I . I
I
I
I
I
, I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
. I
I . I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I I
I ' I
I I
I ' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ' I
I I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I ' I
I . I
I . I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I '
I '
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I '
I '
I .
I .
I
I
I
I .
I
I
, I
, I
, I
, I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
, I
. I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
I
. I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I ' I
I
I '
I .
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I '
I '
I '
I '
I '
I '
I
I
I
I
I . I
, I
I
. I
, I
. I
I
. I
, I
I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I . I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I . I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I .
I .
I '
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I
I . I
I . I
I I
I ' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
I I
I . I
I .
, I
, I
I , I
I . I
I . I
I I
I I
I
, I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
I . I
I . I
I I
I , I
I . I
I , I
I , I
I . I
I I
I , I
I . I
0 . 0
en co en
"'0 0> "'0
~. I ..,
::::l co :3"
(Q -....J (Q
I\J )> .....
0 :J co
0 :J co
.j:>. C -....J
Q!..
0
Ql
Iii
-
.
::l
C.
C
en
-
::!.
D)
:E
D)
en
-
CI)
o
00
-3
'<"0
o 0
.....en"T1
(JJ;:;:
D) -. co
_Oc
S' ::l a
D)C"~
s: '< ·
(JJ:E~
:E ~.
.co
"T1~
-
~
to
to
0)
.
to
......
<
en
N
o
o
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
Results of the construction/ demolition waste steam comparisons are provided in
Appendix D. A detailed construction/ demolition waste composition by weight is
shown in Figure 4-5.
The most significant difference in the Spring 2004 construction/ demolition waste
composition was a decrease in Leaves and Other Yard Waste. This decrease is
attributed to the implementation of the current yard waste collection program in the
City of Salina. Wood increased significantly between the Spring/Summer 1997 and
the Spring 2004 waste streams but only moderately between the Annual 1996-97 and
Spring 2004 waste streams. Textiles, Rubber and Leather decreased significantly
between the Annual 1996-97 and Spring 2004 waste streams but moderately increased
between the Spring/Summer 1997 and Spring 2004 waste streams.
4.2.6 Total Landfilled Waste Stream
The totallandfilled waste stream results from Spring/Summer 1997, Annual 1996-97,
and Spring 2004 were compared to determine if there were any statistically significant
differences in the totallandfilled waste stream.
Data indicated that the following categories had statistically significant differences:
. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper;
. Newsprint;
. High-Grade Paper;
. PET Bottles;
. Clear HDPE Containers;
. Colored HDPE Containers;
. Other Plastic;
. Food Waste;
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste;
. Wood;
. Textiles, Rubber, and Leather;
. Diapers;
. Unc1assifiable Fines;
. Steel and Bimetal Food and Beverage Containers; and
4-10
P:\8558salina\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Sedion 4.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
. Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
. Other Inorganics / Non-Combustibles.
Results of the totallandfilled waste steam comparisons are provided in Appendix D.
A detailed totallandfilled waste composition by weight is shown in Figure 4-6.
There were several significant differences in the Spring 2004 totallandfilled waste
composition. Other Plastic increased significantly in Spring 2004, possibly due to an
increased use of Other Plastic in packaging. PET Bottles increased significantly,
possibly caused by an increased use in packaging or an increased use of bottled water.
Wood increased significantly in Spring 2004. Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper
increased significantly between the Spring/Summer 1997 and Spring 2004 waste
streams but only moderately between the Annual 1996-97 and Spring 2004 waste
streams. High-Grade Paper increased significantly in Spring 2004. Food Waste
increased significantly between the Annual 1996-97 and Spring 2004 waste streams
but only moderately between the Spring/Summer 1997 and Spring 2004 waste
streams; the difference may due to seasonal variations.
Newsprint decreased significantly in Spring 2004. Other Inorganics/Non-
Combustibles decreased significantly in spring 2004, possibly due to both the change
in categories and lack of Phillips Lighting disposal of glass waste at the landfill. Clear
and Colored HDPE Containers and Steel and Bimetal Food and Beverage Containers
decreased in Spring 2004, possibly due to changes in packaging. Leaves and Other
Yard Waste decreased significantly in 2004, possibly due to the yard waste collection
program. The difference in Unclassifiable Fines was likely due to the change in the
categories used in Spring 2004. The differences in Roofing Material and Gypsum
Board and Plaster are likely due to the high variability of these materials throughout
all waste loads.
4.3 Spring 2004 Waste Characterization Conclusions
The landfilled waste streams in Spring 2004 have several significant variations from
the Spring/Summer 1997 waste streams, which result in significant changes in the
totallandfilled waste composition. The Spring/Summer 1997 and Annual 1996-97
compositions were included in the discussion in Section 4; however, the
Spring/Summer 1997 to Spring 2004 comparison appears to be the most relevant due
to the seasonal differences in the waste streams. Based on the results provided in
Section 3 and Section 4, the following changes to the landfilled waste composition
were found:
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, PET Bottles, and Other Plastic in the residential
waste stream;
. An increase in Newsprint and PET Bottles in the commercial waste stream;
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, PET Bottles, and Other Plastic in the combined
residentialj commercial waste stream;
CDIVI 4-11
P:\8558salina\waste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\Section 4.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
CDM
-
.....
.c
Cl
'Qj
3:
>-
.c
-
Ql
Cl
ra
.....
s:::
Ql
o
...
Ql
a..
Figure 4-5
Construction/Demolition Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
75%
70%
--.... -- ----- -- ---.................................... -- -- -----...................... --.............. --............. --.................... -..-..-........................................................ --...... --.......... --........ ---
o Spring 1997
.96-97 Annual Data
o Spring 2004
65%
60% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . - - - - - - - - - . - - . - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . - - - . . . . - -
55% . - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - . - . - . . - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - . . - . . .
..-....... ---................ -..-......................................... --................. ---.................. --.. --.. --....-.......... ---.. --.............. ---........ --...............................
50% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - . . - - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - . . - . - - - - . - -
.................................... --....................................... --....... -----.... --......................... ---.... -............ -..-.. --.......... ----.. --...... ---...... --............-..
45%
40%
5%
ro
0&5
rn
E
Ol
c
<;::
o
o
0:::
2
~
()
c
o
()
"0
~
:l
o
a..
In
-'"
()
o
in
Cii
t)
<1l
Ci
"0
C
<1l
"0
ro
o
.c
E
:l
In
C.
>-
Cl
35%
30%
25%
20% ... - - - - . - . - . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15% ..... - . - - - . - . . . - . - - - - - - - - - - -
10% .... - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0%
Cii
C.
<1l
a..
~
e:
:.::
o/l
"0
<1>
rn
Ol
2
(;
o
....
c
.~
In
;:
<1>
Z
In
<1>
~
'0
.c
W
I-
W
a..
~
<1>
c
~
c
o
()
In
In
<1l
OJ
<1>
:l
;e
C
<1>
<1>
(5
In
<1>
:0
ti
:l
.c
E
o
y
c
o
c
u;
()
Oc
<1l
Ol
(;
o!::
In
()
Oc
e
u
<1>
iii
In
<1>
.~
~
co
In
<1>
C
<;::
<1>
:0
<1l
<;::
0(i5
In
<1l
C3
c
:J
In
-'"
()
~
Notes:
1,
2.
3.
E
:l
c
oE
:l
<(
Data from 1996-97 Adjusted to Correlate to 2004 Categories. Error Bars Indicate Upper and Lower 90% Confidence Interval.
Spring 1997 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 12 to May 16, 1997, provided in City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study Final Report, August 1997.
Spring 2004 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 17 to May 21, 2004, provided in City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring Summary Report, June 24, 2004 - Draft.
In
<1>
c
ON
<1l
Ol
<1l
:2
Cii
Co
<1l
Co
Cii
.c
o
Cii
Co
<1l
Co
<1>
"0
e:
C(>
.c
Ol
I
Cii
.c
ro
~
"0
C
<1l
i
.c
.c
2
vi
~
~
<1>
I-
In
<1>
~
.c
W
a..
o
I
ro
<1>
(3
()
+'
In
<1l
Ci
Cii
.c
o
<1>
t)
<1l
;:
"0
o
o
I.L.
<1>
t)
<1l
;:
"0
ro
>-
Cii
.c
'0
"0
C
<1l
In
<1>
>
<1l
<1>
--l
In
<1>
~
'0
.c
w
a..
o
I
"0
<1>
(;
(5
o
~
.l9
Oc
<1l
In
~
<1>
Co
<1l
is
"0
o
~
In
In
e:
Cl
In
<1>
:0
~
:l
.c
E
o
()
u;
()
Oc
<1l
Ol
(;
Cii
.c
o
In
Cii
c
19
c
o
()
<1>
Ol
e:
<1>
>
<1>
.c
o/l
"0
o
.Q
ro
(j)
E
<1>
:0
<1l
C3
>-
()
~
Cii
.c
o
ro
(j)
E
<1>
:0
<1l
<1>
C3
>-
()
~
c
o
Z
In
Cii
c
O(ij
c
8
In
In
<1l
OJ
ro
<1>
(3
In
Cii
c
O(ij
C
o
()
In
In
<1l
OJ
C
;:
o
O:i
Qi
<1>
i'i5
~
<1>
c
O(ij
C
o
()
<1>
Ol
<1l
Cii
>
<1>
.c
o/l
"0
o
.Q
ro
(j)
E
In
:l
e
Cii
I.L.
ro
013
<1>
Co
In
o/l
$:
I
I
Cii
.c
o
Section 1-4 Tables & Figures.xls Fig 4-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDM
20%
Figure 4-6
Total Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OSpring1997
.96-97 Annual Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o Spring 2004
15%
-
-
.l:
Cl
'Q)
3:
>-
e
10%
Ql
Cl
l'll
-
r::
Ql
CJ
...
Ql
a..
5%
0%
Qj c Qj t/l Qj t/l t/l t/l U Q) t/l Q) "'C Qj ~ t/l t/l
Q) Q) ~ ~ ti t/l ti 0 Q) Q)
a. .~ a. c: a. Q) ;: ~ 0 .s= .!!! c: ;Q
l'll l'll .N l'll ;: 0 0 l'll l'll l'll s: m .c l;:::
D... t/l a. a. 0 C. 3: " 3: ti
3: <II ..0 ..0 ..0 .J!! l'll Q)
<l:: Q) Q) 01 Qj W Qj "'C "'C t/l ::c ::>
l'll "'C <II W W 0 ro "'C ..0
~ Z <II :E .s= I- D... D... .s= 0 c: l!! l'll E
9> a Cl Cl a u. >- l'll Q) l;:::
w .iij 0
~ D... J: J: Qj Qj a. t/l ~
.s= l'll
.2> ro "'C .s= i:5 l'll t/l
"'C 0 ..0 "'0 u
Q) J: Q) ~ ..0 c: .c
m U 0 "'C ::> ::l l'll
....
01 "0 c: e'
2 u l'll <Ii
0 t/l ~ 0
Q) Qj
U > X
l'll Q) .s=
Q) I- a
...J
l!! Q)
Q) 01
c: l'll
.(ij Qj
c >
0 Q)
U ..0 l!!
Q) ~ Q)
01 "'C .5
l'll o l'll
Qj ~'E
> 0
Q) E u
..0 ::>
~ .5
"'C E
0 ::>
.E <(
a;
Q)
en
Iii Iii Iii t/l l!! l!! l!! t/l Iii t/l ~ Q) t/l t/l Qj
a; a; a; Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) .0 u a; .><: .><: ti
~ ;Q .c Qj u u
E E E c: c: c: Q) e 0 .;:: 0 l'll
.(ij .(ij .(ij ti a. m c: III iXi C.
t/l Q) Q) m c c C ::> t/l ti E 0
::> ::c ::c III 0 0 0 ..0 ~ Q) U "'C
e l'll l'll U U u E W 01 "'C c:
Q) "'0 s: c: l'll
Qj "'0 t/l t/l t/l 0 l;::: ~
u. >- t/l t/l t/l ? J: 0 ::> "E
[) U l'll l'll l'll J: 0
~ en en en c: 0 l'll
~ 0 0::: D... 0
Qj ro c: Q) c: ..0
c: --
0 .s= Q) 3: ::> t/l E
z a u e ;e u ::>
III c: .c t/l
l'll a.
Q) e' >-
Q) "
i5 0
.5
Qj
.s=
a
Notes:
1. Data from 1996-97 Adjusted to Correlate to 2004 Categories. Error Bars Indicate Upper and Lower 90% Confidence Interval.
2. Spring 1997 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 12 to May 16,1997, provided in City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study Final Report, August 1997.
3. Spring 2004 data based on results of the waste characterization study conducted by COM from May 17 to May 21, 2004, provided in City of Salina, Kansas Solid Waste Characterization Study Spring Summary Report, June 24, 2004 - Draft.
Section 1-4 Tables & Figures.xls Fig 4-6
1
I
1\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I,
I
I
I
I.
I
I
Section 4
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
. A decrease in Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper and Food Waste in the
combined residentialj commercial waste stream;
. An increase in Other Paper in the industrial waste stream;
. A decrease in Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles in the industrial waste stream;
. An increase in Wood in the construction/ demolition waste stream;
. A decrease in Leaves and Other Yard Waste in the construction/ demolition waste
stream;
. An increase in Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper, High-Grade Paper, PET
Bottles, Other Plastic, and Wood in the totallandfilled waste stream;
. A decrease in Newsprint, Clear HDPE Containers, Colored HDPE Containers,
Leaves and Other Yard Waste, Steel and Bimetal Food and Beverage Containers,
and Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles in the totallandfilled waste stream.
CONI 4-14
P:\6558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\Sectlon 4.doc
~'r'
.J'
,I
,,-'
, L, ,',
"
, _ I" _.. . ~.
,-r, ,
,:.[ r'
-. "
" ..------
r
I ':
'~I '
.L.~
'....;
[.
. '
." \
-,:...l"< ...
...[....
f',:" L--..
I,:,,' "
:.>c"
I ' :~;- '""'~-< ,~.' .,,~
, ~ '-. _l', )
, ,..-.~'
o
I"'"
I/._.:C~,
',",
.'- ;>,'
-~; .
'C
. f',',
,'-, :'T'-"
.<."' ~
,':.01'.
'. I
","C;;'.
.- - J ~
,_"....1.
,[
.L......'
.- . >~, - :r:.;',
':L~';:~'
( ,,- ~-"; .:. . ...._,~' ..:t
!-, ..'
i..:t;:
','
, .
I'
l..-.....' '......,
\ . -, .
. L.',
I '" ,
'. ~ J
!.r":
I.,:"L~',
I ,\ '~. >
,.
;',
l;-":
':t.
-.' '" '..
.;~ '
.;-, ,
'~
.,,'r,
....:".
-;. ~ "
,
.<
. -~ . -",
'.
:.,..
. ,-.... 'J
.~'" ,-'"> ~" ..
'-, \..:
',"
:,'
,"
','
~ . ~",,,j
'I,
.;
~ j. ;'y
"
'," -
'"j
-:':c
:,','
. ,.
~
","'.
. \-. .~,
. ,
'- ,<'I
.r'...
-'I.'
- I'-,:-~'
"
.'; ~.,.;-
..;-j- .
'I..
-;.
~ \,
'"")
:'~v ,
;;;"
'. ~ y:".
',", "
t.",
,~ ::- ~
" .
...., ,.
. -,~..: ~... ~ T.
"t, - : )
,J
0.,' -
" '.,~
;.
,,',
./'
.'
,~ /' . ,
.. :;;:,-~"-:~~ ~-~:"':!'!'t,,::,~~.
? ..
;><.
, - .-'!,
.... ~ 'J'
, -,"
, l},"
," ':.
.'i'J.
\.
~: "
,-:'
,\.~. '
',.
~- "-
,
s;
.'( "-
?~ , '~~ .
"
I,
~ ",
~,
, ,
'.,':'
,^
'c('." ."
. .' .- ~,
>=> ~ ,
j.;,
",
-.",.',.
. <
en
-, rtl
/")
....,
.....
0'
='
Ul,
.j,
::-'
,~'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
J)
Section 5
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Results
5.1 Introduction
The Annual 2004 waste composition was developed based on the results provided in
Section 4. The method used to calculate the Annual 2004 waste composition was
dependent on the difference between Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004 results.
For categories without significant differences, the estimated Annual 2004 waste
composition of each category was calculated by using weighted waste compositions
of the Spring 2004 and Annual 1996-97 compositions, as shown in Equation 1:
Estimated Annual 2004 :::;: fSpring 2004 (%)1 + fAnnua11996-97 (%)1 * 2
Waste Composition (%) 3 3 (Equation 1)
An equal weight was assigned to each season (spring, fall, and winter) to determine
the Annual 2004 Waste Composition. Because it is more representative of the current
waste stream, the Spring 2004 results were weighted more heavily. The weighted
composition assumes that the Spring 2004 composition accounts for approximately
1/3 of the yearly composition, while the Annual 1996-97 composition is used to
estimate the composition for the fall and winter seasons.
If a statistical difference was found or if a change in the waste category definition was
found to impact the Spring 2004 value for that waste category, the Spring 2004 results
were assumed to be representative of the Estimated Annual 2004 Waste Composition.
For example, Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper in the residential waste stream
accounted for 10.0 to 12.2% in the Annual 1996-97 waste stream and 5.9 to 8.3% in the
Spring 2004 waste stream. Because the ranges did not overlap, the difference was
considered significant, and the range defined in the Estimated Annual 2004 Waste
Composition is 5.9 to 8.3%.
Because derivation of the estimated waste composition percentages varied, the
estimated waste composition percentages were normalized. The Estimated Waste
Composition percentage was determined for each waste stream and then combined to
provide the Annual 2004 Total Landfilled Waste Composition as shown in Table 5-1.
5.2 Residential
For the purposes of this report, the residential waste stream is defined as solid waste
collected by City and private haulers from residential units and multi-family
residential buildings with up to three units within Saline County and disposed at the
Salina MSWLF.
The following categories had significant differences between the Annual 1996-97 and
Annual 2004 and therefore were not calculated using Equation 1: Corrugated & Kraft
5-1
a
P:\8558salina\waste study\Phasa 2 revised\Summary Report\Section 5.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
Table 5-1
Composition of 2004 Landfilled Waste Streams (by Weight)
City of Salina MSWLF
Construction/ Total Weighted
Industrial Demolition Commercial Residential Composition
Waste Category Mean Percentage Mean Percentage Mean Percentage Mean Percentage Mean Percentage
Food waste 33.71% 0.01% 12.75% 10.1% 14.29%
Other nlastic 13.30% 1.54% 15.61% 12.7% 12.46%
Other naner 14.83% 1.27% 14.09% 12.1% 12.00%
Corrugated & Kraft Paper 19.47% 3.41% 10.06% 6.9% 9.94%
Wood 9.97% 35.32% 4.24% 2.3% 8.31%
Leayes and other yard waste 0.05% 9.45% 4.14% 13.1% 7.24%
Newsprint 0.00% 0.03% 5.53% 6.6% 4.22%
Textiles, rubber, and leather \.13% 2.64% 4.26% 4.8% 3.66%
Roofine material 0.00% 23.33% 0.71% 0.3% 3.09%
Other oreanics/combustibles 1.36% 1.24% 2.48% 4.2% 2.75%
Ferrous metal 2.85% 2.47% 2.44% 1.3% 2.12%
Hieh-erade naner 0.27% 0.14% 2.65% 2.4% 1.82%
Gynsum board and nlaster 0.00% 11.28% 1.44% 0.1% 1.85%
Dianers sanitary 0.00% 0.00% 1.42% 3.3% 1.68%
Maeazines 0.00% 0.00% 1. 82% 2.7% 1.57%
Steel food & beyeraee containers 0.44% 1.35% 1.79% 2.0% 1.56%
Un classifiable fines 0.00% 0.39% 2.24% 1.9% 1.48%
Grass 0.00% 0.39% 1.86% 2.3% 1.47%
Other inorganics/non-combustibles 0.33% 0.62% 2.05% 1.5% 1.34%
PETE bottles 0.15% 0.10% 1.51% 1.5% 1.07%
Clear elass containers 0.00% 0.02% 1.07% 1.8% 1.00%
Electronics 0.16% 0.58% 0.74% 1.3% 0.83%
Aluminum food & beyeraee containers 0.03% 0.09% 0.92% 0.8% 0.61%
Clear HOPE bottles 0.63% 0.07% 0.56% 0.7% 0.57%
Poured concrete 0.45% 2.39% 0.32% 0.2% 0.56%
Brown elass containers 0.00% 0.00% 0.89% 0.6% 0.51%
Colored HOPE bottles 0.00% 0.01% 0.75% 0.7% 0.50%
Other recyclable metal 0.69% 0.63% 0.42% 0.3% 0.46%
HHW & special 0.11% 0.00% 0.41% 0.5% 0.34%
Bricks 0.00% 0.95% 0.43% 0.0% 0.26%
Nonrecycleable metal 0.07% 0.27% 0.12% 0.4% 0.21%
Green/blue elass containers 0.00% 0.00% 0.07% 0.2% 0.11%
Batteries 0.00% 0.00% 0.21% 0.1% 0.10%
Blocks 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.1% 0.03%
TOTAL 100.00% 100.00% 100% 100% 100%
COM
5-1 Totals Annual 2004 Sections 5-10 Tables & Figures B.xls
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 5
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Results
Paper; High-Grade Paper; PET Bottles; Other Plastic; Unclassifiable Fines; Other
Organics/Combustibles; Other Inorganic/Non-Combustibles; HHW and Special; and
Electronics.
Based on the calculated Annual 2004 Residential Waste Composition, approximately
61.5 percent of the waste was comprised of the following waste categories:
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (13.1 %)
. Other Plastic (12.7%)
. Other Paper (12.1 %)
. Food Waste (10.1 %)
. Corrugated & Kraft Paper (6.9%)
. Newsprint (6.6%)
A detailed comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004 residential waste
compositions by weight is shown in Figure 5-1.
5.3. Commercial
As stated in Section 3, for the purposes of this report commercial waste is defined as
solid waste generated by commercial businesses and multi-family residential
buildings with more than three units within Saline County and brought to the
MSWLF.
The following categories had significant differences between the Annual 1996-97 and
Annual 2004 and therefore were not calculated using Equation 1: Corrugated & Kraft
Paper; Newsprint; PET Bottles; Other Plastic; Unclassifiable Fines; Other
Organics/Combustibles; Non-Recyclable Metal; Other Recyclable Metal; Other
Inorganic/Non-Combustibles; HHW and Special; and Electronics.
Based on the calculated Annual 2004 Commercial Waste Composition, approximately
58.1 percent of the waste was comprised of the following waste categories:
. Other Plastic (15.6%)
. Other Paper (14.1 %)
. Food Waste (12.8%)
. Corrugated & Kraft Paper (10.1 %)
. Newsprint (5.5%)
CDI\II 5-3
P:\8556salina\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Section 5.doc
-
i
)>0
::l III
::l r+
s:: III
2!.:::::'
NO
03
0....
01:>0<0
c..<O
III O'l
r+ .
III <0
(') ......
III )>
-c..
(') .....
s:: s::
iii'!!L
r+CD
~c..
trr+
III 0
1II 0
CD 0
c..~
o CD
::l iii'
~CD
.., r+
3 0
s:: N
iii'g
"C 01:>0
a 0
< III
c:iD
CDCC
c..o
..,
:j' CD.
cn!'l
CD
(') m
r+ ..,
o. ..,
::l ~
~OJ
....Ill
..,
1II
::l
c..
,;,
III
r+
CD
c:
"C
"C
CD
..,
III
::l
c..
r
o
::E
CD
..,
<0
o
'#.
o
o
::l
-
c:
CD
::l
(')
CD
::l
r+
CD
<
2!.
CJl
CD
U
o'
:J
'"
'!:.
o
--i
Ql
e-
m
'"
l>>
."
<6'
c
m
'"
<II
x
in
."
<6'
'!:.
-
"'....z
o
r+
CD
1II
-
-
-
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HOPE Containers
Colored HOPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass Clippings
Leaves / Other Yard Waste
Textiles, Rubber, & Leather
Disposable Diapers
Un classifiable Fines
Other organic/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-recyclable metal
Other recyclable metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green Glass Containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW and Special
Electronics
Roofing Materials
Concrete
Bricks
Gypsum Board & Plaster
Blocks
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Percentage (by Weight)
o
:::R
o
N
:::R
o
Q)
:::R
o
.......
o
:::R
o
.......
N
:::R
o
~
:::R
o
00
:::R
o
Wood
-
.......
~
:::R
o
.
}>
:J
:J
s::
~
t\)
o
o
~
-
.
}>
:J
:J
s::
~
.......
co
co
Q)
I
co
......
-
-
-
.......
Q)
cF.
::c
CD
cn
c.
CD
::::s
!:!:
I>>
:E
I>>
en
-
CD
00
-.0
-<"3
0'0
......0"
C/) S!!. cO'
I>> !:!: s::
=0.,
::::s ::::s CD
1>>C"U'1
3:'< ~
~~
r- -.
"cg.
-
-
~
co
co
0)
I
co
.....,
<
en
N
o
o
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 5
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Results
A detailed comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004 commercial waste
compositions by weight is provided in Figure 5-2.
5.4 Industrial
Waste included in this waste stream is generated by industries and manufacturing
companies within Saline County and brought to the MSWLF.
The following categories had significant differences between the Annual 1996-97 and
Annual 2004 and therefore were not calculated using Equation 1: Other Paper; PET
Bottles; Clear HDPE; Unclassifiable Fines; Other Organics/Combustibles; Steel Food
and Beverage Containers; Aluminum Food and Beverage Containers; Non-Recyclable
Metal; Other Inorganic/Non-Combustibles; HHW and Special; and Electronics.
Based on the 2003-2004 landfilled quantities, approximately 71 % of the industrial
waste stream originates from Tony's Pizza. Approximately 91.3 percent of the waste
was comprised of the following waste categories:
. Corrugate & Kraft Paper (19.5%)
. Other Paper (14.8%)
. Wood (10.0%)
. Other Plastic (13.3%)
. Food Waste (33.7%)
Tony's Pizza waste contains mostly Food Waste, Corrugated & Kraft Paper, Other
Paper, and Other Plastic. One additional significant category identified in the
industrial waste stream was Wood. A detailed comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and
Annual 2004 industrial waste compositions by weight for the industrial waste stream
is provided in Figure 5-3.
5.5 Construction and Demolition
As stated in Section 3, the construction/ demolition waste stream is defined as waste
generated from construction/ demolition activities within Saline County and brought
to the MSWLF for the purposes of this report.
The following categories had significant differences between the Annual 1996-97 and
Annual 2004 and therefore were not calculated using Equation 1: PET Bottles; Clear
HDPE; Colored HDPE; Grass; Unclassifiable Fines; Other Organics/Combustibles;
Steel Food and Beverage Containers; Aluminum Food and Beverage Containers; Non-
Recyclable Metal; Clear Glass Containers; Other Inorganic/Non-Combustibles; HHW
and Special; and Electronics.
5-5
P:\8558salina\waste studY\Phas~ 2 revised\Summary Report\Section 5.doc
r-_
i
)>0
::l III
::l -
c: III
~=:o
NO
03
0.....
,I:lo.CO
0. CO
III 0)
- I
III co
n ......
III )>
-0.
n .....
c: c:
j;"!!l.
-CD
g,o.
-
0"0
~ (')
CD 0
o.~
o CD
::l j;"
C)'CD
.. -
3 0
c: N
j;"g
"C ,I:lo.
.. (')
o III
< -
is: CD
CDlC
0.0
..
::l iii'
cn!ll
CD
n m
- ..
O' ..
::l ~
~DJ
.....11I
..
1Il
::l
0.
C;'
III
-
CD
c:
"C
"C
CD
..
III
::l
0.
r
o
:E
CD
..
co
o
'#.
(')
o
::l
-
is:
CD
::l
n
CD
5'
-
CD
<
~
en
l1>
il
o.
::>
'"
~
o
-I
..
0-
m
'"
ll<>
"T1
cO.
c:
iil
'"
OJ
x
in
"T1
cO.
'f
'"
-
~.....z
o
-
CD
1Il
-
-
-
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass Clippings
Leaves / Other Yard Waste
Textiles, Rubber, & Leather
Disposable Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other organic/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-recyclable metal
Other recyclable metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green Glass Containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHWand Special
Electronics
Roofing Materials
Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board & Plaster
-
- -
o
~
o
N
~
o
.j:>.
~
o
Wood
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I . I
I . I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
I I
I . I
I I
I I
I . I
I I
I . I
I I
I . I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
, ,
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
-
1
. ,
1
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I .
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I 1
I . 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
1 . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I I
I . I
I . 1
I . I
I . 1
I . 1
I . I
I I
1 . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I I
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I I
I 1
I . I
I I
I I
1 I
1 I
1 . 1
1 I
1 I
1 I
, 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, . 1
1
I
. 1
I I
I . 1
1 I
1 I
1 . I
, . 1
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
, 1
I 1
I I
I I
I I
-
-
-
(j)
~
o
Percentage (by Weight)
N
~
o
1 1
I 1
I I
I 1
I 1
1 I
I 1
I 1
I . 1
I . 1
1 1
1 1
I I
1 1
I . 1
1 1
1 1
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
I I
I . I
I . I
I I
1 . I
1 . I
I I
1 I
1 I
I 1
, . 1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I j . I
I I
I 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
1 1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I . I
I 1
I 1
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I . 1
1 1
I I
I I
I I
1 . 1
(Xl
~
o
......
o
~
o
. ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
I I
1 I
1 I
I I
1 I
1 . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I . 1
I I
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
1 1
I I
I I
I
I
I .
I .
I
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I . 1
1 I
1 I
1 . I
I I
I . I
1 . 1
I . 1
. 1
I
I
I
I
I
. 1
. 1
. 1
I
I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
I .
. 1
I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
I . 1
I . 1
I I
I I
I . 1
I I
I I
1 1
1 I
I . I
I . I
I . 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I . I
1 1
1 I
1 I
1 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
I I
I . I
I 1
I 1
I 1
1 1
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
1 I
I 1
I 1
I I
I I
1 I
, . 1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I 1
I 1
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 . 1
1 . 1
1 1
1 I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 . 1
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
1 I
1 I
I I
1 I
1 . 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 I
I I
1 I
, . I
1 I
1 1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
. I
I . I
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
. 1
I
I
I
I
1
1
. 1
1
I
1
. I
-
- --
1
1 .
1
1
I
I .
I .
I
1 .
I .
1 .
1 .
I .
I
I
I
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
I .
1
I
I .
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I .
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
1 . ,
1 . 1
1 1
1 I
1 I
I I
I .
1
I
1 .
1
......
.j:>.
~
o
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
. I
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1 . 1
1 1
1 . 1
1 1
1 I
, 1
I I
I I
I I
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
I I
I . 1
1 1
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I 1
1 1
I I
I I
1 1
I I
I 1
I . I
I
1 .
I .
I .
I .
I .
I
1 .
1 .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I 1
I I
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 . 1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 I
I 1
I . 1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I I
I 1
1 1
I I
I I
1 I
1 I
1 1
I I
1 1
1 1
I I
I . I
1 . 1
1 . I
, . I
I 1
I 1
1 I
1 1
1 . 1
I I
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
1 1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
1 .
I
I
I .
I
1
I
I
I
......
(j)
~
o
......
(Xl
~
o
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I .
I
1 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
.
)>
::l
:J
c:
9:1..
N
o
o
.j:>.
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1 .
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1 . 1
1 1
1 . 1
1 . 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 . 1
I . I
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
1 1
I 1
I I
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
. 1
1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
. I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.
)>
:J
:J
C
9:1..
co
co
(j)
I
co
......
I
1
1 .
I
I
1
I
I
I .
1 .
I
I
I
I
I
1
I .
1
1
1
-
N
o
~
o
::E
D)
en
-
(I)
00
-. 0
0<3
0'0
....0
ClJen
D) ::0:
;- O'
D) ~
s:~
CIJ::E
::E(I)
r- -.
-nee
~
-
-
~
CO
CO
0')
I
CO
.....
<
en
N
o
o
.a::a.
-
-
-
o
o
3
3
(I)
..,
E.
D)
-n
cO'
t:
a
UI
I
N
-
-
-
-
-
i
~ .... z
0
)> c -
CD 0
~ III III ~
~ -
III 0
c:
!!!.. :;-
N 0
0 3 Corrugated & Kraft Paper
0 ....
,Il. (l)
a. (l)
III Ql
- I Newsprint
III (l)
" "'"
III )>
-a.
" .....
c: c: High-grade paper
-Ill
III _
-CD
~a.
C'" - Magazines
III 0
III (")
CD 0
a. ..,
..,
0 CD Other paper
~ iii
0- -
CD
.., -
3 0
c: N Wood
iii 0
0
"0 ,Il.
.., (")
0 Clear HOPE bottles
< III
-
is: CD
CDCC
a.o
-- :::::!. Colored HOPE bottles
~ CD
cn!'l
CD
" m
- .., PETE bottles
o. a
~ ..,
~ m
.... III
.., Other plastic
III
S-
a.
c:;" Food waste
III
-
CD
c::
"0
"0 Grass
CD
..,
III
~
a. Leaves and other yard waste
r-
0
==
CD
.., Textiles, rubber, and leather
(l)
0
'#.
(") Diapers sanitary
0
~
-
is:
CD Other organics/combustibles
~
"
CD
S-
- Steel food & beverage containers
CD
<
III
Aluminum food & beverage
containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
Unclassifiable fines
Roofing material
en
<l>
0
-,
0 Poured concrete
"
'"
~
0
-i
'" Bricks
0-
m
'"
ll<>
."
cO'
c: Blocks
OJ
'"
III
x
in
."
cO' Gypsum board and plaster
'f
'"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Percentage (by Weight)
CJ1
~
o
.....
o
?fl.
.....
CJ1
~
o
N
o
~
o
N
CJ1
~
o
-
w
o
~
o
-
-
VJ
CJ1
~
o
-
-
-
.j::>.
o
~
o
::::J
C.
C
I U'l
-
I ::J.
I
I D)
I
I :E
I
I D)
I U'l
I -
I CI)
I (")
I
I (") 0
I
I ~-5
I
I
I 0 0
I -t/I ."
I en ::;' cO.
I OJ o.
I C
I ::::J ~
I ::::J
I D) C"
I :s::'< (J1
I I
I en:E w
I
I :E ~.
I
I .ce
I .,,::T
I -
I -
I ~
I CD
I CD
I
I en
I I
I CD
I .......
I <
I
I U'l
I N
I 0
I
I 0
I ~
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. . I
)> )> I
:J :J
:J :J
C C
~ ~
N ....
0 r..o
0 to
~ 0)
I
r..o
-...I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
Section 5
Annual 2004 Waste Composition Results
Based on the calculated Annual 2004 Construction and Demolition Waste'
Composition, approximately 79A percent of the waste was comprised of the following
waste categories:
. Wood (35.3%)
. Roofing Material (23.3%)
. Gypsum Board and Plaster (11.3%)
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (9.5%)
A detailed comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004
construction/ demolition waste streams is shown in Figure 5-4.
5.6 Total Landfilled Waste Composition
The Annual 2004 material compositions from the four landfilled waste streams
(residential, commercial, industrial, and construction/ demolition) were combined to
estimate the composition of waste currently being landfilled. As stated in Section 3,
the weight percentages of the various waste streams are based on 2004 Salina landfill
tipping records. Each landfilled waste stream was weighted based on the tonnages in
Table 3-1 in Section 3 to provide the Annual 2004 Total Landfilled Waste
Composition as shown in Table 5-1.
The Annual 2004 Total Landfilled Waste Composition data shows that the most
abundant materials by weight percentage are:
. Food Waste (14.3%);
. Other Plastic (12.5%);
. Other Paper (12.0%);
. Corrugated Cardboard & Kraft Paper (9.9%);
. Wood (8.3%); ~nd
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (7.2%).
Figure 5-5 compares the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004 combined waste streams by
material type. Figure 5-6 displays the Annual 2004 waste material by weight.
5-8
P:\8558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revtsed\Summary Report\Section 5.doc
-
~
en
<D
~
o.
:J
V>
'!:
o
"""
ll>
cr
CD
V>
go
"
cO.
c:
Cil
V>
IJJ
X
'"
"
cO.
0>
....
-
~--'Z
o
-
CIl
III
)>0
;:] I>>
;:] -
s::: I>>
~:;-
NO
03
0--.
~CD
0. CD
I>> en
_ I
I>> CD
(') """
I>> )>
-0.
(') .....
s::: s:::
iii~
-CIl
~o.
0"-
I>> 0
III 0
CIl 0
o.~
o CIl
;:] iii
O'CD
.., -
3 0
s::: N
iiig
"C ~
~ ~
-. -
o.CIl
CIllO
0.0
..,
;:] m'
oo!"
CIl
(') m
-..,
O' ..,
;:] Q
~D:J
--.1>>
..,
III
;:]
0.
e;'
I>>
-
CIl
c:
"C
"C
CIl
..,
I>>
;:]
0.
r
o
:E
CIl
..,
CD
o
'#.
o
o
;:]
-
is:
CIl
;:]
(')
CIl
;:]
-
CIl
<
~
-
-
-
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
PETE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
Un classifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
-
o
~
'"
Wood
Grass
-
CJ1
~
'"
. I
. I
I I
I 1
l' 1
1'1
1'1
I I
1 I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
I I
I I
1 I
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
l' I
I I
I ,
I' ,
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
-
--.
o
~
'"
. I
. I
1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. 1
. I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I I
1 . I
1'1
1'1
, . I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I
I'
I'
I
1 .
I
1 .
I'
I'
, .
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I 1
I 1
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
. 1
. I
I
I
I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
. I
. I
1 I
1 I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
, . I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
I
I
. I
. I
I
I
I
I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
l' I
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I
I'
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
-"
CJ1
~
'"
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
l' 1
I I
1 I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
l' 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1 I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
I I
1 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
, . ,
l' I
1'1
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
, . ,
. I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
, . ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
, . ,
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
, . /
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I 1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1
. I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
-
J\.)
o
~
'"
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
l' I
I 1
I 1
I I
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
, . 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
l' I
1'1
/ . I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
, I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
I I
, J
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
I'
, .
, .
I'
I'
I'
, .
, .
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I' ,
I'
I'
,
I
, .
I'
I'
I'
I'
,
I
I'
I'
I'
, . ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
, .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
, .
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
1'1
1'1
1'1
/ . I
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I
I'
, .
I'
I'
, . I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
I I
1'1
I 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
, . I
1'1
l' 1
l' I
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
1 1
l' 1
, . 1
1'1
l' 1
l' I
I 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
, . ,
1'1
, I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
-
-
-
-
Percentage (by Weight)
J\.)
CJ1
~
'"
I
,
I
. I
. I
I
I
I
. ,
,
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
I' ,
. I
. I
. I
, .
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
, "
1'1
I I
1 ,
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
l' I
l' ,
1'1
1'1
, . 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. 1
. ,
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. 1
. I
. ,
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
I
I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. ,
. I
. I
. ,
. I
. 1
. I
. 1
. I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. ,
. I
I
I I
1'1
, . I
1'1
, . I
1'1
, . I
, . I
c.v
o
~
I ,
I 1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
, . I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
,
,
1
I I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
( ( ' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I 1
I I
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
. I
. I
. I
l' I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. ,
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
l' I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
, . I
, . I
, . I
I I
1 I
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I 1
I I
, I
, . I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
I 1
I I
l' I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
l' ,
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
I
I
I
. I
. I
. ,
. I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
l' ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
I' ,
1 1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' ,
l' I
1'1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
, .
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
l' 1
1'1
l' 1
1'1
, . ,
1'1
1'1
I'
I
I
I'
, .
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. ,
. ,
. I
. ,
. I
. I
. I
1'1
I I
, J
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
l' I
l' 1
I 1
1
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
c.v
CJ1
~
'"
I I I
I I I
I I I 1
I I I I
I I I 1
I I I
I I I
I , I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I J I
I I I
I I 1
I I'
I l'
I I
I I
, I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I'
I I'
I I'
I j',
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
1'1
1'1
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. ,
. I
. 1
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' ,
I 1
1 I
I I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I'
1'1
I 1
I I
I I
, . I
I I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
I
I
, . I
1'1
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I'
I'
I
1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
/ /
/ . I
1'1
1'1
/ . 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' /
1'1
1'1
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. /
. I
I
1
. I
~
o
~
'"
I
I
I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
, . I
1'1
I 1
I
/ .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I
,
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
I I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
1 I I
I I . I
I I . I
I I 1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I 1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1/ I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
/ . I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I
I
I
I'
I'
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
~
CJ1
~
I I I I
I I. I
I I. I
I I I
I I I
I I. I
I I I I
I I I
I 1 I
I I. I
I I. I
I I. I
I I. I
I I. I
I I I I
I I I 1
I " I
I " I
I I I I
I I. I
I I I I
I I I I
I I. I
I I. I
I I I 1
I I 1
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I. I
I I. t
I 1'1
I I I t
I 1'1
I 1'1
I 1'1
1 1 I I
I I. I
I I. I
I I. I
It. I
I 1.1
I ,. I
I 1'1
I 1'1
I 1'1
I I. I
1 1'1
I I I I
I I. I
I 1'1
I t I I
I 1'1
I 1'1
I 1 I I
I J I r
I I. I
I I I I
t I I I
I I I I
1 I. I
I I I I
I 1'1
I I I
I 1.1
I I I I
I t I I
I 1'1
I 1'1
I 1'1
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
t I I I
I 1'1
I I' t
t I I I
J I. I
I I. I
I I. I
I 1'1
I J. r
I 1'1
I I I I
I 1'1
I 1'1
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I t
I I I t
I I I
I I I
I 1'1
I 1'1
I I I t
I I I I
I I I J
fl'l
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
/' ,
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
1'1
I
I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
I
. I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I ,
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
CJ1
o
~
'"
1 .
I'
, . I
1'1
1'1
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I' ,
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
-
CJ1
CJ1
~
'"
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
, "
. I
. I
. I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
, ,
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
, . ,
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
I' ,
1'1
1'1 I
1'1
1'1
l' I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1'1
, . I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
, . /
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
/ . I
1'1
1'1
I 1
I 1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
l' I
1'1
/ I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
, . ,
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
/ . I
1'1
1'1
I'
I
I
I'
I
1 I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
I I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I
I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
, .
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I 1
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I' /
/ .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
1'1
1'1
1'1
-
0>
o
?fl.
0>
CJ1
~
'"
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
I I
I
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I
. I
.
.
1 .
I
,
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
,
I
I
I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
. I
. I
, ,
I
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
1
I 1
I I
1 I
I I
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I
I
1 .
I'
I
I
I'
, .
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
1 .
I'
I'
I'
I'
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I'
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
.
):>
::J
;:]
s:::
Q!.
J\.)
o
o
~
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
I I
, I
I I
I I
I J
I I
I I
I I
I I
l' I
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1'1
I I
I I
-
-....J
o
~
'"
I 1
I I
I I
1'1
I I
I I
I I
I I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
1'1
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
. I
I
I
I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
I
I
I
. I
. I
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
, ,
1'1
1'1
1'1
I 1
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
l' I
, . ,
.
, . 1
. I
. I
. I
. 1
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. 1
, . ,
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
. I
, . I
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
1'1
I I
I I
I I
1'1
l' I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
1'1
I' J
1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
1
.
):>
;:]
;:]
s:::
Q!.
-"
co
co
0>
I
co
-....J
I
I
I'
1
I
,
-
-
-
-....J
CJ1
~
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
o
o
::::J
t/l
-
..,
c
n
!:!:
o
::::J
-
C
(I)
3
o
-
;:;
O'
::s
o:E
~~
-
o (I)
~o:!!
e!.~cg
::s "C a
A) 0 CJ1
3: t/l ·
cn!:!:~
:Eg
IC'"
""'<
:E
(I)
cQ'
::r
-
-
.-
(0
(0
0)
.
(0
......
~
I\)
o
o
~
-
-
~
en
CD
~
,;-
::>
'"
':':
o
--i
'"
0-
m
'"
00
."
<0"
S;
g:
CD
X
"'
."
<0"
0>
in
-
~.J.Z
o
-
(I)
III
)>0
::::I III
::::I -
C III
III =r
NO
03
O.J.
~co
0. co
III en
- I
III co
n .....
III )>
-0.
n ......
c c
er~
-(I)
:g"o.
0"8'
III (")
(I) 0
o.~
o (I)
::::I iii
C)'CD
., -
3 0
C N
erg
"C ~
~ &>
-. -
0.(1)
(l)lQ
0.0
:j' ;.
(J)!'l
(I)
n m
- .,
o' .,
::::I Q
~C1J
.J.lll
.,
III
::::I
0.
(=;'
III
-
(I)
C
"C
"C
(I)
.,
III
::::I
0.
r
o
=E
(I)
.,
co
o
'#.
(")
o
::::I
....
c:
(I)
::::I
n
(I)
::::I
-
(I)
<
~
-
-
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
PETE bottles
Clear HOPE bottles
Colored HOPE bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Unclassifiable fines
Other organics/combustibles
Steel food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Other recyclable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
H HW & special
Electronics
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Gypsum board and plaster
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Percentage (by Weight)
o
:;g,
o
U1
:;g,
o
-"
o
;ft
Grass
Wood
Batteries
Bricks
Blocks
-
-
-"
U1
:;g,
o
-
.
:l>
::l
::l
C
Q!..
N
o
o
.j:>.,
-
.
:l>
::l
::l
C
Q!..
-'"
to
to
0)
I
to
~
-
-
-
'"
o
;ft
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
,
"
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
-f
o
-
s:u
:E
s:u
CIl
-
CD
o
o
03
-. "C
-0
'< CIl
o ;::;:
-It -. "T1
en 0 -.
s:u:::lCO
=C"~
:::I '< CD
S:U:!ECJ1
5:CD(;.
en -.
~cg.
.-
"T1~
CO
CO
0)
.
CO
......
<
CIl
t\)
Q
Q
.I:lo
-
~
z
o
r+
!I!
)>
::s
::s
s::
!!!..
~
o
o
~
C.
t\l
r+
t\l
o
t\l
0-
s::
OJ"
r+
CD
C.
C"
t\l
III
CD
C.
o
::s
.....
o
....
3
s::
OJ"
"0
a
<
is:
CD
c.
::s
en
CD
a
0"
::s
C1I
:.a.
(fl
'"
Q.
0"
:J
'"
'!:
o
-i
lU
0"
ro
'"
po
"T1
.0"
!:i
'"
'"
lJJ
x
<;;
"T1
.0"
m
0,
Food waste
Other plastic
Other paper
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Wood
Leaves and other yard waste
Newsprint
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Roofing material
Other organics/combustibles
Ferrous metal
High-grade paper
Gypsum board and plaster
Diapers sanitary
Magazines
Steel food & beverage containers
Unclassifiable fines
Grass
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
PETE bottles
Clear glass containers
Electronics
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Clear HOPE bottles
Poured concrete
Brown glass containers
Colored HOPE bottles
Other recyclable metal
HHW & special
Bricks
Nonrecycleable metal
Green/blue glass containers
Batteries
Blocks
Percentage (by Weight)
o
~
-" -"
C11 0 C11
?ft. -$. ift.
I
N
o
~
o
I
I
I
I
I
I\)
o
o
.1:::00
-t
o
-
(")e!.
;::;::lE
'< Q)
o Ul
.... (\)- "T1
CIJ -.
Q) (") (Q
-oS::
-. ..,
::::J 3 (\)
Q) '0 U1
SOl
ClJUlC>>
:lEa:
..0
"T1::::J
C"
'<
:lE
(\)
(Q
:r
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------l!::,j
[,
-;.;;
: .'~
....<t.
C"~
- _ r,
..i"}' ;....,
'...,'
:.( .
','
',.'>
."f~
'l
'-r'
. "
_- 1-
'c~
,.., . .~' I
"-"1 '.<.,1_
.( ..
~ -'"
'co
'.,
. +".
:c
, ~'- ,- .
" , -~
-.... .,'/
'.."C
- r
:.. [
',fA.
{ :~
r.....
,\:-
'"','.
. <;. ~
',." ,
t.: . '-
'. ".'
',".',-
'C '~
','
, ... ( - , -~
'"
. '- '" ~
',[' .~~
........; ,
;. \ ~
,..
",I'
" .
\c;- _
I,..">
,0
'. -. ..."
).,:,.-
,; "
',co
,".J
"'" -("
:C'
. '" _~. ',\,;", f
.:....\
J,' '
") ~
. -<
, ,\'
,;
.[
;;,"
-i", -,
-:'-
"-O:"r-
'. (r
., ',~" :;,
- ,"
'81i66
""', - . - ,.. .' , <. ~ - , " .....
",." .J) ....
'Six
,:0-' -"
~ -.. -';. .
\. ,'","
~.'[
~ .....'..
j'L'
," [
: " ",'
~')C ^
;,
i
i
:
I,
",
. -.~',
-',:
1._,1:
'-,'
'>',.
." ~
<:i'
--'('
"
'- f'
,,'
,,' ''>
10;:[','-
.. "
" .~.
oJ,',
, " ~~ . ~ - '-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 6
Conclusions
6.1 Summary of Activities
The goal of this study is to characterize the 2004 waste stream generated within Saline
County and landfilled at the Salina MSWLF. CDM developed a work plan for a one-
season waste composition study and conducted the study in Spring 2004. The results
were provided in an interim summary report dated June 2004. Comparing the results
of the Annual 1996-97, the Spring/Summer 1997, and the Spring 2004 waste studies,
CDM developed the Annual 2004 Waste Composition data.
This comprehensive report describes the field sampling event, provides the results of
the Spring 2004 waste study, compares the Annual 1996-97, the Spring/Summer 1997,
and the Spring 2004 waste studies, and provides the Annual 2004 Waste Composition
data.
6.2 Comparison of the Annual 1996-97 and Annual 2004
Waste Compositions
The landfilled waste streams in 2004 have several significant variations from the
. 1996/1997 waste streams, which result in significant changes in the totallandfilled
waste composition. The differences noted in the individual waste streams were
discussed in Section 4. Based on the results provided in Section 3 and Section 4, the
following changes to the Annual 2004 landfilled waste composition were found:
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, PET Bottles, and Other Plastic in the residential
waste stream;
. An increase in Newsprint and PET Bottles in the commercial waste stream;
. An increase in Other-Paper in the industrial waste stream;
. A decrease in Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles in the industrial waste stream
and the totallandfilled waste stream, which can be attributed to the removal of
Phillips Lighting's glass debris from the waste stream;
. An increase in High-Grade Paper, Food Waste and Wood in the totallandfilled
waste stream;
. An increase in PET Bottles in the totallandfilled waste stream, which is likely due
to the a national trend toward increased consumption of bottled water and
increased use of single serving containers;
. An increase in Other Plastic in the totallandfilled waste stream, which is likely
due to a national trend towards increased use of plastics in packaging;
CDIVI 6-1
P:\6556sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revised\Summary Report\Sectlon 6.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
CONI
. A decrease in Newsprint, Clear HDPE Containers, Colored HDPE Containers and
Steel and Bimetal Food and Beverage Containers in the totallandfilled waste
stream;
. A decrease in Leaves and Other Yard Waste in the totallandfilled waste stream,
which can be attributed to the implementation of a yard waste composting facility.
6.3 Annual 2004 Waste Characterization
As reported in Section 5, the Annual 2004 Total Landfilled Waste Composition data
shows that the most abundant materials by weight percentage are:
. Food Waste (14.3%);
. Other Plastic (12.5%);
. Other Paper (12.0%);
. Corrugated Cardboard & Kraft Paper (9.9%);
. Wood (8.3%); and
. Leaves and Other Yard Waste (7.2%).
According to the 2004 Salina tipping records, waste landfilled at the Salina MSWLF
can be categorized by source as shown in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1
Saline County Landfilled Waste Quantities by Souree1
Jan 1, 2004 through Dee 31, 2004
Type of Waste Tons %
City of Salina 14,810 21%
Saline County 37,377 53%
Other 8,463 12%
TOTAL 70,522 -
1. Data provided by the 2004 Salina MSWLF tipping records.
Based on analysis of the Annual 2004 Waste Composition data, the following results
were found and should be considered for recycling programs:
. Approximately 80% of the residential waste is from the City of Salina, and
approximately 20% is from Saline County;
. Tony's Pizza generates 71 % of the waste in the industrial waste stream;
6-2
P:\8558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Sectlon a.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONI
I
. Tony's Pizza's Food Waste comprises 6.5% of the total waste stream which is
slightly less than half of the total Food Waste generated in Saline County; and
. Yard Waste represents approximately 7.2% of the total waste stream, comprising
13.0% of the residential waste stream and approximately 9.5% of the
construction/ demolition waste stream.
, 6-3
P:\8558sallna\waste study\Phase 2 revlsed\Summary Report\Sectlon 6.doc
[
,[
r
r "
l-
r'
I '
L',
[
"
[
[
[
[
f""'\.
'U
"
C.
[,
[ ,
[
[
[,
,[
[,
",;
:,"
':--
~,
I .~<
'- ~ ~'
. ',.
;,' -
r ~ '.'
Section
Seven
. . .,. . . -' ~
'C"""''''''~'."'''''''''''''=''''"","J'''."" ;c:;._......~....-.. .-0.:0'...-'.' '.
"-..,......,..-.O_-,,~"~..'~..""'..,._\T''':'-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 7
References
CDM,1997. City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study, Final Report, Camp
Dresser & McKee, Inc., August 1997.
CDM, 2004. City of Salina Solid Waste Characterization Study, Spring Summary Report,
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., June 24, 2004.
CDI\II 7-1
P:\855Bsallnalwasle studyIPhase 2 revisedlSummary ReportlSection 7.doc
<,'0'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix A
Photographic Log
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #1
Date of Photograph: 5/19/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Private hauler tipping a load at the active face of the Salina MSWLF.
Photograph #2
Date of Photograph: 5/19/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Weighing of the Corrugated Cardboard and Kraft Paper.
P:\8558SALINA \ W ASIE SIUDy\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #3
Date of Photograph: 5/19/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
.;j J .",
,:.:::tU: f.J I
o @
J,t~ G \
Photograph Description: Collection of the waste for disposal after sample sorting was completed.
Photograph #4
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Collection of sample for sorting at the sorting table.
P:\8558SALlNA \ WASTE STUDy\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG. DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #5
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Sorting of waste sample into the 34 waste categories.
Photograph #6
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Collection of a sample at the active face of the Salina MSWLF.
P:\8558SALINA \ WASTE STUDY\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #7
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Sorting box used for sorting the waste samples into the 34 waste categories.
Photograph #8
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograp-h Description: CDM conducting a health and safety briefing for the sorting activities.
P:\8558SALINA \ WASTE STUDY\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #9
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Construction/ demolition load visually characterized at the active face of the Salina
MSWLF.
Photograph #10
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Hauler tipping at the Salina MSWLF active face.
P:\8558SALlNA \ WASTE STUDY\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #11
Date of Photograph: 5/20/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: ATony's Pizza load that was visually characterized at the active face of the Salina
MSWLF.
Photograph #12
Date of Photograph: 5/21/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Sorting of waste sample into the 34 waste categories.
P:\8558SALINA \ WASTE STUDY\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIELD PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph #13
Date of Photograph: 5/21/04
Photographed by: Chris Martel
Photograph Description: Tipping of a waste sample in the sorting area.
P:\8558SALlNA \ WASTE STUDy\SPRING EVENT\SUMMARY REPORT\PHOTO LOG.DOC
I
L
[
r'
i-
I ,
,[
I
[
[ ,
. ,,'
[
[
l .
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix B
Solid Waste Characterization Study
Sampling Event Work Plan
~[
c
c
-_. . -.- ._. ~ -
c
c
[
O~
C
,[
C
:L
'e
,[
[
l
-.. c .~.;
[. .
"
"J' :
, ,,:,
'."-;
'.,-,',
;.>
J.
,[;
1\'
,'~ \' "
-,:..,
-'5
,''',."
.).'
. , .
[" ....
. ~ ,- -~
\ .. -
;-\..' ,
.e.
" .i:" >'"
'-
.".....
"
"
:-'.~', .
,,','
.:'<:,'
.' I
1",
f,.:
'C":.'
. .
~.
,'.-'
(',' '
.~
",.,',
-,,-,
[.
(.
" , ,-\
.> .
';.,"
,-;
\.
..:..L-.....
. .' .
.,
",-I,
. "
, t
.1' ,(
.."",i' ....'
:'>~
"',_".t;':
c".,
." _; ',f
I.
, .
",,',
:0.'.
;("
;"C',
..
. ~ '<..:-
-\ '-,
. .,
L
""- .
'I'
.~
.[
,"co .-~. <,'
, . ,/
,e
y c'~'-} <'
.-,
,"
-[
)
,-,.r}
,:,1
"
. ~ '1:.
.C':,
"
J .~'.
, .':..~.
)' ~; ,
~.~ .
. "
<.'
"
.'<-..
i[
'. -
<'C"
:- :
'J'
} ~..,
.]0t")h.'~~.e.........~. /t:.d
.'. :~Y.I.,'cll..I.J. V
.c,
~ ,;.
'r"
", ,~
" -'.:,
.i
: ~:
'f~'
L..<
;: ,
,.' .'
,.,
"..:,..-
".-r:.
,'.
l~
;,,-
'--j
.',( '.'-.
.--;
,.'-
',.,
~-'-- "
,f- ~\
;":>'
.--t;.'
/". '.
,.,
,:'"
;:~[''-;
l.r
-L .'
" ,
, \.'
. . '
'. .
",~ '
~. . ..
;..,","
J,':/,
), I >,-,"1
~\
......
'i"
"'.I
,;' ,
h'
<,.f
',;
~ .'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION.. ........... .... ............... ....... ............................. ...... .......... ..... .......... ....... ...... 1-1
1.1 Purpose of Report................. ~.......................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Scope of Work ..... .................. ......... ..... ...................... ........... ........... ..... ..... ......... ............. 1-1
1.3 Report Structure............................................................................................................... 1-2
2.0 WASTE GENERATION AND COLLECTION PRACTICES....................................... 2-1
2.1 Waste Generation Rates. .... ..... ................. ............. .... ........ ....... ....... ....... .............. ............ 2-1
2.2 Waste Collection Practices ........................ ........ ... ...... ........ ......... ............ ....... .......... ....... 2-1
2.3 Sources To Be Sampled ...... ..... ............... ........ .............. ....... ................... ..... .................... 2-3
3.0 COMPOSITION SAMPLING EVENTS ..... .......... ...... ........ ........... .......... ............ ............. 3-1
3.1 De~ign of Sampling Program .......... ...................... ..... ...... ........ ..... ................... ...... .... ...... 3-1
3.2 Sampling Method. .................... .............. ....... ...... .................. ...... ............... ..... ................. 3-1
3.3 Accepting/Rejecting Samples ....................... ........... ............ ......... ....... ... ..... ........ ... ......... 3-4
3 .4 Waste Category Definitions ............... ..... .............. ........... ............ ............. ..... ...... ...... ...... 3-4
3.5 Safety .............................................................................................................................. . 3-6
4.0 FINDINGS PRESENTATION ...........................................................................................4-1
4.1 Data Analysis................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 Reporting....... .......... ....... ........ ....................... ......... ... .... ..... ....... ............ ..... ........ .............. 4-1
APPENDIX A - FIELD INFORMA nON FORMS
APPENDIX B - RELEASE FORMS
APPENDIX C - HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDM
Section 1
Introduction
The City of Salina is in the process of implementing a pilot curbside recycling
program within the City of Salina. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and
quantify statistically significant changes, if any, in the waste stream due to the
implementation of the curbside recycling program. In order to determine significant
changes in the waste stream, it is important to first update the estimates of the
quantity and composition of wastes that are being currently disposed of at the City of
Salina Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility (Salina MSWLF). The waste
composition was previously determined in 1997 and documented in the City of Salina
Waste Characterization Study Final Report dated August 1997. To assess the effects of
the curbside recycling program, the City of Salina has contracted with Camp Dresser
& McKee Inc. (CDM) to conduct a characterization study of the waste stream prior to
implementation of the pilot recycling program and after implementation of the pilot
recycling program. This work plan is a description of CDM's approach to conducting
the study.
1.1 Purpose of Report
The purpose of this waste characterization study is to provide data to the City of
Salina for use in the determining the effectiveness of a pilot program for curbside
recycling. The following data are required to accomplish these ends:
. waste composition by weight percentages prior to implementation of the pilot
curbside recycling program;
. waste composition by weight percentages after implementation of the pilot
curbside recycling program.
Examples of the use of this data include: determining what types of materials will be
targeted for source reduction and recycling efforts; and determining what impacts
these efforts :will have on the total waste stream. The data could also be used in
determining facility sizes and specific facility equipment needs such as sizes of balers
for a recycling facility, and size and financial impacts on the landfill resulting from
waste reduction and recycling programs.
1.2 Scope of Work
The following tasks will be conducted to achieve the goals of the study:
. Design of waste characterization program including identification of waste
collection and hauling companies utilizing the Salina MSWLF;
. Performance of two sampling events over two seasons (sampling refers to the
selection of specific samples of waste from within vehicles selected for
sampling: sorting refers to the separation of waste samples obtained from the
selected vehicles);
1-1
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section1.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Section 1
Introduction
. Visual characterization of bulky, landscape, construction/ demolition, and
industrial waste;
. Preparation of interim report of findings after the spring sampling event; and
. Preparation of final study report.
1.3 Report Structure
This document will discuss the following information:
.
Waste Generation and Collection Practices (Section 2)
.
Composition Sampling and Sorting Events (Section 3)
Findings Presentation (Section 4)
Field Information Forms (Appendix A)
Release Form (Appendix B)
.
.
.
.
Health & Safety Plan (Appendix C)
1-2
P:\8558salina\waste stooy\Work Plan\FinaI\Section1.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Section 2
Waste Generation and Collection Practices
2.1 Waste Generation Rates
Based on the information provided to CDM by the City, the quantity of waste from
Saline County being landfilled at the Salina MSWLF was determined. The Salina
MSWLF tipping records from Fiscal Year 2003 were used to develop this information.
A summary of Saline County waste quantities is provided in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1
Breakdown of Saline County LandfiIIed Waste Quantities by Material Type
January 1, 2003 through
Type of Waste December 31, 2003
Tons %
Residential 25,183.06 36.89%
Concrete 351.93 0.52%
Landscape 348.43 0.51%
Commercial 18,979.31 27.80%
Industrial 12,800.34 18.75%
Construction/ 6,966.32 10.21 %
Demolition
Medical 53.78 0.08%
Other Metal 139.70 0.20%
Agricultural 82.91 0.12%
Misc. Waste 3,354.86 4.91%
Total 68,260.64 100.00%
2.2 Waste Collection Practices
CDM's first task in determining the composition of Saline County waste landfilled at
the Salina MSWLF was determining the collection practices in the county. The
information collected included waste haulers, number of trucks, collection service
areas, and waste quantities landfilled per hauler. The list of haulers, routes, and
quantities landfilled were compiled from landfill records and CDM's discussion with
haulers (see Table 2-2).
2-1
P:\855Bsalina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section2.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
Section 2
Waste Generation and Collection Practices
Table 2-2
Saline County Hauling Companies
Phone Number of Landfilled
Hauler Number Trucks Collection Service Area Quantity
(Tons)
City of (785) 826-7395 10 Rear Residential - Salina 14,378
Salina Loaders (21.06% )
Salina 4 Rear Loaders Residential-Salina & Townships 36,026
Waste (785) 825-9155 3 Front Loaders Commercial-Salina & Townships (52.78)
Systems 3 Roll-Offs Industrial-Salina & Townships
Salina Iron (785) 826-9838 1 Front Loaders Commercial-Salina & Townships 3,479
& Metal 1 Roll-Offs Industrial-Salina & Townships (5.10% )
Peterson (785) 225-6704 1 Rear Loader Residential-Townships 343
Refuse Commercial-Salina (0.50% )
Gimenson 1 Rear Loaders Residential-Townships 389
------- Commercial-Townships (0.57% )
Harris & Residential-Salina & Townships
Son Trash 4,545
and (785) 823-3996 2 Rear Loader Commercial-Salina & Townships (6.66%)
Recycling 1 Roll-Off Industrial-Salina & Townships
The objective of the waste collection survey is to help assure CDM select samples that
represent the characteristics of the generators in the city and county. This is to assure
the waste chosen for sorting should not come from only one part of the county or
from only one waste stream. Therefore, the quantities of waste generated in the
county (residential, commercial etc.), and the collection routes of the haulers (both
public and private) must be established.
Based on discussions with the identified haulers, CDM determined the individual
companies' hauling routes and service areas as shown in Table 2-2 and depicted in
Figure 2-1. For the most part, Salina's residential waste is collected by the City of
Salina Department of Public Works (about 80%) and Salina Waste Systems (about
CDIII
2-2
P:\8558salina\waste study\Wort<. Plan\Final\Section2.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDtt
Section 2
Waste Generation and Collection Practices
20%), with a small percentage of the Salina residential waste collected by Harris &
Son Trash and Recycling. This is the extent of the City's waste hauling operations,
hauling only within Salina city limits and only from residential houses and apartment
buildings with 3 or fewer units.
The residential hauling routes for both the City's trucks and Salina Waste Systems are
the similar (as shown in Figure 2-1) in order to decrease confusion to customers with
separate pick up days.
Commercial and industrial waste collection throughout the county, as well as
residential waste outside the City of Salina, is performed solely by private hauling
companies. Salina Waste Systems and Salina Iron and Metal collect the majority of
the commercial stops in Salina, while Salina Waste Systems handles most of the
commercial and industrial collections throughout the county. Much of the waste
generated in the townships of Saline County (outside Salina) is collected by smaller
hauling companies.
Waste collected in the county is typically disposed at the Salina MSWLF. Any truck
that has mechanized tipping capabilities brings its waste directly to the active
disposal area at the landfill. Other trucks may dispose their refuse at one of four 30-
cubic yard containers in the convenience area located adjacent the scale house. This
area typically receives large quantities of landscaping and construction/ demolition
material.
2.3 Sources To Be Sampled
The source of the samples was determined based on the discussions with haulers and
the City of Salina. COM identified which collection routes will be sampled based on
the estimated waste quantities collected, type of waste collected (residential,
commercial, etc), and the collection route. However, we will maintain the flexibility
to adjust the sources based on field observations and discussions with haulers as the
material is delivered. As the trucks enter the city landfill, a solid waste professional
from COM will identify the trucks to be sampled as well as provide direction to the
scale operator. COM may interview the driver to confirm the source of the materials
in the truck. COM will then identify the sample within the delivered load and direct
staff to collect the material and initiate sampling: Each sample will be collected from
a randomly selected location in the load. The person who identifies the samples is
referred to in this protocol as the "sample collector."
The quantities and composition of other materials such as sludges and petroleum
products will be determined through interviews with haulers and generators. This
material cannot be sampled it is we assumed the material is delivered erratically, and
poses different health and safety issues.
Standard procedure for determining the number of samples to be collected during a
waste stream characterization study involves apportioning the total number of
2-3
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\FinaI\Section2.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDIII
Section 2
Waste Generation and Collection Practices
samples to be collected in the study to the waste stream portions by their respective
percentages of the whole. For example, if 100 samples were to be collected during a
study and the waste stream being sampled consisted of 70 percent residential waste
and 30 percent commercial and institutional waste, then 70 samples would be
collected from the residential waste stream and 30 samples would be collected from
the commercial and institutional portion. The number of samples required to provide
an accurate estimate for the study area is dependent on the size and characteristics of
the study area. For this study, 40 to 50 samples each are to be collected during each of
the two 5-day sorting events.
The annual weights of the various waste streams estimated in Section 2.1 from the
Salina MSWLF records were used to apportion the number of samples to be collected
in this study. Data showed approximately a 4 to 3 ratio (1.3:1) of residential to
commercial waste for Saline County. Therefore, CDM will sample 23 to 28 residential
and 17 to 22 commercial trucks during each of the sorting events. The city residential
samples will be taken primarily from City and Salina Waste trucks during all days of
the week so that all areas are sampled. Since there are small quantities of refuse being
generated in the townships, generally all township collection routes will be sampled.
Most of the commercial waste to be sampled will be from front and rear loading
collection vehicles which collect waste from multiple smaller commercial businesses.
The larger commercial customers using large capacity roll-off containers will typically
not be sampled so that the results will not be skewed from one load. However, these
loads will be visually examined during tipping on the landfill in order to determine
an approximate volume percentage of materials. This visual estimation procedure
will also be done for industrial and construction/ demolition (C/D) loads, which are
most commonly from Tony's Pizza (typically unmanageable food waste).
2-4
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section2.doc
I
I
I
I
10
c
I~
I
Ii
.0
I
I~
v
;,j.
I~
o
"-
lfl
10
I~
<I:
Z
I~
1/
>-
Cl
~
I~
~
/
I~
Iii
I
-I
COM
-
-
Glendale
~
~ I,l
GLENOALE
l~ersan - Wednesday
I"
r ,
~I
~
~j
I ,
I ..,
'-' f
I--
lJ
r----
Spr.i.!l9 Cr eek
'\
)
J
L
~
(
BRO~ILL~ l
IPetersa1 t Thursday)
I ~
5V-.
,... -- - - - ~~.- - -.... ..... -
,
,
HE~ ,
,
, Resldentla, - Frlc y-..
JISallna Wast - Th rsday) ,
,
.
,
, JI
1
J
f
I Ohi
\
,.
~
Ir::~
I~~~RI
!Selina Wa,ste I-
I/V I~
r
\ Washill9'
-m)
n
=-- r I ;/
T \
-y
L
-
~ *~
ISall ' s e - Fr day)
Falun
"-
l I
u.. r
I I I ~
-
!
III es dentLaL =---Wed esd
eSlCle~ - ues a
hursda )
.. "",:",._~.
-
CIT'Y OF S~L1NA
LANDF~ Sr alan
~,Y ~prrN
$q~ISl-~~ an-=...f; Iday'
-
SmOky View
,
i EN 0
i IS, Ilna W ste I
, ~anda II
~
- _.. ~ ..
!
\ rBR)pGE~~
~t~I~;~~;:)t~ !
, I
r ,CambrIa
Sollna Wa~te - WednesClay)
-
~ -
r ~
1 ,-
i
I
I
Day tan j .
, (
I--
i,NEW tA BRIA ~ I I
-, allf'la ast!. i I
1- Monday)
--.:! (
I ~f- I -
.-
L
I Sola an
Residential Thursd y ,
'- esldentla - Man ay
II
Walnu
j
II I
I
, I
" '
l
l.ibe 1'1
I
- -
()rn y
~
~
GlmenS~ dneSdC1y)
I
Eure~..
I~
)
f-
-
L.
) ~eM I
ISoLlna Wa'te - F Iday)
-
\
~
!
( J
I
-
\ Gyps
~
-
-
-
-~
- I I -
I ,
\
"'
f-
r
~
~
LEGEND
~ MONDAY ROUTES
~ TUESDAY ROUTES
~ WEDNESDAY ROUTES
~ THURSDAY ROUTES
~ FRIDAY ROUTES
NOTE:
HAULING ROUTE AREAS
ARE APPROXIMATE
Rgure No. 2-1
RESIDENTIAl & COMMERCiAl COLLECTION ROUTES
SAliNE COUNTY HAULERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
/
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
3.1 Design of Sampling Program
Waste characterization field work will be performed over two periods: May 2004 and
November 2004, corresponding to prior to and after implementation of the city's pilot
recycling program. The length of each sort will be five days, Monday through Friday.
Field work will not be scheduled for any period that includes a day on which waste is
not collected because of a holiday or other special event.
Sampling and sorting, if possible, will be conducted in the maintenance building of
the Salina MSWLF, as it is preferable to have a paved or other controlled surface.
The selection of the specific solid waste samples is based on the random sampling of
pre-determined loads from selected collection routes (see Section 2.3 for a discussion
of vehicle route selection procedures). Although materials disposed of in the landfill's
convenience area will not be sorted, CDM will periodically monitor these containers
throughout the sampling events as part of the visual estimation of bulky materials.
All loads entering the Salina MSWLF will be surveyed by use of a standardized check
sheet (see "Gate Form" in Appendix A) ""hich is to be completed by the scale house
employee or CDM sample collector.
3.2 Sampling Method
This section describes the following steps required to characterize waste through
sampling and sorting:
. Selection of trucks to sample
. Collection of samples from the selected trucks
. Sorting the samples
. Weighing the sorted waste and recording the results
'1
3.2.1 Selection of Trucks to Sample
The field work will be performed from May 17 through May 21, 2004 and during one
week in November at the Salina MSWLF. Table 2-1 shows the ratio of residential and
commercial samples based on the Saline County landfilled quantities. Section 2.3
discussed the targeted ratio of sources to be sampled.
The CDM sampling coordinator will maintain communication with Salina MSWLF
personnel during the sorting event. Trucks carrying residential and commercial
waste (or a mixture) will be identified and, where possible, the area where the waste
was collected will be identified.
3-1
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section3.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
mill
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
3.2.2 Collection of Samples from the Selected Trucks
A single grab sample will be collected from a single location in each selected load of
waste, immediately after each selected truck dumps its load at the landfill tipping
area. A front-end loader will collect the samples from the landfill tipping area and
deposit them next to the sorting area. The CDM sampling coordinator will help the
front-end loader operator learn what a sample of approximately 200 pounds to 250
pounds looks like (approximately a 4-foot by4-foot by 2-foot load).
Samples collected by large front-end loaders tend to be too large. If a sample
deposited next to the sorting area appears excessively large, CDM personnel will
remove material from the far side of the sample until the remaining pile appears to
weigh approximately 250 pounds. The remaining pile will be the sample for purposes
of this study.
3.2.3 Sorting the Samples
Sorting will be conducted in the maintenance building of Salina MSWLF. The sorting
operation will proceed as follows:
. The CDM sampling coordinator/supervisor will fill out a data form which will
include the sample number, the date, the area where the sample was collected, the
time of arrival of the sampled truck, and whether the sampled load was residential
or commercial. The data form is shown in Appendix A.
. The sample will be unloaded from the front-end loader bucket onto the
maintenance building floor next to the sorting area.
. Prior to manually sorting waste or transferring waste to a sorting table, the waste
should be spread apart in the area it is deposited. Visual observation of the waste
prior to manually sorting is critical to worker safety. The potential for cuts, scrapes,
and puncture wounds exists if workers grab armloads of waste or stick hands
deeply into waste. All unopened bags of waste will be opened using care not to be
cut or scraped. Bags will be broken open using shovels or similar long handled
tools or by puncturing an area of the bag where waste is not located. The sample
should be transferred to the sorting table using a shovel and further spread out
using hand-held tools to allow a visual observation of its contents.
. Large items (e.g., corrugated cardboard, wood) and bags containing a single waste
category (most often yard waste) will be removed from the sample and set aside for
weighing, bypassing the sorting box.
. The remainder of the sample will be transferred by increments into the sorting box,
using broad-bladed shovels to transfer loose material.
. Each sample of waste will be sorted by hand into 34 categories (listed in Section
3.4)
3-2
P:\855Bsalina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section3.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
. The waste will be sorted into the containers surrounding the sorting box. The
sorting supervisor will check the containers periodically for accuracy of sorting.
. The containers should remain as free from extraneous debris such as mud, ice, and
snow as possible to avoid changes in the tare weight. It may be necessary to
periodically clean the containers.
. Regularly, the sort supervisors will check the containers into which waste is being
sorted to ensure that the sorting is being performed properly.
. Sorting will continue until only a few pounds of the smallest pieces from the
sample remain on the screen. Care will be taken to sort small pieces of broken glass
and ceramic into their appropriate categories.
. If a significant number of ferrous metal items such as bottle caps remain on the
screen, they will be removed by passing a large magnet back and forth just above
the screen~
. Because food waste is by far the messiest of the sample categories, the sorting team
will use the same container for food waste during the entire study. As food residue
builds upon these containers, the tare weight used in calculating the net weight of
the food waste will be adjusted.
3.2.4 Weighing the Sorted Waste and Recording the Results
After each sample is sorted, the sorted waste will be weighed and the results recorded
as follows.
. The containers will be brought to the scale, checked for accuracy of sorting, and
weighed.
. The weight of the waste in each container will be recorded in the appropriate space
on the data form.
. Comments on the characteristics of the material may need to be recorded following
visual analysis.
. The containers will be dumped back on the floor of the maintenance building for
disposal by the facility operator.
Six City of Salina workers will perform most of the sorting. Three CDM personnel
will work with the sorters to help improve the sorters' technique and understanding
of the waste categories.
When sorting and collection of the fines are complete, the sorters will bring the
containers to the weighing area. As each container is placed on the scale, the sort
supervisor will look into the container to see which category of waste is in the
3-3
P:\8558salina\waste study\WOrk Plan\FinaI\SectionJ.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDII
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
container and to check for items that do not belong to that category. CDM will use
sorting containers with individual tare weights that vary no more than 2 percent from
their average tare weight. It will therefore be unnecessary to use the individual tare
weights. If the sorted waste in a container weighs very little in proportion to the
container, the waste will be removed from the container and weighed loose. If the
material in the container is satisfactory, the sort supervisor will read the gross weight
of the container and contents and record it in the appropriate spot on the "Data Form
for Waste Samples" (see Appendix A) supplied for that sample by the sample
collector.
At the end of each day of field work, CDM will remove the completed data forms
from the site and store them in a safe place. CDM will make copies of the data forms
as soon as possible. After completing the field work, CDM will transfer the
information from the data forms into computer spreadsheets (Microsoft Excel). The
original data forms will be retained as a permanent record of the field activity.
3.3 AcceptinglRejecting Samples
The supervisor will have the responsibility for accepting or rejecting loads for sorting.
Reasons for rejecting loads include, but are not limited to, the following:
. Unidentifiable contents,
. Hazardous waste or materials posing a safety hazard,
. Hospital waste, and
. Materials soaked in a liquid other than rain OTwater.
If such a load is identified, it will be reported to the facility manager for removal from
the sampling area.
3.4 Waste Category Definitions
This section defines the 34 waste categories to be used in the study. The results of the
study should not be interpreted without reference to these category definitions.
Definitions of the waste categories used in the current study follow.
3.4.1 Paper
Corrugated cardboard and kraft paper. Cardboard with a rippled inner layer that creates
small tube-like passages through the cardboard. Includes waxed corrugated
cardboard and corrugated cardboard with a glossy outer layer. Also includes kraft
paper, a heavy brown paper of the type used to construct corrugated cardboard
(primarily grocery bags).
Newsprint. Anything printed on the type of paper generally used for newspapers,
including advertising inserts printed on newsprint.
3-4
P:\855Bsalina\waste.study\WOrK Plan\FinaJ\Section3.doc
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CDM
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
High Grade paper. White and colored uncoated bond paper and computer printout
paper including photocopy/printer paper and ledger paper. Includes canceled
checks. Does not include envelopes with plastic windows, carbon paper~ or paper
used in multi copy carbonless forms (sometimes called "NCR forms").
Magazines and other glossy paper. Magazines, catalogs and books with glossy pages
and soft covers, and similar high-grade glossy paper.
Other paper. All paper that does not fit any of the paper categories defined above.
3.4.2 Plastic
Clear HDPE (high density polyethylene) containers. Translucent plastic milk, water and
juice containers, and certain personal hygiene products.
Colored HDPE (high density polyethylene) containers. Pigmented (white or colored)
HDPE containers for beverages, cleaning products such as detergents, cleaning
products, and certain personal hygiene products. Does not include 5-gallon buckets.
PETE (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles and jars. Clear and green plastic carbonated
soft drink bottles, plus plastic bottles and jars identifiable as PETE based on labeling
or a mold-mark in the center of the bottom of the container. Does not include "beer
balls." Weight includes food residue on the surface of the containers (containers are
emptied prior to weighing, but not washed out).
Other plastic. All plastic other than PETE bottles and jars and HDPE bottles and jugs
as defined above. Includes plastic clothing such as unlined vinyl raincoats.
3.4.3 Yard Waste
Grass clippings. Clippings from mowing lawns and fields.
Leaves and other yard waste. Leaves, shrub and garden trimmings, uprooted plants and
shrubs, weeds, grasses pulled up with the roots, pine needles and cones, tree branches
and twigs, vegetative ground litter, and dirt that cannot readily be separated from the
plant material. Also includes indoor plants and cut flowers.
3.4.4 Other Combustible/Organic Materials
Wood. Most forms of wood not included in the definition of 11 other yard waste"
above. Includes wood that has been processed for use in a structure or manufactured
product, plus wood waste generated during wood processing or woodworking.
Includes both lumber and reconstituted wood such as plywood, particle board,
composition board, and chip board. Includes packing crates and pallets. Also
includes sawdust, wood shavings, cork and wicker.
Food waste. All items produced or gathered for use as food, including the inedible
portions. Includes bones and shells if interspersed with other food waste. In practice,
3-5
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\FinaI\Sedion3.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
mM
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
some food waste becomes part of the fines category. Food waste includes coffee
grounds, but a substantial portion of coffee grounds are found in the fines category.
Does not include cooking oils when discarded separately.
Textiles, rubber and leather. All clothing and fabrics. Includes rugs and carpeting,
drapes, towels, and bedding. Natural and synthetic rubber and leather, plus some
materials that are technically plastics but are have rubber-like characteristics and are
commonly thought of as rubber, such as polyurethane foam. This category includes
most shoes.
Disposable diapers and sanitary products. Infant and adult disposable diapers, sanitary
absorbent pads, and tampons.
Other organics/combustibles. Organic/combustible materials not included in any other
category, including soap, ceiling tile, and charcoal. Includes animal feces not mixed
with cat litter. Also includes composite objects with substantial combustible/ organic
components, such as mattresses and box springs, roofing shingles, tar paper, vinyl
flooring, automotive air filters and filters used in heating and air-conditioning
systems.
3.4.5 Metal
Aluminum food and beverage containers. Food and beverage cans made entirely of
aluminum. Includes most soda and beer cans as well as aluminum pet food cans.
Does not include aluminum aerosol spray cans or bimetal (aluminum and steel) cans.
Steel and bimetal food and beverage containers. Food and beverage containers with steel
sides, including those commonly called"tin cans." Includes detached tops if made of
steel. Also includes cans with steel sides and attached aluminum tops, such as some
soda cans. Weight includes food residue on the surface of the cans (cans are emptied
prior to weighing, but not washed out).
Ferrous metal. All iron based objects other than tin-steel and bimetal cans as defined
above. Includes steel trash cans, steel furniture, wire hangers, the steel parts of
electrical and electronic devices, and a large number of other items. Includes paint
cans, steel aerosol spray cans, and the type of can in which paint thinner is typically
sold.
Other recyclable metal. Metal not included in the definitions of "aluminum food and
beverage containers" and "steel and bimetal food and beverage containers" above, or
the definition of "batteries" below, for which a substantial and reliable recycling
market exists. Generally includes any significant object consisting of aluminum,
brass, or copper, but usually not a mixture of these metals. Includes many steel and
aluminum cans not included in the metal container categories above or the
"household hazardous and special waste" category below. Includes metal most
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section3.doc
3-6
I
I,
'I
I,
I
I
,I
I
I
I,
I
I:
I
I
I
I
I:
I
I
COM
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
cookware, aluminum catering trays, clean aluminum foil, and clean aluminum oven
pans.
Nonrecyclable metal. All metal not included in the four metal categories above or in the
"batteries" or "household hazardous and special waste" below. Includes significantly
contaminated aluminum foil and oven pans. Includes many items that are composites
of different metals such as electric motors, lawn mowers, and bicycles.
3.4.6 Other Noncombustiblejlnorganic Materials
Clear glass containers. Glass containers with no color or tint in the glass. Includes caps
left on empty containers by the consumer. Weight includes food residue on the
surface of the glass (containers are emptied prior to weighing, but not washed out).
Does not include ceramics, drinking glasses, glass plates, cooking utensils, ash trays,
decorative glass containers, vases, perfume bottles, or containers for cosmetic
products.
Brown glass containers. Glass containers with brown or amber color or tint in the glass,
however faint. Includes caps left on empty containers by the consumer. Weight
. includes food residue on the surface of the glass (containers are emptied prior to
weighing, but not washed out). Does not include ceramics, drinking glasses, glass
plates, cooking utensils, ash trays, decorative glass containers, vases, perfume bottles,
or containers for cosmetic products.
Greenjblue glass containers. Glass containers with a blue, green or emerald color or tint
in the glass, however faint. Includes caps left on empty containers by the consumer.
Weight includes food residue on the surface of the glass. (containers are emptied prior
to weighing, but not washed out). Does not include ceramics, drinking glasses, glass
plates, cooking utensils, ash trays, decorative glass containers, vases, perfume bottles,
or containers for cosmetic products.
Other inorganicsjnoncombustibles. Inorganic/noncombustible materials not included in
any of the categories above, or in "batteries" or "household hazardous and special
waste" below. Includes fiberglass insulation, flat glass, cat litter and associated
materials, light bulbs, ceramics, dirt, ash, sand, stones, and gravel.
3.4.7 Miscellaneous
Household hazardous and special waste. Materials that are toxic and/ or require special
handling, and are not included in any other category such as "batteries" or
"electronics" below. InCludes toxic liquids and powders and their containers. Also
includes tires and asbestos shingles. Does not include metal objects containing lead,
which are included in "other recyclable metal" above. Materials in this category will
be catalogued by type (lubricating oils, pesticides, flammable aerosols, etc.).
Electronics. All objects containing a circuit board of significant size relative to the size
of the object.
P:\855Bsalina\waste study\Work Plan\Finaf\Section3.doc
3-7
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
,I:
'I
I
I,
I
I
I,
I
CDI
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
Batteries. All batteries, catalogued by type (alkaline/carbon-zinc, nickel-cadmium,
sealed lead-acid, lead-acid vehicle, etc.).
Unclassifiable fines. Materials that pass through the half-inch mesh screen on the
bottom of the sorting box, plus items that do not pass through the screen but are too
small to sort efficiently. The largest components of the material that passes through
the screen are dust and dirt, small bits of food (including coffee grounds), and cat
litter. The principal components of the fine material that does not pass through the
screen are broken glass and small pieces of food and "other paper." When possible
based on examination of the fines, they are allocated among other categories such as
"other inorganics/noncombustibles," "food waste," and "other paper."
Roofing materials. All roof covering materials that do not fall within one of the other
categories. Includes asphalt roofing shingles and roofing felt (often called tar paper).
Also includes plywood and any kind of composition board if coated with tar for use
as a roof covering.
Poured concrete. All concrete except concrete blocks.
Bricks. Bricks and associated mortar.
Blocks. Concrete blocks, cinder blocks, cement blocks, and associated mortar.
Gypsum board and plaster. Includes loose plaster and gypsum based wallboard
commonly referred to by the trade names" sheetrock" or "drywall."
3.5 Safety
The approved CDM Solid Waste Characterization Health and Safety Plan (see
Appendix C) will be followed during the solid waste sampling and sorting event. A
copy of the plan should be carefully reviewed by all participants prior to beginning
any sampling and sorting activities. The plan should be reviewed with the landfill
supervisor for coordination of safety procedures on-site. All personnel not employed
by CDM will be sign the release form provided in Appendix B.
A training session will be conducted before initiating fieldwork. The session will
stress the procedures discussed in this report as well as the requirements set forth in
the Solid Waste Characterization Health and Safety Plan. The field staff will follow
the safety procedures during the waste composition sampling.
The sorting crew will, at a minimum, consist of a supervisor from CDM who is
experienced in sorting and two assistant sorters. The supervisor will record data,
instruct sorters on material identification, and discuss sample selection methods with
operators and haulers.
The supervisor will distribute gloves, safety goggles, and dust masks to each crew
member. Any other personal safety equipment will be supplied by others. The
3-8
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Final\Section3.doc
I
~I
~I
I,
'I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
,I
I,
I
I
I
I
COM
Section 3
Composition Sampling Events
supervisor will be responsible for ensuring that all safety equipment as described in
the Solid Waste Characterization Health and Safety Plan is at the site and that the Plan
is followed.
3-9
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\FinaI\Section3.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
,I
I.
I
I
I
mil
Section 4
Findings Presentation
4.1 Data Analysis
The weight data collected for each material in each sample are used to calculate
percentages of the materials by weight in relation to the total weight of each sample.
The percentage data for each material in each sample will be used to calculate mean
material percentages in relation to the respective waste streams being sampled
For the spring sampling event composition data set the mean will be developed for
each material category. The standard deviation from the sample mean and 90-percent
confidence intervals will also be calculated for each material category. The standard
deviation from the sample mean for each material type will be calculated to assess the
variability of the samples. A higher standard deviation value indicates greater
variation in the data.
The 90-percent confidence interval for the percentage of each material in the waste
stream is calculated to provide a range of percentages for each material that could be
expected to contain the actual mean percentage of the material during the sampling
event with a 90-percent statistical probability. The confidence interval is assumed to
be accurate in the absence of sampling and sorting errors and with the assumption
. that the results for the individual samples are normally distributed. This assumption
of normal distribution is not completely accurate but is generally reasonable for most
waste categories.
It can be expected that material categories with the largest confidence intervals in
proportion to their percentage in the samples are categories such as high-grade paper
and other landscape waste, which are generally concentrated in a relatively small
number of samples. Conversely, waste categories with the smallest confidence
intervals in proportion to their percentage in the samples are categories such as other
paper and food waste, which are generally found in significant quantities in nearly all
samples.
The results of the spring sampling event will be compared to the results of the spring
sampling event conducted in 1997. This comparison will then be used to identify the
statistically significant differences in the waste streams of 1997 and 2004. A new
annual waste stream composition for the Salina MSWLF will be developed based on
the differences in the spring waste sampling events. In addition to the new annual
waste stream composition, the spring sampling results will be used to identify the
statistically significant effects of the pilot curbside recycling program.
4.2 Reporting
The results of the first sampling event will be presented in an Interim Solid Waste
Characterization Study Report which will be submitted after completion of the May
2004 field sampling event. A summary of both sampling events will be presented in
4-1
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\Finar\Section4.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I"
"
I,
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
Section 4
Findings Presentation
the Final Solid Waste Characterization Study Report which will be submitted
following completion of the November 2004 sampling event.
CDUI
4-2
P:\8558salina\waste study\Work Plan\FinaI\Section4.doc
I:
L~
-~[
C
G
L~
"
C'
[
. ,
'C.
0-'
''',!,'
'.o<~
[
[,
.c'
.c.
.C
.,<.'..
[~
r
L~
"
t",
['
<~ - ,;;
[
" '0..
.\-,
~.
,r'-
.~
- )
r
;i'
r
,',{
, I~ _~"
/
-,
~. "','
".
(
,_J,'
.i
'.7,:- ,
-{
," ,-;:.
,.
,-,
- ' ~.
:,1
.0
Append
c-
}:
~' ".
, .
'. ~)
.7 r.
'"f._.,
) \.
t.
,v;
. f~
.,
APPENDIX A - FIELD INFORMATION FORMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Salina MSWLF Waste Composition Data Form
,
Sample #: Date: Time: I Weather:
Source: Hauler: Vehicle: Sector:
Corrug. & kraft Newsprint High-Grade paper Magazines Other paper Wood
Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total:
Clear HOPE Colored HOPE PETE bottles Other plastic Food waste Grass Leaves and other
bottles bottles yard waste
Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total:
Textiles, rubber & Diapers/sanitary Other organics/ Steel f&b Alum. f&b Ferrous metal Other recyclable
leather combustibles containers containers metal
Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total:
Nonrecyclable Clear Glass Brown Glass Grean/Blue Other inorganics/ HHW & special Electronics
metal containers containers Glass containers noncombustibles
Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total:
Batteries Unclassifiable Roofing Materials Poured Concrete Bricks Blocks Gypsum Board
Fines and Plaster
Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total: Total:
Notes
Total weight
of sample
I Date:
I Hauler:
I o City of Salina
Type of Vehicle:
I o Rear Loader
Landfill Routing:
I Tonnage:
I Hauling Location:
o Salina (City)
I .~ ! ,1
GATE FORM
Time:
AM / PM
o Salina Waste
o Recycle It
o Refuse & Recycle 0 Other
o Front Loader
o Roll-Off
o Pick Up
o Semi
o Landfill
ODrop Off Boxes
tons
I 0 Assaria
o Hedville
o Township (Check all below)
o Out of County
o Bavaria
o Bridgeport
o Brookville
o Falun 0 Glendale
o Gypsum
o Kipp 0 Mentor
o New Cambria
o Smolan
o Other
I Type of Waste (Check all that apply):
o Residential
o Commercial
o Industrial
o Landscape
o Other
I 0 Construction/Demolition (Describe)
I Hauler:
I o City of Salina
Type of Vehicle:
I o Rear Loader
Landfill Routing:
I Tonnage:
I Hauling Location:
o Salina (City)
o Salina Waste
o Recycle It
o Refuse & Recycle 0 Other
o Front Loader
o Roll-Off
o Pick Up
o Semi
o Landfill
o Drop Off Boxes
tons
I 0 Assaria
o Hedville
o Township (Check all below)
o Out of County
o Bavaria
o Bridgeport
o Brookville
o Falun 0 Glendale
o Gypsum
o Kipp 0 Mentor
o New Cambria
o Smolan
o Other
I Type of Waste (Check all that apply):
o Residential
o Commercial
o Industrial
o Landscape
o Other
I 0 Construction/Demolition (Describe)
I
I GA TEFORMWPD
APPENDIX B - RELEASE FORMS
',~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RELEASE FORM
I, , hereby release and hold harmless Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
(CDM) and its officers, directors, employees, subcontractors, and consultants from any and all claims,
causes of action, or liability associated with the work that I am undertaking on behalf of the CITY OF
SALINA.
Print Name
Signature
Date
RELEASE.WPD
APPENDIX C - HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
; i
''''..'"
.l , ,.'~ ..','
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
FIELD SAMPLING
SOLID WASTE CHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
EMERGENCY CONTACT: Chris Marlowe
(732) 225-7042 ext 332
(732) 313-5593 (24 Hour)
Raritan Plaza One
Edison, NJ 08818
(732) 225-7000
1. A copy of this Health and Safety Plan must be kept on site during the entire sampling event.
2. All Field Sampling staff must complete two copies of the emergency contact form, Appendix A to
this Plan. One copy of the emergency contact form for each staff person must be attached to this Plan
and kept on site during the entire sampling event. The second copy of the form must be left with the
CDM emergency contact staff at the local CDM office.
3. The following information, for each sampling site, must be completed prior to beginning the
sampling event.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Name of Landfill or Sampling Site:
Dates at Site: 5/17/2004 to 5/21/2004; 1 week in 10/2004
Fire Phone Number:
Ambulance Phone Number:
Police Phone Number:
Salina Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
911 or 785-826-7340
785-452-7161 (TAC-EMS)
911 or 785-826-7210
Nearest Hospital with Emergency Facility
Name:
Hospital Phone:
Hospital Address:
Contact Name:
Directions from site to Hospital:
Salina Regional Health Center
785-452-7000
400 S. Santa Fe, Salina, Kansas
Diana Knudson
North on Burma Road to Crawford Street,
Go right (east) to Santa Fe Avenue,
Go left (north) to Hospital (on the left)
SEE ATTACHED MAP
CDM Field Supervisor:
Name ofCDM Emergency Contact
CDM Local Office Phone:
Salina MSWLF Contact Number:
CDM Employee Contact Numbers:
Chris Martel (773) 965-0620
Chris Marlowe (Phone numbers above)
(312) 346-5000
(785) 826-7395
Shawn Shiffer
ick Simons
Signature of Health & Satefy Coordinator:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
I
2.0 OVERVIEW OF FIELD SAMPLING SAFETY
I
3.0 ELIMINATION OR REDUCTION OF POTENTIAL FOR BODY CONTACT
3.1 Clothing
3.2 Hand to Mouth Contact
3.3 Accidental Exposure to Waste
I
4.0 ANTICIPATION OF POTENTIAL THREATS
4.1 Weather Conditions
4.2 Crew Visibility
4.3 Crew Behavior
4.4 General Health of Crew Members
4.5 Rejecting a Sample
4.6 Evacuation
2
5.0 VISUAL OBSERVATION OF WASTE
3
6.0 STAFF TRAINING
6.1 Training Session
6.2 Responsible Individual/CDM Field Supervisor
4
7.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
7.1 Responsible Party
7.2 Safety Equipment on Site
7.3 On-Site Treatment
7.4 Off-Site and Professional Medical Treatment
5
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT C
Equipment for Solid Waste Characterization Sampling and Sorting
Emergency Contact Form
Map of Salina (Route to Hospital)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
FIELD SAMPLING
SOLID WASTE CHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The health and safety of field workers in a primary concern of CDM. This document was
developed to present guideline for personal safety during solid waste characterization studies
(also known as "waste picks") at landfills. This document will be reviewed by CDM staff
responsible for the field sampling events and the Field Supervisor. The guidelines in this
document will be reviewed during the safety and training session required of all field staff.
This document is not intended for sites containing hazardous or toxic wastes regulated under
federal or state laws.
2.0 OVERVIEW OF FIELD SAMPLING SAFETY
Field worker safety includes using all reasonable precautions to:
· eliminate or reduce the potential for body contact from solid waste and airborne waste or
"flying waste;
· anticipate potential threats to field worker safety;
permit visual observation of the solid waste prior to handling or sorting;
provide adequate information and training to enable field workers and CDM supervisory
staff to perform the sampling in a safe and responsible manner; and,
provide procedures for responding to emergencies.
3.0 ELIMINATION OR REDUCTION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR BODY CONTACT
Due to the presence of bacteria, sharps, and other potentially dangerous materials in solid
waste, the following precautions and procedures will be followed by all field workers during
all solid waste sampling events. These are intended to minimize field workers coming in
contact with solid waste and airborne solids.
3.1 Clothing
Personal Clothing All field workers are to wear: ankle length pants; socks; sturdy boots or
shoes with reinforced toes, and long sleeved, loose fitting shirts. No sandals or canvas shoes
will be worn during the sampling.
2
I
I
I
I
Safety Clothing: CDM will supply the following safety equipment: respirators or dust masks, safety
glasses, disposable or other coveralls, disposable latex gloves, and puncture resistant outer gloves
such as Best's 65NFW or Ansell-Edmont's Orange Heavyweight. All field workers are required to
wear safety glasses, coveralls, and the puncture resistant gloves during sampling and sorting.
Disposable, latex inner gloves are not required but recommended to eliminate the hand from which
the first outer glove is removed from touching the remaining dirty outer glove. Respirators or dust
masks are not required but will be present for use in the event that waste materials becomes airborne.
The employees that are in the active area of the landfill will also be required to where hard hats and
safety vests.
I
I
3.2 Hand to Mouth Contact
I
I
No eating, smoking, drinking, or application of cosmetics will be permitted during the sampling. The
crew may perform these behaviors during breaks after washing their hands, and if required by the
field supervisor, their faces.
Fresh water for drinking and hand washing will be kept at the site at all times. Breaks will be taken
regularly as indicated by weather conditions. Gloves will be removed before pouring or drinking
water.
I
I
3.3 Accidental Exposure to Waste
No crew will handle any solid waste without gloves. Accidental skin contact with waste will require
cleansing with soap and water. A wash-up station will be available at the site.
I
All crew will have a tetanus shot within ten years of the sampling. If necessary, CDM will cover the
cost of the shot for all field workers prior to beginning the sampling.
I
I
I
CDM will offer Hepatitis B immunization to all CDM crew members.
4.0 ANTICIPATION OF POTENTIAL THREATS
Working in an active landfill presents a variety of potential dangers. The following procedures are
intended to improve field worker safety.
4.1 Weather Conditions
I
Sampling will not be done in adverse weather conditions such as heavy rains, snowstorms,
thunderstorms, or winds strong enough to lift sorting barrels.
I
Fresh water and cups for drinking will be available at all times. Chairs or some place to sit will be
available at the sorting site. If the sampling occurs during the warm months, an ice chest with cold,
wet towels will be available at the sorting site. Any field worker exhibiting signs of heat exhaustion
will be immediately required to take a break.
I
I
I
3
I
I
I
4.2 Crew Visibility
I
I
The sorting site will be located in an area out of the immediate waste hauling vehicle and landfill
equipment routes. The CDM field supervisor and the landfill supervisor will jointly agree on the
sorting site. All field workers that are working in the active areas of the landfill will wear hard hats
and safety vests for visibility.
4.3 Crew Behavior
No field workers may arrive at the site under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
I
All field workers will wear personal and safety clothing as described in 3.1 above.
I
No smoking will be permitted at any time on at the sorting site.
No throwing or tossing of waste at a person will be permitted during the sampling.
I
All field workers will complete the CDM Solid Waste Sampling and Safety Training.
4.4 General Health of Crew
I
All crew members should be in good physical health.
I
I
4.5 Rejecting a Sample
I
The field supervisor will be responsible for determining if a sample is potentially hazardous or
dangerous. The sample will be rejected if it: contains potentially infectious hospital or medical waste;
is soaked in a liquid other than water; contains unidentifiable contents; contains hazardous waste or
materials posing a safety hazard; or has an unusual odor not like other solid waste. If such a load is
identified, it will be reported to the landfill supervisor for removal from the sampling area.
4.6 Evacuation
I
I
The field supervisor will be responsible for determining if circumstances warrant evacuation for the
site.
5.0 VISUAL OBSERVATION OF WASTE
I
To reduce the potential for cuts or puncture wounds, all waste will be spread out and viewed prior to
handling or sorting. The waste sample will be selected from the site via a front end loader or similar
machine. It will be deposited on a separate tarp. Waste will be spread apart using a shovel or pitch
fork. Bags will be carefully lifted to the sorting table and broken open with a shovel. A shovel will
be used to put loose waste from the sample onto the sampling table. It will be further spread out with
hand tools such as gardening trowels so that contents can be visually examined prior to handling.
I
I
No field staff will pick UP an armload of waste. No field staff will grasp or "hug" an unopened bag of
I
4
I
I
I
I
waste.
6.0 STAFF TRAINING
I
I
Understanding the procedures necessary to promote safety and knowing how to respond to an
emergency before it happens, are essential to ensuring worker safety. All field staff will participate in
a waste characterization training prior to beginning the sampling. The training will be held as close
as possible to the actual sampling and may take place during the first part of the day the sampling and
sorting begins. The training session will require no more than one to one and one-half hours.
I
6.1 Training Session
I
I
The field worker training will include:
Introduction
I
- purpose for waste characterization study
- intended use
- method of compensation (if using outside help)
- dates of sorting and rain dates
- supervisory responsibility at site
I
Sampling and Sort Procedures
- procedures described in the accompanying sorting procedure document
I
Health and Safety Plan
I
- specifics described in this plan
6.2 Responsible Individual / CDM Field Supervisor
I
I
Safety during the field work is the responsibility of the CDM Field Supervisor. The supervisor must
have previous solid waste sampling and sorting experience. The Supervisor will make project level
decisions regarding compliance with this Health and Safety Plan during field operations. The
Supervisor may temporarily suspend work if there appears to be a threat to health and safety. The
Supervisor, or one crew member, will have a current, Red Cross First Aide Training Certification.
The individual with the First Aide Certification will be considered the project Safety Coordinator.
I
The Field Supervisor will:
I
. Ensure that appropriate personal protective equipment is available and properly utilized by all field
staff during the sampling activities;
I
· Ensure that field staff are familiar with the Health and Safety Plan and trained in the work practices
necessary for safe and efficient data collection;
I
5
I
I
I
I
· Ensure that field staff are aware of potential hazards associated with site operations, such as broken
glass, heavy equipment, etc.; and,
I
. Be responsible for correcting any work practices or conditions that may result in injury to personnel
or exposure to hazardous substances.
,I
7.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
I
Most landfills and waste collection facilities have safety plans and procedures for the site. Prior to
beginning the sampling event, the facility supervisor will be contacted to receive site specific safety
procedures. COM staff will follow the existing procedure for handing an emergency on site. In
addition, the following COM emergency procedures will be followed.
I
For the purpose of this plan, an emergency is a situation or condition which could require temporary
suspension of sampling or field work. This includes but is not limited to: adverse weather conditions,
fires, accidents or injuries to field staff, and discovery of waste samples that contain materials which
are potentially hazardous.
I'
I
In the event of a site emergency, such as a fire or release of hazardous chemicals, the landfill's safety
coordinator or the field supervisor will instruct the crew to leave the area by the pre-planned
evacuation route. In general, COM personnel will not participate in efforts to control facility
emergenCIes.
I
7.1 Responsible Party
I
The Field Supervisor is responsible for deciding whether a situation or condition is an emergency.
The Supervisor is responsible for deciding whether the situation requires evacuation, on site medical
attention, adjustments in procedures, or off site medical attention.
I
7.2 Safety Equipment on Site
I
I
A variety of safety equipment will be kept on site throughout the sampling. Table 7 - 1 lists the
necessary safety equipment.
7.3 On Site Treatment
I
I
Minor injuries such as cuts, scrapes, and the initial stages of heat exposure, will be treated on site by
the Safety Coordinator or Field Supervisor who is trained in First Aide.
7.4 Off-site and Professional Medical Treatment
Unless the injury definitely requires first-aid only, the Field Supervisor will seek professional medical
assistance. If such an injury occurs the following procedure will be followed.
I
I
. Immediate emergency first aid treatment will be given at the site.
6
I
I
I
I
-The injured party will be transported immediately to the nearest emergency facility as identified on
the front cover of this Plan.
I
. -
-The supervisor or a member of the sort crew as designated by the Field Supervisor will call the
emergency facility to inform them of the injury and that personnel are approaching for
treatment.
I
-The CDM staff emergency contact will be called and asked to contact the person, on the emergency
contact form (A TT ACHMENT A), identified by the injured party, to be called in case of an
emergency. The CDM emergency contact is a designated individual or individuals at the local
CDM office who is available during the sampling event to receive and make emergency phone
calls for the sorting crew.
I.
I
- If the supervisor must leave the site, all field staff will stop work until a responsible CDM substitute
can arrive to supervise the sampling.
I
- If the injury was the result of a cut or puncture from a sharp or needle, the item will be retrieved and
placed in a zip-lock plastic bag for further examination or testing.
I'
- A report explaining the incident will be submitted to all interested parties including but not limited
to: CDM client officer, CDM health and safety group, CDM client contracting for the sampling,
landfill owner, and the injured party. Accident reports will be filled out where necessary.
I
I
I
I
I
1\
I.
I
I
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT A
Equipment for Solid Waste Characterization Sampling and Sorting
Personal Safety Equipment:
Dust masks
Hard hats (where required)
Safety glasses
Disposable coveralls
Disposable under-gloves (up to 5 pairs I day I worker, so workers will not touch bare hand to outer glove
after first glove is removed)
Over-gloves, puncture resistant such as Best's 65NFW or Ansell-Edmont's Orange
Safety vests (where required)
Site Safety Equipment:
Copy of Health and Safety Plan with cover sheet completed
Copy of Emergency Contact forms for each field worker
First Aid Kit containing at a minimum:
eye wash, compresses, antiseptic wipes and spray, band-aides, gauze, first aid tape, aspirin;
Vehicle to permit immediate site evacuation
Clean water and cups for drinking
Clean water and soap for washing
Ice chest with ice and wet towels (for hot weather)
Chairs or place to sit
Zip-lock plastic bags
Paper towels, rags, and tissues
Light colored tarp for shade
Portable phone
Sorting Equipment:
Copy of sampling procedure
Copy of selected trucks or routes to sample
Sampling sheet, clip board, pencil, waterproof pens
Front end loader and driver
Heavy duty cloth tarp, approximately 25' x 50'
Sand bags to hold down tarp
Sorting table (4 sawhorses and 3 sheets Yz" plywood)
Plastic sheeting
Staple gun (wi stapl~s)
Five gallon plastic buckets (20)
Shovels, pitch fork, rake, gardening hand tools
Push broom
Sorting barrels (40 residential waste polycarts)
Duct tape for labeling barrels
3' x 3' digital scale with 20-hour rechargeable battery
Camera and film
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT B
CDM Employee Emergency Contact Form
NOTE: Two copies of this form are to be completed by every field sampling worker. One copy is to be
kept at the site during the sampling event. One copy is to be left with the CDM emergency contact
person at the local CDM office.
Name:
Home Phone:
Blood Type:
Date of Last Tetanus Shot:
Date of HB-Ig Shot:
Medications Currently Taking:
Allergies to Medication:
If an emergency occurs during sampling, please contact
Name:
Phone:
Date Completed:
Signature:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT C
Map of Salina (Route to Hospital)
I ,.
,.. u
U lit
l~
," j:
'f'
I
I
I
1
I
I"
I
lilU
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,\\ f"l'/iI.'.(:I[-ITl~/[lEl\l'\I' t:
rVIL:~ I!] 'iDll" Ssnili:l1l'~ lJRmute \lql l[-li{~SIIJJlllI:;,nn
- .-....-- ....c
o
-.
~
~,
'?
'v
:; ()~
<'~~~c:\~
u ~~w -.(-
;:. 'l
i
m.'''" I ~
'-<J_~-'-'l
'URCH'/N~.~ ~
IJJ I .,J
~ -~---i ~
1---' u
~r---=f~~~-~-
, 1'110
'" :;~ 1
~ ._HAVtlrfl \
ml Il
I -
: I, f
D~CHCnAI-~' nil. !
W[Ll~ ilDr~
Ill! ..:~ oli.n0ssv no
=..~\
:~l
'"'o:'"~...:..-
~
00 t;
~
f~ SAl.uNA LANOFllL
\11 "~~"+ ~"'- ~ SM~'~,
" \ ",
:: (~~) '0 ,)
I " JI
. G> ~=_~:r,'~YNDLD~~ 1fT.:,!
I"
MCR.EYJY()~DS. ._
:m
"
1>>
C
[)
'E
"
"
I"
I
i
.1
dJd
. tJ I~--'~ ! A u\' l I @
Vil -' II f'P, 1- . " I'"
- ..... .' h I i
c",~=\\==d =i}f1,-=.~-
I
I
ATTACHMENT D
Health and Safety Plan Signature Form
I
CDM Health and Safety Program
I
I
INSTRUCTIONS: All field personnel must sign this form indicating their receipt of this health and
safety plan. Keep this original on site. It becomes part of the permanent project files.
Send a copy to the health and safety manager.
I
SITE NAME I NUMBER:
City of Salina Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility
I
Salina, Kansas
DIVISION I LOCATION:
I
I understand, and agree to comply with, the provisions of the above-referenced
HSP for work activities on this project. I agree to report any injuries to the site
health and safety coordinator (SHSC). I agree to inform the SHSC about any drugs
(legal or illegal) that I take within three days of site work.
I
Print Name Signature Date
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT D
Health and Safety Plan Signature Form
CDM Health and Safety Program
I
I
INSTRUCTIONS: All field personnel must sign this form indicating their receipt of this health and
safety plan. Keep this original on site. It becomes part of the permanent project files.
Send a copy to the health and safety manager.
SITE NAME I NUMBER:
City of Salina Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility
I
I
Salina, Kansas
DIVISION I LOCATION:
I understand, and agree to comply with, the provisions of the above-referenced
HSPfor work activities on this project. I agree to report any injuries to the site
health and safety coordinator (SHSC). I agree to inform the SHSC about any drugs
(legal or illegal) that I take within three days of site work.
I
Print Name
Signature
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT D
Health and Safety Plan Signature Form
CDM Health and Safety Program
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INSTRUCTIONS: All field personnel must sign this form indicating their receipt of this health and
safety plan. Keep this original on site. It becomes part of the permanent project files.
Send a copy to the health and safety manager.
SITE NAME! NUMBER:
City of Salina Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility
Salina, Kansas
DIVISION I LOCATION:
I understand, and agree to comply with, the provisions of the above-referenced
HSP for work activities on this project. I agree to report any ~uries to the site
health and safety ~oordinator (SHSC). I agree to inform the SHSC about any drugs
(legal or illegal) that I take within three days of site work.
I
I
I
Print Name Signature Date
,
I
I
I
I
I
l
[
[
[
[
I
r
I
ndix
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix C
Spring 2004 Sample Results
-
-
-
-
Sample Number
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electron ics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 1 of8
Sou rc
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/17/2004 5/1712004 5/17/2004 5/1712004 5/1812004 5/1812004 5/18/2004 5/1812004
1 2 3 5 10 11 15 16
34.2 51.6 170.8 38.0 12.8 2.7 6.0 45.4
9.2 3.8 2.6 0.0 4.6 39.8 4.8 24.2
46.0 1.8 8.2 2.8 22.6 9.0 1.8 6.4
8.8 6.0 2.8 3.8 13.4 8.0 8.8 8.2
68.8 39.6 47.0 48.4 61.4 51.2 33.4 40.2
6.6 5.4 8.6 0.0 2.0 18.0 1.0 0.6
2.0 0.8 2.2 1.4 0.2 1.4 1.2 4.0
0.8 2.6 3.6 4.8 5.8 0.6 0.8 3.0
3.2 2.0 1.2 2.0 5.0 2.4 6.2 3.4
36.2 54.2 43.6 51.0 40.6 43.6 45.6 51.8
21.4 45.4 33.8 60.0 13.2 28.4 9.8 22.0
0.0 15.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2 3.6 0.0 50.0 1.0 3.2 0.0 1.2
4.2 0.2 0.0 5.4 9.8 3.4 1.4 0.4
10.4 0.1 1.6 0.0 9.6 5.4 0.0 3.8
7.6 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.4 7.2 30.0 0.4
3.8 6.6 0.4 6.2 1.0 4.2 3.6 6.8
1.6 1.6 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.0 12.2 1.6
0.0 4.8 3.0 0.6 3.2 6.4 5.4 0.2
0.1 2.8 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2
1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
5.4 6.4 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.2 2.2 0.2
0.0 8.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.2
0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 5.4 41.2 0.2 2.8 11.2 0.0 9.0
0.0 0.4 2.6 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
9.0 4.8 6.4 3.8 2.2 7.0 3.6 7.4
0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0
282.9 279.8 385.0 283.6 216.7 260.9 179.8 322.4
Dat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1(lb)
-
-
-
-
Sample Number
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE .Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Un classifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-RecycIeable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-1
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 2 of 8
Sourc
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/19/2004 5/1912004 5/1912004 5/1912004 5/2012004 5120/2004 512012004 512012004
22 23 25 27 33 34 . 35 36
-34.2 96.0 13.4 17.8 76.6 17.6 14.6 7.2
3.4 3.4 4.2 2.8 6.0 4.2 6.8 7.6
3.6 43.4 39.6 8.2 11.6 0.4 10.0 1.2
2.0 38.6 11.0 5.6 4.2 2.6 2.0 5.4
18.4 40.4 12.4 10.8 22.2 19.4 18.2 33.2
0.0 2.0 0.0 7.8 1.0 22.6 1.0 0.2
0.0 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.4
0.1 0.0 2.2 0.1 2.0 0.0 1.4 1.0
0.8 3.4 0.4 1.6 4.4 1.4 2.4 2.8
13.2 34.4 19.2 9.0 8.8 17.8 15.0 24.0
5.8 13.4 44.4 17.0 5.0 2.6 24.2 51.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
10.0 0.0 1.4 24.4 7.0 0.1 56.8 4.4
102.4 12.2 1.2 84.8 4.] 26.2 3.4 13.2
1.2 3.0 1.6 0.0 .. 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.6
1.0 23.0 2.0 2.2 1.0 3.0 2.4 1.4
0.6 0.4 4.2 1.4 0.6 4.6 3.4 4.8
0.2 2.6 0.7 1.0 0.4 0.1 2.0 3.6
0.4 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 2.6 0.4 1.8
0.2 0.4 0.8 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2
0.0 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.0 6.0 7.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 3.8 4.0
0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.2 0.0 0.2 1.2 2.4 10.0 2.0 3.8
0.0 0.2 1.6 1.4 0.2 0.0 1.2 0.6
0.0 3.2 36.2 0.0 0.0 1.8 8.4 0.4
0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0
1.2 1.6 4.0 2.6 1.8 6.8 3.0 4.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0
199.3 325.6 204.1 208.2 161.3 158~9 1'95.2 189.8
Dat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1 (Ib)
-
-
-
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Un classifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Ino,rganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 3 of8
Sou rc
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 Total Weight Mean Sample
Sampled Weight
r 46 47 48 51 52 (Ib) (Ib)
41.2 14.0 39.0 60.4 14.8 808.3 38.5
1.0 2.6 4.2 7.2 17.4 159.8 7.6
1.8 8.4 20.4 13.0 8.6 268.8 12.8
0.2 51.4 6.2 3.8 12.0 204.8 9.8
1.4 50.4 41.4 35.6 21.6 715.4 34.1
57.6 " 4.2 3.8 2.4 0.8 145.6 6.9
0.0 3.2 0.8 1.0 1.2 22.9 l.l
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 2.8 33.0 1.6
0.0 1.6 7.8 1.8 2.6 56.4 2.7
6.4 37.6 27.6 18.2 39.0 636.8 30.3
0.2 41.0 37.6 41.0 19.6 537.4 25.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 0.7
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 165.7 7.9
0.4 0.2 12.2 3.8 14.0 302.9 14.4
0.0 0.0 0.8 3.4 32.4 78.9 3.8
0.4 0.2 5.2 13.8 25.0 129.4 6.2
0.0 4.8 0.1 1.2 7.0 65.7 3.1
0.1 0.4 2.4 1.0 1.2 39.7 1.9
0.4 0.0 18.0 8.0 3.2 62.6 3.0
0.2 0.2 0.2 2.2 0.8 12.6 0.6
0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.4 0.2
0.0 0.0 0.8 3.6 1.6 40.0 1.9
0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.2
23.2 0.8 0.4 9.6 2.2 126.2 6.0
0.0 1.0 3.6 0.6 0.8 17.2 0.8
0.2 0.0 4.4 1.8 2.0 59.0 2.8
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.2 3.8 0.2
0.0 2.0 7.2 3.8 2.2 84.8 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
0.0 44.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.8 2.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 86.6 4.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
299.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 318.2 15.2
434.3 270.4 244.7 238.6 234.6 5276.1 251.2
Dat
-
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1(lb)
-
-
-
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
. Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 4 of 8
:e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
(Commercial)
e 5/1712004 5/17/2004 5/1712004 5/17/2004 5/1712004 5/1812004 5/1812004 5/1812004
r 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14
12.2 27.2 15.2 30.8 23.2 27 ]8.4 13.0
I 9.8 19.2 27.0 12.0 4.8 29.6 22.4 31.6
2.6 4.0 3.0 5.4 7.2 12.4 5.8 7.6
5.8 1.6 11.0 6.6 7.4 26.6 10.4 10.4
17.2 39.2 60.2 33.6 32.4 74.2 47.9 37.8
12.0 5.8 10.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 6.4 20.4
0.8 3.0 J.O 3.6 3.8 3.4 0.2 3.0
0.6 4.4 2.2 2.0 0.4 4.0 0.1 1.8
1.8 4.0 4.0 2.4 3.0 5.6 1.8 4.8
32.2 23.8 4J.6 21.0 30.2 56.6 54.6 25.6
8.0 20.6 33.8 12.0 10.8 25.0 15.8 14.6
0.4 85.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0
37.8 4.0 47.6 8.2 5.4 103.0 75.4 116.6
21.2 6.0 16.4 4.2 2.2 17.8 . 7.8 7.8
2.0 3.0 2.2 25.8 0.0 13.4 3.0 2.4
6.8 5.6 3.8 7.6 0.8 2.1 9.2 16.4
3.4 4.8 4.4 4.4 1.8 7.0 6.0 5.2
0.4 5.0 5.4 3.2 1.4 4.0 3.8 2.6
15.6 16.0 0.6 10.2 0.6 7.0 8.2 1.2
1.6 1.6 0.4 0.8 2.0 0.4 1.7 0.4
0.2 0.6 0.8 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.2 5.8 2.2 1.2 1.4 4.4 0.8 4.4
1.4 2.2 3.6 0.0 2.4 3.4 0.1 0.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.8 1.2 8.0 0.8 0.4 L8 3.5 8.0
0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.1 12.8 2.2
2.0 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.0 37.2 0.0 0.6
0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2
0.4 3.6 3.4 1.4 6.0 5.0 6.2 11.8
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0
203.6 299.1 309.0 206.3 149.2 479.2 324.7 354.8
Sourc
Dat
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1(lb)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 5 of 8
e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
Residential (Commercial) (Commercial) (Commercial)
e 5/18/2004 5/1812004 5/18/2004 5/1812004 5/18/2004 5/19/2004 5/1912004 5/1912004
17 18 19 20 21 24 26 28
25.0 15.2 11.2 5.2 6.8 31.6 23.0 6.0
10.0 5.0 8.8 8.2 7.6 7.6 14.0 6.4
5.8 19.2 2.8 5.2 1.8 4.6 7.8 0.4
3.2 1.6 4.8 0.0 4.0 7.4 5.2 2.8
30.4 35.2 32.0 21.6 21.7 27.8 17.2 15.6
2.0 0.4 0.2 0.6 15.6 J6.6 8.0 11.0
2.6 1.6 2.4 1.2 0.8 1.0 0.2 1.0
0.8 1.8 2.0 3.8 1.0 3.0 0.4 1.2
3.4 3.4 4.6 8.4 1.2 4.0 1.2 2.0
28.6 38.4 28.2 23.0 40.2 23.4 23.0 21.0
22.4 13.8 26.0 l3.6 15.2 8.0 8.2 12.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 70.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.0 25.2 2.4 6.8 3.6 20.4 31.0 40.4
12.8 3.6 25.8 4.6 1.6 12.2 4.7 14.6
14.4 14.8 3.8 5.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 3.0
11.8 5.8 0.6 5.0 0.2 4.8 10.8 16.8
5.2 3.0 4.4 4.2 3.0 2.4 1.8 3.8
5.2 2.2 2.8 3.6 0.6 1.0 1.6 0.1
0.2 0.1 0.0 2.0 1.8 6.8 4.4 0.2
0.4 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.2
0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.1
2.0 3.2 10.2 0.0 13.0 1.4 0.6 7.8
1.4 0.8 0.4 0.6 1.4 1.4 2.6 0.0
0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.0 5.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.6
0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.4 0.0
14.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 21.0 0.0 2.0
0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2
8.0 9.0 6.0 2.0 2.8 8.6 12.4 4.0
3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
219.9 211.8 182.1 195.6 152.0 222.4 195.7 177.4
Sourc
Sample Number
Dat
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Un classifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1(lb)
-
-
-
-
-,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,-
Tabl~ C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 6 of8
e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
e 5/1912004 5/19/2004 5/1912004 5/19/2004 512012004 5120/2004 512012004 512012004
29 30 31 32 37 38 39 40
20.6 4.6 14 26.4 33.0 21.6 13.6 8.6
10.0 18.2 77.4 7.2 6.2 11.6 12.0 9.2
9.8 J.2 1.2 8.8 2.6 5.6 6.2 9.4
10.2 3.6 2.2 . 1 J.2 4.6 10.6 3.6 17.0
18.4 19.2 22.8 16.2 41.2 21.8 27.6 22.4
0.8 1.8 4.2 10.4 1.8 50.8 0.0 45.8
2.0 0.6 0.4 0.6 2.4 1.2 1.0 0.2
0.4 0.8 1.6 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.4 2.4
3.2 3.2 4.4 1.6 3.2 1.8 3.4 1.2
30.1 14.0 29.8 18.2 30.8 15.4 28.2 24.4
16.8 9.2 11.0 11.8 22.6 7.0 14.0 5.6
3.0 12.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
23.2 20.8 34.0 1.4 8.0 64.2 I L6 70.2
11.6 8.0 ]8.4 6.4 23.0 14.6 12.0 64.0
11.0 12.0 3.4 3.8 15.4 1.8 1.2 0.6
23.0 0.4 12.8 28.0 34.0 65.8 2.4 6.0
1.8 3.6 3.6 1.6 2.2 2.2 3.4 1.2
3.4 2.6 2.0 1.2 2.4 0.6 0.8 0.8
0.2 0.0 7.2 4.4 18.0 24.6 17.0 11.6
0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.4
0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.2 0.6 0.0 0.0
0.8 0.2 5.4 2.6 3.6 0.1 1.8 0.2
0.2 0.6 2.5 1.2 1.4 0.4 0.4 0.6
1.8 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
5.2 0.2 15.6 1.2 0.0 0.8 3.8 3.4
0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.6 1.6 5.2 1.6
3.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0
0.0 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0
4.0 0.0 3.6 0.8 4.2 1.2 11.2 4.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
215.8 137.4 284.5 178.0 269.0 329.0 199.8 322.8
Sourc
Dat
Sample Number
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Un classifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1(Ib)
-
-
-
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
U nclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
GreenlBlue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 7 of 8
Sourc
e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
e 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004
r 41 42 43 44 45 49 50
9.6 4.4 7.8 18.8 2.4 11.2 22.0
8.6 14.4 13.2 17.8 19.3 40.6 16.2
\.0 2.4 \.2 11.4 5.2 1.4 19.0
3.6 2.6 I\.6 ]9.0 8.8 9.0 5.8
24.8 16.0 28.2 27.6 ]6.6 48.2 26.6
1.8 2.4 \.6 0.6 0.6 6.8 0.4
2.4 0.2 \.6 1.4 0.4 ].4 1.2
1.4 0.4 0.4 2.6 0.2 0.8 0.6
3.4 2.8 2.2 3.8 2.2 7.2 6.2
21.4 26.2 32.8 42.6 15.2 35.0 33.0
7.8 15.8 10.2 47.0 6.2 . 11.8 21.4
0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.2 0.0 31.4
73.0 2.4 14.2 39.4 74.2 15.0 19.6
4.2 1.0 3.4 6.0 6.2 7.0 15.4
32 10.8 3.6 14.0 6.4 4.8 4.8
11.0 6.0 2.6 11.0 2.6 0.4 8.2
5.0 3.8 2.8 3.6 2.2 5.0 6.2
0.6 1.4 3.2 1.2 \.0 1.6 4.2
0.2 0.2 0.6 \.2 0.0 0.4 6.4
0.0 0.2 0.8 3.8 2.2 0.6 0.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0
0.6 7.0 1.8 8.0 6.0 3.6 2.4
\.8 2.6 1.8 1.4 2.2 1.2 3.2
0.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 9.2 0.0 0.0
0.0 \.0 4.4 4.8 5.9 19.4 2.6
2.2 \.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 2.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 9.6
0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2
0.0 4.0 4.2 3.6 0.0 3.2 3.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
188.8 129.4 154.4 295.9 197.2 243.0 270.8
Dat
-
..
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1 (Ib)
-
-
-
-
Sample Number
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
CDM
-
-
-
-
-
,-
-
-
-
Table C-l
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 8 of 8
Residential
e Total Weight Mean Sample
Sampled Weight
(Ib) (Ib)
509.6 16.4
505.9 16.3
182.0 5.9
232.2 7.5
921.6 29.7
242.8 7.8
46.6 1.5
49.5 1.6
105.4 3.4
908.5 29.3
478.6 15.4
219.6 7.1
1000.0 . 32.3
364.5 11.8
198.6 6.4
322.3 10.4
113.0 3.6
69.9 2.3
166.9 5.4
23.5 0.8
22.8 0.7
103.7 3.3
43.6 1.4
16.2 0.5
113.0 3.6
40.4 1.3
116.4 3.8
5.3 0.2
138.4 4.5
9.4 0.3
5.4 0.2
0.0 0.0
15.6 0.5
7.4 0.2
7298.6 235.4
Combined Residential/Commercial
Total Weight Mean Sample
Sampled Weight
lib) (Ib)
1317.9 25.3
665.7 12.8
450.8 8.7
437.0 8.4
1637.0 31.5
388.4 7.5
69.5 1.3
82.5 1.6
161.8 3.1
1545.3 29.7
1016.0 19.5
235.0 4.5
1165.7 22.4
667.4 12.8
277.5 5.3
451.7 8.7
178.7 3.4
109.6 2.1
229.5 4.4
36.1 0.7
26.2 0.5
143.7 2.8
64.3 1.2
19.4 0.4
239.2 4.6
57.6 1.1
175.4 3.4
9.1 0.2
223.2 4.3
9.5 0.2
56.2 1.1
86.6 1.7
15.6 0.3
325.6 6.3
12574.7 241.8
Source
Oat
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-1 (I b)
-
-
_.
-
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
U nclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 1 of8
Sourc
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004
r 1 2 3 5 ]0 ]1 ]5 16
12.1% 18.4% 44.4% 6.0% 13.4% 9.1% 4.9% 14.9%
3.3% 1.4% 0.7% 4.8% 0.0% 6.4% 8.7% 5.8%
16.3% 0.6% 2.1% 1.3% 1.0% 1.3% 1.0% 2.6%'
3.1% 2.1% 0.7% 2.8% 1.3% 0.5% 3.6% 3.2%
24.3% 14.2% 12.2% 8.4% 17.1% 13.1% 19.5% 16.3%
1.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.9% 0.7% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2%
0.7% 0.3% 0.6% 0.4% 0.5% 1.0% 0.3% 1.7%
0.3% 0.9% 0.9% 0.3% 1.7% 1.5% 0.7% 1.0%
12.8% 19.4% 11.3% 15.8% 18.0% 8.0% 13.5% 10.2%
7.6% 16.2% 8.8% 3.9% 21.2% 6.9% 10.9% 5.8%
0.0% 5.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 28.7% 0.0% 0.0%
0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 18.6% 17.6% 1.3% 15.4% 4.0%
2.3% 1.9%. 2.2% 5.9% 0.0% 1.9% 3.4% 1.7%
1.5% 0.1% 0.0% 10.4% 1.9% 2.0% 5.3% 2.0%
3.7% 0.0% 0.4% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.7% 12.5%
3.2% 1.7% 1.7% 0.2% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 0.7%
2.7% 0.5% 0.3% 3.3%. 0.3% 1.9% 1.2% 3.7%
1.3% 2.4% 0.1% 1.7% 2.2% 1.6% 1.4% 2.1%
0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.2% 0.6% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6%
0.0% 1.7% 0.8% 7.7% 0.2% 5.3% 0.2% 4.9%
0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0%
0.0% 1.0% 0.1% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 0.]% 0.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.9% 2.3% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 1.9% 0.7% 0.6%
0.0% 3.1% 0.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 1.2% 0.0%
0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.1% 1.9% 10.7% 2.8% 0.1% 0.4% 2.6% 0.4%
0.0% 0.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%
0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 1.5%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Oat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
-
-
-
-,
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
.Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recydeable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,-
-
,-
-
-
-
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 2 of8
Sourc
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/t 9/2004 5/t 9/2004 5/t 9/2004 5/t 9/2004 5/20/2004 5120/2004 5/2012004 5/20/2004
r 22 23 25 27 33 34 35 36
15.5% 5.9% 1.0% 5.6% 5.7% 3.7% 3.3% 14.1%
3.2% 2.1% 15.3% 6.2% 6.9% 8.9% 2.7% 7.5%
4.8% 10.4% 3.4% 2.6% 1.8% 2.1% 1.0% 2.0%
5.0% 6.2% 3.1% 5.6% 3.2% 2.9% 4.9% 2.5%
21.7% 28.3% 19.6% 15.5% 14,8% 10.7% 18.6% 12.5%
2.0% 2.3% 0.9% 1.2% 0.6% 1.4% 3.4% 1.1%
2.5% 0.1% 0.5% 0.7% 0.1% 0.8% 0.7% 1.2%
0.3% 2.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5% 0.4% 0.9%
20.2% 18.7% 16.7% 11.8% 16.8% 7.2% 25.4% 16.1%
7.2% 6.1% 10.9% 5.2% 4.9% 4;1% 5.5% 6.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3.6% 0.5% 1.2% 21.5% 23.2% 32.9% 0.0% 0.4%
0.0% 0.9% 6.9% 0.0% 2.0% 5.7% 0.6% 0.2%
1.5% 4.5% 1.3% 3.7% 2.4% 2.2% 0.8% 0.1%
0.0% 4.4% 2.1% 2.8% 0.9% 0.7% 0.0% 1.2%
4.0% 1.0% 2.7% 1.0% 1.9% 3.3% 2.0% 2.3%
0.5% 0.2% 2.8% 0.4% 2.8% 4.6% 16.7% 0.1%
1.2% 0.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.8% 1.5% 2.0% 2.1%
0.9% 1.0% 0.4% 0.8% 1.2% 0.7% 6.8% 0.5%
0.4% 1.5% 2.5% 1.5% 2.5% 0.3% 3.0% 0.1%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
1.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
0.]% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
0.9% 1.2% 0.5% 0.9% 0.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.1%
1.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.7% 0.1%
0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.3% 1.3% 4.3% 0:-4% 1.1% 2.3% 0.0% 2.8%
0.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 3.9% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.8% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.3%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Dat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
-,
-;
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
.-
-
-
-,
-
-
'.
..
,-
..
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 3 of 8
e Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial
e 5/21/2004 5/2112004 5/2112004 5/2112004 5/2112004 Mean Standard 90%
. Confidence
Percentage Deviation
r 46 47 48 51 52 Interval
4.5% 7.2% 6.2% 2.7% 4.5% 9.7% 9.3% 3.3%
11.4% 2.4% 4.8% 4.2% 5.0% 5.3% 3.7% 1.3%
2.6% 9.1% 1.5% 2.7% 1.2% 3.4% 3.9% 1.4%
1.5% 0.8% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 2.8% 1.7% 0.6%
13.8% 16.6% 17.6% 11.0% 14.3% 16.2% 4.7% 1.7%
0.9% 1.6% 2.5% 4.3% 0.8% 1.5% 1.0% 0.4%
1.2% 0.8% 1.3% 0.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.6% 0.2%
0.4% 0.8% 1.1% 1.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.6% 0.2%
1.5% 18.1% 15.5% 11.8% 26.4% 15.0% 5.8% 2.1%
13.0% 6.5% ]4.3% 7.0% 10.0% 8.7% 4.4% 1.6%
10.2% 0.0% 0.0% 36.1% 0.0% 3.9% 9.8% 3.5%
0.0% 11.9% 1.3% 3.5% 2.4% 7.7% 9.8% 3.5%
0.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 10.3% 2.2% 2.8% 1.0%
5.8% 1.7% 14.2% 2.4% 1.1% 3.1% 3.5% 1.3%
6.5% 7.0% 2.1% 2.6% 1.3% 2.4% 3.1% 1.1%
5.4% 4.2% 3.3% 1.0% 1.8% 2.1% 1.3% 0.5%
2.4% 2.7% 0.3% 2.6% 0.1% 2.4% 3.6% 1.3%
2.4% 1.4% 2.4% 2.1% 2.0% 1.7% 0.6% 0.2%
0.1% 1.0% 1.5% 1.8% 0.4% 1.2% 1.4% 0.5%
0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.2% 1.7% 2.1% 0.7%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%
0.9% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1%
0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
0.1% 1.5% 5.6% 0.0% 8.6% 1.4% 2.1% 0.7%
2.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.9% 0.6% 0.8% 0.3%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.]% 0.0%
6.6% 2.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.6% 0.9%
0.]% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.8% 0.3%
3.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.7% 1.8% 0.7%
1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 5.5% 2.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ~ 0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3%
100.0% ]00.0% 100.0% 100.0% ]00.0% ]00.0% 0.0% -
Sourc
Dat
_.
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
-
-,
-
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HOPE Containers
Colo'red HOPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
CDM
-
-'
-
..
.)
..
.-
.'"--
-
-
-
-)
-,
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 4 of 8
Sourc
e _.Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
(Commercial)
e 5/1712004 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/17/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004
r 4 6 7 8 9 12 13 14
6,0% 9.1% 4,9% ' 14.9% 15.5% 5.6% 5.7% 3.7%
4.8% 6.4% 8.7% 5.8% 3.2% 6.2% 6.9% 8.9%
1.3% 1.3% 1.0% 2.6% 4.8% 2.6% 1.8% 2.1%
2,8% 0.5% 3.6% 3.2% 5.0% 5.6% 3.2% 2.9%
8.4% 13.1% 19.5% 16.3% 21.7% 15.5% 14.8% 10.7%
0.9% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 2.0% 1.2% 0.6% 1.4%
0.4% ].0% 0,3% 1.7% 2,5% 0.7% 0.1% 0.8%
0.3% 1.5% 0,7% 1.0% 0.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5%
15.8% 8.0% 13.5% ]0.2% 20.2% 11.8% 16.8% 7.2%
3.9% 6.9% 10.9% 5,8% 7,2% 5.2% 4.9% 4.1%
0,2% 28.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0%
18.6% 1.3% 15.4% 4.0% 3.6% 21.5% 23.2% 32.9%
5.9% 1.9% 3.4% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 5.7%
10.4% 2.0% 5.3% 2.0% 1.5% 3.7% 2.4% 2.2%
1.0% 1.0% 0.7% 12.5% 0.0% 2.8% 0.9% 0.7%
0.2% 1.2% 1.1% 0.7% 4.0% 1.0% 1.9% 3.3%
3.3% 1.9% 1.2% 3.7% 0.5% 0.4% 2.8% 4.6%
1.7% 1.6% 1.4% 2.1% 1.2% 1.5% 1.8% 1.5%
0.2% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 0.9% 0.8% 1.2% 0.7%
7.7% 5.3% 0.2% 4.9% 0.4% 1.5% 2.5% 0.3%
0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.8% 0.5% 0.1% 0.4% 1.3% 0.1% 0.5% 0.1%
0,0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%
0.6% 1.9% 0.7% 0.6% 0.9% 0.9% 0.2% 1.2%
0.7% 0.7% 1.2% 0.0% 1.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% ' 0.0% 0.0%
2.8% 0.4% 2.6% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 1.1% 2.3%
0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 3.9% 0.6%
1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 1.5% 0,0% 7.8% 0.0% 0.2%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0,0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% ]00,0% 100.0% 100,0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Dat
Tables & Figures 2,xlsTable C-2(%)
-
-, ,-
!.'
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
U nclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
~
..
-
....
'.--'
,'.....
-
..
-
-)
-
'..~
_f
-
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 5 of8
Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
e Residential (Commercial) (Commercial) (Commercial)
e 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/19/2004 5/19/2004 5/19/2004
r 17 18 19 20 21 24 26 28
11.4% 7.2% 6.2% 2.7% 4.5% 14.2% 11.8% 3.4%
4.5% 2.4% 4.8% 4.2% 5.0% 3.4% 7.2% 3.6%
2.6% 9.1% 1.5% 2.7% 1.2% 2.1% 4.0% 0.2%
1.5% 0.8% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 3.3% 2.7% 1.6%
13.8% 16.6% 17.6% 11.0% 14.3% 12.5% 8.8% 8.8%
1.5% 1.6% 2.5% 4.3% 0.8% 1.8% 0.6% 1.1%
1.2% 0.8% 1.3% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1% 0.6%
0.4% 0.8% l.l% 1.9% 0.7% 1.3% 0.2% 0.7%
13.0% 18.1% 15.5% 1l.8% 26.4% 10.5% 11.8% 11.8%
10.2% 6.5% 14.3% 7.0% 10.0% 3.6% 4.2% 7.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 36.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.5% 11.9% 1.3% 3.5% 2.4% . 9.2% 15.8% 22.8%
0.9% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 10.3% 7:5% 4.1% 6.2%
5.8% 1.7% 14.2% 2.4% 1.1% 5.5% 2.4% 8.2%
6.5% 7.0% 2.1% 2.6% 1.3% 2.7% 0.5% 1.7%
3.6% 4.2% 3.3% 1.0% 1.8% 3.9% 6.3% 2.3%
5.4% 2.7% 0.3% 2.6% 0.1% 2.2% 5.5% 9.5%
2.4% 1.4% 2.4% 2.1% 2.0% 1.1% 0.9% 2.1%
2.4% 1.0% 1.5% 1.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.8% 0.1%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1:0% 1.2% 3.1% 2.2% 0.1%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 0.1%
0.2% 0.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%
0.9% 1.5% 5.6% 0.0% 8.6% 0.6% 0.3% 4.4%
0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.9% 0.6% . 1.3% 0.0%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2.3% 2.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 1.5%
0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.7% 0.0%
6.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 9.4% 0.0% 1.1%
1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Sourc
Dat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
.;-
/--
'.
-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
U nclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Coritainers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
..
..
-
-
'..' ..
-
-
-
-\ '..}
..-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 6 of 8
Sourc
:e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
e 5/19/2004 5/1912004 5/19/2004 5/19/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004
r 29 30 31 32 37 38 39
9.5% 3.3% 4.9% 14.8% 12.3% 6.6% 6.8%
4.6% 13.2% 27.2% 4.0% 2.3% 3.5% 6.0%
4.5% 0.9% 0.4% 4.9% 1.0% 1.7% 3.1%
4.7% . 2.6% 0.8% 6.3% 1.7% 3.2% 1.8%
8.5% 14.0% 8.0% 9.1% 15.3% 6.6% 13.8%
1.5% 2.3% 1.5% 0.9% 1.2% 0.5% 1.7%
0.9% 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 0.5%
0.2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.1% 0.3% 1.7%
13.9% 10.2% 10.5% 10.2% 11.4% 4.7% 14.1%
7.8% 6.7% 3.9% 6.6% 8.4% 2.1% 7.0%
1.4% 8.7% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10.8% 15.1% 12.0% 0.8% 3.0% 19.5% 5.8%
0.4% 1.3% 1.5% 5.8% 0.7% 15.4% 0.0%
5.4% 5:8% 6.5% 3.6% 8.6% 4.4% 6.0%
5.1% 8.7% 1.2% 2.1% 5.7% 0.5% 0.6%
1.90;. 0.0% 1.3% 0.4% 1.6% 0.4% 5.6%
10.7% 0.3% 4.5% 15.7% 12.6% 20.0% 1.2%
0.8% 2.6% 1.3% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 1.7%
1.6% 1.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0'.9% 0.2% 0.4%
0.1% 0.0% 2.5% 2.5% 6.7% 7.5% 8.5%
0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0%
0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
0.4% 0.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.3% 0.0% 0.9%
0.1% 0.4% 0.9% 0.7% 0.5% 0.1% 0.2%
0.8% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%
2.4% 0.1% 5.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.2% 1.9%
0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.5% 2.6%
1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.8%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Dat
..
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
-
,-
;--
i_
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
" HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
...
-
'.
-,
..
'.
~-
...
<-.
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 7 of8
e Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential
e 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/2012004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004
r 40 4] 42 43 44 45 49 50
2.7% 5.1% 3.4% 5.1% 6.4% 1.2% 4.6% 8.]%
2.9% 4.6% ] 1.1% 8.5% 6.0% 9.8% 16.7% 6.0%
2.9% 0.5% 1.9% 0.8% 3.9% 2.6% 0.6% 7.0%
5.3% 1.9% 2.0% 7.5% 6.4% 4.5% 3.7% 2.1%
6.9% 13.1% 12.4% 18.3% 9.3% 8.4% 19.8% 9.8%
0.4% 1.8% 2.2% 1.4% -1.3% 1.1% 3.0% 2.3%
0.1% 1.3% 0.2% 1.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.6% 0.4%
0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%
7.6% 11.3% 20.2% 21.2% 14.4% 7.7% ]4.4% 12.2%
1.7% 4.]% ]2.2% 6.6% 15.9% 3.1% 4.9% 7.9%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.]% 0.0% 11.6%
2 I. 7% 38.7% 1.9% 9.2% 13.3% 37.6% 6.2% 7.2%
14.2% 1.0% 1.9% 1.0% 0.2% 0.3% 2.8% 0.1%
19.8% 2.2% 0.8% 2.2% 2.0% 3.1% 2.9% 5.7%
0.2% 1.7% 8.3% 2.3% 4.7% 3.2% 2.0% 1.8%
1.3% 0.0% 3.]% 2.7% 1.2% 0.0% 1.3% 1.3%
1.9% 5.8% 4.6% 1.7% 3.7% 1.3% 0.2% 3.0%
0.4% 2.6% 2.9% 1.8% 1.2% 1.1% 2.1% 2.3%
0.2% 0.3% 1.1% 2.]% 0.4% 0.5% 0.7% ].6%
3.6% 0.]% 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 2.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.]% 0.0%
0.]% 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% ].3% 1.1% 0.2% 0.2%
0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.]% 0.1% 0.2% 0.]%
0.1% 0.3% 5.4% 1.2% 2.7% 3.0% ].5% 0.9%
0.2% ].0% 2.0% 1.2% 0.5% 1.1% 0.5% ].2%
0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0%
1.1% 0.0% 0.8% 2.8% ].6% 3.0% 8.0% ].0%
0.5% 1.2% 1.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 0.9% 0.0%
3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0% 3.5%
0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Sourc
Dat
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTableC-2(%)
-
-
..' ,-
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High"Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
U nclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-
-
i.'
~.,
-
...
..
..
-
Table C-2
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Weight Percent
Residential and Commercial
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 8 of8
e Residential
e Mean Standard 90%
Percentage Deviation Confidence
r Interval
7.1% 4.0% 1.2%
6.9% 5.0% ].5%
2.5% 2.0% 0.6%
3.1% 1.8% 0.5%
12.8% 4.1% 1.2%
1.5% 0.8% 0.2%
0.7% 0.5% 0.2%
0.7% 0.5% 0.1%
13.1% 4.6% 1.4%
6.8% 3.3% 1.0%
2.9% 8.3% 2.5%
12.6% 10,7% 3.2%
3.1% 4.1% 1.2%
4.8% 4.1% 1.2%
3.0% 3.0% 0.9%
2.0% 1.6% 0.5%
4.3% 4.7% 1.4%
1.6% 0.6% 0.2%
1.0% 0.6% 0.2%
2.1% 2.6% 0.8%
0.4% 1.3% 0.4%
0.3% 0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.6% 1.9% 0.6%
0.6% 0.5% 0.1%
0.2% 0.8% 0.3%
1.5% 1.7% 0.5%
0.5% 0.8% 0.2%
1.4% 2.6% 0.8%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.3% 1.4% 0.4%
0.1% 0.6% 0.2%
100.0% 0.0% -
Combined Residential/Commercial
Mean Standard 90%
Confidence
Percentage Deviation Interval
8.2% 6.7% 1.5%
6.2% 4.5% ].0%
2.9% 2.9% 0.7%
3.0% 1.8% 0.4%
14.2% 4.6% 1.1%
1.5% 0.9% 0.2%
0.7% 0.6% 0.1%
0.7% 0.6% 0.1%
13.9% 5.2% 1.2%
7.6% 3.9% 0.9%
3.3% 8.9% 2.0%
10.6% 10.5% 2.4%
2.8% 3.6% 0.8%
4.1% 3.9% 0.9%
2.8% 3.0% 0.7%
2.1% 1.5% 0.3%
3.5% 4.4% 1.0%
1.7% 0.6% 0.1%
1.\% 1.0% 0.2%
1.9% 2.4% 0.5%
0.3% 1.0% 0.2%
0.4% 0.4% 0.1 o/~
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.5% 2.0% 0.4%
0.6% 0.6% 0.1%
0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1.7% 2.1% 0.5%
0.5% 0.8% 0.2%
1.\0/0 2.3% 0.5%
0.1% 0.4% 0.]%
0.1% 0.3% 0.]%
0.5% 3.5% 0.8%
0.2% 1.\% 0.2%
0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
100.0% 0.0% -
Sourc
Dat
~-
..:-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-2(%)
-
_i
,-
..
Dat
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Wood
Clear HDPE bottles
Colored HDPE bottles
PET bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and ieather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel & bimetal food & beverage containe
Aluminum food & beverage containers
FerrouS metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
UnclllSSifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
TOTAL
CDM
-
-
-
""
-
..:;
...
...
-
-
Table C-3
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Visual Inspection
Industrial and ConstructionIDemolition
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 1 of 4
Sourc
Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial
E Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial
5/18/2004 5/18/2004 5/1812004 5/1912004
5/1712004 5/17/2004 5/18/2004 5/18/2004
e 12
5 8 9 11
r 1 2 4 10% 35%
35% 14% 0% 15%
4% 5% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 20% 2% 4%
33% 38% 0%
0% 0% 75% 1%
0% 0% 100% 2%
90.5% 0.0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0.1% 0.0% 0% 15% 5% 20%
20% 9%
2% 30% 0% 45% 0% 40%
0% 65% 0% 34% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
1% 0% 0% 1%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
-0% 0% 0% 0%
5% 0% 0% 2%
2% 0% 2% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
rs 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
00/0 0% 0% 5% 0%
5% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
1% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 100.00% 100.00%
100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
99.60% 100.00% 100.00%
-
--
-
..
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-3 2004visual - %
..
-
-
-
Dat
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Wood
Clear HDPE bottles
Colored HDPE bottles
PET bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel & bimetal food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
NonrecycleabJe metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass. containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
Unclassifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
TOTAL
COM
-
-
-;,
..
-
'"
-
-
L__]
-
_.
...
-
..
Table C-3
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Visual Inspection
Industrial and ConstructionlDemolition
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 2 of 4
Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial Industrial
e 5/19/2004 5/19/2004 5/19/2004 5/20/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 Mean Percentage Standard 90% Confidence
r 14 16 18 24 28 31 32 Deviation Interval
3% 75% 23% 10% 15% 5% 25% 19.5% 19.2% 8.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 95% 0% 0.2% 24.5% 10.4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
]% 3% 20% 10% 10% 0% 5% J2.8% 12.4% 5.3%
85% . 3% 10% 0% 0% 0% 60% 15.4% 40.2% 17.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.5% 1.3% 0.5%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0.5% ]% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
5% 8% 20% 15% 5% 0% 10% 14.1% 8.8% 3.7%
0% 0.5% J5% 63% 69% 0% 0% 33.7% 27.6% 11.7%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.2%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
3% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.2% 1.8% 0.8%
0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0.4% 0.7% 0.3%
0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
0% 2% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1.0% 1.8% 0.8%
.1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0.5% 0.2%
0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3%
1% 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%
1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.2%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.98% 0.10% 0.03%
Sourc
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xJsTable C-3 2004visual - %
-
-
-
-
Dat
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Wood
Clear HDPE bottles
Colored HDPE bottles
PET bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Textiles, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel & bimetal food & beverage container
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Greenlblue glass containers
Other inorganics/non-combustibles
HHW & special
Electronics
Batteries
UncJassifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
TOTAL
CDM
-
-
..
..
-
-
-
-
-
..
...
->
-
-
-
Table C-3
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Visual Inspection
Industrial and ConstructionlDemolition
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 3 of 4
:f C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D
e 5/1712004 5/1812004 5/1812004 5/18/2004 5/1912004 5/1912004 5/1912004 5/1912004 512012004 512012004 512012004
r 3 6 7 10 13 15 17 19 20 21 22
0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 5% 10%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 8% 1% 0% 0% 30%
50% 10% 50% 0% 86% 99% 5% 7% 0% 80% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 1% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0.1% 1% 0% 1% 0%
0% 0% 10% 0% 1% 0% 5% 1% 0% 3% 55%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% . 0% 0% 5% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% . .0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%
s 50% 0% 0% 0% '0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 5% 1% J% 5% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
00/0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 98% 0% 0% 0% 85% 99% 0% 0%
0% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 40% 0% 0% 0% 68% 1% 0% 2% 0%
100% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sourc
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-3 2004visual - %
-
-
-
....
Dat
Sample Numbe
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-grade paper
Magazines
Other paper
Wood
Clear HDPE bottles
Colored HDPE bottles
PET bottles
Other plastic
Food waste
Grass
Leaves and other yard waste
Texti]es, rubber, and leather
Diapers sanitary
Other organics/combustibles
Steel & bimetal food & beverage containers
Aluminum food & beverage containers
Ferrous metal
Other recyclable metal
Nonrecycleable metal
Clear glass containers
Brown glass containers
Green/blue glass containers
Other in organics/non-combustibles
HOW & special
Electronics
Batteries
Unclassifiable fines
Roofing material
Poured concrete
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum board and plaster
TOTAL
CDM
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table C-3
Spring 2004 Sample Results by Visual Inspection
Industrial and ConstructionlDemolition
City of Salina MSWLF
Page 4 of 4
C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D C&D ConstructionlDemol ilion
e 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 5/20/2004 .5/20/2004 5/21/2004 5/21/2004 Mean Percentage Standard 90% Confidence
r 23 25 26 27 29 30 Deviation Interval
30% 0% 5% 20% 5% 6% 2.2% 8.3% 3.4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 6% 0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 3% 0% 5% 5% 3.2% 7.3% 3.0%
50% 18% 50% 30% 5% 30% 39.7% 32.4% 13.3%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%
0% 0% 2% 5% 5% 5% 3.2% 13.1% 5.4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 6% 0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
0% 0% 0% 30% 5% 5% 2.0% 7.3% 3.0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 5% 0.6% 1.7% 0.7%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 5% 1.3% 6.1% 2.5%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% , 0% 1.4% 12.1% 5.0%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1%
15% 1% 2% 10% 15% 6% 3.2% 5.0% 2.1%
5% 1% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0.4% 1.4% 0.6%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% D% 0.0% ,0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 6% 0.6% 1.8% 0.8%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0%, 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 10% " 6% 0.6% 2.7% 1.1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 6% 0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
0% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19.1% 39.8% 16.4%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1.0% ]9.4% 8.0%
0% 0% 35% 0% 0% 0% 3.0% 8.5% 3.5%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.0% 0.0% -
0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 16.8% 18.5% 7.6%
100% ]00% 100% 100% 100.0% 100.00% 99.88% 0.00% -
Sourc
-
-
-
Tables & Figures 2.xlsTable C-3 2004visual - %
, ,,,.'
,,','r':'
. T '.
-,:C;,
,~ '.
~ { )'. . ,
'. ,,:-'
,.",.:
. '.' .
-'. \
. '. _. 1
':f;-;
," r >-
'-~
.'
'C
,- ~ F
; '-..:r-:~:
"'" _I r .'
'-. .Lj,
i-' .,~ .
..
','
'. ,
I, ~ '':"'".'."
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix D
Comparison of Waste Composition Results
I
I
Table D-l
Residential Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I
I
Corrugated & Kraft Paper 9.5% 3.5% \.1%
Newsprint 6.1% 2.7% 0.8%
Hig,h-Grade Paper 0.3% 0.6% 0.2%
Magazines 2.6% 2.3% 0.7%
Other Paper 12.4% 6.8% 2.2%
PET Bottles 0.6% 0.3% 0.1%
Clear HDPE Containers 0.8% 0.5% 0.2%
Colored HDPE Containers 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%
Other Plastic 7.9% 2.9% 0.9%
Food Waste 9.0% 5.1% 1.6%
Grass 4.9% 9.5% 3.0%
Leaves and Other Yard Waste 18.4% 10.1% 3.2%
Wood 2.5% 2.2% 0.7%
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather 5.6% 5.6% 1.8%
Diapers 3.2% 3.3% 1.0%
Unclassifiable fines 2.7% 2.1% 0.7%
Other Organics/Combustibles 0.8% 0.8% 0.2%
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers 1.8% 0.9% 0.3%
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers 0.9% 0.5% 0.2%
Ferrous Metal 1.3% 2.2% 0.7%
Non-RecycleabJe Metal 0.3% 0.7% 0.2%
Other Recyclable Metal 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%
Batteries 0.1% 0.2% 0.0%
Clear Glass Containers 1.7% 1.4% 0.4%
Brown Glass Containers 0.5% 1.0% 0.3%
GreenIBlue Glass Containers 0.2% 0.4% 0.1%
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles 3.7% 2.3% 0.7%
HHW & Special 0.0% 0.0%
Electronics 0.0% 0.0%
Roofing Material 0.0% 0.0%
Poured Concrete 0.9% 3.1% 1.0%
Bricks 0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
Gypsum Board & Plaster 0.0% 0.0%
Blocks 0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
TOTAL 100.0%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Annual 1996-97
u u
OJ) "0 g C.l
0:
S a '.c u_
0: "0 oS
fii u '0 .~ ~ ~ ~
u ~ ~8 g8~
~~
1\.1% 5.9% 1.1%
6.8% 3.8% 0.7%
0.7% 1.3% 0.3%
2.6% 2.3% 0.4%
12.3% 5.6% 1.1%
0.6% 0.5% 0.1%
0.7% 0.5% 0.1%
0.7% 0.8% 0.2%
7.7% 3.6% 0.7%
12.2% 7.2% 1.3%
2.0% 6.1% \.1%
13.9% 14.7% 2.7%
2.0% 3.5% 0.6%
5.0% 5.8% \.1%
3.7% 3.7% 0.7%
3.3% 2.0% 0.4%
1.5% 1.6% 0.3%
2.3% 1.4% 0.3%
0.7% 0.5% 0.1%
1.0% 2.0% 0.4%
0.4% 0.8% 0.1%
0.3% 0.5% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.9% 1.6% 0.3%
0.6% 1.0% 0.2%
0.2% 0.5% 0.1%
4.8% 2.5% 0.5%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0% -
0.4% 3.1% 0.6%
0.3% 1.9% 0.3%
0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.1% 0.5% 0.1%
100.0% -
Sorinl? 2004
u u
C.l
OJ) "0 g 0:
S a .~ ~Oi
fii Ii "0 'S: ~ 'E ~
~ ~ B u ~8i::
~ CIlCl
7.1% 4.0% 1.2%
6.9% 5.0% 1.5%
2.5% 2.0% 0.6%
3.1% 1.8% 0.5%
12.8% 4.1% 1.2%
1.5% 0.8% 0.2%
0.7% . 0.5% 0.2%
0.7% 0.5% 0.1%
13.1% 4.6% 1.4%
6.8% 3.3% 1.0%
2.9% 8.3% 2.5%
12.6% 10.7% 3.2%
3.1% 4.1% 1.2%
4.8% 4.1% 1.2%
3.0% 3.0% 0.9%
2.0% 1.6% 0.5%
4.3% 4.7% 1.4%
1.6% 0.6% 0.2%
1.0% 0.6% 0.2%
2.1% 2.6% 0.8%
0.4% 1.3% 0.4%
0.3% 0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.6% 1.9% 0.6%
0.6% 0.5% 0.1%
0.2% 0.8% 0.3%
1.5% 1.7% 0.5%
0.5% 0.8% 0.2%
1.4% 2.6% 0.8%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.3% 1.4% 0.4%
0.1% 0;6% 0.2%
100.0% - -
Tables & Figures 2.x1s Table 0.1
I
I
I
I
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
I
Magazines
Other Paper
I
PET Bottles
Clear HOPE Containers
Colored HOPE Containers
I
Other Plastic
Food Waste
I
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
I
Wood
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
I
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containers
I
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
I
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
I
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
I
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other InorganicslNon-Combustibles
I
HHW & Special
Electronics
Roofing Material
I
Poured Concrete
Bricks
I
Blocks
Gypsum Board & Plaster
TOTAL
I
I
COM
Table D-2
Commercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I Sorin f!! Summer 1997
" "
"
on "0 g c
19 .a .~ ~OI
a il ~~t
~E ~~ ~8]
15.7% 7.5% 2.7%
2.2% 2.7% 1.0%
\.2% 2.2% 0.8%
2.1% 4.9% 1.8%
13.8% 12.3% 4.4%
0.5% 0.4% 0.1%
0.4% 0.4% 0.1%
\.0% 1.5% 0.5%
10.6% 6.7% 2.4%
14.5% 15.2% 5.5%
\.9% 6.2% 2.2%
3.4% 6.8% 2.4%
3.9% 4.0% 1.4%
4.2% 5.2% 1.9%
1.3% 2.3% 0.8%
2.7% 3.5% 1.2%
2.1% 3.3% 1.2%
1.8% 2.1% 0.8%
0.8% 1.0% 0.4%
1.3% 2.6% 0.9%
1.9% 6.0% 2.1%
0.2% 0.2% 0.1%
0.2% 1.1% 0.4%
1.0% 0.9% 0.3%
1.6% 4.9% 1.8%
0.2% 0.5% 0.2%
5.5% 5.6% 2.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
2.4% 10.7% 3.9%
1.2% 5.5% 2.0%
0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0%
0.2% 0.4% 0.1%
100.0% - -
Annual 1996-97
" "
00 "0 g "
19 c
c a 0;:: ~<<i
a " -g .~ ~ ~ ~
g
" " 19 " ~8~
~ p... (1)0
18.7% 10.7% 2.4%
2.8% 5.7% 1.3%
2.1% 3.4% 0.7%
1.2% 3.2% 0.7%
12.2% 9.1% 2.0%
0.4% 0.4% 0.1%
0.4% 0.4% 0.1%
0.7% 1.1% 0.2%
12.5% 9.6% 2.1%
14.0% 12.7% 2.8%
0.7% 3.9% 0.8%
2.1% 5.2% 1.1%
5.0% 6.6% 1.5%
4.6% 5.1% 1.1%
0.8% 1.7% 0.4%
2.8% 2.9% 0.6%
1.3% 2.4% 0.5%
1.7% 2.4% 0.5%
0.7% 0.8% 0.2%
2.7% 5.8% 1.3%
'1.3% 4.2% 0.9%
1.1% 6.8% 1.5%
0.3% 1.0% 0.2%
0.8% 1.2% 0.3%
1.0% 3.5% 0.8%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
4.4% 4.1% 0.9%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0% -
1.0% 6.6% 1.4%
0.4% 3.4% 0.7%
0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% -
1.9% 7.6% 1.7%
100.0% - -
Soring 2004
~ "
c "
c
19 ] .g ~ca
c
a " ] .~ ~'E~
" g ~~ ~8]
~ "
p...
9.7% 9.3% 3.3%
5.3% 3.7% 1.3%
3.4% 3.9% 1.4%
2.8% \.7% 0.6%
16.2% 4.7% 1.7%
\.5% \.0% 0.4%
0.8% 0.6% 0.2%
0.9% 0.6% 0.2%
15.0% 5.8% 2.1%
8.7% 4.4% \.6%
3.9% 9.8% 3.5%
7.7% 9.8% 3.5%
2.2% 2.8% \.0%
3.1% 3.5% 1.3%
2.4% 3.1% 1.1%
2.1% 1.3% 0.5%
2.4% 3.6% 1.3%
\.7% 0.6% 0.2%
\.2% 1.4% 0.5%
1.7% 2.1% 0.7%
0.1% 0.2% 0.1%
0.4% . 0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.4% 2.1% 0.7%
0.6% 0.8% 0.3%
0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
2.0% 2.6% 0.9%
0.4% 0.8% 0.3%
0.7% \.8% 0.7%
0.1% 0.4% 0.1%
0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
1.2% 5.5% 2.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.3% 0.8% 0.3%
100.0%
Tables & Figures 2.xls Table 0-2
I
I
Table D-3
Combined ResldentiaUCommercial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I
~ U
'0 a 5 _
" a '::J ~~g
fJ u "t:) .~
u n H u ~8~
Corrugated & Kraft Paper 12.2% 6.4% 1.5%
Newsprint 4.4% 3.3% 0.8%
High-Grade Paper 0.7% \.6% 0.4%
Magazines 2.4% 3.6% 0.9%
Other Paper 13.0% 9.5% 2.3%
PET Bottles 0.5% 0.3% 0.1%
Clear HDPE Containers 0.6% 0.5% 0.1%
Colored HDPE Containers 1.0% 1.1% 0.3%
Other Plastic 9.0% 5.1% 1.2%
Food Waste 11.4% 11.0% 2.6%
Grass 3.6% 8.3% 2.0%
Leaves and Other Yard Waste 11.8% 1\.5% 2.7%
Wood 3.1% 3.2% 0.8%
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather 5.0% 5.4% 1.3%
Diapers 2.4% 3.0% 0.7%
Unclassmable Fines 2.7% 2.7% 0.6%
Other Organics/Combuslibles 1.4% 2.3% 0.5%
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Conlainers 1.8% 1.6% 0.4%
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers 0.8% 0.7% 0.2%
Ferrous Melal 1.3% 2.3% 0.6%
Non-Recycleable Melal 1.0% 4.0% 1.0%
Other Recyclable Metal 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%
Batteries 0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
Clear Glass Containers 1.4% 1.2% 0.3%
Brown Glass Containers 1.0% 3.3% 0.8%
GreenIBlue Glass Conlainers 0.2% 0.4% 0.1%
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles 4.5% 4.1% 1.0%
HHW & Special 0.0% 0.0%
Electronics 0.0% 0.0%
Roofing Material 1.0% 7.1% 1.7%
Poured Concrete 1.0% 4.3% 1.0%
Bricks 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%
Blocks 0.0% 0.0%
Gypsum Bna rd & Plasler 0.2% 0.5% 0.1%
TOTAL 100.0%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Annual 1996-97
u 1l
CD '0 a "
e ~ :~ u-
" '0 ..
, fJ 1l fJ > ~~t
~ll. ciio ~8.5
14.3% 9.1% 1.3%
5.1% 5.1% 0.7%
1.3% 2.5% 0.4%
2.0% 2.8% 0.4%
12.3% 7.3% 1.0%
0.5% 0.4% 0.1%
0.6% 0.5% 0.1%
0.7% 0.9% 0.1%
9.7% 7.2% I.O'Vo
13.0% 9.9% 1.4%
1.5% 5.3% 0.8%
8.9% 13.0% 1.9%
3.3% 5.2% 0.7%
4.8% 5.5% 0.8%
2.5% 3.3% 0.5%
3.1% 2.4% 0.3%
1.4% 2.0% 0.3%
2.1% 1.9% 0.3%
0.7% O.6(}~, 0.1%
1.7% 4.1% 0.6%
0.8% 2.8% 0.4%
0.7% 4.4% 0.6%,
0.2% D.7IYo O.l%
1.5% 1.6% 0.2%
0.8% 2.4% 0.3%
0.2% a.slvo 0.1%
4.7% 3.3% 0.5%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.6% 4.8% 0.7%
0.4% 2.6% 0.4%
0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.9% 5.0% 0.7%
100.0%
I Spring 2004 I
u u
CD '0 a 5_
e iJ'::J
fJ Ii '0 ..
'a .~ ~'Et
~[ ~o ~8.B
8.2% 6.7% 1.5%
6.2% 4.5% 1.0%
2.9% 2.9% 0.7%
3.0% 1.8% 0.4%
14.2% 4.6% 1.1%
1.5% 0.9% 0.2%
0.7% 0.6% 0.1%
0.7% 0.6% 0.1%
13.9% 5.2% 1.2%
7.6% 3.9% 0.9%
3.3% 8.9% 2.0%
10.6% 10.5% 2.4%
2.8% 3.6% 0.8%
4.1% 3.9% 0.9%
2.8% 3.0% 0.7%
2.1% 1.5% 0.3%
3.5% 4.4% 1.0%
1.7% 0.6% 0.1%
1.1% 1.0% 0.2%
1.9% 2.4% 0.5%
0.3% 1.0% 0.2%
0.4% 0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1% 0.0%
1.5% 2.0% 0.4%
0.6% 0.6% 0.1%
0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
1.7% 2.1% 0.5%
0.5% 0.8% 0.2%
1.1% 2.3% 0.5%
0.1% 0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.5% 3.5% 0.8%
0.2% 1.1% 0.2%
0.2% 0.7% 0.2%
100.0%
Tables & Figures 2.Kls Table D-3
I
I
I
Corrugated & Kran Paper
I
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
I
Magazines
Other Paper
Wood
I
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
PET Bollles
I
Other Plastic
Food Waste
Grass
I
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
Diapers
I
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Containe
I
Aluminum Food & Beverage Containers
Ferrous Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
I
Non Recycleable Metal
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
I
GreenIBlue Glass Containers
Other lnorganics/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
I
Electronics
Batteries
Unclasslfiable Fines
I
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
I
Bricks
Blocks
Gypsum Board and Plaster
I
TOTAL
I
I
I
COM
Table D-4
Industrial Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I SprinlliSummer 1997 I
" "
<)
eo '" g "
B ta ." " -
" '" "
f.i lJ "'C .f! ~'E~
f.i >
~~ ci30 ~8.s
17.2% 21.9% 4.4%
1.1% 2.1% 0.4%
0.1% 0.9% 0.2%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5.2% 8.2% 1.6%
6.8% 26.0% 5.2%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
12.8% 13.8% 2.7%
26.2% 32.5% 6.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.2% 0.9% 0.2%
2.0% 14.4% 2.9%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
I 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5.9% 11.9% 2.3%
0.5% 2.7% 0.5%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
21.9% 32.8% 6.5%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%) 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 12.1% 2.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%1 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%'
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
100.0% -
I Annual 1996-97 I
" "
eo 1.g "
B 0-
" '" "
f.i lJ "'C .~ ;:{e ~ ~
~~ a " g8:S
",0
15.4% 20.6% 2.8%
0.0% 1.S% 0.2%
0.3% 1.9% 0.3%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5.6% 9.5% 1.3%
5.2% 24.4% 3.4%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10.1% 13.2% 1.8%
26.6% 29.9% 4.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.1% 0.6% 0.1%
1.4% 11.2% 1.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
3.2% 9.5% 1.3%
0.8% 2.0% 0.3%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
25.2% 33.1% 4.6%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0";',
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 8.4% 1.2%
0.0% 0.0% 0.00;;,
0.6% 5.0% 0.7%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
94.3%
Sprin~ 2004
" lJ
eo '" g "
B ta ." " -
c '" "
" " '5 .~ ~ 'E t
" "
~~ 000 ~8E
19.5% 19.2% 8.1%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.2% 24.5% 10.4%
0.0% 0.0%
12.8% 12.4% 5.3%
15.4% 40.2% 17.1%
0.5% 1.3% 0.5%
0.0"10 0.0%
O.l% 0.3% 0.1%
14.1% 8.8% 3.7%
33.7% 27.6% 11.7%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.2% 0.4% 0.2%
0.0% 0.0%
1.2% 1.8% 0.8%
0.4% 0.7% 0.3%
0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
1.0% 1.8% 0.8%
0.2% 0.5% 0.2%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.3% 0.8% 0.3%
0.1% 0.4% 0.2%
0.1% 0.6% 0.2%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% -
0.0% 0.0%
100.0% -
Tables & Figures 2.xls Table D-4
I
I
I
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
I
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
I
Magazines
Other Paper
Wood
I
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
PET Botlles
I
Other Plastic
Food Waste
I
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
Textiles, Rubber, and Leather
I
Diapers
Other Organics/Combustibles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Cant 0.0%
I
Table D-S
Constructionffiemolition Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
Annual 1 -97
Ferrous Metal
Aluminum Food & Beverage Container 0.0%
I
Other Recyclable Metal
Non Recycleable Metal
Clear Glass Containers
I
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other Inorganics/Non-Combustibles
I
HHW & Special
Electronics
I'
Balleries
Unclassifiable Fines
Roofing Material
I
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
I
Gypsum Board and Plaster
TOTAL
I
I
I
COM
~
Iii ii
" Ii
::E.,.,
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% O.4'Y.
0.0% 0.0%
67.9% 43.9%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
10.0% l4.3%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
6.2% 18.6%
100.0%
'2 .g
~ .!!!
~ i)
CIlO
"
u
"
,,~
'0 co
~ 'E ~
g8:S
"
~
~ ii
::E~
5.9%
0.8%
4.2%
0.5%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.2%
0.4%
39.9%
5.4%
35.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
O.J1Yo
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
13.8%
17.3%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.0%
1.5%
9.5%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
37.1%
5.1%
27.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
10l.8%
] .g
"'d ~~
~~
13.0%
0.4%
0.3%
0.0%
1.9%
39.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
0.3%
0.0%
33.8%
3.8%
16.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
9.1%
0.8%
7.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
41.7%
3.3%
12.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.3%
24.1%
11
ii~
'0 co
~'iJ~
00"
0\(.)_
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
3.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.7%
"NUM!
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
I Spring 2004 I
" 11
.. 'e.g ii_
s
Ii .g .~ '0 co
~ Ii B ii ~~~
::E .,., CIlO ~8~
2.2% 8.3% 3.4%
0.0% D.Ofyo
0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
0.0% 0.0%
3.2% 7.3%1 3.0%
39.7% 32.4% 13.3%
0.1% 0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.2% 0.1%
0.1% 0.4% 0.2%
3.2% 13.1% 5.4%
O.ooAI 0.01X.
0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
2.0% 7.3% 3.0%
0.6% 1.7% 0.7%
0.0% D.OIYo
1.3% 6.1% 2.5%
1.4% 12.1% 5.0%
0.1% O.2f:lu 0.1%
3.2% 5.0% 2.1%
0.4% 1.4% 0.6%
0.3% 0.3(7'0 0.1%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0'%
0.0% 0.0%
0.6% 1.8% 0.8%
0.0% 0.0'%
O.6(M. 2.71Yu 1 .1%
O.O'}Io 0.0%
0.4% 1.8% 0.8%
19.1% 39.8% 16.4%
I.GeX. 19.4% 8.0%
3.0% 8.SlXI 3.5%
0.0% 0.0'%
16.8% 18.5% 7.6%
97.7%
Tables & Figures 2.xls Table D-5
I
I
Table D-6
Total Landfilled Waste Composition by Weight (1996-97 vs 2004)
City of Salina MSWLF
I
I Spring/Summer 1997 I
" "
0
~ li_
E '"<:l '"
a " t;; t
~ ~ "
" ~8~
~ l><
9.8% 1.5%
4.2% 1.0%
2.1% 0.7%
2.0% 0.4%
12.8% 1.1%
1.1% 0.2%
0.6% 0.1%
0.5% 0.1%
12.8% 1.1%
11.8% 0.9%
2.4% 2.0%
7.3% 2.4%
9.5% 0.8%
2.9% 0.9%
1.9% 0.7%
1.5% 0.3%
2.7% 1.0%
:l 1.4% 0.1%
0.8% 0.2%
1.9% 0.5%
0.2% 0.2%
0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0%
1.1% 0.4%
0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.2%
1.3% 0.5%
0.3% 0.2%
0.8% 0.5%
2.3% 5.5%
0.2% 2.7%
0.7% 1.2%
0.1% 0.2%
2.1% 2.5%
100.0%
I
Corrugated & Kraft Paper
Newsprint
High-Grade Paper
Magazines
Other Paper
PET Bottles
Clear HDPE Containers
Colored HDPE Containers
Other Plastic
Food Waste
I
I
I
Grass
Leaves and Other Yard Waste
I
Wood
Textiles, Rnhber, and Leather
Diapers
Unclassifiable Fines
Other Organlcs/Combustihles
Steel & Bimetal Food & Beverage Cont
Aluminum Food & Beverage Container
Ferrous Metal
Non-Recycleable Metal
Other Recyclable Metal
Batteries
Clear Glass Containers
Brown Glass Containers
Green/Blue Glass Containers
Other lnorganlcs/Non-Combustibles
HHW & Special
Electronics
I
I
I
I
I
Roofing Material
Poured Concrete
Bricks
Blocks
'Gypsum Board & Plaster
I
TOTAL
I
I
I
I
I
COM
Annual 1996-97
" "
0
E "
" ~ca
a " ~ 'E t
0
" Il ~8~
~~
7.6% 1.3%
7.5% 0.7%
0.7% 0.4%
2.9% 0.4%
13.4% 1.0%
0.4% 0.1%
1.1% 0.1%
1.3% 0.1%
8.3% 1.0%
8.6% 1.4%
3.4% 0.8%
14.7% 1.9%
1.9% 0.7%
5.0% 0.8%
3.5% 0.5%
3.6% 0.3%
1.5% 0.3%
2.4% 0.3%
1.2% 0.1%
1.4% 0.6%
0.5% 0.4%
0.3% 0.6%
0.1% 0.1%
1.5% 0.2%
0.5% 0.3%
0.4% 0.1%
5.2% 0.5%
0.0% -
0.0% -
0.4% 0.7%
0.4% 0.4%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0% -
0.3%, 0.7%
100.0% -
Sprini 2004
" "
0
I>ll "
'" .go;;
a ~ t;; t
~ ~ "
" ~8:S
~ "
~
9.8% 1.5%
4.3% 1.0%
2.1% 0.7%
2.0% 0.4%
12.7% 1.1%
1.1% 0.2%
0.6% 0.1%
0.5% 0.1%
12.8% 1.1%
12.0% 0.9%
2.4% 2.0%
7.5% 2.4%
9.3% 0.8%
2.9% 0.9%
1.9% 0.7%
1.5% 0.3%
2.8% 1.0%
1.4% 0.1%
0.8% 0.2%
1.9% 0.5%
0.2% 0.2%
0.3% 0.1%
0.0% 0.0%
1.1% 0.4%
0.4% 0.1%
0.1% 0.2%
1.3% 0.5%
0.3% 0.2%
0.8% 0.5%
2.2% 0.1%
0.1% 0.1%
0.7% 0.8%
0.1% 0.2%
2.0% 0.2%
100.0%
Section 1-4 Tables & Figures.xls Table D-6